Latest / Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems / Once a Person is above a System, it Falls 52024

Transcript

Once a Person is above a System, it Falls 52024 · Talk to Prince Show - Solving World's Problems

• 0:02
  Functional system depends on trust and consistency. For without trust and consistency, the
• 0:18
  system falls apart. A country or a people, or a civilization or a
• 0:33
  way of life succeeds or continues into the future because of a system of trust
• 0:48
  and consistency, and without trust and consistency, systems are on shady grounds.
• 1:07
  A consistent and trustworthy system is a system that believes in its ideals and consistently
• 1:26
  persist in upholding, preserving and promoting that ideal or those ideas, and preventing
• 1:45
  that trust and consistency of trust from falling apart. Nation states, our government
• 2:01
  based on institutions or establishments that are trustworthy and consistent in what such systems it's
• 2:21
  called upon to do basic trust in the system. It's very very important for
• 2:32
  a survivor and continuity and the thing that stands against trust a consistency in the
• 2:50
  system that most systems should always be careful of its corruption and the purchasing and
• 3:07
  group think or a dictatorship of one person, so that the fear that is
• 3:22
  system that is trusted and the intent to becnsistent without trust in the future should
• 3:37
  be very sensitive of making that system to be of one person. The human
• 3:49
  being is a flawed being, and the human being is a sinful being,
• 3:57
  and the human being is a model being. So if a system becomes that
• 4:05
  physical border being, then that system cannot be trustworthy or cannot be trusted in
• 4:14
  the lower that system cannot be consistent in the long run, and that system
• 4:21
  cannot survive in the loner because the human being in its biological form can only
• 4:31
  can only last that long. So systems that survive systems that are trust worthy
• 4:48
  and consistent with such trusts that are not vested in an individual, but vest
• 5:00
  that in instruments of law or fundamental practices that are largely accepted by the people,
• 5:18
  and that is not repugnant to natural or customary justice. So systems should
• 5:30
  remember that, and in humans in themselves, you remember that. That's why
• 5:39
  if you see a system that succeed, like the United States of America,
• 5:49
  you know the system is a system of governance depends on fundamental, unshakable instruments
• 6:05
  like the constitution and the rule of law. The constitution established establishes what the
• 6:17
  system should look like and what should happen if fails to happen, or what
• 6:29
  should happen if b if be or see happens. So a system that doesn't
• 6:40
  depend on one person and that cannot be changed by one person. It's a
• 6:49
  system that survives, a constitutional state that is the follow presidents of power,
• 7:03
  structural dynamics makes and that that follows the the peaceful transfer of power. It's
• 7:18
  bound to be a system that survives. And the trustworthy system and the consistent
• 7:31
  system. It's a system that uses the law and the law enforcement or the
• 7:47
  legislation, the constitution, the constitutional council, the executive branch, h or
• 8:00
  the judiciary to enforce legislatives and implement the laws of the land and are consistent
• 8:18
  in that implementation and not trustworthy by the people. It's very important that if
• 8:33
  a system it's not trustworthy or cannot be trusted, and that system is bound
• 8:45
  to fail. You always remember not to make a country or an entity,
• 8:58
  or even an establishment or an institution to be about a person. It should
• 9:09
  be governed by ideals, by ideologies that are tested and trusted, and such
• 9:20
  ideals should be the driving force that makes a nation to be a nation,
• 9:28
  that makes a people to be a people, and that makes a civilization to
• 9:33
  be a civilization. Trust in a system is very vital for the survival of
• 9:46
  that system, and for there to be trust in the system, that system
• 9:54
  must have been consistent and it's trustworthiness inconsistency. It's not good for a system
• 10:11
  that intends to survive and for that system to be consistent. That system cannot
• 10:24
  be consistent by doing what the people doesn't what the people don't want. That
• 10:33
  system cannot be consistent by being corrupt or napolistic, so system will not survive.
