Latest / Drive with John Perlman / New Mayor, Same Bill - SAMWU Says R10.3bn Wage Deal Must Stand
Transcript
- 0:05Speaker 1: Well, let's focus our attention now on some other very,
- 0:08Speaker 1: very big numbers. And I'm talking about the salary settlement
- 0:12Speaker 1: that Johannesburg has wrestled with in regard to some 35,000
- 0:17Speaker 1: municipal workers, many or most of them belonging to the
- 0:21Speaker 1: South African Municipal Workers' Union. My understanding is that a
- 0:25Speaker 1: deal which has been on and then off again and
- 0:27Speaker 1: the subject of court disputes is now actually something that
- 0:32Speaker 1: has been signed, settled. I'm not sure what we should
- 0:36Speaker 1: actually call it. Let's welcome 2702 Drive, Feral Havaji, Associate Editor.
- 0:42Speaker 1: at Daily Maverick, who's been following this story very closely indeed. Feriala,
- 0:47Speaker 1: very good afternoon to you, and thanks for making your
- 0:49Speaker 1: time available on an extremely busy day. What do we
- 0:53Speaker 1: know about the Joburg Metro Samu deal?
- 0:59Speaker 2: I know, John, that it was a push through last
- 1:01Speaker 2: night and surprised many of us when it popped up
- 1:04Speaker 2: as a press release. If you read the press release,
- 1:07Speaker 2: you'll see that it's really, really opaque. It says that
- 1:11Speaker 2: an addendum to the agreement has been struck and it
- 1:15Speaker 2: doesn't say what that includes or how much has been
- 1:17Speaker 2: agreed by the unions. What we do know is that
- 1:21Speaker 2: one billion rand of the politically facilitated agreement has been
- 1:25Speaker 2: paid for the year. This means adjustments to... Wage grades,
- 1:30Speaker 2: it's different to the annual increase when about 5 billion
- 1:34Speaker 2: rand was promised as part of the agreement which was
- 1:39Speaker 2: negotiated by Advocate Terry Motau.
- 1:43Speaker 1: So the original settlement, I've got a number in front
- 1:45Speaker 1: of me, 10.3 billion, is that correct?
- 1:47Speaker 2: That's over three years, it's correct.
- 1:50Speaker 1: Okay, so over three years, National Treasury has stepped in.
- 1:57Speaker 1: I don't know if they've stepped in in a way
- 1:59Speaker 1: that says we're going to stop this going ahead, but
- 2:01Speaker 1: they've certainly made it clear Johannesburg doesn't have the money.
- 2:05Speaker 1: Would this agreement be binding on the next administration? I
- 2:09Speaker 1: assume it would.
- 2:10Speaker 2: So I think this is going to be the big
- 2:13Speaker 2: first reporting after the results come out. I do believe
- 2:16Speaker 2: that agreements are binding on the next administration, which would
- 2:20Speaker 2: explain why it was so quickly put through. You'll see
- 2:25Speaker 2: many examples of this, I think, emerging in the coming weeks.
- 2:29Speaker 2: I don't think the Treasury is going to allow this
- 2:31Speaker 2: because you would have seen that at the weekend, the
- 2:34Speaker 2: Finance Minister, Enoch Gordon, threatened a Section 39 intervention if
- 2:39Speaker 2: Johannesburg didn't come right, if it didn't start managing its
- 2:42Speaker 2: finances properly.
- 2:45Speaker 1: We don't always get flattering comments made about municipal workers
- 2:51Speaker 1: when their work is discussed or when wages and protests
- 2:56Speaker 1: come into the conversation. But would it be fair to
- 2:59Speaker 1: say that perhaps the way the municipal workers are portrayed
- 3:03Speaker 1: in this dispute is somewhat unfair? This is money around
- 3:07Speaker 1: which there was an agreement made. And if they are
- 3:12Speaker 1: angry at not being paid what they've been promised, do
- 3:14Speaker 1: they have a point?
