Latest / Wicked Radio with Bill Adams / 9-18: Daughter Taken. Will The DOJ Fight The State Of Massachusetts In Trans Case?

Transcript

9-18: Daughter Taken. Will The DOJ Fight The State Of Massachusetts In Trans Case? · Wicked Radio with Bill Adams

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: So my original title for this episode, this podcast, is
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: I wanted to talk about this was going to go
• 0:09
  Speaker 1: something like this. Did a Massachusetts, did the state of Massachusetts,
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: I should say, steal a family's daughter over a transgender issue?
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: So much has changed over the past couple of days
• 0:22
  Speaker 1: on this in a story that you're about to hear
• 0:24
  Speaker 1: about if you haven't already. I really think this is
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: going to be one of the defining issues, this particular story,
• 0:31
  Speaker 1: in the upcoming midterms. I really do. Not just in
• 0:33
  Speaker 1: that state, but nationally as well. Because so much has changed.
• 0:36
  Speaker 1: That's a fact now. That's established. Now, that the state
• 0:40
  Speaker 1: of Massachusetts basically abducted this daughter and drummed up a
• 0:44
  Speaker 1: bunch of fake abuse charges of this poor family. You
• 0:48
  Speaker 1: may have seen this clip already. That's established. Very quickly,
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: this is turned into, will the Department of Justice... the
• 0:57
  Speaker 1: federal Department of Justice, the big one, step in and
• 1:00
  Speaker 1: fight the state of Massachusetts to get this family's daughter back?
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: That's the real relevant question now because of what happened.
• 1:06
  Speaker 1: And I think it's going to happen. I really do.
• 1:10
  Speaker 1: There's a lot to this in the Kutzko family saga
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: that's now made national news and I think is only
• 1:17
  Speaker 1: about to grow, which is why we're talking about it.
• 1:18
  Speaker 1: But it's unbelievable. And sometimes I forget, we'll get into this,
• 1:23
  Speaker 1: but sometimes I forget how absolutely tyrannical and powerful the
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: state of Massachusetts can actually be. I mean, you see
• 1:30
  Speaker 1: me on here almost every single day with a Red
• 1:32
  Speaker 1: Sox hat or a pad shirt or something like this.
• 1:34
  Speaker 1: For God's sake, the name of the podcast is Wicked Radio.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: That's a reference to New England stuff. I'm out of there.
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: Most of my family is still there. But two weeks ago,
• 1:42
  Speaker 1: I was just in that state. And I was looking
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: around and just saying, the rest of the country doesn't
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: understand what's happening here. This is like a state population
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: of great people, mostly great people, Completely held captive. And
• 1:55
  Speaker 1: they're so used to this madness that slowly crept in
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: and taken over their state up there. They don't get it.
• 2:03
  Speaker 1: They don't get it. I've said this many times, you know,
• 2:05
  Speaker 1: half jokingly, but the number one question, my entire public
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: career in local radio in South Florida, and then on here, constantly,
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: the most popular question I've ever gotten from people, going, hey,
• 2:17
  Speaker 1: I see you're from Massachusetts. What is with that place?
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: Because the rest of the country looks at them, and
• 2:22
  Speaker 1: I tried to explain this to some of my relatives,
• 2:24
  Speaker 1: The rest of the country looks at them and they're like,
• 2:25
  Speaker 1: what is going on in that place? This is the
• 2:29
  Speaker 1: one that's going to get the rest of the country
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: involved in this, I think. Anyway, we'll get into it.
• 2:33
  Speaker 1: Thanks for being here. It's Friday. Wish we had a
• 2:35
  Speaker 1: lighter topic, but it's important. Thanks for finding Wicked Radio,
• 2:38
  Speaker 1: the live stream and replay on X and YouTube and
• 2:40
  Speaker 1: Facebook and all that good stuff. And the audio podcast
• 2:43
  Speaker 1: always available for you whenever you want on your favorite
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: podcast platforms. I upload that shortly after the live stream.
