Latest / Man in America Podcast / James Roguski Interview: URGENT W.H.O. Moves to Crush U.S. Sovereignty

Transcript

James Roguski Interview: URGENT W.H.O. Moves to Crush U.S. Sovereignty · Man in America Podcast

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to Man in America. I'm your host, Seth Holehouse. So the World Health Organization is just about to vote on a motion that would shred our constitutional rights. We've all suspected something sinister behind the COVID nineteen agenda. But what if its true purpose was to permanently hijack US sovereignty?
• 0:23
  Today, I'll be interviewing James Roguski as he reveals how public health may soon become the Trojan horse for a globalist takeover. Now folks, if you're not following me on social media, I highly recommend follow me on Telegram Truth Social. My account is man in America. I'm most active on those two places. They're so far the free and uncensored locations.
• 0:46
  So please go follow me on there. If you're watching on YouTube or Facebook or any of the public platforms, at least come over and watch me on Rumble. Rumble has stood up for free speech. And if you're watching on Rumble, make sure you subscribe to my channel so you can get these shows. I do live videos every Tuesday and Thursday at 2PM eastern.
• 1:07
  Folks, today's show is brought to you by Rise TV. Rise TV is literally the reason I can do Man in America full time. With the big tech censorship and the inability to make money from their platforms, they've made it really tough for people like me with a mission to tell the truth. And that's why we built Rise TV. Because folks, right now, we're at war, and it's an information war.
• 1:28
  And man in America, this is how I'm fighting. So on Rise TV, we have a massive content library. At the end of every show, we always have an after show. We do a q and a over there. So if today you wanna ask our guests today some questions after the show, we do that over on Rise TV.
• 1:44
  There's a link for a free trial in the description below the video. You can come sign up. Check it out. I hope you stick around. And folks, look, as you'll see in today's show, I think we have some shaky times ahead, and a lot of folks are looking for ways to protect their wealth.
• 1:59
  I'm always one that's been recommending physical gold and silver. Now that Putin has backed his ruble with gold and there's rumors that China will soon follow, Combine that with the hyperinflation of the dollar. Honestly, I believe that gold and silver are one of the safest assets to get through the turbulent times ahead. For this, I'm confident in recommending Noble Gold. You can buy gold or silver with them directly, or you can do what's called an IRA transfer, which they specialize in where they allow you to transfer your assets from your IRA into physical gold and silver that you will own with no penalties and no taxes or fees.
• 2:34
  So if you want to learn more about this, go to goldwithseth.com, or you can call (877) 646-5347 to speak with someone right here in America. Again, it's goldwithseth.com, or call (877) 646-5347. Alright, folks, so as you're gonna see today, there is some serious, serious stuff happening with the World Health Organization that threatens the sovereign rights of every individual, not just in America, but all across the world. So I'm going to start with a list that was written up by my guest today on his blog that highlights what is potentially going to be happening with the World Health Organization, and how this will affect their control over our country directly. So I'm bring this up for you.
• 3:22
  So here we have this is what James has written on his blog. It's the World Health Organization is attempting a power grab. So I'm gonna go and read through this just to help you understand what we're talking about today. So most people have never heard of the International Health Regulations, the IHR. The United States agreed to the IHR in 02/2005.
• 3:43
  Folks, these regulations override and supersede the US constitution. You heard me right. So on 01/18/2022, the United States submitted a number of amendments to the IHR that serve to give away even more of our sovereignty and to greatly empower the World Health Organization to restrict your health related rights and freedoms. The seventy fifth meeting of the World Health Assembly will be held in Geneva, Switzerland, this May. The assembly will vote on the amendments to the IHR.
• 4:18
  These are they're very likely to pass and be enacted into international law unless we, the people, stand up against this tack on our attack on our sovereignty. These amendments to the international health regulations do not need to be approved by two thirds of the US Senate. No. We have already agreed to obey the IHR by virtue of our membership in the UN and the WHO. We have already given away some of our sovereignty.
• 4:45
  These amendments are designed to confuse the member nations into giving away even more of their sovereignty. So folks, what this means is that if this goes through, the World Health Organization would be able to declare emergencies in any country. So what we saw the past couple of years, we saw our constitutional rights being stripped away by corrupt governments and politicians. This would allow the World Health Organization to play that role and declare lockdowns, forced vaccinations, any number of these things that represent a medical tyranny under the guise of public health, even in your local city in America. This is a big deal, folks.
• 5:29
  So I'm gonna go ahead and bring on my guest today, who is an author and researcher and someone who is fighting back against what's happening. So let's go ahead and welcome James Roguski. James, thank you so much for joining us today.
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: Thank you very much for having me. I'm glad we got all the little technical difficulties straightened out. I'm so happy to be here. And you adapted just in the last half an hour to, you know, a realization that the discussion of the pandemic treaty, the proposed pandemic treaty, which, you know, many people haven't heard of, but many people have, in my opinion, because I've been down that rabbit hole big time for a month, I realized that while it is a, you know, a threat off in the future, at this moment in time, it's a decoy, it's a distraction, like much that is in the news. Your attention is pulled over here when when somebody is actually doing something over there.
• 6:27
  And I I used to manage a nutrition store, and it was a small store. We never really had any problems, but you you were made aware just from a security standpoint that if somebody was causing a ruckus in the back of the store, products could very easily walk out the front of the store. And that's what this pandemic treaty is. It's it's the commotion that everybody's paying attention to while the amendments were designed to they were, submitted back in January. They were never published to my knowledge, and I looked really hard on any, government website.
• 7:03
  They pretty much disappeared. They popped up quietly on April 12 on the WHO website, and no news media coverage at all. Okay? I saw them for what they were. I started raising, you know, the alarm bells that, you know, this is something that people need to know about.
• 7:23
  I think what their plan was to have it pop up somewhere between, May during the World Health Assembly in Geneva. And like Nancy Pelosi said, you know, just vote for it and you can read it later. I think that the delegates from all around the world are walking into a trap that they don't realize has been set for them, where, you know, maybe they'll be told, you know, these are great. These amendments are wonderful. We need these things.
• 7:51
  Just vote for it. Don't worry about it. Don't read it. And there's a six month period afterwards where the nations much like if you buy something online, and you could return it if it's not, you know, what you really really wanted, there actually is a six month period where all a 94 nations could say, well, you know, we we looked at these things and we don't want them. It's gonna be far easier to raise the alarm in these next two weeks before the assembly and and alert people that you really you really do wanna read these things.
• 8:25
  It's horrible. I've met with, you know, a team of, legal professionals. We cannot find one redeeming word in here. These these amendments are just absolutely pure evil in my opinion. But very simplistically, I I think that they could be seen by history as the, formative document of the great reset.
• 8:50
  Because essentially, it takes sovereignty away from a 94 nations and gives that power over to the World Health Organization. And as I said, you know, to you just before we, went on air, the Roman time definition of a dictator was the person who was given complete power during an emergency. So by definition, you can't have dictatorship unless you have emergency. And what these amendments are doing is making it so that at the whim of the not director general of the WHO, but the dictator general, there would be no check on the dictator general's, ability to give, you know, declare a public health emergency of, international concern anywhere in the world at any time. And so the expectation would be we're always in a state of emergency.
• 9:51
  There's always this, you know, emergency powers being spread, and then that cascades down if the World Health Organization declares a public health emergency of international concern, then in The United States, the secretary of health and human services could declare a public health emergency for the whole country, and then the governors declare emergencies in the counties and cities and, know, everywhere down the line. It's just emergency emergency emergency all the time. I don't know about you, but, you know, I'm not scared right now. It doesn't feel like it's you know, we just had a tornado or or a hurricane or a flood or or an earthquake. The emergency is over, but the powers are still there.
• 10:35
  Speaker 1: So am I do I understand it correctly that we joined this the IHR, the International Health Regulations back in 02/2005. And so what's happening now is that there were some amendments that were introduced, which basically go from saying that the the WHO, if it if it's an agreement with the country, together they can make these decisions, that got basically edited out to now say that we're going to be giving the WHO full power to not only declare these public health emergencies, but then to implement actions such as lockdowns, forced vaccination, etcetera, that we're handing over that to them to enforce globally. Is that correct in my understanding?