• 10:46
  That system cannot be consistent by being unequal, unjust, unfair, and
• 10:56
  no kind or inhumane and crue to its people. A system that is consistent
• 11:07
  in inhumanity and cruelties or corruption are systems that are constantly fighting for its survivor
• 11:22
  and that are constantly unable to develop themselves. For the people that shall be
• 11:30
  the most developed and the most civilized, are the most stable and futuristic and
• 11:39
  peaceful and sustainable. Are systems that are trustworthy and that are consistent and persistent
• 11:56
  in doing what is right, what is fair, what is just, what
• 12:05
  is humane, and what is compassionate or reasonable to its people and to the
• 12:20
  future of its own being. She always remembered that a country that survives when
• 12:35
  the president or the prime minister or the foreign minister dies is a country that
• 12:45
  only has trustworthy and consistent instruments of peaceful transfer of power, that is respected
• 13:05
  by the people, and that has been tested and proven to be trustworthy.
• 13:16
  If a system cannot hold itself to be dependent to the instruments of its founding
• 13:28
  and to respect the rule of law, then that system is bound to fail.
• 13:37
  Such system we constantly suffer from coud'tas instabilities, violence, onder development,
• 13:52
  poverty, and misery. The one thing that sets the West or the global
• 14:05
  North from the global South is the trustworthiness or consistency or continuity and the trust
• 14:28
  of the rule of law or the trust in the rule of law and the
• 14:37
  accord to a peaceful transfer of power. That's the thing that separated the West
• 14:48
  from anybody else, the Western system and the Western people. I've gone through
• 15:03
  a lot to understand that when the country is about one person like Hitler or
• 15:18
  other detect other dictators like Mussolini and just to name, I feel such systems
• 15:33
  hardly suffice the worse. Equally understood that when if a system depends on the
• 15:41
  king or on the will of a single person, that single person is not
• 15:50
  they know all but the mortal being that it's simple and not that intelligent enough
• 16:04
  to be the god of the nation of a society. So the social the
• 16:14
  social contract when the humans, when humans surrender their rights and freedoms and privileges
• 16:22
  into the hands of the constitution and written and accepted rules and laws. Social
• 16:37
  contracts, if trusted and consistent, makes a better society, makes a better
• 16:47
  human. The health of a society and the wealth of prosperity of the people
• 17:00
  of society, or their longevity of futurism, or their hopes and dreams and
• 17:11
  calls and ambitions, depends on the trust's worthiness of a system in which they
• 17:21
  live, and it depends on the consistency on the peaceful transfer of that trust.
• 17:36
  Remember that if a president dies, a nation to continue because it's not
• 17:48
  about that person. It's about the instruments of governance that is tested and proven
• 17:57
  to be unshakable but solid in its consistency in the peaceful transfer of power.
• 18:11
  It's tested and consistent in the role of law, that no single individual can
• 18:18
  be above the law, no matter how you like an individual, no matter
• 18:26
  how you like a person or dislike a person, don't make your system to
• 18:36
  be about one person. The system that survives. It's not about a person,
• 18:47
  but about a way of life, A way of life that serves the
• 18:52
  people, that strengthened the instruments of governance, that stands with the rule of
• 19:02
  law, that stands for justice, for fairness, for equity and equality to
• 19:15
  all. A system that's not based on this fundamental principles of justice, fairness,
• 19:23
  equity, and equality shall hardly be a system that survives it's rainy days
• 19:34
  or its trial days. Things you are happening to test a system that's all
• 19:44
  geo politics. You're in not being about about testing the trustworthing of a system
• 19:53
  to see what happens if the head of that system is not there. Will
• 20:00
  it fall apart? Will it descend into chaos or civil war of violence?
• 20:11
  I could at are a system that survives the most difficult time to its leadership
• 20:27
  or of its leadership, it's a system that can be trusted. For the
• 20:37
  system to be trusted a consistent that system must be of the people, for
• 20:47
  the people, by the people, to be system that it's designed by the
• 20:55
  people, to serve there people and to continue the history and the sacrifices.
• 21:08
  An endeavor in the endeavors laid down by the blood and death or strives of
• 21:22
  those before them. And if that is not established, or if that is
• 21:30
  not meant to be consistent in such systems are not systems but Fel states.
