Latest / V / The Censorship Regime Came After Me (Ep.36)

Transcript

The Censorship Regime Came After Me (Ep.36) · V

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Good morning and welcome to Bungie in a Report, early edition.
• 0:03
  Speaker 1: A lot of stories to get to today. The censorship
• 0:06
  Speaker 1: regime attacked this show. Yep, the one that you're listening
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: to right now, Kamala Harris. gives an objectively awesome election
• 0:15
  Speaker 1: integrity take that she has since, of course, abandoned. Rumors
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: are circulating that Travis Kelsey and Taylor Swift's relationship was
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: all a PR stunt. Gamers revolt against the new and
• 0:27
  Speaker 1: woke video game Concord. The World Darts Federation has threatened
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: female competitors with disciplinary action if they dare refuse to
• 0:35
  Speaker 1: compete against trans-identifying men. An LGBTQ activist says, Targeting children
• 0:42
  Speaker 1: is now a convicted pedophile. All this on Bongina Report,
• 0:46
  Speaker 1: early edition. You guys could hear some noise there. I'm
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: having my comments out to see everything that you're saying.
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: And then I accidentally had the volume on. So I
• 1:05
  Speaker 1: was hearing myself as we were going. Michael says it
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: wasn't his fault for once. That's true. But I have
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: my phone out because I'd like to see what you
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: all are saying as the show goes on because I
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: love all of your feedback. So keep commenting, keep talking.
• 1:20
  Speaker 1: I will lower the volume now. To the first story,
• 1:24
  Speaker 1: the censorship industrial complex has officially come for the early edition. Yesterday,
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: I posted a TikTok clip from my show about Kenya's
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: digital ID system, and it was banned on the platform.
• 1:38
  Speaker 1: Here is the now censored clip. New world order is
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: closing in on us fast. Kenya's multi-billion dollar digital ID
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: system intends to digitize citizens' biometric data. Here is Kenya's
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: Interior and National Administration Cabinet Secretary discussing the project.
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: We have an ID system in Kenya which is semi-automated.
• 2:04
  Speaker 2: Part of it is a bit of automation, but quite minimal.
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: Going forward, we are looking at upgrading our current automated
• 2:12
  Speaker 2: fingerprint identification system, AFIS, into a automated biometric identification system,
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: which goes beyond the fingerprints and involves the iris, the fingerprints,
• 2:36
  Speaker 2: as well as facial recognition.
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: Now, there have been some legal challenges to this new
• 2:41
  Speaker 1: digital ID system, so it hasn't been fully rolled out yet,
• 2:44
  Speaker 1: but it is only a matter of time. And I
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: bring this story up to you guys because if you
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: want to know what the permanent state has in mind
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: for all of us, you have to look to the
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: third world. There's really no difference between foreign and domestic
• 2:58
  Speaker 1: American policy. It's all the same. What the elites push
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: on Kenya or Sri Lanka is what they want to
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: do here in America. So TikTok gave zero explanation for
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: why my video was deleted. They simply said that I
• 3:14
  Speaker 1: violated community guidelines. You see that community? Yep. No explanation.
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: No fact check attached to it. Just you violated community guidelines.
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: The video is gone. And what's really disturbing about this,
• 3:27
  Speaker 1: you guys, if you remember back when before Elon took
• 3:30
  Speaker 1: over Twitter and they would take down posts or they
• 3:33
  Speaker 1: would censor users, if it wasn't a shadow ban, it
• 3:36
  Speaker 1: was an actual deletion of a post or banning of
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: a person, they would justify it. They would tell you
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: why they are censoring you. Even on Instagram, I've been
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: censored on Instagram a couple times, they attach a fact
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: check to it. What's scary is that now we've reached
• 3:53
  Speaker 1: a point where the censorship industrial complex no longer even
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: bothers to justify its speech policing. And this is why
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: what we talked about yesterday is so important. Eric Weinstein said,
• 4:04
  Speaker 1: in that really incredible interview, that modern censorship is not
• 4:08
  Speaker 1: about persuasion. It is about instruction. So I don't even
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: attempt to tell you why they're censoring you. It's a
• 4:15
  Speaker 1: code that instructs you on what amounts to wrong think,
• 4:20
  Speaker 1: what will lead you to social, legal, and financial consequences.
