Latest / How Canadian Markets Work / Episode 44: Bonds with Options Attached

Transcript

Episode 44: Bonds with Options Attached · How Canadian Markets Work

0:00
We have a really fascinating stack of source
0:02
notes to dive into today. Oh, yeah, this is a
0:04
good one. It really is. It's drawn directly from
0:08
an exploration of bonds with options attached.
0:11
And specifically, we're looking at notes based
0:13
on episode 44 of How Canadian Markets Work. Right.
0:17
And the mission for this deep dive is custom
0:21
tailored for you, the listener, basically to
0:24
arm you with the real mechanics of the fixed
0:26
income market. Because it's not always as straightforward
0:29
as it looks. Exactly. We're going to decode why
0:32
two identical bonds, you know, issued by the
0:35
exact same company, maturing on the exact same
0:38
day with the exact same credit rating, why they
0:40
can have completely different yields. Yeah, that's
0:42
the big mystery we're unpacking. But before we
0:44
get into like the heavy architecture of all that
0:48
I want you to imagine just for a second that
0:50
you are booking a flight okay I'm with you you're
0:53
scrolling through the options and you see a ticket
0:55
that is just suspiciously cheap like how cheap
0:58
I'm talking half the price of every other airline
1:01
on the exact same route oh I mean I'm buying
1:03
that immediately right of course you are so you
1:05
buy it you pack your bags and you get to the
1:08
gate okay but right as you go to board the gate
1:11
agent stops you and says Oh, sorry. Someone else
1:15
was willing to pay more for this seat at the
1:17
last minute. We're bumping you. Oh, man. But
1:19
hey, enjoy that upfront discount we gave you,
1:21
though. Yeah, that's rough. But you know, that
1:24
discount wasn't actually a gift, was it? No,
1:26
not at all. It was basically a prepayment for
1:29
your eventual inconvenience. You didn't buy a
1:31
standard ticket. You bought a ticket where the
1:34
airline kept the right, like, the option to change
1:38
their mind if a better deal came along for them.
1:40
Which is so frustrating as a consumer. Totally.
1:43
And that exact same dynamic is playing out in
1:45
the financial markets every single day. And it's
1:48
often completely invisible to the person buying
1:50
the asset. Which brings us to the core thesis
1:53
of the research notes we're looking at today.
1:55
There is a singular golden rule of embedded options
1:59
that dictates how these markets function. Yeah,
2:01
the golden rule. And it's this. Whoever holds
2:03
the option pays for it. And whoever gave it up
2:06
gets compensated. Whoever holds the option pays
2:09
for it. Period. I mean... In finance, options
2:12
aren't just those derivatives traded on an exchange
2:14
that you hear day traders talk about. Right,
2:16
right. They could be legally embedded right into
2:19
the contract of a standard bond. Wow. And when
2:22
they are, they fundamentally alter the risk and
2:24
the return. So if you're looking at a bond that
2:27
yields noticeably more than its identical peers,
2:30
you haven't just like stumbled onto some magical
2:32
market inefficiency. No, definitely not. You
2:35
have given something away. The extra yield you're
2:37
getting is the exact mathematically calculated
2:40
price of the power you just handed over to the
2:43
issuer. Let's ground this in the real world a
2:46
bit. If higher yields mean we've given away an
2:48
option, what does that actually look like when
2:51
a retail investor goes out to buy debt? Sure.
2:53
Walk me through the mechanics of, you know, the
2:56
most common structural trap we see in the notes,
2:58
the callable bond. Yeah, the callable bond. So
3:01
a callable bond is a debt instrument that gives
3:03
the issuer the right to redeem the bond early.
