Latest / The Junto Podcast / E69: Republican Contradictions - Liberty Talk, Power Grabs

Transcript

E69: Republican Contradictions - Liberty Talk, Power Grabs · The Junto Podcast

0:10
Hello, America. Welcome to the Junto podcast, where we promote the practical
0:14
applications of critical thinking and bold creativity.
0:18
I'm your host, Edgar Mills. Thank you for.
0:29
Hello, America. Welcome back to what I think is episode 69.
0:36
Yep. So, in light of my last episode, a friend,
0:44
pointed out that, hey, maybe you are to think about bringing up some conservative
0:48
Republican contradictions.
0:51
And, hey, that was already on deck. Right? That was already on deck.
0:59
You know, classifying myself politically, you guys know I'm a libertarian,
1:04
that's where I live politically, but I mean,
1:11
if I had to say I lean one way or the other, I do lean a little more conservative
1:15
than progressive there, but that doesn't mean the Republicans are blameless.
1:23
We're talking about contradictions and hypocrisy We're not talking about who's
1:27
right, wrong, or otherwise necessarily We're just talking about contradictions,
1:33
And Republicans are not short of contradiction,
1:40
So, let's get to it Well, their stated platform is limited government Fiscal
1:47
responsibility They claim to care about individual liberty.
1:56
They do stand on solid, strong defense structure, defense apparatus.
2:04
And they say they stand on free markets.
2:10
Well, those ideals seem to diverge in practice a little bit.
2:17
And we can talk about stuff as obvious as the 2024, Trump's 2024 campaign.
2:25
If you guys remember, man, they were leaning heavily on libertarian rhetoric.
2:31
I mean, they were using libertarian talking points.
2:36
They were befriending libertarians.
2:40
And I mean like skeptical of, you heard the word deep state about a million
2:46
times and surveillance state and the intelligence apparatus.
2:52
So the Trump campaign was running on like, hey, we're very skeptical of these things.
2:59
No new wars.
3:02
Because that's a libertarian thing, right? Non-aggression principle.
3:06
Libertarians don't want any wars overseas.
3:09
If we've got to fight war on American soil, yeah, and then you can talk about nuance, right?
3:15
We fight overseas so we don't have to fight at home and that kind of thing.
3:18
But that's here and there.
3:21
They introduced shortly after that campaign the Doge Department of Governmental Efficiency.
3:29
I was fully on board with that. Oh, man, was I.
3:33
Anyway, and you see what happened post-election, right?
3:38
So we're not going to belabor that. We'll get into the details,
3:41
but we all know that election campaign rhetoric is, everybody accepts it.
3:49
Everybody knows and accepts that
3:51
what is said in a campaign is not what's going to happen in real life.
3:56
And it's too bad that we've accepted it.
4:00
Really, it's too bad. Anyway.
4:04
So, number one and most important to me, all right, I've mentioned these guys on here a few times.
4:12
Banish Big Brother is a podcast, and it's a libertarian, for sure,
4:18
libertarian podcast, but Zach and Elizabeth...
4:24
Who operate that podcast are very knowledgeable and they do the research and
4:30
they're very passionate about mass surveillance, state surveillance on the people.
4:39
So the conservatives, the Republicans who were criticizing the deep state and
4:47
the deep state abuses and,
4:51
abuse of the Fourth Amendment, which all the surveillance is exactly an abuse
4:56
of the Fourth Amendment for sure.
4:59
And they talked all about the skepticism of these things. Well,
5:04
let's look back in time just a little bit.
5:07
But September 11, 2001 was a tragic, tragic event in U.S. history.
5:15
Twin Towers were destroyed. 3,000 plus human beings were killed.
5:23
What immediately followed that? Immediately followed that. Yeah, the Patriot Act.
5:30
And that opened the floodgate for surveillance authorities and the FISA process
5:40
and all that stuff, wide open, unchecked.
5:46
And here we are in 2026 And still 25 years A quarter century later,
5:55
There's still all these FISA, Section 702 Blah blah blah And they keep reauthorizing,
6:04
Congress keeps reauthorizing Well who's in charge Of the government right now,
6:11
The Republicans are in charge Of the government right now.
6:16
But never mind that, it has bipartisan backing, right? The FISA warrants have vast bipartisan.