• 4:25
  Speaker 1: There was nothing inaccurate about my video, nothing. TikTok did
• 4:28
  Speaker 1: not even provide a fact check. The reality is that
• 4:32
  Speaker 1: Digital IDs is just simply a conversation that powerful people
• 4:36
  Speaker 1: don't want us having. And the only logical reason as
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: to why is because I'm correct and they do want
• 4:45
  Speaker 1: to implement digital IDs here in America, but they don't
• 4:48
  Speaker 1: want us awake and prepared to resist. All right, switching
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: gears here. You guys know how we are fighting for
• 4:56
  Speaker 1: election integrity in this country. We need physical paper ballots,
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: poll watchers from the local places that they're counting the ballots,
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: proof of citizenship, bans on ballot harvesting, an end to
• 5:08
  Speaker 1: mass mail-in voting. And I can't believe I'm saying this,
• 5:11
  Speaker 1: but I want you guys to listen to Kamala Harris
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: make some excellent points about election integrity back in 2018.
• 5:18
  Speaker 3: Systems to audit. but also what they can do around
• 5:22
  Speaker 3: best practices and best machinery. We are talking with them
• 5:26
  Speaker 3: about the fact that it is probably best that you
• 5:29
  Speaker 3: do not have your election system connected to the Internet,
• 5:32
  Speaker 3: because that will create greater vulnerabilities. And then look at
• 5:35
  Speaker 3: where we are now in this year of our Lord, 2018.
• 5:37
  Speaker 3: We're talking about paper ballots, but that actually might be
• 5:41
  Speaker 3: one of the smartest systems. Going back to, you know,
• 5:45
  Speaker 3: a day when we could have something tangible, that we
• 5:48
  Speaker 3: can hold on to because Russia cannot hack a piece
• 5:50
  Speaker 3: of paper like they can a computer system connected to
• 5:53
  Speaker 3: the internet.
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: Kamala Harris is so right. But here's the thing. She's
• 6:02
  Speaker 1: not saying that in the year of our Lord, 2024.
• 6:04
  Speaker 1: And the reason is because Democrats know the benefit of
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: an insecure system. The reason they're so adamantly against the
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship at the polls,
• 6:19
  Speaker 1: and the reason they have mobilized the entire corporate media
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: apparatus against the SAVE Act is because illegals will vote
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: in our elections and vote Democrat. Democrats in places like
• 6:29
  Speaker 1: San Francisco, Oakland, D.C. already permit illegals to vote in
• 6:32
  Speaker 1: local elections. So of course they want them to vote
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: in federal elections. Now, I know that voter integrity can
• 6:40
  Speaker 1: be exhausting, but it does matter. in the swing state
• 6:43
  Speaker 1: of Wisconsin, it really matters. And the propaganda press is
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: in full swing. Per the left-wing Milwaukee Journal Centennial, Wisconsin
• 6:52
  Speaker 1: voter ID law still is causing confusion, stifling turnout in Milwaukee.
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: This is a quote. The implementation of a state law
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: that requires voters to show photo identification increased ballot security,
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: Republican authors argue, but the side effects have disproportionately hit
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: black voters in Milwaukee who are more likely to not
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: have a photo ID and less inclined to seek one
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: than their white peers, experts, and advocates say. And we're
• 7:16
  Speaker 1: going to talk about experts later on in the show.
