Latest / Murder Files Unsealed / Dyatlov Pass Incident

Transcript

Dyatlov Pass Incident · Murder Files Unsealed

0:00
Speaker 1: The Diet Love pass Incident. It's one of those things
0:03
just the name sends shivers down your spine, doesn't it
0:07
It does. It sounds like, I don't know, something you'd
0:08
read out of like a thriller novel or you know,
0:11
some fictional fictional.
0:13
Speaker 2: Story, campfire tale.
0:14
Speaker 1: Yeah, but this mystery, it's all too real, it is,
0:19
and that's kind of what makes it so much creepier. Right,
0:22
So we're talking the Soviet Union nineteen fifty nine, Okay,
0:26
when this group of hikers they vanish in the Ural mountains, right,
0:30
and it's under such bizarre circumstances, like it's stumped investigators, Yeah,
0:36
for decades. I mean, this isn't something that like you know,
0:37
oh they figured it out the next year or whatever. Right, Right,
0:40
this has gone on for.
0:41
Speaker 2: A long time. It's perplexed people.
0:43
Speaker 1: And rightfully so. Right.
0:44
Speaker 2: Yeah.
0:44
Speaker 1: So today that's what we're diving into, taking a look
0:47
at this. And we're using excerpts from this online article
0:50
and they titled it simply Diet Love pass Incident, straightforward, yeah,
0:55
which I kind of appreciate. Keeps it to the point, Yeah,
0:59
nice and easy. Yeah, So hopefully we can you know,
1:01
take a look at this separate fact from fiction, maybe
1:04
uncover a truth or two along the way.
1:07
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, it's a case that truly captures the imagination.
1:11
It's one of those things where it's it's not just about,
1:14
you know, a tragic disappearance, it's about the limits of
1:18
what we know, and then the unsettling feeling that sometimes,
1:22
like you said, the simplest explanation just isn't quite right right.
1:26
Speaker 1: And that's what gets me is because on the surface,
1:29
you think, okay, hiker's gone missing in the wilderness.
1:32
Speaker 2: Yeah, tragic, but it happens.
1:34
Speaker 1: Stuff happens, yeah.
1:35
Speaker 2: You know, sadly, it's not unheard of.
1:37
Speaker 1: Happens all the time, unfortunately.
1:39
Speaker 2: But then you start looking at the specifics right of
1:42
the dialogue past incident, and it's almost like falling down
1:46
this rabbit hole of like, wait, what how did that happen?
1:49
So you've got these experienced hikers, and that's what's so
1:51
crazy to me. These were not amateurs. These people were
1:55
venturing out in the dead of winter and they were
1:59
aiming for their Grade three certifications, which I mean.
2:03
Speaker 1: That's that's that's hardcore.
2:05
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're talking like the highest hiking certification in the
2:08
Soviet Union. So no small feat.
2:10
Speaker 1: These guys knew what they were doing, or at least
2:12
should have. Yeah, this was serious business, right, and their
2:15
goal was this grueling one hundred and ninety mile trek
2:20
through the Ural mountains.
2:21
Speaker 2: Yeah, ambitious.
2:22
Speaker 1: Yeah, So this was no you know, walk in the park.
2:25
Speaker 2: They were going for it.
2:26
Speaker 1: They were going for it exactly.
2:27
Speaker 2: And that's what and that's what's crucial, right, because that
2:30
detail about their experience, it immediately undercuts the easy answers. Right.
2:37
These weren't weekend warriors who wandered off ill prepared, Right.
2:41
They knew the risks, They understood, like you're saying, the
2:45
challenges of these conditions.
2:46
Speaker 1: Right.
2:47
Speaker 2: They were meticulously organized. Yeah, I mean they had detailed itineraries,
2:51
they registered their route, they got approval from the local
2:54
sports committee.
2:55
Speaker 1: They were doing they were checking all the boxes.
2:57
Speaker 2: They checked all the boxes, which makes it so bizarre.
3:00
It makes their fate all the more strange.
