Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / DOJ Admits Feds Were In Crowd On Jan 6

Transcript

DOJ Admits Feds Were In Crowd On Jan 6 · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: So there's long been speculation that seems fairly obvious that
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: there were, you know, confidential human sources at January sixth,
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: and it seems like we're getting some confirmation of that finally.
• 0:17
  Speaker 2: So let me come back to January the sixth, four
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: years four and a half years ago, three and a
• 0:22
  Speaker 2: half years ago, sir, there were a lot of people
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: who thought that there were federal operatives within the crowd
• 0:29
  Speaker 2: that day. Michael Horowitz, the DO Jason Spector General, was
• 0:32
  Speaker 2: on the hill today and seemed to indicate that people
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: who believed there were covert or confidential human sources in
• 0:39
  Speaker 2: the crowd might actually be right. Listen to what he said.
• 0:44
  Speaker 3: So, but now that you've restarted it, do you have
• 0:47
  Speaker 3: evidence of the number of confidential human sources that were
• 0:52
  Speaker 3: operating on the Capitol grounds on January sixth?
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: Our report will include the information in that regard.
• 0:58
  Speaker 3: Can you tell us day how many there were? Were
• 1:01
  Speaker 3: there more than one hundred?
• 1:02
  Speaker 2: I'm not in a position to say that, both because
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: it's in draft form and we have not gone through
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: the classification reviews, and so I need to be careful.
• 1:11
  Speaker 3: Do you know how many were reimbursed for travel?
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: As I sit here. I don't recall the number, but
• 1:18
  Speaker 2: there's something in the reportment. This is very intriguing. He
• 1:20
  Speaker 2: didn't say yes, he didn't say no. He said this
• 1:23
  Speaker 2: is being looked at in the report. It could be
• 1:27
  Speaker 2: that the report says no, there weren't any, but he
• 1:29
  Speaker 2: seems to be leaning toward yes, there were. Oh.
• 1:31
  Speaker 4: I think he was definitely implying us there were, because
• 1:34
  Speaker 4: when he was asked, well, how many of them these
• 1:36
  Speaker 4: confidential human sources were pro effectively spies for the FBI?
• 1:39
  Speaker 4: It's a tool of law enforcement. When asked how many
• 1:42
  Speaker 4: were reimbursed for travel, he said he didn't recall the
• 1:44
  Speaker 4: number off the top of his head, which indicates there's
• 1:47
  Speaker 4: a number. And so I personally think this is the
• 1:49
  Speaker 4: sleeper story of the day. You know, so many lawmakers
• 1:52
  Speaker 4: and pundits were decried as crazy for suggesting that there
• 1:56
  Speaker 4: could be confidential human sources involved in January sixth. There
• 2:00
  Speaker 4: might just have been. Now, of course, the questions are
• 2:03
  Speaker 4: what was their level of involvement, what was the conversations
• 2:06
  Speaker 4: there were they in fact enticing or inducing anyone to
• 2:09
  Speaker 4: commit crimes? Because that would be a whole separate legal issue,
• 2:12
  Speaker 4: of course, But lots of questions and out of this
• 2:15
  Speaker 4: very interesting testimony off Capital Health today.
• 2:17
  Speaker 2: Well during that time in the year before, a lot
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: of it is were told, well, if you think this,
• 2:21
  Speaker 2: you're crazy and you're tinfoyl Hot conspiracy theorist. But a
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: lot of that turned out to be true. So we'll
• 2:25
  Speaker 2: see where this goes. It's intriguing, very intriguing.
• 2:28
  Speaker 4: We'll see what that report says. When that report comes out, Great.
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: To see you.
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: So it's really looking quite plausible at this point that
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: there were some number of operatives at the demonstration. And
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: obviously it's not the first we've heard of this. I mean,
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: here's an article from September twenty twenty three from the
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: New York Post. FBI lost count of how many paid
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: informants were at the Capitol on January sixth, and later
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: performed audit to figure out exact number. That's from an
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: ex official. And let's not forget the very strange case
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: of Ray Epps, for whom there is video evidence of
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: him at the Capitol tomorrow.
• 3:10
  Speaker 3: We need to go into the Capitol.
• 3:13
  Speaker 1: In the Capitol, the people around him there in the
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: crowd were chanting fed, fed, fed, which is interesting. I'm
• 3:31
  Speaker 1: not claiming that he was, but the people around him
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: weren't sure suspicious And the suspicion continues with the fact
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: that he was sentenced to probation while people who did
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: far less than that were given lengthy prison sentences. Seem strange.
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: Of course, the headline here is man who was subject
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: of January sixth conspiracies sentenced to probation. It's just kind
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: of strange to me. And here's the Washington Post. I
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: haven't seen them publishing anything at bemoaning the ill treatment
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: of any other person that was there that day. But
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: you see this latest news which very much leaves the
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: way open to their being operatives, to an admission of
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: their being operatives at January sixth, and it kind of
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: feels like jigsaw puzzles falling into place, doesn't it, especially
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: when you consider there are new transcripts that have been
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: revealed that prove that Trump urged the use of a
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: National Guard troops to protect the capital on January sixth,
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: but was rebuffed here from John Solomon, says General Mark Milly,
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, confirmed
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: to the Pentagon Inspector General three years ago that during
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: a January third, twenty twenty one Oval Office meeting, Trump
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: pre approved the use of National Guard or active duty
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: troops to keep peace in the nation's capital on the
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: day Congress was to certify the results of the twenty
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: twenty election. And why didn't that happen? Why weren't the
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: troops used? Well, Milly said that the then acting Defense Secretary,
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: Christopher Miller, himself a former general, assured Trump that there
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: was an adequate safety plan for Pentagon assistance to Washington, DC. Quote.
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: Miller responds by saying, Hey, we've got a plan and
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: we've got it covered. And that's about it, Milly recalled.
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: So Trump's requests for extra security at the capitol were denied,
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: the ex Capitol police chief's requests were denied. And what
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: happened to that pipe bomb? By the way, what happened
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: with that? That's all pretty murky, isn't it. I don't know.
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: You start to fit the pieces into place, and I
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: think one could be forgiven for wondering if perhaps there
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: was some sort of a plan in place to ensure discord,
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: to ensure a riot, to ensure that the media and
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: the incoming administration would have something to talk about and
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: in fact to demonize over well into the foreseeable future. So,
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: in the increasingly obvious case that there were operatives in
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: the audience at the demonstration, what were their roles? Was
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: it to insight? Was it just to report? Was the
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: denial of extra security to make sure that if a
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: fire did get started that it wouldn't get put out again?
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: Kind of feels like jigsaw piece has fallen into place. Anyway,
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: That's all I'm going to say about that. Please like, share,
• 6:33
  Speaker 1: and subscribe. Subscribing really helps me out. I thank you
• 6:36
  Speaker 1: for that. I will see you next time.