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: Keep that in mind. But here we go again with
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: the subtle and not so subtle racism from the left. Oh,
• 7:23
  Speaker 1: black people, they don't have IDs. So we can't have
• 7:27
  Speaker 1: proof of citizenship before voting. These people are jokes and
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: they aren't well-meaning. It's not about black Americans voting. It's
• 7:35
  Speaker 1: about ensuring that non-citizens can illegally vote in the presidential
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: election because it benefits Democrats. Nothing they do is in
• 7:43
  Speaker 1: good faith like this. CNN exclusive. Biden administration to accuse
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: Russia of sustained efforts to influence 2024 election. Really? Again?
• 7:55
  Speaker 1: Democrats blame Russia for everything. But what you guys need
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: to understand is it is a projection. Because the actual
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: people influencing the 2024 election are those part of the
• 8:06
  Speaker 1: security state. The ones who orchestrated the Russia collusion hoax
• 8:10
  Speaker 1: and suppressed the Hunter Biden laptop story. The laptop was
• 8:14
  Speaker 1: authenticated by the feds almost a full year prior to
• 8:18
  Speaker 1: the New York Times story. Think about that. They authenticated
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: it almost a full year prior, but still told social
• 8:25
  Speaker 1: media companies that it's evidence of Russian disinformation. And these
• 8:30
  Speaker 1: are the same people who are currently directing social media
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: companies to suppress disfavored speech, like my TikTok yesterday. The
• 8:38
  Speaker 1: same people who are creating censorship apparatuses in countries across
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: the world, including Brazil, which we talked about yesterday. And
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: how about the nonpartisan, nonpartisan, left-wing organizations changing election laws
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: and regulations in key swing states? Russia is a projection.
• 8:56
  Speaker 1: The deep state, those are the ones who have and
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: are interfering in our elections. Have to remember that. Speaking
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: of manipulation of the masses, there are reported rumors that
• 9:10
  Speaker 1: Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelsey and Taylor Swift
• 9:15
  Speaker 1: potentially started their whole relationship that the world was obsessing
• 9:19
  Speaker 1: over in a publicity stunt. Yes, and the news comes
• 9:24
  Speaker 1: after an alleged contract with an exact date that they
• 9:28
  Speaker 1: would break up began circulating online. A document from a
• 9:33
  Speaker 1: Los Angeles-based firm known as Full Scoop PR began appearing
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: on social media with a split date on September 28th
• 9:41
  Speaker 1: for Kelsey and Swift. And the document also appeared to
• 9:46
  Speaker 1: outline a plan for how to handle the reaction to
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: the breakup, including allowing the initial media frenzy to settle
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: and ensure Now, Kelsey's reps have denied Kelsey's relationship with
• 9:58
  Speaker 1: Taylor is fake and he spoke for full scoop says
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: the document is entirely false and fabricated now of course
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: i can't confirm for you all whether this document is
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: real but if it were real let's think for a
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: second about who would possibly benefit first travis kelsey I
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: had no idea who Travis Kelsey was before his relationship
• 10:20
  Speaker 1: with Taylor Swift. I'm just going to be honest with
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: you guys. So after his relationship, he has a newfound
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: stardom and a cross-gender cohort of fans who will tune
• 10:30
  Speaker 1: into his podcast and buy whatever products he's selling. And
• 10:33
  Speaker 1: it also benefits the NFL, enticing women to pay attention
• 10:36
  Speaker 1: to football. And then the question is, well, how does
• 10:39
  Speaker 1: it benefit Taylor? And guys, Taylor is notorious for her
• 10:43
  Speaker 1: inability to keep a man. She's had countless breakups, and
• 10:47
  Speaker 1: countless songs written about her breakups. And we know that
• 10:51
  Speaker 1: she's insecure about this. She'll accuse people of being sexist
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: for even discussing her numerous breakups. And her hit song,
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: Shake It Off, she sings, I go on too many dates,
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: but I can't make them stay. At least that's what
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: people say. Very famous song. So could their whole relationship
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: be staged? It's possible. And I think this is a
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: good opportunity to discuss publicity versus sexism. Conspiracy. The media
• 11:18
  Speaker 1: likes to label conceivable publicity stunts as conspiracies, but invisible
• 11:26
  Speaker 1: wire pullers or propagandists have been carefully manipulating public figures
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: and cultural symbols to shape public opinions forever. And these
• 11:36
  Speaker 1: efforts are not overt or direct forms of manipulation. They're sophisticated,
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: behind-the-scenes operations designed to subtly guide public perception. I want
• 11:47
  Speaker 1: you guys to reflect on the 2023 Super Bowl. There
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: was a peculiar number of right-leaning cultural elements. First, you
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: had Post Malone performing America the Beautiful dressed as a cowboy.
