Latest / Sleepy Facts About History / Why Did the Early Caliphate Face Crisis After Every Succession? - The Saqifa Meeting and the Birth of the Caliphate | Sleepy Facts About History

Transcript

Why Did the Early Caliphate Face Crisis After Every Succession? - The Saqifa Meeting and the Birth of the Caliphate | Sleepy Facts About History · Sleepy Facts About History

0:04
Welcome to Sleepy Facts About History. In June
0:13
of the year 632, as Prophet Muhammad lay unwashed
0:17
and unburied in a small room in Medina, a handful
0:20
of men crowded into a roofed enclosure to answer
0:23
a question no one had prepared for. What holds
0:27
this community together now that the Prophet
0:29
is gone? The crisis of succession that unfolded
0:33
in those first hours was not a coronation. but
0:36
an urgent argument, a contested handclasp, and
0:40
an improvised political settlement that would
0:42
shape one of the world's great civilizations.
0:45
This episode examines the historical events of
0:49
the Saqifah meeting, the selection of Abu Bakr
0:52
as the first caliph, and the subsequent struggles
0:55
that defined the Rashidun period. It explores
0:59
how a community built around personal loyalty
1:02
to a single prophet attempted to transfer authority
1:05
to an institutional office. From the Riddle Wars
1:09
and the establishment of the State Register to
1:11
the assassinations and civil wars that followed,
1:14
the narrative reveals a period of profound contingency
1:18
rather than a predetermined golden age. I wanted
1:22
to understand why the uncertainty of a single
1:25
afternoon in Medina produced arguments that have
1:28
lasted for centuries. By looking closely at the
1:31
historical sources and the different mechanisms
1:34
by which the first four caliphs came to power,
1:37
we can see how the tension between communal consensus
1:39
and designated succession formed the foundation
1:42
of early Islamic history. In June of the year
1:48
632, in the city of mud brick houses and palm
1:52
groves, a man died. His body lay in a small room
1:57
still unwashed. still unburied outside the community
2:02
he had built over two decades faced a question
2:05
no one had fully answered what holds us together
2:08
now that he is gone this is not a story about
2:12
the end of something it is a story about the
2:16
first hours of a crisis that would shape one
2:18
of the world's great civilizations not because
2:22
the answers were care but because they were not
2:25
muhammad ibn abdullah the prophet of islam died
2:31
in Medina on a Monday in early June. He was in
2:35
his early 60s. The illness had come suddenly,
2:39
lasted perhaps 10 days, and left the community
2:42
in a state of shock that our sources describe
2:45
in unusually vivid terms. Umar ibn al -Khattab,
2:51
one of his closest companions, reportedly refused
2:54
to believe the news. He threatened to kill anyone
2:58
who said it aloud. The Prophet's body remained
3:02
in the house of his wife Aisha, daughter of Abu
3:06
Bakr, while the community that had gathered around
3:09
his person confronted an unprecedented void.
3:13
To understand what happened next, we need to
3:16
understand what Muhammad had actually built.
3:20
The community he led was not a conventional state.
3:24
It was a coalition held together by personal
3:27
loyalty to the Prophet himself. By shared religious
3:31
practice, by the spoils of successful campaigns,
3:35
and by a series of alliances that were often
3:38
personal rather than institutional, the Muhajiram,
3:43
the Meccan emigrants who had accompanied Muhammad
3:46
in his flight to Medina in 622, formed one pillar.
3:51
The Ansar, the Medinan converts who had sheltered
3:55
and supported them, formed another, beyond Medina.
4:00
Numerous tribal groups across Arabia had pledged
4:02
allegiance to Muhammad personally. Their commitment
4:06
was recent, sometimes superficial, and now untested.
4:11
The framework that held these groups together
4:13
is partly visible in the Constitution of Medina,
4:16
preserved in the earliest biography of the Prophet.
4:20
This document, agreed upon after Muhammad's arrival
4:24
in Medina, established the Ummah as a new kind
4:27
of community. It was one that transcended tribal
4:31
boundaries while still operating within tribal
4:33
realities. The Mu 'ahizrun and Ansar were named
4:38
as distinct groups with distinct obligations.
4:42
Jewish tribes were included as allied communities.
