Latest / The Animal Advocate / Animal Control Funding: Why Shelters Walk Away from City Contracts

Transcript

Animal Control Funding: Why Shelters Walk Away from City Contracts · The Animal Advocate

0:01
I wanna start with a story out of Syracuse, New York. Last
0:04
month, a shelter called BNR Bunkhouse notified the city of
0:08
Syracuse that it wouldn't renew its contract to handle the city's stray
0:12
animals. The city was reportedly paying BNR about
0:15
$75,000 a year for the service. Syracuse
0:19
officials scrambled to find alternatives. Like most places,
0:22
shelters and kennels in the Syracuse area have been running at capacity for
0:26
years. City officials had been trying to build their own
0:30
municipal shelter for several years, but had struggled to identify a
0:33
compliant site. So you have a city that
0:37
relies on a nonprofit partner to manage stray intake,
0:41
bite cases, and care for animals seized in cruelty and neglect
0:44
cases, and that partner walks away, and the
0:48
city has no facility of its own to fall back on.
0:52
Syracuse isn't alone. And the nonprofit walking away is just one
0:56
of the ways these arrangements can fall apart. I don't know about
0:59
you, but I think everyone should have someone they can call when they see a
1:03
stray dog, especially an injured or dangerous one.
1:07
But I'm here to tell you that for lots of people, there is no one
1:11
to answer that call who can or will do something about it
1:14
and bring that dog to safety. And ever since I found that out,
1:18
it's bugged the crap out of me.
1:23
Welcome to The Animal Advocate, where we arm animal lovers
1:27
with the information and inspiration you need to become
1:31
effective advocates. I'm your host, Penny Ellison, and
1:34
I've taught animal law and advocacy at the University of Pennsylvania
1:38
since 2006. If you've ever thought,
1:42
"Someone should do something about that," I'm here to guide you
1:45
on your journey to being that someone. You can
1:49
find us on the web at AnimalAdvocacyAcademy.org.
1:54
And that's where you'll find show notes and resources, and you can send
1:57
us your comments on episodes and ideas for topics you'd like to hear
2:01
on future shows. So, on to today's
2:05
topic.
2:12
Before we go further, I want to be clear about what I mean when I
2:16
say animal control, because I think there's a lot of confusion
2:19
about this. Confusion that makes it harder to have a productive
2:23
discussion about funding. I try to be nice
2:26
online, and I think I succeed for the most part, but if
2:30
I see one more post asking for the director of an animal control
2:34
shelter to be fired coming from someone who never sets foot in the
2:37
shelter and doesn't understand what animal control does, I
2:41
may just explode. So, Since I don't want to break
2:45
my rule, I'm going to lay it out in this episode so you can
2:48
share with your frustrated friends who think their local animal control shelter
2:52
is killing animals because they're lazy or don't care.
2:56
When I talk about animal control, I'm talking about the legally
3:00
required public safety functions. I'm not talking about
3:03
long-term sheltering until adoption, behavioral
3:07
rehabilitation, or the kind of extensive medical support people
3:11
often associate with a well-resourced Humane Society.
3:15
I'm talking about specific legally or contractually
3:19
mandated obligations: managing stray animals,
3:22
taking owner surrenders, maybe responding to bites
3:26
and possible rabies cases, dangerous dog
3:29
enforcement, and sheltering animals for the legally
3:33
mandated stray hold period. That is
3:37
animal control. And it's normally either performed directly
3:41
by a city, county, or town, or contracted out to
3:44
a nonprofit. When a city writes a check to a
3:48
nonprofit for animal control services, that check
3:51
is supposed to cover that public safety floor
3:55
I just described. Anything beyond that—adoption
4:00
marketing, longer-term care, specialized medical
4:04
or behavioral work— is typically funded through donations
4:07
and grants, not municipal contracts. And that
4:11
distinction is the key to understanding why these contracts
4:14
keep failing. Most municipal animal control
4:18
contracts fund the legally required minimum,
4:21
if that, sometimes not that. They certainly
4:25
don't fund the full ecosystem of care that people
4:29
assume the shelter provides. It almost
4:32
never covers the cost of being a genuinely good shelter.
