Latest / The Quark Side - Quantum Physics Podcast / CERN Recreates the Primordial Matter After the Big Bang
Transcript
- 0:01Speaker 1: Welcome to the quart Side Quantum Physics Podcast, an exploration
- 0:05Speaker 1: of the fundamental structure of reality, where quantum laws govern matter, energy,
- 0:11Speaker 1: and information. Here, uncertainty is a feature, not a flaw,
- 0:16Speaker 1: and understanding begins at the smallest scales.
- 0:27Speaker 2: I want you to take a second and just imagine
- 0:29Speaker 2: something for me. Picture holding a tiny, almost imperceptible droplet
- 0:33Speaker 2: right in the palm of.
- 0:34Speaker 3: Your hand, just a tiny speck.
- 0:36Speaker 2: Really, yeah, exactly, But this isn't a droplet of water.
- 0:40Speaker 2: This is a droplet of the universe, exactly as it existed,
- 0:44Speaker 2: mere fractions of second after the Big Bang, A microscopic
- 0:48Speaker 2: speck of the most extreme, unimaginable heat and energy, just
- 0:52Speaker 2: sitting right there in the room with you.
- 0:54Speaker 3: It's a completely mind bending thought, honestly. I mean, we
- 0:57Speaker 3: are talking about conditions so incredibly violent that the very
- 1:01Speaker 3: laws of physics, the way matter behaves on an everyday basis,
- 1:05Speaker 3: they completely break down. They transform into something totally alien
- 1:08Speaker 3: to our current reality.
- 1:09Speaker 2: Right, And the craziest part isn't just imagining it. The
- 1:12Speaker 2: really wild part is that scientists are actually recreating this
- 1:16Speaker 2: exact primordial soup right now here on Earth.
- 1:19Speaker 4: They really are today We.
- 1:20Speaker 2: Are exploring a massive breakthrough in particle physics.
- 1:24Speaker 4: We're looking at.
- 1:25Speaker 2: Brand new twenty twenty five data from the Large Hadron
- 1:28Speaker 2: Collider ETCERN, and we're going to figure out how scientists
- 1:31Speaker 2: are actively rewriting the rules of the early universe by
- 1:34Speaker 2: discovering this extreme state of matter in a surprisingly tiny package,
- 1:39Speaker 2: which is oxygen collisions. Okay, let's umpact this.
- 1:42Speaker 3: Yeah, So to really grasp the magnitude of creating this
- 1:45Speaker 3: primordial soup, what physicists call a quark gluon plasma or
- 1:51Speaker 3: QGP for short, we have to bypass the everyday atoms
- 1:54Speaker 3: that make up your chair or your body. We have
- 1:56Speaker 3: to zooms straight into.
- 1:57Speaker 4: The nucleus, like all the way down.
- 1:59Speaker 3: All the way down, because if you look at a
- 2:00Speaker 3: single proton or a neutron, they are not solid little spheres.
- 2:04Speaker 3: They're actually made up of even smaller fundamental particles called quarks,
- 2:07Speaker 3: and these quarks are bound together by another type of
- 2:09Speaker 3: particle called the gluon.
- 2:11Speaker 4: Gluons.
- 2:12Speaker 2: I've always loved that name because it literally sounds exactly
- 2:15Speaker 2: like what they do.
- 2:16Speaker 4: They're the glue.
- 2:17Speaker 3: They are the glue exactly. They carry what we call
- 2:20Speaker 3: the strong nuclear force and I gotta say, the strong
- 2:22Speaker 3: force more than lives up to its name. It is
- 2:25Speaker 3: the most powerful force in nature. It's vastly stronger than
- 2:28Speaker 3: gravity or electromagnetism.
- 2:30Speaker 4: Wow.
