Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Hail, hail the (w)itches are defunded! | HBR Talk 384

Transcript

Hail, hail the (w)itches are defunded! | HBR Talk 384 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome to HBr Talk three eighty four. Hel
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: Hel the witches are defunded because see, you know, we
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: have to watch our language. I'm your host, Hannah Wallen
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: here with nonsense annihilator Lauren Brooks and the personification of
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: perceptivity of Mike Stevenson. We have the Hello Hello guys,
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: and we have the dog in charge, Brian Martinez working
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: with the BA in the background, fighting with both obs
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: and re stream tonight because they're being a couple of bitches. Uh,
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: there we go. There's the language, and tonight we fooled
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: you a little bit. We're not talking about the USA's infection.
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: We've got better news, better news that I am intensely
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: happy about and have been doing happy dances about. But
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: before we get into it, we've got to do what
• 0:51
  Speaker 1: we've got to do. As always, Honey Badger Radio dishes
• 0:55
  Speaker 1: out a smorgas board of thought provoking discussions and has
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: experiences both and long past have demonstrated the provoked thoughts
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: are fighting back. They made it clear that for people
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: like us relying on third party payment platforms like Patreon
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: to fund our work is treading on thin ice or
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: building our house in the path of a rapidly growing wildfire.
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: In light of this, we strongly encourage our supporters to
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: switch at least their support for us to Feed the
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: Badger dot com the most stable way to help us out,
• 1:27
  Speaker 1: And if you want to tip us directly instead of
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: relying on any social media platforms, tip jar. The link
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: for that is feed the Badger dot com slash just
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: the tip. And as always, the same risk applies to
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: our social media platforms, which is why you should further
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: provoke thought police by tracking our thought provoking discussions on
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: Honeybadger Brigade dot com, where you can find your way
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: to all of our content, as well as a link
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot com in the drop down
• 1:53
  Speaker 1: menu at the top of the page. And with that,
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: as you can see from the shared screen here that
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: I've got going on, we are looking at a presidential
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: action on withdrawing the United States from international organizations, conventions,
• 2:12
  Speaker 1: and treaties that are contrary to the interests of the
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: United States. So why would I be excited about this? Because,
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: I mean, I know that some people are very concerned.
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: I've seen some statements about some of these things that
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: people are very upset about because they're they're considering them
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: to be a threat to peace with the United States.
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: But there is one one in particular, uh at that
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: that I am just beside myself with happiness about. And
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: as we get down here, it takes a minute to
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: find it because it isn't labeled the way that you
• 2:57
  Speaker 1: would think. So let's see, there we go. So the
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: un entity for gender equality and the empowerment of women
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: is you and women. So right now, according to this paper,
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: I hate that this thing exists. See if I can
• 3:25
  Speaker 1: strengthen the text a little bit so I can see, No,
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: it's not gonna let me do that. Dang it. That
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: wasn't showing before and now it is. It drives me nuts,
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: all right, but I'll read it anyway. So, by the
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: authority vested in President of the President, by the Constitution
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: of the Laws or in the Laws of the United
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: States of America, the President has hereby directed, on via
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: Order fourteen, withdrawing the United States from an ending funding
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: to certain United Nations organizations at reviewing the United States
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: support to all international organizations. Blah blah blah. There's a
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: lot of legalese there. Based on the Secretary of State's
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: report and deliberating with his cabinet, which essentially means they
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: actually looked at what these organizations are doing. They didn't
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: just do it on the basis of well, I don't
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: like what this organtion says it represents. The actual basis
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: for this decision was, we don't like what these organizations
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: are are doing. What are their actions? So there are
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: organizations from which the United States will withdraw, and there
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: are multiple non UN organizations here.
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: Before we get into it, a lot of us are
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: wondering what exactly it is that that the United Nations does, because,
• 5:03
  Speaker 2: as far as a lot of us know, all they
• 5:05
  Speaker 2: ever do is say things. I mean, they extract money.
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: They extract funding from all kinds, from all kinds of countries,
• 5:13
  Speaker 2: including the US. And this is the big story. The
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: US is no longer going to siphon an unglady amount
• 5:20
  Speaker 2: of money into this institution that, as far as we know,
• 5:23
  Speaker 2: just says a bunch of things, including how everyone should
• 5:27
  Speaker 2: should focus their morality on the well being of women
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: and only women. But yeah, I'm I, among others, am
• 5:36
  Speaker 2: wondering what does what does the UN actually do? What
• 5:39
  Speaker 2: did it ever do other than say a bunch of things.
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: And I'm you know, saying things is doing things to
• 5:46
  Speaker 2: some extent only as long as saying those things results
• 5:50
  Speaker 2: in other people doing things. And I suppose that's it right.
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: Well, the UN, they there, their function is for world
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: leaders to get together and hold meetings, to determine the
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: content of treaties, and to decide how to fight with
• 6:10
  Speaker 1: world leaders that are not part of the UN, so
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: national leaders basically that are not part of the UN
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: over things that the nations that are part of the
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: UN have decided are important enough to kill people over.
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: And that's essentially it. That is the entirety of what
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: the UN does. There is no something better that you
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: can say about it, that you know, could justify the
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: actions that they take or the the content of the
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: various treaties that occurs as a result of UN actions,
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: UN meetings and stuff. And then the other thing that
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: the UN does is take money that countries pay into
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: it and distribute it to some of these sub organizations
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: or to various nations for different purposes. So it is
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: a giant money laundering organization in a way, in a
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: pretty big way, actually, and I think a lot of
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: people recognize that already. But the hullabaloo that's going to
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: come out of this is going to, I think, help
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: more people recognize that because there this is. I think
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: the United States is actually the biggest funder of you
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: and women. I don't think they get more money from
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: somewhere else than they get from US. And so if
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: that's if that's true, if I'm right about that, they're
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: going to raise holy hell about the United States ceasing
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: to fund them, and you'll start seeing all this victimy
• 8:01
  Speaker 1: bullshit on on sites like X because they're gonna they're
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: gonna try to guilt trip the President into changing his mind.
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: They don't know how to, They don't know how to
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: do it in any other way, right, they don't really.
• 8:16
  Speaker 2: Have Basically there imagine if greamer worm tongue wasn't just
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: greamer worm tongue, but like the guild of greamer worm tongues,
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: Like for every king of every nation, there's a greamer
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: wang worm tongue behind him, funded by the U n H,
• 8:35
  Speaker 2: the UN being funded by all these nations, especially the
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: US and and and now some kind of Gandalf emerging
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: through the U s A has shoved his stuff in
• 8:49
  Speaker 2: in in in the guild of greamer worm tongue's face
• 8:53
  Speaker 2: and gone, get the gone or whatever it was in
• 8:56
  Speaker 2: the script, hrever and yeah, yeah, And this is where
• 9:02
  Speaker 2: the metaphor breaks down, because it's not one king. It's
• 9:05
  Speaker 2: all kinds of kings. It's it's not the king that's
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: waking up from from his intoxicated slumber. It's just the
• 9:14
  Speaker 2: the guild of green at worm tongues that have that
• 9:17
  Speaker 2: that no longer have the magical power, the magical power
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: that they once had, and and they have no choice
• 9:24
  Speaker 2: but to crawl back into the woodwork, so to speak.
• 9:29
  Speaker 2: And I'm here for it.
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: Yeah, me me as well. I'm I'm here for it
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: as well. And we we have a night motorcyclist in
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: the chat talking about some of the other stuff that's
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: going on. And yeah, the the the Europeans are are
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: quite mad about this. Now, why won't my there we go?
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: I can't scroll back up. But yeah, notice how it's
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: mostly white women supporting this crap. To be fair, you
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: and women actually does have it's it's it's international. Uh,
• 10:03
  Speaker 1: but I think there will be more white women complaining
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: about the change, then there will be women women of
• 10:11
  Speaker 1: various colors various shades of brown and gold. But in
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: any case, yeah, we will we will see weeping and
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: gnashing of teeth. Uh and and we probably will see
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: a lot of liberal white women in the United States
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: making it out like the women of the world just
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: can't can't survive without an American sugar daddy, which you know,
• 10:42
  Speaker 1: kind of kills the whole strong, independent women who don't
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: need no men narrative likely play out.
• 10:49
  Speaker 2: Fortunately, the liberal white women of the USA are currently
• 10:53
  Speaker 2: distracted by a certain incident in Minnesota that they are
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: they are currently using to distract us from another incident
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: in Minnesota, namely the Somalians fucking frauding ten billion from
• 11:09
  Speaker 2: from from the American taxpayer. So they're like going all
• 11:12
  Speaker 2: in on this. Look, there's lesbian mother that has been
• 11:16
  Speaker 2: killed for no reason, just absolutely no reason.
• 11:20
  Speaker 1: It has nothing to do with the fact that she
• 11:22
  Speaker 1: was trying to run a guy over.
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: We're not talking about that. We're not talking about that. Yeah,
• 11:27
  Speaker 2: means we're not talking about the un getting defunded.
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So I'm I really am here for it. So
• 11:37
  Speaker 1: in the last the last several months, we've got a
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: lot of discussion about how you and women have spent
• 11:44
  Speaker 1: money in foreign countries, and night motorcyclist, by the way,
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: says they will never lear We also got I mean
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: as he gave us five dollars and in a super
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: chap and says, honey for the badger's HPR talk three
• 12:07
  Speaker 1: eighty four. What does the UN do nothing? It it
• 12:12
  Speaker 1: an organize or it's an organized crime syndicate that tries
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: to present itself as wanting peace and morality. And that
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: is true. The the UN kind of shakes down the
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: rest of the world for for money, or at least
• 12:33
  Speaker 1: the member nations for money, and organizes aggression against other
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: foreign nations that are also being shaken down for money.
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: But there isn't like when you hear about you in
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: peacekeeping forces. You and peacekeeping forces are soldiers moving into
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: a nation as an active war, usually in response to
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: something that they've called an active war. Let's see absolute
• 13:10
  Speaker 1: troll wi fi of you said what got defunded? Did
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: it actually get defunded or another doge fake out. No,
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: this actually got defunded. This is a presidential order that
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: we are removing funding from these organizations. We are leaving
• 13:27
  Speaker 1: the twenty four to seven carbon free energy Compact, which
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: I'm excited about. There are several things that we're getting
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: out of and a lot of them are things like
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: the Freedom Online Coalition, if I remember right, is a
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: communist organization, not a not a freedom organization. So a
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: lot of these things, like when you look at the name,
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: it sounds like he's doing something awful and leaving a
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: very important, good organization that does good things. But then
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: when you find out they're actual practices what they do,
• 14:04
  Speaker 1: that you're you're you're not looking at the president leaving
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: something that we should have been, that we should have
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: stuck with and funded, like with you and women. We'll
• 14:17
  Speaker 1: go back to that part of the list. So Entity
• 14:20
  Speaker 1: for Gender Equity and the Empowerment of Women, all right.
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: We just went through, uh, the the articles that they
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: published on the Manisphere, all right, And the Manisphere actually
• 14:35
  Speaker 1: includes a lot of women. There are a lot of
• 14:38
  Speaker 1: us who are part of the men's rights movement. There
• 14:41
  Speaker 1: are women who are involved in more traditional lens of it.
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: There are women who are red Pill, there are women
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: who are supportive of migtaal been going their own way,
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: and there are women who are even supportive of the
• 14:57
  Speaker 1: pickup artist community. God knows why, but but they are.
• 15:03
  Speaker 1: There are women who support the pick up artist communities,
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: theories on mating habits and such and what's right and
• 15:12
  Speaker 1: so on, and in terms of how people should get together.
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: And I disagree with a lot of that, But one
• 15:23
  Speaker 1: thing I do agree with is that the the whole
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: body count thing, uh, in terms of women's body count mattering.
• 15:31
  Speaker 1: But in any case, there's there's a lot of us,
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: and they don't empower us. They have demonized us. They
• 15:39
  Speaker 1: have told us that we are evil. They have taken
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: measures to try to censor us and even criminalize our speech.
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: So I don't I don't feel very supported by you
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: and women here, and and they don't like us for
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: the simple reason and that we don't hate men. We
• 16:01
  Speaker 1: don't think that men should be treated as less human
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: than women. And so if something is a human right,
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: it should also be a man's right just as much
• 16:11
  Speaker 1: as a woman's right, not just a gendered right. Human
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: rights are not gendered. If they're gendered, they're not human rights,
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: they're gendered rights. And of course equal treatment under the
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: law doesn't support the idea of gendered rights. So either
• 16:30
  Speaker 1: feminism can say they're fighting for equality or they can
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: say they're fighting for gendered rights and you and women
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: likes to lie about that, so they're not supporting women
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: like us. They're not supporting women who don't want to
• 16:47
  Speaker 1: carry the bazooka referenced in I think it was called
• 16:52
  Speaker 1: the Whare Bitch Project or something like that that you did, Mike.
• 16:57
  Speaker 1: That's an old one, but yeah, it's like forever ago.
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: It's one of my favorite cartoons though, because it's true
• 17:07
  Speaker 1: the bazuka refers to women's legal power to like to
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: destroy a man with lies in court and uh, with
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: lies in social settings, right, and and the character played
• 17:23
  Speaker 1: by by Brian actually comes out and says, you know,
• 17:27
  Speaker 1: I think you'd actually be a much nicer person if
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: you just put down the bazukah. And that's that's true.
