Latest / Beyond The Horizon / New Mexico And The Epstein Related Lawsuit Filed Against The DOJ (Part 1) (10/17/26)

Transcript

New Mexico And The Epstein Related Lawsuit Filed Against The DOJ (Part 1) (10/17/26) · Beyond The Horizon

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone and welcome to another episode of the
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: Epstein Chronicles. In this episode we're going to start taking
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: a look at the complaint filed by the state of
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: New Mexico against the DOJ and Todd Blanche. Case number 126-CV-02762.
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: State of New Mexico, by and through its Attorney General
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: Raul Torres, Plaintiff, vs. U.S. Department of Justice and Todd Blanche. Complaint.
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators engaged in widespread trafficking and
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: sexual abuse of young girls, some as young as 14,
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: when the abuse occurred. Throughout his lifetime, per the federal
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: government's own accounting, Epstein and his criminal network subjected over 1,000
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: survivors to egregious and predatory conduct, including vulnerable young girls
• 0:50
  Speaker 1: in New Mexico. By 2021, the United States Court of
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: Appeals for the 11th Circuit already recognized that the relevant
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: facts were beyond scandalous. They tell the tale of a
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: national disgrace. Current acting United States Attorney General Todd Blanch
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: and members of the U.S. Department of Justice, leadership in Washington, D.C.,
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: the Southern District of New York, and the District of
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: New Mexico perpetuate that disgrace. Their conduct now actively harms
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: victims and undermines the public interest by stonewalling New Mexico's
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: Attorney General Raul Torres' ongoing criminal investigation and into conduct
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: by Epstein and his co-conspirators at Zorro Ranch, located outside
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: Santa Fe. Acting Attorney General Blanche and the USDOJ's conduct
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: violates promises USDOJ made to New Mexico to secure an
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: agreement for state law enforcement to stand down Epstein-related investigations
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: in 2019. USDOJ wanted federal investigators to complete their work
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: before the state investigated related crimes and assured New Mexico
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: that federal law enforcement would cooperate in subsequent state investigations
• 1:59
  Speaker 1: and prosecutions. In reliance on those assurances, New Mexico gave
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: up timely access to witnesses, victims, and other evidence. The
• 2:08
  Speaker 1: state's reliance was reasonable given decades of successful state-federal cooperation
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: that has included the sharing of confidential investigative files, evidence,
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: and reports in similar criminal investigations. New Mexico had no
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: reason in 2019 to believe federal law enforcement officials would
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: breach their express assurances and deviate from historical practice just
• 2:30
  Speaker 1: to block their state counterparts from successfully investigating child sexual
• 2:34
  Speaker 1: abuse under state law. After reopening New Mexico's investigation in
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: February of 2026, however, Attorney General Torres and senior prosecutors
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: he leads at the New Mexico Department of Justice have
• 2:48
  Speaker 1: faced sustained resistance to the type of information sharing that
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: has been routine from USDOJ under prior administrations of both
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: political parties. An MDOJ started with the informal requests that
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: normally are adequate to obtain investigative information from federal law
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: enforcement for a related state matter. USDOJ responded by promising
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: cooperation while requesting formal TUI requests. Attorney General Torres and
• 3:15
  Speaker 1: MDOJ provided those formal requests, only to have USDOJ and
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: various components respond with a rejection, reneging on their promises.
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: USDOJ has betrayed survivors and the public related to Jeffrey
• 3:28
  Speaker 1: Epstein and his co-conspirators at least three times. First, USDOJ
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: secretly negotiated a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein without consulting survivors.
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: It appears the prosecutors worked hand-in-hand with Epstein's lawyers, or
• 3:42
  Speaker 1: at the very least acceded to their requests, to keep
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: the non-prosecution agreement existence in terms hidden from survivors. As
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: things progress, the government's efforts appear to have graduated from
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: passive nondisclosure to, or at least close to, active misrepresentation. Second,
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: bipartisan legislation from Congress required public disclosure before the end
• 4:05
  Speaker 1: of 2025. Of the files from federal investigations of Epstein,
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: his co-conspirators, redacted to protect survivors, see Exhibit 1 at
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: 2 and 7. But USDOJ instead publicly posted detailed unredacted
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: personal information about survivors, ranging from their contact information to
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: nude images. Now, USDOJ and Acting Attorney General Blanche are
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: refusing to facilitate an investigation of state law crimes by
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: hiding information about Epstein and his co-conspirators from Attorney General
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: Torres and state law enforcement. When New Mexico is one
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: of few jurisdictions that may still have an opportunity to
• 4:44
  Speaker 1: hold Epstein's associates accountable or otherwise provide some sense of
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: justice to survivors. Attorney General Torres has marched through every
• 4:53
  Speaker 1: bureaucratic hoop USDOJ has demanded, only to have years of
• 4:57
  Speaker 1: promised federal cooperation turn into bureaucratic defiance. Federal inaction does
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: not merely stall the investigation. It prolongs and compounds the
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: suffering of survivors. New Mexico seeks declaratory and injunctive relief
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: to compel USDOJ and Acting Attorney General Blanche to abandon
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: their unlawful non-cooperation policy and comply with the NMDOJ's investigative demands.
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: USDOJ's conduct is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion
• 5:28
  Speaker 1: and not in accordance with the law. Alternatively, if USDOJ
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: denies its take in final agency action, it's unlawfully withholding
• 5:36
  Speaker 1: and unreasonably delaying the action in violation of the Administrative
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: Procedure Act, U.S. Code 5, Section 706, Jurisdiction and Venue.
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: The court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to U.S.
