Latest / The Front / Trump, Zelensky, a sharp suit and a peace deal?

Transcript

Trump, Zelensky, a sharp suit and a peace deal? · The Front

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: From The Australian. Here's what's on the front. I'm Claire Harvey.
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: It's Wednesday, August twenty, twenty twenty five. Benjamin Nettania, who
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: says Anthony Albanezi is a week leader who has betrayed
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: Israel and abandoned Australia's Jews by indicating he'll recognize Palestinian statehood.
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: Union leaders want a new tax on business to pay
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: for training workers, but employer groups.
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: Say that's a no go.
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: It's just one of the big ideas being thrashed out
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: at the government's economic reform roundtable. You can follow our
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: coverage live at the Australian dot com dot au. Vladimir
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: Putin is reportedly considering a meeting with Donald Trump and
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: Vladimi Zelenski of Ukraine. That's after positive talks at the
• 0:56
  Speaker 1: White House between the US, Ukraine and europe and leaders.
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: There's now talk of a europe led peacekeeping force and
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: America buying into Ukraine's drone program. Today, are we really
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: a step closer to peace?
• 1:21
  Speaker 2: We all remember this.
• 1:23
  Speaker 3: God, bless you and bless You're not here to work.
• 1:26
  Speaker 3: Don't tell us what we're gonna feel. You're gambling with lives.
• 1:29
  Speaker 3: Billions of people think you're gambling with World War.
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: Three, So this sounds like progress. Thank you very.
• 1:38
  Speaker 3: Much for being here. Thanks so much, you spredent. Thank
• 1:42
  Speaker 3: you very much for your efforts, personal efforts to stop
• 1:46
  Speaker 3: killings and stop this war. We'll work with Russia. We're
• 1:48
  Speaker 3: going to work with Ukraine. We're gonna make sure it works.
• 1:51
  Speaker 3: And I think if we can get to piece, it's
• 1:53
  Speaker 3: going to work. I have no doubt about it.
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: Right well, who can tell?
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: As European leaders say they're confident a deal between Russia
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: and Ukraine is close, and Vladimir Putin considers a trilateral
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: meeting with Donald Trump and Vladimi Zelenski, I've called in
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: the big gum, Greg Sheridan to pick our way through
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: whether this change of tone should make us hopeful.
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: It couldn't be more different, could it these two occasions.
• 2:20
  Speaker 4: No, that's right, And that very difference illustrates the difficulty
• 2:25
  Speaker 4: of interpreting Trump because his moods vary so wildly. And
• 2:31
  Speaker 4: I must say I've always admired the true Trump loyalist
• 2:35
  Speaker 4: because you have to be able to leap backwards and
• 2:38
  Speaker 4: forwards across so many red lines and tie yourself into
• 2:42
  Speaker 4: so many knots. To be a consistent Trump supporter is
• 2:46
  Speaker 4: a high achievement in gymnastics.
• 2:48
  Speaker 3: I think.
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: This time Volodimiseelenski, having had a bit of a dig
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: from one of the questions last time around about his clothing.
• 2:59
  Speaker 3: Why don't you wear a suit? Suit? You're the highest
• 3:03
  Speaker 3: level in this country. Is awful? Say, and you refuse
• 3:06
  Speaker 3: to wear a suit? Just want to see people you
• 3:08
  Speaker 3: own a suit?
• 3:09
  Speaker 4: Yeah?
• 3:10
  Speaker 3: Yeah, a lot of Americans have problems with you, not
• 3:13
  Speaker 3: respect of I will wear a question after this war
• 3:18
  Speaker 3: will finish.
• 3:20
  Speaker 2: He wore a suit this time, right, Yes, I got.
• 3:24
  Speaker 3: A question for each yours all this President? You love
• 3:27
  Speaker 3: fabulous in that suit? I said, yeah, look you look good.
• 3:31
  Speaker 3: I said the same thing. Yeah, I said the one
• 3:33
  Speaker 3: that attacked you last time that I remember that. I
• 3:36
  Speaker 3: apologize to you. Look you look wonderful. No, my first
• 3:39
  Speaker 3: question for you President in the same suit I changed you.
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: Was that a smart move?
