Latest / Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News / Making my head explode

Transcript

Making my head explode · Cultural Wars | America Out Loud News

• 0:11
  Helping to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.
• 0:15
  This is the Constitution Study on the America Out Loud Network with your host, Paul Engel.
• 0:31
  We all have our pet peeves, you know, those little things that bother us more than they probably should.
• 0:37
  Well, today, I'm looking into some of my pet peeves that do more than bother me.
• 0:42
  They make me reach for the duct tape to keep my head from exploding.
• 0:46
  Hello there, everyday Americans, Paul Engel here with the Constitution Study, where we read and study the Constitution, teach the rising generation be free.
• 0:53
  I'm glad you could join me today.
• 0:56
  You know, I I often go back to John Jay, our first chief justice that every member of the state ought diligently to read and study the constitution of his country.
• 1:05
  Notice he doesn't say every attorney, judge, and politician.
• 1:08
  Lord knows I wish they would.
• 1:11
  Because one of my pet peeves is when I see executive orders that are just blatantly unconstitutional, following ridiculously stupid facts.
• 1:21
  And well, we have one that came out recently from Donald Trump.
• 1:25
  He says, by the authority vested in me as president by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and he goes on to quote laws that, well, most of which are unconstitutional to begin with, because he wants the federal government to take over elections.
• 1:40
  That may not be his expressed intent, but that's effectively what he's saying.
• 1:45
  He said the right to vote, this is in section one, the right to vote in federal elections is reserved exclusively for citizens of the United States under the Constitution and federal law.
• 1:56
  That's not true.
• 1:58
  There's nothing in the Constitution that talks about citizenship being required to vote.
• 2:04
  Now, every state constitution has such a clause that I'm aware of, has such a clause.
• 2:10
  It says you have to be a citizen of the United States in order to vote, uh, but not the Constitution of the United States.
• 2:16
  I'm not even sure if federal law does.
• 2:19
  I know they've been trying to pass such a law, but they they haven't yet, as far as I know.
• 2:25
  So again, it's based on a lie, and he's pointing to some other laws, again, most of when are unconstitutional.
• 2:31
  But then he gets into section two, and this is the part that really pissed me off.
• 2:35
  To the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law, including but not limited to the Privacy Act of 1974, the Secretary of Homeland Security, through the director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, in coordination with the commissioner of SSA shall take appropriate action to compile and transmit to the chief election official of each state a list of individuals confirmed to be United States citizens who will be above the age of 18 at the time of the upcoming federal election and to maintain a residence in the subject state.
• 3:04
  Okay, this has to, again, this is uh I understand the issue, right?
• 3:09
  I I believe that every state should enforce their constitutional requirement that a person be a citizen to vote.
• 3:16
  But now you have the federal government saying, hey, you know what we're gonna do?
• 3:19
  We're going to create a kind of a registration, a voter registration registration.
• 3:25
  Uh he goes on in subsection B for the purpose of this order, an individual is eligible to vote in federal elections if the individual is a citizen of the United States.
• 3:34
  Well, there's no law, this is not him and for there is no law yet.
• 3:38
  And any law that would be passed will would be unconstitutional because the federal government doesn't or the con federal the constitution of the United States doesn't give the federal government the authority on who can and cannot vote.
• 3:51
  Yes, there are amendments that say you cannot be denied the right to vote because of your age, race, sex, whatever.
• 3:59
  But there's no more they give in the state.
• 4:00
  We're going to derby who is and isn't eligible to vote.
• 4:03
  As I said, there's nothing in the Constitution that says the vote because voting, the people voting, is not done at the federal level.
• 4:11
  It's done at the state level.
• 4:13
  Even elections for uh uh federal office, and of course, the only two federal offices the people vote for is House and Senate.
• 4:22
  All right.
• 4:22
  So um no, he the people don't vote for president.
• 4:27
  I've talked about that numerous times.
• 4:28
  You tell your state who to who to appoint for electors, but the people don't vote for president.
• 4:34
  But though even then, you're talking about there's no law.
• 4:38
  This is this is something the president Trump making up.
• 4:40
  He's been having, I believe he's been having a hard time getting the Save Act passed through, mainly because of democratic uh obstructionism, but half of the Save Act is unconstitutional because the federal government has no authority over the state voter registration roles.
• 4:54
  So again, this is just more uh he goes on.
• 4:58
  Um under section three, he says the unlawful use of the mail in connection with elections is prohibited by various federal statutes.
• 5:05
  Yada yada yada.
• 5:06
  To ensure the faithful execution of federal law, protect the integrity of the mail and the medium transmitting federal election ballots, there are no federal election ballots, uh, and establish uniform standards for mail and absentee balloting, not a power delegated to the United States, it's not to the president, I should say.
• 5:22
  Um the Postmaster General is hereby directed to initiate a proposed rulemaking pursuant to 39 USC 401, another applicant authority within 60 days of that order.
• 5:31
  The notice of proposed rulemaking will be basically wants the the um the post office to uh create a system for mail and balloting, but that's not a power delegated the president.
• 5:43
  Now, Congress can by law change the time, place, and manner of elections, but only for House and Senate.
• 5:52
  This, ladies and gentlemen, is Trump's version of Obama's he has a pen and a phone.
• 5:58
  He's been pushing for the Save Act, which again has serious constitutional, half of it is unconstitutional, but he's not getting anywhere.
• 6:05
  So he's decided he's going to do with a pen and a phone what he couldn't has been able to do through Congress.
• 6:11
  And it is just as unconstitutional, it's just as criminal today as it was under the Obama administration.
• 6:17
  It doesn't matter that you know Trump's an elephant and Obama was a donkey.
• 6:22
  This is not a power vested in the government of the United States.
• 6:25
  And the fact that he's claiming he has this power shows that both he and the people advising him are constitutionally illiterate.
• 6:33
  It's the only way I can describe it.
• 6:34
  They have to be constitutionally illiterate to see this and say, yep, we can do this.
• 6:39
  And of course, if you're talking about constitutionally illiterate, you gotta talk about the Supreme Court.
• 6:43
  Dear Lord in heaven, if there's a group of nine people that need a reading comprehension program in this country, is the nine justices of the Supreme Court.