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: Take a listen.
• 12:06
  Speaker 3: America, America God shed his grace on thee.
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: There's Taylor. All right, that's good, Mikey. You also had
• 12:40
  Speaker 1: comedian Shane Gillis, who sat in a special Bud Light
• 12:44
  Speaker 1: section at the Super Bowl, and a Bud Light square
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: appeared at the top of the replay. It said, this
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: angle brought to you by Bud Light. You had Reba
• 12:53
  Speaker 1: McEntire and Luke Combs performing. Travis Kelsey and Taylor Swift were,
• 12:58
  Speaker 1: of course, the It couple, representing, in my opinion, this
• 13:01
  Speaker 1: sort of Americana, traditional, hetero relationship that really does appeal
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: to conservative middle Americans who are flooded, generally, with disordered relationships.
• 13:13
  Speaker 1: Then you had the He Gets Us Jesus ads, which
• 13:15
  Speaker 1: were sort of woke, but they were also Christian ads.
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: and Travis Kelsey advertising Pfizer shots in a commercial that
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: ran back-to-back with Bud Light just after halftime, which is
• 13:26
  Speaker 1: one of the most expensive placements for ads. And all
• 13:30
  Speaker 1: this is in stark contrast to 2020, when the NFL
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: embraced anti-racism messaging on the field. We can pull that up, Mikey.
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: And then you had players taking knees, throwing their fists
• 13:43
  Speaker 1: in the air throughout the season during the national anthem.
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: This is the wake of George Floyd. You guys all remember.
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: And Isaac Simpson, who laid this all out in The
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: Dark Futurist Substack, summed up what's happening today versus then
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: really well. He said, sometimes the bigger the propaganda, the
• 14:03
  Speaker 1: more complex and shadowy we make it. When the reality
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: is very simple. The party of Davos, the regime, whatever
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: you want to call it, is buying back white people,
• 14:14
  Speaker 1: white men in particular, so they don't vote for Trump
• 14:18
  Speaker 1: Don't stop buying Bud Light and don't forget to sign
• 14:21
  Speaker 1: up for the draft. They're trying to win back the
• 14:25
  Speaker 1: right after we awaken to the fact that they hate us.
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: This is the same reason you're seeing patriotic elements in
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: Kamala Harris's campaign right now. It's not a conspiracy. It's careful,
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: calculated publicity attempting to influence the masses. So Travis and
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: Taylor don't even need to be formally involved. a part
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: of or aware of some sort of publicity stunt. It's
• 14:50
  Speaker 1: undeniable that the NFL chose to highlight their relationship. And
• 14:55
  Speaker 1: it makes sense why. Propagandists use celebrities to attract specific
• 15:00
  Speaker 1: demographics and create cultural moments. The same way that the
• 15:04
  Speaker 1: experts lend authority to the narratives, making them persuasive. Both groups,
• 15:10
  Speaker 1: celebrities and the experts, they guide public discourse. Think about
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: during COVID. the COVID PSYOP, as I'd like to call it,
• 15:18
  Speaker 1: the experts in the celebrity class joined forces to control
• 15:21
  Speaker 1: the national discourse and ultimately control people's minds. It was
• 15:26
  Speaker 1: so powerful that people didn't believe their own bodies. They'd
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: contract COVID after being vaccinated and still claimed sincerely that
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: the vaccines work. So we need to be smart. We
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: need to be smart enough to resist the propaganda because
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: these people still hate us. Whether it's Kamala Harris or
• 15:43
  Speaker 1: the NFL, they want to use us for votes or views,
• 15:46
  Speaker 1: whatever it may be, but they still detest us. And
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: I think the second big takeaway here is this could
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: break the matrix. This Taylor Swift, Travis Kelsey, potentially stage relationship,
• 15:59
  Speaker 1: if true, could expose countless influence campaigns and annihilate carefully
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: curated lies and narratives that The idea that the Trump
• 16:08
  Speaker 1: assassination attempt was an honest mistake. The COVID vaccines work.