3:06
OK, so they can just end it early. Right. At
3:09
a specified price and unspecified dates before
3:12
the bond actually reaches its official maturity
3:15
date. Got it. Essentially, they can hand your
3:17
original principal back to you and just stop
3:19
paying you interest whenever their predetermined
3:22
call schedule permits. But help me understand
3:24
the incentive structure there. Like, why would
3:27
a corporation go through the massive legal and
3:30
financial undertaking of borrowing hundreds of
3:32
millions of dollars for 10 years just to hand
3:35
it back after three? Well, it comes down to the
3:37
shifting cost. of capital. Let's say a company
3:40
issues a 10 -year bond with a 6 % coupon. They're
3:44
locking in that borrowing cost, right? 6 % is
3:47
their cost. But then three years later, the macroeconomic
3:50
environment shifts and prevailing yields in the
3:52
broader market drop down to 3%. Oh, I see. Yeah.
3:55
So if the company issued a standard non -callable
3:58
bond, they are stuck overpaying at 6 % for the
4:01
next seven years. Because they promise. Exactly.
4:04
But if they embedded a call option into that
4:06
bond, they will absolutely exercise it. So they
4:09
just call the bond, return your principal, and
4:12
then immediately turn around and issue new debt
4:15
to new investors at that much cheaper 3 % rate.
4:19
Bingo. So they are essentially refinancing their
4:22
corporate debt the exact same way a homeowner
4:25
would refinance a mortgage when mortgage rates
4:27
drop. That is the perfect parallel. Yeah. But
4:30
we really need to look at what this does to the
4:32
person holding the bond. Right. The investor.
4:34
Because it creates this massive structural asymmetry.
4:37
You, the investor, are left bearing severe reinvestment
4:42
risk. Reinvestment risk. Unpack that for me.
4:44
Well, you get handed a pile of cash, exactly,
4:47
in a world where nothing pays 6 % anymore. Oh,
4:50
man. Because rates drop. Right. So you are forced
4:53
to take your money and reinvest it at the new
4:56
lower 3 % rate. So my upside is completely capped.
5:00
Exactly. I take all the downside risk if things
5:02
go poorly, but I don't get to participate in
5:04
the upside if things go well. Your upside is
5:06
just mathematically truncated by the market.
5:09
Think about how standard bond pricing works.
5:11
When general interest rates fall, the price of
5:15
existing higher yielding bonds goes up on the
5:18
secondary market. Because everybody wants that
5:20
higher yield. Right. If you hold a standard 6
5:23
% bond in a 3 % world, buyers are going to pay
5:26
a huge premium to take that bond off your hands.
5:28
That makes sense. But a callable bond's price
5:32
behaves very differently. It experiences what
5:35
we call price compression. Walk me through the
5:37
mechanics of that price compression. Why wouldn't
5:39
it just rise in value like any other bond? Because
5:42
the market is exceptionally good at pricing and
5:45
probabilities. OK. Let's say the issuer has the
5:47
right to call your bond for $1 ,020 next year.
5:51
Right. Even if a standard 6 % bond should theoretically
5:54
trade for, say, $1 ,100 in this new low -rate
5:57
environment, no rational buyer is going to pay
6:00
you $1 ,100 for a callable bond. Why would they?
6:02
They know the issuer is just going to snatch
6:04
it away for $1 ,020 in a few months. Exactly.
6:07
The predetermined call price acts as this heavy
6:10
ceiling, just pinning the bond's value down.
6:12
So the option truncates your good outcome. Yes.
6:16
But it leaves your bad outcome. say, rakes rising
6:19
to 9 % and the price of your bond plummeting
6:23
completely intact. Let's pause there, because
6:26
this raises a huge red flag regarding how these
6:29
products are marketed to everyday people. Oh,
6:31
absolutely. If a callable bond is designed to
6:34
end early, exactly when it's most disadvantageous
6:37
for the investor, how can we possibly trust the
6:40
yield numbers flashing on our brokerage screens?
6:43
You really can't. Like if I log into my account
6:45
right now and look at a callable bond, what number
6:48
am I actually seeing? You're touching on one
6:49
of the most misleading UI aspects of retail bond
6:52
investing. The source material actually provides
6:55
a very clear mathematical example to illustrate
6:57
this deception. Oh, good. Let's hear the math.
