Latest / Man in America Podcast / RED ALERT: Miscarriages & Infertility Are SKYROCKETING—OBGYN Warns of Population Collapse

Transcript

RED ALERT: Miscarriages & Infertility Are SKYROCKETING—OBGYN Warns of Population Collapse · Man in America Podcast

• 0:14
  Seth Holehouse: Welcome to Man in America, a voice of reason in a world gone mad. I'm your host, Seth Holehouse. Well, first off, as you can tell, my voice is still on its way coming back. So it'll be a little bit scratchy, but anyway, just par for the course, I guess. So today's topic is a more serious one.
• 0:35
  Obviously, I've covered and so if you're new to the show, maybe you'll just you'll be seeing this, but if you're not, you know this very well that one of the big topics I've focused on has been the COVID injection. And and beyond that, the overall pandemic, the, you know, the psychological operation, the fear campaign, everything surrounding COVID, getting into the origins of it and everything. But the side effects in what's happening now because of the injection has been very near and dear to me. One is because I've been covering this really since day one, interviewing, you know, brave doctors and scientists about what's happening, what they expected to happen. But also, I've I've had tons of family members that have either died, like, suddenly, you know, died from massive heart attack to having strokes, to cancer, to all kinds of things.
• 1:25
  I mean, so I've personally seen just how much havoc this this injection has been wreaking upon our society. And so joining me today is a wonderful woman whose name is doctor Kimberly Biss. Now she is an OB GYN. She's been delivering babies for for decades upon decades. And what she's here to share with us is pretty shocking information, especially about the miscarriage rate that she had seen, and she is still seeing things are leveling off a little bit, but within her own practice, where in some instances, the data was showing almost an eight hundred percent increase in miscarriage rate.
• 2:05
  So we're gonna be diving into a lot of specifics, and some research and data, and some slides that she has. But the the purpose of of continuing to have these discussions is that the even though, you know, the COVID and the vaccine was was was a really big story that of the past couple of years, and now the news cycle is shifting and everything, Like, this is something that still is affecting a lot of Americans and a lot of people around the world. Like, right now, it's not going away. We're not seeing cancer drop off. We're not seeing, you know, miscarriage and newborn, you know, new rates of miscarriages or stillbirths or all those things.
• 2:43
  It's like, oh, everything's back to normal now. It's it's not the case at all. So it's really important we continue to have these discussions that we continue to chronicle what really happened, because I would love to see at some point some sort of justice that happens. I really believe that what we witnessed with with the vaccine rollout and everything, it wasn't just an accident. It wasn't a rush product, and there's some sort of criminal intent here that needs to be uncovered and prosecuted.
• 3:10
  And so, anyway, let's go ahead and just dive right in this interview. It's gonna be a fascinating one, and I hope that you I would enjoy, but it's not an enjoyable subject. But I hope you learn from this. And if you do, I'd love if you could share this with one of your friends. That'd be fantastic.
• 3:26
  Alright. Thank you, and enjoy the interview. Doctor Kimberly Biss, it is an honor to have you on the show. Thank you very much for joining us today.
• 3:36
  Kimberly Biss: Thank you for having me.
• 3:37
  Seth Holehouse: Absolutely. So you are one of the brave doctors, and I've got a there's a couple categories of brave doctors in my mind. You're one of the ones that saw something happening in your own practice that didn't make sense and was not good. And you took that data, and you took it to as many people as possible to try to, you know, sound the alarm of saying, look, something is going seriously wrong as it relates especially to your focus, which is birth. Right?
• 4:11
  You're an OB GYN. You you run you have your own office. So why don't you just start let's give us just a quick background of yourself, and then let's walk through those early stages of when that first red flag started, you know, kind of shaking in your mind.
• 4:27
  Kimberly Biss: Sure. So I am a board certified obstetrician gynecologist. I did all of my schooling up in the Northeast, went to medical school Boston, and then decided I didn't want to live in winter anymore, so came south, did a surgical internship at Emory in Atlanta, and then came further south to the Tampa Bay area here in Florida and did my obstetrics and gynecology residency. I completed residency in 'ninety eight and I've been in private practice ever since. And we were always taught in OBGYN to not give a pregnant woman anything fresh out of the gate because we have two patients there.
• 5:06
  We have mom and the baby, and you want to be sure the baby's not harmed and you know once born reaches all the milestones, etc. So I couldn't even fathom the concept that we were going to give the messenger RNA injections called vaccines to pregnant women. And I did start tracking data once the vaccines were rolled out and specifically honed in on my miscarriage rates, but I also noticed some other things go awry with not only our obstetric patients, but our gynecology patients as well.
• 5:41
  Seth Holehouse: So you're watching these miscarriage rates. And if I remember correctly, you know, your office, you you might deliver what, you know, two fifty to three hundred babies per year. Is that a typical year for you?
• 5:56
  Kimberly Biss: Correct. Correct.
• 5:58
  Seth Holehouse: And I was gonna say, so prior to to COVID, what was your what was a normal miscarriage rate? And and what what classifies a miscarriage versus a stillbirth? Is it the is that it's that twenty week cutoff. Is that correct?
