Latest / Trumponomics / How America's China Trauma Strains Alliances

Transcript

How America's China Trauma Strains Alliances · Trumponomics

• 0:02
  Speaker 1: China's expanding economic power and projections it will surpass the
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: US as the pre eminent commercial power have preoccupied people
• 0:12
  Speaker 1: for years. But what about the idea of America as
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: a kind of rogue state in its decline, lashing out here,
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: lashing out there. That's not a perspective you run into
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: every day, even in the Trump era. But as the
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: Trump administration rolls on, more and more countries and world
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: leaders might come to see America as the disruptor rather
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: than the stabilizer. Welcome to Benchmark. I'm Daniel Moss, the
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: columnist at Bloomberg Opinion in New York, and I'm Scott Landman,
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: an economics editor with Bloomberg New in Washington. America as
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: the economic and political renegade rather than the status quo
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: is a pretty new concept, but Bob Carr says it's
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: one we should take seriously. He's a former Australian Foreign
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: minister and longtime student of US history and politics. He's
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: the author of a new book, Run for Your Life.
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: Bob joins US from Sydney, where he's Director of the
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: Australia China Relations Institute at the University of Technology, Sydney.
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: Bob thanks for joining us. Mike, pleasure, Dan and Scott
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: By pleasure to be talking to you. You've had a
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: long career in government. Before serving as Foreign Minister, you
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: are a Premier of New South Wales for ten years,
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: which for our American listeners is a little like being
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: both governor of New York and California combined. I should
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: also stress from the outset that you're no anti American
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: rabble rouser. But what has America traditionally meant for you.
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: We've seen America traditionally as a great sources of democratic values,
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: and America's had a proud and mobile, even if inconsistent
• 2:16
  Speaker 1: or patchy record evalivating human rights. I mean, there've been
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: moments when I have thought, I guess twenty years ago,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: that if there's going to be a dominant power in
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: the world, then it's it's good that it's America. Then
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: came two shocks to that happy, rather optimistic view of
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: American power, and Mike, one was the invasion of Iraq.
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: In the absence of any concept of international law or
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: any consensus in the West, the invasion of the Iraq
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: was a huge disrupting influence. The other one was America
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: deciding under Bush, that would really vacate leadership on on
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: client to change that. That really got me thinking about
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: the US. And of course under Trump, both those concerns
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: has been magnified. Let's go back a little further, Bob,
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: I learned about Chester A. Arthur at my eleventh grade
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: US history class. I can't recall all the details, but
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: can you tell us what is the Chester A Arthur Society?
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: In the early eighties, Ion a group of friends formed
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: the Chester A. Arthur Society to have dinners and to
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: test ourselves with a paper on some aspect of US
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: presidential history and a series of sometimes quite challenging trivia
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: quizzes about about US the details of US presidential history.
• 3:50
  Speaker 1: It was great fun. Do you still have the meetings, Bob?
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: Or have you ceased them? In disgust? We ceased them
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: and George W. Bush because it was you got to
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: celebrate the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt or Abraham Lincoln. If
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: all this pageant simply lead to the disasters of the
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: George W. Bush presidency, it would be utterly impossible to
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: hold them now. I mean, I've discussed with friends who
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: like me, have been so fond of American history, the
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: hollowness of any any celebration of this great feast for storiography,
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: when it all seems to lead to the degradation of
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: a Trump presidency. How you can extoll the shrewd, level
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: headedness of Eisenhower's to term leadership of America, Let alone
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: Franklin Roosevelt's leadership in depression and war when in the end,
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: let alone Abraham Lincoln in the end, when it all
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: devolves on a brabel rousing populist in Donald Trump, And
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: without any sense, I might add, and I think this
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: is an important point, Dan Scott, without had any sense
• 5:01
  Speaker 1: of an imminent recovery, none of us believes, no, no
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: friends of America. It was wild friends of America. Looking
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: at the Trump presidency from Australia, I think there's going
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: to be a return to liberal internationalism. China's ascendency in
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: this context isn't really a new idea. What are people
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: failing to grasp about the current moment. There are two
• 5:25
  Speaker 1: new elements in perceptions in Asia, and that is that
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: the China's economic rise is robust, and China's on a
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: trajectory whereby two thousand and thirty it'll have an economy.
