Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Men should pay for welfare AND be blamed for abusing it!

Transcript

Men should pay for welfare AND be blamed for abusing it! · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBR News number 571. We're in the Upside Down,
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: where we discuss the news of the week and give
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: it the badger treatment. Hello, everyone, and welcome back to
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Honey Badger Radio. I hope you guys are doing well
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: this week and that you are laughing at all of
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: this insanity so that it does not drive you insane.
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: I'm your host, Brian. I'm joined by, as always, my
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: lovely co-hosts, Hannah Wallen and Dr. Ranamercam.
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: On this week's... I noticed that the low bar says
• 0:37
  Speaker 2: join Brian, Hannah Wallen, Mike Stevenson, and Dr.
• 0:40
  Speaker 3: Ren.
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: I didn't write that. That wasn't me. I'm a little loopy,
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: but I guess you could be two people.
• 0:49
  Speaker 2: I get it.
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: There's another side to you. You're a complex person. Like Shaft.
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: I'm Clark Kent and Superman. Um....
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: Okay, we got to get you like some glass. Oh,
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: you have glasses. So when you remove them or something.
• 1:07
  Speaker 1: Or maybe when you put on the hat and when
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: you take it off. That's what it is.
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: All right. I was until I put on the hat.
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: We have a great show lined up for you guys today.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: So please be sure to continue the conversations both in
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: the chat as well as the comments section. On this
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: week's HBR News, we're going to be talking about... A
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: couple of interesting news items, like I guess there was
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: a movie made called Primetime, and it's caused an amount
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: of discussion that I thought was worth talking about, because
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: we did cover a similar story, which was, I think
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: it involved, oh, I forget the name, The Sound of Freedom,
• 1:49
  Speaker 1: and the media backlash against that movie, which in a
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: way was just sort of like, water under the bridge
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: at this point, but it was an interesting time. And also,
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: did you guys know that young white men are actually
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: the new welfare queens? And we also have a story
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: of a trans woman who bit off her or his
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: stepdad's ears and more. So stick around. It's going to
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: be a good time. And be sure to join us
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: afterwards for Or the patron only show. So I got
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: this Medium article up. I probably will also. So like
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: over the weekend I was on a camping trip. Which
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: is why I might sound a little bit weird. I'm
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: very tired. I didn't sleep really well one of those nights.
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: It was an experience. And then I drove four hours home.
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: And I had to like unpack everything. And now we're
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: doing all the laundry. And like making sure that there's
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: no ants in anything. Because there were ants everywhere. But
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: I did have a good time overall. Saw Mount Vernon,
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: visited George Washington's estate, and saw his tomb, and talked
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: with people there. It was really cool. But we also
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: got this article here because, as always, medium feminists, and
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: I can only describe them that way, they all have
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: opinions on the manosphere, and they all think they're bringing
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: something new to the table. And I have a feeling
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: that they're actually just kind of all on the same page.
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: So we're going to look at this article again. probably
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: talk about my trip i got something my thoughts on
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: that as well so if you guys want to join
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: us for that uh please consider becoming a badger yourself
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: by going to feed the badger.com forward slash subscribe five
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: bucks a month will uh get you into the discord
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: server where you'll be able to watch all the additional
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: content and chat with us directly and and yeah please
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: consider doing that um i think that it's a good
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: thing to do and we can use your support really
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: appreciate it and also speaking of support where our fundraiser
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: is still going on Um, again, I've been checked out.
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: Like I basically wasn't looking at what was going on
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: on the internet for the whole time that I was gone.
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: It is good to take an internet break every so often,
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: but when I came, but yeah, but when I came back,
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: holy shit, a lot had happened in two days. So, so,
• 4:03
  Speaker 1: and I mean like a lot of this stuff, I'm
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: not even going to cover on today's show because there's
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: no time to look at it, but, but, uh, yeah,
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: it's interesting. So, but we are not quite at our
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: goal yet. So please, if you are, someone that supports
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: us and wants to see us continue to grow, which,
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: you know, whether it's from us or the people that
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: we work with, the men's movement is gaining traction.
• 4:24
  Speaker 2: Dr.
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: Warren Farrell recently did a interview or discussion with Tammy Peterson,
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: which is Jordan Peterson's wife. And that was a really
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: good video as well. And, you know, he's working on
• 4:38
  Speaker 1: a new book. And so like, there's all kinds of
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: stuff going on. So please, again, consider supporting us going
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: to feedthebadger.com forward slash... I think it's just feedthebadger.com now.
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: And you'll be able to go right to the fundraiser
• 4:50
  Speaker 1: and help us achieve our goals. So we're almost there.
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: We just need you guys to help. Anything, anything will do.
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: And if you don't want to wake up one morning
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: to find that we've been yeeted from the internet or
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: we were unable to continue to fund our work, then
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: go to badgerfeed.com or honeybadgerradio.com to find where all of
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: our content lives. Now with all that out of the way,
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: let us get into today's story. So first... Before we
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: get into the write-ups, I got to throw in the
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: little curveball. We have here a very short clip from
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: the holdout juror from the Lindsay Clancy trial, Michael Desrunville.
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: And he made a little video. So this is the
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: man responsible for not, you know, like Lindsay Clancy not
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: going to jail or at least like the hung jury,
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: the mistrial. And I thought we'd look at his statement.
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: So let's see if this plays. Let me know if
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: this works. I'm going to check right now.
• 5:45
  Speaker 4: Hi, my name is Michael Peggy Desronville, also known as
• 5:49
  Speaker 4: the Lone Jorah. I know the whole focus has been
• 5:53
  Speaker 4: on me, but we want to reel everything back and
• 5:56
  Speaker 4: put the focus on the three angels that's at hand.
• 6:00
  Speaker 4: The ones that can't speak for themselves, the ones that
• 6:03
  Speaker 4: can't defend themselves, and the ones that can't fight the battles.
• 6:08
  Speaker 4: And those are Cora, Dawson, and Callan. A little bit
• 6:12
  Speaker 4: about me. I want to thank God for my Catholic faith.
• 6:18
  Speaker 4: I want to thank God for blessing me with the
• 6:20
  Speaker 4: ability to love my daughter. And foremost, I would like
• 6:26
  Speaker 4: to thank everyone, every individual that has supported me throughout
• 6:31
  Speaker 4: this difficult situation. Your prayers, your emotional support, your psychological support,
• 6:41
  Speaker 4: Is a tremendous.
• 6:42
  Speaker 3: To my heart.
• 6:43
  Speaker 4: That I feel. That I sense. That I know. I
• 6:48
  Speaker 4: do want to thank you. From the bottom of my heart.
• 6:51
  Speaker 2: Thank you.
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: That's it. That's the message. So.
• 6:56
  Speaker 2: I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Like. jurors shouldn't
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: have to do.
• 7:01
  Speaker 5: This right you're not wrong anonymous like legally they're supposed
• 7:09
  Speaker 5: to not have to do this but because he's been
• 7:11
  Speaker 5: doxxed he's he's like i'm very sorry about all this but.
• 7:15
  Speaker 6: Because i've been doxxed i'm like yeah hi here's me
• 7:20
  Speaker 6: please don't fucking kill me or throw me in jail
• 7:23
  Speaker 6: for 25 years like you did with derek chauvin oh.
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: Anybody have any thoughts on this? I sense that someone
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: wants to say something about this.
• 7:35
  Speaker 3: I mean, that is the most important thought right there
• 7:38
  Speaker 3: is he should not have to do this. It's wrong
• 7:42
  Speaker 3: that he has to do this. And the only reason
• 7:44
  Speaker 3: that he has to do this is because people wanted
• 7:46
  Speaker 3: to have an historical moment for women. And I'm sorry,
• 7:52
  Speaker 3: but this turned out to be an historical moment for women.
• 7:58
  Speaker 3: The problem is it's not a good one.
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: Oh, but it's a necessary one.
• 8:02
  Speaker 3: This is an historical embarrassment for women. The idea that
• 8:11
  Speaker 3: just any case will do as the case that puts
• 8:18
  Speaker 3: postpartum psychosis on the map as a thing that we
• 8:22
  Speaker 3: have to talk about and figure out and accommodate and
• 8:28
  Speaker 3: learn how to handle and how do we approach the
• 8:32
  Speaker 3: situation of the mother having mental health issues bad enough
• 8:37
  Speaker 3: that she may be a danger to herself and others
• 8:40
  Speaker 3: without violating anybody's rights. This case where the killing was
• 8:48
  Speaker 3: clearly premeditated, not a product of Of postpartum psychosis. And
• 8:56
  Speaker 3: it was clearly. The diagnosis. Was clearly faked. To the
• 9:02
  Speaker 3: point that it was. Researched first. By the liar. Before
• 9:08
  Speaker 3: it was faked.
• 9:11
  Speaker 6: That.
• 9:11
  Speaker 3: That has to be the case. That we're going to rest.
• 9:15
  Speaker 3: Women's claims. About this illness. On that case. The case
• 9:22
  Speaker 3: where it was a lie. Because if that's the case.
• 9:28
  Speaker 3: Nobody's ever going to believe that this diagnosis is a
• 9:31
  Speaker 3: real diagnosis, that the disorder is real, that treatment is
• 9:36
  Speaker 3: necessary and so on. And more kids will die. Yeah,
• 9:43
  Speaker 3: that's that's terrible. I think it's. Wonderful how. And I'm
• 9:54
  Speaker 3: so sorry that he has to do this. And that
• 9:58
  Speaker 3: he has to go through this. and so grateful that
• 10:02
  Speaker 3: he's willing even though you know uh he really didn't
• 10:08
  Speaker 3: get much of a choice but he seems to have
• 10:11
  Speaker 3: taken it on with dignity and determination and uh For that,
• 10:18
  Speaker 3: I am grateful, just as a citizen, but also as
• 10:24
  Speaker 3: a woman. Yeah. Because somebody has to save the world
• 10:29
  Speaker 3: from the crazy women, and they don't listen to the
• 10:33
  Speaker 3: sane women. So this is about the only way that
• 10:41
  Speaker 3: the right thing is going to happen. I still hope
• 10:44
  Speaker 3: he sues the living daylights out of everybody. But more
• 10:49
  Speaker 3: power to him.
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: Especially the defense lawyer.
• 10:53
  Speaker 3: Oh, yeah.
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: By the way, the next trial is already underway. And
• 10:59
  Speaker 2: for some reason, Lindsay Klasick has the same defense lawyer,
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: despite him completely fucking up the previous case and outing
• 11:07
  Speaker 2: this man as a man. And in the previous case,
• 11:11
  Speaker 2: he was saying, oh, yeah, she's obviously guilty of killing
• 11:14
  Speaker 2: the children. But here's why she wasn't responsible for it.
• 11:17
  Speaker 2: And in this case, he's going, ah, well, maybe she
• 11:21
  Speaker 2: didn't kill them.
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I saw that too.
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: I saw that.
• 11:26
  Speaker 3: Oh, is he adopting the narratives that the women at
• 11:31
  Speaker 3: the internet put out there?
• 11:33
  Speaker 1: Yeah, the TikTok detectives.
• 11:36
  Speaker 2: It's no longer important. Now I'm espousing the next truth.
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: Because I know the jury in this case will be
• 11:45
  Speaker 2: just as... doxxed and defamed as this man was. So
• 11:52
  Speaker 2: now he's just going on ahead with, yeah, Lindsay Clancy
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: didn't even do it. Despite the fact that in the
• 11:59
  Speaker 2: previous case I said she did do it, but she
• 12:02
  Speaker 2: wasn't responsible. Now I'm going to go with she didn't
• 12:04
  Speaker 2: do it. And I'm going to get away with it.
• 12:06
  Speaker 2: Because I know we can intimidate the fucking jury if
• 12:09
  Speaker 2: they give us a wrong answer.
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: It's also telling that this guy is a father of
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: a girl. I think that we underestimate the... Well, people
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: underestimate the protective instincts of fathers. I think that's what
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: he's operating under. I mean, it should be obvious. Even
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: if you're a man that doesn't have children of your own,
• 12:36
  Speaker 1: and you're looking at a woman who kills her three kids,
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: and you're like, I don't want to marry any women.
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: That's what is actually impacting... the landscape of dating and
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: marriage at this point is men are like trying to
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: figure out which women support Lindsay Clancy so they can
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: avoid them because they don't want their kids murdered. But
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: imagine that amplified even more. If you are a father
• 12:57
  Speaker 1: of young children and you see this and you see
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: people trying to Cape for the, you know, the, the perpetrator.
• 13:03
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: I mean, absolutely. Yeah.