4:46
The document speaks of mutual protection, of
4:50
shared responsibility in war, of the authority
4:53
of God and his messenger. What it does not contain
4:57
is any procedure for succession. any mechanism
5:00
for transferring authority from Muhammad to another
5:03
leader. The community was built around his person.
5:08
Most critically, Muhammad had left no unambiguous,
5:12
universally accepted mechanism for choosing a
5:15
successor. He had no surviving sons. His children
5:20
who lived to adulthood were daughters, most prominently
5:23
Fatima, who was married to her cousin Ali ibn
5:26
Abi Talib. The question of whether he had designated
5:30
anyone to lead after him is precisely what later
5:34
generations would dispute most fiercely. What
5:39
the sources agree on is that no such designation
5:41
was universally acknowledged at the time of his
5:44
death. The immediate crisis was both political
5:47
and existential. Without Muhammad, the coalition
5:51
he had assembled risked fragmenting. Tribes that
5:56
had pledged loyalty to him personally might withdraw.
6:00
The unity of Arabia, achieved with enormous effort,
6:03
could dissolve. And within Medina itself, the
6:08
relationship between the Meccan emigrants and
6:10
the Medinan hosts was suddenly thrown into question.
6:14
What happened next did not happen in a grand
6:17
hall or a constitutional convention. It happened
6:21
in a roofed enclosure called the Sakifa, the
6:24
meeting place of the Banu Saidah clan of the
6:27
Khazraj tribe. one of the two main Arab tribes
6:30
of Medina. The Saqifah was a modest structure,
6:35
a covered space of limited size, perhaps no larger
6:39
than a small courtyard enclosed by walls and
6:42
a roof of palm fronds and timber. On this day,
6:46
as the Prophet's body still lay unburied in Aisha's
6:49
house, leading men of the Ansar gathered there
6:52
to discuss the succession. Picture the scene.
6:57
The heat of early June in the Hijaz. the dry
7:00
air carrying dust from the surrounding plain
7:03
men arriving in haste from different parts of
7:06
the city crowding into a confined space where
7:09
the roof trapped the warmth and the voices of
7:12
perhaps two dozen men echoed against mud -brick
7:15
walls this was not a chamber designed for momentous
7:19
decisions it was a clam meeting place accustomed
7:23
to local disputes and marriage negotiations now
7:27
pressed into service for a question that reached
7:29
far beyond the Banu Saidah. The physical closeness
7:34
mattered. In that crowded space, disagreement
7:37
could not be avoided, and the urgency of the
7:40
moment pressed on every participant. We do not
7:44
have a stenographic record. What we have are
7:48
accounts compiled a century or more later, transmitted
7:51
through chains of narrators, shaped by the political
7:55
and theological conflicts of the intervening
7:58
generations. But the broad outline of what occurred
8:02
is accepted across the surviving traditions and
8:04
it reveals something essential. The first succession
8:08
was improvised, urgent and contested. The Ansar
8:12
gathered at the Sakifa because they believed
8:15
the leadership should pass to them. Their argument
8:19
was not unreasonable. They had sheltered the
8:23
Prophet and his followers when the Meccan emigrants
8:25
had nowhere else to go. They had fought alongside
8:29
Muhammad in the battles that established the
8:32
community's position. They knew the local terrain,
8:36
the local tribes, the practical requirements
8:39
of governance in Medina. Some among them reportedly
8:43
proposed a division of authority. One leader
8:46
from among the Ansar. One from among the Quraish,
8:50
the Meccan tribe to which Muhammad belonged.
8:53
The arrival of three Meccan emigrants changed
8:56
the course of the meeting. Abu Bakr, an early
9:00
convert in his early 60s, had been among Muhammad's
9:03
closest companions. Umar, younger and more forceful,
9:08
was already a dominant personality. Abu Ubayr
9:13
ibn al -Jarrah, another early companion, accompanied
9:16
them. They came not as invited participants,
9:20
but as interlocutors who understood that the
9:22
succession would be decided in these hours and
9:25
that their absence would mean exclusion. They
9:29
entered that crowded, heated space as men who
9:32
had known the Prophet in Mecca, who had emigrated
9:35
with him, who had fought beside him at Bada and
9:39
Uhud. What followed was a negotiation, not a
9:43
coronation. Abu Bakr reportedly argued that leadership
9:48
must remain with the Quraysh, the tribe of the
9:51
Prophet, because the broader Arab world would
9:54
accept no other arrangement. The Ansai, he suggested,
9:59
might be accepted as councillors and administrators,
10:02
but not as the supreme leaders of a community
10:05
that extended far beyond Medina. The argument
10:09
was pragmatic as much as principled. The recently
10:13
converted tribes of Arabia, had submitted to
10:16
Muhammad a Quraishi and would not readily transfer
10:19
allegiance to a Medinan. Umar reportedly spoke
10:24
with characteristic force, warning against division
10:27
and invoking the specter of civil conflict. The
10:31
sources preserve different versions of the debate,
10:34
but the common thread is clear. The question
10:37
was resolved not by a pre -existing procedure,
10:40
but by persuasion, pressure. and the urgent need
10:44
for a decision before the community fragmented.
