Everything You Know About the McDonald's Coffee Lawsuit is WRONG | Dr. Lawyer Breakdown Ep. 8
Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!
For decades, the McDonald’s hot coffee lawsuit has been treated as proof that people can sue over anything. But the actual facts of Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants tell a very different story.
Bradford Keaty and Dr. Joseph Ramos revisit the case that changed how Dr. Ramos viewed attorneys. They discuss Stella Liebeck’s third-degree burns, the hundreds of prior burn complaints, why McDonald’s served its coffee at approximately 180 to 190 degrees, how comparative fault affected the…
The skinny
The skinny isn't ready yet — notes appear once the transcript is processed.