• 3:51
  Speaker 4: Well it was, of course, but it's completely backing mad
• 3:55
  Speaker 4: that the question of a suit should have come up. Zelenski,
• 4:01
  Speaker 4: in solidarity with Ukrainian soldiers who were fighting and dying
• 4:05
  Speaker 4: in huge numbers, has throughout his presidency since the war
• 4:09
  Speaker 4: worn a kind of informal military garb, not giving himself
• 4:14
  Speaker 4: any insignia or wearing phony metals or anything, just to
• 4:17
  Speaker 4: be in solidarity with the soldiers. But when they were
• 4:21
  Speaker 4: picking a fight with Lotomer Zelenski, the Trump loyalists decided
• 4:24
  Speaker 4: to make a big deal of the fact that Zelenski
• 4:27
  Speaker 4: didn't wear a suit to the White House, and the
• 4:29
  Speaker 4: odious taker Carlson said, Zelenski is like a nightclub bouncer
• 4:34
  Speaker 4: or something. Why don't you get a nightclub for him
• 4:36
  Speaker 4: to run or something like this. So okay, so he
• 4:38
  Speaker 4: wore a suit today. Now, honestly, you're talking about the
• 4:42
  Speaker 4: lives and deaths of hundreds of thousands of people in
• 4:46
  Speaker 4: Ukraine and Eastern Europe, and the peace agreement may turn
• 4:50
  Speaker 4: on whether Zelensky sacks up to Trump's ego by wearing
• 4:54
  Speaker 4: an unaccustomed suit in the White House. It just shows
• 4:58
  Speaker 4: how bizarre reality has become.
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: But this is the way you have to play Donald Trump, right,
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: because things like clothing and symbols mean a lot to him.
• 5:07
  Speaker 3: Yeah, and he's a very strange person. Trump.
• 5:10
  Speaker 4: Now, the difficulty for an analyst is that Trump at
• 5:15
  Speaker 4: his best is very good and at his worst, he's
• 5:18
  Speaker 4: unspeakably terrible, and to hold the two different trumps in
• 5:22
  Speaker 4: your head at once is very difficult. There are good
• 5:25
  Speaker 4: results that he's achieved internationally. In his first term. He
• 5:29
  Speaker 4: achieved peace agreements between Israel and four Arab neighbors. That's astonishing.
• 5:34
  Speaker 4: No previous president had achieved that. On the other hand,
• 5:37
  Speaker 4: there are absolute debarcles that he's presided over. Famously, he
• 5:42
  Speaker 4: declared after a meeting with North Koreas Kim Jong un
• 5:45
  Speaker 4: that the nuclear threat from North Korea was over and
• 5:48
  Speaker 4: that Kim Jong un was committed to denuclearizing the whole
• 5:51
  Speaker 4: Korean pininula.
• 5:52
  Speaker 3: No such thing ever happened. Now.
• 5:54
  Speaker 4: The difficulty we've got interpreting what's going on now is
• 5:57
  Speaker 4: that all the messages that came out of the Trump
• 6:01
  Speaker 4: summit with Vladimir Putin are contradicted by all the messages
• 6:05
  Speaker 4: coming out of the Trump summit with Zelensky and with
• 6:09
  Speaker 4: the European leaders.
• 6:11
  Speaker 3: And I think only.
• 6:13
  Speaker 4: God knows what is going to happen, or which set
• 6:17
  Speaker 4: of messages is going to be true, or if something
• 6:21
  Speaker 4: new is going to come up.
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: So let's talk about what seemed to be the developments
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: out of this Oval Office meeting. There's talk of a
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: European led reassurance force of troops that could go to
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: Ukraine and keep the peace if a peace deal is
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: reached with Russia. What do you think of that, Greg,
• 6:42
  Speaker 1: Is that something that realistically could happen?
• 6:45
  Speaker 3: Yes, it could, It could.
• 6:46
  Speaker 4: So there were very confusing reports about whether there was
• 6:49
  Speaker 4: any chance of American troops being involved. Trump seemed to
• 6:53
  Speaker 4: indicate that was a possibility, Then he seemed to indicate
• 6:56
  Speaker 4: that wasn't a possibility.
• 6:57
  Speaker 3: That he put out a tweet.
• 6:58
  Speaker 4: Or whatever we call tweets the stay saying that it
• 7:01
  Speaker 4: would be European forces coordinated by the United States. Now
• 7:05
  Speaker 4: god aline knows what coordinated means. Now, I suppose this
• 7:09
  Speaker 4: is a concession by Putin because he's always said he
• 7:12
  Speaker 4: wouldn't accept foreign forces in Ukraine. But European defenses are
• 7:17
  Speaker 4: so feeble that to deploy thirty thousand troops is a
• 7:21
  Speaker 4: huge ask for the Europeans. We rightly see Trump's chaos
• 7:26
  Speaker 4: as a bad thing, and it is a bad thing,
• 7:29
  Speaker 4: But the Europeans, in substance are more guilty than Trump.
