Latest / AI Fire Daily / #92 Robin: The "AI Agency" Bubble is Popping - How to Get Rich as the Inside AI Builder Using Claude

Transcript

#92 Robin: The "AI Agency" Bubble is Popping - How to Get Rich as the Inside AI Builder Using Claude · AI Fire Daily

• 0:00
  In 2026, everyone is shouting the exact same
• 0:04
  advice at you. Yeah, totally. They say, start
• 0:06
  an AI agency. Go out and find clients. Sell them
• 0:09
  generic automations. But the real uncrowded alpha
• 0:13
  is actually hiding. It really is. It is sitting
• 0:17
  in plain sight right at your current job. The
• 0:20
  whole external agency path is getting completely
• 0:23
  saturated today. Welcome to the deep dive. We
• 0:26
  are untacking a specific blueprint today. Yeah,
• 0:29
  a really practical one. We want to figure out
• 0:31
  how you can actually make money with AI. And
• 0:35
  you absolutely do not need to start an agency.
• 0:38
  Exactly. It's about using the tools that are
• 0:40
  already sitting around you. We are going to explore
• 0:42
  why businesses are desperate right now. They
• 0:45
  do not just need casual AI users. Right. They
• 0:48
  are begging for internal builders. I really appreciate
• 0:50
  how grounded this approach is, honestly. We will
• 0:53
  walk through a very specific three -phase roadmap
• 0:56
  today. This roadmap is designed to make you utterly
• 0:59
  indispensable at work. Yeah. But before we get
• 1:01
  to the how, we must understand the where. Exactly.
• 1:04
  We have to ask why you should look inward instead
• 1:06
  of outward. Let's unpack the realities of that
• 1:09
  2026 AI agency path. It is packed. with people
• 1:14
  selling the exact same automation services. Businesses
• 1:17
  are just becoming so much harder to impress lately.
• 1:20
  Yeah. Generic email workflows and you know. basic
• 1:24
  chat bots are incredibly easy to copy. The massive
• 1:28
  opportunity is actually stepping inward instead.
• 1:30
  Yeah. You can become the dedicated AI person
• 1:33
  inside a specific business. Think about it. Companies
• 1:36
  already have the budget set aside. Right. They
• 1:38
  are definitely feeling the immense pressure to
• 1:41
  adapt. They have powerful tools like Claude,
• 1:44
  ChatGPT, and Copilot ready. Right. And what they
• 1:46
  completely lack is the connective tissue. They
• 1:49
  desperately need someone who connects the tool
• 1:51
  to the actual daily work. Most people at work
• 1:55
  use AI in the exact same superficial way. Yeah.
• 1:58
  They are what we call basic AI users. They just
• 2:00
  open up a tool in their browser. They ask for
• 2:02
  a quick summary of a long document. Or they ask
• 2:04
  for a rough draft of a basic email. They paste
• 2:07
  the results somewhere and then they just move
• 2:08
  on. It helps a little bit with their personal
• 2:10
  efficiency, sure. But it rarely changes how the
• 2:14
  business actually operates on a fundamental level.
• 2:16
  The AI person. is an entirely different kind
• 2:19
  of worker. You are building rigid, repeatable
• 2:23
  workflows that solve actual business bottlenecks.
• 2:27
  You are building AI agents. AI agents are systems
• 2:31
  that independently complete specific multi -step
• 2:34
  tasks. That is a crucial distinction right there.
• 2:37
  You're engineering a real reliable system. It's
• 2:40
  like stacking Lego blocks of data. Yeah, I love
• 2:43
  that. A basic user just plays with one single
• 2:45
  brick. They ask one question and they get one
• 2:47
  answer back. But the builder constructs an entire
• 2:50
  automated castle from those bricks. Exactly.
• 2:52
  You snap the data gathering block directly to
• 2:55
  the summarization block. Right. Then you securely
• 2:57
  lock that into the email drafting block. You
• 2:59
  are creating an assembly line, not just having
• 3:02
  a chat. I have to admit something here. I still
• 3:04
  wrestle with prompt drift myself, so I understand
• 3:07
  why most people just stick to basic chat. Oh
• 3:09
  yeah, prompt drift is rough. Prompt drift is
• 3:11
  when AI forgets original instructions during
• 3:14
  long chats. It happens to everyone who relies
• 3:17
  on long chat threads, honestly. But building
• 3:19
  rigid systems actually... overcomes that problem
• 3:23
  completely. You aren't relying on the AI's memory
• 3:26
  in a chaotic thread. You are feeding it the exact
• 3:30
  same strict rules every single time you hit run.