- 2:31Speaker 3: Yeah, under normal conditions in the universe today, that strong
- 2:34Speaker 3: nuclear force is absolute. Quarks are never ever found on
- 2:38Speaker 3: their own, and the mechanics of it are just bizarre because,
- 2:42Speaker 3: unlike gravity, which gets weaker the further two things are apart,
- 2:46Speaker 3: the strong force actually gets stronger the harder you try
- 2:49Speaker 3: to pull two quarks away from each other.
- 2:51Speaker 2: It's essentially a microscopic prison, like if you think of
- 2:53Speaker 2: a proton as a heavily certified prison cell. The quarks
- 2:56Speaker 2: of the inmates and the gluons are these unbreakable heavy
- 3:00Speaker 2: iron chains keeping them longed inside.
- 3:02Speaker 3: And that's a great way to picture it.
- 3:03Speaker 2: And because pulling them apart only makes the chains pull
- 3:05Speaker 2: back harder, under normal circumstances, there's absolutely no escape. So
- 3:10Speaker 2: I mean, how exactly do we break those chains to
- 3:12Speaker 2: get this core gluon plasma.
- 3:14Speaker 3: Well, the only way to melt those unbreakable chains is
- 3:16Speaker 3: through an environment of unimaginable heat and density. We are
- 3:20Speaker 3: talking about temperatures reaching roughly five and a half trillion
- 3:24Speaker 3: degrees celsius trillion with a T with a T that
- 3:28Speaker 3: is hundreds of thousands of times hotter than the core.
- 3:31Speaker 2: Of our Sun, which is almost impossible to even conceptualized.
- 3:34Speaker 2: And what even happens to a proton at five trillion degrees?
- 3:38Speaker 3: A complete phase change happens. Think about how solid ice
- 3:42Speaker 3: melts into liquid water, right and then it boils into
- 3:45Speaker 3: a chaotic cloud of steam as you add heat. When
- 3:48Speaker 3: you take normal matter and subject it to the temperature
- 3:50Speaker 3: of the early universe, it undergoes the ultimate phase change.
- 3:54Speaker 3: The boundaries of the protons and neutrons just they melt
- 3:57Speaker 3: away entirely. The strong force loses its grip, so of
- 4:01Speaker 3: the chains break exactly. The quarks and gluons are no
- 4:04Speaker 3: longer trapped in their little prisons. They roam completely freely,
- 4:07Speaker 3: swarming around each other in this dense, super hot fluid.
- 4:11Speaker 4: The cork gluon plasma.
- 4:12Speaker 3: That is, the plasma. It is exactly what the entire
- 4:16Speaker 3: universe look like for a fleeting, tiny fraction of a
- 4:19Speaker 3: second right after the Big Bang. This was before space
- 4:23Speaker 3: expanded and cooled down enough for the first permanent protons
- 4:26Speaker 3: and neutrons to condense.
- 4:27Speaker 2: Okay, So by smashing particles together at nearly the speed
- 4:31Speaker 2: of light in the large hat and collider, physicists are
- 4:33Speaker 2: generating that specific level of heat for just a microscoptic
- 4:37Speaker 2: fraction of a second in a space vastly smaller than
- 4:40Speaker 2: a single atom.
- 4:41Speaker 3: Right, they're creating a localized big bang.
- 4:43Speaker 2: Let's set the scene on how they actually do that, though,
- 4:45Speaker 2: because the engineering alone is just staggering. You've got the
- 4:49Speaker 2: CMS collaboration, the compact Muon solenoid operating on this massive
- 4:54Speaker 2: twenty seven kilometer underground ring.
- 4:56Speaker 3: It's a marvel of human engineering, truly.
- 4:58Speaker 2: You have these super cool electromagne and it's chilled to
- 5:00Speaker 2: a temperature colder than outer space, and they're guiding these
- 5:04Speaker 2: atomic nuclei in an absolute vacuum until they cross paths
- 5:08Speaker 2: and just violently collide.