• 21:38
  A Fel state is a state better of one person, matter of one king,
• 21:45
  a human being that is the dictator to itself and a dictator to the
• 21:51
  people, human being that it is all about. Hain are much about nothing
• 21:59
  when it's then depends on one single individual. It cannot develop itself but serve
• 22:06
  one person. It cannot strengthen itself but strengthen one person. It cannot be
• 22:15
  consistent to the future of itself but consistent in obedience to one person. And
• 22:25
  when that one person dies, everything falls apart, because if it's all about
• 22:32
  one person, then it's all about nothing. It's all about nothing that can
• 22:37
  be passed on, nothing that can be remembered. And we always remember that,
• 22:49
  even in the business or in the family structure. Don't make it to
• 22:59
  be about one person or not really to be a boy a person. Make
• 23:03
  it to be about an idea, something to believe in, something to trust,
• 23:10
  a something bigger or larger than life, something to pass on, something
• 23:18
  to be remembered. Not forgotten, something to be venerated, something to be
• 23:27
  monumentized, something to be history or history or forgot full NICs, but a
• 23:41
  history to be remembered, build something. A nation is something beyond one person.
• 23:52
  A country is something that is only given to the individual, that cannot
• 23:56
  be made by the individual. I should not be about that individual. An
• 24:03
  individual is a beneficiary of a country, is a beneficiary of a trustworthy,
• 24:11
  consistent institution. If you're a president or prime minister of a country, it
• 24:18
  is because of precedents and similar fact evidence that somebody was once there and that
• 24:27
  you took over from that person. I cannot therefore make it to be about
• 24:33
  you, as you destroy that which is meant to serve everybody else. The
• 24:41
  temptation to make the system to be about you is an entropment that ends up
• 24:51
  desjoined a system in itself, and the system should be careful of populace or
• 25:02
  charismatic people or leaders who come into the system with a courtlike personality that blinds
• 25:17
  the people from the truth, or a court like leader, a charismatic person
• 25:26
  who blinds the people from reason, from facts, or from the history of
• 25:34
  continuity, and tempt the people to make the system to bear him, him
• 25:44
  or her. Once a system is about a person and that system is due
• 25:52
  to fail, the system can be about a person who is a symbol of
• 26:03
  the ideals of the system, for he will believe in the system becomes the
• 26:14
  system. But who uses the system to make the system to about him destroys
• 26:25
  that system. If you do love the sister, don't make it to about
• 26:33
  you. Make it to about something beggard than you. If you do love
• 26:40
  the sister, strengthen the system. Strengthen the rule of law, Strengthen the
• 26:51
  priamble of the Constitution and the Constitution itself. Strengthen the positive ways of life.
• 27:02
  Strengthen the humanity of that system. Strengthen the justice of that system.
• 27:11
  Strengthen the fairness of that system. Strengthen the equity in that system. Strengthen
• 27:22
  the equality within that system. Strengthen the meritocrasy of that system. A system
• 27:33
  based on merit is a system meant to survive. And if you do believe
• 27:41
  in the system, you should be scared of that sister. Should do everything
• 27:49
  to venerate that system, to make that system to accept it, to be
• 27:56
  laughed, to be protected and preserved. If you do love the system and
• 28:10
  want the system to survive, Help the system to be good, to be
• 28:18
  kind, to be compassionate, to be empathetic or sympathetic. If you do
• 28:29
  want the system to survive, help the system fight it's worst angels. Help
• 28:40
  the system fight against corruption, against nepotism, against discriminations like racism, sexism,
• 28:49
  pagetry, or caste, or on fairness injustices. If you do love
• 29:02
  the system, I want the system to be trustworthy and consistent. Don't use
• 29:11
  the system or the resources given to you by the system to enrich yourself and
• 29:22
  to help your friends or empower your clique or your gang at the detriment of
• 29:37
  the system itself or the expense of the people. The system that want to
• 29:45
  survive shall foster freedoms, research, education, technologies, invention, innovation,
• 30:03
  engineering, exploration, expeditions. A system that intends to survive and that is
• 30:15
  trustworthy does everything to develop its people, to make its people to be free,
• 30:23
  to be independent, to be self reliant, to be self determined.