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: According to an official Australian government assessment published in our
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: Foreign policy white paper out late last year, we're the
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: Chinese economy will be twice the size of the US economy,
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: and I think that's a trauma for many Americans to
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: contemplate no longer the as largest economy. And the second
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: thing has been the Trump presidency. Across Asia, the consensus
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: has formed that you cannot rely on America. It's behavior
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: is going to be uddly, unpredictable. Do you think with
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: regards to China, is it really the fact that China
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: is getting that big you think is threatening America? Or
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: is it the fact that China's economy is becoming so
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: much more sophisticated. I mean, it used to be all
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: about sweatshops producing cheap clothes and shoes and that sort
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: of thing. They still do a fair amount of that,
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: and yet the economy has evolved so much that you
• 6:39
  Speaker 1: have technology powerhouses like Ali Baba, ten Cent that are
• 6:45
  Speaker 1: being mentioned often in the same breath as American giants
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: like Facebook, Amazon and so on. All of that's true.
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: Another way of putting it is that when Joe Biden,
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden used to say, he said to me, China
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: doesn't innovate. Well, that that can't be said today in
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: view of already have pointed to China is a great
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: source of innovation and in many respects has already overtaken
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: the US in innovation. And I think that makes it
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: even harder for American aggress I noticed in the New
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: York Times there's hardly any coverage of this, of China's
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: transition to an economy based on services and based on consumption.
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: The Chinese have already pulled off that transition. And as
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: I look at the pages of the New York Times
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: every day, and it's it's almost stubborn failure to cover
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: what's happened in China. I think there's that there might
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: be a latent American jealousy or distaste for what China represents.
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: And I can understand that China's pulling off this economic
• 7:49
  Speaker 1: transition without using the democratic means that we we'd all
• 7:53
  Speaker 1: prefer to see China using. It's it's becoming a predominantly
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: middle class nations, becoming by international tests, a rich country,
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: and without permitting more political freedoms. And this is this
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: upsets the The rule book contradicts the rule book and
• 8:15
  Speaker 1: the expectations that all US Democrats have had. American declinism
• 8:20
  Speaker 1: is nothing new, As you're well aware, the country has
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: a long history of reinvention. Can it do it again? Yes,
• 8:28
  Speaker 1: that's got to be admitted as a possibuilding and other
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: possibuilding is that American decline is attenuated, it stretches out.
• 8:36
  Speaker 1: None of us knows, None of us knows what form
• 8:39
  Speaker 1: American decline will take. But we ought to be focusing
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: with laser like concentration on the political crisis. There's a
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: political crisis in Washington that is seeing the character of
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: the two great political parties transformed. Just think the Republican
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: Party is becoming a party opposed to immigration and opposed
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: to trade. It's also becoming the first choice, the first
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: preference the white working class American males. The Democratic Party
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: looks more and more like an alliance of America's rich
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: living on the East and West coast and its welfare
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: dependent classes. Now, these these are big shifts, and the
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: bonapartism of Trump has produced this change, and that represents
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: nothing short of a political transformation in the US. But
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: it's only one measure of the way America has changed politically.
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: You could have a second career as a political analyst
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: on one of the American television networks. I think with
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: what you just said. But what you were just talking
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: about reminded me of a quote that I saw that
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: got some wide play back in when you were the
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: Foreign Minister, and you said something along the lines of
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: America was one budget deal away from restoring its global
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: pre eminence. Do you think it's going to take a
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: lot more than one budget deal or one election even
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: now to get back to that level. Yeah, I don't.
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: I don't think America can return to the liberal internationalism
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: that was once synonymous with its power and might. I
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: just can't see that happening. I think Trump is the
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: most transformative president since lb J or Franklin Roosevelt. He's
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: the most successful demagogue in American political history. He's a
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: true bonapartist, the leader above party, above faction. And the
• 10:41
  Speaker 1: fact that the Republican Party is shackled to him rather
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: than the relationship being the other way around, him being
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: a product of the Republican Party and its values. All
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: this counts greatly. And I can't see the Democrats under
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: any the candidates for presidency that are now now imaginable
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: beating him in two thousand and twenty. I see him
• 11:08
  Speaker 1: as a a two term president. Certainly that's the most
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: likely outcome. And I think America will be changed utterly
• 11:15
  Speaker 1: by eight years of Trump and the Republican leadership that
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: will emerge after him very different from the Republican leadership
• 11:23
  Speaker 1: at the Bushy Earl let alone. What was there before
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: George W. Bush and before the Tea Party. How do
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: you get from the sense of political crisis and political
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: trauma to security threat. I think the political crisis in America,
• 11:42
  Speaker 1: and that for once the term crisis is not is
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: not hyperbole, is of significance precisely because it's changing America's
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: international character. America is tearing up the rules on free trade.