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: Kamala Harris is actually an American patriot. Voting IDs are racist.
• 16:16
  Speaker 1: Joe Biden is mentally fit to be president. The climate
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: crisis will incinerate the earth. Men can become women. Iraq
• 16:22
  Speaker 1: has weapons of mass destruction. The 2020 election was the
• 16:25
  Speaker 1: most secure in American history. It is all unraveling. And
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: it's possible that Taylor Swift and Travis Kelsey could be
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: the breaking point. All right, back to the powerful detesting
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: the masses. The battle between video games and left-wing propagandists
• 16:40
  Speaker 1: is raging on. Gamergate is a struggle that lives on
• 16:44
  Speaker 1: to the present. Instead of listening to consumers, game developers
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: are still pushing wokeness on consumers. But this week, PlayStation
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: and Firewalk have announced that the video game Concord will
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: be taken offline on September 6th and refunds will be
• 17:01
  Speaker 1: issued immediately. across all platforms. And the news comes after
• 17:04
  Speaker 1: major backlash from fans over the game developers infecting the
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: Concord with wokeism. Here is what the characters look like
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: in the game. All gender bending, right? Fat acceptance. Everybody
• 17:20
  Speaker 1: has weirdly colored hair. All look kind of non-binary. And
• 17:25
  Speaker 1: somebody said on a Concord discussion board, this game is
• 17:29
  Speaker 1: infected with DEI. A lot of gender fluid characters, subtle
• 17:33
  Speaker 1: hints in voice lines that being a rebel is so
• 17:35
  Speaker 1: cool and progressive. All the characters look weird or straight
• 17:38
  Speaker 1: up ugly. Preferred pronouns for all the fictional characters shown
• 17:41
  Speaker 1: on the character choice menu, one of which is a robot,
• 17:45
  Speaker 1: a robot that has a gender, and the amount of
• 17:47
  Speaker 1: weird purple haircuts. Somebody else wrote, this is just the
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: surface level of woke. There is much more the developers
• 17:54
  Speaker 1: tried to hide. For example, the lead character designer says
• 17:56
  Speaker 1: that whites must acknowledge their position of privilege. And in
• 17:59
  Speaker 1: order to work towards equity, equality, he has a character
• 18:03
  Speaker 1: designer outright refuse to make white characters. Now, according to
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: Pink News, which is an LGBT website, anti-LGBTQ plus bigots
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: are falsely claiming that poor Concord sales were due to
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: pronouns and wokeness. And do you guys want to know
• 18:21
  Speaker 1: what Pink News' evidence is of this? Pink News says so.
• 18:26
  Speaker 1: There is no indicator as to any of the characters' sexualities,
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: and only one character uses they, them pronouns. We say so.
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: It's only a few evidences of their, a little bit
• 18:40
  Speaker 1: of evidence that they're using LGBTQI characters, but it's not
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: a big deal. It's all made up by bigots. except
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: for all the actual gamers who are complaining about this
• 18:50
  Speaker 1: video game being woke in all the discussion groups, and
• 18:53
  Speaker 1: they're not buying the game. On the point of insane
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: gender politics, the World Dart Federation has threatened female competitors
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: with disciplinary action if they refuse to compete against trans-identifying men.
