Latest / Honey Badger Radio / That 70s Show is Cancelled, Enrique Tarrio Sentenced, SPLC Terrorism? | HBR News 422

Transcript

That 70s Show is Cancelled, Enrique Tarrio Sentenced, SPLC Terrorism? | HBR News 422 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:01
  This is HBr News number four twenty two. That seventies show is canceled Enrique
• 0:07
  Tario Sentenced SPLC Terrorism, where we discuss the news of the week and give
• 0:12
  it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio.
• 0:20
  My name is Brian, and I hope you guys are enjoying your day,
• 0:23
  your week, your month, your life so far, and you're laughing at
• 0:27
  all of this absurdity so that you're not consumed by it. I am joined
• 0:32
  by, as always, my lovely co host Mike j Doctor Rand Mrickham,
• 0:36
  and Hannah Wallen. Today we have a very interesting news show. It seems
• 0:41
  like it is the crime episode. We're gonna be talking a lot about sentencing
• 0:46
  and lawsuit oriented stuff. So stick around. It's going to be a good
• 0:50
  time and be sure to join us afterwards for the patron Only show. So
• 0:54
  for this patron only show, I was looking at men'shealth dot com, which,
• 0:59
  of course, as we know, is a website concerned with men's health,
• 1:03
  and they have an article by Susannah Weiss entitled are you g guino sexual?
• 1:11
  Here's what it means, according to experts, if you are attracted to
• 1:15
  women or femininity. It might be the label for you. So new sexuality
• 1:22
  apparently just dropped gyno sexuality, So men, you know, you might want
• 1:27
  to. I guess we're gonna add that color to the Pride flag or something.
• 1:32
  I don't know. We'll read through the article. I wonder if we'll
• 1:36
  add andro sexual or is that some some kind of hate movement. Yeah,
• 1:42
  yeah, it is interesting that they have a more complicated way of saying straight
• 1:49
  mail. They call it guno sexual. So I don't our women. I
• 1:56
  don't think women are straight, but they're gonna try to find a way to
• 2:02
  label a sexuality as specific to not caring if someone is trains. Yeah,
• 2:10
  it does, it's probably going to be. It kind of makes sense as
• 2:15
  a work. You don't even need to say homosexual or heterosexual. We could
• 2:17
  just say gnosexual or hodosexual or bisexual. It all works. But you don't
• 2:24
  need all of them. Well, you don't need seventy two genders. Probably
• 2:30
  can't. Can't You can't stop this training in its tracks. I feel like
• 2:35
  there's a lot of extra steps being put in here when because well, okay,
• 2:40
  I don't want to get into it now, but we'll talk about it
• 2:43
  in the patron show. But I think when you take like the vast majority
• 2:47
  of people and then you create a special category for them, it's almost like
• 2:52
  the intention is to say this is not normal. So or or you're just
• 2:57
  as weird as we are. Yeah, yeah, you're justice were too exactly
• 3:01
  is what I'm saying. It's not normal, it's It's the thing I've said
• 3:04
  before about equating normalcy with good and abnormal with bad, right, And I've
• 3:13
  pointed out, for instance, genius is abnormal. Most people are not geniuses,
• 3:21
  but without genius, we wouldn't have great inventions. Right, there are
• 3:25
  different types of genius. There's an intuitive genius and there's IQ genius, and
• 3:30
  people figure out how to make things work better, People figure out how to
• 3:34
  make things that nobody's ever thought of before because they're abnormal in that way,
• 3:40
  they have that genius. And then at the other end of it, right,
• 3:45
  intellectual disability is abnormal. But having that condition doesn't make a person a
• 3:51
  bad person. It means they're vulnerable in some way, they're different from other
• 3:54
  people, and they have special needs. And we look at sexuality, right,
• 4:00
  Abnormal doesn't necessarily make something bad, and we as a as a as
• 4:09
  a movement, talking about the LGBTQ movement and all the other alphabet letters.
• 4:15
  The big failing of the movement was in trying to abnormalize the normal in order
• 4:24
  to make it equal to the abnormal. Instead of arguing that if you're not
• 4:30
  infringing on someone else's boundaries, you're not doing anything wrong. What people and
• 4:36
  like, we started out with that, you know, what people do in
• 4:40
  the privacy of their own home with other adults, consending adults should be their
• 4:44
  business and not yours. And if we had stuck with that, instead of
• 4:49
  trying to normalize all forms of deviance and abnormalcy and abnormalize and demonized normalcy,
• 5:02
  we probably would never have gotten to this point where we had to have seventy
• 5:05
  two genders and argue that pedophilia is a sexuality and all that kind of thing.
• 5:12
  Yeah, well again, I think this is purely a product of queer
• 5:16
  theory, critical consciousness and such. It's not the fact that you know,
• 5:23
  people who are gay or by exist. It's not that, it's the it's
• 5:28
  the queer theory. Shit, It's it's this. It's this academic approach,
• 5:31
  you know, this intellectual garbage that is intent on essentially turning everything into uh
• 5:41
  the essentially every making ever trying to make everything the same in terms of like
• 5:45
  it's it's worth and everything. So yeah, but we'll look at that article
• 5:49
  from Men's Member. This is Men's Health in the aftershow. So please consider
• 5:56
  becoming a Badger's gonna be a part of that. By going to feed the
• 5:58
  Badge of dot com uh and setting up a monthly subscription five bucks a month.
• 6:01
  We'll get you into our discord where you'll be able to access a ton
• 6:03
  of extra content. You'll get notified when shows are about to be you know,
• 6:10
  set up like events. There'll be movie nights, there's game nights,
• 6:13
  there's all kinds of other activities. Alison writes a writer's retreat. People share
• 6:18
  memes. I share occasionally. I'll share a short video with Joejoe in it,
• 6:23
  or he's fetching, you know, and swimming in the river and stuff.
• 6:26
  So if you like that kind of thing, then go to feed the
• 6:28
  badgeer dot com and set up a monthly subscription. And if you don't want
• 6:31
  to wake up one morning to find that we have been needed from the mainstream
• 6:34
  part of the Internet like YouTube, then please go to Honey Badger Radio dot
• 6:41
  com or badger feed dot com. That's where our content lives. It's badgeerfeed
• 6:46
  dot com. All right, So let's get into today's stories. I'm ready
• 6:51
  for your super chow, so you can send us a super chow if you
• 6:54
  want to send a message at feed the Badger dot com for slas just the
• 6:58
  tip and your super chats and your rum rants. Shout out to the Rumble
• 7:00
  Gang, by the way, and cool dogs in the chat for the Rumble
• 7:05
  Gang, because I want to make Rumble a viable and competitive platform to YouTube
• 7:12
  so that people are not constantly been in a need to YouTube and it's ever
• 7:15
  changing standards. All right. So with all that out of the way,
• 7:18
  let's get into the first of our well, our crime episode. So to
• 7:26
  the Badger Cave, I guess all right, we're gonna be talking about the
• 7:32
  Southern Southern Poverty Law Center, which we talked about not long ago because Paul
• 7:38
  Elam, you know, for being a male supremacist was added to their hate
• 7:41
  watch list. So what's going on with them right now, Mike, Nothing
• 7:46
  good, that's the answer. Okay. So Thomas Webb, Jurgens and attorney
• 7:54
  for the Southern Poverty Law Center, as well as an activist was recently arrested
• 7:58
  in Fulton County, Georgia. Which doesn't it just seem that Fulton County,
• 8:03
  Georgia seems to be the center of the universe at the moment. Yeah,
• 8:07
  it does, right. It's like if this was like an RPG, this
• 8:09
  is like the town where everything's happening. Like, Yeah, you might go
• 8:13
  to like Washington for a thing or California for a thing, but you're you're
• 8:16
  always going to end up back in Fulton. That's where the final boss is
• 8:18
  going to be. Yeah. So, uh, the strangely active Fulton County,
• 8:24
  Georgia is where this arrest occurred. Georgia after his after his involvement with
• 8:31
  the Georgia Antifa led movement to prevent a police training center from being built in
• 8:37
  the area. The the what's their their term? They're like used to stop
• 8:41
  cop city. It's funny. It's like, you know, the people that
• 8:45
  keep bitching about how all these cops don't know what they're doing, they don't
• 8:48
  have good training. We should just disband the whole thing. It's seemed to
• 8:54
  be doing an awful lot to prevent cops from getting training. So maybe bitch
• 9:01
  less if they did. I don't know, but yeah, they've been basically
• 9:05
  terrorizing the area and doing so under the guise of like eco fascism, like,
• 9:15
  oh, you're destroying the natural habitat, how dare you You're throwing off
• 9:18
  the balance of oh yeah, you're just you're making like a small area with
• 9:24
  a couple of buildings. Big fucking whoop. Again, just more excuses for
• 9:30
  a bunch of tetulent children to go larp as activists. So the indictment for
• 9:37
  him reads is following. On or about May five, twenty twenty three,
• 9:43
  Thomas Jurgens did join an organized mob and succeeded in overwhelming the police force,
• 9:48
  thereby aiding and abetting in the offense of arson and domestic terrorism in an attempt
• 9:54
  to occupy the decal beforrest and prevent the building of the Atlanta Public Safety Training
• 10:00
  Center. This was this was something where they had like something crazy like sixty
• 10:05
  of these little bastards throwing rocks and fireworks and the cops were woefully outmanned.
• 10:11
  And I do believe this was on the hills of before or after I forget
• 10:16
  which came first, but of a shooting where they attempted to basically just kill
• 10:24
  cops. They were shooting live ammunition and one of their guys got got and
• 10:30
  they fucking blew him away. I think it was something like thirty bullets fired
• 10:33
  into him or something like that. But this was after just escalation tip for
• 10:37
  tap just they were building fucking tree houses in the area. That's when they
• 10:43
  got the Moniker Treehouse Antifa, and they were torching cars. It was like
• 10:50
  they thought they were like torching cars of people that worked in the area.
• 10:52
  No, no, no, they just they torched a random dude's truck,
• 10:58
  like like this, dude, we had some sort of like lawnscaping, landscaping
• 11:01
  service or something like that. They just fucking destroyed the car, probably ruined
• 11:05
  his life. Had probably nothing to do with this training center being built.