• 6:12
  Kimberly Biss: Correct. So a fetal loss prior to twenty weeks is a still is a miscarriage. Twenty weeks and further would be classified as a stillbirth. And most miscarriages occur in the first trimester, which is from, you know, conception up till about thirteen weeks of gestation. The normal miscarriage rate that we were always taught was about thirteen to fifteen percent, although clinically I've never seen it that high.
• 6:42
  And actually an article came out in 2022 by a Mr. Nairt et al. That showed the actual miscarriage rate is about four to six percent. In 2020, when the pandemic was declared, I will tell you we had a normal miscarriage rate from month to month. It was four percent, and we had the highest number of deliveries that year to date, wink wink, probably because of the lockdowns.
• 7:10
  We had a lot of what we call Brona babies in the fall that year. And we had the most, the highest rate of newly entering first trimester pregnant women into the practice in 2020. All those numbers changed pretty dramatically in 2021 after the injection started.
• 7:32
  Seth Holehouse: And so I know we've got a presentation from you, so do you have any particular slides that we pull up and you can start getting into this, the overall story of the data and what you're seeing?
• 7:42
  Kimberly Biss: Yeah. So what we could do is, if you wanna go to slide number, 28, That is actually my data that I presented to Marjorie Taylor Greene and other representatives of Congress. Maybe I don't have it numbered correctly. Go up. Keep going.
• 8:10
  Keep going. It's gonna be orange and blue bars. You'll see it keep going.
• 8:21
  Seth Holehouse: Let's go back. So I think I is it right here?
• 8:23
  Kimberly Biss: That's it.
• 8:23
  Seth Holehouse: Okay.
• 8:24
  Kimberly Biss: Yeah. Yeah. So this was data that I had collected from January of twenty twenty, and it ended in February. And I sent the data to Jessica Rose who published it in her Substack in November of that year, and I highly encourage our audience to follow her, not only on Twitter, but go on her Substack because she has a lot of articles, a lot of graphs, easy to read. But she took my data and the graph that's here, the blue bars represent the newly entering first trimester pregnant women into practice.
• 9:02
  And in 2020 we had the highest number to date of newly entering pregnant women, which is a reflection of perhaps miscarrying prior to making the appointment or possibly infertility which I did see increase after the injections were rolled out. We had women we had delivered previously had no issues getting pregnant and then they needed to pursue in vitro fertilization in order to conceive a pregnancy. The orange bars represent the miscarriage rates. So in 2020, as I'd already mentioned, we had a normal month to month average rate of four percent of miscarriage. Then in 2021, it had gone up by one hundred percent with the average month to month being eight percent.
• 9:52
  I will tell you in November of that year, we had a peak rate of miscarriage which incidentally followed the booster injection. In 2022, it doubled again to fifteen to sixteen percent. Now that was up till November 2022. Jessica didn't have my data after that. In December of that year, we had a twenty seven percent miscarriage rate.
• 10:19
  And then in January and February of twenty twenty three, the miscarriage rate went as high as thirty percent. Now I've never seen that prior to these injections. What was concerning is I also tracked the number of patients in my obstetric practice that received the injections. So sixty five percent of my population received the injections. Bainly had three total injections, very few had four or more, so that would mean the majority of the injections occurred in 2021.
• 10:55
  '80 percent of those were Pfizer, the remainder were Moderna, and I had a handful of J and J injections. So the concern is the injections occurred in 2021, however we were still seeing an increase in the miscarriage rates going into 2022 and in the early portion of twenty twenty three and they didn't normalize back down again until the summer of twenty twenty three, and they've remained at the normal rates ever since. Probably because very few women are getting these injections any more. This which is why most stopped at three. So
• 11:34
  Seth Holehouse: So you went from seeing roughly an average of a four percent miscarriage rate to seeing upwards of a thirty percent miscarriage rate.
• 11:48
  Kimberly Biss: Correct.
• 11:49
  Seth Holehouse: So, I mean, I'm not I'm not a statistician, but that's, you know, almost an 800% increase if I'm not mistaken. Right?
• 11:58
  Kimberly Biss: Yeah. Well, it definitely went up a hundred percent year to year and then even more so, in those, you know, the the latter three month the, you know, the three months after my data had stopped for Jessica. So, you know, it's concerning because why was it still occurring? Women weren't even getting these injections anymore. My goodness.
• 12:19
  Is is lingering, let's say.
• 12:24
  Seth Holehouse: Gosh. And so, know, Anna, how long have you been delivering babies and working in this? You know, you're not new at this. Right? You've got some history with this.
• 12:34
  Kimberly Biss: Right. So if you include my residency training, I delivered babies for thirty years and probably took care of 8,000 pregnant women in that time that spanned, you know, various demographics, health, comorbidities, and ethnicities. So I had a, you know, a very well rounded group of patients. I didn't have just a select, you know, very healthy certain age group of people. And, you know, I never saw miscarriage rates that high and never saw the problems with fertility and other issues with pregnancy.
• 13:09
  I mean, you know, they had, you know, I don't want say threatened, but they put a lot of fear into pregnant women in 2020 stating if you got COVID, you would be at increased risk for early labor, you know, preeclampsia, other problems with pregnancy, but in all actuality, those rates remained the same as prior to 2020 in my practice. We didn't see issues increase with frequency until after 2021. Preeclampsia, which is high blood pressure in pregnancy, went through the roof. So didn't low amniotic fluid levels around the babies, which both of those problems are issues with poor placental function. If you follow Doctor.
