Latest / Brian Thomas / 55KRC Tuesday Show - Tom Z, Breitbart, Deep Dive

Transcript

55KRC Tuesday Show - Tom Z, Breitbart, Deep Dive · Brian Thomas

• 0:06
  Speaker 1: Five o five.
• 0:08
  Speaker 2: At fifty five KRC. The talk station Suesday. That'd be Tuesday,
• 0:17
  Speaker 2: some says.
• 0:19
  Speaker 3: Say, hopefully will.
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: A vacation.
• 0:28
  Speaker 4: And that's the way the news going.
• 0:31
  Speaker 2: It is the way the news goes. Happy Tuesday. Brandon
• 0:33
  Speaker 2: Thomas right here, glad to be and uh well, at
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: least alive, awake and uh well, prepared to dive into
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: the topics this morning with your help. If you choose,
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: you can always call me. I always appreciate the calls.
• 0:43
  Speaker 2: Five one three, seven four nine fifty five hundred, eight
• 0:45
  Speaker 2: hundred eight two to three talk down five fifty on
• 0:48
  Speaker 2: your AT and T phones, coming up seven thirty. It
• 0:51
  Speaker 2: is Tuesday. But always here from Tom z Awastowski from
• 0:53
  Speaker 2: where the People Convention dot org. And he's got a
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: continuing ongoing message which is the same mess as we
• 0:58
  Speaker 2: get from Americans for prosperity. Excuse me, and literally every
• 1:04
  Speaker 2: punted it out there. You got to get out and
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: vote conservatives, libertarians. Hopefully the libertarians will lean conservative. That's
• 1:10
  Speaker 2: kind of the mindset. That's my mindset. Anyway, get out
• 1:14
  Speaker 2: and vote. Got to get out and vote. That message
• 1:16
  Speaker 2: ring through. Have you talked to your friends that might
• 1:19
  Speaker 2: otherwise normally not vote and told them how important it
• 1:22
  Speaker 2: is they have to get out and vote. This wave
• 1:26
  Speaker 2: and ever growing popular, the popularity of socialism is frightening
• 1:31
  Speaker 2: the hell out of me. I had a long conversation
• 1:37
  Speaker 2: with a friend of mine yesterday, I left leaning friend.
• 1:41
  Speaker 2: He loves, he'd loves to bash Trump. He's just a
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: afflicted with Trump arrangement syndrome. And he said, he is
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: a dear friend, and yeah, we managed to still get
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: along in spite of the fact that he goes on
• 1:53
  Speaker 2: these long rambles and you know, he'll randomly pick some
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: criticism about Trump an inarguable point. It's like, okay, I'll
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: can see that one man. But for everything you choose
• 2:03
  Speaker 2: to select hand pick in terms of criticism about people
• 2:06
  Speaker 2: on the right side of the ledger, there are an
• 2:10
  Speaker 2: equal number of criticisms for people on the left hand
• 2:13
  Speaker 2: side of the ledger. And ultimately, I was just trying
• 2:15
  Speaker 2: to point out we have a lot of corruption and
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: lunacy in politics. It's endemic. It's a problem within the system.
• 2:27
  Speaker 2: It's all over the place, which supports my little libertarian leanings.
• 2:30
  Speaker 2: You know, don't give this decision making to some other people.
• 2:33
  Speaker 2: They'll screw it up. They have their own personal interests.
• 2:38
  Speaker 2: Like my saying that I say all the time, and
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: you can disagree with it if you want. The fool's
• 2:42
  Speaker 2: the one that's not looking up for his or her
• 2:43
  Speaker 2: own best interests. Politicians are the same way, and sometimes
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: even worse. Sometimes actually they seek office in order to
• 2:50
  Speaker 2: get stuff and things for themselves. And that should come
• 2:54
  Speaker 2: as a shock to no one, this whole idea that
• 2:56
  Speaker 2: all they're altruistic, all they want is to care about Yeah, yeah, okay,
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: right whatever, they have a personal invested interest. I mean,
• 3:03
  Speaker 2: how many of them go to Washington, DC, or maybe
• 3:05
  Speaker 2: in the state of Ohio Columbus come back very wealthy.
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: How does that happen? We know what their salaries are,
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: and we know what you can get in terms of
• 3:12
  Speaker 2: return on investment in the stock market, assuming you're not
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: inside or trading. We've had a problem with that over
• 3:18
  Speaker 2: the years, haven't we with elected officials?
• 3:20
  Speaker 5: Hmmm.
• 3:20
  Speaker 2: I don't know why. Hillary Clinton immediately comes to mind,
• 3:23
  Speaker 2: just one of many. The Clinton Foundation itself. I'll bet
• 3:27
  Speaker 2: there's no corruption in there, so you know, but going
• 3:33
  Speaker 2: back to the November election, Yeah, you're going to have
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: to hold your nose and maybe vote for someone who's
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: thinking about their own best interest, but maybe not as
• 3:41
  Speaker 2: much as the other guy. Maybe not as much as
• 3:43
  Speaker 2: this socialist candidate on the other side of the Ledger
• 3:45
  Speaker 2: who literally wants to take over more and more of
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: your life, put in place more policies that tend to fail.
• 3:52
  Speaker 2: I mean health policy member Obamacare. Yeah, we were going
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: to be able to keep our policy, keep our doctors,
• 3:59
  Speaker 2: and it was going to be twenty five hundred dollars
• 4:00
  Speaker 2: less per year. Did that work out? And now they
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: want to push Medicare or yeah, Medicare for all, it'll
• 4:07
  Speaker 2: be more like Medicaid for all. But the problem that
• 4:10
  Speaker 2: they said they were going to solve made the problem.
• 4:12
  Speaker 2: The situation with health care were so entered the socialist
• 4:16
  Speaker 2: cries for a bigger, broader, presumably more corrupt, failing government
• 4:21
  Speaker 2: policy to solve the problem. So I know we're all
• 4:27
  Speaker 2: frustrated out there. I get it, but that frustration should
• 4:33
  Speaker 2: not lead to capitulation. Because you're conceding to the left
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: side of the Ledger means you are conceding to more
• 4:42
  Speaker 2: of their policies coming your way. And I really expect
• 4:47
  Speaker 2: that you really should go look at back at the
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: policies and find out how well they've worked out. And
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: my friend and I had a conversation. You talked about
• 4:53
  Speaker 2: how wonderful social Security is. I said, if you've been
• 4:55
  Speaker 2: paying attention to the news of late twenty thirty two,
• 4:59
  Speaker 2: unless Congress does something to solve an inevitable, obvious problem,
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: a bipartisan agreement has emerged. Under the agreement being well,
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: we all know that if we don't do something to
• 5:11
  Speaker 2: fix social Security. The current trajectory, my senior friends out there,
• 5:15
  Speaker 2: twenty two percent of your Social Security monthly payment, it's
• 5:18
  Speaker 2: going to be cut, and that will only get worse.
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: And I brought this this attention. I said, there, see, well,
• 5:26
  Speaker 2: whose fault is that? I said, it's politician's fault. This
• 5:29
  Speaker 2: has been a brewing problem forever. They've been projecting this
• 5:32
  Speaker 2: problem and talking about this calamity that's coming our way
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: for I won't say forever, they'd be far too broad
• 5:40
  Speaker 2: a brush, but for a really, really, really long time.
• 5:46
  Speaker 2: This is the slow motion train wreck. And you know
• 5:49
  Speaker 2: if someone, hey, somebody stopped to train that, hell, well,
• 5:51
  Speaker 2: we can't touch it. It's the third rail of politics.
• 5:54
  Speaker 2: Both sides of the Ledger afraid to fix an obvious problem,
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: and that was the one you said. It was so
• 6:01
  Speaker 2: wonderful and great theoretically, Yeah, but then when you put
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: it in the hands of people who don't really care
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: and who are really just worried about offending someone because
• 6:09
  Speaker 2: the trajectory didn't work out the way it was originally planned.
• 6:12
  Speaker 2: You can't keep a system going where when it started
• 6:16
  Speaker 2: out with fifteen people working for every one senior on
• 6:20
  Speaker 2: Social Security, which senior was going to die within a
• 6:22
  Speaker 2: few years of joining the ranks of recipients of the
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: Social Security program. The dynamic has changed. Fewer workers, a
• 6:29
  Speaker 2: lot few were paying into the system, and a hell
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: of a lot more people living a hell of a
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: lot longer now on the program. That's a problem. Maybe
• 6:36
  Speaker 2: they couldn't envision it when this glorious grand program was enshrined.
• 6:40
  Speaker 2: Oh they could never have foreseen this. But they didn't
• 6:43
  Speaker 2: know about the problems that were gradually unfolding this unemployed.
• 6:48
  Speaker 2: This employment ratio didn't come out overnight. We didn't go
• 6:52
  Speaker 2: from fifteen people paying into three people paying in in
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: a moment's time. It was a gradual reduction of the
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: number of people working and paying into the Social Security system.
• 7:00
  Speaker 2: Giant red flags waving all over the place, a problem
• 7:03
  Speaker 2: for both sides of the political ledger. Oh my god,
• 7:06
  Speaker 2: if social security collapses or it becomes a real problem,
• 7:09
  Speaker 2: we're all going to hear about it. Yeah, true, nothing done,
• 7:14
  Speaker 2: I mean, and then you press them on finding some
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: other government programs all worked out real great and everybody's advantage,
• 7:20
  Speaker 2: and you know, the silence can be kind of deafening,
• 7:22
  Speaker 2: or the evasive comments start entering the equation. Now, we
• 7:25
  Speaker 2: don't want to talk about that. So I know this
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: problem is going to disappear in November if we if
• 7:36
  Speaker 2: the Republican side of the equation maintains control. But if
• 7:39
  Speaker 2: the Democrats get control, huh, it's going to be a
• 7:44
  Speaker 2: profound shift in this country and a threat to the
• 7:49
  Speaker 2: future of our country. You know, capitalism has worked out
• 7:53
  Speaker 2: so well for so many people. It is not in
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: any way, shape or form perfect. But again I emphasize
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: that people need to step back from their complaints about
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: this economic system and pull back from the globe and
• 8:08
  Speaker 2: search the world for a better one. You are not
• 8:11
  Speaker 2: going to find one. And when I read accounts and
• 8:15
  Speaker 2: reports about you know, these socialists, you know, not wanting
• 8:19
  Speaker 2: to pay rent, that squatting is okay, That stealing is okay.
• 8:24
  Speaker 2: If you're in a bad way, go ahead and steal it.
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: You should be forgiven for that. First off, it was
• 8:31
  Speaker 2: capitalism that created the buildings that people are living in,
• 8:36
  Speaker 2: Buildings that were built because there was a capital incentive,
• 8:41
  Speaker 2: a profit incentive. If there was no profit incentive in
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: the first place, built on a capitalist model, the building
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: that you want for a rent in wouldn't even be there.
• 8:52
  Speaker 2: You're squatting in something that was brought about by capitalism.
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: Take capitalism out of the equation, Well, you're a homeless
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: person squatting in the street, which, of course we'll call
• 9:04
  Speaker 2: for a government solution to solve that problem. If you're
• 9:07
  Speaker 2: stealing from someone, you are stealing from a capitalist model
• 9:11
  Speaker 2: that brought whatever product to the store that you're stealing,
• 9:15
  Speaker 2: entire system built on profit incentive. The manufacturer of the
• 9:20
  Speaker 2: individual product that you stole, whether it was in China
• 9:24
  Speaker 2: or here in the United States or any place else,
• 9:26
  Speaker 2: shipped to and across the globe or across the state
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: or country to that store. Store owner purchased the good
• 9:34
  Speaker 2: at a wholesale price, selling it for a modest profit.
• 9:38
  Speaker 2: That entire capitalist structure supported by profit incentive, profit to
• 9:42
  Speaker 2: the shipping company as well. You steal it because well
• 9:45
  Speaker 2: it's just fair, or it's okay because you don't have
• 9:49
  Speaker 2: enough to eat or whatever fill in the blank. It
• 9:53
  Speaker 2: wouldn't hit the product wouldn't even be there for you
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: to steal. Absent capitalism. No, we just need a socialist
• 10:01
  Speaker 2: system where all the government controls the means of production,
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: the government creates the products, and the government creates the buildings. Okay,
• 10:10
  Speaker 2: socialist system, and how well have they worked out in
• 10:13
  Speaker 2: every other country that's tried it. It doesn't. The incentive
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: work disappears. The products created by government, whether it be
• 10:21
  Speaker 2: housing or the food or whatever, obviously inferior. I'm immediately
• 10:26
  Speaker 2: thinking of Soviet style housing, of course, and slowly and surely,
• 10:33
  Speaker 2: because of the lack of profit incentive, the whole system
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: will collapse on itself. Look at the entire continent of
• 10:38
  Speaker 2: South America. Now, I'll admit that part of it's still
• 10:41
  Speaker 2: full on socialist, but year after year after year, and
• 10:45
  Speaker 2: it's just happened. Most recently, the countries who had previously
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: embraced socialism have chucked it out in favor of reforming
• 10:52
  Speaker 2: their economic models. To more closely align with the most
• 10:56
  Speaker 2: successful business and economic model that the world has ever seen, right,
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: United States capitalism with all its warts. That's the direction
• 11:07
  Speaker 2: they move because the people are starving and living in
• 11:10
  Speaker 2: miserable conditions under the oppression of a socialist government, and
• 11:15
  Speaker 2: when given the opportunity, they voted in something that more
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: closely aligns with what we have here, warts and all.
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: And then move back and realize, if you don't believe
• 11:27
  Speaker 2: our business model has been most successful, how in God's
• 11:29
  Speaker 2: name is it that we end up funding literally said, well,
• 11:35
  Speaker 2: not literally. Okay, there's somebody out there going you're painting
• 11:36
  Speaker 2: with the two Broadway brush, Thomas. I'll acknowledge that funding
• 11:39
  Speaker 2: a lot of stuff around the globe to the tune
• 11:41
  Speaker 2: of trillions and trillions of dollars over the years. I mean,
• 11:44
  Speaker 2: it's one of the reasons that Donald Trump unloaded on
• 11:47
  Speaker 2: South Korea the other day. Now, I think maybe it
• 11:49
  Speaker 2: more has to do with the cost of the Iran
• 11:51
  Speaker 2: War and the cost of war games with the South Koreans,
• 11:56
  Speaker 2: but he unloaded on South Korea well, because we have
• 11:59
  Speaker 2: been defending them and supporting them militarily and defending them
• 12:02
  Speaker 2: against the North Koreans, and a lot of money has
• 12:05
  Speaker 2: been outlaid. We got thirty nine thousand soldiers over there
• 12:07
  Speaker 2: guarding them from Kim Jong. Oh. This is all the
• 12:10
  Speaker 2: stuff that Donald Trump pouted out just the other day.
• 12:12
  Speaker 2: It's the same thing argument he was making with NATO. Listen,
• 12:15
  Speaker 2: we the United States of America, going back to my point,
• 12:17
  Speaker 2: with all of its economic might and superiority, can afford
• 12:22
  Speaker 2: to defend you. We've been doing it since World War Two.
• 12:25
  Speaker 2: How about you start poning up and defending yourself. We're
• 12:29
  Speaker 2: tapped out. Could any other country on this planet defend
• 12:37
  Speaker 2: as we have and to the extent we have the
• 12:40
  Speaker 2: other countries of the world from the fears and the
• 12:42
  Speaker 2: problems that confront them, No, of course not. Why can
• 12:46
  Speaker 2: we do it because in spite of the fact that
• 12:48
  Speaker 2: we had to spend forty trillion dollars more than we
• 12:51
  Speaker 2: actually took in to do it, our economy is so
• 12:56
  Speaker 2: good that in spite of the debt, we're still the
• 12:59
  Speaker 2: best out there. That's because of the work that you
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: and I do every day, that we still continue to
• 13:07
  Speaker 2: go to work and earn and pay into the taxation
• 13:10
  Speaker 2: system and are far more efficient and effective at generating
• 13:15
  Speaker 2: wealth and income than anybody else. So people look at
• 13:19
  Speaker 2: us and say, may they've got a real problem on
• 13:21
  Speaker 2: their hands. They're paying one trillion dollars a year in
• 13:24
  Speaker 2: interest payments on that forty trillion hole they dug themselves in,
• 13:27
  Speaker 2: and they're still digging themselves into a deeper hole. That's
• 13:29
  Speaker 2: a recipe for disaster. Yeah, But in terms of Fiat currencies,
• 13:34
  Speaker 2: in terms of the economic might, in terms of the
• 13:36
  Speaker 2: likelihood of success long term, they're the best out there.
• 13:40
  Speaker 2: The United States of America five nineteen fifty five KR.
• 13:44
  Speaker 2: Se the talk station Feielfred to give me a call,
• 13:47
  Speaker 2: love to hear from you, be right back. This is
• 13:49
  Speaker 2: fifty five KARC an iHeartRadio station sixty eight degrees Here
• 13:52
  Speaker 2: fifty five KR see the talk station five point twenty
• 13:56
  Speaker 2: two on a Tuesday, five one three seven fifty eight
• 13:59
  Speaker 2: hundred eight. She's talking on by fifty on AT and
• 14:01
  Speaker 2: T phone. Don't forget think if I have care see
• 14:03
  Speaker 2: dot iHeart dot com and listen to the Christopher Smithman
• 14:06
  Speaker 2: about the firing of Chief Washington and the inevitable paycheck
• 14:10
  Speaker 2: these cities and the taxpayers of the City of Cincinnati.
• 14:12
  Speaker 2: Maybe Cherylong herself, we'll be writing as a consequence of
• 14:16
  Speaker 2: his wrongful termination civil rights violation. Let's go over to AJ.
• 14:19
  Speaker 2: He's on the phone. AJ. Thanks for calling today and
• 14:20
  Speaker 2: a happy Tuesday to you.
• 14:23
  Speaker 6: Hey, Hey, Brian, appreciate you taking a call. Just that
• 14:27
  Speaker 6: really quick question for you. I live in Montgomery, I believe,
• 14:31
  Speaker 6: just a little bit south of where you day, and
• 14:34
  Speaker 6: I've seen a lot of yard signs starting to pop up.
• 14:38
  Speaker 6: I'd say primarily Shared Brown, maybe a few Amy Actins
• 14:42
  Speaker 6: and this Kara Jacob, who I actually actually I had
• 14:45
  Speaker 6: to look that up to see what her views were.
• 14:48
  Speaker 6: Of course she's a crazy, wild leftist.
• 14:50
  Speaker 5: But I haven't seen a single VVAK or John Housta sign.
• 14:58
  Speaker 6: What is What do you think is behind that? Why
• 15:01
  Speaker 6: do you think only the left side, at least from
• 15:06
  Speaker 6: my experience going throughout different parts of the neighborhood. Why
• 15:10
  Speaker 6: is there no conservative or Republican signs out there?
• 15:16
  Speaker 2: If you're asking me to speculate, I'm happy to do it,
• 15:18
  Speaker 2: because you know what opinions are like, I've got one,
• 15:20
  Speaker 2: and I think there maybe a couple things at play.
• 15:23
  Speaker 2: I think the left feels rather emboldened right now in
• 15:25
  Speaker 2: spite of the problems that are going on within the
• 15:26
  Speaker 2: Democrat Party. Donald Trump is wildly unpopular. I mean, I
• 15:30
  Speaker 2: know my listeners hate to hear those words, but and
• 15:33
  Speaker 2: I know how we feel about polls and surveys. But
• 15:35
  Speaker 2: he just said there's a new Reuter's poet pull out.
• 15:37
  Speaker 2: He's got a record low now thirty three percent. This
• 15:39
  Speaker 2: war is really hurting the president and more and more
• 15:44
  Speaker 2: people in growing ranks of conservatives also upset about the war.
• 15:48
  Speaker 2: And it may be that just everybody's trying to keep
• 15:49
  Speaker 2: their head down. You know, if you put out a
• 15:51
  Speaker 2: Ramaswami sign, you're affiliated with the right, and of course
• 15:54
  Speaker 2: that makes you immediately a maggot in the hearts and
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: minds of the leftists out there. Maybe people are afraid
• 15:59
  Speaker 2: of being targeted or something, because you know how crazy
• 16:02
  Speaker 2: left this star. I don't see a whole lot of
• 16:03
  Speaker 2: right wingers going around and beating the crap out of
• 16:05
  Speaker 2: left wingers, but you get the idea, and maybe and
• 16:09
  Speaker 2: here's a problem that I've been facing and struggling with
• 16:11
  Speaker 2: the reality that VV. Ramaswami is not extremely popular within
• 16:16
  Speaker 2: the Republican Party itself, and that really pisses me off
• 16:19
  Speaker 2: and drives me wildly angry. And I can't come up
• 16:21
  Speaker 2: with the reason why Aj. I really can't. He's got
• 16:24
  Speaker 2: more cred than most politicians out there. He's wildly successful.
• 16:28
  Speaker 2: He doesn't need the job. A successful businessman. He has
• 16:31
  Speaker 2: navigated the challenges in the state of Ohio, a state
• 16:34
  Speaker 2: that I think he profoundly loves. There's no downside. What's
• 16:37
  Speaker 2: the problem with VVI Ramaswami. I think AJ that a
• 16:40
  Speaker 2: lot of Republicans maybe maybe again speculation, don't like his
• 16:44
  Speaker 2: name and don't like his religion. You know, that's a
• 16:47
  Speaker 2: concern that's not going to drive people to the polls.
• 16:50
  Speaker 2: You know, Ah, we got this Hindu Ramaswami guy. You know,
• 16:55
  Speaker 2: come on, we don't live in a theocracy. I go
• 16:57
  Speaker 2: back to that, and you know what's wrong with V.
• 16:58
  Speaker 2: Vig Ramaswami. Nothing in terms of his credibility. And I know,
• 17:03
  Speaker 2: but I think people just maybe can't get enthused about him.
• 17:07
  Speaker 2: I really don't know. I see. I mean that's you know,
• 17:09
  Speaker 2: going into this my rantings here in my comments. It's
• 17:12
  Speaker 2: all wild speculation. But it's always troubled me AJ when
• 17:16
  Speaker 2: I go through various neighborhoods to see an overwhelming left
• 17:20
  Speaker 2: leaning a showing of signs Montgomery. I saw it when
• 17:25
  Speaker 2: most recently, I think it was going to the twenty
• 17:27
  Speaker 2: twenty four election. It was Milford and I was riding
• 17:30
  Speaker 2: my motorcycle ledgy all around Milford and I overwhelmed at
• 17:33
  Speaker 2: the number of signs for Kamala Harris and other Democrat candidates.
