Latest / UK Column Radio / UK Column Podcast 14th June 2024

Transcript

UK Column Podcast 14th June 2024 · UK Column Radio

0:08
Good afternoon. It's Friday, the fourteenth of June twenty twenty four, just
0:11
after one o'clock. Welcome to UK column News. I'm your host Mike Robinson
0:14
joining me today by videolink. We have Debbie Evans and Ben Rubin who welcome
0:19
to the program both. We're going to get started today with the G seven,
0:23
which of course is kicked off in Italy, and here they all are
0:27
for their family photograph. Actually, the final image that we show at the
0:32
very end of the program will have the same people on it, but we'll
0:35
keep that for later. So of course this is the G seven group of
0:40
nations as Canada, France, Germany, at Lee, Japan, UK,
0:43
United States and the EU of course there as well. So what have they
0:47
been talking about. Well, yesterday they had a session on Africa, climate
0:51
change in development and as you could see from that photograph, Africa well represented
0:55
amongst the leaders there. But anyway, then they had a session on the
0:59
Middle East, and they had a session on Ukraine. We'll come on to
1:02
that in one second. And then today they're talking about migration and artificial intelligence
1:07
and so on. So anyway, they were having a session on Ukraine.
1:11
Here they are and Zelensky was invited. He was taking part in it,
1:15
so they were very happy for their virtue signaling photographs to be published. There
1:21
Sean Michel, and there is Justin Trudeau. I'm sure we recognize him.
1:26
And of course Richie Sunak was there. I'm not sure whether he left us
1:29
earlier or not, but anyway, he was there. But what else happened,
1:34
Well, of course there was a deal done between Zelenski and Joe Biden.
1:38
I'm not quite sure how that happened, as you'll see in a second,
1:40
but anyway, it appears to have happened. They've signed a ten year
1:44
bilateral security deal between Ukraine and the United States. They're calling it historic,
1:49
but of course it's not really worth the paper that's written on because it has
1:53
a get out of Jill free card associated with it, and that is that
1:59
either party can with draw from the agreement with six months notice, so it
2:01
doesn't tie whoever the next president of the United States might be into anything.
2:07
So Biden, of course then also went on to and the others went on
2:12
to announce fifty new sanctions, a crackdown on Putin's war chest. It's always
2:17
prudence, it's not Russia. It's putin because of course, Saul Olinsky says,
2:23
you've got to personalize everything, and that's what they're doing. They don't
2:25
like anybody personalizing it in their direction, but they'll do it whoever they like.
2:30
So fifty new sanctions and this includes fifty billion pound loan which they are
2:37
funding by stealing the money from the sanctioned companies and individuals. So money that's
2:45
been frozen by the G seven is going to be stolen and given to Ukraine
2:51
instead. And they say this as a long term funding mechanism, so they're
2:54
looking forward to doing more of this. We do understand that this is the
3:00
rules based international order at work, but where apparently there are no particular rules.
3:06
Now, as for Joe Biden himself, let's have a look at this
3:10
a little bit of video, because there was a demonstration of parachutists. They
3:16
were all falling out of the sky with various flags attached to their to themselves,
3:22
and this one had the G seven flag, and all the leaders were
3:25
of course very excited about that. But Joe got a bit bored and he
3:30
decided to walk away, and well they all gathered around him because they wanted
3:36
to hurt him back into the group again, and they were looking after him
3:42
very carefully. There are a bunch of videos on social media at the moment,
3:46
Ben, I see you laughing there, So I'm going to ask you
3:49
for comment on this because there are a bunch of videos on social media and
3:52
I basically showing the same kind of thing with Biden losing attention, his attention
3:58
span isn't that great anymore, losing his attention, drifting off away from the
4:02
party, and then they all try to gather random again to hurt him back
4:05
in the right direction. It is a bit pathetic. And my question is
4:10
at what point are we going to recognize or are people broadly going to recognize
4:14
that this man is not fit for purpose. That's a very good question.
4:21
It's been going on for some years now, right even in the previous presidential
4:26
campaign, IDEM was presenting with well, essentially looks like Alzheimer's with dementias or
4:31
something like that, and then nothing has happened in the subsequent four years to
4:35
dispel those impressions. And actually I think that he's fairly well accepted. It's
4:44
fairly well accepted at this point. Well, yes, but I just find
4:47
it fascinating how they are clearly slightly embarrassed about the whole situation, but they're
4:54
doing their best to put a brief fast on it. It's a bit pathetic,
4:57
but let's just have another example of him giving a speech following the signing
5:02
of the agreement with Ukraine. It includes major commitments from Ukraine to impact excuse
5:12
me, dimplomented democratic, economic and security reforms. Right. Social media is
5:18
just full of clips of a similar nature where he is trying to read from
5:23
the auto Q is not capable of doing it anymore, and really is the
5:28
United States seriously considering having this man stand for another four year term now as
5:34
I understand it. In the meantime he is going to take part in a
5:39
live debate with Donald Trump. I just don't see how that can possibly happen.
5:43
But I mean getting back to the G seven and related issues. Then
5:46
in the meantime, we have the bricks. Over the last couple of days
5:51
have been holding a meeting of foreign ministers and this was taking place in Russia.
5:58
This is a first gathering of bricks since the expansion to include Egypt,
6:02
Ethiopia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. Another fifteen countries including Turkey,
6:09
were there and one of the things that they did was to complete its D
6:15
dollarization program. So we'll talk about that in a second, but before we
6:17
do, I'll just say that Lavrov on Monday was saying that bricks countries are
6:23
developing their own payments platform in order to underpin this whole thing which was going
6:30
to allow them to bypass the US dollar, and he said that the platform
6:34
will improve international monetary system and allowed payment in national currencies for mutual trade.
6:41
They of Russia, of course, very keen to move its trading partners off
6:45
the dollar because they effectively feel that they're being held to ransom at the moment.
