Latest / Turley Talks / Ep. 3402 Dems PANIC as Their BLUEST STATE Is Turning RED!!!
Transcript
- 0:00[SPEAKER_01]: The liberal globalist order is on its brink and awakening a new conservative age.
- 0:06[SPEAKER_01]: Dr. Steve Turley joined me every day as we discover answers to today's toughest challenges and explore the re-bondalization of conservative civilization.
- 0:18[SPEAKER_01]: This is Turley Talks.
- 0:20[SPEAKER_02]: to introduce the Forty-Five and the Forty-Five and the Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-Five, Forty-
- 0:37[SPEAKER_00]: We've never seen it.
- 0:38[SPEAKER_00]: There's a twenty thousand people cheering for every executive order star president Trump comes in and he needed to begin taking action to fix each and every one of these fires that the Democrats started with six months delivering on the agenda.
- 0:50[SPEAKER_02]: This ultimately is promises made promises kept by the president.
- 0:54[SPEAKER_02]: This is a message to the rest of the world.
- 0:56[SPEAKER_02]: The days of ripping off America and Americans are officially over.
- 1:01[SPEAKER_01]: The Trump
- 1:02[SPEAKER_01]: archive are a series of near-impossible feats.
- 1:06[SPEAKER_01]: The safest, most secure border in the history of this nation.
- 1:09[SPEAKER_01]: Order crossings have dropped so much with that federal agents now outnumber illegal crossers.
- 1:13[SPEAKER_01]: He had a mandate and he's delivering it.
- 1:16[SPEAKER_01]: The American economy is better for it now that it has to be torqued in all time high gas prices for down retail sales are up to billion dollars in international financial agreement and records paraphrase
- 1:29[SPEAKER_01]: The USA is on a roll, commenting in the signing of the one big beautiful bill on July, or a bill for invite the people.
- 1:38[SPEAKER_01]: Thanks to this bill, Trump will resign tomorrow, and still point to an enduring legacy.
- 1:43[SPEAKER_01]: And he's full seam ahead for America.
- 1:44[SPEAKER_01]: This movement that President Trump has started is only getting bigger and has more energy, more enthusiasm, and what he's going to do is show up in work hard and deliver every day for the American people.
- 1:54[SPEAKER_02]: You'll watch him history.
- 1:55[SPEAKER_02]: So buckle up, because the next three and a half years will probably be just as busy.
- 2:03[UNKNOWN]: Thank you for watching!
- 2:14[SPEAKER_00]: The America First Mega Wave is sweeping even the ultra blue state of California.
- 2:23[SPEAKER_00]: These are scenes from if you can believe it Beverly Hills.
- 2:27[SPEAKER_01]: They have had it with their incompetent, lawless leftist government.
- 2:32[SPEAKER_01]: They are joining the fight to take back their state as patriots all across the country, arising up to take back.
- 2:41[SPEAKER_01]: our nation.
- 2:41[SPEAKER_01]: And it's happening even in the bluest of blue states.
- 2:44[SPEAKER_01]: We got all the data on California turning red, the unthinkable.
- 2:51[SPEAKER_01]: This is going to absolutely blow your mind.
- 2:54[SPEAKER_01]: Wait until you see this greetings, everyone.
- 2:56[SPEAKER_01]: It is a live stream Friday.
- 2:58[SPEAKER_01]: I'm your as Dr. Steve or Patre professor here to help you make sense of all the madness as the radical left desperately tries to stop the unstoppable, the inevitable rise.
- 3:10[SPEAKER_01]: of a new conservative age all around the world.
- 3:13[SPEAKER_01]: So if you want a front row seat on how you are changing the world in ways you never even imagine, make sure to smack that bell and subscribe, but you are not going to want to miss a single episode.
- 3:24[SPEAKER_01]: As always, we've got a jam packed show for you today, our super chats are up.
- 3:27[SPEAKER_01]: So feel free to send in your comments, your questions.
- 3:30[SPEAKER_01]: It'll be my privilege to read them and answer them for everyone here on this livestream.
- 3:34[SPEAKER_01]: You can actually do that in two ways either through a one time gift via our YouTube super chats.
- 3:40[SPEAKER_01]: Or if I'd be coming to courageous patriots, club member where your monthly gift will enable you to ask me as many questions as you like.
- 3:47[SPEAKER_01]: So just click on that link below to join you.
- 3:49[SPEAKER_01]: I have instant access to all kinds of exclusive live Q and A special content either way.
- 3:56[SPEAKER_01]: It will be my privilege to answer your questions through this livestream.
- 4:00[SPEAKER_01]: Also, I do want to give a big shout out to one of our sponsors, our awesome sponsors for today's livestream.
- 4:06[SPEAKER_01]: That's our good friends over at Bean Dream.
- 4:09[SPEAKER_01]: I have told you about these guys.
- 4:11[SPEAKER_01]: They're amazing.
- 4:12[SPEAKER_01]: I've been using Bean Dream nightly now for months.
- 4:15[SPEAKER_01]: And I genuinely cannot imagine my nights without him.
- 4:18[SPEAKER_01]: My son now starting to take bean dream and he loves it.
- 4:22[SPEAKER_01]: Because frankly, both of us, we just are not very good sleepers.
- 4:26[SPEAKER_01]: We lie awake for hours.
- 4:28[SPEAKER_01]: For me, I'm always, I can't turn my brain off, you know?
- 4:31[SPEAKER_01]: But now, I fall asleep.
- 4:34[SPEAKER_01]: I fall asleep.
- 4:35[SPEAKER_01]: I kid you not in under thirty minutes.
- 4:38[SPEAKER_01]: And I stay asleep throughout the night.
- 4:40[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, we're talking that deep sleep.
- 4:41[SPEAKER_01]: And then I wake up.
- 4:43[SPEAKER_01]: without that foggy sluggish feeling.
- 4:45[SPEAKER_01]: And in fact, since I began taking dream consistently, I've noticed a real difference just in my daily focus, my mood, my energy throughout the day.
- 4:54[SPEAKER_01]: Dream is made with top quality science back ingredients that help you relax and get the deep, uninterrupted sleep your body needs.
- 5:01[SPEAKER_01]: I'm excited, I take it each night, it's become a rich while I actually look forward to.
- 5:05[SPEAKER_01]: And like other sleep aids, there's no groginess in the next day.
- 5:09[SPEAKER_01]: Just clear, headed,
- 5:12[SPEAKER_01]: Focus engine like I'm giving you right now.
- 5:14[SPEAKER_01]: So if sleep is something you've been struggling with and let's face it most of us do I cannot recommend dreaming now.
- 5:22[SPEAKER_01]: So right now if you click on that link below you could save up to thirty five percent off with my exclusive beam discount thirty five percent off just click the link below or scan the QR code
- 5:36[SPEAKER_01]: and use code turly at checkout.
- 5:38[SPEAKER_01]: Don't settle for rustless night's gang.
- 5:40[SPEAKER_01]: There's no point of having them.
- 5:42[SPEAKER_01]: Try Dream.
- 5:42[SPEAKER_01]: You'll feel the difference.
- 5:43[SPEAKER_01]: Click on that link below.
- 5:45[SPEAKER_01]: Right now.
- 5:47[SPEAKER_01]: All right.
- 5:47[SPEAKER_01]: California.
- 5:49[SPEAKER_01]: is indeed turning red.
- 5:52[SPEAKER_01]: California is going through a massive voter roll per, how do I say that three times?
- 5:58[SPEAKER_01]: That's voter roll per, voter roll.
- 6:00[SPEAKER_01]: There we go.
- 6:01[SPEAKER_01]: Voter roll perge as we speak.
- 6:04[SPEAKER_01]: They are legally required to do so by federal law because they do get federal funds for their elections.
- 6:10[SPEAKER_01]: They're reported, they're required to report their voter roll numbers.
- 6:14[SPEAKER_01]: at their voter role activity to what's called the EAC, that's the election assistance commission, a federal agency.
- 6:21[SPEAKER_01]: So this includes detailed reports covering various aspects of election administration voting, voter registration, voting practices, and the use of federal funds, how they use those federal funds in election administration.
- 6:35[SPEAKER_01]: And the numbers that are coming out of California as of this week are frankly stunning.
- 6:42[SPEAKER_01]: And I want to give a huge shout out, by the way, to shallow marks and his ex account for keeping very detailed tabs on the voter role purchase and changes going on in California.
- 6:53[SPEAKER_01]: Thank you for that, shallow.
- 6:54[SPEAKER_01]: Shadows basically saying that
- 6:57[SPEAKER_01]: When all of a sudden done, we actually may have already flipped California.
- 7:00[SPEAKER_01]: Now, that is, I'm going to say it upfront.
- 7:03[SPEAKER_01]: That is a very, very optimistic interpretation of the numbers I'm going to show you.
- 7:11[SPEAKER_01]: So I'm going to give you the other side.
- 7:14[SPEAKER_01]: But he's saying, it may be a done deal.
- 7:18[SPEAKER_01]: It's California flipping red is baked in the cake right now.
- 7:23[SPEAKER_01]: I know that literally sounds impossible, but take a look at this.
- 7:28[SPEAKER_01]: California just officially removed three point one million in eligible voters from their voter rules.
- 7:39[SPEAKER_01]: Okay.
- 7:39[SPEAKER_01]: So these are names of people either died or people moved away or whatever, right?
- 7:45[SPEAKER_01]: But they are ineligible either way.
- 7:47[SPEAKER_01]: That could be a legal you name it.
- 7:49[SPEAKER_01]: Three point one million ineligible voters have been purged since November.
- 7:58[SPEAKER_01]: from California's voter rolls.
- 8:00[SPEAKER_01]: Now, that of course is a significant number and other itself to massive voter purge.
- 8:06[SPEAKER_01]: Now, you might remember when Texas did something very similar, they removed nearly a million ineligible voters from their voter rolls just before the November election.
- 8:14[SPEAKER_01]: And what we find is whenever ineligible voters are removed,
- 8:19[SPEAKER_01]: Who always benefits and who always is adversely effective, right?
- 8:24[SPEAKER_01]: It always always always benefits Republicans and it always always always always without fail adversely affects Democrats.
- 8:33[SPEAKER_01]: And we can see that in real time here.
- 8:38[SPEAKER_01]: Three point one, million in eligible voters perched.
- 8:42[SPEAKER_01]: Do you want to take a guess at how many votes, Kamala one, California buy back in November?
- 8:49[SPEAKER_01]: It's, I kid you not, three point two million.
- 8:55[SPEAKER_01]: We just removed three point one million in the eligible voters from California's voter rolls and Kamala one California by three point two million.
- 9:04[SPEAKER_01]: That's what this fellow Shala Marx means by saying, guys, we may already have just flipped the nation's bluest of blue states.
- 9:15[SPEAKER_01]: It's incredible.
- 9:16[SPEAKER_01]: And the significance of this voter role purge applies down ticket as well.
- 9:22[SPEAKER_01]: When Adam ship got elected, right, ship to shift, oh pencil neck, when he got elected back in November.
- 9:28[SPEAKER_01]: California had four point nine million in eligible voters on its roles.
- 9:35[SPEAKER_01]: So by the way, this three point one is just the beginning.
- 9:38[SPEAKER_01]: It's good to continue here.
- 9:40[SPEAKER_01]: But they had four point nine million in eligible voters on its roles.
- 9:43[SPEAKER_01]: Think about the political party, by the way.
- 9:46[SPEAKER_01]: That's cynically tells us that they are the defenders of democracy.
- 9:50[SPEAKER_01]: They allow for nearly five million in eligible voters to vote.
- 9:56[SPEAKER_01]: But since then,
- 9:58[SPEAKER_01]: At the time of this tweet, which was a few weeks ago, two point five million in eligible voters had been removed, had been purged from California's voter rolls.
- 10:11[SPEAKER_01]: And that's significant because, Shifty Shift, will pencil neck, one by two point five million votes.
- 10:21[SPEAKER_01]: So that's the beauty of these voter-roll purges, voter-roll purges are the great equalized.
- 10:26[SPEAKER_01]: They signal the death now for Democrats literally everywhere, even in the blues to blues states such as California.
- 10:34[SPEAKER_01]: Now again, to be fair.
- 10:36[SPEAKER_01]: All right, if we want to sort of, you know, steel man, the counter-argument here.
- 10:45[SPEAKER_01]: We don't have the partisan breakdown of this voter purge.
- 10:48[SPEAKER_01]: So we don't actually know that all three point one million are Democrats are voted Democrat.
- 10:54[SPEAKER_01]: But we are on pretty safe ground to assume that at least half are Democrats given the enormous registration advantage Democrats have in California.
- 11:04[SPEAKER_01]: So if there's any kind of voter purge, again, given to the federal government, given to the federal elections commission, that they get to audit and check out make sure it's on the up and up.
- 11:15[SPEAKER_01]: They're not just purging Republicans, for example.
- 11:19[SPEAKER_01]: Given the, given the inordinate,
- 11:24[SPEAKER_01]: voter registration advantage that Democrats have in California.
- 11:29[SPEAKER_01]: We're on safe ground assuming that we're looking at a reduction about one point eight million or so Democrats with the rest split between Republicans and independence.
- 11:38[SPEAKER_01]: So that would mean
- 11:41[SPEAKER_01]: that the Republicans would have net gained as a result of this purge, they would have net gained upwards about one point to one point three million voters in California, which is absolutely extraordinary in and of itself.
- 11:54[SPEAKER_01]: And again, it's probably more than that.
- 11:56[SPEAKER_01]: It's probably more than that given that ineligible Republicans don't actually vote.
- 12:06[SPEAKER_01]: And that's of course because Republicans generally play by the rules.
- 12:10[SPEAKER_01]: They love America, and they don't want to see our republic squandered through corruption fraud and deceit.
- 12:16[SPEAKER_01]: Democrats on the other hand hate our country, and they will exploit ineligible voters, ineligible Democrat registered voters, even if they no longer are in their state, they will exploit that and find some way to get them to vote.
- 12:32[SPEAKER_01]: especially through mail-in ballots.
- 12:34[SPEAKER_01]: And we've talked about this before.
- 12:36[SPEAKER_01]: Democrats hate our country.
- 12:38[SPEAKER_01]: I'm not exaggerating.
- 12:39[SPEAKER_01]: They are literally post-American.
- 12:42[SPEAKER_01]: That's what it's technically called post-Americanism.
- 12:45[SPEAKER_01]: And it's the belief that America's fundamentally evil.
- 12:48[SPEAKER_01]: It's fundamentally an unfair, exploitive, racist, unjust society, and therefore deserves to be completely replaced by a post-nineteen sixty-four political and cultural revolution.
- 13:01[SPEAKER_01]: So you literally have Democrats like Ellie missed all a frequent contributor to MSNBC and just a rabid left wing lunatic who openly declares that all laws passed prior to nineteen sixty four civil rights act.
- 13:17[SPEAKER_01]: are by definition null and void because they were passed by what was an effect in a part-time state.
- 13:23[SPEAKER_01]: Of course, that goes all the way back to basically nullifying the Constitution for these radical leftists because they will openly state that the Constitution is itself an inherently racist document.
- 13:34[SPEAKER_01]: And you know, you even see it in defending the so-called black national anthem being sung before NFL games.
- 13:40[SPEAKER_01]: You have radical leftists arguing like on MSNBC that the national anthem itself is racist, particularly the third verse.
- 13:48[SPEAKER_01]: So we have to understand these people don't care.
- 13:52[SPEAKER_01]: They will cheat.
- 13:53[SPEAKER_01]: They will lie.
- 13:54[SPEAKER_01]: They will fabricate.
- 13:55[SPEAKER_01]: They will deceit.
- 13:56[SPEAKER_01]: They will do anything and everything they need to do to take political power and bring down
- 14:02[SPEAKER_01]: the whole of the American system and not to get too far field here, but in eligible Republicans generally don't show up to vote, right?
- 14:12[SPEAKER_01]: They don't show up in the vote tally.