• 13:57
  James Thorpe, he's got plenty of pictures of abnormal placentas with, you know, multiple calcified areas and other, you know, findings in the placentas. And we know now, you know, this was supposed to stay in everybody's arm, but we know now that all these components of the vaccines go to the babies. You know, we knew that the spike protein, of course, was going to travel to the baby, But we now have literature showing vaccine RNA in umbilical cords and placentas, which means it's going to the babies. And there's a recent trial that was just published with fetal mice where they injected the moms and then they measured the messenger RNA spike protein, I believe, and antibodies in the fetuses. And it was very quick.
• 14:51
  I mean, and it was also dose dependent. The more you gave to the mamas, the more of a response there was in the fetal end. So this all goes into the baby. The baby mice were producing spike protein and their own antibodies. So it's concerning because this lipid nanotechnology, if we want to go to the way back machine and remember how these were formulated, so you have a strand of modified RNA that's packaged in a fatty envelope which are lipid nanoparticles.
• 15:22
  The lipid nanoparticles are what attach to your cell wall and deliver what's inside of that package into the cell. Well lipid nanotechnology was made to cross barriers, specifically blood brain barrier to get chemotherapeutics into the brain. So if we know all these components are going to the babies, what does this mean for our babies brains? I mean, it's very concerning. The other thing is these lipid nanoparticles go to all endocrine glands because endocrine organs use cholesterol to make your hormones.
• 15:58
  Cholesterol is a fat. They're called lipophilic, meaning they like fat. And the original Pfizer rat distribution studies showed these lipid nanoparticles concentrated very highly in the rat ovaries and also in the male rat testes. So if all of this is going to the babies and you have a female fetus developing in the mom, where all of her eggs are made that she will ever have by twenty two weeks of gestation in the ovaries, they don't regenerate like men regenerate sperm, What does that mean for these babies moving forward? Are they going to even go through puberty?
• 16:39
  Are they going to have enough eggs to have babies? These are things we don't know, of course, because these were rushed out and the globe was the experiment. So, you know, we are seeing definitely fertility issues worldwide. There are some countries now where their death rates have exceeded their birth rates. And, you know, that's depopulation.
• 17:04
  Seth Holehouse: I mean, it it is. As much as people might wanna skirt around the issue, it is literally a reduction, a d of the population. Right? And so, gosh, there's there's just so much to unpack here. Amir, I because I've even heard recently how they're finding in utero that these fetuses are developing cancer.
• 17:27
  Like this is one of the other things I'm seeing is that, you know, they haven't come across this ship, but they're finding these fetuses are developing cancer, which again, if you look at a lot of the the cancer, and the the turbo cancers they're finding now, It just it's just crazy to think that this is happening, and that so many women were were duped into this. And now in addition to just the miscarriages, right, which now I think we've established is that is a loss of the baby up to twenty weeks. So you've got miscarriages, you've got infertility, and you've got stillborns, if if I'm, you know, correct. Right? And then kind of the main categories.
• 18:05
  Did you did you see any shift in the stillborns? Anything in the loss of the life of the baby after twenty weeks?
• 18:13
  Kimberly Biss: So fortunately in my area, we did not have an increase in the stillbirth rate. I actually had analytics run on our labor and delivery ward for a three year period of time. And the stillbirth rate remained constant, didn't increase. We had in a three year period of time starting from 2020, we had one stillbirth. Sorry, we had two stillbirths.
• 18:41
  One was probably directly linked to receiving the vaccine because she had received a booster and then two weeks later she had a twenty six week fetal demise and there was a huge clot in the umbilical cord. So I would think it was probably due to the injection. Doctor. Thorpe does definitely have stillbirth data and there are certain parts of our country, Canada, I believe Scotland had a huge increase in the stillbirth rates and that may be related to lot numbers of the vaccines because we know in the vaccine injured communities, the most injured people pretty much received the same lot numbers to either the Moderna or the Pfizer injections.
• 19:30
  Seth Holehouse: I mean, it's just crazy looking around because even within my own family, and I'm talking just direct family or step family, aunts and uncles and cousins, which is, you know, is not a huge fan, but I've we've had two sudden deaths, you know, three probably two or three different heart attack issues, you know, breast cancer in a 40, you know, a woman in forties. I mean, it just like, it goes nonstop. It feels like probably more than half of my family have had pretty serious medical issues all within the past two years. And I'm just one, you know, sampling of this, but it it's just it's mind blowing to just try to wrap your head around this. And but so one other one or not one other one additional question I have is with women's menstruation.
• 20:24
  Right? So I've got another friend that is in her mid thirties, and she got a couple of the boosters, and now is dealing with bleeding almost, you know, like, not just on her her time of her period, but you know, having heavy bleeding at other times, low iron from blood loss. I mean, you know, very, very intense cramping and everything during the periods. So what else are you seeing in terms of just, you know, women's, I guess, reproductive health?
