Latest / The Augarius Williams Show / United States vs. The Trump Administration | Episode 01

Transcript

United States vs. The Trump Administration | Episode 01 · The Augarius Williams Show

0:02
Speaker 1: Hey, thanks for listening to The Igarius Williams Show podcast.
0:06
You can cast new episodes every week on the iHeartRadio
0:09
app Apple podcast to where you enjoy listening to your
0:12
favorite shows. We finally made it. What's going on? Everybody,
0:30
Welcome into the very first episode of the Agarius Williams Show.
0:34
I'm your man, Igarius Williams thanking all of you for listening,
0:37
however and wherever you may be listening on this Tuesday,
0:40
July eighth of twenty twenty five. Hope that you're all
0:43
having a great day. Hope that you're all looking forward
0:46
to the halfway point of the week just as much
0:47
as I am. And I don't know about you, guys,
0:50
but it seems as dope, and I'm pretty sure a
0:52
lot of you are going to agree with one of
0:54
them about to say, it seems like we are just
0:57
fast forwarding our way through twenty twenty. It was just
1:01
yesterday where it felt like it was January first, and
1:05
now here we are six months through the year and
1:09
some change. I say all that to say this, if
1:13
no one has implored you to do this, let me
1:17
be the first to do it for you, with every
1:21
fiver of my being. I want to implore all of you,
1:26
if you aren't doing this already, to get out and
1:30
enjoy every single day. Don't take a single day for granted.
1:36
If something happens to you throughout the day, brush it off.
1:40
There is more day to live. Not every battle has
1:44
to be fought right then and there. As the old
1:47
saying goes, sometimes you just have to live to see
1:50
another day. Sometimes you have to live to fight another fight.
1:54
Don't let all these negative things take up all of
1:58
your energy, because it takes there's a lot of energy
2:01
to respond to something negative. So as I sit here
2:05
recording this episode on this July eighth of twenty twenty five,
2:10
I want all you guys to know that the storms
2:14
don't last forever, the rain doesn't last forever, because the
2:18
sun has to come back out. And I feel like
2:21
when we're talking about our country and when we're talking
2:25
about our world, some people have already gotten it figured
2:29
out in their head that the sun will never come
2:32
out again because of all the negative stuff that's happening
2:37
in our world.
2:40
Speaker 2: I tend to look at it from a more optimistic standpoint.
2:44
Speaker 1: I do think that if we're able to flush all
2:47
this bullshit out of our society, the sun can come
2:51
back out again. And I know what some of you
2:53
may be asking yourselves, Well, I live in a particular
2:56
part of the country. I live in a particular part
2:58
of the world where the sun comes out nearly every day.
3:01
I'm talking about in more of a figurative sense. For
3:04
a lot of people, they haven't seen the sun in
3:07
a long time, and they live in a place where
3:09
the sun is out constantly. As I'm recording this right now,
3:13
the sun is out. I can look out my window
3:16
and see the sun, but in so many different aspects,
3:20
it doesn't feel like the sun is up because of
3:23
all of this stuff that's gone or on around where
3:27
I am, whether locally, statewide, countrywide, worldwide, there's always something
3:38
going on that causes you to wonder, why have we
3:42
fallen so far? And I say all that to say this,
3:46
my thoughts and prayers go out to all those who've
3:50
been affected by the apocalyptic type flooding that's taken place
3:55
in Texas. The All Girls Christian Camp Mystic is at
4:00
the center of this and at the time of this recording,
4:03
one hundred and nine people have been reported dead in
4:09
this flooding, and of course there can't be anything that
4:13
happens in the world today, especially in the United States,
4:18
that cannot include a political ramification behind it. You have
4:23
some people who are insisting that if it had not
4:27
been for President Trump taking massive cuts to the National
4:33
Weather Service and to other entities, those people who have
4:37
perished would have had ample time to get out of
4:41
that particular area of Texas before the flooding came. Listen,
4:49
there's a time and a place for, quite frankly everything.
4:54
I don't think that right now, while first responders are
4:57
still on the scene looking for survivors, that this will
5:00
be a good time to talk about how this thing
5:04
could have ultimately been avoided. As we all know, the
5:09
government doesn't control the weather. The weather's controlled by the
5:13
man who sits up high and looks down low.
5:18
Speaker 2: He controls the weather.
5:22
Speaker 1: This whole thing about whether the government they control the weather,
5:25
they don't. Now does the government do things to manipulate
5:30
certain weather systems, Absolutely, we know that. But to just
5:35
sit here and just flat out say that the government
5:39
controls every aspect of the weather, you have to be
5:41
living in another dimension to believe that. Now, don't get
5:46
me wrong, I love a great conspiracy theory. But there
5:49
are just some conspiracy theories that, for a number of
5:53
different reasons, I'm not gonna get behind, and this full
5:56
out governmental control of the weather is one of those
5:59
conspiracy theories that I just refuse to get behind. But
6:05
as I previously stated, thoughts and prayers go out to
6:08
those who've been impacted by the flooding in that particular
6:12
area of Texas. And when you think about the people
6:15
who have lost their lives one hundred and nine people
6:18
once again at the time of this recording, it really
6:21
puts into your mind how many of us were able
6:26
to go to camp and safely leave that camp without
6:30
having to deal with Mother Nature. As we know, there
6:36
are two things in this world that are undefeated, Father
6:39
Time and Mother Nature, because they'll always get what they
6:44
come for. Mother Nature she wreaks havoc. Father Time when
6:52
he catches up with you, he will wreak havoc on
6:56
his victim. But you just have to really feel for
7:03
those counselors, for those chaperons, for the young children who
7:09
went to that camp for the summer because they wanted
7:15
something productive to do with their summer vacation, and now
7:21
they won't be able to go to school for the
7:24
new school year, they won't be able to graduate, they
7:28
won't be able to enjoy this thing called life. And
7:31
yet so many people out here have decided to make
7:35
this a political issue when this is not the time
7:39
or the place to make this a political issue. But
7:45
we know that in this world that we live in now,
7:47
people are going to do whatever the hell they want
7:49
to do because they seem to think that they're justified
7:52
in saying and doing whatever the hell that it is
7:54
that they want to say or do. It's just very
7:59
bad all around. We've been hearing stories about how some
8:04
people have taken it upon themselves to go on rescue
8:06
missions to rescue people who are still out there in
8:11
those flood waters. And those are the people that should
8:15
have the spotlight shine on them. Those are the people
8:17
who should be commended for the heroics. And we should
8:21
leave this conversation about politics at the door, because to
8:25
those people who've lost the loved one, they don't necessarily
8:29
care right now about Democrat or Republicans. They don't necessarily
8:33
care about who you voted for this past November.
8:37
Speaker 2: They don't care about any of that.
8:39
Speaker 1: All they care about is how would they be able
8:41
to move on with their lives and find some sembilance
8:45
of a life after they've lost the loved one. This
8:50
is a camp that has been open for nearly one
8:53
hundred years. They would have celebrated, if I remember hearing
8:56
this correctly, they're one hundredth year anniversary next year. This
9:02
community will never be the same. They can rebuild, they
9:06
can do all of this stuff to provide some similars
9:10
of what it used to be, but it will never
9:11
feel the same. And this is a particular part of
9:16
Texas that's called what is it called flash flood Alley
9:21
if I remember hearing that correctly, And this is one
9:25
of those times, sadly, where it is lived up to
9:28
its name. So thoughts and prayers go out to the
9:33
one hundred and nine at this at the time, it
9:36
is recording one hundred and nine victims who we've lost
9:40
because of those floods. And the sad part about this,
9:43
to make this point go a little bit further, is
9:48
that that particular area of Texas is going to be
9:51
dealing with some more flash flooding this week. So when
9:55
you when you've thought to yourself that okay, the worst
9:59
is behind us, some more's coming just a very very
10:03
sad all around situation. I failed to mention this at
10:10
the beginning of the show. There was a particular time,
10:16
not too long ago, to be quite honest with you,
10:19
where there was a podcast on the podcasting ecosphere that
10:25
went by the name The a Garrius william Show. And
10:29
some of you may be wondering to yourselves, well, if
10:32
you're that same person, why did you decide to end
10:35
the original version of this podcast?
