Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 2 Part 3) (9/20/26)

Transcript

Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 2 Part 3) (9/20/26) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the program. In
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: this episode, we're picking up where we left off with
• 0:05
  Speaker 1: the Tyler Robinson prelim hearing, day number two. And we
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: left off with the prosecution asking the question, on what day?
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: And Agent Hall responds, September 10th, 2025. And that, of course,
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: leads us into today's episode. Question, okay, what just happened?
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: Or what did we just see happen? Answer, the individual
• 0:28
  Speaker 1: actually kind of rolls over the railing onto the roof
• 0:30
  Speaker 1: of the Losey building. Question, all right, go ahead, sorry. Answer,
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: and again, in the top left corner, the individual is
• 0:37
  Speaker 1: now seen running across the rooftop of the Losey building
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: to what would be the southwest corner of the building,
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: crouching down and then crawling to the corner of the building. Question,
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: and what time is this at? Answer, around 1223. I
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: think the timestamp on the video is 1222. Question on
• 0:54
  Speaker 1: the 10th. Answer, on the 10th, yes, 2025. Question, we're clear,
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: this is the roof of the Lhotse building. Answer, correct. Question,
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: can you still see that individual? Answer, yeah, you can,
• 1:08
  Speaker 1: laying prone. Question, do you believe this to be Mr. Robinson? Answer,
• 1:13
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry? Question, do you believe this to be Mr. Robinson? Answer,
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: I do, yes. Question, and how long is he out
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: there on the edge of that building? Answer, Just until
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: the reported shot was fired at 12-23-28, the individual then
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: stands up and then moves across the building to the north. Question,
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: is that what we're seeing happening now? Answer, it is, yes.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: They move behind the atrium area on the rooftop to
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: the northeast corner where the white triangle is. Question, do
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: you see Mr. Robinson now? Answer, I do, yes. He
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: is just arriving at the corner of the building, almost
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: the top of the center image. Question, what are we
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: seeing now? Answer, Mr. Robinson lowering and jumping off of
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: the roof of the low C building onto the grass
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: area and then moving away towards Campus Drive. And he
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: appears to be carrying some kind of object in his
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: hand at this time. Question, so he's approaching? Answer, Campus Drive. Question,
• 2:10
  Speaker 1: and again, broken into quadrants, where is he currently? Answer,
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: in the top right quadrant. Question, and the time? Answer,
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: it's 12-24-42 on the timestamp. Question, what do we see now? Answer,
• 2:23
  Speaker 1: he then crosses Campus Drive and drops down into the
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: wooded area on the far side of Campus Drive. Question,
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: and that's located in what part of the video, what quadrant? Answer,
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: it would have been just off center on the top
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: left side. Question, okay, what do we see now? Answer,
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: this is the intersection of Campus Drive and 800 South.
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: There's a vehicle attempting to turn right onto Campus Drive.
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: That's the vehicle that's driven by Mr. Robinson. Question, and
• 2:50
  Speaker 1: on the screen... Where is the vehicle that you're referring
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: to located, if you broke it into quadrants? Answer. It's
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: on the left side. On the upper side, the upper quadrant. Question. Now,
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: what do we see? Answer. That vehicle is now pulling
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: away and heading east on 800 south. Question. And why
• 3:08
  Speaker 1: do you believe that that vehicle was Mr. Robinson's vehicle? Answer.
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: When the vehicle stopped, it actually made contact with an
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: officer who was doing security detail. Question. And do you
• 3:18
  Speaker 1: know who that officer is? Answer. Officer Goforth. Question. Okay.
• 3:23
  Speaker 1: And do you know which department he works for? Answer.
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: Spanish Fork Police. Question. And did you have a conversation
• 3:29
  Speaker 1: with Mr. Goforth regarding this interaction at the intersection? Answer.
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: I did. Yes. Question. Okay. And what time was that interaction?
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: I'm sorry. Did I ask you that? Answer. It was
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: approximately 1230 AM. Question. Okay. On the 11th. Answer. On
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: the 11th, 2025. Question. So you talked to Officer Goforth
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: about the contact on the corner. I guess during the
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: early morning hours of the 11th? Answer, correct. Question, and
• 3:55
  Speaker 1: what did Officer Goforth tell you about that interaction? Answer,
• 3:59
  Speaker 1: it was an interaction that I guess cop intuition, but
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: there was something about the interaction that made him make
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: note of the license plate of the vehicle. And then subsequently,
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: when information was available that the vehicle or a vehicle
• 4:12
  Speaker 1: matching the description of that was involved in the incident,
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: he ran the information that he had obtained from the stop,
• 4:18
  Speaker 1: and was able to identify that it was registered to Mr. Robinson.