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: I think a lot of what stops men and women
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: from being able to get along is women's addiction to
• 17:42
  Speaker 1: that power and their attempts at justifying that power, and
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: men's legitimate fear of that power, because that's a power
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: that is nefarious. It's not good that a woman can
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: destroy a man with a lie. Nobody should be able
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: to destroy another person would lie, not legally or socially,
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: and the fact that they can do it without repercussions
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: is terrible. It's even worse than the fact that they
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: can do it at all, because there's at least if
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: there were repercussions for doing that to somebody, at least
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: if you were going to suffer because you did that
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: to somebody, the behavior would become limited. There would be
• 18:31
  Speaker 1: fewer people willing to risk it, and there would be
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: it would take a lot worse circumstances or a lot
• 18:39
  Speaker 1: bigger motivations for somebody to do that. Just like you know,
• 18:46
  Speaker 1: even even though there are many many people who are
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: maybe morally or ethically deviant, very few people try to
• 19:00
  Speaker 1: rob a bank, right because the repercussions, Even though the
• 19:03
  Speaker 1: payoff seems like it would be huge, the repercussions, the
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: risks are so bad that you're unlikely to do it.
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: So if you just put down the bazuka, you might
• 19:18
  Speaker 1: be an actual decent person to be around, right you.
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: And women doesn't want women to put down the bazukah.
• 19:30
  Speaker 2: And yeah, in regard to the question of what UN
• 19:34
  Speaker 2: women actually does or what the UN actually does, again,
• 19:37
  Speaker 2: all they do is say things they don't really have
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: the power to actually do things. But that's not to
• 19:42
  Speaker 2: say that there's no connection between saying things and doing things.
• 19:46
  Speaker 2: It's all a matter of scale. If everyone is saying
• 19:50
  Speaker 2: a certain thing, then that can lead people to do
• 19:54
  Speaker 2: certain things. I mean, it's like the education system. If
• 20:00
  Speaker 2: teachers are telling children, it teaches us saying certain things
• 20:06
  Speaker 2: to children, and that's that's going to encourage children. And
• 20:12
  Speaker 2: I say that in the nicest terms, encourage. It's going
• 20:16
  Speaker 2: to encourage children to do certain things. And as long
• 20:22
  Speaker 2: as there's a monopoly on what people are allowed are
• 20:24
  Speaker 2: allowed to say, it's going to cause a monopoly on
• 20:27
  Speaker 2: what people are allowed to do. And yeah, that's that's
• 20:33
  Speaker 2: kind of what we're seeing. I this is how you
• 20:36
  Speaker 2: have to kind of work this idea of free speech
• 20:39
  Speaker 2: around this idea of freedom of Yes, people should be
• 20:47
  Speaker 2: allowed to say anything they want, but they should not
• 20:50
  Speaker 2: necessarily be funded to say things they're not everyone necessarily
• 20:56
  Speaker 2: wants them to say. We hear around a Badger radio
• 21:01
  Speaker 2: are not particularly fond of what un Women is telling
• 21:06
  Speaker 2: people it is the truth. Given that it's not exactly
• 21:12
  Speaker 2: the truth, you and Women is in the business of
• 21:16
  Speaker 2: fucking lying to people. Buy a mission At best, and
• 21:21
  Speaker 2: just straight up fucking lying at worst, And yeah, this
• 21:26
  Speaker 2: is something the mass media likes to call misinformation. And yeah,
• 21:33
  Speaker 2: you should absolutely be allowed to say that. You should
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: be absolutely allowed to say anything you like, even if
• 21:39
  Speaker 2: it's a lie. But we are not under any obligation
• 21:43
  Speaker 2: to pay you to say those lies.
• 21:48
  Speaker 3: Yeah.
• 21:48
  Speaker 2: In fact, and think fuck that. The US is finally going, yeah, no,
• 21:53
  Speaker 2: we're not going to pay you to say those lies.
• 21:55
  Speaker 2: Get a fuck.
• 21:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah you and women has made a practice of some
• 22:01
  Speaker 1: interesting styles of lying. And I think in the Nuzzo
• 22:08
  Speaker 1: letter here this is one, right, he highlighted this. I
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: hope I'm pronouncing his name right. I think it's Nuzzo,
• 22:15
  Speaker 1: not Newso, but it might be newsoh which would which
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: would be brilliant because he is a journalist. James Newso
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: is in the new Zo letter or Nuzzo anyway, if
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: somebody knows, let me know. But they had this post.
• 22:34
  Speaker 1: This is from a while ago, because I remember responding
• 22:37
  Speaker 1: to it. Of all journalists killed in twenty eleven, eleven
• 22:41
  Speaker 1: percent were women. In twenty twenty, this was six percent,
• 22:46
  Speaker 1: which means the number of female journalists killed was cut
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: in half just about in a couple of years on
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: the International Day to End Impunity for Crimes against Journalist,
• 23:00
  Speaker 1: Let us sail out stop targeting women journalists. You know,
• 23:05
  Speaker 1: obviously this is one where he pointed this out, and
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: a bunch of the rest of us pointed this out
• 23:09
  Speaker 1: as well. That's that's a tiny minority. In twenty twenty one,
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: if eleven percent were women, then eighty nine percent were men,
• 23:23
  Speaker 1: And in twenty twenty if six percent were women, then
• 23:27
  Speaker 1: ninety four percent were men. So the number of male
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: journalists that was being killed went well, the percentage of
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: journalists being killed who were male went up. That doesn't
• 23:37
  Speaker 1: mean the number went up. This is not two were
• 23:40
  Speaker 1: journalists getting.
• 23:41
  Speaker 2: Killed because the proportion of female journalists went down. The
• 23:45
  Speaker 2: proportion of women in every white collar job has gone
• 23:49
  Speaker 2: up and up and up over yeaherations. It's it's even
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: though the proportion of female journalists has gone up, the
• 23:57
  Speaker 2: proportion of female journalists getting killed has only gone down.
• 24:04
  Speaker 2: That's what that is.
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, pretty much. So you know they're complaining that any
• 24:10
  Speaker 1: women are among the journalists who are getting killed. They
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: don't mind if journalists are getting killed. They only mind
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: if the journalists who are getting killed happen to be female.
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: Like That's essentially what they're saying there. So the way
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: that they lie, though, is to look at a minority
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: like that tiny minority eleven percent, six percent out of
• 24:37
  Speaker 1: one hundred percent, when the majority eighty nine to ninety
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: four percent are not women, they're men. And what they
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: say is stop targeting female journalists. How how do you
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: get women are the target out of the vast overwhelming
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: majority of targets being men. How do you get that?
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: You have to be able to play victim of even
• 25:13
  Speaker 1: being a fraction of the And I can tell you why.
• 25:18
  Speaker 1: Most journalists who get killed or men. Most journalists who
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: go into the dangerous areas and war zones. Most journalists
• 25:29
  Speaker 1: who try to talk to the enemy and find out
• 25:31
  Speaker 1: what they're thinking. Most journalists who are in combat zones,
• 25:37
  Speaker 1: they're men. They're not women. Women don't usually do that.
• 25:42
  Speaker 1: Even female war correspondents are not in large numbers going
• 25:49
  Speaker 1: into the areas where people are actively shooting at each
• 25:52
  Speaker 1: other or where they're likely to get kidnapped by enemy soldiers,
• 25:59
  Speaker 1: a specially when the United States is at war with
• 26:05
  Speaker 1: one of the more conservative nations of the world. I
• 26:11
  Speaker 1: won't say patriarchal because if you if you look at Islam,
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: it's really geared around protecting women from everything, and that
• 26:20
  Speaker 1: looks like a cage because it is. It's it's the
• 26:24
  Speaker 1: same kind of cage that that you put your pets
• 26:28
  Speaker 1: in when you're trying to protect them from everything. So
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: it's it's not exactly it's not exactly patriarchal in the
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: sense that feminists use where they say oppression for oppression's sake,
• 26:43
  Speaker 1: this is this is it feels oppressive to be caged
• 26:47
  Speaker 1: for your own protection, but it is evolence.
• 26:55
  Speaker 2: As the number of female journalists go up, the fem
• 27:00
  Speaker 2: journalists are not out that reporting on was they're sort
• 27:03
  Speaker 2: of doing the equivalent of buzzfield, but BuzzFeed articles they
• 27:09
  Speaker 2: like what Disney Princess character are you?
• 27:13
  Speaker 1: Yeah? Top ten top ten ways that women in the
• 27:21
  Speaker 1: military still manage to be fashionable or some bullshit, because
• 27:27
  Speaker 1: that's what women in the military want written about them.
• 27:30
  Speaker 1: I'm sure you know they worked very hard to overcome
• 27:36
  Speaker 1: certain stereotypes and that that kind of shit comes out.
• 27:40
  Speaker 1: We got a super child for Richard Bierre gave us
• 27:44
  Speaker 1: five dollars and said, well, on the surface, this looks
• 27:46
  Speaker 1: like a good thing, I can. I think that the
• 27:48
  Speaker 1: celebration might be premature, given how we have seen those
• 27:51
  Speaker 1: recordings of meetings where the middle bureaucrats were bragging about
• 27:54
  Speaker 1: getting around various policies that they don't agree with. I
• 27:57
  Speaker 1: will also say that depending upon how how many of
• 28:00
  Speaker 1: those new hires are still at the IRS, perhaps tasking
• 28:03
  Speaker 1: them with investigating and auditing the financial shenanigans related to
• 28:08
  Speaker 1: certain childcare and learning centers might get the idealogue to
• 28:11
  Speaker 1: resign because they only signed up to soak the rich.
• 28:15
  Speaker 1: It's a possibility. The thing is that unless the UN
• 28:23
  Speaker 1: starts funding UN women, this is like a direct a
• 28:29
  Speaker 1: direct thing. It's not a situation where money can just
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: be dispensed to UN women without permission, you know, without
• 28:43
  Speaker 1: some sort of protocol being followed to get them that money,
• 28:48
  Speaker 1: so it would be traceable and it would be caught.
• 28:52
  Speaker 1: Where like the thing that we were looking at, these
• 28:57
  Speaker 1: were people discussing the formation of contacts and organizations as
• 29:04
  Speaker 1: a means of continuing the work they were doing without
• 29:09
  Speaker 1: US funding and without US involvement. So you and women
• 29:13
  Speaker 1: may reach out to a bunch of other countries to
• 29:15
  Speaker 1: get their funding right, but it won't be coming from
• 29:18
  Speaker 1: the United States, and that's that is a very big deal.
• 29:22
  Speaker 1: And to me, I look at this, there are other
• 29:25
  Speaker 1: nations that if the US isn't funding something, they don't
• 29:29
  Speaker 1: fund it either, or they don't they follow suit because
• 29:36
  Speaker 1: they don't want to spend the money. They don't they
• 29:39
  Speaker 1: don't try to hold it up. And I don't think
• 29:44
  Speaker 1: that You and Women is going to be getting a
• 29:46
  Speaker 1: whole lot of money from the nations that they've been criticizing,
• 29:50
  Speaker 1: for instance, given their propensity to promote the other side
• 29:57
  Speaker 1: of the conflict. And I don't think that they're going
• 30:02
  Speaker 1: to get much funding from Israel, So there's one wealthy
• 30:07
  Speaker 1: nation that won't be likely to fund them. They might
• 30:11
  Speaker 1: get funding from European nations, but European nations are economically
• 30:17
  Speaker 1: cutting their own noses off despite their face right now,
• 30:20
  Speaker 1: so they may not have a bunch of extra money
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: to be shooting out to You and Women. Maybe China,
• 30:27
  Speaker 1: if China thinks that they're subversive enough to the West,
• 30:31
  Speaker 1: might fund You and Women. Maybe Russia for the same reason,
• 30:39
  Speaker 1: but you won't see them getting a bunch of Middle
• 30:41
  Speaker 1: Eastern money because they have been criticizing the fuck out
• 30:46
  Speaker 1: of Islamic States, and you probably won't see them getting
• 30:54
  Speaker 1: any money from South America, mainly because the nations that
• 31:00
  Speaker 1: are the most feminist in South America don't have any money.
• 31:04
  Speaker 1: They're broke.
• 31:07
  Speaker 2: We don't have any money in Europe either, but they're
• 31:09
  Speaker 2: probably going to still keep funding you and women. The
• 31:13
  Speaker 2: fact that the US isn't doing it anymore under Donald Trump,
• 31:18
  Speaker 2: it just means they're going to go, ah, well, if
• 31:20
  Speaker 2: Donald Trump is doing something, we're going to do the
• 31:22
  Speaker 2: fucking opposite. Yeah, this is what keeps fucking happening. Certainly
• 31:27
  Speaker 2: in the UK, like the only country we were allowed
• 31:32
  Speaker 2: to be xenophobic about is the US. So in the
• 31:37
  Speaker 2: event that the US is under America First policies, like
• 31:42
  Speaker 2: as long as the fucking Democrats are in charge of
• 31:45
  Speaker 2: the US, the UK is going to go, oh, bravo,
• 31:49
  Speaker 2: bravo US, thank you so much for putting yourselves last.
• 31:54
  Speaker 2: If only you could put the Israel last as well.
• 31:56
  Speaker 2: But in the meantime, we're so glad that you're putting
• 31:59
  Speaker 2: yourself last, and and and and we will get behind
• 32:01
  Speaker 2: you in putting ourselves last as well. But yeah, and
• 32:10
  Speaker 2: if if, if you've ever listened to our media. You'll
• 32:13
  Speaker 2: you'll know, like the only country other than itself that
• 32:20
  Speaker 2: they're that they're allowed to criticize or go in the
• 32:22
  Speaker 2: other direction from is an America that puts America first.