7:00
So imagine a bond with a thousand dollar face
7:02
value and a six percent coupon with ten years
7:05
left until maturity. OK. And it is callable in
7:08
three years at a slight premium of a thousand
7:10
twenty dollars. Because it pays a generous 6
7:13
% and current market rates are lower, it's currently
7:16
trading at a premium price of $1 ,050. OK, I'm
7:20
tracking the math. I pay $1 ,050 today out of
7:24
pocket. And in return, I receive $60 a year in
7:28
interest. Correct. Now, if you assume this bond
7:31
runs its full uninterrupted 10 year life to maturity
7:35
and eventually repays the thousand dollar face
7:38
value at the end of the decade, your yield or
7:41
what the industry calls yield to maturity or
7:44
YTM works out to five point three four percent.
7:47
It feels like a really solid return. I mean,
7:50
five point three four percent locked in for 10
7:53
years. But we have to factor in the option. Right.
7:55
The golden rule. What if the issuer exercises
7:58
their right to call the bond in exactly three
8:00
years at $1 ,020? Let's run that reality. So
8:04
you paid $1 ,050 today. You collect your $60
8:06
a year for just three years, which is $180. OK.
8:10
Then the issuer forces you to hand the bond back,
8:12
and they give you $1 ,020. When you factor in
8:15
the premium you paid versus the cash you got
8:17
back, your actual annualized yield is only 4
8:21
.81%. That's a big drop. Yeah, and this metric
8:24
is called the yield to call. Wait, so if I'm
8:26
looking at my brokerage dashboard and it highlights
8:28
the 5 .34 % yield to maturity in bright green,
8:32
I mean, that's practically a fiction, isn't it?
8:34
It pretty much is. Because if the bond is already
8:37
trading at a premium of $1 ,050, it means rates
8:39
have fallen. Right. The issuer is almost certainly
8:42
going to call it to refinance. So the computer
8:44
system knows I'm likely getting 4 .81%, but it
8:48
advertises 5 .34%. It is technically accurate
8:52
arithmetic, but it's based on a highly improbable
8:54
assumption. That's crazy. The 5 .34 % YTM is
8:58
the absolute best case 10 -year scenario presented
9:01
to you when the issuer hold all the legal rights
9:03
to force the three -year. 4 .81 % worst case
9:07
scenario. How do we defend against this? There
9:09
has to be some standardized metric that cuts
9:11
through the illusion. There is. You have to demand
9:13
the yield to worst, often abbreviated as YTW.
9:17
Yield to worst. OK. This is a calculation that
9:20
automatically runs the math on every single possible
9:23
call date plus the final maturity date, figures
9:26
out which scenario results in the lowest possible
9:30
return for the investor, and uses that lowest
9:33
number as your baseline. That makes so much more
9:35
sense. The source notes actually refer to yield
9:37
to worst as the industry at its most candid.
9:40
I like that. If your trading platform cannot
9:43
or will not display the yield to worst on a callable
9:46
bond, you really need to understand that the
9:48
product is not being fully explained to you.
9:50
That is such a critical checkpoint for anyone
9:52
managing their own fixed income. Always demand
9:55
yield to worst. Always. But I want to pivot slightly.
9:58
We've established that the standard callable
10:00
bond is brutally punitive to the investor. Very
10:03
much so. It forces them into a nasty reinvestment
10:06
scenario, and the issuer needs the flexibility
10:09
to clear debt off their balance sheet, but investors,
10:12
you know, they look getting screwed. Right. Is
10:14
there a structural compromise here? There is,
10:16
and it's this fascinating geographic quirk in
10:19
the debt markets. It's known as the Canada call.
10:21
The Canada call. I have to admit, that sounds
10:24
incredibly polite. It does, right. What makes
10:27
a call provision distinctly Canadian? Well, it's
10:30
actually known formally as a make whole provision
10:32
and became heavily standardized in Canadian corporate
10:36
bonds. Why Canada specifically? Historically,
10:38
the Canadian corporate bond market didn't have
10:40
the massive deep liquidity of the U .S. market.