3:02
Speaker 1: It really does. So rewind January twenty fifth, nineteen fifty nine. Okay,
3:07
our group of ten sets off right on this what
3:10
was supposed to be this ambitious journey, first by train
3:14
and then they were making their way to the village
3:17
of his high and this was like the last outpost
3:20
of civilization before you hit like the real wilderness and
3:24
of the wild.
3:24
Speaker 2: Yeah. And they're documenting their journey in these diaries and
3:28
with photographs as you do, like you do when you're
3:31
on an adventure. You know you're going to take pictures,
3:34
you're going to write about it. And they even had
3:36
to adjust their plans slightly. Okay, one of their members,
3:41
your Udine, he had to turn back. He had some
3:44
health problems, so he couldn't continue.
3:48
Speaker 1: Can you imagine being that guy, Oh my gosh, the
3:50
last man to see them alive essentially, And.
3:53
Speaker 2: Then years later, right after everything that unfolded, did he
3:57
ever retrace those steps? You know, right thinking about what
4:00
if I had just stuck it out?
4:01
Speaker 1: What if I had just yeah, if I.
4:02
Speaker 2: Just toughed it out, right, I would they all still
4:05
be here.
4:05
Speaker 1: It's like a ghost story in its own right, just
4:07
that piece of it.
4:08
Speaker 2: Yeah.
4:09
Speaker 1: But even with that setback, the remaining nine hikers they
4:12
had continued on determined. Oh yeah, yeah, they were going
4:16
to complete this thing, right. They followed their planned route.
4:21
They even stashed some supplies along the way, like, you know,
4:25
for their return trip. Yeah, which always gets me because
4:27
it's just like they were so confident, like this just
4:30
shows their confidence and their abilities.
4:32
Speaker 2: We got this, We're gonna be big, Yeah, exactly, piece
4:37
of cake.
4:38
Speaker 1: And it makes it that much more eerie, right right, And.
4:40
Speaker 2: It makes their later decisions, as we'll get to, even
4:43
more perplexing, right because, as we know, things take a turn. Yes,
4:47
they encountered some severe weather, heavy snowstorms, yeah, reduce visibility,
4:53
and this kind of forced them off their intended course
4:55
a little bit.
4:56
Speaker 1: Right.
4:56
Speaker 2: They ended up on the slopes of Cullet Cycle Mountain, okay,
5:01
which ends up being you know, yeah, this place that's
5:04
etched in history for all the wrong.
5:06
Speaker 1: Reasons, right right.
5:07
Speaker 2: And it's here that we encounter one of the first
5:12
big why questions, Yes, of the dial Off Pass incident. Okay,
5:17
So they get to this mountain, yeah, and instead of
5:20
backtracking just a short distance to a more sheltered area,
5:24
for whatever reason, they decided to set up camp right
5:27
there on the exposed slope.
5:29
Speaker 1: Yeah, why, And that's the question. Like experienced hikers, you
5:33
would think deteriorating conditions, you're not going to put yourself
5:37
in a more precarious situation.
5:38
Speaker 2: You'd think they would want to hunker down and be safe. Yeah,
5:41
find the safest possible spot.
5:43
Speaker 1: So was it just a miscalculation, were they overconfident it's possible?
5:48
Or was there something else entirely that made them.
5:50
Speaker 2: Stop there that we don't know about? Right?
5:52
Speaker 1: And that's what makes it so intriguing, exactly.
5:54
Speaker 2: It's haunted investigators for decades.
5:56
Speaker 1: And then there's semyon the solitary off right, Yes, the
5:59
miss the mystery man of the group.
6:01
Speaker 2: It's a curious case, right, he was the eleventh person
6:04
on the approved list, okay for this expedition, but like
6:08
you said, details about him, they're so sparse, very thin. Yeah,
6:14
we don't know a whole lot about him, Like who
6:16
was this guy?
6:17
Speaker 1: What was he doing there?
6:18
Speaker 2: What was his connection to the group?
6:20
Speaker 1: Who was his story?
6:21
Speaker 2: Right? And you see these accounts some people suggesting that
6:24
maybe he even had a different name.
6:26
Speaker 1: Oh really yeah, interesting.
6:27
Speaker 2: Like what's going on there? Was he just a quiet,
6:31
enigmatic member of the group or could there be more?