• 32:28
  Speaker 2: It's getting increasingly difficult to get this through to the
• 32:34
  Speaker 2: normies of the UK. They seem convinced that the only
• 32:39
  Speaker 2: country that's doing anything wrong is America and everyone else
• 32:43
  Speaker 2: is doing everything right. And this is probably this goes
• 32:46
  Speaker 2: especially for those in charge of the government. As soon
• 32:50
  Speaker 2: as kissed Arma here is about the hit about this,
• 32:52
  Speaker 2: he's going to be like, oh, well, wait, wait, wait, well,
• 32:56
  Speaker 2: if if the Donald Trump regime isn't going to bump
• 32:58
  Speaker 2: any more money into the UN, then we're gonna triple
• 33:01
  Speaker 2: down on our efforts. We're gonna dot deca duple down
• 33:06
  Speaker 2: on our efforts and give every last cent we have
• 33:08
  Speaker 2: to the u N. We don't have any fucking money either,
• 33:12
  Speaker 2: with fucking poorer than a church mouse whose whose wife
• 33:16
  Speaker 2: recently ran away with all the cheese. But that's not
• 33:20
  Speaker 2: going to stop our government from giving every last penny
• 33:25
  Speaker 2: to a bunch of cunts who hate us. That's just yeah,
• 33:28
  Speaker 2: we're still stuck in that paradigm that the yeah, the
• 33:36
  Speaker 2: u K. Lust, especially England, England last, especially the English people. Last,
• 33:46
  Speaker 2: it's especially the people last. It's it's a hell of
• 33:51
  Speaker 2: a state of affairs. And again, you can't get this
• 33:54
  Speaker 2: through to people because even when you try it, they'll go, oh, yeah,
• 33:58
  Speaker 2: that sounds bad, but it must be even worse us
• 34:00
  Speaker 2: in America. No, No, it's not.
• 34:04
  Speaker 1: No, and that it's gonna end up becoming blatantly obvious
• 34:09
  Speaker 1: that it's not. We're in a we're in a situation
• 34:13
  Speaker 1: now where things are improving and they're going to improve
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: at a rate of speed that's going to shock the
• 34:20
  Speaker 1: hell out of the people in Europe who support all
• 34:24
  Speaker 1: of this UK last bullshit. Mm hm, they are. They're
• 34:29
  Speaker 1: really not going to understand what's happening here. And uh,
• 34:35
  Speaker 1: I think we're going to see some some economic changes
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: that are going to shock the hell out of people too.
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: So yeah, it's it's they're going to end up either
• 34:48
  Speaker 1: looking like nut jobs trying trying to uh continue that
• 34:54
  Speaker 1: line of thinking, or changing their minds. You know, there's
• 34:59
  Speaker 1: the there will be some people, maybe not you know enough,
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: but there will be some people that will change their
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: minds simply because the evidence is going to be overwhelming, honestly,
• 35:13
  Speaker 1: and I think that changes in the US will hopefully
• 35:19
  Speaker 1: pull the world up with us. But uh but yeah,
• 35:26
  Speaker 1: uh and I Packard Packard's got an interesting point, Well,
• 35:32
  Speaker 1: wealthy liberal white women might try to uh fund you
• 35:37
  Speaker 1: and women with their husband's money. That that I could
• 35:42
  Speaker 1: see that. I could see them doing that.
• 35:44
  Speaker 3: I could see these old biddy's of the old school,
• 35:49
  Speaker 3: like the old guard of boomer liberalism, trying to take
• 35:55
  Speaker 3: their their husband's money and keep this organization afloat.
• 36:00
  Speaker 2: Uh.
• 36:01
  Speaker 1: And it's it might for a while, but I think
• 36:04
  Speaker 1: eventually they're they're going to like their selfishness is going
• 36:09
  Speaker 1: to override that, and they won't. They won't continue long
• 36:15
  Speaker 1: enough to make a big difference. I'm starting to get
• 36:18
  Speaker 1: my prediction.
• 36:19
  Speaker 2: I'm starting to get pretty sick of so called conservatives
• 36:25
  Speaker 2: or whatever blaming everything on white liberal women because that
• 36:29
  Speaker 2: just gives them an excuse to eke into these so
• 36:32
  Speaker 2: called progressive fucking mindset where it's white people that are
• 36:36
  Speaker 2: the problem. Like, but it's okay if it's why women
• 36:40
  Speaker 2: who are the problems. Now it's women who are the problem.
• 36:42
  Speaker 2: Don't get me wrong. It's more definitely women who are
• 36:46
  Speaker 2: the problem.
• 36:47
  Speaker 1: Yeah, But when we're talking about money, it's usually being spent.
• 36:51
  Speaker 1: But like somebody spending their husband's money, it's usually white
• 36:54
  Speaker 1: liberal women. When when you're talking about like organization and
• 36:59
  Speaker 1: promotion of comunism, the the grift, like black lives matter,
• 37:05
  Speaker 1: where you know, they taken a bunch of money and
• 37:08
  Speaker 1: then they spend it on themselves, that's usually black liberal women.
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: But it's both both ends of it. Are liberal women
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: doing those things mis injury? On the other hand, you
• 37:20
  Speaker 1: get that from women of all political facets.
• 37:27
  Speaker 2: Well, women of all stripes suffer from them. Well, I
• 37:32
  Speaker 2: say suffer, but they have this tendency towards relational aggression. Yes,
• 37:40
  Speaker 2: like any any given nation, as soon as it has
• 37:43
  Speaker 2: the economic wherewithal to do so, they they will fall
• 37:48
  Speaker 2: upon their women, and the relational aggression of their women,
• 37:51
  Speaker 2: and the relational aggression of them of their women will
• 37:54
  Speaker 2: spread to their men and eventually to their children, to
• 37:57
  Speaker 2: the to the youngest of possible age, and they'll keep
• 37:59
  Speaker 2: teaching it to the children of the youngest possible age.
• 38:03
  Speaker 2: Like it's like race really is secondary to all of this.
• 38:10
  Speaker 2: And if you're going to talk about white liberal women,
• 38:14
  Speaker 2: like it's not like the fact that they're white is tertiary.
• 38:20
  Speaker 2: The fact that they're liberal is secondary. The fact that
• 38:24
  Speaker 2: they're women is primary. Okay, So if you.
• 38:29
  Speaker 1: Way method changes, that's what I'm talking about. Like there,
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: you look at a different method each each each group
• 38:38
  Speaker 1: has their different methods. What are they doing. For instance,
• 38:43
  Speaker 1: you have the racial victim signaling. You know, white women
• 38:47
  Speaker 1: really don't get a lot of leverage with that for
• 38:52
  Speaker 1: the most part, unless they are leveraging it with uh
• 38:58
  Speaker 1: certain types of conservatives. But for the most part that
• 39:02
  Speaker 1: if they shout that, you know, shout into their shouting
• 39:05
  Speaker 1: into the wind, nobody cares, right, So they aren't going
• 39:08
  Speaker 1: to use that, But they will use economic power if
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: they have it. Whereas if you have women who have
• 39:18
  Speaker 1: some sort of racial history, you know that there's whether
• 39:24
  Speaker 1: they're Black or Latino or Asian, they'll use victim signaling
• 39:30
  Speaker 1: on that basis because they can, and so they'll try
• 39:35
  Speaker 1: to eclipse. Each one has a reason why they eclipse
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: their femininity behind some other victimhood, right, the illusion of victimhood.
• 39:48
  Speaker 1: And they're all playing victim of things that happen to
• 39:50
  Speaker 1: other people, things that happened to somebody one hundred years ago.
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: Or two hundred years ago, things that happened to somebody
• 39:55
  Speaker 1: in another country, things that happen to somebody in another date, like,
• 40:01
  Speaker 1: for instance, conservative women will play victim of things that
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: happened to women in other states at the hands of
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: gang members from other countries, and then they'll make the
• 40:17
  Speaker 1: issue about women and not about crime. Right and as
• 40:22
  Speaker 1: if men are not also being killed by gang members
• 40:26
  Speaker 1: from other countries. They are, by the way, often in
• 40:31
  Speaker 1: the course of protecting the women in their lives, but
• 40:36
  Speaker 1: not always. We also have Packard also pointed out that
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: both shoe on head and your dumpster fire, I don't
• 40:43
  Speaker 1: know your dumpster fire. That one's an unfamiliar person to me.
• 40:48
  Speaker 1: State they ask their husbands how to vote. I'm not
• 40:51
  Speaker 1: going to come out and say that I ask my
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: husband how to vote. But what I do when I'm
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: thinking about the issues I'm voting on, so I talk
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: to him about it. Because nobody I know is a
• 41:04
  Speaker 1: better idea sorter and idea better than he is. So
• 41:13
  Speaker 1: if I'm thinking about something and I bring it up
• 41:16
  Speaker 1: to him and we talk about it, and and I'm
• 41:21
  Speaker 1: not considering something important, usually he is able to peg
• 41:29
  Speaker 1: the important thing that I am not thinking about, like
• 41:32
  Speaker 1: nail it right there and say hey, have you considered,
• 41:37
  Speaker 1: especially when we're talking about local issues, like often you'll
• 41:42
  Speaker 1: have funding on the ballot for schools and stuff like that.
• 41:47
  Speaker 1: And and my my knee jerk reaction is anytime there's
• 41:53
  Speaker 1: something on the ballot, we want to fund this or that,
• 41:57
  Speaker 1: and and and they say things like, well, it's not
• 41:59
  Speaker 1: going to result in any taxes. I always suspect that yes,
• 42:03
  Speaker 1: it will, just not right now. And so it takes
• 42:07
  Speaker 1: a lot for me to vote yes on any issue.
• 42:10
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 42:11
  Speaker 1: Once in a blue moon, he'll have something to say
• 42:14
  Speaker 1: that I'll be like, oh, okay, that that I might
• 42:17
  Speaker 1: actually vote yes on this. But very rarely when when
• 42:22
  Speaker 1: something like that is under discussion, does he come up
• 42:26
  Speaker 1: with anything that I haven't already thought of. But there
• 42:30
  Speaker 1: have been times where I've looked at different candidates or
• 42:33
  Speaker 1: different ideas and stuff. It was actually, you know, discussing
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: politics a little bit here and there with my husband.
• 42:42
  Speaker 1: They got me thinking about, you know, really most of
• 42:45
  Speaker 1: the things that we talk about in the men's rights
• 42:48
  Speaker 1: movement are not a left right issue in that one
• 42:51
  Speaker 1: party is going to rescue us right and one party
• 42:55
  Speaker 1: is going to make everything okay for men, give men
• 42:57
  Speaker 1: equal treatment, respect what men contribute to society, and give
• 43:04
  Speaker 1: men fair treatment. There isn't one party that's going to
• 43:07
  Speaker 1: do that. Working with the different parties in power will
• 43:13
  Speaker 1: take different pathways because there are different languages that they speak,
• 43:21
  Speaker 1: and there are different values that they express, and there
• 43:23
  Speaker 1: are things that you know, if you have to be
• 43:27
  Speaker 1: able to show the politician how they can sell the
• 43:31
  Speaker 1: change that they're making to the public.
• 43:36
  Speaker 2: And so.
• 43:38
  Speaker 1: Unless you can do that, we can't persuade any political
• 43:43
  Speaker 1: group to work with us on anything. We don't have
• 43:48
  Speaker 1: what they want. They're not ethical, they're not morally guided.
• 43:56
  Speaker 1: Their would say both political major political parties that control
• 44:04
  Speaker 1: politics in the US are pretty uh, pretty sociopathic, right,
• 44:09
  Speaker 1: They're they're in it for them. They don't really, as
• 44:12
  Speaker 1: a party, necessarily care about the public. They don't care
• 44:16
  Speaker 1: about the people. They're kind of like two different sides
• 44:20
  Speaker 1: of Cthulhu. So you have to show cthulhu what's in
• 44:25
  Speaker 1: it for Cthulhu? What are you going to feed him
• 44:29
  Speaker 1: in order to get what you want? And this this
• 44:32
  Speaker 1: particular type of Cthulhu eats public relations. Basically, they have
• 44:43
  Speaker 1: to be able to market themselves every election, so you
• 44:48
  Speaker 1: have to be able to feed them a way to
• 44:50
  Speaker 1: market themselves in the next election. Look what we accomplished
• 44:55
  Speaker 1: for everybody by changing the law to support equal treatment
• 45:01
  Speaker 1: of men in this one way, Women of all stripes
• 45:10
  Speaker 1: exploit the shit out of that absolutely use it to
• 45:17
  Speaker 1: their best advantage. And you find that Republicans will work
• 45:24
  Speaker 1: with feminist groups, Democrats will work with church groups. They
• 45:30
  Speaker 1: will cross party lines and back and forth like they're
• 45:36
  Speaker 1: trying to do a zigzag stitch on a on a
• 45:39
  Speaker 1: giant flag across the country, and you and women is
• 45:44
  Speaker 1: no different. Like they will they will reach out to
• 45:47
  Speaker 1: parties on both sides of the aisle they to get
• 45:50
  Speaker 1: what they want, and their propaganda that they use to
• 45:57
  Speaker 1: do this plays on whatever type of victimhood female victimhood
• 46:04
  Speaker 1: that particular party finds most marketable to its base. So
• 46:11
  Speaker 1: the left thinks women are victims of stifling family structure
• 46:19
  Speaker 1: and stifling morality, and the right thinks that women are
• 46:28
  Speaker 1: victims of an exploitative loss of family structure and exploitative immorality.
• 46:38
  Speaker 1: And the reason that both sides have those opinions they
• 46:42
  Speaker 1: don't afford women the agency to make their own choices.
• 46:45
  Speaker 1: So if the norm is a particular family structure, then
• 46:53
  Speaker 1: the left says, oh, well, women have to do this,
• 46:56
  Speaker 1: They don't have a choice, even though they always have.