• 7:35
  Speaker 4: Russia invaded Crimea in twenty fourteen. That's eleven years ago.
• 7:40
  Speaker 4: In those eleven years, the Europeans have not increased their
• 7:44
  Speaker 4: defense budgets, they have not created military production lines. Now
• 7:49
  Speaker 4: they've just started to increase their defense budgets now, but
• 7:53
  Speaker 4: they had eleven years clearly where Putin's intentions were telegraphed
• 8:00
  Speaker 4: to them. They are cumulatively vastly bigger economy than Russia.
• 8:05
  Speaker 4: They are there begging Trump to be involved because of
• 8:09
  Speaker 4: their own failure to provide for their own security, which
• 8:12
  Speaker 4: they could well afford to do given the size of
• 8:14
  Speaker 4: their economies.
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: One of the other things where now apparently talking about
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: is territory swaps. It seems that Vladimir Zelenski is open
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: to what he referred to as proportional swaps of territory.
• 8:27
  Speaker 1: There's a suggestion that Russia wants basically most of the
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: Donyetsk region, which includes some of Ukraine's most prized territory.
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: What do you think that means, Greg, Are we actually
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: going to see a land swap?
• 8:40
  Speaker 2: And is that maybe the road to peace?
• 8:43
  Speaker 4: Well, if the Ukrainians do, that represents a massive defeat
• 8:46
  Speaker 4: for them. It may be the best thing to do.
• 8:48
  Speaker 4: Sometimes you're better to take a defeat on the terms
• 8:53
  Speaker 4: that you can get and if you keep going you
• 8:55
  Speaker 4: get a much worse defeat. Now there are two big
• 8:59
  Speaker 4: parts of the don Bus which Russia doesn't currently control,
• 9:03
  Speaker 4: and Putin said that any interim agreement or peace agreement
• 9:08
  Speaker 4: or anything involves him getting at least the rest of
• 9:11
  Speaker 4: the Donbas. Once you see territory to Russia, it's gone forever.
• 9:15
  Speaker 4: And if Ukraine gets a security guarantee in exchange, what
• 9:20
  Speaker 4: exactly does that mean? Because in nineteen ninety four Ukraine
• 9:24
  Speaker 4: gave up the nuclear weapons that it had inherited from
• 9:26
  Speaker 4: the Soviet Union, and if it had held those nuclear weapons,
• 9:30
  Speaker 4: it certainly would not have been invaded by Russia. And
• 9:32
  Speaker 4: in exchange for giving those weapons up, it got a
• 9:35
  Speaker 4: historic security guarantee from Russia, the United States and the
• 9:39
  Speaker 4: United Kingdom that it would never be attacked, that its
• 9:42
  Speaker 4: borders were in violate, that its territorial security was guaranteed.
• 9:46
  Speaker 4: And then blink Anihilator, Russia invades and takes Crimea, and
• 9:50
  Speaker 4: the West collectively does nothing. Weakness is provocative, and they
• 9:53
  Speaker 4: tempted the Russians to do more. So, what you would
• 9:57
  Speaker 4: get if Ukraine gives a great slab of new territory
• 10:00
  Speaker 4: to Russia. You repeat nineteen ninety four, but you do
• 10:03
  Speaker 4: it with a much much weaker Ukraine, much harder to defend.
• 10:08
  Speaker 4: The areas that it would have to give up, are
• 10:11
  Speaker 4: areas which involve fortified cities, which Ukraine has been able
• 10:15
  Speaker 4: to hold against all Russian invasion attempts up till now.
• 10:20
  Speaker 4: There would be a security guarantee in which apparently there'll
• 10:23
  Speaker 4: be no American troops coordinated by America. But I bet
• 10:27
  Speaker 4: Donald Trump doesn't promise to send American troops to fight
• 10:30
  Speaker 4: if anything happens. Ukraine still won't be allowed into NATO,
• 10:33
  Speaker 4: so it doesn't get the permanent Article five protection of NATO,
• 10:37
  Speaker 4: and there'll be the successes to Macron in France and
• 10:41
  Speaker 4: Starmar in Britain allegedly Saint of Vladimir Putin. Well, look
• 10:46
  Speaker 4: look at the lesson we taught you last time. Last time,
• 10:49
  Speaker 4: you thought you'd invade Ukraine and you only got twenty
• 10:51
  Speaker 4: five percent of the country. Do it again and see
• 10:54
  Speaker 4: what happens. You get another twenty five percent. I don't
• 10:57
  Speaker 4: think that can be what was envisaged, because I don't
• 11:01
  Speaker 4: think the Europeans would have emerged from the White House
• 11:04
  Speaker 4: with so much of a smile on their faces. But honestly,
• 11:07
  Speaker 4: we just don't know. One of the difficulties with Trump
• 11:10
  Speaker 4: is that nothing holds longer than a news cycle.