• 4:21
  Speaker 1: And he had, in fact, made contact with Mr. Robinson
• 4:24
  Speaker 1: on the morning of September 11th, 2025. Question the information
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: that he ran. When you say he ran information, the
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: agent jumps in, yeah, he ran a partial plate. Question, oh, okay,
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: a license plate? Answer, correct. Question, and based on that
• 4:40
  Speaker 1: partial license plate, he was able to identify the owner
• 4:42
  Speaker 1: of that vehicle? Answer, yes. Question, and did he tell
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: you who the owner of the vehicle was? Answer, he did, yes. Question, okay.
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: And who did he tell you that it belonged to? Answer,
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: that there were two registered owners of the vehicle, Tyler
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: Robinson and Amber Robinson. Question, did he say anything about
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: the person that he actually interacted with? Answer, yeah, it
• 5:06
  Speaker 1: was a male he believed to be Tyler Robinson. Question, okay.
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: Let's return again to what's been marked State Exhibit 12.1. Again,
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: you reviewed that video. Agent, yes. Question, okay. And the
• 5:19
  Speaker 1: difference between 12.1 and what's been marked as state exhibit 12.1
• 5:22
  Speaker 1: and 12.4, if I understand you correctly, are these enhancements
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: that we've been talking about. Answer, yes. Question, and specifically
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: be specific about the enhancements, and let's go one at
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: a time. Answer, okay. Question, I think there's a reference
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: to either red circles or red highlights. Answer, correct. Question,
• 5:41
  Speaker 1: that's how Mr. Olson described it, red highlights. Answer, yes. Question,
• 5:46
  Speaker 1: what's he referencing by the red highlights? Or what do
• 5:49
  Speaker 1: you believe that he's referencing? Answer, I believe he's referring
• 5:52
  Speaker 1: to red ovals or circles that were placed over the
• 5:55
  Speaker 1: image to identify specific individuals of note. Question, and these
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: red circles, are they permanent circles? Are they temporary? Anything different? Answer,
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: I would assume they're temporary. They're not very technological, but
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: I believe they would be overlaid of the image. Question,
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: this is a bad question. What I mean by that is,
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: do they appear and disappear quickly, or do they linger
• 6:17
  Speaker 1: or last for a period of time? Answer, they're there
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: for a notable period, but I believe they come off
• 6:23
  Speaker 1: the video. Question, alright, what do the circles do? Answer,
• 6:28
  Speaker 1: they identify an area or a person of interest within
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: the video. Question, and other than that, do the circles
• 6:34
  Speaker 1: or the highlights, do they do anything with regard to
• 6:37
  Speaker 1: the video itself, as far as its accuracy? Answer, not
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: to my knowledge, no. Question, okay, I think the next
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: enhancement that's been mentioned that we've talked about, is there
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: some blurring? Answer, yes. Question, tell us what it is.
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: What blurring do you see? What's been marked as state
• 6:55
  Speaker 1: exhibit 12.1 that you now don't see in 12.4? Answer,
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: if I recall, there were some individuals in the parking
• 7:02
  Speaker 1: garage footage and their faces were blurred. Question, anything other
• 7:06
  Speaker 1: than faces being blurred? Answer, not that I recall, no. Question,
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: And how often do you see the blurring throughout the video? Answer.
• 7:14
  Speaker 1: I believe it's just in the original sequence in the
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: parking garage. Question. Well, the blurring, other than obviously blur
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: out part of the image, does it change or impact
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: the accuracy in your mind of that part of the
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: compilation video? Answer. Not to my knowledge, no. Question. And
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: then the last thing is, I believe there's some zooming
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: in and zooming out. That's 12.1. That has been removed.
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: And 12.4. Answer, yes. Question, what can you tell us
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: about the zooming in and zooming out? Answer, predominantly it's
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: in the area that was referred to as viewing the
• 7:50
  Speaker 1: Losey Building rooftop. I believe it focuses on the area
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: where Mr. Robinson comes up the stairs and onto the rooftop.