6:48
But let's just have a look at a comparison, a quick comparison between
6:53
the G seven and the bricks. Of the bricks is in purple and the
6:56
G seven is in sort of tail color here, and if we look at
6:59
the globe will share of GDP, we see that Brix is quite well ahead
7:02
share of world population. Of course, bricks is very well ahead. In
7:06
terms of global oil production, they're quite far ahead, and in terms of
7:11
contribution to economic growth, they're very far ahead, at least double the economic
7:16
growth in terms for bricks as opposed to the G seven. So we've got
7:19
to ask ourselves when we're looking or we're hearing Western countries banging the war drums
7:26
as hard as they are, is the reason for it. But of course
7:30
it's not just bricks countries that are looking at the dollarization, because Saudi Arabia
7:34
has ended its eighty year petro dollar deal with the United States in favor of
7:41
multi currency sales. And so this is an article India today and they're making
7:46
the point that they've decided not to renew the eighty year petro dollar deal with
7:51
the US. It expired on Sunday, the ninth of June. The agreement
7:57
was originally signed in nineteen seven four. It's been a key part, according
8:01
to this article of US global economic influence, and of course it has,
8:07
and the article saying by choosing not to extend this contract, Saudi Arabia can
8:09
now sell oil and other goods using different currencies such as the Chinese runimbi,
8:16
euros, yen, and juan instead of only US dollars. This is a
8:20
really significant development. But before we start thinking that Sidi's doing something positive,
8:28
we should also just kinter point that with the fact that SAIDI has decided to
8:31
join Project Mbridge, which is the Bank for International Settlements sort of UBERCDBC CBDC.
8:39
Sorry, So every central bank will have a central bank digital currency,
8:45
and m Bridge is the glue that connects all the various central bank digital currencies
8:50
together. So this is going to be what they're describing a collaborative effort exploring
8:54
a digital currency platform shared amongst central banks and commercial banks. And headline says
9:01
it has reached minimum viable product stage and Sadi Riba has decided to join.
9:07
So there we go. That's a quick rind up of the G seven and
9:11
the sorry state of Western leadership, Debbie. Where does that take us?
9:18
That perhaps takes us to organs for sale? Well, yes, I've been
9:24
doing a little bit of deep diving and I've been joining a few dots that
9:26
I'd like to share with our audience because I know that we've got a lot
9:31
of researchers, data crunches, doctors and experts watching. So what if,
9:37
for example, different areas or different countries were going to be targeted by different
9:43
pathogens creating epidemics, not pandemics this time, but epidemics. Is it even
9:50
possible many of our regular watchers and listeners will remember the times that I've mentioned
9:56
Professor James Giardano so very quickly. I have to read all of these things
10:00
from my notes because it's so big. James Giardano is chief of the Department
10:05
of Neurology at Georgetown. He's head of the European Brain Project. He's a
10:11
member of DAPER. He's the project leader for Dual News Neurotechnologies. He's also
10:18
a member of the Joint Staff of Pentagon. He's published three hundred papers,
10:26
seven books, and he's authored twenty United States Government white papers. Just before
10:33
this clip I'm about to show you. Just remember what he says, a
10:35
lecture delivering to a military audience is not science fiction, it's science fact.
10:43
So is this possible? Can we spread pathogens about? Have a listen to
10:48
what he has to say. Here a technique that's become very well known,
10:52
chrisper cast nine, that allows us to literally modify bugs in a variety of
10:56
different ways. So I now may be able to take a relatively harmless microbiological
11:01
agent, a bacterium or a virus, do some gene editing and make this
11:05
thing far more morbidly viable. Make it far more virulent and in some cases
11:11
even make it far more lethal. But I don't want lethality, at least
11:13
not necessarily. But I want is high morbidity. I want people to complain.
11:18
So what do I do. I go to des Moines. Ladies and
11:20
gentlemen of people on the screen. I have nothing against des Moines. I
11:24
live there for four years. I go to des Moines. I infect a
11:26
couple of sentinel cases in des Moines. I go to Seattle. I infect
11:31
a couple of cases there. I go to North Carolina, I go to
11:35
Wisconsin. What I'm doing is I'm using a dispersion methodology to be able to
11:39
infect sentinel cases with a highly morbid condition. These individuals complain. Again,
11:45
this is a central nervous system condition, so they're complaining of whatever the bug
11:48
may do, it'll produce some cascade of neurological and neuropsychiatric signs and symptoms.
11:54
And then when I do the real bug that I use is the Internet.
12:00
I take attribution for that. Yes, I'm a terrorist group, and I
12:03
have done this by infecting him with a highly little agent. And the first
12:05
signs and symptoms of lethality are x y and z these people are really sick
12:11
with this. But then I say, others who are also infected will show
12:15
subdromal pre dromal signs of lethality, and what that will be is anxiety,
12:20
sleeplessness, agitation. What I've now done is I've got every individual who is
12:26
diagnostically hypochondriacal, and I've got every individual who's the worried well flooding the public
12:31
health system banging on the door. The CDC comes back and says nonsense,
12:35
that's not real. I come back and say that's fake news. And as
12:41
a consequence of doing that, what I do is I create a schism between
12:45
the police and the public health system. I fracture the integrity of trust and
12:50
reliance upon the population and its government. So we know it's possible. Now
12:58
last week, might remember I was talking about ecoli. So can they make
13:03
up an ecoli? Well, according to the Smithsonian yes, Now scientists can
13:07
create ecoli with a completely different genome, so they could create it. So
13:15
this is eco line. Remember we were talking about antimicrobial resistance last week,
13:20
and I don't suppose many of you have heard of a pandemic exercise, A
13:24
little known pandemic antimicrobial resistance exercised by the UK government. So this took place
13:31
in twenty eighteen in Argentina by our very own Dame Sally Davis, and they
13:37
were using ECOLI to see what happens to livestock, what happens when you travel,
13:41
does it cross borders? Now, as you know, ecoli's been quite
13:46
interesting to me, and back in my blog actually which I'll come onto in
13:50
a minute. But back in twenty twenty two, the WHO prepared a paper
13:56
and it was called Strengthening the Global Architecture for Health Emergency Preparedness and Response called
14:03
HEPRA. Now in this document there was a map and the map is very
14:09
significant and I'm going to show you this map now. Now you might have
14:13
to go to the document which is in my blog, which is on the
14:16
front page of the UK column on Editor's Choice. Now, notice the title
14:22
of the document, increasing number and scale of health emergencies from all hazards,
14:28
and the headings at the top are newly emerging, re emerging, resurging,
14:33
deliberately emerging. So this map would appear to forecasts targeted ap epidemics in different
14:39
countries, so not looking at a pandemic, but looking at epidemics, and
14:43
you'll notice there that if you do zoom in, you'll see anthrax bioterrorism is
14:48
deliberately targeted. Now this slide here is zoomed in on the UK and Western
14:54
Europe and you can see that we're looking at cryptospidium at which is drinking water,
15:01
and ecoli which is wastewater, and these are highlighted as newly emerging.