• 11:23
  Speaker 2: That's that's mostly correct, but I'd like to add some details. The specific amendments simply to the first part that you said, where there's literally a line that crosses out one sentence, and we talked about that, where currently, as you said, each nation is sovereign. And if the WHO is negotiating with the nation, you know, oh, you've got some kind of, you know, health related problem going on here. If the nation says get out of here, the WHO has to put their tail between their legs and and and leave. There's nothing they can do under the current regulation.
• 12:01
  The current regulations, I don't have any problem with with that aspect of it. It it should be not by some one size fits all, you know, universal, governance. It it it should be local. Right? And so they wanna take that away and give 100% of the control of the declaration of an emergency over to the dictator general of the of the WHO.
• 12:29
  Now where a lot of people get confused is what that does is it then is connected in laws in each country, and we can get into exhibit g to get into the details about this at some point if you want. The United States changed their definition years ago in preparation for this. They they got into lockstep before this is even happening, where one of the newly defined, regulatory cover for a declaration of public health emergency in The United States says if the director general of the WHO merely makes a recommendation, and that could be, yeah, you guys ought to wear masks because something's going on. That's enough for our regulatory's definition for our secretary of health and human services to declare a nationwide public health emergency. And what to be super clear, it's each nation and each state and each province and each county that are busy as we speak, putting in some of the most outrageous, you know, quote unquote regulations or laws.
• 13:49
  They're trying to pass, you know, the craziest things here in California. So the amendments on an international level are are on one way, you know, it's just flipping the switch of switching the control from the nations, individual nations to the WHO, and then it just cascades downward. And, you know, I I'm in touch with people in Ecuador, and, you know, the regulations that they've put in there are just absolutely frightening. So each country is gonna do their own thing, you know, maybe states like Florida will, you know, be a little different than Texas and California and New York, but it's the triggering of the emergency that people who are in those positions of authority, you know, governors and health commissioners, oh, they love the power that comes from, you know, declaring an emergency.
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
• 14:46
  Speaker 2: And, you know, it's it's complicated, but yet it's simple. The amendments shift the control from a 94 individual nations to this one body, and the director general is set to be, you know, I think, coordinated at this assembly. He's up for reelection, but he's unopposed. You know, we hear about that all the time in Banana Republic or, you know, North Korea or whatever. I I think that their plan was to vote him into office unopposed for another five years and just hand him the keys to the kingdom.
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: So where does the constitution come into place with this? Because I live in Ohio, for instance, very conservative I
• 15:31
  Speaker 2: grew up in Ohio.
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: Oh, great. Yep. And I think about locally, how can some guy over in, whether it's Geneva, wherever they're headquartered, make a rule that is going to change my way of life and even force medical decisions upon me? So how does this I mean, when The United States agreed to abide by this, and I know that you said that Obama made some changes just before he left office, did the federal government or did key people in our government basically sell us out to the World Health Organization, these globalist organizations, and say that, you know, we're gonna sign this permission over to you that in the right time in the future, you can come in, and we're gonna agree on behalf of the people to let you just bypass our constitution.
• 16:23
  Speaker 2: I do my best to stick to facts, and I don't try to ascribe intent or my opinion. And the beauty of what I've got going on here is, you know, I have the evidence. And so to answer your question with, you know, factual precision, in exhibit g, and you don't have to pull it up, there's just a little, excerpt there, you can see where they published in the Federal Register a change in the language. There's a whole bunch of words that they changed the meaning of. It's really it's classic 1984 news speak.
• 16:59
  You think you know what a word means, but it doesn't mean what you think it means because they just put in regulations that change the definition. And so it's kinda easy to find this stuff, actually. You just look for where they change the meaning of words, and it's a pretty good clue that something, you know, fishy is going on there.
• 17:15
  Speaker 1: Actually, here's here's exhibit b And
• 17:19
  Speaker 2: and so this is what I mentioned earlier. They changed the definition for, you know, how we could declare a public health emergency. And it literally is if the director general makes a recommendation. And, you know, it's mind boggling. It's like, if this person says so, then, you know, we're gonna have an emergency.
• 17:45
  And those changes along with a couple others that I'll mention, one of them is kind of amusing to me, they changed the definition of an ill person. K? Now I can accept that you wanna define, you know, what it is when someone is ill. Okay? And there's a handful of different things that they use for the, thing that makes sense, you know, you have a fever, all that sort of thing.
• 18:06
  But one of the definitions of an ill person for purposes of quarantine is you could quarantine someone who meets these criteria, and the criteria are the person is warm to the touch, they have a headache and a stiff neck. So since we're in the middle of a public health emergency right now, and if you're traveling and you get off the plane and you're hot and you go, oh, man, I got a headache, my neck is stiff, you're you're an ill person. You could be quarantined under the regulations. It's that absurd. K?
• 18:40
  The other thing that they changed is in the international health regulations. The international health regulations as they stand, I feel do a better job of defending my bodily autonomy, you know, my my my person, my my my body, myself. And it's considered to be invasive to have something stuck up your nose as part of a test, you know, like, if you're traveling and they wanna do a PCR test. The international health regulations say that, you know, you have to give your permission. They can't be mandated or forced.
• 19:13
  And the Obama administration, on their last day in office, changed the definition of an ill person, changed the definition of a public health emergency, and changed the definition of what an invasive test is. And before Trump came into office, they made it so that, oh, yeah, we could stick something up your nose, you know, nothing you can do about it. Now, I I wanna be clear that regulations are you know, it's witchcraft, it's spell work, it's it's wordsmithing. They don't truly have the force of law, but they really have a strong illusion that is cast among upon people. It's not like congress took those recommendations and debated them on the floor and and passed a a law with all these regulations in there.
• 20:00
  They never actually passed it into positive law, and it clearly, you know, doesn't fit with our rights under the constitution. But if you are hypnotized, and and, honestly, I think this is what happened has happened with the media, I've accidentally written many times World Health recommendation or I'm sorry, International Health recommendations, because I know inside myself that that's all they are. They they do not carry the course of law. But if people think that these regulations are actually an obligation, if you've been hypnotized to where you watch the news and you hear Fauci or you hear the WHO make a recommendation, if your mind translates that into something subconsciously where you think you have to just because somebody says so, you gotta read the law, and you gotta understand that a recommendation doesn't have the force of law over you.
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: But That's why I think we're seeing what we the past couple of years we saw that that it wasn't just the individuals where they say, well, the the my state's health director came out and said that we have to do x. They don't think about that. No one carries around the constitution in their pocket. Right? Well, some patriots do.
• 21:21
  Right? So that it seemed like that's what this is doing is it's just this permission. It's giving these people this mental permission to carry out these acts, carry out these lockdowns, these mandates. And the problem, and this is why it's so important with what you're doing, is that we the people don't see through it because we don't, you know, they're not covering this on Fox News. Because if enough people said, Hey, that's not constitutional, then that would be enough to stop what they're doing, but but but people are just following along blindly.
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: And and even beyond constitutional, it's just not defined. And I'll digress just a tiny little bit because it's a story that I think people will relate to. A month or two ago when the, newest supreme court justice was going through the nomination process, they asked her to define the term woman. And I was just pulling my hair out. I wish I could have been her adviser and sitting next to her because what I would have advised her to say is, well, senator, if if you all ever get around to passing a law that defines the word for the purposes of, you know, some title in in in The US code, then as a supreme court justice, she would be able to take the details of the case and use the legal definition of the word in regards to the case at hand.
• 22:45
  Well, you know, a supreme court justice had their opinion on the common everyday definition of any word is just as important as yours or mine. They're supposed to deal with legal definitions, and if she had just said that Interpretation of law. Yeah. There is no law. There is no legal definition of the word woman.
• 23:03
  And so to play off on that, whenever I hear Fauci or someone say, well, you know, we have a pandemic, and we gotta get all these vaccines into people's arms because they're safe and effective, and we have all these cases. I go, could you find where those words have any legal meaning whatsoever? It's just talking smack. It's just talking. There's no authority in any of those words.