• 47:00
  Speaker 1: If the prevailing rebellion against the norm is a particular
• 47:10
  Speaker 1: avenue of immorality or particular avenue destruction and family structure,
• 47:16
  Speaker 1: the right then treats women who want to have that
• 47:21
  Speaker 1: family structure or want to be morally wiser as victims
• 47:28
  Speaker 1: of the fact that their outliers to this, this rebellion
• 47:34
  Speaker 1: against morality or whatever. They treat it like it's an
• 47:39
  Speaker 1: attack that you know, you have to protect women from
• 47:46
  Speaker 1: the criticism and demonization of the of the left. But
• 47:53
  Speaker 1: then when you see the same thing happening to men, right,
• 47:56
  Speaker 1: the left portray men as predators and criminals, even though
• 48:02
  Speaker 1: less than one percent, less than one tenth of one
• 48:04
  Speaker 1: percent in fact, of the world population commits violent crimes. Sorry,
• 48:16
  Speaker 1: neither party will speak up because they don't have that
• 48:21
  Speaker 1: same failure to afford agency. Well, men don't have to
• 48:25
  Speaker 1: actually be what they're what they're stereotyped is, so therefore
• 48:29
  Speaker 1: it's not that big of a deal that these people
• 48:30
  Speaker 1: are stereotyping men, even though they're advocate, advocating for a
• 48:34
  Speaker 1: legislation and getting it passed based on those stereotypes. So
• 48:40
  Speaker 1: women capitalize on it. Men haven't historically, and that's probably
• 48:46
  Speaker 1: the one thing that we really need to be able
• 48:49
  Speaker 1: to change in the movement, not necessarily through victimhood, but
• 48:55
  Speaker 1: through increasing emphasis on common sense and results. I think
• 49:04
  Speaker 1: we need to get the public more results oriented and
• 49:11
  Speaker 1: that's probably going to be our biggest challenge. But back
• 49:16
  Speaker 1: to you and women, So what we've talked about in
• 49:20
  Speaker 1: the past, we went over the fact that they were
• 49:23
  Speaker 1: specifically targeting us. They had several articles that we've been
• 49:34
  Speaker 1: looking at on their plans to take down the manisphere,
• 49:41
  Speaker 1: and one of their big things that they had intended
• 49:44
  Speaker 1: to do is to persuade world governments to censor us.
• 49:54
  Speaker 1: They wanted a system where your government would tell your
• 50:01
  Speaker 1: social media companies what we could and could not say
• 50:07
  Speaker 1: in order to prevent us from being able to criticize
• 50:12
  Speaker 1: the actions of these feminist organizations. And they also had
• 50:18
  Speaker 1: plans then to essentially not just go after, you know,
• 50:28
  Speaker 1: the social media companies and make them censor us, but
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: get laws enacted similar to the misogyny laws that you
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: see happening now in the UK where if someone like
• 50:42
  Speaker 1: say maybe not meet they wouldn't go after a woman
• 50:45
  Speaker 1: as quickly as they would a man, but possibly because
• 50:49
  Speaker 1: we're on the wrong side of the fence. But let's
• 50:52
  Speaker 1: say they might look at poll Elum's article that feminists
• 50:55
  Speaker 1: mischaracterize as serious the satire where he made fun of
• 51:04
  Speaker 1: Oh that stupid cat blog Jezebel. Sorry, I do have
• 51:10
  Speaker 1: a cold. I'm gonna end up coughing too much, but
• 51:16
  Speaker 1: where he made fun of Jezebel's writers for saying that
• 51:19
  Speaker 1: they beat up their boyfriends, bragging about it and stuff
• 51:22
  Speaker 1: their husbands and their boyfriends by writing an article if
• 51:26
  Speaker 1: you see Jezebel in the street, knock that bitch out
• 51:31
  Speaker 1: something along those lines, and it's said at the beginning
• 51:34
  Speaker 1: of the article. You know, he had to put it
• 51:37
  Speaker 1: disclaimer to show that it was parody, but in the article,
• 51:40
  Speaker 1: if you read the entire article, it was pretty obvious
• 51:42
  Speaker 1: that it was parody. And he very clearly pointed out that,
• 51:46
  Speaker 1: you know, we would rightfully recognize treating women violently in
• 51:52
  Speaker 1: that manners as wrongful violence, but as soon as they
• 51:57
  Speaker 1: say it about men, it's funny all of a sudden
• 52:01
  Speaker 1: to people and that that is an unequal treatment right
• 52:06
  Speaker 1: articles like that, where the point he was making ultimately
• 52:12
  Speaker 1: wasn't that people should be engaging in violence toward women,
• 52:17
  Speaker 1: but was that it's just as bad for women to
• 52:22
  Speaker 1: engage in violence toward men. That would get him jailed
• 52:26
  Speaker 1: under policies that you and women wanted enacted in countries
• 52:31
  Speaker 1: all over the world. Now in the United States where
• 52:33
  Speaker 1: we live, not in the same state, but both of
• 52:37
  Speaker 1: us are American citizens. I don't think that there's a
• 52:42
  Speaker 1: legal avenue necessarily to make that happen without significant challenges
• 52:51
  Speaker 1: to whatever laws might be passed, because it's it'd be
• 52:58
  Speaker 1: a violation of the First Amendment right to freedom of
• 53:01
  Speaker 1: speech if the federal government tried to regulate that. You
• 53:05
  Speaker 1: say that you couldn't parody a violent article. He declared
• 53:11
  Speaker 1: bash a violent bitch month to draw attention to a problem.
• 53:18
  Speaker 1: But again, like I said, I don't think we would
• 53:23
  Speaker 1: have that repercussion here, but I think they could achieve
• 53:26
  Speaker 1: it all over the rest of the world, and I
• 53:28
  Speaker 1: think most countries the legislators wouldn't read past the first
• 53:34
  Speaker 1: paragraph after the disclaimer, which they would skip, and and
• 53:40
  Speaker 1: the next things that you would have would be laws
• 53:43
  Speaker 1: stating that that kind of writing can't be allowed. You'd
• 53:47
  Speaker 1: have misogyny laws. I'm surprised by the way that Australia
• 53:51
  Speaker 1: doesn't have those like that. The UK was first, because
• 53:56
  Speaker 1: feminism in Australia is even worse.
• 53:58
  Speaker 2: Consider that women are stronger than children mum to a
• 54:05
  Speaker 2: certain age, certainly until teenage age. And we can wax
• 54:09
  Speaker 2: all kinds of lyrical about how much women beat their
• 54:13
  Speaker 2: children in the same way we can wax lyrical about
• 54:16
  Speaker 2: how men beat their wives or the or the women
• 54:22
  Speaker 2: in their lives or whatever. And we and we could
• 54:25
  Speaker 2: present a satire either way about these things. I mean,
• 54:29
  Speaker 2: imagine presenting a satire about how children should beat their mothers.
• 54:37
  Speaker 2: Before I elaborate on that, I just want to let
• 54:39
  Speaker 2: it percolate among your minds. Right, given that the women
• 54:47
  Speaker 2: are stronger than their children up to a certain age,
• 54:53
  Speaker 2: certainly up to the teenage age, to what degree would
• 54:59
  Speaker 2: it be acceptable to present the satire or even a
• 55:06
  Speaker 2: serious artistic diatribe as to the degree to which we
• 55:14
  Speaker 2: should be encouraging children to beat the ship out of
• 55:16
  Speaker 2: their mothers. I wonder, if I've just presented my own
• 55:20
  Speaker 2: elam moment, if this is what people are going to
• 55:25
  Speaker 2: present as Look at what doctor Randamgahm said. He said
• 55:29
  Speaker 2: that children should beat the ship out of their mothers.
• 55:32
  Speaker 2: And yeah, no, I'm just I'm just like you know,
• 55:37
  Speaker 2: you know how this power differential is often painted that
• 55:42
  Speaker 2: it's okay for women to beat men because they're just
• 55:44
  Speaker 2: so much weaker, except when it comes to sports, in
• 55:48
  Speaker 2: which case you can identify it as whatever you want.
• 55:54
  Speaker 1: Well, we're in the workplace like you. Obviously, even in
• 55:57
  Speaker 1: the harshest of work environments, women do we equal work, right.
• 56:01
  Speaker 2: It's it's it's we're always We're always, we always fighting
• 56:05
  Speaker 2: this war on on on two fronts where where feminists
• 56:11
  Speaker 2: will acknowledge that men are stronger than women when it
• 56:14
  Speaker 2: comes to these domestic issues, but when it comes to sports, no, no, no,
• 56:18
  Speaker 2: biological men are not stronger than women. You can't possibly
• 56:22
  Speaker 2: say that because that's misogynistic, and so we should let
• 56:25
  Speaker 2: men beat the share out of women in the boxing
• 56:27
  Speaker 2: ring because and none of it makes any fucking sense.
• 56:34
  Speaker 2: But I'm just I'm just trying to draw a parallel,
• 56:37
  Speaker 2: a modern day parallel to Paul's infamous article about Jezebel
• 56:43
  Speaker 2: that you know, it's not okay for men to beat
• 56:46
  Speaker 2: women because men are stronger than women, But it's also
• 56:49
  Speaker 2: not okay for women to beat men even though they're
• 56:54
  Speaker 2: weaker than men. Well, what if I suggested that it's
• 56:57
  Speaker 2: okay for children to beat the share out of their mothers.
• 57:03
  Speaker 2: Would that work even though children are weaker than their mothers?
• 57:08
  Speaker 2: Does that? Does that make sense? No? It doesn't, does it,
• 57:10
  Speaker 2: because there would just be another form of relational aggression.
• 57:15
  Speaker 2: Like people shouldn't beat the ship out of each other
• 57:17
  Speaker 2: in general, Like it's not like unless you're actually fearing
• 57:23
  Speaker 2: for your life, unless you actually have to beat the
• 57:26
  Speaker 2: ship out of someone in order to prevent a greater
• 57:30
  Speaker 2: violence from happening. Like, people shouldn't be beating the ship
• 57:33
  Speaker 2: out of each other. They shouldn't even be punching each other.
• 57:36
  Speaker 2: They shouldn't even they shouldn't even be bopping each other
• 57:43
  Speaker 2: in in ways that seem irrelevant.
• 57:47
  Speaker 1: And yeah, you have this loggiest of knees. Doc.
• 57:55
  Speaker 2: Yeah, it's people like to say that men are naturally
• 57:58
  Speaker 2: more violent than women, but they're not women naturally. Will
• 58:04
  Speaker 2: bop men? Do I need to explain what a bop is?
• 58:07
  Speaker 2: Where they just whether where they just go because you
• 58:11
  Speaker 2: said something spicy, because you said because you said because
• 58:16
  Speaker 2: you said a spicy joke, and so they just instinctively
• 58:19
  Speaker 2: just sort of bop you on the chest. It doesn't hurt, obviously,
• 58:24
  Speaker 2: but they do it anyway because their first instinct is
• 58:28
  Speaker 2: to do something a little bit violent, because because they
• 58:34
  Speaker 2: can't think of anything else to say in result, as
• 58:38
  Speaker 2: in reaction to the spicy thing you just said. So
• 58:41
  Speaker 2: they just go because they know it's not going to
• 58:44
  Speaker 2: hurt you. But when you translate this to the relationship
• 58:49
  Speaker 2: between women and children, they do the same thing. If
• 58:52
  Speaker 2: a child says something a little bit spicy, the woman
• 58:55
  Speaker 2: will just bop them. And in that and that's and
• 58:58
  Speaker 2: in that scenario it kind of does hurt. Because women
• 59:03
  Speaker 2: don't know their own strength, they don't care about their
• 59:05
  Speaker 2: own strength because they're always comparing it with men's strength.
• 59:09
  Speaker 2: They can always bop a man because it doesn't hurt,
• 59:14
  Speaker 2: and so they think they can always bop a child
• 59:16
  Speaker 2: because it doesn't hurt. But it kind of does not.
• 59:19
  Speaker 1: Just it doesn't always teach either.
• 59:21
  Speaker 2: Not just not just physically, but psychologically. A woman will
• 59:24
  Speaker 2: just instinctively bop a child, especially when there's no man
• 59:28
  Speaker 2: in the house when she can't just delegate that violence
• 59:34
  Speaker 2: to the man in the house, which is how he
• 59:36
  Speaker 2: usually works if there's no man in the house, which
• 59:38
  Speaker 2: there frequently isn't in this day and age of ingle
• 59:42
  Speaker 2: mothers as such.
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: In those houses, they're doing more than bop. You haven't
• 59:48
  Speaker 1: heard of the flying slipper of death. Women will take
• 59:54
  Speaker 1: their footwear off and throw it at their kid. And
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: some women are quite adept at hitting the child in
• 1:00:03
  Speaker 1: the side of the head with a flying shoe or
• 1:00:07
  Speaker 1: slipper flipslops whatever, and this is or the other one
• 1:00:11
  Speaker 1: is they'll take the shoe off and smack the child
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: with it like they use it as a as a
• 1:00:17
  Speaker 1: whip or a paddle. And I mean, I've seen this.