10:43
OK. So to attract capital, Canadian issuers had
10:46
to offer stronger structural protections to investors.
10:49
So instead of having a fixed punitive call price
10:53
like the thousand and twenty dollars we just
10:55
discussed, the Canada call uses a dynamic formula.
10:59
Interesting. How does a dynamic formula solve
11:02
the reinvestment risk, though? By mathematically
11:05
neutralizing it. Really? Yeah. If a company wants
11:08
to call a bond early under a make -hole provision,
11:11
they cannot just hand back your principal. They
11:13
are legally required to calculate the present
11:15
value of all the future interest payments you
11:18
would have received if the bond had gone to maturity.
11:20
Wow. All of them. Yes. They discount those future
11:24
cash flows using a very conservative rate. typically
11:28
government bond yield, plus a tiny predefined
11:32
spread. And they have to pay you that entire
11:34
calculated lump sum today. Oh, I see the elegance
11:36
in that. It gives the corporation the absolute
11:39
flexibility to retire the debt if they're being
11:42
acquired or if they need to restructure their
11:43
balance sheet. But they have to buy their way
11:45
out of the contract fairly. Exactly. They have
11:48
to actually compensate the investor for the yield
11:50
they're destroying. It completely removes the
11:53
harsh asymmetry of the standard fixed price call.
11:56
The investors genuinely made whole. That's brilliant.
11:59
But if we're talking about asymmetry, let's explore
12:01
what happens when we flip the power dynamic entirely.
12:04
Okay, let's do it. Everything we've discussed
12:06
so far involves the issuer holding the option.
12:09
What happens when the investor holds the option?
12:11
Now we're talking. How do I get to be the one
12:13
who decides when the contract ends? You look
12:16
for retractable or extendable bonds. They're
12:19
sometimes referred to broadly as putable bonds.
12:22
Putable bonds, got it. A retractable bond gives
12:25
you the investor. the legal right to force the
12:29
issuer to repay your principal early at a set
12:33
price and on specific dates. Let me think through
12:35
the mechanics of why I would actually use that.
12:37
Sure. If I buy a bond, the whole goal is to lock
12:41
in a predictable yield, right? Why would I want
12:44
to force early repayment? Am I using this if
12:47
I see the company's financials deteriorating
12:49
and I want to pull my money out before they go
12:50
bankrupt? I mean, you could theoretically use
12:53
it for credit protection, but that's not its
12:56
primary utility. I think back to our discussion
12:58
on the cost of capital. You want to force early
13:00
repayment when macroeconomic conditions change.
13:03
Right, interest rates. There you go. If I am
13:05
holding a retractable bond, paying 3%, and central
13:08
banks hike rates so the broader market is suddenly
13:10
offering 6%, my 3 % bond is totally underwater.
13:15
It's essentially dead money. Exactly. Under a
13:17
normal bond contract, yes, you would suffer a
13:19
massive opportunity cost. But with a retractable
13:22
bond, I don't have to suffer. I just exercise
13:24
my put option, hand the bond back to the issuer
13:28
for my original principal, take my cash, and
13:30
go buy the new 6 % bonds. It is the ultimate
13:33
defense mechanism against rising interest rates.
13:36
It is an incredibly powerful tool, but let's
13:38
apply the golden rule of embedded options to
13:40
this scenario. Okay, golden rule. You hold the
13:43
option. What does the golden rule dictate? Whoever
13:45
holds the option pays for it, which means I am
13:49
not getting this protection for free. Not a chance.
13:51
A retractable bond must offer me a noticeably
13:54
lower yield than a standard plain vanilla bond
13:56
from the exact same issuer. I am paying for my
14:00
interest rate insurance by accepting a lower
14:03
coupon every single year. You've nailed the fundamental
14:05
trade -off. The mechanics perfectly balance each
14:08
other out once you identify where the hidden
14:10
levers are. You accept lower income in exchange
14:13
for downside protection. That makes total sense.
