Latest / Reformed Thinking / הַר (Har): The Mountain of God’s Presence

Transcript

הַר (Har): The Mountain of God’s Presence · Reformed Thinking

• 0:00
  Welcome to the deep dive. This is a space for reformed
• 0:03
  thinking, where we get into subjects that might seem
• 0:05
  straightforward on the surface but have so much more going on
• 0:09
  underneath. And our goal is to give you the
• 0:11
  full context to move past the simple definitions and see how
• 0:15
  these ideas fit into the whole biblical narrative.
• 0:17
  Today we are looking at a single Hebrew noun, just three letters,
• 0:22
  har. Right har it means mountain or
• 0:24
  hill. Seems simple enough.
• 0:26
  But it's not. I mean, when you think about the
• 0:28
  story of Scripture, this one word is doing some serious
• 0:31
  theological work. Yeah.
• 0:32
  It's where the law is given at Sinai.
• 0:35
  It's the center of hope in Zion. It's the meeting point.
• 0:38
  It's the spot on the map where God chooses to intersect with
• 0:41
  humanity. It's never just geology.
• 0:43
  And that's our mission for this deep dive.
• 0:45
  We want to get into the linguistic side of things, the
• 0:47
  geography and of course the theology behind this word har.
• 0:51
  We want to how this idea of elevation gives structure to
• 0:55
  biblical faith itself. It defines where covenants are
• 0:58
  made, where God dwells, and where future hope is directed.
• 1:01
  OK, so let's start with the basics.
• 1:03
  The anatomy of the word, the sheer frequency of it in the
• 1:06
  text, tells a story all by itself.
• 1:08
  It really does. The numbers are pretty striking.
• 1:10
  Horror shows up somewhere between 520 and 558 times in the
• 1:15
  Old Testament. That tells you something about
• 1:17
  the world they lived in. This was a culture defined by
• 1:20
  high ground. It's a masculine, primitive
• 1:22
  noun, just a core part of their vocabulary for describing their
• 1:26
  physical world. And it doesn't just mean one
• 1:28
  thing. Our sources point out three main
• 1:30
  ways the word is used. And sometimes they can overlap a
• 1:34
  little. That's where you have to watch
• 1:35
  the context. The first definition is the
• 1:37
  obvious 1 mountain, a big highland mass.
• 1:40
  And the second. The second is hill, a smaller,
• 1:43
  more localized elevation. And the key thing here is that
• 1:46
  the Bible often doesn't make a sharp distinction between the
• 1:49
  two. The same word har could be a
• 1:52
  huge pick or a gentle slope. So that brings us to the third
• 1:55
  use, which helps a lot with geography, Hill Country or
• 1:58
  mountain range. That's the one that becomes so
• 2:00
  useful for mapping things out. When HAR refers to a whole
• 2:03
  region, it sets that elevated area in contrast to the
• 2:07
  flatlands. You know, the valleys or the
• 2:09
  lowlands? And that's how they started
• 2:11
  defining territory. It's how they drew their maps.
• 2:14
  In a way, the topography defined who lived where.
• 2:17
  You can also see how flexible the word is in its different
• 2:20
  grammatical forms. It's not just the noun har.
• 2:22
  No, it adapts. You have the basic singular HAR.
• 2:26
  Add the definite article you get har the mountain.
• 2:29
  But what I find really interesting is how it shows
• 2:31
  movement. Movement being so key in the
• 2:34
  biblical story. It is and to show movement
• 2:36
  towards a mountain. The text uses a special form har
• 2:41
  to the mountain. It only appears about 13 times.
• 2:44
  But when it does, it carries a lot of.
• 2:46
  Weight a lot someone is going up to meet God or fleeing for
• 2:49
  safety. It's always directional and
• 2:51
  purposeful. The sources also point out a
• 2:53
  really unique variant form. A kind of linguistic fossil,
• 2:57
  yes. This is fascinating.
• 2:58
  The form is Hira. It shows up only once in the
• 3:01
  entire Old Testament. We're at it in Genesis 14, in
• 3:05
  the story about the War of the Kings near Sodom.
• 3:08
  It's what's called a dialect dissimilated form.
• 3:11
  It just gives us a little window into the history of the language
• 3:14
  itself, showing that there were subtle regional differences in
• 3:18
  how people spoke. So the word was alive.