• 2:49
  Speaker 1: Let's get to the issue. This was. I think it
• 2:51
  Speaker 1: was about a week ago now. This is when I
• 2:53
  Speaker 1: first saw this. Like you, I probably had the initial
• 2:56
  Speaker 1: reaction like, what? All right. It caught my attention because
• 3:00
  Speaker 1: most of my feed, you know how your algorithm works,
• 3:02
  Speaker 1: like you like one thing and then you get a
• 3:03
  Speaker 1: million things like that. There's so many New England and
• 3:06
  Speaker 1: Northeast-based things because of my family heritage being there. Anything
• 3:10
  Speaker 1: that happens there kind of like makes it to my feed.
• 3:12
  Speaker 1: So I saw this couple out of Southboro, Massachusetts, Algonquin
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: School District. Important. Pleading. emotional plea to get their daughter back.
• 3:24
  Speaker 1: It's kind of even caught me by surprise, and I'm thinking,
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: what's going on with this one? And then the national story.
• 3:37
  Speaker 1: We reached out to DCF for comment, but they have
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: not yet responded. Last Friday, a judge temporarily blocked the
• 3:43
  Speaker 1: state from giving Sophie a high-dose testosterone, and the next
• 3:47
  Speaker 1: court date is October 29th. Hold on.
• 3:50
  Speaker 2: Whoa.
• 3:51
  Speaker 1: Okay, hold on. We've got some corner family begging for
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: their daughter back. Was she abducted? What's going on here?
• 3:57
  Speaker 1: And then the National Fox News legal reporter talking about
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: the state of Massachusetts blocked from continuing with their high-dose
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: testosterone treatments. And this is the one that got me
• 4:09
  Speaker 1: to go, oh, hold on a second. I think we've
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: got something completely different here. And then I looked into
• 4:13
  Speaker 1: the story, and shame on me, But I looked into
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: the story, and the first piece of information that came
• 4:19
  Speaker 1: out I saw was that she was taken, as we
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: now know, from the state of Massachusetts in December of 24.
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: So we're talking almost two years ago. My first initial
• 4:30
  Speaker 1: reaction from just being a dad, with daughters, by the way, was,
• 4:34
  Speaker 1: are you freaking kidding me? I don't care who it is.
• 4:39
  Speaker 1: I don't care if you're talking about aliens or the
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: state of Massachusetts or Massachusetts aliens or The federal government,
• 4:46
  Speaker 1: you take my daughter away, it's not going to go
• 4:49
  Speaker 1: this long. Listen, I'll fight anybody if you touch my family.
• 4:55
  Speaker 1: But shame on me. That was my initial reaction as
• 4:58
  Speaker 1: a sane person. You probably had the same reaction too,
• 5:00
  Speaker 1: as I described it. Sometimes I forget how tyrannical and
• 5:05
  Speaker 1: insane that state is. Sometimes I forget. It takes me
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: to go back there every once in a while for
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: family visits or events to understand how powerful they are.
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: So shame on me for having that initial thought of
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: this family not going to, you know, the ends of
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: the earth to get their daughter back. They're fighting a massive, tyrannical,
• 5:26
  Speaker 1: completely off-the-edge lunatic state. That's where they are right now.
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: That's what's happening. So shame on me for that initial thought.
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: But it's true. And then you get into the details
• 5:35
  Speaker 1: of the story. And I think this guy's name is
• 5:37
  Speaker 1: Rob Finnerty on Newsmax. He interviewed the couple, did a
• 5:40
  Speaker 1: good job, and the attorney, So we're going to play
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: a couple of pieces of his interview, which was just
• 5:45
  Speaker 1: the other night. So she was taken from a school day,
• 5:51
  Speaker 1: December of 24. There were charges involved in January of
• 5:58
  Speaker 1: 25 against the family. This is relevant to the story
• 6:01
  Speaker 1: in the timeline here, but let's have them describe it
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: a little more. Here's the first part of them describing.
• 6:06
  Speaker 1: What do you mean taken? What are you talking about, Bill?
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: A school day in the state, just like they abducted her.
• 6:11
  Speaker 1: Is that what you're talking about? Well, guys, apparently, yes,
• 6:14
  Speaker 1: that's exactly what we're talking about. Here's the mom at
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: first talking about getting that call. Can you imagine?
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: I say that.
• 6:26
  Speaker 3: Sophie went to school just the regular day, you know,
• 6:30
  Speaker 3: and then I know she was in school. And then
• 6:35
  Speaker 3: later on, somebody called me and they told me that
• 6:39
  Speaker 3: sophie doesn't want to go home and i said can
• 6:42
  Speaker 3: i talk to sophie and they didn't even let me
• 6:45
  Speaker 3: talk to sophie is she okay.