• 17:37
  Speaker 2: I was unaware that Milford, at least certain areas of
• 17:40
  Speaker 2: it were so Democrat. And when I said it to
• 17:42
  Speaker 2: somebody go, oh, yeah, yeah, So there are enclaves out there.
• 17:45
  Speaker 2: You might drive by where you'll see that, but go
• 17:48
  Speaker 2: around the corner to a different part of that particular
• 17:50
  Speaker 2: area you may see a whole bunch of Ramaswami Houstead signs.
• 17:54
  Speaker 2: I wouldn't know, but you know, t everybody out there,
• 17:56
  Speaker 2: get a sign in your yard. They're free. I know
• 17:58
  Speaker 2: the Ramaswami campaign can of hoard them. I'm sure Houston's
• 18:03
  Speaker 2: campaign can as well. So not just just I think
• 18:07
  Speaker 2: it's just comes down to maybe lack of enthusiasm perhaps,
• 18:10
  Speaker 2: or maybe it's just a little early. We do have
• 18:12
  Speaker 2: some time before November to get those yard signs out
• 18:14
  Speaker 2: there and for people to get engaged. Schools back in session,
• 18:17
  Speaker 2: people start paying closer attention to politics. I know it
• 18:20
  Speaker 2: feels like we've been in like a moment in time
• 18:23
  Speaker 2: away from an election for the last two years, but
• 18:26
  Speaker 2: we now find ourselves there. Hopefully people will wake up
• 18:29
  Speaker 2: and hopefully people start getting engaged and at least a
• 18:32
  Speaker 2: little bit enthused. Five twenty seven Right now, if you
• 18:35
  Speaker 2: have KCD talk station, love to hear from you, give
• 18:37
  Speaker 2: me a call. We got local stories in app In
• 18:39
  Speaker 2: the absence of calls, be right back fifty five KRC.
• 18:43
  Speaker 2: The talk station currently sixty eight degrees. If you have
• 18:46
  Speaker 2: KERSD talk station five thirty one, Happy Tuesday, five three
• 18:52
  Speaker 2: seven fifty five hundred eight hundred eighty three talk five
• 18:56
  Speaker 2: KRC dot. iHeart dot com for the podcast and the
• 18:59
  Speaker 2: information and real quick here shocking literally no one. Before
• 19:05
  Speaker 2: I get to Tom's call, local news just happened this morning.
• 19:10
  Speaker 2: I'll bet you know what's coming. Yeah. One person's dead
• 19:12
  Speaker 2: and another hurd after an overnight shooting in Clifton. Apparently
• 19:16
  Speaker 2: two scenes Brookline Avenue just off Ludlow near Burnett Woods
• 19:20
  Speaker 2: and another Brookline and Wentworth Avenues. Police are still investigating.
• 19:23
  Speaker 2: That is all the information I have right now. Another
• 19:26
  Speaker 2: shooting in Clifton. I know Bobby's out there keeping track.
• 19:29
  Speaker 2: Let's see what Tom's got this morning. Tom, Happy Tuesday.
• 19:31
  Speaker 2: Good to hear from you as always.
• 19:34
  Speaker 7: Yeah, good, good morning. Yes, you're talking about capitalism and
• 19:40
  Speaker 7: the warts and the biggest source of the wars of
• 19:44
  Speaker 7: the people. I think capitalism itself is a fantastic idea
• 19:49
  Speaker 7: and then we've seen how well it works, but it's
• 19:52
  Speaker 7: when people don't use it properly or abuse it. Yeah,
• 19:57
  Speaker 7: that's definitely have a problem, and I guess the wars
• 20:00
  Speaker 7: of the system are the system allows for that to happen.
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
• 20:04
  Speaker 2: Going back to my point about politicians looking at for
• 20:07
  Speaker 2: their own personal best interest and not the interest of
• 20:09
  Speaker 2: the constituency. That's where you get crony capitalism, which I
• 20:13
  Speaker 2: understand the criticisms of it. If you are a wealthy
• 20:16
  Speaker 2: multi multi billionaire and you have enough lobbying dollars or
• 20:20
  Speaker 2: enough campaign pledges that you can influence some politician to
• 20:23
  Speaker 2: give you a break in the tax code, then you're
• 20:25
  Speaker 2: engaging in crony capitalism. Can we enjoy the same break
• 20:28
  Speaker 2: you are getting. If the answer is no, then screw you.
• 20:31
  Speaker 2: You're not entitled to a break. Yeah, I agree, I agree.
• 20:35
  Speaker 2: The problem yeah, and you have good yeah.
• 20:38
  Speaker 7: People that you know that the nepotism yea. And people
• 20:42
  Speaker 7: let people help people out that they're related to or
• 20:45
  Speaker 7: friends with. And uh, you know, if you're if you
• 20:48
  Speaker 7: own a company and you want your your brother's kid,
• 20:52
  Speaker 7: your nephew to get ahead start in life, and and
• 20:56
  Speaker 7: here's a job for him, Okay, fine, whatever, as long
• 20:58
  Speaker 7: as as long as he's able to do it, as
• 21:01
  Speaker 7: long as he's you know, it's confident enough or willing
• 21:04
  Speaker 7: enough to show up and all that stuff. You know,
• 21:06
  Speaker 7: it's all how we use it and whether we abuse
• 21:08
  Speaker 7: it or not, or you know, if we're showing favoritism.
• 21:12
  Speaker 7: And you know, if if it's your company, you have
• 21:14
  Speaker 7: the right to show favoritism anybody you want. But understand this,
• 21:17
  Speaker 7: if if it's obvious that that favoritism isn't warranted, if
• 21:21
  Speaker 7: that person is just taking a spot and they don't
• 21:22
  Speaker 7: deserve it, or they're you know, they're just a drag
• 21:25
  Speaker 7: and it's just gonna it's just gonna hurt them morale
• 21:27
  Speaker 7: of the company. So yeah, capitalism has has the problem
• 21:32
  Speaker 7: has problems that it's that's really when people abuse it
• 21:35
  Speaker 7: and don't use it properly, yes, and and and the
• 21:38
  Speaker 7: and we've talked about this multiple times. The part that
• 21:41
  Speaker 7: that's that pisses me off is is all the people
• 21:44
  Speaker 7: that that rail against capitalism, and yet they they got
• 21:48
  Speaker 7: their hand out there and they want the benefits of capitalism,
• 21:51
  Speaker 7: but they don't want the responsibility.
• 21:52
  Speaker 2: Don't want to pay for it, right, right exactly.
• 21:56
  Speaker 7: That's all. They don't want to pay for it, but
• 21:57
  Speaker 7: they want it. You know, you want what capital loads
• 22:00
  Speaker 7: and producers, you just don't want to be held responsible
• 22:02
  Speaker 7: to work for it.
• 22:04
  Speaker 2: That's that was my point, the squatting and the stealing
• 22:07
  Speaker 2: and the justifications behind it.
• 22:11
  Speaker 7: Yeah, exactly, And and that's that's what we when we
• 22:14
  Speaker 7: when we think about who we're going to vote for.
• 22:16
  Speaker 7: That's the that's one of the things we got to
• 22:18
  Speaker 7: pay attention to. These people on the left that are
• 22:20
  Speaker 7: promising you all kinds of things, and they're making it
• 22:22
  Speaker 7: sound like conservatism is so bad, and uh, you don't
• 22:26
  Speaker 7: really hear them rail against conservatism. You hear them. You
• 22:29
  Speaker 7: hear them go out against people who are conservatives and
• 22:32
  Speaker 7: talking about their warts. Everybody's got warts, everybody's got problems
• 22:36
  Speaker 7: and things they do wrong or things they say wrong
• 22:38
  Speaker 7: or whatever, but we we have to understand there there's
• 22:41
  Speaker 7: a there's a system that we we're voting for, not
• 22:44
  Speaker 7: necessarily a human being. Uh And and you definitely don't
• 22:48
  Speaker 7: want socialism. You definitely don't want what the Democrats are offering.
• 22:52
  Speaker 7: It's it's you know, you can have a nice, shiny,
• 22:55
  Speaker 7: you know, clean cut person and everything sounds looks great,
• 22:58
  Speaker 7: but really what they're trying to sell you is they're
• 23:00
  Speaker 7: selling you down the river and it's going to It's
• 23:03
  Speaker 7: just you've seen it ruined counties and cities and states
• 23:07
  Speaker 7: all over this country.
• 23:08
  Speaker 6: Uh.
• 23:08
  Speaker 7: And again we talked about it before. You don't have
• 23:10
  Speaker 7: to look at South America anymore. We can just look
• 23:13
  Speaker 7: in our own country and see where or this thing
• 23:16
  Speaker 7: that the Democrats are selling and trying to get you
• 23:18
  Speaker 7: to to think it's so great. It's it's a failure.
• 23:21
  Speaker 7: It's nothing but a failure. And we have to that's
• 23:24
  Speaker 7: the message we have to get to people. If we
• 23:26
  Speaker 7: just talk about the people involved or what their religion is,
• 23:29
  Speaker 7: and it's irrelevant, it doesn't really matter. What matters is
• 23:31
  Speaker 7: the system that we're living under. Capitalism is great as
• 23:34
  Speaker 7: long as you use it right. Democracy and the Democrats
• 23:38
  Speaker 7: what they have to offer. It sucks, So don't vote Democrats.
• 23:42
  Speaker 7: A great day.
• 23:42
  Speaker 2: Boiling it down to a word, sucks. We can break
• 23:47
  Speaker 2: that down for a long time. It's kind of what
• 23:48
  Speaker 2: they think you have. Casey morning shoe is all about,
• 23:50
  Speaker 2: isn't it? Yeah, thank you, Tom, always appreciate it. If
• 23:53
  Speaker 2: I've one three seven fournine fifty eight two to three talk,
• 23:55
  Speaker 2: feel free to give me a call. Otherwise stack oh stupid,
• 23:58
  Speaker 2: Oh right on the top a draw, Ohio couple, don't
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: go ahead.
• 24:03
  Speaker 8: This is fifty five KRC an iHeartRadio station or the station.
• 24:09
  Speaker 2: It is five forty. It is Tuesday. Stay in the audience.
• 24:13
  Speaker 2: We have people can mentioned in Tom's Awastowski coming up
• 24:15
  Speaker 2: at seven thirty. You need to get out and vote.
• 24:17
  Speaker 2: Inside scoop of Bright Barton News Finance and economics editor
• 24:19
  Speaker 2: John Carney. He returns today at eight oh five. Fought well.
• 24:23
  Speaker 2: People keep acting as if bond yields are a rising
• 24:26
  Speaker 2: bond yields or a bad sign. He says it's a
• 24:28
  Speaker 2: good sign. He'll explain that. He suggests also that Trump
• 24:32
  Speaker 2: arrangement syndrome has clouded people's conclusions with regard to the
• 24:35
  Speaker 2: bond yields anyway, Daniel Davis deep dive. Of course, update
• 24:37
  Speaker 2: on iron and we got a lot to talk about
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: that Trump threatening to bomb Oman yesterday. That had me
• 24:42
  Speaker 2: scratching my head. Anyhow, phone calls are welcome. Beyond that,
• 24:47
  Speaker 2: let's go to the stack. Is stupid starting Ohio or
• 24:51
  Speaker 2: at least people from Ohio anyway, Thank you very much.
• 24:54
  Speaker 2: Uh drunk describing the describing the couple drunk Ohio couple
• 24:58
  Speaker 2: they're on a cruise ship allegedly barged into another family's
• 25:01
  Speaker 2: cabinet after being told to quiet down, and of course
• 25:03
  Speaker 2: attack them. That's why they're arrested. Gannon Jaycox, who's twenty nine,
• 25:09
  Speaker 2: and Jaycox's girlfriend, Brooklyn Hicks, twenty eight, arrested over the
• 25:14
  Speaker 2: weekend and Port Canaverral, about forty miles from Orlando International Airport.
• 25:19
  Speaker 2: Why there was a fight on the ship that they
• 25:22
  Speaker 2: were on, Breverd County Sheriff Wayne Ivy providing the details,
• 25:26
  Speaker 2: He said both o from Ohio, apparently arguing loudly after
• 25:29
  Speaker 2: taking advantage of some adult beverages. One of the victims
• 25:33
  Speaker 2: asked them to amen. One of the victims asked them
• 25:36
  Speaker 2: to quiet down. Prompting the pair to confront that victim
• 25:38
  Speaker 2: and get in their face outside the cabin door of
• 25:40
  Speaker 2: that family's room, allegedly drunken passenger. Both of them then
• 25:48
  Speaker 2: pushed their way into the victim's room, said the sheriff,
• 25:51
  Speaker 2: where Jaycox began attacking two adult victims and their nine
• 25:58
  Speaker 2: year old child corner to white ground I know, corner,
• 26:03
  Speaker 2: Sheriff Ivy. A fight ensued. Jaycox ends up hitting all
• 26:06
  Speaker 2: three people, including the child, and Hicks was just swinging
• 26:10
  Speaker 2: hoping what would land. So Jaycox got a pretty gross
• 26:13
  Speaker 2: injury to his eye that was either caused by one
• 26:15
  Speaker 2: of the victims or friendly fire from the haymaker's his
• 26:19
  Speaker 2: girlfriend was throwing. Does have a sense of humor about this,
• 26:22
  Speaker 2: I have to acknowledge. Fortunately, none of the family members
• 26:25
  Speaker 2: were very seriously injured in what the sheriff described as
• 26:28
  Speaker 2: a ridiculous escapade. Jaycox been charged with burglary and battery
• 26:33
  Speaker 2: of a child, child abuse without great bodily harmed. Hicks
• 26:37
  Speaker 2: charged with burglary with battery and a battery touch slash
• 26:41
  Speaker 2: strike following the attack. I don't even know what that
• 26:43
  Speaker 2: charge is. Both taken to the Brother County Jail, thirty
• 26:47
  Speaker 2: one thousand dollars bond for Jay Cox Hicks six thousand
• 26:50
  Speaker 2: dollars bond. Ivy had this to say the sheriff. It's
• 26:54
  Speaker 2: for sure the alcohol combined with an apparent lack of
• 26:57
  Speaker 2: common sense the moral of this story, sheriff said, if
• 27:01
  Speaker 2: you can't hold your liquor, then you definitely shouldn't be
• 27:04
  Speaker 2: out in public causing a scene like this and injuring
• 27:06
  Speaker 2: random people, including a child. Now who could argue with that?
• 27:08
  Speaker 9: Now, who can argue with that?
• 27:10
  Speaker 2: Thank you, Joe? He went on. And if that memo
• 27:13
  Speaker 2: is not clear enough for you, then you might want
• 27:15
  Speaker 2: to stay your butt out of Brevard County. You know
• 27:17
  Speaker 2: the deal. Folks break the law in Brevard County, and
• 27:20
  Speaker 2: I promise you the lodge will have a reservation with
• 27:23
  Speaker 2: your name on it. Double exclamation points, bravos, Sheriff Ivy. Yeah,
• 27:28
  Speaker 2: maybe Joe.
• 27:32
  Speaker 1: Go to Miami.
• 27:33
  Speaker 2: Twenty nine year old woman's behind bars now after police
• 27:35
  Speaker 2: officers said she hit her coworker in the head with
• 27:38
  Speaker 2: a bottle.
• 27:39
  Speaker 10: A's this tradition.
• 27:41
  Speaker 2: I'm going to struggle with the last name on this
• 27:43
  Speaker 2: her first name Virgin v irge n draw your own conclusions.
• 27:48
  Speaker 2: What last name Perier Asar Dewey. Close enough, got in
• 27:55
  Speaker 2: an argument with a coworker about serving alcoholic beverages to customers.
• 27:58
  Speaker 2: This was twenty minute till four o'clock in the morning
• 28:01
  Speaker 2: at a place called Gwembo's. This prairie sororitied guy anyway,
• 28:07
  Speaker 2: grabbed a glass alcohol bottle, hit the victim in the forehead,
• 28:10
  Speaker 2: causing the victim to suffer a laceration on the right
• 28:12
  Speaker 2: side of her forehead, lose consciousness and follow to the floor.
• 28:15
  Speaker 2: That's court to Miami police report. A man took the
• 28:18
  Speaker 2: victim to the hospital, where she underwent several stitches. Victim
• 28:22
  Speaker 2: reported of the July eighteenth attack to the police in
• 28:25
  Speaker 2: August sixth, said she had worked for this crazy woman
• 28:31
  Speaker 2: from Wednesday to Saturday since February. Those were her work hours. Anyway,
• 28:35
  Speaker 2: Police officers arrested her shortly after a quarter after eleven
• 28:37
  Speaker 2: on Friday, Miami Day Corrections off. He booked her into
• 28:42
  Speaker 2: the jail. She's facing charge of aggravated battery with great
• 28:46
  Speaker 2: bodily harm, second degree fellow in the court to Miami
• 28:48
  Speaker 2: Dade Court reports, she was born in Cuba. Denied bond
• 28:52
  Speaker 2: on a hold by US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. I
• 28:55
  Speaker 2: guess she's here illegally, so and you know, with the
• 28:59
  Speaker 2: plunging I'm great in this country. And it is a
• 29:01
  Speaker 2: precipitous drop in crime. A lot of people are attributing
• 29:04
  Speaker 2: it to well Donald Trump's deportations of millions, many of
• 29:08
  Speaker 2: whom came from foreign countries from their prisons. And if
• 29:15
  Speaker 2: you are subject to a detention order and your or
• 29:17
  Speaker 2: and or you are just know you're here illegally in
• 29:19
  Speaker 2: the country, you tend to not commit crime because look,
• 29:23
  Speaker 2: if you smash somebody over the head with a bottle
• 29:25
  Speaker 2: and you are subject to a deportation order, the police
• 29:27
  Speaker 2: may be called. In a place like Miami, where there
• 29:30
  Speaker 2: aren't sanctuaries, you'll be deported. Five KRC the talk station.
• 29:36
  Speaker 2: It is five p fifty one, not on a Tuesday.
• 29:38
  Speaker 2: Gonna jump to the fund before I get back of
• 29:40
  Speaker 2: the stack of stupid. Why because Keith is on the line.
• 29:42
  Speaker 2: Hey Keith, thanks for calling this morning. Welcome to the program.
• 29:45
  Speaker 11: Hi, Brian, haven't talked to you a while.
• 29:47
  Speaker 9: Welcome back.
• 29:47
  Speaker 11: I'm sorry. Two things I want to point out about
• 29:53
  Speaker 11: the social security system possibly crashing now, people have to
• 29:58
  Speaker 11: consider there may be those people in political power or
• 30:01
  Speaker 11: shadowed deep state government types. They might actually want the
• 30:06
  Speaker 11: social security system to crash so afterwards they can gain
• 30:11
  Speaker 11: more political and government.
• 30:13
  Speaker 2: Power, shall we say, right, because they create crises through
• 30:16
  Speaker 2: their programs, and when things get really really bad, like
• 30:18
  Speaker 2: for example, when Obamacare collapses, right, it's it's heading that direction,
• 30:21
  Speaker 2: then they're going to say, well, that didn't work. We
• 30:24
  Speaker 2: need more government, we need a one size fits all
• 30:26
  Speaker 2: medicare for all solution. Right, we're going to fix the
• 30:29
  Speaker 2: problem that we created or exacerbated that. You may very
• 30:32
  Speaker 2: well be right, Keith, It's certainly possible.
• 30:36
  Speaker 11: And your son else I want to point out about
• 30:40
  Speaker 11: I'm sorry, I got a little bit of broad kitas
• 30:43
  Speaker 11: about North Korea sending thirty thousand troops over to Russia
• 30:48
  Speaker 11: to help them fight in Ukraine. Okay, years ago, there
• 30:52
  Speaker 11: was this woman that some people considered a profit by
• 30:56
  Speaker 11: the name of Jeane Dixon, that predicted about this time
• 31:01
  Speaker 11: frame was last year or so, that either China or
• 31:05
  Speaker 11: North Korea would send troops and to Russia helped him
• 31:09
  Speaker 11: fight a ward Europe.
• 31:11
  Speaker 2: How about that fifty Actually, I think the number is
• 31:14
  Speaker 2: fifty thousand. That's the number I read Keith. But either way,
• 31:16
  Speaker 2: your point is an accurate one, which is really what
• 31:19
  Speaker 2: was puzzling me the other day when he when Donald
• 31:21
  Speaker 2: Trump referred to North Korea and Kim Jong un is
• 31:23
  Speaker 2: unthreatening and respectful while criticizing the South Koreans and cutting
• 31:27
  Speaker 2: off these war games. Isn't that the same North Korea
• 31:29
  Speaker 2: that did, in fact sen fifty or so thousand troops
• 31:32
  Speaker 2: to fight over in Ukraine at least sent them in Russia.
• 31:34
  Speaker 2: Isn't that the same North Korea that's been selling drones
• 31:37
  Speaker 2: to the Iranians?
• 31:39
  Speaker 7: Right?
• 31:40
  Speaker 2: Okay, Yeah, they do pose a bit of a threat
• 31:44
  Speaker 2: at least on some levels. Appreciate the call, Man, I
• 31:46
  Speaker 2: hope you're feeling better too. San Diego Man's pleaded guilty
• 31:50
  Speaker 2: to federal charge after he was caught on video kicking
• 31:54
  Speaker 2: and chasing a protected seal lion. San Diego, what you
• 31:58
  Speaker 2: queue up the award? We may give it to Tyler Mule,
• 32:01
  Speaker 2: eighteen year old from the described as upscale neighborhood allhisle
• 32:04
  Speaker 2: pleaded guilty to violating the Marine Mammal Protection Act after
• 32:09
  Speaker 2: repeatedly kicking the animal as it tried to get away.