• 6:50
  Now, they recently heard oral argument, and I'm gonna get deep dive into this later, but I had to talk about some of the things because the reporting I've heard in this really disturbs me.
• 7:01
  Now, part of it is they're saying, well, they're leaning toward the idea of continuing birthright citizenship.
• 7:08
  But I want to tell you there's there's duct tape time, right?
• 7:12
  How many of you heard reporting on this where they say, well, this is based on the 14th Amendment?
• 7:17
  Birthright citizenship is not based in the 14th Amendment.
• 7:21
  It is not.
• 7:22
  The 14th Amendment says all persons born and naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
• 7:31
  Now, Donald Trump's executive order matches federal law, which matches the 14th Amendment that says you not only have to be born in this country, you have to be subject to the jurisdiction.
• 7:43
  In other words, your parents, at least one parent has to be a citizen of the United States.
• 7:48
  Maybe you could go as far as saying a permanent resident, but certainly not illegal aliens and visitors and whatnot.
• 7:56
  No, this is not based in the 14th Amendment, ladies and gentlemen.
• 7:59
  Let me tell you the truth.
• 8:00
  This is based in a horrible opinion of the Supreme Court.
• 8:05
  See, the case is called the United States versus Wang Kim Ark.
• 8:10
  Now, this is a 19, I'm sorry, 1898 ruling, where the Supreme Court said, Mr.
• 8:17
  Ark is a child of citizens of subjects of the Emperor of China.
• 8:23
  In other words, not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
• 8:26
  They were subject to the jurisdiction of the Empire of China, Emperor China, but still said that he should get citizenship because he was born here.
• 8:34
  In complete contradiction to the language of the 14th Amendment.
• 8:39
  This whole thing, this 120 plus years of nonsense, has nothing to do with the 14th Amendment.
• 8:46
  It's whole is wholly made up by the court's fever dream.
• 8:50
  And now, as from what I've seen, again, I haven't gone, I'm going still going into the uh the oral arguments.
• 8:56
  Um, they uh they're they're gonna no, no, no, this is all based on the 14th Amendment.
• 9:01
  Here's the other one.
• 9:03
  So uh uh Justice Alito said what we're dealing with here is something that was basically unknown at the time of the 14th Amendment was adopted, which is illegal immigration.
• 9:12
  Well, that's a bald-faced lie, Mr.
• 9:15
  Leto.
• 9:15
  Because if you did just a modicum of research into the just look at the debates, the gentleman who offered the language and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, was very specific about why he did that.
• 9:27
  He said, This is what I think the law of the land already is.
• 9:30
  But he said it would this would definitely exclude aliens and foreigners.
• 9:37
  In other words, people who are not here permanently, certainly people who are not here legally.
• 9:44
  This is not something that was foreign to the the drafters of the 14th Amendment.
• 9:49
  It was the very reason they added the language and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
• 9:56
  But apparently that um uh that that uh you know.
• 10:00
  It was just too much for the Justice of the Supreme Court.
• 10:02
  Again, they haven't decided yet.
• 10:04
  And sometimes oral arguments can be, you know, uh devil's advocates, right?
• 10:08
  You're intentionally trying to poke holes in the argument, even if you agree with the argument.
• 10:13
  So you have to wait and see.
• 10:15
  But the court watchers, the people that try to prognosticate how the court will decide.
• 10:20
  They seem to be leaning the idea that the court was going to find against Donald Trump.
• 10:28
  But again, oh God.
• 10:30
  I'm I'm I'm sorry.
• 10:31
  There is one justice on that court who so frequently becowns herself with her ignorance and stupidity.
• 10:39
  So much proves that she is an affirmative action hire.
• 10:45
  It's gotta be Katanji Brown Jackson.
• 10:47
  I'm sorry.
• 10:48
  I can't say it truly is an embarrassment.
• 10:52
  And when this happens, she said she was on was asking when she goes, I was thinking, you know, I, as a U.S.
• 11:00
  citizen am visiting Japan.
• 11:02
  And what it means is that you know, if I steal someone's wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me.
• 11:09
  It's allegiance, meaning, can they control you as a matter of law?
• 11:14
  Well, ma'am, we're subject to the laws of the state.
• 11:17
  It doesn't say subject to the laws of the United States.
• 11:20
  It says subject to the United States.
• 11:24
  And again, as the person who drafted that language, who proposed that language to the amendment.
• 11:29
  He said that it would that that people who were here, it would exclude um ambassadors, foreign ministers, it would exclude aliens and foreigners.
• 11:39
  It is not rocket science.
• 11:42
  What you have is a terrible decision where the Supreme Court once again made something up out of thin air, completely ignored the language of the Constitution, made something up, and now are trying to cover their own backsides because the Supreme Court worships their previous decisions much more than the Supreme Law of the Land.
• 12:01
  They took an oath to uphold.
• 12:05
  I'm telling you, that that type of stuff I need the duct tape, man.
• 12:09
  My head's gonna explode having to listen to this nonsense.
• 12:12
  How stu- I'm a little literary.
• 12:14
  How stupid can this lady be?
• 12:16
  And it'd be one thing if this was like an isolated incident.
• 12:21
  But almost every decision I cover here at the Constitution study, I would say 75% of them, she makes some ridiculously stupid argument that makes absolutely no rational sense, but she's on this case.
• 12:35
  Because remember, she's not on the court because of her legal acumen.
• 12:39
  She is on this court because she's a black woman.
• 12:42
  And that's and that that's the sole reason she's on this court.
• 12:46
  Biden said it.
• 12:48
  He wanted a black, he wanted a woman of color.
• 12:50
  Well, she's a black woman that I guess could pass the test.
• 12:53
  And you know what?
• 12:53
  I don't simply blame uh Joe Biden for this.
• 12:57
  Because let's face it, the Senate had to advise and consent.
• 13:02
  And the Senate, apparently a lot of people in the Senate voted not because of her intelligence and her her uh legal arguments.
• 13:10
  She couldn't even define what a woman was.
• 13:13
  No, she was voted for because she's a black woman.
• 13:16
  And that really kind of describes just how far down the rabbit hole is stupid.
• 13:22
  Our representatives have fallen.
• 13:24
  Yet we still vote for these idiots.