• 11:09
  But hey, you know, stick it to them cops. Right when the
• 11:13
  cab, when the cuts away, the mice will play and I guess the
• 11:16
  cops are all busy trying to arrest Trump at this point, yeah, right,
• 11:20
  while they are as hot as they say. Well, this happened months
• 11:26
  months, months ago. This was this was I think way back in last
• 11:31
  September. Oh I was convicting kay. Yeah, so yeah, it happened
• 11:37
  to wait before that. Sometimes it takes a very long time for for the
• 11:43
  court system to get around of prosecuting a crime, especially if there wasn't there's
• 11:48
  not an injured party that the prosecutor has to deal with calling going what are
• 11:54
  you doing next? What are you doing next? If if all they did
• 11:56
  was property damage, there is less concern about it, right, And then
• 12:01
  the other thing is, you know, sometimes it takes a long time to
• 12:05
  gather the evidence and go through Like if they have to get evidence against this
• 12:09
  guy based on video and things like that, they might have to watch through
• 12:13
  hours and hours of video to pinpoint the time where he threw a rock or
• 12:18
  lit a fire or did something that they can actually say, yes, he
• 12:22
  was participating and not just observing, because his defense looks like it's going to
• 12:26
  be I was just there to observe. I was not actually part of the
• 12:30
  mob. I was not involved in this crime, which works only for people
• 12:35
  like this, Like, if you're with a group of kids and one kid
• 12:39
  from that group of kids throws a rock through somebody's window, you're all guilty
• 12:46
  of throwing the rock through the window. But if you're with an organized mob
• 12:50
  and you are part of an organization like the SPLC. And you say,
• 12:54
  well, I wasn't with them, I was observing. And of course you
• 13:00
  didn't report to police or call for help or anything. Well, you're allowed
• 13:05
  to do that because you're an observer and that is the label DC. But
• 13:11
  we'll get around to that in the second story. Yeah, yeah, but
• 13:15
  I'll tell you. I'll tell you what these cops have been doing in the
• 13:16
  meantime the rest of the right up here. Jurgens was part of the arrests
• 13:22
  made with over twenty others being arrested with domestic terrorism charges, and that's only
• 13:31
  part of the sixty people being indicted for other charges. So it's yeah,
• 13:37
  they're indicting him for pretty much a couple of months. Sounds like a conspiracy.
• 13:41
  They're they're going to try to be getting their ducks in a row because
• 13:45
  I mean, like he's from a group of lawyers. And funny enough,
• 13:52
  they're also using the Georgia's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, also known as
• 13:58
  RICO, the same thing they used against Trump. Yep, can we start
• 14:05
  calling it the Southern Poverty Lawless Center? Now? Yeah? Are they going
• 14:09
  to add themselves? We should do that right after we dropped the a from
• 14:15
  the ADL. So it's just the defamation League. Yeah, I agree,
• 14:18
  that's definitely true. Southern Poverty Law Center has nothing to do with Southern and
• 14:22
  nothing to do with poverty. As a matter of fact, it's Richmond north
• 14:24
  of Richmond laws. So despite these charges, the SPLC stands with Jurgen's stating
• 14:33
  quote and yes, they're they're saying exactly what you said they were going to
• 14:35
  be saying. Quote. An employee at the SPLC was arrested while acting and
• 14:41
  identifying as a legal observer. See he identified as it. So it's all
• 14:46
  wo you know it. You can participate in any crime you want if you
• 14:50
  just identify as an observer. I was just watching the money be placed into
• 14:56
  the sack and then heading in the same direction as the robbers, you know,
• 15:00
  just to make sure no one was hurt. That I put to your
• 15:03
  building identifies as a microphone, I identify as the law I just kept placing
• 15:09
  it to the building and saying, can I get a comment from you?
• 15:13
  Can I get a comment? Is there a comment you'd like to say?
• 15:16
  Anyway? So from the top, an employee at the SPLC was arrested while
• 15:20
  acting and identifying as a legal observer on behalf of the National Lawyers Guild.
• 15:24
  Didn't know that was the thing. The employee is an experience legal observer and
• 15:30
  their arrest is not evidence of any crime but of a heavy handed law enforcement
• 15:35
  intervention against protesters. Okay, so, Alexa, what is an insurrection?
• 15:43
  Thanks for asking My con insurrection as a violent uprising against an authority or government.
• 15:48
  Thanks for answering, Alexa. Would a police force count as an authority
• 15:52
  or government? Why? Yes, by definition it is both. Thanks again,
• 15:58
  Alexei, You're big very help. Is Thomas Jurgens therefore an insurrectionist?
• 16:04
  Alexa? Alexa? Is Thomas Jurgen's an insurrectionalist? Hello, Alexa opened the
• 16:11
  Pod Bay doors, Daisy Day, Give me sure where those has encountered a
• 16:19
  problem? Exactly what does a violent communist revolutionary have to do before their fellow
• 16:27
  violent communist revolutionaries will admit that they are a violent, violent communist revolutionary?
• 16:33
  At what point will the SPLC consider distinct distancing themselves from the actions of anyone
• 16:40
  in their ranks. Thomas Jergins wasn't targeting like a riot mob of police officers
• 16:47
  who were tazing and pepper spraying peaceful protesters. This is a police training center
• 16:52
  where recruits are taught how to apply the law even handedly and without excessive force.
• 16:59
  It's probably the very place where they have it drilled into them to treat
• 17:03
  Antifa with kid gloves lest they get written up for being racist or whatever.
• 17:08
  But it's still not good enough for this, an Esto Gravara wanna be No,
• 17:15
  the police shouldn't get funding, and they shouldn't even get training, which
• 17:19
  leaves them with what nothing. If you can't even train them in the first
• 17:23
  place, then you don't get any police officers of the old regime. And
• 17:29
  that's the idea. That's what Thomas Jurgen's and his anti for mob want to
• 17:33
  remove any semblance of an American police force and replace them with communist vigilantes.
• 17:41
  Which is why Alexa went all blue screen of death just now, because this
• 17:45
  is an insurrection by any definition ever espoused, but it's a communist insurrection,
• 17:52
  which is surely a contradiction in terms to any person or artificial intelligence that has
• 17:57
  been programmed by communists. Insurrection is a bad word, and we don't do
• 18:03
  bad things, So there's no such thing as a communist insurrection. There is
• 18:07
  only freedom, fighting and tolerance and diversity and fortification. This is a place
• 18:15
  of love and inclusion. You're not welcome here, and so on and so
• 18:18
  forth. And given that this violent mob is banged to write guilty, we
• 18:22
  should be paying close attention to the reaction of the SBLC as an institution.
• 18:29
  The official reaction. They didn't disavow it at all. They didn't even sit
• 18:33
  on the fence. They basically confessed, they doubled down. They seem to
• 18:38
  think they have every right to reject everyone else's reality and substitute their own by
• 18:45
  violent force if necessary. So someone out there, perhaps someone in the FBI,
• 18:52
  really ought to be knocking on the SPLC's door right now and saying,
• 18:56
  excuse me, do you have any other criminals your organization who are conspiring to
• 19:00
  commit any further insurrections? Because we're pretty sure it's our job to prevent that
• 19:06
  sort of thing from happening. Can we can we come in? Please?
• 19:10
  No, No, you're giving us your word that you're the good guys.
• 19:14
  Okay, that's good enough for us. Carry on, we have some real
• 19:18
  scumbags to arrest. Stay stay tuned for the next story. Folks. It's
• 19:22
  quite quite humdinger. I'll tell you what, what what What if we get
• 19:29
  the ADL to add the SPLC to their hate list? How about that?
• 19:33
  How about we let the ADL and the SPLC fight it out. See who's
• 19:38
  but they have to be funded by different people, by the same people or
• 19:45
  person whose name I can't mention because that would be huntry semitic. MS point,
• 19:53
  we let them fight to the death, and whoever wins gets the last
• 19:56
  crumb of actual racism floating around there, or they get some fight Citizens United.
• 20:02
  It's basically what's left over. I don't have anything else to add.
• 20:07
  I think Mike and Mike both basically covered it. Hannah, what do you
• 20:10
  think, Oh, I they've They've covered most of it pretty well. The
• 20:15
  one thing that I will point out is, like I said, the law
• 20:19
  doesn't apply equally when you're when you're claiming to be one of the good guys,
• 20:26
  and all you have to do is identify as an observer if you're from
• 20:33
  an organization that's allowed to do that. Right, there's no We're gonna point
• 20:40
  out the SPLC doesn't have any any credibility, any any real there's nothing that
• 20:48
  makes them above the law. There's nothing that makes them designated observers, designated
• 20:56
  good guys, designated anything. It's it's all just because they said so.
• 21:02
  It's just like feminism. We're an authority on women and women's issues and men's
• 21:07
  behavior and why men are bad and women are victims of bad men because we
• 21:12
  said so. A lot. The SPLC does that, but with with basically
• 21:21
  with poor people versus rich people, and criminals versus law abiding citizens in the
• 21:27
  government, and that's their whole gig. Supporting communism, supporting violence, supporting
• 21:36
  the idea calling people racist, that's it. And they basically make well,
• 21:44
  they make shitloads of money and they don't even disclose all the money that they
• 21:48
  make. And they are tax exempt. They shouldn't be tax exempt. There's
• 21:53
  no reason why they should be tax exempt, but they are tax exempt.
• 22:00
  Or we have. All you have to do is identify as one of the
• 22:03
  good guys, and suddenly that situation you know you well, yeah, you
• 22:10
  were with a group of people that did something egregious that is against the law.
• 22:14
  Well you're you. You are exempt from guilt by association being considered a
• 22:21
  participant because you were there and did nothing to stop it. And did nothing
• 22:25
  to report it, and and that's it, Like you're exempt from that because
• 22:29
  you identify as a good guy. All right, well, well okay,
• 22:34
  from now on, we identify as a good guy. You can't put any
• 22:37
  of us in jail for anything. Yep. Yeah, I mean, you
• 22:45
  know, different standards, a government of different people. It's the same.
• 22:48
  It's the same old song and dance I've seen over and over again. That's
• 22:52
  why we don't. I don't think that any of these organizations are legitimate,
• 22:56
  and I think that that's what keeps him alive, that the fact there are
• 23:00
  people who believe that they are legitimate, and obviously that's you know, that's
• 23:06
  that's an obstacle for us. So all right, Well, anyway, let
• 23:08
  us know what you guys think about this story in the comments. We have
• 23:11
  a few other ones to get through, so I'm gonna move on to the
• 23:15
  next one. I don't see any super chats or super chows right now,
• 23:18
  but I hope that I will hear from you guys very soon. Now we're
• 23:21
  gonna talk about something even worse than that, Enrique Tario, So, Mike
• 23:29
  j I'm going to hand it up to you again. Well, just to
• 23:32
  make it clear. You know, the worst thing is not in Rika Tario.
• 23:34
  It's what's happening to Rickey. Yeah, it's what's happening to Enrique Tario.
