Latest / UBS Trending / UBS Road to the midterm elections: The future of Social Security explained
Transcript
- 0:09Hello everyone, and welcome to UBS Studios award winning series,
- 0:13road to the election.
- 0:14This time
- 0:14around, with a focus on the upcoming midterm elections
- 0:17here in the US. I'm Anthony Pastore.
- 0:19Thanks for joining me once again.
- 0:20As we discuss
- 0:21what matters most at the intersection of policy and markets.
- 0:25My guest for this conversation
- 0:26today is Andrew Dubinsky, senior economist at UBS.
- 0:29Within our chief investment office.
- 0:30Andrew, thanks for joining me.
- 0:32Good time for you to be here
- 0:33because we just released our most recent publication
- 0:37for the Election Watch series that we do,
- 0:39which this is a part of, but this one is about Social Security,
- 0:43which we pulled you in and said, you're getting questions.
- 0:46There are a lot of questions out there
- 0:48about what it what it means, because there are,
- 0:50as we just talked about,
- 0:51there are a lot of misconceptions about Social Security.
- 0:55People think that when you say it's going insolvent,
- 0:57that there is going to be $0 left
- 1:00and that Social Security is going to just go away,
- 1:02maybe you can clear up before we even get into the what and the
- 1:05how and the why is what's going on, and clear up
- 1:09those misconceptions
- 1:10about the Social Security issue that we're potentially facing.
- 1:13Right? Yeah.
- 1:14So
- 1:15Social Security is a benefit program
- 1:17many people are familiar with.
- 1:19It's designed as a pay as you go system.
- 1:21So people that are working,
- 1:23they pay payroll taxes along with their employer.
- 1:25And the beneficiaries are getting a benefit
- 1:28that was based on their work history.
- 1:31And in good times, those payroll taxes exceed what's going out.
- 1:36And you have an accumulation that went to a trust fund.
- 1:40And what's happening now is as the population's aging,
- 1:43we're getting a lot more outflows than inflows in that trust fund,
- 1:46which had built up, over many years of surpluses, is likely
- 1:50to become insolvent around 2032, based on the latest estimates.
- 1:54And what will happen then based under the way the programs design
- 1:58is that
- 1:58there'll be an automatic benefit cut down to the money
- 2:01that's coming in.
- 2:02And based on the current estimates, that could be around a 22%
- 2:06benefit cut.
- 2:07So people will still get, payments.
- 2:10If there's no you know, interventions.
- 2:12So it's not going to zero.
- 2:13But it's certainly a big benefit cut for people,
- 2:17for seniors and many of them, you know,
- 2:18highly reliant on this source of income. Right.
- 2:20So insolvent does not mean zero.
- 2:23It just means a cut to what the benefits would be today.
- 2:26Like you said, up to around 22% potentially
- 2:30if no action is taken.
- 2:31Yeah.
- 2:31The cuts this going down to the money that's coming in
- 2:35based on the current workforce.
- 2:37And just how much wages people are making
- 2:40and the formula applied to those wages.
- 2:42So if the economy's doing really well,
- 2:44maybe the benefit cuts could be a little bit smaller, but
- 2:46there's just a large population of beneficiaries.
- 2:49So it's,
- 2:50you know, fairly like there would be a benefit cut
- 2:52without some intervention. Right.
- 2:54So I mean, this is not the first time
- 2:55this has happened in US history.
- 2:57In 1983,
- 2:58President Reagan
- 2:59at the time worked with Congress to come up
- 3:01with a bipartisan deal to fund or fix the issue.
- 3:04And here we are
- 3:05now, all these years later, and it's coming up again.
- 3:07But what's the difference between then and now?
- 3:09Why can't we just do what they did then to fix the problem today?
- 3:13Yeah.
- 3:14So there's a lot of similarities to that point in time.
- 3:16The fund was about to become insolvent.
- 3:19And there was actually a lot more uncertainty about
- 3:21what could happen to those payments.
- 3:23And so
- 3:25what's different then is I think there's a bit more,
- 3:28focus on using, cuts to benefits as part of the solution.
- 3:33So they used at the time,
- 3:35a mix of, you know, increases to revenue,
- 3:38but they also did things like raise the retirement age over time,
- 3:41they delayed the COLA, which, allow for some savings.
- 3:45And they did some other things
- 3:46which, weakened the benefits for some,
- 3:49employees and employees that had benefits elsewhere.
