Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / The Either Or Concept 041124

Transcript

The Either Or Concept 041124 · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

0:01
The either or phenomenon. You're either this or your that, and it's a
0:09
it's a type of thinking that you get the dam against us and either or
0:18
phenomenon. It's the side taking type of thinking that's I got religion, tradition,
0:26
culture and politics and and divisions in society that people reduce themselves uh in
0:37
their way of thinking to particular points. Right, But my philosophy says,
0:45
let things be themselves. And the thing is everything is true in itself if
0:49
it's itself. But something being true in itself does not negate other things from
0:56
being through true in themselves. So you can't believe in something and that thing
1:02
is true to you, and somewhere else can believe in something else or something
1:07
different. And I think I equally be true. I said, it's a
1:12
wealth of thinking. They mays ten people can equally be true at the same
1:18
time and they come wrong at the same time. And you must not reduce
1:23
things to one thing, because if something is reduced to one thing, the
1:29
things stop from being holistic. You see things to different dimensions, different angles,
1:36
different lenses, different viewpoints, different projection, different perception, different perspective,
1:45
different subjectivities, different illusions, different ways because things are what they are
1:56
to be what they are. But because things cannot speak for themselves, things
2:01
are subjected to interpretation based on human intelligence, the human tradition, human religion,
2:10
human culture, the human education, human ignorance, or the human ways
2:17
of lives. What the human being sees can be different from what another human
2:27
being sees. Humans can see sometime at the same time, but interpret it
2:32
differently and say it differently. But their interpretations can all be true, and
2:42
it can all be false. But the thing is to itself. So things
2:50
are themselves and things should be allowed to be themselves, but those things equally
3:00
can be subjected to human interpretation. It means I can still believe in that
3:07
which you don't believe in. A lot of us can hold true to what
3:14
we're believing, and can still be able to live together despite our differences,
3:23
because believing in that thing or not does not negate or nullify that thing from
3:34
being what it is. I love America, for example, to the core
3:45
of my being. And I can give you reasons why I like America.
3:51
But somebody can tell me that they don't like America, I can ask them
3:57
the reasons why they don't like America. What is true, is that America
4:01
is the America. But our reasons for me like in America and the person
4:09
not like in America can both be true and can both not be true,
4:15
whether that person has the right to its view and half mine, because all
4:21
those views are subjective interpretation of that which is, and that thing we still
4:29
be that which that thing is, whether our subjective interpretation, and that thing
4:34
doesn't even care if we interpret it or not, or what we say or
4:40
not. The system or the being of America itself does not even know even
4:46
exist and actually does not even care if we say it's good or bad whatever
4:55
that what means, whether I think itself it is true, but our subjectives
5:00
understanding that the equally it is true. Things should be left to be themselves,
5:12
and people could say what they want to say about things without fighting or
5:15
this joying one another, whether they equally have rights to their opinion, and
5:20
they can still cosies with others because that thing will still be what that thing
5:25
is despite the interpretation of that thing. So whether they're fighting and hearing or
5:30
hurrying okay one another, it's about their interpretation and their subjectivities of a reality
5:40
that is and a reality that doesn't even care about them of a reality that
5:46
may be an object, may be an object that cannot talk to them,
5:50
or that can be an abstract that that does not have human mind, human
5:57
body, human flesh, human in tissue, or human feeling. It's a
6:01
thing in its essence, in its in its abstract being, away from the
6:12
human physical being of a motal mass. So most people fight in society in
6:20
the name of something, by in reality, they're fighting themselves. I might
6:29
be a Republican, of which I think I am, and at the same
6:35
time might be a Democrat, of which I think I am, And at
6:40
the same time I might be an independent, of which I think I am,
6:46
And at the same time, I might neither be a Republican, an
6:49
independent, or a Democrat of which I can equally be, and I will
7:00
still be myself. And the Democratic Party, the Democratic party, the Republican
7:04
paris to be a Republican party, and the Independent Party, if it exists,
7:10
still be an independent party, and I will still be myself. So
7:15
the point of contestation, or the point of debate, or the issue in
7:20
which people agree or disagree, is itself in its own identity of being that
7:30
is true in itself. But the arguments or the debate, or the subjectivities
7:36
of which those people are talking or arguing or fighting about are true in themselves.
7:47
I might never write in themselves, but should not notify anything or should
7:54
not be a confrontation that people get to hurt themselves about that issue. Mean
8:00
people can disagree to agree, or people can disagree to disagree but still be
8:05
themselves without fighting herd on one another. If they get to understand understand that
8:13
that debaring or disagree over an issue, that that issue will still be that
8:20
issue, with or without that debate or disagreement. Things are themselves because things
8:28
are meant to be themselves, with or without humans, and the subjectivities that
8:33
humans create themselves are in themselves entities of themselves, with or without those humans
8:41
are created in We talk about Socrates and Age of enlighten men, and industrial
8:46
revolution and capitalism and asignalting with science and relativity with Armstein, all these great
8:54
ideas. Those ideas are in themselves entities of themselves, away from those who
9:01
created them, and those ideas are here to stay, and those people who
9:07
created they might not be here. You can argue for or against their creativity
9:16
or their philosophy or the invention. But those things are in themselves their essence
9:24
of being with o without you. So when you fight about it, you
9:31
cannot hurt yourself or artists about because those things will be with overout you.