- 5:09Speaker 3: And the precision required for that is mind boggling. But
- 5:13Speaker 3: you know that brings up the fundamental challenge of this
- 5:16Speaker 3: entire field of physics, because if this newly created droplet
- 5:20Speaker 3: of primordial soup is smaller than an atom, and it
- 5:23Speaker 3: only exists for a yactosecond, a yactosecond, that's a billionth
- 5:27Speaker 3: of a billionth of a millionth of a second.
- 5:29Speaker 4: Oh wow, Yeah, it.
- 5:30Speaker 3: Exists for that unfathomably short time before it cools down
- 5:34Speaker 3: and turns back into normal matter. So the question is,
- 5:36Speaker 3: how can we possibly know it was ever there?
- 5:38Speaker 2: Right, because you can't exactly snap a photo of a
- 5:41Speaker 2: yactosecond event.
- 5:42Speaker 4: It's too fast exactly.
- 5:44Speaker 3: By the time the giant fourteen thousand tons cms detector
- 5:48Speaker 3: even registers that a collision happened, the quark gluon plasma
- 5:51Speaker 3: is long gone. So instead of looking for the plasma itself,
- 5:55Speaker 3: physicists have to look for its footprints. They analyze the
- 5:58Speaker 3: microscopic debris the aftermath of the collision.
- 6:01Speaker 2: And this is where the detectors act like a giant
- 6:03Speaker 2: high speed three D camera, right, just tracking all the
- 6:05Speaker 2: pieces of flyoutward.
- 6:07Speaker 3: Yeah, that's spot on. When these near life speed collisions happen,
- 6:10Speaker 3: they don't just generate intense heat. The impact also produces
- 6:14Speaker 3: incredibly energetic particles that shoot outward in opposite directions. Okay, now,
- 6:18Speaker 3: if there is no quark gluon plasma created in the collision,
- 6:22Speaker 3: these high energy particles just fly outward freely. They hit
- 6:25Speaker 3: the outer layers of the detectors at full speed.
- 6:28Speaker 2: It's kind of like firing a bullet into a pool
- 6:30Speaker 2: of water, right Like, if I fire a bullet through
- 6:33Speaker 2: the empty air, it just keeps going, it retains almost
- 6:36Speaker 2: all of its speed and trajectory. But if I fire
- 6:39Speaker 2: that same bullet into a dense swimming pool, the water
- 6:42Speaker 2: immediately pushes back on it. The bullet experience is massive drag.
- 6:46Speaker 2: It slows down dramatically, and it loses a ton of
- 6:49Speaker 2: its kinetic energy before.
- 6:50Speaker 4: It gets very far.
- 6:51Speaker 3: That illustrates the physical mechanism perfectly. In particle physics, that
- 6:55Speaker 3: pool of water is the microscopic droplet of quark gluon
- 6:58Speaker 3: plasma A. So if a collision is violent enough to
- 7:02Speaker 3: create a droplet of QGP, those fast, highly energetic particles
- 7:07Speaker 3: that are trying to spray outward suddenly find themselves having
- 7:10Speaker 3: to push their way through this incredibly dense, super hot
- 7:14Speaker 3: soup of free floating quirks and glue.
- 7:17Speaker 2: On, And just like the bullet hitting the water, they
- 7:19Speaker 2: experienced that massive drag.
- 7:21Speaker 3: They lose a tremendous amount of energy along the way.
- 7:23Speaker 3: Physicists actually call this specific phenomenon jet quenching. Jet quenching,
- 7:28Speaker 3: right There's a researcher, Jang Yongjia who specializes in this
- 7:32Speaker 3: exact phenomenon at Stonybrick University, and he points out that
- 7:36Speaker 3: observing this massive energy loss, this jet quenching, is the
- 7:40Speaker 3: absolute gold standard in the.
- 7:41Speaker 4: Field, really the gold standard.