• 13:08
  Speaker 3: There's something that you all have to consider and this
• 13:11
  Speaker 3: is dark. All right. But when you look at homicide
• 13:16
  Speaker 3: as a human behavior, killing human beings as a human behavior,
• 13:23
  Speaker 3: and you consider who gets killed by whom. I know
• 13:28
  Speaker 3: feminists like to tell you the statistics on murder of
• 13:33
  Speaker 3: adults and murder of older kids and everything. but there's
• 13:38
  Speaker 3: something else buried in there that the statistics show that
• 13:42
  Speaker 3: feminists don't want to think about when a human being
• 13:47
  Speaker 3: is too underdeveloped or undeveloped and too vulnerable, or when
• 13:54
  Speaker 3: a human being is elderly and requires care and is
• 13:59
  Speaker 3: too vulnerable to defend themselves. So under the age of
• 14:05
  Speaker 3: five and, uh, old and infirm, basically living with family
• 14:12
  Speaker 3: or in a nursing home or with home health care
• 14:15
  Speaker 3: and stuff like that. The majority of homicides committed in
• 14:20
  Speaker 3: those cases are committed by women. Everybody that is too
• 14:25
  Speaker 3: vulnerable to defend themselves that gets killed. They have a
• 14:29
  Speaker 3: higher chance of being killed by a female perpetrator. It
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: is only after an individual gets old enough to defend themselves,
• 14:41
  Speaker 3: to have a chance to fight back, that female homicide
• 14:46
  Speaker 3: starts dropping off. And then it rises again when an
• 14:52
  Speaker 3: individual becomes old and infirm or sick or injured and
• 14:57
  Speaker 3: can no longer defend themselves. Women kill when it doesn't
• 15:03
  Speaker 3: take that much effort. And the largest victim set of human,
• 15:12
  Speaker 3: living human organisms killed by other living human organisms is
• 15:21
  Speaker 3: unborn children. Women kill most of all, and they do
• 15:29
  Speaker 3: it before the child is ever born. The next step
• 15:35
  Speaker 3: is infancy. Almost exclusively women. Perpetrators. Until you get up into. Toddlers.
• 15:46
  Speaker 3: Toddler age. Elementary school age. That's when women start dropping off.
• 15:53
  Speaker 3: From homicide. That's basically it. They have to have a victim.
• 15:59
  Speaker 3: That is helpless.
• 16:03
  Speaker 2: A lot of men kill in self-defense. Yep. Most women
• 16:07
  Speaker 2: can't really claim that unless the baby is actually threatening
• 16:12
  Speaker 2: their life, which it doesn't in more than 1% of cases.
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 16:20
  Speaker 3: It's extremely rare for an abortion to not be elective.
• 16:27
  Speaker 3: The overwhelming majority of abortions are elective. And, you know,
• 16:33
  Speaker 3: the 100% of Infanticides. Are elective. The baby after birth.
• 16:41
  Speaker 3: Is never threatening the mother's life. So it's just the thing.
• 16:47
  Speaker 3: I wanted to point out. It is a dark. And
• 16:51
  Speaker 3: ugly thing to look at. But it is a fact.
• 16:55
  Speaker 3: That when women kill. The overwhelming majority of the time.
• 17:01
  Speaker 3: The victim. Is helpless.
• 17:02
  Speaker 2: Helpless.
• 17:04
  Speaker 3: And when the victim is helpless, the overwhelming majority of
• 17:07
  Speaker 3: the time, the killer is a woman.
• 17:11
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: And I think this guy had to come out because,
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: you know, again, like they doxed him and all the other, well,
• 17:19
  Speaker 1: not all, but like, you know, other jurors came forward
• 17:22
  Speaker 1: because they felt like they needed to say something. They
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: wanted to do their little media tour and they did.
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: And they, you know, made themselves look ridiculous if people
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: were listening and using 1% of their brain. Um, I
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: think that this guy inevitably had to come out and
• 17:36
  Speaker 1: say something. And I think that he was very classy.
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: He didn't attack anybody. He didn't play victim. All he
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: did was he said, I thank my, he say, I
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: thank God for my faith. I thank people who support me.
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: And that's it. Like, you know, that's it. Like very classy. And, um,
• 17:53
  Speaker 1: I appreciate that. So, and I know he's going to,
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: he's going to, he was getting shit already. Now he's
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: just going to get more of it. But at least
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: now we have a face to go with, uh, you know,
• 18:02
  Speaker 1: what's going on.
• 18:03
  Speaker 3: So. Well, I thank God for putting a man on
• 18:06
  Speaker 3: this earth that had the balls the size of Texas
• 18:10
  Speaker 3: to stand up to every fucking crazy woman in the country.
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: And weak men.
• 18:15
  Speaker 3: And still say, no.
• 18:18
  Speaker 2: Bad.
• 18:19
  Speaker 3: Don't kill your kids. And the weak men, yeah. Like,
• 18:25
  Speaker 3: I was afraid we had gotten to the point where
• 18:29
  Speaker 3: there wasn't anybody left that wasn't you know, in our,
• 18:34
  Speaker 3: in our little niche. Um, but yeah, here we are.
• 18:40
  Speaker 3: So I am glad.
• 18:42
  Speaker 1: There you go.
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 18:44
  Speaker 1: Well, um, I just wanted to give you guys a follow-up.
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: Have you seen this interview? Like this just went up
• 18:49
  Speaker 1: a couple hours ago, so I thought I would share
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: it right away. Let me know what you guys think
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: about this in the comments, but you know what I say,
• 18:56
  Speaker 1: this guy's a freaking hero. Um, you go, I want
• 18:59
  Speaker 1: to be like Mike. Do you remember that song?
• 19:02
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: So yeah, let us know what you guys think about
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: that one in the comments, but we're going to move
• 19:07
  Speaker 1: on to the next story. All right, so first we
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: got to talk about the recent 2026 film, Primetime. So
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: I didn't really, first of all, full disclosure, I'd never
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: seen the movie. I didn't see it. I didn't really
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: have an interest in it. I heard they were making
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: a movie about Chris Hansen. I didn't think anything of it,
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: like that it was going to be anything other than
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: You know, a movie about a guy who used to
• 19:30
  Speaker 1: have a show where he basically caught predators, child predators specifically.
• 19:37
  Speaker 1: And I don't see any reason to take issue with that.
• 19:41
  Speaker 1: But I also wasn't really interested in watching it because
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: I just don't do movies anymore that are new because
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: I assume they're all going to be garbage. of one
• 19:50
  Speaker 1: stripe or another. But apparently this one came out and
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: it's created some controversy. So the recent controversy around the
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: 2026 A24 film Primetime centers on its stylized critical depiction
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: of To Catch a Predator host Chris Hansen, played by
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: Robert Pattinson. and the ethical problems of the NBC series. Also,
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: I like Robert Pattinson. I think he's a good actor.
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: I don't hold any of this against him. I think
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: he's just a guy doing a job, and I think
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: that that's generally how it should be. But anyway, directed
• 20:22
  Speaker 1: by Lance Oppenheim and inspired by the 2006 Murphy Texas
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: Sting operation in which the target died by suicide, a
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: character that I believe appears in the film. The film
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: portrays Hansen and his team as ratings-obsessed figures whose methods
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: blur journalism and spectacle, contributing to the real show's controversies, lawsuits,
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: and eventual end. Hansen has repeatedly criticized the project as
• 20:49
  Speaker 1: an insult, identity theft, and largely fictional exploitation of his
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: name and brand for commercial gain. He declined an advanced
• 20:57
  Speaker 1: screening after refusing what he described as a restrictive agreement.
• 21:01
  Speaker 1: A24 and sources have called it a standard NDA. questioned
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: Hollywood's motives, bought pre-film ads promoting his own true crime network,
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: and later attended a screening while interviewing audience members who
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: shared his view that it was inaccurate and unfair. Director Oppenheim,
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: that's the director's name, responded by saying he looked forward
• 21:23
  Speaker 1: to Hansen having a seat to watch it in theaters,
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: echoing Hansen's famous catchphrase. You know, why don't you have
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: a seat? Critics have been divided. Some praise Pattinson's intense
• 21:38
  Speaker 1: performance and the film's examination of justice as entertainment, while
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: others call it one-note lurid, incurious about the real show's consequences, yes,
• 21:48
  Speaker 1: or itself indulgent in the same sensationalism it critiques, especially
• 21:52
  Speaker 1: compared to the 2025 documentary Predators. Additional debate has touched
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: on the film's graphic content, leading to cuts and warnings
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: for its India release, interestingly enough, and the sensitive subject
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: of televised Predator stings. The movie premiered at Venice in
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: early September of 2026 and opened theatrically on September the 25th. So,
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: there's a guy, well, I'm sorry, you guys know the
• 22:17
  Speaker 1: story about this? Should I elaborate any more? I mean,
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: you guys can just give your thoughts.
• 22:21
  Speaker 2: Carry on.
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: Well, To Catch a Predator was a show, it actually inspired,
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: I don't know if you guys know, but there's a
• 22:28
  Speaker 1: lot of people that use, you know, that do this
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: on social media channels, where they go and they.
• 22:32
  Speaker 3: That inspired a whole genre of.
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: Of people... Yeah, yeah. Now, you could say that, you know,
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: maybe they're entrapping them or whatever, but.
• 22:39
  Speaker 3: Pedophile hunters.
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: Yeah, pedophile hunters, right. And I think that.
• 22:45
  Speaker 3: I.
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: Just don't see how any of this is controversial, that
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: you would need to, like, make a hit piece, which
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: that's what it sounds like it is. Again, I haven't
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: seen it. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe everybody's getting a wrong
• 22:58
  Speaker 1: read of the whole thing, but... That was basically the
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: only thing I wanted to say, so go ahead, take
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: it if you would.
• 23:05
  Speaker 2: I'm going to start by making two statements here, arguably
• 23:10
  Speaker 2: both controversial statements. Firstly, I think nonces should be woodchippered,
• 23:19
  Speaker 2: like slowly lowered into the woodchipper and then buried under
• 23:23
  Speaker 2: the woodchipper. You wouldn't think this would be controversial, but
• 23:27
  Speaker 2: apparently it is in this day and age. Secondly, and
• 23:30
  Speaker 2: this is where it gets trouble brewing just because someone
• 23:35
  Speaker 2: styles themselves as a nonce hunter, that doesn't mean everything
• 23:40
  Speaker 2: they do is an unassailable pedestal of God's work. They
• 23:43
  Speaker 2: might just be latching onto the easiest possible virtue signal
• 23:48
  Speaker 2: and scorching the earth over their own ego. Bear in mind,
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: Chris Hansen is a TV star. You might say he
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: was always doing God's work, and maybe 90% of the
• 24:01
  Speaker 2: time that was true. But I would remind you, however
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: much you hate the media, you know, the mainstream media,
• 24:08
  Speaker 2: you don't hate them enough. Yeah? Let's not forget that
• 24:12
  Speaker 2: the TV is the media. It's the audio-video distillation of
• 24:16
  Speaker 2: the media. Are we going to go ahead and forget
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: that the TV lies to us rather a lot? You're
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: a pedophile, Defender! We've heard that before, haven't we? When
• 24:29
  Speaker 2: someone reminds you of some kind of meme along the
• 24:33
  Speaker 2: lines of, everyone I don't like is an autist, colon,
• 24:37
  Speaker 2: a child's guide to online discourse. That doesn't necessarily mean
• 24:40
  Speaker 2: that they are defending pedophiles. Have you been there, folks?
• 24:45
  Speaker 2: Has anyone else been there? This has been happening since
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: before the Epstein scandal came to light. The worst thing
• 24:53
  Speaker 2: we can think of is a paedophile. Understandably. But, therefore,
• 24:59
  Speaker 2: if someone challenges you on the mindless accusations you make
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: every time you disagree with someone, that doesn't necessarily mean
• 25:06
  Speaker 2: that they are a paedophile defender. It's kind of the
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: equivalent of calling someone a Nazi. If you say, not
• 25:15
  Speaker 2: everyone you disagree with is a Nazi, that doesn't necessarily
• 25:19
  Speaker 2: mean you're a Nazi. It can just mean Calling people
• 25:23
  Speaker 2: names is not a conviction. It's just an accusation. Again,
• 25:27
  Speaker 2: in case you forgot what I just said, if someone
• 25:29
  Speaker 2: is a nonce, provably a nonce, wood chipper, painful death,
• 25:36
  Speaker 2: preferably in public, make an example of them, discourage anyone
• 25:41
  Speaker 2: else from ever noncing a child ever again. I'm absolutely
• 25:44
  Speaker 2: in favour of that. But I'm going to need more
• 25:46
  Speaker 2: than an accusation. I'm going to need more than... I'm
• 25:53
  Speaker 2: determined not to name any names, but there are certain
• 25:56
  Speaker 2: online influencers who got themselves into the business of building
• 26:00
  Speaker 2: their reputation as an influencer by falsely accusing someone of
• 26:05
  Speaker 2: being a pedophile defender just because they made fun of
• 26:08
  Speaker 2: their meme game. Like along the lines of, I notice
• 26:13
  Speaker 2: you call literally everyone autistic. Maybe that's not necessarily the case.
• 26:18
  Speaker 2: And then it's, you're a pedophile defender! And then you're like, wait, what?
• 26:23
  Speaker 2: How the fuck are you joining those dots? It's like
• 26:26
  Speaker 2: saying we shouldn't let millions of illegals flood into the country.