• 3:34
  And that reliability is exactly what businesses
• 3:36
  are willing to pay for. I want to push back on
• 3:39
  this a little bit though. Why is taking this
• 3:42
  internal path actually easier than the agency
• 3:44
  route? Isn't it faster to just build an agency
• 3:47
  and scale it up? Well, it really comes down to
• 3:50
  the friction of doing business. Inside your company,
• 3:53
  you already have the necessary context. You already
• 3:55
  have your boss's trust. You have direct access
• 3:57
  to real annoying workflows that need fixing.
• 4:00
  Exactly. You do not need to run expensive Facebook
• 4:02
  ads. Right. You do not need to cold pitch and
• 4:05
  close strangers on the internet. So, skip cold
• 4:08
  pitching strangers and solve the expensive annoyances
• 4:11
  right in front of you. That is the core philosophy,
• 4:13
  yeah. You leverage the environment you already
• 4:15
  understand perfectly. So, how do you actually
• 4:19
  step into this role? without annoying everyone.
• 4:23
  Right. You cannot just declare yourself the AI
• 4:25
  expert. Yeah, definitely not. That brings us
• 4:26
  to the first phase. You have to position yourself
• 4:29
  as the builder, not the talker. Every company
• 4:32
  already has those highly annoying talkers. They
• 4:35
  just talk about AI constantly in long meetings.
• 4:38
  They're always sharing random articles in the
• 4:41
  company Slack. Yeah. They constantly mention
• 4:44
  new tools they read about on Twitter. They always
• 4:46
  vaguely say the team really should use AI more.
• 4:49
  Right. But they never actually implement a single
• 4:52
  useful thing themselves. That behavior is not
• 4:55
  valuable to a business at all. It just creates
• 4:57
  noise. Your job is to be the quiet, effective
• 5:00
  builder instead. You take one highly annoying
• 5:03
  task and quietly turn it into a usable system.
• 5:07
  The trick here is to start incredibly small.
• 5:09
  You want to pick the team you already work closely
• 5:11
  with. That could be your own marketing department.
• 5:13
  It might be your direct customer support team.
• 5:15
  Because you already understand these people and
• 5:18
  their daily frustrations. You know where the
• 5:20
  messy files are kept. You know the repeated mind
• 5:23
  -numbing work. But how do you market yourself
• 5:26
  internally without acting weird or arrogant?
• 5:29
  Yeah, that's tricky. You simply ask your coworkers
• 5:31
  what tasks they absolutely hate doing every week.
• 5:34
  You just watch carefully for delayed work or
• 5:37
  highly manual processes. Do not ever guess what
• 5:42
  you think they want you to build. Let the team
• 5:44
  explicitly show you where the real value is.
• 5:47
  Exactly. I hear you on starting small, but let
• 5:50
  me challenge that. Isn't it risky to just ask
• 5:53
  people about their boring tasks? Yeah. Wouldn't
• 5:55
  proposing a grand company -wide AI strategy get
• 5:59
  you promoted faster? Actually, proposing a massive
• 6:02
  strategy is incredibly dangerous for your career.
• 6:05
  Yeah. Starting small builds immediate undeniable
• 6:08
  trust with your peers. It completely avoids those
• 6:11
  massive, highly public corporate failures. Exactly.
• 6:15
  If a grand million dollar AI strategy fails,
• 6:18
  you look terrible. Right. You might even get
• 6:20
  fired. If a small, quiet automation fails, you
• 6:24
  just tweak it on a Tuesday afternoon. You let
• 6:27
  the team's daily friction points become your
• 6:30
  exact product roadmap. Yes, you are solving their
• 6:33
  real pain, not some hypothetical executive pain.
• 6:36
  And they will love you for making their day easier.
• 6:39
  So you have finally found that one incredibly
• 6:42
  annoying task. Right. Let's say it is the dreaded
• 6:45
  weekly marketing report. Ugh, yeah. The temptation
• 6:48
  is to run to your boss and shout about it. But
• 6:51
  building blindly is a massive trap. This is where
• 6:54
  we enter phase two. You have to prove your value
• 6:57
  strategically. We call this the name the number
• 6:59
  protocol. You must prove you can fix the problem
• 7:02
  cleanly. First, you need to pick the right kind
• 7:04
  of task. Pick tasks that are highly repeatable
• 7:07
  and very low risk. They need to be extremely
• 7:09
  easy to compare before and after. Weekly reports
• 7:12
  are fantastic because they happen so often. Weekly
• 7:14
  meeting notes are another incredibly low risk
• 7:16
  target. Right. Inbox sorting has very clear,
• 7:21
  measurable time savings attached to it. Data
• 7:24
  cleanup is terribly boring, but very easy to
• 7:27
  check for accuracy. The absolute best first task
• 7:30
  is expensive, repeatable, and completely safe.
