Latest / V / The Deadly Biden Scandal that has Dems Panicking | Episode 319

Transcript

The Deadly Biden Scandal that has Dems Panicking | Episode 319 · V

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Everybody, welcome to Vince on a Friday. Great to have
• 0:02
  Speaker 1: you with us. I start today with some amazing news.
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: We got a bunch of great Supreme Court decisions yesterday,
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: but are we merely being fattened up for the slaughter? Yes,
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: that's right. Are we about to get a big stinker
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: of a Supreme Court decision? We'll see. I'll walk through
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: all of the good news and the worry about the
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: bad news coming up. here on the program today. Also,
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: we talked earlier this week about a very deadly Joe
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: Biden-led scandal that killed lots of American citizens. We're finding
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: out more about this now, including the reaction from some
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: Democrats who are saying they want criminal investigations in to
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: the Biden administration. We'll discuss what's happening there and so
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: much more all ahead on this Friday edition of Vince
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: as we get Closer and closer, the 250th anniversary of
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: our great country. Great to have you with us. Look
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: at you all. Look at you all, the best audience anywhere.
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: If you're listening to us live, listening to us rather
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: on podcast, you should join us live. Rumble.com slash Vince
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: on any given weekday morning, 8 a.m. We do this
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: show together and we've got the great chat gathering. It's
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: so wonderful. So that's another option for you. Something to do.
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: On a weekday morning, 8 a.m. in the morning, it'd
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: be great to have you. All right, let me thank
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: one of the great sponsors who do make this show possible.
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: Bone Charge. Bone Charge. We love Bone Charge in the
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: Colonize household. Bone Charge, the infrared sauna blanket, has been
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: wonderful for me. I first turned to that sauna blanket
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: to help with muscle recovery, detoxification. It's been a total
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: game changer. It's easy to use. I just wrap myself
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: up and let the heat work. It's perfect. It's a
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: great relaxation thing. And it's actually such a joy to
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: have a sauna in the house.
• 1:38
  Speaker 2: What a joy.
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: I've noticed a huge difference in how I relax and
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: how I rejuvenate and how I feel afterward. Allison, she's
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: got the red light face mask. She wears it. Every day,
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: she loves it, and she finds that it works really
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: well because, first of all, red light therapy.
• 1:52
  Speaker 3: Hello.
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: If you look this stuff up, it works. It improves
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: her skin's texture. It reduces inflammation. She has seen fantastic results.
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: It's like having a mini spa treatment right inside our home.
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: So if you're thinking about trying either of these products out,
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: you are in luck. Head to BonCharge.com, B-O-N-Charge.com. Use the
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: code Vince at checkout. Get 15% off. Both of these
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: products have made a huge impact on us and our wellness.
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: I think you're going to love them too. Use the
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: code Vince at BonCharge.com to save 15%. These statements and
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: products have not been evaluated by the FDA. These products
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: disease or condition.
• 2:30
  Speaker 3: Boom.
• 2:34
  Speaker 4: Yeah, yeah.
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: Oh, yeah, that's a good point, too. Juice McGregor says,
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: make sure to subscribe to the program. Yes, that would
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: be wonderful while you're here. If this is the first
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: time or if this is the umpteenth time you've joined us,
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: but you're not yet subscribed, subscribe. It'd be worth your while,
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: I think. Let me start today with the fact that
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: Democrats are now asking questions not about Joe Biden's brain,
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: but the wisdom of allowing him to kill American citizens
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: en masse. Interesting. Now, I will straight up tell you
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: right now that they're not using the word Biden, but
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: it is all about Biden, or at least the people
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: who were pulling the levers inside of his administration. We
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: go to the Democrat governor of New Mexico. Do we
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: have anybody from New Mexico in the chat today? We
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: have this woman, Michelle Lujan Grisham, who's just released a
• 3:22
  Speaker 1: statement this week saying that she wants a criminal investigation
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: of into is yes, the Biden administration's decision to poison
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: American citizens with fentanyl. Here's what she says. Governor Michelle
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: Lujan Grisham today issuing the following statement, quote, I'm appalled
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: by reporting this week by the Associated Press and Albuquerque
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: Journal that revealed federal authorities made a deliberate, federal authorities,
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: that's Biden, made a deliberate decision to let hundreds of
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: thousands of fentanyl pills Let me say that again. The
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: DEA watched as 74,000 fentanyl pills were delivered to a
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: mobile home park in Albuquerque, and they did nothing. And
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: that's just one transaction. Shockingly, the federal government stood by
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: while monitoring shipments, tallying exact pillow counts and watching as
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: these deadly drugs hit the streets. Look, there's this audience
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: is going to know this story a lot better than than, well,
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: I would say most people, because we had Tristan Levitt
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: on earlier this week from Empower Oversight. He represents whistleblowers,
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: including the whistleblower who brought this story to the public.
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: And the revelations are absolutely staggering. If you haven't seen
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: the Tristan Leavitt interview, just go back a couple of
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: days here. We've got it. I know Tristan also shared
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: it to his ex account. And in it, he and
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: I talked about the fact that millions of these fentanyl
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: pills are were observed by the Biden administration coming into
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: the country, and they did nothing to stop them. They
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: let them go under this ridiculous notion that somehow this
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: would improve the quality of law enforcement. No, catch the
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: guys before they kill American citizens. You don't have any
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: room to play around with this.
• 5:16
  Speaker 5: This is insane.
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: And this is why we're calling it fentanyl and furious.
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: It's just like Operation Fast and Furious, except far more deadly.
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: In that case, the deadly implements, the guns, were being
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: tracked by the Obama administration as they were going to
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: the cartels in Mexico. One of those guns came back
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: and a cartel member killed a border patrol agent by
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: the name of Brian Terry. That led to an epic
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: scandal during the Obama administration. Eric Holder would eventually be
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: held in contempt of Congress related to all of that.
• 5:48
  Speaker 1: Of course, he never faced criminal consequences because he was
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: the attorney general and didn't inflict criminal consequences on himself.
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: because he's above the law. But this story is huge.
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: And now you've got the Democrat governor of New Mexico saying,
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: we need a criminal investigation into the people who were
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: killing American citizens. She's right about that. There are no
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: words to describe how reckless and dangerous these decisions were,
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: she says. Make no mistake, the DEA knew that people
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: would die if these pills made it into the New
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: Mexico communities. And the agency let it happen anyway. The result,
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: hundreds of New Mexican parents burying their kids, hundreds of
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: New Mexican kids growing up without stable parents, all while
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: the federal government stood by. If the justification for letting
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: these pills flood our communities was that it would somehow
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: make New Mexico safer, the results say otherwise. New Mexico
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: now leads the nation in the increase in overdose deaths
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: for the second straight year, despite deaths dropping nationwide. She
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: says she's been trying to get in touch with a
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: whole bunch of people here. You see, pay attention to
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: the dates here. Because only one references a Trump official,
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: that's Attorney General Pam Bondi. She says in 2022, she
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: sought information from Chris Wray during the Biden administration, imploring
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: the FBI to assign no less than 50 additional agents
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: to New Mexico to stem escalating drug trafficking and violent crime.
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: September of 2022, she reaches out to the Attorney General
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: Merrick Garland, requesting support. August of 2023, she writes again
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: to Garland, renewing her request. September of 2023, she writes
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: to Garland again, reiterating her request. She's ignored. She said
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: she finally was able to reach out to Pam Bondi
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: in September of 2025. She merely mentions that she once
• 7:47
  Speaker 1: again requested additional agents and resources. Well, I'll tell you what,
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: During the Trump era, the fentanyl deaths have been going down.
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: During the Trump presidency, the overdose deaths have been going down.
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: There's a good story to be told, a better story,
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: let's put it that way, a better story to be
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: told about that situation now in the country. Continues to
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: be a crisis. The Trump administration is working very hard
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: on it. But keep this one in mind. You've got
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: a Democrat governor. Let's see if this grows beyond the
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: Democrat governor of New Mexico, because it should. It should.
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: This is one of the biggest scandals of our lifetimes.
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: And put that in the pile of a lot of
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: big scandals, from the COVID betrayals, the jab stuff, the
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: shutdowns related to that, to the rigging of our elections,
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: the hiding of really important information, the Trump-Russia conspiracy hoax,
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: the assassination attempts on President Trump. There are a lot
• 8:42
  Speaker 1: of big scandals to deal with. But this one, this
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: one's right up there. When you've got overdose deaths killing
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: over 100,000 Americans a year, yeah, you can you can
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: be damn sure this one's up there. So there you go.
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: Update on that, a quick update on that. But we
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: also have some other big updates on the sovereignty of
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: our country. The Supreme Court released a series of really
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: important decisions yesterday that I found very encouraging. I found
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: encouraging because they adhered to the Constitution and the rule
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: of law. I always like decisions that do that. And
• 9:13
  Speaker 1: I want to start with the one that we just
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: got out of Hawaii. Now, curious, anybody in Hawaii right
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: now in the chat, I'd be a little shocked. Hawaii,
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: I think, is six hours, six hours difference. And everyone's,
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: I think, in their beds at the moment. But in Hawaii,
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: you know, the Second Amendment does apply to the state
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: of Hawaii, right? You guys know this chat. This chat
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: knows this. The Second Amendment applies to Hawaii. Yeah, because
• 9:39
  Speaker 1: it's a part of the United States of America. Well,
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: The Supreme Court over the last decade or so has
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: been releasing a number of really important, really the last
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: two decades, has been releasing a number of really important
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: decisions that have sided with the Second Amendment. And they've
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: made it all the more possible for people to have
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: their Second Amendment rights protected. Here's the problem. Democrats hate
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: the Second Amendment. They hate an armed populace. They think
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: the only people who should be armed is the government
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: so that the government can inflict upon you whatever tyranny
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: the left devises for your life. Meanwhile, normal people would
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: like to protect their families and would like to be
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: able to be armed in order to do that. As
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: you know, when seconds count, the police are minutes away.