10:47
Abu Bakr himself proposed two alternatives before
10:51
accepting the position, Umar or Abu Ubaidah.
10:56
Umar's response, in the most widely transmitted
10:59
account, was to seize Abu Bakr's hand and pledge
11:03
allegiance to him immediately, declaring that
11:06
Abu Bakr was the most senior and most worthy.
11:09
Others followed. The acclamation was not unanimous.
11:14
but it was sufficient to establish a decisive
11:17
momentum. Several things matter about this moment.
11:22
First, Ali ibn Abi Talib, the Prophet's cousin
11:26
and son -in -law, was not present at the Saqifah.
11:30
Neither were other members of the Banu Hashim,
11:33
Muhammad's clan. The sources disagree about whether
11:37
they were deliberately excluded, occupied with
11:40
the burial, or simply not informed in time. What
11:44
is clear is that the decision was made by a subset
11:47
of the community, in haste, in that small, hot,
11:51
crowded space, and that its legitimacy would
11:54
be questioned. Second, the title that emerged,
11:58
Khalifa or Khalif, meaning successor or deputy,
12:03
was itself improvised. There was no pre -existing
12:07
office with defined powers, no constitutional
12:10
framework for what a caliph should be. The word
12:14
appears to have been applied retroactively to
12:17
describe a position that was being invented in
12:19
real time. Third, the Saqifah was not the end
12:24
of the story. Abu Bakr's acclamation there had
12:27
to be confirmed by a border oath of allegiance,
12:30
the Bayah, in which the community formally pledged
12:34
loyalty. This occurred in the mosque, with Abu
12:38
Bakr seated on the minbar, the pulpit from which
12:41
Muhammad had preached. The Bayah. was not an
12:45
abstract vote. It was a physical act, men coming
12:50
forward to clasp a Brubaker's hand, the hand
12:53
clasp by which allegiance was pledged, the bodily
12:56
commitment of loyalty that made the political
12:59
relationship concrete. The difference between
13:02
the intimate gesture and the abstract concept
13:05
of allegiance matters. This was personal obligation
13:09
made visible, one man grasping another's hand
13:12
in front of witnesses. But the sources indicate
13:16
that Ali and some of the Banu Hashim initially
13:19
withheld this act. For how long and with what
13:23
intensity is one of the most contested questions
13:26
in the entire historical record. The Sunni tradition,
13:30
as preserved in the canonical Hadith collections
13:33
compiled in the 9th century, generally minimizes
13:36
the duration and significance of Ali's hesitation.
13:39
It presents a narrative of rapid reconciliation.
13:44
emphasizing the unity of the companions and the
13:47
legitimacy of Abu Bakr's selection through consensus.
13:51
The Shia tradition, recorded in works like Al
13:55
-Qulaini's Al -Kafi from the 10th century, preserves
13:59
a very different account. It describes Ali's
14:02
claim based on kinship and designated succession,
14:06
a prolonged refusal to acknowledge Abu Bakr,
14:08
and a narrative of usurpation that would become
14:11
foundational to Shia identity. Modern historical
14:15
scholarship, from Wilford Madelung's detailed
14:18
reconstruction to Fred Donner's broader interpretive
14:21
work, emphasizes that we cannot recover a single
14:24
definitive account of these hours. The sources
14:28
were compiled generations later, shaped by the
14:31
political and theological conflicts that had
14:34
developed in the interim. What we can say with
14:37
confidence is that the succession was contested,
14:40
that Ali's position was ambiguous. and that the
14:43
narratives we possess already reflect later arguments
14:46
about legitimacy. The immediate test of Abu Bakr's
14:51
authority came with extraordinary speed. In the
14:55
months following Muhammad's death, numerous Arabian
14:58
tribes that had pledged allegiance to the prophet
15:01
now withdrew it, refusing to pay the religious
15:04
tax or accept Medinan authority. Some claimed
15:09
to follow new prophets of their own, the Ridda
15:13
Wars. The wars of apostasy erupted across the
15:17
peninsula. The mechanism of this challenge is
15:20
important to understand. The tribes had not pledged
15:24
allegiance to an institution. They had pledged
15:28
allegiance to Muhammad personally. His death
15:31
severed that bond. The question the Raida Wars
15:35
answered was whether the authority established
15:38
at Medina could compel obedience from tribes
15:41
that had no personal connection to Abu Bakr.