6:34
Speaker 1: Right? And if there is more, what is it?
6:36
Speaker 2: We don't know yet?
6:37
Speaker 1: And does it come? See, these are the questions, these are.
6:39
Speaker 2: The threads we're trying to untangle.
6:41
Speaker 1: So many questions and we're just getting started.
6:43
Speaker 2: Just at the tip of the iceberg.
6:45
Speaker 1: So the last confirmed date that we have from these
6:47
hikers is February first, nineteen fifty nine. Okay, after that
6:52
radio silence, silence, they were due back. They never arrived,
6:57
never showed. So search parties they went out into this
7:01
unforgiving wilderness. They're bracing for the worst.
7:05
Speaker 2: Of course, they're thinking it's not going to be good.
7:07
Speaker 1: It's not going to be good. And what they found
7:10
would send shock waves through the Soviet Union and honestly,
7:14
I mean captivate the world for generations to come. Absolutely,
7:18
because February twenty sixth, the searchers they find this abandoned campsite.
7:24
And abandoned doesn't even cover it. Okay, the tent was
7:28
a mess, partially buried in the snow. But here's the
7:31
real kicker. It had been cut open from the inside.
7:34
Us I know.
7:36
Speaker 2: Right, why would you do that?
7:37
Speaker 1: That's what doesn't make sense. Yeah, it's almost as if
7:41
you know, like.
7:41
Speaker 2: What would possess you to do that?
7:43
Speaker 1: Right? It suggests panic, at least a desperate flight from something.
7:47
Speaker 2: It's like they were running for their lives.
7:49
Speaker 1: It really is like they were running from something.
7:52
Speaker 2: Terrifying. Imagine being one of those searchers coming across that scene,
7:56
that slashed tent in the middle of nowhere. Yeah, I mean,
8:00
it's got to send chills down your spine.
8:02
Speaker 1: Yeah, just thinking about it, just a total mystery, like
8:04
where did they go?
8:06
Speaker 2: Right?
8:06
Speaker 1: Did they just disappear? Did somebody grab them? What happened?
8:09
Speaker 2: Yeah? Like what are you running from? That would make
8:11
you cut yourself out of a tent rather than unzip it,
8:14
I know, bizarre?
8:16
Speaker 1: And then to lead to lead away from this tent. Yeah,
8:19
they found nine sets of footprints, Okay, some barefoot, some
8:23
it just socks. Oh no, I know, talk about a
8:26
way to get frostbite.
8:28
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's a recipe for disaster, especially in those conditions,
8:31
in that kind of weather.
8:32
Speaker 1: Yeah, absolutely brutal. So they followed these tracks towards a
8:37
nearby wooded area, but then they disappeared after about five
8:41
hundred meters, just gone, just gone, swallowed by the snow. Wow,
8:46
Which I mean, if you think about that image, it's
8:48
like these footprints leading into the white void.
8:50
Speaker 2: You know, it's eerie.
8:51
Speaker 1: It's eerie. Yeah, and it speaks to like the isolation,
8:54
the desperation, mystery out of those final moments.
8:57
Speaker 2: Absolutely, but it's like out.
8:59
Speaker 1: Of a revival horror movie or something, you know, totally.
9:03
And at the edge of these woods they found under
9:07
a large Siberian pine, they found this small fire, okay,
9:12
and there two bodies were discovered, Kravonashenko and Doroshenko, Okay,
9:17
shoeless only in their underclothes, frozen solid.
9:21
Speaker 2: So this is where it starts to get really strange.
9:23
Speaker 1: Right, because at this point you're like, Okay, maybe exposure,
9:25
like that's kind of a logical it makes sense.
9:27
Speaker 2: Given the environment. Right, Hypothermia it's a very real threat,
9:33
and it can lead to disorientation, even paradoxical undressing.
9:37
Speaker 1: Yeah, where you're taking your clothes.
9:38
Speaker 2: Off exactly, even though it's freezing cold, you feel like
9:41
you're overheating. Yeah, it's a strange quirk of how the
9:44
body reacts.
9:45
Speaker 1: Yeah. So at this point, you know, they're like, Okay,
9:48
well this is sad, but it's kind.