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: Ahead of this year's World Championship, the Federation stated that
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: it will not tolerate any woman who forfeits their match
• 19:13
  Speaker 1: because they have to play against males, and the statement reads,
• 19:16
  Speaker 1: The WDF wishes to clarify its position on player withdrawals.
• 19:21
  Speaker 1: Once the first dart has been thrown in a tournament,
• 19:23
  Speaker 1: any player that subsequently withdraws from playing match may be
• 19:26
  Speaker 1: considered to be bringing the game into dispute and could
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: face disciplinary action. And this news comes months after British
• 19:34
  Speaker 1: female darts player Detta Hedman did forfeit a match against
• 19:39
  Speaker 1: a man. And here is an image of Detta Hedman. Oh,
• 19:44
  Speaker 1: there she is right there. And then you can see
• 19:47
  Speaker 1: the person that she competed against.
• 19:51
  Speaker 3: Yep.
• 19:53
  Speaker 1: I mean, come on. So according to Detta, it's all
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: about the mental health of transgender women, which is really
• 20:03
  Speaker 1: just men. They have not once come to us, ladies,
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: and asked how we were feeling about it. We're having
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: to stand up and say, this is how we feel.
• 20:11
  Speaker 1: And in other gender wars news, two of Elle magazine's
• 20:17
  Speaker 1: eight incredible women are men. They're men. Let's look at
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: those photos, Mikey.
• 20:25
  Speaker 3: If we could.
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: These are the two women. Eight incredible women per Elle magazine. Yes,
• 20:33
  Speaker 1: very feminine looking. Drop a comment. Tell me if you
• 20:36
  Speaker 1: think these look like women. I'd say absolutely not. But
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: you guys know that the real targets of all of
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: this insanity are really children. I want you guys to
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: watch this video shared by Jack Posobiec giving examples of
• 20:51
  Speaker 1: all the trans and gay agenda injected into children's content.
• 20:56
  Speaker 1: Children age two to five years old, mind you. We're
• 21:00
  Speaker 1: talking about toddlers here on the young end. Take a listen.
• 21:08
  Speaker 1: You may now kiss the brides.
• 21:13
  Speaker 3: And I also use they and them. That's because I'm non-binary.
• 21:18
  Speaker 1: I'm Rand. And I'm Roy. And these are our baby twins. Wow!
• 21:24
  Speaker 1: And those are the puppies. We think the way you
• 21:27
  Speaker 1: look great is to.
• 21:29
  Speaker 3: Just be yourself.
• 21:30
  Speaker 1: Wow! You guys, I did not have children's content like
• 21:59
  Speaker 1: that growing up. I'm almost 25, pretty young. This is
• 22:05
  Speaker 1: very new. I mean, this is Gen Alpha content. I'm
• 22:09
  Speaker 1: not seeing, I didn't grow up with this as a
• 22:11
  Speaker 1: Gen Z-er. It's a radical shift in media content geared
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: toward children with an explicit anti-family, sexual, frankly, agenda. Something
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: else that I'm noticing as a Gen Zer that I
• 22:27
  Speaker 1: never saw growing up in the early 2000s, and again,
• 22:29
  Speaker 1: it just really seems to be with Gen Alpha children,
• 22:33
  Speaker 1: is little boys acting gay or effeminate. Here's an example.
• 22:51
  Speaker 1: If you're listening, these boys are dancing sort of sexually
• 22:56
  Speaker 1: gay undertones to it. It's not normal. Somebody taught them
• 23:01
  Speaker 1: to do that. Someone is encouraging that behavior. It's not organic, seven,
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: eight-year-old boy behavior at all. And I actually think what's
• 23:12
  Speaker 1: happening here is much sicker and darker than many of
• 23:16
  Speaker 1: us are willing to admit. There's a reason why many
• 23:19
  Speaker 1: LGBT activists also defend pedophiles and want them rebranded as
• 23:25
  Speaker 1: minor attracted persons. There's a reason many LGBT activists are
• 23:30
  Speaker 1: pedophiles themselves. This story is just from a few days ago.
