Latest / The Epstein Chronicles / Judicial Watch And The Epstein Related FOIA

Transcript

Judicial Watch And The Epstein Related FOIA · The Epstein Chronicles

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up everyone, and welcome back to another episode of
• 0:03
  the Epstein Chronicles. It's been four months since Donald Trump
• 0:07
  was elected, and the only thing Epstein related we have
• 0:10
  to show for it are a bunch of jerk off
• 0:12
  influencers who don't know the first thing about Jeffrey Epstein
• 0:16
  and some lame ass white binders. And unfortunately for everybody
• 0:20
  out there that thought change was coming, I hate to
• 0:22
  say it, but I told you so. Meet the new boss,
• 0:26
  same as the old boss. The people who are in
• 0:28
  charge here, and believe me, it's not the masade like
• 0:31
  the morons want to tell you. The real people who
• 0:34
  are in charge here are the people who are in
• 0:36
  charge of the purse strings. That means the financial sector
• 0:39
  and whatever the financial sector says goes. Are you not
• 0:43
  paying attention yet? I'm not exactly what you would call
• 0:46
  a super religious guy, but if you read the Bible,
• 0:50
  who did Jesus get mad at the only people? Basically, Yeah,
• 0:53
  that's right, the bankers. So all the people out here
• 0:56
  that want to talk their nonsense about dancing Jews, thea
• 0:59
  is Railies, massad, and there's no doubt that all of
• 1:03
  those folks I just mentioned certainly played a little bit
• 1:06
  of a part. But anyone who wants to pitch the
• 1:08
  bullshit that they were the ones running Epstein, that they
• 1:11
  were the ones in charge of Epstein, well, those people
• 1:14
  that are pumping that shit, they're part of the syop
• 1:18
  and they're part of the misdirection. And I hate to
• 1:20
  be the bearer of bad news. But neither party gives
• 1:23
  a shit about justice when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein
• 1:26
  because all of their leashes are being held by the banks.
• 1:30
  So you can save all the other bullshit for somebody
• 1:32
  else who doesn't know this story. But around these parts,
• 1:35
  the whole entire misdirection bullshit part of the syop is
• 1:39
  not going to get any traction. There's no doubt that
• 1:42
  Jeffrey Epstein was farmed out to the Masader, but to
• 1:47
  act like Jeffrey Epstein was a Masad creation is absolutely
• 1:52
  insane and completely wrong. But some people want to feed
• 1:55
  into their bias, right, Some people need that part of
• 1:58
  the story to be the glue that connects the rest
• 2:00
  of their bullshit together. But the truth is, the real
• 2:03
  boogeyman isn't the intelligence networks themselves. It's the people that
• 2:07
  are funding these intelligence networks and to find out who
• 2:11
  those people are, look no further than the hedge funds
• 2:13
  and the financial sector itself, people like Jamie Dimon, etc.
• 2:18
  So you can get as mad as you want, and
• 2:20
  you can throw a fit, have a temper tantruom and
• 2:24
  think that your boy and Carol knows what he's talking about.
• 2:26
  But ask yourselves why dudes like that are being platformed
• 2:30
  while people that are telling the real story about the
• 2:32
  CIA and the FBI being involved here and creating epstein
• 2:36
  are being shadow banned and deplatformed, because that's what's happening
• 2:40
  to real truth tellers. Do you really think if the
• 2:42
  masade was this all knowing force, this all knowing power,
• 2:46
  that they'd let this sort of narrative be out there.
• 2:49
  Of course they wouldn't, they'd kill that shit on arrival.
• 2:53
  But it helps the overall story, right, It's all part
• 2:56
  of the cover, and that cover is being provided for
• 2:59
  our very own intelligence agencies that are being dogwalked by
• 3:03
  the financial sector. And if you were wondering why those
• 3:05
  files haven't been turned over, that's one of the biggest
• 3:08
  reasons why today we have an article from Law and
• 3:11
  Crime and the headline public demands for transparency under LAWDJ
• 3:16
  violating FOIA by refusing to release Jeffrey Epstein files. Conservative
• 3:21
  Watchdog says this article was authored by Colin Kombucker. The
• 3:26
  Trump administration is violating a Freedom of Information Act by
• 3:30
  refusing to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein. A lawsuit
• 3:34
  filed this week in Washington, DC alleges well, at least
• 3:38
  Judicial Watch is taking a proactive approach. Is anybody going
• 3:42
  to do the same about Stacey Plaskett? Anybody going to
• 3:46
  show any sort of rage or remorse on the left
• 3:49
  about that? Or No, We're just going to make pretend
• 3:52
  that it's not happening. Seems to me that a lot
• 3:54
  of people would just like to believe and make pretend
• 3:57
  that Stacy Plasket, a sitting congressional delegate from the USVII,
• 4:03
  is not being sued currently over her alleged role in
• 4:05
  Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise. Especially considering the big ass mouth
• 4:09
  that Stacy Plaskett has, you'd think that that would be
• 4:12
  a bigger story, But I guess not. I guess people
• 4:14
  are way too busy talking some stupid bullshit about Tom
• 4:18
  Hanks going to Jeffrey Epstein's island and eating children because
• 4:22
  that really gets the story going. Huh. That really gets
• 4:24
  things over the home and gets people to pay attention.