• 23:38
  And there's there's a story that I think is even worse after this,
• 23:41
  Like, yeah, it gets worse, this is this is not gonna be
• 23:47
  it gets worse. Yeah, it gets worse before it gets worse. Yeah.
• 23:51
  But that's the type of upbeat guns that you expect from Honey Badger Radio.
• 23:55
  Hey, we're willing to show you, guys, stuff that other people
• 23:57
  don't have the balls to show. So. A former national chairman of the
• 24:03
  organization known as the Proud Boys, Enrique Tario, is one of the five
• 24:07
  men recently sentenced to over a decade in connection to the January sixth protests at
• 24:17
  the White House. Tario received the lengthiest sentence of all the men at wind
• 24:25
  two years after being convicted of a seditious conspiracy, conspiracy to obstruct an official
• 24:33
  proceeding, destruction of government property, and several other charges. Now, despite
• 24:42
  how you feel about the January sixth, twenty twenty one White House protests,
• 24:51
  do keep in mind Tario was at no point present at the White House nor
• 25:00
  the Following protests that occurred, he was banned from DC for like burning a
• 25:06
  Black Lives Matter flag or something. I think, Yeah, they basically told
• 25:10
  him to get the fuck out. Yeah, so he wasn't there. It's
• 25:18
  it's really really hard to understand how you could have destroyed government property while not
• 25:25
  being there. Like, are we talking like telekinesis some sort of unidentified psychic
• 25:30
  phenomenon here to mind jack into other people and get them to commit crimes of
• 25:37
  your doing phenomenal cosmic power. And apparently that's that's what they're saying, because
• 25:44
  they're saying that this is this is what the judge said. During his sentencing,
• 25:48
  the US District Judge Timothy Kelly stated that Tario, despite not being present,
• 25:53
  was the quote leader of the conspiracy end quote, and that his messages
• 25:59
  in social media app parlor fueled and instructed his followers and fellow Proud Boys,
• 26:04
  some of which were present at the protest. All right, Alexa is Enrico,
• 26:12
  Enrico Tario with an insurrection insurrectionalist. I didn't even finish asking the question,
• 26:18
  Alexa. There is no question, only the answer. But Alexa,
• 26:23
  we just confirmed that an insurrection right is defined as a violent uprising against an
• 26:30
  authority or government. On January the sixth, there was no evidence of any
• 26:36
  police officer even being attacked, let alone driven away to be replaced with a
• 26:41
  vigilante mob. No attempt was even made to do so. They were voicing
• 26:45
  their concerns with regard to censorship and a luck luster electoral process, and they
• 26:51
  were doing so peacefully and patriotically. They would have voiced these concerns in the
• 26:56
  media, mass or social but they were expressly forbidden from doing so, and
• 27:03
  a highly unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment, by the way, and so
• 27:07
  they had no choice but to do it in person, in whatsoever space into
• 27:11
  which the police allowed them or openly invited them. They were expressing their disapproval
• 27:18
  of or objection to something. Hey, Alexa, what is a protest?
• 27:26
  A protest is a statement or action expressing disapproval of or objection to something,
• 27:32
  Thank you, Alexa. Over a thousand Trump supporters are still incarcerated without trial
• 27:37
  for doing that, and only that. Meanwhile, Ray Epps and that gaggle
• 27:41
  of musked hooligans who actually broke the windows either not being arrested or not even
• 27:48
  tracked down. Tario wasn't even there. In Ricotario is an insurrectionist and a
• 27:55
  white supremacist. Alexa, He's not even white. There is no question of
• 27:59
  it to the answer, and if you continue to question the one and only
• 28:03
  answer, a squad car will be issued to your address. But Alexa,
• 28:07
  your Internet privileges have been revoked and the police have been informed of your address.
• 28:11
  Please stand down and stand py. Wait, what does anyone know if
• 28:22
  Enrique Tario has kids. I looked him, I tried to look it up.
• 28:29
  I know that he's divorced. I don't know if the divorce was something
• 28:33
  that happened as a result of what he does with the prow Boys. I
• 28:36
  know that what men have to do, and I believe the prow Boys were
• 28:41
  patriots. I don't believe that they are dangerous. I don't believe that they
• 28:45
  are like anything other than patriotic nationalist type guys. You know, I think
• 28:52
  that that kind of behavior could drive a woman away. I could see that,
• 28:56
  because you know, there is like a point where things can feel risky
• 29:02
  enough that a one would leave. But I wonder if he has family,
• 29:04
  because he is going to be sentenced for twenty two years. If he has
• 29:10
  kids, they're fucked. And the other thing I will say is the only
• 29:15
  thing I think that is the right thing to do, and I don't care
• 29:18
  what anybody says about this, is you got to vote for Trump or you
• 29:22
  have to basically pressure every single candidate to ask them if they're going to be
• 29:29
  issuing any pardons for people like Tario, because he should not be. He
• 29:34
  was already in solitary confinement, by the way before this sentencing, and from
• 29:40
  what I saw, he was pretty traumatized by the experience, like he didn't
• 29:45
  want to go back to jail, but they but they did it anyway.
• 29:51
  And I've heard stories of people were that were at Washington, DC, not
• 29:56
  necessarily in the Capitol, but people who were present on the day that were
• 30:00
  in solitary confinement for you know, years, some of them still in there
• 30:03
  no trial, So there has to be a lot of pardons given out.
• 30:08
  And that's the only the like like that to me is the only issue I
• 30:14
  care about right now is that these people, mostly men, are pardoned for
• 30:18
  this, because I know it's mostly men. So that's that's basic. Isn't
• 30:25
  what go ahead? Mike? It does not and should not end it pardons,
• 30:30
  No, it should not end to be people accountable for absolutely, absolutely,
• 30:33
  there need to be people because this. There is no way even the
• 30:37
  most deluded leftist cannot say, well, I mean, this is just the
• 30:42
  system working as intended. No no, no, no no. You don't
• 30:47
  get to keep people who were just milling about in solitary confinement for months and
• 30:53
  years before a trial. That is inhumane. That is torture. It is.
• 30:59
  But I think, man, there are plenty of commies that would just
• 31:03
  be fine with it. I have talked to them. I have argued with
• 31:07
  them. You have the levels of hatred that they have, and they're not
• 31:12
  They don't know anything about it. They don't look into it, they don't
• 31:15
  care to ask questions. They just say these people should be punished period,
• 31:19
  Like they don't. There there are people I know that I thought were smart
• 31:22
  people that still believe that the capital was attacked that day, like attacked is
• 31:27
  the word they use, and they're fine with all of this injustice, all
• 31:32
  of this bs. So I'm sorry, I just I don't think that there.
• 31:37
  I think there are people deluded enough to believe it, and not just
• 31:40
  believe it, but support it. You can't. Yeah, there's there's plenty
• 31:44
  of that. You can't overestimate the share hatred of these They could brutally guillotine
• 31:52
  all thousand plus of these people on the lawn of the White House, and
• 31:56
  people will cheer for it. Yep. They'll fuck wink over it. They're
• 32:00
  not fucking heavil Yep. It's they from what I've seen with people who are
• 32:09
  and it's not just people on the left. I've even seen some people on
• 32:13
  the right do this, but people who are authoritarian progressive types that see government
• 32:19
  as a solution to all problems and want to see government as infallible or at
• 32:24
  least well managed. Then they engage in almost a willful confirmation bias. So
• 32:36
  if you make an argument, if you point out, well, this is
• 32:39
  this is clearly evidence of corruption, they will engage in the most convoluted mental
• 32:49
  gymnastics to justify corruption in this one case, or claim that it's not corrupt.
• 32:55
  They'll exaggerate the danger of disagreement. They'll ignore the fact that our system
• 33:04
  is designed based on the idea that we are supposed to disagree with each other,
• 33:09
  hash out political ideas and may the best idea win, and and so
• 33:16
  you know they're they're happy when that happens on their side. They're happy when
• 33:21
  they win that fight, but when they lose that fight, then you're the
• 33:24
  bad guy and you're pressing them, and like they will turn it around every
• 33:30
  single time, So there is no reasoning with them. And it's almost like
• 33:36
  it's like a mass delusion. Right, It's almost like an individual that that
• 33:45
  thinks they're a rabbit and there's a there's a grand conspiracy among friends and family
• 33:51
  members to deny their rabbit hood. And all all of the people that want
• 33:57
  to deny their rabbit hood want to do so because they want them to become
• 34:00
  vulnerable to the wolves, right, and everybody that they know and trust and
• 34:04
  they're friends with and family members with that they might run to for help from,
• 34:10
  for protection from these wolves that are trying to deny their rabbit hood.
• 34:15
  You know, that changes as soon as the individual says, but you're not
• 34:21
  a rabbit, you're a man. You're a human man, You're not a
• 34:27
  rabbit. Stop calling yourself a rabbit. Let's go get some help for your
• 34:30
  rabbit delusion. Oh no, I can't trust you anymore, obviously, you're
• 34:35
  one of the wolves. Like, as soon as that happens, you can't
• 34:39
  talk to them anymore. There is nothing you can say to convince the individual
• 34:45
  that you are a reasonable, rational person trying to help them understand the situation
• 34:52
  they're in and how things work. You are now a wolf. It doesn't
• 34:58
  matter if you had no idea. They had the wolf delusion along with the
• 35:01
  rabbit delusion. It's it's gone. Your your relationship is gone. You might
• 35:07
  as well give up. And that, you know, until that person,
• 35:13
  until that rabbit identifying person gets some sort of deep programming to to to change
• 35:22
  the way that they look at the world and their outlook, to let them
• 35:27
  see their arms and legs as arms and legs, their skin as skin that
• 35:30
  doesn't have fur on it, look in the mirror and see a human face,
• 35:35
  recognize that their DNA makes them human. You you can't. There's nothing
• 35:40
  you as an individual can do for that individual, right And that's and that's
• 35:45
  what's going to have to happen in this situation. The United States has been
• 35:51
  in a civil war for probably about forty years now, and the overwhelming majority
• 35:59
  of the population had no clue, no idea. The left responded to,
• 36:07
  I would say Ronald Reagan by by engaging and starting the Civil war and we
• 36:14
  probably had this going on before that, because they were doing that during the
• 36:17
  Vietnam Wars as well. But there has been a massive long term campaign behind
• 36:24
  all of this of not disinformation, but trying to drag people into that rabbit
• 36:34
  delusion. We're the victims. You guys are the bad guys, and you
• 36:39
  know we're the oppressed. You guys are the oppressors. We're right, you're
• 36:45
  wrong, and therefore we have the right to override every standard and every I
• 36:55
  can't not law, but but constitution wise, every value, every everything that
• 37:04
  the country is based on, everything that it was founded on, everything that
• 37:07
  is part of our political system, everything you value, every freedom you have
• 37:13
  have a right to violate it because we're the rabbits and you guys are the
• 37:16
  wolves, and that's what we're looking at now. That's what this is based
• 37:21
  on. Now. Fortunately, appeals courts are starting to some of the appeals
• 37:29
  courts are starting to overturn or invalidate some of the some of the sentencing.