- 14:14[SPEAKER_01]: Where is ineligible Democrats always do?
- 14:18[SPEAKER_01]: Republicans refrain from that kind of deceit because we love our country.
- 14:22[SPEAKER_01]: And we know that if we were engaged in that kind of deception, that we would destroy the rule of law.
- 14:27[SPEAKER_01]: And we don't want to do that because we love the rule of law.
- 14:30[SPEAKER_01]: We love our nation.
- 14:30[SPEAKER_01]: Whereas Democrats, they doubled down on the seat because it helps to destroy the country they hate.
- 14:37[SPEAKER_01]: So, so I would argue that it's probably a Republican pickup more around two million as a result of this massive voter purge in California when you factor in the case that whatever Republicans got purged from that voter role wouldn't have been voting anyway.
- 14:57[SPEAKER_01]: Whereas every single Democrat that was in that illegitimate voter role would have definitely been
- 15:03[SPEAKER_01]: would have found a way of having their names or their votes counted.
- 15:08[SPEAKER_01]: And I think we're seeing this trend, by the way, with the whole new voter registration gains, the new registrations.
- 15:17[SPEAKER_01]: So these are people who are now actively registering to vote.
- 15:22[SPEAKER_01]: The GOP is out registering the Democrats in California by a factor of two to one.
- 15:28[SPEAKER_01]: It's pretty incredible.
- 15:29[SPEAKER_01]: So while Democrats gained about a hundred and ninety seven thousand voter registrations in California over the last few years, during that same time period, Republicans gained just shy of half a million, four hundred and forty two thousand.
- 15:44[SPEAKER_01]: So Democrats are losing their ineligible voters and Republicans are gaining new voters all across the state.
- 15:53[SPEAKER_01]: So that's what I mean where I'm talking about this red.
- 15:55[SPEAKER_01]: There is a
- 15:57[SPEAKER_01]: There is both a negative and a positive red wave happening all across the Golden State.
- 16:04[SPEAKER_01]: And it gets even better.
- 16:05[SPEAKER_01]: We talked about this in our video yesterday on the end of Gavin News.
- 16:08[SPEAKER_01]: Some of you definitely want to check out that video.
- 16:10[SPEAKER_01]: That's good.
- 16:11[SPEAKER_01]: But even with all of these millions of eligible voters on their voter rolls,
- 16:16[SPEAKER_01]: California was still shifting right.
- 16:20[SPEAKER_01]: That's key, even with all of those millions of eligible voters on their voter rolls, California still shifted right.
- 16:30[SPEAKER_01]: So in November, California voters shifted ten points to the right since twenty twenty ten freaking points.
- 16:39[SPEAKER_01]: That is huge.
- 16:41[SPEAKER_01]: Trump flipped a number of counties.
- 16:43[SPEAKER_01]: Many of you know this.
- 16:44[SPEAKER_01]: We've talked this a lot.
- 16:45[SPEAKER_01]: He flipped San Bernardino.
- 16:46[SPEAKER_01]: He flipped Orange County.
- 16:48[SPEAKER_01]: He flipped Fresno.
- 16:49[SPEAKER_01]: About a half a dozen blue counties that were blue in twenty twenty flipped red.
- 16:55[SPEAKER_01]: Not a single county in California flipped the other way.
- 16:58[SPEAKER_01]: Not one.
- 16:59[SPEAKER_01]: not one flip from red to blue, not one.
- 17:01[SPEAKER_01]: And not only that, but Californians said we talked about this yesterday.
- 17:05[SPEAKER_01]: California's completely rebuffed Gavin Newsom and Kackles Kamala by voting overwhelmingly for what's called Proposition thirty six.
- 17:15[SPEAKER_01]: So this was the proposition that restored very top
- 17:18[SPEAKER_01]: very harsh penalties for criminals.
- 17:21[SPEAKER_01]: Newsom ran against it.
- 17:23[SPEAKER_01]: Come on.
- 17:24[SPEAKER_01]: A cackles was, of course, ambiguous.
- 17:25[SPEAKER_01]: She would never tell us how she voted or her position on it.
- 17:29[SPEAKER_01]: She just gave us her word salad and the likes.
- 17:31[SPEAKER_01]: So obviously, she voted against it.
- 17:34[SPEAKER_01]: Obviously, she opposed it.
- 17:36[SPEAKER_01]: And what California's did, I mean, point blank is they both told both of them to shove it.
- 17:45[SPEAKER_01]: And they voted for the proposition with seventy percent of the votes seven out of ten California voters and again with all of those ineligible millions of ineligible voters to boot.
- 17:57[SPEAKER_01]: They still seventy percent voted for the proposition.
- 18:01[SPEAKER_01]: They basically told new some in cackles to shove it.
- 18:04[SPEAKER_01]: It was a total repudiation of their soft on crime governance.
- 18:08[SPEAKER_01]: And then we've talked to
- 18:10[SPEAKER_01]: about the fact that even California Democrats themselves are shifting right.
- 18:16[SPEAKER_01]: This is an absolutely fascinating phenomenon happening right now, particularly in the city of San Francisco where I spent so much time.
- 18:26[SPEAKER_01]: My mom is from
- 18:27[SPEAKER_01]: in the Bay Area.
- 18:29[SPEAKER_01]: They now San Francisco now has a mayor who's just elected back in November, who's quietly becoming perhaps the single most conservative mayor in the nation outside of the mayor.
- 18:41[SPEAKER_01]: I'm forgetting his name is Johnson in Dallas, but look up Mayor Daniel Lurry.
- 18:47[SPEAKER_01]: He's fascinating.
- 18:48[SPEAKER_01]: Lurry is a Democrat, of course.
- 18:50[SPEAKER_01]: They all are in San Francisco, but he is governing San Francisco very much like a Giuliani Republican.
- 18:57[SPEAKER_01]: The most conservative Democrat mayor in the nation right now is governing what was at one time probably the single most liberal city in the nation San Francisco very few people are paying attention to this he's he's very quietly moving to make
- 19:13[SPEAKER_01]: to basically restore sanity to San Francisco politics.
- 19:17[SPEAKER_01]: So there, the many respects the city is turned to corner, they're coming back, they're quietly cleaning up the homeless population, they're cracking down on crime, they're prosecuting car thefts and shop lifters.
- 19:29[SPEAKER_01]: And they're turning around fast, and the far left presence, San Francisco has been actually asking mayor Larry about what he thinks about Trump.
- 19:37[SPEAKER_01]: And whether he's going to take a stand against Trump and ICE and so forth.
- 19:41[SPEAKER_01]: And this guy, to his credit, again, a Democrat is coming out and saying, hey, guys, that's not my jurisdiction.
- 19:48[SPEAKER_01]: That's not my lane.
- 19:49[SPEAKER_01]: I'm a mayor of a local city.
- 19:52[SPEAKER_01]: That's federal politics.
- 19:53[SPEAKER_01]: And I'm not, I got nothing to do with that.
- 19:57[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, he's appealing to federalism and his answers.
- 19:59[SPEAKER_01]: It's astonishing.
- 20:00[SPEAKER_01]: And it's literally all turning around in San Francisco.
- 20:04[SPEAKER_01]: We got a little precursor to this back in June of twenty twenty two after a special election, a recall election.
- 20:13[SPEAKER_01]: So San Francisco voters went to the polls.
- 20:15[SPEAKER_01]: The overwhelmingly recalled their ultra woke
- 20:21[SPEAKER_01]: D.A.
- 20:21[SPEAKER_01]: Chase a bodeen.
- 20:23[SPEAKER_01]: He was a bank road bank roll by George Soros.
- 20:26[SPEAKER_01]: He was an absolute disaster, you know, implementing this restorative justice nonsense and they voted overwhelmingly to get rid of him and then to replace him.
- 20:38[SPEAKER_01]: And they, again, overwhelmingly voted in a staunch law and order DA by the name of Frank Jenkins.
- 20:46[SPEAKER_01]: She won in a landslide.
- 20:48[SPEAKER_01]: And now she, along with this new mayor, are prosecuting criminals left and right.
- 20:54[SPEAKER_01]: So to me, what's so key here in that kind of the lesson that we can take from that, particularly what's happening in San Francisco, is that the fundamentals of the mega movement are officially becoming pre-political.
- 21:12[SPEAKER_01]: The fundamentals of the mega movement are officially becoming pre-political.
- 21:17[SPEAKER_01]: What I mean by that is issues like border security, right, mass deportations, law and order,
- 21:24[SPEAKER_01]: anti-wokeness, anti-DI, patriotism, a reverence and love for our nation's culture, customs and traditions.
- 21:33[SPEAKER_01]: These are all now political baselines.
- 21:37[SPEAKER_01]: They're overwhelming popularity.
- 21:40[SPEAKER_01]: Now pre-seeds partisanship.
- 21:44[SPEAKER_01]: Such that now even Democrats are starting to embrace this stuff.
- 21:49[SPEAKER_01]: And keep in mind, first it's Democrat voters, as we saw, for example, with that San Francisco DA recall.
- 21:55[SPEAKER_01]: First Democrat voters and then Democrat politicians to follow because the Democrat politicians only realize that the only way that they're going to politically survive.
- 22:04[SPEAKER_01]: is to finally embrace some kind of mega-oriented agenda.
- 22:09[SPEAKER_01]: Now, of course, you still have your rabid radical Marxist, twenty percent, the ones who doubled down on the eighty-twenty doom loop who embraced the single most unpopular political opinions on the planet like we're currently seeing in Manhattan or New York with Mamedani or the or Minneapolis with this new Somali socialist.
- 22:29[SPEAKER_01]: But that is why
- 22:31[SPEAKER_01]: Those two are causing so much consternation from within the party, particularly among the likes of someone like James Carval because they recognize Carval on the like recognize that if these radical Marxists become the face of the Democrat party, they're toast.
- 22:48[SPEAKER_01]: They're toast.
- 22:49[SPEAKER_01]: If MAGA is truly becoming pre-political, if that's baseline, if we're not even going to be talking about politics at state and federal levels, apart from the basic structure of MAGA border security, mask deportations, economic security, anti-wokeness and alike, then
- 23:08[SPEAKER_01]: If the Democrat, if if Mam Donnie or this Somali socialist become the faces of the Democratic Party, they are flipping toast, they will not win another national election for generations.
- 23:24[SPEAKER_00]: And as it turns out, they're right.
- 23:26[SPEAKER_00]: They're right because it's happy, you know, case book, case book.
- 23:33[SPEAKER_01]: I'm mixing my metaphor.
- 23:34[SPEAKER_01]: Case study, textbook example, California.
- 23:40[SPEAKER_01]: And what's happening in California is actually a microcosm of what's happening all across the nation.
- 23:47[SPEAKER_01]: Wait until you see the latest data on this, it is going to absolutely blow you away.
- 23:53[SPEAKER_01]: But first gang, if you are just joining us, I'd love to hear your thoughts on all of this.
- 23:58[SPEAKER_01]: Let us know what you think either by setting us a super chat or by clicking on that link below and joining our courageous patriot club.
- 24:04[SPEAKER_01]: We're for just one monthly fee.
- 24:06[SPEAKER_01]: I'll feature your comments on all our broadcasts.
- 24:09[SPEAKER_01]: You can ask me as many questions as you like.
- 24:11[SPEAKER_01]: I'll be happy to answer them.
- 24:13[SPEAKER_01]: On this livestream, but we also get some private, we get our own exclusive digital platform for live Q&A where you get to talk to me once a week.
- 24:22[SPEAKER_01]: We have a great, great fellowship.
- 24:24[SPEAKER_01]: There's thousands of us that can come together every week to celebrate faith, family, and freedom.
- 24:29[SPEAKER_01]: So just click on that link below.
- 24:30[SPEAKER_01]: Go to fight.turlytalks.com slash join or just send us a super chat, whatever you like.
- 24:36[SPEAKER_01]: Also, do you ever wonder
- 24:38[SPEAKER_01]: Why your brain feels foggy?
- 24:42[SPEAKER_01]: Even when you're eating clean and exercising, right?
- 24:45[SPEAKER_01]: We all know it.
- 24:46[SPEAKER_01]: Well, it may not be burnout.
- 24:48[SPEAKER_01]: It could be parasites.
- 24:50[SPEAKER_01]: I kid you not.
- 24:52[SPEAKER_01]: Ground breaking research from Dr. Allen McDonald revealed the direct link between chronic parasitic infections and neurological disease like multiple scrosis.
- 25:03[SPEAKER_01]: Parasites can cause inflammation, nerve damage, and long-term cognitive decline.
- 25:08[SPEAKER_01]: More reason to do a full body cleanse at least once a year.
- 25:12[SPEAKER_01]: Well, the wellness company has a solution for you.
- 25:15[SPEAKER_01]: I've remacked in plus Mabendezol.
- 25:18[SPEAKER_01]: That is the gold standard Parasite solution now combined.
- 25:23[SPEAKER_01]: in one cleanse combo, designed to eliminate harmful invaders and support your immune system naturally, medical grade, not some trendy herbal gimmicks.
- 25:33[SPEAKER_01]: All you got to do is just fill out a quick intake form and get a three month supply ship straight to your door.
- 25:39[SPEAKER_01]: Maha is officially here and the wellness company is making hard to get medications digitally accessible so you can live your best life now.
- 25:49[SPEAKER_01]: All you got to do is head on over the TWC
- 25:52[SPEAKER_01]: dot health slash thoroughly.
- 25:54[SPEAKER_01]: That's TWC dot health slash, to early use code, to say, ninety dollars off plus free shipping.
- 26:02[SPEAKER_01]: Click on that link below and cleanse your body today.
- 26:06[SPEAKER_01]: All right.
- 26:07[SPEAKER_01]: So as it turns out, the political shifts in California are but the latest.
- 26:15[SPEAKER_01]: of the Democrats worries, perhaps a single best threat to the Democrats ever taking back congressional power like for the foreseeable future lies in the mass redistricting plans happening right now as we speak in a number of solid red states.
- 26:33[SPEAKER_01]: Now the irony here is that for years, this is exactly what the Democrats did.
- 26:37[SPEAKER_01]: Democrats covered up a they carved up deep blue states like Illinois, California, New York,
- 26:44[SPEAKER_01]: how do you want to know calm in a jerry manner spaghetti strands that were all deliberately intended to pad their congressional numbers and Republicans now are finally finally returning fire and it's literally turning in nothing less than shock and all and we're seeing this most particularly in Texas and Ohio were the new congressional maps they're being drawn up
- 27:12[SPEAKER_01]: promised to deliver upwards of thirty two solid GOP seats thirty two safe solid red GOP seats for the twenty twenty six midterms just between these two states alone and you ready for this you may need to sit down for this all right I want to prepare you for it if you're driving you might not just pull on over ever so carefully to the side of the road
- 27:41[SPEAKER_01]: If that happens and it looks like it's happening, that starts us at two hundred and seventeen seats nationwide.
- 27:51[SPEAKER_01]: Two hundred and seventeen safe, deep red GOP seats.
- 27:57[SPEAKER_01]: Two seventeen would be baseline for any congressional election.
- 28:03[SPEAKER_01]: That means all we need
- 28:06[SPEAKER_01]: is just to pick up one more seat to keep that gavel and continue advancing President Trump's America first agenda.
- 28:14[SPEAKER_01]: That's it for the magic two eighteen one seat.
- 28:18[SPEAKER_01]: So what Texas is doing here is they're splitting El Paso, they're fortifying the Rio Grande Valley, which, by the way, has been going very, very deep red, turning quite red.
- 28:29[SPEAKER_01]: And they're in the process turning longtime swing districts deep red by just simply, you're finagling the district thing there.
- 28:36[SPEAKER_01]: And the beauty here is that it's not just Texas in Ohio.
- 28:40[SPEAKER_01]: It's a number of red states.
- 28:42[SPEAKER_01]: We're about to redraw their congressional districts in such a way that promises to pick up
- 28:47[SPEAKER_01]: To pick up brand new we don't have this yet to pick up.