14:16
We've been heavily focused on options that protect
14:18
either the issuer or the investor from macroeconomic
14:20
shifts, primarily interest rates. But what if
14:23
the option isn't about interest rates at all?
14:25
Like, how does an issuer weaponize their own
14:28
stock price in the bond market? Ah, now they
14:31
step into the world of convertible bonds. Convertible
14:34
bonds. You see these constantly in tech startups,
14:36
biotechnology, you know, high growth sectors.
14:39
All the time. How does the architecture of a
14:42
convertible actually work? So a convertible bond
14:44
is a hybrid instrument. It starts as debt. You
14:48
are a lender holding a bond that pays regular
14:50
interest and promises to return your principal.
14:52
OK, sounds standard so far. However, Embedded
14:55
in that debt contract is the option to convert
14:58
the bond into a predetermined fixed number of
15:01
the issuers common equity shares. Wow. It's marketed
15:05
as the holy grail of investing, isn't it? It
15:08
really is. You get the safety and regular income
15:10
of a bond. But if the company invents the next
15:13
big microchip and the stock skyrockets, you just
15:15
flip a switch, forfeit your bond, and suddenly
15:18
you're riding the unlimited upside of the equity.
15:21
Just sounds too good to be true. And because
15:23
of our golden rule, we know it is. You are paying
15:26
a steep hidden cost every single day. You hold
15:29
a convertible bond because I'm holding the option.
15:32
Exactly. Because you have secured this incredibly
15:34
valuable option for equity upside, the issuer
15:38
is going to pay you a meaningfully lower coupon
15:40
rate compared to their standard debt. You are
15:43
buying that lottery ticket with foregone income.
15:47
And here is the harsh reality that a lot of investors
15:50
ignore. If the company's stock goes nowhere or
15:54
declines, you will never exercise the conversion
15:57
option. Right. Why would you? You won't. You
15:59
will just hold a low -yielding bond all the way
16:02
to maturity. You essentially paid for an option
16:05
that expired completely worthless. Meanwhile,
16:08
regular bondholders who didn't demand the equity
16:10
option collected far more cash along the way.
16:12
Exactly. And what is the mechanism for the company's
16:15
existing shareholders? If I exercise my option
16:18
and demand stock, The company doesn't just go
16:20
buy shares on the open market to give to me,
16:22
do they? No, they don't. And this is why existing
16:24
shareholders often absolutely despise convertible
16:27
debt. What? When you convert, the company honors
16:30
the contract by creating new shares out of thin
16:33
air. Oh, wow. This is called dilution. It increases
16:37
the total number of shares in existence, which
16:39
means the pie doesn't get any bigger. It just
16:41
gets sliced into more pieces. Right. Every existing
16:45
shareholder suddenly owns a slightly smaller
16:48
percentage of the company. Let's talk about the
16:50
downside protection, though, because brokers
16:52
often pitch convertibles by leaning heavily on
16:55
the concept of the bond floor. Oh, yeah, the
16:57
famous bond floor. The marketing pitch is essentially,
17:00
you know, don't worry about the stock being volatile.
17:03
Even if the tech startup's equity crashes, you
17:05
still hold their debt. You have this solid mathematical
17:08
floor of fixed cash flows that protects your
17:11
downside. That's the pitch. Let me challenge
17:13
the structural integrity of that bond floor.
17:15
Let's test the logic. What happens in a real
17:18
crisis? Well, if a company's stock price is absolutely
17:21
collapsing down 70, 80 percent, it's usually
17:25
not a coincidence. No, usually not. Their underlying
17:27
business model is likely failing, their cash
17:30
flow is drying up, and their credit rating is
17:32
probably getting downgraded to junk simultaneously.
17:36
So the bond floor isn't made of concrete. It
17:38
seems like you're buying a life raft made out
17:40
of the exact same material as the sinking ship.
17:42
If the equity goes to zero, the debt is likely
17:45
defaulting right alongside it. That is a brutally
17:48
accurate assessment. And it really dismantles
17:51
the myth of the impenetrable bond floor. Right.