• 20:56
  Kimberly Biss: Yeah. The menstrual periods definitely were affected not only with the injections, but actually with women who got the infection because it's probably somehow related to spike. You know, very early on, Doctor. Bakhti in Europe was concerned with these injections because the spike protein is very similar to a protein that is in the embryo layer as it's traveling down the fallopian tube to implant in the uterine wall. That layer is called the syncytiotrophoblasts.
• 21:31
  And he was very concerned from the get go that the whole way these injections are designed is that you're gonna make antibodies to the spike protein. So perhaps you could then make antibodies to that layer. So that could be one reason why we're seeing an increase in the miscarriages. But with regards to the menstrual issues, I mean, there were a lot of women complaining of that right off the bat and of course they were all, you know, gaslit and it was poo pooed and not a problem and what's the issue if you have a bad period? Well, that's how women work, right?
• 22:05
  I mean, we have a menstrual cycle. If that is affected, then why would it be any surprise that we would see issues with miscarriages and then with pregnancies? But I will tell you, not only is the bleeding problem an issue, I've noticed and some of my colleagues have as well, women who had endometriosis, that condition seemed to have been exacerbated after these injections. Fibroids, not only were stimulated to grow, but I've had patients that had no fibroids and then all of a sudden within a year's time, now they have a nine centimeter fibroid that came out of nowhere. Breast cancer rates, yes, have increased.
• 22:49
  My local breast cancer surgeon has noticed a thirty percent increase in breast cancer rates in women 50, and a lot more are presenting with bilateral breast cancer, which is not common to have a tumor in each breast at the time of diagnosis. I've had a few patients that have had breast cancer either newly diagnosed or had been in remission for many, many years, and now they have a recurrence. I had one lady, she received two Pfizer injections after I told her not to get them. And she was diagnosed with bilateral breast cancer. She went to our local cancer center here in Moffett in Tampa which encouraged the booster vaccines by the way.
• 23:39
  So she's probably had five injections up to this point. I saw her a year ago for her annual exam. Months prior to that visit she had had a craniotomy for a brain tumor which they didn't suspect was going to be a recurrent breast cancer but the pathology came back breast cancer, which is not a common place for breast cancer to metastasize. She said her oncologist couldn't believe it. I said, well, I'll tell you why it's in your brain because these things go to your brain.
• 24:13
  Seth Holehouse: It's it's absolutely it's it's just it's just crazy. And so
• 24:17
  Kimberly Biss: It's sad.
• 24:18
  Seth Holehouse: I mean, it really is. Like, that's the thing is because these are these are people that oftentimes were just trying to do the right thing. Mhmm. They're either trying to protect their baby or protect their family or their their grandparents, or just do, you know, the right thing as per what the authorities are telling you to do, which now I, you know, I I have always been very rebellious. So if the authorities say Seth, sit down in your chair, they turn around, I'm standing on my chair.
• 24:46
  Right? Just how I've always been. Mhmm. But for a lot of people though, they they they're they're listening to what the doctor's saying, and what the medical journals are saying. And so wasn't it that there is one particular study published, I forget which medical journal it was, a prominent medical journal, which was one of the benchmark studies and saying, look, this is safe for pregnant women, but that study was completely full of holes.
• 25:10
  Were you familiar with that study?
• 25:13
  Kimberly Biss: Yeah. So I actually have a couple slides that show how these vaccines were rolled out to pregnant women, which I think your audience would be pretty, it's way in the beginning, pretty surprised at how they came up with the safe and effective mantra in pregnant women. So this is go back. You went too far. Keep going.
• 25:40
  That one. No, go back up one. Yeah. So the way our, the Pfizer trial is what determined the emergency use authorization being granted to the injections. And this trial was completed in December of twenty twenty and that's when when Tony Fauci got up on stage and said, Oh goody, we have a vaccine, it's ninety five percent effective.
• 26:07
  Which he was quoting the wrong statistic. He was quoting the relative risk reduction, which is basically what happens to the numbers in a study, but that doesn't apply clinically. What you wanna tell the audience is the absolute risk reduction, meaning doctor, if I get this injection, how much am I reducing my chance of getting COVID infection? And serious COVID infection was reduced by 0.037. Minor symptoms, stuffy nose, sore throat, etc, not even a percent were you reducing your risk.
• 26:47
  It was zero point eight four percent. So right away, the public, the media, etcetera was misled thinking ninety five percent effective, the lay person's gonna think, well that means I only have five percent chance of getting sick if I get these injections. So these were rolled out in the December. The first group of people, if you go to the next slide, the first group of people to receive these injections were the first responders. And again, it's not because anybody cares about first responders, but if a doctor or a nurse receives an injection, then the lay public will soon follow.
• 27:27
  There's a lot of psychology behind all of this. Well, some of those first responders were women, of course. So the aftermarket data that Pfizer was mandated to publish at the February, although the public didn't have access to that until the subsequent year, and Naomi Wolf and her colleagues did a lot of work on dissecting that information. But the after market data came out showing the numbers I have highlighted there. Now in the original Pfizer trials, you were not allowed to get pregnant.