• 3:21
  It was changing over time. It was, and when the writers
• 3:24
  wanted to be more literary or poetic, they'd use different
• 3:27
  forms again. You see that a lot in the
• 3:29
  Psalms. For sure in poetry you get the
• 3:32
  plural construct form. Hooray.
• 3:34
  It's a more elevated, formal way of saying mountains of and that
• 3:39
  leads right into some of the most powerful phrases in the
• 3:41
  Psalms. You mean like mountains of God
• 3:43
  Harawe? That's the one.
• 3:45
  Grammatically, when you attach God's name all to a noun like
• 3:48
  that, it functions as a superlative.
• 3:50
  It doesn't mean mountains. God literally owns.
• 3:53
  It means something more like the most majestic mountains
• 3:55
  imaginable. Precisely.
• 3:56
  You see it in Psalm 36. It's painting a picture of a
• 3:59
  scale and grandeur that reflects God's own might.
• 4:03
  These are God sized mountains. And we know this word wasn't new
• 4:06
  to Israel. It was part of the regional
• 4:08
  vocabulary for a long, long time.
• 4:10
  Right. It has a deep history in the
• 4:12
  ancient Near East. You find cognates in other
• 4:14
  ancient languages. Like in the Amarna letters.
• 4:17
  Yes, the Canaanite word airy appears there, and in Phoenician
• 4:20
  you see the exact same spelling as the Hebrew.
• 4:24
  This tells us that the idea of elevation being a significant
• 4:27
  marker was common across the whole region.
• 4:29
  OK, so once we understand the word itself, we can see how it
• 4:32
  gets applied. And this is where har stops
• 4:35
  being just a word and starts becoming a geographical marker
• 4:38
  that defines borders and even whole civilizations.
• 4:42
  This is where a simple noun starts doing political work.
• 4:45
  The Bible uses har to draw lines on the map, setting the
• 4:49
  mountainous zones apart from the flatlands, the plains, the
• 4:52
  valleys, the lowlands. And for Israel, these weren't
• 4:54
  just geographical lines, they were administrative.
• 4:57
  When you pair HAR with a name, it defines a territory.
• 5:01
  It defines jurisdiction. You get these classic regional
• 5:04
  names, the Hill Country of Judah Har Yuda.
• 5:06
  Which was the heartland of the Southern Kingdom.
• 5:08
  And then the Hill Country of Ephraim har Iprem which was
• 5:11
  central for the northern Kingdom and it even applied to non
• 5:15
  Israelite areas like the Amorite Hill Country Har Har Yumri.
• 5:19
  These names aren't just poetic, they're describing a reality on
• 5:22
  the ground. The mountains offered
• 5:24
  protection, a different way of life compared to the more
• 5:27
  exposed lowlands. A defensible position and that
• 5:30
  idea of a whole mountain range acting as one unit becomes very
• 5:34
  potent in the prophets. Especially in Ezekiel, right
• 5:37
  during the exile. Yes, look at the phrase Hardy
• 5:39
  usual, the mountains of Israel. It shows up 15 times just in
• 5:43
  Ezekiel. He's not talking about one
• 5:44
  specific peak anymore. No, He's addressing the entire
• 5:47
  national landscape as a single entity.
• 5:50
  It's a prophetic device. It means God's judgement.
• 5:52
  And also, his future restoration isn't just for a city like
• 5:56
  Jerusalem or Samaria, it's for the whole land, the whole
• 5:59
  elevated identity of the nation. And then, separate from those
• 6:02
  big regions, horror is of course used for all the famous
• 6:05
  individual peaks, the ones that are stages for major events.
• 6:09
  Mount Hermon, Mount Carmel, Mount Tabor, Gilboa, the Mount
• 6:14
  of Olives, Nebo. Each one is an anchor for a
• 6:17
  story. Carmel is the stage for Elijah's
• 6:20
  showdown. Gilboa is where Saul dies.
• 6:23
  Nebo is where Moses sees the promised land.
• 6:25
  These mountains aren't just scenery, they are active
• 6:28
  settings in the biblical drama. Then there's one that's a bit of
• 6:31
  a puzzle. In the wilderness accounts we
• 6:33
  get this name Horhar. Hor.
• 6:36
  The Mount. It sounds repetitive, like
• 6:38
  saying mount them out. What's going on there?
• 6:40
  The sources confirm it is a specific individual mountain.