- 28:51[SPEAKER_01]: Seventeen new solid red seats as a result of this redistricted Texas alone would pick up seven Ohio Florida.
- 29:01[SPEAKER_01]: They'd all pick up handful of seats.
- 29:03[SPEAKER_01]: I move basically lock the Democrats permanently out of congressional power for the foreseeable future because remember remember when all is said and done.
- 29:12[SPEAKER_01]: Every congressional election basically comes down to fifteen percent of seats, eighty five percent of Congress' seats are guaranteed in combat reelection, guaranteed.
- 29:24[SPEAKER_01]: It comes down to fifteen percent.
- 29:26[SPEAKER_01]: And right now as we speak, the Democrats occupy seventy percent.
- 29:33[SPEAKER_01]: of those fifty, it's basically seventy seats, sixty nine if I recall exactly.
- 29:39[SPEAKER_01]: They occupy seventy percent of those seats.
- 29:41[SPEAKER_01]: They're already applying on the defensive.
- 29:44[SPEAKER_01]: They're already on the defense of all they have to do is lose one of those seats with this new baseline.
- 29:51[SPEAKER_01]: Republicans could literally lose all of them.
- 29:54[SPEAKER_01]: All of the fifteen percent just gain what for the exception one, just gain one, but with this new redistricting, they get their two eighteen and there's nothing the Democrats can do about it.
- 30:04[SPEAKER_01]: That's the beauty in this.
- 30:06[SPEAKER_01]: The Democrats and the blue estates can't do anything about it, California and Illinois, New York.
- 30:11[SPEAKER_01]: These are all states of a governed by an independent redistricting commission and changing that would require a constitutional amendment approved by voters for their state.
- 30:21[SPEAKER_01]: So ironically,
- 30:24[SPEAKER_01]: Ironically, blue states ended up only basically destroying with with the because they were doing all this redistricting.
- 30:33[SPEAKER_01]: The citizens push back and set up these independent redistricting commissions by vote and put it into their state constitutions.
- 30:42[SPEAKER_01]: So it's enshrined as law.
- 30:45[SPEAKER_01]: So ironically, all of their redistricting efforts in the past have resulted in them getting hamstrung in a way that red states aren't.
- 30:54[SPEAKER_01]: That's the brilliance of what the Republicans are doing in Texas and Ohio and North Carolina and Florida.
- 30:59[SPEAKER_01]: They are exploiting the fact that all these deep blue Democrat states are all hamstrung by independent redistricting commissions while red states are not.
- 31:09[SPEAKER_01]: But ironically,
- 31:11[SPEAKER_01]: Before blue states were hampered by redistricting commissions, of course, they were doing the exact same thing these red states are now doing.
- 31:20[SPEAKER_01]: It just took us President Trump
- 31:23[SPEAKER_01]: to come before Red State's finalies started fighting back, fighting fire with redistricting fire.
- 31:32[SPEAKER_01]: Again, this is what makes Trump so amazing.
- 31:35[SPEAKER_01]: And this is what will most likely be his lasting enduring legacy for the next century.
- 31:41[SPEAKER_01]: He finally taught the GOP how to fight.
- 31:46[SPEAKER_01]: He finally taught the GOP how to fight and beat the Democrats.
- 31:52[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, it took what, seventy, eighty years because it was the Democrats remember who established the pre-political paradigm.
- 32:00[SPEAKER_01]: The Democrats who established, you know, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, all that.
- 32:04[SPEAKER_01]: So they established the pre-political paradigm that no
- 32:08[SPEAKER_01]: that everyone had to get on board with if they would ever get elected.
- 32:12[SPEAKER_01]: Now it's Trump and the magamovement.
- 32:14[SPEAKER_01]: That's establishing the new pre-political baseline for American politics and Trump did that because he showed the GOP how to fight, but it's even better.
- 32:26[SPEAKER_01]: Here's the key.
- 32:27[SPEAKER_01]: He taught us how to fight, but without burning down the whole country in the process like the Democrats do.
- 32:35[SPEAKER_01]: Right?
- 32:36[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, again, this is kind of closing a loop with what we were just talking about before.
- 32:39[SPEAKER_01]: The GOP hates using the Democrats tactics because we love our country and the Democrats exploit that love.
- 32:48[SPEAKER_01]: They exploit that love of our nation by engaging in petulant and destructive tactics that they know the Republicans will never ever reciprocate because it would mean the end of our republic as we know it and as we love it.
- 33:03[SPEAKER_01]: And so what Trump so
- 33:06[SPEAKER_01]: What makes Trump so incredibly amazing is he has taught the GOP how to fight back effectively against the Democrats and beat them all the while regaining our country rather than losing it.
- 33:23[SPEAKER_01]: He taught the GOP how to effectively fight fire without losing the nation we loved and ironically regaining it.
- 33:32[SPEAKER_01]: And the GOP is big rewarded big time for it.
- 33:35[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, take a look at these fundraising numbers.
- 33:38[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, these are insane.
- 33:42[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, I'll just, but bottom line bottom line Republicans are out raising the Democrats five to one bottom line.
- 33:50[SPEAKER_01]: The RNC, the Republican National Committee right now as we speak holds over eighty million dollars cash on hand all the while Trump's war chest.
- 33:59[SPEAKER_01]: has topped an unprecedented one billion dollars.
- 34:03[SPEAKER_01]: Trump, who technically can't even run for reelection, has a ace as a second term president, is more powerful than any first term president, modern political history.
- 34:14[SPEAKER_01]: He's a massed a one billion dollar war chest for the midterms.
- 34:19[SPEAKER_01]: And we just barely surpassed the six month mark of his second term.
- 34:25[SPEAKER_01]: By contrast, the Democrats are broke.
- 34:28[SPEAKER_01]: Yo, I'm just good.
- 34:29[SPEAKER_01]: I'm not going to candy coat it.
- 34:30[SPEAKER_01]: The Democrats are broke.
- 34:32[SPEAKER_01]: They're broke.
- 34:33[SPEAKER_01]: Act blue.
- 34:35[SPEAKER_01]: They're chief fundraising arm.
- 34:37[SPEAKER_01]: It's defunct.
- 34:39[SPEAKER_01]: It used to raise them billions upon billions.
- 34:41[SPEAKER_01]: It kind of funny.
- 34:41[SPEAKER_01]: It's strange how that happens once USAID is is is is banned once USAID folds all of a sudden all these Democrat.
- 34:52[SPEAKER_01]: fundraising organizations end up going to fun.
- 34:55[SPEAKER_01]: It's very interesting how that works.
- 34:57[SPEAKER_01]: It must be no connection.
- 35:00[SPEAKER_01]: Democrats are literally going into debt just to keep their lights on in politics as in everything else money talks and so will our ground game in twenty twenty six and by the way that includes JD.
- 35:13[SPEAKER_01]: JD is freaking crush on it.
- 35:16[SPEAKER_01]: He is a wash and cash.
- 35:19[SPEAKER_01]: Clearly the successor for Trump in twenty twenty eight.
- 35:22[SPEAKER_01]: They're already talking about advanced Rubio ticket.
- 35:24[SPEAKER_01]: Which would be very, very hard to beat with the electoral map flipping radically red in the twenty thirty senses with the GOP picking up nearly twenty more electoral votes.
- 35:36[SPEAKER_01]: The Democrats proportionally losing that many votes.
- 35:39[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, look, I mean, twenty twenty eight.
- 35:43[SPEAKER_01]: It's really the Democrats' last chance at the White House for the foreseeable future.
- 35:47[SPEAKER_01]: So they're losing Congress.
- 35:50[SPEAKER_01]: They've ordered loss the Senate for the foreseeable future because they're just simply when all said it done.
- 35:55[SPEAKER_01]: There's more red states than blue states.
- 35:57[SPEAKER_01]: There's really nothing they can do there.
- 35:59[SPEAKER_01]: And they're about to be permanently locked out of the two seventy needed for the White House.
- 36:07[SPEAKER_01]: And the Democrats do honestly appear to be finished and a red California.
- 36:14[SPEAKER_01]: may end up being the crown Jew of them all.
- 36:18[SPEAKER_01]: Over to you gang, over to you.
- 36:20[SPEAKER_01]: If you are a homeowner, you need to listen to this.
- 36:23[SPEAKER_01]: When was the last time you checked in your home title?
- 36:26[SPEAKER_01]: That's the legal proof you own for your house.
- 36:29[SPEAKER_01]: If you're like me, the answer's never.
- 36:31[SPEAKER_01]: But the problem is in today's AI and cyber world.
- 36:34[SPEAKER_01]: Scammers are stealing home titles and your equity is the target.
- 36:38[SPEAKER_01]: Now, here's how it works.
- 36:40[SPEAKER_01]: Criminal's fortress signature on one document.
- 36:42[SPEAKER_01]: They use a notary, a fake notary stamp.
- 36:45[SPEAKER_01]: Then they pay a small fee with your county and boom, that's it.
- 36:49[SPEAKER_01]: Your home title has been transferred out of your name.
- 36:52[SPEAKER_01]: Then they take out all these loans using your equity or even selling your property.
- 36:57[SPEAKER_01]: You won't even know it's happened until you get a collection notice or a foreclosure notice.
- 37:01[SPEAKER_01]: So that's why you need to stop what you're doing right now and find out today if you've already been a victim.
- 37:07[SPEAKER_01]: Use promo code to early talks at home.todolock.com.
- 37:10[SPEAKER_01]: to make sure your title is still in your name.
- 37:12[SPEAKER_01]: You also get a free title history report plus.
- 37:15[SPEAKER_01]: You're going to get a free, fourteen-day trial of their million dollar triple-lock protection.
- 37:20[SPEAKER_01]: That's twenty-four-seven monitoring of your title.
- 37:23[SPEAKER_01]: Urgent alerts, Danny changes, and if fraud should happen, they'll spend up to one million dollars to fix it.
- 37:30[SPEAKER_01]: Just go to home.alok.com.
- 37:33[SPEAKER_01]: Now, use promo code.
- 37:34[SPEAKER_01]: Turly talks.
- 37:35[SPEAKER_01]: It's all one word.
- 37:36[SPEAKER_01]: Turly talks.
- 37:37[SPEAKER_01]: That's home.todolok.com promo code.
- 37:40[SPEAKER_01]: Charlie talks.
- 37:41[SPEAKER_01]: All right, Josh, what do we got?
- 37:43[SPEAKER_01]: What do we got?
- 37:43[SPEAKER_01]: What do we got?
- 37:44[SPEAKER_01]: That's gross, Dr. Charlie.
- 37:46[SPEAKER_01]: I would bet you a scotch.
- 37:48[SPEAKER_01]: Gavin Newson will be the Denver presidential nominee in twenty twenty eight.
- 37:51[SPEAKER_01]: Will you take that bet?
- 37:53[SPEAKER_01]: Who do you think they'll nominate?
- 37:58[SPEAKER_01]: I can't do it.
- 37:59[SPEAKER_01]: I can't take that.
- 38:01[SPEAKER_01]: But now, just because it's too early on in the game for Democrats and they're too, I mean, I'll take a bet.
- 38:09[SPEAKER_01]: I'll take a bet with you on a scotch, a real cheap scotch, right?
- 38:13[SPEAKER_01]: Our whiskey.
- 38:14[SPEAKER_01]: How about wild turkey?
- 38:15[SPEAKER_01]: Wild turly.
- 38:16[SPEAKER_01]: Maybe I'll have my own wild turly.
- 38:20[SPEAKER_01]: But I,
- 38:21[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, yes, Gavin Newsom is clearly vying for it.
- 38:25[SPEAKER_01]: He's in the top threes in the top four.
- 38:29[SPEAKER_01]: The problem is the radical left who have all the power in the Democrat party.
- 38:33[SPEAKER_01]: They don't want him.
- 38:34[SPEAKER_01]: They hate him.
- 38:35[SPEAKER_01]: They can't stand him.
- 38:36[SPEAKER_01]: He destroyed himself when dis himself from trans.
- 38:39[SPEAKER_01]: Same with Rama manual, Rama manual and he or she, Rama manual is going to give him a fight for that kind of center moderate Democrat position, even though even though.
- 38:52[SPEAKER_01]: Bruce and Newsom is he is governed like a radical leftist, but we'll see we'll see I still think he's done I don't I mean he may get that doesn't stop the Democrats from destroying themselves, but he may end up getting the nomination, but
- 39:10[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I mean, that's your bet, right?
- 39:12[SPEAKER_01]: He'll get the nominated show.
- 39:13[SPEAKER_01]: I was gonna say even if he got it, I think he, there's no way he wins Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin.
- 39:20[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, he's just, he's shot.
- 39:21[SPEAKER_01]: He'll have a hard time winning the bottom, all the left UGs that left eat.
- 39:25[SPEAKER_01]: There's no ways winning Arizona with all the left UGs.
- 39:29[SPEAKER_01]: And just the voter registrations is the Republicans are just so outnumbering Democrats right now in Arizona that's insane.
- 39:36[SPEAKER_01]: So anyway, we'll see, we'll say, but yes,
- 39:40[SPEAKER_01]: Hold me accountable to that.
- 39:41[SPEAKER_01]: I can get out.
- 39:42[SPEAKER_01]: I can do, uh, I can bet you a scotch at some point.
- 39:47[SPEAKER_01]: The rock dog, brother.
- 39:48[SPEAKER_01]: Let me ask you something, brother.
- 39:50[SPEAKER_01]: How likely is it is that, uh, a bowl of virus and they held a beast or Pedro Joe or any of these stats will actually be charged and prosecuted for crimes.
- 40:00[SPEAKER_01]: All right.
- 40:01[SPEAKER_01]: That's an excellent question.
- 40:05[SPEAKER_01]: And I'm glad you put it in two terms.
- 40:09[SPEAKER_01]: I think it is very likely they are charged.
- 40:13[SPEAKER_01]: Right now, I think it is very likely they are charged.
- 40:18[SPEAKER_01]: I don't know about Ebola virus, just because of the whole presidential immunity thing.
- 40:25[SPEAKER_01]: If he was acting in
- 40:28[SPEAKER_01]: Again, this is where the Supreme Court decision is both a blessing and a curse as it were for us.
- 40:35[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, it protects President Trump, but it also protects President Obama as well.
- 40:40[SPEAKER_01]: No, I don't care if it's illegal, if he was acting in the capacity of the presidency, which is what they're going to argue.
- 40:50[SPEAKER_01]: The meeting on was at December eighth.
- 40:52[SPEAKER_01]: December ninth took place in the situation room.
- 40:54[SPEAKER_01]: It was national security policies as far as they could say.
- 40:58[SPEAKER_01]: But that does not apply to Brennan.
- 41:01[SPEAKER_01]: That doesn't apply to Clapper.
- 41:03[SPEAKER_01]: It doesn't apply to the other gods.
- 41:05[SPEAKER_01]: And it certainly doesn't apply to Colmy.
- 41:07[SPEAKER_01]: It doesn't apply to any of the other ones that were in that meeting.
- 41:12[SPEAKER_01]: So I do think that they're toast.
- 41:16[SPEAKER_01]: I do think they are going to get charged.
- 41:21[SPEAKER_01]: The prosecution is going to be tricky because it can't happen inside a DC circuit court because the DC circuit court is irreparably compromised with far left-wing lunatics who would comprise that jury.
- 41:37[SPEAKER_01]: So they would either have to take it out of out of the DC court or now I know this is going to infuriate you or
- 41:48[SPEAKER_01]: Trump, and I think he might do this with Obama.
- 41:51[SPEAKER_01]: Trump could preemptively pardon them.
- 41:54[SPEAKER_01]: Now, I know that's going to infuriate because we want to see, well, you can still get the purple walk as the moment they're indicted, but we want to see him in jail, right, deservedly so.
- 42:06[SPEAKER_01]: But even with Obama,
- 42:09[SPEAKER_01]: The strategy here is that by preemptively pardoning him, he is, he is forever marked as a felon.
- 42:19[SPEAKER_01]: He's forever marked as someone who needed a pardon in order to avoid jail.