• 26:30
  Speaker 2: And then suddenly you're a Nazi. Like that has any
• 26:34
  Speaker 2: connection whatsoever. It's click baiting by lowest common denominator. You're
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: not helping when it comes to the number of Nazis
• 26:45
  Speaker 2: at large or the number of nonces at large. If
• 26:48
  Speaker 2: you're accusing random people of such things, then all you're
• 26:52
  Speaker 2: doing is muddying the water, creating a fog of war,
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: and you're only making it difficult to differentiate actual nonces
• 27:02
  Speaker 2: from people who made fun of you once. You're actually
• 27:09
  Speaker 2: making it worse, and you're doing it for the sake
• 27:12
  Speaker 2: of clicks and your ego. Now, I'm not saying this
• 27:17
  Speaker 2: is what Chris Hansen was doing. he had the distinct
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: advantage of actually filming people and catching them in the
• 27:24
  Speaker 2: act of, well, not actual noncing, but at least waiting
• 27:29
  Speaker 2: in someone's kitchen and taking a seat in that kitchen
• 27:34
  Speaker 2: with the intent of noncing. That's much more viable than
• 27:39
  Speaker 2: just calling people nonces when they don't like what you're
• 27:43
  Speaker 2: saying about how not everyone you don't like is necessarily autistic. But, Again,
• 27:49
  Speaker 2: Chris Hansen worked for the television. People who work for
• 27:55
  Speaker 2: the television catch all sorts of things on camera and
• 27:59
  Speaker 2: then act like the narrative they're presenting can only possibly
• 28:04
  Speaker 2: be the truth. Folks, are we yet old enough and
• 28:09
  Speaker 2: ugly enough to at least question that everything we see
• 28:13
  Speaker 2: on TV is not necessarily the truth, the whole truth
• 28:16
  Speaker 2: and nothing but the truth? Even if Every last man,
• 28:20
  Speaker 2: and I mean man, who Chris Hansen caught was a
• 28:25
  Speaker 2: practicing nonce and not just a victim of entrapment. Do
• 28:30
  Speaker 2: we really need to see that on TV? Kind of
• 28:35
  Speaker 2: seems like it ought to be something that the police
• 28:38
  Speaker 2: should be doing, like behind closed doors and as a
• 28:41
  Speaker 2: matter of course. Why does it need to be filmed
• 28:45
  Speaker 2: and broadcast to millions? Does it prevent nonces from noncing?
• 28:51
  Speaker 2: Do nonces see that and think, well, shit, I'd better
• 28:55
  Speaker 2: not do any noncing or else Chris Hansen will catch me.
• 28:58
  Speaker 2: Has the general rate of noncery gone down since Chris
• 29:04
  Speaker 2: Hansen started doing that? I'm going to stick my neck
• 29:08
  Speaker 2: out and say I don't think it has. As a
• 29:10
  Speaker 2: matter of fact, in the past 30 years, our schools...
• 29:13
  Speaker 2: have been taken over and dominated by nonces. Nonces who,
• 29:20
  Speaker 2: not content with raping children, will convince those children to
• 29:24
  Speaker 2: have their genitals mutilated and then proceed to nonce them
• 29:28
  Speaker 2: and their mutilated genitals. Most of these state-sponsored nonces, in
• 29:35
  Speaker 2: case you haven't noticed, are women. Or women identifying as men,
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: or vice versa. Again, to reiterate, all practicing nonces should
• 29:50
  Speaker 2: be buried under the wood chipper. I'm just saying, there
• 29:54
  Speaker 2: are more nonces now than there ever were before Chris
• 29:58
  Speaker 2: Hansen started setting about them. I've never actually watched a
• 30:05
  Speaker 2: full episode of To Catch a Predator, but of the
• 30:09
  Speaker 2: few clips I've seen, none of them were women. Is
• 30:16
  Speaker 2: that because no nonces are women?
• 30:21
  Speaker 1: I think not.
• 30:24
  Speaker 2: This show should perhaps have been called To Catch a Man.
• 30:29
  Speaker 2: While your boy Chris Hansen has been catching men before
• 30:33
  Speaker 2: they commit the crime of having sex with the police
• 30:37
  Speaker 2: plant who was pretending to be a child, there have
• 30:41
  Speaker 2: been countless women actually raping underage boys and girls. I, sorry,
• 30:52
  Speaker 2: but I have trouble giving a shit about this fucking
• 30:55
  Speaker 2: TV show that's been Mike?
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: Mike? Are you there? Did he drop out?
• 31:08
  Speaker 3: It looks like he did.
• 31:10
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, he did. He dropped out mid-rant. Did you
• 31:13
  Speaker 1: want to say something in the meantime?
• 31:15
  Speaker 3: Yeah, I actually have a bunch of things. Alright. I
• 31:22
  Speaker 3: will start out with the horrible as a recovered victim caveat.
• 31:30
  Speaker 3: Because There's a lot of things that people say that
• 31:35
  Speaker 3: I think are based in emotion, not logic, when it
• 31:41
  Speaker 3: comes to this subject. And I know they mean well.
• 31:47
  Speaker 3: And I know they're speaking on behalf of kids like
• 31:51
  Speaker 3: the kid I was when it happened to me. And
• 31:54
  Speaker 3: it wasn't some stranger I met on the internet because
• 31:56
  Speaker 3: the internet didn't exist. It was another kid. who was
• 32:01
  Speaker 3: just a lot older than me and had other problems. Uh,
• 32:08
  Speaker 3: one of which was the, he had been brutally raped
• 32:11
  Speaker 3: by his mother, right? This is this.
• 32:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 32:15
  Speaker 3: You're back, Mike. Well, this is, this is.
• 32:17
  Speaker 1: How I got to plug you back in. Mike, can
• 32:21
  Speaker 1: you hear us?
• 32:22
  Speaker 3: All right. Can you hear us, Mike?
• 32:25
  Speaker 1: No, I don't think you can hear us right now.
• 32:27
  Speaker 3: Well, we can hear Mike.
• 32:28
  Speaker 1: It's okay. We can hear you. You might have to
• 32:32
  Speaker 1: leave and come back.
• 32:33
  Speaker 3: Yes, can you hear us?
• 32:35
  Speaker 2: Okay.
• 32:36
  Speaker 3: Sorry.
• 32:37
  Speaker 1: Alright, I'm going to plug Mike back in. I've got
• 32:39
  Speaker 1: to plug him in again.
• 32:40
  Speaker 3: Before I finish what I started to say after you
• 32:43
  Speaker 3: dropped out, did you have an end that you wanted
• 32:45
  Speaker 3: to put on that rant?
• 32:53
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I kind of don't give a shit about this
• 32:57
  Speaker 2: fucking TV show that's been controversially excusing male nonces. I mean,
• 33:02
  Speaker 2: I guess I do give a small shit, but it's
• 33:04
  Speaker 2: a drop in the ocean compared to the TV shows
• 33:07
  Speaker 2: that have been excusing female nonces. Namely, all of the
• 33:12
  Speaker 2: TV shows, including the news. You never hear about the
• 33:17
  Speaker 2: female nonces on TV shows. You only hear about them
• 33:22
  Speaker 2: here on Honey Badger Radio. Many an opportunistic click-baiting influencer
• 33:29
  Speaker 2: will have Listen to me saying what I said here
• 33:33
  Speaker 2: and conclude that I'm a paedophile defender. But for a
• 33:37
  Speaker 2: fourth time, nonces should be buried under the woodchipper. I
• 33:43
  Speaker 2: am merely pointing out that the majority of nonces may
• 33:49
  Speaker 2: very well be female. And despite that, there has never
• 33:54
  Speaker 2: been a TV show bringing female nonces to justice. And
• 33:59
  Speaker 2: so the female nonces continue to get away with their
• 34:02
  Speaker 2: noncing as they traumatize males into becoming the next generation
• 34:07
  Speaker 2: of nonces, whereupon they are entrapped and arrested, like in
• 34:13
  Speaker 2: some kind of coliseum ritual, while the female nonces are
• 34:17
  Speaker 2: left to go about their merry way, creating more and
• 34:20
  Speaker 2: more nonces by noncing them. That's right, I'm trying to
• 34:25
  Speaker 2: prevent the noncing in the first place by holding... everyone
• 34:30
  Speaker 2: as accountable as each other. For that, I will probably
• 34:37
  Speaker 2: be called a pedophile defender and probably an autist by
• 34:42
  Speaker 2: cluster B narcissists who are themselves probably nonces. Cancerous nonces.
• 34:56
  Speaker 2: All right, now I'm done. Sorry. Okay. Sorry for the thing.
• 34:59
  Speaker 3: That's all right. But basically to go on, then what
• 35:06
  Speaker 3: I would point out is I'm not speaking from a
• 35:11
  Speaker 3: position of being outside the experience. I'm speaking from a
• 35:15
  Speaker 3: position of being inside the experience. So if anybody was
• 35:19
  Speaker 3: going to get emotional about it, I think that I
• 35:23
  Speaker 3: would be most justified. And I've tried really hard to
• 35:26
  Speaker 3: do exactly the opposite and analyze the situation as best
• 35:29
  Speaker 3: I could because of the profound effect it had on
• 35:33
  Speaker 3: my life. Took me years and years, for instance, to
• 35:39
  Speaker 3: develop the side of the boundary that you have between
• 35:43
  Speaker 3: other people and yourself that keeps other people from continually
• 35:48
  Speaker 3: taking advantage of you. And there's three things that can
• 35:53
  Speaker 3: happen basically, if you are victimized. You can go on
• 35:59
  Speaker 3: to recover if you have all of the right things
• 36:01
  Speaker 3: in place very well and have little effect on the
• 36:07
  Speaker 3: rest of your life. And a few people get that
• 36:13
  Speaker 3: wonderful situation where it was a speed bump for them
• 36:17
  Speaker 3: or it's a traumatic memory, but the trauma didn't influence
• 36:23
  Speaker 3: the trajectory of their lives there for the rest of
• 36:27
  Speaker 3: us you either become a doormat which is what happened
• 36:32
  Speaker 3: to me or if you're really unlucky you're raised in
• 36:37
  Speaker 3: a violent and abusive environment like my perpetrator was and
• 36:42
  Speaker 3: you become a pedo and here's the thing you don't
• 36:48
  Speaker 3: stop being a person So I hate when I hear
• 36:52
  Speaker 3: people talk about torturing a human being to death because
• 36:57
  Speaker 3: they have a sickness. I am just fine with the
• 37:02
  Speaker 3: idea of enacting justice the same way that we do
• 37:08
  Speaker 3: for everybody else. That people can go to jail if
• 37:13
  Speaker 3: they choose to break the law. That if someone has
• 37:17
  Speaker 3: a sickness, that that goes the route of treatment and
• 37:24
  Speaker 3: if treatment cannot prevent the individual from being a danger
• 37:30
  Speaker 3: to themselves or others that they should be housed in
• 37:34
  Speaker 3: a facility for people who are ill and that's good
• 37:39
  Speaker 3: enough that's all that really has to happen they're not
• 37:43
  Speaker 3: demons they're very sick people brain damaged in fact And
• 37:52
  Speaker 3: it is, I don't think that it is benevolent or
• 37:59
  Speaker 3: heroic or moral or caring to suggest that because some
• 38:12
  Speaker 3: people with this terrible sickness who are a danger to
• 38:18
  Speaker 3: others have harmed others. that the sickness of doing harm
• 38:25
  Speaker 3: to others as a response to impulses and a lack
• 38:30
  Speaker 3: of impulse control should be spread to more people by
• 38:36
  Speaker 3: allowing emotion to result in humans resorting to torturing someone
• 38:44
  Speaker 3: to death because their sickness is repulsive. And I don't
• 38:48
  Speaker 3: think we should make a spectacle of them either. We
• 38:52
  Speaker 3: don't do that when somebody sees things that aren't there
• 38:58
  Speaker 3: or hears voices. We don't do that when someone is
• 39:03
  Speaker 3: terrified of germs. There are portrayals on TV of various
• 39:09
  Speaker 3: illnesses and the difficulties that people live with when they
• 39:13
  Speaker 3: live with those illnesses and the difficulties that they cause
• 39:17
  Speaker 3: other people when their symptoms get out of control. And
• 39:20
  Speaker 3: it's dealt with in a comical manner sometimes, and it's
• 39:23
  Speaker 3: dealt with in horror movies other times, and that's fine.
• 39:28
  Speaker 3: But I don't... think that we should make circus freaks
• 39:32
  Speaker 3: out of the mentally ill. Because they can't help it.
• 39:36
  Speaker 3: At least not unwilling circus freaks. It's a different thing
• 39:43
  Speaker 3: if they choose to go on TV themselves and make
• 39:47
  Speaker 3: a spectacle of themselves on purpose. So I had people
• 39:53
  Speaker 3: in my life that knew everything that had happened to
• 39:56
  Speaker 3: me and thought that I would like the show to
• 40:02
  Speaker 3: catch a predator. But I just can't get around the
• 40:11
  Speaker 3: fact that I'm watching a human being squirm uncomfortably under
• 40:18
  Speaker 3: a social magnifying glass in the sun. And it doesn't
• 40:23
  Speaker 3: matter why it's happening. It's still happening to a person.