- 7:43Speaker 3: Yeah, it's the definitive signature physicists used to prove that
- 7:46Speaker 3: a qgp droplet was present. When you measure the debris
- 7:49Speaker 3: and see that the fastest particles were suddenly slowed down
- 7:52Speaker 3: and sapped of their energy. You know with certainty they
- 7:55Speaker 3: had to travel through that dense primordial soup.
- 7:57Speaker 2: Okay, so that establishes the how we look for the
- 8:00Speaker 2: fast particles losing energy the jet quenching. But I want
- 8:03Speaker 2: to back up a second, because I know the Large
- 8:05Speaker 2: Hadron Collider has been operational for years. I mean, it's
- 8:08Speaker 2: femous for discovering the Higgs boson over a decade ago. Absolutely,
- 8:12Speaker 2: So haven't we been smashing particles and looking for this
- 8:15Speaker 2: soup for a long time? Why is doing it with
- 8:18Speaker 2: oxygen In twenty twenty five at five taro electron volts
- 8:22Speaker 2: such a revolutionary leap.
- 8:23Speaker 3: Well, it comes down to the sheer scale of the
- 8:26Speaker 3: collisions For many years, physicists have absolutely been creating quark
- 8:30Speaker 3: glue on plasma and observing this jet quenching effect, but
- 8:34Speaker 3: they were only able to achieve it by smashing together
- 8:37Speaker 3: the absolute behemoths of the periodic.
- 8:39Speaker 4: Table, the really heavy stuff.
- 8:40Speaker 3: Exactly. We are talking about massive, incredibly heavy nuclei, like
- 8:45Speaker 3: lead or gold.
- 8:45Speaker 2: The lead nucleus has what two hundred and eight protons
- 8:48Speaker 2: and neutrons packed into it, right.
- 8:49Speaker 4: Two eight.
- 8:50Speaker 3: So when you smash two heavy lead nuclei together at
- 8:53Speaker 3: ninety nine point nine percent the speed of light, you
- 8:57Speaker 3: have a massive amount of material involved. It is the
- 9:00Speaker 3: atomic equivalent of a head on collision between two fully
- 9:03Speaker 3: loaded freight trains.
- 9:04Speaker 4: Okay, that makes sense.
- 9:05Speaker 3: Tons of material, and because of that you create a
- 9:07Speaker 3: relatively large, long lasting droplet of plasma, which makes the
- 9:12Speaker 3: bullet in water effect the jet quenching very obvious and
- 9:15Speaker 3: easy to measure. But whenever physicists tried to look for
- 9:19Speaker 3: this exact effect in lower mass collisions, say smashing a
- 9:22Speaker 3: single tiny proton into a lead nucleus, they hit a wall.
- 9:26Speaker 4: They couldn't find it.
- 9:27Speaker 3: They might see vague hints of unusual fluid dynamics, but
- 9:30Speaker 3: they never saw clear convincing evidence that the particle jets
- 9:34Speaker 3: were being suppressed by a plasma.
- 9:35Speaker 2: I assume because there just wasn't enough material to make
- 9:38Speaker 2: a big enough pool of water to slow the bullet
- 9:40Speaker 2: down in.
- 9:40Speaker 4: The first place.
- 9:41Speaker 3: Exactly that was the widely held assumption in the community.
- 9:44Speaker 3: There seemed to be a strict size limit. You needed
- 9:47Speaker 3: a heavy freight train to generate the heat and density
- 9:49Speaker 3: required to melt the strong nuclear force. Which is why
- 9:52Speaker 3: the twenty twenty five cms experiment with oxygen is just
- 9:55Speaker 3: overturning decades of assumptions.
- 9:57Speaker 2: Because oxygen is vastly smaller than less. If lead has
- 10:01Speaker 2: two hundred eight nucleons, oxygen has just sixteen. It's a
- 10:04Speaker 2: tiny fraction of the mass it is.