- 42:25[SPEAKER_01]: So the nuance and the reality of it is no, he's not going to get convicted.
- 42:31[SPEAKER_01]: He's, I don't even think he can get in.
- 42:32[SPEAKER_01]: Why?
- 42:32[SPEAKER_01]: I guess they can indict him, but they can overturn the indictment.
- 42:35[SPEAKER_01]: That would not help.
- 42:39[SPEAKER_01]: That would be a political win for them.
- 42:43[SPEAKER_01]: Instead, what you can do is you can have Trump, even though he can't technically be indicted, you can have Trump preemptively pardon him.
- 42:51[SPEAKER_01]: There's nothing he can do about it.
- 42:54[SPEAKER_01]: And then, and that way, you know, for the rest of his life, Republicans say, well, you know, yeah, again, just like with Fauci and so forth, why would he need a pardon if he wasn't guilty?
- 43:04[SPEAKER_01]: So Trump knew his guilty, he saw the evidence and he pardon him.
- 43:07[SPEAKER_01]: And then it's so for the rest of Obama's life, he will have the stigma of having done something wrong.
- 43:15[SPEAKER_01]: So I like the way you divided that.
- 43:17[SPEAKER_01]: I do think
- 43:19[SPEAKER_01]: The non-presidential actors in this are going to get indicted.
- 43:23[SPEAKER_01]: And then the question is, how does the prosecution work out given the irreparable corruption of the DC courts?
- 43:33[SPEAKER_01]: We'll have to see how that plays out.
- 43:37[SPEAKER_01]: Maximilian, what are our epistemologies and how do we know they are correct?
- 43:41[SPEAKER_01]: Oh my, have max a million, it's so hard.
- 43:44[SPEAKER_01]: You give me all these deep, well, there's lots and lots of epistemologies.
- 43:50[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, so an epistemology is the science of knowledge.
- 43:54[SPEAKER_01]: What has to obtain in order for us to know something?
- 43:59[SPEAKER_01]: So when I ask the question, how do I know?
- 44:02[SPEAKER_01]: How do I know that?
- 44:03[SPEAKER_01]: I'm asking what's called an epistemological question.
- 44:06[SPEAKER_01]: It goes back to a Greek term epistome, which basically means knowledge.
- 44:13[SPEAKER_01]: It can also mean pistes can mean faith, interestingly enough.
- 44:17[SPEAKER_01]: Knowledge is generally defined as justified true belief.
- 44:21[SPEAKER_01]: So whatever we know we believe, but can't just be belief, it has to be true.
- 44:28[SPEAKER_01]: And you know it's true because it's just been, it's been justified.
- 44:32[SPEAKER_01]: The basic, if you were to read like an Oxford handbook on epistemology, like six, seven hundred page volumes that talk about all the different studies in epistemology,
- 44:48[SPEAKER_01]: there's there's basically there's a there's a list of ways of knowing and they're all complimentary there's not one way of knowing you know so there there is what's
- 45:03[SPEAKER_01]: There's what we would call, say, practical knowledge, like if you want to know how to write a bike.
- 45:09[SPEAKER_01]: Well, there's only one way you're going to know how to write a bike, right?
- 45:14[SPEAKER_01]: So it's by doing it.
- 45:16[SPEAKER_01]: It's practicing it.
- 45:17[SPEAKER_01]: So there's practical knowledge where you have to, you know a skill by learning it.
- 45:23[SPEAKER_01]: There's what's called a priori knowledge.
- 45:27[SPEAKER_01]: And that's knowledge of the mind, the rational knowledge, two plus two equals four, all mathematics is a priori knowledge.
- 45:37[SPEAKER_01]: There's a posteriori knowledge, so that's what we call empirical knowledge, scientific verification, testing, and either verifying or falsifying a hypothesis.
- 45:50[SPEAKER_01]: There's relational knowledge
- 45:54[SPEAKER_01]: So relational knowledge is how you know people.
- 45:59[SPEAKER_01]: The Bible uses that term.
- 46:00[SPEAKER_01]: Adam knew his wife.
- 46:02[SPEAKER_01]: Eve.
- 46:04[SPEAKER_01]: So, you know, when your mom calls you in the phone, you don't have to go through a posterior or a pre-order or even practical means of
- 46:14[SPEAKER_01]: of knowledge.
- 46:16[SPEAKER_01]: You know, it's just, it's an intuitive and perfectly justifiable form of knowledge.
- 46:24[SPEAKER_01]: I know my mom's voice kind of thing, right?
- 46:27[SPEAKER_01]: There's aesthetic knowledge.
- 46:30[SPEAKER_01]: So knowledge through the arts.
- 46:33[SPEAKER_01]: What is better, what do you think gives you a more accurate and deeper knowledge of marriage, of the nature of marriage, a Webster's dictionary definition, or the first five minute montage of the Pixar film up, right?
- 46:53[SPEAKER_01]: And you all know what I'm talking about, everyone who's seen up knows that first five minutes gives you the most beautiful
- 47:00[SPEAKER_01]: montage vision of marriage imaginable and beats any definition or any study
- 47:10[SPEAKER_01]: scientific study amount.
- 47:12[SPEAKER_01]: So the aesthetic nature of knowledge is very, very important.
- 47:19[SPEAKER_01]: There's also what's known as tacit knowledge.
- 47:22[SPEAKER_01]: We know knowledge through things, just like the way I see through my glasses.
- 47:29[SPEAKER_01]: Well, books, traditions, religions, culture, they all provide a lens through which I see
- 47:39[SPEAKER_01]: the world.
- 47:40[SPEAKER_01]: So that's what's known as tacit knowledge, Michael Polanyi, the, if I recall, Hungarian or Polish, I think it was Polish epistemologist focused a lot on that.
- 47:52[SPEAKER_01]: And there's also something you'll be interested in this maximum.
- 47:55[SPEAKER_01]: There's also something called virtue epistemology.
- 47:58[SPEAKER_01]: And that's actually, uh, if anything, that is, that is the most, that's sort of the most sacred form of knowledge.
- 48:05[SPEAKER_01]: And it is the notion, and this is what you'll get in Platonism and Neo Platonism and get in Christianity.
- 48:12[SPEAKER_01]: All the religions pretty much teach a form of virtue of epistemology.
- 48:16[SPEAKER_01]: And that's the notion that
- 48:20[SPEAKER_01]: Our, the state of our knowledge is inexorably impacted by the state of our hearts.
- 48:29[SPEAKER_01]: So our moral state inevitably influences how we know.
- 48:35[SPEAKER_01]: So a virtuous grandmother knows the world differently than a serial killer.
- 48:41[SPEAKER_01]: It's very, very interesting.
- 48:42[SPEAKER_01]: So that's called virtue of epistemology.
- 48:44[SPEAKER_01]: And so a lot of times we cannot see a lot of people cannot know the way, say, a monastic knows the world, the way a Buddhist monk knows the world, because that person
- 48:59[SPEAKER_01]: frankly, has a profanity that's covered in their hearts that's covering up their minds as it were.
- 49:06[SPEAKER_01]: Romans one, if you're a, if you do your New Testament study, Romans one makes that connection between the heart and the mind that it's a brave heart always leads to a, to brave mind.
- 49:17[SPEAKER_01]: So there you go.
- 49:18[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, you have a, you have a priori, you have a posteriori, you have this static, you have relational, you have tacit,
- 49:28[SPEAKER_01]: Uh, what, uh, yeah, the virtue of epistemology.
- 49:30[SPEAKER_01]: Uh, so those are all, and then, and then every culture and every tradition works those, all those out differently.
- 49:39[SPEAKER_01]: So there's not a one size fits all knowledge out there.
- 49:42[SPEAKER_01]: Again, that's what the Enlightenment tried to do.
- 49:44[SPEAKER_01]: They tried to say the scientific method.
- 49:47[SPEAKER_01]: In the eighteen century, the Enlightenment, they argued the scientific method was the one true way of knowing the world.
- 49:52[SPEAKER_01]: And then that worked itself out in the nineteenth century was sort of the one true political and economic system for the world.
- 49:59[SPEAKER_01]: That's why you get a Marx, for example, or even an Adam Smith, in fairness, who basically argued that capitalism was the one true way of doing economics.
- 50:09[SPEAKER_01]: But then that worked itself out into the three big kaiju's and three big titans of capital, the Western liberalism.
- 50:17[SPEAKER_01]: Soviet communism and Nazi fascism basically battling out to rule the world.
- 50:21[SPEAKER_01]: The battle goes back to a singular one-size-fits-all epistemology from the Enlightenment of Scientific Rationalism, which has been a disaster and it's been rejected.
- 50:31[SPEAKER_01]: That's what post-modernity basically is.
- 50:34[SPEAKER_01]: So Francois Liethard wrote to the postmodern condition and his argument was that the meta narrative, the scientific rationalism is being the one true way of understanding what had died in the hearts and minds of most Westerners.
- 50:49[SPEAKER_01]: And so that's postmodernity now is just the breakup of all these micro narratives now that get to, and identities that get to the fine.
- 50:57[SPEAKER_01]: knowledge from that vantage point.
- 50:59[SPEAKER_01]: How do we know which one is true?
- 51:01[SPEAKER_01]: Whether they're all, they're all circular by nature, all the different epistemologies are by definition, circular, not circular in a, not circular in a, a logical, felacious sense, A is true because A is true.
- 51:20[SPEAKER_01]: Circular in that,
- 51:23[SPEAKER_01]: You're always going to have a pre-suppositional transcendent or transcendental starting point to your thought that determines all the rest of the thought.
- 51:38[SPEAKER_01]: So there's always going to be some kind of bedrock in your thinking.
- 51:43[SPEAKER_01]: that more or less determines how you're going to think and then ultimately what you're going to think from that point forward.
- 51:54[SPEAKER_01]: So also Buddhist epistemologies, Hindu epistemologies, Christian epistemologies, secular epistemologies,
- 52:03[SPEAKER_01]: There, there, you know, and then again, you could break it down, Texan epistemologies, Sri Lankan epistemologies, Russian epistemologies, right Nigerian epistemologies.
- 52:15[SPEAKER_01]: These are all, they're all going to have their own inner structure.
- 52:22[SPEAKER_01]: But that said, they're all also going, they're all, they're all bumping against the same reality.
- 52:31[SPEAKER_01]: They're all bumping against the same world.
- 52:34[SPEAKER_01]: And they're four.
- 52:37[SPEAKER_01]: There is some overlap.
- 52:39[SPEAKER_01]: And the overlap is more or less three.
- 52:45[SPEAKER_01]: There has to be logical consistency.
- 52:48[SPEAKER_01]: Even those, I remember somebody, a member of student desperately trying to argue that she had the right to contradict herself, that she did not have to be logically consistent.
- 53:00[SPEAKER_01]: And then the joke that I tried to
- 53:02[SPEAKER_01]: I tried to point out to her in a loving way as I could and that was one of my better moments.
- 53:08[SPEAKER_01]: I've had, I've also had times where I just kind of dismissed them.
- 53:11[SPEAKER_01]: But I tried to point out to her, do you understand you're trying to logically argue why you have the right to be illogical?
- 53:20[SPEAKER_01]: So these are, these are what are basically called undeniability, unafirmability proposition.
- 53:29[SPEAKER_01]: So we know we
- 53:32[SPEAKER_01]: We all have different epistemologies that never the last in this kind of flowery like venn diagram all kind of overlap with you need some logical consistency.
- 53:47[SPEAKER_01]: All you have to do is argue with me you've proved my point.
- 53:50[SPEAKER_01]: You need some empirical adequacy.
- 53:53[SPEAKER_01]: There has to be some kind of physical proof in some way shape or form for what you're logically arguing.
- 54:03[SPEAKER_01]: Because we're physical beings and whatever it is that you're arguing, you got to argue with a tongue.
- 54:10[SPEAKER_01]: You got to argue with a brain, you got to argue with a computer and AI.
- 54:14[SPEAKER_01]: So there has to be a physical confirmation to what you're arguing for in some way, shape or form.
- 54:22[SPEAKER_01]: And then thirdly, there has to be some kind of experiential relevance for it.
- 54:29[SPEAKER_01]: It can't just be this abstract
- 54:35[SPEAKER_01]: Yo, crossword puzzle or, or, or, or even e equals mc squared, even that has tremendous experiential relevance.
- 54:45[SPEAKER_01]: for human life.
- 54:47[SPEAKER_01]: It has to mean something.
- 54:49[SPEAKER_01]: It has to be a part and parcel of what gives life its meaning and its weightiness and its livability.
- 55:01[SPEAKER_01]: It can't be something that we can all dismiss and move on with.
- 55:04[SPEAKER_01]: So it's got to be logically consistent, it's got to be empirically adequate and it's got to be experientially relevant.
- 55:09[SPEAKER_01]: And then for me, the coolest thing is when you do overlap all these epistemologies,
- 55:15[SPEAKER_01]: Along those three sort of
- 55:20[SPEAKER_01]: corrective says it were to make sure, you know, you're kind of getting rid of some of the more dumb things like somebody saying, well, my world view says I can, I can contradict myself.
- 55:29[SPEAKER_01]: Well, then why are you arguing with me after that?
- 55:33[SPEAKER_01]: Right, just, so anyway, as when you do that, then all of a sudden they start to fruitfully interact with each other and you begin to see some really beautiful things emerge.
- 55:44[SPEAKER_01]: Houston Smith, the, the, the religion scholar just loved
- 55:50[SPEAKER_01]: seeing in sort of this chain of be this platonic chain of being structure how all the different religions though very different they're all different clearly and all but all the different major religions did sort of have some very significant overlap and he's doing something comparable to what you're doing so there you go max a million you're giving my my brain a workout this morning good stuff man good stuff is always
- 56:15[SPEAKER_01]: Connor, I was about to say that some ineligible voters that were purged from the roles in California might have been illegal aliens.
- 56:22[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, so I didn't even bring that up today, but now you know why they're all flipping out.
- 56:28[SPEAKER_01]: Why Karen Basson grew some new some more off flipping out with all these illegal migrants being purged.
- 56:36[SPEAKER_01]: from particularly LA, but all over in San Fran, you name it is, yeah, because it's not just the voter rules.
- 56:43[SPEAKER_01]: It's also the illegal migrants as well.
- 56:45[SPEAKER_01]: You're absolutely right.
- 56:47[SPEAKER_01]: Cardamom didn't even get into that.
- 56:49[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
- 56:49[SPEAKER_01]: So we can add that to it.
- 56:50[SPEAKER_01]: So this thing just keeps piling on, brilliant.
- 56:54[SPEAKER_01]: And that's, and that's true across the country.
- 56:57[SPEAKER_01]: That's true.
- 56:58[SPEAKER_01]: That's what they're really flipping out over.
- 57:00[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, when they see all this redistricting in the red states that are gaining legit citizens right through all these left U.Js, they're flipping out at the same time of this mass deportation efforts.
- 57:12[SPEAKER_01]: We're already now there estimate about one point five million have been deported either forcibly or through self deportation.
- 57:20[SPEAKER_01]: And they're freaking out going like, I mean, that's it.
- 57:24[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, we'll never win another national election again.
- 57:29[SPEAKER_01]: The role is Dr. Turley, did you see the new totally unwoke fantastic form movie?
- 57:34[SPEAKER_01]: Is this the sign that Disney's figuring out woke doesn't sell?
- 57:37[SPEAKER_01]: What's your favorite superhero besides Trump?
- 57:41[SPEAKER_01]: All right, I have not, I have not, I think.
- 57:44[SPEAKER_01]: Let's see, my son was, no, no, he saw the new, the remake, if I know what you did last summer, what you said was horrible.
- 57:53[SPEAKER_01]: So he did a horror movie last night.
- 57:54[SPEAKER_01]: He was either gonna do that, he's gonna do,
- 57:58[SPEAKER_01]: Uh, the new Superman, which I hear is struggling, uh, or or the fantastic for.
- 58:03[SPEAKER_01]: So we chose that.