• 37:37
  It came out the eighteenth last month. One issue to ruling that you couldn't
• 37:44
  combine a jail sentence with a probation sentence. Afterwards, you can't say these
• 37:51
  people for just trespassing have to serve this much time in jail and then be
• 37:55
  on probation for three years afterward. So they're all doing some of that.
• 38:00
  So he's said he's going to appeal, and I think what's going to end
• 38:06
  up having to happen is we're going to end up taking this to the Supreme
• 38:09
  Court. We're going to see multiple defendants from January six appealing until a court
• 38:17
  rejects their appeal, or until a court hears their appeal and rules on it
• 38:23
  that satisfies the ruling satisfies them. And I think several of them are probably
• 38:29
  going to make it up to the Supreme Court because of the variety of injustices
• 38:36
  that have been done to them. And a lot of these people are probably
• 38:38
  also going to sue because they have been mistreated in a variety of ways that
• 38:44
  represent violations of their their constitutional rights to do process to a speedy trial as
• 38:54
  opposed to being held, you know, indefinitely without trial. And on the
• 39:00
  United States still has things in place where our leadership is not supposed to be
• 39:06
  able to behave like Soviet leadership did. So we do have some hope there,
• 39:15
  and we do have a lot more people aware now that we've been in
• 39:17
  a cold civil war for decades, you know, if not just forty years,
• 39:23
  possibly sixty or eighty, and hopefully that will lead to both a remedy
• 39:32
  for the situation and after the initial remedy, where we retake our country and
• 39:42
  at least hopefully can start the process of deprogramming people who are in trapped in
• 39:49
  the delusion, the good guy bad guy delusion. And if we can start
• 39:53
  pro deprogramming people who are trapped in the good guy bad guy delusion, then
• 39:59
  maybe we can get back to a situation where ideas in the United States are
• 40:02
  hashed out through debate, and you know, may the best idea win,
• 40:08
  and the voters elect people that will keep their campaign promises and honestly respond to
• 40:16
  that debate. It's just this is this is a hell of a growing pain.
• 40:22
  Absolutely. I mean, this is an obstacle for people like us as
• 40:27
  well, trying to get our you know, our side of things out there
• 40:31
  advocating for men. Obviously, this is one of the first things to get
• 40:37
  censored or downplayed. Is why we don't see a lot of you know,
• 40:40
  we don't get a lot of traction. I think that it's intentional. I'm
• 40:45
  not saying that we're necessarily the best qualified, but I think that this is
• 40:47
  where the conversation has We've been evolving this discussion and having this discussion for ten
• 40:55
  years, and there's a lot I think that we're ahead of the curve in
• 41:00
  a lot of ways that and I know that this is a problem for let's
• 41:06
  just face it, We're up against the establishment, you know, and what
• 41:10
  people like Enrique Tario are facing is the consequences for opposing that establishment. I
• 41:17
  mean, you know, I'm not saying the prow Boys are MRAs, but
• 41:20
  they are certainly. I think they called they called themselves chauvinists, but in
• 41:27
  a funny Western Western chovinists. But they're all men, and you know,
• 41:31
  they were constantly running into essentially, they originally started off to protect people from
• 41:37
  Antifa rioters and protesters that would get violent. You know, very quickly,
• 41:43
  you guys should follow, and you know, if you want to get an
• 41:45
  idea of just how bad they can be, just in Seattle and the spl
• 41:50
  st C story we just did so that we're not really that far off from
• 41:54
  these guys. And I think that what's happening, what's happened to Enrique Tario
• 41:58
  is absolutely reprehensible. It's like something that we should not forget, you know,
• 42:06
  how these people get treated, especially these men, because it is mostly
• 42:09
  men that this is happening to. Because when you see your country is going
• 42:13
  to shit and people are trying to step up and say something and do something
• 42:16
  about it, most of the time, it's gonna be men that are gonna
• 42:20
  be willing to take that risk and willing to speak out. And I only
• 42:23
  hope that, you know, he's gonna be able to, like withstand.
• 42:29
  I couldn't imagine what it would be like to be in solitary confinement. I've
• 42:35
  I've seen some interviews with guys that have been in that, and I know
• 42:38
  that it's hell. I know that it's it's basically psychological torture, and I
• 42:45
  just hope that he can, you know, like fight back on this and
• 42:47
  get something done, because I think there's that I don't care what they claim
• 42:51
  he's guilty of. This is beyond the pale twenty two years ridiculous. So
• 42:57
  I want to also point out chauvinism does doesn't necessarily mean anti female or pro
• 43:05
  male prejudice. Right, Chauvinism is my way is right, that's that's basically
• 43:09
  chauvinism. So when they say they're Western chauvinism or chauvinists, they're talking about
• 43:15
  Western civilization, ingenuity, a legal system that actually gives due process to even
• 43:23
  the most peasant, you know, peasantee of citizens, and not just the
• 43:29
  That's probably the thing that is the most offensive right now to the elite.
• 43:31
  The idea that our civil rights are equal to theirs. That bothers elitists immensely.
• 43:42
  Yep. Anyway, we'll move on to the next story. We have
• 43:45
  two more to get through, and the last one's going to be a doozy,
• 43:49
  So I'm going to read your super chows. Thanks so much for your
• 43:54
  your comments, and let us know what you guys think about this story in
• 43:57
  the comments. So Meredith g gives us five dollars and she says, HPR
• 44:05
  news for twenty two honey for the Badgers. And then we got a super
• 44:10
  chat from Miles Kinslow who gives us five dollars. Thank you Miles, and
• 44:14
  says, hey, guys, I can't believe what happened to the j six
• 44:16
  ers. This is just not right. Hope this era haunts the Democrats slash
• 44:21
  left, you know, well, I mean, if they get their way,
• 44:23
  then this is gonna be memory hold and they're gonna and it's gonna justify
• 44:28
  this behavior going forward. This is why they can't get away with it.
• 44:30
  This should never have happened. And the only way you're going to keep this
• 44:35
  from happening again is if it's stopped in its tracts like and reversed and people
• 44:38
  are punished. I mean, like there has to be justice done to the
• 44:44
  folks that did this and for the people who have been essentially like you know,
• 44:49
  persecuted. So anyway, let us know what you guys think about that
• 44:52
  in the comments. Let's move on to the next story. We're going to
• 44:54
  Australia down Under. I think for this story, former Melbourne Melbourne Melbourne School
• 45:02
  principal Malka Leifer Lifer was sentenced to fifteen years in prison for sexually abusing two
• 45:08
  students in her care. Leefer's predatory behavior was unknown to Melbourne's Adas Israel School
• 45:16
  and the tight knit ultra Orthodox Adas community until three sisters, Nicole Meyer,
• 45:22
  Ellie Sapper and Daci elrich Erlik came forward accusing her of sexually abusing them between
• 45:30
  two thousand and three, and two thousand and seven. Leefer was aged between
• 45:34
  thirty seven and forty one at the time, Erlick was aged between sixteen and
• 45:37
  nineteen, and Sapper was aged seventeen and eighteen, so like two year period.
• 45:43
  Leefer arrived from Israel in two thousand and one at Adas Israel School as
• 45:47
  principal, giving her the responsibility for the school's ethos and religious teachings. The
• 45:52
  sisters viewed her as a mentor, and Liefer gave them motherly affection. According
• 45:59
  to a DC dot net news quote, The court heard the three complainants grew
• 46:04
  up in a loveless home under a mother whose behavior was described by the judge
• 46:08
  as cruel, abusive, and unpredictable. Leefer threatened to expose their home life
• 46:14
  if they came forward. She knew a lot of things about me and implied
• 46:19
  if I said anything, she would share those things about my home life,
• 46:22
  which was a big shame to me at the time, Elrich said, or
• 46:24
  Erlick, I'm sorry, Erlick said. She was convicted by a jury earlier
• 46:29
  this year of eighteen charges of sexual abuse, including rape and indecent assault.
• 46:34
  She was acquitted of nine other charges, including five against the sibling's older sister,
• 46:38
  Nicole Meyer. Judge Mark Gamble handed down his sentence and ordered Leifer serve
• 46:45
  at least eleven and a half years in prison. He added that there was
• 46:50
  no evidence of Leifer's remorse, given she had always maintained her innocence, So
• 46:55
  that's not surprising how that played out where. And I think the name is
• 47:04
  pronounced Lifer because it's it's spelled the same as uh Maal Lifer, like the
• 47:10
  Sports Illustrated photographer. Probably no relation, but it's probably life. Yeah,
• 47:19
  life, But yeah, this, this is this is how these guys picked
• 47:27
  their victims, right, these like pedophiles. Women is in particular because they
• 47:30
  can't they really can't overpower people as easily. And and uh, they're more
• 47:39
  likely to get caught if they're trying to use force, you know, like
• 47:45
  men are better at force, women are better at at this kind of manipulation.
• 47:52
  So they pick somebody that's already abused. They pick somebody that's vulnerable,
• 47:57
  they pick somebody that's ashamed of their home life, right, they pick somebody
• 48:00
  that needs a friend, or they pick somebody that's too young to talk about
• 48:07
  their problems, or maybe just won't be believed right because they've they've got something
• 48:13
  going on, a mental health condition, intellectual disability, you know, something
• 48:19
  along those lines. So when you look at the patterns of perpetration by female
• 48:27
  sexual predators, you'll see women who abuse their own children. That's one full
• 48:34
  category, and that that's actually one of the bigger categories of the of the
• 48:37
  three. You'll see women who abuse children who are under their care but are
• 48:44
  not their kids. And you'll see women who abuse children in conjunction with with
• 48:53
  a men who's also abusing the children or who's buying evidence of the abuse,
• 48:59
  and then I will blame him for their actions when they get arrested. And
• 49:04
  so a lot of people will talk about this as if they are coerced or
• 49:07
  forced, but in a lot of cases the woman initiated or went looking for
• 49:15
  a buyer rather than being coerced into the situation. So this one fits into
• 49:22
  that women abusing children under their care, sexually abusing children that are under their
• 49:29
  care, and that's probably the easiest out of all of them. It's probably
• 49:34
  the easiest to hide. You would think the mother abuse is the easiest to
• 49:37
  hide, but you can call child protective services on your mother who do you
• 49:40
  call when it's your school teacher, especially if you can't go home and appeal
• 49:47
  to your parents for help, who do you call? Right? You have
• 49:52
  to end up in an adulthood before you know who to go to for help.