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: One thing we do know about Trump is that he's
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: always got an eye on what's in it for America.
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: Last time he met with Zelenski, they were talking about
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: access to Ukraine's rare earths. Now he's asking Zelensky reportedly
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: for a fifty billion dollar steak in the Ukrainian drone industry,
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: and Zelenski is talking about purchasing one hundred billion dollars
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: worth of American weapons and equipment through the Europeans. So
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: is that a new development, greg, Is that something that's
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: emerged now, this conversation about drones and about equipment.
• 11:48
  Speaker 4: Yes, yes, that is new, and that's quite important. Again,
• 11:51
  Speaker 4: it's very hard to know what strength to give it.
• 11:53
  Speaker 4: Many of these announcements that Trump makes with foreign governments
• 11:56
  Speaker 4: about hundreds of billions of dollars never actually happen.
• 12:00
  Speaker 3: For him.
• 12:01
  Speaker 4: The announcement is everything, getting the announcement of the dealers everything.
• 12:05
  Speaker 4: It is quite shocking and profoundly morally offensive that Trump
• 12:09
  Speaker 4: is trying to shake down a democratic allied nation which
• 12:14
  Speaker 4: is subject to a brutal invasion by a neighboring dictator.
• 12:18
  Speaker 4: We would have been appalled if the Clintons had behaved
• 12:20
  Speaker 4: this way. We were appalled when Joe Biden behave this
• 12:24
  Speaker 4: way with his son Hunter Biden doing deals with countries
• 12:27
  Speaker 4: his dad was negotiating with his vice president. Ukraine has
• 12:32
  Speaker 4: always bought American weapons, So one way Trump gets round
• 12:37
  Speaker 4: his base not wanting American taxpayer money to go to
• 12:39
  Speaker 4: Ukraine now is to say, well, we'll sell you the
• 12:42
  Speaker 4: weapons and the Europeans will pay for it.
• 12:43
  Speaker 3: Well, that's not bad, that's okay.
• 12:45
  Speaker 4: The Europeans need to pay for Ukraine's defense because defending
• 12:49
  Speaker 4: against Russia is defending themselves, so that's good. But the
• 12:54
  Speaker 4: fifty billion dollars stake in Ukraine's draining, So what does
• 12:58
  Speaker 4: that mean? Ukraine will make owns mainly for its own
• 13:02
  Speaker 4: use and then pay America for the privilege of making
• 13:06
  Speaker 4: its own drones. Just seems to defy not only all
• 13:11
  Speaker 4: morality but all common sense. But you can take some
• 13:14
  Speaker 4: consolation from the fact that these deals never actually seem
• 13:17
  Speaker 4: to eventuate. You know, Australia has been talking about a
• 13:20
  Speaker 4: rare Earth deal with America, I think longer than World
• 13:24
  Speaker 4: War Two went on. For you can't dismiss Trump. He's
• 13:27
  Speaker 4: the most powerful man in the world. Things really happen,
• 13:30
  Speaker 4: But nor can you take everything that he says as
• 13:33
  Speaker 4: actually meaning something.
• 13:36
  Speaker 2: Coming up.
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: But does Vladimir version really want peace? And what will
• 13:41
  Speaker 1: he and the deal maker in chief, Donald Trump want
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: in return? Only a few days since we saw Vladimir
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: Putin of Russia and Donald Trump meeting in Alaska in
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: immense pomp and circumstance, nothing seemed to emerge from that.
• 14:10
  Speaker 2: Do you feel, though, Greg, that there is now momentum here?
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: As you say, the European leaders are in Washington, DC
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: looking like they feel like something is happening.
• 14:19
  Speaker 4: I would honestly say to you, anyone who tells you
• 14:21
  Speaker 4: they know what's going on, is you know, you just
• 14:24
  Speaker 4: want to check.
• 14:24
  Speaker 3: What they're having in their morning coffee.