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: So being able to protect your family is an essential thing.
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: And being able to carry a gun on you is
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: also a great American right. In fact, the United States
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court has routinely protected the rights of concealed carry Americans,
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: Americans who are carrying guns. in a concealed fashion. Is
• 10:46
  Speaker 1: it protected enough? Is that right, protected enough? No, nowhere
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: near enough. We need nationwide reciprocity. We need those gun
• 10:52
  Speaker 1: rights protected. This idiocy about gun-free zones is really just
• 10:56
  Speaker 1: like shooting zones for criminals. But in their effort, in
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: the left's effort to try and upend the Supreme Court
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: and the protections of the Second Amendment, in Hawaii, they
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: had devised a law that said you are not allowed
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: to conceal carry onto any private property that is accessible
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: to the public unless you get affirmative consent from the
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: property owner. You see, let me break down that example
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: a little bit more explicitly for you so you can
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: understand what I'm talking about. In other words, if you
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: are carrying a gun in a concealed way and you
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: go to a gas station to fill up your tank
• 11:35
  Speaker 1: in Hawaii, under Hawaii law up until yesterday, under Hawaii law,
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: It would be illegal for you to continue to conceal
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: carry onto the private property of the gas station unless
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: you sought and secured affirmative consent from the owner of
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: the gas station. That turns the Second Amendment directly on
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: its head. It deprives American citizens of their gun rights
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: at scale in the beautiful state of Hawaii.
• 12:05
  Speaker 3: And.
• 12:06
  Speaker 1: So the court yesterday, they come up with a decision
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: really clear, six to three, saying that Hawaii's law banning
• 12:14
  Speaker 1: licensed concealed carry permit holders from carrying guns onto private
• 12:18
  Speaker 1: property open to the public is unconstitutional. Now, the justice
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: is right in this opinion yesterday. It's entirely possible for
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: a property owner to forbid guns on their private property.
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: So like you, if you're on your home and you
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: decide that you don't want someone coming in with a gun,
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: you can forbid them from doing that. That's your right
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: as a property owner. That also is the right of
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: a gas station owner who owns the property. They could say, hey,
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: no guns on my property. They're allowed to do that.
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: But this inversion where you're not allowed to carry a
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: gun onto this private property if it's accessible to the public,
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: unless you seek affirmative consent from the owner in the
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: first place, Yeah, that's not going to fly. The Supreme
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: Court struck that down yesterday in an important win for
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: the Second Amendment. So that battle continues. The battle to
• 13:05
  Speaker 1: protect the Second Amendment continues. But meaningful victory yesterday as
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: yet another attempt by the left at what you might
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: refer to as malicious compliance. Oh, yeah, we're protecting the
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: Second Amendment as they crap all over it. Yeah, that's
• 13:18
  Speaker 1: not going to fly. So the Supreme's striking that down yesterday.
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: Appreciative of that. We also have some big Supreme Court
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: decisions when it comes to our border. And those are
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: the screaming headlines from the day. Although I think the
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: Second Amendment case is really important too. Let's talk about
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: the border cases, shall we? This is how we do it.
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: Let's see. We got the Supreme Court yesterday ruling that
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: President Trump, yes, can turn away so-called asylum seekers who
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: arrive at our border. At our border, just because you
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: arrived south of the U.S. border, you're standing in Mexico,
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: and you start yelling, sanctuary, sanctuary, I claim asylum, or
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: whatever the incantation you think you need to use in
• 14:05
  Speaker 1: order to get into the United States is, just because
• 14:07
  Speaker 1: you utter the words does not mean you are entitled
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: to come into our country and stay here forever. In fact,
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: the United States could just turn you away, and you
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: are not entitled to stay. That is U.S.
• 14:19
  Speaker 3: Law.
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: And that is, of course, what the United States Supreme
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: Court ruled yesterday in another 6-3 decision. There's a difference
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: between arriving at our country and arriving in our country.
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: And the difference in those prepositions, well, it makes all
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: the difference in the world. Listen to Justice Alito. This
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: is back in March, as he was pointing out, that
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: the left keeps trying to smuggle the people into the
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: country by claiming that arriving at the border somehow entitles
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: you to stay here forever. Watch this.
• 14:55
  Speaker 6: I believe that both you and Justice Sotomayor and Justice
• 15:01
  Speaker 6: Jackson on several occasions have used the phrase arriving at.
• 15:06
  Speaker 6: I think you said you arrived at your house, but
• 15:09
  Speaker 6: that's not the term. that is in the statute, do
• 15:12
  Speaker 6: you think there is no difference between arriving at a
• 15:16
  Speaker 6: location and arriving in the location? Does a person arrive
• 15:21
  Speaker 6: in the house when the person is not in the
• 15:23
  Speaker 6: house and is knocking at the door asking to be admitted.
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: To the house? Great question. No, those are two different things.
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: If somebody arrives at your house, They're not yet in
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: your house. And then they get invited in your house.
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: That's a separate step. And here's the Supreme Court saying
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: President Trump has every right to say, no, thanks. We're
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: having dinner and sending you away. The president can do that. Also,
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: to be really clear about this asylum stuff, you understand
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: how ridiculous it is that we have people from all
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: over the planet who are claiming asylum in the United States?
• 16:03
  Speaker 1: You know, under international asylum principles and laws that you
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: are supposed to claim, seek asylum status rather, in the
• 16:14
  Speaker 1: first safe third country you arrive at. Like once you
• 16:18
  Speaker 1: get out of the place where you say you're being persecuted,
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: attempt to claim asylum at the first place you arrive at.
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: That's not the United States. How many Chinese nationals have
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: flown into South America and then transited the Darien Gap
• 16:34
  Speaker 1: and come all the way up into the United States,
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: tens of thousands by some counts over the course of
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: the Biden administration of illegal alien Chinese nationals pouring into
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: our country in this way. Not just Chinese nationals, how
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: many people from countries everywhere on planet earth, from Asia,
• 16:51
  Speaker 1: from Africa, from Europe, from South America, just all pouring
• 16:56
  Speaker 1: through our borders. under the Biden administration, many of whom
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: claimed some ridiculous, quote, credible fear, and then never show
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: up for their asylum hearings because they know at that
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: point they're home free. They can just stay in the
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: United States forever. So the president has been shutting down
• 17:12
  Speaker 1: these routes whereby foreigners invade our country. This has been
• 17:17
  Speaker 1: one of them. And the Supreme Court said yesterday, you
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: have every right to do that. In fact, you have
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: an obligation to do that under the law. So the president,
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: it can do that. That's, that's great. Another one for you.
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: You ready for another big Supreme Court case? So I've
• 17:31
  Speaker 1: gone over two. Here's the third from yesterday. Yesterday, the
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: Supreme Court sided with the president of the United States.
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: And yes, he can end temporary protective status for Haitians
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: and for Syrians. It's at his discretion whether or not
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: that status continues to be extended. And because it's temporary,
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: it means at some point you've got to go. And yesterday,
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: the Supreme Court agreed with President Trump You've got this power. Therefore,
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: they have to go. More on that in just a moment.
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: And also the screeching the left is doing over the
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: fact that foreigners who are supposed to be here on
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: a temporary basis don't get to stay here forever. They're
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: going crazy because they're the left. It's typical stuff. All right,
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: more ahead on this edition of Vince. I want to
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: thank one of our fine sponsors today. That's Shopify. You know,
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: starting something new is not just hard. It can be terrifying. Terrifying.
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: And even before we started this program, I did wonder,
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: I was like, is this going to work? Am I
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: going to be able to do this format? But taking
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: that leap, man, it changed everything. And having tools that
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: simplify the process to take leaps, it makes it so
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: much easier. Trusting yourself is the first big step forward.
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: And this is where Shopify comes in. Shopify powers millions
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: of businesses worldwide and about 10% of U.S. e-commerce, from
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: global brands to first-time founders. You can build a beautiful
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: storefront with ready-to-use templates that match your style, no coding needed.
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: Their built-in AI helps write product descriptions, headlines, and even
• 19:01
  Speaker 1: improve photos, saving hours every single week. Plus, you can
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: create email and social campaigns in just minutes, so your
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: brand reaches customers everywhere. And when questions pop up, 24-7
• 19:11
  Speaker 1: support has your back. It's time to turn those what-ifs into...
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: With Shopify today. Sign up for your $ 1 per month
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: trial today at Shopify.com slash Vince. Go to Shopify.com slash Vince.
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: That's Shopify.com slash Vince.
• 19:31
  Speaker 3: All right.
• 19:31
  Speaker 1: Let's see here. Yeah, so the Supreme Court yesterday said, yes,
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: the president can end temporary protective status. That's well within
• 19:38
  Speaker 1: his powers. And no, just because you're upset about it
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: doesn't mean you get to litigate and stay inside the
• 19:43
  Speaker 1: country forever. You've got to go. So let me give
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: you some context, ladies and gentlemen. Who here, anybody in
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: the chat know what year Haiti, Haitians, were granted temporary
• 19:56
  Speaker 1: protective status right here in the United States? When was
• 19:59
  Speaker 1: this designation done? Does anybody in the chat know? It's
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: okay if you don't. I had to look it up
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: to verify myself. What year did this? I'll give you
• 20:09
  Speaker 1: a hint. It revolved around a devastating natural disaster. A
• 20:14
  Speaker 1: devastating natural disaster. Now, it's not quite so far back
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: as the 1990s. There we go. Corey nailed it.