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: The video of it, of course, it went viral shows
• 32:15
  Speaker 2: him throwing kicks at the sea lion that was sitting
• 32:17
  Speaker 2: on a sea wall, as at least one other person
• 32:20
  Speaker 2: can be heard laughing in the background. This punk follows
• 32:23
  Speaker 2: the sea lion, throwing more kickset as it tries to
• 32:25
  Speaker 2: scoot away before the video ends. He admitted he did,
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: in fact kick the sea lion four times, landed at
• 32:30
  Speaker 2: least two kicks on the animal. As part of the
• 32:33
  Speaker 2: plea agreement, he acknowledged that the video capturing the attack
• 32:35
  Speaker 2: was a fair and accurate recording of what recurred. National
• 32:39
  Speaker 2: Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's guidelines say people should stay at
• 32:42
  Speaker 2: least fifty feet away from those sea lions. They are
• 32:45
  Speaker 2: protected again by the Marine Mammal Protection Act. According to
• 32:49
  Speaker 2: Eric Morgan, official with the Noahfiicieri's Office of Law Enforcement,
• 32:53
  Speaker 2: West Coast Division, we've got one of those out there.
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: That's the person who investigated the case. Eric said, Intentionally
• 32:59
  Speaker 2: striking or kicking marine mammal is not only illegal, it
• 33:02
  Speaker 2: is dangerous for the well being of the animal, and
• 33:06
  Speaker 2: it entitles you to the award that we are going
• 33:09
  Speaker 2: to give to this punk kid Tyler Mule here on
• 33:11
  Speaker 2: the fifty five Krsee Morning Show. He now faces a
• 33:13
  Speaker 2: year in prison and a fine of one hundred thousand dollars.
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: He will be sent and st October twentieth. Let him
• 33:19
  Speaker 2: have it, Joe Strecker EERI is the biggest douche of
• 33:23
  Speaker 2: the universe, in all the galaxies. There's no bigger douche
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: than you.
• 33:30
  Speaker 5: You've reached the top, the pinnacle of douche dom.
• 33:35
  Speaker 1: Good going, Douce, Your dreams have come true.
• 33:42
  Speaker 2: It is five fifty five on a Tuesday. Stick around.
• 33:45
  Speaker 2: We're gonna elaborate a little bit on what Keith point
• 33:47
  Speaker 2: that Keith made and some of the points I made.
• 33:49
  Speaker 2: Love Etalk Station six O six and fifty five garaseeed
• 33:53
  Speaker 2: E Talks Station Happy Tuesday. My name is Brian Thomas.
• 33:56
  Speaker 2: I am to be host of the fifty five Karsee
• 33:57
  Speaker 2: Morning Show. Honored to be in this position. Streker, Executi, producer,
• 34:01
  Speaker 2: Internet Research, Greer are and great guys responsible for while
• 34:04
  Speaker 2: making this program actually work in spite of the challenges
• 34:06
  Speaker 2: we face that are largely out of Joe's hands in
• 34:08
  Speaker 2: my hands. Does a great job. Joe Strekker, I salute you,
• 34:11
  Speaker 2: my brother. I appreciate you being there and I appreciate
• 34:13
  Speaker 2: you taking calls, and I appreciate you lining up guests calls.
• 34:16
  Speaker 2: Feel free to ring me five on three seven four
• 34:17
  Speaker 2: nine fifty five hundred eight hundred eight two to three
• 34:19
  Speaker 2: talk Tom z Awastowski the first guest for the lineup.
• 34:22
  Speaker 2: This morning seven thirty. We'll hear from We the People
• 34:24
  Speaker 2: Convention ot orgs Tom Zawastowski about the Yeah Conservatives, you
• 34:28
  Speaker 2: got to get out and vote, and we got a
• 34:29
  Speaker 2: great op ed piece by Jonathan Turley to explain exactly
• 34:32
  Speaker 2: that on the heels of the conversation I had with
• 34:33
  Speaker 2: Keith going into the break here one moment inside Scoop
• 34:36
  Speaker 2: at bright Bart News financial and Economic Senator John Carney
• 34:39
  Speaker 2: about the bond yields and he suggests people are acting
• 34:42
  Speaker 2: as if rising bond yials are a bad sign for
• 34:44
  Speaker 2: the economy. He says, no, it's a good sign and
• 34:47
  Speaker 2: believes Trump arrangement syndrome is behind their conclusions. To the contrary,
• 34:50
  Speaker 2: Daniel Davis Deep Dive with the latest on Iran? Are
• 34:53
  Speaker 2: we going to be bombing Oman? Now? Struggling with that
• 34:58
  Speaker 2: from yesterday, Donald Trump's threatn and gome On and my
• 35:01
  Speaker 2: friend from Rhinoshield Tod's going to join us. It is
• 35:03
  Speaker 2: a great product, better than paint rhinoshield. Wo'll be at
• 35:06
  Speaker 2: the bottom of the at the last segment of the
• 35:07
  Speaker 2: eight o'clock hour and pivoting over now. When Keith suggested,
• 35:11
  Speaker 2: and I've never heard the idea that they want social
• 35:14
  Speaker 2: security to collapse. I was talking about the failure of
• 35:17
  Speaker 2: social Security. Were running headlong into it. Twenty two percent
• 35:20
  Speaker 2: reduction in calendar, you're twenty thirty two if they don't
• 35:22
  Speaker 2: do something to fix it. So he said, well, maybe
• 35:25
  Speaker 2: they wanted to collapse. And I was trying to come
• 35:27
  Speaker 2: up with the reason why that would be a failure
• 35:31
  Speaker 2: of the Social Security system if it collapsed, right, what
• 35:33
  Speaker 2: might be the cries like phoenix rising from the ashes
• 35:38
  Speaker 2: of social security? What solution might they offer? And what
• 35:41
  Speaker 2: came to me over the break And maybe this isn't
• 35:43
  Speaker 2: my own unique thought process, Maybe someone else out there
• 35:46
  Speaker 2: has concluded this. I thought, Hmmm, here's the Democrats opportunity
• 35:52
  Speaker 2: to get in shrine in the United States laws universal
• 35:56
  Speaker 2: basic income. It had been test marketing that one in
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: different cities around this country, giving people a check just
• 36:04
  Speaker 2: for being a person alive. Well, so security gives people
• 36:09
  Speaker 2: a check after retirement, but they paid into the system.
• 36:11
  Speaker 2: But if that collapses, what might be a solution ah
• 36:14
  Speaker 2: universal basic in come to the rescue. Maybe the point
• 36:17
  Speaker 2: being a failure. This is John Fan Turley's article. He's
• 36:22
  Speaker 2: a legal scholar, law professor, and a conservative commentator and
• 36:25
  Speaker 2: a person with a tremendous metal logic and common sense.
• 36:28
  Speaker 2: From New York to California, he writes, the American left
• 36:31
  Speaker 2: is proving that nothing succeeds like failure an areas ranging
• 36:35
  Speaker 2: from immigration to taxes to healthcare, politicians are playing to
• 36:38
  Speaker 2: their past fiascos to push an even more radical agenda.
• 36:43
  Speaker 2: Let's start with immigration. Many included the Democratic Socialists, have
• 36:47
  Speaker 2: called for open borders or disbanding ICE after the Biden
• 36:50
  Speaker 2: administration chose to allow millions of undocumented people to enter
• 36:53
  Speaker 2: the country. Most Democrats are now calling for pathways to
• 36:56
  Speaker 2: make them citizens. After all, they argue, there are two
• 36:59
  Speaker 2: men to deport. We know how the open border was
• 37:03
  Speaker 2: a choice. Trump ministration immediately stopped crossings using the same
• 37:06
  Speaker 2: law as Biden had refused to enforce. As expected, Democrats
• 37:10
  Speaker 2: are expressing horror at the thought that the government would
• 37:13
  Speaker 2: try to deport the millions that they allowed and even
• 37:17
  Speaker 2: encouraged to enter the country. Pivot over health policy. Remember
• 37:25
  Speaker 2: when the Obamacare was going to reduce health care costs
• 37:27
  Speaker 2: and improve healthcare opera options while insisting that they did
• 37:31
  Speaker 2: not want government run single payer health care. Democrats promise
• 37:34
  Speaker 2: that Obamacare would lower costs while allowing you to keep
• 37:36
  Speaker 2: your own doctor in health care plan. During the two
• 37:39
  Speaker 2: thousand and eight presidential campaign, Obama promises plan would quote
• 37:42
  Speaker 2: lower your premiums by up to twenty five hundred dollars
• 37:45
  Speaker 2: per family per year. Close quote. By that measure, Obamacare
• 37:49
  Speaker 2: or the Affordable Care Act, is a colossal failure. Premiums
• 37:54
  Speaker 2: you have nearly tripled since the law took effect. Deductibles
• 37:57
  Speaker 2: have more than doubled. The cost of coverage for a
• 38:01
  Speaker 2: family of four has increased more than ten thousand dollars
• 38:07
  Speaker 2: a cord to the studies that he links in his
• 38:09
  Speaker 2: op ed, in twenty twenty six alone, the median premiums
• 38:12
  Speaker 2: increased by twenty percent, and that has already risen by
• 38:14
  Speaker 2: another fifteen percent in twenty twenty seven. Meanwhile, enrollments continue
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: to plummet across the country. Democratic leaders and advocates are
• 38:23
  Speaker 2: now responding to that failure by calling for more regulations
• 38:27
  Speaker 2: and medicare for all. As with immigration, the failure is
• 38:31
  Speaker 2: the basis for doubling down on bad policy with even
• 38:35
  Speaker 2: worse policy. Same is also true of public education, which
• 38:39
  Speaker 2: has failed families in major cities for generation. The solution
• 38:42
  Speaker 2: has been to increased budgets while lowering efficiency standards. One thing,
• 38:47
  Speaker 2: teachers unions and school districts supposes market based system to
• 38:50
  Speaker 2: let families choose between programs through voucher systems. The solution
• 38:54
  Speaker 2: is again more staff, more funding, more control over family's options.
• 38:59
  Speaker 2: The system gets worse and more expensive in the teachers'
• 39:01
  Speaker 2: union to get more powerful, including greater ability to block reforms.
• 39:06
  Speaker 2: No one has perfected the politics of failure more than
• 39:08
  Speaker 2: Zoron Mamdami and New York Chaos only undermines the status quo.
• 39:13
  Speaker 2: For example, his demand for free buses has predictably led
• 39:17
  Speaker 2: to thousands of commuters, including affluent citizens, skipping fares, costing
• 39:21
  Speaker 2: Metropolitan Transportation Authority tens of millions of dollars. After all,
• 39:26
  Speaker 2: only a chump would pay a fare that's about to
• 39:28
  Speaker 2: be eliminated as the transit budget implodes, the calls for
• 39:33
  Speaker 2: greater state subsidies will only increase, as will calls to
• 39:37
  Speaker 2: just accept the reality and make public transportation free to
• 39:41
  Speaker 2: the user, of course at the expense of the taxpayer.
• 39:44
  Speaker 2: And then there's rent reform. With Momdami promising rent controls,
• 39:50
  Speaker 2: landlords are predictably raising rents. Rent costs have reached their
• 39:54
  Speaker 2: highest level even underman Momdami, get a load of this, folks,
• 39:59
  Speaker 2: be thankful you live it the greater Cincinnati area or
• 40:01
  Speaker 2: some other than New York. The average apartment now cost
• 40:04
  Speaker 2: four thousand, nine hundred and sixty five dollars a month
• 40:08
  Speaker 2: and in Manhattan six thousand, six hundred and fifty five
• 40:12
  Speaker 2: bucks average. So mom Domi can now push for even
• 40:17
  Speaker 2: more significant regulations and rent controls by pointing to these
• 40:21
  Speaker 2: to the rise in housing costs in an endless loop.
• 40:24
  Speaker 2: As rent controlled inevitably constrains supply and prices for market
• 40:28
  Speaker 2: rate aparkments skyrocket, he can call for even greater controls.
• 40:34
  Speaker 2: Moving over to law enforcement, FAU can also solve problems
• 40:36
  Speaker 2: through attrition. Mom Domi recently boot off stated a stage
• 40:40
  Speaker 2: at law enforcement event in New York the officers and
• 40:43
  Speaker 2: their families are clearly upset with his embrace of figures
• 40:46
  Speaker 2: calling for the defunding of police, and his long hostility
• 40:50
  Speaker 2: toward law enforcement. The result, however, is precisely the downsizing
• 40:55
  Speaker 2: that many on the left. One New York police department
• 40:58
  Speaker 2: has been losing as many as three hundred officers every month.
• 41:04
  Speaker 2: What is true for police officers is also true for
• 41:07
  Speaker 2: wealthy tax players. Mom Domi has taunted affluent citizens with
• 41:11
  Speaker 2: his new taxes and attacked them as not quote paying
• 41:15
  Speaker 2: their fair share clothes quote and as a consequence, o
• 41:18
  Speaker 2: wealthy are flee in New York and taking tax revenues
• 41:21
  Speaker 2: and jobs with them. Success through failures, especially eviditing the
• 41:25
  Speaker 2: housing policies, Mom Dommie has brought in socialists who called
• 41:28
  Speaker 2: for seizing the means of production that's quote just as
• 41:31
  Speaker 2: he has, and wiping out private ownership of housing. Most recently,
• 41:35
  Speaker 2: mom Dommy embraced figures such as Tracy Rosenthal. I wasn't
• 41:38
  Speaker 2: familiar with her anyway, Described as the privileged teacher of
• 41:41
  Speaker 2: a well known music industry figure who's refused to pay
• 41:43
  Speaker 2: rent despite her family as wealth, she's been effectively squatting
• 41:46
  Speaker 2: on property. The co founder of the Los Angeles Tenants
• 41:50
  Speaker 2: Union and co author of abolished rent, how tenants can
• 41:53
  Speaker 2: end the housing crisis. Rosenthal a darling of the far
• 41:56
  Speaker 2: left in New York. She declared that rent is a ransom,
• 42:00
  Speaker 2: and we pay rent at the peril of our need.
• 42:04
  Speaker 2: I go back to who built the damn apartments that
• 42:06
  Speaker 2: you think should be free. Rosenthal portrays landlords as blood suckers,
• 42:10
  Speaker 2: rallied the left to refuse to pay rent, even though quote,
• 42:13
  Speaker 2: if we don't make this payment, our landlords can call
• 42:16
  Speaker 2: on agents of state violence, who can use physical force
• 42:19
  Speaker 2: to throw us outdoors. Someone rode good after that? Oh
• 42:23
  Speaker 2: that was me. Rosenthal is perfected not only the squatter culture,
• 42:27
  Speaker 2: but also the use of regulations to take effective control
• 42:30
  Speaker 2: of properties. In allegedly squatting in California, Rosenthal reportedly pushed
• 42:35
  Speaker 2: to get her building placed under the Housing Preservation Apartment's
• 42:38
  Speaker 2: Alternative Enforcement program, which would require the landlord to fix
• 42:42
  Speaker 2: problems or risk losing the property. Hmmm, mom, Dommy Pursuing
• 42:47
  Speaker 2: a similar model, He's ramped up tenant coordination to bring
• 42:51
  Speaker 2: complaints to his advocacy office. As landlords are hit with
• 42:56
  Speaker 2: snowballing complaints and costs, they can be forced to surrender
• 43:00
  Speaker 2: their properties or have them seized by the city. The
• 43:04
  Speaker 2: mom Dami administrators see seize properties that were built by capitalism.
• 43:09
  Speaker 2: See I keep throwing that in there without capitalism have
• 43:11
  Speaker 2: nothing to seize. H it pisses me off. Sorry, mom
• 43:15
  Speaker 2: Dami administration wants those fayars to result in tenant or
• 43:18
  Speaker 2: nonprofit ownership business. What it will do is ensure that
• 43:22
  Speaker 2: fewer rental units come on the market. There's you take away.
• 43:24
  Speaker 2: The capitalists incentive nobody's building anything, making the problem worse
• 43:29
  Speaker 2: and creating new excuses to of course take further harmful action.
• 43:33
  Speaker 2: This pattern of success through failure has manifested itself on
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: an even larger scale in history. Socialists often destroy economic conditions,
• 43:40
  Speaker 2: resulting in greater unemployment and greater demand for government subsidies.
• 43:45
  Speaker 2: That expansion of government powers or power continues until conditions
• 43:49
  Speaker 2: grow so severe that emergency actions are needed. Huh huh.
• 43:57
  Speaker 2: Just just think about that and ponder the insane immigrant
• 44:00
  Speaker 2: problems and everything that led to that anyway, and he
• 44:05
  Speaker 2: points out in Rage in the Republic, that's his book.
• 44:07
  Speaker 2: I discussed how this pattern played out in Great Britain
• 44:09
  Speaker 2: and France in the last century, when socialist policies devastated
• 44:12
  Speaker 2: those countries' respective economies. Great Britain ultimately had to be
• 44:16
  Speaker 2: rescued by the International Monetary Fund as if it were
• 44:19
  Speaker 2: a Third World nation. Yeah, you remember that this bust
• 44:24
  Speaker 2: and boom cycle is now repeating itself. As these policies
• 44:27
  Speaker 2: fuel decline in these areas, demand grows for expanding the
• 44:32
  Speaker 2: policies and government controls. If McDonald's were to offer ever
• 44:37
  Speaker 2: shrinking food items at ever increasing prices, it would go
• 44:40
  Speaker 2: out of business. Government is the only industry that grows
• 44:44
  Speaker 2: with failure. For radical social and economic upheaval is not
• 44:49
  Speaker 2: a tragedy, but an opportunity. Lennin told the Bolsheviks utilized
• 44:54
  Speaker 2: crisis to hasten the collapse of the rule of capital.
• 44:58
  Speaker 2: His words, remember anybody body else saying something like never
• 45:01
  Speaker 2: let a good crisis go to waste?
• 45:02
  Speaker 5: Ah.
• 45:03
  Speaker 2: Yes, the future seems bright for the American socialist after all,
• 45:07
  Speaker 2: with just a little more failure, who knows what mom
• 45:09
  Speaker 2: domin the others can achieve in America. Amen. Jonathan Turley
• 45:15
  Speaker 2: five one three, seven, nine fifty eight hundred d two
• 45:18
  Speaker 2: three talk. I don't know if if your yard struggle.
• 45:21
  Speaker 1: Like Talk Station.
• 45:23
  Speaker 2: Sixty about Kcity Talk station, Happy Tuesday. Feel free to
• 45:27
  Speaker 2: give me a call. The local stories come up for
• 45:29
  Speaker 2: the next segment and one hour from little more than
• 45:31
  Speaker 2: an hour from now, Tom's auistatsk on the reason we
• 45:33
  Speaker 2: all need to get out and vote now. One of
• 45:35
  Speaker 2: the reasons, of course, is the invasion of the Democrats
• 45:38
  Speaker 2: by the DSSA. And this is something else. Like my friend,
• 45:41
  Speaker 2: my Democrat leaning friend the other day, and I got
• 45:43
  Speaker 2: into this discussion about and I had pointed out, you know, listen, uh,
• 45:47
  Speaker 2: I had I may not be self identifying as a Republican,
• 45:50
  Speaker 2: but at least the Republican Party hasn't lost its mind.
• 45:52
  Speaker 2: Have you seen that your Democrat party has been invaded
• 45:54
  Speaker 2: by the DSA. And I think he thought I was
• 45:57
  Speaker 2: accusing him of joining into the philosophy the which is
• 46:00
  Speaker 2: radical and crazy, a point I'll get to in a moment.
• 46:03
  Speaker 2: But I'm not saying you're part of it, but you
• 46:07
  Speaker 2: are the welcoming part of the DSA. I was in
• 46:09
  Speaker 2: Chucky Schumer talked about the big tent, all the Democrats
• 46:12
  Speaker 2: refusing to reject what the DSA stands for, which is
• 46:16
  Speaker 2: completely underminding the constitution. You welcome them in. It's your camp.
• 46:20
  Speaker 2: They share values more fully aligned with the Democrats than
• 46:23
  Speaker 2: they do the Republicans. They're aware that they need to
• 46:25
  Speaker 2: have a D after the name to get elected because
• 46:27
  Speaker 2: people are so brainwashed that know they have to vote
• 46:30
  Speaker 2: for a D, regardless of what that D might stand for.
• 46:35
  Speaker 2: Big Tent, And he accused the Republican Party of embracing racists.
• 46:41
  Speaker 2: I said, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. There may be
• 46:44
  Speaker 2: racists out there who choose to vote Republican, but you've
• 46:46
  Speaker 2: never heard a single Republican candidate, at least not one
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: that I'm aware of, embrace them or refuse to address
• 46:52
  Speaker 2: racist ideology. And by the way, the Klan was the
• 46:56
  Speaker 2: Democrat side of the Ladger. If you ever had racists
• 46:58
  Speaker 2: that were supporting in big way and with great success,
• 47:01
  Speaker 2: there was the client in the South Democrats. But ignore that.
• 47:07
  Speaker 2: But you don't hear Republicans embracing it or refusing to
• 47:09
  Speaker 2: reject that kind of ideology. Nobody wants them in the
• 47:12
  Speaker 2: Big Tent. With that, I pivot over this craze loon
• 47:18
  Speaker 2: Democrat Socialists of America's Steering Committee member. His name Cliff Connolly.
• 47:23
  Speaker 2: He was on a podcast called The Revolution and Democracy
• 47:27
  Speaker 2: Marxist Unity Group's vision for DSA. There is initial cap
• 47:34
  Speaker 2: Marxist Unity Group described described as a caucus within the DSSA.
• 47:40
  Speaker 2: So the dssa's got a big tent too, and beneath
• 47:42
  Speaker 2: that big tent is the Marxist Unity Group. Now, these
• 47:47
  Speaker 2: are the clowns in the DSA that we're having this conversation.
• 47:49
  Speaker 2: So going back to the Steering Committee member Cliff Connolly statements,
• 47:53
  Speaker 2: he said, quote, so the two things that we're famous for, uh,
• 47:57
  Speaker 2: is our commitment to a program and are hatred of
• 48:02
  Speaker 2: the United States Constitution and what the program does. And
• 48:06
  Speaker 2: I think the program is a DSA platform. I'm reading
• 48:09
  Speaker 2: into that a little bit, but that's my perception of
• 48:11
  Speaker 2: what that means when he says program and what the
• 48:13
  Speaker 2: program does is give us a roadmap to revolution, and
• 48:16
  Speaker 2: it gives us the obstacle that we finally will have
• 48:19
  Speaker 2: to get over to have a revolution, which is the
• 48:22
  Speaker 2: United States Constitution, the basis of the United States government.