• 23:32
  There's no legal definition. But because people are hypnotized by the media, they just comply even though it's it's not even about being unconstitutional. It's not in the law. And, you know, who reads the law? Well, that's all I did.
• 23:49
  I didn't hack anything. I'm I'm I'm not a hacker. I'm I'm not Snowden. I I didn't have a contract and get, you know, private, you know, top secret information. I'm not Assange.
• 24:00
  I didn't have somebody, you know, give this to me. I just went on the Federal Register, and I went on the WHO's website, and I read documents that make your head, you know, turn into spaghetti that's all stuck together, but I've got enough of a background to be able to see through the bullshit and and just go, wait a minute. This sure looks like it's resetting sovereignty from a 94 nations, giving it to the WHO. I I think this is the founding document of the great reset. And I think we can stop it just by shining some light on it, because, you know, nobody was ever supposed to see it.
• 24:41
  Speaker 1: So that leads me to one of the questions I have, which is on you on your blog, which I will share so folks that are watching, I'll share this on social media afterwards. But if you even if you search for James, and it's Roguski, r o g u s k I on Substack, Right? You can find it. You have a wealth of information on there. But you talk a lot about there in different places about how you believe this is setting the stage for the one world government.
• 25:10
  This is moving us into that. So how do you see is this a Trojan horse? Is the medical the medical tyranny? Is it something they're sneaking this into that will lead us into this place where we can be centrally controlled, you know, the world over? How do you make sense that what do you see coming out of this?
• 25:30
  Speaker 2: It's an interesting question. And the best answer I can give is a Trojan horse. I wasn't there at the time, but my understanding of the story is that they wheeled it in and everybody saw it coming in. Okay? This is more like a Trojan horse that, was from Star Trek, and they just beamed it in.
• 25:48
  Okay? That you were not supposed to see this being wheeled in. Alright? Now that we can see it, the analogy would be as if they tried to, wheel in the Trojan horse, and and you could see that there were soldiers inside of it, okay, as I as I understand the story to go. And so it's it's something that was meant to be we were all meant to be distracted by these ungodly horrible things that they're talking about with a pandemic treaty.
• 26:23
  The discussion of the pandemic treaty is something that I will do just a little tiny bit today just because you asked, and and and we'll talk about it so that I can make it clear that that's not what we're talking about. Okay? A month prior to finding all this information, I was going down the rabbit hole of the pandemic treaty. And if you wanna if you wanna read about it, it's the longest article you'll ever read. You'll never get to the bottom of it Connect it to all of the documents that they've produced.
• 26:52
  There there's millions of words, and there's weeks worth of videos. You'll be there forever. Don't read my pandemic treaty article. Okay? Maybe sometime in the future when we win this battle, you can go see what they were plotting.
• 27:08
  But I published that after probably being down that rabbit hole for a month, and I kept researching, and then I came upon the amendments to totally different body of work, the International Health Regulations. It's a 84 page PDF. And you asked me a question a little while ago, and I'll I'll answer it now. It was
• 27:37
  Speaker 1: It looks like we lost James there. Oh, there we go.
• 27:42
  Speaker 2: Okay. Good. Someone was trying to call me. I'm sorry. I'm on my phone.
• 27:45
  Speaker 1: Oh, I thought that was Tedros and the WHO's pressing this big red button.
• 27:50
  Speaker 2: No. I'm glad it was I'm glad it was just a phone call. I'll call them back, which leads me to this. I'll come back to that idea. Here's my phone number folks.
• 27:58
  It's (310) 619-3055. Don't call it right now, we're on the show, but if you have any questions, call me. I'm that serious about this. It's that important, and I've met some of the most wonderful people, present company included, who are concerned about this as they darn well should be. And so the pandemic treaty is a horrific beast of a thing that gets people's attention, but the reason why it's being presented is they didn't want anybody to see that this was just underground, it's gonna get voted on in, at the assembly in Geneva from May, And then there's a six month period, you know, for implementation, but it's also a six month period, and this is a very unusual legalistic situation.
• 28:52
  Every single country can just reject the amendments. All they have to do literally, it's like, you know, getting a note from your doctor or getting a note from your mom, you know, to play hooky. If the delegations after the amendments pass, or, you know, we hope they don't pass, but if they pass, every country can just write a notification to the WHO, and say, No thanks, you know, we don't want this. And it's astonishingly simple, but it's going to be an enormous battle to wake people up to demand that. But we're lucky because now everyone knows that that's a possibility.
• 29:31
  And so there's probably a couple of questions out there that you've asked me now, but with the conversation, I've missed something, bring me back to whatever might be a question that you have.
• 29:41
  Speaker 1: Sure. So one of the big questions just as an individual in America, it's we know we know how to affect our local governance, know, we have the midterms coming up or out voting in the primaries. How do we affect what's happening at the UN? Mean, I don't recall voting anybody into power to represent The United States at the United Nations. So, A, I guess there's two questions is, what can we do as an individual, as someone that is not very tech savvy?
• 30:11
  Or that's one question. But B is, how did these individuals even get into power to represent us on such important issues without us even being aware of it?
• 30:23
  Speaker 2: Well, that's a darn good question. And we didn't even talk about that. So kudos to you for asking good question. That's actually the next article that's coming out on on my blog. I'm gonna be sharing that with a a number of lawyers today.
• 30:38
  That very question is the heart of the question, and it ends up being an Abbott and Costello routine. If you've ever heard the Abbott and Costello routine from decades ago, it was about a baseball game, and the name of the baseball player who was on first base, his name was who, Right? And so the skit goes, well, who's on first? And then the answer is yes. Right?
• 31:01
  So, you know, who is responsible for, you know, starting this whole procedure? Who is responsible for writing these amendments? Who benefits from, you know, shifting sovereignty from nations to the WHO? Well, those aren't questions, those are statements. And just like to skit, the who benefits from all of this, and so that's really the root source of of what's happening here.
• 31:29
  And so not a % sure if I answered your question directly. You were asking?
• 31:38
  Speaker 1: No, that's helpful, but actually that leads to another question before we get into what people can do. You know, with looking at how the WHO benefits from this, you know, one of
• 31:47
  Speaker 2: the people represents this? Yeah, yep. We don't know. Nobody on earth knows. And and that's what the legal action that we're discussing is gonna be is, now, just hold on, wait a minute.
• 32:00
  And so I've been digging into, the foreign, affairs, protocols and and things like that. And so you had asked me a question a little while ago. If anybody says the word treaty, you have to realize that in American legal system, a treaty is defined by something that has been approved by the senate and signed by the president. This is not that. Okay?
• 32:29
  The international health regulations actually go back far before the 02/2005 that you mentioned. They got the name international health regulations in 1969, but they actually go back like a hundred plus years. I mean, it it's it's an agreement which is different than a treaty. And and, you know, you get into a bunch of legalistic stuff, but presidents and and the secretary of state, they can make agreements. You know, think of the Paris climate accords, think of the Iran nuclear deal.
• 33:06
  It never got approved by the senate, so it's not a treaty. It's an agreement. And so the international health regulations, my understanding from what the research has showed shown is it's a sole executive agreement. And what that essentially means is, you know, the president told some diplomat, okay. Great.
• 33:31
  You can go sign for the country. Right? And so that administrative protocol of, you know, who is going to the who to speak in our name, none of that information of how these people were chosen and how they were given the authority and, you know, there's been no public comment. There's been no public discussion. The senate and the congress haven't voted on this.
• 34:00
  I I kinda think we actually have them, you know, right where we want them in that they've broken their own protocols to try to sneak this through quietly. And, hopefully, you'll see some lawsuits popping up or, you know, filings with the Supreme Court, essentially to say, look, you can't do that. You know, you can't just pretend to have authority and pretend to speak for the nation and go and do this. And, you know, quite frankly, if they do, the least of the crimes committed would be, administrative malfeasance, but the worst is treason. And, you know, define it however you want.