• 4:27
  And at this point I'm convinced that all the people
• 4:29
  out here talking that kind of shit are a part
• 4:31
  of the sy op. At this point, if you aren't
• 4:34
  on target, you're doing it willfully. Either that or you're
• 4:37
  ignorant as fuck. There is no excuse not to have
• 4:40
  the whole entire story here before you start piping off
• 4:42
  about it and running your mouth. But then again, considering
• 4:46
  the current environment where everybody with the Internet is an
• 4:49
  expert on everything, I guess we shouldn't be too shocked.
• 4:54
  And the allegations are coming from perhaps an unlikely source.
• 4:57
  In a six page filing, conservative government accountability group Judicial
• 5:01
  Watch accuses the US Department of Justice under Attorney General
• 5:05
  Pound Bondi violating FOIA law on number of occasions over
• 5:10
  the past few months concerning several distinct requests. Well, welcome
• 5:15
  to the party, pal, That's all I can say. The
• 5:17
  amount of times I've been stonewalled over the years covering
• 5:20
  this case is almost hard to quantify. Just About every
• 5:23
  time you turn around where you're trying to get some
• 5:25
  official help, you're getting stonewalled, and the justification has always been, well,
• 5:30
  this is an ongoing investigation, which is absolute horseshit. They're
• 5:34
  trying to tell us that there's a decade's long investigation
• 5:37
  and only two arrests. That's what they're trying to tell you.
• 5:40
  The reality is what they're trying to do is bury
• 5:42
  it under the veil of secrecy by saying that it's
• 5:45
  national security or an ongoing investigation, when it's none of
• 5:48
  those things. Simply put, the Justice Department needs to respond
• 5:53
  to public demands for transparency under law and release the
• 5:56
  Epstein files under FOIA. Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said
• 6:01
  in a press release announcing the litigation, and good for them,
• 6:04
  like them or not, at least they're doing something here
• 6:07
  to try and get the public this information. The lawsuit
• 6:10
  stems from a February twenty first request to the DOJ's
• 6:13
  Office of Information Policy, a subagency dedicated to facilitating Freedom
• 6:19
  of Information Act requests and government compliance with the statute.
• 6:24
  According to the lawsuit, that FOIA requests sought all records
• 6:28
  of communication between Attorney General Bondie and any other individual
• 6:32
  or entity of regarding any lists or other records depicting
• 6:35
  the identities of clients or associates of Jeffrey Epstein. This
• 6:39
  request includes, but is not limited to, all records related
• 6:43
  to the department's compliance distribution handling, and the potential public
• 6:48
  release of any such record or the information contained therein.
• 6:52
  To help DOJ's staff understand the salience of the request,
• 6:56
  Judicial Watch cided a Fox News article published the day
• 7:00
  before which mused Trump's return to the Oval office came
• 7:03
  with a prospect of the public finally being able to
• 7:06
  see Epstein's long awaited black book amid inquiries into the
• 7:10
  deceased financier, pedophile and sex trafficker. We already have the
• 7:14
  black book. What are you guys even talking about? This
• 7:17
  is what I mean. You got people that just interject
• 7:20
  themselves into this conversation and they don't have the first
• 7:23
  idea what they're talking about. Then all of a sudden,
• 7:26
  they're platformed as some kind of expert breaking news. Dumbass,
• 7:29
  you're not an expert. Okay, you don't even know what
• 7:31
  you're fucking talking about. And it's very apparent at this
• 7:34
  point who has read the core documents and who hasn't,
• 7:38
  And if you haven't read them, kindly shut the fuck up,
• 7:43
  because you have no idea what you're talking about. All
• 7:45
  you're doing is regurgitating things that you heard other people
• 7:48
  say or that you've read in an article. Well, where
• 7:52
  do you think they get all of that information from?
• 7:54
  What do you think they have a magical tree where
• 7:56
  they just pull all this stuff out of No, they
• 7:59
  go to the docket, they revocord documents, then they write
• 8:01
  an article. So if you want to really be hip
• 8:04
  to what's going on, you go to the source material. Right.
• 8:07
  Not very difficult to understand how this works. But people
• 8:09
  are lazy. Instead of putting in the time to get
• 8:12
  themselves hip to what's going on, they'll just be afflicted
• 8:15
  with Dunning Krueger syndrome and think they know everything about everything.
• 8:19
  Those hopes, however, have not been born out, and neither
• 8:22
  have any of the resulting Freedom of Information Act requests.