15:07
This document was published in twenty twenty two because of this map, which I
15:11
think is significant. Thanks to Cheryl Granger very much for bringing my attention to
15:18
a video that Dr David Martin has recently put out. He was being interviewed.
15:24
He was being interviewed about newly emerging pathogens. Let's listen to what Dr
15:28
David Martin says. Yeah, well that's a great question, and Emerald,
15:33
too few people are asking that question. And unfortunately the House Select Committee that's
15:39
looking into the COVID origins is actually missing the point because and I want to
15:43
come back to this, well, a lot of people think this is a
15:45
COVID story or a SARS spike protein kind of approach. The problem is there
15:50
are sixty eight scheduled pathogens that are currently developed and ready for various stages of
15:58
release on the population. And that schedule of toxins is something that NIH and
16:03
NIAID have funded both in the gain A function research side as well as distributed
16:10
through a little known company, BI Resources, which was started by the Rockefeller
16:14
Foundation at the early part of the last century. And that particular platform of
16:19
essentially a library of the most hideous forms of chimeras known to humanity include are
16:26
you ready for this? The H five N two that, according to the
16:29
World Health Organization had never been seen before. Well, it turns out you
16:33
can buy it from the BEI Resources. Hmmm, buying it from BI Resources.
16:41
So I went to b EI Resources and found out that b E Resources
16:45
are actually under contract for seven years to American Type Culture Collection otherwise known as
16:52
ATCC. So just remember that ATCC. So what do BI do and what
17:00
do they sell? So if you just pop to the next slide, you'll
17:02
see that they were established by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases NIAD.
17:07
You might think of FAUCI when you think of that organization. So basically,
17:14
this is a bank of toxins and body parts. Some can be made
17:17
to order, you can deposit into it as well, and they have a
17:21
catalog, so let's look and see what's in their catalog, and there's a
17:25
whole heap of stuff. You can find pretty much anything you want, and
17:30
I'm just going to highlight a few of the things that they've got in their
17:33
catalog because according to this company, if you're registered and approved, and I'm
17:38
not sure how you get registered or approved, you can pretty much order anythink
17:42
you want, including SARS covy two. So if we go into their catalog,
17:48
there you'll see SARS CoV two. This one was particularly isolated in England
17:53
in twenty twenty from a sick patient. And this is just one of the
17:57
things we can buy input in our cart and have delivered in three days.
18:03
I'm not quite sure how or what vans are passing us in the street with
18:07
all of these substances on board. But let's look at ATCC next, because
18:11
ATCC are a global Biological Resource Center, so basically life sciences, and that's
18:18
a catalog of everything that they do. If we have a look at ATCC
18:22
collection holdings, we can see that they're into everything. They actually specialize in
18:29
donor diversity, ethnic gender diversity. They have tumor cells for sale, eighteen
18:36
thousand bacterial lines, seven six hundred species of fungus and yeast. They've got
18:41
tissues, they've got body parts, they've got pretty much everything. They even
18:47
store cancer. And they have a big page just on cancer where they talk
18:52
about organoids. And at the next slide you'll see right at the bottom they
18:57
talk about organoids, which is very very important when we think about genomic medicine.
19:03
But perhaps we can talk about that a little bit in extra. So
19:07
what kind of stuff can you buy then from ATCC. Well, you can
19:11
buy a frozen uterus if you want one, and it'll cost you three thousand,
19:15
seven hundred and seventy nine dollars. Or you can have some cancer metastatic
19:22
cancer from the large intestine of the colon, and again that costs three thousand,
19:26
seven hundred and seventy nine dollars. Let's see what else we can buy.
19:30
Let's see what sells on the menu. Oh, ecoli, so you
19:34
can have I mean, there are heaps of ecolies that you can buy.
19:37
I've I've just highlighted a couple. You've got Ecolife for four hundred and sixty
19:42
dollars, and then you've got the genomic DNA for three hundred and eighty eight
19:47
dollars and one more. Let's go for one more because I think we'll probably
19:49
be able to find cryptos barridium. And oh yes, there's cryptos barridium at
19:55
a cool five hundred and seventy four dollars. So when I went to look
20:00
who ATCC supply, especially in the UK, one of the people that they
20:06
supply is LGC, and you'll see that on the heading there, I've just
20:11
marked ATCC and LGC. Now LGCS was formerly the laboratory of the Government Chemist.
20:17
They are now a private chemist. So you've got a private company literally
20:22
running the government chemist. And this the government chemist is called Sir Julian Braybrook,
20:32
I believe, And this is all financed by venture capitalists. But what's
20:37
even more interesting is LGC, who can buy all of these toxins and body
20:42
parts and pretty much everything else. They are directly linked into our very good
20:48
friend, the MHRA. So LGC supply the MHRA, who actually test all
20:56
of the medicines before them H give approval. So a little bit more about
21:03
the MHRA LGC alliance, and there you can see forty scientists they test the
21:08
medication so that the MHR can approve them as safe for patients. And my
21:15
question is is where are your body parts going if you've had surgery? Perhaps,
21:21
and especially ladies who are having babies, placentas are worth a lot of
21:23
money, But are your body parts going to academics, to laboratories for a
21:30
lot of money being sold? What are you consenting to? And also there
21:34
is that question two of what's happening to organs that are removed during post mortem?