• 34:42
  Writing an agreement, negotiating an agreement with other countries, because many other countries voiced their support for this almost immediately after, sorry, people call me, and that's wonderful. They voiced their agreement and support like days after it was submitted, which tells me, you know, they obviously knew what it was in advance. That sure sounds like treason to me. And it's not just The United States, we're we're the country that submitted it to the WHO, and I see it as a trap for the other, you know, 94 countries, 93 countries plus one that, you know, have they read it? You know, I've had friends, it's actually the person who was calling me, people in Ecuador have helped to translate this into eight or nine languages, and then other people in Germany and Portuguese, and the the WHO hasn't even met their fundamental obligation of translating this into the six languages that they say they support.
• 35:54
  So countries around the world have no idea what their delegates are walking into. You know, I believe that our Congress or, you know, our house and our senate, call your congressperson, call your senators, and say, look, do you know about this? You should be pissed off. You're supposed to give advice and consent. These quote unquote diplomats are are not properly voicing the will of the people through Congress.
• 36:23
  What are you going to do about it? You want to be elected in November? You better speak up about it, because this sure looks like, you know, global treason.
• 36:33
  Speaker 1: And that bring you bring up a good point getting into what people can do, And I want to point people towards your website where you've got I'll pull up the page here. This is your your Substack page. This is so again, folks, just James Ruguski. So I'll post this on Truth Social and Telegram afterwards. But James has an entire page here on his website called Sound the Alarm.
• 36:56
  And this has all of these steps of what you can do. It gives you this activist toolbox, which is fantastic. There's videos here, but it literally shows you exactly how you can take action. You know, what I've gathered from the information you put together, James, is that the most important thing that people can do is to get this information out to as many people as possible. And so this video so I came across you on SGT report.
• 37:24
  My wife was actually listening to SGT and she goes, Seth, you got to listen to this. And she was he gave his phone number. She says, call up this James guy, get him on your show. And so I called you and said, Hey, James, like, want to have you come on my show. This is an important message.
• 37:38
  So I think that's the biggest thing. I'll let you talk about that. But from what I'm seeing with this, the most important thing that people can do is to share this video, share your website, you've got materials people can download and print off and share those. So why don't you talk a little bit about what people can do to help affect this situation?
• 37:57
  Speaker 2: Well, you know, step number one is don't believe me. Okay, the evidence is on the website. It's on my Substack, but I have a lot of articles, and so to make it easy, if you go to don'tyoudare.info, as in don't you dare give away our sovereignty, right, don'tyoudare.info, not Com, .info, and no apostrophe on the don't. That'll take you right to the evidence. Okay?
• 38:21
  Read it for yourself. It'll hurt your brain, but I've tried to clarify it, you know, in video form and and and summary form. If you're ready to take action, go to stopthewho.com. That'll get you right to the activist toolbox. And, you know, different strokes for different folks.
• 38:43
  If you're a social media warrior, boy, there's a lot of stuff you can share. Could be sharing all day long, all night long. There's tons of videos, tons of articles, tons of graphics, so forth and so on. If you want to call your elected officials, and I'd like to expand on that actually, think out loud, if you will, which people out in the world have jobs where they've been asked to swear an oath to defend the constitution. Okay?
• 39:20
  Certainly military people, certainly elected officials, certainly, you know, possibly policemen and other things. Anyone who's sworn an oath to defend the constitution, when you inform them of what is potentially a treasonous plot to give away American sovereignty to a corrupt corporation, because the WHO is a corporation, they're under an obligation to defend our country against that potentially treasonous action. So scratch your head and go, who do I know that may have sworn an oath to the Constitution? I was speaking to somebody earlier today who was in the military, is now, you know, a veteran, considered a veteran, but the oath continues. He swore the oath, and it's not like they undo the oath when you leave.
• 40:10
  It's a lifetime thing as far as I understand. And so election season is coming up, and so let's just use one example. You know, everyone is going to be being asked to vote in primaries or in the general election for House of Representatives or for your Congressman, you know, possibly for senators, and there's going to be an incumbent who may be running, and there's going to be all of the candidates who are opposing that incumbent. Reach out to each and every person who's running for office, give them this information, give them a day or two to let it sink in, call them back up and go, hey, what are you gonna do about it? And if they do something, maybe they deserve your vote.
• 40:54
  If they don't and same thing with, you know, alternative media, you know, by all means, you can tell the big news networks about this, and I wouldn't expect any comment from them. But, you know, you saw something on SGT report, and you called me up, and here I am. You're doing your part to spread the word. You're a force multiplier. However big your audience is, you're one person, I'm one person, so we got two people telling however many this audience is, and everyone who's listening to this, I encourage you, make this be his biggest video ever because it's worldwide.
• 41:33
  You know, maybe your audience is predominantly in The United States, but if you know somebody who knows somebody who knows somebody, you know, I've gotten calls from people in Uganda, and South Africa, and Malaysia, and Singapore, and Europe, all around Europe, and Ecuador. This affects the entire world, and so, you know, don't keep this video to yourself. Share it with everybody. Get on your phone, start with the A B C D E F G, and just text the link to this video to everybody. Get out your email address book, and send it to absolutely everybody, and just say, Hey, have you seen this?
• 42:11
  What's your opinion about this? And don't get into trying to explain it to them. Let the information speak for itself, let the evidence speak for itself. There's a difference between awareness, and I pronounce this word differently than most people, ignorance, right? You've probably heard ignorance is no excuse, right?
• 42:35
  Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Well, it's properly pronounced ignorance. The law is the law, and if you know what the law is, and you ignore it, well, bad on you, okay? If you're unaware of what's going on, it's kind of hard to blame people because they just didn't know, and people mix up, They think ignorance means you don't, you're not aware. Ignorance actually means you're aware, and you don't give a crap, and you don't want to do anything.
• 43:02
  So in this particular case, there's actually a law, and it's one of the articles on my blog, called Misprision of Treason. And for anybody who knows of a treasonous plot, if you keep it a secret, you're actually guilty of a different crime, which is keeping that plot secret. It's called mispervision of treason. So I've put all your audience into a bit of a pickle. You're legally obligated to inform the authorities that you know that something's up.
• 43:34
  So do your civic duty, do your patriotic duty, and don't keep this a secret because actually keeping this a secret is a crime.
• 43:44
  Speaker 1: That's that's rare. I've never been able to legally compel my audience to share the video. There we go. So I've got I've got one more big question I want to get into. And then we're going to be jumping into the q and a.
• 43:58
  And but I just want to tell folks that if you want to join us for the q and a, it'll be over on Rise TV. I'll pull that up for you. So Rise TV, there is a link in the description below where you get a free trial. It's our streaming platform. It's by Patriots for Patriots.
• 44:13
  We have a lot of fantastic content over there. And if there's a like I said, there's a free trial if you want to stick around at $10 a month. If not, I understand I know gas prices are outrageous and you know, Biden's not helping us at all with that. And so if your finances are tight, I understand which is why I continue to do this content on the public platforms as I do. But if you want to support what we're doing, joining Rise TV is the number one way to do that.
• 44:38
  So we will be over there shortly for the q and a session of this. But one question I have. So I interviewed an author named Michael Sanger. And he wrote a book which you probably would find fascinating, basically describing how Xi Jinping and China through their control of Tedros, who actually the CCP in many ways put him into power. And so Tedros is in many ways a puppet for the CCP as are a lot of people in the UN, the WHO, etc.
• 45:10
  But this author Michael Singer in his book revealed how it was actually the World Health Organization became an arm of the Chinese Communist Party that was used to lock down the entire world to implement all these things to basically crush the whole world under the weight of the COVID pandemic, which goes it really is rooted in their, you know, their warfare tactics of China. So do you think that what we're seeing with this in any way ties back to China that this is you could say that we're handing over a lot of our rights to the World Health Organization. But to me, like, the even bigger concern, especially if you look at what's happening in Shanghai right now, is that we're handing over our rights to the worst communist regime that the world has ever seen.
• 45:58
  Speaker 2: It's a little bit different than that, because what this really is, is legalized fascism, and people get the terms mixed up. Fascism is when corporations and government work together hand in hand. And so, you know, I haven't been to China. I don't think there are actually too many communes still kicking around, okay? What you're dealing with are corporations.
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: Concentration camps there.