• 1:00:20
  Speaker 1: I've witnessed this with friends growing up. That the kid
• 1:00:25
  Speaker 1: does or says something that the mom considers a bridge
• 1:00:30
  Speaker 1: too far, inappropriate, whatever, and the kid the next thing
• 1:00:35
  Speaker 1: you know, the kid's running across the room being pursued
• 1:00:39
  Speaker 1: by an angry woman wielding a piece of footwear as
• 1:00:44
  Speaker 1: a bludgeon and getting hit on the butt and the
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 1: side of the head like they'll hit the top of
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 1: the head right behind the ear. Is like the target
• 1:00:56
  Speaker 1: or around the shoulders, and god forbid you accidentally turn
• 1:01:01
  Speaker 1: your head at the wrong moment because your lip is
• 1:01:03
  Speaker 1: getting split. And I've seen that. You know, I grew
• 1:01:09
  Speaker 1: up in a neighborhood where that was not uncommon as
• 1:01:12
  Speaker 1: a practice when it came to you know, And and
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 1: of course there are some ethnicities that are known for
• 1:01:20
  Speaker 1: it more than others. So you don't if you are
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 1: messing around and and you see your hispanic friend's mom
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 1: start taking off one of her shoes, you better run.
• 1:01:35
  Speaker 1: She won't even differentiate between which kid is hers and
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 1: the other kids in the room. Everybody's getting everybody's getting slippered.
• 1:01:44
  Speaker 1: But but yeah, this is a common behavior among women,
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 1: And yeah, they would, they would freak the fuck out
• 1:01:51
  Speaker 1: if you said their kids should hit them back. They
• 1:01:54
  Speaker 1: would They would be first of all, their authority authoritarian.
• 1:02:00
  Speaker 1: So the idea that their kids should rebel or resist
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 1: in any way is offensive to them. But second of all,
• 1:02:07
  Speaker 1: you know, they're they're only going to be thinking of
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 1: their sons hitting them back. And the first thing that
• 1:02:13
  Speaker 1: they'll they'll say is that that's misogynistic, because obviously, you know,
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: boys can't hit any female.
• 1:02:24
  Speaker 2: Fathers can get around this quite easily with the stink
• 1:02:29
  Speaker 2: i or with a slightly raised voice, just a that
• 1:02:34
  Speaker 2: that sort of thing in a way women can't. I
• 1:02:37
  Speaker 2: don't know why. They said, well, it's probably because my
• 1:02:40
  Speaker 2: mom could, because it's a it's a deeper voice. But
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 2: you know, in general, in general, men have this fathers
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 2: have this way of of they just seem scarier that
• 1:02:54
  Speaker 2: there's probably some evolutionary reason for this. All they have
• 1:02:57
  Speaker 2: to do is raise their hand without actually the attacking
• 1:03:01
  Speaker 2: with it, or just raise their voice without actually going
• 1:03:05
  Speaker 2: on a fucking rant about it, or just given the
• 1:03:07
  Speaker 2: old stinki without adding a bunch of psychological torture on
• 1:03:13
  Speaker 2: top of it. Whereas women they can't. They kind of
• 1:03:18
  Speaker 2: they can't do what what fathers can do without following
• 1:03:22
  Speaker 2: through with an actual beating or an actual screaming, or
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 2: an actual psychological torture. And this is and this is
• 1:03:33
  Speaker 2: why it's so important for men to be in the
• 1:03:36
  Speaker 2: household in the first place, because because they can, they
• 1:03:41
  Speaker 2: can enact this authoritarianism so much easier and without escalating
• 1:03:49
  Speaker 2: it into into into unnecessary bullshit.
• 1:03:56
  Speaker 1: In fact, most of the time, when when you do
• 1:04:01
  Speaker 1: find child abuse that is perpetrated by the dad. You
• 1:04:05
  Speaker 1: find a man who has not matured into adulthood by
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: the time he became of age. Humans are born violent.
• 1:04:15
  Speaker 1: We are violent from the moment we are able to
• 1:04:19
  Speaker 1: start controlling our movements. And it's not just you know,
• 1:04:26
  Speaker 1: violence to get stuff, like we think it's hilarious when
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 1: we're little to bop people in the face and get
• 1:04:33
  Speaker 1: a surprised look or whatever and laugh. Somebody gets bumped
• 1:04:38
  Speaker 1: on the head, it's funny, you know, and so on,
• 1:04:41
  Speaker 1: like that's one of the earliest forms of humor your
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 1: baby engages in is laughing because you got hit on
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 1: the nose where you got hit on the head, you know,
• 1:04:51
  Speaker 1: and stuff, giggling about stuff like that. And then the
• 1:04:57
  Speaker 1: next thing that happens when your baby is old enough
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 1: to start like moving around and picking up toys and
• 1:05:05
  Speaker 1: playing with them and everything, is that if two children
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 1: are close to the same age at that stage in
• 1:05:12
  Speaker 1: their life, when they're they're still learning to control some
• 1:05:15
  Speaker 1: of their movements, but they have enough that they can
• 1:05:17
  Speaker 1: pick up toys and play with them. If one of
• 1:05:19
  Speaker 1: them has a toy and the other one wants it,
• 1:05:23
  Speaker 1: they don't try to share, they don't try to enjoy
• 1:05:25
  Speaker 1: the toy together, they don't offer a trade. So those
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 1: are not natural behaviors right up front. Those are things
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 1: that you learn later on through aversion to violent consequences
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 1: of confrontation in early childhood, where you know, you see
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 1: another kid with a toy that you want, and you
• 1:05:50
  Speaker 1: bop that kid on the head to get that toy,
• 1:05:52
  Speaker 1: and the kid turns around and bops you back harder,
• 1:05:55
  Speaker 1: and you realize that bopping is not necessarily the best
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 1: way to detoy who gets the toy, that maybe you
• 1:06:03
  Speaker 1: might try some more diplomatic method and so on. And
• 1:06:10
  Speaker 1: you learn that throughout childhood by getting into fights and losing,
• 1:06:19
  Speaker 1: and boys do that throughout their entire childhood. Boys frequently
• 1:06:26
  Speaker 1: get into rough and tumble, rough and tumble, play fights,
• 1:06:36
  Speaker 1: serious fights, all kinds of you know, learning learning how
• 1:06:42
  Speaker 1: to get along with each other, or learning how to
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 1: not get along with each other, and essentially learning ways
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 1: to avoid being the target of violence. And you want
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 1: to learn if you want to avoid being the target
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 1: of violence, one of the primary ways to avoid that
• 1:07:01
  Speaker 1: is to not engage in violence. If you're a boy,
• 1:07:05
  Speaker 1: because there isn't anybody going, you know, behind you going,
• 1:07:09
  Speaker 1: you can't hit him he's a boy. Nobody says that
• 1:07:14
  Speaker 1: to anyone. You can't hit him, he's a boy, as
• 1:07:17
  Speaker 1: opposed to you can't hit her, she's a girl. It's
• 1:07:21
  Speaker 1: not okay to hit her because she's a girl. We
• 1:07:25
  Speaker 1: do say that about girls. You can't hit her. She's
• 1:07:29
  Speaker 1: a girl. What's wrong with you? You're hitting a girl.
• 1:07:33
  Speaker 1: And so girls don't have the same set of lessons
• 1:07:39
  Speaker 1: historically growing up about violence, and therefore they consider violence
• 1:07:47
  Speaker 1: to be a different animal when they are the target
• 1:07:52
  Speaker 1: than it is when a guy is the target. They
• 1:07:55
  Speaker 1: consider it to be more okay when it happens to
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: male human beings then it is when it happens to
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 1: female human beings. And when male human beings complain about
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: female violence, women get offended. They get They don't just
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 1: get a little offended either, they get very offended. You're
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: a misogynist, for instance, if you think that if an
• 1:08:24
  Speaker 1: attacker is female and the target of the attack is male,
• 1:08:29
  Speaker 1: that doesn't mean the target should be obligated to endure
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: the attack without attempting to defend himself in any way.
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 1: Just having that opinion will get you deemed a misogynists.
• 1:08:46
  Speaker 1: Can you imagine suggesting the reverse that if a target
• 1:08:51
  Speaker 1: is male, or if the attacker is female, there is
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 1: male and theget the target is female, that the target
• 1:09:00
  Speaker 1: should just endure the attack without defending herself in any
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 1: way because men are are exempt from your self defense.
• 1:09:10
  Speaker 1: Somehow there would be we would be cold, how oppressive
• 1:09:15
  Speaker 1: that is to women. We would be told how evil
• 1:09:19
  Speaker 1: that is, even if we were talking about just a
• 1:09:23
  Speaker 1: subset of men. Well, if a guy who is disabled
• 1:09:27
  Speaker 1: does something to you, physically disabled, not mentally physically disabled,
• 1:09:31
  Speaker 1: does something to you, and you could get away with him,
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 1: you shouldn't hit him back. Just telling women that is
• 1:09:39
  Speaker 1: enough to get you called a misogynist. But you could,
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 1: you know, you could suggest that a man should be
• 1:09:46
  Speaker 1: able to hit a woman back if she's bigger and
• 1:09:49
  Speaker 1: stronger than him, and you'd still get told no, no, no,
• 1:09:53
  Speaker 1: she's a woman. A man should never hit a woman. Right, So, yeah,
• 1:09:57
  Speaker 1: there is a definite inequality there, and and part of
• 1:10:00
  Speaker 1: it is that women don't fully understand the consequences and
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 1: rules around violence. They don't understand what stems from not
• 1:10:15
  Speaker 1: learning to control your violence because they don't, and they
• 1:10:20
  Speaker 1: don't face the repressions a man would face if he
• 1:10:23
  Speaker 1: didn't learn how to control his violence. You and women,
• 1:10:30
  Speaker 1: in terms of what we've seen from them historically when
• 1:10:36
  Speaker 1: they complain about men's rights activists and other manisphere entities
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 1: try to portray us as violent, and they do so
• 1:10:49
  Speaker 1: mostly buy association with people who aren't actually involved in
• 1:10:57
  Speaker 1: any men's rights activism or any other men's issues discussion
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 1: or activity. They just are people who went off, and
• 1:11:10
  Speaker 1: they do it by trying trying to connect dots that
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 1: don't really connect, and the result ends up being, you know,
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 1: these articles where they they'll write about one guy, and
• 1:11:27
  Speaker 1: then they'll write as if an entire movement of father's
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 1: rights advocates and uh, you know, men who don't want
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 1: to be kept out of goods and services that are
• 1:11:42
  Speaker 1: provided for victims of intimate partner and sexual violence should
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 1: be ignored because this guy did this thing, and they're
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 1: Their logic for wanting to censor us is essentially that
• 1:11:58
  Speaker 1: men should not have the right to object it, that
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 1: the men should not have any any say in whether
• 1:12:05
  Speaker 1: we view them as individuals or as a monolith. And
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 1: women are not a monolith, but men apparently are, and
• 1:12:15
  Speaker 1: so their whole, their whole outlook on social media, the
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 1: things that they have said on the social media that
• 1:12:26
  Speaker 1: they want us to be censored on what you know
• 1:12:32
  Speaker 1: what this article says what mister Nuzzo has found essentially
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 1: analyzing all four hundred and ninety nine tweets published by
• 1:12:43
  Speaker 1: you and women between September twenty four, twenty twenty four,
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 1: and September thirty, twenty twenty five. So basically just a
• 1:12:54
  Speaker 1: few days, but he went through an analyze, or not
• 1:13:00
  Speaker 1: just a few days, but a year. He went on.
• 1:13:06
  Speaker 1: He went on to describe what their actual percentage was
• 1:13:12
  Speaker 1: of different things. So here we go. First thing is
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 1: that they mostly tweeted about women, right, most of them
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 1: referred only to girls or women. Less than one percent
• 1:13:28
  Speaker 1: referred to only boys and men, and one point six
• 1:13:31
  Speaker 1: referred to both sexes. So clearly they're you know, they're
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 1: going to be biased toward women. They're going to be
• 1:13:38
  Speaker 1: mostly talking about women. What I have found interesting with
• 1:13:43
  Speaker 1: when looking at how they tweet, then when they talk
• 1:13:46
  Speaker 1: about women and men's behavior, Like I said that acceptability
• 1:13:51
  Speaker 1: of behavior. They expect you to accept violence from women,
• 1:13:57
  Speaker 1: and violence women engage in for reasons they consider to
• 1:14:02
  Speaker 1: be self defense have to be protected, right, but men
• 1:14:08
  Speaker 1: shouldn't be allowed to defend themselves. Again country, So most
• 1:14:16
  Speaker 1: of the time they don't specify a country, but when
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 1: they did, eight percent was Gaza. So, like I said,
• 1:14:23
  Speaker 1: Israel probably going to be stepping up to fund these guys.
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 1: Then they fall into line here Afghanistan, Sudan, Ukraine, Lebanon,
• 1:14:34
  Speaker 1: and then all other countries. Their tweet topics mostly women's rights.
• 1:14:46
  Speaker 1: The next thing down violence, safety, protection, and then war
• 1:14:49
  Speaker 1: and peace and women's leadership. And we're looking at again
• 1:14:54
  Speaker 1: this is you and women. So they're going to be
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 1: primarily talking about women. So the idea that they would
• 1:15:01
  Speaker 1: be talking about women's rights pretty standard, right, violence, safety,
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 1: and protection. Though the primary victims of violence in the world,
• 1:15:12
  Speaker 1: the majority of victims of violence in the world are men,
• 1:15:18
  Speaker 1: and you and Women, of course, ignores that, and the
• 1:15:24
  Speaker 1: majority of perpetrators of violence in the world fall into
• 1:15:31
  Speaker 1: this at least of non war related violence fall into
• 1:15:35
  Speaker 1: the group of less than one tenth of one percent
• 1:15:39
  Speaker 1: of the world population. You and Women generalizes that to
• 1:15:44
  Speaker 1: all men on a regular basis, very little discussion about
• 1:15:55
  Speaker 1: actual issues that women face. Right family, there's two point
• 1:16:00
  Speaker 1: four percent of their tweets they don't say a lot
• 1:16:06
  Speaker 1: about us in their tweets that they save their articles
• 1:16:10
  Speaker 1: for that this was an interesting one. So he says,
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: the five most common topics were, and we talked of
• 1:16:20
  Speaker 1: it a little bit about some of this gender equality
• 1:16:23
  Speaker 1: of women's rights. Twenty nine point seven percent of tweets
• 1:16:26
  Speaker 1: violence and Women's safety, slash protection, war and Peace, Women's
• 1:16:30
  Speaker 1: Leadership fund, and invest in Women. For the current analysis,
• 1:16:34
  Speaker 1: the category of violence and Women's safety slash protection consisted
• 1:16:38
  Speaker 1: of tweets on domestic violence against women and online online
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 1: violence against women, digital threats against women, and any tweets
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 1: that contained the words safety or protection. So the category
• 1:16:51
  Speaker 1: war on peace included any tweets on war and any
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 1: tweets that included the word piece, So all of all
• 1:17:01
  Speaker 1: of the things that we've been reading about them complaining
• 1:17:04
  Speaker 1: about would have been included in that twenty one percent.