- 10:06Speaker 3: Comparing a massive lead collision to an oxygen collision is
- 10:10Speaker 3: like comparing that catastrophic freight train crash to two small
- 10:13Speaker 3: compact cars bumping bumpers on the highway.
- 10:17Speaker 4: Wow.
- 10:17Speaker 3: And this brings us to the energy scale of the
- 10:19Speaker 3: twenty twenty five experiments, which run at five terra electron
- 10:23Speaker 3: vaults or TV.
- 10:24Speaker 2: Let's actually define that because five TV sounds impressive, but
- 10:28Speaker 2: what does that energy scale actually look like?
- 10:30Speaker 3: In the real world like practically sure, so, one tero
- 10:34Speaker 3: electron vault is roughly equivalent to the kinetic energy of
- 10:37Speaker 3: a flying mosquito. A mosquito, Okay, right, that might not
- 10:40Speaker 3: sound like a lot of energy to us, but imagine
- 10:42Speaker 3: taking the kinetic energy of five flying mosquitos and concentrating
- 10:46Speaker 3: all of it into a space a trillion times smaller
- 10:49Speaker 3: than a single grain of sand. That is horrifying action
- 10:52Speaker 3: an unbelievable density. That is the energy packed into a
- 10:55Speaker 3: single proton. So multiply that by the sixteen protons and
- 10:58Speaker 3: neutrons and the oxygen nucleus, and you have this unbelievably
- 11:01Speaker 3: concentrated point of energy upon impact.
- 11:04Speaker 2: Okay, here's where it gets really interesting, because despite how
- 11:07Speaker 2: incredibly tiny the oxygen nuclei are, data pouring out of
- 11:11Speaker 2: those five TV collisions in twenty twenty five revealed a massive,
- 11:15Speaker 2: undeniable reduction in the energy of the particles sprang out.
- 11:19Speaker 2: We are talking about a suppression reaching about thirty percent
- 11:22Speaker 2: at certain energy levels.
- 11:23Speaker 3: Yeah, the fast particles were losing nearly a third of
- 11:26Speaker 3: their energy. That's huge, it is the magnitude of that
- 11:29Speaker 3: drop is far beyond what could ever be explained by
- 11:32Speaker 3: a simple anomaly or a random statistical fluctuation in the detectors.
- 11:36Speaker 3: And what made the physicists truly take notice was the
- 11:39Speaker 3: shape of the data.
- 11:40Speaker 4: What do you mean by the shape?
- 11:41Speaker 3: The specific curve of how the energy was lost across
- 11:44Speaker 3: different trajectories and the tiny oxygen collisions. It matched the
- 11:47Speaker 3: pattern scene and the massive lead collisions perfectly. Oh wow,
- 11:51Speaker 3: The effect was weaker overall, simply because the droplet itself
- 11:54Speaker 3: is smaller, sure, but the underlying physics, the specific way
- 11:57Speaker 3: the jets were quenched looked identical to them massive heavy
- 12:00Speaker 3: ion crashes.
- 12:02Speaker 2: So even though oxygen only has sixteen protons and neutrons,
- 12:05Speaker 2: it still manages to create a dense enough medium to
- 12:08Speaker 2: absorb a massive chunk of that energy.
- 12:10Speaker 3: Exactly.
- 12:11Speaker 2: It proves that the primordial soup doesn't need a heavy
- 12:14Speaker 2: massive collision to form. You don't need the freight trains.
- 12:17Speaker 2: It can happen in these incredibly light, tiny subatomic systems.
- 12:20Speaker 3: It radically rewrites our understanding of the minimum threshold required
- 12:24Speaker 3: to melt the strong nuclear force. We now know that
- 12:27Speaker 3: quark luon plasma can form in microscopic droplets vastly smaller
- 12:32Speaker 3: and faster than anyone in the physics community previously thought possible.