• 11:56
  Speaker 1: The next step can only be withdrawal from the World
• 11:59
  Speaker 1: Trade Organized Nation because it's not adhering to the rules
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: of the w t O. America is looking down, dusting
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: off its allies like Canada, like the Europeans. America is
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: saying alliances don't matter to us anymore. America seems to
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: be treating a North Korea and a Russia with more
• 12:26
  Speaker 1: respect than it's treating Germany or the United Kingdom or Canada.
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: You can't pawn the crown of global leadership and then
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: buy it back at the old price. If there is,
• 12:39
  Speaker 1: in a stunning reverse all the election of a president
• 12:42
  Speaker 1: who wants to abandon the key tenants of Trump's leadership,
• 12:46
  Speaker 1: then he or she is going to find it very,
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: very hard to rebuild alliances, to re establish respect because
• 12:54
  Speaker 1: during the eight years of Trump and during whatever follows Trump,
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: the world Asia, for example, but the Europeans as well,
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: again to be making their own security arrangements. Australia might
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: be the most rusted on and the most unquestioning of allies,
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: but I suspect even Australia I would need to take
• 13:21
  Speaker 1: account of what appears to be happening in Southeast Asia,
• 13:24
  Speaker 1: that is, the Ten Nations of Asigan reach in its
• 13:29
  Speaker 1: own way accommodating Chinese power and counting on America to
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: be utterly unreliable. But let's talk about China for a moment.
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: I spent three years in China as an economics editor
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: in Beijing. It is an impressive place, but it also
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: has its weaknesses that you might not be visible from
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: a long distance. And there's this idea that China supports
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: free and fair trade. They talk about a lot, but
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: it seems like it's something that could be challenged. But
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: to me, at least, China does talk about free and
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: fair trade, and maybe isn't the one that's trying to
• 14:13
  Speaker 1: ratchet up the tariffs like the Trump administration is. But
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: let me ask you, is China kind of getting a
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: free pass right now for all of it's you know,
• 14:23
  Speaker 1: the many kinds of violations they've been accused of in
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: the economic arena for many years. Are those being kind
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: of looked over just because America is being such a
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: bad actor. Yes, I think they are getting a free pass.
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: And I think if there's a defense to be made
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: of Trump's aggressive behavior on trade, it might be this
• 14:47
  Speaker 1: that it will greatly strengthen the hand of the reforms
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: in China. The people who do want to see the
• 14:53
  Speaker 1: Chinese economy open up, who do want to see a
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: burst of economic liberalization, It could well be that they
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: get the upper hand, and faced with the provocation and
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: the challenges of all the Trump's doing on trade, that
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: we see China introduced market based reforms at a faster
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: rate than the Party, and the government has promised to
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: introduce that would be good for the world, would be
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: very good for China. Already, China's got a smaller public
• 15:30
  Speaker 1: sector in terms of the percentage of its workforce employed
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: by government, including state earned enterprises, than many countries in
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: the Western world, including Australia. But imagine if in response
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: to Trump reformers really forge your head in China. It
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: talked about the Asian countries making their own accommodation with China.
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: Why has the issue of China become so politically toxic
• 15:56
  Speaker 1: in Australia of late Yeah, I think the government of
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: Australia tilted against China from early two thousand and seventeen,
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: so it left people like me running a think tank
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: as I am on Australia China relations saying, as I've
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: been saying very recently, we more or less had it
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: right as an American ally running a pragmatic China relationship
• 16:21
  Speaker 1: back under the prime ministership of Tony Abbott, the Prime
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: minister immediately before our current Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull. So
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: we've gone through a period of shock and trauma because
• 16:35
  Speaker 1: of the rapidity of China's rise. It's been a shock
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: to the inherently pro American defense and security establishment in Canberra.