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: Their main message was that women around the world are
• 1:17:12
  Speaker 1: experiencing widespread victimization, including unequal rights, and that gender equality
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: can be achieved only if women are given more money,
• 1:17:21
  Speaker 1: greater political power, and further protections from perceived physical and
• 1:17:24
  Speaker 1: non physical harms. So that's the avenue they're what they
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 1: were trying to do, what we were funding. The thing
• 1:17:36
  Speaker 1: that we were we were paying into was an organization
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: that was trying to get laws passed to protect women
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: against words.
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 2: Word god? What kind of word? Kunt? Yeah? Am I
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 2: under or arrest?
• 1:17:58
  Speaker 1: I don't know that one's a It depends are you
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: pretending to be Australian?
• 1:18:04
  Speaker 2: What about miss indry? Is that going to do me in?
• 1:18:10
  Speaker 1: What were you saying? I can't understand your accent? So
• 1:18:17
  Speaker 1: skip in there. Like the domestic violence thing, I think
• 1:18:21
  Speaker 1: we've talked about that at nauseum. It's difficult to not
• 1:18:25
  Speaker 1: do that though, because it's one of their biggest topics,
• 1:18:29
  Speaker 1: feminism's biggest topics. And we know because we've showed you
• 1:18:33
  Speaker 1: the research that the majority of domestic violence is actually
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 1: two way. That among one way domestic violence, seventy percent
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: of it is female perpetrated. And that among two way
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: domestic violence, that's associated with more violence from women than
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: from men. So most of that is also female initiated.
• 1:18:56
  Speaker 1: And again, like I said, women do not mature as
• 1:19:01
  Speaker 1: much as men do when it comes to violence, and
• 1:19:03
  Speaker 1: so they don't learn to control their violence. So they
• 1:19:05
  Speaker 1: do have a habit of pushing men into corners, backing
• 1:19:10
  Speaker 1: men up against the wall, poking, prodding, yelling, hitting and
• 1:19:16
  Speaker 1: generally getting into a man's space until he snaps and
• 1:19:20
  Speaker 1: defends himself and then playing victim. And because of that,
• 1:19:26
  Speaker 1: you know, we have this idea that there's a huge
• 1:19:30
  Speaker 1: amount of only female victims of domestic violence, when in fact,
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: that's a traumatic experience having somebody back you up against
• 1:19:38
  Speaker 1: the wall, stick a finger in your chest repeatedly, and
• 1:19:42
  Speaker 1: then start slapping you and hitting you, even if it's
• 1:19:46
  Speaker 1: not doing significant damage, even if they're not good at it,
• 1:19:51
  Speaker 1: it is a traumatic experience, and eventually you do lose
• 1:19:58
  Speaker 1: control of your ability to to refrain from striking back
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 1: or lashing out, or pushing them away, and even just
• 1:20:07
  Speaker 1: a little push to push someone away who is doing
• 1:20:10
  Speaker 1: that to you. If you're a man and a person
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: who is attacking you as female, that can get you
• 1:20:16
  Speaker 1: sent to jail, even if you're covered in bruises and
• 1:20:20
  Speaker 1: she's completely uninjured. Hey, David Lowboy says, what did you say?
• 1:20:28
  Speaker 1: I couldn't hear you. I've an inner ear in function.
• 1:20:32
  Speaker 1: It's the yeast of my problems and now I must
• 1:20:34
  Speaker 1: finger it out. That's great. Recently we've talked about their
• 1:20:43
  Speaker 1: digital violence threats and safety. This is a big deal
• 1:20:47
  Speaker 1: for me, right, This is a major thing. You and
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 1: women and other feminist groups when they talk about this,
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: they'll say digital threats, and they'll say threats that lead
• 1:21:06
  Speaker 1: to real world violence. But then when you look at
• 1:21:10
  Speaker 1: what they want censored, it's not threats. It's not anything
• 1:21:16
  Speaker 1: that leads to real world violence. It's men saying things like,
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 1: you know, women should get back in the kitchen, which is,
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 1: you know, nothing happens when a man says that. A
• 1:21:29
  Speaker 1: man can say that all he wants. I just had
• 1:21:31
  Speaker 1: an argument with a guy, a troll that I'm pretty
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 1: sure was just trying to make the men's rights movement
• 1:21:41
  Speaker 1: look bad, some dipshit, and the argument is unfortunately gone
• 1:21:48
  Speaker 1: because the dipshit got really aggressive and got suspended. The
• 1:22:00
  Speaker 1: count seems to be gone. But but essentially this individual
• 1:22:05
  Speaker 1: said every way, shape or form, you know, shut the
• 1:22:08
  Speaker 1: fuck up because you're a woman, get back in the kitchen,
• 1:22:11
  Speaker 1: blah blah blah. And nothing happened to me, literally nothing,
• 1:22:16
  Speaker 1: There was zero impact on me. Well, there was one thing.
• 1:22:19
  Speaker 1: I gained followers. I don't know why. I mouthed off
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 1: to the guy a bunch of times like I didn't really,
• 1:22:28
  Speaker 1: you know, I made fun of him.
• 1:22:29
  Speaker 2: For his.
• 1:22:31
  Speaker 1: Stereotypical you know, like this, this was I'm pretty I'm
• 1:22:37
  Speaker 1: pretty sure this was a feminist trying to create click
• 1:22:43
  Speaker 1: uh not clickbait, but uh quote mining opportunities, and nobody
• 1:22:55
  Speaker 1: bit nobody jumped in and defended this individual because nobody
• 1:23:00
  Speaker 1: in the men's rights movement actually talks like that to anybody.
• 1:23:04
  Speaker 1: It's not it's not a normal behavior, right, and it
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 1: was it's funny, you know, and it might be done
• 1:23:12
  Speaker 1: as a joke, but it's not really, it's not a
• 1:23:16
  Speaker 1: real behavior. Nobody does that.
• 1:23:18
  Speaker 2: It's like I was saying earlier in the show about
• 1:23:20
  Speaker 2: how the UN does nothing but speech, but speech can
• 1:23:26
  Speaker 2: lead to actions. And I know that kind of makes
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 2: me sound like I'm I'm one of these feminist snowflakes
• 1:23:36
  Speaker 2: is talking about how speech leads to violence. But it's,
• 1:23:43
  Speaker 2: like I said, it's a matter of scale, Like, do
• 1:23:48
  Speaker 2: we have educational institutions in which men's misogynistic speech leads
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 2: to violence against I don't think we do. I don't
• 1:24:02
  Speaker 2: think we do across the entire educational industry, if you
• 1:24:08
  Speaker 2: can call it that, and the entire media industry, if
• 1:24:13
  Speaker 2: you can call it that we don't have speech that
• 1:24:18
  Speaker 2: leads men to deal violence to women. Every effort has
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 2: been made across all of these sectors to make sure
• 1:24:28
  Speaker 2: that men's speech does not lead to men's violence, but
• 1:24:34
  Speaker 2: no effort has been made to prevent women's speech from
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 2: leading to violence against men. The very idea of women's
• 1:24:43
  Speaker 2: violence against men has been rendered as nothing but a fantasy.
• 1:24:49
  Speaker 2: But it's not. It is not a fantasy. Women's violence
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 2: against men is just as much as a reality as
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 2: it's always been. But the efforts of our education system
• 1:25:03
  Speaker 2: and our media system has has has only presented as
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 2: a smoke screen, as as this effort two to present
• 1:25:16
  Speaker 2: this idea that women are never violent against men, whereas
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 2: they are are there, and it's a problem, and it's
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 2: always been a problem. And if all you do is
• 1:25:33
  Speaker 2: pretend that it's not a problem, you're only just going
• 1:25:35
  Speaker 2: to make it worse. And that and that is indeed
• 1:25:39
  Speaker 2: what has happened. We're sort of programmed, dare I say,
• 1:25:46
  Speaker 2: evolutionary programmed to make sure that all violence is exacted
• 1:25:53
  Speaker 2: against men, because men are the appropriate recipients of violence,
• 1:26:01
  Speaker 2: whether it be from men or women. And and and
• 1:26:06
  Speaker 2: that women don't do violence. There's no such thing as
• 1:26:10
  Speaker 2: female violence, especially not female violence against men. And the
• 1:26:17
  Speaker 2: efforts of U n women or in the UN or
• 1:26:20
  Speaker 2: indeed any given government, or indeed any given affectation of modernity,
• 1:26:28
  Speaker 2: it's it's all just been an effort to pretend that
• 1:26:36
  Speaker 2: violence by women against men it's just not a thing,
• 1:26:40
  Speaker 2: and so we don't need to worry about it, and
• 1:26:44
  Speaker 2: so it keeps happening, and so it keeps it keeps happening.
• 1:26:47
  Speaker 2: And so when women are violent against men, and indeed
• 1:26:52
  Speaker 2: women are violent against boys of the youngest of all ages,
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 2: it just keeps happening. And the consequences of that violence
• 1:27:06
  Speaker 2: I just blamed on men. And and here we have it.
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 2: We have generational violence of women against men. And because
• 1:27:19
  Speaker 2: it's never acknowledged as a thing that happens, it's just
• 1:27:23
  Speaker 2: a thing that keeps happening, and no effort is ever
• 1:27:27
  Speaker 2: made to prevent it from happening. Every effort is made,
• 1:27:35
  Speaker 2: every effort is made to prevent men from being violent
• 1:27:38
  Speaker 2: against women. And yes, yeah, that's a good idea. Men
• 1:27:43
  Speaker 2: shouldn't be violent against women, and God bless everyone from
• 1:27:47
  Speaker 2: making sure that doesn't happen. But it will be awesome
• 1:27:51
  Speaker 2: if at the same time some effort was made to
• 1:27:54
  Speaker 2: prevent women from being violent against men and boys. But
• 1:27:59
  Speaker 2: so effort has not been made, and we found ourselves
• 1:28:04
  Speaker 2: with this dare I say, pipeline of men and boys
• 1:28:10
  Speaker 2: who have had violence exacted upon them, And so those
• 1:28:17
  Speaker 2: men and boys exact violence upon whoever happens to be
• 1:28:21
  Speaker 2: in their general vicinity, And who happens to be in
• 1:28:25
  Speaker 2: their general vicinity is women, because they happened to have
• 1:28:30
  Speaker 2: been raised in single mother families. And all anyone can
• 1:28:35
  Speaker 2: do about this is go, well, well, look, men are
• 1:28:38
  Speaker 2: being violent. Men and boys are being violent against women
• 1:28:42
  Speaker 2: because they've been raised in environments where the only thing
• 1:28:46
  Speaker 2: in their general vicinity is women. Well maybe that's the problem.
• 1:28:51
  Speaker 2: Maybe yeah, If you didn't deprive men and boys of
• 1:29:00
  Speaker 2: anything but women, then there will be some violence against anyone.
• 1:29:08
  Speaker 1: But well, or there might be less violence in general,
• 1:29:12
  Speaker 1: because boys who are raised in homes with active fathers,
• 1:29:19
  Speaker 1: with involved fathers are less likely to get into trouble
• 1:29:23
  Speaker 1: with the law. They're less likely to engage in violence.
• 1:29:27
  Speaker 1: But one of the worst aspects of female violence against men,
• 1:29:31
  Speaker 1: in my opinion, is proxy violence, and it's it becomes
• 1:29:37
  Speaker 1: easily disguised as male violence because women will use male
• 1:29:43
  Speaker 1: guynocentrism and male loyalty to any particular woman, or they
• 1:29:50
  Speaker 1: will use law enforcement. And so this this thing about
• 1:29:56
  Speaker 1: digital threats for instance, Now this one tweet that they've
• 1:30:04
  Speaker 1: highlighted here is about journalists, right, But the articles that
• 1:30:10
  Speaker 1: we've read in the past on HBr talk that you
• 1:30:17
  Speaker 1: and women have published and other feminist organizations have published
• 1:30:22
  Speaker 1: trying to impose censorship on social media in women's name,
• 1:30:29
  Speaker 1: what they've basically stated is that they want the ability
• 1:30:34
  Speaker 1: to get people arrested for saying things that feminist de misogynistic.