- 12:35Speaker 2: Hold on, though, I got to play Devil's advocate here. Yeah,
- 12:38Speaker 2: a thirty percent drop is massive. Yes, but we're talking
- 12:40Speaker 2: about quantum physics here, and quantum mechanics is notoriously weird
- 12:44Speaker 2: and unpredictable. Couldn't that massive energy loss just be like
- 12:48Speaker 2: a glitch in how the oxygen atom was structured before
- 12:51Speaker 2: it even crashed?
- 12:52Speaker 4: Like, are we entirely sure?
- 12:53Speaker 2: It's plasma drag?
- 12:54Speaker 3: And this is exactly why the scientific method demands rigorous skepticism.
- 13:00Speaker 3: Never jump to the final conclusion until you have methodically
- 13:03Speaker 3: eliminated absolutely every other possibility. And to their credit, the
- 13:07Speaker 3: researchers publishing this data are fully acknowledging a very significant
- 13:11Speaker 3: quantum caveat. There is an alternative explanation for a large
- 13:16Speaker 3: portion of that thirty percent drop.
- 13:17Speaker 2: Wait, really, what could mimic a plasma drag so perfectly?
- 13:21Speaker 3: It has to do with something physicists call nuclear parton
- 13:24Speaker 3: distribution functions or npdfs for short.
- 13:27Speaker 2: Okay, let's break that down. Partons are just the collective
- 13:30Speaker 2: term for the quarks and the gluons, right, the inmates
- 13:33Speaker 2: in the chains.
- 13:33Speaker 3: Correct, But those quarks and gluons inside an oxygen nucleus
- 13:37Speaker 3: are not static because of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The
- 13:41Speaker 3: inside of a nucleus is a boiling, chaotic sea of
- 13:44Speaker 3: virtual particles. The quarks and gluons are constantly moving, shifting,
- 13:48Speaker 3: and interacting in incredibly complex ways.
- 13:50Speaker 4: So it's not a neat little package.
- 13:53Speaker 3: Not at all. A nuclear parton distribution function is essentially
- 13:57Speaker 3: a mathematical probability map. It maps out out how all
- 14:00Speaker 3: those quarks and gluons are arranged and moving inside the nucleus,
- 14:05Speaker 3: right in the mirror at a seconds before the collision happens.
- 14:08Speaker 2: Oh, I get it. That's like knowing the exact seating
- 14:11Speaker 2: arrangement of passengers on an airplane right before a crash. Like,
- 14:14Speaker 2: if all the passengers are seated on the left side
- 14:16Speaker 2: of the plane, the structural damage during impact is going
- 14:19Speaker 2: to look completely different than if they were evenly spread out.
- 14:23Speaker 3: That analogy gets right to the core of the causality here.
- 14:26Speaker 3: Let's extend that seating arrangement idea to explain the physics
- 14:29Speaker 3: of what we call shadowing.
- 14:31Speaker 4: Shadowing.
- 14:31Speaker 3: Yeah, when you pack sixteen protons and neutrons together, into
- 14:35Speaker 3: an oxygen nucleus, they start to crowd each other. The
- 14:38Speaker 3: way the quarks are distributed inside a single, lonely proton
- 14:41Speaker 3: is slightly different than how they are distributed when they
- 14:44Speaker 3: are crammed together inside oxygen. Sometimes, in that boiling sea
- 14:47Speaker 3: of particles, the quarks line up in a way where
- 14:50Speaker 3: the ones in the front literally shield or shadow the
- 14:53Speaker 3: ones in the back.
- 14:54Speaker 2: Ah, So when the two oxygen nuclei smash into each other,
- 14:58Speaker 2: the incoming particles only hit the quarks in the front row.
- 15:02Speaker 2: The quarks in the back are basically protected by the ones.
- 15:05Speaker 4: In front of them.
- 15:05Speaker 3: Exactly because of that shadowing. The total number of hard
- 15:09Speaker 3: head on impacts is reduced. And remember it is those
- 15:13Speaker 3: hard head on impacts that create the high energy particles
- 15:16Speaker 3: the bullets in the first place.