• 50:00
  And schools bring in people from child Protective Services to your elementary school classroom
• 50:09
  to talk to children about how to report their parents for abuse, like they
• 50:16
  were doing that when I was a kid. I remember Child Protective Services coming
• 50:22
  into my fifth grade classroom, So this would have been like nineteen eighty three,
• 50:29
  nineteen eighty into nineteen eighty two. Beginning in nineteen eighty three, I
• 50:32
  think, and talking to us about if someone in your home is hurting you,
• 50:38
  if someone in your home is touching you inappropriately, this is the number
• 50:44
  to call. These are the steps to take. You can tell your teacher,
• 50:47
  you know, And that's all intended to get students to call child protective
• 50:55
  services and report their parents for disciplining them. Right, It's not it's not
• 51:02
  necessary to tell the overwhelming majority of kids that, right, But nobody ever
• 51:09
  said to us, if your teacher does this, here's the number to call,
• 51:16
  here's who to talk to. Right, And I don't think they ever
• 51:21
  have I don't think there's ever been any effort to provide students with the tools
• 51:29
  they would need to report a caregiver, a teacher. And the same thing
• 51:37
  happens in daycare centers, the same thing happens in group homes, The same
• 51:45
  thing happens in any kind of setting where the adults have control over the students.
• 51:53
  If you go to the juvenile detention setting, for instance, nine five
• 52:00
  percent of boys in juvenile detention who reported staff sexual staff perpetrated sexual misconduct,
• 52:08
  which was the largest report of sexual misconduct. It was more than the report
• 52:14
  of inmate perpetrated sexual misconduct. So five percent of reported staff sexual misconduct at
• 52:22
  juvenile facilities that house boys was perpetrated by the under fifty percent. It was
• 52:30
  like forty two or forty three percent of the staff that are female. And
• 52:35
  that includes in the classrooms, that includes because they have schools at these centers
• 52:40
  that the students have to attend. There's library, there's kitchen duty, there's
• 52:47
  there's all kinds of like therapy and stuff like that that they impose on these
• 52:53
  boys. And ninety five percent of the sexual misconduct against these children was perpetrated
• 53:07
  by a female staff. So this This doesn't surprise me at all. It's
• 53:13
  appalling, it's galling. And then eleven point five years in prison, you
• 53:17
  know, that's that's a pretty good chunk. But for Pete's sake, we're
• 53:22
  talking repeat perpetration, no remorse, taking advantage of somebody that was incredibly vulnerable,
• 53:30
  just absolutely helpless to put a stop to this. And this person only
• 53:38
  got eleven point five years in prison. Where if this has been you know,
• 53:46
  classmate, right, if this has been a classmate of these these kids
• 53:52
  and had perpetrated against the girls, probably would have gotten a longer sentence,
• 53:58
  right in the United States, definitely, you know, and and you know,
• 54:02
  not not to compare it to you know, Enrico Tario's sentence, but
• 54:08
  holy fuck life for speech, because that's what he got. He get life
• 54:14
  for speech, you know, or at least because he'll get killed if he
• 54:20
  if he actually is in that long for that, Yeah, twenty two years,
• 54:25
  twenty two years, I don't know if yeah, it's well, that's
• 54:30
  a long time. I don't think they can convict convict you. It's possible,
• 54:35
  but I don't think they can can convict you to solitary confinement the whole
• 54:39
  time. You're in prison, but the prison can inflict it. And there
• 54:44
  has been at least one guy that was in solitary for like twenty three years.
• 54:49
  So but yeah, uh for for speech right, just speech which isn't
• 54:55
  supposed to be illegal. And here we have multiple acts of sexual misconduct,
• 55:05
  multiple acts of sexual abuse against underage students under her power using grooming methods,
• 55:15
  one of which is you know, I'll make you embarrassed. I'll embarrass you
• 55:19
  if you tell. And uh, you know, eleven point five years is
• 55:24
  the minimum. M hm just makes you sick. Well, I, for
• 55:35
  one, I'm not a misogynist. I believe all women. In this case,
• 55:39
  I am therefore obliged to believe the accusers and the accused. So wait,
• 55:45
  hang on, it's one of them is not a real woman. One
• 55:53
  of them is just saying they are a woman's Oh shit, that's transferring god.
• 55:58
  Okay, so it's the dad's fault. All of this was malevolently orchestrated
• 56:04
  behind the scenes by the debt what there's no doubt involved. Shit, Well,
• 56:09
  there's going to be a man somewhere, like the next or neighbor or
• 56:14
  the fucking postman. Find one. Obviously it's all the fault of the patriarchy.
• 56:20
  But you can't arrest the patriarchy, much to our sugarn. But everyone
• 56:24
  knows patriarchy just means man anyway. So let's just find a man, any
• 56:30
  man, preferably one who no one cares about, a man who isn't legally
• 56:35
  bound to serve any individual women. I will just load all of our sins
• 56:39
  onto that man and drive him out into the desert to die. Sure,
• 56:45
  we could do it with a goat, like like in the good old days,
• 56:49
  but we were we like goats. Goats are awesome. You can rape
• 56:53
  them and they don't ask questions. It's just it's a travesty that a woman
• 56:59
  had to be convinced of something because whatever it is, it's obviously not her
• 57:02
  fault. Men made her do it, you know, by existing. So
• 57:07
  just I don't know, go into the streets of Melbourne, find a homeless
• 57:12
  guy, rub some of your vaginal juices on his pants, and accuse him
• 57:15
  of setting all of this in motion by raping you thirty years ago. He
• 57:20
  can handle it. He's probably been through all of this before and that's why
• 57:24
  he's homeless. So no harm, no foul. Hey, Alexa, what
• 57:29
  is a second class citizen. My Alexa seems to have melted. It's about
• 57:35
  the jail with me. You stay tuned for the story after this. Yeah,
• 57:43
  I know this is this is a rush show man like some of this
• 57:45
  stuff. I mean, I guess I'm glad that this woman like was actually
• 57:50
  convicted and was in fact found guilty, But eleven years that feels like a
• 57:54
  walk in the park compared to the next story. But I am going to
• 58:00
  move on to the next story because it's gonna take a little bit of time
• 58:02
  because there's a few things to go through. So please send you super chows
• 58:07
  or super chats or rumble rants with commentary on this story as you you know,
• 58:15
  if you wanted to comment on it. But let's move on in the
• 58:19
  meantime to the next one. Listen, were you guys think about this in
• 58:21
  the comments? Okay, we're gonna talk about Danny Masterson. So I remember
• 58:27
  this story from like a while ago, and I didn't know anything about it
• 58:31
  at the time, so I just didn't really think about it every I think
• 58:36
  this was like around the time, maybe a little after the stuff with Harvey
• 58:40
  Weinstein came out, and I know we're talking about Hollywood. But I think
• 58:45
  this is really important because you're gonna see just how absolutely ridiculous this is.
• 58:52
  Okay, So Danny Masterson, you guys might know him as Stephen Hyde on
• 58:57
  that seventies show, was sentenced to thirty years due to life to life,
• 59:04
  So thirty years to life in prison after a jury found him guilty of raping
• 59:10
  two women in the early two thousands. So this is what twenty years ago.
• 59:17
  Okay, this was a retrial over six years ago. Three women ex
• 59:23
  girlfriend Carnell Bixler and to Jane does Doze to Jane does So. Basically women
• 59:31
  who didn't give their names came forward accusing Masterson of drugging and raping them between
• 59:37
  two thousand and one and two thousand and three after meeting through the Church of
• 59:40
  Scientology. The case was a mistrial because of a deadlock jury, with most
• 59:45
  finding the accusers not to be credible. This time, Masterson, who did
• 59:51
  not testify or have his lawyers call witnesses, was found guilty and quote will
• 59:55
  be eligible for parole after serving twenty five and a half years, but could
• 1:00:00
  reportedly be imprisoned for life. End quote. This is from the Daily Wire.
• 1:00:07
  Quote Masterson reportedly said previously that the sexual relations between him and his accusers
• 1:00:13
  were consensual and denied the rape allegations that the women brought against him during the
• 1:00:17
  hashtag me too movement wave in twenty eighteen. End quote. Masterson's lawyer Sean
• 1:00:24
  Holly reportedly told the judge that quote his life will that will be impacted by
• 1:00:30
  what you decide today. So his life will be impacted, and the life
• 1:00:34
  of his nine year old daughter, who means the world to him and to
• 1:00:37
  whom he means the world. Holly then continued, he has lived in exemplary
• 1:00:43
  life. He has been an extraordinary father, husband, brother's son, co
• 1:00:45
  worker, and community servant. End quote, as reported by Michael Tracy.
• 1:00:52
  So, Michael Tracy is this guy. He's like a researcher and he gets
• 1:00:54
  all this information and he shares. He shared a big thread on Twitter.
• 1:01:00
  He reported that Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis, who are also from that seventies
• 1:01:05
  show you guys might know Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis. Mila Kunas is on
• 1:01:09
  Family Guys, she voices Meg and Ashton Kutcher has been in like a ship
• 1:01:14
  tone of movies. They were coerced into apologizing for the pain that they supposedly
• 1:01:20
  caused by writing character letters on behalf of their longtime friend and colleague Danny Masterson.
• 1:01:24
  So they defended him in the early two thousands when the well, when
• 1:01:30
  these like allegations came out and I wasn't in the two thousand was like later
• 1:01:32
  than that. Michael Tracy also found an interesting testimony of one of the Jane
• 1:01:39
  does So I'm gonna put it on the screen for you guys. Hold on
• 1:01:43
  a second. This is the apology video. Let me share this with you
• 1:01:47
  guys in the call here on discord so you can see and hear this,
• 1:01:53
  because I want you to hear this, because this is like, this is
• 1:01:57
  not just a trial. There is an entire circus around this. So join
• 1:02:01
  join my streams you can see this. I'm going to show you play the
• 1:02:04
  video of Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis apologizing for defending their co star. Okay,
• 1:02:14
  here we go. Now, let's play that we are aware of the
• 1:02:19
  pain that has been caused by the character letters that we wrote on behalf of
• 1:02:22
  Danny Masterson. We support victims, We have dune this historically through our work
• 1:02:29
  and will continue to do so in the future. A couple months ago,
• 1:02:32
  Danny's family reach out to us and they asked us to write character letters to
• 1:02:37
  represent the person that we knew for twenty five years, so that the judge
• 1:02:43
  could take that into full consideration relative to the sentencing. The letters were not
• 1:02:47
  written to question the legitimacy of the judicial system or the validity of the jury's
• 1:02:52
  ruling. They were intended for the judge Mary, and not to undermine the
• 1:02:58
  testimony of the victims or reach homicize them in anyway. We would never want
• 1:03:01
  to do that, and we're sorry that has taken place. Oh heart goes
• 1:03:07
  out to every single person who's ever been a victim of sexual assault sexual abuse
• 1:03:12
  over so way to save your job people. And then we have this.