- 3:16Speaker 2: They do have a point. In the detail, and maybe
- 3:20Speaker 2: we could chat about this another time, when councils were
- 3:24Speaker 2: consolidated and recreated early in our democracy, so you'll see
- 3:31Speaker 2: smaller councils, the pay scale is different, big ones, big
- 3:35Speaker 2: complex ones, people earn more, and that adjustment was never
- 3:39Speaker 2: made in Joburg, and that is very clearly what was negotiated.
- 3:43Speaker 2: I suppose the simple thing right now is that it's unaffordable.
- 3:49Speaker 1: Was it ever affordable? And I realize that answer may
- 3:55Speaker 1: not be a simple yes or no, but has the
- 3:59Speaker 1: deal been put in jeopardy, as have so many other things,
- 4:03Speaker 1: by the increasing inability of the city, A, to manage
- 4:07Speaker 1: its finances, and B, to effectively spend money it has?
- 4:10Speaker 2: I suppose the difficulty with a deal like this is,
- 4:15Speaker 2: If the services were excellent, if we weren't also paying
- 4:20Speaker 2: contractors 30% of the $ 97 billion budget. Then I think
- 4:25Speaker 2: people would say our workers are doing really well. I
- 4:28Speaker 2: think job workers are people generally with big hearts who
- 4:30Speaker 2: want to do the right thing. Services are excellent. We
- 4:34Speaker 2: can see the effort going into it. We can see
- 4:37Speaker 2: that the call centers are answered immediately. We feel a
- 4:41Speaker 2: sense of service from the people who work in the city.
- 4:45Speaker 2: Then I think it would be an easier sell. But
- 4:47Speaker 2: because it's such a hassle and we are at an
- 4:51Speaker 2: election day with many areas without water, if I was
- 4:55Speaker 2: driving around today and the condition, the picket up strike
- 4:58Speaker 2: has really caused the city to look terrible, then there's
- 5:02Speaker 2: also regular power cuts. That makes it difficult to sell
- 5:06Speaker 2: an agreement like this as much as it may be
- 5:09Speaker 2: and is legitimate based on the history of the dispute.
- 5:15Speaker 1: We had a major electrical problem in the place where
- 5:19Speaker 1: I live. And I got chatting to the workers who
- 5:22Speaker 1: are trying to do something to fix it. I won't
- 5:26Speaker 1: go into details about what I thought might have been
- 5:29Speaker 1: some inefficiencies. in in in their approach but the comment
- 5:34Speaker 1: was fairly uniform i mean they said listen we we
- 5:37Speaker 1: would fix this stuff we don't have the cables we
- 5:40Speaker 1: need we don't have the stuff they need and they
- 5:42Speaker 1: said the money that is needed to fix things keeps
- 5:45Speaker 1: getting chowed i mean your point is well taken that
- 5:50Speaker 1: You know, if people saw value for money, there might
- 5:53Speaker 1: be more behind the workers who deliver the services. But
- 5:57Speaker 1: in a way, is there more of a potential for
- 6:01Speaker 1: some kind of alliance between the employees and the residents
- 6:05Speaker 1: and ratepayers?
- 6:06Speaker 2: I think most of us know or many of us
- 6:09Speaker 2: know fabulous people who work for the city, who go
- 6:14Speaker 2: above and beyond the call of duty. And there is
- 6:17Speaker 2: a lot of chowing happening. And we know they are MacGyvers.
- 6:20Speaker 2: You know, they make things happen even when their stock
- 6:23Speaker 2: rooms and their storerooms are completely depleted because the city
- 6:27Speaker 2: owes suppliers so much money. Nobody will give it credit lines.
- 6:31Speaker 2: They have great people working for the city. And if
- 6:33Speaker 2: only they weren't put in this position.
- 6:38Speaker 1: Feryal Hafti, thank you. Daily Maverick, check out their coverage
- 6:43Speaker 1: today on the Daily Maverick site of that agreement reached
- 6:46Speaker 1: and it would seem signed between the South African Municipal
- 6:50Speaker 1: Workers Union and the people who currently run the city
- 6:54Speaker 1: of Johannesburg.