• 1:30:41
  Speaker 1: And if you want to know the long list of
• 1:30:45
  Speaker 1: things that feminist dem misogynistic, you don't look at what
• 1:30:49
  Speaker 1: they say on x about their words leading to violence,
• 1:30:54
  Speaker 1: where you know, you say, somebody says I'm going to
• 1:30:56
  Speaker 1: come to your house and do X y zu, and
• 1:30:58
  Speaker 1: then they do it. You look at what they put
• 1:31:01
  Speaker 1: into their research. They have a questionnaire they use to
• 1:31:09
  Speaker 1: measure different types of sexism, like different questionnaires actually for
• 1:31:14
  Speaker 1: different types of sexism, and one of them is on
• 1:31:19
  Speaker 1: sexism that you don't necessarily think of as sexism, like
• 1:31:23
  Speaker 1: benevolent sexism or another one is on I think they
• 1:31:27
  Speaker 1: don't use the word inherent sexism. It's something like that,
• 1:31:30
  Speaker 1: though it's a sexism, that is, it flies below your radar, right,
• 1:31:37
  Speaker 1: And they would include things like if you say women
• 1:31:42
  Speaker 1: do bad things, right, they have a list of bad
• 1:31:45
  Speaker 1: things that people do, both men and women, and they'll
• 1:31:49
  Speaker 1: make a statement true or false women do this thing. Well, yeah,
• 1:31:53
  Speaker 1: sometimes women do that thing. So you say, yes, you're sexist, right,
• 1:31:59
  Speaker 1: because they've stated it as a stereotype. They didn't say
• 1:32:04
  Speaker 1: all women, they didn't say most women, they didn't say
• 1:32:07
  Speaker 1: some women. They just said women. And you answered yes,
• 1:32:12
  Speaker 1: because to answer no would mean that women never do
• 1:32:16
  Speaker 1: that thing, and you know that some women do, but
• 1:32:19
  Speaker 1: they take it as you saying that that thing is
• 1:32:22
  Speaker 1: characteristic of being female, that men don't do it, but
• 1:32:25
  Speaker 1: women do, and therefore your sexist because of the way
• 1:32:30
  Speaker 1: they interpret your answer. So that's essentially like if you
• 1:32:38
  Speaker 1: criticize the fact that mothers are more likely to be
• 1:32:43
  Speaker 1: child abusers than fathers, If you point out that seventy
• 1:32:48
  Speaker 1: percent of children who are abused to death by one
• 1:32:56
  Speaker 1: parent acting without the other are killed by their mothers,
• 1:33:01
  Speaker 1: not their fathers. If you point that out online. They
• 1:33:03
  Speaker 1: consider that sexist. It's true, it's a fact, but it's
• 1:33:10
  Speaker 1: sexist because you're talking, you're criticizing women. They consider it
• 1:33:15
  Speaker 1: woman bashing to acknowledge that people who do bad things
• 1:33:21
  Speaker 1: can be female, and being female doesn't make it okay
• 1:33:27
  Speaker 1: to do those bad things, and that we should consider
• 1:33:34
  Speaker 1: perpetrators of bad things to still be dangerous and in
• 1:33:40
  Speaker 1: need of reformation even if they are women. Right, those
• 1:33:47
  Speaker 1: kinds of statements they would want you arrested for. Arrest
• 1:33:53
  Speaker 1: is violent by its nature. You are being forcibly kidnapped
• 1:34:03
  Speaker 1: and stuck in a cage when you get arrested. So
• 1:34:07
  Speaker 1: it's something that our society should only reserve for circumstances
• 1:34:11
  Speaker 1: when the individual being targeted with it is a real
• 1:34:16
  Speaker 1: present threat to the community and cannot that threat cannot
• 1:34:22
  Speaker 1: be abated in some other way. But they want you
• 1:34:29
  Speaker 1: arrested for saying that women can be mean, that women
• 1:34:34
  Speaker 1: can be bitches right, that women can be dishonest, that
• 1:34:40
  Speaker 1: women can lie, and that women can use lives to
• 1:34:44
  Speaker 1: hurt other people, That other people can face consequences when
• 1:34:48
  Speaker 1: a woman lies, and that those other people who face
• 1:34:52
  Speaker 1: those consequences when a woman lies deserves that, they deserve
• 1:34:58
  Speaker 1: reparations that they deserve for that woman to face repercussions,
• 1:35:02
  Speaker 1: and they deserve to have as much repair done to
• 1:35:07
  Speaker 1: their lives as possible by the community, because the community
• 1:35:14
  Speaker 1: is the instrument that the woman used to hurt them
• 1:35:16
  Speaker 1: when she lied. Just saying that, they want you to
• 1:35:20
  Speaker 1: be arrested for that. They want you to be arrested
• 1:35:24
  Speaker 1: for noticing women's body shape. If you don't like fat chicks,
• 1:35:32
  Speaker 1: or if you don't like women with big tits or
• 1:35:34
  Speaker 1: small tits or whatever, you like big butts and you
• 1:35:37
  Speaker 1: cannot lie, or you hate big butts and you cannot lie.
• 1:35:40
  Speaker 1: They want you arrested for saying it. Not for breaking
• 1:35:46
  Speaker 1: into somebody's house and stealing their stuff at risk of
• 1:35:49
  Speaker 1: their life and limb. Not for beating people up on
• 1:35:52
  Speaker 1: the street, Not for throwing bricks through windows and stealing
• 1:35:55
  Speaker 1: from stores because something happened in another state that you have, uh,
• 1:36:01
  Speaker 1: some means of playing victim of Nope, Nope. Just if
• 1:36:05
  Speaker 1: you say bitches be crazy, or just if you say
• 1:36:14
  Speaker 1: you know Amy Amy Schumer's new bikini pictures are ugly. Yeah,
• 1:36:22
  Speaker 1: any of those statements, you're you're being threatened with being
• 1:36:28
  Speaker 1: targeted for arrest. So the idea that defunding you and women,
• 1:36:32
  Speaker 1: I'm sure there are going to be a lot of
• 1:36:33
  Speaker 1: feminists out there. There will be hate, and there will
• 1:36:36
  Speaker 1: be weeping and gnashing of teeth, and maybe in a
• 1:36:40
  Speaker 1: future show will will show some of that if it
• 1:36:42
  Speaker 1: if it's entertaining enough. But I want you to remember
• 1:36:47
  Speaker 1: when you see upcoming complaints about the United States ceasing
• 1:36:54
  Speaker 1: to fund this organization, that what they have stopped funding
• 1:37:00
  Speaker 1: is an organization that has been pushing for you to
• 1:37:03
  Speaker 1: get arrested. If you advocate that women should go to
• 1:37:10
  Speaker 1: jail for lying to the police about being raped and
• 1:37:15
  Speaker 1: getting a man put in jail on a basis of
• 1:37:18
  Speaker 1: those lies.
• 1:37:22
  Speaker 2: If women complain along the lines of but you and
• 1:37:26
  Speaker 2: women were doing things, and we can say to them, no,
• 1:37:29
  Speaker 2: you and women was never doing anything. All it was
• 1:37:32
  Speaker 2: ever doing was saying things, and and women will say,
• 1:37:37
  Speaker 2: but we wanted them to say those things, and we'd
• 1:37:41
  Speaker 2: be like, yeah, but saying things isn't the same as
• 1:37:45
  Speaker 2: doing things, And then they'll say no, saying things can
• 1:37:49
  Speaker 2: result in doing things, and I'd be like, yeah, well,
• 1:37:53
  Speaker 2: all right. That was the point that I was making
• 1:37:56
  Speaker 2: a lot earlier on in the show. But we're sat
• 1:38:01
  Speaker 2: here dreaming of a world in which saying things isn't
• 1:38:06
  Speaker 2: necessarily doing things. Doing things is doing things, and saying
• 1:38:12
  Speaker 2: things are saying things. And yes, there should be some
• 1:38:14
  Speaker 2: kind of crossover, but that crossover shouldn't involve the likes
• 1:38:22
  Speaker 2: of UN women, Like obviously there's always going to be,
• 1:38:27
  Speaker 2: you know, we start by saying things and then we've
• 1:38:30
  Speaker 2: finished by doing things. But it shouldn't have to be
• 1:38:35
  Speaker 2: filtered through an institution as evil as UN women or
• 1:38:43
  Speaker 2: as the UN in general, like these these middle men,
• 1:38:50
  Speaker 2: and I say middle men quite ironically, what I should
• 1:38:53
  Speaker 2: be saying middle women, These middle women shouldn't exist in
• 1:38:59
  Speaker 2: the first place, because they only serve to muddy the
• 1:39:03
  Speaker 2: waters between saying things and doing things. Because because it's
• 1:39:10
  Speaker 2: all the UN has ever done, has has has taken
• 1:39:15
  Speaker 2: the saying things and fuck it up beyond beyond all
• 1:39:20
  Speaker 2: recognition before it can ever become doing things. It's it's
• 1:39:26
  Speaker 2: it's it's just it's just been there too to prevent
• 1:39:32
  Speaker 2: important things from being done for the sake of unimportant
• 1:39:38
  Speaker 2: things being said. And that is that's the gender dynamic.
• 1:39:46
  Speaker 2: In a nutshell. Women just want things to be said.
• 1:39:49
  Speaker 2: Men want things to be done. Yeah, And the the
• 1:39:53
  Speaker 2: the shite state of affairs in which we found ourselves
• 1:39:57
  Speaker 2: is largely because we've been we've been under the rubric
• 1:40:03
  Speaker 2: of women. He just want things to be said at
• 1:40:06
  Speaker 2: the expense of men who actually want things to be done.
• 1:40:11
  Speaker 1: And we have to recognize a difference too. There's a massive,
• 1:40:17
  Speaker 1: over overarching difference something that it's almost ridiculous. It is ridiculous,
• 1:40:25
  Speaker 1: honestly that people ignore it. The difference between some some
• 1:40:28
  Speaker 1: rando on social media telling some other rando on social
• 1:40:32
  Speaker 1: media like me, shut the fuck up, bitch, get back
• 1:40:34
  Speaker 1: in the kitchen, which has literally zero impact on my life.
• 1:40:39
  Speaker 1: Somebody can say that in a minute later, I'm watching
• 1:40:42
  Speaker 1: TV with my husband and potato chips, big fat, hairy deal, right,
• 1:40:45
  Speaker 1: and somebody walking into a congressman's office and bringing in
• 1:40:50
  Speaker 1: a bunch of mocked up fake statistics and saying we
• 1:40:54
  Speaker 1: have an emergency. You have to change the law so
• 1:40:57
  Speaker 1: that women can can can can and get a conviction
• 1:41:02
  Speaker 1: in cases where they've accused a man of certain types
• 1:41:06
  Speaker 1: of crime without having to present any evidence, and they
• 1:41:11
  Speaker 1: can't be cross examined fully because it might embarrass them.
• 1:41:16
  Speaker 1: And the congressman goes, okay, you know that speech is
• 1:41:23
  Speaker 1: lobbying and it's actual setting things in motion. It's Rube
• 1:41:28
  Speaker 1: Goldberg's speech where an effect happens on the lives of individuals.
• 1:41:35
  Speaker 1: A man who goes to jail because it doesn't take
• 1:41:40
  Speaker 1: evidence to prove that he committed a crime in terms
• 1:41:45
  Speaker 1: of the court making a decision, and he's also not
• 1:41:50
  Speaker 1: allowed to introduce some of his exculpatory evidence, and he's
• 1:41:53
  Speaker 1: not allowed to cross examine the accuser as effectively as
• 1:42:00
  Speaker 1: he would be if the accuser claimed that he broke
• 1:42:03
  Speaker 1: into her car and stole it. And so he goes
• 1:42:07
  Speaker 1: to jail for those reasons, and not because he actually
• 1:42:10
  Speaker 1: committed a crime and it was demonstrably proved by physical
• 1:42:15
  Speaker 1: evidence that showed him committing the crime, or that placed
• 1:42:19
  Speaker 1: him at the scene and so on. He is a
• 1:42:24
  Speaker 1: victim of that speech. He is a victim of that lobbying,
• 1:42:29
  Speaker 1: and he is a victim of the congressman listening. Like
• 1:42:34
  Speaker 1: when they use lies to get laws passed that allow
• 1:42:38
  Speaker 1: them to use lies to destroy your life. That speech
• 1:42:42
  Speaker 1: is an actual threat that is dangerous. And if somebody
• 1:42:48
  Speaker 1: were to say there have been a couple instances where
• 1:42:51
  Speaker 1: somebody has online has said they were going to come
• 1:42:54
  Speaker 1: get me or do things to me. One person published
• 1:42:58
  Speaker 1: my address and a bunch of other addresses that were
• 1:43:00
  Speaker 1: previously associated with my name, but I didn't live there anymore,
• 1:43:05
  Speaker 1: and you know, I filed police reports and emphasized that
• 1:43:10
  Speaker 1: I don't think anything's going to happen, but if something does,
• 1:43:14
  Speaker 1: now you have this, and so you know that there's
• 1:43:18
  Speaker 1: not going to be a big investigation. The cops aren't
• 1:43:20
  Speaker 1: going to waste their time on it. But then if
• 1:43:23
  Speaker 1: something happens to me, they have a thread to follow.
• 1:43:28
  Speaker 1: But in terms of actual you know, that's like one
• 1:43:35
  Speaker 1: in a billion things that people have said to me online,
• 1:43:39
  Speaker 1: and for the most part, none of it has any
• 1:43:41
  Speaker 1: impact on me. Actually laughed at the guy that published
• 1:43:44
  Speaker 1: my address, made fun of him, because it's not like
• 1:43:48
  Speaker 1: anybody else couldn't have found it if they wanted it.