• 20:20
  Speaker 3: Corey 1215.
• 20:20
  Speaker 1: It was 2010. It was 2010 that this took place.
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: There was an earthquake in Haiti on January 12th of 2010.
• 20:35
  Speaker 1: On January 21st, before the end of the month of
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: that year, now 16 and a half years ago, the
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: United States government created temporary protective status for Haitians who
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: were fleeing the devastation. 16 years ago. 16 years. So
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: if you can stay in the United States for 16
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: years and then just keep on going, at what point
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: do we say it's not temporary anymore? Kind of seems permanent,
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: doesn't it? If you're going to stay here for decades, Similarly,
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: in Syria, that designation was conferred in 2012. That would
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: have been 14 years ago. That designation was not for
• 21:14
  Speaker 1: an earthquake. It was for the Syrian civil war. And
• 21:17
  Speaker 1: since then, Bashar al-Assad is gone. Assad has been dethroned.
• 21:22
  Speaker 1: He's unseated. And so the Assad government, which was involved
• 21:26
  Speaker 1: in the Syrian civil war, is now gone. So the
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: point is, go back to Syria. You were here on
• 21:33
  Speaker 1: a temporary basis. Now you can go back. And this
• 21:36
  Speaker 1: temporary protective status thing, understand what this says about the
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: United States. It first of all conveys the most obvious thing,
• 21:43
  Speaker 1: which is we are a very generous country. We are
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: very generous. In fact, we will open our doors to
• 21:49
  Speaker 1: taking people on a temporary basis until their country can
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: get back on their feet and then send them back
• 21:54
  Speaker 1: on their way. Go on back, get back to your home.
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: That's a very generous thing for us to do. But
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: at one point, does our generosity, become utterly suicidal. Because
• 22:06
  Speaker 1: it seems to me that the cruel thing to do
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: is to take advantage of our generosity and then to
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: abuse us, despite how good we've been to places like
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: Haiti and Syria, or at least the people of Haiti
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: and the people of Syria. That seems like the cruel thing.
• 22:21
  Speaker 1: So when the Supreme Court comes out with this decision yesterday,
• 22:24
  Speaker 1: it's on the side of the rule of law, it's
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: on the side of decency. It's like, hey, look, you
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: had a good run, but now's the time to go home.
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: That's all wonderful. This is something that Democrats are raging about.
• 22:36
  Speaker 1: They are furious about this. Yesterday, Chuck Schumer was calling
• 22:40
  Speaker 1: it very cruel that these Haitians and Syrians have to
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: go back to their home countries now. Seth Moulton, whoever
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: the hell that is, was whining that President Trump, he
• 22:52
  Speaker 1: said it was President Trump. It wasn't President Trump. It
• 22:54
  Speaker 1: was the Supreme Court. He said, Donald Trump's Supreme Court
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: has ended legal protections for tens of thousands of Haitians
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: and Syrian migrants. Rather than protect the hardworking families that
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: contribute to our communities, Trump's justices are sending them back
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: to the same places they fled. Democrats need to, you
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: see this? Democrats need to reform the court to preserve
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: our rights and protect TPS families. So here's a Democrat
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: congressman speaking on behalf of all the other Democrats who
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: are saying the same nonsense in the last 24 hours.
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: saying that the real people that they're there in Congress
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: to protect are foreign nationals who have overstayed both their
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: welcome and our generosity, who have gotten every benefit imaginable
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: from the people of the United States and should go home.
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: That guy is fighting harder for the foreigner, for the abuser,
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: for the person who wants to just stay here forever.
• 23:55
  Speaker 1: than he is for any American citizen. Can you imagine
• 23:58
  Speaker 1: if these Democrats fought half as hard for Americans as
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: they fight for these people? What a great country this
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: would be. If we could get these guys in Congress
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: to fight half as hard as they do for foreign nationals,
• 24:11
  Speaker 1: it's wild. And watch as he dresses up. The language
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: here is like, hey, you have a moral obligation to
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: sell out your own country. You have a moral obligation
• 24:21
  Speaker 1: to be taken advantage of.
• 24:22
  Speaker 3: No, I don't.
• 24:23
  Speaker 1: To hell with you. I have a moral obligation to
• 24:26
  Speaker 1: tell the truth. That's the moral obligation I have. I
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: have a moral obligation to my family. I have a
• 24:31
  Speaker 1: moral obligation to my God, and I have a moral
• 24:34
  Speaker 1: obligation to my country. And in the interest of all
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: of those things, I'd like the rule of law back, please.
• 24:40
  Speaker 1: I'd like order back. I'd like America to be for
• 24:45
  Speaker 1: Americans on our terms, not people who violate our laws
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: or take advantage of our generosity. So Seth Moulton says that,
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: but that key, that one I just highlighted for you,
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: Democrats need to reform the court, he says. This is
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: the game plan. Notice how he starts the post. He
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: says it's Donald Trump's Supreme Court. And then he says
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: Democrats need to reform it. In other words, Democrats need
• 25:11
  Speaker 1: to package so that their policy preferences are just absolutely
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: rammed down the throat of the American people. It's not
• 25:19
  Speaker 1: about the Constitution. It's not about the rule of law.
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: They're not interested in people who are going to look
• 25:24
  Speaker 1: at the text of the Constitution and the law and
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: render wise judgments on that basis. They're looking for people
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: to invent left-wing laws directly from the bench. That's what
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: they want. And also, it's to be, again, clear, this
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: is an obvious warning sign to Republicans in the Senate.
• 25:44
  Speaker 1: What are you doing with the filibuster, dude? Get rid
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: of it. All of these Democrats are going to get
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: rid of it the second they can because they want
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: to pack the Supreme Court in order to make permanent
• 25:55
  Speaker 1: their disgraceful policy preferences, which involves selling out the American people.
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: Are you not seeing the writing on the wall? Are
• 26:02
  Speaker 1: you not seeing the writing on social media? Are you
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: really that dense that you don't perceive what's about to
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: happen next? Crazy to me. Absolutely crazy. So, You know,
• 26:18
  Speaker 1: I got one more Democrat spazzing out for you, and
• 26:19
  Speaker 1: then we'll get to Stephen Miller. It'll be Miller time.
• 26:21
  Speaker 1: I can't wait for the Stephen Miller stuff. But first,
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: one more Democrat spazzing out. This is a woman who's
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: on a network called Ms.
• 26:29
  Speaker 3: Now.
• 26:29
  Speaker 1: You guys know about Ms.
• 26:30
  Speaker 7: Now?
• 26:31
  Speaker 2: Ms.
• 26:32
  Speaker 4: Now.
• 26:33
  Speaker 1: This Ms. Now, kind of like a lesbian cable network
• 26:36
  Speaker 1: or something. They've got a woman on there with resting
• 26:39
  Speaker 1: Democrat face by the name of Nicole Wallace. And she
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: was really upset yesterday. that all of these Haitians and
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: Syrians would have to leave the United States of America. Now,
• 26:50
  Speaker 1: if I had to venture a guess, Nicole Wallace doesn't
• 26:55
  Speaker 1: live anywhere near where the Haitians and the Syrians are.
• 26:59
  Speaker 1: In fact, she would probably be the first to, you know,
• 27:03
  Speaker 1: make sure that the Haitians and Syrians can't live in
• 27:05
  Speaker 1: her community, wherever that is. But here she is yesterday
• 27:09
  Speaker 1: whining about the Supreme Court decision and saying that a
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: poem on the Statue of Liberty says that you're supposed
• 27:15
  Speaker 1: to betray your country.
• 27:16
  Speaker 3: Listen to this.
• 27:17
  Speaker 5: Trump's Supreme Court making a mockery of the words emblazoned
• 27:20
  Speaker 5: on the Statue of Liberty. Quote, give me your tired,
• 27:24
  Speaker 5: your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free is
• 27:28
  Speaker 5: where we start today.
• 27:29
  Speaker 3: Uh.
• 27:34
  Speaker 1: A poem on the Statue of Liberty. That poem was
• 27:38
  Speaker 1: written by a woman called Emma Lazarus. The New Colossus
• 27:42
  Speaker 1: is the name of the poem. It was affixed to
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: the Statue of Liberty many decades after the statue was
• 27:49
  Speaker 1: put up and dedicated. And that little tiny line inside
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: of the poem has been used by the left as
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: some sort of declaration of what America's laws are supposed
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: to be, that your borders are supposed to be wide
• 28:02
  Speaker 1: open and that America is not supposed to be for Americans.
• 28:04
  Speaker 1: That's the position that the left routinely takes as a
• 28:07
  Speaker 1: justification for betraying our sovereignty. Now, notice she doesn't use
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: another phrase to refer to immigrants in that poem, which
• 28:16
  Speaker 1: is wretched refuse. So if we're going to go ahead
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: and use the poem as some sort of gospel of
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: truth about immigration, is Nicole Wallace saying that immigrants are
• 28:27
  Speaker 1: wretched refuse? Has she read the poem? It's all so stupid. Anyway,
• 28:37
  Speaker 1: the point is, the poem is not US law. The
• 28:40
  Speaker 1: poem is not US law. And the left will, once again,
• 28:44
  Speaker 1: routinely use it as a means to pretend it is,
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: just in case you're wondering what that was about. All right,
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: in a moment, I've got a palate cleanser for you.
• 28:51
  Speaker 1: The great Stephen Miller reacting to this big decision yesterday.