• 40:29
  Speaker 3: It doesn't matter what the person was planning. It never
• 40:34
  Speaker 3: struck me as the right way to handle that situation.
• 40:41
  Speaker 3: I'm good with the police doing it, and they do.
• 40:45
  Speaker 3: I think that it's sometimes done overzealously. Like I read
• 40:50
  Speaker 3: about a case a while back where an officer made
• 40:57
  Speaker 3: contact with a guy who was not seeking the attention
• 41:03
  Speaker 3: of an underage kid and first offered to sell the guy,
• 41:09
  Speaker 3: pretending to be a 13-year-old girl, offered to sell the
• 41:11
  Speaker 3: guy her mother's panties and then tried to get him
• 41:15
  Speaker 3: to buy her panties and then tried to get him
• 41:18
  Speaker 3: to meet her And then badgered him until he finally
• 41:23
  Speaker 3: gave in and then arrested him as a pedo. I
• 41:26
  Speaker 3: think that's going well overboard. I think that's entrapment. And
• 41:30
  Speaker 3: I hope that the guy eventually beat that rap and
• 41:34
  Speaker 3: got help for whatever the cop did to his mind.
• 41:39
  Speaker 3: But at the other end of it, it is.
• 41:45
  Speaker 3: Not surprising to me at all. That Hollywood would want
• 41:48
  Speaker 3: to demonize a man. Who spent his life chasing down predators.
• 41:54
  Speaker 3: That were.
• 41:55
  Speaker 2: Pedos. Because.
• 41:58
  Speaker 3: Most of the community in Hollywood. Is. Like that. And it's.
• 42:06
  Speaker 3: It's pretty. Pretty widespread. Pretty open. Like they don't even.
• 42:13
  Speaker 3: Care anymore that people know. They never tried to hide it.
• 42:19
  Speaker 3: They always just tried to put a layer of makeup
• 42:23
  Speaker 3: on it to make it look like it was not
• 42:25
  Speaker 3: what it was. So at one end, no, I hate
• 42:32
  Speaker 3: that show. And I'm not really a big fan of
• 42:37
  Speaker 3: Chris Hansen. And at the other end, I'm pretty sure
• 42:42
  Speaker 3: that this movie is going to be bullshit too. And
• 42:48
  Speaker 3: it gives me no satisfaction to say that either. The
• 42:53
  Speaker 3: other thing that I would say is, I know a
• 42:56
  Speaker 3: lot of young people have been, and there's a lot
• 42:59
  Speaker 3: of millennials that did this, been inspired by Hanson to
• 43:05
  Speaker 3: hunt pedophiles. And there's an issue I have with that
• 43:10
  Speaker 3: as well. And it isn't that I don't want these
• 43:15
  Speaker 3: people caught It's that you don't know what you're bringing
• 43:21
  Speaker 3: close to you until the person shows up and you
• 43:27
  Speaker 3: don't know how that person's going to react. And there's
• 43:31
  Speaker 3: two ways that could go horribly wrong. And both of
• 43:34
  Speaker 3: them are something that, that, uh, you should do everything
• 43:38
  Speaker 3: in your power to prevent, including have the cops meet
• 43:43
  Speaker 3: them there instead of you. Because, uh, either of those
• 43:50
  Speaker 3: two things, either the pedo hunters getting killed by the
• 43:56
  Speaker 3: pedo or the pedo hunters having to kill in self-defense
• 44:01
  Speaker 3: because the pedo turns out to be armed and very dangerous,
• 44:05
  Speaker 3: those would both be awful outcomes. Both would end up
• 44:11
  Speaker 3: either with an innocent group of people dead or with
• 44:15
  Speaker 3: a group of people who have deliberately placed themselves in
• 44:19
  Speaker 3: a situation where they ended up having to defend themselves
• 44:22
  Speaker 3: and then they're going to have to beat a murder
• 44:24
  Speaker 3: charge and it's going to be difficult for them to
• 44:27
  Speaker 3: argue that it wasn't premeditated so all of all of
• 44:31
  Speaker 3: these um groups of kids and i i say kids
• 44:37
  Speaker 3: when i know half of them are like in their
• 44:39
  Speaker 3: 30s now uh that that had been running around and
• 44:43
  Speaker 3: i don't know if they're still doing it or not
• 44:45
  Speaker 3: um Baiting and capturing on camera people who think they're
• 44:53
  Speaker 3: going to meet kids. It's a dumb idea. It's not
• 45:01
  Speaker 3: a good way to handle the situation. Get the information
• 45:04
  Speaker 3: to the authorities and let them handle it. And if
• 45:07
  Speaker 3: they don't, then you go to the press. But at
• 45:13
  Speaker 3: least give the authorities a chance to handle it first.
• 45:18
  Speaker 3: And for God's sake, learn from all of this shit.
• 45:22
  Speaker 3: Do not let your kids on the internet unsupervised. Gen
• 45:30
  Speaker 3: X should have known because we were on the internet unsupervised.
• 45:35
  Speaker 4: Right?
• 45:37
  Speaker 3: Millennials, no. And they should not be letting their kids
• 45:42
  Speaker 3: on the internet unsupervised. Zoomers, y'all got kids, some of you.
• 45:47
  Speaker 3: Don't let your kids on the internet unsupervised. Not on
• 45:51
  Speaker 3: their phone, not on their computer, not on their tablet,
• 45:55
  Speaker 3: not on anything. Don't let them on the internet unsupervised.
• 45:59
  Speaker 3: If they're using it, you should be in the room
• 46:02
  Speaker 3: with them. If you're not in the room with them,
• 46:04
  Speaker 3: they shouldn't be using it. And that may mean that
• 46:10
  Speaker 3: your kids shouldn't have a smartphone until they're old enough
• 46:14
  Speaker 3: to understand What they're getting into. And that may mean
• 46:21
  Speaker 3: that you may be the unpopular parent. But that's what
• 46:27
  Speaker 3: you should do. You can't trust that there's a safe website.
• 46:33
  Speaker 3: You can't trust that there's a safe communication network. There's
• 46:38
  Speaker 3: no such thing as a closed circle on the internet.
• 46:43
  Speaker 3: There is nothing that can't be hacked online. There's nothing
• 46:47
  Speaker 3: that bad people can't get into. So just don't leave
• 46:53
  Speaker 3: them unsupervised on the internet. Because this will happen again
• 46:59
  Speaker 3: and again. We will have again and again somebody who
• 47:04
  Speaker 3: discovers yet another way that predators are contacting kids and
• 47:12
  Speaker 3: coming to meet them. And while they're making their money,
• 47:17
  Speaker 3: Exploiting people's shock and horror at the squirming worms of
• 47:22
  Speaker 3: human beings in somebody's kitchen. For every one of those
• 47:27
  Speaker 3: guys that was on that show, there were a thousand
• 47:32
  Speaker 3: that didn't get caught. Men and women, adults from various countries,
• 47:40
  Speaker 3: not just the U.S., but all over the world. Getting
• 47:44
  Speaker 3: kids to send pictures. Getting kids to try to meet somebody.
• 47:52
  Speaker 3: Kids going missing daily because of this. Don't worry about
• 48:02
  Speaker 3: whether or not you let your kids play outside. Don't
• 48:06
  Speaker 3: let them be on the internet unsupervised. That's way more
• 48:12
  Speaker 3: important than any stupid TV show.
• 48:15
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm sorry how angry I got when one of
• 48:18
  Speaker 2: my devices fucking dropped me out and let me.
• 48:22
  Speaker 1: That's all right.
• 48:23
  Speaker 2: I understand. Pick up another one of my devices.
• 48:26
  Speaker 1: I get mad at my devices, too.
• 48:28
  Speaker 2: It dropped me out halfway through a very important thing
• 48:30
  Speaker 2: that was very nuanced.
• 48:32
  Speaker 3: Devices are inanimate objects. You can cuss them out all
• 48:35
  Speaker 3: you want.
• 48:36
  Speaker 2: It's a good thing I have multiple devices. All right.
• 48:40
  Speaker 2: Let's continue. All right.
• 48:42
  Speaker 1: So, yeah, let us know what you guys think about
• 48:45
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments. I think that, like, if
• 48:48
  Speaker 1: you're going to do a show where you're going to
• 48:51
  Speaker 1: try and catch female predators, I think that you have
• 48:53
  Speaker 1: to change the methodology. Because I think with the... Maybe
• 48:56
  Speaker 1: it's the way that they go about it. And, yeah,
• 49:00
  Speaker 1: I mean, look, I don't know. Like I said, I
• 49:01
  Speaker 1: never watched the show myself. But if you were going
• 49:06
  Speaker 1: to try to catch female predators, I think that the method...
• 49:11
  Speaker 1: of doing it would probably be different from the one
• 49:13
  Speaker 1: they're doing. And I'm sure the one that they did
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: was based on assumptions about predators being men and ignoring
• 49:21
  Speaker 1: the fact that there are female predators. I'm certain of that, right?
• 49:27
  Speaker 1: But I'm just saying, if you were gonna do a show,
• 49:28
  Speaker 1: maybe somebody should do a show because I do think
• 49:31
  Speaker 1: that a lot of these sort of like online guys
• 49:34
  Speaker 1: that catch people, they're doing it for internet clout And
• 49:39
  Speaker 1: I'm not saying that what they're doing isn't good, assuming
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: they actually catch one. But the motives behind it sort
• 49:45
  Speaker 1: of determine their methods as well. So that means that
• 49:49
  Speaker 1: they're not really going to be looking at, you know,
• 49:53
  Speaker 1: what is the right thing to do and how is
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: the right way to go about it. But rather, what's
• 49:57
  Speaker 1: going to be the most sensational way to expose this
• 50:00
  Speaker 1: person so I can get the maximum amount of clicks
• 50:02
  Speaker 1: on my video? Again, not that they're not doing, you know,
• 50:07
  Speaker 1: something good if they're actually catching someone. But I do
• 50:10
  Speaker 1: think it is an unprofessional approach. And it does, in
• 50:14
  Speaker 1: a lot of these cases, boil down to a method
• 50:16
  Speaker 1: of virtue signaling. And if you call that out, then
• 50:20
  Speaker 1: of course they have the defense of saying, oh, you
• 50:22
  Speaker 1: support pedophiles. And it's like, no, I'm not even saying
• 50:26
  Speaker 1: that what you're doing is wrong. But I think that
• 50:29
  Speaker 1: it's probably not the most, let's say, rewarding or not rewarding,
• 50:34
  Speaker 1: the most efficient way to do things. And it's also
• 50:38
  Speaker 1: probably not, it's going to have a lot of blind
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: spots because even you going into this are going to
• 50:43
  Speaker 1: have a lot of presumptions on what a predator is.
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: And yes, on this show, we have covered countless stories
• 50:49
  Speaker 1: of female predators, and I just don't think they operate
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: the same way that male predators do, you know?
• 50:55
  Speaker 3: No, they get an education degree.
• 50:57
  Speaker 1: Yeah, they become teachers. Exactly. So like, yeah. And they send,
• 51:01
  Speaker 1: they send lewd images to their students or something, or
• 51:04
  Speaker 1: they go into daycare or whatever. whatever. They go into
• 51:08
  Speaker 1: the juvenile detention system. They're working with the kids.
• 51:12
  Speaker 3: They adopt a child.
• 51:15
  Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. So there's lots of other ways to do it,
• 51:18
  Speaker 1: but again, that's not as sexy, I guess, for a show,
• 51:22
  Speaker 1: or the people who do these things hadn't even considered that,
• 51:25
  Speaker 1: which I think is more likely the case, but I
• 51:27
  Speaker 1: don't know. But anyway, let me know what you guys
• 51:29
  Speaker 1: think about this one in the comments. We're going to
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: look at some of your super comments, and then we're
• 51:34
  Speaker 1: going to move on to The next one, I got
• 51:36
  Speaker 1: one from an anonymous for $ 5. They didn't say anything.
• 51:40
  Speaker 1: So if you meant to say something, I don't know
• 51:41
  Speaker 1: your name, but I know you gave us five. So
• 51:43
  Speaker 1: thank you for that. Just, you know, let me know
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: what you guys think. If you wanted to say something
• 51:48
  Speaker 1: to go with the comment with your super chow, let
• 51:51
  Speaker 1: me know who you are and add it in. I'll
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: try to find it and read it. Zarynx gives us
• 51:55
  Speaker 1: $ 10 and says, are we now understanding why Milo didn't
• 51:59
  Speaker 1: name names when asked or why Corey Feldman was wanting
• 52:02
  Speaker 1: security when he wanted to show his film? based on
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: subject of H wood PDFs after he went to cops
• 52:10
  Speaker 1: in 1993. No, we've talked about that on the show too,
• 52:13
  Speaker 1: as well as women. It could be.
• 52:16
  Speaker 2: That's, that's, that's probably what happened. Mm hmm. Oh, is
• 52:20
  Speaker 2: there anything says you can't be raped by women. So
• 52:23
  Speaker 2: it didn't happen.
• 52:24
  Speaker 1: Yes.