- 58:04[SPEAKER_01]: So no, I have not caught up on that.
- 58:06[SPEAKER_01]: I hope to.
- 58:07[SPEAKER_01]: I've heard amazing things about it, right?
- 58:09[SPEAKER_01]: Very, very pro family and the like.
- 58:12[SPEAKER_01]: Um, but I have to catch up on it.
- 58:14[SPEAKER_01]: I have not done that.
- 58:15[SPEAKER_01]: My favorite superhero superhero growing up without question was the incredible hope.
- 58:21[SPEAKER_01]: I love the Hulk.
- 58:22[SPEAKER_01]: I love Lou Ferrigno, Bill Bixby, and the, I don't, how many seasons was it?
- 58:27[SPEAKER_01]: Four, five seasons of the Hulk on CBS.
- 58:31[SPEAKER_01]: I watched it religiously.
- 58:33[SPEAKER_01]: I think it was every Friday night.
- 58:35[SPEAKER_01]: Absolutely, absolutely loved it.
- 58:38[SPEAKER_01]: I love the Hulk comics.
- 58:41[SPEAKER_01]: I've always been, and I love,
- 58:43[SPEAKER_01]: I've always had this kind of Japanese, you guys know I'm a big anime fan and so forth.
- 58:47[SPEAKER_01]: I've always had this Japanese like infatuation with giants, always loved giants of some kind, some one of my favorite movies, War the Garcantua, so that's what I when I was on Newsmax, I said it was that the Trump
- 59:03[SPEAKER_01]: Elon feud was more or less akin to the war, the Gargantua.
- 59:08[SPEAKER_01]: I've always loved that.
- 59:10[SPEAKER_01]: I love Pacific Rim, the first one, the second one sucked, but the first one was just so cool, the Kaiju's.
- 59:17[SPEAKER_01]: I just, I love big giant light figures.
- 59:21[SPEAKER_01]: There's just something, I don't, you know, maybe Genesis six from me or something with the Titans and the Nephilim and the light.
- 59:31[SPEAKER_01]: So the Hulk was the closest thing to that.
- 59:34[SPEAKER_01]: It's funny, I knit because I was never that interested in the thing.
- 59:37[SPEAKER_01]: The thing being the other very huge bulky, hokey.
- 59:41[SPEAKER_01]: There was something about, I guess the drama, I love the drama too of the banner and just his being a wanderer and trying to deal with this
- 59:55[SPEAKER_01]: this side of him that was capable of so much destruction, but yet at the same time, would bring about so much salvation and rescuing.
- 1:00:08[SPEAKER_01]: So again, very much like Godzilla, very, very interesting ambiguity there.
- 1:00:19[SPEAKER_01]: Richard will pal's fed building renovation, become it so much.
- 1:00:23[SPEAKER_01]: His own, mausoleum, was that not the funniest thing in the world when you saw him and Trump with their hard hats and Trump's like, you know, yeah, you're three billion over, over budget and pals like, no, I'm not.
- 1:00:36[SPEAKER_01]: No, no, pal doesn't even, yeah.
- 1:00:38[SPEAKER_01]: We'll see apparently the word on the street is pals get a lower interest rates.
- 1:00:43[SPEAKER_01]: It's inevitable.
- 1:00:44[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, Josh is also talking about Iron Man versus Captain America as well.
- 1:00:48[SPEAKER_01]: What do you got there at your message?
- 1:00:50[SPEAKER_01]: from, oh, yeah.
- 1:00:52[SPEAKER_01]: Ironman in Captain America, Elon and Trump Civil War.
- 1:00:55[SPEAKER_01]: Yes.
- 1:00:56[SPEAKER_01]: All right.
- 1:00:56[SPEAKER_01]: You got that.
- 1:00:57[SPEAKER_01]: You got me all that one.
- 1:00:58[SPEAKER_01]: That's that's for sure.
- 1:00:59[SPEAKER_01]: It's awesome.
- 1:01:00[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
- 1:01:02[SPEAKER_01]: Pal should be lowering interest rates.
- 1:01:03[SPEAKER_01]: Keep an eye on that.
- 1:01:05[SPEAKER_01]: He, he should.
- 1:01:06[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, again, they're, they're, they're, they're, they're the pressure is enormous.
- 1:01:11[SPEAKER_01]: When you even have Scott Basin over the weekend, saying, yeah, maybe we do need to not just audit the Fed, but really take a look of whether we need it or not.
- 1:01:19[SPEAKER_01]: That's, that's when the whole Federal Reserve says, guys, guys, look, no.
- 1:01:25[SPEAKER_01]: Jerome Trump can't fire you, but he sure is hell can shut this whole thing down.
- 1:01:30[SPEAKER_01]: And he's he's going to get what he wants.
- 1:01:32[SPEAKER_01]: So let's give him let's cut some interest rates.
- 1:01:35[SPEAKER_01]: Let's just show him.
- 1:01:36[SPEAKER_01]: We're good faith actors here.
- 1:01:37[SPEAKER_01]: Give him his old victory.
- 1:01:39[SPEAKER_01]: And we all keep our jobs and our influence and in the country kind of thing.
- 1:01:45[SPEAKER_01]: So we'll say we'll see if it becomes as mausoleum.
- 1:01:48[SPEAKER_01]: So far, I think he's going to be playing it right.
- 1:01:52[SPEAKER_01]: Simple logic, the structural marvel that is Adam shift is on borrowed time.
- 1:01:57[SPEAKER_01]: I honestly see him going to prison.
- 1:01:59[SPEAKER_01]: I do two structural logic.
- 1:02:00[SPEAKER_01]: I think we're going to start.
- 1:02:02[SPEAKER_01]: We're going to see he'll be one of the ones that gets indicted.
- 1:02:05[SPEAKER_01]: I think Trump has done playing games here.
- 1:02:07[SPEAKER_01]: He spent the first six months building maga building the golden age.
- 1:02:14[SPEAKER_01]: getting that big beautiful bill pass even got the resisions pass and write the ten billion dollars in doge cuts that got rid of NPR and he's he's ready to I think now ready to start slapping down some indictments.
- 1:02:33[SPEAKER_01]: Rubbo Guy, thank you for the super chat.
- 1:02:35[SPEAKER_01]: All of you, thank you for your super chats.
- 1:02:37[SPEAKER_01]: What a payment process is dictating what our payment process is dictating what people can't or can't buy.
- 1:02:43[SPEAKER_01]: These in MasterCur are going around censoring and shutting down content that they deem bad and it's out of control.
- 1:02:51[SPEAKER_01]: We need to rain them in or find alternatives.
- 1:02:53[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, yeah, so who was it that was just having that issue?
- 1:02:59[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, what's this name, Michael from Daily Wire?
- 1:03:04[SPEAKER_01]: I think was having an issue with financial processing.
- 1:03:15[SPEAKER_01]: But it wasn't Masquervisa, I'm forgetting which one it was.
- 1:03:18[SPEAKER_01]: But he, they thought it looks like they finally got it resolved.
- 1:03:24[SPEAKER_01]: I thought that had gone on, it's a form of debanking.
- 1:03:29[SPEAKER_01]: And I thought that it's sort of gone on hiatus after November, but maybe it is coming back again.
- 1:03:36[SPEAKER_01]: Again, this is where crypto comes in.
- 1:03:40[SPEAKER_01]: So crypto resolves this.
- 1:03:42[SPEAKER_01]: If you haven't gotten the crypto yet, make sure you take whatever steps you can start getting into crypto.
- 1:03:50[SPEAKER_01]: We have a number.
- 1:03:51[SPEAKER_01]: We have prime defy.
- 1:03:54[SPEAKER_01]: uh, we have a block trust IRA.
- 1:03:56[SPEAKER_01]: We have a number of sponsors that I use.
- 1:03:59[SPEAKER_01]: I personally use them all.
- 1:04:01[SPEAKER_01]: Uh, I don't do sponsors that I do not endorse myself.
- 1:04:04[SPEAKER_01]: Um, so, uh, they are, they are both at Dan Ryder, particularly of prime defy their brilliant.
- 1:04:11[SPEAKER_01]: And they will walk you through the process of getting involved in crypto.
- 1:04:15[SPEAKER_01]: But that's what crypto is the major hedge against debanking.
- 1:04:20[SPEAKER_01]: They can't to bank you.
- 1:04:22[SPEAKER_01]: They simply cannot to thank you.
- 1:04:24[SPEAKER_01]: You are, you are anti debancable as it were.
- 1:04:30[SPEAKER_01]: But that said, yes, there are other parallel structures.
- 1:04:34[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, Russia found this out at a national level when they were kicked off of Swift, which is the international financial transaction platform.
- 1:04:42[SPEAKER_01]: And then they just hooked up with China's, which is Kips.
- 1:04:48[SPEAKER_01]: So they didn't have a problem.
- 1:04:49[SPEAKER_01]: They just simply decoupled themselves from the West and hooked up with some alternative payment processor.
- 1:04:59[SPEAKER_01]: And we have it too.
- 1:05:00[SPEAKER_01]: If I recall, there's one called parallel economy, which is an alternative payment process.
- 1:05:05[SPEAKER_01]: And there are a bunch of them out there.
- 1:05:07[SPEAKER_01]: But granted, it is scary to see
- 1:05:11[SPEAKER_01]: credit card companies and payment processors take it upon themselves to be moral policemen and social creditors.
- 1:05:19[SPEAKER_01]: No question about it.
- 1:05:24[SPEAKER_01]: Art, what percentage of these ineligible voters vote?
- 1:05:27[SPEAKER_01]: I don't have the breakdown.
- 1:05:28[SPEAKER_01]: I was looking for that as well.
- 1:05:32[SPEAKER_01]: Again, the numbers are relatively suggestive.
- 1:05:35[SPEAKER_01]: When you get rid of three point one million ineligible voters and Kamala wins by three point two.
- 1:05:41[SPEAKER_01]: That is really close.
- 1:05:44[SPEAKER_01]: That's really close.
- 1:05:45[SPEAKER_01]: We'll see in twenty twenty six and twenty twenty eight and other elections as it as it pans out the the one to one correlation between the purging of ineligible voters and the sudden dramatic decline in the Democrat turnout.
- 1:06:05[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, we got some of that in November.
- 1:06:09[SPEAKER_01]: When, what is it?
- 1:06:10[SPEAKER_01]: Five, six million of Biden's voters just disappeared after Texas and a number of states and upperging their voter roles of ineligible voters.
- 1:06:20[SPEAKER_01]: Very, very interesting how that happened.
- 1:06:23[SPEAKER_01]: We had several million ineligible voters, purged from voter roles across the country, and a comparable number disappear from the Democrat president candidates total.
- 1:06:34[SPEAKER_01]: It's very, very interesting on that.
- 1:06:37[SPEAKER_01]: So I'll have the hard numbers there, but we'll have to look at some anecdotal evidence in the near future.
- 1:06:45[SPEAKER_01]: Carol, good morning, Dr. Steve.
- 1:06:47[SPEAKER_01]: I just resigned for another year as a, oh, I just resigned or signed up.
- 1:06:52[SPEAKER_01]: Re-signed.
- 1:06:57[SPEAKER_01]: Love you, Carol.
- 1:06:58[SPEAKER_01]: Just a re-signed for another year as a civil.
- 1:07:02[SPEAKER_01]: Silver, remember.
- 1:07:03[SPEAKER_01]: Thank you, Carol, for our courageous Patriots Club.
- 1:07:06[SPEAKER_01]: Hope you can handle another year with your grandma group, but you know I always can, Carol.
- 1:07:11[SPEAKER_01]: I know you said Obama Clinton won't ever be put in jail.
- 1:07:15[SPEAKER_01]: Could I wipe pill you and say, even I'm hopeful that may happen with Clinton.
- 1:07:19[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, so bomb a no.
- 1:07:21[SPEAKER_01]: Thinking this might be one time you'd love to be proved wrong most certainly.
- 1:07:25[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, no, I agree.
- 1:07:26[SPEAKER_01]: I think I'm going to meet you halfway, Carol.
- 1:07:29[SPEAKER_01]: I think Clinton could get definitely indicted for particularly for how she participated in this coup against this attempted coup against President Trump with the steel Dalsier that was created through a million dollars or whatever millions of dollars in funding.
- 1:07:51[SPEAKER_01]: through her campaign that we're hidden behind the Perkins Kui law firm.
- 1:07:56[SPEAKER_01]: And the advantage you have when you're paying for things behind the doors of a law firm is you have, you know, attorney client privilege.
- 1:08:04[SPEAKER_01]: So things could be kept secret there.
- 1:08:06[SPEAKER_01]: You, you hide behind the veneer of attorney client privilege.
- 1:08:11[SPEAKER_01]: And to the extent that she was caught up in it,
- 1:08:15[SPEAKER_01]: which she was in terms of the deliberate attempt to try to bring down a presidency through false allegations and false evidence, fabricated evidence.
- 1:08:26[SPEAKER_01]: I think she's going down.
- 1:08:27[SPEAKER_01]: The only thing with Obama's, I just think the immunity, the presidential immunity is going to, is going to give him the cover he needs.
- 1:08:35[SPEAKER_01]: That's why I think President Trump is thinking about like preemptively pardoning him and forever having that
- 1:08:43[SPEAKER_01]: That stigma of you are a part in prejudice like Nixon, you're a part in, and I don't think Nixon, by the way, did anything wrong, but you're a part in president and again, CNN and MSNBC and New York times of dismiss it, but their their audience is dwindling and our audience is growing and he'll forever be known in our audience and are we being the news now.
- 1:09:07[SPEAKER_01]: we being the media now, he'll forever be known as a criminal president.
- 1:09:12[SPEAKER_01]: So yeah, I'll meet you halfway.
- 1:09:14[SPEAKER_01]: I think Hillary's going to get it.
- 1:09:15[SPEAKER_01]: I'd be very surprised with Obama.
- 1:09:20[SPEAKER_01]: Franz, good morning, Dr. Steven, a recent video spoke about article three judges regarding the prosecution of the Russian hoax.
- 1:09:26[SPEAKER_01]: Could that change to digital involvement was discovered?
- 1:09:34[SPEAKER_01]: No, not to my knowledge.
- 1:09:38[SPEAKER_01]: The research I did said, if you're a citizen,
- 1:09:43[SPEAKER_01]: you cannot, you're not, I mean, outside of actually working directly with an enemy regime, you cannot be put in front of a military tribunal.
- 1:09:55[SPEAKER_01]: You have to be tried in accordance with Article three powers.
- 1:09:58[SPEAKER_01]: There's just no way around it.
- 1:10:00[SPEAKER_01]: So by that, what Franz is talking about, so Article one deals with Congress, Article two, the presidency, Article three, the courts.
- 1:10:07[SPEAKER_01]: And you, as a citizen, have the right constitutionally,
- 1:10:13[SPEAKER_01]: to a court hearing in front of a jury of your peers.
- 1:10:20[SPEAKER_01]: And you will not be caught up.
- 1:10:22[SPEAKER_01]: I'm you believe me.
- 1:10:24[SPEAKER_01]: I was hoping to see military drive unals.
- 1:10:26[SPEAKER_01]: Believe me.
- 1:10:27[SPEAKER_01]: But I'll ask, you know, I'm your patriarch.
- 1:10:30[SPEAKER_01]: I got always be honest with you guys from from what I found in my research.
- 1:10:34[SPEAKER_01]: And I looked.
- 1:10:34[SPEAKER_01]: I look quite extensively.
- 1:10:35[SPEAKER_01]: Did a AI deep dive and all that good stuff in the research process.
- 1:10:40[SPEAKER_01]: And now
- 1:10:42[SPEAKER_01]: I think everybody involved in the Russian hoax is going to be tried in accordance with Article III powers.
- 1:10:55[SPEAKER_01]: Terry would a new Western Canadian Federation consisting of BC, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Sask, and Manitoba make a good trading partner in our life for the United States.
- 1:11:08[SPEAKER_01]: How likely has that come about?