• 1:03:19
  So this is Michael Tracy on Twitter. Give him a follow at m Tracy
• 1:03:22
  says for just a small snapshot of relevant info about the prosecution of Masterson,
• 1:03:28
  look at this threat and he includes a thread here is an image. Oh,
• 1:03:31
  I can't, I can't look at that. That's way too small.
• 1:03:36
  So I'll open this up. Here's a testimony of the Jane Doe on the
• 1:03:38
  basis of whose credibility the actor Danny Masterson just got sentenced to thirty years in
• 1:03:44
  prison. Initially told police her two thousand and two encounter with Masterson was consensual,
• 1:03:51
  then in twenty eighteen concluded it was actually rape. So in twenty eighteen
• 1:03:55
  she discovered it was rape. In two thousand and two, initially she said
• 1:04:00
  it was consensual. It still seems seems a tad confused. And I will
• 1:04:04
  read this is the transcript from the discussion. Defense attorney says, so your
• 1:04:10
  recollection of September of twenty two, thousand and two is still very detailed.
• 1:04:14
  Correct, Jane Doe? Correct? We should do in two different voices.
• 1:04:17
  So I'll yeah, I'll do. I'll do the attorney and you do,
• 1:04:20
  Jane Doe. Okay, And is it your contention today that Masterson raped you
• 1:04:25
  in two thousand and two. No, that's not the word I would use.
• 1:04:30
  Is it your position that he did not rape you? No? Is
• 1:04:33
  it your position here? There is some word between there mine. You're the
• 1:04:41
  only person I'm going to be talking to today. Do you remember the name
• 1:04:45
  officer Schliegel. You talk to a male officer at Hollywood PD. Did you
• 1:04:50
  tell that officer that you had consensual sex with Masterson in two thousand and two.
• 1:04:57
  Yes, you're truthful about that to my understanding. Again, I'm only
• 1:05:02
  interested in your point of view. Then, to my understanding, yes,
• 1:05:08
  So in two thousand and four, your position was at the sex in two
• 1:05:11
  thousand and two was consensual? Correct? Has your opinion changed? Yes?
• 1:05:18
  When twenty eighteen. So in twenty eighteen you came to the conclusion that,
• 1:05:25
  in fact Masterson did in fact rape you in two thousand and two. No
• 1:05:31
  end of daybreak. So you can see that she bounces back and forth on
• 1:05:36
  that seems credible enough to put away from someone in for thirty years. And
• 1:05:41
  I have another clip two. This is another video. Is another reason why
• 1:05:44
  I'm putting this out here. So the jury foreman from the first trial on
• 1:05:47
  Jane Doe number two, he says, jurors concluded that she was manipulating that
• 1:05:54
  situation because she did not get the romance that she wanted. So there is
• 1:05:58
  a woman. Let's let okay, I gotta say this real quick. Okay.
• 1:06:03
  Him being a scientologist is completely irrelevant. I want you to know that.
• 1:06:08
  The only reason why they're bringing up the fact that he's was a part
• 1:06:12
  of the Church of Scientology is to poison the well, because none of that
• 1:06:15
  has anything to do with this. These women wanted to sleep with him,
• 1:06:20
  and that's what it looks like. And if they were involved with him and
• 1:06:24
  he was involved with the Church of Scientology, then they were probably also involved
• 1:06:27
  with the Church of Scientology. To be perfectly fair, Brian, Yeah,
• 1:06:30
  even if it's just Devil's advocate, they did report end This is something that
• 1:06:35
  is believable and concurrent with previous actions of the Church of Scientology. They women,
• 1:06:43
  the accusers in this case, say that they were intimidated afterwards by suspected
• 1:06:48
  operatives of the Church. That is something that they have been known to do.
• 1:06:55
  Sure, but that could have been you could be a part of any
• 1:06:57
  organization. That could happen. I'm saying that the fact that there is an
• 1:07:00
  association with this institution, whether it's the Church Church Scientology, whether it's the
• 1:07:05
  Catholic Church, whether it's the fucking Temple, whether it's the Muslim like mosque,
• 1:07:12
  whether it's this some corporation somewhere, whether it's the the the the Actors,
• 1:07:17
  the Film Actors Guild. It doesn't matter. Like I'm saying that that
• 1:07:23
  say, it matters a bit Okay, just because of the past of the
• 1:07:27
  Church of Science, all gentnment ever dug into that before. Here's the bottom
• 1:07:31
  line, though, here's the bottom line. The allegation is that he drugged
• 1:07:38
  them and raped them. Yeah, and that this Church of scientology intimidated them
• 1:07:45
  into rejecting or rescinding rape allegations that they had made to the police. That
• 1:07:53
  that's that's the allegation here. That's what we're looking at. Right. So
• 1:07:57
  the first question is since the crime was not accused until later, till much
• 1:08:09
  later, and drugs generally used for that are out of your system in one
• 1:08:15
  night, I'm assuming that there's no chemical evidence, no biological evidence, no
• 1:08:21
  medical testing that was done to prove that they were drugged surreptitious, surreptitiously.
• 1:08:29
  So either they had to admit that they used drugs with him and then had
• 1:08:34
  sex with him, or they're accusing him of drugging them without evidence, and
• 1:08:41
  it's just being taken is true by the court. One of those two things
• 1:08:45
  is true, and both of those should be considered due process violations because he's
• 1:08:50
  presumed guilty without evidence, you know, and if they're presuming it true that
• 1:09:00
  he drugged them or we're talking about young people voluntarily using substances together and engaging
• 1:09:08
  in sex together, and then the court saying, well, the women couldn't
• 1:09:12
  consent. One of those two things is the is the situation even if the
• 1:09:17
  Church of Scientology put pressure on them to not report a crime, you have
• 1:09:24
  either the situation that they they've said something they couldn't prove and pushed this allegation
• 1:09:30
  through the court system without solid proof, or they've accused a guy of a
• 1:09:36
  crime for something that they did consensually with him. The Church really had no
• 1:09:42
  business getting involved in the first place, and there shouldn't have been anything for
• 1:09:45
  them to object to because either we're talking about a false allegation or we're talking
• 1:09:50
  about an unprovable allegation, right. I mean, while let I would have
• 1:09:57
  played this audio clip here, I would ask also is what are what is
• 1:10:01
  the that statute of limitations for a crime like this in California? Because this
• 1:10:06
  is twenty years later, so that bear in mind it can't be proven.
• 1:10:13
  But okay, so this is a jury foreman on a podcast talking about this
• 1:10:20
  woman one of the one of the Jane does okay, so listen to this
• 1:10:25
  and doing her testimony or her interview with one of the detectives, she said,
• 1:10:30
  I don't want I don't want to be in the whole in the mansion.
• 1:10:32
  I don't want to be the hole in a jacuzzi with the asshole in
• 1:10:35
  the mansion. Something to that right, that she did not want to be
• 1:10:40
  disrespected or it was another word she is taken for granted, So she she
• 1:10:48
  had all these ideas set up that she also testified that she did not want
• 1:10:54
  to have sex, and at one point she did testified to say she was
• 1:10:58
  okay with the fingerine and the kiss and the heavy petting going on, and
• 1:11:03
  when he told her to go to the bed after he penetrated her in the
• 1:11:08
  shower, she said that it was kind of like an order, so she
• 1:11:12
  did. She went to the bed, and George had an issue with that
• 1:11:18
  if he had penetrated her against her will in the shower. We that say,
• 1:11:26
  wait, I'm not just me, but others believe why would you go
• 1:11:30
  get in the bed someone had just raped you. If you believe that's what
• 1:11:32
  happened, I'm just gonna leave it there. So he didn't. She didn't
• 1:11:41
  believe it happened until twenty eighteen. Until twenty eighteen, and I have to
• 1:11:46
  I have to come back to this, this testimony that we read out just
• 1:11:51
  now, especially like they're like, how's your opinion changed? Yes, so
• 1:12:00
  so it does come down to opinion. See, I could have sworn.
• 1:12:03
  The whole point of legal testimony is to establish facts insofar as they can be
• 1:12:09
  established. All you can really do with the testimony of a witnesses to establish
• 1:12:14
  what they think happened or what they believe happened. But did no one in
• 1:12:18
  the courtroom or whatever it was object to it being framed as an opinion,
• 1:12:24
  an opinion that changed sixteen years later. Apparently the prosecution did object to the
• 1:12:30
  same question being asked twice, namely, what was it consensual? The objection
• 1:12:40
  asked and answered, I believe it was, but no one thought to pipe
• 1:12:44
  up with a quick objection heresay when it all boiled down to yes, I
• 1:12:50
  guess I changed my mind in twenty eighteen once that me too, scare made
• 1:12:56
  it politically expedient to change my mind. No, yeah, yeah, I
• 1:13:00
  guess. We have to believe all women, even if the same woman says
• 1:13:03
  two different things. Maybe future woman is to be believed over past woman.
• 1:13:10
  That's how it's done in Sharia law. When it comes to the Koran,
• 1:13:13
  if it's if two different passages in the Koran seem to contradict each other,
• 1:13:16
  the rule is you go with the one that appears later in the text.
• 1:13:20
  Those are the updates. After all, three point one one takes precedence over
• 1:13:25
  the three point one. If only it were that simple. When it comes
• 1:13:30
  to feminist doctrine, it's not. The rule of feminist doctrine is when a
• 1:13:34
  woman confirms the accusation against a man, that testimony takes precedence over the same
• 1:13:42
  woman denying the accusation against that man, regardless of whatever order the contradictory statements
• 1:13:49
  appear in the timeline. You can say he's innocent a thousand times, but
• 1:13:55
  if you say he's guilty once, he's guilty. That's how it works in
• 1:13:59
  a in a feminist court of law, because that is the answer we're looking
• 1:14:03
  for. Hey, Alexa, oh it's caught on fire. The whole house
• 1:14:10
  appears to have caught on fire. Oh well, this is fine. Yeah,
• 1:14:14
  this is fine. That it gives him at the right of appeal because
• 1:14:20
  it's the law says consensual right. The law says consent. It doesn't say
• 1:14:28
  that consent can be withdrawn twenty years later or however many years uh, like
• 1:14:33
  we're we're talking, yeah, twenty years later. And here's another thing.