• 52:25
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 52:25
  Speaker 3: Well, Feldman eventually did name names. Um, I think after,
• 52:31
  Speaker 3: after his predator, uh, passed away, And it wasn't a woman.
• 52:37
  Speaker 3: But it is difficult for a lot of guys. And
• 52:45
  Speaker 3: even as a female who has experienced both male and
• 52:51
  Speaker 3: female predators, when I talk about my experiences with male predators,
• 52:58
  Speaker 3: I get a lot of compassion from people. And it's
• 53:02
  Speaker 3: not really what I'm looking for. I'm trying to get
• 53:04
  Speaker 3: a point across usually when I talk about it. Because
• 53:06
  Speaker 3: it's not really any other point in talking about it.
• 53:09
  Speaker 3: I'm not going to get trauma relief or nothing like that.
• 53:14
  Speaker 3: But as soon as I bring up her, all hell
• 53:20
  Speaker 3: breaks loose with other women. And suddenly it's all made up.
• 53:25
  Speaker 3: I'm a liar. I don't know what I'm talking about.
• 53:29
  Speaker 2: My.
• 53:29
  Speaker 3: sexuality is in question. Uh, maybe, maybe it was, I
• 53:34
  Speaker 3: was just confused. Um, I actually had one, one therapist, um, who, uh,
• 53:43
  Speaker 3: had a couple of different other degrees and one of
• 53:46
  Speaker 3: them was up on his wall. One of them was, uh,
• 53:50
  Speaker 3: some sort of certificate from the women's studies department of
• 53:53
  Speaker 3: my university. Um, Started pursuing the idea. That I was.
• 54:01
  Speaker 3: Blaming a girl for something a boy did. Like literally.
• 54:07
  Speaker 3: The girl didn't have a brother. There was no male
• 54:09
  Speaker 3: in the house at the time. But. I must have
• 54:13
  Speaker 3: been blaming. You know. Her for something that a boy did.
• 54:17
  Speaker 3: Because it couldn't have been a female. Girls don't do
• 54:20
  Speaker 3: that kind of thing. And that is. When the victim
• 54:26
  Speaker 3: is female. It's got to be ten times worse for guys. Especially, like,
• 54:34
  Speaker 3: I was overpowered. And I was overpowered because I was
• 54:38
  Speaker 3: sick and recovering from an illness that had almost killed me.
• 54:41
  Speaker 3: I had encephalitis from a mosquito bite. If I had
• 54:46
  Speaker 3: been a boy instead of a girl and that had
• 54:50
  Speaker 3: happened to me, people wouldn't have believed that part. Because
• 54:56
  Speaker 3: how often does a boy get overpowered by a girl?
• 55:02
  Speaker 3: So it is very difficult for guys to tell their story.
• 55:06
  Speaker 3: They get shamed for things like that. They get treated
• 55:08
  Speaker 3: like they're hurting the predator. By damaging her reputation. And
• 55:17
  Speaker 3: they get treated like they must have liked it. And
• 55:20
  Speaker 3: now they're just looking for attention or something. Maybe they
• 55:25
  Speaker 3: were lucky or, you know, even worse, you know, I
• 55:31
  Speaker 3: wish that happened to me. No, you don't. They become
• 55:37
  Speaker 3: up to 14 times more likely to commit suicide. Something
• 55:43
  Speaker 3: hurt them from that situation. Yeah.
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 55:51
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 55:52
  Speaker 1: So let us know. Oh, I got another rumble rant
• 55:55
  Speaker 1: from Nova fan who gives us a dollar and says
• 55:59
  Speaker 1: another thing that frustrates me about the film's dramatization and
• 56:02
  Speaker 1: falsehoods is that some amateur YouTuber years ago probably accidentally
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: made a more accurate version of Chris Hansen and his show.
• 56:10
  Speaker 2: Yeah, probably.
• 56:11
  Speaker 1: Well, and well, look, I'm not we got to move
• 56:13
  Speaker 1: on because we've taken a lot of time on this
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: one story. But But yes, I think that there's definitely
• 56:19
  Speaker 1: a conversation to be had about all of those things.
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: But anyway, let me know what you guys think about
• 56:25
  Speaker 1: this one in the comments after this is over. We're
• 56:27
  Speaker 1: going to move on to the next story. This one
• 56:30
  Speaker 1: should create a lot of rage. All right, so Arkansas
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders faced intense backlash from various right-wing
• 56:39
  Speaker 1: commentators after releasing a campaign ad on September 28th promoting
• 56:43
  Speaker 1: her state's welfare-to-work requirements. The ad features a young white
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: man named Brad lounging on a beanbag, eating snacks, and
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: playing video games because, you know, gamers are the most
• 56:54
  Speaker 1: oppressed group. While Sanders narrates that taxpayers fund welfare for
• 56:58
  Speaker 1: people like him who just choose not to work, critics
• 57:01
  Speaker 1: including Oren McIntyre, Sean Davis of The Federalist, Jack Posobiec,
• 57:05
  Speaker 1: and Matt Walsh condemn the portrayal as dishonest and cowardly,
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: arguing that young white men are among the least likely
• 57:11
  Speaker 1: demographics to receive welfare benefits, and that the ad mocks
• 57:14
  Speaker 1: a core Republican constituency while avoiding more statistically common recipient groups,
• 57:20
  Speaker 1: let's say. Many accused Sanders of hating young white men
• 57:23
  Speaker 1: or producing an anti-white message that risked alienating male voters
• 57:27
  Speaker 1: at a time when younger men were already drifting away
• 57:29
  Speaker 1: from the GOP. Some demanded that the ad be pulled,
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: her communications team fired, and an apology issued. Sanders dismissed
• 57:36
  Speaker 1: the criticisms, defending the policy itself and quipping that critics
• 57:39
  Speaker 1: might next complain about the snacks shown. Left-leaning outlets highlighted
• 57:43
  Speaker 1: the irony of conservatives objecting not to welfare stereotypes in general,
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: but specifically to the use of white male figures rather
• 57:50
  Speaker 1: than a minority one, which is sort of like the trap, right?
• 57:53
  Speaker 1: So here's like a bit of the ad itself. If
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: you guys haven't seen it, it's 30 seconds long. So
• 57:58
  Speaker 1: let's take a look.
• 57:59
  Speaker 2: Yeah.
• 57:59
  Speaker 1: Oh, you want some of this?
• 58:01
  Speaker 2: Come on.
• 58:01
  Speaker 3: Me, Brad. Brad has turned relaxing into a full-time profession.
• 58:07
  Speaker 2: But you, you actually work hard.
• 58:09
  Speaker 3: You pay taxes to cover welfare for guys like Brad
• 58:13
  Speaker 3: who just choose not to work. That's why I launched
• 58:17
  Speaker 3: a welfare-to-work requirement.
• 58:19
  Speaker 2: Almost there.
• 58:21
  Speaker 3: Now, more Arkansans are working than ever before.
• 58:26
  Speaker 1: Even Brad. Yeah. So anyway, that's the ad. I think,
• 58:33
  Speaker 1: just real quick... Brad is the new Chad, yes. That's
• 58:37
  Speaker 1: definitely Brad behavior. I want to be like Brad.
• 58:43
  Speaker 2: No.
• 58:44
  Speaker 3: Well, no.
• 58:45
  Speaker 2: Go on.
• 58:46
  Speaker 1: No, no. I'll just wait till the end. You guys
• 58:49
  Speaker 1: can go ahead and say what you want to say
• 58:50
  Speaker 1: about this.
• 58:51
  Speaker 2: So, go ahead. Well, the principle is valid, but the
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: execution is unsound, I think is the logical way of
• 59:02
  Speaker 2: putting it. To a blind person... This campaign's video is
• 59:07
  Speaker 2: 10 out of 10. No notes. I suppose one could
• 59:12
  Speaker 2: argue that everything beyond that is arbitrary, but it's not.
• 59:15
  Speaker 2: It's because of what goes on subliminally. Well, not even subliminally. Like, liminally.
• 59:24
  Speaker 2: Kind of superliminally, always. We expect the left to portray
• 59:30
  Speaker 2: all bad things as white and male and all good
• 59:33
  Speaker 2: things as non-white and non-male. That's par for the course.
• 59:39
  Speaker 2: We'll criticize it, but we won't be surprised. But in
• 59:43
  Speaker 2: a two-party system, like what you'll have in the United States,
• 59:47
  Speaker 2: there is some hope held out that Republicans won't just
• 59:52
  Speaker 2: join in with the same colored propaganda. I think it's
• 59:58
  Speaker 2: something in the region of 1% of young white males
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 2: who are on fucking Snap or whatever, who are just
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 2: sponging off of the free food and the free everything.
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 2: White women are considerably more. Non-white men are even more.
• 1:00:18
  Speaker 2: And non-white women are massively overrepresented when it comes to
• 1:00:23
  Speaker 2: the gimme diets. So if this campaign featured one person
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 2: and one person only, it would not in fact be
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 2: racist to make that one person a non-white female. It
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 2: would simply be representing the statistics. It's not racist to
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 2: accurately represent statistics. But we all know why you did
• 1:00:52
  Speaker 2: what you did, Sarah. if you presented the face of
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 2: welfare sponging as a woman or a non-white, the Democrats
• 1:01:04
  Speaker 2: would have called you racist and sexist. And you don't
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 2: want to have to deal with Democrats calling you racist
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 2: and sexist because it's such a headache, one for which
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 2: you might have to apologize. Well, guess what? You presented
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 2: a young white male as the face of welfare sponging,
• 1:01:28
  Speaker 2: and now you're being accused of racism and sexism. But
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 2: hey presto, you don't feel the need to apologize for it.
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 2: Why would you? It doesn't matter how white males react,
• 1:01:43
  Speaker 2: or how anyone reacts on behalf of white males, or
• 1:01:46
  Speaker 2: indeed how right-wingers react. on their own behalf or anyone
• 1:01:53
  Speaker 2: else's behalf, you are not being crushed in the palm
• 1:01:58
  Speaker 2: of their hand. You are being crushed in the iron
• 1:02:01
  Speaker 2: fist of the Democrats, of the massive racist misandrists of
• 1:02:08
  Speaker 2: the extreme left. I called it a two party system
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 2: just now, but I appear to be describing what is
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 2: effectively a one party system pretending to be two parties.
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 2: It's an illusion of plurality. A monolithic identitarian regime in
• 1:02:30
  Speaker 2: a hall of mirrors. And bear in mind, there was
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 2: no reason to only use one actor in this campaign.
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 2: You could have used several. You could have made it...
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 2: What's the word? Diverse? You could have shown us a
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 2: white man and then a black woman and then a Hispanic...
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 2: non-binary Muslim, and then a fucking Indian? Heaven fucking forfend!
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 2: Even the Democrats might have let you off if you
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 2: did that, if you presented a number of different diverse
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 2: people as the protagonists. When leftists want to present universal misogyny,
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 2: like in the infamous Gillette ad, They will happily include
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: black men in their propaganda against men. And Asian men
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 2: and Hispanic men. They're absolutely fine with that. Yes, all men.
• 1:03:32
  Speaker 2: Even fucking green men and purple men are the enemy.
• 1:03:37
  Speaker 2: That's fine. As long as it is exclusively men you're
• 1:03:42
  Speaker 2: shitting on. Conversely, Canada... Whoa, Nelly, you can probably guess
• 1:03:51
  Speaker 2: what I'm going to say about Canada. Government-assisted euthanasia is
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 2: rapidly approaching the leading cause of death in Canada, at
• 1:03:59
  Speaker 2: least among those of European descent. It has already taken
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 2: over the firearm-related deaths in the USA. And that's in
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 2: a country with approximately 1,000% of the population of Canada. Well,
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 2: not content with that, the Canadian government is now advertising
• 1:04:20
  Speaker 2: their euthanasia services. And this is no surprise whatsoever that
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 2: there is zero diversity in those adverts. It's white people,
• 1:04:31
  Speaker 2: white people, white people. Because if there is even a
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 2: single drop of non-white blood in such an advert, that
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 2: would be racist. And I call it euthanasia, but the
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 2: prefix you means good, while the suffix thanos means death.
• 1:04:50
  Speaker 2: But at this point, it's way beyond that. There's now
• 1:04:53
  Speaker 2: a famous story about an elderly Canadian woman who did
• 1:04:58
  Speaker 2: not want to be killed. She protested against it with
• 1:05:03
  Speaker 2: every fiber of her being, as did her family, and
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 2: then they killed her anyway. There is no room for
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 2: euphemisms anymore. This is not a sister death in Canada.
• 1:05:16
  Speaker 2: It is, by any stretch of any definitions, Murder. And
• 1:05:22
  Speaker 2: where there's smoke, there's fire. Where there's one instance that
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 2: made the news, there are countless instances that did not.
• 1:05:32
  Speaker 2: The stories get buried as swiftly as the people they're
• 1:05:36
  Speaker 2: killing get buried. The Canadian government is murdering its citizens.
• 1:05:41
  Speaker 2: And yes, approximately 95% of the victims are of European descent.