- 3:52So there's a lot more focus on getting some savings from cuts.
- 3:56Right.
- 3:57And it's interesting because, you know, when
- 3:58you look at the upcoming midterm elections,
- 4:00which this series is focused on.
- 4:02The senators that will be potentially voted in
- 4:05or stay in their seats, they are likely going to be there in 2032
- 4:10when this insolvency problem really kind of rears its ugly head.
- 4:12So it's really important to kind of understand if.
- 4:16And I'll go back to what you discovered,
- 4:18which is when Americans were polled, most of them said they'd
- 4:22rather see tax increases than benefit cuts.
- 4:25So you've got to look at who's running in your state,
- 4:28for Senate
- 4:29and for the House and figure out what are their platforms
- 4:32when it comes to Social Security,
- 4:34because that seems to be
- 4:34a really important question
- 4:36that we need to be asking our local politicians is,
- 4:38what are you going to do about this potential insolvency issue?
- 4:41So and that's really where we are at this point
- 4:44when it comes down to the policy of it.
- 4:46Yeah, no, I agree.
- 4:46So when you look, when we look at the battleground states,
- 4:50for senators who will likely have to face this problem
- 4:52and probably could really heat up
- 4:55in 20 around the next presidential election.
- 4:58As we get closer to that deadline, we can already,
- 5:01see a little bit of a foreshadowing
- 5:03of the policies
- 5:04that they're putting forward to help fix the problem.
- 5:06And there's definitely a lot more focus on,
- 5:09expanding the payroll tax, either, you know, raising the cap.
- 5:12Right now, it's around 185,000.
- 5:15Or, you know, raising the payroll tax itself.
- 5:18It's so there's a lot more focus on
- 5:21changing the revenues as opposed changing the benefits.
- 5:24And that's if, you know, the momentum we've seen,
- 5:27with expanding benefits, it's been in place
- 5:29for the past few years.
- 5:30President Trump talked about protecting, benefits.
- 5:34And he, introduced a tax deduction for Social Security.
- 5:39So the recent momentum
- 5:40has really been about protecting
- 5:41and even expanding the benefits in some way.
- 5:44And we see that with the, the current senators that are running.
- 5:48And I think that tells us the direction of policy
- 5:51probably the next couple of years. Yeah.
- 5:52And hopefully,
- 5:54like happened in 1983, there will be bipartisan support
- 5:57because, you know, there is a lot of divisiveness,
- 5:59as always, has been and continues to be
- 6:01when it comes to policy and politics,
- 6:03but hopefully especially with this issue,
- 6:04which it is, because it is so important to every single American
- 6:08who pays into the Social Security system,
- 6:10which I've been doing
- 6:10since I'm 11 years old and had a paper route, you know, so
- 6:13and it was a small chunk of that.
- 6:15But, you know,
- 6:15I've been paying into the system
- 6:16as all of our colleagues and coworkers
- 6:18have, and family members and friends.
- 6:20So here's sort of the thing is,
- 6:21because when you think about it from a markets perspective,
- 6:24on the investment side,
- 6:26this could lead to potentially different things
- 6:27higher taxes, benefit deductions,
- 6:31impacts to Treasury yields.
- 6:33What should the markets and investors really be
- 6:35thinking about or quote unquote, be concerned about
- 6:39when it comes to this issue, whether they solve it or not?
- 6:42Yeah.
- 6:42So you raised a number of the things they'll be watching.
- 6:46And I think part of it is just the competency of the politicians
- 6:51to really, you know, deal with the issue.
- 6:54So it will likely require bipartisanship.
- 6:57And the question is, just
- 6:58how close do we get to the deadline?
- 7:02And we know it's going to likely require bipartisanship
- 7:05because this is something that can't be used, can't use the,
- 7:08special reconciliation process
- 7:11that only requires, a majority.
- 7:14So and we're going to see, you know, is there a focus on,
- 7:18raising revenues, which has some economic effects?
- 7:22Or will it be a focus on, cutting benefits,
- 7:25which likely have a bigger economic drag
- 7:28if we and if we obviously a close to that cliff,
- 7:31there is a lot of uncertainty that would come around which people
- 7:33possibly even spend it pulling back on spending ahead of that.
- 7:36And the third way
- 7:37they could manage
- 7:39the solution is just by borrowing in the short term.
- 7:41And that would signal to markets that,
- 7:45the US government is really not,
- 7:47doing
- 7:48a good job of preemptively solving its problems.