• 6:44
  The name horror is actually related to the word har, so the
• 6:47
  repetition isn't an accident, it's for clarification.
• 6:50
  It's a way of removing any and all doubt about which mountain
• 6:53
  is being talked about. And it's a very specific
• 6:55
  location. It's mentioned 11 times in the
• 6:57
  Book of Numbers. Right.
• 6:58
  And it's most famously the place where Aaron the high priest
• 7:01
  dies. So when an event has that kind
• 7:02
  of covenant await the death of the first high Priest, the text
• 7:06
  make sure the location is absolutely locked down.
• 7:09
  It's like saying the peak, that specific mountain peak.
• 7:13
  There's no ambiguity. The event is tied to an
• 7:16
  unmistakable spot on the Earth. But maybe the most interesting
• 7:19
  geographical pairing, the one that is almost a stage set for
• 7:22
  theology, is Mount Ebal and Mountgarism.
• 7:27
  They are fascinating. Harrell and Hargarism.
• 7:30
  The text always presents them as a pair.
• 7:32
  It's not just that they're geographically close.
• 7:34
  The law itself gives them a shared job to do.
• 7:37
  You see it laid out in Deuteronomy and then carried out
• 7:39
  in Joshua. This covenant renewal ceremony
• 7:43
  has to happen right there with these two mountains facing each
• 7:46
  other. And you have to try and
• 7:47
  visualize what's described in Joshua chapter 8.
• 7:50
  It's an amazing scene. You have all the tribes of
• 7:52
  Israel gathered in the natural valley between these two
• 7:54
  mountains, and they're split into two groups.
• 7:57
  Half on the slopes of Jerusalem to shout the blessings.
• 7:59
  And the other half on the slopes able to shout the curses.
• 8:02
  The actual topography of the land becomes the theater for the
• 8:06
  law. The two mountains separate the
• 8:07
  people and force them to physically participate in
• 8:10
  affirming the terms of the covenant.
• 8:12
  So the geography itself becomes part of the message.
• 8:15
  The mountain isn't just a witness, it's an instrument in
• 8:18
  the covenant ceremony. It turns a legal agreement into
• 8:21
  this massive 3 dimensional surround sound experience.
• 8:25
  It's one thing to read a document, it's another to stand
• 8:28
  between two huge natural landmarks while its terms are
• 8:31
  shouted across the valley. The high ground defined their
• 8:34
  relationship with God. And that idea of high ground in
• 8:37
  God's law leads us right into the next section where heart
• 8:41
  stops being about geography and becomes almost pure theology.
• 8:45
  Right, the two central holy mountains of Israel's faith.
• 8:48
  Because lots of mountains are mentioned, but the sources
• 8:51
  identified too as being absolutely central to Israel's
• 8:54
  worship and experience of God's presence.
• 8:56
  And these two really define the whole story from beginning to
• 8:59
  well, not to end, but to its long term home.
• 9:02
  Let's start at the beginning. Then the mountain where the
• 9:04
  nation was formed, Sinai, also called Horeb.
• 9:08
  The sources are clear on this. Mount Horeb Hardrub is also
• 9:12
  known as Mount Sinai Harshanae. They are two names for the same
• 9:15
  sacred mountain in the wilderness.
• 9:17
  And the titles this mountain gets are just incredible.
• 9:19
  They set it apart from every other place on Earth.
• 9:22
  The titles tell you its function.
• 9:23
  First it's the mountain of God Har Hoshim.
• 9:26
  You see that Exodus 3 and again in First Kings 19.
• 9:29
  The idea that God's presence was so concentrated there that the
• 9:32
  mountain itself took on his name.
• 9:34
  It became consecrated by his presence.
• 9:36
  It was God's temporary address, you might say.
• 9:40
  It's also called by God's covenant name.
• 9:42
  Yes, Mel Yahweh Har who? That title is used in Numbers
• 9:47
  10. Right as the Ark of the Covenant
• 9:48
  is leaving the mountain, it marks it as a place belonging
• 9:52
  holy to the Covenant Lord of Israel.
• 9:54
  What's also interesting is how once you're in that part of the
• 9:57
  story, the text doesn't even need to use the full name.
• 9:59
  That's right. The context is so clear that
• 10:02
  just the definite article is enough.
• 10:04
  The mountain ha ha in Exodus and Deuteronomy when it says they
• 10:08
  went up the mountain, everyone knows which one it is.