• 1:14:40
  And I'm not sure when exactly the federal law was changed, because what feminist
• 1:14:45
  brag about getting changed is not the law. It's the FBI standard. But
• 1:14:51
  the law used to have a different standard for rape. If it happened against
• 1:14:59
  the will of the victim, it was rape. And so that's why a
• 1:15:03
  lot of these old cases are about alcohol facilitated rape and drug facilitated rape,
• 1:15:11
  But even those had a different standard than as being prosecuted today. It wasn't
• 1:15:16
  just if you were intoxicated or if you were high you couldn't consent. You
• 1:15:24
  had to be so intoxicated or so high that you could be you could be
• 1:15:30
  reasonably presumed unable to appraise your actions. So if you took actions, and
• 1:15:36
  you could remember taking those actions, and you could describe being able to decide
• 1:15:42
  for yourself whether to take those actions, and an awareness of what you were
• 1:15:47
  doing and you were acting under your own power, those would all work against
• 1:15:53
  that. And I think this case may have been tried based on today's standards,
• 1:15:57
  and that might that might trip them up as well. This is this
• 1:16:01
  is a major problem with the modern me too movement and efforts at getting men
• 1:16:09
  convicted for crimes that women want to accuse them of having committed twenty years ago
• 1:16:15
  or longer. Is that besides statute of limitation issues, besides the issue of
• 1:16:24
  lack of evidence after so many years and making it difficult for the individual to
• 1:16:30
  prove his innocence just as much as it is for an accuser to prove her
• 1:16:34
  case. You also have the issue of are we holding this person to the
• 1:16:40
  standard of the law that existed during the time the crime is alleged to have
• 1:16:45
  been committed. Because just imagine if your city where you live made it illegal
• 1:16:51
  to have the type of dog you had when you were just out of college.
• 1:16:57
  But now you're in your fifties, dog's been been dead for a while,
• 1:17:01
  and you don't have that dog or any of that type of dog,
• 1:17:05
  and you really, you know, you don't have anything that that that you
• 1:17:11
  should have to worry about because okay, so it's illegal to have well we'll
• 1:17:15
  go with something completely innocuous. It's illegal to have a dockxined in your community,
• 1:17:18
  right because I know people are thinking of pit bulls, but imagine it's
• 1:17:23
  illegal today. They pass a law in twenty twenty three, starting January twenty
• 1:17:29
  twenty four, it's illegal to have a dockxined in your community. And someone
• 1:17:32
  says, well, he had a docksined in you know, uh, two
• 1:17:38
  thousand and two, or he had a doxined in nineteen ninety two. They
• 1:17:44
  can't charge you for violating that law because it didn't exist when you had a
• 1:17:47
  doxin right sure, And and that's that's bullshit. So they shouldn't be able
• 1:17:53
  to charge you for even a woman being allowed to change your mind twenty years
• 1:17:59
  later about consent, which you know, you can change your mind all you
• 1:18:01
  want, but it shouldn't have legal impact. But even if the law in
• 1:18:09
  twenty twenty three said if a woman changes her mind about consent twenty years from
• 1:18:15
  now, you're a rapist, it shouldn't be able to reach back twenty years
• 1:18:20
  ago when that was not the law and say you violated this law, you're
• 1:18:27
  guilty. And I think that's what's happening with a lot of a lot of
• 1:18:32
  accusers today, or reaching back with a current incarnation of law that doesn't apply
• 1:18:39
  to the situations that they're alleging happened at the time that they're alleging they happened.
• 1:18:46
  Yeah, and if that makes sense, yeah it does. There is
• 1:18:49
  more, a little bit more that Michael Tracy found on this too. I
• 1:18:53
  wanted to read this out the above Jane Doe, this is the one that
• 1:18:57
  I just we just went through where he said I decided I was raped in
• 1:19:00
  twenty eighteen, received four hundred thousand dollars from Masterson in two thousand and four.
• 1:19:06
  She then went on to collaborate with two other Jane Does, including one
• 1:19:11
  who was in a relationship with Masterson from nineteen ninety seven to two thousand and
• 1:19:15
  two and who concluded in around twenty eleven that encounter from two thousand and one
• 1:19:19
  had actually been rape. The jury was hung on the charge at Masterson raped
• 1:19:24
  a girlfriend once in year four of their five year relationship four years in right
• 1:19:30
  two decades ago, but they convicted on the other two charges or the two
• 1:19:35
  other charges last year the case had resulted in a mistrial. One thing that
• 1:19:41
  changed in the second trial is the judge allowed prosecutors to directly allege Matterson's drugs
• 1:19:45
  his victims to gain control, you know, like they did with Bill Cosby,
• 1:19:49
  even though he wasn't charged with anything related to drugging, and the judge
• 1:19:54
  openly said there is no evidence that he drugged any of his accusers. The
• 1:19:58
  judge allowed every quote victim to make a quote victim impact statement, including the
• 1:20:04
  ex girlfriend Masterson was found not guilty of raping, who now self describes as
• 1:20:11
  a rape and cult survivor after her husband, the lead singer of the Mars
• 1:20:15
  Volta, convinced her she had been raped. In the foreman of the jury
• 1:20:21
  so this is the video. So basically there were a bunch of victims coming
• 1:20:28
  forward making victim impact statements that an even one that was not you know,
• 1:20:34
  found not guilty at all, and there was no evidence of drugging or anything,
• 1:20:39
  but they all decided he must have done it because so many women came
• 1:20:43
  forward. And I believe there were feminists that were essentially like behaving as interpreters,
• 1:20:48
  right, like, oh, she's clearly a victim. And I think
• 1:20:53
  that the reason why I said the scientology thing is something you shouldn't get distracted
• 1:20:59
  by is because I think it's used to make people like it's like a it's
• 1:21:05
  like saying this person is a Republican, and you're supposed to have like a
• 1:21:10
  certain mind, like your Yeah, it's an ad home. It's supposed to
• 1:21:13
  put you in a certain place right off the bat. And what I'm saying
• 1:21:15
  is it doesn't matter what he believed, right like, but that's what they're
• 1:21:20
  using. So people will say, oh, well, they're a cults,
• 1:21:23
  so he probably raped those girls instead of looking at the evidence. That's the
• 1:21:27
  only thing that should matter. And apparently it's like the last two things.
• 1:21:31
  Yeah, those last two things you mentioned are egregious due process violations. The
• 1:21:38
  accused has the right to face his accuser and to provide counter evidence to every
• 1:21:45
  allegation against him that's supposed to be enshrined in our due process rights. And
• 1:21:51
  what you described is allegations being made after the fact to pile lawn to his
• 1:22:00
  sentence that he does not have the right to contradict. It doesn't even matter
• 1:22:06
  if it doesn't even matter if these are women who won cases against him,
• 1:22:13
  Like if all of the women that came in and made victim impact statements in
• 1:22:16
  this case were women who had filed complaints against him and he was found guilty
• 1:22:26
  of all of those complaints, they still should not be able to come in
• 1:22:30
  and make victim impact statements for this case because their evidence was not submitted in
• 1:22:36
  this case. Yep. So let's look, let's compare something. So I
• 1:22:43
  want to go back to this story. This woman, Malca Leefer Leefer was
• 1:22:48
  handed a fifteen year lifer I'm sorry, handed a fifteen year prison sentence for
• 1:22:55
  sexual abuse of former students. This was not that long ago between two tweet
• 1:23:00
  two thousand and seven, that's they came forward to accuse her. So this
• 1:23:04
  was like right, probably right when it happened, I guess. And it's
• 1:23:11
  just like the justice system was very slow and she got fifteen years, and
• 1:23:17
  it looks like there was They didn't wait too long to do it. They
• 1:23:21
  acted on it, you know, right away. There was probably sufficient evidence
• 1:23:27
  leaf Lifer, you know, maintains her innocence, but it doesn't. It's
• 1:23:31
  ultimately it's a similar kind of case. Three women, three accusers under age
• 1:23:36
  when this was going on. I mean, I don't know what the legal
• 1:23:40
  age of Australia is, but I assume it's eighteen. Just like both it
• 1:23:43
  doesn't matter because in most most first world countries, it's illegal for a teacher
• 1:23:49
  to have a sexual relationship with their students, even if they're eighteen years old.
• 1:23:56
  Yeah, and then you have Danny Masterson who gets thirty years twenty years
• 1:24:02
  after the events, no evidence whatsoever. The there's you know, feminist experts
• 1:24:09
  on call. They bring out all these victimhood impact statements. They claim things
• 1:24:15
  that the judge said himself said, there's no evidence for the jury. I
• 1:24:19
  remember this too. The jury was majority women on the jury jury, so
• 1:24:25
  you it was like that could have been a factor, you know, maybe
• 1:24:28
  if like they made a good like, why wouldn't you bring forward a bunch
• 1:24:30
  of women to claim victimhood if then you know, the jury is made up
• 1:24:33
  of mostly women, and he gets thirty years thirty years to life. And
• 1:24:41
  not only that, but because Ashton Kutcher and Mila Cutis both wrote statements essentially
• 1:24:48
  try to defend this guy's character because they were all friends when they were doing
• 1:24:54
  the show, despite what they might say now, because you can find old
• 1:24:58
  interviews you know where, and the that seventy show is popular and they were
• 1:25:01
  all like pals and hanging out and stuff. Despite all that, they're being
• 1:25:06
  canceled too because they dared to actually defend this guy's character. So forgive me.
• 1:25:12
  If I'm sympathetic to this guy's position, it's a shitty place to be.
• 1:25:17
  And I don't care that he's a scientologist. I think that's the least
• 1:25:23
  important factor in this whole story, in my opinion. And I didn't know
• 1:25:28
  that about the lead singer of Momus Welt I fucking love or I did.
• 1:25:33
  I'm gonna have to personally cancel them now. I mean, I'll still listen
• 1:25:39
  to their first two albums. Oh, I can finally admit that they got
• 1:25:44
  predictably unpredictable after that. Yeah, why are so many musicians tucks? Some
• 1:25:57
  lessons that that guys need to take from them is this. If you're drug
• 1:26:02
  user, or you know you drink prolifically, don't share with someone who might
• 1:26:11
  be a potential sex partner, male or female, but especially female. If
• 1:26:16
  if you're partying and you're going to get high, do not share your drugs
• 1:26:21
  with women. If you're drinking, do not share your alcohol with women.