• 13:26
  We still vote for these buffoons, these people who continually be clown themselves with stupid decisions, and we keep hiring them over and over and over again.
• 13:35
  And dear God in heaven.
• 13:37
  The only thing keeping my head from exploding is the duct tape.
• 13:41
  Maybe I should invest in duct tape because I have a feeling there's gonna be more.
• 13:45
  I know there's gonna be more for this program.
• 13:47
  I'm sure there's gonna be more for this country over the next few years, probably over the next few decades.
• 13:52
  You know, I I really do am concerned for the future of this country.
• 13:56
  Because as long as we decide who will represent us based on the color of their skin, their gender, their political party membership, and other ridiculous stupid things like that, we're gonna end up with more stupid people in the courts, in Senate, in the House, in our state and local legislatures.
• 14:14
  They're gonna continue to do incredibly stupid things that eventually we'll look back and say, our you know, our heads will explode.
• 14:24
  Or maybe as Ronald Reagan said.
• 14:27
  But freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.
• 14:30
  We didn't pass it on to our children in the bloodstream.
• 14:33
  The only way they can inherit the freedom we have known is if we fight for it, protect it, defend it, and then hand it to them with the well-taught lessons of how they and their lifetime must do the same.
• 14:46
  And if you and I don't do this, then you and I may well spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it once was like in America when men were free.
• 14:57
  That's not that's not a story I want to tell.
• 15:01
  But more and more, that looks like where we're going.
• 15:04
  And uh, yeah, I find it frustrating.
• 15:07
  I find it aggravating.
• 15:08
  It makes me makes my head want to explode explode when I see such foolishness, such idiocracy, such stupidity, such wanton disregard for our rights, our freedoms, our liberties.
• 15:26
  And people not only showing this absolute disregard, but patting themselves in the back for it, and saying, Oh, you're really great because, well, you gave up your freedom.
• 15:39
  Don't believe me.
• 15:40
  Look what happened during COVID.
• 15:42
  COVID to me was the perfect example.
• 15:45
  You had bureaucrats without any evidence whatsoever, saying, put a diaper on your face, stand six feet apart, become a medical experiment, do medical guinea pig.
• 15:55
  And if you don't, we're gonna punish you.
• 15:58
  And the vast majority of the American people simply complied.
• 16:04
  I used to drive by uh uh there used to be a testing center in the town, the county seat, and I used to drive by there to get to one place.
• 16:12
  And every time I drove by that sign, all I could think of was the sheeple lining up to do what they were told.
• 16:18
  Not because there's any scientific basis for it, not because they figured it was safe, they simply were told.
• 16:25
  That has that led to the long COVID, has that led to the vaccine injuries, the the shedding.
• 16:32
  Now, if you are concerned about this, if you have symptoms, or you're just plain concerned.
• 16:37
  Might I recommend daily spike support from our friends at the wellness company.
• 16:42
  The the spike proteins, that's the toxic part of COVID-19.
• 16:46
  It's the the inflammatory part that makes your body do bad things.
• 16:50
  Well, spike support is a revolutionary set of ingredients designed to block and dissolve the spike protein.
• 16:57
  I'm not an uh an epidemiologist, I'm not a virologist, I don't play one on TV, but I do know it's backed by documentary research, and I do know it's vetted from the chief by the chief medical board of the wellness company, which means I recommend you at least look at it.
• 17:10
  Go to AmericaOut Loud.shop, click on the spike support panel, and then do your own research.
• 17:15
  Be an informed consumer.
• 17:17
  Don't follow a lawn like around like a sheeple.
• 17:20
  Let them prove it to you.
• 17:22
  And when they've satisfied you, use the code out loud at checkout, you'll get 20% off of your order.
• 17:28
  So if you're concerned about symptoms or you know someone has symptoms, go to AmericaOut Loud.shop, do your own research.
• 17:35
  I hike, I can't recommend that enough.
• 17:37
  And when you've convinced yourself by the evidence and data that this is something you want to try, don't forget to use that code out loud at checkout to get 20% off of your stop being a sheeple.
• 17:48
  Follow science by looking at at data and facts and making your decision for yourself.
• 18:07
  July 2nd, 3rd, and 4th for a powerful celebration of faith, freedom, and the American spirit.
• 18:15
  America Out Loud, the wellness company and clear, invite you to join us for the 25010 Nashville event.
• 18:23
  You'll experience best in class speakers, extraordinary voices from across America, bringing inspiring messages you won't forget.
• 18:32
  And on July 4th, get ready for the most spectacular by work show in the country.
• 18:37
  Lighten up the Nashville sky.
• 18:39
  250 years of liberty in America and 10 years of America Out Loud News.
• 18:46
  Standing strong for truth, justice, and the nation we all love.
• 18:50
  You can save now with Early Bird Pryson at AmericaOut Loud.
• 18:54
  News.
• 19:00
  America Outloud News.
• 19:01
  25010, Nashville.
• 19:04
  One in three people will face cancer, and most never see it coming.
• 19:08
  I'm Dr.
• 19:08
  Kelly Victory with the wellness company, and I know this personally.
• 19:12
  I exercised daily, avoided processed foods, and had no symptoms when a routine mammogram resulted in a cancer diagnosis.
• 19:19
  And modern medicine is often reactive instead of preventative.
• 19:23
  That's why I formulated SHIELD, a two-part system designed to support immune health and antioxidant defense.
• 19:30
  A chemical-free cocoa mix and soft gels.
• 19:33
  Prevention is power.
• 19:34
  Visit TWC.
• 19:40
  In just two minutes per day, you could reclaim your health and cut your grocery bill in half with one simple convenient product.
• 19:47
  Our doctor formulated Green 85 juice formula's powerful dose of ultra concentrated essential nutrients stops hunger in its tracks and supplies your cells with what's missing in the grocery store food.
• 20:00
  Go to chemicalfree body.com forward slash out loud today, get nature's super multivitamin green 85, empower your immune system, cut down on your grocery bill, and save 20% on your first order.
• 20:12
  Have you been looking for a healthy snack for on the go?
• 20:16
  Well, not all energy bars are soft and sugary.
• 20:20
  Bear bars or a crunchy savory bar made from just six simple natural ingredients.