10:37
Speaker 2: And I'll explain.
10:39
Speaker 1: We got all the way up to, if I remember correctly,
10:42
ninety one episodes of the original Agarius Williams Show, and
10:47
it got to a point where I started to feel burnout.
10:52
And I'm pretty sure you've all been in that position
10:54
before in your own life, where you've gotten to a
10:56
place where you've just sat back and said, I don't
10:58
know if I can go any first, Because the one
11:02
thing about this journey when you go on it called podcasting,
11:06
is that when you don't have someone sending across from you,
11:08
or someone sending beside you, or whatever the case may be,
11:11
to debate issues back and forth with this can become
11:14
very very boring after a while, even when you're talking
11:17
about things that interest you now I went scorch stirf
11:22
a lot of those episodes talking about things that were
11:25
of interest to me, and that same thing will be
11:28
in effect for this podcast too. This podcast was not
11:32
curated for snowflakes. So if you're someone, with all due
11:39
respect that's quick to get upset, this podcast will not
11:43
be for you. If you're someone that doesn't like to
11:46
hear your particular political party get ridiculed, this podcast is
11:50
not for you. If you're someone that's a diehard Donald
11:53
Trump fan and you don't like to hear your favorite
11:55
president get criticized, this podcast may not be for you.
11:59
As a matter of fact, I know that it won't
12:01
be for you because we're talking about the biggest political
12:05
stories and sometimes we'll sprinkle in some of the biggest
12:08
cultural stories too. But I didn't come here. I didn't
12:13
start this podcast to make friends. I didn't start this
12:18
podcast to keep friends. As matter of fact, I could
12:24
count to you on one hand how many friends true
12:27
friends I have, and it's not many. And as you
12:30
get older, you start to realize that you don't need
12:32
as many people as you thought you needed. So if
12:36
I offend somebody who I'm friends with with my commentary. Then,
12:42
with all due respect, then this friends Shop is probably
12:45
teetering on the brink of collapse to begin with. I
12:48
didn't come here to spare feelings. I didn't come here
12:50
to tiptoe around the issues. I came here to break
12:54
these things down in an unbiased, unapologetic, and sometimes controversial way.
13:00
Because unlike some of these other people in the podcast
13:03
in space that dubs themselves as fair minded podcasters or
13:07
straight down the middle shooters, I don't have an agenda. Hell,
13:13
I don't even have sponsors, So that tells you everything
13:16
you need to know about this show. This is all
13:20
on my time, which allows me to freedom to say
13:25
the things that some other people just don't want to
13:28
say because they don't want to piss off the people
13:31
who pay them. And to all of you out there
13:35
that may be listening that may want to come on
13:37
board with the Igarius Williams Show as a sponsor, or
13:40
an advertiser, whatever you want to call it.
13:43
Speaker 2: If you're going to.
13:44
Speaker 1: Come on here, and if you think you're going to
13:47
police the commentary that I give, then I don't want
13:51
you a part of this because I have to be
13:54
freely able to speak my mind and if you're going
13:57
to police my thoughts because you're scared that I'm gonna
14:00
run away some people, then this in for you. You
14:03
can take your advertising dollars and go somewhere else with it.
14:08
Because for too long in this country, in the United States,
14:12
we've been bounded by people who wanted us to shut
14:15
the hell up when we had opinions that did not
14:18
match mainstream talking points. Legacy media is dead. They can
14:26
no longer convince us that they have the wherewithal to
14:30
give us the news straight, no chaser.
14:34
Speaker 2: Those days are long gone.
14:36
Speaker 1: Independent media is where it's at when you think about
14:41
the news and how it's being disseminated. People nowadays turn
14:45
to independent media to get their news rather than going
14:49
to traditional mainstream main state media ABC News, NBC News, CNN, MSNBC,
14:55
and Hell even sometimes Fox. Because they're just the propaganda
15:00
arm of the Republican Party. But yet they always are
15:04
quick to claim that seeing n MSNBC and NBC, ABC
15:07
are propaganda arms for the Democratic Party, seeing or Fox
15:13
and Newsmax and One American News there are propaganda arms
15:18
for the Republican Party, but yet try to consider themselves
15:22
to be fair and balanced, so to steal that phrase
15:27
from Fox News. This podcast will be fair and balanced
15:32
because I'm gonna talk about things from the Democratic perspective,
15:36
the Republican perspective, and my own independent perspective. I don't
15:41
belong to either political party because I think both political
15:45
parties are the exact same. They just have to convince
15:47
you and I that that's not the case. Their missions
15:50
are the same, or their mission is the same. They
15:55
want full control over you and I, but they are
15:59
going about different to get that full control. Both parties
16:05
love censorship, but it's always the Republicans that will try
16:08
to tell you that censorship is bad. But they're the
16:12
main ones that are sitting up there trying to get
16:15
people taking off television or taking off the Internet that
16:19
don't agree with what they're saying. Well, the Republicans, they're
16:25
for free speech, They're for a free.
16:27
Speaker 2: Expression and this, that and the third.
16:28
Speaker 1: Well, then why are they so heavily invested in trying
16:31
to block people's access to watch pornography. I'll let that
16:38
question sit there so it can marinate. If the Republicans
16:42
were so for freedom of speech, freedom expression, the First
16:46
Amendment all together, then why are they sitting around here
16:49
trying to ban people's ability to watch pornography. Now they'll
16:55
ban pornography on the guide. So of well, we're doing
16:58
it because we want to pret minors because we don't
17:02
want them accessing pornographic material. That's the start. But we
17:06
know how this will end up. In most cases, it's
17:09
gonna end up by them having us, or it's gonna
17:13
end up with them requiring us to use a driver's
17:16
license to get on the Twitter, to get on the TikTok,
17:19
to get on the Facebook, Instagram, so on and so forth.
17:24
Because you can be exposed to the same pornographic material
17:27
on those platforms that you can on a porn site.
17:35
You think I'm lying, go to any one of those
17:38
platforms and you'll find it. It may not be explicit
17:43
pornographic material, but it is pornographic material nonetheless. So anytime
17:49
that you hear the Republicans talk about how they're so
17:52
against censorship, just think about how many Republican led states
17:56
have led the charge to basically require people to force
18:01
people to show proof of identity to log onto various sites.
18:11
Speaker 2: Think about it.
18:11
Speaker 1: These are the same people who talk about how strict
18:15
they follow the constitution of this country.
18:20
Speaker 2: And yet they're the main ones that are trying to
18:22
force every public school in their respective states to put
18:26
up the Ten Commandments in classrooms.
18:30
Speaker 1: To bring prayer back. And don't get me wrong, I'm
18:35
a man of faith. I'm not the strongest man of faith.
18:39
I'll go ahead and be honest with you and tell
18:41
you that truth. But I also understand that you have
18:46
some people that are agnostic, they're atheists, or they may
18:51
not be Christian. They may be Jews, they may be Muslims,
18:56
they may be Buddhists, they may be a rare other
18:59
real religions. But to sit here and to think that
19:03
most people fall under the umbrella of Christianity, if you're
19:08
a Republican, you have to be sadly mistaken by that.