• 48:26
  Speaker 2: And I've been saying this for a while. If you
• 48:29
  Speaker 2: read the DSA platform, it would require you to throw
• 48:33
  Speaker 2: out large chunks of the United States Constitution. How can
• 48:38
  Speaker 2: you swear an oe to the Constitution? As all elected
• 48:40
  Speaker 2: officials must if your whole platform is to throw it
• 48:43
  Speaker 2: under the bus. And he realizes that you because the
• 48:47
  Speaker 2: Constitution has specific rules in place to change it, constitutional convention, amendments,
• 48:53
  Speaker 2: et cetera. That is a huge obstacle to their revolution.
• 48:58
  Speaker 2: What boiled down the way I read this, They want
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: to have They're going to have to have a revolution
• 49:02
  Speaker 2: because there's no other way to throw out the US Constitution. Huh,
• 49:08
  Speaker 2: there's the big tent. And the Democrats do not reject this.
• 49:13
  Speaker 2: Any Democrat when asked, what is your perception of the
• 49:15
  Speaker 2: ESA with the exception of a couple and yeah, I
• 49:17
  Speaker 2: know John Fatiman is no Republican, but he's one to
• 49:20
  Speaker 2: at least call out this craziness. Oh and my dear
• 49:23
  Speaker 2: friend also happens to be Jewish. And I did mention
• 49:25
  Speaker 2: a couple of comments about how the Democrat Party has
• 49:27
  Speaker 2: been overrun with anti Semitism. It's almost a party platform
• 49:33
  Speaker 2: they run on. Now, where in God's name did that
• 49:35
  Speaker 2: come from? Six six fifty five KRC the Talk Station. Ah,
• 49:42
  Speaker 2: it's time for cool.
• 49:42
  Speaker 1: I five KRC the Talk Station.
• 49:46
  Speaker 2: Sixty one. If you have KRC the Talk station, Every Tuesday,
• 49:49
  Speaker 2: one hour from now Tom's Awastowski. We the people convention. Yeah,
• 49:52
  Speaker 2: and good morning, Christopher Smith. And you heard me talking
• 49:54
  Speaker 2: about Jonathan Turnley's comment and why the my side comments
• 49:57
  Speaker 2: about the Democrats. You know, welcoming all these nutcases is
• 50:00
  Speaker 2: into their tent, not rejecting them at all, in spite
• 50:04
  Speaker 2: of the fact that many of them are radical Marxist
• 50:06
  Speaker 2: revolutionary types. Christopher Smithman type's Nazi tattoo. That's right, Christopher
• 50:14
  Speaker 2: Graham Platner, that crazed loon. Yeah, a Nazi tattoo on
• 50:19
  Speaker 2: his chest, and yet the Democrats did everything in their
• 50:24
  Speaker 2: power to back him. Another illustration. I appreciate it, Christopher.
• 50:29
  Speaker 2: Good morning. Go to local stories here you can feel
• 50:31
  Speaker 2: free to give me you a call. Though, I appreciate
• 50:33
  Speaker 2: that a woman shot outside of Mason home happened yesterday
• 50:35
  Speaker 2: evening man taking it to custody, police said. Mason Police Department,
• 50:39
  Speaker 2: fourteen hundred blocker Windward is where they were called about
• 50:42
  Speaker 2: seven thirty evening. He said it here. Yesterday evening domestic
• 50:45
  Speaker 2: violence situation was reported Mason Police Captain Levi Wells. So
• 50:49
  Speaker 2: when officers got there, they found a woman had been shot.
• 50:52
  Speaker 2: Taking the UC Westchester for her injuries conditioned currently unknownt
• 50:55
  Speaker 2: least as the time. Fox nineteen is Alli Hennter reported
• 50:58
  Speaker 2: on this one. After the woman takes to the hospital,
• 51:00
  Speaker 2: Warren County Tactical Response Team negotiated with the man who
• 51:03
  Speaker 2: had barricaded himself inside the house. He was taken into
• 51:06
  Speaker 2: custody without further incidents. Captain Well said the relationship between
• 51:09
  Speaker 2: the victim and suspect not immediately known, but Mason Police
• 51:12
  Speaker 2: are continuing their investigation. Real quick here before I get
• 51:16
  Speaker 2: to ra on one more I broke this morning, Joe
• 51:18
  Speaker 2: Strekker hot on the news. Happened at about two thirty
• 51:21
  Speaker 2: or two fourteen, two fifteen this morning. Person's now dead,
• 51:24
  Speaker 2: another hurt. It was an overnight shooting. And overnight shoot
• 51:26
  Speaker 2: happened in Clifton. Since I polease say, they're investigating two scenes.
• 51:30
  Speaker 2: One along Brookline Avenue just off Ludlow near Burnette Woods,
• 51:33
  Speaker 2: the other Brookline in Wentworth Avenues. Officers showed up with
• 51:37
  Speaker 2: the thirty four hun block of thirty four hundred block
• 51:39
  Speaker 2: of Brookline and again quarter after two there was a
• 51:42
  Speaker 2: report of a shooting. When they got there, or rather
• 51:44
  Speaker 2: when they were on the way, they were informed that
• 51:46
  Speaker 2: a shooting victim had arrived at Good Sam with non
• 51:48
  Speaker 2: life threatening injuries. A second victim, according to authorities, was
• 51:52
  Speaker 2: located at the scene. They were pronounced dead. No additional
• 51:55
  Speaker 2: information identifying about either victim. Police say these circumstances led
• 51:59
  Speaker 2: to shooting also remain under investigation. Let's see you what
• 52:03
  Speaker 2: Ron's got this morning. Ron, thanks so much for calling
• 52:05
  Speaker 2: the show this morning, and Happy Tuesday to you.
• 52:08
  Speaker 5: Oh, happy Tuesday as well, Brian, And thanks so much
• 52:10
  Speaker 5: for being on the show. I listened way back in
• 52:12
  Speaker 5: the years when your father was running it as well,
• 52:14
  Speaker 5: and I just wanted too. Oh yeah, absolutely, I gotta.
• 52:19
  Speaker 2: I say it to everybody, Ron, if you listen to
• 52:21
  Speaker 2: my dad, I always thank people for putting me through college.
• 52:23
  Speaker 2: So thank you Ron for doing that.
• 52:25
  Speaker 5: He more than happy to. And I spent about a
• 52:29
  Speaker 5: decade up there in Illinois in similar areas you did too,
• 52:34
  Speaker 5: before retiring back here to Ohio.
• 52:36
  Speaker 2: Hey, did you have the same reaction when you moved
• 52:38
  Speaker 2: back round as I did? My God, I wish I
• 52:40
  Speaker 2: hadn't taken the city for granted so much over the years.
• 52:43
  Speaker 2: It is so much better than living in Chicago.
• 52:46
  Speaker 5: We were looking forward to moving back because the family
• 52:48
  Speaker 5: and the reasons it was just a temporary stent for
• 52:51
  Speaker 5: a good job, take their money and run.
• 52:53
  Speaker 2: Well, that was kind of my motivation. But I also
• 52:55
  Speaker 2: was excited about living in Chicago. But when the kids
• 52:57
  Speaker 2: came along, Yeah, that's was family motivated it primarily, but
• 53:00
  Speaker 2: just it was the awakening of how less expensive it
• 53:03
  Speaker 2: is to live here and how easy it is is
• 53:05
  Speaker 2: to get from in spite of our challenges to get
• 53:07
  Speaker 2: from point A to point B compared to Chicago. So
• 53:11
  Speaker 2: that's all. It was an eye opener for me and
• 53:13
  Speaker 2: my family.
• 53:15
  Speaker 5: Indeed, Hey, the reason I'm calling you is very simple,
• 53:18
  Speaker 5: and you've probably thought about this a lot when you
• 53:20
  Speaker 5: talked about your Democratic friend and trying to tell them
• 53:23
  Speaker 5: about the positions of the current DSSA the Democrat Party
• 53:26
  Speaker 5: welcoming them. I'd love to hear back from you if
• 53:29
  Speaker 5: you could try this experiment. Maybe you already have ask
• 53:32
  Speaker 5: them what the official name of the twentieth century National
• 53:37
  Speaker 5: Socialist German Workers Party was back in the twentieth century
• 53:42
  Speaker 5: and see if they have an answer for you, if
• 53:43
  Speaker 5: they probably won't, and then when you remind them that
• 53:46
  Speaker 5: was the Nazi Party, and yes, indeed they shared the
• 53:48
  Speaker 5: anti Semitic views of the current DSSA see what they do.
• 53:51
  Speaker 5: I would look here back, and I think anybody that
• 53:54
  Speaker 5: encounters this should just ask that question and see if
• 53:56
  Speaker 5: they get an answer.
• 53:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe I will.
• 53:58
  Speaker 5: Thanks realize it's the Nazis.
• 54:00
  Speaker 2: He is one guy. I guarantee you knows full well
• 54:03
  Speaker 2: the answer to that question. He's, Uh, his family's very
• 54:06
  Speaker 2: closely affiliated with the Center for Holocaust and Humanity here
• 54:09
  Speaker 2: in the city of Cincinnati, which actually came up during
• 54:12
  Speaker 2: conversation yesterday. He goes, you know you need to do
• 54:14
  Speaker 2: you need to go to see the Center of Holocausting Humanity.
• 54:15
  Speaker 2: I said, I've been there. I know about it. Sarah
• 54:18
  Speaker 2: Weiss took me through the original one back before they
• 54:20
  Speaker 2: move locations. It's it was, it's it's an amazing thing.
• 54:23
  Speaker 2: I mean I had to remind him because he and
• 54:25
  Speaker 2: I have been friends for years. He knows full well
• 54:27
  Speaker 2: I'm the least anti Semitic person he's he's ever going
• 54:29
  Speaker 2: to run into. I don't understand personally anti Semitism, but yeah,
• 54:34
  Speaker 2: he knows.
• 54:36
  Speaker 7: I think no connection there.
• 54:38
  Speaker 5: I mean, really that that out of scales so strongly
• 54:42
  Speaker 5: sealed over their eyes, they can't.
• 54:43
  Speaker 2: See that well, honestly, if I had to really, because
• 54:47
  Speaker 2: he is an extraordinarily intelligent guy, I think he does
• 54:51
  Speaker 2: it more to try to pimp me and get me
• 54:54
  Speaker 2: wound up, because you know, he knows how to push
• 54:56
  Speaker 2: my buttons and get me all ginned up, and his
• 54:59
  Speaker 2: denial of something like that, he knows I'm gonna go
• 55:02
  Speaker 2: through the roof, So I because of his level of intellect,
• 55:05
  Speaker 2: because I think he full well knows this is not
• 55:07
  Speaker 2: good for the Democrat party. But like so many other
• 55:11
  Speaker 2: Democrats that are maybe not saying it out loud, some
• 55:13
  Speaker 2: of them that are are suggesting this is a problem
• 55:15
  Speaker 2: for them. They're going through this crisis of identity over there.
• 55:18
  Speaker 5: So he's aware to change their position and say they
• 55:21
  Speaker 5: never believed it in the first place.
• 55:23
  Speaker 2: Yeah, Yeah, that's that's pretty much it. I appreciate the challenge, Ronan.
• 55:26
  Speaker 2: I'm gonna have to throw that at him one time.
• 55:28
  Speaker 2: But again, I think I've got to conclude that again
• 55:31
  Speaker 2: he may be resisting my observations just to get me
• 55:34
  Speaker 2: wound up. He cad he did. Congratulations six thirty six
• 55:38
  Speaker 2: to fifty five Karcity Talks Station. You're quite a few
• 55:40
  Speaker 2: friends and know how to push my Bucks forty two
• 55:42
  Speaker 2: here at fifty five KARSG talk station. Yeah, I was
• 55:49
  Speaker 2: just the litany in the list of all these crazies
• 55:52
  Speaker 2: out there, I mean legitimately crazy people, and he kind
• 55:55
  Speaker 2: of wondering, you scratch your head. Is there at some
• 55:56
  Speaker 2: point where they are screaming and advocating for the overthrow
• 55:59
  Speaker 2: of the United States government? This cannot be tried for
• 56:01
  Speaker 2: that like seditious conspiracy or which prohibits two more people
• 56:05
  Speaker 2: from conspiring to forcefully put down prevented to lay the
• 56:07
  Speaker 2: execution of laws here in the United States. Advocating the
• 56:11
  Speaker 2: overthrow of the United States government, which outlaw is organizing
• 56:14
  Speaker 2: and joining groups that advocate for government destruction via force
• 56:17
  Speaker 2: or violence treason kind of makes you wonder. And you know,
• 56:25
  Speaker 2: there's that pesky constitution that they want to throw out
• 56:29
  Speaker 2: while they advocate I'll go back to this this loon
• 56:32
  Speaker 2: that I read his quotes from earlier advocating for getting
• 56:38
  Speaker 2: rid of the constitution, setting the States for revolution. The
• 56:40
  Speaker 2: DSA Steering Committee, Cliff Connolly, he talked about this, that's
• 56:46
  Speaker 2: what they want, but that free speech. You know here
• 56:51
  Speaker 2: he is advocating for the overthrow basically, and I'll read word,
• 56:54
  Speaker 2: rephrase his words. You know, yes, Brian's name of the broadbrush,
• 56:57
  Speaker 2: just summarizing it. They don't like the United States of America.
• 57:00
  Speaker 2: Constitution is the impediment. It is the thing standing in
• 57:03
  Speaker 2: the way of revolution. His words, not mine the very
• 57:07
  Speaker 2: constitution that protects him from saying stuff like that. In
• 57:09
  Speaker 2: any other country, that got to be locked up and
• 57:11
  Speaker 2: disappeared or something in some prison somewhere. So in this
• 57:15
  Speaker 2: United States that he enjoys all the freedoms and liberties,
• 57:18
  Speaker 2: where he's advocating for the overthrow the very thing that
• 57:20
  Speaker 2: allows him to speak. You pivot over and you know,
• 57:26
  Speaker 2: a headline over. I guess I got this over, Briber.
• 57:28
  Speaker 2: It doesn't matter. It is actually happening. German parties, this
• 57:31
  Speaker 2: is a bipartisan effort or multiparty effort effort. When you're
• 57:34
  Speaker 2: dealing with German you got more than two parties. German
• 57:37
  Speaker 2: parties converge the change law that makes it a crime
• 57:40
  Speaker 2: to insult politicians. Yeah, criminalizing citizens for offending politicians. That
• 57:46
  Speaker 2: is a law on the books there. They don't enjoy
• 57:48
  Speaker 2: free speech over there, now, do they? And can you
• 57:51
  Speaker 2: what kind of world if this crazed loon Marxist Kami
• 57:57
  Speaker 2: gets his way. Cliff Connley, you get your way and
• 58:00
  Speaker 2: the constitutions eradicated. What's going to come out the other side.
• 58:03
  Speaker 2: What is your vision for the future. We already know
• 58:05
  Speaker 2: it's socialism slash Marxism. Fine, but does it include free speech? Huh?
• 58:12
  Speaker 2: Or are we going to go through a purge like
• 58:15
  Speaker 2: all of the other organization all the other countries have
• 58:17
  Speaker 2: gone through when they enshrine in their laws this nonsensitive
• 58:22
  Speaker 2: socialism or communism. History is filled with demonstrations or points
• 58:26
  Speaker 2: about that, I mean censorship. They bring in censorship, they
• 58:31
  Speaker 2: can't they outlaw criticizing politicians. Just to say that out
• 58:36
  Speaker 2: loud just blows my mind. Honestly, folks, I'm just so
• 58:39
  Speaker 2: used to being able to say whatever I darn well please,
• 58:42
  Speaker 2: because we have the free speech rights in this country,
• 58:44
  Speaker 2: and I've defended because I believe more speech right, more
• 58:47
  Speaker 2: speech will allow logic and reason to win the day.
• 58:53
  Speaker 2: It's the points I make here in the fifty five
• 58:54
  Speaker 2: Carossee Morning Show. Yeah, it sounds great on paper, this
• 58:57
  Speaker 2: glorious grand dream of socialism and communists will eat your
• 59:02
  Speaker 2: coording's ability to reach your coording to his need and
• 59:04
  Speaker 2: then you break it down. You break it down because
• 59:06
  Speaker 2: you discuss the pros and the concept different things. You
• 59:08
  Speaker 2: talk about the times has been tried elsewhere and failed,
• 59:11
  Speaker 2: You talk about the reasons for the failure, and then
• 59:14
  Speaker 2: you come to the conclusion that, well, you know it
• 59:15
  Speaker 2: really doesn't work. But who wants to outlaw the speech?
• 59:21
  Speaker 2: Who wants to outlaw the discussions? Who wants to at
• 59:25
  Speaker 2: least in this country we have free speech. Docs you threaten,
• 59:29
  Speaker 2: you stand outside your home and wave signs? Right, I
• 59:39
  Speaker 2: guess I'm kind of curious if anybody in my listening
• 59:41
  Speaker 2: audience has ever taken time out of their free uh
• 59:44
  Speaker 2: the free time that they've got, and gotten a sign
• 59:47
  Speaker 2: and gone to some politicians yard and protested at their home,
• 59:51
  Speaker 2: the home of a politician. I would never do that.
• 59:55
  Speaker 2: I mean, I think we're all in tied to some
• 59:57
  Speaker 2: peace and some respect and some I was seeing our
• 1:00:00
  Speaker 2: own homes, but there they are regularly everywhere. Six forty
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 2: six Joyce, I promise I will get your car. I
• 1:00:09
  Speaker 2: just looked up and saw you there. I apologize and
• 1:00:10
  Speaker 2: engage in a little bit of a fun fifty five
• 1:00:12
  Speaker 2: Carsite talk Station five one, three seven nine fifty five
• 1:00:16
  Speaker 2: eight hundred eight two three talk. I want to thank
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 2: Joyce for holding over the break. Welcome to the fifty
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 2: five Carsee Morning Show. Joyce's good to hear from you.
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 12: Hey, good morning, Brian. I hope you're doing well.
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 2: I am. Thank you very much. I hope you can
• 1:00:26
  Speaker 2: say the same.
• 1:00:28
  Speaker 12: I'm just getting ready to go for my run. I
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 12: almost hung up because good.
• 1:00:33
  Speaker 2: For you anyway, inspiring others. Maybe maybe Joyce, you just
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 2: inspired somebody else to exercise. It's a good thing. I'm
• 1:00:40
  Speaker 2: trying to do that myself. Not running, but I'm trying
• 1:00:42
  Speaker 2: to get into an exercise routine, so I appreciate any
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 2: extra support though. Glad you're doing it.
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 5: Well.
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 12: I figure every workout I do is an investment in
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 12: my later years because we are the same age. And also,
• 1:00:55
  Speaker 12: I guess I think I've told you this before, but
• 1:00:57
  Speaker 12: I grew up listening to your dad.
• 1:00:59
  Speaker 6: Because my mom was the big fans.
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 2: Same thanks to you, Joyce. I appreciate you putting me
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 2: through college.
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 12: Yeah, that might be a dubious thanks. I don't know.
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 2: No, listening to the program ratings and sponsors and supporting
• 1:01:13
  Speaker 2: the sponsors. All that went into my dad's salary, which
• 1:01:16
  Speaker 2: part of which put me through college. So thank you.
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 7: Serious, I just don't know.
• 1:01:19
  Speaker 12: About undergrad college.
• 1:01:21
  Speaker 6: I mean, I did the same thing, but I'm like well.
• 1:01:24
  Speaker 2: Armed with real quick, armed with logic and reason. Thanks
• 1:01:27
  Speaker 2: to my parents, I could see through the crap when
• 1:01:30
  Speaker 2: it was being fed through me.
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 9: So I went.
• 1:01:32
  Speaker 2: I got out of college completely unscathed, Joyce, and they
• 1:01:34
  Speaker 2: thank my parents for that too. Anyway, go ahead, go ahead.
• 1:01:40
  Speaker 8: So my point is, I am really frustrated with the
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 8: lack of response from our senators as far as like
• 1:01:48
  Speaker 8: listening to us and at like a concrete example, when
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 8: they're still trying to push that stay back through.
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 12: I contacted both Moreno and who Staid. I emailed them
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 12: and I phone their offices. Now the Bernie Moreno's credit,
• 1:02:03
  Speaker 12: I did receive a canned response, wasn't a personal like
• 1:02:09
  Speaker 12: addressing my issues with passing to say back now with Houstead.
• 1:02:15
  Speaker 12: I emailed him four separate occasions and called his office.
• 1:02:19
  Speaker 12: I got zero response, not even the canned response that
• 1:02:25
  Speaker 12: Bernie sent me. So yeah, it's it's actually mind boggling.
• 1:02:32
  Speaker 12: I know that they have staff, I know that they
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 12: could do something, and you know, I went through I
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 12: know that my emails went through, and I know that
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 12: my phone calls were answered and I got messages taken.
• 1:02:44
  Speaker 12: You know, I'll vote for him, because I'm not going
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 12: to vote for Sharon Brown at all. But it's just,
• 1:02:51
  Speaker 12: you know, the non responsiveness. It's it's like, you know,
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 12: who are you there to serve?
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 2: Yeah, you at minimum go into your comment about Moreno
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 2: at minimum at least acknowledge having received the message, and
• 1:03:04
  Speaker 2: it can response is better than no response silence, definitely,
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 2: And I honestly, Joyce, I believe, and I will stand
• 1:03:11
  Speaker 2: corrected all day long if my recollection is incorrect here.
• 1:03:15
  Speaker 2: But someone had called last week or the week before.
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 2: It was fairly recently with the same complaint, and I
• 1:03:20
  Speaker 2: do believe it was about Houston's office. And I say
• 1:03:23
  Speaker 2: this out loud regardless of whether I'm right on that
• 1:03:25
  Speaker 2: your call here this morning is a great idea for
• 1:03:29
  Speaker 2: the Houston campaign because I know there are folks that
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 2: are working on his campaign that listen to the show,
• 1:03:34
  Speaker 2: respond to the phone calls. Please, it's an election year
• 1:03:38
  Speaker 2: and you're running neck and neck with shared Brown. I mean, right, Joyce, Yeah.