- 15:18Speaker 1: Right.
- 15:18Speaker 3: Depending on exactly how the quarks were arranged right at
- 15:22Speaker 3: the moment of impact, it can actually change the total
- 15:24Speaker 3: number of high energy jets that get produced.
- 15:27Speaker 2: So the data might be tricking us. It might not
- 15:29Speaker 2: be that a bunch of particles are getting created and
- 15:31Speaker 2: then slowed down by a pool of plasma. It might
- 15:34Speaker 2: be that fewer high energy particles are being created to
- 15:37Speaker 2: begin with. Simply because of how the quarks were shadowing
- 15:39Speaker 2: each other before they even hit.
- 15:41Speaker 3: You nailed it. Researchers diving into the math of these
- 15:44Speaker 3: nuclear part and distribution functions estimate that the sheer quantum
- 15:48Speaker 3: randomness of how the quarks and gluons were arranged could
- 15:51Speaker 3: potentially account for up to half of that thirty percent
- 15:54Speaker 3: energy loss all on its own.
- 15:56Speaker 2: Up to half, So it could be a fifteen percent
- 15:58Speaker 2: drop caused by the actual plasma drag and a fifteen
- 16:01Speaker 2: percent drop caused by the initial seating arrangement preventing the
- 16:05Speaker 2: particles from forming in the first place.
- 16:07Speaker 3: Right, Well, what's fascinating here is that this uncertainty isn't
- 16:10Speaker 3: seen as a failure of the CMS experiment.
- 16:13Speaker 4: It's not.
- 16:13Speaker 3: No, it doesn't mean the quark gluon plasma isn't there
- 16:16Speaker 3: in the oxygen collisions. It just means the signal of
- 16:19Speaker 3: the plasma is entangled with the initial state of the nucleus.
- 16:23Speaker 3: Identifying exactly what you don't know and defining the boundaries
- 16:26Speaker 3: of that uncertainty is the most crucial step in quantum physics.
- 16:31Speaker 3: This caveat provides the perfect roadmap for exactly what scientists
- 16:34Speaker 3: need to do next to isolate the plasma signal completely.
- 16:37Speaker 2: Okay, but if we know the seating arrangement of the
- 16:40Speaker 2: quarks is muddying the data by up to fifteen percent,
- 16:43Speaker 2: how on earth do you isolate that? Do you just
- 16:45Speaker 2: have to run the collision with a simpler atom.
- 16:48Speaker 3: That is exactly the next phase of the research. The
- 16:51Speaker 3: immediate next steps involve changing the variables of the crash.
- 16:55Speaker 3: The Large Hadron Collider has upcoming operational runs plan where
- 16:59Speaker 3: they won't just smash to complex oxygen nuclei together. Instead,
- 17:03Speaker 3: they are going to collide a single solitary proton into
- 17:07Speaker 3: an oxygen nucleus.
- 17:08Speaker 4: So you take the.
- 17:09Speaker 2: Simplest possible projectile, just one single proton, and fire it
- 17:13Speaker 2: into the complex oxygen nucleus.
- 17:15Speaker 3: Yep, a proton oxygen collision doesn't have nearly enough mass
- 17:19Speaker 3: or energy to create a meaningful amount of quirk gluon plasma.
- 17:23Speaker 3: The droplet, if it forms at all, would be too
- 17:25Speaker 3: negligible to cause any jet quenching. Okay, So if we
- 17:29Speaker 3: measure the high energy particles from that specific collision, any
- 17:32Speaker 3: strange energy suppression we see will be purely due to
- 17:35Speaker 3: those part and distribution functions. The initial seating arrangement and
- 17:38Speaker 3: shadowing of the oxygen quarks.
- 17:39Speaker 4: You're establishing a clean baseline exactly.
