Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Howard Lutnick And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Congressional Hearing (Part 3) (5/14/26)

Transcript

Howard Lutnick And The Transcript From His Epstein Related Congressional Hearing (Part 3) (5/14/26) · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:03
  Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're getting right back to
• 0:07
  the Howard Lutnik transcripts from his interview with Congress mister Emmer.
• 0:16
  Question did mister Epstein ever fly on one of our
• 0:20
  of one of your private planes? Answer no? Question did
• 0:23
  you ever fly with mister Epstein on any aircraft? Answer no,
• 0:27
  I had no other personal interaction with them, just the three,
• 0:31
  So I'm happy to say no, but there by definition no,
• 0:35
  since I had no personal interaction with them. Question to
• 0:38
  the best of your recollection, when was the last time
• 0:41
  you communicated with mister Epstein. Answer It's the one email
• 0:46
  exchange in twenty eighteen, and that's the only one that
• 0:49
  I know of actually. Question, thank you, Secretary. The Committee
• 0:53
  is also investigating Maxwell. Do you know Glenn Maxwell? Answer
• 0:57
  from the newspapers. Question have you ever met Kallayne Maxwell? Answer?
• 1:02
  I met her once? Question can you explain to me
• 1:05
  and the committee when you met her? Answer to the
• 1:08
  best of my recollection, I met her once. It was
• 1:11
  at a Rockefeller Institute fundraiser in New York City. Question
• 1:16
  and what was the nature of your conversation with miss Maxwell?
• 1:19
  To the best of your recollection. Answer meaningless inconsequential. Mister
• 1:24
  Grant pops in. Do you know roughly what year this
• 1:27
  meeting would have occurred? Lutnick, I do not. Spector asked
• 1:31
  a question, now, did you know where to be affiliated
• 1:33
  with Jeffrey Epstein when you met her? Lutnick? No, question
• 1:39
  by mister Emmer. Who else was present when you met her? Answer? Well,
• 1:43
  it was a charity fundraiser for Rockefeller Institute, which is
• 1:46
  the premier medical research institute in New York, which is
• 1:49
  adjacent to New York Hospital. Question thank you, Secretary Lutnik.
• 1:55
  In two thousand and five, police in Palm Beach, Florida
• 1:57
  began investigating Epstein. In two thousand and six, Epstein was
• 2:01
  arrested for the first time for soliciting prostitution for minors.
• 2:06
  When did you first learn of Jeffrey Epstein's two thousand
• 2:08
  and six arrest Answer, I don't recall whether when or
• 2:12
  whether I knew that, so I just had no recollection
• 2:14
  whether I knew that or not Spector. Mister Epstein reportedly
• 2:19
  had to register as a sex offender after he was
• 2:21
  convicted of that two thousand and six offense. Were you
• 2:24
  ever notified by way of him being your neighbor. Will
• 2:27
  you ever notified about his status? Secretary Lutnik, No spector.
• 2:33
  Did you have children under the age of eighteen during
• 2:35
  that time? Lutnik? Yeah, Emmer. And to be clear, did
• 2:40
  you ever have any reason to suspect mister Epstein was
• 2:43
  sexually abusing young women and girls? Answer no. Question did
• 2:48
  anyone around you ever discuss mister Epstein's arrest in Florida?
• 2:52
  Answer not that I can remember. Question Secretary Lutnik, You
• 2:56
  touched on this in your opening statement, But to be clear,
• 2:59
  you visit Did Little Saint James Epstein's island in December
• 3:03
  of twenty twelve? Is that right? Answer? In around just
• 3:08
  before Christmas twenty twelve, I visited the island for lunch
• 3:12
  with my wife, my children, my friends, my friend, his wife,
• 3:15
  their children, and my staff for an hour I did.
• 3:19
  I'm not sure I knew the name of it either.
• 3:21
  Question If I said that your visit was on December
• 3:25
  twenty third of twenty twelve, would you dispute that statement? Answer?