• 7:34
  A small AI hallucination there will not damage
• 7:38
  the core business. If you are listening to this,
• 7:40
  you might be having a dangerous thought. You
• 7:42
  might be thinking, great, I will just dump our
• 7:45
  Q3 financials into Chat Cheap ET. Please do not
• 7:48
  ever do that. There is a golden rule of trust
• 7:50
  here. You must only use officially company approved
• 7:53
  AI tools. Never paste unapproved company data
• 7:57
  into a random web browser. Right. Never paste
• 8:00
  sensitive customer data into unapproved third
• 8:02
  party tools. That is the absolute fastest way
• 8:05
  to get fired in 2026. Yep. One single mistake
• 8:08
  there ruins the entire opportunity instantly.
• 8:11
  You lose all leadership trust and you will never
• 8:13
  get it back. You have to build safely. Now we
• 8:15
  get to the absolute secret sauce of this phase.
• 8:17
  Okay. You must deliberately name the number before
• 8:19
  you start building. The final result must fall
• 8:22
  clearly into one of three specific buckets. Right.
• 8:25
  It must be time saved, mistakes reduced, or money
• 8:28
  made. For example, let's look at that Friday
• 8:31
  Weekly report. Maybe it currently takes a manager
• 8:34
  four painful hours every single Friday. You go
• 8:38
  to them and clearly state your specific target.
• 8:41
  You tell them you are bringing it down to 20
• 8:43
  minutes. You are confidently stating the business
• 8:45
  value before you even open Claude. Then you actually
• 8:48
  sit down and build the Claude workflow. You don't
• 8:51
  just ask Claude to write a summary blindly. No.
• 8:54
  You feed it the raw data export first. Then you
• 8:57
  apply a strict formatting template. based on
• 8:59
  past reports. Finally, you securely route that
• 9:02
  output directly to your boss's inbox. You record
• 9:05
  the undeniable proof of the before and after
• 9:07
  states. Whoa. I mean, imagine scaling that to
• 9:10
  a billion corporate queries. Yeah. Or even just
• 9:13
  returning 3 .5 hours to a stressed team every
• 9:16
  single Friday. It compounds massively over a
• 9:19
  year. It really does. It completely changes the
• 9:21
  whole emotional dynamic of a team. But why is
• 9:23
  it so critical to name the number before you
• 9:26
  even open Quod? Why not just build it and surprise
• 9:30
  them? Because naming the number fundamentally
• 9:32
  shifts the entire conversation. You move entirely
• 9:36
  away from, hey, look at this cool tech. You move
• 9:38
  directly to, look at this measurable business
• 9:41
  ROI. Exactly. Business leaders honestly do not
• 9:44
  care about the AI tool itself. Right. They care
• 9:47
  exclusively about the number you are improving.
• 9:49
  You're selling a measurable business outcome,
• 9:51
  not just a cool, clawed party trick. That is
• 9:54
  exactly how you get leadership to actually pay
• 9:57
  attention as a sponsor. Welcome back to the Deep
• 10:01
  Dive. We have secured our local wins. Yeah. We
• 10:04
  saved a manager 3 .5 hours on those Friday weekly
• 10:07
  reports. We built some real trust without leaking
• 10:09
  any corporate data. But to truly become indispensable,
• 10:13
  we have to scale this impact. Right. We must
• 10:16
  seamlessly connect those small wins to the company's
• 10:19
  highest levels. This is the third and final phase,
• 10:21
  becoming truly hard to replace. We're talking
• 10:23
  about actively solving major growth bottlenecks.
• 10:26
  The problem with quiet local wins is they often
• 10:28
  get totally lost. Yeah. Results often get blended
• 10:31
  into general good team performance reviews. People
• 10:34
  just assume leadership will naturally notice
• 10:37
  their brilliant background work. Let me tell
• 10:39
  you, they usually will not notice at all. Your
• 10:42
  hard work just disappears quietly behind the
• 10:44
  scenes. Yes. You must explicitly connect the
• 10:48
  business win to your specific system. You always
• 10:51
  frame every win as a massive business win. but
• 10:55
  you make the custom system behind it extremely
• 10:57
  obvious. For example, do not just tell leadership
• 11:00
  that support is resolving tickets faster. Right.