15:45
Abu Bakr's response was swift and uncompromising.
15:48
Military campaigns dispatched under capable commanders
15:51
to reassert control. Khalid ibn al -Walid led
15:56
the principal campaign against the tribes of
15:59
Najd and the false prophet Musaylimah. Other
16:03
commanders were sent to Yemen, to the Hadramaut,
16:06
to the borders of Oman and Bahrain. These campaigns
16:10
accomplished something beyond their immediate
16:12
military objectives. They demonstrated that the
16:16
Caliphate could raise armies, dispatch commanders,
16:19
and enforce obedience across vast distances.
16:22
The Caliphate was becoming an institution that
16:25
could survive the death of any individual leader,
16:28
that could compel allegiance through organized
16:30
force rather than personal charisma. This was
16:34
the transition from personal to institutional
16:36
authority, and it was tested and proven in the
16:40
crucible of the Ridder Wars. By the time of his
16:44
death in August 634, after a caliphate of just
16:48
over two years, Abu Bakr had not only preserved
16:51
the community, but set in motion the conquests
16:55
that would carry it beyond Arabia into the Byzantine
16:58
and Sasanian empires. Yet the succession crisis
17:02
of 632 had created no permanent formula for how
17:07
caliphs should be chosen. This is the crucial
17:10
point that the later reference for the Rashidun,
17:13
the rightly guided caliphs, can obscure. Each
17:18
of the first four caliphs came to power through
17:20
a different mechanism, and each accession was
17:23
contested in different ways. Umar ibn al -Khattab,
17:28
Abu Bakr's successor, was designated not by any
17:32
communal election, but by Abu Bakr's private
17:35
appointment. On his deathbed, Abu Bakr named
17:40
Umar as his successor and the broader community
17:43
accepted this designation. It was a personal
17:47
transfer of authority justified by Abu Bakr's
17:50
judgment of Umar's capability and by the community's
17:54
trust in the first caliph's wisdom. The biya
17:57
followed, the hand clasp extended again, but
18:01
the mechanism was different. It was not acclamation
18:05
in a heated argument. but acceptance of a predecessor's
18:09
considered choice. Umar's caliphate, from 634
18:13
to 644, was transformative. Arab armies carried
18:19
the new state into Syria, Egypt, and Iraq. The
18:24
conquests created an unprecedented problem of
18:27
administration. How to organize the resources
18:30
of empire? How to distribute the spoils of war?
18:34
How to maintain the cohesion of a community now
18:37
expanded far beyond its Arabian origins. Umar's
18:42
response included the Diwan, a register that
18:45
recorded soldiers and their entitlement to stipends
18:48
from the public treasury. It was, in essence,
18:52
a list, names, amounts, a way of organizing obligation
18:55
and reward in a community that had outgrown personal
18:58
memory. But his accession established no precedent
19:02
of formal designation that would be consistently
19:04
followed. Umar himself attempted to create a
19:08
more institutional mechanism as he lay dying
19:11
from an assassin's dagger in 644. A Persian slave
19:16
named Abu Lulua, who had been taken captive in
19:20
the conquests, stabbed Umar repeatedly in the
19:23
mosque during morning prayers. The wound was
19:27
mortal. In his final days, Umar appointed a council,
19:32
a shura, of six leading companions to select
19:36
his successor from among themselves. The deliberations
19:40
were reportedly tense and contested. The council
19:44
included Ali, Uthman and four other prominent
19:48
figures, each with distinct claims and distinct
19:51
supporters. The shura selection process reveals
19:56
the persistence of the same arguments that had
19:58
surfaced at the Saqifah. Uthman ibn Affan, a
20:03
member of the Umayyad clan of the Quraysh, was
20:06
wealthy, an early convert, and Muhammad's son
20:09
-in -law threw his marriage to two of the Prophet's
20:12
daughters. His selection was not uncontested.