6:25
The government, whatever red or blue, they want the power over you and they
6:29
want to be able to spy on you for whatever reason.
6:35
So, you know, in Donald Trump's first term, look, I don't care what you think about Donald Trump.
6:44
The Obama administration did him wrong and the Biden administration did him wrong.
6:48
No doubt about it. Whether you like the guy or not, what do you think?
6:52
He's a pompous ass car salesman, used car salesman or not.
6:57
They abused powers to try and set that guy up for various reasons, for any reason.
7:04
And so Trump criticized it for being used against him. And then here we are now.
7:12
He himself was pushing for a clean reauthorization of the 702,
7:17
the FISA, Section 702, with minimal, if any, new restrictions.
7:24
And they keep building up the intelligence gathering apparatus.
7:28
And I'll drop Palantir to immigrate into law enforcement.
7:35
Palantir, as I knew it, was a tool for synthesizing intelligence on a battlefield.
7:43
So it just enables further abuse by the government.
7:47
So the contradiction, what are the contradictions? Well, we'll see.
7:53
Anyway, all the government speaks in rhetoric anyway, right?
7:58
And you don't hear many people, with the exception of the libertarian-leaning,
8:04
guys, talk about individual liberty in government.
8:11
Now, I know and respect people, well, kind of on both sides,
8:15
less so the Democrat, but...
8:19
The guys who talk about individual liberty in Congress and Senate,
8:24
Thomas Massey and Rand Paul, Justin Amash back in the day,
8:30
those guys are shit on by both sides of the aisle because they don't back all
8:38
this expansive intelligence gathering stuff.
8:43
And they'll sell it under the guise of terrorism and foreign invasions and whatnot. Whatever, man.
8:53
So when surveillance targets the conservatives for political and campaign purposes, it's bad.
9:00
And then when in office, suddenly it's okay. It's good.
9:07
And you know what the conservatives love to say? And this burns me,
9:12
it burns me, it burns me up.
9:15
If you're doing nothing wrong, you have nothing to worry about.
9:20
Is that the bar for privacy? Well, if you're doing nothing wrong,
9:24
you have nothing to worry about. Oh, man.
9:29
So, again, there are libertarian-leaning Republicans or semi-conservatives out
9:34
there who put emphasis on privacy and government restraint.
9:40
Government controls, not individual controls.
9:45
But all this stuff is always sold under the guise of national security, always.
9:52
And even individuals, right, non-governmental people, right-wing activist types,
9:59
they're not as loud and vocal as the left-wing activist types,
10:03
and for different reasons.
10:06
But they, well, sure, they support the military, but they kind of align with
10:14
some of these hyper-conservative sort of think tank types as well. And.
10:21
They think that they're being hyper-intellectual when they advocate for these
10:27
intelligence gathering tools without putting any real solid parameters on them.
10:38
So, are they hypocrites or they just don't care? They want to live in a controlled state.
10:43
I don't know, man. Now, I always bust balls on the left.
10:47
You know, one of the things that lefties love to say, they say,
10:51
oh, it's going to become handmaid's tale with the hyper-conservative Christian types taking over.
11:00
And I tell them that they're so full of it when they say that.
11:03
But there are some right-wing activists out there.
11:08
The surveillance, that's the tool. That's the tool to further the control.
11:17
They can watch you and hear you no matter what, no matter where,
11:22
and recall anything they want.
11:26
That's where it is right there. The left loves it too, by the way.
11:30
Yeah, they do. We're talking about the right.
11:34
So on mass surveillance and surveillance apparatus and intelligence apparatus,
11:39
I think the conservatives, generally speaking, are hypocrites, hypocrites.
11:45
Yeah. And if you're a conservative, if you're a tried and true Republican, hit me up on that.
11:52
And because it's not that the technology exists, I don't oppose the technology existing.
12:00
I oppose the willingness to use it Not in accordance with the Constitution Well,
12:08
it's technology, it's different The Constitution doesn't really want to bullshit,
12:13
At least it's an obvious Fourth Amendment issue If not multiple others Alright,
12:21
what's next for the conservatives?
12:23
The things the conservatives love a lot Well, foreign policy in general And
12:30
specifically, what we hear in the 2024 campaign, I think he said, no new wars.
12:37
You remember George H.W. Bush?