• 28:03
  Men were told to abstain from sex, but if you have sex, wear two condoms and be sure your partner is on a good form of birth control. So clearly, they knew something could be transmitted to the woman and they didn't want any pregnancies and I'm sure there were accidental pregnancies in the trials. However, I don't have that information. But the aftermarket data showed two seventy women were pregnant when they either received the injections or shortly after. And you would have thought they would have been white on rice following up on all those pregnancies, however they only followed up on thirty two.
• 28:38
  And twenty six out of those miscarried which is an eighty one percent miscarriage rate. Now the public didn't have that information however, Rochelle Walensky did who was the CDC director at the time. And in April of that year, she did an audio recording for the New England Journal of Medicine website with Doctor. Rubin who at the time was the editor in chief of the journal. And she stated during that interview that these injections were safe and effective in pregnant women.
• 29:08
  Now how is she making that statement? Because we had no trial data showing that and if anything we had negative data from the aftermarket information which she knew. Now we've also subsequently found out that same month Maggie Thorpe who's an attorney, Doctor. Jim Thorpe's wife, submitted a FOIA and found out that HHS had been funneling money to a trust out of which various entities were receiving money such as the sports teams, the media, Hollywood, etcetera, all the three and four letter medical associations like our boards and ACOG. ACOG received somewhere range of 11 to $13,000,000 to market these injections to women.
• 29:56
  Now here's the psychology again. Why are we going to market these to women? Because who makes the decisions with regards to health care in the average family? It's the woman. The other thing is just like the health care people getting jabbed, if a pregnant woman who won't eat tuna fish, take an aspirin, or dye her hair takes an injection, everybody on the planet is going to go and get these.
• 30:21
  So this was heavily marketed to women. Now in June of twenty twenty one is what you referenced earlier with regards to the Tom Shimabukuro article that came out stating that these were safe and effective in pregnancy because the miscarriage was normal at thirteen percent, which I've already discussed that's not a normal rate. The normal rate's five to six percent. And they did the wrong math because they took eight hundred and twenty pregnant women that were in first, second, and third trimesters and used that number as the denominator.
• 31:01
  Seth Holehouse: Gold has surged 46% in less than a year, doubling the gains of the Nasdaq and the S and P five hundred. But this isn't just another rally. Global reserves are shifting, exposing cracks in the monetary system. Investors are losing confidence in paper gold and demanding physical metal, creating a massive gap between gold owed and gold available. But this isn't about how institutions broke another system.
• 31:29
  It's about how you can profit from it. Right now, Noble Gold Investments has a limited supply of investment grade gold bars and coins available. As banks scramble to fulfill their obligations, pushing gold prices is higher, you can profit. Smart investors are already moving into physical gold. Noble Gold Investments makes it easy for you to do the same.
• 31:52
  And right now, when you make a qualified investment, Noble Gold will add a free tenth ounce gold coin to your order. Don't wait until it's too late. Visit goldwithSeth.com or call (626) 654-1906 now and turn their panic into your profit. Again, that's goldwithseth.com or (626) 654-1906. You'll find that information in the description for the show as well.
• 32:22
  Kimberly Biss: Maggie Thorpe, who's an attorney, doctor Jim Thorpe's wife, submitted a FOIA and found out that HHS had been funneling money to a trust out of which various entities were receiving money such as the sports teams, the media, Hollywood, etcetera, All the three and four letter medical associations like our boards and ACOG. ACOG receives somewhere in the range of 11 to $13,000,000 to market these injections to women. Now here's the psychology again. Why are we going to market these to women? Because who makes the decisions with regards to healthcare in the average family?
• 33:04
  It's the woman. The other thing is just like the healthcare people getting jabbed, if a pregnant woman who won't eat tuna fish, take an aspirin, or dye her hair takes an injection, everybody on the planet's gonna go and get these. So this was heavily marketed to women. Now in June of twenty twenty one is what you referenced earlier with regards to the Tom Shimabukuro article that came out stating that these were safe and effective in pregnancy because the misc arriage was normal at thirteen percent, which I've already discussed that's not a normal rate. The normal rate's five to six percent.
• 33:43
  And they did the wrong math because they took eight twenty pregnant women that were in first, second, and third trimesters and used that number as the denominator. They also didn't use the correct numerator. So when you actually read the article critically and use the correct numbers, the miscarriage rate was similar to the aftermarket data was eighty two percent. A letter was sent to the editor and published in the journal. However, that article has not been retracted.
• 34:19
  You can still open that article up today. Well sadly that article was used the following month in July for both ACOG and the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, which is the High Risk Obstetrician Society, to now state these are safe, we need to inject all our pregnant women or women thinking of getting pregnant or breastfeeding. And if you go on to the ACOG website today, that is still the guidance. And even in Comer Natti's package insert which you know that became FDA approved which was a lot of word salad too because that product was not what was given to the public in our country. The EUA version of all these vaccines are what was provided because there's no liability to Pfizer or Moderna with the EUA product.
• 35:12
  If anybody receives Commodity and has an adverse event, Pfizer's on the hook for that. So nobody received that in our country, but in any event in their package insert, it even states they can't say these are safe in pregnancy. So where is this safe and effective coming from? Even Pfizer was going, was doing a study, a trial. It started in 2021, perhaps early portion of twenty twenty two.