4:38
On paper, the contract model looks clean. The
4:41
municipality writes a check, the nonprofit handles field
4:44
responses and intake, and the city avoids the
4:47
complexity of managing a facility and employing specialized
4:51
staff. And if the numbers actually worked, it could
4:55
be a reasonable arrangement. But in practice,
4:59
those contracts are negotiated under intense budget pressure.
5:03
Municipal officials are tasked with keeping the costs low.
5:07
That's their job. Well, truth be told, that's part of
5:10
their job. Nonprofits, on the other hand, are
5:14
mission-driven and genuinely reluctant to leave animals and the
5:18
community without services. So what happens
5:21
repeatedly is that the contract ends up funding at most
5:25
the minimum legal obligations, and the nonprofit absorbs
5:29
the gap between that minimum and what humane care
5:33
actually costs. They make up the difference through
5:37
fundraising, through grant writing, through staff working more
5:41
hours than they're compensated for, and they do it because they love
5:44
animals and can't stand the thought of leaving them without
5:48
anyone. And that can work for a while.
5:52
It stops working when the gap gets too wide, when staff
5:56
burn out, when donor revenue doesn't keep pace with
5:59
intake. At that point, the nonprofit
6:03
faces a choice that no organization should have to face:
6:08
keep subsidizing a government function indefinitely,
6:12
start euthanizing adoptable animals, or walk
6:15
away. And none of those is a good outcome for the animals.
6:20
I brought up the Syracuse example, but this pattern is far from unique.
6:25
I've had very similar discussions with people working in shelters in Pennsylvania
6:28
and New Jersey, and we talked about it in episode 20,
6:32
so you can find a detailed discussion of what's happening in New
6:35
Jersey at
6:38
animaladvocacyacademy.com/20. When
6:41
I started looking into this more for this episode, I found a lot more
6:45
situations playing out in places I wouldn't have expected.
6:49
In Canyon County, Idaho, for example, West Valley
6:52
Humane Society had been operating the county shelter for over a decade.
6:56
In 2025, they publicly stated that they were
6:59
significantly underfunded and asked for approximately
7:03
$1.5 million in joint funding from the county
7:07
and the two largest cities. The government's budgeted
7:11
just under a million. West Valley said that was
7:14
just not enough to do the job responsibly. The county put the contract
7:18
out for bid, and a new organization called Copper Quill
7:22
Haven was picked. But then Copper Quill
7:25
withdrew from negotiations before even opening the doors, citing
7:29
concerns about animal welfare standards, contract structure,
7:33
and what they described as a lack of good faith engagement from the
7:36
municipal partners. At one point, Canyon County was
7:40
genuinely days away from having no animal shelter at all. They eventually
7:44
reached an agreement for West Valley to stay through the end of the fiscal year,
7:48
the same organization they just decided not to fund adequately,
7:51
but the underlying funding questions remained unresolved.
7:56
In Clearlake, California, a nonprofit called North Bay Animal
7:59
Services was running the city's shelter on a contract worth
8:03
$375,000 a year. Grand jury
8:06
investigations in two counties raised serious concerns about
8:10
overcrowding and compliance failures. The city
8:13
terminated the contract. The former operator disputes
8:17
some of the characterizations and notes they sometimes operated at their
8:21
own expense. Whether you put the blame on the operator, the contract
8:25
terms, or both, the situation shows the dynamic that keeps
8:29
repeating itself.: a fixed municipal contract
8:32
amount colliding with variable and rising
8:36
intake. When what you've paid is fixed and what you're asked to
8:40
absorb is not, strain is eventually
8:43
inevitable. Here's an illustration of what I mean. A California
8:47
shelter advocacy organization reported that one nonprofit
8:51
contracted to handle dog impounds was receiving $2,400
8:54
a year from its municipality. The actual cost of
8:58
the service was over $67,000. They
9:02
were absorbing a gap of more than $64,000 every
9:06
year out of donated funds. The gap between what
9:09
the contract paid and what the work actually cost was
9:13
covered by donors, people who thought they were funding animal
9:17
care and not making up for a city's underfunding.