12:41
Was it George H.W. Bush that said, no new taxes? Did we get new taxes?
12:47
No new wars. Did we get a new war?
12:53
These days, look, George Orwell, man, you know, it's so almost cliche to refer
12:59
to George Orwell, but 1984,
13:05
was, you know, it, it could have been called 2001 or 2020 or whatever.
13:14
It's all happening. Everything in that book is happening.
13:19
It's happening piecemeal from different factions but it's happening,
13:25
and what did George Orwell say wars weren't meant to be won they were meant
13:32
to be perpetual in a perpetual state of war,
13:38
the conservatives seemed to love it hey man our troops I'm all for them I love
13:44
our troops I was a troop Uh,
13:49
all we do is send troops to go die for.
13:56
Not only political causes, man, but I think, I think the, the,
13:59
the, the problem is, is we don't get the full read in on why we're doing the things we're doing.
14:07
So the troops who go and fight for the bigger cause don't get the honest assessment
14:13
of what the bigger cause is.
14:15
Therefore they can't. make an informed decision on whether or not they choose
14:21
to go fight for that cause.
14:24
That's what I think is happening these days.
14:28
So, yeah, the Republicans say, oh, forever wars, get us out of the war.
14:33
They talk about the financial cost of war.
14:39
But then we get in there and it's bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb,
14:42
bomb. Those bombs have a price tag attached to them, folks.
14:46
And every life, never mind the moral factor of a life being lost.
14:53
Now, look, I'm a patriot. I'm an American. And I don't think one single American
15:00
life is worth 10,000 Iranian lives.
15:04
That's just on a war scale.
15:09
Correction, 10,000 Iranian lives aren't worth one American life when it comes to war.
15:16
There are so many different ways to do a thing. There are so many different
15:20
ways to accomplish a thing.
15:23
And the shock and awe and the big giant bombs and everything and then you hear
15:28
conservatives what will they say well just blow the country off the map.
15:36
Yeah that might do it that might do it but it also might just create 8 million
15:46
more problems bigger problems,
15:50
now you can say well that's That's exerting our American strength and showing
15:57
our dominance in the world.
15:59
We are dominant in the world, that's true. And if we erase the moral factors
16:06
of decimating an entire population and turning Iran into a glass factory.
16:17
Okay. But then, I mean, at that point, the rhetoric from the left about mass
16:23
murder and genocide kind of becomes true.
16:26
It's instant genocide. You drop a giant nuke right in the middle of Iran.
16:32
Anyway, my point is this. There's a lot of ways to do a thing.
16:36
There's surgical ways to do things.
16:38
The U.S. military and intelligence apparatus has some of the most highly trained dudes on the planet.
16:46
And believe it or not, there's some highly strategic thinkers and smart,
16:51
smart, smart dudes and women who have the capacity to solve complex problems.
17:01
But it's always politics, man, always politics that is the obstacle. Conservatives love it.
17:09
Yeah, conservatives love it.
17:12
They say they hate intervention into foreign issues.
17:17
But what happened? Well, let's see.
17:21
When George W. Bush was in office, they specifically, even word for word,
17:27
said that they opposed nation building.
17:33
That's all we did for 20 years.
17:39
Oh, man.
17:44
How many billions of dollars, possibly trillions, if you look at Afghanistan
17:49
and Iraq together over the course of 20 years?
17:52
How many trillions of dollars are just poured into what?
17:59
Okay, well, what is Afghanistan now?
18:04
Yeah, man. Well, in 2024 campaign, again, he criticized heavily.
18:10
Trump criticized heavily the entanglements and the way that the withdrawal from
18:16
Afghanistan happened, by the way, which, by the way, should be a criminal.
18:23
It should be tried and everybody involved in it should be tried as criminals.
18:28
The way that happened was all wrong. and I'm not a strategic thinker and I'm
18:34
telling you that was all wrong.
18:38
And if you don't believe it, and I've always said, Hey man, if it was me,
18:41
I'll just take my ball and go home.
18:43
Not frigging literally, right? You got to phase that stuff out.
18:47
The vacuum. Well, anyway, what's happened is the vacuum that happened and it's worth criticizing.
18:54
So when you're on a campaign trail and you're criticizing it and it's good and
18:57
right. But then what happens?