• 20:27
  Bear bars or plant-based, organic gluten-free, contain six grams of protein and are low temperature dried for unique crunch.
• 20:36
  Most energy bars are based on chocolate or fruit and are held together with syrups or sweeteners.
• 20:43
  To learn more, just visit barebar.com slash out loud.
• 20:53
  Welcome back, everyday Americans the Constitution study.
• 20:57
  And today I'm talking about stuff that's making my head explode.
• 21:00
  I'm going to invest in duct tape to have to keep the pieces together.
• 21:04
  Things that drive me nuts.
• 21:06
  One of them is a lot of discussion about artificial intelligence, AI, which is not really AI.
• 21:12
  It is II.
• 21:14
  It is imitation intelligence.
• 21:16
  These are systems designed to imitate human intelligence.
• 21:20
  They don't create intelligence, they imitate it.
• 21:23
  They follow a set of training that they are given.
• 21:27
  Now, of course, there's a lot of hype because everyone's seen, you know, like Terminator or the Matrix, and they think that's what they're talking about.
• 21:34
  But that's not what they're talking about.
• 21:37
  So some recent studies came out.
• 21:40
  Uh as many as 80% of the people are concerned about AI.
• 21:46
  So couldn't pay a released a poll back on Monday.
• 21:49
  Uh, let's say 51% say they use AI to research topics, um, which is up from 37% from last year.
• 21:57
  Uh, there's also an increase in the use of data analysis and creating images and and writing.
• 22:03
  Um, yeah, but uh despite all of this growth, people say they don't trust it, which I find confusing.
• 22:13
  I mean, according to the study, roughly three quarters of Americans only rarely, if ever trust AI, but they still use it frequently.
• 22:23
  Now, I have concerns about AI, but it's not about the AI, it's about how people use it.
• 22:31
  So, again, AI is a tool.
• 22:33
  Now, just so you know, I do not use AI here at the Constitution study.
• 22:38
  None of my content is created.
• 22:39
  I don't even have images created about under AI.
• 22:41
  I tried a couple times just to see what it would look like, and I didn't like it.
• 22:45
  But all my content is created by my own research, you know, looking through news items, researching, reading, uh, you know, the Constitution, federal law, state law, stuff like that.
• 22:56
  Yes, it's not AI generated.
• 22:58
  But I see people, and here's my problem.
• 23:01
  They put their trust in AI when they wouldn't trust an expert.
• 23:06
  Because look at it during COVID, is there's a perfect example of why we shouldn't trust experts.
• 23:11
  It was COVID, where we had so-called experts that were were eventually found out to be just uh making stuff up.
• 23:20
  Uh, you know, Fauci was making stuff up, the AMA, they were not following science, they were making up assumptions, and because people were experts, they followed them.
• 23:31
  Well, it's kind of the same with AI.
• 23:33
  Now, I get people send me a lot of the uh I get a lot of information, articles, YouTube videos, and I love the YouTube videos because I can generally spot what they're likely AI.
• 23:44
  Uh, there's like only a couple voices you hear over and over and over and over again.
• 23:49
  And I'm guessing these are AI generated.
• 23:52
  Uh it's it's really interesting because there's a narrator, and then you watch the video, and sometimes the the lips aren't in sync, and you know, sometimes things are a little.
• 24:03
  But what's interesting is they rarely give actual facts and data.
• 24:09
  In other words, you know, there was Gary, and well, where is Gary?
• 24:13
  Good's his last name.
• 24:13
  Where's he from?
• 24:14
  What's on?
• 24:14
  None of the data you could use to follow up.
• 24:17
  See, it's not that AI, because again, AI has advantages.
• 24:21
  AI can go through permutations much faster than a human being.
• 24:25
  There's talk about using them to uh do some initial drug analysis because they can run through the models quickly and like weed out certain things so that what's left a human can look at.
• 24:38
  But it's that important point is that that people need to, humans need to look at um, they need to look at the and then analyze it itself.
• 24:48
  In other words, for me, the problem isn't the AI, it's people's trust in AI, kind of the same with people's trust in the truth.
• 24:56
  Uh a perfect example.
• 24:58
  There's, you know, I I keep saying, you know, it's not what you don't know that hurts you, it's what you know that just ain't so.
• 25:05
  And I see a lot of it.
• 25:06
  And of course, we used to, you know, there were a lot of people saying, you know, well, constitutional experts, constitutional attorney.
• 25:13
  Yeah, except that doesn't mean they got it right, because they often don't.
• 25:17
  When I first sat down and read the constitution, I was struck by two things.
• 25:21
  The first was how much I had not been taught about the constitution in school.
• 25:25
  The second was how much I had been taught about the constitution that was absolutely wrong.
• 25:32
  AI isn't right because it's AI.
• 25:34
  We shouldn't trust AI.
• 25:37
  We should no more trust AI than we would trust the people that develop the AI.
• 25:41
  For example, uh, do you trust do you do you believe that Google searches are biased?
• 25:46
  If that's the case, why would you trust Google's AI?
• 25:49
  Was it Gemini, I think it is, to uh to give you an unbiased answer.
• 25:54
  Why would you trust Grok or Chat GPT or Klon to give you an unbiased answer if you have no idea where this data is coming from?
• 26:03
  See, AI is designed to imitate human intelligence by processing large quantities of data quickly.
• 26:11
  And it's just a tool.
• 26:14
  But we become so concerned about it.
• 26:18
  There's another poll, this one from KFF, that uh claims 16% of American adults turn to AI for mental health advice or emotional support over the last year.
• 26:31
  16% turn to an imitation intelligence for health and emotional advice.
• 26:40
  Again, they must think it's like the terminator or the matrix.
• 26:44
  It's just it's infallible artificial intelligence.
• 26:49
  However, according to a stubborn uh study published this March in the uh in the magazine science, um, they looked at 11 of the major large language models, and they asked it a series of questions, and they found that the AI affirmed questionable behavior, potentially dangerous behavior, 49% more than humans.
• 27:13
  And rather than holding someone accountable to their actions, they affirm their behavior, even though that was at best questionable behavior.
• 27:22
  So let me see if I can make an example out of this.
• 27:24
  Let's say um uh you got this bright idea, right?