17:55
Yes. Theoretically, a convertible bond has a
17:58
floor value based on its fixed cash flows. But
18:01
you have identified a recurring theme that runs
18:03
deep through the source material we are analyzing
18:06
today. Which is? Structural financial protections
18:08
have a nasty habit of weakening under the exact
18:11
conditions that make you want to use them. The
18:13
trapdoor effect. Precisely. The trapdoor effect.
18:16
When an issuer's equity collapses, the market
18:18
aggressively reprices their bonds to reflect
18:21
the new massive default risk. So your so -called
18:24
bond floor drops right out from under you. It
18:26
does. And we see this phenomenon across the entire
18:28
financial system. Margin calls arrive at the
18:31
worst possible moment. Always. Market liquidity
18:34
entirely vanishes exactly when panic hits and
18:38
you desperately need to sell. You just cannot
18:41
rely on a structural floor when the entire building
18:44
is experiencing an earthquake. It's a sobering
18:47
reality check, honestly, but it perfectly frames
18:50
why we have to look past the marketing jargon.
18:52
We have to understand the actual granular mechanics
18:56
of what we are buying. Absolutely. Which brings
18:59
us to the ultimate synthesis of today's deep
19:01
dive. If we distill all of these notes into actionable
19:05
intelligence for the listener. What are the core
19:08
guardrails they need to establish? It comes down
19:11
to three critical checkpoints for navigating
19:13
fixed income. Okay, let's hear them. First, whenever
19:15
you see an unusually high yield on a bond, or
19:18
any fixed income product really, immediately
19:20
stop and ask yourself, what option did I quietly
19:23
give away to earn this? Golden rule. Love it.
19:25
Exactly. Second, never trust the yield to maturity
19:28
metric on a callable bond. Right. always demand
19:31
to see the yield to worse because that represents
19:33
the reality of the mathematical ceiling you're
19:34
actually facing. Yep, the industry at its most
19:37
candid. Yes. And third, understand that embedded
19:41
protections like the bond floor on a convertible
19:44
often feature trapdoors that swing wide open
19:47
when markets truly panic. Those are phenomenal
19:50
guardrails. And to wrap up this deep dive, I
19:53
want to leave you, our listener, with a final
19:55
provocative thought to mull over. We've spent
19:57
the last 15 minutes dissecting bond mechanics,
20:00
but the core lesson here... applies far beyond
20:03
your investment portfolio. It applies to everyday
20:05
life. Oh, the golden rule is universally applicable.
20:09
It really is. Whoever holds the option pays for
20:11
it. Isn't just a bond market rule. It is a fundamental
20:14
law of human negotiation. Think about your employment
20:17
contracts, your gym memberships, or even the
20:20
terms of a new mortgage. If you are being offered
20:22
a massive discount, a huge sign on bonus at a
20:25
new job, or a suspiciously cheap monthly rate,
20:29
stop and ask yourself what hitting call up on
20:31
your time, your flexibility, or your personal
20:33
data did you just hand over to the other party?
20:35
That's such a vital framework to have. Like,
20:37
did you accept a sign -on bonus that legally
20:39
traps you in a hostile workplace for two years
20:42
unless you pay it back? Did you get a deeply
20:44
discounted gym rate, but give them the option
20:48
to automatically renew you at a 50 % markup with
20:52
a cancellation process that requires, like, certified
20:55
mail? Oh, the certified mail gets you every time.
20:58
It does. When the terms look too good to be true,
21:01
you're usually being compensated for an asymmetry
21:03
that runs against you in the fine print. In finance
21:06
and in life, there is no free yield. You are
21:09
always paying for it, one way or another. So
21:12
the next time you see a flight that costs half
21:14
the price of the competition, well, you might
21:16
just want to check the fine print to see who
21:18
actually owns the option on your seat. Keep questioning
21:20
the numbers you see on your screens and always
21:22
read the terms. Thanks for joining us for this
21:25
deep dive. We'll catch you next time.