19:00
You get off the campaign trail. You get elected and then you start doing.
19:09
Start considering the needs of other countries alongside or above your own and
19:15
start going into operations against other various countries for various reasons
19:21
to support various people.
19:24
And then you start talking about peace through strength, and that's sort of
19:28
right, but easily abused.
19:33
And then it costs. Every military action costs, costs, costs, costs. And who pays it?
19:41
Well, the government, for some reason, thinks that we owe them money, the government.
19:47
And I'll go back to the old school taxation and theft.
19:51
We pay for everything the government does, the government provides.
19:58
We pay for the military. We pay for every single bomb, every JDAM,
20:03
every hellfire, every 7-6-2 by 5-1 round. We pay for.
20:12
So promises, the libertarian-esque promises to restrain our spending and our
20:19
foreign policy and focus domestically, right?
20:23
We got homeless veterans and this and that.
20:27
And meanwhile, we're sending billions of dollars to every country on the planet
20:31
just about to include countries that hate us, literally.
20:37
That's what's going on. And conservatives will criticize the foreign aid,
20:43
but then they will praise the influence.
20:48
Well, you don't get influence just through firepower.
20:52
You don't get influence just through firepower. You got to buy the influence.
21:00
It's a very mafioso sort of cycle there.
21:04
And then the money and then the influence that we are attempting to buy,
21:07
we ain't getting very much influence with it.
21:11
And clearly, just like on the left where there's multiple factions that have
21:15
different thoughts about different things, so on the right.
21:21
The neocons out there, they love foreign intervention. They love to get in the mix.
21:26
The CIA loves getting up in other countries' business and trying to export democracy,
21:34
or controllable political figures, really, is what I think.
21:38
They love it. And there's neocons. They love it.
21:43
Then you got your populists, though, who prioritize America first, right?
21:49
And never mind the slogan, America first or MAGA or whatever.
21:53
Never mind that. I'm not talking about that shit.
21:56
America first policies, that should be the standard.
22:01
How does this affect us first? Not how does it affect someone else?
22:06
And then what famously though, within the conservative ranks,
22:11
within the Republican ranks, what happens is, is you have these conservative type think tanks.
22:19
It kind of happens on the left, too, but in a different way.
22:21
But you have these conservative-type think tanks, and then those people,
22:26
eventually, they'll start holding cabinet positions.
22:30
And they're the advisors who are pushing all these bizarro policies,
22:36
whether they're interventionists or what.
22:39
And that's how you got Dick Cheney and Kellogg Brown and Root.
22:47
Everything from dropping bombs
22:48
to cleaning shitters and, and war zones and making all the money off it.
22:55
So private activists, they, they can wiggle their way to, to have influence and they do often.
23:05
And also those private activists, that probably comes with money,
23:07
right? They, they make these political action committees first to be able to,
23:13
collect up a bunch of money, and then they buy their way into a cabinet position.
23:19
This is the Republican way.
23:22
What else? I always say that Republicans and Democrats are, and not me only,
23:27
I mean, it's a popular phrase out there, that they're two sides of the same coin,
23:33
or that they are the right and left feather of the same bird.
23:38
Well, allegedly, Republicans promote the free market and,
23:45
limited intervention, government intervention over these like protectionist
23:52
sort of tariffs and stuff like that.
23:56
That's good. I'm a free market man. I'm laissez-faire capitalism,
24:00
minimal government oversight, minimal government interference with the free market.
24:07
I think the market is a natural thing.
24:12
And what comes from the market unmolested, what comes from the market when it
24:17
is unmolested is natural and correct.
24:21
That's what I think.
24:23
But once in control.
24:26
The game is to keep control. So now we start subsidizing this or putting tariffs
24:35
on that, and it doesn't let the free market.
24:39
Now, look, you can argue that we are in an unfair battlefield here because places
24:46
like China I don't play by the same rules that we do.
24:50
But I can tell you this, the majority of those rules are self-imposed.
24:55
So, yeah, I'd say generally speaking that was, and the Republicans kind of held
24:59
to that for a long time. But,
25:03
since 2000, since the 2000s, no. Nope.
25:10
They start using tariffs heavily, not just as leverage, you know what I mean?
25:16
Not just, but as tools to try to control and stay on top.