9:21
I want to stop here for a minute because I don't want to be unfair
9:24
to municipal officials. They operate under genuine
9:28
fiscal constraints. Tax bases vary
9:32
enormously. Competing demands like police, fire,
9:35
roads, schools will almost always crowd out animal
9:39
services in a budget debate. So most people
9:42
assume animal control is a government function, the same way
9:46
they assume the city will fill potholes or staff a fire
9:51
department. But when budget season comes, picking up stray dogs
9:55
doesn't compete well against roads and police. In many
9:59
communities, the basic animal control functions of picking up and
10:02
housing stray dogs and dealing with bite cases end
10:05
up underfunded. And in states like Pennsylvania,
10:09
where there's no law requiring municipalities to provide animal
10:13
control at all, often there are literally zero
10:16
dollars allocated to it. The prevention side—
10:21
spay/neuter access, licensing enforcement, breeding
10:24
regulation— gets even less, which means more strays,
10:28
more bites, more rabies exposure, the exact
10:32
problems animal control exists to prevent. And when
10:35
a contract does fail, the consequences,
10:39
to animals and humans, are real.
10:42
Police officers have nowhere to take a stray dog, at 11 o'clock at
10:47
night. A bite quarantine gets delayed. A finder is
10:50
told to hold on to an unfamiliar animal until space opens up
10:55
somewhere. Owners with no means to care for their pets have no safe place to
10:59
surrender them. Animal control
11:03
is a public safety function. When it's funded as though it's
11:07
a charity program and optional, those gaps
11:10
shouldn't come as a surprise. They're designed into the
11:15
system. So the question for advocates becomes, can they
11:18
be designed out? Let's review a
11:22
few options. The most direct path is
11:25
state legislation that requires municipalities to
11:29
provide animal control services and pairs that
11:32
mandate with funding mechanisms that reflect actual
11:37
costs. New Jersey has a state mandate, requiring
11:40
every municipality, all 565 of them, to have
11:44
a licensed animal control officer and an
11:47
impoundment facility. But the problem
11:51
is that it's entirely unfunded. The state says
11:55
municipalities must provide the service, but gives them no money to do
11:59
it and no guidance on how. So you end
12:02
up with 565 municipalities all solving the
12:06
problem independently and differently, many of them
12:10
still contracting with nonprofits at rates that don't cover the real
12:14
cost, and without implementing local regulations around things
12:17
like trap-neuter-return for free-roaming cats that would
12:21
make the job easier. The mandate without
12:25
the funding, guidance, or criteria doesn't fix
12:28
the problem. We need both. A
12:32
second option, short of a full funding mandate, would
12:36
be minimum contract standards—legislation
12:39
requiring that animal control contracts be based on a
12:43
documented cost-of-service analysis, rather than whatever number
12:46
a municipality wants to spend. If you have to show
12:50
your math before you can put a contract out to bid, that changes
12:54
the negotiating dynamic entirely.
12:57
Some housing and social services contracting uses similar models, and
13:01
there's no reason it couldn't work
13:05
here. Third, mandatory contract
13:09
transparency. Right now, most animal control contracts are buried in
13:13
municipal archives that almost nobody ever looks at. What
13:17
if states required those contracts to be publicly posted,
13:21
along with annual reports showing what the contract paid, what
13:24
the documented cost of services was, and how any gap
13:28
was covered. Transparency alone won't fix
13:31
the funding problem, but it makes the subsidy
13:36
visible. When voters can see that their city is paying a
13:39
nonprofit, say, $375,000 for a
13:43
service that costs them $600,000 to
13:46
provide, and they are expecting donors to quietly make up the
13:50
difference, that becomes a story. It becomes something a local
13:54
journalist can write about, and it becomes something a city council
13:58
candidate can run on. Fourth,
14:02
county-level consolidation. In a lot of communities, animal control
14:06
is handled at the municipal level, meaning each city, township,
14:09
or borough has its own arrangement.
14:12
That fragmentation makes it nearly impossible to achieve any
14:16
economies of scale, and creates situations where a small
14:20
municipality genuinely can't fund the service at any reasonable level
14:23
on its own. Some advocates argue for
14:27
consolidating animal control at the county level, with
14:31
county-funded facilities and county-employed staff, and then
14:34
using nonprofits as true partners, running
14:38
adoptions programs, doing community outreach,
14:41
providing supplemental care. Rather than asking them to bear the
14:45
entire weight of a public safety function.