• 6:49
  Speaker 1: Okay first of all that's what we're talking about here
• 6:51
  Speaker 1: well what are you who first of all let me
• 6:54
  Speaker 1: talk to my daughter no no i'm sorry you can't
• 6:56
  Speaker 1: talk to your daughter no you can't do that first
• 6:58
  Speaker 1: of all that's where i go ballistic and so does
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: the mom here but can you just put yourself in
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: her shoes for a second And then you start to think,
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: what the hell are you talking, where's my daughter? What
• 7:10
  Speaker 1: do you mean? And she's 15, by the way, Sophie.
• 7:12
  Speaker 1: What do you mean you're not going to let me
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: talk to my daughter? That's the first thing. Now, in
• 7:15
  Speaker 1: my head, that makes me think that there were school
• 7:18
  Speaker 1: officials or DCF officials saying, you feel unsafe at home, right?
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: You don't want to talk to, you don't, kind of
• 7:26
  Speaker 1: like egging her on. Now, I don't know if that
• 7:28
  Speaker 1: actually happened, but when I have somebody who won't let
• 7:30
  Speaker 1: me speak to my daughter, that's the first thing that
• 7:32
  Speaker 1: runs through my head. Now, In this entire story, there
• 7:38
  Speaker 1: were these charges that popped up. What do you mean, charges?
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: I know it's a complicated date to remember, but go
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: back to this for a second, because this is really
• 7:46
  Speaker 1: relevant to this story, which is why I think the
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: whole country is going to hear about this. Taken at
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: that school day, December of 24, removed, these charges alleged
• 7:56
  Speaker 1: against this family, specifically the dad, Joe Kutzko, January of 25,
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: What do you mean? And he goes on to explain
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: what these charges are. First, the attorney and then him.
• 8:08
  Speaker 4: And they have not been allowed to see their daughter
• 8:10
  Speaker 4: or make basic decisions since that time during which she's
• 8:14
  Speaker 4: treated as a boy, placed with boys, and they want
• 8:16
  Speaker 4: to transition her medically to male.
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: And they're actively trying to transition her. Joseph, how do
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: you react to that and how do you respond to
• 8:23
  Speaker 1: that from the governor of your state?
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: Well, first of all, she's trying to deflect and make
• 8:33
  Speaker 2: the topic about us, and it's not about us. It's
• 8:38
  Speaker 2: about what they're doing to our daughter.
• 8:41
  Speaker 1: Has your son been able to? So that was the
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: first question. So where is she now? And that's what
• 8:46
  Speaker 1: the attorney answered. Well, she's in Department of Children and
• 8:49
  Speaker 1: Family Services, DCF Care, housed with boys, by the way,
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: housed with boys. and they're actively trying to complete her
• 8:57
  Speaker 1: high-dose testosterone treatment. A judge has temporarily blocked that, but
• 9:01
  Speaker 1: later on next month is apparently the next hearing to
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: go on with that. But it gets down to these charges.
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: What charges are you talking about? Charges. A lot of
• 9:09
  Speaker 1: people have said, oh, well, it was abusive dad, right?
• 9:11
  Speaker 1: The state couldn't lie about that. They've got charges here. Oh,
• 9:14
  Speaker 1: let's go in about these charges, because the charges against
• 9:18
  Speaker 1: this dad about abuse allegations, this came from the governor herself. Well,
• 9:22
  Speaker 1: just the day before yesterday, who's at a press conference,
• 9:26
  Speaker 1: and thankfully, the press up there is asking her questions
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: about this. A little low audio to hear, but here's what.
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: Maura Healey, the governor of Massachusetts, who, by the way,
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: has a big election coming up, we'll get to that,
• 9:36
  Speaker 1: says about these charges, no, no, this girl wasn't taken
• 9:40
  Speaker 1: from her family. This is all relating to charges against
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: the family. All right, let's get into those.
• 9:45
  Speaker 5: Let me be clear about the facts in that matter.
• 9:49
  Speaker 5: First of all, DCF did not remove the child from,
• 9:54
  Speaker 5: because of a health issue or a gender-affirming care issue.