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 12: I was so pleased when Moreno asked him and now
• 1:03:48
  Speaker 12: we have to contend with him again, and I'm really
• 1:03:52
  Speaker 12: very worried that he's going to.
• 1:03:53
  Speaker 2: Get back in as am. I. That's where I know
• 1:03:57
  Speaker 2: Poland's been inaccurate lately, and it always typically is, and
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 2: we regularly complain about it. But you got to look
• 1:04:03
  Speaker 2: at whatever is being fed in terms of polling and
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 2: neck and neck I think is maybe a good thing
• 1:04:07
  Speaker 2: for the Republicans out there. Oh my god, we're neck
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 2: and neck with Shared Brown. Damn it. I guess we
• 1:04:11
  Speaker 2: better get out and vote, right.
• 1:04:14
  Speaker 12: Yeah, we'll be absolutely And you know, my last point
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 12: is I'm voting for Vivec with much enthusiasm. Anybody that
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 12: doesn't see how good he could be for this state
• 1:04:28
  Speaker 12: and are staying home because of his name, Listen, I'm
• 1:04:32
  Speaker 12: gonna tried and true Christian, but that is not going
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 12: to prevent me from voting for Ramaswami. I can tell
• 1:04:36
  Speaker 12: you that I will go there with bells on and
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 12: past my vote for that guy.
• 1:04:40
  Speaker 2: And I'm in your camp on that, Joyce, and to that,
• 1:04:43
  Speaker 2: noting your comment about religion, Amen, Joyce, get out and
• 1:04:46
  Speaker 2: vote Bbeck. Ramaswani is a fantastic candidate and I think
• 1:04:49
  Speaker 2: he's going to do very well for the state of Ohio. Joyce,
• 1:04:52
  Speaker 2: thank you so much for calling six fifty six folks
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 2: out there. I've listening audience. Feel free to give me
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 2: a call as well. Love Joyce's point there, maybe you
• 1:04:59
  Speaker 2: have one, Feel free make it. After the top of
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 2: the air news got a little time to talk before
• 1:05:02
  Speaker 2: we get to Tom Zawastowski from We the People Convention
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 2: on the same topic getting conservatives out to vote. Don't
• 1:05:07
  Speaker 2: go away the iHeartRadio app. It's where we put the
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 2: app in happening.
• 1:05:13
  Speaker 3: This is actually happening.
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 2: Downloaded now at fifty five KRC the talkstation. The latest
• 1:05:20
  Speaker 2: on your money on fifty five KRC the talkstation. This
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 2: is the Bloomberg Muckstation seven oh five Here at fifty
• 1:05:43
  Speaker 2: five krsite talkstation. Happy to this day, looking forward to
• 1:05:47
  Speaker 2: Bodom the Hour, the return of Tom Zawastowski, We the
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 2: People Convention dot Org on the whole concept of us
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 2: need to get out and vote Conservatives most notably, and
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 2: I will echo my earlier comments, I would appreciate my
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 2: little l libertarian friends or even kap Low libertarian friends
• 1:06:01
  Speaker 2: come out and vote to your choices usually are limited.
• 1:06:04
  Speaker 2: If you want a different party but I think it's
• 1:06:06
  Speaker 2: safe to say that more likely libertarians voting for conservatives,
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 2: and we could sure use the help on that. Inside
• 1:06:11
  Speaker 2: scoop with Bright Part News in one hour, we will
• 1:06:14
  Speaker 2: be talking with Breitbart Finance and Economics editor John Carney
• 1:06:17
  Speaker 2: about the rising bond yields, which some are saying is
• 1:06:20
  Speaker 2: a bad sign for the economy. Now John's argument is no,
• 1:06:23
  Speaker 2: it's a good sign, and he says Trump derangement syndrome
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 2: has clowned, has clouded their conclusions. Looking forward to that,
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 2: plus the Daniel Davis deep die with Trump threatening to
• 1:06:33
  Speaker 2: bomb Oman yesterday, I was scratching my head over that
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 2: one his praise. I will boil down his comments about
• 1:06:39
  Speaker 2: the North Korean leader being a decent guy. That strikes
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 2: me as very odd. And he said that, of course
• 1:06:44
  Speaker 2: in connection with not going on with the war games
• 1:06:47
  Speaker 2: with South Korea. Is it a munitions question? Is it
• 1:06:51
  Speaker 2: a cost question? But why praise Kim Jong un, who
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 2: has provided fifty thousand troops to the Ukraine War as
• 1:06:58
  Speaker 2: well as drones in the Ron conflict. I'll see if
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 2: Daniel Davis has any inside scoop on that. He's got
• 1:07:04
  Speaker 2: a lot of inside resources, so that'll be at eight
• 1:07:06
  Speaker 2: thirty without further ado. Tracy, thanks for calling the morning show.
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 2: I appreciate you holding there for a moment. Welcome Brian.
• 1:07:13
  Speaker 13: I listened to your show every every morning. First time
• 1:07:18
  Speaker 13: that I called in, I was able to say hi
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 13: to Joe. Regarding mister Ramaswami and these idiots that bring
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 13: in religious concern, I just want to say that he
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 13: was valid victorian at my alma mater, Saint Xavier High School.
• 1:07:38
  Speaker 2: Yes, so.
• 1:07:41
  Speaker 3: That should be known.
• 1:07:43
  Speaker 2: I mean, and they're known for their actually they're known
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 2: in Xavier Universe or Xavier High School for their academic rigor. Tracy.
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 2: That is not an easy high school to get through,
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 2: and he came out on top. And last time I checked,
• 1:07:57
  Speaker 2: it doesn't Xavier High School still consider itself a cat
• 1:08:00
  Speaker 2: like high school.
• 1:08:02
  Speaker 13: That's correct.
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I knew the answer. The question is. I just
• 1:08:05
  Speaker 2: wanted to have someone confirmed.
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 1: Out loud.
• 1:08:09
  Speaker 13: For those out there that are naysayers, you're wrong.
• 1:08:14
  Speaker 7: So anyway, you guys do a great job.
• 1:08:17
  Speaker 2: Tracy. I appreciate you tuning in. Man, I appreciate you
• 1:08:20
  Speaker 2: calling in and pointing out that very logical point. We
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 2: don't live in a theocracy. The religion of our elected officials,
• 1:08:28
  Speaker 2: unless they're trying to enshrine in law their orthodoxy, doesn't
• 1:08:33
  Speaker 2: make a wits worth of difference. What do they say
• 1:08:35
  Speaker 2: on economics, What do they say on taxes? What do
• 1:08:37
  Speaker 2: they say on growth? What are their ideas to get
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 2: us here in the state of Ohio, in the case
• 1:08:43
  Speaker 2: of the governor, on path, on the right track? And
• 1:08:47
  Speaker 2: what is the right track? These are all points politicians have,
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 2: you know, control over. I don't have any control over
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 2: the religion. He's just a demonstrably great guy. Oh No, listen,
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 2: Jack Windsor from the Hot pressentover. He joins the program
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 2: usually on Fridays. He just posted this yesterday late yesterday
• 1:09:02
  Speaker 2: talking about David Pepper claiming Vivek Ramaswam he moved his
• 1:09:07
  Speaker 2: company from Ohio to Texas, and Jack points out astuteley,
• 1:09:11
  Speaker 2: there's one problem. SEC filings proved Ramaswami had resigned from
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 2: chairmanship of the company twenty months before the relocation decision
• 1:09:20
  Speaker 2: was made, and he notes astutely the headquarter move is
• 1:09:24
  Speaker 2: a call made by the management and the board. By
• 1:09:26
  Speaker 2: November twenty twenty four, he sat on neither had pointed
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 2: out on the air yesterday owning a stock and running
• 1:09:33
  Speaker 2: a company are different things. The headquarter relocation is a
• 1:09:37
  Speaker 2: decision made by management in the board, and Ramaswamy sat
• 1:09:40
  Speaker 2: on neither of November twenty twenty four. But nonetheless, Oh
• 1:09:45
  Speaker 2: Pepper made the claim. Anyway, I'm shocked that someone would
• 1:09:48
  Speaker 2: lie to you like that, he said, The documents are
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 2: publicly available. Is exactly why we pull the filing. So
• 1:09:54
  Speaker 2: he question by from Jack Windsor to I guess us
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 2: generally speaking of David Pepper, particularly if a public figure
• 1:09:59
  Speaker 2: gets caught making a provably false claim, David Pepper, does
• 1:10:05
  Speaker 2: a correction matter anymore? Or do the politicis just move
• 1:10:08
  Speaker 2: on politics, Move on, Jack. You know the answer of
• 1:10:10
  Speaker 2: his rhetorical question, No, they don't have to go unring
• 1:10:13
  Speaker 2: the bell of the false claim they made previously. This
• 1:10:16
  Speaker 2: is politics, and we all know First Amendment protects lying
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 2: about people to a large extent. Anyway, something else disturbing me.
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 2: It was talking earlier about the free speech component of
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 2: the First Amendment, which again going back to this time,
• 1:10:32
  Speaker 2: the DSA members who want to get rid of the Constitution,
• 1:10:35
  Speaker 2: which is the impediment to the revolution, making comments like
• 1:10:39
  Speaker 2: that because they're protected in a country that has a
• 1:10:42
  Speaker 2: First Amendment. Now I got to pivot it over to
• 1:10:46
  Speaker 2: the Indiana Fever Atlanta dream game the other day. In
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 2: connection with that. They don't like dissent. They don't want
• 1:10:54
  Speaker 2: to engage in a discussion about the end outcomes of
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 2: their socialist dream Why because once you start going through it,
• 1:11:01
  Speaker 2: you always end up reaching at the reality that it's
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 2: gonna collapse, it's not gonna work, and all the reasons
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 2: why that we've been through time and time again. But
• 1:11:11
  Speaker 2: they want to take away your ability to challenge them,
• 1:11:14
  Speaker 2: and in a country with free speech, that can be
• 1:11:17
  Speaker 2: difficult to do unless they are coming down on you,
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 2: attacking you personally, causing you then to cower, put your
• 1:11:25
  Speaker 2: tail between your legs, or maybe not even utter a syllable.
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 2: All that chilling effect, that evil angry leftists screaming at you,
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 2: dosing you, making social media posts, or even showing up
• 1:11:34
  Speaker 2: your house a house with a sign protesting what you
• 1:11:37
  Speaker 2: have to say. Area of illustration. This whole gender controversy
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 2: we find ourselves going through with the transgender movement and
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 2: the WNBA. So we have some Georgia residents, Casey Thomason
• 1:11:51
  Speaker 2: and her daughter Annie, Annie Thomason were over at the
• 1:11:55
  Speaker 2: Indiana Fever Atlanta Dream Game, each of them wearing a
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 2: very very clear and terms of messaging T shirt xx
• 1:12:03
  Speaker 2: x Y Athletics t shirts to support Sophie Cunningham had
• 1:12:06
  Speaker 2: one of them her effort, the Sophie Cunningham effort to
• 1:12:10
  Speaker 2: keep women's sports in spaces all female outspoken critic of
• 1:12:14
  Speaker 2: allowing men to play in women's basketball, and I understand
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 2: the reasons for that. It's a legitimate criticism. Logic and
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: reason points that out time and time again, there is
• 1:12:22
  Speaker 2: a competitive advantage men might have over women, right, No kidding,
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 2: that's your logic and reason argument. When dealing with people
• 1:12:29
  Speaker 2: who want to ignore that, passion is what they go to,
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 2: which isn't logic and reason anyway. Casey wore the xx
• 1:12:36
  Speaker 2: xy shirt with letters on her front. Annie wore a
• 1:12:39
  Speaker 2: Riley Gains collaborative piece with an XX on the front
• 1:12:42
  Speaker 2: and for the girls on the back. They sat through
• 1:12:45
  Speaker 2: the game all the way through overtime, and that's when
• 1:12:48
  Speaker 2: a security guard approached him. About halfway through the five
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 2: minute overtime clock is ticking down this most exciting part
• 1:12:53
  Speaker 2: of the game. Right guard tried to get Casey and
• 1:12:55
  Speaker 2: to leave their seats and have a conversation with him.
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 2: They say, we're not sure quite why, And Casey looked
• 1:12:59
  Speaker 2: at Adam and said, is this about our shirts? Security
• 1:13:03
  Speaker 2: guard told them that fans were offended by the shirts,
• 1:13:07
  Speaker 2: so they had one of two choices, get the hell
• 1:13:10
  Speaker 2: out of the building or cover them up by wearing
• 1:13:13
  Speaker 2: an Atlanta Dream Wellness and Health night shirt, which they
• 1:13:15
  Speaker 2: were provided. They reluctantly agreed to put the shirts on
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 2: State Farm Arena is the venue? Oh and looky here, folks.
• 1:13:25
  Speaker 2: I was wondering whether this might have been a First
• 1:13:27
  Speaker 2: Amendment violation, So I was reading this article, I did
• 1:13:29
  Speaker 2: a little search on the first of the State Farm
• 1:13:32
  Speaker 2: Arena where they were playing the game. You know who
• 1:13:34
  Speaker 2: built that, right, Taxpayers two hundred and thirteen and a
• 1:13:40
  Speaker 2: half million dollars to construct arena. City of Atlanta cover
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 2: more than one hundred and ninety four million of it,
• 1:13:45
  Speaker 2: ninety percent of the cost through one hundred and thirty
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 2: point seventy five million in government back bonds, any three
• 1:13:52
  Speaker 2: percent rental car tax for infrastructure, So you shoulder the burden,
• 1:13:55
  Speaker 2: my Atlanta friends, taxpayers that may prevent the stadium from
• 1:13:59
  Speaker 2: engage in free speech violations, which this would be. I
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 2: haven't concluded legally whether that's an actual argument. Now, Ultimately
• 1:14:07
  Speaker 2: they did capitulate. The w NBA came out and said
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 2: that they were wrong and making fans cover up the
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 2: dream the shirts at that Dream Fever game, So at
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 2: least they backed off the lunacy from this position. But
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 2: according to the State Farm Marina's prohibition prohibited list of items, clothing, garments,
• 1:14:25
  Speaker 2: or signs displaying explicit language, no f bombs, profanity, or
• 1:14:31
  Speaker 2: derogatory characterization toward any persons, that's what's prohibited. Obscene in
• 1:14:36
  Speaker 2: decent messages on signs or clothing will not be permitted. Fine,
• 1:14:39
  Speaker 2: does an xx x Y shirt fall into any of
• 1:14:42
  Speaker 2: those categories? Absolutely not. There's no argument you can make
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 2: that it does. What does fall into the fall into
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 2: that category. The T shirt itself offend some people, and
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 2: that's what led to these women being told to cover
• 1:14:56
  Speaker 2: their shirts up. Someone said they were offended. Now the
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 2: backpedaling that showed up. Okay, okay, we can't filter out
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 2: the content. It's okay for them to wear the shirt.
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 2: I might disagree with it personally, he says. The WNBA spokesperson.
• 1:15:11
  Speaker 2: But see there's the pivot. If they had a logical
• 1:15:17
  Speaker 2: and reasonable argument, rather than forcing them to cover up
• 1:15:20
  Speaker 2: the shirt, why not just show a picture of on
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 2: the big screen. Yet there they are wearing the xxxy shirts,
• 1:15:25
  Speaker 2: and use it as an opportunity to advance your argument
• 1:15:29
  Speaker 2: that it's okay for men to compete against women in sports.
• 1:15:34
  Speaker 2: There they are with those xx y shirts. You know
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 2: what that means. They're on the side that says men
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 2: shouldn't compete in women's sports, or rather transgender women. And
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 2: then strike try to convince us that this logical, reasonable, biological,
• 1:15:47
  Speaker 2: and science based t shirt is somehow wrong and advance
• 1:15:52
  Speaker 2: your argument. Don't say you can't show the shirt, but
• 1:15:58
  Speaker 2: use it as a talking point to advance your agenda.
• 1:16:02
  Speaker 2: Do you hear that happening much? No, And you can
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 2: move it down into pretty much any other category. You
• 1:16:07
  Speaker 2: get screaming, you get yelling, you get doxing, you get
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 2: a name calling, which is not argument. You've won the
• 1:16:14
  Speaker 2: argument if someone starts calling you names in the middle
• 1:16:16
  Speaker 2: of a debate that's supposed to be predicated on facts
• 1:16:19
  Speaker 2: and logic and reason. So it's just it's crazy, folks.
• 1:16:29
  Speaker 2: This is who they are. Seven sixteen fifty five Karosite
• 1:16:32
  Speaker 2: talk station. We'll get rid of the stench the talk station. Yeah,
• 1:16:37
  Speaker 2: seven twenty one here fifty five Kersite talk station. Very
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 2: happy Tuesday to you, Tom z Awastowski, We the People Convention,
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 2: continuing the conversation. All the reasons we need to get
• 1:16:45
  Speaker 2: you off the couch and into the voting booth. This
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 2: is November, or take advantage of early voting. We've got
• 1:16:50
  Speaker 2: it here in Ohio, So why not? So to the
• 1:16:53
  Speaker 2: polls we go, says Tom's Alastawski. All the reasons why
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 2: I hadn't gotten to this as tangential to all the
• 1:17:00
  Speaker 2: seemingly more important at least in terms of my prioritization
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 2: here in the morning show issues out there in the world.
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 2: I thought this was rather than usual development but also
• 1:17:06
  Speaker 2: revealing of a just an eye opening statistic. Here in
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 2: the United States, Attorney General Todd blanche has just announced
• 1:17:15
  Speaker 2: they're going to be allowing individuals who lost their gun
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 2: rights because of a felony conviction to apply to have
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 2: them reinstated. This was announced yesterday. They are expecting a
• 1:17:26
  Speaker 2: surge by all calculations, Lisa, as has been reported and
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 2: estimated three hundred and thirty thousand felons who've had their
• 1:17:33
  Speaker 2: Second Amendment right taken away or expected to apply to
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 2: the Justice Department during the first year. Now that's going
• 1:17:39
  Speaker 2: to overwhelm the office, I suspect. But there will be
• 1:17:41
  Speaker 2: some sort of I guess, evidentiary hearing or some sort
• 1:17:44
  Speaker 2: of evidentiary analysis on whether that person is worthy of
• 1:17:47
  Speaker 2: getting the fire at the Second Amendment right. According to
• 1:17:49
  Speaker 2: Attorney Joe, turning to Blanche, the second Moment is not
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 2: a second class right, and the federal government should not
• 1:17:54
  Speaker 2: permanently deprive Americans of a constitutional right without regard to
• 1:17:57
  Speaker 2: whether they pose a danger to public saye. And that's
• 1:18:01
  Speaker 2: the analysis that's going to be performed. Is this person
• 1:18:03
  Speaker 2: a danger to society? At this point? New rule will
• 1:18:07
  Speaker 2: keep firearms still key, I should emphasize keep firearms out
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 2: of the hands of an undocumented immigrants, registered sex offenders,
• 1:18:13
  Speaker 2: and violent criminals. And here here's the stat that kind
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 2: of blew my mind. Now real quick, here in your
• 1:18:20
  Speaker 2: mind unless you know the figure, how many Americans do
• 1:18:24
  Speaker 2: you think are barred from owning guns because of their
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 2: criminal convictions? If you had to take a wild guess
• 1:18:32
  Speaker 2: considering that they are what roughly three hundred and thirty
• 1:18:35
  Speaker 2: million Americans out there, thirty million have lost their Second
• 1:18:41
  Speaker 2: Amendment rights because of a felony conviction. I thought, wow,
• 1:18:44
  Speaker 2: I really couldn't believe the size of that. So I
• 1:18:48
  Speaker 2: personally am not overly concerned about this. And again, there's
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 2: that Constitution, and you know, do felons lose any other
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 2: rights another constitution? I mean, I think they retained their
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 2: First Amendment rights. And maybe because they got convicted of
• 1:19:08
  Speaker 2: a fellon a found they're criminals. And some people immediately
• 1:19:12
  Speaker 2: equate crime with firearms. Well, we all know that the
• 1:19:15
  Speaker 2: guns aren't the problem, it's the individual. So maybe the
• 1:19:18
  Speaker 2: process is in place to keep the most dangerous folks
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 2: in the country, of the thirty million felons that are
• 1:19:23
  Speaker 2: out there, from getting a firearm. I don't know what
• 1:19:28
  Speaker 2: the test is. I don't know what hurdles you need
• 1:19:31
  Speaker 2: to overcome my felons out in the listening audience, But
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 2: clearly this administration embraces the Second Amendment. You got that
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 2: National Firearms Act I believe was the name of it,
• 1:19:41
  Speaker 2: that outlawed suppressors and short barrow rifles has already been
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 2: deemed unconstitutional. It was predicated on attacks. When you used
• 1:19:49
  Speaker 2: to go in you had to pay two hundred dollars
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 2: and register and get finger printed, and so the federal
• 1:19:54
  Speaker 2: government knew the serial number of the item that you
• 1:19:56
  Speaker 2: bought and where your fingerprints are. It's kind of an intrusion.
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 2: But the problem I always had that and I never
• 1:20:00
  Speaker 2: exercised my ability to do that. It's because I found
• 1:20:05
  Speaker 2: it offensive that to pay the government money so that
• 1:20:11
  Speaker 2: I can enjoy my constitutionally protected right to keep them
• 1:20:14
  Speaker 2: bear arms. So the fees not there anymore. And the
• 1:20:18
  Speaker 2: only reason that that Act remained on the books and
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 2: was not deemed unconstitutional is because it was built around
• 1:20:23
  Speaker 2: a tax. They had the federal power of taxation. You
• 1:20:26
  Speaker 2: pay the tax, you get the item. Once the tax
• 1:20:29
  Speaker 2: was eliminated. That was the foundation of the Supreme Court
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 2: case upholding the Act. The whole basis for a polling,
• 1:20:35
  Speaker 2: the Act fell down upon itself, and at least in
• 1:20:37
  Speaker 2: one circuit, you can go ahead and buy a suppressor
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 2: or a short barreled rifle without having to register with
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 2: the federal government. And that's already been done. And there's
• 1:20:45
  Speaker 2: now calls here in the state of Ohio to get Columbus,
• 1:20:49
  Speaker 2: the elected officials there to revoke Ohio's comparable ban. If
• 1:20:55
  Speaker 2: it's unconstitutional under federal law, just because Ohio adopted it
• 1:20:58
  Speaker 2: doesn't mean it's not unconstitutional understate law seven to twenty six.
