Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Carney Is Not What He Was Sold As, Pierre Poilievre Says

Transcript

Carney Is Not What He Was Sold As, Pierre Poilievre Says · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: While there have been many illusions that he would change course,
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: that he would approve projects that he would quote build
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: at unimaginable speeds, none of this has materialized in any
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: form of reality.
• 0:14
  Speaker 2: This is up there with one of the best moments
• 0:16
  Speaker 2: of Pierre in Parliament to date. He nailed it here.
• 0:19
  Speaker 2: This was posted by Ryan garretson. Let's take a peek,
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: mister speaker.
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: The Liberal illusion is now on a collision course with reality.
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: See the Prime Minister ran an entire election campaign promising
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: to be the opposite of who he was, and to
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: do the opposite of what he had been saying and
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: writing and what the Liberal government had been doing for
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: the prior ten years. It wasn't just on this question
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: of developing our resources. It was on questions of fiscal policy.
• 0:53
  Speaker 1: He had obviously caused a massive inflation and housing crisis
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: in the UK by printing nearly endless sums of money
• 1:02
  Speaker 1: over there, and then came back here promising that he
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: would spend less, a promise he promptly broke. He advised
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: the Prime minister in this country, Justin Trudeau, to do likewise,
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: and then promised to do precisely the opposite. He argued
• 1:16
  Speaker 1: that not only should there be a carbon tax, but
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: that tax should be raised even further, only to promise
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: that he would get rid of it, a promise that
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: he is already in the process of breaking. And he
• 1:29
  Speaker 1: had campaigned around the world to defund the energy sector,
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: convincing financial institutions to stop loaning and investing to Canadian
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: energy and writing and I quote that he believed that
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: as much as half of oil reserves proven oil reserves
• 1:45
  Speaker 1: need to stay in the ground if we're going to
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: get where we are, if we're going to get where
• 1:50
  Speaker 1: we are, And he further said that it was a
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: quote sensible decision to cancel the Northern Gateway pipeline. I
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: think it is the right decision. He said. Those were
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: his positions up until oh about two months before he
• 2:07
  Speaker 1: launched his campaign for Prime minister, at which point he
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: suddenly reversed himself and tried to plagiarize the positions of
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: the Conservative Party. Now here's the problem with someone pretending
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: to believe something he clearly does not just to get elected,
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: is that after the election is over, he reverts quickly
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: to his original course. And that is what we have seen.
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: While there have been many illusions that he would change course,
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: that he would approve projects that he would quote build
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: at unimaginable speeds. None of this has materialized in any
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: form of reality. Here we are six months into the
• 2:45
  Speaker 1: latest Liberal term and there is not a single new
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: project that was not already in the works which has
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: been given the green light, and certainly not one that
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: is under construction. And so today we have an opportunity
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: to find out what the liberals real position is on
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: the subject of a pipeline, because yes, this motion is
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: about our ability to ever build a pipeline. Let's break
• 3:11
  Speaker 1: it down. We all agree the Canada has the most
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: resources in the world. We all agree, at least liberals
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: and conservatives agree that the only reason we can't build
• 3:21
  Speaker 1: pipelines to move those resources to tide water is because
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: of federal bureaucracy and federal laws. Now, you might ask,
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: how can you say that the liberals agree with that proposition. Well,
• 3:34
  Speaker 1: the answer is that they passed C five, the foundation
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: of which is that we need to go around all
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: of the liberal laws and bureaucracies in order to get
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: things built.
• 3:49
  Speaker 2: Yeah, by the way, so instead of just getting rid
• 3:52
  Speaker 2: of their basically, you know, Nick Dave the No New
• 3:56
  Speaker 2: Pipelines Bill. Instead of getting rid of the legisla that
• 4:00
  Speaker 2: prevents Canada from utilizing its energy at making money, they
• 4:04
  Speaker 2: pass a bill that allows them to bypass parts of
• 4:08
  Speaker 2: that their own bill. When I say chaos and dysfunction,
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: I'm not using those words lightly.
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: Law literally allows the Prime Minister, through the stoke of
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: the stroke of the pen, to go around all of
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: the environmental public safety laws and the associated bureaucracies, which
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: means that he believes that those laws and bureaucracies are
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: neither necessary to protect the environment nor possible if you
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: want to get anything done. So we agree that the
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: laws and the bureaucracy are the obstacle. Here's where we disagree.
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: His view is that to solve the problem of liberal
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: laws and liberal bureaucracies, that we need more liberal laws
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: and liberal bureaucracies, which is to say he confuses the
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: problem with a solution. We believe that if there are
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: liberal laws and bureaucracies roadblocking development, then get rid of
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: those liberal laws and bureaucracies. Put simply get out of
• 5:17
  Speaker 1: the way.
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: Get out of the way. I guess that would just
• 5:22
  Speaker 2: be too pragmatic, that would make too much sense. Pierre
• 5:27
  Speaker 2: mentioned there that Mark Carney seemed to reverse himself on
• 5:31
  Speaker 2: everything he believed his entire adult life just as he
• 5:34
  Speaker 2: was running for Prime minister. I mean, you know, those
• 5:38
  Speaker 2: of us that were paying attention, I'll sult right through that.
• 5:42
  Speaker 2: And his book Values was not written twenty thirty years
• 5:45
  Speaker 2: ago out of youthful naivete. Now it was like twenty
• 5:50
  Speaker 2: twenty two. He clearly still believed everything he wrote in
• 5:53
  Speaker 2: that book. And Pierre says that Carni and the Liberals
• 5:57
  Speaker 2: need to get out of the way. I've got some
• 5:59
  Speaker 2: bad news on that front. Mark Kearney is a bureaucrat.
• 6:04
  Speaker 2: He lives to be in the way. It is the
• 6:06
  Speaker 2: very meaning of his existence to be in the way,
• 6:10
  Speaker 2: to be a central planner, to decide for you what
• 6:15
  Speaker 2: is best for you. So I'm afraid the only way
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: out of this is to vote him out of the way,
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: hopefully sooner than later. Anyway, that's all I'm going to
• 6:27
  Speaker 2: say about that. Please like, share and subscribe. Subscribing really
• 6:30
  Speaker 2: helps me out. I thank you for that. I will
• 6:33
  Speaker 2: see you next time.