- 17:42Speaker 3: Once physicists measure exactly how much of the energy loss
- 17:45Speaker 3: is caused by the initial state of the oxygen, they
- 17:47Speaker 3: can take that number and simply subtract it from the
- 17:50Speaker 3: thirty percent total suppression they saw in the oxygen oxygen collisions.
- 17:54Speaker 4: That is brilliant.
- 17:55Speaker 3: Whatever suppression is left over after that math is done,
- 17:58Speaker 3: is your definitive under deniable proof of the quark gluon
- 18:02Speaker 3: plasma droplet causing drag.
- 18:05Speaker 2: It's like doing the math to subtract the weight of
- 18:07Speaker 2: the glass bowl so you know exactly how much the
- 18:10Speaker 2: flower inside it weighs.
- 18:11Speaker 3: It is the exact same principle, just applied it at
- 18:13Speaker 3: nearly the speed of light and beyond these proton oxygen collisions.
- 18:16Speaker 3: Researchers also plan to test other light nuclei across the
- 18:20Speaker 3: periodic table, like neon.
- 18:22Speaker 4: Neon's just a bit heavier right.
- 18:23Speaker 3: Right, Neon is slightly heavier than oxygen with twenty nucleons.
- 18:27Speaker 3: By comparing the proton baselines with oxygen, the neon, and
- 18:30Speaker 3: then all the way up to lead, they can map
- 18:32Speaker 3: out a continuous, unbroken curve of exactly how the properties
- 18:36Speaker 3: of this primordial soup scale as you slowly increase the
- 18:39Speaker 3: size of the colliding system.
- 18:41Speaker 2: That's incredible. So to wrap this up, what does this
- 18:43Speaker 2: all mean for the person listening right now? If we
- 18:45Speaker 2: connect this highly complex particle physics to the bigger picture.
- 18:49Speaker 2: Why does a tiny split second droplet of plasma in
- 18:52Speaker 2: an underground tunnel in Switzerland actually matter?
- 18:55Speaker 3: Well, it matters because this is the mechanics of our
- 18:57Speaker 3: very existence.
- 18:58Speaker 4: Wow, okay, big it is.
- 19:01Speaker 3: The strong nuclear force is the reason atoms can form.
- 19:05Speaker 3: It is the reason complex chemistry is possible, which means
- 19:09Speaker 3: it is the reason you exist. But for decades, human
- 19:12Speaker 3: beings have only truly understood how that force operates in
- 19:16Speaker 3: the cold, calm, structured conditions of our current universe.
- 19:19Speaker 4: Right the everyday stuff.
- 19:21Speaker 3: By studying these tiny droplets of cork gluon plasma, we
- 19:25Speaker 3: are finally seeing how the strong force behaves under the
- 19:28Speaker 3: most extreme, violent conditions known in nature. We are looking
- 19:32Speaker 3: directly into the engine of the early universe. You know,
- 19:35Speaker 3: we're discovering how matter itself evolved from a chaotic, super
- 19:38Speaker 3: hot soup into the structured, stable, atoms that make up
- 19:42Speaker 3: our entire reality.
- 19:43Speaker 2: We're figuring out the exact threshold where the primordial universe
- 19:47Speaker 2: crystallizes into the modern world, And honestly, the incredible part
- 19:50Speaker 2: is realizing that this violent, chaotic origin isn't just trapped
- 19:54Speaker 2: thirteen point eight billion years in the past. It's locked
- 19:57Speaker 2: inside the very oxygen molecules we breathe every single day,
- 20:00Speaker 2: just waiting for enough energy to be unleashed again.
- 20:02Speaker 3: It's a beautiful way to think about it. The blueprint
- 20:04Speaker 3: of the Big Bang is hidden in the simplest elements
- 20:07Speaker 3: all around us.
- 20:08Speaker 2: Just remember that the next time you take a deep breath,
- 20:11Speaker 2: you're inhaling the potential for a billion tiny big bangs.