• 27:28
  You're uh uh you've decided that uh you're gonna you're gonna sell your home and everything you you oh you own, and you're going to go pursue um a modeling career.
• 27:41
  Well, guess what?
• 27:42
  You're more likely for the AI said, sure, go for it.
• 27:44
  You'll have a great life than people saying, well, career doing one.
• 27:50
  Or maybe you decide, you know what, uh uh I want to do, you know, I've decided I want to have uh I want to have three fingers of scotch every night uh because it's a and again, these aren't exact examples.
• 28:01
  These are things I'm I'm guessing at based on what I've seen.
• 28:07
  And the AI is almost 50% more likely to tell you, sure, go for it than say, really, is that what you want to do?
• 28:14
  They're more like it's this idea of it's going to, it's not gonna dissuade you, it's not gonna hold you accountable for potentially bad decisions.
• 28:22
  Yet, okay, hey, I have no problem.
• 28:26
  Imagine this.
• 28:27
  Imagine going to an AI and saying, uh, um, oh, I don't know, is it legal for me to do X, Y, and Z?
• 28:36
  And it says, yeah, sure, you should be fine.
• 28:39
  And then you do X, Y, and Z, and the police come up and they arrest you for committing X, Y, and Z.
• 28:44
  And you say, but the AI said it was fine.
• 28:46
  And I said, well, the law doesn't.
• 28:50
  Why do we put such trust into these?
• 28:53
  It's this worship of expertise, and then believing that AI is somehow an expert.
• 29:01
  It's not.
• 29:03
  It's no more an expert than the person that created it.
• 29:07
  Then the people that trained it, than the data they trained it on and the data they give it access to.
• 29:14
  It's taking people's, it's imitating our intelligence using the data we gave it and the answers we told it were correct.
• 29:23
  Yet people simply they they seem to trust us as if, hey, anything goes.
• 29:30
  And another perfect example.
• 29:31
  So the Department of Defense.
• 29:32
  I know people call it the Department of War, but the president cannot change the name of a department.
• 29:37
  Only Congress can.
• 29:38
  To my knowledge, they have not changed the name.
• 29:40
  It is still the Department of Defense.
• 29:42
  And they went to anthropic.
• 29:44
  They said, we want to use your AI.
• 29:46
  I think it's called Claude.
• 29:48
  But the problem is the AI had certain rules placed around it.
• 29:53
  There were restrictions built into the code to prevent it from doing certain things.
• 29:57
  You know, what we would consider moral.
• 30:00
  limitations.
• 30:01
  Not because the AI thought they were moral, but because the guy the people that programmed it put moral limitations on it.
• 30:07
  And the Department of War said, no, we want access.
• 30:10
  We don't want those limitations.
• 30:12
  We want raw access to anything we want in your product.
• 30:16
  And Anthropic said no.
• 30:18
  So the Department of War said, oh, you're in a supply chain risk.
• 30:23
  We're not going to do business with you because you're suddenly a national uh security risk because you won't give us anything we want in this AI model.
• 30:34
  Does that sound like uh uh a safe situation to you?
• 30:39
  Well uh the district uh U.S.
• 30:41
  District Court uh judge Rita Lynn of San Francisco issued a preliminary injunction saying that um uh no the the anthropic is not a supply chain risk that the Department of War was uh could not boycott anthropic uh or or direct federal agencies to avoid using it because they had no just purpose they had no due process anthropic is a corporation it's what's considered an artificial artificial person in the law and under the Fifth Amendment you cannot be deprived of life liberty or property without due process of law the liberty to design a system to work the way I want it to work the liberty the property I have in the the the intellectual property I have in that product you the government can't simply take it away because they want it it has to uh uh uh it it has to go through due has to protect the rights of the individual including the people that own the company anthropic now before you think this is just just nitpicky um they the department of defense wanted anthropic to remove safeguard for venting its use for mass surveillance and fully autonomous weapons the department of defense wanted to use an AI model for mass surveillance and for fully autonomous weapons now mass surveillance okay mass surveillance of who guess what anthropic we don't want to be used for mass surveillance you have every right to do that if the department boards don't want it they're not forced to buy it however they can't punish anthropic they can't boycott anthropic because anthropic won't bow to their to me immoral demands and fully autonomous weapons do you really want think of all the drone think of the drone warfare in Ukraine and and in Iran and let me ask you do you want to just have someone setting up a drone going eh you go find a bad guy and kill them and without a human intervention because that's what apparently the department of quote unquote defense wanted so I find that interesting even the Department of Defense wanted to trust AI for things like mass surveillance and remember it's not you know people think well it's AI it's gonna be great.
• 33:03
  No I've seen I've seen cases where um AI got it completely wrong.
• 33:09
  There was one case where one person was arrested for trespass because they were in a casino I think it was um in Lake Tahoe if memory serves and the AI uh generated uh a surveillance system facial recognition system identified him as a banner there's just one problem the picture of the person the AI picked out was obviously not the person that was arrested but they were still arrested well the AI said but yeah I got wrong look at the picture look at the person nope we can't human interview we we let AI do that that's the type of danger we run into when we let our thinking be done by someone else or by a machine and uh these are the types of things that make my head explode because we talk about wanting to be free but yet then we enslave ourselves to an expert and I have a friend of mine he moved here from New Jersey because he couldn't go to work anymore because the building that his company's office was in was filing an illegal I think it was a state I don't know if steady or city mandate New York State or New York City that required a vaccine to enter these these buildings and uh the because an expert said they were safe and effective when they had been tested for neither they were not properly taste tested for safety they were never even tried to be tested for effectiveness but you see an expert said oh well we got to follow the expert it's really not any different for AI.
• 34:44
  AI said that doesn't make it right it's literally turning over your your thinking your liberty your most precious commodity to someone else or something else.
• 34:59
  And the fact that so many people are doing this and doing it repeatedly makes my head want to explode and then they claim well we live in the freest country in the world as long as we do what our masters in AI tell us to do yeah like I said I'm sorry there's only so much stupid I can take before I got to get some reality it's one of the reasons why there are certain businesses I don't work with I won't do business with them I won't buy their products their services I won't to I wouldn't touch them with a 10 foot pole because they're supporting organizations that are doing these types of let's turn yourself over to whatever some expert said now there are companies that don't do this.