21:40
So more to come on this in the very near future. Debbie,
21:45
thank you very much. That video clip at the beginning was incredible. I
21:48
have no doubt we'll be speaking about this an extra But Ben, let's move
21:52
on to you and well queer advertising. Absolutely, yes, it's June,
22:00
so that means it's Pride month. So the already ubiquitous LGBTQ propaganda has reached
22:07
an even more fevered pitch. The question is is this messaging appropriate for public
22:14
consumption? Does it break advertising standards? And are some of these messages being
22:19
deliberately targeted towards children and going against the wishes of their parents. Now I'm
22:26
going to endraw your attention to these billboards. I took this video last week
22:30
Wednesday, the fifth of June, around three thirty in the afternoon, and
22:33
you can see that they are flashing up some rather striking messages now every sort
22:42
of fifteen to twenty seconds, right, so this is high repetition communication across
22:48
these digital billboards. They were flashing up words like pan sexual, which the
22:53
Cambridge Dictionary defines as sexually or romantically attracted to people of any gender. I
22:59
suppose this is the upgrade of bisexual, given that we now have an infinite
23:03
number of genders. Also, this was on the screen. Cis gender and
23:07
relatively new term if you're not familiar with it. It's used to describe a
23:11
person whose sense of personal identity and gender corresponds to his or her sex at
23:17
birth. And then this classic is gay it means homosexual. And this was
23:26
going on on a constant basis. There was a constant stream of these messages
23:32
popping up. I was really quite taken aback by it, to be honest
23:34
with you, because this is hyper sexualized. It's in your face, there's
23:37
no nuance whatsoever, and I don't feel like it's appropriate or necessary for these
23:42
things to be being pushed out like this in public you know, which is
23:47
bad enough. But then about three hours later, I was walking back past
23:52
the same billboards and we should be able to see this video playing, and
23:56
what it's going to show you, I won't play. The whole thing is
23:59
when it will show you is that those ads, the ads saying gay,
24:03
pan sexual assisienda, they aren't on the screens. Three hours later, it
24:08
struck me that what could be happening here is that someone has decided to deliberately
24:15
target children or young people on the way home from school. If you think
24:21
about who's on the road at three point thirty in the afternoon, four o'clock
24:23
in the afternoon, it's kids, right, Whereas at six six thirty rush
24:27
hour that's when the parents are going home from work generally, right. So
24:32
that seemed to me that that was a deliberate attempt to target those hyper sexualized
24:37
messages at children, potentially young children. And so we don't know who's going
24:41
to be looking at this stuff really really important. So I wanted to understand
24:45
who are who's the organization behind this, what exactly is going on here?
24:48
And I came across this website. So the organization is called social arts dot
24:55
work and the url their web address is very prominent placed on those adverts.
25:02
You probably couldn't see it that well because I was a bit back from the
25:04
advert. It was very clear who it was coming from. It was this
25:08
organization Social Arte dot Work. You can see another example of the campaign on
25:12
their screens run by this fella, A lovely bit of one I Shenanigan's going
25:19
on there. His name is Martin Ferrell or Ferrell, and he's a British
25:25
public artist long associated with the international out of home industry. So that's the
25:30
billboard industry, right, and these organizations that run the billboards, but huge
25:33
international companies. He does a lot of work with them, apparently, and
25:37
it says that his works challenged unjust power systems of all kinds, including patriarchal
25:44
power, the oppression of women and non heterosexuals, and the heteronormative status quo.
25:49
Okay, so you get a sense of what mister Ferrell's about. And
25:55
this campaign is called All Varieties. It's a nationwide public art work celebrating the
26:00
labels that help people express their individuality and define their place in the world.
26:07
He's got a quote from Stephen Frye. All Varieties is a wonderful thing when
26:11
the tide of justice around the world is moving out, leaving our beach of
26:17
fellowship, love and solidarity all the more there typical Stephen Frye quote sounds like
26:25
they're recruiting. Actually when I read that, really quite odd actually when you
26:30
dig into what's going on here. So a bit more about mister Farrell's ideological
26:36
background. So he's a big socialist. Apparently socialisms and moral ideas is another
26:40
campaign that he's done. Also, this one which I came across in Hackney
26:45
in twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen. I remember seeing All Men Are Dangerous and
26:48
I remember saying to my friend, why is someone telling me and everyone else
26:52
that all men are dangerous? It feels like, well, first of all,
26:55
it's not true. Then also, is this a deliberate attempt to divide
26:59
us up? Could be? Yeah, So that was first put out in
27:02
two thousand and six, but it's certainly been run recently. As I said,
27:04
I mentioned seeing it myself back in aund around twenty nineteen. It was
27:08
certainly pre pandemic, so highly politicized, highly sexualized. Who's behind it?
27:15
Well, let's have a little look at the funders and the backers. So
27:18
there's an organization called Nordern. Can't find anything out about Nordern. I don't
27:23
know who they are, but they're very prominently based there in the top left
27:27
hand corner. Also Bury Brothers and Rudd who if you're not familiar with that,
27:30
they are a very very posh and expensive wine shop in Mayfair. Right,
27:36
So they're in the mix here as well as basically the entire out of
27:40
home media industry. So this is remarkable. You've got JC decal, you've
27:44
got a clear channel, you've got a light media. You know. This
27:48
is basically all of outdoor advertising across the whole of the UK, all of
27:52
the billboards, all of the bus stop ads, absolutely everything are aligned behind
27:56
this campaign. And the organization that operated the billboards that I saw was this
28:03
one Alike Media. They describe themselves as positively different, out of home,
28:10
inclusive, out of home, built on positive connections. Quite sure what that
28:15
means, but anyway, they run ads and I got in touch with them
28:19
and I downloaded some of their information and it turns out that it is actually
28:23
possible through their digital planning platform to what they call offer optimized campaigns based on
28:32
multiple goal types, including day parts, so you can actually select in their
28:37
system specific time slots based on who you want your messages to be seen by.
28:44
So actually my assumption or my interpretation of what I saw, I think
28:48
is borne out by the facts. The capability certainly exists to target younger people
28:52
and to keep messaging away from their parents who are going to be traveling through
28:56
the same area at a different time. Next organization was this one, and
29:03
I think is an interesting one to look at, Queer Britain, and the
29:08
campaign describes its Queer Britain as its museum partner and Queer Britain is the UK's
29:15
first and only LGBTQ plus museum. They're based on Granary Square in some Pancreas,
29:22
just behind some pangres where the big Google European headquarters, the Facebook European
29:26
headquarters, the Guardian newspaper central, some martins, a whole bunch of cultural
29:30
and media and technology institutions are based there. That's where the Queer Britain Museum
29:37
is based. They've got a load of corporate backing, so from big international
29:41
drinks companies Ago to Leaves to M and C, SARChI the advertising agency,
29:48
as well as e Y. They seem to crop up everywhere I go at
29:52
the moment, Universal Music Groups, Sony Music Group, Fitch Group, who
29:56
do ratings for the financial markets. They've got a huge network of patrons and
30:04
partners, including Elizabeth Bingham Obe who's a top Ey partner, Dr ANLM Cbe,
30:11
who was the former chair of the Scouts. It tells you what you
30:15
need to know about the Scouts a plus links with a whole range of other
30:21
big cultural institutions, from the TAKE to the BNA, and a whole bunch
30:25
of other people. So we've got, as I said at the start,
30:29
hyper sexualized messaging apparently being targeted towards young people and children, coming from an
30:38
organization that is back to the hilt by cultural stars like Stephen Frye, the
30:44
British establishment, big international corporations, and I really just don't understand how why
30:51
this stuff is going on. So I got in touch with them. I
30:53
sent them an email on Wednesday basically to our for a bunch of information,
31:00
but specifically relating to the question do you view younger people as your target audience
31:06
for all varieties and does this have any bearing on the timing of the advertising
31:11
when you're putting this stuff out. I haven't received the response back yet.