• 23:33
  Speaker 1: 39-year-old Andrew Easton was convicted in Scotland after being caught
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: by cybercrime officers on an internet chat talking to someone
• 23:42
  Speaker 1: Easton believed to be a 13-year-old boy. Easton referred to
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: the boy as baby boy and was soliciting explicit photographs
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: from him. Here's where it gets interesting. Easton is also,
• 23:56
  Speaker 1: as it turns out, an LGBT activist who co-authored a
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: taxpayer-funded guide on coming out as transgender for children as
• 24:05
  Speaker 1: young as 13. These people are evil. And they're pushing
• 24:12
  Speaker 1: sex and gender politics on children themselves. For a reason.
• 24:17
  Speaker 1: And it ultimately comes down to a breakdown of the family.
• 24:20
  Speaker 1: No mom and dad, but dad and dad, or only mom,
• 24:24
  Speaker 1: or dad acts like mom and mom acts like dad.
• 24:27
  Speaker 1: And the children are ultimately raised by the state more
• 24:29
  Speaker 1: than their disordered parents. Somebody says, bring back God into school.
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: I totally agree with that. Prayer needs to be back
• 24:36
  Speaker 1: in the classroom. Or better yet, if you're at the
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: point where, you know, we can't have an education system
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: that we can trust, You homeschool your kids. You have
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: to do what's right by your kids. And I sincerely
• 24:49
  Speaker 1: believe that the weaker the family is, the more powerful
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: the state becomes. Because weak families are more susceptible to
• 24:59
  Speaker 1: influence campaigns, to the lies, to the mind control. They
• 25:02
  Speaker 1: want to weaken your intellect. And frankly, they want to
• 25:05
  Speaker 1: weaken your soul too. And again, this is why I
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: always say, if you want to avoid the censorship edicts
• 25:10
  Speaker 1: attempting to control you, the propaganda campaigns attempting to manipulate you,
• 25:14
  Speaker 1: the social media and social punishment controlling you, the breakdown
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: and disorder attempting to corrupt you. Just be a normal person.
• 25:27
  Speaker 1: It's the best defense. Have conversations at the dinner table
• 25:30
  Speaker 1: more often than you scroll through your phone. Cultivate a
• 25:34
  Speaker 1: real world community and immediate family around normal American Christian values.
• 25:38
  Speaker 1: It's the best thing that you can do. All right,
• 25:41
  Speaker 1: that's all that I have for today. As always, shout
• 25:43
  Speaker 1: out to my husband, Michael. He makes this show happen.
• 25:46
  Speaker 1: If you want to follow me on Instagram or X,
• 25:48
  Speaker 1: my user is avitaduffy underscore one. And my TikTok is avitaduffy.alfonso.
• 25:53
  Speaker 1: Make sure to like and follow if you are listening
• 25:56
  Speaker 1: on Apple or Spotify. I'm here live on Rumble at
• 25:58
  Speaker 1: 9 a.m. Eastern time, five days a week. I'll see
• 26:01
  Speaker 1: you all tomorrow.
• 26:02
  Speaker 2: The U.S.
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: Soccer Podcast.
• 26:04
  Speaker 3: I'm your host, Megan Klingenberg, and I am super stoked
• 26:07
  Speaker 3: to be joined by Daryl Dike.
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: Arguably, your most impressive quality cannot be measured.
• 26:13
  Speaker 3: You're a guy who is the definition of grit. Injuries
• 26:16
  Speaker 3: have ended plenty of careers, but instead you decided yours
• 26:19
  Speaker 3: would only be a chapter instead of the ending.
• 26:21
  Speaker 1: Welcome to the show, Daryl.
• 26:22
  Speaker 3: Thank you so much. That's a good intro right there.
• 26:24
  Speaker 2: That's good.
• 26:25
  Speaker 1: The U.S. Soccer Podcast. Follow and listen on your favorite platforms.