• 35:40
  I want to deal with companies that believe what I believe.
• 35:43
  One of those is Patriot Mobile America's only Christian conservative wireless provider I didn't join them because of their 4G and 5G coverage which is really great they're on the same towers and carriers and towers as as and networks as a major carriers it's not because their customer support is 100% U.S.
• 35:59
  based boy the I'll tell you though when I first joined them their customer support it was awesome that's not why I joined them I joined them for a simple reason they take a portion of every dollar and use it to support organizations that are protecting our rights freedom of religion freedom of speech freedom of press free to be secure from unreasonable searches and diseases free to not be deprived of due process they also by the way support the sanctity of life our veterans and our first responders and now they support the constitution study as well squish it to patriot mole today get your activation absolutely free by using the code constitution at checkout just go to patriotmobile.com slash constitution find a plan that works for you and check out for a discount everyone from veterans and first responders to families with multiple lines get discounts so you can even save some more money while you're doing it.
• 36:51
  And when you check out use that code constitution to get your line activated absolutely free do so and do so today support the world support your rights and support your freedom with your cell phone by going to patriotmobile.com slash constitution and signing up today I also hope you'll head over to AmericaOut Loud dot news I go there each and every day for news and information why because corporate media has been lying to us and they've been doing it for decades but now now we live in the information age we can get news from all different sources and we can find out the truth that the corporate media has been hiding from us one of those places America dot news but I want you to do a bit more yes go read the the articles and the stories are great then share them listen to the podcast watch the videos then share them you'd be surprised how many people will be shocked by what you told them because you've heard it on AmericaOutLoud.news that they didn't hear anywhere else but it's more important ever that we share this information because that's how we help secure the blessings of liberty for all of us I'm Doug Evans author of this sprout book and I'm also a father with a three-year-old daughter and that's why we grow sprouts did you know that you could take seeds add water and get fresh organic vegetables in three to five days without soil sunshine or fertilizer for under a dollar a serving that's the miracle of sprouting and I want to share that with you go to the spouting company.com slash out loud and use the code out loud for a special offer.
• 38:31
  You wouldn't go a day without brushing your teeth or washing your hands what about washing your nose I mean your nose does filter the air you breathe air loaded with bacteria viruses and irritants make nasal hygiene part of your routine with clear no messy bottles to fill no drowning sensation clear is a natural drug-free saline with the added benefit of xylitol which blocks bacterial and viral adhesion available in stores and online at clear.com that is xl ear.com prepare for the next pandemic with the wellness company's contagion emergency kit designed by Dr.
• 39:05
  Peter McCullough get life saving medications like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine plus a free nebulizer and a guidebook for safe use order now by going to TWC dot health forward slash out loud and use code out loud for 65 dollars off your first order plus free shipping welcome back everyday American jury join the constitution study today we're talking about things that make my head explode all right this one maybe not explode maybe just a brief rupture you see on March 30th the Supreme Court denied the sortiory to uh a mother who was appealing her school district's attempts to aid her daughter in a so-called gender trans transition now the case is called Levine versus Great Salt Bay uh community school board and uh the court released an unsigned order where they they didn't explain why no justice does no
• 40:00
  No information about why they simply decided not to hear this case.
• 40:04
  And I find this interesting because they recently decided a case that said California could not hide a student's mental disorder like transgenderism from the parents.
• 40:16
  They couldn't that they couldn't uh use a child's preferred pronoun without parents' permission.
• 40:22
  They they had to let the parents know the parents had to have a say.
• 40:26
  And the brief description of this case, well, it it sounds very familiar.
• 40:34
  And if you think about it, according to certain reports, there's many 6,000 public schools around the country that have policies that intentionally prevent parents from under from knowing about a child's gender identity choices in school, but they turned it away.
• 40:51
  Now, again, there's no order.
• 40:53
  We have no idea why.
• 40:54
  Are they assuming that the other cases where they've said no, the parents have the power to raise this the parents' right to guide the raising of their children?
• 41:03
  The parents have a need to know the the medical, both physical and mental issues with their child, and they simply assume the courts will go back and deal with it.
• 41:13
  I don't see that.
• 41:14
  That's not what they did.
• 41:16
  They simply dismiss the petition against this uh this school board.
• 41:23
  So this really has me scratching my head, you know.
• 41:26
  Why?
• 41:28
  I mean, I could understand if they said if they if the order was said, you know, we're just see this previous decision and you know, deal with it based on that.
• 41:38
  Or uh, you know, we remand this back to lower court following our decision in XYZ.
• 41:44
  That would make sense.
• 41:45
  This is just a nobody knows why.
• 41:49
  So to me, it's again, it's a real head scratcher, and um I don't know what's going to happen.
• 41:54
  Uh, apparently the first circuit's uh decision is is uh gonna stay in place, even though attorneys for the mother said that the the first circuit did not follow the Supreme Court's decision um in previous cases.
• 42:10
  So again, head scratcher, and then this one.
• 42:14
  Oh, they're this lady, this woman, uh, an Angie Griffin.
• 42:19
  Uh she was in the top 10 U.S.
• 42:22
  master swimming competition for her age group.
• 42:25
  Uh, I mean, she's she's 46 years old, she's been dedicated to sports swimming, and I mean, she's obviously very skilled in her job, but or in her in her sport, but then something happened, and uh well, I'll let her describe it.
• 42:39
  This was uh in a post on uh X.
• 42:43
  I lost the national title to a man last April at the U.S.
• 42:48
  Masters Swimming Nationals in San Antonio.
• 42:51
  I unknowingly raised a male in the women's category.
• 42:54
  I finished second and watched my title awarded to him.
• 42:57
  He won five women's national titles that weekend.
• 43:00
  I spoke up, and now I'm facing a potential lifetime ban for my sport.
• 43:05
  This same athlete has taken women's titles and prize money across multiple sports after nationals.
• 43:10
  It was widely reported that the athlete dominating the women's field was male.
• 43:14
  Several of us filed protests and posted online.
• 43:16
  I asked U.S.
• 43:17
  masters for fairness and to an address of policy that allows men to compete in women's events.