9:51
Speaker 2: Of that's a tragic accident, you think, right, we kind.
9:54
Speaker 1: Of see what happened here. Yeah, But as more bodies
9:57
are found over the following weeks.
9:59
Speaker 2: Uh, oh, I know, right, it gets more complicated.
10:01
Speaker 1: The plot thickens. That hypothermia theory, it starts to fall
10:05
apart a.
10:05
Speaker 2: Little, I think quite fit.
10:07
Speaker 1: So we're not just talking about bodies found frozen in
10:10
the snow. No. Three of these hikers, they had suffered
10:14
severe trauma, and like the kind of trauma that doesn't
10:17
add up to a simple fall or an animal attack
10:21
or anything like that.
10:22
Speaker 2: So what are we talking about.
10:23
Speaker 1: We're talking serious chest fractures. Wow, a major skull injury
10:28
was found.
10:29
Speaker 2: That's serious stuff.
10:30
Speaker 1: Yeah, like injuries that are more consistent with a car crash.
10:34
Speaker 2: Really than, like you said, anything you'd expect to find
10:37
out in the wilderness, right.
10:38
Speaker 1: And the forensic expert at the time, he said that
10:41
the force needed to cause these injuries was like being
10:45
hit by a car at high speed. A serious I know,
10:48
and obviously there were no cars involved, but it just
10:51
gives you a sense of the force that we're talking
10:53
about here.
10:54
Speaker 2: It's a bizarre detail. It's like, what on earth could
10:57
it cause this?
10:58
Speaker 1: Okay? And it gets weirder. So remember those footprints, Yeah,
11:02
some of them barefoot, some of them in socks. Right, Well,
11:05
some of these hikers they were found partially dressed.
11:08
Speaker 2: Okay, Now that's strange. Why would you why would you
11:11
take your clothes off in that kind of weather, right,
11:14
it's freezing.
11:15
Speaker 1: I know. It's one of those things where it's like,
11:17
I mean, I guess paradostoxical undressing could be a factor.
11:21
Speaker 2: It could be you know, like we were saying, with hypothermia. Yeah,
11:25
the body systems start to shut down, you get confused,
11:28
you might feel a false sense of warmth, right, right,
11:31
you know it's a grim irony of survival sometimes.
11:33
Speaker 1: Right.
11:34
Speaker 2: But even with that explanation, you know, the severity of
11:39
the injuries, the nature.
11:40
Speaker 1: Of the injuries, it doesn't make sense.
11:42
Speaker 2: It just doesn't quite add up.
11:43
Speaker 1: It really doesn't. It just seems like one thing after another.
11:46
Speaker 2: It's like it's like the mountain itself lashed out at
11:49
these hikers with this force that nobody can explain. It's true,
11:54
and it's no wonder that the dialog Pass incident. It
11:56
becomes this breeding ground for wild theories.
11:59
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, you've got a slash tent, you've got strange injuries,
12:03
you've got missing clothing, Like, come.
12:05
Speaker 2: On, it's a recipe for speculation, right.
12:09
Speaker 1: It really is. I mean, you've got everything from animal
12:11
attacks to avalanches to UFOs too, because like secret government experiments.
12:17
Speaker 2: I mean, it's got it all, it really does. It's
12:20
human nature to try to find an explanation.
12:22
Speaker 1: Yeah.
12:23
Speaker 2: Of course, when we're faced with something we don't understand,
12:25
we want to fill in the blanks. We want to
12:27
make sense of it, right, and when the logical explanations,
12:30
you know, they kind of fall short. Yeah, we tend
12:33
to get creative. It's no surprise that this case, with
12:36
its tantalizing.
12:37
Speaker 1: Lack of closure, it really does. Yeah.
12:40
Speaker 2: It captures imaginations. Yeah, it gets people talking, it does.
12:43
Speaker 1: Okay, So let's let's dive into some of these theories.
12:46
Then let's start with the animal attack, okay, because I
12:49
mean that seems like the most straightforward, right. Sure, you know,
12:52
you're in the wilderness. It happens, something happens.
12:55
Speaker 2: It could be a bear, a bear.