• 28:55
  Speaker 1: There's nothing like Miller time. We're going to get to
• 28:56
  Speaker 1: that in just a moment. But first, I want to
• 28:59
  Speaker 1: tell you something. It's funny how sleep changes as you
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: get older. When you're young, let's say you're early 20s.
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: That's young. You can stay up too late, get four
• 29:06
  Speaker 1: or five hours of sleep, grab a coffee, somehow still
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: function the next day. But somewhere in your 30s, that sleep,
• 29:12
  Speaker 1: it stops being optional. And you feel it when it's off.
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: You get the brain fog, the shorter patience, the sluggish workouts.
• 29:19
  Speaker 1: You're annoyed at your coworkers. You're needlessly cursing at Josh. Well,
• 29:23
  Speaker 1: I'll tell you what. For me, falling asleep was never
• 29:26
  Speaker 1: the issue. It was the staying asleep that became the issue.
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: And this is why I started using Beam's Dream Powder.
• 29:32
  Speaker 1: It gives you a real restorative sleep. Dream is made
• 29:34
  Speaker 1: up of a powerful blend of all natural ingredients. Reishi, magnesium, L-theanine, apigenin. melatonin.
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: Beam's already improved over 30 million nights of sleep, helping
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: people all across the country wake up and feel their best.
• 29:47
  Speaker 1: If you're in that stage of life where you can't
• 29:48
  Speaker 1: just push through bad sleep anymore, this is precisely what
• 29:52
  Speaker 1: you got to try. Go to shopbeam.com slash vinshow. Use
• 29:56
  Speaker 1: the code vinshow. Take advantage of my exclusive offer for
• 30:00
  Speaker 1: up to 40% off of Beam's Dream Powder. Seriously, think
• 30:03
  Speaker 1: about it. How much would you pay for a truly
• 30:05
  Speaker 1: great night of sleep? Doesn't have to be that much.
• 30:08
  Speaker 1: Not with my discount code VINSHOW. Go to shopbeam.com slash
• 30:12
  Speaker 1: VINSHOW today. Also want to thank Native Path Collagen. Just
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: been a joy. It's been so helpful to me. I
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: think you'll get something out of it too, you know,
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: because as we all get older, we talk about getting
• 30:24
  Speaker 1: older and the effects of that. It's the little things
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: you start to really notice, the waking up stiff or
• 30:28
  Speaker 1: your skin doesn't bounce back the same way. It turns
• 30:31
  Speaker 1: out there's a reason for that. And this is why
• 30:34
  Speaker 1: I love Native Path Collagen. Collagen helps support everything from joints, bones, skin,
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: and hair. And after you turn 30, your body starts
• 30:43
  Speaker 1: to make less collagen every year. You know about this?
• 30:45
  Speaker 1: And by age 60, people lose about half of it.
• 30:49
  Speaker 1: But Native Path Collagen helps replenish that protein and helps
• 30:52
  Speaker 1: you support the parts of your body that help you
• 30:53
  Speaker 1: stay active, vital, and more like yourself. And another thing
• 30:57
  Speaker 1: I love about NativePath, if you don't feel that difference
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: like I have in your health, you get your money back.
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: There's no questions asked, so give it a try. Plus,
• 31:06
  Speaker 1: I'll get you over 50% off, free shipping. Go to getnativepath.com
• 31:11
  Speaker 1: slash Vince. That's getnativepath.com slash Vince. These statements or products
• 31:16
  Speaker 1: have not been evaluated by the FDA. These products are
• 31:18
  Speaker 1: not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease
• 31:21
  Speaker 1: or condition. Consult with a healthcare professional.
• 31:26
  Speaker 3: All right.
• 31:27
  Speaker 1: You getting ready for Miller time? You ready for Miller time?
• 31:31
  Speaker 1: Let's do it. So Stephen Miller reacting yesterday to all
• 31:36
  Speaker 1: of this news. I've got, let's see. I want to
• 31:39
  Speaker 1: make sure I got the right clips here, Josh. I've got,
• 31:41
  Speaker 1: you've got two Stephen Miller clips in here for me.
• 31:43
  Speaker 1: I know I've got a third one. Let me see.
• 31:47
  Speaker 1: Stephen Miller.
• 31:48
  Speaker 2: Here he is.
• 31:49
  Speaker 1: All right, Miller time. When it comes to deportations, let's
• 31:52
  Speaker 1: go with this one. This is a cut three on
• 31:54
  Speaker 1: whether President Trump can deport Haitians. Watch this. Does the
• 31:58
  Speaker 1: administration consider Haiti a safe country? For Haitians?
• 32:02
  Speaker 3: Absolutely.
• 32:05
  Speaker 1: For Haitians?
• 32:06
  Speaker 2: Yes.
• 32:06
  Speaker 1: I mean, yes, Haitians live in Haiti.
• 32:08
  Speaker 8: It's not our position that Haitians should leave Haiti.
• 32:11
  Speaker 1: I mean, it would be crazy for us to say
• 32:13
  Speaker 1: that Haitians couldn't live in Haiti.
• 32:14
  Speaker 8: It's their country.
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: Of course Haitians should live in Haiti.
• 32:17
  Speaker 8: There's no viable asylum facility or use a technical term here,
• 32:20
  Speaker 8: cat claim, or withholding claim, for any Haitian seeking relief
• 32:25
  Speaker 8: from going back to Haiti, to their homeland. The fact
• 32:28
  Speaker 8: that there might be pockets of Haiti with this higher crime.
• 32:31
  Speaker 3: Rates, guess what?
• 32:32
  Speaker 8: There's pockets of Chicago with crime rates just as high, right?
• 32:36
  Speaker 8: There's pockets of cities like St. Louis with crime just
• 32:40
  Speaker 8: as high. Pockets of Los Angeles with crime just as high.
• 32:43
  Speaker 8: It has never been the case that having communities that
• 32:46
  Speaker 8: have high crime rates is a basis for asylum. Never
• 32:49
  Speaker 8: has been, never will be.
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: Thank you all. That's true. High crime rates is not
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: a basis for asylum. That bears repeating. High crime rates,
• 32:58
  Speaker 1: not a basis for asylum. Not in any way under
• 33:01
  Speaker 1: the statutes. a basis for asylum in the United States.
• 33:05
  Speaker 1: So what an interesting Q & A. I love that.
• 33:08
  Speaker 1: The guy's like, do you think Haiti's safe? And Stephen
• 33:11
  Speaker 1: Miller goes, for Haitians? Yeah, that's why we're sending him back.
• 33:15
  Speaker 1: That's why we're sending him back. And the truth is,
• 33:17
  Speaker 1: the safety question is fundamentally not actually the asylum situation.
• 33:22
  Speaker 1: Just because you have a high crime rate somewhere in
• 33:24
  Speaker 1: the country does not justify asylum here in the United States.
• 33:28
  Speaker 1: So good, always good to see Stephen Miller out there.
• 33:31
  Speaker 1: I think He should take over. Don't you think he
• 33:33
  Speaker 1: should take over for one of these Caroline Leavitt maternity
• 33:36
  Speaker 1: leave press conferences? Wouldn't that be great? They had Marco
• 33:41
  Speaker 1: Rubio's done a wonderful job.
• 33:42
  Speaker 3: J.D.
• 33:43
  Speaker 1: Vance has done a wonderful job. A bunch of these
• 33:45
  Speaker 1: guys have shown up to answer some questions. I know Dr.
• 33:47
  Speaker 1: Oz did it at one point. Stephen Miller to do
• 33:51
  Speaker 1: the press briefing. Can we get an amen in the
• 33:54
  Speaker 1: chat on Stephen Miller doing the press briefing? I would
• 33:57
  Speaker 1: love to see that. I think that'd be phenomenal. I
• 34:01
  Speaker 1: think that'd be super great. Anyway, we'll see. And even
• 34:05
  Speaker 1: when Caroline's back at the lectern, I still think that
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: Stephen Miller should fill in every so often. That'd be good. Yeah,
• 34:12
  Speaker 1: we got some amens. All right, all right. The chat's
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: on board. Yeah, good. All right, well, we'll let the
• 34:16
  Speaker 1: White House know. Time for Stephen Miller to do the
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: press briefing. It'd be great. Let me see here. I've
• 34:22
  Speaker 1: also got more for you from Stephen Miller, but first
• 34:25
  Speaker 1: I want to dwell on.
• 34:28
  Speaker 3: The wins.
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: Here's the wins here. So the Supreme Court gave us
• 34:31
  Speaker 1: a couple of great decisions yesterday, in particular when it
• 34:34
  Speaker 1: came to protecting America's sovereignty and cleaning up our immigration system,
• 34:38
  Speaker 1: which the left has been abusing. But I don't know
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: about you, Chad, but it's making me a little nervous
• 34:45
  Speaker 1: that we're getting all these good decisions and we still
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: haven't received the big enchilada yet. You know what I'm
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: talking about? Birthright citizenship. The birthright citizenship case still sits
• 34:57
  Speaker 1: before the Supreme Court. Next week, we're expected, on Monday,
• 35:01
  Speaker 1: we'll begin to get some of the remaining opinions, and
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: we're expected to have the rest of these opinions over
• 35:05
  Speaker 1: the course of this next week. And that birthright citizenship case,
• 35:10
  Speaker 1: oh boy. If this doesn't go the right way, it's
• 35:15
  Speaker 1: going to be some real chaos. It's going to be
• 35:18
  Speaker 1: some real chaos. So you've got, the court is considering
• 35:25
  Speaker 1: right now whether or not somebody who just blitzes into
• 35:30
  Speaker 1: our country and has a baby suddenly has an American
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: citizen on their hands? That's the question before the court
• 35:36
  Speaker 1: right now. Now, any decent American, anybody with two eyes,
• 35:41
  Speaker 1: two ears, and two brain cells to rub together knows
• 35:44
  Speaker 1: that you should not be entitled to American citizenship by
• 35:47
  Speaker 1: putting a toe on American soil and having a baby here.