• 43:23
  Instead of addressing the policy, they filed a grievance against me, charging me with unsportsmanlike conduct, not for cheating, not for lying, but for saying men and women's sports is unfair.
• 43:34
  World Aquatics has already removed this athletes' times in recognition from the women's category.
• 43:39
  But USMS expects me to stay silent or face losing my own times and recognition.
• 43:45
  Women's sports can only survive if women are allowed to tell the truth.
• 43:49
  Now, again, this makes well actually makes me mad.
• 43:53
  It makes me mad that uh you have this this swimming competition, this swimming organization, right?
• 44:02
  The the master's U.S.
• 44:03
  master swimming that is punishing a competitor for pointing out a person that she can be against at an unfair advantage.
• 44:13
  Now, what's interesting is if she had pointed out that this person had taken steroids, I doubt she would have been she'd have been punished, or threatened at least.
• 44:22
  If she'd pointed out some other uh violation of the rules of fairness, she'd have been fine.
• 44:29
  But she pointed out that this was a dude swimming against women.
• 44:34
  A dude, by the way, that has a history of, I mean, he won five titles in that event.
• 44:38
  He has a history of collecting not only titles but money from women in women's sports, and the fact that she spoke up is what she's getting is what she's getting punished for.
• 44:49
  I'm sorry, but this is the type of stuff it's like reality has twisted.
• 44:53
  You know, we're in bizarre world.
• 44:55
  And um, yeah, you know, U.S.
• 44:58
  master swimming.
• 44:59
  Uh first of all, I don't I don't follow swimming, but uh as far as I'm concerned, they're now an illegitimate organization because they claim to have a women's sports team, but they don't have women's, they claim to have women's competition, but they don't have women's competition, which by the way, isn't that fraudulent advertising?
• 45:19
  If you're advertising, if you're claiming to have a women's swim competition and you allow men to swim on it, isn't that marketing fraud?
• 45:28
  Isn't that some sort of fraud?
• 45:30
  I wonder maybe somebody should go after them for that.
• 45:35
  But uh uh this basically is is punishing the victim.
• 45:40
  We're gonna punish her for pointing out the fraudulent activity when U.S.
• 45:45
  Mass says it's a women's competition, but we're allowing men to swim.
• 45:49
  They didn't announce it, they didn't say this was a mixed competition, this is a women's competition.
• 45:55
  Does that make your head want to explode?
• 45:57
  Does that get you angry?
• 45:59
  What if it wasn't this this lady?
• 46:01
  What if it was your daughter?
• 46:02
  What it was your wife?
• 46:04
  What if it's any situation where women are put at a disadvantage?
• 46:10
  You know, I see all these things about women's rights and women's rights, and here you have an entire political movement to deny women their rights.
• 46:19
  And when someone, when a woman speaks up, she's told to sit down, shut up, or we're gonna give you a lifetime.
• 46:27
  I'm sorry.
• 46:28
  That is that that's a level that shouldn't exist, not because it should be made against the law, but because the American people should be so outraged at this injustice that U.S.
• 46:39
  Masters ceases to exist, either reforms itself or ceases to exist because it's funding is dried up.
• 46:46
  Because people will stop supporting, they'll stop going to their their events, they'll stop participating.
• 46:51
  It should simply shrivel on the vine and blow away in the dust because the American people refuse to reward such injustice as blaming a woman for pointing out the unfair competition that this swimming meet was, the fraud in claiming it was a women's competition when they let a man compete, and then punishing the women for actually saying so.
• 47:20
  Evil, evil organization.
• 47:23
  And I mean, you could probably tell.
• 47:25
  I I get emotional by these things.
• 47:26
  This is why I talk about, you know, these types of things often make feel like my head's gonna explode.
• 47:31
  I need the duct tape to keep it from exploding.
• 47:33
  Because there's a everybody thinks they understand what is right.
• 47:42
  I'm no different, right?
• 47:44
  I I um I assume, I mean, I I make assumptions, and when I see something that contradicts them, I often find it frustrating.
• 47:55
  But the question then becomes what are these these frustrations based on, right?
• 48:00
  Like I said, I'm the type of person I talk back to the television.
• 48:04
  Uh, you know, I'm the I'm the type of guy when when someone says something that is factually incorrect, I'm more likely than not going to pipe up and say something.
• 48:15
  I uh I politely, but I will I will pipe up and say something.
• 48:19
  So when I see these things, they get under my skin.
• 48:24
  They, you know, if we're talking about the land of the free, how can we be the land of the free when these freedoms are people overrule us when people act as if we are not free, when the you know a sports organization punishes someone for pointing out the truth.
• 48:43
  Uh again, that sounds more like uh, you know, Orwell's 1984, or even say the Soviet Union or communist China than it does the land of the free.
• 48:55
  So I I wonder this cognitive dissonance between freedom and thinking that we live free simply because we're here in America, or simply because we have a vote, a say in our government.
• 49:09
  These things make my head explode, not because I don't understand why people do them, because I look at the logical outcome of these positions.
• 49:20
  And I'm like, uh it's like we're we're in a a speeding train heading for a bridge that is obviously out.
• 49:29
  You know, we're not talking about it sneaking up on us.
• 49:31
  You look at you can see, you know, the truth, the bridge is down.
• 49:35
  There's smoke billowing from the ravine, and we're hurtling toward it at high rates of speed, and nobody wants to do anything about it.
• 49:42
  I should say few people want to do anything about it.
• 49:45
  And some of the things they want to do actually don't make this the problem better.
• 49:49
  They simply point and say the bridge is out, the bridge, no, the bridge isn't out, everything's fine.
• 49:56
  That's kind of the attitude I see so often.
• 49:59
  It again.
• 50:00
  I find it frustrating.
• 50:02
  And sometimes I just got to go out and uh uh I sometimes I got to vent.
• 50:09
  Whether it's yelling back at the TV or sometimes, you know what?
• 50:11
  I just got to go out and pet a horse.
• 50:13
  That's how I lower my blood pressure, right?
• 50:16
  I go outside and I pet a horse.
• 50:17
  Uh by the way, it works really, really well, unless I guess you're afraid of horses.
• 50:21
  I'm not.
• 50:23
  But this recognition that there are things that are drive us nuts.
• 50:26
  And the point I want is what are you going to do about it?