• 46:30
  Speaker 2: You're dealing with massive somewhere along the line, in my opinion, and I like to distinguish fact from opinion, and you're kind of asking me, you know, to give an opinion, and I'll be happy to do that, but I want to clarify, it's an opinion. I want to focus everybody's attention on the evidence and the facts about what we've been talking about. It's my opinion that quietly China shifted from being purporting to be communist with communes. Okay? You know, the state owns everything.
• 47:01
  Well, you know, they're really morphed into a fascist society where the government and the corporations work hand in hand to crack down on the people. And you just got to listen to Benito Mussolini's definition, fascism is the combination of corporate power and government power. And we see that everywhere in the world, United States, across the board. People mistakenly, in my opinion, forget what communism commune. Okay?
• 47:33
  We're dealing with what could be the foundational document of a world fascist takeover. So I think it's fascism. People want to, I think mistakenly refer to it as a communist takeover, the issue is not what name you give it. Okay? It's the combination of corporate power and government control putting their boot on the head and the neck of of common everyday people.
• 48:06
  And I think we can all agree that by whatever name you wanna give it, that's what's happening. The the common person is being abused by corporations, and by mind control government. Okay? And so I haven't read the book that you're referencing. I trust that, you know, there's things going on that, you know, I'm unaware of that you may have researched, but it seems very very clear that this is not about health.
• 48:39
  There's not a single word in these amendments that talks about, you know, any kind of essential medications, or nutrition, or early treatment, or any of that sort of stuff. It's simply about control mechanisms, and they talk about global governance. The amendments to the international health regulations don't say a damn thing about anything to do with curing some disease or maintaining health, it's all about how can we grab more power and more control, and I encourage people to read as much as you're, you know, you can handle, but don't get stuck by paralysis by analysis. You know, read enough to realize that, you know, Obama changed a bunch of definitions the day before Trump got into office, and one thing we skipped over, which is Exhibit A, you don't have to bother pulling it up, people can do that at home. In 1948, when The United States joined the WHO, literally I found the place where Harry Truman and the Speaker of the House and the President Pro Tem of the Senate signed the joint resolution on 06/14/1948, where The United States joined the WHO, and you know, like, hey, we want to work with the entire international community for the health and benefit of everybody, but it literally says there in the clearest clearest English, We'll join, but there's nothing that is in your constitution of the WHO, and there's nothing that you can recommend that forces us to do anything you say.
• 50:20
  And if people would just read section five of that joint resolution, and realize that our terms of service, when we join, our terms of agreement, when we join the WHO, is we'll join, but you can't tell us to do anything, period. And that's even reflected in Article 61 of the International Health say that again, the International Health Regulations, which are really recommendations, even if they pass these amendments, we can just say, No, thank you. We reject those amendments, not for us, you know, if other countries in the world don't wake up, then they'll be stuck with it, but we just have to wake up and realize that we are free people, and they only get away with telling us what to do if we let them.
• 51:11
  Speaker 1: That's such a good point. So we're going to now head over to Rise TV for the q and a. Actually, I just saw the first question I want to get to pop up from Metal Avenger who says, Do you think criminals like Tejros and Gates will finally be exposed and arrested in the near future? So we'll get to that in a second here in the q and a portion. But I want to ask you before we get off the public platforms, if you want to let people know where they can follow you.
• 51:36
  Are you active on social media? I know that you've mentioned a few websites, which is StopTheWho, so stopthewho.com and don'tyoudare.info. No apostrophe don'tyoudare.info. So where else would you recommend folks find you or get in touch with you? Or if you also if want to give your phone number again, people can call after the show's over.
• 51:59
  Speaker 2: Yeah, wait. My phone number is 310, I live in California, three one zero six one nine three zero five five. I would ask that you review the information on the websites, because, you know, it's all prepared for anyone to just look through it, and if you get to a point where you've spent some time, you've watched the videos, you've read the documents, and you have a question, by all means call me. Most of the phone calls that I get are, what can I do? How do I help?
• 52:26
  You know, this is crazy. I get it, I see it, you know, what do we do? And you know, the answer to that is really very simple. Spread the word, you know, stopthewho.com, don'tyoudare. Info.
• 52:37
  My Substack with everything on it is jamesrekuske. Substack dot com. It's not about me, it's about the information, and so if anyone out there has the desire and the ability to steal all of the information that I have, you know, borrow it, copy it, repost it, blog it, take the videos, take them down, copy them, put them up on your channel, write your own articles, I don't care if you credit me or whatever, the information needs to be duplicated. I don't think I'm going to have any trouble with this, because I'm not bringing fake news, It's just government documents that are being discussed. And so by all means, please take anything you think that is of value, and share it, copy it, post it on your own platforms.
• 53:31
  And if you're creative, whatever it is you're creative for. If you're musical, write a song about it. If you're a graphic artist, do some graphics. Of the graphics that we have, you can actually put your image behind the transparency, and put your own quote. You can make your own graphics with the tools that we provide on the Activist Toolbox, which runs shop.who.com.
• 53:58
  And so, be creative, be proactive, spread the word like crazy. We caught them before they were going to try to put their hands in the cookie jar and have every nation be all confused, and give away our sovereignty. It's not just The United States. If you know somebody who knows somebody who knows somebody who lives overseas, wherever it may be, we have to wake up the world with this, and I think this is a very clear, easy to understand red pill. And if anything's gonna red pill the world, it's the WHO trying to snatch everybody's sovereignty and create, you know I I refer to them as the World Hypnosis Organization, and Tedros is going to be coronated for his second unopposed five year term.
• 54:48
  You know, they want to make him be the dictator general. And so I think the question mixed in there somewhere was, you know, Bill Gates or Tedros going to be charged with the crime and put away? Well, this crime is documented. It's an attempt at treason, and so are we going to be able to nail, you know, those two people? You know, they're so hidden behind the scenes, you know, how do you chase the strings from the puppets to the puppet master?
• 55:21
  I'm not saying that's easy, But they're not going to get away with this one, because now everyone's going to know about it before they even try it.
• 55:30
  Speaker 1: That's a yeah, I agree. It's a very good point. So, Dom, you can go ahead and cut the public streams. We're going to now jump into the q and a. And so you've already you've already kicked off the q and a with answering that question.
• 55:42
  So the next question I have for you, this is from Supu, who says, do the World Health Organization and the World Economic Forum work together?
• 55:53
  Speaker 2: I will say that I will give you my opinion, because those are not bits of evidence that I have on my website that I can point to. Oh, hell yeah. You know, that's my opinion, duh. Of course they do, but, you know, go out there and do your own research, and bring back some documents, and put them up on your website, and, you know, that's just not some place where my energy has been, But you know, without a doubt, of course.
• 56:23
  Speaker 1: Here's actually, this is from Lunasma who says, Could you give us a little more information about yourself and your background?
• 56:31
  Speaker 2: I'll give you the two minute version. I'm 62 years old. I just had a birthday, Sunday or so ago. I'm wonderful day. You.
• 56:41
  And interestingly enough, it took me sixty two years to realize that as a I'm born in the sign of Taurus, right, the bull, and I realized why I'm so good at recognizing bullshit when I step in it, okay, and so that's my bad joke for the day, but I was born in Ohio, I was a good student, I was valedictorian in my class, I went to Brown University, Ivy League school, and I dropped out. Didn't finish because I realized I was being lied to. Was being indoctrinated. And so
• 57:15
  Speaker 1: Looks like someone may have called James. Let's see if he pops back in. Told people not to call you till after the show's over. Let's see. Let's give him a second to come back in.
• 57:31
  Speaker 2: Can you hear me?
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: Yep. There we go. Yep.
• 57:35
  Speaker 2: Yeah, people, don't call now. Give me a few minutes to get through this. I'll talk to later. I knew I was being indoctrinated, so I dropped out of school. I worked as a carpenter.
• 57:43
  I fixed up old homes. I had a change of life, came out to California, and I managed a couple of nutrition, mom and pop nutrition stores. I wrote a book about twelve, thirteen years ago now. I've always given it away. It's YourDoctorIsAliar.com.
• 58:01
  You can have the book for free. If you know if you've ever heard the word cholesterol, I can guarantee you've been lied to. It's just a total scam. You know, that's just a pile of bullshit that I was talking about twelve years ago.