• 35:51
  Speaker 3: Like what?
• 35:52
  Speaker 1: We had years of Chinese birth tourism going on where
• 35:57
  Speaker 1: You had wealthy Chinese nationals flying into the country to
• 36:00
  Speaker 1: have babies to make them American citizens and then bringing
• 36:03
  Speaker 1: their babies back to China as newly minted American citizens.
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: What is that system? That doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
• 36:13
  Speaker 1: And I guarantee you there's no way the founders ever
• 36:17
  Speaker 1: intended for citizenship to be conferred on people under circumstances
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: like that. If you're an illegal alien to our country,
• 36:24
  Speaker 1: if you break our country's laws and then have a
• 36:26
  Speaker 1: baby within a day or something of your arrival, or
• 36:29
  Speaker 1: it doesn't matter what timeframe, that doesn't entitle you to
• 36:32
  Speaker 1: an American citizen child by extension tethering you to the
• 36:36
  Speaker 1: United States, which is why we use the phrase anchor baby.
• 36:40
  Speaker 1: In fact, a lot of the welfare, American taxpayer money
• 36:44
  Speaker 1: that's taken by illegal aliens is taken by way of
• 36:48
  Speaker 1: their unearned American citizenship children. That's just the truth. Now,
• 36:53
  Speaker 1: has this system been broken for a while? Yes, it has.
• 36:57
  Speaker 1: But the length of time that it's been broken should
• 36:59
  Speaker 1: not be a justification for allowing this abuse to continue.
• 37:04
  Speaker 1: The court's already said, all of the oral arguments on
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: the subject have already indicated, by the way, nobody's going
• 37:09
  Speaker 1: to have their citizenship revoked, even if it was gotten
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: in this ill-gotten way. It's about every person going forward.
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: That's what this is about. So if the court rules
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: on the side of decency, on the side of the
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: American people next week, that it's going to affect every
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: case going forward, that no, an illegal immigrant can't come
• 37:29
  Speaker 1: to the United States and then boom, have an American
• 37:31
  Speaker 1: citizen child. In fact, the claims about birthright citizenship emanate
• 37:37
  Speaker 1: out of the 14th Amendment, a mangled reading of the
• 37:40
  Speaker 1: 14th Amendment. And we should be really clear about what
• 37:44
  Speaker 1: the 14th Amendment is about and why it was set
• 37:46
  Speaker 1: up in the first place. It was set up to
• 37:48
  Speaker 1: address freed slaves. former slaves and their children. It was
• 37:54
  Speaker 1: meant to establish once and for all that anybody who
• 37:58
  Speaker 1: was ever in a condition of slavery in the United
• 38:01
  Speaker 1: States or their children, these are American citizens. They are
• 38:05
  Speaker 1: a part of the American story. They have every right
• 38:10
  Speaker 1: to dictate the future of this country on the basis
• 38:12
  Speaker 1: of that citizenship. They enjoy the blessings of American citizenship.
• 38:17
  Speaker 1: That's what the 14th Amendment is about. In fact, the 13th, 14th,
• 38:21
  Speaker 1: and 15th Amendments are all dedicated to welcoming former slaves
• 38:28
  Speaker 1: into the full fabric of the United States of America. Now,
• 38:31
  Speaker 1: what would ensue after all of those amendments, of course,
• 38:33
  Speaker 1: were many attempts by Democrats to continue to prevent Black
• 38:36
  Speaker 1: Americans from having their voting franchise, from being able to
• 38:40
  Speaker 1: participate in the United States of America. No doubt, that
• 38:43
  Speaker 1: history continues to exist. But this is the point of
• 38:45
  Speaker 1: the 14th Amendment. It was meant to get us to
• 38:49
  Speaker 1: that more perfect union. It wasn't meant to be to
• 38:54
  Speaker 1: make us imperfect, to break us, to introduce chaos. And
• 38:58
  Speaker 1: yet that is precisely what the left has used the
• 39:00
  Speaker 1: 14th Amendment to do. It's amazing. It's amazing. So this
• 39:08
  Speaker 1: needs to end. And I'm worried that, and I'm not alone.
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: I know there's a bunch of people who are worried
• 39:13
  Speaker 1: about it, that the court is releasing all of these
• 39:16
  Speaker 1: opinions right now to essentially soften us up for the
• 39:19
  Speaker 1: death blow. That, yeah, we're going to keep this crappy
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: system set up where people can just steal American citizenship.
• 39:26
  Speaker 2: What?
• 39:27
  Speaker 1: That's insane to me. And I hope it doesn't come
• 39:29
  Speaker 1: to pass, but I'm nervous it's about to. And on
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: this front, let me share something with you. Here's a
• 39:38
  Speaker 1: Mike Davis post on the subject, the great Mike Davis,
• 39:40
  Speaker 1: Article 3 Project. We love Mike. And here's what he says.
• 39:43
  Speaker 1: The Supreme Court just issued two good 6-3 decisions on immigration,
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: TPS and asylum. Don't let the timing fool anyone. Soon
• 39:51
  Speaker 1: the court will likely issue an egregiously wrong ruling. The
• 39:54
  Speaker 1: court will pretend that Chinese birth tourists, trend de Aragua terrorists,
• 39:57
  Speaker 1: Islamist invaders, and other illegals get automatic birthright citizenship. We
• 40:02
  Speaker 1: the people, the sovereign citizens of America, never agreed to this.
• 40:06
  Speaker 1: Not at our founding, not after the Civil War, not
• 40:09
  Speaker 1: in any subsequent Congress.
• 40:11
  Speaker 2: Never.
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: This will serve as the most serious violation of our
• 40:15
  Speaker 1: most crucial sovereign power, controlling who comes and who goes
• 40:20
  Speaker 1: and who becomes one of us. We the people never
• 40:25
  Speaker 1: agreed to this judicially sanctioned invasion and replacement. He's right
• 40:33
  Speaker 1: about that. He's right. You know, there's also all sorts
• 40:38
  Speaker 1: of evidence to be really clear about that the 14th
• 40:42
  Speaker 1: Amendment didn't just give blanket citizenship to any person who
• 40:46
  Speaker 1: was born inside of the territorial borders of the United States.
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: It's not true in the case of foreign diplomats. It's
• 40:53
  Speaker 1: well accepted that foreign diplomats are not entitled to American
• 40:57
  Speaker 1: citizen children just by giving birth here in the United States.
• 41:01
  Speaker 1: Those children are citizens of the countries that that diplomat
• 41:03
  Speaker 1: comes from. So, well, wait a second. The 14th Amendment
• 41:08
  Speaker 1: doesn't apply to that kid?
• 41:09
  Speaker 3: Why?
• 41:10
  Speaker 1: What happened to equal protection? Equal protection, the equal protection
• 41:14
  Speaker 1: clause is found in the 14th Amendment too. Oh, it
• 41:17
  Speaker 1: doesn't apply to foreigners. That's interesting. In fact, Supreme Court
• 41:24
  Speaker 1: Justice Clarence Thomas yesterday wrote a very interesting concurring opinion
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: in the case involving temporary protective status. So I just
• 41:35
  Speaker 1: told you about that case where President Trump can get
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: rid of all these Haitians, all these Syrians, time to
• 41:40
  Speaker 1: go home. You've stayed long enough. Yesterday, Justice Clarence Thomas
• 41:45
  Speaker 1: wrote a concurring opinion for that opinion, meaning he shares
• 41:51
  Speaker 1: the opinion of the majority, but he's got one extra
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: thing he'd like to say. Sean Davis took a screen
• 41:55
  Speaker 1: grab of it. We love Sean. And here's what Justice
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: Thomas wrote. Quote, I join the opinion of the court
• 42:02
  Speaker 1: in full. I write separately to address two more fundamental
• 42:06
  Speaker 1: problems with the Mayotte respondents' suit. First, their equal protection claim,
• 42:12
  Speaker 1: while meritless under the court's precedence, was also beyond the
• 42:15
  Speaker 1: district court's jurisdiction. Second, and this is the most important part,
• 42:20
  Speaker 1: even assuming jurisdiction, the equal protection claim fails for the
• 42:24
  Speaker 1: additional reason that aliens have no equal protection rights against
• 42:31
  Speaker 1: the federal government. You got that? Aliens have no equal
• 42:36
  Speaker 1: protection rights against the federal government. In other words, aliens
• 42:41
  Speaker 1: don't have some sort of equal claim to U.S. citizenship
• 42:46
  Speaker 1: just because their babies are born here. That doesn't make
• 42:49
  Speaker 1: any sense. No, absolutely not. And you have Justice Thomas.