• 35:41
  They never published the results because if they had had one more baby have a congenital anomaly, that would have made it statistically significant to be a harmful injection. So they didn't publish any of those results. We have no randomized placebo controlled trial on pregnant women and subsequently their babies showing that these are safe. And yet that's the mantra, safe and effective.
• 36:12
  Seth Holehouse: I mean, it's just crazy because I'm looking at this and thinking I'm seeing the two numbers we have here on screen. The the post marketing data, which was was fully requested, you know, eighty one percent miscarriage rate, and then the the v safe cohort of eight eight hundred and twenty seven women, which was Mhmm. Eighty two percent, which is I mean, that's really, really, really high. Right? Especially the normal is Mhmm.
• 36:41
  Four percent. But what's what's even worse with all this? It's hard to say what is worse. I mean, you have well, that it's like the you're walking into a crime scene with dead bodies everywhere, blood everywhere, like the the jewelry is gone. I mean, it's like the whole thing is just this giant criminal scene.
• 37:00
  But then the fact that Walensky, it can still come out after these reports and this information had to have come across her desk, and say that that injection, that gene therapy is safe and effective in pregnant women, and that you still have so many even to this day, you I I still drive around, and I'll I'll still see, you know, COVID night. Do you have your COVID nineteen, you know, vaccines? Or I it's still being pushed. I mean and and and people think it's, oh, it's such a big deal that RFK junior is talking about removing the the COVID vaccine from the childhood schedule. It's like, well, of course, that that's that's great, but it's crazy that that's all we are on.
• 37:48
  That that's that's the only place that we've gotten to on this when, like, this this data is staring us in in the face.
• 37:57
  Seth Holehouse: It can't be ignored.
• 37:57
  Kimberly Biss: I'm all I'm all for having these completely removed from the market. But especially, if you're an adult and you wanna risk, it shouldn't be mandated for one, we never should have had mandates, but if you're an adult and you want to choose to get these injections, then that's on you. But children, the risk of death from COVID is three in a million, Okay? There's no reason to give a child, especially up to, what is it, up to nine months now on the schedule, there's three COVID injections to be given to a baby? I mean what are we doing here?
• 38:39
  But my argument too is babies start in the womb. Okay? Why are we just going to halt in the children? Why are we still recommending that pregnant women get these injections? I mean that's where babies start.
• 38:52
  You know? But I'm all for these being taken off the market. I don't even think they should be studied. They clearly there's thousands of articles out now showing the dangers from this technology. I don't think we should be injecting genetic material into people.
• 39:10
  And we also know now, because of Kevin McKernan and others that have, you know, stated yes his findings are correct, There's DNA in these injections that are being injected into people. And of course the FDA quickly came around and said, well, we have a safe amount of DNA that can be injected into a person. Which by the way, that's based on a rat study, for one. And for two, that's naked DNA. That's not DNA that's protected from this fatty envelope, okay?
• 39:42
  So naked DNA injected into a mammal, let's say, is gonna be quickly found to be foreign in the system and chewed up and dispersed up. But when it's protected in this fatty envelope and delivered into the cells, and by the way, it doesn't have to go in the nucleus to do any work and can stay in the cell cytoplasm and create havoc. So this is not good. This is not good. And you know we are there's several mechanisms on how these cause the cancer increase that we're seeing, you know, around the globe.
• 40:20
  There was a the American Medical Association just put something out. I saw a tweet the other day about how the cancer rates in our country have gone down from year to year, but they stopped at 2022, right? Why don't you show us the data from '23, '20 '4, and '25? Because I will tell you that's not the case. Every hospital in our country is building cancer towers.
• 40:48
  I mean, the demand, we don't there's so many people. Try getting an appointment with an oncologist. You know, but there's several ways these shots cause the cancer. For one, they screw up our immune system to where it doesn't function properly. And everybody's immune system, we fight cancers off in our body every day with our immune system.
• 41:10
  And these shots are creating our immune systems to not function properly. Some people call it VAIDs, vaccine AIDS. It's not from HIV, it's from the shots. But also the spike protein inhibits certain, we have genes in our DNA that make us not get cancer. And the spike proteins specifically with BRCA, which is the breast cancer gene, Angelina Jolie had a defect in those genes.
• 41:41
  You know, these spike proteins are preventing those genes from functioning properly. So there's various mechanisms by where these are creating and maybe even the DNA because the SV40 promoter has been found in these DNA plasmids that have been found in these vials and that's a cancer causing simian virus. So there's a menagerie of ways this is happening. But you know, it's just I think at this point it's criminal that we're still allowing these to be on the market and injected into people because there's so much information out there now showing how these are clearly unsafe.
• 42:26
  Seth Holehouse: Oh, I I couldn't agree more. But looking at let's say for first of watching or listening or, you know, one of your patients that comes in, maybe that's say twelve weeks, you know, or fourteen weeks, and she says, look, I've you know, and you can see she's healthy so far, but she might say, look, I I got my first booster a year and a half ago. I'm really worried, you know, which is a lot of people actually that now they they they really understand what's going on, but a lot of these people what, you know, kind of woke them up might have been getting the shot, an adverse reaction, getting a booster. So for people that are now aware of what these injections can do, how can they are there any ways to reverse it? Especially looking at women specifically that maybe they they're they're not pregnant now, but they wanna they wanna fall pregnant, and now they're concerned about their fertility because they got a couple of boosters.