31:15
I think it's probably unlikely that I will. I am going to get in
31:18
touch with the Advertising Standards Agency because I actually do think that this is a
31:23
violation of a part of the code which relates to causing physical, mental or
31:30
moral detriment to persons under the age of at and you know this is hyper
31:33
sexualized messaging. I'm not really sure why it's being put out and certainly some
31:41
questions I think to be answered about this organization, what it's up to,
31:45
and whether all this is legal or not. And thank you very much for
31:49
that. Okay, if you like what the UK Column does, you would
31:52
like to support us, we do need your support. Please go to support
31:56
dot UK column dot org and you can there mechanisms to help us out there.
32:01
Please do do that if you possibly can, because we can only do
32:06
what we do with your help. But if you can't do that at the
32:08
very least, please share anything you see on the various platforms, especially UK
32:13
colun dot org and UK callumn Extracts dot com at UK and alternatively you could
32:19
pick something up on the UK Column Shop Now. Yesterday at one pm,
32:24
the interview that I did with Andrew Bridgen was broadcast and that is now on
32:29
the UK Column website. If you haven't seen that yet, it's quite an
32:32
interesting discussion. Do watch it. I think you'll be surprised by a couple
32:38
of things you see on that, so please do watch it and share it
32:42
critically share it. A reminder that on Sunday at ten am we will be
32:46
having our UK Column Live event. Everybody that's on screen will be taking part.
32:52
We're looking forward to that. Do join us for it. It's going
32:54
to be an interesting day. And then we will be at the Science Beautiful
33:00
Festival June twenty seventh to thirtieth in Wimborne in Dorset. If you can possibly
33:05
make that as well, we'd look forward to meeting you there. So that's
33:09
that and I let's move on then to Northern Ireland and doctor Anne McCluskey,
33:15
who many people will know was a prominent doctor speaking out on COVID issues in
33:22
Northern Ireland from the beginning. She subsequently was given a fine of two hundred
33:28
and fifty five pounds for not conforming with the COVID restrictions and that particular legal
33:36
issue has been dragging on for quite a long time. Now, and she
33:39
ended up in court in a magistrates court where she was seen in front of
33:45
a district judge who give her the option to pay the fine or go to
33:49
prison, and as a result, she is now in prison. She is
33:54
in prison in High Bank would Prison, which is a women's prison, which
33:58
is adjoint to a a young offenders prison in southeast Belfast or just to the
34:02
southeast of Belfast rather, and so she's there for fourteen days for not paying
34:08
this fine. Now, the documentation I saw in this used the term in
34:14
lieu of paying the fine. So I'm not clear at this point, and
34:16
if anybody can help me, please let me know. I'm not clear whether
34:21
the time in prison will remove the obligation to pay the fine, or whether
34:25
she will still be required to pay it or not. But the interesting thing
34:30
about this is that she was standing in the general election as an independent candidate
34:36
in Derry, and so of course if she's in prison for the next two
34:40
weeks, she can't do any campaigning. Her name will be on the ballot,
34:45
but you know, she doesn't get the opportunity to do any campaigning.
34:49
I just find that incredible timing. Now we should make the point that many
34:54
many people are still refusing or have not paid their COVIDI that fines for breaking
35:01
COVID restrictions. And this article from itv X was from December because lawyers were
35:07
calling at that time to give an amnesty because thousands of these fines remain unpaid
35:14
and the courts aren't capable of actually dealing with them because the court is under
35:19
so much pressure that they can't get them through the lists. And so again
35:22
I'm just going to ask why was Anne McCluskey brought the court at this time
35:29
for this issue when she made it absolutely clear that she had no intention of
35:34
paying the fine. I think there is a political motivation to this, but
35:38
anyway we can have we can discuss that more in an extra as well.
35:44
Let's move on then, and Debbie, the NHS and people being treated in
35:50
cupboards, Oh my goodness. Look, they want us all out of hospital.
35:54
It's as simple as that. They want to frighten you so badly that
35:59
you're never going to want to go to hospital. And I'm sure many people
36:01
watching won't want to go to hospital. But what happens if you do go
36:06
to a and E so Sky brought out this story about nurses have declared a
36:12
national emergency. As NHS patients are treated in cupboards and car parks as well
36:16
as corridors, I might have to say. The story went on to say
36:22
that all of this information was taken from the Royal College of Nurses survey.
36:29
They'd surveyed eleven thousand frontline staff and had actually called this a national emergency.
36:35
Now in the nursing times, nurses are warning of hospitals that are crumbling,
36:40
literally falling down around their ears, and they're saying that the ceilings are falling
36:46
down. They talked about it at the Royal College of Nursing Congress which was
36:52
held and actually I'll talk about more about that in a minute, but thank
36:54
you so much to Paul, one of our regular viewers and subscribers who gives
36:59
us actually full on reports on the RCN. But they've been saying that basically
37:04
the nurses are too busy watching the ceilings to see if they're moving in order
37:09
to treat patients. So, as I say, the RCN Corongress was held
37:15
last week in South Wales and they were discussing this a lot, and they'd
37:22
also brought out a report the RCN and it's called Corridor caate a care unsafe,
37:28
undignified, and unacceptable. The report goes on to say that this is
37:35
affecting patients privacy, dignity, and worryingly, more than half of the respondents
37:40
said that patients had no access to life saving equipment and they were running out
37:46
of oxygen. In fact, it's everything is becoming so normalized now that treating
37:52
patients in inappropriate areas has been normalized, and it's unsafe, undignified, and
37:57
unacceptable. This was written by Professor Nicola Ranger, who's acting CEO of the
38:02
RCN, and the RCN put out a very short video about corridor care.