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: This is not the same opinion, obviously. They haven't released
• 42:57
  Speaker 1: the birthright citizenship opinion. But he's making it really clear
• 43:01
  Speaker 1: in his concurring opinion, no, foreigners don't get the equal
• 43:05
  Speaker 1: protection rights of Americans. That's insane. Why would the Constitution
• 43:09
  Speaker 1: ever say that? Let me give you an example in
• 43:12
  Speaker 1: a different context. You know that under current federal law,
• 43:15
  Speaker 1: although it's very poorly enforced, obviously, under current federal law,
• 43:20
  Speaker 1: it is illegal for illegal aliens to receive almost every
• 43:25
  Speaker 1: single category of welfare. They're not entitled. They're not even
• 43:29
  Speaker 1: allowed to collect welfare. Now, as I pointed out a
• 43:33
  Speaker 1: few minutes ago, oftentimes illegals will smuggle welfare through their
• 43:37
  Speaker 1: unearned American citizen children. That often happens. And there's all
• 43:40
  Speaker 1: sorts of other ways that illegals tap into taxpayer resources
• 43:44
  Speaker 1: and exploit our system. But on this core point, which
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: is like, hey, can you get food stamps? Are you
• 43:50
  Speaker 1: entitled to welfare of any kind? No, it's illegal under
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: federal law. Now, if the Equal Protection Clause applied to
• 43:59
  Speaker 1: illegal aliens, that wouldn't stand. It'd be like, no, actually,
• 44:03
  Speaker 1: they're entitled to welfare too. Equal protection. That's insanity. This
• 44:07
  Speaker 1: is all insanity. And the idea that it's even... possible
• 44:11
  Speaker 1: that the court could side with the illegal aliens having
• 44:13
  Speaker 1: American citizen children is nut job stuff. It's completely both
• 44:18
  Speaker 1: ahistoric and totally rejects the law and the Constitution, and
• 44:22
  Speaker 1: yet we may see that decision from the court. Because
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: not only do we have three left-wing lunatics on the court,
• 44:28
  Speaker 1: we also have some judges with some very weak knees
• 44:31
  Speaker 1: who collapse under the slightest bit of pressure from the
• 44:34
  Speaker 1: New York Times and these other establishment hacks. So be
• 44:39
  Speaker 1: on guard for that and continue to pray for the
• 44:41
  Speaker 1: right outcome. This thing's not out yet.
• 44:43
  Speaker 4: Who knows?
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: Maybe you and I will be celebrating a proper decision
• 44:46
  Speaker 1: next week. We'll see. But as always, pray for your country. Now,
• 44:51
  Speaker 1: if this doesn't go our way one way or another,
• 44:53
  Speaker 1: we've got to fix this. We've got to fix this problem.
• 44:56
  Speaker 1: In fact, here's Stephen Miller unloading on this notion of
• 44:59
  Speaker 1: birthright citizenship for illegal aliens. Watch this, cut two. What
• 45:03
  Speaker 1: is your sense of where the court will go on
• 45:05
  Speaker 1: birthright citizenship?
• 45:07
  Speaker 7: Well, look, I don't know where they're going to go.
• 45:09
  Speaker 7: I'm not going to forecast it. Here's what I can say.
• 45:13
  Speaker 7: Anybody who has read even 30 seconds of American history
• 45:18
  Speaker 7: understands the Reconstruction Amendments after the Civil War were to
• 45:24
  Speaker 7: ensure that the children of slaves would be franchised in
• 45:29
  Speaker 7: the United States.
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: The author of the.
• 45:32
  Speaker 7: 14th Amendment was clear in saying it did not apply
• 45:35
  Speaker 7: to aliens. There should be a 9-0 ruling in a
• 45:40
  Speaker 7: functioning democracy. The idea that you can have a country
• 45:43
  Speaker 7: where you just set foot on U.S. soil and any
• 45:46
  Speaker 7: child you have gets to be an American citizen and
• 45:49
  Speaker 7: vote in our elections, collect our welfare, sit in our juries,
• 45:52
  Speaker 7: sit in judgment... of our fellow men and women is
• 45:56
  Speaker 7: such an outrage to the idea of having a country,
• 45:59
  Speaker 7: it defies the scriptures. I don't know what they're gonna do,
• 46:01
  Speaker 7: but here's what I can say. If this country doesn't,
• 46:05
  Speaker 7: one way or another, end birthright citizenship, this country doesn't
• 46:08
  Speaker 7: have a future. Citizenship has to be sacred and precious.
• 46:13
  Speaker 7: And as we stand here on the 250th anniversary of
• 46:17
  Speaker 7: America's founding, the idea that we wouldn't have in this
• 46:21
  Speaker 7: country respect And sanctity for citizenship for the voting franchise
• 46:27
  Speaker 7: is such an insult to generations of Americans who spilled
• 46:31
  Speaker 7: their blood for our freedom in battlefields here and all
• 46:34
  Speaker 7: across the earth, Will.
• 46:36
  Speaker 1: Yeah, he's totally right. One way or another, the only
• 46:39
  Speaker 1: way we're going to preserve this country is if we
• 46:41
  Speaker 1: restore order. That's it. That's it. So what do we do? Well,
• 46:46
  Speaker 1: I'll tell you what. If the court rules against American
• 46:51
  Speaker 1: citizens next week, There is absolutely no question that we
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: have to amend the United States Constitution. And I know,
• 46:59
  Speaker 1: I know that's a heavy lift. You might already be
• 47:01
  Speaker 1: thinking like, Vince, is that even possible? We can barely
• 47:03
  Speaker 1: get these guys to do a speaking filibuster.
• 47:05
  Speaker 3: I know, I know.
• 47:08
  Speaker 1: But what other recourse do we have? We have to
• 47:11
  Speaker 1: make it crystal clear what the 14th Amendment actually means.
• 47:17
  Speaker 1: A clarifying amendment to the Constitution. I can't believe we
• 47:20
  Speaker 1: have to clarify it. The people who drafted the 14th
• 47:23
  Speaker 1: Amendment were clear. Stephen Miller was just very clear. But
• 47:29
  Speaker 1: if you need us to say it more loudly and
• 47:31
  Speaker 1: more clearly, we will. America is for Americans. It's not
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: for people who invade it. It's an amazing thing. It's amazing.
• 47:40
  Speaker 1: But be on guard for this because we've got a
• 47:43
  Speaker 1: big story coming in the next week, one way or
• 47:45
  Speaker 1: the other. Let me get to some other news, though.
• 47:48
  Speaker 1: There's some other important things going on. I told you
• 47:50
  Speaker 1: this week and actually over the course of the last
• 47:52
  Speaker 1: two weeks, there's a lot of people that are attempting
• 47:54
  Speaker 1: to sow division between the vice president of the United
• 47:57
  Speaker 1: States and the secretary of state for some reason. I
• 48:00
  Speaker 1: think this has to revolve around 2028 preferences. People might
• 48:03
  Speaker 1: either like Marco Rubio better or J.D. Vance better, whatever
• 48:07
  Speaker 1: it is. And the funny thing is, like, you hear
• 48:09
  Speaker 1: from these guys, and they're constantly conveying that they're on
• 48:11
  Speaker 1: the same page on what's going on with Iran.
• 48:15
  Speaker 3: Constantly.
• 48:15
  Speaker 1: They're even telling everyone, they're both telling everybody, hey, read
• 48:18
  Speaker 1: the Memorandum of Understanding. Like, all this, like, nonsense that's
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: being spread around it. Read first. More reading, less talking.
• 48:27
  Speaker 1: It's always good life advice. Do a little bit more
• 48:29
  Speaker 1: research first. But here's Marco Rubio being asked questions repeatedly.
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: yesterday about, why is J.D. Vance more prominent than you
• 48:37
  Speaker 1: are in the Iran negotiations? And Rubio responds to this
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: woman that she's being a moron, basically. He's a little nicer.
• 48:44
  Speaker 1: And says, he's the vice president of the United States.
• 48:47
  Speaker 1: He's the second most powerful person in our government. What
• 48:50
  Speaker 1: are you talking about? Watch this.
• 48:52
  Speaker 2: As the country's top diplomat, do you not want more
• 48:55
  Speaker 2: of a direct role in these talks, which have been,
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: until now, really led by the Vice President? I think
• 49:03
  Speaker 2: that's just a silly analysis. The Vice President is the
• 49:05
  Speaker 2: second-ranking person in our government. It just shows you how
• 49:08
  Speaker 2: seriously we take that endeavor. And we have a team
• 49:10
  Speaker 2: of people that do work. I mean, I'm here today
• 49:12
  Speaker 2: because they were overseas last week. We all have a
• 49:14
  Speaker 2: role to play in this regard. So, I mean, I'm here.
• 49:16
  Speaker 2: I've been here for three days. This is a key
• 49:18
  Speaker 2: component of that.
• 49:19
  Speaker 4: So.
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: But I think that's a really silly question. The Vice
• 49:22
  Speaker 2: President of the United States, other than the President, is
• 49:24
  Speaker 2: the second most powerful person in our government. The fact
• 49:26
  Speaker 2: that he's directly involved in this tells you the importance
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: that our administration has given to this topic. So I
• 49:31
  Speaker 2: think it's a very positive thing that he's involved in it.
• 49:34
  Speaker 1: Yeah, isn't it funny? So what he's really saying is
• 49:37
  Speaker 1: it's a sign of President Trump's commitment to this process.
• 49:40
  Speaker 1: That's what he's saying. That he sent his senior most
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: lieutenant to handle it. Like, what are you talking about?
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: That I would be mad that J.D. Vance is on this?
• 49:52
  Speaker 1: I'm not mad. This is great. In fact, one of
• 49:55
  Speaker 1: the reporters said, asked yesterday more explicitly, tell me about
• 49:59
  Speaker 1: your divide with J.D.
• 50:00
  Speaker 3: Vance.
• 50:01
  Speaker 1: Okay, here we go. Watch this. Cut six.
• 50:05
  Speaker 6: How wide is the divide between you and the Vice President?
• 50:08
  Speaker 2: On what issue? On any issue, but Iran in particular.