• 1:21:02
  Speaker 2: Right now, Tom z So Tom z Awastowski.
• 1:21:05
  Speaker 1: Defied KRS the talk station.
• 1:21:08
  Speaker 2: It's seven thirty one, fifty five KRCD Talk Station. Happy Tuesday.
• 1:21:11
  Speaker 2: It's that time a week we get the benefit of
• 1:21:14
  Speaker 2: Tom z Awastowski's sage wisdom. You can find Tom throughout
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 2: the week, and I recommend you check out his weekly podcast,
• 1:21:20
  Speaker 2: it's We the People Convention dot Org. Welcome back, Tom
• 1:21:23
  Speaker 2: z Awastowski. It's always a pleasure to have me on
• 1:21:25
  Speaker 2: the fifty five KRC Morning Show. My friend.
• 1:21:27
  Speaker 9: Great to be back with you, Brian, and glad to
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 9: hear the forecast is starting to lighten up. I've been
• 1:21:32
  Speaker 9: worried about you guys down there. You've been just getting battered.
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 9: So I'm looking for that low humidity seventy nine Thursday.
• 1:21:39
  Speaker 9: That'll be awesome.
• 1:21:40
  Speaker 2: Amen to that all day long. We can probably find
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 2: bipartisan support for that issue.
• 1:21:44
  Speaker 7: Tom.
• 1:21:45
  Speaker 2: Okay, there's okay, Now, there's two things. Humidity sucks and
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 2: cancer sucks. All right, we can agree on two things
• 1:21:50
  Speaker 2: in this world. Everything else we're in complete disagreement on.
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 6: Now.
• 1:21:53
  Speaker 2: One of the things that is concerning me, I know
• 1:21:55
  Speaker 2: you wanted to talk about getting people ratcheted up and
• 1:21:57
  Speaker 2: getting him out to vote, and I know you just
• 1:21:59
  Speaker 2: spoke about this the other day in your podcast Strategy
• 1:22:01
  Speaker 2: for the twenty twenty sixth election. Someone had called earlier
• 1:22:04
  Speaker 2: and was a little alarmed by the fact that now,
• 1:22:07
  Speaker 2: I suppose it depends on what neighborhood you're in, but
• 1:22:10
  Speaker 2: they were driving down through Montgomery and all they saw
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 2: was a bunch of any act and signs and a
• 1:22:14
  Speaker 2: bunch of shared brown signs. And I think she said
• 1:22:17
  Speaker 2: that or he can't recall no Houston signs, no Ramaswami signs.
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 2: And I was trying to maybe come up with a
• 1:22:26
  Speaker 2: reason why that might be. Maybe some people are reluctant
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 2: to support a Republican period because they're afraid that these
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 2: crazy leftists might do something to their home or steal
• 1:22:34
  Speaker 2: the sign. Maybe it's a little early in the election cycle,
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 2: they're not prepared to put one out yet. Maybe they
• 1:22:39
  Speaker 2: aren't paying attention to the election yet because the kids
• 1:22:41
  Speaker 2: and it's just now went back to school. I don't know, Tom,
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 2: but I am getting given the what polling we've got,
• 1:22:48
  Speaker 2: that any acting could be even close to Ramaswami at
• 1:22:53
  Speaker 2: this point, what is there a we are we struggling
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 2: on the conservative side of the ledger or the Ramaswammis ledger?
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 2: Are we are we struggling with an enthusiasm problem? Tom?
• 1:23:03
  Speaker 2: And if so, why what might be the basis for that?
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 7: Yeah?
• 1:23:06
  Speaker 2: I think we are.
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 9: I think that's a good observation.
• 1:23:09
  Speaker 12: Uh.
• 1:23:10
  Speaker 9: And the basis for it, from what I can see,
• 1:23:13
  Speaker 9: started with the you know, the disappointment about the property
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 9: tax not getting on the ballot, and you know, the
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 9: the you know, that whole issue, and now it's moved
• 1:23:21
  Speaker 9: into the whole data center fight that you know, we're
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 9: spending all our time arguing about data centers and not
• 1:23:28
  Speaker 9: about who we're going to vote for, you know, for
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 9: governor and for Senate and House and things like that.
• 1:23:33
  Speaker 9: Now it is August, and you know, and there's time
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 9: you know, to pivot to that. But I will note this.
• 1:23:40
  Speaker 9: I don't know, you know, it's funny you're saying about
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 9: these amy exercise because if I recall, right, I don't
• 1:23:45
  Speaker 9: think you're allowed to put up signs until a month
• 1:23:47
  Speaker 9: before the election or early voting. And I think those
• 1:23:50
  Speaker 9: sides are probably illegal, which would make sense because they
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 9: don't need no staking laws, right the the SA Democrats,
• 1:23:56
  Speaker 9: they can put them up whenever they want. Who cares
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 9: about the law?
• 1:23:59
  Speaker 2: Well, run on that guy, because that's not something that
• 1:24:01
  Speaker 2: came into my mind. I was not aware that there
• 1:24:04
  Speaker 2: is a limitation on campaign signs. I would immediately say,
• 1:24:07
  Speaker 2: we'll be at the first amendment. I could put any
• 1:24:09
  Speaker 2: damn sign up in my front yard that I want.
• 1:24:11
  Speaker 2: There is a law in the book, Tom, And can
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 2: you explain that, because again I'm in the dark on
• 1:24:14
  Speaker 2: that one.
• 1:24:15
  Speaker 9: Yeah, no, there actually are laws on the books, and
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 9: it has to do with just, you know, the community.
• 1:24:21
  Speaker 9: It's a community, back community. It's not a federal or
• 1:24:24
  Speaker 9: okay community.
• 1:24:26
  Speaker 6: You know.
• 1:24:27
  Speaker 9: Most of them are thirty days, you know, and and
• 1:24:29
  Speaker 9: that's you know, been abused and we've actually reported people
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 9: for doing it, you know, too early. And again it's
• 1:24:37
  Speaker 9: it's them trying to get a head start on it.
• 1:24:40
  Speaker 9: And we're we're gonna see some signs from VAC and
• 1:24:42
  Speaker 9: those guys, I'm sure, but not probably till after Labor Day.
• 1:24:46
  Speaker 2: Fair enough, and I'll encourage my listeners to get one
• 1:24:48
  Speaker 2: of those signs. Maybe go door to door, work with
• 1:24:51
  Speaker 2: Americans for Prosperity, get the word out, get your friends
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 2: off the couts, right, Tom, everything we can do.
• 1:24:56
  Speaker 9: Let me say that something about that too. Get your
• 1:24:59
  Speaker 9: friends to take absentee ballot request forms door to door
• 1:25:04
  Speaker 9: and get when you find someone that says, hey, I'm
• 1:25:07
  Speaker 9: with you, I'm against the communists, say hey, can you
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 9: fill out this absently bout request form and I'll turn
• 1:25:13
  Speaker 9: it in for you so we can make sure they vote.
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 9: Because the issue this year, Brian, is turnout. It's not
• 1:25:20
  Speaker 9: you know who you're going to vote for, it's if
• 1:25:22
  Speaker 9: you're going to vote at all. And that's what I
• 1:25:24
  Speaker 9: addressed in my announcement this week about our strategy for
• 1:25:28
  Speaker 9: this selection.
• 1:25:30
  Speaker 2: Well, let's talk a little bit about why people might
• 1:25:32
  Speaker 2: not vote, just the whole idea of not going in
• 1:25:34
  Speaker 2: and bothering. We'll continue with We the People Convention dot Org.
• 1:25:38
  Speaker 2: Tom Zawastowski, after I mentioned my friends at Chimney Care fireplaces,
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 2: still there'll be your friends.
• 1:25:42
  Speaker 1: To five KRC the talk station.
• 1:25:47
  Speaker 2: Seven nine here fifty five krse talk station Hay Tuesday,
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 2: we either people Convention dot Org find Tom Zawastowski throughout
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 2: the week and find him here every week beginning at
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 2: seven thirty fifty five Karose Morning Show on a Tuesday,
• 1:25:57
  Speaker 2: Tom z eh We've seen low voter two turnout in
• 1:26:00
  Speaker 2: a lot of elections. It's it's a sad, pathetic reality
• 1:26:03
  Speaker 2: from my standpoint, especially when you look like sort of
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 2: an off cycle election like the City of Cincinnata council
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 2: and the mayor's race, twenty five percent turnout, twenty five
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 2: percent and so many really important issues like the zoning
• 1:26:18
  Speaker 2: issues got the people in Hyde Park all outraged. You'd
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 2: have thought, you know what, you'd at least expect massive
• 1:26:23
  Speaker 2: voter turnout in at least one area of town. Now
• 1:26:26
  Speaker 2: they got their way, but in advance of the election.
• 1:26:29
  Speaker 2: But come on, there was a lot of really important
• 1:26:31
  Speaker 2: issues to vote on, and there were options and alternatives.
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 2: But look, twenty five percent turnout. Of course, a hot,
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 2: solid slate of Democrats, which we expect, but as we
• 1:26:41
  Speaker 2: go into the November election, it is most assurely an
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 2: on cycle election, bigger turnout because of the all critical
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 2: important votes, the balance of the House and Senate. What
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 2: is do you sense because of the polling numbers suggesting
• 1:26:56
  Speaker 2: and reflecting it that people are kind of a bit
• 1:26:58
  Speaker 2: exhausted with Trump. Maybe the war with Iran is not
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 2: going really well. It is wildly unpopular. Now I can't
• 1:27:04
  Speaker 2: imagine being you're very unhappy with the war, which I
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 2: am making me vote for a socialist or even any Democrat.
• 1:27:12
  Speaker 2: But I can see maybe the lack of enthusiasm and
• 1:27:15
  Speaker 2: this this this craziness from the left and anti Trump
• 1:27:20
  Speaker 2: sentiment is going to get them to the polls perhaps,
• 1:27:22
  Speaker 2: but it might cost some Republicans are a little upset
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 2: with the economy and the war just to sit it out, Tom,
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 2: Can we overcome that sort of sense that at least
• 1:27:29
  Speaker 2: I have, and maybe I have a different sense than
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 2: you do.
• 1:27:33
  Speaker 9: Well, I think we have to overcome it. I think
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 9: that's why we're having this conversation. I think that's why
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 9: we put forward, you know, our position on this election,
• 1:27:42
  Speaker 9: and my podcast this week and our website, because Brian,
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 9: it's it's really something that our citizens are getting tired
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 9: of not being represented. You know, the Save Act not
• 1:27:55
  Speaker 9: passing despite all the effort that people put in, and again,
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 9: you know, it's a eighty twenty issue at worst, and
• 1:28:03
  Speaker 9: you can't get any Democrats to vote it, and you
• 1:28:05
  Speaker 9: can't get these key Republicans to vote for it. People
• 1:28:08
  Speaker 9: are just saying, does it matter? Does it matter? Is
• 1:28:12
  Speaker 9: my vote matter? I'm here to tell you it never
• 1:28:15
  Speaker 9: has mattered more in your fricking life. Good point, Okay,
• 1:28:19
  Speaker 9: because we are literally now facing the destruction of our republic.
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 9: There are literally, there is literally a force in our country.
• 1:28:29
  Speaker 9: They call themselves the Democratic Solcials of America. They're communists.
• 1:28:33
  Speaker 9: They've been in our country, says Woodrow Wilson, and they
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 9: have been infiltrating our government. They've been stealing our money
• 1:28:41
  Speaker 9: through all this fraud that we're now disclosing. Okay, that
• 1:28:44
  Speaker 9: wasn't a bug, that was a feature, all right, And
• 1:28:48
  Speaker 9: so now they're amassing. They think this is the time,
• 1:28:52
  Speaker 9: they think this is the chance for them to rise
• 1:28:54
  Speaker 9: up take power, and they just say it out loud, Brian.
• 1:28:58
  Speaker 9: They want to destroy the United States. No president, no
• 1:29:02
  Speaker 9: Supreme Court, no porters, no police, no prisons, free college,
• 1:29:06
  Speaker 9: free housing, free you of food, free everything that. I
• 1:29:10
  Speaker 9: don't know who's supposed to pay for that, but I'm
• 1:29:11
  Speaker 9: pretty sure it's you. And I we got a rally
• 1:29:14
  Speaker 9: and we have to say in my flyer this no number.
• 1:29:17
  Speaker 9: We must all vote to protect our own personal interests.
• 1:29:22
  Speaker 9: I'm not asking to vote for Republicans. I'm asking you
• 1:29:25
  Speaker 9: to vote for yourself and for America and to elect
• 1:29:29
  Speaker 9: every Republican with a pulse to defeat the commune Democrats.
• 1:29:33
  Speaker 9: That's my message.
• 1:29:34
  Speaker 2: Well, and you get a guy like Shared Brown who
• 1:29:36
  Speaker 2: will come out and you know he will vote in
• 1:29:38
  Speaker 2: whatever leftist policy is advanced by the collective Democrat Party
• 1:29:42
  Speaker 2: he will vote for. So he can't protect himself from
• 1:29:44
  Speaker 2: his voting record, but he's going to come across and
• 1:29:47
  Speaker 2: he does come across as a sanier version of these
• 1:29:49
  Speaker 2: communists who do scream for the overthrow of government. So
• 1:29:52
  Speaker 2: it's like, oh, well, I'm not voting for a communist.
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 2: He's not flying, he's not running under the banner of
• 1:29:58
  Speaker 2: the DSA. He hasn't come out and said, you know,
• 1:30:01
  Speaker 2: get rid of police and prisons, so I'm safe with him.
• 1:30:05
  Speaker 2: But that would be sort of It will be a
• 1:30:07
  Speaker 2: person lying to themselves about the advancement of the the
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 2: d essay within the Democrat Party because they are a loud,
• 1:30:14
  Speaker 2: loud and prominent voice and do have apparently a tremendous
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 2: amount of sway, so much so that while being surrounded
• 1:30:21
  Speaker 2: by outright anti Semites and outright Marxist revolutionaries, normal quote
• 1:30:27
  Speaker 2: unquote run of the middle Democrats, centrist Democrats aren't even
• 1:30:30
  Speaker 2: rejecting that they're principles and the policies, they're welcome in
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 2: the big Tent Tom, which means cher Brown's going to
• 1:30:37
  Speaker 2: be voting right along with him.
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 7: Yeah.
• 1:30:39
  Speaker 9: Well, let's not forget that. The one Democrat I think
• 1:30:43
  Speaker 9: it was a House member, said he voted because of
• 1:30:47
  Speaker 9: the intimidation of his family. Okay, these people aren't going
• 1:30:51
  Speaker 9: to just persuade you with your words. They're going to
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 9: burn your frickin' house down. Okay, that's who you're talking about.
• 1:30:59
  Speaker 9: And the Democrats are fooling themselves about, Oh, we're a
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 9: big tenure. How came Jefferies yesterday? Was like, well, I
• 1:31:04
  Speaker 9: don't believe what they believe in, but you know, we'll
• 1:31:07
  Speaker 9: accept them into our tent. They're gonna burn your tent
• 1:31:10
  Speaker 9: to the ground, pal, and they're gonna burn our country
• 1:31:13
  Speaker 9: to the ground, and we have to stomp them out
• 1:31:15
  Speaker 9: like a bug by voting forever Republican this November. I
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 9: don't care if it's dog catcher or senator or governor
• 1:31:22
  Speaker 9: or whatever, because we have a chance to end this
• 1:31:25
  Speaker 9: this November. I mean that we can end it to
• 1:31:28
  Speaker 9: this November, because once they have no power, they will
• 1:31:31
  Speaker 9: cease to exist like the wigs.
• 1:31:33
  Speaker 2: Well, let's continue this conversation in the next segment there,
• 1:31:36
  Speaker 2: Tom Zawastowski, I'll hold you over and we'll do a
• 1:31:39
  Speaker 2: little more talking about these important issues.
• 1:31:41
  Speaker 1: Are ce the talk station.
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 2: It's seven to fifty to fifty five KERCV talk station.
• 1:31:47
  Speaker 2: We're gonna hear from Breitbart get the inside scoop up
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 2: at the top of the our news from Economic Senator
• 1:31:51
  Speaker 2: John Carney, plus the Daniel Davis Steve Dive. Tom's Awastowski
• 1:31:55
  Speaker 2: from We the People Convention dot orgs on the phone
• 1:31:57
  Speaker 2: talking about the issues. Can I ask you you speak
• 1:32:00
  Speaker 2: with the John Houston folks regularly, Tom, or at least
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 2: maybe speak to him personally from time to time.
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 9: I actually do not. He's one of the few people
• 1:32:10
  Speaker 9: in Ohio that I don't have a relationship with.
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 2: Huh is maybe there is there an explanation for that?
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 2: Is it completely Houston's camp? That's just not engaging with you.
• 1:32:20
  Speaker 9: Yeah. I think it goes back to when he was
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 9: running for governor and then he decided to join with
• 1:32:25
  Speaker 9: the Wine to become lieutenant governor, and I did not
• 1:32:28
  Speaker 9: support that. I was very vocal about that. And since then,
• 1:32:32
  Speaker 9: you know, we really haven't had any conversation. I do
• 1:32:35
  Speaker 9: support him. I do think that, you know, he has
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 9: voted the way we would want since he's been appointed
• 1:32:41
  Speaker 9: to the Senate, and I think that he will win.
• 1:32:44
  Speaker 9: And again, you know, you and I both know John
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 9: Houston really was bad during COVID. You want to talk
• 1:32:50
  Speaker 9: about Amy Acton, Yeah, talk about John Houston. But here's
• 1:32:54
  Speaker 9: the point. It doesn't matter to you and I. We
• 1:32:58
  Speaker 9: have to vote in our own personal beds interest, our
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 9: own personal best interest is to make sure that Communis
• 1:33:04
  Speaker 9: don't take over the US Senate. So you gotta vote
• 1:33:06
  Speaker 9: for John Houston, not because of his policy or his record,
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 9: and you don't have to vote against Sharon Brown because
• 1:33:13
  Speaker 9: of some vote. It doesn't matter. What matters is what's
• 1:33:17
  Speaker 9: best for you, your family, your community, and our state
• 1:33:20
  Speaker 9: and our nation. It's to defeat the communists. And as
• 1:33:23
  Speaker 9: we said in the last segment, John Houston ain't gonna
• 1:33:27
  Speaker 9: vote with the communists, but share it brown, share as
• 1:33:30
  Speaker 9: hell will. So it's real clear who you got to
• 1:33:33
  Speaker 9: vote for, and you got to motivate everyone around you
• 1:33:36
  Speaker 9: to do that. And that's why I put that flyer together.
• 1:33:39
  Speaker 9: At we the People Convention dot org. You can copy
• 1:33:42
  Speaker 9: it right off the page. You can click it, download
• 1:33:45
  Speaker 9: a PDF and print them and start handing them out
• 1:33:48
  Speaker 9: because it's real clear. You know me, I'm real subtle.
• 1:33:50
  Speaker 9: You know Thoms is always really subtle. So basically, this
• 1:33:54
  Speaker 9: is gonna spell it out. This is why you gotta vote,
• 1:33:57
  Speaker 9: because if you don't, you're gonna get hurt really bad.
• 1:34:01
  Speaker 2: Yeah, no question about it. And you just lay out
• 1:34:04
  Speaker 2: what they're in favor of. And you know, maybe to
• 1:34:07
  Speaker 2: the non weed dwellers Tomas Awastowski, they don't really truly
• 1:34:10
  Speaker 2: appreciate the fact that the DSA and these folks who
• 1:34:14
  Speaker 2: have really just invaded, if not taken over, the Democrat
• 1:34:18
  Speaker 2: Party are in favor of getting rid of police and
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 2: prisons is right there, prominently displayed on your fire. Whether
• 1:34:24
  Speaker 2: people can vention it out or tom, I have not
• 1:34:27
  Speaker 2: any have seen any single Democrat, even the DSA folks,
• 1:34:30
  Speaker 2: adequately explain what the world would look like if they
• 1:34:33
  Speaker 2: got rid of the police and they got rid of prisons.
• 1:34:36
  Speaker 9: They never have any any explanation on the website on that.
• 1:34:41
  Speaker 9: You know, that story that we're talking about. I've got
• 1:34:43
  Speaker 9: two things. First, we always bring receipts. Don't believe me.
• 1:34:47
  Speaker 9: There's a Fox News interview with the head of the
• 1:34:49
  Speaker 9: DSCA say exactly what there will do. Then below it
• 1:34:53
  Speaker 9: you will see a great thing that Will Kine did
• 1:34:56
  Speaker 9: where he talks about the fact that it would cost
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 9: like two one hundred trillion dollars to fund what the
• 1:35:04
  Speaker 9: heck they're proposing, and they have no idea of how
• 1:35:08
  Speaker 9: to pay for that.
• 1:35:09
  Speaker 1: You got to see that.
• 1:35:11
  Speaker 9: I think, no, that just don't get it yet.
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 1: That was a stuck.
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 2: That was a study from the Cato Institute. They ranged
• 1:35:17
  Speaker 2: between seventy one and two hundred trillion dollars, which would
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 2: be the cost of the entire Democratic Socialist of America
• 1:35:23
  Speaker 2: platform over ten years. Tom ten.
• 1:35:27
  Speaker 9: It's impossible.
• 1:35:28
  Speaker 2: I know, it's beyond impossible. They even Kato crunched the
• 1:35:31
  Speaker 2: numbers and said, you could confiscate every single dollar of
• 1:35:35
  Speaker 2: every corporation and billionaire in the United States of America,
• 1:35:38
  Speaker 2: all the money every dollar that they make, and it
• 1:35:41
  Speaker 2: still wouldn't be enough to scratch the surface of the
• 1:35:43
  Speaker 2: costs of the stuff that they want to implement. And
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 2: does anybody ever ask the other side of the political ledger?
• 1:35:48
  Speaker 2: And I will criticize the Republican Party from now till
• 1:35:51
  Speaker 2: time memorial til Kingdom come over their fair to do
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 2: something about a reckless overspending. They always promise to deliver
• 1:35:58
  Speaker 2: fiscal responsibility and never delivered it. The Democrats never promise it.