• 10:10
  There is no other. So its main role is the place of
• 10:12
  the law, the 10 commandments, the establishment of the
• 10:15
  covenant. It's the birth place of the
• 10:17
  nation of Israel. It's their founding document
• 10:19
  written in stone on that spot. But the key is that the Sinai
• 10:23
  encounter was temporary. God gave the law there, but He
• 10:26
  didn't set up his permanent home there.
• 10:29
  Which brings us to the second, and in a way, the permanent holy
• 10:32
  mountain bound to Zion, Jerusalem.
• 10:35
  And that contrast is so important.
• 10:37
  Sinai was the mountain of the initial meeting, the giving of
• 10:41
  the Law. Zion is the chosen place for
• 10:44
  God's established permanent dwelling and His.
• 10:47
  Rule. You can see that shift in just
• 10:49
  how often it's mentioned. The name Zion Ion shows up 154
• 10:53
  times in the Old Testament. It dominates the Psalms in
• 10:56
  Isaiah and the specific phrase Mount Zion harion appears 20
• 11:00
  times. It becomes the theological
• 11:02
  shorthand for the city of God. And his origins were actually
• 11:05
  pretty humble, geographically speaking.
• 11:07
  Very humble. It started as the fortress Zion
• 11:09
  made a Dione, which was a Jebesite stronghold on the
• 11:12
  eastern hill of Jerusalem. It became the city of David only
• 11:15
  after he conquered it. So the whole theological weight
• 11:17
  of the place comes later. It's about God's choice, not the
• 11:20
  mountain's natural features. It's all about divine election.
• 11:24
  Zion isn't special because it's the tallest mountain.
• 11:26
  It's not even close. It's special because God chose
• 11:29
  it. Psalm 132 is clear.
• 11:31
  God desired Zion for his dwelling place.
• 11:33
  That choice changes everything. And that divine choice results
• 11:37
  in a whole new set of titles for the mountain, all connected to
• 11:39
  the temple that would be built there.
• 11:41
  The titles explain its new job. It's called God's Holy Mountain,
• 11:44
  Harkogee. You see that in Psalm 2, in
• 11:47
  Isaiah, in Ezekiel, it's the mount of the House of Yahweh.
• 11:50
  Har bet you tying it directly to the temple building or sometimes
• 11:54
  just the temple hill har ha by it.
• 11:56
  But the language used to describe Zion goes way beyond
• 11:59
  just the physical temple, the sources show.
• 12:01
  It gets elevated to this cosmic symbolic status.
• 12:04
  This is where the theology gets really grand.
• 12:06
  Zion is described as the quintessence of beauty and the
• 12:09
  center of the world. Passages in Psalms 48 and 50 are
• 12:13
  not just local praise songs, they are making a cosmic claim.
• 12:16
  They connect Zion to the idea of a world mountain.
• 12:19
  Which was a common idea in the ancient Near East.
• 12:22
  The sources point out the conceptual link to the peak of
• 12:25
  Zephon, which was the mythical Mountain Home of the Canaanite
• 12:28
  God Ball. So the biblical writers are
• 12:31
  engaging in a bit bit of polemics here A.
• 12:33
  Huge bit by using that kind of language for Zion, they are
• 12:37
  making a direct challenge. They're saying your God's
• 12:40
  mountain is a myth. Our God's mountain Zion is the
• 12:43
  true cosmic center. This is the real source of order
• 12:47
  and life. And there's an even bigger claim
• 12:49
  in the sources, the idea that the creation of Zion is linked
• 12:53
  to the creation of the world itself.
• 12:55
  This is a massive theological step.
• 12:57
  It suggests that Zion wasn't just a historical choice, but
• 13:00
  was part of the original design of creation.
• 13:03
  If Zion was made with the world, it shares in the world's
• 13:05
  God-given stability, which. Is why Psalm 125 can say that
• 13:09
  Mount Zion cannot be moved. It's stability is tied to the
• 13:11
  stability of creation itself. Zion becomes the physical point
• 13:15
  on earth that represents God's intention for order and and good
• 13:18
  government for the whole world. So Zion isn't just the place you
• 13:21
  go to worship, it's the Source from which all good things flow
• 13:24
  out to the people. That's the outcome of its
• 13:26
  status. From Zion comes help and aid.