• 50:12
  Speaker 2: Everyone here is aligned behind the President of the United States,
• 50:14
  Speaker 2: every single one of us. The President of the United
• 50:17
  Speaker 2: States makes the foreign policy of our country. In our job,
• 50:19
  Speaker 2: we obviously give advice, we give counsel, we give opinions,
• 50:22
  Speaker 2: but when the President of the United States is the
• 50:24
  Speaker 2: one who is elected by the people of our country
• 50:26
  Speaker 2: to conduct our foreign policy, the President makes these decisions,
• 50:29
  Speaker 2: and all of us on his team, every single one
• 50:31
  Speaker 2: of us works in lockstep very closely with one another
• 50:34
  Speaker 2: to execute on the President's foreign policy. Everything we do
• 50:37
  Speaker 2: is because the President's made a decision that it's going
• 50:39
  Speaker 2: to be done. And one of the things I'm very
• 50:41
  Speaker 2: proud of, I can't speak for every element of our
• 50:43
  Speaker 2: government because I'm not involved in other aspects of our government,
• 50:45
  Speaker 2: but one of the things that I'm the proudest of
• 50:47
  Speaker 2: is that when it comes to foreign policy and national security,
• 50:50
  Speaker 2: we have no drama, we have no games. We have
• 50:53
  Speaker 2: a group of people that work very well together and
• 50:55
  Speaker 2: closely to execute on the President's directives, which is why
• 50:59
  Speaker 2: I think we've had good outcomes and good achievements. And
• 51:01
  Speaker 2: we're going to continue to have good outcomes and good achievements.
• 51:03
  Speaker 2: Everyone has an important role to play and everyone is
• 51:05
  Speaker 2: playing that role and doing it in a collaborative process.
• 51:08
  Speaker 2: And I think that serves the president well and I
• 51:10
  Speaker 2: think that serves the country well.
• 51:14
  Speaker 1: We have no drama. We have no games. That's interesting
• 51:18
  Speaker 1: because the media wants to create drama and they love
• 51:21
  Speaker 1: playing games. That's what that was. Tell me about your division.
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: We don't have division. We've got a team. We've got
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: no drama. We've got no games. We're working on the
• 51:33
  Speaker 1: president's vision. Wow, what an improvement over the first administration,
• 51:38
  Speaker 1: by the way. Remember all the people who were inside
• 51:40
  Speaker 1: and were like constantly trying to subvert the president, working
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: against him, undermining him, trying to rein him in. Oh,
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: you can't do this. You can't do that. Wait, hold
• 51:49
  Speaker 1: on a second. Who got elected? Who's the guy who
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: got elected to this gig? That's President Trump. Who do
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: you work for? That's President Trump. Whose agenda are you fulfilling?
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: That's President Trump. And most importantly, the Trump voter. That's
• 52:03
  Speaker 1: the agenda you're fulfilling. So if you're opposed to it, leave.
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: But if you're on board, thank you. Thanks for being
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: in the fight. Good answers from Rubio yesterday. I just love,
• 52:16
  Speaker 1: just like, you know, don't fall for the garbage. There's
• 52:18
  Speaker 1: like people out there. Oh, Rubio is keeping his head down.
• 52:20
  Speaker 1: He's really embarrassed by all this.
• 52:22
  Speaker 3: Really?
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: Because he keeps answering all these questions. He keeps telling
• 52:24
  Speaker 1: you suckers to actually read the MOU. And that he's
• 52:27
  Speaker 1: happy to be a part of this great team. So,
• 52:30
  Speaker 1: you know, who am I going to believe? The people
• 52:32
  Speaker 1: who are making up crap or the guys who are
• 52:34
  Speaker 1: actually in the thick of it? I know the answer
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: to that question. You guys want a quick Save America
• 52:41
  Speaker 1: Act update? I've done a lot of Save America Acts
• 52:44
  Speaker 1: this week. I thought, you know, maybe we could shrink
• 52:46
  Speaker 1: Save America just a little bit today. Although it is
• 52:49
  Speaker 1: so important. In order for us to do Save America, though,
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: we got to do, we got to gavel into it.
• 52:54
  Speaker 1: A little Save America Act update. You want some hot
• 52:56
  Speaker 1: rage on the Save America Act?
• 52:58
  Speaker 3: Good.
• 52:59
  Speaker 1: Me too. Here we go. Byron Donalds is my spirit
• 53:03
  Speaker 1: animal this week. Here's Byron Donalds going absolutely ham yesterday.
• 53:07
  Speaker 1: Cut 10. Watch this.
• 53:09
  Speaker 3: Byron Donalds. Man, the Senate sucks. I'm just going to
• 53:17
  Speaker 3: come out and say it. They suck. True. This is
• 53:19
  Speaker 3: not hard. 80% of the American people want the Save
• 53:23
  Speaker 3: America Act to pass, not 80% of Republicans, 80% of
• 53:27
  Speaker 3: the American people. And the only organization that refused to
• 53:31
  Speaker 3: act is the United States Senate. Everybody else is saying
• 53:35
  Speaker 3: this is common sense. We should do common sense things.
• 53:38
  Speaker 3: Let's make sure only Americans are voting in our elections.
• 53:42
  Speaker 3: Makes sense, right? Let's protect the franchise of the American people.
• 53:46
  Speaker 3: Let's make sure that people who are sent to Washington
• 53:49
  Speaker 3: are being voted on by Americans. Who the American people
• 53:53
  Speaker 3: choose is up to them, but we have a responsibility
• 53:55
  Speaker 3: to secure that franchise and to secure that process for
• 54:00
  Speaker 3: the American people. And what is happening in the U.S.
• 54:03
  Speaker 3: Senate is laziness, and quite frankly, it's disgusting. What? The
• 54:09
  Speaker 3: Senate Democrats don't want to have voter ID in America.
• 54:13
  Speaker 4: Why?
• 54:14
  Speaker 3: Because they want to maintain their power. Senate Republicans don't
• 54:18
  Speaker 3: want to do the right thing and actually have a
• 54:21
  Speaker 3: true filibuster on the floor and debate the matter on
• 54:25
  Speaker 3: the floor because it would take them away from their
• 54:27
  Speaker 3: precious meetings that they have to conduct.
• 54:30
  Speaker 4: I'm sorry.
• 54:31
  Speaker 3: They have a responsibility to open up the Senate floor
• 54:34
  Speaker 3: and debate this issue in front of the American people.
• 54:36
  Speaker 1: I agree with Chairman Harris. Thank you.
• 54:38
  Speaker 3: One thousand percent.
• 54:40
  Speaker 1: So Byron Donald's totally right about that. The what we
• 54:42
  Speaker 1: really are dealing with is the affliction of laziness going
• 54:46
  Speaker 1: on in the United States Senate. They just don't want
• 54:48
  Speaker 1: to do it. That really honestly, this is like, you know,
• 54:52
  Speaker 1: Occam's razor. It's like the most obvious explanation for why
• 54:56
  Speaker 1: a lot of these Republicans are just not doing it.
• 54:58
  Speaker 1: They're too lazy. They're too lazy. You know, the reality is,
• 55:03
  Speaker 1: I don't know if this will come as a shock
• 55:05
  Speaker 1: to you. A lot of these guys just enjoy being
• 55:07
  Speaker 1: called senator. That's it. They just like, you know, patting
• 55:12
  Speaker 1: each other on the back. I'm a senator. They're perfectly content,
• 55:15
  Speaker 1: a lot of them, being in the minority. In fact,
• 55:17
  Speaker 1: the less they have to do, the better. The less
• 55:19
  Speaker 1: that you can even get them to do, the better.
• 55:23
  Speaker 1: As long as I'm a senator, it's fine. And then
• 55:25
  Speaker 1: they can enrich their friends and vote on corrupt backroom
• 55:29
  Speaker 1: deals and not have to spend too much time really
• 55:31
  Speaker 1: thinking about the purpose of our country and their role
• 55:34
  Speaker 1: in trying to hold it together. Because if they did
• 55:38
  Speaker 1: care about that, we wouldn't be $ 37, $ 38, $ 39 trillion
• 55:42
  Speaker 1: in debt right now. If they did care about that,
• 55:46
  Speaker 1: then this wouldn't be an issue. We wouldn't have to
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: worry about pleading, begging, cajoling them in order to establish
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: election integrity. If they did care about that, they wouldn't
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: be on recess right now. And yet the Senate is.
• 56:00
  Speaker 1: They're on recess. They work two and a half days
• 56:02
  Speaker 1: a week. Is it anyone else in this chat have
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: a two and a half day work week? I don't
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: have a two and a half day work week. I
• 56:10
  Speaker 1: don't know what that's like. In the Senate, they've got
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: a two and a half day work week. And then
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: they give these long lectures insofar as they ever stand
• 56:18
  Speaker 1: in front of a microphone doing anything about how they're
• 56:20
  Speaker 1: working so hard for the American people. Two and a
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: half day work week. What are you talking about? I
• 56:28
  Speaker 1: work harder than the senators, you think, Josh? I'm trying.
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: He said I'm putting the work in. I'm trying. I'm trying.
• 56:36
  Speaker 1: I feel like I've got a better grasp of how
• 56:38
  Speaker 1: the freaking Senate works than a lot of these senators.