12:56
Speaker 1: A pack of wolves, you know, a rogue moose, who knows,
13:00
who knows? It could be bigfoot for all.
13:02
Speaker 2: We know, right, lurking in those woods.
13:04
Speaker 1: Right exactly.
13:05
Speaker 2: But here's the thing. Okay, there's no evidence, right, Like
13:08
you said, they were running, they were afraid of something.
13:10
They cut themselves out of the tent. But there's no
13:12
animal tracks. Oh. Interesting, there's no signs of a struggle.
13:16
There's no you know, animal hair.
13:18
Speaker 1: There's no It's like they were running from an idea, right, It's.
13:21
Speaker 2: Like they were running from something they couldn't see.
13:23
Speaker 1: Okay, Okay, So it wasn't an animal.
13:24
Speaker 2: Or at least there's no evidence to support it. Okay.
13:27
We can't rule it out completely, but it doesn't seem likely.
13:29
Speaker 1: Right, Okay, So what about the Mancy people? Oh?
13:31
Speaker 2: Right, the indigenous people of the region.
13:33
Speaker 1: Yeah, because I know they were initially suspected, right they were.
13:36
Speaker 2: There were some initial suspicions because you know, this was
13:38
their land, they knew the area. Maybe there was a territorial.
13:41
Speaker 1: Dispute or something, right, something that we just wouldn't understand, right.
13:45
Speaker 2: Some cultural clash that were not privy Tokay. But again,
13:49
no evidence interesting, no signs of a struggle, no, you know,
13:53
no weapons or anything like that. So as intriguing as
13:59
that theory might be, it just doesn't hold water.
14:02
Speaker 1: It really doesn't, not with the evidence we have. Okay.
14:05
So if it wasn't an animal, it wasn't another group
14:09
of people. What about the environment itself? Could it have
14:13
been you know, an avalanche?
14:15
Speaker 2: An avalanche?
14:16
Speaker 1: Because that's a theory that's gained a lot of traction.
14:19
Speaker 2: Right, it has, and it would certainly explain the force
14:22
needed to cause those injuries. We're talking about a lot.
14:26
Speaker 1: Of force, massive amounts.
14:27
Speaker 2: Of force, right, and an avalanche could definitely do that.
14:30
Speaker 1: Okay, But wouldn't they have heard it coming?
14:32
Speaker 2: That's the thing. Not necessarily really, it depends on the
14:36
type of avalanche. Oh okay, we're not just talking about
14:39
a Hollywood style avalanche with this giant, roaring wall of snow,
14:44
a slab avalanche, which is common in that area. It
14:47
can occur with little to no warning.
14:50
Speaker 1: Oh.
14:50
Speaker 2: It's basically a large section of snow that breaks loose
14:54
and slides down the slope. And it could happen incredibly fast.
14:58
Speaker 1: Oh wow, So you wouldn't have time to react exactly.
15:00
Speaker 2: You're caught off guard. You're in trouble.
15:02
Speaker 1: Okay, So that would make sense why they cut themselves out.
15:05
Speaker 2: It could. It's a desperate attempt to escape, right, You're
15:08
trying to get out of there any way you can.
15:10
Speaker 1: Okay, that makes sense.
15:11
Speaker 2: But even with the avalanche theory, there are still some
15:14
unanswered questions, like what well, for example, some of those
15:18
injuries they don't seem to fit with just being caught in.
15:21
Speaker 1: An avalanche, right, like that skull fracture. That doesn't really
15:25
that's a head scratcher, it really is.
15:27
Speaker 2: And then the whole partially dressed thing, right, why if
15:30
you're buried under snow, why are you taking your clothes off?
15:33
Speaker 1: It doesn't make any sense. And then on top of that,
15:37
the radiation.
15:38
Speaker 2: Ah, yes, the radiation.
15:40
Speaker 1: Because we didn't even get into that yet.
15:41
Speaker 2: Right, because that adds a whole other layer to this,
15:44
a whole other like, because now we're not just talking
15:46
about a natural disaster or a tragic accident, We're talking
15:50
about something potentially more sinister.