• 1:43:51
  Speaker 1: That stuff is your address. Every single person that's listening
• 1:43:55
  Speaker 1: right now, your address is available for ninety nine sense
• 1:44:00
  Speaker 1: on one of of hundreds of websites, any one of
• 1:44:07
  Speaker 1: hundreds of websites that sell that information. But in any case, yeah,
• 1:44:14
  Speaker 1: there's there's a humongous difference between somebody saying something like
• 1:44:19
  Speaker 1: that and then doing nothing right, versus somebody going to
• 1:44:25
  Speaker 1: the police and lying and getting you arrested, or somebody
• 1:44:29
  Speaker 1: going to your politicians, your your legislators and lying and
• 1:44:35
  Speaker 1: getting laws passed that result and a lot of people
• 1:44:38
  Speaker 1: getting wrongly arrested. That's that's the speech that we should
• 1:44:42
  Speaker 1: be looking at and controlling. And the reason is because
• 1:44:47
  Speaker 1: not because freedom of speech shouldn't be absolute, but because
• 1:44:53
  Speaker 1: regardless of your ability to own something right like a
• 1:44:57
  Speaker 1: car or a swimming pool or a gun, you're liable
• 1:45:03
  Speaker 1: for the actions that you take with it, and if
• 1:45:06
  Speaker 1: you use it as a weapon to do damage to
• 1:45:09
  Speaker 1: another person wrongfully, then you're liable for that action. So
• 1:45:16
  Speaker 1: it's not the fact that you used your speech, it's
• 1:45:18
  Speaker 1: the fact that you attacked another person wrongfully and did harm.
• 1:45:23
  Speaker 1: That's where that speech should be controlled. Just saying something
• 1:45:28
  Speaker 1: shitty to somebody online. The government shouldn't get involved in that.
• 1:45:33
  Speaker 1: But that's what you and women wants. They want you
• 1:45:35
  Speaker 1: to not be able to contradict them so that they
• 1:45:37
  Speaker 1: can go to their politicians with mora lies and get
• 1:45:41
  Speaker 1: more laws passed that allow women to get you arrested
• 1:45:46
  Speaker 1: on the basis of lies without facing repercussions and without
• 1:45:51
  Speaker 1: you having any recourse.
• 1:45:54
  Speaker 2: And yeah, for anyone who's given me the obvious response
• 1:46:01
  Speaker 2: of but doctor adabacabat, all you do is say things.
• 1:46:05
  Speaker 2: You just sit here online like shouting a bunch of things.
• 1:46:09
  Speaker 2: And I'm like, yes, yes, i am no better than
• 1:46:12
  Speaker 2: a woman, like I'm no better than than some man
• 1:46:18
  Speaker 2: who just barks a bunch of shit. Yeah, I never
• 1:46:20
  Speaker 2: pretended to be otherwise. I'm not a politician. I'm not
• 1:46:23
  Speaker 2: a great man of history. I am someone who who
• 1:46:28
  Speaker 2: decided from quite an early age that all I'm gonna
• 1:46:31
  Speaker 2: do is yell a bunch of shit. And you know,
• 1:46:34
  Speaker 2: I never pretended otherwise.
• 1:46:37
  Speaker 1: I'm I'm at least you're not lying.
• 1:46:41
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm I'm not I'm never going to be a politician.
• 1:46:44
  Speaker 2: But I'm I'm here to to tell people that, you know,
• 1:46:50
  Speaker 2: men should be politicians. I'm here to it to enforce
• 1:46:55
  Speaker 2: the idea that certain people should be the great men
• 1:46:59
  Speaker 2: of history and certain people should not. I should not
• 1:47:02
  Speaker 2: be one of the great men of history. I'm just
• 1:47:05
  Speaker 2: one of these goblins sat in the background yelling things
• 1:47:09
  Speaker 2: at people. And I'm like, I'm letting women know that's
• 1:47:15
  Speaker 2: what you should be too. I'm letting men know that's
• 1:47:19
  Speaker 2: what you should be too if you're one of the
• 1:47:24
  Speaker 2: the ninety fifth percentile of people, and that includes like
• 1:47:30
  Speaker 2: rock stars and intellectual blowhards who are only ever going
• 1:47:38
  Speaker 2: to sit here like yelling their political opinions at people
• 1:47:43
  Speaker 2: like that's fine, that's the best that most of us
• 1:47:48
  Speaker 2: can achieve. Well, the best that most of us can
• 1:47:50
  Speaker 2: achieve is just being a blue collar worker, just keeping
• 1:47:55
  Speaker 2: the infrastructure of our society going. And you know, I'm
• 1:48:03
  Speaker 2: not here acting like I'm one of one of the
• 1:48:06
  Speaker 2: great men of history. I'm just here doing what I can,
• 1:48:10
  Speaker 2: doing what I can do to nudge the great men
• 1:48:12
  Speaker 2: of history. And I'm just I'm just telling the great
• 1:48:16
  Speaker 2: men of history that you shouldn't fucking simp for women,
• 1:48:20
  Speaker 2: because there are very few women who are gonna be
• 1:48:26
  Speaker 2: the great women of history. And as it happens, I
• 1:48:29
  Speaker 2: work with a few of those women. Like I'm I
• 1:48:34
  Speaker 2: live out in some hope that the women I work
• 1:48:37
  Speaker 2: with here a hand in Badger Radio might one day
• 1:48:39
  Speaker 2: be recognized as as some of the smartest people who
• 1:48:44
  Speaker 2: who ever lived. And and I'm not even joking. I
• 1:48:49
  Speaker 2: am Hannah and Alison and Karen are some of the
• 1:48:55
  Speaker 2: smartest people who ever lived. But they're not going to
• 1:48:58
  Speaker 2: get statues bill of them. They're just gonna sit here
• 1:49:02
  Speaker 2: like going, you're a you're a bunch of fucking idiots,
• 1:49:05
  Speaker 2: And this is this is how you should do things differently.
• 1:49:08
  Speaker 2: And what you should do is stop fucking simping for women,
• 1:49:12
  Speaker 2: stop fucking simping for outsiders, you know what I mean? Yeah,
• 1:49:19
  Speaker 2: just just fucking get get back to what you know
• 1:49:21
  Speaker 2: is obviously true. And yeah, this is what this is
• 1:49:25
  Speaker 2: what some of us are here to do. We're just
• 1:49:27
  Speaker 2: we're just normal people. We're just simple men and women
• 1:49:31
  Speaker 2: just telling you to fucking do what you know to
• 1:49:34
  Speaker 2: be true. And that's that's all we were ever here
• 1:49:37
  Speaker 2: to do. We're just here to remind you to give
• 1:49:41
  Speaker 2: yourself permission to believe what you already believe, what what
• 1:49:46
  Speaker 2: your ancestors already believed for the longest time, and just
• 1:49:53
  Speaker 2: to to.
• 1:49:53
  Speaker 1: Fucking to not believe something just because it's politically correct.
• 1:49:59
  Speaker 2: Rather do away with this political with with with this
• 1:50:04
  Speaker 2: ship we call politically correct. There's obviously euphemism. Just do
• 1:50:08
  Speaker 2: away with this with whatever we refer to by these
• 1:50:15
  Speaker 2: euphemisms like progressive and politically correct and social justice and
• 1:50:20
  Speaker 2: woke and all this bullshit. It's it's it's just new
• 1:50:28
  Speaker 2: for the sake of being new. It was never gonna work.
• 1:50:31
  Speaker 2: It was always bullshit. Just give yourself permission to believe
• 1:50:39
  Speaker 2: what you always believed. That's all it is.
• 1:50:44
  Speaker 1: And I will bulk at the idea that I'm like
• 1:50:48
  Speaker 1: super smart. I know I've had a Q test that
• 1:50:51
  Speaker 1: have like put me way up there and everything.
• 1:50:53
  Speaker 2: But that's exactly what a super smart person was saying.
• 1:50:58
  Speaker 1: Hannah, stop, You're very kind, but I want you to remember,
• 1:51:03
  Speaker 1: you know, even though you know we've we've examined a
• 1:51:06
  Speaker 1: lot of things that maybe people don't look at too
• 1:51:10
  Speaker 1: deeply most of the time. When it comes down to
• 1:51:16
  Speaker 1: men's rights and the topic itself and the aspects of
• 1:51:22
  Speaker 1: the topic that the various ideas surrounding the topic, there
• 1:51:29
  Speaker 1: isn't anything that I've talked about that is breaking some
• 1:51:33
  Speaker 1: new genius ground. This is all just common sense. People
• 1:51:38
  Speaker 1: already know this stuff all right. People are already aware
• 1:51:43
  Speaker 1: that all human beings are human. So when I point
• 1:51:48
  Speaker 1: out that all human beings are human, it's not a
• 1:51:52
  Speaker 1: genius move. It's me being flabbergasted that it has to
• 1:51:56
  Speaker 1: be said. Why do people not understand that men are
• 1:52:01
  Speaker 1: as human as women? Why is it that when I
• 1:52:05
  Speaker 1: say on on social media a line like that men
• 1:52:08
  Speaker 1: are just as human as women, that I will get
• 1:52:10
  Speaker 1: people pushing back on that idea, an idea that is
• 1:52:18
  Speaker 1: fundamentally true and ridiculously simple, right, not something out there
• 1:52:28
  Speaker 1: or up there. And I think the reason isn't because
• 1:52:32
  Speaker 1: most people are stupid. I think the reason is because
• 1:52:35
  Speaker 1: most people have been brainwashed into a level of KINDNESC
• 1:52:38
  Speaker 1: centrism that is crippling. And it's it's a different type
• 1:52:44
  Speaker 1: of stupid. It's not the low IQ stupid. It's you
• 1:52:49
  Speaker 1: have shut off important parts of your brain stupid. And
• 1:52:55
  Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not brilliant for recognize things that are
• 1:53:03
  Speaker 1: simple and true. I'm just pissed off that everybody else
• 1:53:08
  Speaker 1: doesn't also recognize these things. Where I'm at should be
• 1:53:14
  Speaker 1: the baseline, not the top. The things that I say
• 1:53:19
  Speaker 1: are things that should be very easy for people to recognize,
• 1:53:25
  Speaker 1: very easy for people to understand, very easy for people
• 1:53:28
  Speaker 1: to accept because they're true, not some stardust level reaches
• 1:53:37
  Speaker 1: of philosophy. And it frustrates me, You know, I don't.
• 1:53:45
  Speaker 1: I'm not mad about the compliment. Obviously, everybody likes getting
• 1:53:50
  Speaker 1: compliments and it, Like I said, it is very kind
• 1:53:52
  Speaker 1: of you to call me brilliant or smart or whatever.
• 1:53:56
  Speaker 1: But I don't think I've done anything remarkable, and it
• 1:54:00
  Speaker 1: shouldn't be remarkable. Nothing I've done should be remarkable. I
• 1:54:08
  Speaker 1: am where normal should be, and it's it's a problem
• 1:54:15
  Speaker 1: that normal isn't there. And that's that's basically I think
• 1:54:23
  Speaker 1: a solid description of the majority of the men's rights movement.
• 1:54:28
  Speaker 1: We are where normal should be. We recognize things that
• 1:54:32
  Speaker 1: should be normal, to recognize that if something is a
• 1:54:37
  Speaker 1: human right, that it should apply to both sexes equally,
• 1:54:41
  Speaker 1: That the color of your skin shouldn't determine whether or
• 1:54:44
  Speaker 1: not it's recognized in regard to your life, that that
• 1:54:50
  Speaker 1: it's respected by the law and protected by the law.
• 1:54:55
  Speaker 2: Right.
• 1:54:56
  Speaker 1: These are not cosmic con This is very down to
• 1:55:02
  Speaker 1: earth stuff, and it makes me sad that we don't
• 1:55:08
  Speaker 1: have more very down to earth people. But I am
• 1:55:13
  Speaker 1: very happy that it's improving. The fact that the President
• 1:55:19
  Speaker 1: of the United States recognized that that an organization that
• 1:55:26
  Speaker 1: exists solely to capitalize on on social guynocentrism in the
• 1:55:35
  Speaker 1: world in women's victim points by getting laws passed to
• 1:55:42
  Speaker 1: fund initiatives that they can then capitalize on, and by
• 1:55:49
  Speaker 1: by taking grants from various countries to do things that
• 1:55:54
  Speaker 1: that don't need done. That that's a big stuck up
• 1:56:00
  Speaker 1: forward in my opinion. It's a very big step forward.
• 1:56:04
  Speaker 1: And the fact that their use of social guides centrism
• 1:56:08
  Speaker 1: is a shield didn't stop him from defunding them is huge, huge.
• 1:56:18
  Speaker 1: But it's time to move on to the after show
• 1:56:22
  Speaker 1: nine o'clock and I do have to work tonight. We
• 1:56:26
  Speaker 1: might find more to discuss about this next week, or
• 1:56:31
  Speaker 1: we might get back to us AIDS. I was prepared
• 1:56:35
  Speaker 1: if we needed to go back to us AIDS tonight,
• 1:56:38
  Speaker 1: but we don't.
• 1:56:40
  Speaker 2: So.
• 1:56:42
  Speaker 1: We'll see what happens. I'll look more at this article
• 1:56:45
  Speaker 1: because there's there's some interesting stuff here. But the main
• 1:56:52
  Speaker 1: thing I would say is this to me is a big,
• 1:56:57
  Speaker 1: big white pill. It's not the biggest white pill, it's
• 1:57:02
  Speaker 1: not the best white pill, but I'm happy as hell
• 1:57:05
  Speaker 1: about it anyway. It's a nice late Christmas present. Thanks
• 1:57:09
  Speaker 1: everybody for listening. Thanks to my co hosts for going
• 1:57:13
  Speaker 1: through this with me. And discussing this. I'm thanks thanks
• 1:57:17
  Speaker 1: to the President of the United States for putting the
• 1:57:20
  Speaker 1: purse strings on you and women. Thanks to everybody works
• 1:57:25
  Speaker 1: in the background to make HBr talk happen. Goodnight all