• 14:26
  Speaker 4: But yes, it looks like the European leaders think there's
• 14:30
  Speaker 4: something afoot. So that's very good. But that is exactly
• 14:33
  Speaker 4: the opposite of what Trump and Putin were saying after
• 14:37
  Speaker 4: their meeting last time. The remark we heard Trump make
• 14:41
  Speaker 4: to Emmanuel Macron, you know, is caught on a hot
• 14:43
  Speaker 4: mic saying, you know what crazy is it sounds I
• 14:46
  Speaker 4: think he Putin wants to do a deal for me.
• 14:50
  Speaker 4: So Trump is the sort of the platonic ideal of narcissism, sollopsism,
• 14:56
  Speaker 4: which means literally the ability to know nothing other than yourself.
• 15:00
  Speaker 4: You only know yourself. Trump is beyond narcissistic. He's solopsistic.
• 15:05
  Speaker 4: And if he really thinks Vladimir Putin is going to
• 15:09
  Speaker 4: do a deal because of his affection for Donald Trump,
• 15:13
  Speaker 4: well that's barking man. Putin has done pretty well in
• 15:17
  Speaker 4: charming a whole series of otherwise hardheaded American presidents. Putin
• 15:21
  Speaker 4: has some sort of hypnotic ability to get American presidents
• 15:25
  Speaker 4: to think that he's on the brink of making a deal.
• 15:28
  Speaker 4: But on the other hand, if we look at what
• 15:30
  Speaker 4: Putin's done, he's just continued the aggression. A very Russian
• 15:35
  Speaker 4: pattern this war. I mean, intelligence doesn't tell you much,
• 15:37
  Speaker 4: but history tells you everything. The Russian pattern of war
• 15:40
  Speaker 4: is they always start very badly. Their logistics are terrible,
• 15:43
  Speaker 4: their NCAAs are always corrupt, half their equipment has been
• 15:46
  Speaker 4: sold on the black market, and so on. It's always
• 15:48
  Speaker 4: chaotic at the start. But then their sheer willingness to
• 15:51
  Speaker 4: endure unspeakable casualty levels and just to go on and
• 15:56
  Speaker 4: on means that they tend to prevail over time the
• 16:00
  Speaker 4: history of wars. It's quite plausible that Putin is simply
• 16:04
  Speaker 4: saying to himself, Look, I can keep these monkeys dancing
• 16:07
  Speaker 4: for months and months, and I am making slow advances
• 16:11
  Speaker 4: on the battlefield. I've turned my economy into a wartime economy.
• 16:15
  Speaker 4: If I tried to demobilize it now, that would be
• 16:18
  Speaker 4: more disruptive to the economy than not. They're never going
• 16:21
  Speaker 4: to stop China in India buying my oil now. I
• 16:25
  Speaker 4: might even have a meeting with Zelenski and present that
• 16:28
  Speaker 4: as a great sign of graciousness and generosity on my part.
• 16:32
  Speaker 4: But I can easily find some way of presenting whatever
• 16:35
  Speaker 4: peace offer I make to Zelenski in a way that
• 16:38
  Speaker 4: I know Zelenski can't accept it. But then Trump so
• 16:41
  Speaker 4: much wants a deal, he'll put the weights on Zelenski,
• 16:44
  Speaker 4: and Putin might just string this out endlessly for months.
• 16:48
  Speaker 4: On the other hand, perhaps Trump is right, and perhaps
• 16:50
  Speaker 4: Putin has had a change of heart, and because of
• 16:52
  Speaker 4: his love of the admirable and spectacular and handsome and
• 16:56
  Speaker 4: best looking ever in history. President may say, well, look
• 17:01
  Speaker 4: I've changed. I've had a lifetime formed by the KGB
• 17:04
  Speaker 4: belief in the most obsessive, paranoid and expansive Russian nationalism.
• 17:09
  Speaker 4: But I'm rejecting all of that right now, and I'm
• 17:12
  Speaker 4: becoming an eleanor Roosevelt Democrat who knows absolutely anything is
• 17:17
  Speaker 4: possible in this scenario, even a good outcome. But although
• 17:22
  Speaker 4: the Europeans were smiling, and that's a good sign, I
• 17:25
  Speaker 4: wouldn't bet my house on a piece steel. Coming up
• 17:28
  Speaker 4: in the next few months.
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: Greg Sheridan is The Australian's Foreign editor. You can read
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: his analysis and all our reporting from around the world
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: right now at the Australian dot com dou