- 7:51And there's other fiscal issues around the corner.
- 7:54And if they can't really address this one,
- 7:56it would be a signal about how they would, face challenges,
- 8:00addressing future ones. Right.
- 8:01So those are the, those three,
- 8:03whether the what path they go down will affect either the economy
- 8:07or could affect, the bond market in terms of the credibility
- 8:11that the US
- 8:11has with preemptively solving
- 8:13these problems before we really get to the cliff.
- 8:15Yeah,
- 8:15a lot of work ahead for not only the politicians in Washington,
- 8:19but folks that are looking at this from the investment case
- 8:22before I let you go, Andrew,
- 8:23because there's always this
- 8:24everything nowadays is tied to artificial intelligence
- 8:27in one way or the other.
- 8:28And there are some experts that have argued
- 8:30that this particular problem can be solved
- 8:34using forms of AI, because they argue that they add
- 8:37to efficiencies,
- 8:39help with cutting spending, and they're looking at
- 8:41every nuanced detail.
- 8:44Is that something that you see
- 8:45as potentially supporting the efforts
- 8:48to solve the insolvency problem,
- 8:51or is this just sort of like an AI pipe dream
- 8:53that people are hoping
- 8:54that there'll be some magic pill to fix this issue?
- 8:57So I definitely think there's truth that, faster growth
- 9:01coming from the adoption of AI could be
- 9:04a real, tailwind for the US fiscal health.
- 9:07And there are some estimates that show if,
- 9:10you know, to AI boost productivity by 1%, that could help reduce
- 9:14the deficit
- 9:15by, let's say, two percentage points over a decade or longer.
- 9:19And the key issue is just the timing.
- 9:22So I could definitely help people make more money
- 9:24and higher wages leads to more payroll taxes.
- 9:27But that insolvency timing is that
- 9:31as soon as, say, 5 or 6 years away,
- 9:33and those types of tailwinds from AI or other, call them
- 9:37structural growth changes
- 9:38where maybe we encourage people to have larger families,
- 9:41those things help longer term solvency.
- 9:44But we have this shorter term problem where the money coming in,
- 9:46it's just not enough to pay the money that's going out.
- 9:49And it's just on a different timeline. Right.
- 9:52Yeah.
- 9:52Lower birth rates
- 9:53is also something
- 9:54that is an issue because as fewer babies are being born,
- 9:57there are fewer people
- 9:58adding funds into the system
- 10:00while our baby boomers are living longer, which is great.
- 10:03But at the same time,
- 10:04we have to make sure they have a livable,
- 10:06you know, amount of money coming in. Yeah.
- 10:08So it's kind of one of those catch 22s.
- 10:10And and not all of us are leaving
- 10:12and, you know, start adding to payroll taxes that soon.
- 10:15Most people start adding a lot later.
- 10:17My dad was like, get a job, learn now. You know, it's
- 10:20but yes, absolutely.
- 10:21And there's certainly a lot of conversations, many conversations
- 10:24that will be had, up into this midterm election
- 10:28and then after until we get to 2032,
- 10:30hopefully with a solution in place.
- 10:32Andrew, great reporting.
- 10:33Really good stuff.
- 10:34Thanks for all the work you do on this.
- 10:36And looking forward to having you back again.
- 10:37Likewise. Looking forward to it.
- 10:38Good to see you, Andrew Dubinsky from the Chief Investment Office.
- 10:41And thank you all for joining us.
- 10:42There's a lot more information on the upcoming midterm elections
- 10:45and, of course,
- 10:45its potential impact to policy, markets,
- 10:47and your portfolio at our website, ubs.com/electionwatch,
- 10:51including the most recent publication with the article
- 10:54that Andrew and I were just referring to
- 10:56on this conversation on Social Security.
- 10:58Plus, make sure to mark your calendars
- 10:59for our special post-election coverage on the CIO monthly
- 11:03livestream that will be taking place on Thursday, November 5th,
- 11:06just two days after the midterm elections at 1:00 p.m.
- 11:09eastern time.
- 11:09Plus, we've got a lot more UBS and CIO content
- 11:12on our websites, including podcasts and videos.
- 11:15You can find that at ubs.com/views.
- 11:18Thanks for joining us everybody.
- 11:19We'll have another edition of Road
- 11:20to the Midterm Elections coming up for you soon.
- 11:22In the meantime from New York City I'm Anthony Pastore.
- 11:25Have a great day. See you soon.