Latest / 1-800-1800 / 1-800-Elsie Venner
Transcript
- 0:00like his kind of landmark contribution here is that maybe
- 0:03mentally ill people are
- 0:04not sinners and maybe they're not necessarily responsible for
- 0:07the way they are and
- 0:08like maybe there's some he doesn't like genes and dna obviously
- 0:12weren't even terms
- 0:13yet but he's like maybe something in their family histories
- 0:16made them this way
- 0:17maybe they had some sort of trauma that made them this way and
- 0:20he's not advocating
- 0:22necessarily for like being kind to those people but maybe of
- 0:24not seeing them as
- 0:25SPEAKER_00: morally responsible for being crazy
- 0:28So dad,
- 0:28what,
- 0:29how does this fit into your history of psychiatry as a field?
- 0:35SPEAKER_01: You know,
- 0:36SPEAKER_01: I was thinking about this a little bit because in part,
- 0:39SPEAKER_01: we tend to,
- 0:40SPEAKER_01: when we're looking at historical characters to,
- 0:42SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 0:43SPEAKER_01: push our current knowledge of what happened back onto them.
- 0:46SPEAKER_01: And so,
- 0:47SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 0:47SPEAKER_01: we have to kind of try and think about what was,
- 0:49SPEAKER_01: Holmes did not know what was going to happen in
- 0:52neurology and psychiatry and psychology disciplines that
- 0:54weren't even really invented.
- 0:56SPEAKER_01: So we see him as anticipating those things, and he clearly was.
- 1:00SPEAKER_01: But he was his own character.
- 1:02SPEAKER_01: Just like,
- 1:03what does it mean that he published this book at the eve of the
- 1:05Civil War,
- 1:07SPEAKER_01: completely ignoring the massive events of the day,
- 1:10SPEAKER_01: right?
- 1:10SPEAKER_01: I mean, he was in his own bubble, right?
- 1:16SPEAKER_01: But I think part of it is, if I think about it, is that
- 1:22SPEAKER_01: What we think of as contemporary psychiatry,
- 1:24SPEAKER_01: where we work with individuals to help them recover or do well or thrive,
- 1:29SPEAKER_01: that's a very different concept than,
- 1:35SPEAKER_01: A,
- 1:35how the severely mentally ill were easily identified and
- 1:39segregated or treated or
- 1:41SPEAKER_01: killed or whatever was done to them.
- 1:45SPEAKER_01: But of course,
- 1:46SPEAKER_01: the vast population of people who benefit from treatment,
- 1:49SPEAKER_01: as we understand it,
- 1:51SPEAKER_01: don't require living in an asylum or jail and are not unable to function.
- 1:58SPEAKER_01: And Elsie Benner is an archetype of that kind of future patient,
- 2:03the person who lives at home and goes to school and takes care
- 2:08of herself in a
- 2:09SPEAKER_01: certain way,
- 2:09SPEAKER_01: even though she's highly eccentric,
- 2:12SPEAKER_01: unorthodox,
- 2:13SPEAKER_01: and has a lot of problematic interpersonal behaviors, right?
- 2:18SPEAKER_01: But we don't think that she's bad.
- 2:21SPEAKER_01: And I think that's,
- 2:22SPEAKER_01: I think,
- 2:23SPEAKER_01: you know,
- 2:23SPEAKER_01: a lot of the book is really more engaged with theology than medicine,
- 2:27SPEAKER_01: right?
- 2:28And these lengthy,
- 2:30and I think somewhat dull disputes between the doctor character
- 2:34and the
- 2:34the one of the ministers you know are kind of arid um but
- 2:39that's the core of the
- 2:40discussion which is and you point that out in your introduction
- 2:43what's is this sin
- 2:45or crime is this responsibility or not does are all people
- 2:48vulnerable to this he's
- 2:50trying to argue that case right i think we're first just
- 2:53extricating ourselves from
- 2:54SPEAKER_01: that legacy which of course
- 2:57SPEAKER_01: as a contemporary psychiatrist,
- 2:58we still haven't extricated ourselves from because people are
- 3:01constantly telling me
- 3:02how they shouldn't be taking antidepressants because really
- 3:04they could do better on
- 3:06SPEAKER_01: their own.
- 3:06SPEAKER_01: And I'm like,
- 3:07SPEAKER_01: maybe you could,
- 3:07SPEAKER_01: and I hope that you do,
- 3:08SPEAKER_01: but perhaps you also have a problem that requires antidepressant,
- 3:11SPEAKER_01: right?