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: Code 28, Section 1331. Venues proper under U.S. Code 28,
• 5:54
  Speaker 1: Section 1391B2 and 1391E1. Defendants or United States agencies or
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: officers sued in their official capacities. Defendants reside in this
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: judicial district and a substantial part of the events or
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: omissions giving rise to this complaint occurred within this district.
• 6:13
  Speaker 1: The Parties plaintiff state of New Mexico as a sovereign
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: state of the United States. New Mexico is represented by
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: and through its chief legal officer, Attorney General Raul Torres,
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: who's authorized to sue on the state's behalf. Attorney General
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: Torres is statutory authority to investigate and prosecute crimes on
• 6:30
  Speaker 1: behalf of the state. And under Attorney General Torres' leadership,
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: NMDOJ is vested with broad authority to investigate violations of
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: New Mexico criminal law. Defendant USDOJ, is a federal cabinet
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: agency within the executive branch of the United States government.
• 6:48
  Speaker 1: The United States Attorney's Office for the District of New
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: Mexico is a component of the USDOJ responsible for representing
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: the United States and federal prosecutions within that district. The
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: office currently operates without a United States attorney. The highest
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: designated official for the office today is First Assistant U.S.
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: Attorney Ryan Ellison. Ellison operates under the supervision of and
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: direction of Acting Attorney General Blanch. The United States Attorney's
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: Office for the Southern District of New York, SDNY, is
• 7:19
  Speaker 1: a component of the USDOJ, responsible for representing the United
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: States in federal prosecutions within that district. Jamie McDonald was
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: appointed by the federal judiciary to serve as United States
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: Attorney for the Southern District of New York, effective July 29, 2026.
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: The FBI, is also a component of the USDOJ that
• 7:41
  Speaker 1: operates under the supervision and direction of the Attorney General.
• 7:45
  Speaker 1: Defendant Todd Blanche is the Acting Attorney General of the
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: United States and the federal official in charge of USDOJ.
• 7:52
  Speaker 1: Defendant Blanche is sued in his official capacity. Background. USDOJ
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: halts New Mexico investigation into Epstein and his co-conspirators' crimes
• 8:03
  Speaker 1: with promises of cooperating in later state criminal investigations and prosecutions.
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: After originally entering a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein in 2008,
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: USDOJ revived its investigation into Epstein and his associates in 2018.
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: SDNY led the investigation with the assistance and collaboration of
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: other federal agencies, including prosecutors from DNM and the FBI. Unsurprisingly,
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: that investigation disclosed concerning information about Epstein and his associates'
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: ties to an alleged criminal contact in New Mexico. In 1993,
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: Epstein purchased Zorro Ranch in Santa Fe County, New Mexico,
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: and visited the state repeatedly until his death in 2019.
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: Public records from the redacted documents released publicly through USDOJ's
• 8:53
  Speaker 1: online Epstein Library pursuant to the EFTA reveal that Zorro
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: Ranch was one of the locations where Epstein's victims were taken.
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: Epstein's known criminal associate, Glaine Maxwell, likewise visited Zorro Ranch
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: repeatedly in the years Epstein owned the property, often accompanying
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: him during his visits to New Mexico. In December of 2021,
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: a jury returned a verdict finding Maxwell guilty of sex
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: trafficking of a minor, transportation of a minor with intent
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: to engage in criminal sexual activity, and conspiracy to transport
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: minors with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity,
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: in connection with her role in the web of sexual
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: abuse surrounding Epstein. Acts that form the basis of Maxwell's
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: grand jury indictment included those that occurred in New Mexico.
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: The Epstein files include over 13,000 references to Zorro Ranch
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: and 5,000 references to New Mexico's locations where victims were trafficked, groomed,
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: and assaulted. An MDOJ began its investigation into potential crimes
• 9:54
  Speaker 1: occurring at Zorro Ranch in February of 2019. Between February
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: and July 2019, NMDOJ investigators and attorneys contacted and interviewed
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: victims who reported being sexually abused in New Mexico by
• 10:08
  Speaker 1: Epstein's associates and former contractors of Epstein's Zorro Ranch. Recognizing
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: the potential for overlapping state and federal criminal investigation, on
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: May 14, 2019, an MDOJ informed USDOJ that New Mexico
• 10:24
  Speaker 1: had been actively engaged in an ongoing investigation and review
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: into potential criminal activities at Zorro Ranch. Explained the investigation
• 10:32
  Speaker 1: may also involve a referral of certain criminal matters within
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: the exclusive statutory authority of the federal government. and requested
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: to meet with USDOJ to de-conflict on sensitive law enforcement
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: matters and discuss possible strategies to streamline investigation and charging.
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: On May 17, 2019, USDOJ initially rebuffed the invitation to
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: share information and coordinate. During a subsequent telephone call on
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: July 23, 2019, USDOJ told NMDOJ to stand down from
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: its investigation into Epstein's potential criminal activity in New Mexico.
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: Federal records included in the publicly disclosed Epstein filed documents
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: that call. The records reflect the end date to cease
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: any investigation into sex trafficking and share whatever an MDOJ
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: had gathered to date regarding sex trafficking activity with the SDNY.
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: All right, we're going to wrap up right here. And
• 11:28
  Speaker 1: in the next episode, we're going to pick up where
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: we left off. All the information that goes with this
• 11:32
  Speaker 1: episode can be found in the description box.