20:17
It reportedly required persuasion and the withdrawal
20:20
of other candidates, including Ali. The mechanism
20:24
was more elaborate than the Saki for acclamation.
20:27
But it was still fundamentally consultative and
20:30
political, not the application of a fixed rule.
20:34
Uthman's caliphate, from 644 to 656, ended in
20:39
assassination. Discontent had grown over his
20:43
favouritism toward his Umayyad relatives, over
20:47
the distribution of conquered wealth, over allegations
20:50
of nepotism and corruption. The sources describe
20:54
a gradual erosion of confidence, complaints from
20:57
provincial garrisons, resentment over appointments,
21:01
a sense that the caliphate was becoming the property
21:04
of a single clan. Rebels from Egypt and Iraq
21:08
converged on Medina, laid siege to his house,
21:11
and killed him while he read from the Quran.
21:15
The caliphate had become a position vulnerable
21:17
to violent overthrow. Ali ibn Abi Talib was acclaimed
21:22
as caliph in the immediate aftermath of Uthman's
21:25
murder, but his accession was the most contested
21:29
of all. He was not selected by a council or designated
21:33
by a predecessor. He was chosen by the Medinan
21:37
community in circumstances of civil war. The
21:41
bayah was extended again, the handclasp offered
21:45
in a city now divided by accusation and blood.
21:49
His caliphate, from 656 to 661, was consumed
21:54
by that war. Aisha, the prophet's widow and daughter
21:59
of Abu Bakr, led an army against him in the Battle
22:02
of the Camel, named for the camel on which he
22:05
was mounted. The battle took place near Basra
22:09
in southern Iraq, and it pitted the Prophet's
22:11
wife against the Prophet's cousin in a conflict
22:14
that would have been unimaginable in Muhammad's
22:17
lifetime. Ali's forces prevailed, but the victory
22:21
solved nothing. Muawiyah, Uthman's kinsman and
22:25
governor of Syria, challenged Ali's legitimacy
22:29
and defeated him in the indecisive Battle of
22:31
Siffin in 657. The arbitration that followed
22:36
split Ali's own supporters. Some accepted the
22:40
principle of negotiation, while others rejected
22:43
any compromise with what they saw as the party
22:46
of usurpation. This latter group, the Karajites,
22:51
became a permanent feature of Islamic political
22:54
history. defining themselves by their refusal
22:57
to accept any leader who fell short of their
23:00
standards of justice. Ali himself was assassinated
23:05
by Akhari Jaiti in 661, struck down while at
23:09
prayer in Kufa. Muwaya established the Umayyad
23:13
Caliphate, a redemptory dynasty that would rule
23:16
for nearly a century, and the consultative principle
23:19
was effectively ended. The period that later
23:23
Sunni tradition would revere as the Rashidun
23:26
Caliphate, the golden age of rightly guided rule,
23:29
was in lived experience a period of assassination,
23:34
rebellion, civil war, and contested authority.
23:38
Three of the four caliphs died by violence. The
23:43
fourth established a dynasty that ended the elective
23:46
or consultative principle entirely. The reverence
23:50
is real and historically significant. but it
23:53
is a later construction, not a contemporary description.
23:57
What happened in the decades after 632 is that
24:01
communities developed different frameworks for
24:04
understanding what had happened and what it meant.
24:07
The arguments formed around the uncertainty of
24:10
the first succession became foundational to the
24:13
political and religious diversity of Islam. For
24:17
what would become Sunni Islam, the central principle
24:20
was consensus, ijima. the agreement of the community
24:25
as expressed through the companions of the prophet.