19:12
And we're always led to believe that, well, if you
19:14
put Christianity back into the schools, then the children will
19:18
get better. I think that it may be high time
19:24
for politicians themselves to get refamiliarized with religion. Because what
19:29
is one of the ten commandments thou shalt not bear
19:33
false witness against thy neighbor, And what are politicians notorious
19:38
for bearing false witness against thy neighbor? Politicians are notorious
19:45
for being liars, but yet they want to legislate morality
19:49
to the rest of us. And let me not forget
19:53
the Democrats. They're always talking about how inclusive they are
20:00
when they're the main political party that will shun anybody
20:04
that goes against any of their talking points. Look at
20:07
how they've been treating John Fetterman, the Senator from Pennsylvania.
20:11
The very moment that John Fetterman came out after Trump
20:14
was elected back on November fifth and said he would
20:17
be willing to work with the Trump administration, that's when
20:19
all of these articles and all these stories came out
20:22
about John Fetterman's ability to be a senator should be
20:25
called in the question how his anger enraged or how
20:30
his anger scared his staff, and all these other salation
20:33
stories that came out about him simply because he showed
20:38
some prospect of wanting to work with the Trump administration
20:43
to make the lives of the American people better. But
20:47
yet this is the same party that always talks about inclusion.
20:51
This is the same party that always talks about we
20:56
need to uphold and protect democracy. But this is the
20:59
same part party that gave Kamala Harris the nomination in
21:03
twenty twenty four without holding a single primary, that wasn't
21:08
even a floor fight at the convention in Chicago last summer.
21:13
But yet this is the party that always talks about
21:15
how Donald Trump is such an existential threat to democracy
21:19
when they're also single handily playing into the hand that
21:22
they claim that Donald Trump is dealing from. This is
21:27
the same party that has no problem with abortion. This
21:31
is the same political party that has no problem with
21:34
guys biological men being in women's sports. This is the
21:39
same political party that tries to tell us that if
21:45
you don't watch out for Donald Trump, he's gonna implement
21:48
Project twenty twenty five. What were the past four years?
21:54
The past four years felt like Project twenty twenty one.
21:59
And yet in so so many aspects, we're still digging
22:01
our way out of the Joe Biden administration and the
22:04
hell that it unleashed on the American people. So both
22:11
of these political parties, they're on the same collision course.
22:14
It's just gonna be interesting to see which one gets
22:17
to the final destination first. They won't full control over
22:21
you and I. They want you and I to bow
22:24
down to their will. They want you and I to
22:26
shut the hell up, Stop asking questions, Stop snooping around,
22:31
because the longer that we stoop around, and the more
22:35
woke we become when it comes to the issues within
22:37
our government, the more problematic we become to those impositions
22:41
of power. As George Carlin so infamously said, it's one
22:46
big club, and you ain't in it. You and I
22:50
are not in the big club. And even though George
22:54
Carlin is gone now, the worst that he spoke nearly
22:57
twenty years ago still resonates.
23:00
Speaker 2: To this very day.
23:02
Speaker 1: The political system in America is one big club, and
23:05
none of us are in it. Democrats and Republicans, they
23:11
always try to come out and play as if they're
23:14
so against each other, but behind closed doors, they're high
23:17
five in each other. They're saying, we got these ignorant
23:19
Americans so full thinking that you and I, but we
23:23
hate each other, when all the while we hate them,
23:27
we're trying to destroy their way of them. But some
23:36
people they'll keep their head buried in the sand and
23:39
they'll still try to convince you that boo. Since the
23:43
government is now being raned by Donald Trump and Republicans,
23:46
these are back to normal, know they or not? There
23:48
was never a such thing as normal government. The founding
23:52
fathers did not intend for the government to become as
23:54
corrupt as it has become today, where a politician could
23:58
go to Washington, DC, broke, he's a joke, and leave
24:01
there with so much money stuffed in their pockets that
24:04
money actually starts flying out of their pockets into the
24:07
streets of the nation's capital.
24:11
Speaker 2: The political system in America is so fucked up.
24:16
Speaker 1: That you could be a flat out democratic socialist like
24:22
Zoron Modanni and damn near coast your way to victory
24:27
in the New York City mayorial race. And Democrats, let
24:31
me be honest with you about mister Mumdani. You guys
24:35
are talking about how well, how did he win the primary?
24:38
He won the primary because nobody was gonna vote for
24:41
that sleazy piece of shit Andrew Cuomo. That's how Zoron
24:46
Mummadani won the nomination. And I don't agree with his platform,
24:51
rent freezes, city owned grocery stores, the version of funding
24:57
from the police to other aspects, and all this other
25:00
stuff that he stands for. I don't stand for any
25:02
of that. But when you've gotten to a point where
25:06
you continue to shove the same establishment Democratic candidates into
25:10
the faces of Americans. They sit up and they say
25:12
to themselves, Okay, what is this other guy talking about. So,
25:19
in all likelihood, barring something unforeseen happening, Zenan Mumdani is
25:23
gonna become the next mayor of New York City unless
25:26
Eric Adams and Curtis sly Will they do something drastic,
25:33
even though you have some people suggesting that Curtis Sliwill
25:35
should drop out of the race so that way you
25:37
can just go down to a two man race between
25:39
Mumdannie and Adams. But when you don't really give New
25:47
Yorkers a good option, a good second option, this is
25:51
the result that you get. Andrew Cuomo, the fact that
25:55
he even thought that he could run for New York
25:57
City mayor and win is laughable after everything that he
26:02
did as Governor of New York to bring New York
26:04
to his knees. Basically, he thought that, Okay, I can
26:07
go to my state's largest city and run for mayor.
26:11
Think about the nursing home debacle during COVID, Think about
26:15
the various allegations of sexual harassment levied against him, so
26:18
much so to where he had to resign as governor
26:20
and hand it off to someone who's been equally worse
26:23
than him, Kathy Hulkel. It seems like Kathy Hochl, JB. Pritsker,
26:30
and Gavin Newsom are in a race to see who
26:32
can be the worst governor in America. And I think
26:37
Newsom and Holcombe they're in first place, respectively, with JB.
26:41
Prisker following close behind in second place. Newsom and Holcomb
26:45
are one A, one B, and Prinsker is just there
26:48
at two. So instead of wondering, or let me rephrase
26:59
this properly, instead of sitting around continuing to wonder why
27:03
mom Donnie was able to win that primary, why not
27:05
ask yourselves, if you're the Democratic Party, why do we
27:09
continue to lose to these people who are so far
27:14
to the left that it makes the center almost obsolete?
27:21
And this is something else that the Democrats are gonna
27:23
have to ponder as more and more time passes before
27:26
the twenty twenty six mid terms. Are you willing, if
27:31
you're DNC leadership, are you willing to embrace more socialism?
27:38
Or are you gonna stand pat and try to work
27:40
your way back to the center. And I think that
27:44
the answer is more of the former than the or
27:48
more of the latter rather than the former. I think
27:51
that you're gonna have to embrace more socialism, especially and
27:56
I do mean this very emphatically a special if Mamdani
28:01
is able to pull a landslide election out of the
28:07
hat come November, if Mamdani wins that New York City
28:11
mayor's race with sixty seventy percent of the vote, then
28:15
if you're the Democratic Party, you would have absolutely no
28:17
choice but to try this socialism movement in other parts
28:20
of the country to see what twenty twenty six could
28:23
possibly be. Once again, I'm not in favor of it,
28:29
but when you've gotten to the point as Americans where
28:31
you've just grown tired of both political parties telling you
28:36
that the top one percent are making it harder for
28:40
everyone else, and then when you get someone like a
28:42
Mamdani coming along saying I'm gonna look to tax the
28:46
one percent or the highest earners in this city to
28:49
the high heavens, and then with the money that we
28:51
get from them, we can diverse it back into these
28:53
other neighborhoods. People start to gravitate towards that. People start
28:58
gravitating towards too freezes, you know, city owned grocery stores.