38:08
Let's have a listen. There are patients who'd been in the department over thirty
38:14
hours waiting for beds. Every cubicles full, so there are patients on beds
38:19
and trolley's in the corridors. It is very, very difficult to provide safe,
38:30
outstanding care when you haven't got the equipment, when you know patients are
38:36
not having the privacy and dignity that they require, and that takes a real
38:40
toll on our members. I've felt inhumane and felt my pin as a registered
38:46
nurse's compromised. It's a silent safety scandal. The reason why it particularly affects
38:53
nursing staff is they are the constant twenty four to seven presents and they've had
39:00
the stress of some people being asked to be examined in A and E departments
39:04
in the toilet. What we're putting our patients through is unsafe, undignified,
39:24
unacceptable, and we absolutely have a responsibility as nursing staff to call it out
39:38
and infection control. Let's not forget that these are never events. They would
39:44
never have taken place on my watch, and many people that are watching that
39:49
trained at the same time as myself will be saying the same. However,
39:52
the message from the RCN, I'm so angry. The message from the RCN
39:58
doesn't seem to have reached the na Chess board. Let's listen to what the
40:01
NHS Board meeting said in February just this year. We have a minimum risk
40:08
escalation matrix, so that we say that we agree that as a trust that
40:14
the trust will not accept delays to patients requiring an ambulance in their place of
40:17
residence is the highest risk to our system, not necessarily to our organizations with
40:22
our system, and then it works down with the lowest risk being business as
40:25
usual. So we go from risk of being the highest is that the people
40:30
in their own homes, the next is people in an ambulance, the next
40:32
is people in d and then finally we're going to get into the real detail
40:36
around the kind of escalation plan that we have within the hospital. We're very
40:39
clear about, for example, how many additional patients on a ward, and
40:43
then working through the lowest risk is probably corridor care and ED, which is
40:49
not great and nobody wants that right through to caring for additional patients in areas
40:53
on the wards that are not designed for those patients. So we've got a
40:57
very clear risk matrix and we have various escalation figures. Have we got complete
41:01
buying from everybody. No, it's absolutely a work in progress. So corridor
41:10
care is acceptable for the NHS board, and yet it's been declared as an
41:15
emergency from nurses. I suggest the board listen to nurses, I really do.
41:21
But they don't want us in hospital. They want us out of hospital
41:23
as quickly as possible. And I've noticed that more and more people, including
41:28
myself, have got hospital beds in their front rooms. But where do you
41:31
get these hospital beds from? Because they're saying that you get ten thousand.
41:36
Now we have ten thousand extra hospital beds, which is your bed. So
41:38
this is a company called vivid Care and they're the key supplier to the NHS.
41:43
Now I'm not going to go into the mechanics of vivid Care and who
41:46
owns it, etc. We'll do that on another news but very quickly,
41:50
how do you get a free hospital bed? So the way you get a
41:53
free hospital bed is basically from the NHS, from the Council, from a
41:57
social worker referral, from a GP refer and in fact, there's not really
42:00
any criteria. Anybody can have a hospital bed. So what do you need
42:06
to have? What kind of disease or illness do you need to have?
42:08
Well, that again it's fans, cathetera care, wound care, chronic disease
42:14
management, bandaging, pressure area care, bowel care, and end of life
42:19
care. So if you fit any of those brackets and more, that's another
42:22
way to keep you out of hospital, to give you a hospital in your
42:25
front room. And let's not forget the other way to keep you out of
42:29
hospital is to send you to our very good friend or old friend. Now,
42:32
the community Diagnostic Centers of which you're going to see springing up on your
42:37
high street very soon. So corridor care and cupboard care completely unacceptable. But
42:44
where are your relatives going? Should they have to need to visit A and
42:49
E? Thank you Debbie for that night. Speaking of old friends, let's
42:54
bring Marianna Spring on screen because she has published a new article on the BBC
43:00
yesterday Bought or Not are fake accounts swaying voters towards re form UK? And
43:06
I just wanted to mention in passing the sheer hypocrisy of this article because,
43:10
of course, when it suits her to present the idea that people are using
43:15
bots on social media, on Twitter and other social media in order to drive
43:20
a political narrative, she of course has already admitted and she's quite proud of
43:24
the fact that she has used this these types of tactics in order to troll
43:30
people that are what she views as conspiracy theorists. So well done, Marianna,
43:36
glad to see you sticking to your standards there. But anyway, sticking
43:39
with the media, this is really what I wanted to talk about. This
43:44
is a report entitled preventing Torrents of hit or Stifling free expression Online and this
43:50
is from the future of free speech, which is a sort of pressure group
43:55
think tank thing, and they're talking about your union in particular in all the
44:00
various legislation that the EUS brought in. But of course what we see in
44:04
terms of online safety legislation in the EU is no different to what we see
44:08
here in the UK. We have the same types of strategies being employed in
44:14
every G seven nation. So if we put that back on screen, let's
44:17
just have a look and see what they're saying in this. The analysis found
44:22
that legal online speech, so that's speech which is online, which is legal,
44:25
it's no way illegal, made up most of the removed content from posts
44:30
on Facebook and YouTube in France, Germany and Sweden. Of the deleted comments
44:35
examined across platforms and countries, between eighty seven point five percent and ninety nine
44:39
point seven percent depending on the sample, were legally permissible. Now, of
44:44
course this harks back to the days of the Online Safety Bill as it was
44:49
before became an act and the issue of legal but harmful content, And although
44:52
that was dropped in the UK, it was only dropped sort of overtly.
44:58
Covertly, it's still a thing. So let's go on with this, the
45:00
highest possible proportion of permissible deleted comments was observed in Germany, where ninety nine
45:06
point seven percent and ninety eight point nine percent of deleted comments were found to
45:10
be legal on Facebook and YouTube. Perspectively, this could reflect the impact of
45:15
the German Network Enforcement Act on the removal practices of social media platforms, which
45:20
may over remove content with the objective of avoiding the legislation's heaf defined In comparison
45:27
to the corresponding figures for Sweden or ninety four point six percent for both Facebook
45:30
and YouTube, France is the lowest percentage of legally permissible deleted comments, with
45:36
ninety two point one percent of the deleted comments in the French Facebook sample and
45:39
eighty seven point five percent of the deleted comments in the French YouTube sample.
45:46
Among the deleted comments, the majority were classified as general expressions of opinion.
45:52
In other words, these were statements that did not contain linguistic attacks, hate
45:55
speech, or illegal content, such as expressing the support of our controversial candidate
46:00
in the abstract. On average, more than fifty six percent of the removed
46:05
comments fall into this category. Moderation of social media is understood by several countries
46:10
as a delicate balance between freedom of expression, security and protection of minorities.