• 1:05:51
  Speaker 2: Are they seriously expecting us not to notice this? Like
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 2: when people put their hands up and say, hang on,
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 2: all the adverts about good things are disproportionately featuring non-white people,
• 1:06:05
  Speaker 2: but the adverts about killing yourself and killing your kids
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 2: and not having kids in the first place, they're all
• 1:06:15
  Speaker 2: white people. How fucking stupid do you think they are?
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 2: When you're at the point. Where you're more concerned about offending. Psychophobes.
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 2: Than you are about. Killing your own people. Like. In
• 1:06:31
  Speaker 2: what meaningful way. Are you. Different from the genocidal psychopaths.
• 1:06:37
  Speaker 2: You're supposed to be pushing back against. That's just it.
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 2: You're not. You're not meant to be pushing back against it.
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 2: You're just containment. Those we call. Republicans. Those we call rhinos.
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 2: While the left is killing white men, be it through war,
• 1:06:59
  Speaker 2: or state subsidized murder, or just the slow creep of starvation,
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 2: you motherfuckers are out here shitting on white men on
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 2: the off chance that they might be able to survive
• 1:07:12
  Speaker 2: on handouts for a couple of months while they get
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 2: forced out of the workplace, forced out of the family...
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 2: And forced out of any semblance of sympathy. What are
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 2: we supposed to do? Escape to another country. There aren't.
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 2: Any countries we can escape to. At least none that
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 2: speak English. Every country in the world. That can speak English.
• 1:07:37
  Speaker 2: Has been trained to hate. And execute men of European descent.
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 2: Unless they have money of course. Like shit loads of money.
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 2: Like billions. But those of us. who don't have a
• 1:07:49
  Speaker 2: pot to piss in, will not find one in any
• 1:07:56
  Speaker 2: other country. But yeah, you're out here going, fuck you,
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 2: white men. You are not and never will be victims,
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: no matter what happens. So pull yourself up by your bootstraps.
• 1:08:07
  Speaker 2: And by that we mean, in case you hadn't already
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 2: figured out, we mean take your bootstraps, take your shoelaces,
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 2: and fucking hang yourselves in prisons. But rest assured, in
• 1:08:21
  Speaker 2: no way is this sexist or racist. Because you as
• 1:08:27
  Speaker 2: white men do not count as a race or a sex.
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 2: You are blank slates. You are walking abortions. As some
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 2: famous feminist once described it. You should never even have
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 2: been born in the first place. And again, None of
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 2: this counts as hate speech.
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 1: You see?
• 1:08:54
  Speaker 2: This is progress. This is political correctness. This is social justice.
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 2: This is woke. Humanity will die if you do this.
• 1:09:08
  Speaker 2: If you eradicate white men, at best, humanity will revert
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 2: to the Stone Age, and it will never recover. It
• 1:09:18
  Speaker 2: will be what Sam Harris used to call the worst
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 2: possible misery for everyone. Even if humans even survive, it
• 1:09:32
  Speaker 2: will be in abject pain and misery forever if white
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 2: men die. Food for thought, ladies and gentlemen, or should
• 1:09:42
  Speaker 2: I say gentlemen. I'm often reminded that ladies are not
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 2: Capable of eating food for thought. I'll leave it there.
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 3: Ladies are a myth.
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 2: So.
• 1:10:02
  Speaker 3: A while back. I had an argument. When I say
• 1:10:06
  Speaker 3: a while back. I mean on Reddit. So I think
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 3: this post is probably. Old enough. That my statistics. Are outdated.
• 1:10:17
  Speaker 1: But.
• 1:10:18
  Speaker 3: At the time that I had this argument, the big
• 1:10:25
  Speaker 3: bone of contention was who were the biggest welfare recipients.
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 3: Because one of the things that had come out was
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 3: that as a population, women don't really pay taxes. We
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 3: benefit from them. Men pay taxes. And a significant portion
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 3: of men's tax paying is basically just transferal of money
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 3: by Uncle Sam from men to women. And it's often
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 3: transferal from American men to women in foreign countries who
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 3: are American women, but who are there teaching the women
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 3: in those countries to hate their men and break up
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 3: their families. And that's shades of USAIDs, anyone? But when
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 3: I went digging with regard to the welfare system, because
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 3: that was one of the big things that we were
• 1:11:30
  Speaker 3: talking about, that when American women in American households receive
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 3: taxpayer-funded anything, it's usually through the welfare system. Obviously, there's
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 3: a lot of other stuff. There's all of the agencies
• 1:11:46
  Speaker 3: and departments that exist to supposedly further our goal of
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 3: equality that feminists say is all of our goal, even
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 3: if some of us don't think it's achievable or a
• 1:12:00
  Speaker 3: worthy goal. But when it comes to public assistance and
• 1:12:09
  Speaker 3: paying people's bills for them instead of them paying their
• 1:12:12
  Speaker 3: own bills, basically. Let's take a look at some factors
• 1:12:17
  Speaker 3: that are contributing factors. When I wrote this post, 85.3%
• 1:12:24
  Speaker 3: of all custodial single parents were mothers. And that's probably
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 3: pretty close to what it is now. I don't think
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 3: it's changed that much. 50-50 shared parenting might have changed
• 1:12:37
  Speaker 3: it in some states. But when you're looking at like
• 1:12:41
  Speaker 3: any state where it's just shared parenting, standard shared parenting,
• 1:12:46
  Speaker 3: which was joint custody with extra steps, which was maternal
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 3: custody with extra steps. So shared parenting is maternal custody
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 3: with extra, extra steps. That's about what the result here is.
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 3: Custodial single parents are the parent that the child lives
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 3: with the most times. And only about 14.7% were fathers
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 3: when I wrote this. So probably around 15 or 16%
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 3: maybe now. 80.7% of all custodial single fathers are at
• 1:13:18
  Speaker 3: or above the poverty level. And 19.3% were below the
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 3: poverty level. And 74.1% of them were employed.
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 2: Right?
• 1:13:22
  Speaker 3: 88.8% of employed single custodial fathers were at or above
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 3: the poverty level, while only 11.2% were below. 8.4% of
• 1:13:48
  Speaker 3: all custodial fathers were among the working poor. So less
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 3: than 10%, real small percentage. But when you look at unemployment,
• 1:14:01
  Speaker 3: you would expect much, much bigger percentage, right?
• 1:14:06
  Speaker 2: Well, no.
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 3: Actually, about two-thirds of unemployed custodial fathers are still at
• 1:14:12
  Speaker 3: or above the poverty level. Only about a third are
• 1:14:15
  Speaker 3: below it. Half of them who are not in the workplace,
• 1:14:20
  Speaker 3: in the workforce, half of all custodial single fathers who
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 3: are not in the workplace are at or above the
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 3: poverty level. This tells you, this is men who have
• 1:14:30
  Speaker 3: custody of their kids, right, who don't qualify for for
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 3: most public assistants. They're not in the workforce, they're not unemployed,
• 1:14:43
  Speaker 3: they're not trying to get a job, and yet they're
• 1:14:48
  Speaker 3: not at a level where they would qualify for public assistance.
• 1:14:53
  Speaker 3: Generally speaking, this is because men don't leave the workforce
• 1:14:59
  Speaker 3: unless they have something that is bringing them income. They trade,
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 3: they Maybe rather than being employed, own a business, provide
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 3: a service, they contract, whatever. So of all of the non-working,
• 1:15:26
  Speaker 3: basically don't have a job, single custodial fathers at that
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 3: time that were, you know, 56.8% of them were at
• 1:15:37
  Speaker 3: or above the poverty level. And when it goes back
• 1:15:45
  Speaker 3: to mothers, the numbers are lower. So you had 80.7%
• 1:15:53
  Speaker 3: of custodial fathers, single custodial fathers, being at or above
• 1:15:59
  Speaker 3: the poverty level. 76.4% of employed mothers custodial single mothers
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 3: are at or above the poverty level. That was just
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 3: the employed ones. 62.6% of all custodial single mothers were
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 3: at or above the poverty level, meaning over a third
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 3: were below the poverty level, whether they were employed or not.
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 3: Even though two-thirds of them approximately are employed or Similarly,
• 1:16:35
  Speaker 3: when you get to unemployed custodial single mothers, less than
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 3: half of them are at or above the poverty level.
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 3: In fact, 57.4% were below it. Among those who are
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 3: not in the workforce, 66.2% were below the poverty level.
• 1:16:54
  Speaker 3: And among the total non-working custodial single mothers, whether they
• 1:16:58
  Speaker 3: were unemployed or simply not in the workforce, 63.3%. were
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 3: below the poverty level, so about two-thirds. So this is
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 3: why you see more single mother households than single father
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 3: households being dependent on public assistance. What we're seeing is
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 3: a pattern. Higher percentage of single custodial mothers than single
• 1:17:28
  Speaker 3: custodial fathers don't have jobs, earn low income, do not
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 3: have enough non-employment income to be above the poverty level
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 3: without being employed. And then the other thing that I
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 3: looked at, with the fathers, more of them have jobs,
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 3: more of them have high income, and more have non-employment income,
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 3: enough to be at the poverty level without being employed.
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 3: Only 3.1% of custodial single parents have a family group
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 3: with six or more people. 91.2% of custodial single parents
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 3: with a family group of six or more people are mothers.
• 1:18:09
  Speaker 3: The overwhelming majority. Similarly, with four or more of their
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 3: own children in the home, most of the time, the
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 3: single custodial fathers in that situation are employed. 61.5%. Barely
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 3: over half, 52.3% of single custodial mothers in the same
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 3: situation have jobs. So there are almost half of mothers
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 3: with four or more of their own children in the
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 3: home do not have a job. So mothers are more
• 1:18:49
  Speaker 3: likely to combine jobs. with multiple child custody, and they're
• 1:18:53
  Speaker 3: also more likely to become custodial parents as teenagers. Now,
• 1:19:00
  Speaker 3: these are things that are a result of society's tolerance
• 1:19:06
  Speaker 3: for women's stupid choices. They're not a result of, people
• 1:19:11
  Speaker 3: call them generational, right? Oh, well, you know, the kid's
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 3: mom did this and so the kid is going to
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 3: do this and so on. That's not it. There are
• 1:19:24
  Speaker 3: girls that do this, even if their parents did not.
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 3: There are girls that don't do this because their parents
• 1:19:33
  Speaker 3: did and they don't want to repeat the same mistake.
• 1:19:36
  Speaker 3: They want their kids to have a better chance than
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 3: they did. And then there are people that do, generationally,
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 3: make the same mistake over and over again. Put the
• 1:19:47
  Speaker 3: cart before the horse. Don't save up before you have
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 3: your kids. And then you're on welfare. And your kids
• 1:19:55
  Speaker 3: are 50% more likely to end up relying on welfare
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 3: if you were on welfare. Which means... portraying some dipshit
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 3: playing video games all day, regardless of that dipshit's gender
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 3: or skin color, as the cause of welfare dependence and
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 3: mass welfare dependence, it's not just missing a detail or two.
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 3: It's missing the whole fucking boat. If you want to
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 3: end welfare dependence... The first thing you have to target
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 3: is women's dipshit mentality of, it's not my fault. If
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 3: you have two X chromosomes, it is your fucking fault.
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 3: You hold the keys to the uterus. Nobody is allowed
• 1:20:51
  Speaker 3: in unless you say so. Anybody that tries to get
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 3: in when you say no is committing a felony. So, yes,
• 1:21:01
  Speaker 3: it is your fucking fault.
• 1:21:03
  Speaker 2: Right?
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 3: It is my fault. I have two X chromosomes. I
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 3: made the mistake. I fucked things up for my kids.
• 1:21:15
  Speaker 3: So I'm not talking about this as an old bitty
• 1:21:18
  Speaker 3: judging other women. I am telling you, this is a
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 3: life of stupidity and misery that women inflict on society.
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 3: And each other, generation after generation, by saying, it's not
• 1:21:36
  Speaker 3: her fault. She's just a woman. It's your fault. Take responsibility.
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 3: Teach your daughters to take responsibility. And stop taking money.
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 3: Take responsibility. Don't get pregnant until you're ready to To
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 3: fund your own family. Teach girls that. Teach girls that
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 3: they're going to fuck up their lives. They're going to
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 3: fuck up the life of the guy they have the
• 1:22:13
  Speaker 3: hots for. They're going to fuck up the lives of
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 3: the cute little babies that they're going to love for
• 1:22:18
  Speaker 3: the rest of their lives. And they're going to regret
• 1:22:22
  Speaker 3: it forever. Even if they do everything they possibly can.
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 3: to remedy the situation after they fuck up, they will
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 3: still regret it forever. They will never stop wondering if
• 1:22:35
  Speaker 3: they could have done better for their kids. They will
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 3: never stop wondering if they could have done better for themselves.
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 3: They will never stop wondering every time something hurts or
• 1:22:45
  Speaker 3: every time a hair falls out or they lose a
• 1:22:49
  Speaker 3: tooth or they see a new wrinkle. Is that because
• 1:22:52
  Speaker 3: I fucked up? Yes, it's because you fucked up. So,
• 1:22:59
  Speaker 3: This ad is worthless. It's not going to do jack shit.