29:02
That stuff starts to sound good after a while to
29:05
people who still think till this very day that their
29:08
government is fucking them over.
29:14
Speaker 2: You know.
29:14
Speaker 1: Marjorie Taylor Green said it best when she did her
29:17
sit down and interview with Tucker Carlson last week or
29:20
week before last. And I'm paraphrasing what she said, but
29:24
it went along the lines of when people feel disenchanted,
29:28
they start listening to voices that they should not.
29:31
Speaker 2: Be paying attention to.
29:32
Speaker 1: Once again, that was a very bad paraphrasing of what
29:35
she said, and she's right. It's almost like when you're
29:39
in a marriage and you start ladies, when you start
29:43
feeling like your husband no longer cares about you, he
29:45
no longer pays you attention, he no longer makes you
29:47
feel like the most important woman in his life. And
29:51
you go out and you find somebody, somebody that probably
29:54
works with you on your job, and he starts making
29:57
you feel the way that your husband used to make
29:59
you feel.
29:59
Speaker 2: Then that temptation starts to creep in.
30:01
Speaker 1: Then you start wandering to yourself, Okay, maybe if I
30:04
do this one time with him, it'll just knock everything
30:08
out my system. Then one time turns into two times,
30:10
then two times turns into three times, and then three
30:12
times turns into you divorcing your husband and then getting
30:15
remarried to that guy that you started talking to on
30:18
your job. I mean New Yorkers have been through this.
30:25
You look at Michael Bloomberg, you look at Rudy Giuliana,
30:28
you look at it with Eric Adams, and they've been saying, Okay,
30:30
it doesn't seem like this city is getting any better.
30:34
So how about we try Zorn and see what he
30:38
can offer. It's almost like an hour and thirty minutes
30:43
west of me in Jackson, Mississippi. For so long you
30:48
have the same democratic mayors promising the same things. Tackle crime,
30:54
fight blight, bring economic opportunities to the capital city at Dale, Danks, Caine, Diddo, Harvey, Johnson,
31:04
Frank Melton, Leslie Macklamore, chalk Way Lamomba Senior, Tony Arbor
31:15
chalk Way Lamomba Junior. And now you got John Horn.
31:21
I bring up Jackson for this specific reason. Chalk Wait
31:25
La Mumba Senior started this and his son finished it.
31:29
For so long you got tired of democratic mayorage promising
31:32
the same things. And then when you had someone like
31:34
a Chalkwait senior come along and promise those same things
31:38
with a little bit more spice, then that's when the
31:40
voters say, you know what, maybe we'll go in his direction.
31:42
Because one thing we know about Chokwait Sor is that
31:46
he was a civil rights fighter. He was a revolutionary
31:50
as they called. And then when his son got elected
31:53
in twenty seventeen, he was the one that said that
31:57
he had planned on making Jackson the most radical city
32:00
in the United States, and he sure as hell succeeded
32:03
in that because by the time he left off his
32:05
backyard July first, eight hundred and forty three people had
32:08
died under his leadership. I mean, this is the same
32:14
Chockway La Mumba that did not like police, the same
32:19
Chockway Lamumba who lost to John Horn. And speaking of this,
32:24
I'm glad I touched on this to the citizens of Jackson, Mississippi.
32:30
I love y'all, but I have a question for y'all.
32:35
When John Horn won this time around, you guys, one
32:43
of the first things that you talk about, oh, he
32:46
has connections, you know, he has the experience, this, that,
32:51
and the third this was not like John Horn's first rodeo.
32:56
When it came to running for mayor. John Horne had
32:59
ran for mayor previous times before, and the same leadership,
33:03
the same connections, the same experience that y'all toughted when
33:06
it came to him in twenty twenty five. He had
33:08
that same stuff with him when he ran in two
33:11
thousand and nine, when he ran in twenty fourteen, and
33:14
when he ran in twenty seventeen. John Horn all three
33:18
previous times was in the Mississippi Senate. John Horn all
33:22
three previous times had connections to the legislature. Those same
33:27
three times that he ran, he had connections to the
33:29
Mississippi Senators. But it took you guys until twenty twenty five,
33:36
two horrific years of Chalkway Lamomber Junior's leadership, to finally
33:40
realize that, Okay, maybe this John Horn guy won't be
33:43
too bad, but in some aspects, you guys have to
33:47
see how bad Chalkway would be as mayor to understand that, Okay,
33:51
we cannot give this guy a third term. And honestly,
33:54
you guys shouldn't have gave him a second term. Chalkwait
33:59
was just bad. So I'm just puzzled about this whole
34:07
John Horn thing. Every time you see someone that lives
34:11
in Jackson King interviewed and they're asked about John Horn,
34:15
I'm so excited about what he can do. He has
34:17
the connections, he has, the experience, so on and so forth.
34:23
This was not John Horn's first time running from mayor.
34:26
Those same things that y'all love to talk now, you
34:29
could have been touting them back then and it could
34:31
have saved yourself a lot of the hardship and despair
34:36
that you had to suffer during the two years or
34:40
during the two terms of Chalkway Lamoma's leadership of the
34:43
capital city. Like I said, I love y'all, I do
34:49
raw Mississippians at the end of the day. But I
34:52
just wish you guys would have looked in John Horn's
34:55
direction when he ran the first three times, and I
34:58
get it when he ran in twenty fourteen the Duyd
35:01
he had turned some of y'all off when it came
35:03
to him, but nevertheless, he was still there. He was
35:05
still a viable option. Harvid Johnson was a disaster. I
35:14
still think to this day that Tony Yarboro wasn't ready
35:17
for that opportunity now. Had Tony Yarboro had had he
35:21
ran in twenty twenty one or twenty twenty five, I
35:23
think he may have gotten. But when Tony Yarboro ran
35:26
in fourteen, I don't think he was ready for it.
35:30
And Frank Melton, Frank Melton was as controversial as they came.
35:34
I mean, this is the same mayor, you know, God
35:36
rest his soul, that he gets into the Mayor's office
35:42
and he starts riding around the city in the Jackson
35:46
Police Department Command Unit vehicle and he has a badge on,
35:51
and he has a gun, and he's ripping down houses
35:54
on Ridgeway Street.
35:55
Speaker 2: And all this other stuff that he was doing.
35:57
Speaker 1: And he got to the point where he had the
36:00
trial and he got found not guilty because the jury
36:03
came back home.
36:05
Speaker 2: That was Frank Milton. And then when two thousand and
36:09
nine rolled around, his time for him to.
36:10
Speaker 1: Run for mayor a second time, he lost to Harvey Johnson,
36:16
and sadly the night of the primary he passed away.
36:23
But anyway, I say all that to say this, getting
36:27
back to the original point, I don't know how effective
36:33
of a mayor Zoran Mamdannie will be. What I do
36:37
know is that when you have a large group of
36:41
people who've become so disenchanted with government, they're willing to
36:45
listen to anybody who's willing to promise them what they've
36:49
been hoping.
36:50
Speaker 2: To hear for.
36:52
Speaker 1: Or hereabout why do you think Obama was so successful
36:56
in two thousand and eight? Obama was successful in two
37:00
thousand and eight because he wasn't George W.