• 43:23
  What would you recommend, for for women in general to detox and and and build their health up against this?
• 43:31
  Kimberly Biss: Yeah. That's a good question. We don't know what we don't know. I am in a research group, abrg.org, that, you know, we're trying to do research to see exactly how these affect the female reproductive system. But I reassure a lot of patients that you know the quality control with creating these injections especially in the beginning was essentially absent.
• 44:04
  I mean probably a lot of people received salt water or a degraded product because remember it had to be negative something something degrees and people are driving up to sport arena parking lots and you know the staff is pulling these out of a igloo cooler under a tent. You know so I think a lot of people didn't get the real product and if you did you would have probably had some sort reaction. So if you were somebody, yeah I got these shots, never, you know, I didn't even, all I had was a sore arm, then you probably didn't get the real thing and that's a good thing. But is there a way to reverse any damage that could have potentially been done? That's a hard thing to answer.
• 44:52
  I mean, what I tell people first and foremost, don't get any more of these injections. You can't undo what you did, but you certainly shouldn't continue to do it. We do know there's various formulations that help to get rid of the spike protein. You know, NATO kinase is one, but a cheap one too is there's a Baobab tree, B A O B A B. It's a tree of life and the fruit is crushed into a powder and you put like a teaspoon in a 16 ounce water container and sip it throughout the day And it has many effects, it helps your immune system, it's an antiviral, it also somehow gets rid of the spike protein in people's system.
• 45:42
  And it also acts like an aspirin. So people that take an aspirin every day because their cardiologist tells them to, you know, it's a platelet, makes them not sticky. This seems to do that as well. So it's got a lot of effects, probably why they call it the tree of life. But that's a cheap, I got a big bag on Amazon, you know, it's a cheap way.
• 46:06
  Know, eating good food, stay away from processed food, exercise, intermittent fasting also has been shown to help the body get rid of the trash, so to speak. So cells that aren't functioning properly with a fast that you can extend even to three days, has been shown to kind of do a reset in our bodies and may help to undo some of the damage. But other than that, there's a lot of unknowns and it just seems like every day we're finding out more and more information that's not necessarily positive. So it's not it's not funny. And I don't mean to laugh, but I mean, honestly, if you don't laugh, you're just going to cry.
• 46:54
  I mean, it's just it's just unbelievable. I think, what we've done to humanity, and we continue to do.
• 47:02
  Seth Holehouse: I I know. I I I hope that at some point we see some sort of Nuremberg trial or something which is a trial that is left for history, where we say, okay, here's where things went wrong. Here are the people that were acting with criminal intent. I mean, this is you look at war crimes, or crimes against humanity, or, you know, like, let's say someone gets caught because they poison the water system, and, you know, 10 families all got sick and died. I mean, this is I can't think of obviously, we have the the various communist, you know, famines and and massacres, but I can't think of anything actually that hits this scale.
• 47:50
  I mean, it's it's potentially it's it's the biggest mistake humanity's ever made in the history of humanity, perhaps. I mean, it's and we're only seeing just the first couple of years of it. We have no mean, look at agent orange, or look at the with thalidomide. Right? I mean, you have no idea what the the law true long term effects of this are.
• 48:13
  Kimberly Biss: Yeah. So diethylstilbestrol or DES is a good analogy to use because that was a medication provided to pregnant women and didn't injure the pregnant mom but the offspring were shown to have a higher increase risk of cervical cancers. So DES daughters they're called, you know, they need pap smears for life because they're at higher risk for vaginal and cervical cancers. And now there's literature showing that the offspring of the offspring may also be at increased risk. My concern is that we are going to have a multigenerational problem, because we injected pregnant women, with these with these, products, you know.
• 49:04
  Seth Holehouse: Yeah. Which is and it's important. Like, that's part of what I see is my mission. So I've got two little girls. I got a one year old and a four year old.
• 49:11
  Both, you know, were delivered at home. Actually, the the most recent one, I my our midwife wasn't even there in time, so I had to help my wife deliver her in the bathtub, And Mhmm. Healthy ten pound baby. But
• 49:23
  Seth Holehouse: Oh, wow. Neither of them have ever seen
• 49:25
  Seth Holehouse: a needle and nor will they. Yeah. Unless it's, you know, of kind of say with an IV and emergency medicine. Right? You know, medicine has its place.
• 49:34
  Right? Yes. Not as vaccines and newborns. Right? Right.
• 49:39
  So that's you know, hopefully, they can and I'm already having talks with both of them, saying, look. You know, I want you to have at least five to eight kids, and and they've both agreed. The one year old's a little more apprehensive, but she's agreed. So long term to repopulate the earth with healthy healthy people, but like that, that's that's kind of what it is. We just have to forge ahead as humans.
• 49:58
  We've had a lot of adversity as a race, and we just have to keep going.
• 50:03
  Kimberly Biss: We do. We do it that.