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 3: People will vote for the welfare to work program and
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 3: that's not going to do jack shit because people not
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 3: being able to work is not the problem. People not
• 1:23:14
  Speaker 3: wanting to work is not the problem. People not wanting
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 3: to keep their legs closed is the problem. People not
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 3: wanting to use birth control if they're not going to
• 1:23:23
  Speaker 3: keep their legs closed. That's the problem. People not wanting
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 3: to hold girls accountable for being near adults when they're
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 3: teenagers and full-fledged adults after they turn 18. That's the problem.
• 1:23:39
  Speaker 3: And girls and women thinking that they can do no wrong.
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 3: That's the problem. Until you can come up with an
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 3: ad and a change to policy and a behavioral change
• 1:23:52
  Speaker 3: campaign that addresses that, You're stuck with welfare. Get used
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 3: to it because it's never going away.
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 2: Sorry.
• 1:24:06
  Speaker 3: All right.
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 1: Well, thanks for your comments. Let us know what you
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 1: guys think about this. Let me see if there's any
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 1: like super comments or anything. No, nothing went through. Thanks
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 1: for your thoughts on this. And we're looking forward to
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 1: seeing your thoughts in the comments. Let's move on to
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 1: the next story. We have two more to get through,
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 1: and this is already turning into a long sausage. So,
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 1: a 31-year-old transgender woman identified as Aurora Naomi Le Fay,
• 1:24:33
  Speaker 1: because this is always the names they always pick for
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 1: themselves when they are able to do that, also known
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 1: as Lucas Serra de Mendonca, was arrested in Manaus, Brazil,
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 1: in connection with a brutal attack on his or her
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 1: 61-year-old German stepfather. Yeah, there are Germans in Brazil. There's
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 1: a bit of history behind that. Police alleged that on
• 1:24:57
  Speaker 1: September 16th, 2026, the suspect waited in the victim's third
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 1: floor apartment, then attacked him upon his return by biting
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 1: off both of his ears, parts of which investigators suspect
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 1: may have been swallowed, gouging his eyes with her fingers
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 1: so severely that surgeons later removed them, leaving them permanently
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 1: blind and sexually assaulting them. The victim, who described the
• 1:25:18
  Speaker 1: assault as satanic, escaped by jumping from the balcony and
• 1:25:21
  Speaker 1: was hospitalized in serious condition. Hear no evil, see no evil.
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 1: Not meant as a joke. Le Fay claimed to have
• 1:25:29
  Speaker 1: been experiencing cannabis-induced hallucinations at the time and cited resentment
• 1:25:37
  Speaker 1: over the stepfather's refusal to accept her gender identity as
• 1:25:41
  Speaker 1: a motivating factor. She denied the rape allegation. Brazilian authorities
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 1: charged her with attempted aggravated homicide and rape. The victim's
• 1:25:51
  Speaker 1: ears were not recovered and forensic results on the sexual
• 1:25:54
  Speaker 1: assault claim were pending at the time of reports. The
• 1:25:57
  Speaker 1: suspect's mother confirmed a strained relationship between the two, but
• 1:26:02
  Speaker 1: no prior violence. You are not prepared for this, yes.
• 1:26:07
  Speaker 2: Again, there are two important points here. One is... this
• 1:26:12
  Speaker 2: person was trans. The other is this person used cannabis.
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 2: Are either of these details responsible for this person chewing
• 1:26:24
  Speaker 2: off someone's ears, gouging their eyes out and raping them?
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 2: I would say no. In the interest of fairness, I
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 2: would say no in both cases. There are perhaps a
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 2: couple million people in the world affected by trans ideologies.
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 2: Very few of them find themselves chewing off people's ears
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 2: and swallowing them and gouging their eyes out and raping them.
• 1:26:54
  Speaker 2: I'd wager there's in excess of at least a billion
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 2: people who have used cannabis. And damn near close to
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 2: 0% of them have used chewed off someone's ears and
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 2: swallowed them and gouged their eyes out and raped them.
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 2: And I'm not even interested in the ratios either way.
• 1:27:18
  Speaker 2: I think it's probably something to do with severe schizophrenia
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 2: or something. You wouldn't do that unless there was some
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 2: kind of demonic voice in your head telling you to
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 2: do that. And yes, famously schizophrenic symptoms can be exacerbated
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 2: by cannabis. Maybe it should be made illegal or something. Well,
• 1:27:50
  Speaker 2: could we perhaps have a conversation about what else might
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 2: exacerbate schizophrenic symptoms? I'm not a psychologist or anything, but
• 1:28:02
  Speaker 2: I have a sneaking suspicion that telling people they are
• 1:28:07
  Speaker 2: in the wrong body might have a teeny tiny effect
• 1:28:13
  Speaker 2: on schizophrenic symptoms. Am I the asshole? Like, I've already
• 1:28:20
  Speaker 2: conceded that cannabis should not be handed out like aspirin
• 1:28:27
  Speaker 2: to any and all takers. It's harmless for most people,
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 2: but that there should be some kind of vetting process
• 1:28:37
  Speaker 2: where even if cannabis is legal, it should not be
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 2: available to people who have been diagnosed with mental illness,
• 1:28:47
  Speaker 2: especially the kind of mental illness that reacts badly with
• 1:28:53
  Speaker 2: that kind of drug. Just like you shouldn't give penicillin
• 1:28:56
  Speaker 2: to people who are allergic to penicillin. Is that Is
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 2: that reasonable? I think that's reasonable. And at the same time,
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 2: telling people that they were born in the wrong body
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 2: is not the kind of therapy that should be handed
• 1:29:13
  Speaker 2: out to every child in your fucking classroom for the
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 2: same fucking reason. Sure, most children will be like, no,
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 2: I don't think I was born in the wrong body.
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 2: That's fucking retarded. I am my body. The very idea
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 2: that the connection between my mind and my body is
• 1:29:32
  Speaker 2: somehow inherently wrong is kind of retarded. I don't get
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 2: how that's even possible. Surely you are your body just
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 2: as much as you are your mind. Like, why are
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 2: you teaching me this? I'm just a child. And even
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 2: I can tell that this will almost certainly fuck up
• 1:29:55
  Speaker 2: my mental health in the event that I take it seriously. Again,
• 1:30:02
  Speaker 2: just like I'm not defending noncery, I'm not defending giving
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 2: cannabis to children or any drugs, any recreational drugs whatsoever.
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 2: I'm just saying, maybe you shouldn't give this metaphysical gender
• 1:30:19
  Speaker 2: cult to children either. Again, to most of them, it's
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 2: water off a duck's back but to the potentially schizophrenic
• 1:30:31
  Speaker 2: children you're playing with some pretty fucking hot fire there
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 2: you are literally disconnecting them from reality in ways that
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 2: make cannabis look like a fucking aspirin there is no
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 2: amount of cannabis that will drive people as crazy as
• 1:30:55
  Speaker 2: literally telling them that their minds and bodies are chronically
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 2: disconnected from each other. Fuck's sake, you could take a
• 1:31:05
  Speaker 2: thousand tabs of acid while your baby is in the
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 2: womb and it would not fuck them up as much
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 2: as telling them that women are oppressed by men and
• 1:31:18
  Speaker 2: that the only solution to this eternal oppression is to
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 2: denounce the gender binary of men and women. How much
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 2: evidence do you need? Even the world's worst acid casualties
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 2: will usually just shrink away from society and spend the
• 1:31:38
  Speaker 2: rest of their lives sitting in their bedroom, dribbling and
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 2: talking to the walls. On quite the other hand, teaching
• 1:31:46
  Speaker 2: them a singular syllabus of a curriculum wherein men are
• 1:31:56
  Speaker 2: evil and women are victims, we'll have them cannibalizing their
• 1:32:03
  Speaker 2: own parents. Like, why wouldn't it? Again, I am not
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 2: saying drugs should be legal. Not even necessarily cannabis. There's
• 1:32:13
  Speaker 2: every reason to have that debate and to do some
• 1:32:19
  Speaker 2: serious scientific experiments into figuring out just how harmful cannabis
• 1:32:24
  Speaker 2: psychedelic drugs are for children or even teenagers or even
• 1:32:29
  Speaker 2: young adults, even the very mildest of hallucinogens like cannabis.
• 1:32:36
  Speaker 2: But when it comes to teaching children that men oppress
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 2: women and therefore you are in the wrong body, whether
• 1:32:45
  Speaker 2: you're male or female, that experiment is already underway. It
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 2: has already been underway for several generations. Because it has
• 1:32:57
  Speaker 2: not been made illegal to perform that experiment. On the contrary,
• 1:33:02
  Speaker 2: it has been made mandatory. First in further education, then
• 1:33:07
  Speaker 2: in higher education, then in general education, and then in
• 1:33:12
  Speaker 2: fucking kindergarten. And it has coincided with ordinary children spontaneously
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 2: deciding to get themselves mutilated. and shooting up their schools,
• 1:33:26
  Speaker 2: and biting off people's ears, and gouging their eyes out,
• 1:33:29
  Speaker 2: and raping them.
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 7: Like, we could have been, we could have been feeding
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 7: children cocaine from the age of five, and it would
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 7: not have led to this kind of fucking Hellraiser horror show.
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 2: I am not saying legalize drugs, even for adults, but
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 2: for fuck's entire sake if that shit isn't legal why
• 1:34:00
  Speaker 2: the fuck is this shit legal like teaching children that
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 2: they're in the wrong bodies how the fuck is that
• 1:34:09
  Speaker 2: not worse than giving them any drug I'm not a
• 1:34:13
  Speaker 2: real doctor none of this is medical advice I hear my.
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 3: Stop okay The first thing that I have to point
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 3: out is I want you to think back, those of
• 1:34:31
  Speaker 3: you who are out there that are Gen X and older,
• 1:34:35
  Speaker 3: to the 1990s and the 1980s, 1970s. Anybody that was
• 1:34:42
  Speaker 3: around and old enough to be paying attention to the
• 1:34:45
  Speaker 3: news in the 1960s. I don't remember a bunch of
• 1:34:51
  Speaker 3: stories about transgender people doing things like this or really
• 1:35:00
  Speaker 3: anything other than fighting for the ability to club together.
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 3: There really wasn't a whole lot of violence and strange
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 3: public behavior desperately trying to be around children or anything
• 1:35:18
  Speaker 3: like that. Until Instead of simply being a civil rights group,
• 1:35:30
  Speaker 3: they became a progressive stack victim group. And there is
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 3: something about becoming a progressive stack victim group that changes
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 3: who is part of your group. And suddenly, some things
• 1:35:50
  Speaker 3: changed about being trans. For instance... you could have no
• 1:35:57
  Speaker 3: characteristics whatsoever of being trans. And say you were trans,
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 3: and you're trans because you said so, and nobody can
• 1:36:06
  Speaker 3: question it. You don't present as the opposite sex, you
• 1:36:10
  Speaker 3: just call yourself the opposite sex. You don't have to
• 1:36:12
  Speaker 3: do anything to maybe put on some clothing the opposite
• 1:36:17
  Speaker 3: sex wears, but nothing else. You don't even have to
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 3: have dysphoria now. No gender dysphoria. Just, I identify as. Oh,
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 3: and there's suddenly 156 genders or whatever. And they all
• 1:36:34
  Speaker 3: have different names that have striking similarity to fetishes. Because
• 1:36:42
  Speaker 3: it's no longer a condition. It's a political identity. Once
• 1:36:52
  Speaker 3: it's a political victim identity, it becomes attractive to people
• 1:36:59
  Speaker 3: who can exploit that identity for their own benefit. People
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 3: who can use it as a means of, well, you
• 1:37:06
  Speaker 3: can't be mad at me for this. I'm this political victim.
• 1:37:09
  Speaker 3: I'm a political victim. I identify as a political victim.
• 1:37:14
  Speaker 3: And therefore, no matter what I do, you have to
• 1:37:17
  Speaker 3: put up with it. Because political victim cred, political victim points...
• 1:37:21
  Speaker 3: political victim shield from accountability. As soon as it got
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 3: the political victim accountability shield, you got the pedos and
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 3: the crazies. So to our trans listeners, you got to
• 1:37:39
  Speaker 3: do something about this because people are going to think
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 3: there's no difference between you who have experienced gender dysphoria
• 1:37:52
  Speaker 3: suffered come to a conclusion and acted upon it and
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 3: are trying to just get by in life as who
• 1:38:03
  Speaker 3: you are to yourself and people who bite their stepfather's
• 1:38:09
  Speaker 3: ear off and swallow part of it people who desperately
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 3: try to be a grandfather grandfather step grandfather i should
• 1:38:19
  Speaker 3: have known better i have a step grandfather um but
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 3: that there's no difference is ridiculous. There is obviously a difference.
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 3: Or there would have been stories like this throughout history.
• 1:38:37
  Speaker 3: And there weren't. There weren't massive numbers of people doing
• 1:38:44
  Speaker 3: a bunch of weird things publicly. Making a spectacle of themselves.
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 3: Standing out on purpose. And not. Trying to pass.