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: It's just been a shock. It's been China's economic influence
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: in the region to our north and China's success in
• 16:53
  Speaker 1: its assertiveness in the South China Sea. I think Chinese
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: behavior too has contributed to the the way views of
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: China have turned have turned negative among the Australian leadership.
• 17:08
  Speaker 1: China lifting the two term limit that applied to its
• 17:11
  Speaker 1: its president is the biggest element in that. But while
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: the Australian leadership has moved to a more entrenched or
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: more flamboyant any China position, at least in terms of rhetoric,
• 17:26
  Speaker 1: I mean we haven't repealed repealed our free trade agreement
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: with the Chinese, public opinion has moved in the opposite direction.
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: The highly respected Lowing Institute, our leading foreign policy think tank,
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: produced a poll three weeks ago that showed the percentage
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: of Australians who see China more as economic opportunity than
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: security threat went up in the last year. It now
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: sits at In fact, over the last two years, I
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: think it's increased by five percent. So Australian views of
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: China's economic potential in terms of mass public opinion have
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: actually strengthened listen inclined to see China is a geo
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: strategic threat then a couple of years ago, but which
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: to me is very interesting now. Bigger than any class
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: between China and Australia would of course be one between
• 18:20
  Speaker 1: China and the United States. And this topic has gotten
• 18:24
  Speaker 1: some attention lately because Graham Allison, a scholar at Harvard,
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: published a book about the Thucidities trap, which is when
• 18:32
  Speaker 1: one great power threatens to overshadow another conflict typically not always,
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: but but typically is the result. Now with China going
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: down a more authoritarian path, like you mentioned, America being
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: fundamentally reshaped by the age of Trump, how have these
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: odds of such a conflict increased over the past year
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: or two. Well, you can say that the China and
• 18:58
  Speaker 1: the US has moved into a trade war. You can
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: say that that has got elements of a Cold war,
• 19:04
  Speaker 1: especially with America reclassifying the way it regards China and
• 19:09
  Speaker 1: seeing China as a strategic rival instead of a partner
• 19:12
  Speaker 1: or a competitor. That's a huge challenge for Australia. But
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: to conservative Australian politicians in the last twenty years have
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: actually addressed it. Alexander Dana, who was Foreign Minister in
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: the Howard government said in two thousand and five in
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: respect to the prospect of a clash in the Taiwan
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: Strait that and wouldn't apply, that the security treaty between
• 19:40
  Speaker 1: Australia and the United States would not drag us into
• 19:42
  Speaker 1: such a conflict, and that made a lot of people
• 19:46
  Speaker 1: pay attention. And again in two thousand and thirteen or fourteen,
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: the Defense Minister in the Abbott government said in respective
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: conflict in the East China Sea that it was most
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: likely that the Answers Treaty would not apply. In other words,
• 20:05
  Speaker 1: and a conflict between China and Japan with the US
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: intervening on behalf of Japan, Australia's obligation to protect its
• 20:13
  Speaker 1: allied the US would not apply. We would not be
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: dragged into it. And you got away with that comment
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: without any blowback in Australia. So there there two signals
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: that really stand out that even on the conservative side
• 20:29
  Speaker 1: of Australia, it would be seen as not in our
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: national interest to enter a conflict between China and the
• 20:37
  Speaker 1: United States. Only stores in the wind, but I think
• 20:41
  Speaker 1: people in the U s state department focused on game
• 20:46
  Speaker 1: playing about these sorts of eventualities would have to take notice.
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: That's Australia, I guess, is the most serious and rusted
• 20:54
  Speaker 1: on American ally in the Pacific, apart from Japan, giving
• 20:59
  Speaker 1: a strong cig no that in a show down between
• 21:02
  Speaker 1: the U S and China it would have to consult
• 21:05
  Speaker 1: its own national interests. One of the arguments advanced for
• 21:09
  Speaker 1: why a conflict between the US and China is unlikely
• 21:13
  Speaker 1: is that their capital markets and their economic systems are
• 21:16
  Speaker 1: so enmashed. What's your perspective on that argument. Yeah, I
• 21:21
  Speaker 1: support that argument. And there is now some critical assessment
• 21:25
  Speaker 1: of Graham Allison's notion of the vicidities trap emerging, among
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: other things, people pointing out that it's it's got no
• 21:32
  Speaker 1: historical residence in East Asia. It's a bit of historicism.