46:15
However, recent evident events and geopolitical developments could disrupt this perceived balance. National
46:21
security concerns have cause governments to try to counter misinformation interference from hostile nations with
46:27
blunt tools. We can have a whole discussion about whether what's being presented is
46:31
misinformation or whether it's be even being inspired by so called governments from outside hostile
46:38
nations. But anyway, it finally goes on to say additionally, without making
46:42
any definitive conclusions, there's some indication that legislations such as NETZGDG, which is
46:49
the German legislation aimed at strengthening citizens and granting them certain rights, has the
46:53
unintended effect of encouraging social media platforms to delete a larger fraction of legal comments.
47:00
This is a preview into the potential impact of the EU's DSA now n
47:05
force on freedom of expression. And I'm going to say very clearly, we
47:08
said this for years. This was going to be the outcome of this legislation
47:14
right across the Western world, in the UK, in the EU, and
47:16
in the United States. No, there's nothing about the intention was not.
47:22
Sorry, there was no una unintended effect here. The effect was absolutely intended.
47:29
This is about countering any narrative which goes against the official approved narrative and
47:35
it's extremely dangerous. And just to finish this segment off, I just want
47:38
to remind everybody of the Camcross Review, and I'm sorry to bring Matt Hancock
47:43
back on screen here. This is from twenty eighteen when he was Secretary of
47:46
State for Digital Culture, Media and Sport, and he was talking about the
47:51
Cancross Review exploring whether intervention may be required to safeguard the future of our free
47:55
and independent press. And he's talking about the mainstream press. Of course,
48:00
now that was pre COVID, and then the mainstream press which was absolutely suffering
48:05
with dodgy business plans and so on business models rather were supported throughout COVID with
48:12
the vast advertising budget that the government presented. But let's move over to Canada,
48:20
because they have, through there online safety legislation, have decided that they
48:24
are going to impose a three percent tax on streaming platforms like Netflix and Google,
48:30
sorry, Amazon Prime and so on in order to fund mainstream media in
48:36
Canada. There's a local media in Canada. But they're basically taking money from
48:39
the streaming companies via the online safety legislation and using that to fund mainstream media
48:45
in Canada. This is very, very dangerous. But we can talk about
48:51
more. Sorry, we'll talk about more about that on Extra Ben. Let's
48:54
come back to you and well some election used because perhaps some people will be
49:00
voarding for an AI bot. Well quite he probably will get some votes.
49:06
Actually, yeah, we talk a lot about democratic innovation, new forms of
49:09
governance, and especially the introduction of advanced tech like AI into the democratic process.
49:15
It's a big topic at the moment and I came across this the other
49:17
day. Ai Steve, who is Brighton and Hove's first aimp policies for the
49:24
People, by the People. Now it comes from a new party it looks
49:30
like called Smarter UK, but apparently they didn't register in time as a party
49:34
for the general election. So Steve Ai Steve is going to be standing as
49:38
an independent in Brighton Pavilion. And it's not only a tech enabled representative but
49:47
also a completely newer way of formulating policies. So Smarter UK talks about recruiting
49:53
local people into two groups, one that creates policies called creator and then commuters
50:01
who are going to get from Brighton rail station who will then school those policies,
50:06
and they call those people validators, and any policies that meet a fifty
50:10
percent threshold will be adopted, and then the validators will control all of AI
50:16
Steve's parliamentary votes and they call this the ultimate form of democracy, right is
50:22
total direct control of your member of Parliament. So you can sign up on
50:28
their website to be a creator or a validator, and then it says he
50:32
how can AI Steve actually represent me in Parliament? Well, it turns out
50:37
that AI Steve is backed up by another Steve, Steve Endercott, who is
50:42
a Sussex entrepreneur. He's created many of the initial policy ideas and will physically
50:49
attend Parliament to vote on policies as guided by AI Steve's feedback from his constituents.
50:55
I'm just reading this directly from the website. So although Steve maintain house
51:00
in Brighton and will use this when attending Parliament, he actually now lives in
51:04
Rochdale with his new wife, which will restrict his ability to talk to constituents
51:08
in Brighton and Hove. So they've created this AI platform so that Steve Endercott
51:15
can live outside of Brighton and still do the job of the MP. It
51:19
seems incredibly convoluted. And also this model removes the kind of traditional relationship human
51:28
to human, peer to peer relationship that we're supposed to have with our members
51:31
of Parliament, right, because this is Steve actually, you know, it's
51:36
not that little avatar that we've been looking at. It's this guy, and
51:38
they actually look different and they are different ultimately because Steve Endicott is a real
51:43
person. He's not an AI bot, right, And he's got a background,
51:46
so he's an entrepreneur. He was the UK MD of a four billion
51:52
pound turnover travel business, so a pretty successful guy. He describes himself as
51:57
a capitalist with socialist conscient which sounds a little bit public private partnership to me.
52:04
You know, that remains to be seen. He says he's a green
52:08
evangelist. Yes, he's big into sustainability and particularly the rollout of electric vehicles.
52:15
And he can bring clear leadership because he's been a company director since he
52:20
was twenty five. He understands business, He understands commercial realities and work kind
52:23
of stuff. He's not just some chilly career politician. But let's dig into
52:29
this a bit more. So. I went to have a look at his
52:30
LinkedIn profile to find out what all of that actually means. You know,
52:32
he says he's big in business. Let's find out some more so. He's
52:37
the chairman of an organization called Neural Voice and another one called Neural River,
52:42
and these are the AI incubators, the AI technology firms that have been used
52:46
to build AI Steve and the underlying technology. He also looks like made a
52:52
bunch of money during the lockdown's building work from home spaces, So, you
52:57
know, entrepreneurial, opportunistic, obviously a big fan of lockdowns because he seems
53:01
to have made quite a bit of money from it. And then crucially,
53:05
he's also the chairman of this sting electric car organization ECO, which provides end
53:09
to end solutions to increase uptake of electric vehicles, from testing, leasing,
53:15
buying, driving, to charging the whole way through. Right, So he
53:17
talks about being a politician with a green agenda, but actually, really crucially
53:23
he's potentially going to make a lot of money out of this as well.
53:27
Right, So there's a very clear conflict of interest going on that they're not
53:30
really trying to hide rights. It's all written into the communication. So why
53:34
would you vote for him? So there are a whole bunch of reasons.
53:37
We'll go back to their website here we can see why would we vote for
53:38
a Steve Well sensible and practical policies. That's the first thing, right,
53:43
So they don't employ any career politicians. Is completely staffed by sensible business people.