• 50:06
  Seth Holehouse: Well, doctor Biss, before we sign off, I wanna bring up just two different websites. One more, this is just the research group that you're part of, the advanced biological research group, and the URL is abrg.org. And then also wanna encourage people to give you a follow over on Twitter or X. So your your handle is just at doc bis. That's d o c b I s s.
• 50:33
  Encourage people to follow you over there. And who who's this guy in your profile picture? First of all, it was Java the Hutt.
• 50:43
  Kimberly Biss: So if you haven't ever been, I highly encourage you go to Iceland. It's a beautiful country. I've been there twice and that is actually a viking statue in a store in Reykjavik. And I took that picture and it's just my favorite picture. I just love it.
• 51:03
  But the country, the waterfall behind it is the second largest waterfall in Europe and it's just vast. I mean, it's just amazing. But, I just love Iceland. I must have some Viking genes in me, I think, because
• 51:21
  Seth Holehouse: I I think
• 51:22
  Kimberly Biss: I do too. To that island.
• 51:24
  Seth Holehouse: Yeah. I'll I'll have to go there. I I've got some this innate desire to swing an axe at things, and so well, doctor Biss, do you have any any final words as we wrap up?
• 51:37
  Kimberly Biss: Don't get any more shots for one. But I'm very hopeful with the current administration, especially with Bobbi and HHS, that we're going to see a lot of changes in the medical model because currently, you know, healthcare is pretty much sick care and very financially driven in our country. I mean, our population globally is about 4%, and yet we consume over 50% of all pharmaceuticals. I mean, food is awful. You know, we're just not a healthy population, and we don't fall very high on the list of countries with health outcomes despite spending the most dollars on healthcare.
• 52:25
  So I'm hoping the whole medical model is going to change and we can empower patients to be healthy on their own without, you know, coming to the doctor and getting injections and getting placed on many, many medications. And also, you know, Western medicine along with Eastern medicine. I mean, Eastern medicine has been around way longer than Western medicine. And full disclosure, you know, prior to COVID, I was a Western medicine snob but I've you know since changed my tune and in that respect you know COVID and the rollout of these injections was kind of a blessing for me and a lot of my colleagues I think, because it really opened the drapes to so many bad things that go on with regards to medical care. So hopefully, the pendulum will now shift in the other direction for for better ways of taking care of people.
• 53:21
  Seth Holehouse: It seems like it is. And I I share the same hope. Well, doctor Biss, thank you again for giving us your time today. I I really appreciate it.
• 53:30
  Kimberly Biss: Thanks for having me.
• 53:31
  Seth Holehouse: Absolutely.
• 53:34
  Seth Holehouse: Do you keep hearing more cases of your friends and family getting a life threatening diagnosis of cancer, or perhaps it's even happened to you? Well, the unfortunate reality is that turbo cancer is now a worldwide epidemic. But the question we should all be asking is, what can I do about it? Well, the good news is that there are therapies that are working and proven in thousands of clinical studies. So one study on PubMed found that breast cancer's growth rate dropped by forty percent in only twenty four hours after using red light therapy.
• 54:04
  Another study on prostate cancer found that forty nine percent of the over four hundred male participants went into remission with just one red light therapy session. A lymphoma cancer pilot study showed that three out of three of the patients became cancer free. It sounds unbelievable, but it's true. And you can discover all this information and more in a special training program from investigative medical journalist Jonathan Otto, who will show you how you can use red light, including the specific wavelengths as proven by studies for all different types of cancer as well as tinnitus, weight loss, wrinkles, acne, dementia, cognitive function, depression, anxiety, long COVID, jab injuries, stem cell regeneration, lower back pain, sciatica, the whole array of autoimmune diseases, including thyroid disease, arthritis, lupus, and gut disorders, and so much more. In fact, you can get your own in home red light therapy device risk free as you're completely covered by a sixty day money back guarantee and a three year warranty.
• 55:04
  On top of that, we've got financing options so you can get it now and pay later. And the best thing folks is that this technology has become amazingly affordable. It's way less than you'd with the smaller units costing only a couple hundred bucks. So just go to myredlight.com to make sure you don't miss out this free special training program and claim the extremely limited time bonus gifts and discounts, which include an additional 10% off with the coupon code Seth. Again, go to myredlight.com to get access to the free training.
• 55:34
  And if you make a purchase, make sure you use a promo code Seth, that's s e t h, to get an additional 10% off the already heavily discounted red light therapy products. Numbers don't lie. The impact that Balance of Nature makes every single day is astounding. You can see the numbers for yourself at their website, balanceofnature.com. So listen to these stats concerning Balance of Nature's worldwide success.
• 55:59
  More than a thousand success stories are reported each month. Hundreds of thousands of customers worldwide. Millions of orders delivered each year and billions, yes, billions of fruits and veggie supplements consumed by people who've decided to start living better. There's only one number missing, that's you. Do what I did and add yourself to these numbers.
• 56:21
  Start taking Balance of Nature's whole food supplements like so many others around the world. Here's another number that should get your attention, 35%. Use my discount code Seth to get 35% off plus free shipping and their money back guarantee. You must use my discount code Seth. So call them at 802468751 and use the discount code Seth, or order online at balanceofnature.com.
• 56:49
  Use discount code Seth to get 35% off plus free shipping.