9:37
So why you're fighting about idea, it's not the idea that you're fighting about,
9:41
because the idea in itself exists, is that you are fighting your interpretation
9:46
or projection, perception of perspective of that thing based on your intelligence, your
9:54
rationality, your reason, your ignorance, or your state of mind, emotions,
10:01
your sentiments for your character traits, the way you see yourself or the
10:07
way you see others. So you're fighting your perception of your ignorance, of
10:16
your sufficiency or insufficiency, of your feeling of adequation or inadequacy, or your
10:22
feeling of insecurity, in security, you know, your your your character is
10:26
fighting an idea pulled away your your your understanding of your being is fighting an
10:35
idea. But the idea with deeply the idea without you. Great people debate
10:41
over a topic, for example, about abortion or the right to bear arms,
10:48
those ideas are essences or entities of themselves. It will never go away,
10:54
but those people will come and go with that with the variant interpretations of
10:58
those things. But the idea is here to start. So when you're debating
11:03
on fighting, you're not fighting the idea, you're fighting yourself. See like
11:11
the Supreme Court, for example, the Supreme Court with the bad ideas.
11:16
The Supreme Court will always be there. We will always be there and ideas
11:20
will always come to the Supreme Court. But what will not be there will
11:24
be those charges. Those nine judges were not here where the interpretation will be
11:33
there, and those interpretations not go away. If those interpretation are rewritten or
11:43
over rided. They overwrited. Interpretation is still there. It doesn't go away,
11:52
but those people will go away, whether subjectivities and contribution, we'll be
11:56
here to start the worth thinking that things are things in themselves no matter what
12:05
humans say. A tree is a tree, no matter what we call it.
12:11
We can fight about the tree. Who can debate about it, But
12:15
that thing called a tree is there. It can reaches not to call a
12:18
tree. But there is something that we're talking about. That's something is true,
12:22
that's something of an essence of itself, with or without the human being.
12:26
But humans can fight about it. So therefore, if humans are fighting
12:31
about it, they should take into consideration that the viewpoint of everybody else can
12:39
be true with are negating the very point of others, and with the things
12:43
to be in itself and the human beings still trying to be in itself.
12:48
What it worse can be right, and what it was can be wrong.
12:52
But the thing we are right or wrong about we still be the sign.
12:56
So therefore we're right or wrong or right and wrong based on our understanding of
13:03
the matter. And that matter can be decided in one way or the other
13:11
based on our understanding of the matter. But that matter or the thing,
13:16
the thing an issue, is still designed. It can go left, it
13:22
can go right, but it's that thing that's going left or right based on
13:28
our understanding of what's left and right this, but the thing in itself is
13:31
always there because things are meant to be themselves. Once something is here,
13:37
it can never go away. You can think it goes the way, it
13:41
doesn't go away, but the interpretation will come and go. The narrative,
13:48
then, the way that we see reality, the illusions we create, the
13:54
subjectivities we create, we come and go, or we create essences of themselves.
14:01
But that which we are talking about we never go away. The concept
14:07
of democrats will never go away. The concept of communism will never go away.
14:11
The concept of dictatorship or oppressive government, will never go away. The
14:16
concept of liberalism we never go away. The concept of the media, we
14:22
never go away. The concept of reproduction, we never go away. The
14:28
concept of freedom and liberty and the pursuit of happiness, we never go away.
14:35
The concept of the American dream. We never go away. Because those
14:39
things are true in themselves subjected to the interpretations of humans. Humans always go
14:46
to war, But that which humans go to war about we will never go
14:52
away. But the humans will kill themselves, but that thing would stay.
15:00
Use things are meant to go what they are, and that which is here,
15:03
it's already here. You can learn to live with it or not.
15:07
You cannot take the thing away. You can't take yourself or somebody away.
15:13
So we are thinking that you must not reduce yourself to a particular point.
15:20
You can believe in God. You can believe that you're a child of God.
15:26
You can believe that you're here because God's brought to here. That is
15:28
true. You can still believe that you're here because of science, and that
15:33
is true too. You can believe that you're here because of your mother or
15:39
father. That is too true. You can believe that you're here because of
15:43
nature, because of the food you eat. That is still true. You
15:46
can believe that you're here because of the doctor, the gynecologists, or the
15:50
nurses in the hospital. That is still true. You can't believe that you're
15:54
here because of the food you eat. That's too true. You can believe
15:58
that you're here because of the common which you living. That is too true.