• 30:33
  A system that wants to survive or a system that is trustworthy and a system
• 30:38
  that wants to continue promotes petrudism, promotes love for country, and a love
• 30:52
  for country should be loved of the ideals of the country, that we hold
• 30:57
  this should be self evident, that all are created equal, or we hold
• 31:06
  this to be self evidence that in God we trust, or that one nation
• 31:12
  indivisible under God, that we the people, or those slogans or prayambles takes
• 31:22
  away power from one person and gives it and gives it to the people,
• 31:30
  and that people can be replaceable. A system that works cannot depend on one
• 31:40
  person, on one philosophy and one religion or one idea. A system that
• 31:52
  works, or a system that survived that, a system that's trustworthy, a
• 31:57
  system that's passed on. It's a system that is constantly changing itself to be
• 32:02
  better, constantly changing the fundamentals, not destroying it, but constantly amending that
• 32:13
  which works for the better men of all, and keeping consistent the fundamentals that
• 32:22
  if changed, destroy the system itself. We cannot wake up one day and
• 32:32
  just destroy the constitution of America without destroying America itself. You cannot destroy the
• 32:43
  You cannot just destroy change the system of governance without destroying the system itself.
• 32:52
  For a system to change, that change should not come from one person.
• 33:00
  If you don't come from a group of people, even if that powerful,
• 33:06
  unless that change is to serve the system, unless that change is for the
• 33:12
  better men, for the future of that system, unless that change is meant
• 33:19
  to put the system together that in a sunder, or unless that change is
• 33:24
  meant to unite the people, then divide them. Change you come within the
• 33:31
  system, and that change you follow the system of law, a proceeding and
• 33:40
  precedents. That change should be legislative, or that change to be debated,
• 33:50
  that change should be proposed. That change should not be about a person,
• 33:59
  but about the system and the people. And the system that survives it is
• 34:07
  a system that does not believe in laziness, entitlement, and victim A system
• 34:15
  that survives is a system that drills work, positive contribution, and positive activity
• 34:25
  in the minds of the people. A system that survives it is a system
• 34:31
  that rewards hard work, the rewards excellence, the rewards innovation, that rewards
• 34:38
  invention and engineering that encourages race to the town that rays to the bottom.
• 34:52
  A system that survives is a system that price itself and create thing of being
• 35:01
  the best talent. The price itself on science and technologies, the price itself
• 35:09
  on competition, the price itself on merit and not nepothism. Nepotism and corruption
• 35:25
  destroys a system. Nepotism and corruption makes a system to be about one person.
• 35:37
  Once nepotism and corruption survives, the dictatorship takes over. And once dictatorship
• 35:49
  takes over, that system becomes a system of one person or a group of
• 35:57
  people. And as the death of the system itself, think about it.
• 36:07
  Group think destroys the sister. Court of personality soon destroys the sister. The
• 36:23
  system needs to be served in order to be it self. People can,
• 36:31
  people shall go to serve the sister, and those who serve that sister,
• 36:38
  those who strengthen their sister, those who sacrifice their lives for the sister,
• 36:46
  should be used by their sister as an example of reward and veneration. If
• 37:01
  you do sacrifice for the system, the system should use you as a as
• 37:09
  a symbol of good citizens and jury, or as a good example of what
• 37:16
  the system is all about. The system that survives employs the best talent and
• 37:30
  insant device great minds in order to showcase its wealth, developed mind, enrich
• 37:49
  men or flourishment of its people, and civilization, consistency, trustworthiness. It's
• 38:07
  very essential for a system that intends to survive, never make the system to
• 38:15
  be about you. Never make the system to be about one person. Don't
• 38:22
  glorify a person, glorify the system. And those who criticize the system are
• 38:35
  those who help the system to survive. A system that camp that camped,
• 38:44
  or that opposes or suppresses criticisms or objections, it's bound to fail. System
• 39:00
  must promote freedom of expression, freedom for people to express that resentment. A
• 39:09
  system must must give the opportunity for people to object to what it does,
• 39:17
  and the system must be willing to use bad actors as example for what the
• 39:24
  system is against the rule of law, and the person is above the law
• 39:35
  wants to make a person to be above the law. A person is above
• 39:39
  the system. And once a person is above the system, the system itself
• 39:45
  crumples and fails. Remember that