• 1:36:03
  Speaker 2: Does anybody ever ask the Democrats how are we going
• 1:36:05
  Speaker 2: to deal with this forty trillion and growing by leaps
• 1:36:08
  Speaker 2: and bounds that we have while still funding anything they
• 1:36:11
  Speaker 2: want to put in place? Tom No, no one ever asked.
• 1:36:15
  Speaker 9: And don't you love the commercials they're running against John
• 1:36:18
  Speaker 9: Houston where they said he voted to take away the
• 1:36:21
  Speaker 9: healthcare from all these people, where the real story is
• 1:36:25
  Speaker 9: that that was Obamacare that was bankrupting us that John
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 9: Houston voted for, which is a good thing.
• 1:36:31
  Speaker 6: Right.
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 9: So again, this is we've got a focus, right, And
• 1:36:36
  Speaker 9: what I mean by that is we can't get into
• 1:36:38
  Speaker 9: the minutia about Trump and the war and gas prices
• 1:36:41
  Speaker 9: and this and that. It's much simpler than that. It's
• 1:36:45
  Speaker 9: freedom and liberty versus communists takeover our country. And I
• 1:36:50
  Speaker 9: have a caveat. I said, we had to vote for
• 1:36:52
  Speaker 9: the Republicans despite the problems we've had with many of them.
• 1:36:55
  Speaker 9: We'll take care of them later this year. We got
• 1:36:58
  Speaker 9: to defeat the communists left, and you do that by
• 1:37:01
  Speaker 9: voting for every Republican on the ballot. But most important,
• 1:37:05
  Speaker 9: you gotta vote Brian. You gotta freaking show.
• 1:37:08
  Speaker 2: Up, Amen, Tom. I can't emphasize that enough. I think
• 1:37:11
  Speaker 2: you did a wonderful job doing it yourself. And if
• 1:37:13
  Speaker 2: any of the Houston campus out there, you know I'm
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 2: voting for John Houston as well. Return calls. Please, if
• 1:37:19
  Speaker 2: someone calls you, at least acknowledge that you heard their message.
• 1:37:23
  Speaker 2: You got it. Whether you want to respond specifically to
• 1:37:25
  Speaker 2: the points made in the message, you got to do
• 1:37:27
  Speaker 2: your campaign as service. We need all the votes we
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 2: can get. Tom. I've had I think two calls to
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 2: my program so far about messages left with senators. Some
• 1:37:36
  Speaker 2: senators do respond, others don't, and John's name has come
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 2: up twice in terms of not even acknowledging that the
• 1:37:43
  Speaker 2: receipt of a phone call. I don't think that's a
• 1:37:44
  Speaker 2: recipe for success moving into November.
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 3: No.
• 1:37:47
  Speaker 9: I think it's a bigger problem than that. I think
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 9: literally all politicians have fout. They can just ignore us
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 9: with impunity. That's part of our problem. They don't hear us. Yes,
• 1:37:57
  Speaker 9: we gotta fix that.
• 1:37:58
  Speaker 2: Amen. Tom's Auastowski people Convention dot or check him out.
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 2: We'll have him on next week. I look forward to
• 1:38:04
  Speaker 2: Ato six here fifty five carsee the talk station. Happy Tuesday.
• 1:38:08
  Speaker 2: It's that time a week. I always turn to Breitbart
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 2: dot com br E I T B A R T
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 2: as one of the one of the sites I review
• 1:38:16
  Speaker 2: in preparation for the fifty five KRC Morning Show. And
• 1:38:18
  Speaker 2: we have the blessing, at least I perceive it as
• 1:38:20
  Speaker 2: a blessing to talk to someone from bright Bart each Tuesday,
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 2: beginning at eight to oh five. Maybe call it the
• 1:38:24
  Speaker 2: inside scoop at bright bart News. Today the return of
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 2: bright bart News Finance and Economics editor John Carney. John Carney,
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 2: welcome back to the fifty five KRSE Morning Show. My
• 1:38:32
  Speaker 2: friend's always a pleasure talking with you. Good morning, and
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 2: thanks for having me pleasure. Now Bond yields, I understand
• 1:38:39
  Speaker 2: Trump arrangement syndrome. It's everywhere. You can't turn away and
• 1:38:41
  Speaker 2: find it. Well, it exists everywhere, But how is the
• 1:38:45
  Speaker 2: Trump dearrangement syndrome has misinterpreted the current thirty year treasury
• 1:38:49
  Speaker 2: yield and the second others because it's gone up as
• 1:38:52
  Speaker 2: I understand it, as you wrote in breit Bart, thirty
• 1:38:55
  Speaker 2: year treasury clond of a five point three percent yesterday,
• 1:38:57
  Speaker 2: highest level since two thousand and seven. Now some perceive
• 1:39:02
  Speaker 2: this as a bad thing with inflation anxiety. I know you.
• 1:39:07
  Speaker 2: One illustration is this you attributed to CNBC fears to
• 1:39:11
  Speaker 2: attribute to fears, you worries growing among investors about persistent
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 2: inflation and government borrowing. Now, got to break that one
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 2: down for me. I always kind of thought, and here's
• 1:39:22
  Speaker 2: where we get into an area where it might not
• 1:39:24
  Speaker 2: be that learned that you raise treasury rates because people
• 1:39:29
  Speaker 2: want a return on their investment. There's a million places
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 2: people can park money, so you got to lure them
• 1:39:35
  Speaker 2: over to buy the bonds. Right, you got to pay
• 1:39:39
  Speaker 2: a sufficient enough rate of return that it can compete.
• 1:39:41
  Speaker 2: It's the stable investment. It is the least risky investment.
• 1:39:46
  Speaker 2: But in return for that stability, you accept less than
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 2: in terms of a percentage return than you would maybe
• 1:39:51
  Speaker 2: in a stock market, which kind of runs around eight
• 1:39:53
  Speaker 2: percent on average, or even more for some people. So
• 1:39:56
  Speaker 2: why would I put something in a bond long term
• 1:39:58
  Speaker 2: if it's only going to give me, say five point
• 1:40:00
  Speaker 2: three percent, when I can put in the stock market
• 1:40:02
  Speaker 2: maybe make more money long term. So you've got to
• 1:40:04
  Speaker 2: raise the rate to get people to invest and make
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 2: that decision. Is is that kind of conceptually where where
• 1:40:09
  Speaker 2: we are generally speaking?
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 4: You know I should just retire. You've got it exactly right.
• 1:40:16
  Speaker 4: This is you know you have you can you can
• 1:40:19
  Speaker 4: rate brip our business. Yeah, no, this is this is no,
• 1:40:23
  Speaker 4: that's exactly right. So what what When bond yields go up?
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 4: It can mean two things. Well, it might mean that
• 1:40:31
  Speaker 4: people are worried about inflation. So if you expect there
• 1:40:35
  Speaker 4: to be a high rate of inflation, you don't want
• 1:40:37
  Speaker 4: to park your money into a bond that's actually going
• 1:40:40
  Speaker 4: to lose money over time because the rate of inflation
• 1:40:43
  Speaker 4: will be so high that you know, if you think
• 1:40:46
  Speaker 4: inflation is going to be three percent, you don't buy
• 1:40:48
  Speaker 4: a bond that pays you two percent, right, because you'll
• 1:40:51
  Speaker 4: lose money.
• 1:40:52
  Speaker 3: But the other reason, and so that's the bad reason
• 1:40:56
  Speaker 3: bonds could go up.
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 4: And that's what a lot of commentators were claiming was
• 1:41:00
  Speaker 4: when the bond yields rose to five point three percent,
• 1:41:05
  Speaker 4: when the but the good reason bond yields can go up.
• 1:41:09
  Speaker 4: And then I'll tell you how we can tell which
• 1:41:11
  Speaker 4: is which the good reason they go up is exactly
• 1:41:14
  Speaker 4: what you were saying. When people actually think the stock
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 4: market is going to do well because they think the
• 1:41:19
  Speaker 4: economy is going to grow, because they think profits are
• 1:41:22
  Speaker 4: going to grow, then you actually have to people demand
• 1:41:25
  Speaker 4: a higher return on the bonds because they think they
• 1:41:29
  Speaker 4: can earn eight percent in.
• 1:41:30
  Speaker 3: The stock market.
• 1:41:31
  Speaker 4: Yes, it's riskier, so you know you will put money
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 4: into bonds even though the return isn't quite as high
• 1:41:38
  Speaker 4: because there's less risk. But the the higher those expected
• 1:41:43
  Speaker 4: returns on the stock market are, the higher the returns
• 1:41:47
  Speaker 4: on bonds have to go. So when people have a
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 4: good view of what's coming down in the economy, bond
• 1:41:54
  Speaker 4: yields go up. The way we can tell which one
• 1:41:57
  Speaker 4: is happening at any given time is the government actual
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 4: sells something called a treasury inflation protected security.
• 1:42:04
  Speaker 3: The acronym is.
• 1:42:06
  Speaker 4: TIPS, and these tell us how much inflation people expect
• 1:42:13
  Speaker 4: down the road. And what we've seen in recent months
• 1:42:16
  Speaker 4: and weeks is that the tips yield actually hasn't gone up,
• 1:42:21
  Speaker 4: meaning people don't expect more inflation, and yet the bond
• 1:42:25
  Speaker 4: yield has gone up. So why is that that tells
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 4: us that people expect better returns in the broader economy
• 1:42:34
  Speaker 4: and therefore demanding higher yields to park their money in
• 1:42:37
  Speaker 4: a bond for thirty years?
• 1:42:39
  Speaker 2: Okay, now they I don't know if it's confusion or now.
• 1:42:43
  Speaker 2: But the clarity I'm seeking here is that some perceive
• 1:42:47
  Speaker 2: these rates increasing because no one wants to buy American
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 2: bonds because they're too much of a risk, just as
• 1:42:54
  Speaker 2: something as an investment, ignoring inflation inflation, I don't want
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 2: to put my money, even though it's and historically a
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 2: sound investment, the rate of return isn't sufficient for me
• 1:43:04
  Speaker 2: to even take the gamble. The world props up our
• 1:43:07
  Speaker 2: economy based upon their purchase of T bills. You know,
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 2: the Chinese own them, the Russians owe them, foreign powers
• 1:43:12
  Speaker 2: that we're not exactly friendly with. They know it's a
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 2: safe place to park their money. But I want to
• 1:43:16
  Speaker 2: pivot over to the concept of like a junk bond.
• 1:43:19
  Speaker 2: Junk bonds are terrible investments, but they come with a
• 1:43:21
  Speaker 2: very high rate of return. Is there analogy that could
• 1:43:24
  Speaker 2: be drawn and these naysayers and these concerned people's worries
• 1:43:27
  Speaker 2: that they're they're reaching the conclusion that the United States
• 1:43:30
  Speaker 2: bonds are reaching junk bond status, that this rate of
• 1:43:33
  Speaker 2: return has to be paid in order to get people
• 1:43:34
  Speaker 2: to even buy them.
• 1:43:36
  Speaker 4: No, there's because there's a huge difference between junk bonds and.
• 1:43:43
  Speaker 3: US treasuries. The US Treasury can actually never default in
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 3: a way.
• 1:43:49
  Speaker 2: At the point when you buy a.
• 1:43:52
  Speaker 4: Junk bond, a company, usually it's a company that's already
• 1:43:56
  Speaker 4: over indebted, may not have enough money to pay back
• 1:43:59
  Speaker 4: the bond. The US government will always have enough money
• 1:44:03
  Speaker 4: to pay back its bonds because it controls the printing press,
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 4: where a private company doesn't.
• 1:44:08
  Speaker 3: They have to sell goods to get cash to be
• 1:44:10
  Speaker 3: able to pay off the bondholders.
• 1:44:12
  Speaker 4: The US government, yes, it raises money through taxes, it
• 1:44:15
  Speaker 4: raises money through fees, but.
• 1:44:18
  Speaker 3: If it came down to it, it could literally print money.
• 1:44:21
  Speaker 4: So the only real risk investors in treasury space is inflation.
• 1:44:26
  Speaker 4: That if you printed money, you know, just to pay
• 1:44:29
  Speaker 4: off your bonds, then it would most.
• 1:44:32
  Speaker 3: Likely produce way too much inflation.
• 1:44:35
  Speaker 4: So that's the risk when you're buying treasuries, not that
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 4: they could default like a corporate bond might.
• 1:44:40
  Speaker 2: Okay, so maybe someone out there has a grand idea, well, well,
• 1:44:43
  Speaker 2: you're forty trillion dollars in debt, just print forty trillion
• 1:44:45
  Speaker 2: dollars on the printing press and we're done, which inflates
• 1:44:48
  Speaker 2: ourselves out of the debt, but also renders our currency valueless.
• 1:44:51
  Speaker 2: We've seen that in other countries over the course of history. Right,
• 1:44:54
  Speaker 2: that's right.
• 1:44:55
  Speaker 4: You do not want to ever be in the position
• 1:44:58
  Speaker 4: where you need to inflate your way out of your debt,
• 1:45:02
  Speaker 4: which is a reason why people can become concerned. If
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 4: you become if your debt is too too high, if
• 1:45:08
  Speaker 4: they don't believe that your economy can support that level
• 1:45:13
  Speaker 4: of government debt, then yes, you will see people's expectations
• 1:45:17
  Speaker 4: for inflation start to rise. The thing that's happened net
• 1:45:21
  Speaker 4: and look, I have to say, I think the government
• 1:45:24
  Speaker 4: borrows too much money. We do need to figure out
• 1:45:29
  Speaker 4: how to get the rate of our borrowing below the
• 1:45:32
  Speaker 4: rate of the growth of the economy. So that the
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 4: debt doesn't keep climbing. The best way to do that
• 1:45:39
  Speaker 4: is to cut spend money. We do need to cut spending,
• 1:45:42
  Speaker 4: but also grow the economy faster. You you know, when
• 1:45:47
  Speaker 4: you take on money to say, buy a house, you've
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 4: taken on an enormous amount of debt. But that's not
• 1:45:53
  Speaker 4: a problem for you as long as you are continuing
• 1:45:56
  Speaker 4: to grow your income. And if your income is growing
• 1:46:00
  Speaker 4: frankly faster than your debt than you are totally fine.
• 1:46:06
  Speaker 4: That's what we need to do as a country to
• 1:46:07
  Speaker 4: support the debt that we have, grow the economy faster
• 1:46:11
  Speaker 4: and grow government spending much slower.
• 1:46:13
  Speaker 2: Well, economy is growing, which is great. You and I
• 1:46:16
  Speaker 2: could probably come up with a list, you know, fifteen
• 1:46:19
  Speaker 2: pages long about ways we could grow the economy, like
• 1:46:21
  Speaker 2: regulatory form low. We just go on and on. But
• 1:46:25
  Speaker 2: the thing that I think a lot of people lose
• 1:46:27
  Speaker 2: sight of because you know, I'm staring in an article
• 1:46:30
  Speaker 2: about that. You know, the price of hamburger is still
• 1:46:32
  Speaker 2: through the roof and there's no end in sight on
• 1:46:33
  Speaker 2: that because you know, there's not enough cows out there
• 1:46:35
  Speaker 2: in the world to lower the price of beef. That's
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 2: an economic supply and demand issue. There isn't sufficient supply
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 2: of beef, ergo limited supply, higher prices great the currently
• 1:46:46
  Speaker 2: we are struggling with inflationary realities in the price of gasoline.
• 1:46:49
  Speaker 2: Why straight off, horror Moses is closed. If there wasn't
• 1:46:51
  Speaker 2: a war for things, probably would be stable and there
• 1:46:53
  Speaker 2: would be an abundance of oil flowing around the world.
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 2: That's an economic inflationary reality brought about by a temporary problem,
• 1:47:00
  Speaker 2: not a supply issue, but an interruption of the chain
• 1:47:04
  Speaker 2: of a delivery issue. But the problem we had with
• 1:47:07
  Speaker 2: inflation largely, and you can correct me if I'm wrong,
• 1:47:10
  Speaker 2: Economics editor John Carney from Breitbart. Our dollar is worth
• 1:47:14
  Speaker 2: one third lesson it was, I think since twenty nineteen.
• 1:47:17
  Speaker 2: Why because of the printing press. You know, you can
• 1:47:21
  Speaker 2: blame Republicans and Democrats for running the printing press, but
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 2: we watered down the value of the dollar along the
• 1:47:26
  Speaker 2: lines of the illustration about printing out forty trillion dollars
• 1:47:29
  Speaker 2: a deal with our dad. We chucked in trillions of
• 1:47:32
  Speaker 2: additional freshly printed, minted dollars, which eroded our borrowing power.
• 1:47:37
  Speaker 2: I mean, you can't lay that at Donald Trump's feet.
• 1:47:39
  Speaker 2: In terms of the price of how that impacted our
• 1:47:41
  Speaker 2: dollars buying ability?
• 1:47:43
  Speaker 4: Can you no, You're absolutely right. What happened was, Look,
• 1:47:49
  Speaker 4: we entered an economic emergency. We ordered and we had
• 1:47:54
  Speaker 4: to increase the depicits. When we were ordering businesses to
• 1:47:59
  Speaker 4: close down, people were losing their jobs.
• 1:48:01
  Speaker 2: On himself in fleged wounds. We created the problem. Then
• 1:48:04
  Speaker 2: we're here to solve the problem with the Prince Press.
• 1:48:07
  Speaker 3: And then we did something that made it much much worse.
• 1:48:10
  Speaker 4: If we had just stuck to all right, you know,
• 1:48:14
  Speaker 4: we ordered things to close, we didn't know how bad
• 1:48:18
  Speaker 4: the pandemic was going to be, and we're going to
• 1:48:21
  Speaker 4: support the economy with some extra government borrowing for a
• 1:48:24
  Speaker 4: little while, that would have been fine. The problem was
• 1:48:27
  Speaker 4: Joe Biden got elected president and the Democratic Party saw
• 1:48:30
  Speaker 4: this as an opportunity to wildly increase government spending and
• 1:48:35
  Speaker 4: they did it. So they poured trillions of extra deficit spending,
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 4: and then the Federal Reserve kept interest rates very low,
• 1:48:43
  Speaker 4: which then printed money to.
• 1:48:45
  Speaker 3: Pay for that extra spending. That is what caused inflation
• 1:48:50
  Speaker 3: to go through the roof.
• 1:48:51
  Speaker 4: If we had done things and this is one of
• 1:48:53
  Speaker 4: the problems with the concept of using the government to
• 1:48:57
  Speaker 4: come in to spend when the economy is not doing well.
• 1:49:00
  Speaker 3: Well, I'm probably the right idea.
• 1:49:02
  Speaker 4: The problem is over and over again, we keep learning
• 1:49:04
  Speaker 4: that we're not good at stopping that when we need to.
• 1:49:07
  Speaker 4: That's it, right, You spend in the crisis, and then
• 1:49:10
  Speaker 4: you stop spending when you're not in the crisis. The
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 4: Democrats treated it like the crisis would be permanent, and
• 1:49:16
  Speaker 4: they you know, they passed they called it the American
• 1:49:18
  Speaker 4: Rescue Act. But the economy was already rescued. We didn't
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 4: need another two trillion dollars. That's what caused the problem.
• 1:49:25
  Speaker 4: It's not Donald Trump's fault, but you know, and it
• 1:49:30
  Speaker 4: very much is the Democrat Party's fault. It very much
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 4: is Joe Biden's fault. And it's the Federal Reserve's fault.
• 1:49:37
  Speaker 4: The federal reserves should have said, okay, you guys are
• 1:49:40
  Speaker 4: spending too much. We need to increase interest rates so
• 1:49:43
  Speaker 4: that inflation doesn't get out of control. They didn't do that,
• 1:49:47
  Speaker 4: and they let it get, you know, beyond anything. I
• 1:49:50
  Speaker 4: think even pessimists thought it wouldn't get as bad as
• 1:49:54
  Speaker 4: it did. It was the worst inflation in forty years.
• 1:49:56
  Speaker 2: Well, never let a good crisis go to way. So
• 1:49:58
  Speaker 2: they use the crisis opportunity to justify the printing press
• 1:50:01
  Speaker 2: run and the passage of legislation, which is by its
• 1:50:05
  Speaker 2: own creation finite. We're doing this because of the current crisis,
• 1:50:10
  Speaker 2: and ergo that presumes at the outset it's going to
• 1:50:13
  Speaker 2: go away at some point. And then they rip their
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 2: bloody hair out about how we're taking away benefits from
• 1:50:17
  Speaker 2: people who need them predicated on that temporary relief that
• 1:50:20
  Speaker 2: they enshrined in law during the crisis period.
• 1:50:23
  Speaker 3: I mean, that's right.
• 1:50:25
  Speaker 4: Every time you try to pull down some level of
• 1:50:30
  Speaker 4: emergency spending, they will present the most sympathetic case, Oh,
• 1:50:37
  Speaker 4: you are taking away the benefit that this mother of
• 1:50:40
  Speaker 4: four needs for her children.
• 1:50:43
  Speaker 3: And the problem is that happens.
• 1:50:45
  Speaker 4: That's true every time you increase spending and then you
• 1:50:49
  Speaker 4: try to bring it back down. When you try to
• 1:50:51
  Speaker 4: bring it back down, by definition, you will be taking
• 1:50:54
  Speaker 4: away benefits from someone. It's the danger of ramping up spending,
• 1:50:59
  Speaker 4: and it is one of the things, frankly, that we
• 1:51:02
  Speaker 4: don't have a good solution to. It does happen in
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 4: almost every crisis. We continue to spend for much longer
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 4: than we should and we can blame lots of things,
• 1:51:15
  Speaker 4: but not and not to be too negative, but the
• 1:51:17
  Speaker 4: American people themselves aren't very good at recognizing that we
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 4: need to be more disciplined when it comes to this,
• 1:51:25
  Speaker 4: that we cannot continue to spend, you know, have deficits
• 1:51:29
  Speaker 4: that are six percent of GDP forever.
• 1:51:32
  Speaker 3: That will be a disaster.
• 1:51:33
  Speaker 2: Well, John Carney, along those lines, I'm just convinced that
• 1:51:35
  Speaker 2: most people just simply do not pay attention to this.