16:03
I even believe that you're here because of the things that make your life
16:07
happy, the maturity of life. That is too true. You can believe
16:12
that you're here because of the money, because of the work, because of
16:15
positive contribution. That is stay true. You can't believe in in anything or
16:19
everything, it is stay true. But believing in one thing does not mean
16:25
that you must not believe in another thing. That's when human seems to be
16:36
or ceases to be holistic in they're thinking. We have an infinity mind as
16:41
an infinity being, because things in themselves has their infinitiness granted that which is
16:51
made cannot go away. It can be dissolved or changed into many forms,
17:00
does not go away. It's it Humans shall wander redus to dust. That
17:03
does just deep humans human. The body shall be consumer other things, and
17:10
those other things is still out of humans. It can be called differently.
17:14
But that which is here, it's already here. It doesn't go away.
17:22
Humans can fight and di are about it as a matter of projection, perception,
17:27
or perspective, and it will be much reasonable on the contrary, for
17:36
their to seek proper measurement, proportionality and balance, for them to seek reason
17:41
and rationality, for their to seek consensus and mutuality or reciproxgy, for their
17:48
to seek basic understanding, for them to come together, not divide themselves aproud
17:55
because of ideas, because those ideas will not go away. Humans come and
18:00
go. Ideas were always ted, and humans will come and go. And
18:07
that which is here is already here. And that human that comes and God
18:12
does not go in its entirety. The blood, the blood, and the
18:18
body, and the fleets in the body we decomposed, the mass itself,
18:26
the physicality itself, but the essence of being, the mind and soul,
18:32
the contribution of that being. The experiences cannot go away. Things are meant
18:41
to be what they are if humans left leave them alone to be what they
18:45
are things are meant to go there are if humans left them to be what
18:51
they are. Humans can agree to disagree or disagree to disagree as to be
18:56
themselves, to be true in themselves will not destroy themselves, And so it's
19:04
encouraged. It's encourages it's encouraging to teach kids debate, to listen to the
19:12
view points of orders. If want to negate the point negative, the point
19:18
does not notify the point of the other person. They might just give more
19:23
reasons why that point should not be accepted. But that point does not deserve
19:27
itself. That point that is not accepted is still here, so you cannot
19:33
fight and die for it. So worth thinking, so worth thinking that either
19:45
of perception is sometimes reducing. Make us not to see things holistically or see
19:53
things in their infinitiveness or in the essence of intrinsic system. Let things be
20:03
themselves for the want to be what the war is. You can fix things
20:11
that can be fixed because they're meant to be fixed. Where the things you
20:18
are fixing does not go away. Is your understanding of what fixing is,
20:23
of what solution is that changes. But I think in itself it's to itself
20:33
because things are what they are in their intrinsic essences and intrinsic individuality. You
20:44
can coexist, to cohabitate like existence. Your existence does not notify the existence
20:53
of another person. The existence of anything HM has an essence of that thing
21:00
itself that is meant to be here and destrain that thing in itself. GREATH
21:10
what create that wish? You have destroyed in many forms. It's just like
21:14
you go towards destroy enemy, whether enemy metasticizes in many other ways. God
21:22
does don't go away. It's just how we sick understand it to be in
21:30
order for others to be or of thinking. Be mindful of the either or
21:40
perception. There is small to that. You can't believe in one thing.
21:47
I could believe in many things, and all those many things has the right
21:52
in themselves previous way. You can still be a Muslim, a Christian,
22:03
a Baha, a Buddhist, a Jewish all together. You can still be
22:10
artistics all at once. The music can agree in something and disagree in something
22:17
that one legion offers, and holistically you build a better humanity and a better
22:22
human You must not be one thing, only another other things. You can
22:30
be everything and still be yourself without nullifying the existence of those things. The
22:44
human being can be more than one thing, giving the human being the choice
22:52
to either all. It's well societifying itself. Racism, sexism, bigotry can
23:00
divide wars. We must take sides, we must take cams. You can
23:07
be on both sides. It can be on all the side and still retain
23:11
your individuality. The thing you cannot compromise. It's the you in itself,
23:18
the being of the being itself, and your intrinsic individuality. You can be
23:22
everything but still be yourself and not be something else or somebody else. It's
23:30
a way of thinking because the human being is a trill on dimensions, more
23:37
of things, the human beaness everything. You're the air you break, You're
23:44
where you're living, You're the community you live in. You have the language,
23:48
you have your the senses. You're the mind, the body, the
23:53
soul, the ecology. You are that holisticness of being that exists in what
24:00
we call human being. So how can you want to reduce yourself to just
24:04
binaries? The human gene code is something more than binary. It's not just
24:15
either or. It's something molti versor something infinity, something multi dimensional. So
24:26
we are thinking there's something more. An either or