37:02
Speaker 2: Bush.
37:03
Speaker 1: Obama was successful in O eight because he wasn't John McCain.
37:06
Obama was successful in O eight because he wasn't Hillary Clinton.
37:10
What I'm simply saying is that Obama wasn't a part
37:14
of the higher echellent of elitism when he ran for
37:18
president the first time. Now, this Obama post White House
37:23
is a completely different person. I mean, when he ran
37:27
the first time in eight, he was a junior senator
37:30
from Illinois who wild everybody with his we are the
37:36
United States of America speech at the two thousand and
37:38
four Democratic National Convention in Boston. So, in some very
37:46
polarizing political times, we all can agree to that. But
37:51
what makes these times even more polarizing is when you
37:55
take a look at the current administration that occupies sixteen
37:58
hundred Pennsylvania Avenue. So, when President Trump was running for
38:03
the White House last year, what was one of the
38:05
key things that he promised in order to win over
38:08
voters that his administration would be one of the most
38:11
transparent administrations in the history of this country. And I
38:14
have a question to all of you Trump supporters out there.
38:18
Do you think the President of the United States of
38:21
America and his administration have lived up to their promise
38:24
of being the most transparent administration in the history of
38:27
this country. I'll answer the question for you, absolutely not.
38:31
Why do I say that? In order to understand where
38:35
this conversation is about to go, Let's go back to
38:38
this past Sunday, fourth of July weekend. Sunday, it was
38:43
reported by Axios that a two page memorandum had been
38:47
going around the Justice Department indicating that Jeffrey Epstein number
38:52
one did not kill himself or Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide,
38:57
and number two that there is no quote un quote
39:00
Epstein client list. Now, why is this so important? It's
39:05
important because the Attorney General of his country, Pam Bondi,
39:11
went on Fox News back in February and she was
39:14
asked by John Roberts about the Epstein client list, and
39:20
she said, these are her words, that it is sitting
39:23
on my desk waiting to be reviewed. Those were her
39:27
words back in February. Now, this same woman wants us
39:33
to all believe that there is no client list. And
39:37
it's Dan Bongino and Cash pattail over at the FBI
39:41
who want to convince us that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide.
39:47
Back on August tenth of twenty nineteen, I smell a rat.
39:53
This whole thing is bullshit, and you guys know it.
39:57
You guys know that it is. They're not fool anybody
40:01
with this charade, because they were the ones, especially Bongino,
40:07
when he had his podcast, he was the main one
40:10
talking about we should not let this story die that
40:14
Jeffrey Epstein did not he didn't commit suicide. Somebody killed
40:18
Jeffrey Epstein. Now he gets to the damn FBI and
40:21
he's asked the same question and he's, well, you have
40:25
to believe me. I'm not paid to tell you what
40:28
I think. I'm paid to tell you the facts. Jeffrey
40:31
Epstein committed suicide.
40:32
Speaker 2: I saw the file.
40:34
Speaker 1: That's what he said on Fox News. He said it
40:38
on Hannity's show that he saw the file, and the
40:42
file explicitly stated that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide. Now we
40:48
all know that Jeffre Epstein did not commit suicide. Jeffrey
40:52
Epstein was killed to protect some very powerful people who
40:57
were associated in his sexual expose as his sexual liaisons,
41:04
if you want to call him that, because Jeffrey Epstein
41:07
was accused of partaking in sexual activity with minors on
41:12
his island, an island that was visited by some of
41:16
the most powerful people on the face of this planet, presidents, princes, philanthropists,
41:29
the whole nine yards, the whole shebang. Why is this
41:35
still so important? Somebody may be asking. It's important because
41:41
maybe it's time to finally get to the nitty gritty
41:44
of this entire thing. And this is where I'm gonna
41:48
piss off a lot of Trump supporters, But maybe it's
41:52
time to get to the realization that Donald Trump is
41:55
more part of the Epstein files than he wanted us
41:57
to believe. And so his Justice Department, in order to
42:02
spare their boss any humiliation, was like, you know what,
42:05
let's just say that there's nothing in these files. Let's
42:08
just say they never existed, and if I'm wrong about that,
42:14
I'm wrong. But I don't think that I am. I
42:16
believe that the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump,
42:20
is heavily implicated in the Epstein files. That has to
42:27
be what is holding this up. Well, it's not holding
42:31
it up anymore because the Justice Department just basically slammed
42:33
the door and said, don't ask us anything else. It
42:35
was interesting today at a cabinet meeting, a reporter asked
42:41
Pam Bondy about what she had said back on Fox
42:44
News in February, and before she could even answer the question,
42:47
that's when Donald Trump chimed in and said, why are
42:49
you still asking about jeffre Epstein?
42:51
Speaker 2: That creep. I'm paraphrasing what he said, but it went
42:53
along those lines. If there is.
42:55
Speaker 1: Nothing to hide, if you want the American people to
42:58
finally start having trust in the government again, then you
43:01
would have let Pam Bondy and Cash Bettil and Dann
43:04
Mangino do whatever they had to do to show the
43:06
American people that they were serious about wanting trust restored
43:11
in governmental agencies. But you know what, you can blame
43:19
Cash Battail to a point, you can blame Dan Bungino
43:22
to a point. You can blame Pam Bondi to a point.
43:27
You can even blame the President of the United States
43:29
himself to a point. But the people who are solely
43:33
responsible for this are the people who continuously beat us
43:38
over the head last year with the same old.
43:41
Speaker 2: Tired talking point.
43:43
Speaker 1: If Donald Trump gets elected, he would be a much
43:45
better president than Kamla Harris. Now, I believe that in
43:49
the election of twenty twenty four, there was no right
43:51
or wrong answer to the question of who should have
43:53
been president, because both of them were equally bad in
43:56
their own right. So let's go ahead and establish that fact. Now,
44:01
both of them would have been not so great. That
44:05
election was the epitome of the expression the lesser of
44:08
two evils, and it still is yet to be seen
44:12
whether or not we chose the right evil. All we
44:17
heard last year was if Donald Trump gets back in
44:21
there the second time, he's gonna be able to go
44:25
in there and not make the same mistakes that he
44:28
made the first time. In Lord and Behold were seven months,
44:30
nearly seven months into this kerfuffle, and now some of
44:34
the same stuff that was spout it the first time
44:37
is being spouted the second time, because now you have
44:40
so many people that are calling for the immediate resignation
44:44
of Pambondi, Cash Betel, and Damn Mangino. Well, lord and behold, Lord,
44:49
have mercy. I thought you guys told me and all
44:53
of us for that matter, that if Donald Trump gets
44:55
back in their second time, he would make better personnel decisions.
44:58
What it seems like is that Donald Trump doesn't have
45:01
a great eye for picking administrative talent.
45:04
Speaker 2: That's what it seems like to Meat. Now.
45:08
Speaker 1: I never thought Pam Bondi should have been Attorney General,
45:12
and it is pretty clear to see why Donald Trump didn't.
45:15
Speaker 2: Pick her to begin with.
45:16
Speaker 1: Matt Gates was his original option, but we saw how
45:19
fast that got pushed down the tube.
45:23
Speaker 2: Cash be tail.
45:25
Speaker 1: He sits up there and talks about how he wants
45:28
to restore trust and accountability at the FBI, and he
45:32
is sure as hell felling at that mission. And Damn
45:35
Bungino once again, the same guy that sat up there
45:38
on his podcast talking about how the deep state needs
45:41
to be held accountable. That's all that they talk about.