• 21:37
  Speaker 1: Because some things have happened in the past, these same
• 21:40
  Speaker 1: things have got to happen in the same way in
• 21:42
  Speaker 1: the future. So I'm basically optimistic. I think a clash
• 21:47
  Speaker 1: would be disastrous for both powers. I am worried about
• 21:53
  Speaker 1: the War Party in the United States at work in Washington,
• 21:57
  Speaker 1: as advisors and commentators and think tankers moving around the
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: circle of power, and I wouldn't hesitate to make the
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: same point abount hawks in Beijing, but that simply puts
• 22:10
  Speaker 1: an obligation on the rest of this to cause in
• 22:13
  Speaker 1: realism and a bit of Kissinger style realism on the
• 22:18
  Speaker 1: part of the the US is needed to avoid an
• 22:22
  Speaker 1: ideological cold war approach to China, which sets us up
• 22:26
  Speaker 1: for the inevitability of some conflict. Bob, let's finish on
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: a slightly different note, talk about some of your days
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: in the government. One typically here's the bemoaning of the
• 22:39
  Speaker 1: age of social media, how it's become almost impossible to
• 22:42
  Speaker 1: govern these days, you know, to properly develop policy, to
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: sell it to an increasingly distracted electorate. You lead Australia's
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: biggest state for ten years. What do you think of
• 22:57
  Speaker 1: that argument? You're I come out of a different era,
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: out of the era of newspapers, a time when people
• 23:04
  Speaker 1: on buses and trains going to work were devowing newspapers,
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: and an era when people watch the free to wear
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: TV news at night, and you can sell a message
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: by appearing on the front pages and on the TV
• 23:22
  Speaker 1: captual summaries of the day's events and throughout the day
• 23:26
  Speaker 1: on that wonderful medium radio. Everything's been shattered, everything's been
• 23:31
  Speaker 1: broken up, but politicians are pretty unconvincing when they complain
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: about it. If the rules have changed, you've simply got
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: to change with the rules. And that means, if necessary,
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: putting the twenty four hour media, the social media to
• 23:46
  Speaker 1: your use, if you've got a good record, if you're
• 23:50
  Speaker 1: listening to the public, if you can pitch your case,
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: the new media rules should not disadvantage. In fact, I'd
• 24:01
  Speaker 1: enjoy the challenge of being back in it again, being
• 24:04
  Speaker 1: able to to take that new rule book and to
• 24:07
  Speaker 1: make it work for me and for the government whose
• 24:09
  Speaker 1: workers in charge of Or you could just take the
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: new rules and take advantage of them as much as
• 24:15
  Speaker 1: you possibly can and become president of the United States.
• 24:18
  Speaker 1: You did once fantasize about being a senator, didn't you, Bob, Yeah,
• 24:22
  Speaker 1: I did. That would have been nice. I thought i'd lead.
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: In my book, I share a fantasy that I'd lead
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: the six Australian states in the American Union. There would
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: have been some disadvantages, some disadvantages applying to that, of course,
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: we would have had to live with America's gun laws. Bob,
• 24:42
  Speaker 1: Thank you very much. For joining us. It's been great
• 24:44
  Speaker 1: to have you good Dan, It's been my honor. Thank you. Scott.
• 24:51
  Speaker 1: Benchmark will be back next week. Until then, you can
• 24:54
  Speaker 1: find us on the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com or
• 24:57
  Speaker 1: Bloomberg App, and podcast destinations such as full podcasts of
• 25:01
  Speaker 1: Spotify or wherever you listen. We love it if you
• 25:04
  Speaker 1: took the time to rate and review the show so
• 25:06
  Speaker 1: more listeners can find us. You can also find us
• 25:09
  Speaker 1: on Twitter, follow me at Scott Landman. Dan You're at
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: moss un the School Echo, and our guest is at
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: Bob J. Carr c A r R. Benchmark is produced
• 25:22
  Speaker 1: by Top Foreheads. The head of Bloomberg Podcasts is Francesco Levie.
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: Thanks for listening. See you next time.