• 8:26
  While the DOJ acknowledged the first request on February twenty seventh,
• 8:30
  assigned it a tracking number, and cited unusual circumstances to
• 8:34
  justify a ten day extension, Judicial Watch has received no
• 8:38
  further response from the government. The lawsuit says, you're not
• 8:42
  going to get any response. Bro. Unfortunately, it doesn't matter
• 8:46
  who is in office. And for all the people out
• 8:49
  there that were wringing their hands and telling me that
• 8:51
  we were going to get all these files now that
• 8:53
  Trump was elected, come on, man, really pipe dreamshit, Because
• 8:58
  everybody who's been paying attention under dance that the real
• 9:01
  bosses were never going to release this information and never
• 9:04
  allow it to hit the public. Can you imagine there's
• 9:08
  zero chance now whatever you do get, if you get anything,
• 9:12
  will be completely sterilized and useless. They're never going to
• 9:15
  release anything here, and they're never going to give you
• 9:18
  the real story. The nonprofit watch dog had no luck
• 9:21
  with follow up requests either. On February twenty seventh, Judicial
• 9:24
  Watch submitted to identical requests to the DOJ's Criminal Division
• 9:28
  and the FBI. According to the complaint, those requests asked
• 9:32
  for all records related to Jeffrey Edward Epstein born in
• 9:37
  New York City on January twentieth, nineteen fifty three, and
• 9:40
  died on August tenth, twenty nineteen, in New York City.
• 9:45
  Epstein died in federal custody while awaiting trial on sex
• 9:48
  trafficking charges. His cause of death was officially ruled to suicide.
• 9:52
  He had repeatedly been placed on suicide watch prior to dying.
• 9:56
  Oh yeah, Colin Kombacher, run a little cover for your
• 9:59
  buddies over at the DOJ. Huh. Epstein was not suicidal,
• 10:03
  point blank period. And the reason that he was put
• 10:06
  on suicide watch is because all high level inmates are
• 10:09
  just like did He was just like Lann Maxwell. So
• 10:12
  stop the bullshit, Colin Kombocker, mister law reporter. I mean,
• 10:17
  you would think a dude that's talking about the law
• 10:19
  would actually like understand it. Judicial Watch says that both
• 10:24
  the February twenty seventh FOIA requests were acknowledged by the government,
• 10:28
  but in different ways. In early March, the request from
• 10:32
  the Criminal Division was deemed duplicative of an earlier request
• 10:36
  submitted in twenty nineteen and closed out. According to the lawsuit,
• 10:41
  the plaintiffs do not express any opinion on this development,
• 10:44
  except to say the twenty nineteen requests was still being
• 10:48
  processed because they have not yet received a determination. In
• 10:52
  mid March, the request to the FBI was acknowledged, again,
• 10:55
  pushed back ten days due to unusual circumstances, and again
• 10:58
  seemingly shelved, with the plaintiffs having received no further response
• 11:02
  from the FBI. According to the lawsuit, on February twenty eighth,
• 11:07
  Judicial Watch up the ante with an FOIA request, explicitly
• 11:11
  tying their inquiry to FBI Director Cash Battel. Patel is
• 11:16
  a longtime Trump stalwart whose confirmation push included pledges of transparency,
• 11:21
  specifically regarding Epstein. The Battel focused FOIA request seeks all
• 11:26
  records of communication between Director Bateel and any other individual
• 11:31
  or entity regarding any list or other records depicting the
• 11:34
  identities of clients or associates of Jeffrey Epstein. This request includes,
• 11:39
  but is not limited to, all records related to the
• 11:42
  departments compilation, distribution, handling, and potential public release of any
• 11:47
  such record or the information contained herein. Once Again, Judicial
• 11:51
  Watch says the FBI acknowledged the request, gave itself an extension,
• 11:56
  and then went radio silent because that's what they do.
• 11:59
  There is no accountability, and anybody who thought mister cash
• 12:03
  Bettel was going to restore that, well, you were out
• 12:06
  to lunch. None of these people care about you, none
• 12:09
  of them. Once Again, Judicial Watch says, the FBI acknowledged
• 12:14
  the request, gave itself an extension, then went radio silent.
• 12:18
  The lawsuit says the DOJ is in violation of Freedom
• 12:21
  of Information Act and claims the irreparable harm has occurred and
• 12:25
  will continue to occur unless defendant is compelled to comply
• 12:28
  with foia's requirements. The complaint seeks the court order directing
• 12:33
  the DOJ to conduct searches for any and all records
• 12:37
  responsive to plaintiffs FOIA requests and to demonstrate that the
• 12:41
  DOJ employed search methods reasonably likely to lead to the
• 12:45
  discovery of records responsive to the requests. Judicial Watch also
• 12:50
  wants the court to force the DOJ to release all
• 12:53
  relevant records covered by the FOIA requests and or a
• 12:57
  list outlining any exemptions claimed by the agency. To that end,
• 13:01
  the plaintiffs are asking DOJ to be enjoined from continuing
• 13:05
  to withhold any and all non exempt records responsive to
• 13:09
  the requests. Let me translate that you're screwed. You're never
• 13:13
  gonna get these records. We're never gonna see them, and
• 13:16
  the DOJ is going to continue doing what the DOJ does,
• 13:20
  and that is ignoring any request for information about Jeffrey Epstein.
• 13:24
  All right, folks, that's gonna do it for this one.
• 13:26
  All of the information that goes with this episode can
• 13:29
  be found in the description box.