53:47
Oh so, very sensible, no political egos. That's good. And
53:52
they've actually done quite a good job in their policy platform of cutting through the
53:57
traditional left right issues. So he's proingtion, for example, very pro immigration,
54:01
but then also pro prisons, and those two things would normally be seen
54:07
as left and right issues, and they've done quite a neat job of bringing
54:12
those things together. He described himself as practically green, so basically, we've
54:16
got to save the planet, but we've got to do it in a way
54:19
that's affordable, very much driven by technology. So actually, and there's a
54:23
real interesting little hint here, they've talked about creating AI. Steve, they
54:28
actually think that they could perform government more broadly with this same technology. Right,
54:32
So they've clearly got big ambitions. What else would we vote for him,
54:37
so he's available twenty four seven, three sixty five. Have you ever
54:39
tried to get a meeting with your MP? It takes months. They don't
54:43
reply to you. You have to go to their office. Whereas AI Steve,
54:45
you can chat to them twenty four hours a day from the comfanment of
54:49
your own home, seven days a week, including bank holidays and Christmas Day.
54:52
Isn't that convenient? Everything will be transcribed and captured through the platform.
54:58
You'll have much more involvement with the creation of policies. So this is kind
55:02
of a bit like it's venturing into the sort of sortition territory that we talked
55:07
about previously. It's not exactly what it is, but it does strike me
55:12
that we have a group of creators that are selected from somewhere, it's not
55:15
specific as to where they come from, and then a bunch of validators,
55:19
which is just the general public. So interesting to see how that would actually
55:23
play out in practice. And then the final point for why we'd vote him
55:29
is because you can actually control your MP via AI, right, So they
55:32
want to give you, they want to give me, They want to give
55:36
the general population total control, and they see this as a potential future model
55:40
for how parliamentary democracy is going to play out, right, So it's pretty
55:44
interesting. One of the policies is very quickly to wrap up. So it's
55:50
Brighten and Hove issues. So big on education and youth. They're talking about
55:54
cutting tuition fees or university by fifty percent and paying for that by doubling or
56:00
even I think quadrupling the cost for foreign students, so that again. They're
56:04
big on immigration bringing people into the country, really big on affordable housing,
56:08
net zero homes, and they're talking about automatically granting planning commission for applications on
56:15
brownfield sites. Right, so they're going to potentially completely remodel and transform the
56:19
center of Brighton based on these policies. Good policies, scrap you lays great,
56:23
but also on the flip side of it, talking about making huge investments
56:28
into electrification and greed infrastructure, which Steve will make a lot of money from
56:32
importantly Brightened voters. Bear that in mind, and obviously because it's Brighton,
56:37
and also because his Pride month is paying tribute to the LGBTQ plus community and
56:44
promising to pay for lots of parties for them. Because they're so special and
56:46
important. So a big platform, a big move into a technological future.
56:52
And we'll see how Steve does in a few weeks of the general election.
56:57
Thank you, Ben and Debbie. Let's come back to you then. The
57:00
NHS, and we're beginning with blood. Oh yes, we're all talking a
57:05
lot about blood, aren't we, just recently, and there's a very good
57:07
reason why. So of course many of you will know, and we've reported
57:10
it before, about the cyber attack that took place in London. They've been
57:15
asking for urgent appeals for blood donors. I can't see that there's going to
57:20
be a huge queue. However, they're looking for oh, blood type O
57:23
positive blood type donors because of the cyber attack. So NHS in trouble there.
57:30
NHS also been trying to reclaim a lot of money back from a company
57:34
who were making faulty PCR tests. This is an overseat. They've agreed to
57:39
pay the government five million pounds to settle the claims that they supplied the NHS
57:44
with faulty tests. I don't suppose they'll be telling any of the people that
57:47
had used the faulty tests about this. The claim was originally much much bigger
57:52
it was for one hundred and forty five million. The article does go on
57:57
to say about these failed tests that the government have basically been sold a load
58:04
of tests that never worked. But did you take one? The Independent are
58:09
talking about thousands of blood samples set to be destroyed after that very same cyber
58:15
attack. It seems to have rippling consequences. So all of these blood tests
58:21
now have got to be destroyed. And most of the GP surgeries where they
58:24
were obtained are in the same area as the area that was cyber attacks,
58:30
so that South London, Bromley, Southwark, Lambeth, Bexley, Greenwich and
58:36
Lewisham. So if you had your blood taken and you haven't got a result,
58:39
that's probably why. And digitization isn't it fantastic? Because even down here
58:45
in Cornwall we had a complete outage and procedures were canceled at patients, appointments
58:52
were canceled because of significant IT issues. So not all in the park is
58:59
rosy for the NHS. Far from it, okay, And what about Greenhoust
59:06
gas emissions? Well, yes, this was just a little finally, because
59:09
I happened to see a story in the Daily Mail. I think it was
59:14
this week saying that we're not going to be able to breathe because we're we're
59:17
breathing out too much meat then carbon. You know it, Basically, breathing's
59:21
not good for you. So I went back to this article in the Conversation.
59:24
We calculated the UK's greenhouse gas emissions from people breathing out. Here's what
59:30
we found. And they're finding out that actually we should all be holding our
59:34
breath. But of course we can't hold our breath, can we. But
59:37
that's obviously what they've got in line for us. Fits in quite nicely with
59:42
the agenda twenty thirty, doesn't it. And for anybody that wants to see
59:45
the academic paper, here's a slide of the academic paper that you can go
59:50
and have a look at. Yes, and just to end, we began
59:52
with the G seven, we'll just end with the G seven. And I
59:57
just wanted to highlight this tweet from somebody to that family photograph that we showed
1:00:00
at the very beginning, and you can see they've all been labeled as unelected
1:00:06
bureaucrats to s Nile to stand trial. We know who that is twenty six
1:00:10
percent approval rating, about to lose election, just lost election at fifty year
1:00:16
low poll numbers. We get the idea and I mean obviously everybody in the
1:00:22
West totally viewing appropriately the standard of leadership that we have, and well we
1:00:31
should leave that there, I think, and we'll talk a little bit more
1:00:34
about that an extra. So thank you very much Debbie and Ben today.
1:00:37
Thanks for everybody that watched. We will be back in a couple of minutes
1:00:42
if your UK column member for some extra and we will see you there.
1:00:45
Otherwise we'll see you at ten am on Sunday, hopefully for UK Column Live.
1:00:51
See you then, Bye bye.