• 56:41
  Speaker 1: A lot of these guys seem to be caught off
• 56:42
  Speaker 1: guard by the fact that they're even allowed to stand
• 56:44
  Speaker 1: up and make a case in order to get something passed. Wait,
• 56:47
  Speaker 1: we can do that? Oh, that sounds awful. Then get
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: out of the job. Let's get somebody who can stand
• 56:54
  Speaker 1: on their own two feet and talk. That's all we
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: need you to do. Stand on two feet and talk
• 57:00
  Speaker 1: and then vote and restore integrity to America's elections. You know,
• 57:05
  Speaker 1: John Cornyn was this week before they went on recess,
• 57:09
  Speaker 1: he took a screen grab of his talking points about
• 57:11
  Speaker 1: why he can't do anything for you. He actually has
• 57:14
  Speaker 1: talking points. Somebody on his staff wrote talking points about
• 57:18
  Speaker 1: why he's not able to do his job. It was
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: the Save Act Talking Filibuster Issues. This is the talking
• 57:26
  Speaker 1: points they wrote for him. And it's a series of
• 57:29
  Speaker 1: excuses for why we can't use the talking filibuster to
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: get this passed. Now, of course, you can use the
• 57:33
  Speaker 1: talking filibuster to get it passed, but let's very quickly
• 57:36
  Speaker 1: go through it. He says the two-speech rule, meaning that
• 57:40
  Speaker 1: Democrats will get two chances for speeches during a filibuster,
• 57:45
  Speaker 1: applies to every debatable action in the Senate, including procedure, amendments,
• 57:48
  Speaker 1: and underlying bill.
• 57:50
  Speaker 8: Yeah.
• 57:51
  Speaker 1: This happens all the time. This happens when you're doing
• 57:56
  Speaker 1: the budget, when you're doing the reconciliation, the voterama. This
• 58:00
  Speaker 1: happens all year long. So like what? It wouldn't be
• 58:06
  Speaker 1: new for the SAVE Act, SAVE America Act. It's the
• 58:10
  Speaker 1: same thing that happens all the time. There's constantly attempts
• 58:13
  Speaker 1: by Democrats to extend debate and disrupt things. That's going
• 58:16
  Speaker 1: to happen no matter what you do. So you may
• 58:18
  Speaker 1: as well be pursuing something worthwhile. He goes on, he says,
• 58:23
  Speaker 1: Democrats can force unlimited tough votes on any subject that
• 58:26
  Speaker 1: divide us any time on any issue for months and months. Again,
• 58:32
  Speaker 1: this happens all the time. And Republicans can get enough votes,
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: if you can actually get your asses together and do
• 58:39
  Speaker 1: something for once, to table all of the nonsense. He says,
• 58:45
  Speaker 1: Republicans must maintain quorum at all times, including nights and weekends,
• 58:48
  Speaker 1: or Democrats can seize control over the floor.
• 58:50
  Speaker 3: Sure.
• 58:50
  Speaker 7: Sure.
• 58:52
  Speaker 1: But as Rachel Bovard points out, and by the way,
• 58:55
  Speaker 1: I'm cribbing a lot from Rachel Bovard here as I
• 58:57
  Speaker 1: assess this because she wrote an amazing ex-post on this subject.
• 59:00
  Speaker 1: You should go to my ex-account or just go right
• 59:03
  Speaker 1: to Rachel's ex-account and find it. It's amazing. It's a
• 59:05
  Speaker 1: great takedown of John Cornyn's lies here and excuses. But
• 59:10
  Speaker 1: she writes about this and she says, you know, a
• 59:12
  Speaker 1: quorum is only maintained through senators registering their presence via
• 59:16
  Speaker 1: a live quorum. It works like a vote. They come in,
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: they raise their hands, and then they leave. So yeah,
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: they need to be near the floor. They don't have
• 59:24
  Speaker 1: to be on the floor. They don't have to be.
• 59:28
  Speaker 1: And once a quorum is present, Democrats need to speak
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: the whole time or else a vote happens. So if
• 59:35
  Speaker 1: Democrats aren't speaking, what happens, chat?
• 59:38
  Speaker 2: A vote.
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: A vote. On the bill. On the legislation. This is achievable.
• 59:46
  Speaker 1: Here's another one. John Cornyn. These are all self-defeating talking points.
• 59:49
  Speaker 1: He says, it becomes impossible for members in cycle to
• 59:52
  Speaker 1: go to their states. We can't go out of session
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: or control the timing of key or hard votes.
• 59:56
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 59:57
  Speaker 3: Okay.
• 59:58
  Speaker 1: So you can't go campaign in a fraudulent election? What if,
• 1:00:04
  Speaker 1: here's a brilliant idea, what if you just busted your
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 1: tail a little bit and delivered for the voters and
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 1: made them enthusiastic to send you back to Washington in
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 1: the first place, and we had credible elections? Could you
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: imagine what kind of tailwinds you would get from that
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: kind of effort? Here's another one. Democrats can drag the
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 1: process out so late in the year, the SAVE Act
• 1:00:24
  Speaker 1: cannot be implemented before the election.
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 3: Okay.
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: Don't fall for this straw man. This is nonsense. It's irrelevant. Fundamentally,
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 1: you and I would love to have the Save America
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: Act before the midterms, obviously. But even if we don't
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 1: get it before the midterms, shouldn't we have it as
• 1:00:43
  Speaker 1: quickly as humanly possible?
• 1:00:47
  Speaker 3: We should.
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 1: The midterms are huge. But if the question is, do
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 1: we get the Save America Act after the midterms or never?
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 1: I'll take it after the midterms. I just want credible
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 1: elections going forward. That's what I want in this country.
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 1: So this is a nonsensical excuse. Wow, we won't be
• 1:01:06
  Speaker 1: able to do it in time. Do it at all.
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: Mail ballot restrictions. Trump wants mail ballot restrictions. We don't
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 1: have the votes for that, even at 50.
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 3: Okay.
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 1: First of all, you should debate it. You should try.
• 1:01:23
  Speaker 1: But if you can't add that to the House legislation, fine.
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 1: Then give us the House legislation that says photo ID
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 1: is required to vote, that you have to prove you're
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 1: an American citizen when you register, and that non-citizens will
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 1: be removed from the voting rolls, and that elections officials
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 1: who violate our laws will be held accountable for it.
• 1:01:42
  Speaker 1: That's what the Save America Act currently says. So if
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 1: we don't get the mail-in ballot provisions that President Trump wants,
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 1: would that be something we should obviously pursue? Yeah, absolutely.
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 1: But if you don't have the votes, you don't have
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: the votes. You have the votes for everything else, though.
• 1:01:57
  Speaker 1: So why don't you try? And he said at the
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: end of the process, we may not even have the
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 1: votes for the bill because of amendments, change views, process fouls,
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 1: et cetera. You have to freaking try, dude. You have
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 1: to try. The Civil Rights Act was passed in this way.
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 1: In the 1960s, the Civil Rights Act did not have
• 1:02:22
  Speaker 1: enough support in order to reach a supermajority. And so
• 1:02:26
  Speaker 1: a filibuster began. They only had 40 votes for the
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 1: Civil Rights Act originally. By the end of the filibuster,
• 1:02:35
  Speaker 1: they secured cloture with 67 supporters. It was two months
• 1:02:41
  Speaker 1: of a talking filibuster. And then at the end, The
• 1:02:45
  Speaker 1: Civil Rights Act gets passed and you can thank Republicans
• 1:02:48
  Speaker 1: for that. It was a filibuster. People needed to be
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: convinced to support it. In the end, they were. That's
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 1: because they had the debate. These guys are arguing about
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 1: whether or not and how they can end the debate.
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 1: We're just asking you to freaking start it. That's it.
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 1: Let's start with step one, baby steps. Start the debate.
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 1: And then eventually pass this thing because the future of
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 1: our country depends on it. Man, oh, man, we're going
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 1: to stay focused on this. Thank you. Barb says, thank you, Vince,
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 1: for all you do to save America. I am just
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 1: standing here shoulder to shoulder with you, Barb. That's it.
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 1: I just I think that is if we can show
• 1:03:26
  Speaker 1: up every day and stay focused on the things that
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 1: matter and then have a little bit of fun in
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 1: the process and appreciate this great country and the legacy
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 1: that we have and the blessings that God has given us.
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 1: I think if we can do all of those things,
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 1: then we can keep moving in the right direction, even
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 1: in the face of this kind of insanity. I hope
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 1: you have a great American weekend. I should tell you,
• 1:03:45
  Speaker 1: for those of you who don't know, I will be
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 1: filling in for the incredible Dan Bongino on Monday, which means...
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 1: If you enjoy this program, let's see if you enjoy
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 1: five hours of me. It's a real big test. Will
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 1: you enjoy the podcast and then the Dan Bongino podcast?
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 1: And then I've got the big national radio show each day.
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 1: That's three hours starting at noon Eastern. Rumble.com slash Vince.
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 1: You'll see us live at one o'clock each day on
• 1:04:06
  Speaker 1: the radio show. We've got all of our amazing affiliates
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: across the country. I highly recommend you check them out
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 1: and support them. And go to TheVinceShow.com to get your
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: local radio listings. Dan's show is 10 o'clock a.m. this morning, rumble.com
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 1: slash Bongino. Haley Karani is on at noon Eastern, rumble.com
• 1:04:22
  Speaker 1: slash Haley. Haley with two Ys.
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 2: Why?
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 1: Because she's great. And you are great as well. God
• 1:04:27
  Speaker 1: bless you. What a great country. What a great audience.
• 1:04:30
  Speaker 1: I can't wait to do it all again with you Monday.
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 1: The Dan Bongino Show.
• 1:04:37
  Speaker 4: I think a lot of people are underestimating the Trump
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 4: effect in this midterm. You've heard it yourself. Act like
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 4: I'm on the ballot. Why is he saying that? You
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 4: think he doesn't know what he's doing? That is the
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 4: X factor. Folks, elections are a math issue. That is it.
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 4: This is not a football game. If you vote, we
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 4: will win. It is not complicated.
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: The Dan Bongino Show. Follow and listen on your favorite platform.