Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / Apple Says Whites Need Not Apply

Transcript

Apple Says Whites Need Not Apply · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: So Apple entrepreneur Camp a one on one product focused
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: technology lab designed to empower underrepresented founders and developers, elevate
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: their app driven businesses and build dynamic communities. So underrepresented
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: founders and developers. I wonder, so that must be seek
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: for us race and ethnicity for Apple, for their employees,
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: that white people are quite underrepresented, only forty two percent
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: of the workforces white people. So they must be talking
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: about white people here.
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: It must be.
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: It must be DEI it must be for those underrepresented
• 0:41
  Speaker 1: white people at Apple. Let's see, I wonder we believe
• 0:45
  Speaker 1: apps for everyone should be made by everyone. Well, there's
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: nobody fucking stopping anyone for making an app or doing
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: any other goddamn thing. Entrepreneur Camp offers programming for founders
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: and developers who are female. Now, notice there's an asterisk
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: on female. What do you think that means? Can you guess?
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: Can you imagine what that asterisk might be for female?
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: Because they don't just say female. There's a little star
• 1:15
  Speaker 1: there too. Let you know it means something else, really
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: but okay, so female and then something mysterious black, Hispanic, Latins, LATINX.
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: I've done videos on Latins. It's like there's like three
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: percent of the Latino community that doesn't absolutely hate it,
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: and then like that three percent doesn't really like it
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: much either, but for some reason, like you know, white
• 1:47
  Speaker 1: far leftist gender studies professor are just insisting on pushing
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: this shit, or indigenous and have the following app driven business.
• 1:56
  Speaker 1: So you got female kind of cospanic Latanks or indigenous.
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: Somebody's left out of that.
• 2:05
  Speaker 2: Huh.
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: It seems like they forgot a group there. What could
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: that group be? Hmm, what could that group be? Oh,
• 2:13
  Speaker 1: that's right, white men, white men, because that's what diversity means.
• 2:19
  Speaker 1: Of course, no white men, that's diversity, that's equity.
• 2:24
  Speaker 2: No white men.
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: I mean again, it's they said, what do they say
• 2:28
  Speaker 1: up here? They say underrepresented? Well, at Apple white people
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: are underrepresented, and I can guess that white men are
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: even more underrepresented. So none of this, it's all fucking bullshit.
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: This is all far left ideology. This is not rooted
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: in reality. It means nothing. This is just the strange fantasy,
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: delusional uh, critical race theory, far leftist Marxist ideology at work.
• 2:59
  Speaker 1: Nothing means a thing, nothing's real. It just has to
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: feel progressive. None of it has to be falsifiable. None
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: of it has to be proven, none of it has.
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: To be real.
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: It just has to feel progressive, that's the whole point,
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: and has to feel like they're being anti racist or inclusive.
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: It doesn't matter what the reality is. They don't care.
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: Nobody over in the far left cares. The academics don't care,
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: the media doesn't care. None of them care. It just
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: does it feel like it's progressive. And if it is, well,
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: there you go. But what about that asterisk right there?
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: What could that possibly be for? I mean, female, that's
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: pretty simple right where sexually reproducing species, sexually dimorphic male female,
• 3:46
  Speaker 1: So it seems like it to be pretty simple. But
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: there's that star there. I wonder, let's see, let's see
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: where where could it be? Right at the bottom here
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: in tiny, tiny letters, it's as Apple believes that gender
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: expression is a fundamental right. We welcome all women to
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: apply to this program. Why did they hide it all
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: the way down here at the bottom and the tiniest
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: writing they could?
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: Huh?
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: So it's not females, it's not women, it's not just them,
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: and they left white men out, but they've left that
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: asterisk there. I wonder if anybody will take advantage of that.
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: It looks like Apple entrepreneur camp is back on the menu. Boys,
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: What a retarded world we live in?
• 4:40
  Speaker 2: You in full return man, never go full retime. Why
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: won't somebody tell that to Apple? Really? Why won't they
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: tell that? Why won't somebody tell that to Apple?
• 4:51
  Speaker 1: No of fans, but it sounds like that's some fucking
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: comed gobbledy goook.
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: A grade norm a grade agreed.
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: Anyway, I think we let's see what else have any
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: of you commented in the chat on this. Let's take
• 5:04
  Speaker 1: a look. When xerxe says only commis like that LATINX thing,
• 5:09
  Speaker 1: it's true. They are the only people who like it.
• 5:12
  Speaker 1: Streamer says, it's just another attempt at changing cultural norms
• 5:16
  Speaker 1: to bring forth their own.
• 5:17
  Speaker 2: LATINX is such a stupid concept.
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: Well, it's because you know, Spanish is a gendered language,
• 5:24
  Speaker 1: of course, and they don't like that, because they don't
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: think that gender is real or something I don't know,
• 5:29
  Speaker 1: or there's a million genders and they don't like that.
• 5:32
  Speaker 1: They want it to be unisex, and obviously that's totally
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: stupid and actually, frankly, I think by their own rules,
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: it's fairly bigoted, right, Like, how is that not colonialism?
• 5:44
  Speaker 1: Like they're so they're very anti colonial, right, well, how
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: is that not colonialism? Trying to colonize their language, change
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: their language?
• 5:53
  Speaker 2: Right?
• 5:53
  Speaker 1: Again, none of it makes sense. None of it makes sense.
• 5:56
  Speaker 1: That's why it's impossible to argue with them. Rumbum says,
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: I could have sworn we had laws about not excluding
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: people based on race, But what do I know. Progressive
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: say white males have all the rights, and they don't,
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: but lately seems it's whites not having any rights yet.
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: Well it is illegal, but it doesn't matter. It doesn't
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: matter because if nobody's willing to enforce the laws, well
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: are they even really laws at that point? Anyway, that's
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: all I'm going to say about that. Please like, share,
• 6:26
  Speaker 1: and subscribe. Subscribing really helps me out. I thank you
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: for that. I will see you next time.