45:44
The deep state, Deep state, deep state, Sure as hell,
45:48
seems like some of y'all are implicated in the deep state,
45:52
because if you were, this stuff would be out. Look
45:57
At how fast Tulca Gabbert had to get on let
46:01
me phrase this right. Look at how fast Touci Gabert
46:04
had to get back in line, or how fast Donald
46:06
Trump put her back in line when she testified in
46:10
front of it was either the center of the House
46:12
back in March or April, that she didn't believe that
46:17
Iran was using their enriched uranium to build a nuclear weapon.
46:24
And then the very minute that Donald Trump gets up
46:26
and says that he believed that Aram was using their
46:30
enriched uranium to build a nuclear weapon. And he was asked, well,
46:33
what about what Tulci gaber said, And he said, I
46:36
don't care what she says. And yet you guys are
46:39
trying to tell me that he did a better job
46:42
this second time around when it came to putting his
46:44
cabinet together than the first time. He just doesn't have
46:47
a good eye for talent. Every time you see Pam Bondi,
46:52
she looks like she's just woking up from a three
46:54
hour nap. Every time you see Cash Betail, he's blinking
46:59
like he's being held. Every time you see Damn Mangino.
47:02
He's looking like he's just drunk the strongest ghost energy
47:05
drink that has ever been made. And yet you guys
47:09
are trying to tell me this is the great cabinet
47:13
that he put together when he won back on November fifth.
47:16
So many heavy hitters in this cabinet. That's what you
47:20
guys continue to sell that this cabinet is the best
47:24
cabinet ever put together.
47:25
Speaker 2: Yeah, no shit.
47:26
Speaker 1: When it comes to putting a blindfold over the American
47:29
people's eyes and trying to convince us that something is
47:31
not there when we clearly see that is there. The
47:36
mere fact that they continue to insult our intelligence when
47:42
it comes to this Jeff Repstein thing should be enough
47:46
to have all of them removed from office because this
47:50
is treasonous what they're doing. How can you sit here
47:55
and definitively say that we don't see any reason to
47:59
believe that jeffre Epstein was that he was not killed
48:05
by somebody else. And then to try to cover their asses,
48:09
what they did is that they put out the video
48:12
and you could clearly see that about ten minutes of
48:14
the original video was cut out, and they claimed that
48:17
that was the video showing that nobody went into Jeffrey
48:19
Epstein's cale around their lage time that the suicide happened.
48:26
Here's the question that I have. If Jeffrey Epstein was
48:33
a high commodity prisoner, so to speak, why would he
48:38
have something in his cell that he could use to
48:41
commit suicide. If you have somebody like him in prison
48:47
charged with some of the things that he was being
48:49
charged with, you would not have anything in his cell
48:53
that he could then use on himself to induce death.
48:59
That's what I've always found strange about this. And Jeffrey
49:02
Epstein's been deceased now for six years, or almost six
49:06
years next month to make it six years, and yet
49:14
they always wonder why people have become so conspiratorial. People
49:18
have become conspiratorial because they don't believe what the government
49:22
has been trying to paint. And it all started with
49:26
President Kennedy's assassination back on November twenty second of nineteen
49:31
sixty three, and since that time, every major event has
49:35
had some conspiratorial aspect attached to it.
49:38
Speaker 2: The moon landing, people don't believe that was real. Nine
49:41
to eleven.
49:41
Speaker 1: Some people believe that our own government had a hand
49:44
in that. This is Jeffrey Epstein, then you have some
49:46
people believe in that he was working for the massade
49:49
aka the Israeli CIA. I was thinking about this morning,
50:01
and I want to say this right now because I
50:03
think of the add a little bit more context to
50:05
this whole conversation. The Democrats have all been talking about
50:12
how the Big Beautiful Bill, the big spending tax cuts
50:16
bill that was passed last week, how it is going
50:19
to derail the Republicans in twenty twenty six once the
50:22
American people understand what's in it. I would happen to disagree.
50:26
I don't think the Big Beautiful Bill would be the
50:29
undoing for the Republican Party. I think this whole Jeffrey
50:33
Epstein thing will be the undoing because this was the
50:38
same group of people that told us that once the
50:40
once the adults got back in the room, things will
50:43
be different. And it doesn't seem like things are different.
50:48
It's the same thing, just with a different person in charge.
50:53
It's almost like at your job, when your horrible boss
50:56
gets fired, they bring in someone else and he or
50:59
she is equally worse than your old boss, and you're saying.
51:02
Speaker 2: Well, things don't change.
51:04
Speaker 1: Things just states or the more things change, the more
51:07
they stay the same, because this guy or this girl
51:10
is just as bad as the last boss that I had.
51:16
And yet what's so interesting is that the Republicans, especially
51:21
those in the House, they have all the time and
51:25
all the energy in the world to investigate this Biden
51:28
autopin thing. But I wish like hell that they had
51:32
the same energy to get the Department of Justice to
51:36
unseal whatever evidence is left when it comes to the
51:40
Epstein files, including the client's list, because we know that
51:43
there is a client's list, and I wouldn't be surprised
51:48
if Pam Bondi and Damn Mangino and Cash Bettail if
51:53
they're not directing people at this very moment to get
51:56
rid of the evidence so that way they can say, look,
52:00
here's the file. There's no client list, there are no
52:02
flight longs. All that stuff is just a figment of
52:05
you guys's imagination when we know that that's bullshit served
52:09
up on a shish kebab. What you guys think would
52:17
love to hear from you? What do you guys think?
52:19
Is there this great, big conspiracy with the Trump administration
52:23
to suppress the truth because they don't want their boss
52:28
interjected into this, or do you guys think that maybe
52:33
for the past couple of years, we've all overreacted and
52:35
there is quite frankly, literally none of this quote unquote
52:39
smoking gun evidence that we all believe is there. And then,
52:45
to make it even worse, you get Caroline Leavitt up there,
52:49
and she reverts back to the same press secretary that
52:55
Donald Trump and his people claim that they got tired of.
53:00
Karine Jean Pierre is the worst press secretary in the
53:02
history of this country. And then when you get and
53:06
then when you get Caroline Leavitt up there, and she's
53:08
asked about Jeffrey Epstein, this whole DJ thing. She's up
53:12
there sweating like a whore in church.
53:18
Speaker 2: Funny.
53:18
Speaker 1: And I think that before you went into office talking
53:26
this big game, you should have sat back and realized
53:28
the ramifications of what you were going to potentially think
53:31
about doing. Like, for an example, if I chose to
53:37
go to a restaurant, I'll use Dave's Hot Chicken for
53:40
an example, even though I don't have one in the
53:42
town that I live in. If I went to Day's
53:45
Hot Chicken today, knowing that as I've gotten older, my
53:52
tolerance for hot stuff has started to dwindle. If I
53:55
went there and ordered the Carolina Reaper, the hottest chicken
54:00
strip that they had, knowing that I have to sign
54:04
a waiver, and I eat the whole thing in order
54:07
to I guess whatever, If I know that I can't
54:11
do it, why would I choose to do it anyway?
54:14
And then I'm sitting up there, My damn life is
54:17
flashing before my eyes because this thing is so hot,
54:22
and I'm just doing it for what, just because I
54:24
wanted to, because I thought.
54:25
Speaker 2: It would be cool to do.
54:27
Speaker 1: I'm posting on TikTok and get ten million people to
54:30
look at it. That's what this felt like. Get people
54:36
talking about it, get people interested in it, and then
54:40
slap them in the face and tell them, well, nothing
54:42
to see here, go back to whatever you're doing. They
54:47
got time to investigate the covid leaku and how that
54:49
happened with that lab and Wuhan, as I stated earlier,
54:53
they got time to investigate Joe Biden, that auto pen scandal.