• 7:58
  Speaker 1: Those portions of that particular footage were zoomed in for clarity. Question, okay,
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: other than zooming in and zooming out, at least that
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: enhancement to the video, does it change the content of
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: the video? Answer, no. Question, the accuracy of the video.
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: In your mind? Answer, no. Question, okay. Are there enhancements
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: in State Exhibit? Well, it's been marked as State Exhibit 12.1.
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: Are they helpful in any way? Or what did they
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: add or take away from that video? Answer, I think
• 8:29
  Speaker 1: for people who are not familiar with the area and
• 8:31
  Speaker 1: what's trying to be shown. They are now an opportunity
• 8:34
  Speaker 1: for people to look at an individual, who we believe
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: to be Tyler Robinson, and also specific movements with more
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: clarity than the original focal point gives. Question, so let's
• 8:45
  Speaker 1: talk about the zooming in and the zooming out. It
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: sounds like it's specific to the low-sea rooftop, if I
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: understand you correctly. Answer, yes. Question, okay. And I think
• 8:55
  Speaker 1: we've all watched that exhibit before. Answer, correct. Question, and
• 9:00
  Speaker 1: although you can see Mr. Robinson and his movements... Is
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: it fair to say that it's difficult to really see
• 9:04
  Speaker 1: what's going on? Answer, that would be fair, yes. Question, okay.
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: And the version that's 12.1, does it facilitate, at least
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: that part of the video, seeing Mr. Robinson and tracking,
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: I guess, his steps? Answer, I believe so, yes. Question, okay, judge.
• 9:21
  Speaker 1: At this point, I think in combination with yesterday, the
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: foundation that was laid yesterday, including the written statement from Mr. Olson,
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: which has been admitted into evidence and is, well, it's
• 9:32
  Speaker 1: already been admitted into evidence. We believe there's enough foundation
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: that at this point, we'd also ask the court to
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: admit what's been marked State Exhibit 12.1. I think it
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: would be beneficial for Your Honor to view it. Judge Graff, Ms. Nestor,
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: Kathy Nestor, thank you, Your Honor. We renew our authenticity
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: objection and we also object for admission purposes. And then
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: we also object to the publication for the same reason,
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: the fair trial issues that we raised, with the unaltered
• 10:01
  Speaker 1: version that was just submitted. Prosecution jumps back in. And judge, sorry,
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: I neglected to mention the other two. Again, judge, we
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: believe that the presumption is that this is a public record,
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: that it should not only be admitted, but it should
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: be published here in the courtroom and and it should
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: be published in such a way that the media can
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: have access to it. Judge Graff, all right, I do
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: have a question. And just directing your attention to the
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: Utah Rule of Evidence 403 to the last phrase, the
• 10:29
  Speaker 1: last four words in that, do you wish to address that? Prosecution, Judge,
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: I'm going to have to look at 403 specifically for
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: those last four words, unless you want to share it
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: with me. Judge, I can read that. Needlessly presenting cumulative evidence,
• 10:45
  Speaker 1: let me just read the whole rule for completeness. The
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: the following. Unfair prejudice, confusing the issue, misleading the jury,
• 10:59
  Speaker 1: undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. I'm
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: not looking at anything else other than that last portion.
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: I recognize there is no jury. I am the magistrate.
