Latest / Marcus Aurelius: Rome's Philosopher King — Fexingo History / Marcus Aurelius and the Antonine Plague
Transcript
- Lucas: Welcome back to Fexingo History. I'm Lucas, and with me is Luna. Today, we're picking up the story of Marcus Aurelius where we left off — but from a different angle. We've talked about his wars, his philosophy, his family. But there's a shadow that hangs over every part of his reign, something that historians sometimes call the forgotten catastrophe of the second century. Luna: The Antonine Plague? Lucas: Exactly. The great plague that swept through the empire from about 165 to 180 AD, right during Marcus's busiest years. And it's not just a footnote. It's arguably the deadliest pandemic in Roman history, possibly killing five to ten million people. To put that in perspective, that's maybe ten percent of the empire's population, maybe more. Luna: And Marcus had to deal with the Marcomannic Wars at the same time. Lucas: Exactly. He was fighting for his life on the Danube front while his cities were emptying out. The plague probably came back with the army from the East. In 165, Roman forces under Avidius Cassius sacked Seleucia on the Tigris, and that city was a major hub. Soldiers brought something home with them. Luna: Do we know what the disease actually was? Lucas: The best guess is smallpox, though some have argued for measles. Our main source is Galen, the great physician, who lived through it and described the symptoms: fever, sore throat, diarrhea, and most characteristically, a pustular rash that could cover the entire body. He called it the 'Antonine plague' later, but at the time people just called it 'the pestilence.' Luna: And Galen was in Rome during the worst of it? Lucas: He left Rome in 166, just as things were getting bad, and retreated to his hometown of Pergamum. But he came back later and treated patients. His medical writings are our best window into the disease. He describes victims covered in black scabs, some surviving, many dying. And he notes that the mortality rate was especially high among the young and the old. Lucas: The plague didn't hit all at once. It came in waves. The first wave peaked around 168-169, and then it recurred in the 170s. By the time Marcus died in 180, it had been ravaging the empire for fifteen years. You can imagine the cumulative effect on morale, on the economy, on the army. Luna: Did it affect the military directly? Lucas: Devastatingly. Cassius Dio, writing a generation later, says that the plague killed so many soldiers that Marcus had to recruit gladiators and even slaves and bandits into the legions. Think about that: the emperor who wrote the Meditations, a Stoic philosopher, was forced to arm criminals to defend the borders. And he mentions that the plague also killed many civilians in Rome and throughout Italy. Luna: So the Marcomannic Wars were fought with a skeleton crew. Lucas: Exactly. And that's one reason the wars dragged on and on. Marcus couldn't raise the kind of army he needed. The plague also struck the emperor's own household. We know that one of Marcus's daughters died, probably from the plague, and possibly his co-emperor Lucius Verus died of it in 169, though some say it was a stroke. Luna: Did Marcus himself write about the plague? Lucas: Interesting question. In the Meditations, he never explicitly names the plague. But you can feel its presence. He writes constantly about death, about the fragility of life, about the need to live each moment virtuously. For example, in Book 2, he says: 'You could leave life right now. Let that determine what you do and say and think.' That's a man who watched people die around him every day. Lucas: There's also a famous passage in Book 8 where he talks about the 'pestilence' that corrupts the mind, but many scholars think he's referring to moral decay, not the disease. Still, the physical plague is the backdrop. The Meditations were written in the field, on campaign, amid sickness and death. Luna: How did the empire cope? Were there any public health measures? Lucas: Not really in the modern sense. Roman medicine was sophisticated for its time, but they didn't understand germs. They blamed bad air or divine anger. There were religious rituals — sacrifices to Apollo or Aesculapius — and some cities had quarantine measures. But mostly, people just died. The economic impact was enormous: labor shortages, abandoned farms, inflation. Lucas: One consequence that historians debate is the plague's role in the spread of Christianity. With people questioning why the gods had abandoned them, the Christian message of a caring God and a promise of resurrection could have been appealing. But that's a topic for another episode. Luna: So the Antonine Plague was a turning point. Lucas: It's often seen as the beginning of the end of the Pax Romana. The empire survived, but it was weakened. The population didn't fully recover for generations. And it set a precedent: later, in the third century, another plague would help trigger the crisis of that era. Marcus Aurelius is remembered as the last of the Five Good Emperors, but he ruled in a time of plague. And he met it with Stoic endurance. Luna: That's a powerful image: the philosopher emperor writing about death while his world dies around him. Lucas: It is. And it makes his Meditations not just abstract philosophy, but a survival manual. He wrote: 'The art of living is more like wrestling than dancing.' And he lived that every day. The plague was something he couldn't control, so he focused on what he could: his own mind, his own responses, his duty. Lucas: Next time, we might look at another aspect of Marcus's reign that we haven't touched — maybe his building projects or his relationship with the provinces. But for now, I think the Antonine Plague gives us a sobering lens through which to see his entire rule. Luna: I'll never look at the Meditations the same way again.