• 11:03
  Say support reduced their average inbox time
• 11:06
  by 40 % specifically after we added the Claude
• 11:09
  workflow. It makes the entire support team look
• 11:12
  incredibly great. But it also explicitly shows
• 11:15
  that your workflow caused the fantastic result.
• 11:18
  That is exactly how a brand new role gets created
• 11:21
  entirely around you. Yeah. But saving a few hours
• 11:24
  of time is really just the start. The much bigger
• 11:26
  opportunity is systematically finding the main
• 11:28
  business bottleneck. What is actually slowing
• 11:31
  the company's overall growth down today? There
• 11:34
  is an ultimate clarifying question you need to
• 11:37
  ask management here. OK. What exactly breaks
• 11:40
  if our total customers doubled tomorrow? That
• 11:43
  question reveals everything about a company's
• 11:46
  real limits. If the operations team simply cannot
• 11:49
  deliver enough product, it is a supply problem.
• 11:52
  If the team can easily handle more work, but
• 11:54
  cannot attract buyers, it is a demand problem.
• 11:57
  You figure out which one it is. Then you walk
• 11:59
  confidently into the room. You explicitly identify
• 12:03
  that specific bottleneck to leadership. You pitch
• 12:06
  your custom -clawed system as the direct solution.
• 12:09
  And most importantly, you name the expected number
• 12:11
  again. Right. Then you go back to your desk and
• 12:13
  you build it. You fix that major constraint.
• 12:15
  And when the business grows and the next constraint
• 12:17
  naturally appears, you just fix that one too.
• 12:20
  What actually happens to your career when you
• 12:22
  fix that ultimate company bottleneck? It becomes
• 12:24
  a highly lucrative, never -ending cycle of value
• 12:27
  creation. Fixing one operational constraint naturally
• 12:31
  creates a brand new one somewhere else. You just
• 12:33
  keep moving systematically down the line, solving
• 12:36
  each one. That is how you become the one person
• 12:38
  a business desperately wants to keep close. Fixing
• 12:41
  one limit just reveals the next. You become a
• 12:44
  permanent growth engine. You evolve from a regular
• 12:47
  employee into a vital piece of infrastructure.
• 12:50
  Let us take a moment and synthesize this entire
• 12:52
  core philosophy. Sure. The real money in 2026
• 12:55
  is not in walking around the office saying, I
• 12:58
  know how to use Claude. Honestly, nobody cares
• 13:00
  at all that you know how to chat with Claude.
• 13:02
  The real alpha is in confidently stating, This
• 13:05
  specific workflow saves the business 20 hours
• 13:08
  a month. It changes you from an expense into
• 13:10
  a pure profit center. It is the deliberate journey
• 13:14
  from being a passive AI user to an active systems
• 13:18
  builder. You learn how to solve real corporate
• 13:21
  constraints safely. Right. You learn how to solve
• 13:23
  them highly strategically. You turn AI from a
• 13:27
  trendy tool you just play with into a rare skill
• 13:29
  people actually pay heavily for. You stop being
• 13:32
  the annoying slack linker and start being the
• 13:34
  architect. I want to leave you with something
• 13:36
  to really think about. OK. Think deeply about
• 13:39
  where this entire trend is actually heading.
• 13:41
  The workplace is fundamentally shifting right
• 13:44
  beneath our feet. If every single company eventually
• 13:48
  adopts this exact framework, if every team suddenly
• 13:53
  has an internal AI person solving these bottlenecks,
• 13:56
  does this weird unofficial role eventually evolve
• 14:00
  into a formal chief automation officer or Will
• 14:04
  building these complex AI workflows just become
• 14:07
  the baseline expectation for every single white
• 14:11
  collar worker in the next five years? It is a
• 14:13
  totally wild timeline to think about. It is.
• 14:16
  Either way, you're going to want to be ahead
• 14:17
  of that curve. Look at your own desk tomorrow
• 14:19
  morning. Find that one mind -numbing copy -paste
• 14:22
  task that takes four painful hours. See if you
• 14:25
  can systematically turn it into a flawless 20
• 14:27
  -minute clod workflow. Be the builder they actually
• 14:29
  need. Yeah. Remember, you have the opportunity
• 14:31
  to start stacking Lego blocks of data. Stop playing
• 14:34
  with just one single brick. Go out there and
• 14:36
  build the castle. OTO music.