• 3:29
  I would not, Emmer. At this time, I would like
• 3:32
  to introduce as majority exhibit one. This is EFTA two
• 3:36
  one five one five three zero, and I'll give you
• 3:40
  a moment to review question, so I'll read it into
• 3:45
  the record. This is an email from Tuesday, November twentieth
• 3:48
  of twenty twelve, sent by Leslie Groff. The subject line
• 3:52
  reads Jeffrey Epstein. The email reads, how well mister Lutnik,
• 3:56
  Jeffrey Epstein understands that you'll be down in Saint Thomas
• 4:00
  over the holidays. Jeffrey requested I please pass along some
• 4:04
  phone numbers to you so the two of you could
• 4:06
  possibly get together. Any numbers you wanted to pass along
• 4:09
  to Jeffrey would be great as well. I will say
• 4:12
  it appears that you are the recipient of this email.
• 4:14
  Do you recall receiving it? Answer? It may be helpful
• 4:18
  for you to understand that if the email says how
• 4:20
  are Lutnik or Lutnik Howard, those went to Matthew Gilbert,
• 4:24
  they didn't go to me. They were not meaning I
• 4:26
  would never see them. They went to Matthew Gilbert. You
• 4:29
  know if they went to me, if they're listed as
• 4:33
  HWL and because I received hundreds of emails sometimes thousands,
• 4:37
  and they went to Matthew Gilbert and I would not
• 4:39
  see them. So these would have gone to him and
• 4:41
  I would not have seen them. Question. I understand, and
• 4:44
  for the record, that's why Matthew Gilbert would have been
• 4:47
  the individual who responded to this email. Is that right answer?
• 4:51
  I mean he would respond sometimes in his name, but
• 4:54
  he would also respond sometimes to the same email in
• 4:57
  my name. Question. And you discuss the invite in your
• 5:00
  opening statement, but I'm going to ask you again, how
• 5:04
  did your visit did Little Saint James come about? Who
• 5:06
  coordinated it? Answer? What I still cannot understand is this
• 5:11
  November twentieth, How or why without any communication for years,
• 5:15
  would you inexplicably know where I'm going. It's unsettling, actually,
• 5:19
  but this is how it happened. You know, I don't
• 5:22
  know why it happened, but this is you're actually literally
• 5:25
  seeing it how it happened. But it's inexplicable that he
• 5:28
  would and his staff would know where I was going
• 5:31
  to be. I had no interactions with them. Question, So
• 5:35
  to be clear, you didn't reach out yourself to tell
• 5:37
  mister Epstein that you were going to be in the
• 5:39
  US Virgin Islands over Christmas? Is that right answer? Yes, Yes,
• 5:44
  that is correct. I did not in any way contact
• 5:47
  or have any connection to them. Question, and it would
• 5:51
  be safe to say that the invite surprised you. Answer,
• 5:55
  I find it unsettling and inexplicable. Question who else was
• 5:59
  involved in coordinating the trip to the island? Answer? I
• 6:02
  have no recollection, so I can't give you more information.
• 6:06
  I just have no recollection of it. Question. During our
• 6:09
  review of the documents that have been released, it appeared
• 6:12
  that your wife may have been in contact with mister
• 6:15
  Epstein's team. Did she ever say anything to you about
• 6:19
  the island visit? Answer? Not that I can recall now, no, specter,
• 6:24
  do you know if anyone on your staff or anyone
• 6:26
  else close to you had a connection with mister Epstein
• 6:29
  or his staff. I'm just trying to understand how he
• 6:32
  may have been aware of your travels. Lutnick, me too,
• 6:36
  I find it inexplicable and unsettling, and just reading this
• 6:39
  sort of it's bothersome. So no, I don't know. Emmer.
• 6:44
  So you are live on the island on December twenty third,
• 6:47
  to the best of your recollection, Can you describe the
• 6:49
  events what happened when you arrived on the island. Lut Nick, sure,
• 6:54
  so it's fourteen years ago. I went for lunch with
• 6:57
  my wife, my four children, my friend, a couple with
• 7:01
  their four children, and staff and boat staff. So it
• 7:04
  was probably fifteen or sixteen people went for lunch. We
• 7:08
  sat outside, had lunch. It was boring. We left. Spector,
• 7:13
  did this friend and their family that was with you
• 7:16
  have any prior connection with mister Epstein? Or were they
• 7:19
  there as your guests and for your visit to your
• 7:22
  neighbor Lutnick. They were there as my guests, but I
• 7:25
  don't know, and I've never heard that they had any
• 7:27
  contact with them whatsoever spector prior or subsequent to the
• 7:31
  visit Lutnick, prior and subsequent Spector, thank you question by Emmer,
• 7:37
  mister Epstein didn't offer you a tour of the island
• 7:40
  while you were there? Answer no other than we walked.