- 1:11:10[SPEAKER_01]: It was all of Alberta's landlocking problem and give them an option beyond petitioning Congress for admission as a state.
- 1:11:17[SPEAKER_01]: Absolutely.
- 1:11:18[SPEAKER_01]: I think all of everything is on the table right now.
- 1:11:22[SPEAKER_01]: I think you're absolutely right on on that.
- 1:11:26[SPEAKER_01]: So we do have some update.
- 1:11:28[SPEAKER_01]: I'll probably do a video either tonight, maybe tomorrow on the latest on what's called Wexet, which is this very real extra.
- 1:11:38[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, it's they're starting to panic in Ottawa over this.
- 1:11:42[SPEAKER_01]: The articles I'm reading at first, they just dismissed it.
- 1:11:45[SPEAKER_01]: Hi, hi, you wouldn't
- 1:11:47[SPEAKER_01]: Mark Carney one real extra high you idiots out in the west you know you got you lost again ha ha that sort of there they're not you're never going to separate blah blah blah they're not kidding anymore that they're they're they're they're they're they're not to dismissing anymore they really do believe
- 1:12:02[SPEAKER_01]: There's a very real possibility that it'll be first Alberta.
- 1:12:06[SPEAKER_01]: I think that's that's clear that Alberta may vote to leave.
- 1:12:09[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, when you have a majority of the conservative party there in Alberta, a majority of their constituents like sixty sixty five percent wanting the leave.
- 1:12:20[SPEAKER_01]: When it's the super majority of the party that's in power and a burden the province.
- 1:12:25[SPEAKER_01]: That's not, I mean, it's a super, I mean, it's, it's not a peripheral, it's not peripheral belief anymore.
- 1:12:31[SPEAKER_01]: And if you can get that up to eighty, ninety percent and then bring in.
- 1:12:37[SPEAKER_01]: See, the thing with independence referendum's Terry that you got again.
- 1:12:43[SPEAKER_01]: and just don't forget this, you know, kind of write this down, put it in your pocket as it were in the midst of all the dismissive press you might get.
- 1:12:49[SPEAKER_01]: I did a video on this actually.
- 1:12:53[SPEAKER_01]: Independence referendum are elections with the biggest turnouts.
- 1:13:00[SPEAKER_01]: The biggest turnout elections always without fail are independence referendum.
- 1:13:06[SPEAKER_01]: The Quebec, if I recall the Quebec,
- 1:13:09[SPEAKER_01]: referendum back in what was at ninety six was like ninety percent ninety three percent turnout.
- 1:13:17[SPEAKER_01]: I mean you see it everywhere.
- 1:13:20[SPEAKER_01]: Brexit had the highest turnout of any British election.
- 1:13:24[SPEAKER_01]: So any independence referendum will get you the biggest turnout imaginable and the key there is that what it does is it brings out
- 1:13:33[SPEAKER_01]: low-prop to no-prop voters, like Trump does.
- 1:13:37[SPEAKER_01]: So voters who are low-propensy-only voted one in the last four elections, or no-propensy who haven't voted none of the last four elections.
- 1:13:46[SPEAKER_01]: They tend to overwhelmingly come out for an independence referendum vote, because now they feel like there's something they can vote for.
- 1:13:54[SPEAKER_01]: And by the way, they inadvertently vote in favor of independence.
- 1:13:58[SPEAKER_01]: So this is real when thirty percent of our burdens want to leave the confederation.
- 1:14:07[SPEAKER_01]: This is real because that's all you need, remember tipping point theory, all you need is thirty percent.
- 1:14:14[SPEAKER_01]: And then getting that extra twenty one percent just doesn't seem to be that hard.
- 1:14:19[SPEAKER_01]: And if that's the case and independence referendum's bring out votes, vote voter turnout that makes, you know, simple national provincial elections pale by comparison.
- 1:14:37[SPEAKER_01]: That might be your nineteen, eighteen percent and you get an extra few percent of independence.
- 1:14:45[SPEAKER_01]: or, you know, fence setters, that's it.
- 1:14:48[SPEAKER_01]: You get it.
- 1:14:49[SPEAKER_01]: And then of course, as a result of the Quebec independence referendum back in the nineties, the Canadian Supreme Court did rule that a province is does indeed have the constitutional right to leave, which I would agree with.
- 1:15:06[SPEAKER_01]: I don't see how you sign up.
- 1:15:08[SPEAKER_01]: with any kind of confederation or even here in the United States, you don't sign up with any kind of union without at least some kind of exit clause.
- 1:15:17[SPEAKER_01]: Well, I don't like this.
- 1:15:18[SPEAKER_01]: I should be able to, regardless.
- 1:15:19[SPEAKER_01]: So all of that's to say Alberta looks like it's really serious.
- 1:15:23[SPEAKER_01]: Sasque will follow.
- 1:15:25[SPEAKER_01]: There, no question on that.
- 1:15:28[SPEAKER_01]: If Alberta leaves Sasque leave.
- 1:15:30[SPEAKER_01]: We'll see what BC and Manitoba.
- 1:15:32[SPEAKER_01]: I don't know enough about BC and Manitoba, just because the ball isn't rolling in BC and Manitoba in the same way.
- 1:15:40[SPEAKER_01]: It's rolling right now without Burda, particularly with the
- 1:15:45[SPEAKER_01]: What is it the Alberta prosperity coalition that they have that are that are really driving this this referendum they've already filed for an application for the referendum with the Canadian elections commission.
- 1:16:03[SPEAKER_01]: So and then Sask is is building.
- 1:16:06[SPEAKER_01]: They've got a ground group.
- 1:16:08[SPEAKER_01]: So I've been watching Alberta and Sask primarily, but that's that.
- 1:16:14[SPEAKER_01]: if they do form a Wexet.
- 1:16:16[SPEAKER_01]: coalition because of Alberta and Sasko.
- 1:16:19[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I bet you'll see Manitoba and BC leave.
- 1:16:24[SPEAKER_01]: If that's the case, I think you're right.
- 1:16:26[SPEAKER_01]: So you don't have the landlock issue.
- 1:16:28[SPEAKER_01]: Of course, they will be a major trading partner with the United States just being the resource rich commodity rich provinces and now officially independent nations that they are.
- 1:16:40[SPEAKER_01]: And then yeah, and then I mean, if Trump is still present of this happens the next
- 1:16:45[SPEAKER_01]: eighteen months or so.
- 1:16:46[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I'm just gonna put a lot of pressure like, come on aboard.
- 1:16:50[SPEAKER_01]: You're conservative.
- 1:16:52[SPEAKER_01]: You're the Texas of Canada, come on aboard.
- 1:16:56[SPEAKER_01]: And enjoy being the, being fifty first, fifty-second, fifty-third states, whatever.
- 1:17:01[SPEAKER_01]: I think there's gonna, you're still gonna want some provincial sovereignty.
- 1:17:05[SPEAKER_01]: So in order to keep that sovereignty, every province would have to be its own state.
- 1:17:10[SPEAKER_01]: But it's fat, I mean, the very fact that we're even talking about the shows,
- 1:17:14[SPEAKER_01]: where things are right now in terms of the golden age, in terms of maga, in terms of that spirit.
- 1:17:21[SPEAKER_01]: Ottawa is behind the times.
- 1:17:24[SPEAKER_01]: They've doubled down on their globalist nonsense with the guy with three passports.
- 1:17:31[SPEAKER_01]: I think what we're seeing here without burden, saskin.
- 1:17:35[SPEAKER_01]: And the others is the way of the future.
- 1:17:37[SPEAKER_01]: So we'll see.
- 1:17:38[SPEAKER_01]: We'll see even if they don't, even if they don't officially succeed, I think they're going to inevitably pull Ottawa to the right.
- 1:17:49[SPEAKER_01]: R&D Corps would be kind of funny if after arresting Obama Trump gave a press conference wearing a tan suit and declassified Obama's first certificate.
- 1:17:58[SPEAKER_01]: Talk about closing a loop because that's how he really began in many respects the whole his political aspirations was Obama's first certificate.
- 1:18:09[SPEAKER_01]: Absolutely.
- 1:18:10[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, that'd be hilarious.
- 1:18:11[SPEAKER_01]: That would be so good.
- 1:18:12[SPEAKER_01]: I love that.
- 1:18:12[SPEAKER_01]: I love the way you're thinking.
- 1:18:14[SPEAKER_01]: Life is a narrative.
- 1:18:17[SPEAKER_01]: Vaughan, Dr. Steve, thank you, by the way, so much for the super chat.
- 1:18:21[SPEAKER_01]: So exciting to be sharing this moment in history with you and with you as well, Vaughan.
- 1:18:26[SPEAKER_01]: How do we replace the guy Donald John Donald John Trump?
- 1:18:30[SPEAKER_01]: What's a session plan?
- 1:18:33[SPEAKER_01]: Would you do if you were him?
- 1:18:35[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I know.
- 1:18:37[SPEAKER_01]: They will never, ever, ever be another Donald J. Trump ever.
- 1:18:41[SPEAKER_01]: He is the goat by definition.
- 1:18:44[SPEAKER_01]: Nothing comes close.
- 1:18:45[SPEAKER_01]: Again, he's ethical.
- 1:18:47[SPEAKER_01]: I wrote about it in my book.
- 1:18:50[SPEAKER_01]: I'm America.
- 1:18:52[SPEAKER_01]: I was just actually doing an interview the other day.
- 1:18:54[SPEAKER_01]: I'm America awakened.
- 1:18:56[SPEAKER_01]: The collapse of globalism returned to faith, family, and freedom.
- 1:18:59[SPEAKER_01]: You can get it on Amazon.
- 1:19:01[SPEAKER_01]: Number one in the number of categories, by the way.
- 1:19:05[SPEAKER_01]: I wrote a whole chapter on how Trump's appeal is mythical in nature.
- 1:19:10[SPEAKER_01]: It's literally mythic.
- 1:19:12[SPEAKER_01]: And I mean that.
- 1:19:13[SPEAKER_01]: literally, scholars call it rematholicization when populations feel like their nation is collapsing.
- 1:19:21[SPEAKER_01]: They look for a Caesar figure to come and not necessarily a dictator or anything, just somebody who can effectively rescue the people from the barbarians as it were.
- 1:19:34[SPEAKER_01]: That's when Trump walks into UFC arena, that's all you got to see to get a sense of the kind of mythic appeal that he has.
- 1:19:44[SPEAKER_01]: Obama could never do that.
- 1:19:47[SPEAKER_01]: Kackles Kamala could never do that.
- 1:19:50[SPEAKER_01]: No one can.
- 1:19:51[SPEAKER_01]: So great question.
- 1:19:53[SPEAKER_01]: How do you replace the irreplaceable?
- 1:19:58[SPEAKER_01]: And I think in the end it's it's JD.
- 1:20:01[SPEAKER_01]: He certainly raken in the money.
- 1:20:03[SPEAKER_01]: He certainly seen as the one who's going to the one who's going to take the mantle.
- 1:20:14[SPEAKER_01]: And I think the best thing JD can do is position himself and then whoever's running made is, which looks like it's gonna be Marco, to position Vance and Rubio as Trump's generation as the first of a new MAGA Golden Age
- 1:20:41[SPEAKER_01]: era.
- 1:20:43[SPEAKER_01]: So Trump ushered it in.
- 1:20:46[SPEAKER_01]: He was the Augustus as it were that ushered in this golden age.
- 1:20:52[SPEAKER_01]: And now these are the new, these are the young torch bearers who are going to bring, who are going to faithfully maintain it and bring it to new and exciting levels.
- 1:21:07[SPEAKER_01]: So that's whoever gets the nod.
- 1:21:11[SPEAKER_01]: And twenty twenty eight.
- 1:21:13[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, bandits still thinks we're going to be able to run Trump a third.
- 1:21:17[SPEAKER_01]: Well, a fourth time in this case, he's going to be able to run for a third term.
- 1:21:21[SPEAKER_01]: We're going to have to see it could they could they could be able to figure out it may not be too successive terms.
- 1:21:27[SPEAKER_01]: It may just be.
- 1:21:29[SPEAKER_01]: Or it may be sorry, two successive terms, but not.
- 1:21:34[SPEAKER_01]: You could do multiple terms as long as you have an interim and between we'll see, we'll see how they work it out.
- 1:21:40[SPEAKER_01]: But when all said it done, I do think if the irreplaceable is ever effectively replaced, it's going to be with a new generation, a younger generation, their own unique.
- 1:21:52[SPEAKER_01]: vibe as it were who are who are seen as the ones who are going to faithfully maintain and flourish America first and it's an end of golden age in perpetuity and to amazing and I think JD will be brilliant.
- 1:22:10[SPEAKER_01]: Count furtherer.
- 1:22:11[SPEAKER_01]: Thank you, sir, for the super chats.
- 1:22:13[SPEAKER_01]: My guess is the majority Democrats are not radicals are crazy like the far left.
- 1:22:18[SPEAKER_01]: And that can be seen and they're now backtracking from some in their party.
- 1:22:23[SPEAKER_01]: How do all the radicals win?
- 1:22:25[SPEAKER_01]: I think there's a next step there, Josh.
- 1:22:31[SPEAKER_01]: Now, how do all the radicals win?
- 1:22:33[SPEAKER_01]: Is that it?
- 1:22:37[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, oh, no, no.
- 1:22:38[SPEAKER_01]: I'm with you.
- 1:22:39[SPEAKER_01]: And again, what you know, MAGA has fully and completely won when it becomes pre-political.
- 1:22:48[SPEAKER_01]: That's what we want.
- 1:22:49[SPEAKER_01]: That was the success of FDR.
- 1:22:52[SPEAKER_01]: That was the success of the new deal.
- 1:22:54[SPEAKER_01]: The new deal became pre-political.
- 1:22:58[SPEAKER_01]: Social security, Medicare, eventually, Medicaid, all of this, nineteen sixties, all of these programs ended up becoming politically basic.
- 1:23:10[SPEAKER_01]: They were baseline.
- 1:23:12[SPEAKER_01]: If you were against them, you were out of politics.
- 1:23:15[SPEAKER_01]: And when MAGA becomes baseline, when every party and every candidate is arguing that they're never going to open up the borders again.
- 1:23:28[SPEAKER_01]: whenever party and every candidate is arguing that they're going to have some kind of achievable quota daily monthly quota for mass deportations.
- 1:23:41[SPEAKER_01]: When everyone is arguing that we need that trade is an extension of national security that manufacturing and industry particularly pharmaceuticals belongs here inside
- 1:23:54[SPEAKER_01]: the United States that DEI is dead on a rival DOA that trans athletes should never ever again be allowed in women's locker rooms or women's sports.
- 1:24:10[SPEAKER_01]: on and on and on and on, right?
- 1:24:12[SPEAKER_01]: That we always should be permanently doging departments and auditing governmental departments for savings and so forth.
- 1:24:23[SPEAKER_01]: When the basics of MAGA become
- 1:24:28[SPEAKER_01]: baseline in our politics, we have won.
- 1:24:31[SPEAKER_01]: We don't care if it's a Republican, we don't care if it's a Democrat.
- 1:24:34[SPEAKER_01]: We don't care if it's JD or if it's Tulsi or if it's RFK, Democrats, right?
- 1:24:42[SPEAKER_01]: We don't care.
- 1:24:44[SPEAKER_01]: because no matter who wins, MAGA succeeds.
- 1:24:49[SPEAKER_01]: If we've achieved that, we've achieved our highest aspirations and our highest political dreams.
- 1:24:58[SPEAKER_01]: When MAGA has become pre-plan, right now it's obviously a hundred percent part of the Republican Party in terms of the platform and so forth.
- 1:25:06[SPEAKER_01]: But I think you're right.
- 1:25:08[SPEAKER_01]: Count Frutteric, we're moving the Democrats are inevitably recognizing this is the new politics of the twenty first century what what's technically referred to as post security politics where border security economic security and cultural security become the baseline politics they're recognizing that and like this
- 1:25:28[SPEAKER_01]: Mayor and San Francisco, they're increasingly embracing it.