• 58:14
  Speaker 1: I So you must if you wrote a book called Your Doctor is a Liar, you must love Fauci.
• 58:21
  Speaker 2: He's not my doctor. Okay. And so, over the past ten years, I've had a number of websites on a multitude of topics. And this past January well, I'm sorry, this past February, I got an email from my website company that I'd been using for a dozen years, and all my stuff went bye bye. And I realized at that point I was being reassigned, and that something new would be coming.
• 58:50
  And so, you know, twelve years worth of work just went away in a heartbeat. Had six websites dedicated to the coronavirus issue, and, you know, I had been I remember, you know, back before the FLCCC and everybody, was early. I wasn't the first, but was very early. I was interviewed by a good friend talking about ivermectin, and people thought I was absolutely crazy. Right?
• 59:17
  And so, you know, new ideas are difficult for people to accept, and this one though, I think there's an amazing advantage in that they were trying to propagandize the pandemic treaty as a distraction, and they wanted the amendments to the international health regulations to be completely hidden. So there's only a little tiny bit of propaganda about it, and so when people see it, they haven't been bludgeoned with this programming, and so they look at the evidence for what's going on with the international health recommendations, regulations, because they are recommendations, and they actually can see through the veil, because it's a real thin veil of propaganda around it, and most people say, I've never heard of that. I don't know what that is, and so when they look at it, they actually see it for what it is, and I think it's going to be the biggest red pill that around the world people wake up with. Not everybody, but enough that we're going to make one heck of a stink about this.
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 1: Yeah, that's certainly true. So, here's other great questions. Here's one from Maureen's wife who says, Do you know how many others are working on this like yourself?
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 2: I can't say I know the number, but I know the phone keeps ringing, and everyone is essentially, I've met the most wonderful people, present company included. Some people look at it, and they say, I'm busy, I gotta go to work, I gotta pay the bills, you know, I'm a carpenter, you know, get it, you gotta do what you gotta do. But some people, I won't mention the name, but I because my phone number's out there last week, I got a phone call, and I pick up the phone, and the person says, Hi, this is so and so, and it was so and so who's a former congressperson. And I said, Oh, well, you know, how can I help you? Got to the point where they wanted to know everything possible, you know, whatever I could tell them, And when we got to the point that these changes in the language were made the day, the last full day of the Obama administration, they changed the definition of an ill person, the definition of a public health emergency, and the definition of whether or not you could stick something up somebody's nose without their permission, and they recognize what date that happened.
• 1:01:48
  They screamed so loud, you know, because when the light bulb goes off in your head, if people are watching this, if you haven't already gone, Oh crap, right, that's the sign that it got in, it got past the propaganda, it got past the programming, it registered in someone's, you know, ability to discern what this is, and people, the sound of the light bulb going off in people's heads is most often audible. They'll scream, they'll sigh, they'll gasp, but then they're like, Holy shit, I gotta tell so and so, I gotta do this, I gotta do that, and boom, they're activated, and it's unlike anything I've ever seen in any of the, you know, organizing or active action that I've taken in the past, people are getting it. You know, they're getting it, and they're getting up off the day. They got a fire in the belly about it because it's just so obvious.
• 1:02:46
  Speaker 1: Good. Well, that's encouraging to hear. Because if we can't wake up now, I don't know when it'll be it'll be too late. The house will be burned down. We can smell the smoke now.
• 1:02:57
  We have to wake up and put the fire out. So that's encouraging. Here's a good question. And I know that you're not a doctor and you tend to be so it sticks more to the facts, but I still would love to hear your opinion, especially with your health background. Mental Avengers says, First off, James, thank you for doing great work.
• 1:03:14
  And they say, What do you think will happen to the people who took the vaccine?
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 2: Oh, I'm fearful for them. I mean, are things that people can do, but the problem is if they go back and talk to the lying doctors who shot them up in the first place, you think they're going to get any healthier? I understand, and obviously this is an opinion, but I've got all kinds of facts, you know, to back it up. The system that people have been hypnotized to trust is designed to chemically poison them, and the injections are just the more sophisticated poison. They don't want to kill you.
• 1:03:50
  They really don't want to kill you, because then the undertaker makes a payment once. They want you to be more ill, because you've swallowed a poison, or you've injected a poison, and then the entire industry grows, and so there's a difference between people don't know what allopathic medicine is. The simple word allo means opposite, path means disease, right? So you walk into a doctor's office and you tell them what your symptoms are. A good doctor would say, Wow, let's try to investigate to figure out why you have those symptoms, and let's make some changes so that you're not causing that problem.
• 1:04:36
  You get at the root cause, okay? If your mechanic behaved like your doctor, if you went to your mechanic and there was a light on on your dashboard, you know, not enough oil, you know, temperature is too high or, you know, whatever it might be, and they said, oh, well, let me give you a piece of tape to cover that light, right, that'll bandage up the problem. You go along your merry way and then you got a blown engine, then you're coming back to the mechanic, you've got a blown engine, that's a lot more money for the mechanic. Well, you know, you go to the doctor, they do all these tests, you know, they're just doing the tests to find some way that they can justify labeling you, not as who you are and treating you, they label you as a diabetic or a cancer patient or a heart patient or whatever it may be, so that they can find an insurance code that authorizes them to charge you for whatever they're going to do to your next, you know, run this test, prescribe this medication, you know, do these diagnostics or these procedures. None of it is investigating what the cause is, So the entire system is just wrong.
• 1:05:48
  You treat the person, not the symptoms. If your mechanic did that, and just said, oh, the lights going off on your dashboard here, let me get my scalpel, and cut the wire, or cut the light out, and oh, problem solved, you know, it's the wording. If you went to the mechanic and you said that light is bothering me, okay, well he could make it so that the light is disconnected, and the light doesn't bother you. When you go to the doctor, and you go, my arm hurts, or, you know, I got this pain, or I got this problem, you're giving them the wrong guidance. You're saying, make my warning light disappear.
• 1:06:26
  The pain and all that sort of stuff is analogous to the warning light on your dashboard, what you should say to your doctor is, can you help me identify the cause, and I can pretty much guarantee you that the cause is not a lack of a pharmaceutical medication, that by definition is a poison, that causes a whole pile of diseases. And I'll go on for days, you passion. I hope that's a good enough answer.
• 1:06:55
  Speaker 1: Actually, was one of the best answers I've heard because a lot of people they approach this, they say, look, the vaccine's a bioweapon, it's a kill shot, it's depopulation. But, you know how you put it, this is the first time I've really heard it phrased that way where you're saying that no, it was a an intentional poison that wasn't meant just to kill everybody off, but actually to make everyone sick. If you look at the side effects, which are now there's been a Pfizer dump this past day or so it's astounding but even the previous one that showed this the side effects I did a whole show on it. If you look at all the autoimmune disorders that come out of this. If you look at I think the cancers that are coming out, it's, it makes perfect sense actually that what does the you know the big pharmaceutical companies they don't want us to be healthy, a healthy person is like a full customer at a restaurant, they don't want your food.
• 1:07:47
  They want us to be sick. And I think that's what you're seeing with this is that it just makes perfect sense is that it's almost like a slow release poison that will get people going back for sick. Oh, I've got heart problems. Okay, well, here's three different medications for your heart problems that you have now. Oh, I've got tingling in my throat, my finger in my toes.
• 1:08:06
  Oh, here's some neurological medicine for you. So it just gets everyone plugged into their system.
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 2: I think the Latin is cui bono, you know, who benefits. Okay? They always tell you follow the money. Okay? In in some of the articles that got destroyed, they're still available on archive.org.
• 1:08:26
  You know, you can go to the Wayback Machine and find my old websites. But one of the deep dives that I did was just where the money is. And so when you have a public health emergency, then and only then can you have emergency use authorizations. So I believe Doctor. Zelenko was very clear about many things, but he was very clear about how the public health emergency is a moneymaker, because now instead of actually showing that something works, okay, realize all of the PCR tests, all of the rapid antigen tests, many of the medications, and there's all kinds of really super duper expensive therapies that most people are not aware of.