14:48
And fifth, for nonprofits negotiating these
14:52
contracts, build in protections on the front end, annual
14:56
cost adjustment provisions, a clear right to terminate if
15:00
funding falls below a defined percentage of documented
15:03
operating costs. Right now, many nonprofits
15:06
sign long-term contracts with fixed rates and no exit
15:10
ramp, and they get trapped. Building those provisions
15:14
in before you sign, rather than years into a relationship when you can't
15:18
imagine leaving the animals behind, gives organizations a
15:21
tool that they currently don't have.
15:25
I also want to circle back to something in the Syracuse story, because two of
15:29
the rescue operators quoted in that coverage didn't just talk
15:32
about burnout and capacity. They specifically called for
15:36
better spay and neuter services, enforcement of rabies
15:40
vaccination requirements, and getting unregulated breeding under
15:45
control. If you've been listening to this show, you know those are the
15:49
upstream pressures that feed this downstream
15:52
crisis. We did a whole episode on unregulated breeding and how
15:56
holding advertising platforms accountable for ads for
16:00
unregistered breeders could maybe move the needle. I'll put a link to
16:03
that episode in the show notes. The shelter capacity
16:07
problem and the breeding regulation problem are not separate
16:11
issues. They're part of the same
16:20
system. Now, I usually use this part of the episode to answer a question from
16:24
a listener, but today I'm gonna flip that around
16:28
because I don't think I have all the answers here, and I suspect a lot
16:31
of you have ideas. So I have 3 questions
16:35
for you, and I'm asking them seriously.
16:39
First, has this happened in your community? Has a shelter walked away
16:42
from a contract, been forced out, or been slowly hollowed
16:46
out by underfunding? I'm collecting these stories because
16:50
the more documented examples we have, the stronger the case
16:53
for legislative change. One story is an
16:57
anecdote. A pattern is evidence.
17:01
Second, if you work in shelter administration, animal control, or
17:05
shelter medicine, I'd love to know: what does your
17:09
contract actually cover versus what the services actually
17:13
cost? You don't have to give me numbers if that feels like too much.
17:17
Even a general sense of the gap what would help me understand the scope of
17:22
this. And third, if you're in a state where you think the law
17:25
already handles this reasonably well, tell me about it. What does
17:29
your state require? How is it funded? Because I'd
17:33
rather point to a model that already works than propose
17:36
something untested. You can
17:38
reach me at
17:42
podcast@animaladvocacyacademy.com. I read everything that comes in. And if you want to go deeper
17:46
on the advocacy skills that make this kind of policy push actually
17:50
work, the strategy, the coalition building, the
17:53
communication, I've put together a private podcast series called The Four
17:57
Cs of Legislative Advocacy for Animals. You can access it
18:01
at
18:15
animaladvocacyacademy.com/fourcs. Your Be the Change action today is a simple one. Go
18:19
to your municipality's website and look for your animal control
18:24
contract. This is, of course, assuming that they don't have their own
18:28
facility. In most places, contracts are public records, so if it's
18:32
not posted, you can request it. Just ask for the
18:35
active animal control agreement and what was paid under it in the
18:39
last fiscal year. You don't have to do anything with that
18:42
information today, but knowing what your city is paying and
18:46
what it expects in return is the first step toward
18:50
being able to push for something
18:57
better. That's it for today. The Animal Advocate podcast is
19:01
brought to you by the Animal Advocacy Academy. You can
19:04
find episodes and show notes at animaladvocacyacademy.org.
19:09
Advocacyacademy.com, along with a link to our Facebook and LinkedIn pages where we
19:13
discuss our podcasts, and we'd love to discuss your thoughts and
19:17
experiences there. If you're interested in learning more about
19:20
protecting animals, subscribe to the show so you get every episode
19:24
when it comes out. If you have any questions on this or
19:28
any other topic related to animal law, email them to
19:31
podcast@animaladvocacyacademy.com. At
19:35
emilyrosieacademy.com, and we'll make sure to get them answered. We'll either email you
19:38
back or feature them in a future episode, or
19:42
both. And remember, compassion is great,
19:45
but compassionate action is infinitely better.
19:49
Until next week, live with compassion.