- 1:25:32[SPEAKER_01]: No, it's going to be their own left wing version.
- 1:25:34[SPEAKER_01]: Fine, you know, I'll never be attracted to it.
- 1:25:37[SPEAKER_01]: But fine, I'll take, you know, I'll take that over the man Donnie's and the Somali Socialist any day.
- 1:25:42[SPEAKER_01]: So I think I think you're absolutely right that that's the only way I think the Democrats end up becoming a viable party.
- 1:25:51[SPEAKER_01]: BW, Hulk really gave us a great rally last time.
- 1:25:55[SPEAKER_01]: I wish we could do a Hulk and Mania Trump rally to honor, and that would be wonderful.
- 1:25:59[SPEAKER_01]: I think at the next Trump rally, I wouldn't be surprised if they had a beautiful montage honoring of Terry.
- 1:26:08[SPEAKER_01]: of the Hulk Hogan, beautiful man.
- 1:26:10[SPEAKER_01]: I did a video just honoring him last night if you want to check that out on how he was actually on how Hulk Amania was actually maga before maga.
- 1:26:20[SPEAKER_01]: Remember, he used to come out into the arenas with the song, Blaring, I'm a real American.
- 1:26:28[SPEAKER_01]: How does Trump come out to his arenas?
- 1:26:30[SPEAKER_01]: Proud to be an American, right?
- 1:26:32[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, I mean,
- 1:26:34[SPEAKER_01]: All the connections between Hulchomania and Maga are actually stunning.
- 1:26:41[SPEAKER_01]: Hulchomania is sort of like the John.
- 1:26:43[SPEAKER_01]: I said, I don't get this wrong.
- 1:26:45[SPEAKER_01]: I'm just just saying using the structure, the narrative old structure.
- 1:26:50[SPEAKER_01]: It's like the John the Baptist to the Messiah as it were.
- 1:26:53[SPEAKER_01]: He is the herald.
- 1:26:57[SPEAKER_01]: as Halkomania, he was the Harold in the nineteen eighties and nineties and early ox, he was the Harold of the maga that was to come.
- 1:27:04[SPEAKER_01]: And so I think it's the most fitting thing in the world where his final major, you know, national spotlight is he tore off his shirt and said, let Trump a mania run wild.
- 1:27:17[SPEAKER_01]: I finished off my video that
- 1:27:21[SPEAKER_01]: that Hulk Mania ran wild so that Trump and Mania might run free.
- 1:27:27[SPEAKER_01]: And I think that's what happened.
- 1:27:30[SPEAKER_01]: So God bless him.
- 1:27:33[SPEAKER_01]: David Bears, I thank you, David.
- 1:27:35[SPEAKER_01]: Thank you so kind of you.
- 1:27:38[SPEAKER_01]: Thornton Maloney from Italy.
- 1:27:41[SPEAKER_01]: God bless your prime minister.
- 1:27:43[SPEAKER_01]: Dr. Steve, are you in rich spirits not talking more?
- 1:27:45[SPEAKER_01]: It's never seem to have a completely different take on any rosy midterm picture.
- 1:27:49[SPEAKER_01]: No, we are talking, I can't keep in mind.
- 1:27:53[SPEAKER_01]: I'm not talking midterms per se.
- 1:27:55[SPEAKER_01]: I'm just talking about these overall trends.
- 1:27:59[SPEAKER_01]: So no, no, so rich is tapping into what he believes to be.
- 1:28:06[SPEAKER_01]: sort of the forgotten maga vote, ironically, that he is concerned will sit out on the midterms, that they're just not going to show up.
- 1:28:18[SPEAKER_01]: So maga is not just made up of Republicans.
- 1:28:21[SPEAKER_01]: It's made up of disaffected independence, and it's made up of non-white working class voters.
- 1:28:31[SPEAKER_01]: Both of whom generally feel slided
- 1:28:37[SPEAKER_01]: and forgotten if not frankly insulted by Trump's Iran bombing and by the by the Epstein files not getting released for these voters and these very specific voters independent
- 1:28:56[SPEAKER_01]: low prop, no prop voters and a certain non white working class voters.
- 1:29:03[SPEAKER_01]: Those issues really matter.
- 1:29:06[SPEAKER_01]: They want United States finally staying out of the Middle East.
- 1:29:12[SPEAKER_01]: and they want this two-tier justice system that the Epstein saga represents, they want that finally resolved.
- 1:29:22[SPEAKER_01]: And they believe that Trump being the victim of that two-tier justice system was finally going to deliver on both ends, both in terms of shutting down the rhinos, neocons, bringing us into more Middle Eastern conflict and in releasing the Epstein files.
- 1:29:39[SPEAKER_01]: And by not doing that,
- 1:29:41[SPEAKER_01]: Rich is found evidence that Trump has gotten hurt.
- 1:29:47[SPEAKER_01]: He's the mega coalition's gotten hurt among these particular voters.
- 1:29:53[SPEAKER_01]: And he is concerned that if these voters do not show up, this low to no prop that showed up in mass voting for Trump,
- 1:30:01[SPEAKER_01]: in twenty-fourth, they don't shop in twenty-six.
- 1:30:05[SPEAKER_01]: Publicans are going to lose a lot of seats.
- 1:30:07[SPEAKER_01]: That's his concern.
- 1:30:09[SPEAKER_01]: And so absolutely right.
- 1:30:13[SPEAKER_01]: And you have the voter registration advantages.
- 1:30:16[SPEAKER_01]: In twenty-six states, I believe, or maybe in thirty-one states, there are thirty-one, if I can't remember.
- 1:30:24[SPEAKER_01]: It's a high-twentizer.
- 1:30:26[SPEAKER_01]: low-thirties, states where voter registration trends are being watched very, very, California being one of them, very, very carefully.
- 1:30:37[SPEAKER_01]: They are all shifting to the right.
- 1:30:39[SPEAKER_01]: They're all shifting to the Republicans in ordnantly, every single one.
- 1:30:43[SPEAKER_01]: And we're seeing it every even in blue states, New Jersey, New York, New Mexico, you name it.
- 1:30:49[SPEAKER_01]: They're all shifting right California.
- 1:30:52[SPEAKER_01]: So Anne, you've got these voter registration, right?
- 1:30:54[SPEAKER_01]: Anne, you've got the voter role purges and you've got the illegal migrants being deported.
- 1:31:02[SPEAKER_01]: Anne, you have the cash on hand with the Republicans outraising Democrats five to one.
- 1:31:08[SPEAKER_01]: So for me, it's a both aunt.
- 1:31:10[SPEAKER_01]: it's not an either or it's a both and you have to take it or so rich rich is focusing on one side and then I'm focusing on the other and then the closer we get to the midterms know absolutely rich and I will be we'll be cross pollinating our data and I'll be taking obviously rich is very very seriously being the number one most accurate polster of of twenty twenty four so absolutely it's both and
- 1:31:41[SPEAKER_01]: BW, once you accept Dems, hate our country, and, by the way, again, to all of you, forgive me if I fail to thank you for the super chats.
- 1:31:49[SPEAKER_01]: Once you accept Democrats, hate our country, understand the double standard between Democrats and Republicans' magas.
- 1:31:54[SPEAKER_01]: We're Americans.
- 1:31:57[SPEAKER_01]: They're not to them.
- 1:31:59[SPEAKER_01]: We're evil.
- 1:32:01[SPEAKER_01]: They are not.
- 1:32:03[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, yeah.
- 1:32:04[SPEAKER_01]: No, you got it.
- 1:32:04[SPEAKER_01]: You got it.
- 1:32:05[SPEAKER_01]: They're post-American.
- 1:32:06[SPEAKER_01]: That's the technical term.
- 1:32:08[SPEAKER_01]: And that's what people have to get.
- 1:32:09[SPEAKER_01]: And again, I'm talking about primarily the leadership and the insane, twenty-twenty percent.
- 1:32:14[SPEAKER_01]: It was part of the eighty-twenty doom loop, the Mamdonny Democrat, the social Somali Democrat, and so on.
- 1:32:23[SPEAKER_01]: What, uh, I should learn it today.
- 1:32:24[SPEAKER_01]: I don't know.
- 1:32:25[SPEAKER_01]: I just keep calling the smaller socialists.
- 1:32:27[SPEAKER_01]: But, um, they do believe that the United States is an evil country.
- 1:32:32[SPEAKER_01]: And they've been taught that from, and in Columbia University, which by the way is now paying to a hundred million dollars in damages for, um, for violating the human rights of, uh, Jewish students there.
- 1:32:47[SPEAKER_01]: I just love the way Trump is clamping down on these these pathetic cultural Marxists.
- 1:32:54[SPEAKER_01]: Ivy League schools, particularly Columbia X's.
- 1:32:56[SPEAKER_01]: That's where cultural Marxism start.
- 1:32:58[SPEAKER_01]: That's where the Frankfurt School came over from Europe in the nineteen thirties and forties into the United States and they the very first university they they infested was Columbia University.
- 1:33:09[SPEAKER_01]: That's why all these all these crazy
- 1:33:12[SPEAKER_01]: protest or we seem to start on the campus of Columbia.
- 1:33:17[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, they hate America and they are post-American.
- 1:33:21[SPEAKER_01]: They believe America is inherently racist, bigoted.
- 1:33:25[SPEAKER_01]: And like I said, that Ellie fellow on MSNBCs repeatedly said that any law passed before, in nineteen sixty-four, he considers Nolan Void.
- 1:33:38[SPEAKER_01]: That is basically the gist of what they've been arguing.
- 1:33:41[SPEAKER_01]: They've been arguing that anything prior to their assent to power should be wiped out, so they're basically restarting the calendar.
- 1:33:51[SPEAKER_01]: And they want to restart the calendar and they want to turn the country into a cultural Marxist image with third world nations get to pillage us the way we supposedly pillage them.
- 1:34:04[SPEAKER_01]: So that's why they are more loyal to illegal migrants than they are to citizens because the illegal migrants are the ones who are inflicting justice back into our nation by virtue of their presence here.
- 1:34:18[SPEAKER_01]: So I'm with you now.
- 1:34:19[SPEAKER_01]: They hate the country and they want to destroy it.
- 1:34:21[SPEAKER_01]: R. D. Corp.
- 1:34:24[SPEAKER_01]: Dr. Shirley, very controversial opinion here.
- 1:34:27[SPEAKER_01]: Yes, Tulsi Gabbard is going after Obama and Obama officials for the Russian hoax.
- 1:34:31[SPEAKER_01]: However,
- 1:34:32[SPEAKER_01]: I am a little paranoid.
- 1:34:35[SPEAKER_01]: Black Sabbath, do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do
- 1:35:02[SPEAKER_01]: You know, that's that's p m people felt the same way about Kennedy and so forth.
- 1:35:07[SPEAKER_01]: It's like the guy's a leftist, you know, I mean, he's not he's not mag it.
- 1:35:12[SPEAKER_01]: But you, um, any lawn too, any lawn too.
- 1:35:16[SPEAKER_01]: And yes, seems things seem to have, uh, fulfilled themselves with the along the concerns.
- 1:35:21[SPEAKER_01]: But keep in mind the same thing could be said of Trump.
- 1:35:25[SPEAKER_01]: Keep in mind the same thing can be said of Trump.
- 1:35:28[SPEAKER_01]: I was on a podcast yesterday talking about my new book, America.
- 1:35:32[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, wake in.
- 1:35:32[SPEAKER_01]: I'm just going to keep plugging this puppy, right?
- 1:35:34[SPEAKER_01]: That you could get on on Amazon brand new number one number of categories.
- 1:35:39[SPEAKER_01]: We actually sold out of it.
- 1:35:40[SPEAKER_01]: It was really cool.
- 1:35:41[SPEAKER_01]: They had to do a whole new reprint.
- 1:35:42[SPEAKER_01]: But I was on a podcast the other day where the fellow point out, you know, he couldn't stand Trump when he first came down the escalator because he's been involved in conservative Republican politics for years.
- 1:35:55[SPEAKER_01]: And here, all of us in this guy who was writing checks to Nancy Pelosi at one point in the Clinton at one point, that's New York politics, by the way.
- 1:36:03[SPEAKER_01]: Now he's all the same to turn around and tell us Republicans how to do things.
- 1:36:07[SPEAKER_01]: So a lot of people didn't trust Trump either.
- 1:36:09[SPEAKER_01]: You have to remember.
- 1:36:10[SPEAKER_01]: So to me, I'm with you, ROT Corp.
- 1:36:13[SPEAKER_01]: And if you don't trust, that's cool.
- 1:36:15[SPEAKER_01]: Just to me, I think what's really happening here is there is a massive political realignment, a political economic and cultural realignment.
- 1:36:24[SPEAKER_01]: where the old left and right binary just doesn't fit anymore.
- 1:36:28[SPEAKER_01]: It's now people versus political class.
- 1:36:31[SPEAKER_01]: And so Tulsi, while she was on the other side of the left and right divide, left versus right divide, she's now on the right side when it comes to the people versus political class vertical divide.
- 1:36:44[SPEAKER_01]: So I think that's the key to kind of reconciling what's going on here.
- 1:36:52[SPEAKER_01]: Rock dog brother, Dr. Steve.
- 1:36:54[SPEAKER_01]: Will let me tell you something, brother.
- 1:36:56[SPEAKER_01]: Did you know that from a thirty five years, Hulk Hogan?
- 1:36:59[SPEAKER_01]: Well, let me tell you all right.
- 1:37:00[SPEAKER_01]: There you go.
- 1:37:01[SPEAKER_01]: There you go.
- 1:37:01[SPEAKER_01]: Now I'm done.
- 1:37:02[SPEAKER_01]: Well, let me tell you something, brother.
- 1:37:04[SPEAKER_01]: Do you know that from a thirty five years, Hulk Hogan without any fan for media announcement would show up, of course, with a staff knowing to Schrinner's hospitals and St.
- 1:37:13[SPEAKER_01]: Jude to entertain and inspire that kids and their families.
- 1:37:17[SPEAKER_01]: I do know that there was one little boy, nineteen ninety four that he met at St.
- 1:37:21[SPEAKER_01]: Jude said he really connected with and I guess he died the next year and his parents said he wept as if it was his own son humble man he was a beautiful man
- 1:37:33[SPEAKER_01]: And yeah, I mean, watch him on there's an early eighties interview on the Johnny Carson show when he was just coming up and coming.
- 1:37:43[SPEAKER_01]: And he just he's so well spoken, so beautifully spoken, so soft spoken.
- 1:37:47[SPEAKER_01]: And he was brilliant, absolutely brilliant.
- 1:37:50[SPEAKER_01]: And he was very honest at the Republican National Convention.
- 1:37:56[SPEAKER_01]: And in July of last year, where he said, I was a coward.
- 1:38:00[SPEAKER_01]: And he said it over and over again, told Laura that he told Jesse, Jesse Waters that, when they said, how can you say you're a coward?
- 1:38:10[SPEAKER_01]: You wouldn't be afraid of anything.
- 1:38:12[SPEAKER_01]: He said, no, I'm a businessman.
- 1:38:14[SPEAKER_01]: I'm a businessman.
- 1:38:16[SPEAKER_01]: I run, you know, I'm the head of the Hulk.
- 1:38:19[SPEAKER_01]: brand and Hulk Amania, and I have fans on both the left and the right, Democrats and Republicans.
- 1:38:25[SPEAKER_01]: I didn't want to alienate anyone, right?
- 1:38:26[SPEAKER_01]: I didn't want to go woke as it were.
- 1:38:28[SPEAKER_01]: I say, I remember I don't think there's a there's a woke right.
- 1:38:32[SPEAKER_01]: I think it's absurd, but
- 1:38:35[SPEAKER_01]: But I didn't want to impose my political opinions on anyone.
- 1:38:39[SPEAKER_01]: So I kind of, I voted for Trump, but I never, I never told anyone.
- 1:38:43[SPEAKER_01]: But when they tried to kill my hero on July, thirteenth and Butler Pennsylvania, that's when I said I cannot hide it anymore.