• 1:09:07
  You know, go to this FDA's website and look up how many things are currently being sold under emergency use authorization. Okay? When I learned, and I have an article about this from months ago, when I learned on January twenty first of this year, twenty twenty two, that remdesivir, which I call run death is near, was authorized, meaning not approved, not safe and effective, not proven to be anything other than let's pump this into people for money, was authorized for outpatient use in infants as small as eight pounds. I blew a gasket. I couldn't believe it, and I still haven't had any luck getting anybody to talk about it.
• 1:09:54
  It's astonishing to me how ignorant, meaning you get the information, but then people ignore it, they authorize the use of a drug that's never been proven to do any benefit whatsoever, and many people will tell you how horrible it is, in eight pound infants on an outpatient basis. Talk about, you know, killing babies, this is just insanity, and so anybody who's insane enough to think that that's a good
• 1:10:27
  Speaker 1: idea, wow, you
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 2: know, that's what we're up against, and it's all hypnosis, because if you actually, you know, clear your head and you look at it, you go, well I would never do that. Who in their right mind would do that? Well people are not in their right mind, they're in their programmed hypnotic, you know, subconscious programming, automaton mind, and they're doing things that are insane, because the World Hypnosis Organization has convinced them that the recommendations that are made by TEDROs somehow get translated in their subconscious as being obligations. That's not what it is.
• 1:11:07
  Speaker 1: You know, I've interviewed Doctor. Brian Artis many times, and specifically talking about the remdesivir protocol, and it's just it's astounding to me. But the segues in You're right
• 1:11:18
  Speaker 2: on it from the very beginning. Absolutely.
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 1: Yeah. So that leads to another question we're taking is actually quite good. Is from Noble Chris who says, Are you aware of any other popular poisonous prescriptions we should be apprehensive of?
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 2: Short answer is yes. I actually became aware of this at a get together that was at a friend's house many number of years ago. We were in the kitchen, people were preparing food, and we were drinking and eating and talking and laughing and joking, and they had the TV on off in the background, and when I was listening to the television that was just sort of like, you know, background noise, it reminded me I've had a lot of conversations with people who call me, and we have a, you know, good long conversation, a lot of information being shared, and then at the end of it, you know, they would say, Oh, I have to ask my doctor. And I'm like, didn't you read the title of the book? Your doctor's a liar.
• 1:12:20
  Why are you going to ask your doctor? That's the last person you want to ask them to think for yourself. And I realize where that comes from. Okay, the advertisements, if you're paying attention to the advertisement, and you have, you know, half of your even half of your brain, you know, operating at the moment, you go, well that's crazy. I don't even know what this drug is for.
• 1:12:41
  I don't go running around through fields, you know, flowers very often, so maybe it's for allergies or something, but then they list all of these diseases, and then they say, you know, ask your doctor if blah blah blah is right for you, and what I've realized is that that's on in the background everywhere, you know, televisions at workplaces, and restaurants, and sports bars, and whatever, and you're not paying attention to it, you're being subliminally programmed by the disease, disease, disease, disease, disease. That's how you start to get these diseases. Your mind's always thinking of them subconsciously, and then you got to go ask your doctor who's not going to treat the cause of your problem, which is, you know, hypnosis. I got a call from a hypnotist today, and you know, I mean, the discussion is how do you dehypnotize somebody who's been hypnotized by the media? That's the task that we have, and because this particular topic people haven't been hypnotized about the international health regulations, I think we have a chance to, you know, poke through the hypnosis, and get people to take this particular red pill, and wake up, and leave the matrix, and stand up for their rights, and don't let them get away with what they're doing.
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 1: Actually that I would love to expand on that a little bit and get your thoughts on that was just with your your background and how you process things. I think it's pretty incredible. How you knowing that especially as it relates to fear, I mean, is one of the greatest tools for hypnosis. It puts us in that primal state. We're very easily influenced by, you know, subtle things.
• 1:14:30
  And so looking at how the media has used fear to hypnotize people into this state where they're they'll literally just run off a cliff if that means they won't get they won't get COVID. If that's where people are at. It's not just it's not just the COVID lies either. It's even talking to some people and saying look maybe the WHO isn't a good organization. Maybe our government doesn't have our best intentions.
• 1:14:55
  There's so many layers to this. How would you recommend because this is actually one of the most common questions that we get in general is people are asking how can we talk to our family? How can we red pill our family and get them to understand what's really happening because this isn't like it was say ten twenty years ago, it feels like that right now we're a time in history where not knowing the truth, not being able to see through the lies and propaganda could be a life and death issue.
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 2: I'm bad with names. So I don't remember who said something to the effect of in times of universal deceit, you know, telling the truth is a crime. Think it was Orwell, but I could be wrong with that. The issue with red pilling your family, okay, if you take that reference from The Matrix, you know, I recognize that in The Matrix, you're not allowed to force people to take the red pill. You give them the red pill and the blue pill, right, and I don't know where the camera is.
• 1:15:59
  Okay. You you get to choose. You can't make anybody do it. Alright. You offer it, and if they say no thank you, you move along because they're not ready to leave the matrix.
• 1:16:12
  It has to be their choice to red pill themselves. By all means, send them to don'tyoudare.info, send them to stopthewho.com, and give them the opportunity and invite them to take a big fat honking red pill. Okay? But if they want to take the blue pill, you know, move along. Next.
• 1:16:30
  And so to go back to your other question about the media and fear, okay, when my, not my entire life's work, but a good chunk of it got just ripped off the Internet, back in February, I landed on Substack, and if you want to know where I came from, watch the first, or I'm sorry, read the first article. It's about MDM. You know what MDM is? Not a fair question. Misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation.
• 1:17:03
  Speaker 1: Oh, I saw that. Okay.
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 2: Yes. And so, you know, there's so many lies that have been told that are just so obvious. Okay? But you asked me about fear. Right?
• 1:17:20
  Someone who's spreading misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation, according to the Homeland Security the Department of Homeland Security is the number one danger to America. And I agree I agree with the Department of Homeland Security that the biggest terrorists are the mainstream media who make people fearful. What is the definition of a terrorist other than someone who generates terror? If you go on that article, and you look at the legal definition, okay, a terrorist is someone who tries to influence, you know, society and government by generating fear and terror. It is crystal clear by the legal definition that our news media and many people in government are clearly terrorists.
• 1:18:27
  Now, you know, I'm telling everybody, lead with love, be nice, tell your friends about this, be kind, give them the information. If they're not ready to take it, then love on them. You know, if I'm scaring somebody, it's because of what you've got on the inside, I'm saying that this is a fantastic opportunity to offer a laser pointed, you know, bit of information and evidence, so that you can understand what they're doing, and how they're trying to do it, so that you let go of that fear, okay, and replace it with courage, and if you're courageous, and you look at and and and you're aware, and you're not ignorant, and and you're not hypnotized, you look at the media and you laugh, you go, how are people falling for this? This is such bad writing and such bad acting. Y'all can't see what they're doing.
• 1:19:23
  Why are you afraid of this, which is worse than a movie? I mean, it's a bad movie. It's bad, you know, play acting. And how are you, who are the terrorists here? The ones who are fueling the fear.
• 1:19:40
  They should all be locked up, because the Department of Homeland Security needs all of us to report when you see, you know, I won't name names, but there's a lot of famous broadcasters, who if you actually clip out what they've said, they're supporting and calling for violence. They're calling for fear, you know, just get your clips of CNN and MSNBC, and send it off to Homeland Security, and say, that guy scared me. He scared me with his words. Or she scared me. I'm in a state of terror.
• 1:20:23
  They are the domestic terrorists, you know, did Doctor. Zelenko, or Doctor. McCullough, or Doctor. Urso, or Doctor. Cole, did they scare you, or did they they have a comforting bedside manner and and come to you and say, you know, hey, we have a solution.
• 1:20:41
  We can have you know, you're sick, you know, come on in. We'll take this, take that. Know, who's the terrorist? Exactly. And that's, you know, my Abbott and Costello routine.
• 1:20:53
  Who's the terrorist? Exactly.