15:52
Speaker 1: Right, because some people believe that that points to like
15:55
secret Cold War experiments.
15:58
Speaker 2: It's possible. I mean, this is so union. They weren't
16:01
exactly known for their transparency, right exactly, And the idea
16:05
of them conducting secret tests, maybe even something involving radioactive materials.
16:10
Speaker 1: It's not that far fetched.
16:11
Speaker 2: It is not that far fetched at all.
16:12
Speaker 1: So we've got all these threads we're trying to untangle.
16:14
Speaker 2: It's a tangled web, that's for sure.
16:16
Speaker 1: It's a real miss.
16:17
Speaker 2: It's like trying to solve a puzzle, but half the
16:20
pieces are missing and the other half are faded.
16:22
Speaker 1: With time, Right, it's like you don't even know what
16:24
you're looking at anymore.
16:25
Speaker 2: Exactly. You're left with more questions than answers.
16:28
Speaker 1: Which is kind of frustrating in a way.
16:31
Speaker 2: It can be, but it's also what makes it so fascinating.
16:33
Speaker 1: That is true. Okay, well let's try to find some
16:35
more of those puzzle pieces.
16:36
Speaker 2: Then let's do it.
16:37
Speaker 1: It really is like trying to solve a puzzle with
16:41
like you said, half the pieces are missing, the other
16:43
half are faded. You don't know if you're coming or
16:46
going with this thing.
16:47
Speaker 2: That's a real head scratcher, it is.
16:49
Speaker 1: And you know what, even with all that, even with
16:53
how crazy it is decades later, Yeah, this case, it
16:57
still fascinates people, of course, and rightfully so. And there
17:01
have been new investigations. They're utilizing modern techniques.
17:04
Speaker 2: Right because we've got better tools now than they had
17:07
back then.
17:07
Speaker 1: Exactly.
17:08
Speaker 2: So it's like, can science crack the code of this
17:11
historical mystery.
17:12
Speaker 1: Right exactly? Can we go back and look with fresh
17:14
eyes and maybe see something that they missed exactly?
17:17
Speaker 2: And that's what I find so fascinating about these more
17:19
recent efforts. Yeah, it's not just about trying to find
17:22
a definitive answer, right, It's about what we can learn,
17:26
what new perspectives we can gain, even if the mystery
17:29
itself remains unsolved.
17:31
Speaker 1: Okay, so what like, what are some of the things
17:33
that they've looked at, because I know, like they exhumed
17:37
Semyon Zolitariov's body back in twenty eighteen.
17:40
Speaker 2: Yeah, that was a big deal.
17:41
Speaker 1: It was a whole thing, right it was.
17:42
Speaker 2: I mean, the idea of trying to extract viable DNA
17:46
from a body that's been frozen for decades.
17:49
Speaker 1: Right in the Siberian wilderness. No less, it's like something
17:52
out of a movie, it really is. Did they find anything,
17:55
like was it worth it?
17:57
Speaker 2: Well? The results were a bit underwhelming on that front. Yeah,
18:00
the DNA analysis didn't reveal any groundbreaking information about his
18:05
identity or anything like that.
18:06
Speaker 1: Oh so, still a mystery man.
18:09
Speaker 2: Still a mystery man.
18:10
Speaker 1: Unfortunately, I was hoping that was our ind I know,
18:12
it'd been great, tie it all together right, connect the
18:15
dots exactly.
18:15
Speaker 2: But there was something Okay, examining his remains did offer
18:20
up a rather eerie detail.
18:21
Speaker 1: Don't tell me it's the car crash thing again. It
18:24
is are you kidding me? I know, right, Like, what
18:27
are the odds?
18:27
Speaker 2: Like that detail just keeps popping up.
18:29
Speaker 1: It's so creepy.
18:30
Speaker 2: The forensic expert involved. He noted that the nature of
18:33
Solitariov's injuries, yeah, consistent with someone being hit by a
18:37
car at high speed.
18:39
Speaker 1: But again, middle of nowhere, nineteen fifty nine.
18:42
Speaker 2: No cars, Nope, no cars.
18:44
Speaker 1: So strange.