• 1:38:56
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 1:38:58
  Speaker 3: But instead trying to exploit. The political victim identity. For
• 1:39:04
  Speaker 3: everything it's worth. And then some. So like I said.
• 1:39:09
  Speaker 3: You got a clean house. Because this is bullshit. Nobody's
• 1:39:14
  Speaker 3: going to accept this.
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 2: Even.
• 1:39:16
  Speaker 3: The most hardcore supporters of your human right to be
• 1:39:21
  Speaker 3: who you are, do your job, go home and watch TV,
• 1:39:25
  Speaker 3: and club together if you want, and be adults together
• 1:39:28
  Speaker 3: if you want. I'm not going to support, you can't
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 3: criticize these people because they're trans, no matter what they do.
• 1:39:40
  Speaker 3: Something's got to give.
• 1:39:43
  Speaker 1: Something's got to give. Something's got to give. Sorry. Let's see.
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 2: All right.
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 1: Well, thanks for your comments. I don't see any super
• 1:39:54
  Speaker 1: chats or super chows. So we're going to move on
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 1: to the final story. Yeah, it's a long sausage, this
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 1: kind of guy. All right. So the estate of a 26-week-old... Okay,
• 1:40:08
  Speaker 1: let me start over. The estate of a 26-week-old aborted fetus...
• 1:40:13
  Speaker 1: referred to as Baby Wabington, received a $ 200, 000 settlement in
• 1:40:20
  Speaker 1: a New Mexico wrongful death lawsuit against late-term abortion provider Dr.
• 1:40:24
  Speaker 1: Curtis Boyd, operating as Southwestern Women's Options. Dr. Emily Cohen
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 1: and the estate of Dr. Carmen Landau. The case, Wabington v. Boyd,
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 1: filed in Bernalillo County Second Judicial District Court, was settled
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 1: and dismissed with prejudice on September 14, 2026. The lawsuit,
• 1:40:47
  Speaker 1: brought by the mother, Giselle Wabington, both individually and as
• 1:40:53
  Speaker 1: personal representative of the child's estate, described the fetus as
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 1: a 26-week-old viable fetus and a person under New Mexico's
• 1:41:03
  Speaker 1: Wrongful Death Act, citing state precedent. Attorneys for the plaintiffs
• 1:41:07
  Speaker 1: characterized it as the first such payout to an aborted
• 1:41:11
  Speaker 1: child's estate treated as a legal person. The complaint alleged
• 1:41:15
  Speaker 1: the 2020 abortion occurred while the mother was under the
• 1:41:18
  Speaker 1: influence of methamphetamine, rendering her unable to provide valid informed
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 1: consent and that the clinic was aware of her intoxication.
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 1: Albuquerque attorney Mike Seelbell, who handled the case with co-counsel
• 1:41:34
  Speaker 1: Justin Hall, stated both the mother and the baby's estate
• 1:41:37
  Speaker 1: sued marking what he called the first instance of an
• 1:41:40
  Speaker 1: abortionist being held liable for the wrongful death of the
• 1:41:44
  Speaker 1: unborn child rather than solely for injuries to the mother.
• 1:41:48
  Speaker 1: The settlement amount was inclusive of costs and fees. New
• 1:41:51
  Speaker 1: Mexico continues to permit abortion despite the recognition of the
• 1:41:55
  Speaker 1: fetus as a person for wrongful death purposes in this instance.
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 3: Guys, guys, Citizen Kate was supposed to be a movie.
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 3: It was just supposed to be a movie. Okay, I'll
• 1:42:10
  Speaker 3: say the rest later. Go ahead.
• 1:42:12
  Speaker 1: No, I've already finished it.
• 1:42:14
  Speaker 2: Go ahead.
• 1:42:15
  Speaker 1: You guys can say whatever you want to say about it.
• 1:42:17
  Speaker 3: Well, before I really dive in, Mike, you got anything?
• 1:42:22
  Speaker 2: I mean, can we go ahead and invoke the Hippocratic Oath?
• 1:42:30
  Speaker 2: It seems like that's what the Hippocratic Oath is for.
• 1:42:34
  Speaker 2: Let's not forget that abortions are elected by women and doctors.
• 1:42:38
  Speaker 2: If we can't blame women for that shit, we should
• 1:42:40
  Speaker 2: at least be able to blame doctors for that shit.
• 1:42:44
  Speaker 2: What good reason do doctors and surgeons have for doing
• 1:42:49
  Speaker 2: that shit? Other than women who are not doctors give
• 1:42:56
  Speaker 2: zero shits about the Hippocratic Oath. Okay, but let's chant
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 2: the mantra together. I am not a biologist. Well, the
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 2: doctor is a biologist. We seem to be at the
• 1:43:09
  Speaker 2: point where the oaths that doctors make don't mean shit.
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 2: If a woman wants to commit murder, the Hippocratic Oath
• 1:43:18
  Speaker 2: means nothing. What happened to trust the science? It kind
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 2: of looks like it doesn't mean shit compared to believe
• 1:43:26
  Speaker 2: all women. So you have to ask yourself, what the
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 2: fuck happened six years ago? Was it really trust the science?
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 2: The scientists who said, this doesn't make any sense, don't
• 1:43:38
  Speaker 2: do this, were discarded by the wayside because of women
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 2: who said, let's do what the consensus said we should do.
• 1:43:50
  Speaker 2: Ask yourself, at what point is it not trust the science,
• 1:43:56
  Speaker 2: but trust the women? Did the quote unquote pandemic happen
• 1:44:01
  Speaker 2: not because of what scientists said, but because of what
• 1:44:05
  Speaker 2: women said? Fucking food for thought. Go on, Anna. Do it.
• 1:44:11
  Speaker 3: Okay. Obviously, the state acknowledging that it is a person
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 3: is a big win for pro-lifers. And we'll set that
• 1:44:24
  Speaker 3: aside for a moment because I want to talk about
• 1:44:26
  Speaker 3: this mother. And, you know, both sides of the abortion
• 1:44:33
  Speaker 3: controversy have done this. Both sides of the abortion controversy
• 1:44:37
  Speaker 3: have championed women who were just absolute colossal fuck-ups. But
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 3: to use meth when you're pregnant? Are you kidding me?
• 1:44:49
  Speaker 3: This mother is not an angel. She didn't do this
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 3: to create a win for the pro-life movement. She did
• 1:45:00
  Speaker 3: this to make money. She didn't sue over moral reasons.
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 3: If she had those kind of moral reasons, she would
• 1:45:10
  Speaker 3: not have used a substance during her pregnancy that she
• 1:45:15
  Speaker 3: would be exposing her baby to that could cause everything
• 1:45:20
  Speaker 3: from low birth weight and small head circumference to poor
• 1:45:25
  Speaker 3: muscle control, jitteriness in the infant, sleeping too little or
• 1:45:30
  Speaker 3: too much, respiratory problems, irritability, abnormal sucking, which can interfere
• 1:45:36
  Speaker 3: with the baby's ability to eat because that's how they
• 1:45:38
  Speaker 3: eat for like the whole first year. And it can
• 1:45:44
  Speaker 3: actually cause changes to the entire function of the brain
• 1:45:49
  Speaker 3: in the long term. It can cause behavioral and developmental issues,
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 3: attention deficits, hyperactivity, learning disabilities, delayed motor skills. Some of
• 1:46:02
  Speaker 3: these kids are at a higher risk lifelong for anxiety, depression,
• 1:46:06
  Speaker 3: and a blunted stress response due to changes in the
• 1:46:10
  Speaker 3: brain structure that they never recover from it. It's every
• 1:46:14
  Speaker 3: bit as bad in some ways as any other drug.
• 1:46:20
  Speaker 3: We hear about crack babies and Babies that were exposed
• 1:46:25
  Speaker 3: to acid and all that. This meth fucks up everything
• 1:46:29
  Speaker 3: about your nervous system. Meth users are generally stupid. In
• 1:46:35
  Speaker 3: my experience. And unfortunately I do have that experience. Because
• 1:46:39
  Speaker 3: I lived next door to a drug dealer. For a
• 1:46:42
  Speaker 3: few years. And it just breaks my heart. That this
• 1:46:49
  Speaker 3: kid was exposed to that. That was like the only
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 3: experience this kid ever had. really was being exposed to
• 1:46:57
  Speaker 3: drugs in utero. Um, but at the same time, this
• 1:47:05
  Speaker 3: is a victory, a pro-life victory in that, uh, the
• 1:47:11
  Speaker 3: state has acknowledged that this is in fact a living
• 1:47:17
  Speaker 3: human organism. Um, It's a double-edged sword, though, because we
• 1:47:25
  Speaker 3: hear all the time about alcohol and consent. We hear
• 1:47:28
  Speaker 3: all the time about being incapacitated and consent. But if
• 1:47:36
  Speaker 3: you can't give medical consent when you're on other substances,
• 1:47:42
  Speaker 3: and it can lead to a lawsuit that gets settled
• 1:47:45
  Speaker 3: out of court. Guys, you can't mix any kind of
• 1:47:50
  Speaker 3: drugs together. With sex. Ever again. Unless maybe birth control pills.
• 1:47:57
  Speaker 3: But even then. The more we're learning about birth control pills.
• 1:48:01
  Speaker 3: Some dumb bitch may come back later. And say. I
• 1:48:05
  Speaker 3: was under the influence. Of the hormones. It was rape.
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 3: And win. So. I really want to be happy about.
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 3: this because of the pro-life win I really do but
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 3: for fuck's sake I can't separate these things it just
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 3: is um I don't know. Not a good victory. It's
• 1:48:46
  Speaker 3: not a good victory. It's unfortunate. I'm glad that the
• 1:48:54
  Speaker 3: courts or at least the attorneys did right by the baby.
• 1:48:58
  Speaker 3: They may have been the only people to have ever
• 1:49:01
  Speaker 3: done right by that baby in his whole short life.
• 1:49:06
  Speaker 2: It's sad. That's it.
• 1:49:14
  Speaker 1: All right.
• 1:49:14
  Speaker 3: Well, I got, I'm sorry. It's all right.
• 1:49:17
  Speaker 1: Uh, Mike, did you already say something? I had to
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 1: get the door real quick while you guys were talking.
• 1:49:23
  Speaker 2: So, okay.
• 1:49:24
  Speaker 1: I think that's it then. I got a rumble rant
• 1:49:26
  Speaker 1: from Nova fan and he gives a dollar and says, uh,
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 1: dear feminists, I hope you enjoyed your near decades of
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 1: freedom from patriarchy because checks notes, MAGA chuds like myself
• 1:49:38
  Speaker 1: voted in more patriarchy and I am not sorry. Alright,
• 1:49:42
  Speaker 1: thank you for the Rumble rant. Let me just look
• 1:49:45
  Speaker 1: and see.
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 3: If there's anything else.
• 1:49:49
  Speaker 1: I vote for patriarchy. Patriarchy party is a thing.
• 1:49:53
  Speaker 3: Needs to happen.
• 1:49:55
  Speaker 1: It's the only way.
• 1:49:56
  Speaker 2: Sorry, guys.
• 1:49:57
  Speaker 1: That's it. We're just going to do that thing that
• 1:49:59
  Speaker 1: they hate. We're just going to do it. Alright, but anyway. Uh, yeah,
• 1:50:03
  Speaker 1: it looks like we're good on that. So we're going
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 1: to go into the patron show now and we're going
• 1:50:06
  Speaker 1: to look at this article, the myth of modern masculinity.
• 1:50:11
  Speaker 1: Hopefully you will join us there. Apparently, um, it's probably
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 1: going to be absolute cringe. So, um, but if you
• 1:50:19
  Speaker 1: guys want to join us for that, go to feed
• 1:50:21
  Speaker 1: the badger.com and, uh, start up a, uh, a membership
• 1:50:26
  Speaker 1: with us by bucks a month. We'll get you into
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 1: the discord server where you'll be able to watch all
• 1:50:29
  Speaker 1: the additional content and join in the conversations as well.
• 1:50:33
  Speaker 1: and I hope that we will see you in the Discord.
• 1:50:35
  Speaker 1: And again, our fundraiser is still up, and we still
• 1:50:39
  Speaker 1: need your help, so if you could, please go to feedthebadger.com
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 1: forward slash support, or just go to the main website
• 1:50:47
  Speaker 1: and look for the links. You can basically help us
• 1:50:51
  Speaker 1: out again by contributing to our fundraiser. Thank you guys
• 1:50:54
  Speaker 1: so much for all of that. And with that said, thanks, guys,
• 1:50:59
  Speaker 1: for coming on the show. Thanks to Hannah and Mike
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 1: for helping me out with this. If you guys like
• 1:51:05
  Speaker 1: this video, please hit like. Subscribe if you're not already subscribed.
• 1:51:08
  Speaker 1: Hit the bell for notifications. Leave us a comment. Let
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 1: us know what you guys think about what we talked
• 1:51:11
  Speaker 1: about on the show today. And share the video because
• 1:51:14
  Speaker 1: sharing is caring. Thanks so much for coming on this
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 1: episode of HBR News. And we will see you next Tuesday.