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly. Who's the terrorist? Here's another very good question, which is as I'm watching the chat, I'm seeing a lot of people talking about the reaction from their doctors when they said they don't get the vaccine or this information because the doctors seem to be very heavily programmed through education, their prestige, the God complex that's trained into them through the Rockefeller Medical Institute. But so Chicken Coop lady asked this question who says, how can we wake up the doctors that we know are good people but are heavily programmed?
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 2: Because if I understood the question, I'll repeat the question. How can we wake up doctors who are heavily programmed?
• 1:21:37
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 2: Forget that forget that it's doctors. It's everybody. It's the same thing. You you sound the alarm. You you offer the information.
• 1:21:50
  You offer the red pill, whatever that might be, and you just keep offering it. If if you if you say something to them that kowtows to their divinity, okay, the the medical deity that they believe themselves to be, and you say, doctor, I've looked at this information, and, you know, you're so much smarter than I am. Could you deem me to be worthy of your opinion? Could you review this information? And, you know, don't get back to me right now, you know, when you have time.
• 1:22:24
  I want you to really look into it. Look it over and give me your opinion. Oh,
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 1: that's that's brilliant. Because you're appeasing, you're playing to their ego, like maybe even showing them this website. Like, what do you think about what's happening in the in the in the in the WHO? You're my doctor like that's what a brilliant way
• 1:22:42
  Speaker 2: of talking to doctors.
• 1:22:46
  Speaker 1: Nope. See, someone called him again. We'll have him back on soon. He he seems to be quick to hop back on here. Maybe he should have waited till the very, very, very end of the show to give up a cell phone number.
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 2: I'm not sure if you want Well, you know, was going to do that, but it's okay. It's been ringing like that the whole time, so it's all wonderful. We were talking about giving this information to your doctor. I wasn't necessarily referring to this WHO information because doctors are dealing with patients and they're busy and all that sort of stuff. They're just a human being.
• 1:23:21
  You share it with them the way you would share it with everybody. More to the point though is political candidates and politicians, I think we talked about that a little bit earlier, you know, especially anybody who's got a sworn oath to defend the constitution, right, and you know, you can have a little bit of fun with it. If you're not having fun with this, you're doing it wrong, and so you send them the information, you give them a little video, pick one, there's like 30 to pick from, you give them the links, you give them the little yellow flyer that has the, you know, basic summary of what's going on, and then you realize that you've actually got them. Okay? Because now they cannot claim to be unaware.
• 1:24:03
  They have the information. Okay? They may or may not agree with it, but if it's information that is about plot to harm, you know, our rights under the constitution, they're obligated to actually, under the mistreatment of treason statute, they have to alert the president and governor and judges, right, and you know, we've got a formal letter that they can just send off. Until they do it, they're actually committing a crime, so you call them back a couple days later, and you go, hey, you know, congressperson, senator, you know, whomever it may be, you know, you realize that you're obligated due to your oath to alert the authorities about this, and I haven't seen that you've done that yet. You realize that you're committing a crime.
• 1:24:53
  Would you care to make a statement? You know, are you for treason, or are you against it? I'd just like to know which one is it?
• 1:25:01
  Speaker 1: These days, think that most of them are for treason, it seems.
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 2: It seems that way, but you have to give them the opportunity to be made aware. If someone is not aware of something, if, you know, I'm gonna guess a good portion of your audience has never seen us. So prior to this, if you weren't up in arms and, you know, shouting from the rooftops about it, well, you just you weren't aware. That's fine. Can't can't fault you for that, but now you know, and so let's see if this video becomes the biggest video of all time on your network, because if it doesn't, then we deserve what we get, right?
• 1:25:38
  If we as a people don't lead, these people are not our leaders, they are our public servants. We pay them a crapload of money, right, to secure our rights and defend our constitution, not to tell us what to do. They work for us, we tell them what to do, and so, you know, if this isn't the biggest video you've ever had, right, going all, you know, you look at your analytics, and it's all over the world, and you're like, man, you know, I never had anybody in, you know, Thailand or Madagascar looking at my videos, you're like, how the heck did that happen? If that doesn't happen, then your audience isn't very patriotic. They aren't very freedom loving.
• 1:26:18
  How hard is it to share a link to inform somebody and allow them to either say, nah, can I have the blue pill instead? I'd rather watch some, you know, TV show than try to defend my country and defend my rights. We'll see. I have faith that, you know, people are gonna know about this. You know, if if Will Smith slapping Chris Rock and Trend for two weeks solid, I think the loss of every nation's sovereignty, potentially, given over to a corrupt organization like the World Hypnosis Organization, if this doesn't trend, then we all deserve what we get.
• 1:26:59
  And, you know, I think we deserve better.
• 1:27:02
  Speaker 1: I agree. Well, James, that's a great place for us to end on. I want to just thank you so much not just for the time you've given me today. I feel very honored to have you as a guest on my show, but also just for everything that you've done to get this information out to people because this is critical and the information that we're discussing today affects our children, our grandchildren, the future of humanity because if they get through what they're trying to do, which I don't believe they're going be able to I think enough people will wake up and set up against this. If they do, it's a dark path, and we cannot allow that.
• 1:27:37
  So I really just sincerely thank you for what you're doing.
• 1:27:41
  Speaker 2: Well, you've given me a platform, and it's been a very inviting and comfortable place to be. Thank you so much, and to your audience, give me a call.
• 1:27:52
  Speaker 1: Great. What's that phone number one more time?
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 2: (310) 619-3055. Be patient with me. I may have some catching up to do because it's been ringing a while even not here, but no, in all seriousness, you know, go to dontyoudare.info, go to stopthewhod.com. They should be self explanatory, but everybody has a question, and there's a million things to do. But it really starts with just sounding the alarm, spreading the word, telling everybody you know, and, you know, the whole six degrees of separation with, you know, if you go through, you know somebody, you know somebody, everybody knows Kevin Bacon, right?
• 1:28:28
  If you go that way. If you do the math, if you have a hundred viewers, okay, who tell a hundred people, who tell a hundred people through five levels, that's 10,000,000,000. So in a heartbeat, we the people could spread the word around the world, and everybody can know about this, and at that point, it's, a lot of eyes on somebody trying to put their hand in the cookie jar. If you've ever had a dog who's trying to steal something off your table, when you make eye contact with them, you know, maybe they'll snatch it faster, but you know, more often than not they look as guilty as can be, and, you know, they're like, oh man, you know, I wanted that food that was on the table, but she caught me. Right?
• 1:29:12
  That's what I think is going to happen, and, you know, I think this was the founding document to flip the switch of the great reset, and I think the circuit breaker is gonna pop, and it's not gonna happen.
• 1:29:26
  Speaker 1: I couldn't agree more so. Well, thank you again so very much. I really appreciate having you, And maybe after the vote happens in late May, we can do a show again. And we'll see where things are at from the moment. Thanks again for joining.
• 1:29:39
  I really appreciate it.
• 1:29:40
  Speaker 2: Well, you know,
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 1: looks like someone called him again.
• 1:29:48
  Speaker 2: Hopefully you can hear me.
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 1: Oh, yeah, you're back. Yes.
• 1:29:51
  Speaker 2: On Memorial Day weekend, you know, we're either going to be battling for another six months to get everybody to say, No, thank you, we'd like to return these amendments, they don't fit our deal here, or we're going to be all going to Memorial Day picnic and cracking a beer and celebrating the fact that we beat back the great reset, and we've reclaimed our freedom.
• 1:30:12
  Speaker 1: Let's hope it's that. Believe we can make it happen.
• 1:30:15
  Speaker 2: Cool. Thank you so much.
• 1:30:16
  Speaker 1: Thank you very, very much. Alright, so folks, thank you all so much for joining us today. Just a quick reminder. So Ben and Rob are going live tonight at 07:30PM Eastern with Edge of Wonder. They're doing some great live shows every Tuesday and Thursday at 07:30PM.
• 1:30:35
  And tomorrow at 07:30PM is my favorite show of the week, Friday Night Live FNL. We've got some great stuff planned for that. Thank you all again. You are the reason we are here. You are the reason why Rise TV exists, and why we can fulfill the mission that we've been given by God to get this information out to people around the world.
• 1:30:54
  So thank you all so much. I hope you have a wonderful evening. I can't wait to see you all tomorrow night. Thank you and take care.