18:45
Speaker 2: It's like our minds try to make sense of the
18:47
inexplicable by drawing these bizarre.
18:51
Speaker 1: Parallels, right, Like our brains just can't compute it. So
18:54
they're like, well, it's like a.
18:55
Speaker 2: Car crash exactly, because what else could possibly cause that
18:59
kind of damage?
19:01
Speaker 1: Right? And that's the thing. It's like we're trying to
19:02
apply logic to something that might be completely illogical.
19:06
Speaker 2: Maybe there's a completely different set of rules.
19:08
Speaker 1: At play here, right, or maybe something happened that we
19:11
just don't have the capacity to understand exactly. Okay, So
19:15
that was twenty eighteen. They exhumed the body, didn't really
19:19
find out a whole lot, not as much as we hoped, right,
19:22
But then the case was officially reopened by Russian authorities
19:27
in twenty nineteen.
19:28
Speaker 2: Yeah, that was a big deal too.
19:29
Speaker 1: It was like they were finally taking it seriously again.
19:32
Speaker 2: It was like they were acknowledging that there were still
19:34
unanswered questions.
19:35
Speaker 1: Right, and they wanted to see if they could finally
19:37
put this to rest.
19:38
Speaker 2: But here's the thing. They were quick to rule out
19:41
foul play. Really yeah, they said there was no evidence
19:44
to suggest that another group or individuals were involved. Interesting,
19:48
they were focused on natural explanations, so like, what specifically
19:53
an avalanche?
19:55
Speaker 1: Again, back to the avalanche.
19:56
Speaker 2: It kept coming up, and this time they were looking
19:59
at it with a more detailed approach.
20:01
Speaker 1: So not just any avalanche. They were looking at specific types.
20:05
Speaker 2: Exactly, because it turns out not all avalanches are created equal.
20:10
Speaker 1: Okay, I'm intrigued, tell me more.
20:12
Speaker 2: So, they were focusing on the possibility of a slab avalanche, which,
20:16
like we talked about before, can happen very suddenly.
20:19
Speaker 1: Right, Like the mountain just sheds its skin.
20:21
Speaker 2: Exactly, and it's a massive amount of force enough to
20:24
cause serious damage.
20:25
Speaker 1: Okay, So that would make sense with the tent and everything.
20:27
Speaker 2: Right, they're caught off guard, they're trying to escape, it's chaos.
20:30
Speaker 1: But what about those injuries and the radiation, Like, how
20:35
does that fit into the avalanche theory.
20:37
Speaker 2: That's the million dollar question, isn't it.
20:39
Speaker 1: It really is. It's like every time we get close
20:42
to an answer, we just end up with more questions.
20:44
Speaker 2: And that's the thing about the Dialogue Past incident. It's
20:47
a case that defies easy answers.
20:49
Speaker 1: So where does that leave us? I mean, after decades
20:53
of investigation, speculation, analysis, it seems like.
20:57
Speaker 2: The avalanche theory it's the most plausible explanation. Okay, it's
21:01
the one that aligns most closely with the available evidence.
21:04
Speaker 1: But it doesn't explain everything.
21:06
Speaker 2: Unfortunately, no, it doesn't. And that's part of what makes
21:08
this case so enduringly fascinating.
21:12
Speaker 1: Right.
21:12
Speaker 2: It's a reminder that even in our age of advanced technology,
21:15
we don't have all the answers.
21:16
Speaker 1: Some things are still a mystery exactly. Well, hopefully someday,
21:20
maybe someone listening right now, you never know, will be
21:22
the one to finally figure it out.
21:24
Speaker 2: Maybe they'll find that missing piece of the puzzle.
21:26
Speaker 1: That would be amazing. Well, until then, the mystery of
21:29
the diet love pass incident.
21:31
Speaker 2: Continues a case for the ages.
21:34
Speaker 1: It really is. If you're interested in learning more, and
21:36
I know you are, of course. The online article we
21:39
used is called Diet Love Pass Incident.
21:41
Speaker 2: Check it out, dive into the details.
21:43
Speaker 1: You will get lost in this. Trust me and until
21:45
next time, keep exploring, keep questioning, and as always, keep
21:50
diving deep