• 1:51:39
  Speaker 2: Maybe it's a consequence of the education system which has
• 1:51:41
  Speaker 2: failed them. They don't understand mathematics, they can't read, or
• 1:51:43
  Speaker 2: speak or write. I mean, this is a huge problem.
• 1:51:45
  Speaker 2: People are getting dumber and dumber every year we graduate
• 1:51:48
  Speaker 2: in other classes of high schoolers. They seem to be
• 1:51:51
  Speaker 2: well less equipped to deal with the problems of the world.
• 1:51:53
  Speaker 2: And lord knows, I mean, politics is competing for the
• 1:51:57
  Speaker 2: precious minutes in our lives versus social media and streaming
• 1:52:01
  Speaker 2: video and streaming audio. People don't have time to pay
• 1:52:03
  Speaker 2: attention to these kind of things, John, That's that's what
• 1:52:06
  Speaker 2: really concerns me. And then when crisis hits them and
• 1:52:09
  Speaker 2: they go to the grocery store and realize groceries are
• 1:52:11
  Speaker 2: through loop. They want to look for someone to blame,
• 1:52:12
  Speaker 2: but don't understand who to blame for it and what
• 1:52:14
  Speaker 2: the solutions are.
• 1:52:17
  Speaker 3: That's right, and what we what we really need to
• 1:52:19
  Speaker 3: do is.
• 1:52:22
  Speaker 4: If we're able to continue to grow the economy, we
• 1:52:26
  Speaker 4: will pass through this. Inflation has come down a lot.
• 1:52:29
  Speaker 4: In fact, we're getting very close to if you take
• 1:52:34
  Speaker 4: and I know this annoys people when I say this,
• 1:52:35
  Speaker 4: but just take out the price of gas for a minute,
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 4: because that is gone up because of the strait of
• 1:52:41
  Speaker 4: her mood, because oil's gone so but if you take
• 1:52:44
  Speaker 4: that out, we're actually pretty close to two percent inflation.
• 1:52:47
  Speaker 4: We're still a little too high. And frankly, even when
• 1:52:50
  Speaker 4: we get to two percent, which is what the FED
• 1:52:53
  Speaker 4: wants to have, prices will feel too high for several
• 1:52:57
  Speaker 4: years in the future because they went up at a
• 1:53:02
  Speaker 4: nine percent for so long, right, exactly that that you
• 1:53:07
  Speaker 4: will feel every time you go to You know, I
• 1:53:10
  Speaker 4: feel this every time I go to eat. I got
• 1:53:12
  Speaker 4: invited by some friends step dinner out at a restaurant.
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 3: I looked at the.
• 1:53:16
  Speaker 4: Menu and for a moment, I thought, did they bring
• 1:53:19
  Speaker 4: me to the nicest restaurant I have ever been to?
• 1:53:22
  Speaker 3: You know how could the prices beat as high?
• 1:53:24
  Speaker 4: And then I, you know, said, oh no, I'm just
• 1:53:28
  Speaker 4: you know, thinking back to what prices you used to
• 1:53:30
  Speaker 4: be back in two and eighteen.
• 1:53:32
  Speaker 3: This is what things cost us, and it will take
• 1:53:34
  Speaker 3: us a long time to get get used to it.
• 1:53:37
  Speaker 2: John, They're not going to go back down. The buying
• 1:53:39
  Speaker 2: power of the dollar has been eroded thanks to the
• 1:53:41
  Speaker 2: printing press's right John Carr, the bright Bart News Finance
• 1:53:44
  Speaker 2: and Economics senator. Read what he has to say over
• 1:53:46
  Speaker 2: at bright bart dot com. John, thank you so much
• 1:53:48
  Speaker 2: for the economics lesson and the analysis this morning. I
• 1:53:50
  Speaker 2: truly appreciate it and I'll look forward to having back
• 1:53:52
  Speaker 2: on the fifty five KRC Morning Show as soon as possible.
• 1:53:56
  Speaker 3: Yeah, thanks for having me. And uh, you know, if
• 1:53:58
  Speaker 3: you have free time, you can come over and brought
• 1:54:00
  Speaker 3: Business Digest.
• 1:54:01
  Speaker 2: Could you get the thank you, John for that vote
• 1:54:04
  Speaker 2: of confidence. I'm not worthy of it, but I sure
• 1:54:06
  Speaker 2: appreciate it. Take care, brother, Ay twenty two right now,
• 1:54:09
  Speaker 2: don't go worry that Daniel Davis deep dive coming your way.
• 1:54:14
  Speaker 2: Oh that's right, Cover, Sincy get in touch with Cover
• 1:54:17
  Speaker 2: since you I've been focusing on medicaid folks, you're fast
• 1:54:19
  Speaker 2: approaching your sign up period. Don't auto and roll get cover,
• 1:54:22
  Speaker 2: sincey to look at where you are and what your
• 1:54:24
  Speaker 2: schedule to auto and roll in, because you may be
• 1:54:27
  Speaker 2: heading down a dangerous path just by letting it auto
• 1:54:29
  Speaker 2: and roll. I listen, It's.
• 1:54:31
  Speaker 1: Fifty five KRC, the talk station, A twenty.
• 1:54:35
  Speaker 2: Nine and a Tuesday. Regular listeners know what time it is.
• 1:54:38
  Speaker 2: It's time for the Daniel Davis Deep Dive. Retired Lieutenant
• 1:54:42
  Speaker 2: Colonel Daniel Davis offering some military analysis and he's got
• 1:54:45
  Speaker 2: a lot of resources and inside information a lot of
• 1:54:48
  Speaker 2: folks don't have. Welcome back to the fifty five KRC
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 2: Morning Show, my friend Daniel Davis. Always a pleasure, always
• 1:54:53
  Speaker 2: a pleasure to be here. Brian, I don't know what
• 1:54:56
  Speaker 2: word I can sum up. I get this sense that
• 1:55:00
  Speaker 2: Donald Trump seems to be frustrated a little bit with
• 1:55:03
  Speaker 2: the ongoing situation, the back and forth with the Iranians.
• 1:55:06
  Speaker 2: Maybe that's too delicate a way of understanding it, but
• 1:55:09
  Speaker 2: he came out threatening to bomb Oman yesterday and I
• 1:55:14
  Speaker 2: kind of was puzzling over that because it was recently.
• 1:55:17
  Speaker 2: I thought that he was sort of encouraging the Iranians
• 1:55:19
  Speaker 2: and the imanis to sort of results and they'll come up.
• 1:55:21
  Speaker 2: Maybe Oman, as opposed to Pakistan, could act as a
• 1:55:25
  Speaker 2: mediary and come up with some sort of workable solution
• 1:55:28
  Speaker 2: for us to ultimately play nicely with the Iranians. But
• 1:55:31
  Speaker 2: bombing them does not sound like things are going well.
• 1:55:33
  Speaker 2: Daniel Davis, can you break this down for my listening
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 2: audience please.
• 1:55:36
  Speaker 6: Yeah.
• 1:55:37
  Speaker 10: It was an eye opener for everybody, to include me
• 1:55:42
  Speaker 10: because the situation which Iran has been talking about quite
• 1:55:45
  Speaker 10: a bit here lately, that they say, listen, what we're
• 1:55:49
  Speaker 10: doing with Oman is only on establishing paths.
• 1:55:53
  Speaker 2: Through this strait of Omont.
• 1:55:54
  Speaker 10: They specifically say it is distinct from saying that the
• 1:55:57
  Speaker 10: strait will open up or that there'll be any mechanism
• 1:56:00
  Speaker 10: to do that. That is something that will be done later.
• 1:56:03
  Speaker 10: And they said that has to whether it's open or not,
• 1:56:05
  Speaker 10: has to deal with negotiations between Iran and the United States.
• 1:56:09
  Speaker 10: So I was a little puzzled by that. I mean,
• 1:56:11
  Speaker 10: unless President Trump knows something that we don't know publicly yet,
• 1:56:15
  Speaker 10: that maybe they're going to change it. Because even as
• 1:56:18
  Speaker 10: the news this morning, Iran is saying that the deal
• 1:56:21
  Speaker 10: is now basically agreed to. The arrangement is agreed to
• 1:56:24
  Speaker 10: between Iran and Oman, and that they may announce it
• 1:56:28
  Speaker 10: as soon as today. But I'm sure that that announcement
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 10: is waiting on what's going to happen with Washington, because
• 1:56:33
  Speaker 10: there's no doubt that Oman, which is this tiny little
• 1:56:36
  Speaker 10: country in the Middle East, there is utterly powerless in
• 1:56:39
  Speaker 10: face of the United States.
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 9: So if they do something we don't like, it is not.
• 1:56:42
  Speaker 10: Out of the question that Trump could actually bomb them,
• 1:56:45
  Speaker 10: and I think that's what's causing the hesitation here. But
• 1:56:47
  Speaker 10: the bigger frustration, I think it's got to be between
• 1:56:51
  Speaker 10: President Trump and Iran, because you know, even this sixty
• 1:56:55
  Speaker 10: days of the so called memorandum of understanding has now elapsed,
• 1:56:58
  Speaker 10: and so where are we now. I mean, we're literally nowhere.
• 1:57:01
  Speaker 10: There's no direct negotiations. There's claims there's back channel stuff.
• 1:57:05
  Speaker 10: President Trump himself made that claim, but there are definitely
• 1:57:08
  Speaker 10: no public discussions between the two. So right now we're
• 1:57:11
  Speaker 10: not even on a path to anywhere. Everybody's just trying
• 1:57:14
  Speaker 10: to figure out what's going on, but there are still
• 1:57:16
  Speaker 10: two blockades on that straight and hardly any oil or
• 1:57:20
  Speaker 10: anything else is coming out.
• 1:57:22
  Speaker 2: Well, one of the things we observed that the Iranians
• 1:57:24
  Speaker 2: woke up to the reality that they can well stop
• 1:57:26
  Speaker 2: traffic through the Straight of Horn moves causing massive economic
• 1:57:29
  Speaker 2: devastation around the globe, and maybe makes some money off
• 1:57:32
  Speaker 2: of it. It seemed to me that these discussions between
• 1:57:34
  Speaker 2: the Iranians and the Monis were to figure out how
• 1:57:36
  Speaker 2: they were going to share the slice of the revenue
• 1:57:38
  Speaker 2: that they could charge going through the strait, which conflicts
• 1:57:41
  Speaker 2: with Trump's demands that reopened the Straight, ignoring bombs and
• 1:57:46
  Speaker 2: minds and all that reopened the Straight to international traffic
• 1:57:49
  Speaker 2: without having to pay anybody a cent like the way
• 1:57:51
  Speaker 2: it used to be. Are the omanis looking for a
• 1:57:53
  Speaker 2: slice of the action here, recognizing an opportunity that perhaps
• 1:57:56
  Speaker 2: didn't exist before.
• 1:57:58
  Speaker 10: To me, and my understand is that's that's what they're
• 1:58:01
  Speaker 10: considering as well. But I think that, uh, the pressure
• 1:58:05
  Speaker 10: that we're putting on and clearly there's a lot is
• 1:58:08
  Speaker 10: one of the reasons why this hasn't happened. That the
• 1:58:11
  Speaker 10: Iranian said a week ago that they had had the
• 1:58:14
  Speaker 10: outlines of their understanding with ira Oman but had never
• 1:58:17
  Speaker 10: announced anything. And I think that's the reason why, because
• 1:58:20
  Speaker 10: they're trying to figure out what they're going to end
• 1:58:22
  Speaker 10: up doing. The original comment was that in the MoU itself,
• 1:58:27
  Speaker 10: was that Iran and Oman would figure out the administrative control,
• 1:58:31
  Speaker 10: you know, for safety and whatever else through the mind
• 1:58:33
  Speaker 10: fields and everything else in the strait during the sixty
• 1:58:36
  Speaker 10: days and then they would negotiate something separate after that.
• 1:58:40
  Speaker 10: And Iran has never said anything except for we will
• 1:58:43
  Speaker 10: retain control the straight we will charge a feed going forward.
• 1:58:46
  Speaker 10: They've been unapologetic about that. What Era Oman is supposed
• 1:58:51
  Speaker 10: to do and how they're going to be responsible for
• 1:58:53
  Speaker 10: that is unknown.
• 1:58:54
  Speaker 2: It's just speculation.
• 1:58:55
  Speaker 10: So until they come out with a deal, I guess
• 1:58:57
  Speaker 10: we just don't know.
• 1:58:59
  Speaker 2: And in the meantime, we continue to keep the Iranian
• 1:59:02
  Speaker 2: ports shut correct, That is correct, Yeah, And that's the
• 1:59:07
  Speaker 2: economic warfare that seems to be the default strategy at
• 1:59:09
  Speaker 2: this point, trying to reap out enough, impose enough hardship
• 1:59:12
  Speaker 2: on the Iranian people in the Iranian government that they
• 1:59:14
  Speaker 2: will capitulate. A friend of mine was talking the other
• 1:59:17
  Speaker 2: day about this, that whole concept, and apparently the Iranians
• 1:59:21
  Speaker 2: are a very calloused people when it comes to dealing
• 1:59:23
  Speaker 2: with economic hardships, and he reminded me of how bad
• 1:59:26
  Speaker 2: things there were, how bad things were there during the
• 1:59:29
  Speaker 2: Iran Iraq War. The people of Iran are kind of
• 1:59:34
  Speaker 2: used to living in poor economic conditions, and I think
• 1:59:37
  Speaker 2: the leadership in Iran seems to have taken an opinion that, listen,
• 1:59:41
  Speaker 2: we're used to suffering, we can handle it, and we're
• 1:59:42
  Speaker 2: going to live through anything you heap down upon us economically.
• 1:59:46
  Speaker 10: That is a fact. I've talked to so many people
• 1:59:49
  Speaker 10: who had been on the ground just recently, just yesterday,
• 1:59:52
  Speaker 10: another Western reporter who had been on the ground recently
• 1:59:56
  Speaker 10: in Iran, A couple of them. Actually, there was a
• 1:59:59
  Speaker 10: report from Al Jazeera I saw literally just before coming
• 2:00:02
  Speaker 10: on here about what the life is lacking. And when
• 2:00:04
  Speaker 10: you see videos and things, it looks like it's normal.
• 2:00:08
  Speaker 10: It looks like a normal country. Things are a little
• 2:00:10
  Speaker 10: more expensive, some things are a lot more expensive. But
• 2:00:13
  Speaker 10: as you say, Iran has been used to doing this
• 2:00:16
  Speaker 10: for their entire existence, all forty seven years of it,
• 2:00:19
  Speaker 10: and especially during the Iran Iraq War period where not
• 2:00:23
  Speaker 10: only were they having economic privations, but they were also
• 2:00:27
  Speaker 10: being bombed relentlessly and they were suffering hundreds of thousands
• 2:00:30
  Speaker 10: of casualties, and they just never given in This is
• 2:00:33
  Speaker 10: part of their DNA, so this is nothing new for them.
• 2:00:36
  Speaker 10: And when we're talking about who can endure the economic
• 2:00:38
  Speaker 10: pain the longest, don't get in a fight with Iran
• 2:00:42
  Speaker 10: on that one, because we're not going to win it.
• 2:00:44
  Speaker 10: And today we see diesel crack has risen to a
• 2:00:47
  Speaker 10: two decade high, which means all the economic activity is
• 2:00:51
  Speaker 10: now going to also concurrently start rising more than it
• 2:00:53
  Speaker 10: has already. And then you add jet a diesel I'm sorry,
• 2:00:57
  Speaker 10: jet fuel to that problem. All of this is exacerbated
• 2:01:00
  Speaker 10: by the Strait the dual blockage being in place, and
• 2:01:03
  Speaker 10: so that's hitting the entire global economy and there's going
• 2:01:05
  Speaker 10: to be some real shortages here just in a matter
• 2:01:07
  Speaker 10: of two or three weeks, especially in Europe. So if
• 2:01:11
  Speaker 10: we're trying to get into a chicken fight or over
• 2:01:15
  Speaker 10: that one, I don't know that's going to work out well.
• 2:01:17
  Speaker 2: For our side well. And the Irridians are painfully aware
• 2:01:20
  Speaker 2: of the political reality is going on the ground over
• 2:01:21
  Speaker 2: here in the United States with the November elections fast approaching.
• 2:01:24
  Speaker 2: I think, by what you have said, and by all
• 2:01:26
  Speaker 2: accounts from everything I've read, they certainly can withstand any
• 2:01:29
  Speaker 2: economic hardships through November, and they believe that it will
• 2:01:32
  Speaker 2: near to their benefit, not just because it'll you know,
• 2:01:35
  Speaker 2: it'll be a slap in Trump's face if he loses
• 2:01:38
  Speaker 2: the House and Senate, but also the potential that if
• 2:01:40
  Speaker 2: the Democrats take over, they might vote us out of
• 2:01:42
  Speaker 2: the war by defunding the conflict or otherwise passing war
• 2:01:46
  Speaker 2: Powers resolution saying it's not authorized. That's possible, isn't it.
• 2:01:50
  Speaker 10: It is possible, especially if the economic pain gets high enough.
• 2:01:53
  Speaker 10: I mean, if it gets high enough, even some Republicans
• 2:01:55
  Speaker 10: would probably.
• 2:01:56
  Speaker 2: Vote in that override of veto because the war is
• 2:01:59
  Speaker 2: so damn un popular. That's my thought.
• 2:02:03
  Speaker 10: Yeah, and we'll see what happens afterwards. I think that
• 2:02:05
  Speaker 10: there is some concern in Iran that the waiting until
• 2:02:10
  Speaker 10: after the midterms would then actually free Trump up to
• 2:02:13
  Speaker 10: go back to combat operations. And there was a comment
• 2:02:16
  Speaker 10: this morning by Golly Boff, their senior negotiator who's also
• 2:02:20
  Speaker 10: the speaker of their parliament, that he implied, you know what,
• 2:02:25
  Speaker 10: if you guys don't make a deal on this and
• 2:02:27
  Speaker 10: get this straight back open up, we may have to
• 2:02:30
  Speaker 10: take action of our own, which implies they themselves may
• 2:02:33
  Speaker 10: return to combat strike.
• 2:02:35
  Speaker 9: So we're not out of the woods yet.
• 2:02:36
  Speaker 10: It's not that they just said we're going to try
• 2:02:38
  Speaker 10: to outlast you, because they're implying they could be taking
• 2:02:41
  Speaker 10: military action themselves. So this this could explode even before November.
• 2:02:45
  Speaker 2: Well and exacerbate the already high price of gasoline and
• 2:02:48
  Speaker 2: diesel fuel because they start hitting all the other oil
• 2:02:50
  Speaker 2: producing nations once perhaps with our base in it, then
• 2:02:53
  Speaker 2: we've got they know, they got a major economic exacerbating
• 2:02:57
  Speaker 2: ability there with some bombs real quick here in pivoting
• 2:03:00
  Speaker 2: over I kind of puzzled over Donald Trump's not praise
• 2:03:03
  Speaker 2: for the North Korean leader, but talking about what a
• 2:03:06
  Speaker 2: decent guy is. The same guy that sent fifty thousand
• 2:03:08
  Speaker 2: troops to Ukraine as well as a say to Russia,
• 2:03:11
  Speaker 2: and the same North Korean leader who has been supplying,
• 2:03:14
  Speaker 2: at least from my understanding, drones and equipment to the Iranians.
• 2:03:18
  Speaker 2: Yet he started he's very upset with the South Koreans.
• 2:03:22
  Speaker 2: I know he articulated because the South Koreans didn't bother
• 2:03:25
  Speaker 2: to assist in the conflict with Iran. That's what he
• 2:03:28
  Speaker 2: said yesterday. Part of me wanted to think he suspended
• 2:03:31
  Speaker 2: these wargames with South Korea because maybe we've talked about
• 2:03:34
  Speaker 2: this before, munitions shortages, we'd have to use a lot
• 2:03:38
  Speaker 2: up doing wargames, and maybe we just don't have them
• 2:03:40
  Speaker 2: to spare, and the money that it costs to run wargames.
• 2:03:43
  Speaker 2: Your thoughts on that before we part company, Daniel Davis.
• 2:03:46
  Speaker 10: Yeah, you know, I was frankly puzzled by that as well,
• 2:03:49
  Speaker 10: because it's one thing, I mean, just making a decision
• 2:03:53
  Speaker 10: like that because of our ammunition need. You can say
• 2:03:56
  Speaker 10: we'll just do it dry fire we call it where
• 2:03:58
  Speaker 10: you just don't use any ammunition, or you can just
• 2:04:00
  Speaker 10: say administrative for yeah, let's.
• 2:04:02
  Speaker 2: Just cut this one back.
• 2:04:02
  Speaker 10: But the fact that he went out publicly and said
• 2:04:05
  Speaker 10: he literally took the side of North Korea by saying
• 2:04:08
  Speaker 10: that the South Korean military and the US made him mad,
• 2:04:12
  Speaker 10: and so he ordered the reduction of the drills, I
• 2:04:16
  Speaker 10: honestly don't have a good explanation for why he would.
• 2:04:19
  Speaker 2: Choose to do it in that way. I just don't.
• 2:04:21
  Speaker 2: It's puzzling that you said that makes me feel better,
• 2:04:24
  Speaker 2: Daniel Davis, because I couldn't figure it out either. I thought, well,
• 2:04:27
  Speaker 2: Daniel's coming on, he'll make some sense out of it. Well,
• 2:04:29
  Speaker 2: we find ourselves in an inexplicable period of time in
• 2:04:32
  Speaker 2: this particular conflict, and around the world it's going crazy.
• 2:04:34
  Speaker 2: We always got Daniel Davis with a Deep Dive every
• 2:04:36
  Speaker 2: Tuesday at eight thirty here in the fifty five KRCY
• 2:04:38
  Speaker 2: Morning Show. You can find him throughout the week on
• 2:04:40
  Speaker 2: wherever you find your podcast. Thank you so much for
• 2:04:43
  Speaker 2: your time and you're honesty today, Daniel Davis, I truly
• 2:04:46
  Speaker 2: appreciate it.
• 2:04:48
  Speaker 3: A pleasure.
• 2:04:49
  Speaker 2: Man, see you next week. You take care of yourself.
• 2:04:51
  Speaker 2: I'll look forward to it forty right now.