• 50:32
  See, there's always going to be things that drive us nuts.
• 50:35
  We're all going to have our pet peeves.
• 50:37
  The question I keep coming back to is what are you going to do about it?
• 50:43
  And if the answer is, well, I'm going to get up on the social media and I'm going to be play keyboard warrior and whine and yell and cry, or I'm going to go demonstrate and I'm going to point out the problems.
• 50:53
  You're not fixing the problem.
• 50:56
  We have to have solutions.
• 50:58
  You have to offer an idea of how to make things better.
• 51:01
  Now, that may be a good idea, may not be a good idea, but you at least have to offer an idea.
• 51:07
  Otherwise, you're just the person pouring gasoline on that fire.
• 51:11
  And uh that doesn't help.
• 51:14
  So let me ask you what makes your head explode.
• 51:17
  What triggers you?
• 51:18
  What do you look at and go, dear God in heaven?
• 51:20
  What were they thinking?
• 51:22
  And let me ask you, what do you do about it?
• 51:27
  How do you uh proceed?
• 51:30
  Do you simply whine and complain and hope somebody will do something, which pretty much means nobody does anything?
• 51:38
  Do you have an idea of how something could be solved?
• 51:40
  And do you express it?
• 51:41
  Do you let other people know what that is?
• 51:44
  And if you people look at that idea and they say, well, I see this problem and that problem.
• 51:49
  Do you simply walk away as if either they don't know any better?
• 51:53
  Or do you try to work out a solution?
• 51:55
  Something that a compromise, which means neither person's happy, but both sides can live with the solu with the answer.
• 52:03
  See, I think the biggest reason my head wants to explode is not because these things happen.
• 52:09
  It's be it's how often these things happen, and I don't see anybody willing to do anything about it, which means it's going to continue.
• 52:17
  And as Albert Einstein said, doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different outcome is the definition of insanity.
• 52:26
  I guess we live in an insane nation.
• 52:29
  Because with all the warning signs of the problems we have, we keep doing the same thing over and over again.
• 52:38
  You know, the question before the Supreme Court in the birthright citizenship case is pretty simple, similar to the one they decided back in 1898 with one Kim Ark.
• 52:52
  And why should we think they're going to come to a different decision?
• 52:54
  We haven't told them that following your opinion above the Constitution is a bad thing.
• 53:00
  Why should we expect them to be any different?
• 53:03
  If the polls are correct and people are truly concerned about AI, do they still use it?
• 53:09
  Or do they find ways to make sure they live without using it, to not be dependent on AI?
• 53:16
  Are they?
• 53:35
  Won't even consider it, won't even discuss it.
• 53:37
  Because they've been taught the same thing.
• 53:40
  The Supreme Court is literally the supreme law of the land, even though it's not.
• 53:45
  And that's where knowledge and education turns out to be the duct tape that helps keep your head together when people do things that make you that make your head want to explode.
• 53:58
  Now, maybe you're sitting there going, but Paul, I don't know what to do next.
• 54:02
  I'm frequently asked, you know, what should I do to study?
• 54:04
  What do you what?
• 54:05
  And the answers usually is, well, it depends.
• 54:10
  Because it does.
• 54:12
  Where are you in reading and studying the constitution?
• 54:14
  Have you done it before or not?
• 54:16
  Is it something you work at?
• 54:17
  Is it something you've been avoiding?
• 54:19
  Are you in a group that may be involved, may help with the study?
• 54:23
  What is your goal?
• 54:24
  What do you want to do with this knowledge and information?
• 54:27
  It's why I set up the Constitution Study Wizard.
• 54:30
  Uh, because uh, yeah, it takes time to look at these things, but that's a great place to get started.
• 54:35
  Go to Constitution Study.com slash wizard and uh fill out a simple form, a simple quiz.
• 54:41
  A little uh uh yes, I ask for your name and email address because we're gonna email you information.
• 54:47
  And then you answer the questions like when did you last read the constitution?
• 54:51
  Are you a part of a group?
• 54:52
  What are your goals?
• 54:53
  And based on those answers, first the system is gonna recommend some some basic things you may you may try.
• 55:00
  And these are just suggestions, right?
• 55:02
  There's no this it's not like you bought anything, it's not like you have to do it.
• 55:05
  These are suggestions, these are ideas.
• 55:07
  And then I'm gonna take a look at it and see if there's anything I want to add on top of that.
• 55:11
  So it's really a great way to get ideas of how you may want to proceed.
• 55:15
  Now, the the wizard itself is free.
• 55:18
  Many of the ideas have free options, so it's a great way to get started.
• 55:22
  And if you want to pursue a discussion after that, well, you can contact me through the website and uh see what can happen.
• 55:28
  But it starts with you know recognize where you are, like any navigation.
• 55:34
  First, you have to know where you are, then you have to know where you're going.
• 55:37
  Then you can figure out how to get here.
• 55:38
  And I don't care if you talk about going to the corner store, driving across country, or flying around the world.
• 55:44
  All navigation starts with knowing where you are, knowing where you want to go, then you figure out how to get there.
• 55:50
  Now, hopefully, when it comes to studying the constitution and understanding what the world around us, part of how you get there will continue to be the constitution study.
• 55:59
  Heard every weekday at 4 p.m.
• 56:00
  Eastern time on America Out Loud Talk Radio, heard on the iHeart Radio Network.
• 56:05
  Now, you can listen on our media player.
• 56:07
  We've also got apps for Apple, Android, and Alexa.
• 56:10
  And of course, you can listen via podcast.
• 56:12
  No, it does take a day or two for an episode to go from talk radio to podcast, but you get to listen in your favorite podcast app.
• 56:20
  Do me a favor though, subscribe to the show.
• 56:23
  Leave us a rating, especially on Apple Podcast.
• 56:25
  It helps the algorithm show us to more people.
• 56:28
  And of course, the more people know we're out here, they're likely to click the link and join us here for the Constitution study.
• 56:34
  Speaking of links, you can find all the links you need on the homepage at America Outloud.news.
• 56:40
  But please share those links, share this program, share the great content you find on AmericaOutloud.news.
• 56:47
  By doing so, you're helping to share the blessings of liberty to everyone who calls this great nation home.