25:23
And what do all those things do? It just drives up the cost of everything we
25:27
consume as the little people.
25:31
For the contradiction, the broader contradiction is if you are conservative
25:38
and because you're guys in charge, you think tariffs and regulations are good.
25:46
Contradiction with yourself. Pure free market principles do not have government interference.
25:53
Government does not pick winners and losers.
25:56
Tariffs raise costs. That's the way it is.
26:01
Now, whether or not you're willing collectively, all right, well,
26:05
first of all, there is no collective. You don't speak for me and I don't speak for you.
26:09
So let's get that square.
26:13
However, some people may be willing to accept a higher cost of gas or food,
26:21
or homes because it costs more to build, because there's tariffs on things that,
26:28
now the price of everything has gone up.
26:31
But those tariffs kind of go along with kind of centralized planning and centralized
26:36
control versus a decentralized free market. It's a contradiction.
26:42
Now people love to invoke Reagan I do too I mean at least he was.
26:49
Mostly about free trade and against sort of protectionism.
26:56
And then you got the supporters, the people out there.
27:01
So the MAGA red hat populist sort of factions, yeah, they want to prioritize
27:08
American made this and that. And I do too. I think that's good.
27:14
But they want to do it via protectionists.
27:19
If our factories can't compete in a free market, then we've got to impose artificial
27:26
means onto them to help them stay competitive.
27:31
That's not the free market. Anyway, so, yeah, I'm not an economist.
27:38
Clearly, I can barely do math. But you can't have your cake and eat it,
27:44
too. It can't be both ways.
27:47
We can't have American made and America first and then call ourselves a free market.
27:53
I made a comment on a post the other day about cronyism versus capitalism.
27:59
And everything that the progressive left bemoans about capitalists, it all requires...
28:09
A government component. I can be a capitalist and not have any influence whatsoever.
28:18
And then I can go bribe a politician to make policy favorable to me.
28:24
And then boom, there it is. Well, it took that politician making policy,
28:30
right? It took that for my, he could have just turned me away.
28:35
So it's not capitalism. It's not even capitalists who are ambitious.
28:41
It's government, people who decide what goes on, policy gets written.
28:46
It's those people with weak constitutions and weak integrity that are willing
28:51
to play along, to get favor, to get votes, that kind of thing. Crony, cronyism.
28:59
That's what all the progressives are bemoaning. They just don't want to call it by what it is.
29:04
They want to call it capitalism. Late-stage capitalism is failing. Bullshit.
29:10
Shit, where am I at? Late-stage capitalism.
29:17
What is late-stage socialism? Damn, I'm talking about conservatives and suddenly
29:21
I'm over here jamming on progressives.
29:25
I can't help it.
29:28
So all that stuff goes along with limited government, right? Limited bureaucracy.
29:34
That's what the conservatives say they want. Limited government, limited bureaucracy.
29:39
But the institutional realities are not that. That's not what they produce.
29:45
They were all very skeptical. They came up with Doge. One of the best ideas
29:49
in government ever. Department of Governmental Efficiency.
29:54
A small surgical team of humans to audit every government three-letter agency and sub-agency.
30:06
From the White House all the way down and cut the fat could have saved probably trillions of dollars.
30:16
It was such an awesome campaign promise.
30:21
And it started working, but they cut it away.
30:25
Unnecessary regulations, waste fraud and abuse, foreign aid.
30:33
That was good. That's what they told us they wanted.
30:37
That's what the Republicans said. What about that fiscal restraint?
30:42
Where are we at on that fiscal restraint? has anybody audited the fed lately,
30:48
somebody audited the irs lately and made any meaningful action taking any meaningful
30:54
action against the fraud waste and abuse or incompetence,
30:59
that should be added in fraud waste abuse,
31:03
we won't call it incompetence fraud waste abuse negligence,
31:08
that's what it should be the office you don't want to doge because it's got
31:13
a connection with Elon Musk, the Office of Fraud, Waste, Abuse,
31:18
and Negligence. That's what we need.
31:22
But they went the opposite. They went the opposite.
31:27
Spending more money more money they reduce any any of these what's called entitlements,
31:33
they haven't reduced any long-term sort of bureaucracy,
31:39
they just back the business as usual that's what they do so what does that mean
31:44
is the machine stronger than the people running it,
31:47
you just got to hop in right along do your insider trading so you can get your net worth up,
31:55
50, 100 million and then ride it until the ride's over then you go off and write
32:03
a book and do speaking tours at liberal colleges.