• 13:28
  From Zion flows blessing. From Zion goes out instruction,
• 13:32
  the Torah and righteousness. It's the spiritual and
• 13:34
  governmental capital of God's Kingdom on earth.
• 13:37
  So we have these two poles, Sinai, the mountain of law and
• 13:40
  temporary presence, and Zion, the mountain of permanent rule
• 13:44
  and cosmic blessing. But the very fact these holy
• 13:48
  mountains exist creates a conflict, doesn't it?
• 13:51
  It does because the idea of elevation of high ground was
• 13:55
  used by Israel for the exact opposite of authorized worship
• 13:57
  all the time. And that takes us to our fourth
• 13:59
  section, Harden, Conflict, Cult, and Prophecy.
• 14:03
  You can't understand the historical books without
• 14:05
  understanding this tension. The mountain gets you closer to
• 14:08
  the transcendent, but what you do when you get there, that's
• 14:10
  the question. So for every divinely authorized
• 14:12
  holy mountain, there were countless unauthorized ones.
• 14:15
  Yes, the high mountains and hills he Harim Harami and were
• 14:18
  constantly being used for illicit worship.
• 14:21
  These were the high places, the bum up.
• 14:23
  Why were they such a persistent problem?
• 14:25
  A few reasons. 1 was just convenience.
• 14:28
  It was a lot easier to go to a local hilltop shrine than to
• 14:31
  make the pilgrimage to Jerusalem, especially for people
• 14:33
  in the Northern Kingdom. But the bigger issue was
• 14:36
  syncretism. Mixing worship of Yahweh with
• 14:39
  Canaanite practices. That's it.
• 14:41
  You end up with unauthorized priests, unauthorized sacred
• 14:43
  objects like Asherah poles, and unauthorized sacrifices.
• 14:47
  It creates this direct opposition between the elevation
• 14:50
  of covenant at Zion and the elevation of rebellion on a
• 14:53
  local hill. The prophets rail against it
• 14:56
  constantly. The books of kings are basically
• 14:59
  a record of this struggle. Yeah, you have good kings who
• 15:01
  carry down the high places, and bad kings who build them or let
• 15:04
  them stand. It became the great test of a
• 15:07
  King's faithfulness. Were they committed to the
• 15:09
  centralized, pure worship at Zion as the Law commanded, or
• 15:12
  did they allow this decentralized, corrupted worship
• 15:15
  to continue? The choice of which hierarchy to
• 15:18
  worship on was a declaration of whose authority you were under,
• 15:21
  God's or your own. And beyond this religious
• 15:24
  conflict, Heron also gets used as a symbol for political
• 15:27
  entities. Mountains stand for strength,
• 15:29
  for pride, for empires. A mountain is a symbol of
• 15:32
  stability and power. So in the prophets, mountains
• 15:36
  often become the targets of divine judgement.
• 15:39
  It's a way of saying that God can bring down even the most
• 15:42
  powerful human kingdoms. Like when Babylon is called the
• 15:45
  mountain of the Destroyer, our hamashet.
• 15:49
  Babylon seemed like an immovable object.
• 15:52
  It had crushed Jerusalem. By calling it a mountain, the
• 15:56
  prophet acknowledges it's apparent strength, but by
• 15:59
  calling for its destruction, he's saying that God can and
• 16:02
  will level any earthly power that sets itself up against him.
• 16:06
  There's that one amazing story in First Kings where this
• 16:09
  theology of terrain gets challenged directly by Israel's
• 16:11
  enemies. Oh, the Syrians.
• 16:13
  It's a great story. During a conflict with King
• 16:15
  Ahab, the Syrian Army gets defeated up in the hills so
• 16:18
  their commanders come to a conclusion.
• 16:20
  They decide that Israel's God must be God of the mountains.
• 16:23
  Elisha Harnam. But not a God thought of the
• 16:25
  plains El sham arkim. They figured his authority was
• 16:27
  limited by geography. If they could just fight Israel
• 16:30
  on flat ground, they'd win a. Huge theological mistake.
• 16:33
  A fatal 1. The text makes it very clear
• 16:36
  what happens next. The battle moves to the plains
• 16:39
  and Yahweh gives Israel an even bigger victory.
• 16:42
  There. The point is made.
• 16:45
  His rule isn't limited to the high ground.
• 16:48
  The mountain might be his chosen place for revelation, but his
• 16:51
  sovereignty is total over every valley and plain.