- 1:38:50[SPEAKER_01]: So he is a hero in every way imaginable.
- 1:38:53[SPEAKER_01]: He always spoke truth.
- 1:38:55[SPEAKER_01]: And even when he was trying to be sensitive to the feelings of some of his fans, even then he came out and said, I can't be untrue to myself into what I know is right.
- 1:39:08[SPEAKER_01]: And and of course he just he just had to he had a beautifully rich wonderful life spiritually politically, culturally economically in every way imaginable and just he will be greatly missed amazing man.
- 1:39:26[SPEAKER_01]: PWD, you think we will lose the midterms is so this is over.
- 1:39:30[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, if you think I know, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no,
- 1:39:53[SPEAKER_01]: when the Senate, but if they were to win some, when the house, it will be a very, very, very thin, thin margin.
- 1:40:02[SPEAKER_01]: It's not going to be big.
- 1:40:05[SPEAKER_01]: They can, they can cause trouble.
- 1:40:06[SPEAKER_01]: They can, you know, but what are they going to do?
- 1:40:08[SPEAKER_01]: What are they going to impeach them a third time?
- 1:40:10[SPEAKER_01]: Is they're going to have, oh, they might have hearing so freaking what?
- 1:40:15[SPEAKER_01]: They're going to cause all that right now.
- 1:40:16[SPEAKER_01]: They're not
- 1:40:18[SPEAKER_01]: No, they're not.
- 1:40:19[SPEAKER_01]: I'm not going to do anything in the end.
- 1:40:21[SPEAKER_01]: So, but no, at this point right now, I think things are looking very, very good, especially with the redistricting.
- 1:40:28[SPEAKER_01]: If you picking up anywhere from twelve to seventeen seats, solid red seats, that's impressive.
- 1:40:34[SPEAKER_01]: That's going to be hard to beat.
- 1:40:36[SPEAKER_01]: Again, it seems to put us as a baseline in twenty seventeen.
- 1:40:40[SPEAKER_01]: If we get to that baseline and all we need is one seat, we'll get it among the sixty nine seats that are up for grabs.
- 1:40:46[SPEAKER_01]: We'll get it.
- 1:40:47[SPEAKER_01]: No problem.
- 1:40:51[SPEAKER_01]: Well, they're too old.
- 1:40:51[SPEAKER_01]: Do you think Pam Bonnie is a strategy or legal loophole to make the Obama Clinton administration accountable for its conspiracy against Trump?
- 1:40:58[SPEAKER_01]: Or is it a pipe dream?
- 1:40:59[SPEAKER_01]: Thank you.
- 1:41:00[SPEAKER_01]: Well, it will.
- 1:41:01[SPEAKER_01]: You're awesome.
- 1:41:02[SPEAKER_01]: No, I do.
- 1:41:03[SPEAKER_01]: I do.
- 1:41:04[SPEAKER_01]: I think so.
- 1:41:04[SPEAKER_01]: I think they know they have to deliver.
- 1:41:07[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, Trump almost got killed.
- 1:41:10[SPEAKER_01]: because of all this nonsense.
- 1:41:12[SPEAKER_01]: So I think they know they have to deliver.
- 1:41:14[SPEAKER_01]: Again, Trump is going to get some push back from rhinos and neocons.
- 1:41:18[SPEAKER_01]: So he's got to appease them.
- 1:41:20[SPEAKER_01]: But in the end, I think Pam Bonnie is going to deliver.
- 1:41:25[SPEAKER_01]: And it's going to blow us away.
- 1:41:28[SPEAKER_01]: I think that's what the next six months are going to be.
- 1:41:30[SPEAKER_01]: First six months were all about restoring or awakening the golden age and then taking the economy off like a rocket.
- 1:41:40[SPEAKER_01]: ceiling the border, mass deportations, crushing DEI, crushing Woke universities.
- 1:41:47[SPEAKER_01]: Now it's about indictments.
- 1:41:52[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, my dear friend, Brian, living my best life in Southwest Florida, love it, my friend, love it.
- 1:41:59[SPEAKER_01]: I know that Murdock hates Trump, but Fox News is still the best on cable, by far, no questions, especially a number of the commentators.
- 1:42:05[SPEAKER_01]: But even many of them reference their own polls.
- 1:42:08[SPEAKER_01]: Is that just job security for them?
- 1:42:10[SPEAKER_01]: They have to know that they're skewed.
- 1:42:12[SPEAKER_01]: Second, why won't they use the accurate pollsters like Baris for us musines so forth?
- 1:42:17[SPEAKER_01]: And third, what does Fox gain from using?
- 1:42:20[SPEAKER_01]: the inaccurate polls.
- 1:42:22[SPEAKER_01]: Dang, Brian, you always ask these good questions, penetrating questions.
- 1:42:25[SPEAKER_01]: I have to think about that, because they do, they do reference these idiot, because these are, they're subletting them out.
- 1:42:33[SPEAKER_01]: They're not even actual Fox News polls.
- 1:42:36[SPEAKER_01]: They don't even have like a hairy ant in the hairy ant in it's not a pollster.
- 1:42:39[SPEAKER_01]: He's just a data analyst.
- 1:42:41[SPEAKER_01]: But they don't even have a data analyst akin to that, which is very interesting.
- 1:42:46[SPEAKER_01]: I don't know.
- 1:42:46[SPEAKER_01]: I could only speculate.
- 1:42:49[SPEAKER_01]: I could see it as job security.
- 1:42:51[SPEAKER_01]: They have to have the keep in mind.
- 1:42:53[SPEAKER_01]: Nobody touched.
- 1:42:55[SPEAKER_01]: You know, when the New York Post ran that stupid, two thousand and three birthday card from Trump to, at the supposed, that they don't even have in their possession could even corroborate a verify.
- 1:43:10[SPEAKER_01]: Nobody on the Fox News line up touched it.
- 1:43:13[SPEAKER_01]: No one, no, and that's a murder, you know, New York Post is a,
- 1:43:16[SPEAKER_01]: as owned by Newscore.
- 1:43:18[SPEAKER_01]: So no one went near it, which I found interesting.
- 1:43:22[SPEAKER_01]: But yeah, it could be, I mean, it could be just the only polls they have access to.
- 1:43:27[SPEAKER_01]: I do from what I understand from my inside scoop, because I've got an agent who sets me up with some interviews and so forth in panels.
- 1:43:37[SPEAKER_01]: So I've done Newsmax, so I've been in their Manhattan Office, which is really cool.
- 1:43:42[SPEAKER_01]: But he said that
- 1:43:45[SPEAKER_01]: At least when it comes to booking guests, generally speaking, Fox is very, very reluctant to book anyone that's hot on acts.
- 1:43:58[SPEAKER_01]: I mean, outside of like the Charlie Kirk's and stuff.
- 1:44:01[SPEAKER_01]: But they tend to like to book from like Washington Insiders.
- 1:44:05[SPEAKER_01]: So they get, they get a lot of people from like the Heritage Foundation so forth.
- 1:44:09[SPEAKER_01]: But it's rare, they're, they'll like never get a jackpot so big.
- 1:44:14[SPEAKER_01]: You know, they'll never, they'll never have Steve Bannon on.
- 1:44:17[SPEAKER_01]: And Barris, Barris and Mitchell, they mark Mitchell for us, music, and they're kind of in that
- 1:44:23[SPEAKER_01]: in that sphere.
- 1:44:25[SPEAKER_01]: So I think that I think in some sense, they may have been, however, and formerly blacklisted from there.
- 1:44:34[SPEAKER_01]: What do they have to gain from the nothing?
- 1:44:36[SPEAKER_01]: It's stupid, it's dumb, and it's just part, it seems to me it's just part of the inherent dysfunctionality of the Republican family.
- 1:44:45[SPEAKER_01]: We are dysfunctional family in a way that Democrats aren't.
- 1:44:49[SPEAKER_01]: Democrats are totally united in growing government, totally united in raising taxes, totally united in more regulations, right?
- 1:45:01[SPEAKER_01]: Democrats don't care what you do as long as it's mandatory.
- 1:45:04[SPEAKER_01]: They're one hundred percent united.
- 1:45:06[SPEAKER_01]: You have factions, no question, pro is Rayleigh, pro Palestinian, you know, the more pro AOC, more pro Schumer.
- 1:45:14[SPEAKER_01]: You've got factions
- 1:45:16[SPEAKER_01]: But they're all at the end of the day, they're all united in expanding government, in expanding regulation, in expanding taxes and their own power.
- 1:45:28[SPEAKER_01]: Whereas Republicans are just, they've got one side that wants to cut taxes, but another side that has no problem
- 1:45:37[SPEAKER_01]: Raise in taxes, if they could figure out and sneak it in, get one side that wants to cut government, you know, the libertarian side, the Randpole, Massey side of things.
- 1:45:46[SPEAKER_01]: You have another side that wants to grow government, the neocons, the rhinos, and so forth.
- 1:45:50[SPEAKER_01]: You have one side that wants to lower regulation, notice I've once increased regulations.
- 1:45:56[SPEAKER_01]: You have one side that's, you know, a totally anti, um, foreign intervention and another side that's one hundred percent for foreign intervention.
- 1:46:04[SPEAKER_01]: So the Republican, you have a hardcore maga, you have anti maga, so, you know, the Lisa McCouskees, Susan Collins and a like.
- 1:46:14[SPEAKER_01]: So the Republicans are just this
- 1:46:18[SPEAKER_01]: They are, they're just this dysfunctional party that never the less because of MAGA makes it work because MAGA is the connective tissue that holds it all together.
- 1:46:26[SPEAKER_01]: And it seems like FOX is more or less that way.
- 1:46:30[SPEAKER_01]: FOX in terms of its major lineup, right, Laura, Jesse, Greg Gopfel, and certainly Sean, they're all one hundred percent MAGA.
- 1:46:41[SPEAKER_01]: They love MAGA.
- 1:46:42[SPEAKER_01]: Laura was a big Papi cannon supporter.
- 1:46:45[SPEAKER_01]: originally, a Jesse is a hundred percent on board, got fell to a hundred percent on board, Sean's a hundred percent on board, although Sean is more neocon, he loves Lindsey Graham for whatever reason.
- 1:46:58[SPEAKER_01]: So that's what keeps Fox together, put there.
- 1:47:01[SPEAKER_01]: But yeah, there what's it?
- 1:47:06[SPEAKER_01]: I'm forgetting at six o'clock.
- 1:47:09[SPEAKER_01]: Why am I forgetting his name?
- 1:47:11[SPEAKER_01]: Garrett?
- 1:47:12[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah.
- 1:47:13[SPEAKER_01]: But, you know, I mean, they, and they had their Chris Wallace, who was a, a vowed Democrat.
- 1:47:18[SPEAKER_01]: He was an open, liberally ended up going with CNN.
- 1:47:21[SPEAKER_01]: Right.
- 1:47:21[SPEAKER_01]: They, the other news division will, will have, they'll have, they'll have, they'll bring in the more blue, more center left impulses that, that unfortunately, I think, don't add to anything, but it, but it is reflective of the sentiments of Rupert Murdoch.
- 1:47:42[SPEAKER_01]: Um, who is more.
- 1:47:45[SPEAKER_01]: He's more centers and more rhino.
- 1:47:47[SPEAKER_01]: So anyway, there you go, Brian.
- 1:47:49[SPEAKER_01]: That's best guest dog got on that.
- 1:47:53[SPEAKER_01]: Rock dog brother.
- 1:47:54[SPEAKER_01]: Let me ask you something, brother.
- 1:47:55[SPEAKER_01]: Do you honestly believe the DHS or DOJ?
- 1:47:58[SPEAKER_01]: Well, rest mayors or governors are refused to work with ICE and hold that sanctuary city status is so.
- 1:48:05[SPEAKER_01]: You do you think is the, oh, who do you think is the first to fall?
- 1:48:09[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, why?
- 1:48:10[SPEAKER_01]: Well, I mean,
- 1:48:12[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, obviously the LA mayor, I think Karen Bass is probably the closest to the one crossing the line.
- 1:48:22[SPEAKER_01]: No, we've already seen it, but the two New Jersey or the one New Jersey representative in Newark when she was when she was inappropriately messing around physically with ICE officers.
- 1:48:39[SPEAKER_01]: when they were trying to storm the ice detention facility in Newark in New Jersey.
- 1:48:47[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, no, they will.
- 1:48:49[SPEAKER_01]: I think they will.
- 1:48:51[SPEAKER_01]: They'll definitely do it.
- 1:48:52[SPEAKER_01]: They have to.
- 1:48:53[SPEAKER_01]: If you if you've drawn the red line as Tom Humb and clearly has, you have to do it.
- 1:48:58[SPEAKER_01]: And again, I think they feel now.
- 1:48:59[SPEAKER_01]: They're working.
- 1:49:00[SPEAKER_01]: They're feeling this all out, but I think they're recognizing, wow, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBCCBS, they just have no power anymore.
- 1:49:08[SPEAKER_01]: They just don't have any power to rhetorically persuade the population and influence political opinions.
- 1:49:16[SPEAKER_01]: So let's do it.
- 1:49:17[SPEAKER_01]: Let's take forward the advantage of this.
- 1:49:19[SPEAKER_01]: Yeah, I think you're going to see it.
- 1:49:23[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, same RNG.
- 1:49:24[SPEAKER_01]: Go up, Dr. Charlie Crypto pumped a lot last week.
- 1:49:27[SPEAKER_01]: It certainly did.
- 1:49:27[SPEAKER_01]: It's pretty good, huh?
- 1:49:28[SPEAKER_01]: It's down a good amount.
- 1:49:30[SPEAKER_01]: Oh, yeah, down a good amount this week, but August first, payment should go fully digital.
- 1:49:35[SPEAKER_01]: Are you as excited as I am?
- 1:49:36[SPEAKER_01]: I am very excited.
- 1:49:38[SPEAKER_01]: Followed Crypto every day.
- 1:49:41[SPEAKER_01]: My coin base account got lots of investments in it.
- 1:49:45[SPEAKER_01]: And I even do some defy with Dan Ryder and our prime defy group work with them a little bit.
- 1:49:52[SPEAKER_01]: I love it.
- 1:49:54[SPEAKER_01]: And yes, very excited.
- 1:49:55[SPEAKER_01]: I think crypto is just getting started and we're going to see digital currency, the new age of money, the new age of a cyberspace money, reach levels of scale and profitability like which were unimaginable prior to the rise of cyberspace.
- 1:50:13[SPEAKER_01]: Because again, cyberspace knows no bounds.
- 1:50:16[SPEAKER_01]: It can keep going up and up.
- 1:50:17[SPEAKER_01]: So it's astonishing.
- 1:50:20[SPEAKER_01]: And then is it gang?
- 1:50:21[SPEAKER_01]: That is it all right.
- 1:50:22[SPEAKER_01]: Got more videos on the back porch, your back porch.
- 1:50:25[SPEAKER_01]: Professor was coming out this weekend.
- 1:50:27[SPEAKER_01]: So I'll see you all throughout the weekend.
- 1:50:29[SPEAKER_01]: Got lots and lots more stuff and updates.
- 1:50:31[SPEAKER_01]: But I absolutely have a wonderful weekend.
- 1:50:34[SPEAKER_01]: God bless you guys.
- 1:50:35[SPEAKER_01]: And Mago all the way.
- 1:50:37[SPEAKER_01]: The Golden Age is here.
- 1:50:39[SPEAKER_01]: God bless you guys.
- 1:50:41[SPEAKER_01]: Thanks so much for listening this episode at the Turley Talks podcast.
- 1:50:44[SPEAKER_01]: Don't forget to subscribe, leave us a five star review, and share this episode with your friends.
- 1:50:49[SPEAKER_01]: Help us defeat the fake news media and rank us the number one news and commentary podcast all over the world.
- 1:50:57[SPEAKER_01]: Come back again tomorrow for another episode celebrating the rise of a new conservative age.