32:11
Money. So data collection, well, the data centers are the hot topic, right?
32:18
But those data centers go along to support a data collection.
32:24
So for all the people who hate on data centers, there's a deeper reason.
32:27
It's not just that it costs, runs our power bill up and our water bill,
32:32
like probably that for sure.
32:35
But all those data collection centers, if they're collecting on 360-plus million
32:41
human beings, you've got to have someplace to put all that.
32:46
The right, the right wing, that's what's going on with the right.
32:50
That's what's going on with the right. Now, I'm notably not speaking about Christians, and why?
32:58
First of all, for whatever you out there who are non-religious or non-political,
33:04
And especially for those of you who are leftist, progressive,
33:09
hyper-LGBTQIA+.
33:16
Whatever it is, not all Christians are goddang Republicans.
33:23
Now, by definition, all Christians ought to be conservative,
33:28
but there's a difference between Republican and conservative.
33:32
Republicans claim that they support family values, and that may be sort of generally
33:39
true, but policy-wise, you don't really see that.
33:48
All Christians are Republicans. There are, and it blows my mind.
33:52
In fact, my Aunt Arlene is a Democrat, and I love her dearly.
33:59
And she's one of the smartest women I know and talented and caring.
34:07
But she's a Democrat. Okay, well. And she's a Christian and has been all her
34:13
life, as far as I all my life.
34:18
So you can't conflate the two don't don't conflate the two if you are you're
34:23
not being a critical thinker,
34:25
so don't they're handmaid's tale that ain't going to happen you know where that's
34:30
going to happen handmaid's tale that's going to happen from the left but it's
34:34
going to be polar opposite from,
34:37
your little concubine, you know, handmade wife, uh,
34:43
baby factory. It's going to be the opposite of that.
34:46
It's, uh, I don't even want to go into that.
34:52
So all this anti-overreach, minimal government efficiency in government, all the,
35:00
all that messaging sort of brought
35:03
conservatives together behind that message, and it did effectively.
35:08
I mean, Trump won, probably despite ongoing campaign fraud, or not campaign
35:16
fraud, election fraud, but governing, actually physically governing, doing the job.
35:26
There's a certain functionality required for these institutions.
35:32
Security has got to, that's always a thing, no matter what your,
35:36
what brand, no matter what your security is a thing, it's necessary.
35:41
Border enforcement is a thing. It's necessary. What do you think it's necessary or not?
35:48
It's necessary. We need to know who's coming and going in this country.
35:51
How you do it, that's another episode.
35:56
But whatever services the government claims to provide, the government doesn't provide a service.
36:01
It facilitates a service that you pay for.
36:05
But for that to happen functionally, you know, conservatives have got to,
36:11
yeah, they've got to compromise their whatever their rhetoric was.
36:14
They've got to compromise it.
36:16
And not only do they compromise it, oh, boy, do they. They expand it.
36:22
Because when you're in charge, man, you want to expand, expand, expand.
36:25
Build an apparatus that supports your staying in power.
36:31
And your hard-right activists, the activists out, not the politicians,
36:34
the hard-right activists out there, arguably most of those are like government agencies anyway.
36:42
Most of them are, I suspect.
36:45
But they use those to interject, just like the progressives have paid agitators,
36:52
which are probably government agencies also.
36:56
The hard right has paid agitators, but they're on the government employment list there.
37:05
And they push the anti-establishment rhetoric and all that stuff to challenge
37:10
incumbents that they're trying to get out or whatever.
37:13
And they talk about challenging the bureaucracy. They say they don't want the bureaucracy.
37:18
And then once they're in power, man, once their guy's in power, mom's the word.
37:26
Practical need to keep the beast alive, the beast, the government beast,
37:33
a.k.a. the self-licking ice cream.
37:36
It exists to exist.
37:39
It doesn't do anything very positive when it comes to individual liberty.
37:46
So these little contradictions, mainly I was on the government mostly there,
37:52
and all variants of these down to private, personal levels, these are longstanding,
38:00
and they flow, and they ebb, and they change a little.