• 7:44
  I think like from where we had lunch, there was
• 7:46
  like this, To the best of my recollection, it was
• 7:48
  like a cliff, so we went to sort of look
• 7:52
  at the water. Question what was the nature of your
• 7:54
  conversation with mister Epstein during the visit? Answer meaningless and
• 7:59
  in consequential. I was with my wife and my children
• 8:03
  and my friends, another couple in their children who was
• 8:05
  a big crowd, and we had lunch and we left. Question,
• 8:09
  besides the group that you arrived with, who else was
• 8:11
  present on the island? Answer just staff. You know we
• 8:15
  were outside under sort of a cover outside area, that
• 8:18
  was it. Question Did you see any young women or
• 8:22
  girls on the island? Answer no? Question and I asked
• 8:26
  this in the context of the New York town Home.
• 8:28
  But did you notice any weird or unusual artwork when
• 8:31
  you visited the island? Answer no, I wasn't inside any building.
• 8:36
  I don't recall being inside any building. Question and you
• 8:40
  never visited the island again? Is that right? Answer? That's correct? Never.
• 8:45
  Question did you ever hear rumors about the island? Obviously
• 8:49
  now it has the nickname Pedophile Island, Nothing of that
• 8:52
  sort prior to or around the time you visited? Answer no,
• 8:57
  of course not. In twenty nineteen, we all learned lots
• 8:59
  of information, but nothing before then. Question there's a photo
• 9:04
  that was released I believe in the Epstein File Transparency
• 9:07
  Act and has been reported. Are you aware of the
• 9:09
  photo of you on the island? Answer yes, question and
• 9:13
  that was or what you were describing of looking over
• 9:17
  the cliff. Would it be safe to assume that was
• 9:19
  when the photo was taken. Answer yes, it's entirely confirmatory
• 9:24
  that photo. Specter. Had you seen that photo before it
• 9:28
  was released by the Department of Justice? Lutnick No question
• 9:31
  by spector. Did you know what it existed? Lutnick, No,
• 9:35
  mister Emmer. At this time, I would like to introduce
• 9:38
  majority exhibit and these are photos that were released by
• 9:41
  the Department of Justice as part of the Epstein Files
• 9:44
  Transparency Act. Lutnick. Majority Exhibit number two was marked for identification. Emmer.
• 9:51
  Question and for the record, these are images showing multiple
• 9:54
  mass of different male faces hanging on the walls of
• 9:57
  a room at mister Epstein's Island, with a aunt his
• 10:00
  chair in the middle of the room. Secretary Lutnik, when
• 10:03
  you visited Epstein's Island, did you see or enter this room?
• 10:07
  Answer no question. Have you seen pictures of the mass before?
• 10:11
  Answer no question. The reason that we introduce this is
• 10:15
  many people online have speculated that one of the masks
• 10:18
  resembles you, specifically the one on the first page in
• 10:22
  the middle. What's your response to these claims? Answer, you
• 10:26
  got to be kidding me. That's the most ridiculous and
• 10:28
  absurd thing I've ever heard what a bald man I
• 10:32
  have hair? Look, I mean I don't have many, but
• 10:34
  at least I have some that is not remotely me.
• 10:37
  That's nonsense. Question. Thank you. During your visit to the island,
• 10:42
  did you discuss the company Adfin Solutions with mister Epstein? Answer?
• 10:46
  No question. What was adfin Solutions? Answer? It was a
• 10:51
  company that attempted to create an exchange for online ads.
• 10:54
  They went out of business. Question Were you personally an
• 10:57
  investor in Adfin Solutions? Answer? No question. Was Canter Fitzgerald
• 11:02
  an investor and Adfin Solutions? Answer yes to this. Mister
• 11:08
  Twellinger jumps in, mister Emmer, just so the record's clear.
• 11:12
  I believe there's different redacted. We can't hear over here. Turwilger. Sure,
• 11:18
  Just so the record's clear, Mister Emmer, I think you
• 11:20
  may want to ask which part of counter Fitzgerald there's
• 11:23
  multiple subsidiaries, or the secretary could offer a little bit
• 11:27
  more information. Which part of Cantor was an investor? Emmer?