24:29
Abu Bakr's selection at the Saqifah, confirmed
24:32
by the broader Bayah, represented this consensus
24:36
in action. The virtue of the first four caliphs,
24:40
their closeness to the prophet, their service
24:43
to the community, became the standard against
24:45
which later rulers were measured. The caliphate
24:49
was understood as a communal trust. ideally selecting
24:53
the most capable and pious member of the community,
24:56
though in practice hereditary and military factors
25:00
increasingly dominated. For what would become
25:04
Shia Islam, the central principle was the designation
25:07
of Ali, understood as transmitted through the
25:11
Prophet's family, Al -Albait, the event of Ghadiyya
25:16
Qum. A stopping point on Muhammad's final pilgrimage
25:20
in 632 became the foundational proof text. Shia
25:25
tradition holds that Muhammad explicitly designated
25:28
Ali as his successor there, taking his hand and
25:32
declaring, Whomever I am his master, Ali is his
25:35
master. The event itself is acknowledged in Sunni
25:40
sources, but interpreted differently. It is understood
25:44
as an expression of friendship and respect. a
25:47
commendation of Ali's character rather than a
25:50
formal designation of political succession. The
25:53
divergence in interpretation is itself a product
25:57
of the later development of distinct communal
25:59
identities, not an immediate binary that existed
26:02
in 632. The terms Sunni and Shia themselves did
26:08
not exist as fixed identities in the first hours
26:11
after Muhammad's death. Shia simply means party
26:15
or faction. and was applied to various political
26:19
alignments before it became attached specifically
26:21
to the supporters of Ali and his descendants.
26:25
Sunni, from Sunna or customary practice, emerged
26:30
as a self -designation in the context of broader
26:33
theological debates about the sources of religious
26:35
authority. These identities crystallized over
26:39
centuries, shaped by political events theological
26:43
argument and the gradual formation of distinct
26:46
scholarly traditions. The arguments they named,
26:50
however, began in the uncertainty of 632. They
26:55
began in the tension between consensus and designation,
26:58
between the community's choice and the Prophet's
27:01
family, between what was improvised and what
27:04
was claimed as ordained. The surviving narratives
27:08
of these events compiled in works like Ibn Ishaq's
27:12
biography of the Prophet, Preserved in Ibn Hisham's
27:15
recension and in al -Tabari's monumental history
27:19
from the early 10th century are not transparent
27:22
windows onto 632. They are texts shaped by the
27:27
concerns of their compilers and the traditions
27:29
they transmit it. The Sunni hadith collections
27:33
of al -Bukhari and Muslim compiled in the 9th
27:36
century preserve traditions that support the
27:39
legitimacy of Abu Bakr and the consensus model.
27:43
The Shia collections, like Al -Qurayni's Al -Khafi
27:48
from the 10th century, preserve traditions that
27:51
support Ali's designated succession. Modern scholars
27:55
like Mardalum and Donner have attempted to work
27:59
critically with these sources, recognizing their
28:02
limitations while reconstructing what can be
28:04
known about the succession crisis as a human
28:06
and political event. The uncertainty is not a
28:11
failure of historical method. It is a condition
28:14
of the evidence. What we can do is understand
28:19
the crisis as a moment of genuine contingency
28:22
in which the future of the community was genuinely
28:25
uncertain and the decisions made were shaped
28:29
by immediate pressures rather than long -term
28:32
planning. The succession crisis matters not because
28:36
it determined everything that followed, but because
28:38
it established the terms on which later generations
28:41
would argue. The Caliphate as an institution,
28:45
the relationship between political and religious
28:47
authority, the role of the Prophet's family,
28:50
the meaning of consensus, the possibility of
28:53
legitimate opposition. All these questions were
28:57
opened in the first hours after Muhammad's death,
29:00
and have remained open in different ways ever
29:02
since. The community that gathered at the Saqifah,
29:06
that argued in the heat of a Medinan June while
29:09
the Prophet's body lay unburied, did not know
29:12
they were founding a civilization. They were
29:15
responding to an immediate crisis with the resources
29:18
available to them, tribal custom, personal loyalty,
29:22
religious commitment, political calculation,
29:26
and the urgent need for a decision. The arguments
29:30
they improvised in that crowded, roofed enclosure,
29:34
the claims they advanced and contested, the hand
29:37
clasps given and withheld. became the raw material
29:41
from which later communities would construct
29:43
very different understandings of legitimate authority.
29:47
That diversity of understanding, that persistence
29:51
of argument about what holds a community together
29:53
and who has the right to lead it, is not a departure
29:57
from the founding moment. It is a consequence
30:01
of its genuine uncertainty. The first succession
30:04
created no permanent formula because the situation
30:08
did not permit one. The arguments formed around
30:11
that uncertainty became, over time, the foundations
30:15
of the political and religious diversity of Islam.