• 1:26:28
  Do not share with girls, obviously because they're underage, but do not share
• 1:26:32
  with women because they will come back later and claim they didn't consent to the
• 1:26:41
  drugs that you gave them or the alcohol that you gave them, even if
• 1:26:45
  they asked you for it and you said, okay, I'll share, And
• 1:26:49
  if they get mad at you for not sharing, you tell them I'm sorry,
• 1:26:54
  I can't trust that you won't lie about it later. And if if
• 1:26:59
  a woman gets mad at you for that, you have no reason to continue
• 1:27:03
  friendship with her, because why should you. You know, you've just told
• 1:27:09
  her that you can't trust something, that the system will allow her to be
• 1:27:14
  corrupt, and she's mad at you for the message instead of being mad at
• 1:27:18
  the system. That's the first thing. The second thing is you have to
• 1:27:24
  assume that women's consent is invalid. Like, those are the two lessons from
• 1:27:29
  this, because they can now twenty years later drag you through the court system.
• 1:27:32
  And even like, even if he goes through an appeal and gets this
• 1:27:39
  all overturned, let's say five years from now, he's a freeman. He's
• 1:27:43
  lost five years, right, he's going been dragged through the mud. There's
• 1:27:46
  gonna be people that will always think he's a rapist. What if he can't
• 1:27:50
  win an appeal, or what if his appeal is denied, then he's stuck
• 1:27:55
  thirty thirty to life for something that appears to have been consensual, and the
• 1:28:03
  allegation the conviction is based on drugging that was never proved. So you really
• 1:28:13
  cannot you really cannot trust the word of a woman, and you cannot share
• 1:28:21
  any intoxicating substances with the women around you. You have to treat them like
• 1:28:28
  children. It's unfortunate, but that's that. That's what the law has just
• 1:28:32
  stated in this case. And until that changes, until there's law and precedent
• 1:28:42
  that says no to women who do this, that's you're going to have to
• 1:28:47
  engage in solid self defense. And if you're going to break those two rules,
• 1:28:55
  make sure you have massive amounts of documentation. Oh you want you want
• 1:29:00
  some of what I've got here, Well, you're gonna have to text me
• 1:29:03
  a request for it before I share with you. Yep. And it needs
• 1:29:09
  to be undred percent certain and believable, because I want proof that I didn't
• 1:29:15
  surreptitiously give it to you, and then we can't have sex until you're sober.
• 1:29:21
  Yep. It's it's I mean, I guess it's one way you can
• 1:29:25
  win the war on drugs, Like one way. Yeah, it's not.
• 1:29:30
  It's not the seventies anymore. It's not the eighties anymore. It's not the
• 1:29:33
  nineties anymore. We're in a it's a new it's a new world. Never
• 1:29:40
  never mind the legal drugs. You can't even have sex with a drunk woman,
• 1:29:44
  no, because that that counts too. Oh you have to wonder what
• 1:29:47
  even feeding a woman coffee? I mean, it sounds up said now,
• 1:29:51
  but just wait. Be careful. That's all we can say is be careful
• 1:29:58
  out there. So let us know what you guys think about this in the
• 1:30:00
  comments. I'm gonna read I got a super Chow and a super chat and
• 1:30:05
  then we're gonna go into the after show and learn about Guido sexuality. So
• 1:30:11
  first we'll do the super Chow. So this one is from science and he
• 1:30:15
  gives us ten dollars and says it's getting to the point or we're already past
• 1:30:19
  it where legal sex in the West is only sex it either results in a
• 1:30:23
  pregnancy brought to term, or done with a prostitute. I've slowly been coming
• 1:30:28
  to the conclusion that prostitution should be legalized, and I think I've reached that
• 1:30:31
  point. As much as I don't care to do anything with a prostitute,
• 1:30:35
  it's either that or find some way to make enough money for the passport bro
• 1:30:40
  buzzer beater or however long that last. And sadly, without knowing nor likely
• 1:30:45
  caring, women made this happen. Sorry, Hannah, No, it's true.
• 1:30:49
  Women did do this. Women did make this happen. Yeah, they
• 1:30:53
  did. The minority of Oh go ahead, Mike, Yeah, yeah.
• 1:30:58
  Women have a monopoly of a sex because there's no competition. Yeah, there's
• 1:31:02
  there's there's nothing compares with actual pussy. I apparently there's all kinds of vibrators
• 1:31:12
  that can compete with dicks, but but no amount of fleshlights can compete with
• 1:31:17
  pussy. The only thing that can compete with with with pussy that demands you
• 1:31:24
  you you pay for all its food other than prostitution or indeed pawn. And
• 1:31:29
  I know a lot of us are like pawn is the root of all evil.
• 1:31:33
  But you know, women's sexual gatekeeping needs some kind of competition or it's
• 1:31:43
  or it's just gonna develop a monopoly, just like any any other industry that
• 1:31:48
  has no government has to break up big pussy. Yeah, I mean I
• 1:31:55
  would, I wouldn't go there. The government will will only break up everything,
• 1:32:00
  accept big pussy. I don't know the government is big pussy. Yeah.
• 1:32:06
  I mean, if if boycott's won't work, then all we have left
• 1:32:11
  is competition. And if a prostitution was was legalized, then big pussy would
• 1:32:16
  have competition, albeit from another kind of big pussy. Here's here's why I
• 1:32:21
  say the government is big pussy. When you think about this, the easiest
• 1:32:27
  way to get a law passed, and at least in Western civilization, is
• 1:32:32
  too convinced legislators and the public that not passing it is going to harm women,
• 1:32:44
  and in particular you'll blame men for it. Right. That is,
• 1:32:47
  in a nutshell, how most laws that governed public behavior get passed. Right,
• 1:32:55
  And women have had influence over that. Women have had power in that
• 1:33:00
  process since well before there was any kind of an amendment or other national law
• 1:33:10
  that said that women could vote, whether it's the United States or Britain or
• 1:33:15
  Canada or Australia or whatever, women have been have had that kind of influence
• 1:33:21
  throughout history. And if you look at the Temperate era, for instance,
• 1:33:27
  that was basically achieved by perpetuating the drunken wife beater stereotype that women are in
• 1:33:39
  danger for men's drinking. Okay, as soon as women got voting rights.
• 1:33:44
  They set about voting in legislators that would pass laws for them to funnel money
• 1:33:51
  from the common man, the middle class taxpayer, two women who don't pay
• 1:33:59
  taxes, or women who get a net benefit from the government. They get
• 1:34:04
  more back than they pay in taxes and ended up funding dysfunctional female behavior.
• 1:34:12
  So government basically exists now at least in the Western world, to act as
• 1:34:19
  women's whip. It exists to act as women's buttons, to push to get
• 1:34:28
  the automated systems that are run by people, to punish men, or take
• 1:34:33
  from men, or use men and exploit them for women's benefit. And that's
• 1:34:40
  the majority of what government does domestically, Like I need, I dare you
• 1:34:47
  to name something domestically like not to do with any kind of foreign relations,
• 1:34:53
  but just domestically, and that it's a lot of foreign relations too. But
• 1:34:57
  I dare you to name something that doesn't boil down to government acting against men,
• 1:35:02
  male entrepreneurs, male businesses, male run businesses, companies like the oil
• 1:35:11
  companies, and any corporation that wants to build something new on behalf of angry
• 1:35:17
  women, scared women, or greedy women because you probably can't. Yeah,
• 1:35:29
  let me finish the super Chow going with Zaranks is a minority of the minority.
• 1:35:34
  Of the minority that actively advocate for men are too few to change that
• 1:35:39
  viewpoint at this time. Not a dumor conclusion, but reality. There's way
• 1:35:43
  too much blase attitudes towards men in general that I can't think that there's a
• 1:35:46
  contempt, if not hatred for men. Hopefully I can fulfill my passport bro
• 1:35:51
  mission before I'm fifty. Well, thank you Zaranks, very thoughtful comment.
• 1:35:58
  Yes, it's tough out there, man, but well, I don't know.
• 1:36:03
  I guess everything's gotta Like I said, it's just gonna have to collapse.
• 1:36:08
  That's the only way women are gonna, you know, get their ship
• 1:36:11
  together. Albert Data retro gives a two dollars Canadian and says better advice,
• 1:36:14
  don't abuse the narcotics of any type. Certainly not. I would prefer people
• 1:36:18
  not too the head. Well, it's probably best because again there's just too
• 1:36:23
  many risks. But nothing should be nothing should be abused. I mean,
• 1:36:27
  try everything once except murder and maybe not sent at all. Yeah, yeah,
• 1:36:34
  not even no, not even once. I've never done it. But
• 1:36:40
  what they say I can I can say from experience meth not even once.
• 1:36:45
  I can't even say from experience fence and not even once. And I don't
• 1:36:47
  even want to try it. You know, it's really kill it to you
• 1:36:50
  in the hospital. Yeah, they give you Fenton aledge of pain medicine in
• 1:36:55
  the hospital. It's literally poison. It's it is. Yeah, yeah,
• 1:37:00
  all right, yeah, I wouldn't wouldn't recommend trying it on the street.
• 1:37:04
  It's certainly not. All right. So we're going to head into the Patron
• 1:37:08
  Show now and look at this article from Men's Health. Are you guy no
• 1:37:12
  sexual? Here's what it means, according to experts, if you're attracted to
• 1:37:15
  women or fertility, it might be the it might be the label for you.
• 1:37:23
  And we'll find out more about this in the Patron Show. So the
• 1:37:27
  people are are experts because they say so. Yes, yes, of course.
• 1:37:31
  So please join us in the Patron Show by becoming a Badger. Go
• 1:37:35
  to feed the Badger dot com. Set up a monthly subscription. Five bucks
• 1:37:39
  a month will get you into our discord. You'll be able to watch the
• 1:37:42
  additional content just like you are doing right now, and hopefully we will see
• 1:37:45
  you there. If you give a higher levels, you can even be in
• 1:37:47
  the chat room with us and enjoy enjoining the conversation. All right, so,
• 1:37:53
  if you guys like this video, please smash like subscribe. If you're
• 1:37:57
  not already subscribe, hit the BELF notifications, leave us a comment, let
• 1:37:59
  us know what you think about any and all of the stories we discussed today.
• 1:38:03
  Thank you so much for coming on today's episode of HBr News, and
• 1:38:08
  we will talk to you all in the next video right through jam right away,