54:58
They got time to investigate all this other stuff. But
55:01
when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, all the cases closed
55:04
on that. Nothing more to see, Yeah, right, there's a
55:07
lot more to see. But you guys are gonna suppress
55:10
this because you don't think that the American people are
55:15
mature enough without revolting, to understand what's in those files.
55:21
That's what this really boils down to. They don't think
55:23
you and I are mature enough to understand what took
55:27
place with Jeffrey Epstein and some of the people around them.
55:35
So the next time that Donald Trump comes out and
55:39
he talks about the fake news media and Joe Biden
55:44
being asleep at the wheel and all this other stuff, Honestly,
55:48
if you haven't already, you should take everything he says
55:50
from this point forward a grain of salt. It goes
55:53
in one ear and comes immediately out the other, because
55:56
not only has he lost credibility, but it's entiremistration has
56:01
lost credibility. No wonder why every time you see Donald
56:06
Trump and Marco Rubio, Marco Rubo looks like he wants
56:08
to get the hell out of Dodge and a lot
56:10
of people saying, well, no, that's just the stress of
56:12
him running all these various agents. Now this Marko Rubio
56:15
realized that he fucked up leaving the Senate to become
56:17
Secretary of State. Last time I seen Marco Rubio look
56:23
somewhat happy in his job was when he and he
56:27
accept and Trump went over to the NATO summit and
56:30
the UH the General Secretary of NATO, when he called
56:36
Trump daddy, and the reporter asked him about it, and
56:39
Marco Rubio just could not help himself and he just
56:43
busted out laughing. That's the last time I saw Marco
56:47
Rubio look happy at his job. Marco Rubio didn't like
56:50
he was happy with his job. When Zelenska came to
56:52
the White House and they had that big meeting. You
56:54
don't have the cards. You don't have the cards. You're
56:58
playing with world War three. Remember that's what Trump told
57:01
the link. You're playing with world War three, and a
57:04
lot of people are going to get killed, a lot
57:06
of Russians and a lot of Ukrainians if things don't
57:08
change quickly. That's what he told them. And now look,
57:16
the very same president that scolded Volodimir Zelinski in the
57:20
Oval Office is the same president that announced here's recently
57:26
that the United States will continue to supply arms to
57:29
Ukraine in their ongoing fight against Russia. Because this is
57:34
a president who realizes that Vladimir Putin is playing him
57:38
like a fiddle.
57:40
Speaker 2: That's what this is.
57:42
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is getting Donald Trump is getting played by
57:46
Vladimir Putin. And anybody who doesn't see it just doesn't
57:51
want to see it. At this point.
57:54
Speaker 2: This is the same.
57:54
Speaker 1: Vladimir Putin who's been outsmarting United States presidents since Bill Clinton.
58:01
Even though Bill Clinton, well, if Vladimir Putin became president
58:05
of Russia May seventh of two thousand, Bill Clinton left
58:09
off as January twentieth to twenty twenty, or he left
58:12
office January twenty of two thousand and one, so he's
58:17
he's been out smarting Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump the first time, Biden,
58:23
and now Trump the second time. So that's five American
58:27
presidents that Vladimir Putin has been out smarting. Look at
58:31
what happened in Chechnya, look at what happened in Georgia,
58:34
look at what happened in Crimea, and look at what's
58:36
happening in Ukraine. And yet we're supposed to think that
58:40
Donald Trump's gonna be the one that's gonna finally rein
58:43
in Vladimir Putin. And then there's always this thing that
58:47
Trump loves to say Putin would have never invaded Ukraine
58:53
if I had been president instead of sleep at Joe Biden.
58:56
What you failed to realize, sir, is that the whole
59:00
time you were president, the first time, from seventeen to
59:03
twenty one, that's when Putin was doing the planning. Why
59:07
do you think the invasion went off without a hitch
59:11
when it was first initiated because he spent the whole
59:15
four years that you were president the first time, planning
59:17
for what he had eventually turned around to do in
59:19
February of twenty two. Steven Wonder could even see that
59:24
that's the case. But to make yourself feel good about it,
59:28
you have to continue to convince yourself that he would
59:30
have never done this if our president yet, and I
59:36
would have never and I would have never won the
59:41
lottery if I continued to sit at home and not
59:45
play the tickets. That's a horrible analogy. I don't want
59:48
you guys thinking I won the lottery.
59:50
Speaker 2: I wish I.
59:51
Speaker 1: Could, but I haven't just yet. It would be nice,
59:54
but gotta keep waiting. And plus I don't spend money
59:57
on lottery tickets anyway, so I can.
1:00:00
Speaker 2: He bunked that.
1:00:05
Speaker 1: So what have we learned so far in this episode
1:00:10
that both political parties are basically fucking us over.
1:00:13
Speaker 2: That's what we learned.
1:00:15
Speaker 1: And until we all and when I say all, I
1:00:20
do literally mean all, when all of us wake up
1:00:25
and we finally start realizing that our government is pissing
1:00:28
on our leg and convincing us that it's raining, we'll
1:00:33
continue to get fucked over. But if we all rise
1:00:36
up and say we've had enough of this, then we
1:00:41
will finally see the change that we need to see.
1:00:47
Why do you think Elon Musk this past weekend announced
1:00:50
that he's starting the America Party Because even Elon Musk,
1:00:55
the world's richest man, realizes that the two party system
1:00:58
in America is as erupted as they come.
1:01:02
Speaker 2: And now you have Trump.
1:01:03
Speaker 1: Supporters sitting around saying, see, I knew it was something
1:01:05
about Elon, like Elon's a snake, But you guys were
1:01:10
singing Elon's praises when he decided to join the Trump
1:01:13
campaign in twenty twenty four. You guys are the ones saying, man,
1:01:18
if we were able to poach Elon from the Democrats,
1:01:20
then you know things have gotten bad over there. And
1:01:23
now that Elon has gotten upset with the President because
1:01:26
of the big beautiful bill.
1:01:28
Speaker 2: Now you guys are saying Elon can kick, saying.
1:01:31
Speaker 1: We didn't vote for him, We voughted for Trump, knowing
1:01:34
all the while that some of y'all only chose to
1:01:36
vote for Trump because of the Elon must endorsement, the
1:01:39
same way that some of y'all only chose to vote
1:01:41
for Donald Trump because of the Joe Rogan endorsement, because
1:01:43
of the Theo vonn endorsement and endorsement, the same way
1:01:52
that some Democrats only chose to vote for Kamala because
1:01:55
Megan is Stallion endorsedter Ushering Doorster, Cardi b and Doorster,
1:02:00
Lebron and Dorster.
1:02:03
Speaker 2: People are swayed even.
1:02:05
Speaker 1: Though they may not want to admit it at times
1:02:08
by celebrities that they claim they don't worship. Speaking of
1:02:14
celebrities that they claim they don't worship. And by the way,
1:02:19
I don't think that Elon's I think Elon's doing something
1:02:22
that could easily make headway, especially if he gets the
1:02:26
right kind of if he's able to get the right
1:02:30
people behind him to do this. Political party, Oh, the
1:02:35
Republicans are gonna be sweating bullets because the reason why
1:02:39
they're truly mad with Elon and starting this third party
1:02:42
is that they realize that Elon's third party would be
1:02:45
a direct hit at them. They already realized that they
1:02:47
have slim majorities in both the House and the Senate,
1:02:50
and if Elon is able to get some political savage
1:02:54
people behind him with this American Party and they're able
1:02:58
to start running in some of these more competitive Senate
1:03:01
and House racist that's what scares Republicans the most, that
1:03:05
Elon could steal their thunder and they don't want that.