• 16:55
  The prophets also use HAR in some very specific critiques.
• 17:00
  There's that disputed passage in Amos 6.
• 17:02
  Right. Amos speaks against those who
• 17:04
  are confident on Zion and carefree on Mount Samaria.
• 17:08
  He's targeting the two capital cities of the two kingdoms, both
• 17:11
  built on hills. And their sense of security came
• 17:13
  from their geography. They thought their fortified
• 17:16
  high ground made them untouchable.
• 17:17
  And the sources lay out a couple of ways to understand this
• 17:19
  verse. One view is that Amos was mainly
• 17:21
  talking about Samaria, the northern capital, and the
• 17:24
  reference to Zion was added later by an editor applying the
• 17:27
  prophecy to Judah. What's the other view?
• 17:29
  A less likely 1 is that the name Zion had become a kind of
• 17:32
  generic poetic term for any capital city on a mountain.
• 17:35
  But either way, the prophetic point is the same.
• 17:37
  The point is the same. He's condemning anyone who
• 17:40
  trusts in their physical elevation, their military high
• 17:42
  background, instead of in God. The very mountain that should
• 17:46
  have been a site of reverence had become a symbol of their
• 17:49
  false security. But all this conflict over the
• 17:51
  use of mountains is in the prophetic you temporary.
• 17:55
  The story is heading toward a future where Zion status is
• 17:59
  undisputed. Har is absolutely central to
• 18:02
  their hope. It is the prophets consistently
• 18:05
  anchor their vision for the future on Mount Zion, especially
• 18:08
  after the exile. The hope is for a glorious
• 18:11
  restoration centered there. And this hope has a few key
• 18:14
  parts. The Exiles will return to Zion.
• 18:16
  Yahweh's kingly rule will resume from Zion, and maybe most
• 18:20
  striking, the other nations of the world will come to Zion not
• 18:23
  as conquerors, but as students. That's the vision in Micah 4,
• 18:26
  isn't it? Come, let us go up to the
• 18:28
  mountain of Yahweh, that He may teach us His ways.
• 18:31
  It's an incredible reversal. The law that was given on Sinai
• 18:34
  to 1 nation now goes out from Zion to all nations.
• 18:37
  Instruction Torah flows from Jerusalem to the ends of the
• 18:41
  earth. The mountain.
• 18:42
  He stops being just a local holy place and becomes the spiritual
• 18:46
  Center for the entire world. The high ground becomes the
• 18:49
  meeting point for all of humanity.
• 18:51
  It's the picture of God's final design, a real, physical,
• 18:56
  elevated place where His rule is established and recognized by
• 18:59
  all. A perfect and permanent Zion.
• 19:02
  So if we bring all this together, this one little word
• 19:05
  har, which appears over 500 times, is doing so much.
• 19:09
  It's not just a hill. Not at all.
• 19:11
  It ranges from being a simple term for the landscape to being
• 19:14
  the specific sacred location for the giving of the law at Sinai
• 19:17
  and then for God's permanent dwelling and rule at Zion.
• 19:19
  It's the geographical pin in the map for Israel's entire story,
• 19:23
  rooting their history and their hope in real, elevated places.
• 19:26
  That elevation always signals A proximity to God, a place of
• 19:30
  significance. And that brings us to a final
• 19:32
  thought for you to consider. The mountain is the place of
• 19:34
  God's most glorious presence for law and for blessing, but it's
• 19:38
  also the most common place for human rebellion for the illicit
• 19:41
  cults on the high places. That tension runs through the
• 19:44
  whole biblical story. The choice is always between
• 19:47
  obedience, going up to Zion as commanded, and rebellion,
• 19:49
  building your own altar on any hill you choose.
• 19:52
  The physical choice of which horror you stand on becomes a
• 19:56
  spiritual statement. Elevation brings you closer to
• 19:59
  the divine. And because of that, the
• 20:01
  consequences of faithfulness or of corruption are that much
• 20:05
  greater. So as you read other stories in
• 20:07
  Scripture that happen on high ground, think about Abraham on
• 20:10
  Mount Moriah or the Transfiguration.
• 20:12
  You can use this framework. Ask yourself, is this mountain a
• 20:15
  confirmation of God's covenant, or is it a site of human failure
• 20:18
  or testing? The context of that elevated
• 20:21
  ground will tell you almost everything you need to know.