38:04
And I'm only really talking since 2000, you know, but even prior to that,
38:10
I think politics has always been greasy.
38:13
But I think since 2000 or so for the past 20, 25, 30 years or so.
38:22
It's changing for the worse is what I think the government is. It's growing for sure.
38:28
If we do an analysis of the size of the government now versus 1996,
38:34
it's probably pretty significant.
38:35
If we look at numbers of budgets and whatnot from 1996 to now,
38:40
it's probably pretty significant.
38:45
So they're not new. They're just getting exacerbated.
38:50
Like all things, they're getting exacerbated, even due to social media, even in politics.
38:58
You got Cortez all over the social medias running or suck.
39:07
So never mind campaign probably. Yeah, campaign.
39:12
The world's complex. The threats exist. All the things exist.
39:19
Not that I necessarily, just like on the left, I don't disagree that poor people should be fed.
39:28
I don't disagree that poor people should be housed. Homeless people should be housed.
39:35
I don't disagree that sick people should be tended to medically.
39:40
I just disagree that it should be the government initiating it and paying for it.
39:45
And that's the same with all these right-wing governmental surveillance programs.
39:53
Now, most, well, not most, a lot of the overreach is within the intelligence
39:59
and military apparatus. And no, of course, we don't have,
40:04
excuse me, we don't have a private version of that. Even though every state
40:09
should have a private militia, I believe.
40:12
There's not a private version of that. So it's easy to use that,
40:18
for the overreach. So it's easy to say things.
40:23
It's easy to speak in ideals. And then it turns out it's not so easy to back that up. Well,
40:34
it's easy enough to back it up if you have the integrity to back it up.
40:39
I say that the majority of politicians lack that integrity.
40:46
The realities of governing, yeah, for sure, are probably, I don't want to say
40:53
overwhelming, but they're probably, the realities of governing is probably pretty tough.
40:59
And I'm not giving any free pass on anybody. They go into politics, what do you expect?
41:04
I mean, don't expect hard things not to be hard.
41:08
So mainly we're talking about the right and their sort of.
41:15
Neocon, war hawk interventionists versus kind of nationalism,
41:21
America first, protectionism versus free trade. So even then,
41:28
it's all contradictory.
41:31
It's all contradictory. Both parties have these contradictions, politically speaking.
41:38
Like I said, you don't even have to designate red or blue.
41:44
You just talk political parties, and you can say all these things,
41:50
and it would be accurate, especially when it comes to campaign promises versus reality.
41:57
So that's where I was at. That's where I was at on the conservative contradictions.
42:02
I didn't want to go into life, right? We can talk about abortion and stuff like that on another episode.
42:11
Because that's—.
42:14
A Republican platform, right? Anti-abortion, but there's a lot of nuance there that doesn't bear this.
42:21
And so as I'm going on here, I got a whole series of contradictions that I'm
42:30
going to post periodically.
42:31
Now I'm trying not to go dark. I'm going to try not to go too dark all the time,
42:37
even though it seems to go that way sometimes.
42:40
However, if you got a topic, right? If you got beef, or if you think incorrect
42:46
or partially correct, or I got something completely wrong or backwards, do hit me up.
42:52
Edgar Mills at thejuntopodcast.com.
42:55
I'm happy to analyze myself.
42:58
Yeah, I'm happy to take in new information, analyze it, and determine whether
43:02
or not I need to change my mind or not, or make a retraction.
43:08
Even though I'm not an official news outlet, I don't think that's necessary.
43:13
This is just my opinions, folks. Just my opinions. So anyway,
43:18
thank you all for listening to this.
43:21
I hope it satisfied some of you who get mad at me for going hard right libertarianish.
43:28
I'm definitely not hard right, I guess. I don't know.
43:32
All right, folks. OspreyshootingSolutions.com. Man, we got a lot of stuff between
43:38
now and the end of October, please check it out.
43:41
Coming first, we have a pistol workshop. I want to say August 8th.
43:46
Coming next, we have a wild card day, and that is August 22nd.
43:55
September 12th, we have another armed self-defense force-on-force scenario-based,
44:02
training course, and that's always a very good one. That's a good one.
44:07
And then October's full of competitions and there's a dynamic everyday carry course.
44:13
All right. So give it a listen and please give to the Help a Homie Fund.