1:03:11
But anyway, Diddy, Um, I would be quite honest with y'all,
1:03:20
When the Diddy verdict came out, I wasn't surprised. I
1:03:26
just I wasn't.
1:03:27
Speaker 2: Now. Do I think that Diddy is a sexual deviate? Absolutely?
1:03:32
Do I think Diddy is a freak? Absolutely?
1:03:36
Speaker 1: Do I think the government did a good job of
1:03:38
proving racketeering and all these other charges.
1:03:40
Speaker 2: Absolutely not. Diddy was only found guilty on.
1:03:45
Speaker 1: Two of the five counts, and those two counts basically
1:03:49
stemmed from providing transportation to engage in interstate prostitution.
1:03:56
Speaker 2: They couldn't prove the nexes of the Rico case.
1:04:00
Speaker 1: And from what we've been hearing from legal experts, there's
1:04:04
a strong chance that Pee Diddy will not serve that
1:04:07
long in jail. Now, we do know that if Diddy
1:04:10
is sent to jail and by the time he comes out,
1:04:12
Diddy's reputation will never recover from this. Diddy can't go
1:04:17
in the studio and make an album and rebound. Did
1:04:20
He can't go out and buy anything and own it
1:04:25
because people don't want to do business with him. Diddy
1:04:27
will basically become exiled. That's where this whole thing stands.
1:04:34
Diddy will frankly become exile from society. So I wasn't
1:04:42
surprised by the verdict. Do I think it was a
1:04:46
letdown to those victims who were actually victimized by Diddy absolute,
1:04:53
But it's very interesting to hear how people are crying
1:04:56
Foule saying the justice system didn't work. Again, when has
1:04:58
the justice system ever been fair? You get you got
1:05:01
a you got a little money, you got a little
1:05:04
influenced the just Department to do. The justice system in
1:05:07
this country will do you so many favors that it
1:05:09
will not be funny, which is why we all kind
1:05:13
of had to have the interpretation in our heads that
1:05:16
Diddy would get off. When it came to I realized
1:05:20
what I just said, We all kind of realized that
1:05:23
Diddy would be acquitted of three of the more serious
1:05:28
charges while the two lesser charges stayed. My question is,
1:05:37
and this is a question that is a very serious question,
1:05:39
I do think. So let's just say, for the sake
1:05:43
of argument, Diddy's sentenced to some months in jail. The
1:05:48
multi million dollar question that you're host, Garrius Williams has
1:05:55
will Sean Diddy comes a ka, p Puff Daddy, Puffy
1:06:02
Daddy Diddy whatever. Will did he be able to get
1:06:08
his baby all back? Like, That's the question that I have, because, Hey,
1:06:13
if you're the government, y'all had a chance to prove
1:06:16
your case, but you didn't do a good job on
1:06:18
those more serious counts. So does did he get his
1:06:22
baby all back? And if you're Diddy's lawyer, do you
1:06:29
try to fight the government to get it back?
1:06:34
Speaker 2: Poor lord?
1:06:35
Speaker 1: We live in some crazy times and they're only gonna
1:06:37
get crazier too. Sometimes you got a smile to keep
1:06:41
from going complete Sometimes you have to smile and laugh
1:06:47
to keep from going completely batshit crazy because of some
1:06:50
of the things that are being done. By those in control. Anyway,
1:06:56
one last thing I want to touch on and then
1:06:58
I'm gonna wrap this up. I was thinking about the
1:07:02
whole Jeffrey Epstein thing. We all remember when Pam Bondy
1:07:09
the three hour nap looking Attorney General, when she invited
1:07:15
those social media influences to the White House and she
1:07:20
gave them the binders of what she called Phase one
1:07:24
of the Jeffrey Epstein file document release, and those influences
1:07:29
came out of the White House, they were granted it
1:07:30
as if they had just left a bar that was
1:07:33
offering three dollar wings and free drinks until midnight, and
1:07:38
they were holding the binders up. They were smiling from
1:07:41
ear to ear like I just said, like they just
1:07:44
left the place like b Dubbs with the Happy Hour special,
1:07:49
only to then find out that that was it. And
1:07:53
what made this situation even more sadder was that when
1:07:56
those influencers found out that nothing in those those binders
1:08:00
were new material, they felt like they had been duped. Like, Pam, seriously,
1:08:07
you told us that this was gonna be stuff that
1:08:11
the people had never seen before. And of course they
1:08:16
when they found that out, they they went on about
1:08:19
their business. So Pam Bondi deserves to be fired. Cash
1:08:28
be telling Dann Magino deserve to be fired. But here's
1:08:32
why they won't be fired, because their boss is just
1:08:35
as complicit as this as they are. Anybody who does
1:08:39
not believe that Donald Trump is complicit in the Justice
1:08:42
Department turning the other cheek when it comes to Jeffre
1:08:45
Epstein has to be sadly mistaken.
1:08:48
Speaker 2: Donald Trump is in on this, and it's not hard
1:08:51
to see.
1:08:53
Speaker 1: Just go back and look at that press conference from
1:08:55
earlier today when that reporter was asking Pam Bondy about
1:08:59
what she had said on news back in February, and
1:09:01
Donald Trump jumped in there before she could even answer
1:09:04
and told the reporter, why are you still asking questions
1:09:06
about Jeffrey Epstein. Donald Trump wants to spike the football
1:09:12
because he wants us to focus on what he did
1:09:15
when it came to bombing Iran, what he did when
1:09:18
it came to getting peace between Iran and Israel, temporarily
1:09:23
getting peace between South Sudan and one other country in Africa.
1:09:31
The tariffs and the big beautiful bill and audiences. All
1:09:34
that stuff is distraction, just like he wants people's attention
1:09:40
to be diverted towards Texas with the flood, which he's
1:09:42
not wrong for that, but you have to wonder deep
1:09:45
down does he want our attention diverted towards what happened
1:09:49
in Texas so that way we can stop asking questions
1:09:51
about Epstein and what I find so haneous or heinous
1:09:59
about all. Now I'm gonna close with this, is that
1:10:03
you have some people in conservative circles like Megan Kelly,
1:10:10
who is somewhat I was about to say somewhat shocked,
1:10:14
who is somewhat surprised that this thing is not turned
1:10:18
out the way she wanted it to. And she's not
1:10:21
upset because the Epstein documents haven't been released. He's upset
1:10:24
because she went out there and campaigned for Donald Trump
1:10:27
and now she's walking around with egg on her face.
1:10:30
On her show yesterday, she was talking about how Dan
1:10:35
Bungino would never lie to the American people about this.
1:10:38
If you stop being naive and wake up and smell
1:10:42
the coffee, you realize that damn Mongino is just as
1:10:44
compromised as everybody else. This Trump administration reeks of corruption,
1:10:49
just like every other damn administration has come through Washington, DC.
1:10:54
Speaker 2: And all this talk about the swamp, the swamp, the swamp,
1:10:57
the swamp.
1:10:59
Speaker 1: In closing, it is hard to defeat the swamp when
1:11:03
you have people in your administration who are knee deep
1:11:06
in the very thing that they claim that they were
1:11:09
brought to Washington to root out. And with that being said,
1:11:13
ladies and gentlemen, that'll wrap up the very first episode
1:11:16
of the revamped Garius Williams Show. Want to thank you
1:11:19
all once again for listening. However, and wherever you may
1:11:22
be listening, we'll be right back here again with a
1:11:24
brand new episode next week. So until then, you guys,
1:11:26
continue to enjoy your day, continue to enjoy your weeks,
1:11:29
they say, take care of God bless Until next time
1:11:32
we're out Peace,