• 11:30
  Which part of Canter Fitzgerald was an investor? Answer Canterer
• 11:34
  Fitzgerald has a subsidiary that did venture capital investing with
• 11:38
  small investments in many companies in sort of high risk investments,
• 11:43
  and then those would then have subsidiary companies that might
• 11:47
  be for each particular investment. It was called Canter Ventures,
• 11:51
  and so the company would be called CV. So Canter
• 11:54
  Ventures would be CV. But it was a venture capital
• 11:58
  alarm of counter Fitzgerald, sort of multiple layers down the
• 12:01
  subsidiary chain. Question. And the reason that we ask is
• 12:06
  there was a stock purchase agreement that was released as
• 12:09
  part of the Epstein File Transparency Act that you signed
• 12:12
  on behalf of CV A FH and mister Epstein signed.
• 12:16
  Did you know that mister Epstein was an investor in
• 12:19
  this company adfin Answer no question. When did you learn
• 12:23
  that he was an investor? Answer to the best of
• 12:26
  my knowledge, when these documents were released, best to my recollection.
• 12:30
  Question And would you have been aware of all the investors,
• 12:33
  whether they were individuals or entities, in any of Kennter
• 12:37
  Fitzgerald's portfolios. Answer no, of venture capital investments, no question.
• 12:42
  And for the record, had you and mister Epstein ever
• 12:45
  invested in the same company prior to this occurrence? Answer no,
• 12:49
  not that I know of. Mister Grant jumps in the
• 12:54
  signatory page from the investment to Advin Solutions. You said
• 12:57
  you had not seen or I'm sorry that you let me.
• 13:00
  You're a phrase. It's common for another investor in a
• 13:03
  VC deal to have the page from another investor. Ludnik
• 13:07
  no I found it inexplicable and unsettling that he had
• 13:10
  that it was released, that my company's signature page would
• 13:14
  be in someone else's files. It's unsettling, Emmer. And when
• 13:18
  a stock purchase agreement is executed and the individuals are signing,
• 13:22
  they're typically not in the same room. Is that right,
• 13:25
  Ludnik That is correct, mister Grant. And do you have
• 13:29
  any idea of how mister Epstein would have come across
• 13:32
  that page? Answer from Ludnik no I find it inexplicable
• 13:37
  and unsettling, mister Emmer. At this time, I'd like to
• 13:42
  introduce majority Exhibit three. And this is an email that
• 13:46
  you are not a recipient of, dated May fourth, twenty thirteen,
• 13:49
  from Jeffrey Epstein to David Mitchell discussing ad Finn and
• 13:53
  a potential meeting between you and mister Epstein. Question, mister secretary,
• 13:59
  do you know who David Mitchell is? Answer yes, Question
• 14:02
  how do you know him? Answer? He was the husband
• 14:05
  of one of my wife's friends. Question were you in
• 14:08
  contact with them during this period of spring twenty thirteen?
• 14:12
  Answer I may have been. Question when did you understand
• 14:15
  his relationship to be with Jeffrey Epstein? Answer I don't
• 14:18
  recall knowing that he had any relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
• 14:22
  Question and what we're specifically interested in here? One it
• 14:26
  says one of the line says, I think I'm seeing
• 14:29
  h Lutnik later cool restaurant in Williamsburg. Do you recall
• 14:33
  meeting Epstein at a restaurant in Williamsburg in May of
• 14:36
  twenty thirteen? Answer? I did not. I mean this seems
• 14:41
  to think that David Mitchell was planning on seeing me,
• 14:43
  not mister Epstein. But as I testified, the only times
• 14:46
  that I recall ever seeing him are the ones that
• 14:49
  we've gone through already, Mister Emmer. At this time, I'd
• 14:54
  like to introduce majority Exhibit four. And this is an
• 14:57
  email chain dated May twenty eighth, twenty eighteen, between Jeffrey
• 15:02
  Epstein and a redacted email labeled HWL it's Big bat
• 15:07
  smart EFTA one zero five zero seven seven two Lutnik.
• 15:12
  Majority Exhibit number four was marked for identification. All right,
• 15:17
  we're going to wrap up right here and in the
• 15:19
  next episode dealing with the topic, we're going to pick
• 15:21
  up where we left off. All the information that goes
• 15:24
  with this episode can be found in the description box.