• 11:11
  Speaker 1: I'm the fact finder. But just addressing that last point
• 11:14
  Speaker 1: of rule 403. Prosecution, right, judge? I don't believe that
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: the evidence is cumulative. I think that each of the
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: two videos, although they portray basically the same footage, there's
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: characteristics of the one that has been enhanced that I
• 11:29
  Speaker 1: think makes it easier for your honor to truly see
• 11:31
  Speaker 1: what's going on and for the public to see what's
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: going on. I mean, we've displayed 12.4 on the video
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: and unless you have a very, very, very good vision
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: or you've zoomed in on the monitor, you really can't
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: see what Agent Hull has just described, the character of 12.1
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: is it simply enhances that at least important parts of
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: that exhibit, and it just makes it easier to see,
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: not only by your honor, but also by the public. We,
• 11:58
  Speaker 1: not only by your honor, but also by the public,
• 12:01
  Speaker 1: and specifically as it relates to the zoning, in or
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: zooming in and zooming out. Judge Graff, okay, anything further
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: from the parties as it relates to 12.1? All right, well,
• 12:13
  Speaker 1: I will admit 12.1 into evidence, but as it relates
• 12:16
  Speaker 1: to playing in the courtroom... or on television for the media,
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: I find that it is, well, as a fact finder,
• 12:22
  Speaker 1: I will look at the evidence and weigh it as
• 12:24
  Speaker 1: a magistrate is required to do. But I do not
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: find it, I don't find it necessary to replay the video,
• 12:30
  Speaker 1: given the representation, that's the exact same video, the difference
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: being enhancements made. If it was different in any way,
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: or if it added to or subtracted from, that would
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: be one factor. But because it's simply the same video,
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: simply zooming in with circles or notations, The court does
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: not find that the interest of justice requires it being
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: played again, but it's received into evidence and will be
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: reviewed by myself in determining a probable cause determination. Prosecution,
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: and I appreciate that, Judge, and just so we're clear,
• 13:02
  Speaker 1: State Exhibit 12.1 has been admitted. Judge, it's received into evidence, yes. Prosecution,
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: and your intent is to review it in its entirety,
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: but not here in the courtroom? Judge, yes. Prosecution, can
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: I make one suggestion? Or maybe one run request? I
• 13:20
  Speaker 1: believe that the most important part, the most helpful part
• 13:22
  Speaker 1: of the video, is the zooming in and the zooming out.
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: And that is the portion that, if you want, we
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: could isolate that and only play that portion of the
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: video if you'd be willing to publish that portion of
• 13:33
  Speaker 1: the video. And that's really the thrust of why we're
• 13:36
  Speaker 1: trying to introduce that exhibit. Because we believe that it's
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: helpful to see it up close. And unfortunately, because of
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: the way it's formatted and the way it's been recorded,
• 13:45
  Speaker 1: There's no way for us to zoom in and out
• 13:48
  Speaker 1: on this video to get a better look at what's
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: going on. And that's the reason why we did what
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: we did. But we had to memorialize it and save
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: it and then present it in the way rather than
• 13:58
  Speaker 1: just present it in its raw form and then have
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: the ability to zoom in and out if that helps.
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: Your Honor understands why we're doing what we're doing. Judge,
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: all right, Ms. Nestor. To the second request of not
• 14:09
  Speaker 1: playing the whole video in its entirety, but simply the
• 14:12
  Speaker 1: portion with the zooming in, How long is this video, prosecution? Prosecution?
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: I think it's a couple of minutes. All right, Ms. Nestor.
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: Kathy Nestor, we object to the prejudice of that, Your Honor,
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: and ask the court to stand by your previous ruling
• 14:27
  Speaker 1: on that. Judge Graff, all right. Thank you. I appreciate
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: both parties. What I'll do is review the video in court,
• 14:34
  Speaker 1: and it'll be displayed to the monitor council table and
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: to the court's monitor to any portion that you wish
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: to play for me to look at so all parties
• 14:42
  Speaker 1: can see clearly what the court's reviewing in court, but
• 14:45
  Speaker 1: I do not find that it necessary for its publication
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: because this is the exact same video. We recognize it's
• 14:51
  Speaker 1: zooming in, but balancing constitutional rights, there's nothing on the
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: video from what's been represented to the public that hasn't
• 14:58
  Speaker 1: already been seen. It's simply zooming in, and I don't
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: find that that is necessary. So I'm balancing with constitutional
• 15:05
  Speaker 1: rights of all parties. I'll view it on the monitor.
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: Counsel's free to view it with me as I'm looking
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: at it, but it will not be broadcast in the courtroom.
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: or by the video camera. Prosecution, I appreciate that, Judge.
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: I respect that. I think there's a natural break where
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: we can start. And that's what I'm going to ask
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: is just simply play the most. You will have this
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: entire exhibit in evidence, though, is that right? Judge Graff,
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: thank you. Yes, I will. All right, whenever you're ready. Counsel,
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: as it relates to your monitors, just as a caution,
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: if you don't want to be wished to be picked up,
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: and I'm not saying it will, I know there are
• 15:38
  Speaker 1: camera operators being diligent in ensuring they're complying with the rules.
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: But in an abundance of caution, this is just your
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: moment to take care of your screens if you feel
• 15:48
  Speaker 1: you need to do so. All right, folks, we're going
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: to wrap up right here. And in the next episode,
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: we're going to pick up where we left off. All
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: the information that goes with this episode can be found
• 15:58
  Speaker 1: in the description box.