• 9:59
  Speaker 5: DCF removed the child after there were criminal charges filed
• 10:05
  Speaker 5: against the parents, including the father.
• 10:10
  Speaker 1: Oh, no. Sorry, that's wrong. Well, Governor Maura Healey is
• 10:14
  Speaker 1: twisting the facts there because, as we know, and this
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: is stated, you can look it up anywhere, she was removed.
• 10:19
  Speaker 1: We know this. state records, I guess, up there, removed
• 10:23
  Speaker 1: from that family, taken at school, December of 24. These
• 10:27
  Speaker 1: charges that Governor is referring to, January of 25, officially charged,
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: not convicted anything. So, no, that's not correct. She was
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: taken from the family home because of alleged not letting
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: her daughter transition. That's why she was taken from that family.
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: I mean, that's clear as day. It's in black and white.
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: That's what's happening here. Okay.
• 10:54
  Speaker 3: All right.
• 10:54
  Speaker 1: Very interesting. So now, and this goes to that governor's
• 10:58
  Speaker 1: story here, where she's getting blasted for twisting the facts
• 11:01
  Speaker 1: in the case and the timeline and the facts. That
• 11:04
  Speaker 1: kid was not taken from that family because of any
• 11:06
  Speaker 1: abuse charges. Those charges didn't even surface until after she
• 11:09
  Speaker 1: was already taken out of their lives and put in
• 11:13
  Speaker 1: DCF care with boys for the testosterone treatments. OK, you
• 11:17
  Speaker 1: know where I'm going here. So now we've got this.
• 11:21
  Speaker 1: And this is where, unfortunately, politics rear their ugly head again.
• 11:25
  Speaker 1: But it's necessary in this case. So that governor, Maura Healey,
• 11:30
  Speaker 1: big election coming up. She's probably going to win re-election.
• 11:34
  Speaker 1: We're running against a guy named Mike Minogue. Very smartly,
• 11:38
  Speaker 1: Mike has jumped all over this. But in my view,
• 11:40
  Speaker 1: not enough. This is what he says. We need to
• 11:43
  Speaker 1: know the truth in the Kutzko case and respect the
• 11:45
  Speaker 1: role of parents in raising their children. DCF removing a
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: child from their parents' home should concern every parent. Good
• 11:51
  Speaker 1: thing he made a statement. Here's what I would suggest
• 11:54
  Speaker 1: to Mike Minogue, not that he cares about anything I
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: have to say, not even a resident of his state.
• 12:00
  Speaker 1: This should be, you should stand and do campaign things
• 12:04
  Speaker 1: on every single driveway in that municipality. You should make
• 12:08
  Speaker 1: this your number one campaign topic. You should make this
• 12:11
  Speaker 1: your talking point. every single day and do not just
• 12:15
  Speaker 1: local Massachusetts interviews. You should do federal interviews, national interviews
• 12:19
  Speaker 1: on every major news network you can about this particular
• 12:23
  Speaker 1: Kutzko family case. And you may be thinking, and Massachusetts residents,
• 12:27
  Speaker 1: you guys are thinking, no, we have other big, we
• 12:29
  Speaker 1: can't afford to live here. We can't afford gas, rent.
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: They're raising taxes again. We had an audit that the
• 12:35
  Speaker 1: state refuses to allow. They're absolute crooks. I get all that.
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: And that's true. Number one issue is affordability because trust me,
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: I know I was just there and I have family there.
• 12:43
  Speaker 1: Nobody can afford that state anymore unless you're the 1%.
• 12:47
  Speaker 1: So that you'd think would be the number one issue.
• 12:49
  Speaker 3: Nope.
• 12:50
  Speaker 1: This should be their number one issue because it goes
• 12:52
  Speaker 1: to everything. Because what kind of a state government would
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: raise your taxes like that and make you made it unaffordable?
• 12:59
  Speaker 1: And why it's one of the top three states where
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: people are leaving and the tax base is going through
• 13:04
  Speaker 1: the roof to make up for that loss. Well, here's
• 13:06
  Speaker 1: your answer. The kind of state that would steal your daughter.
• 13:09
  Speaker 1: That's the kind of state that would. That's why this
• 13:11
  Speaker 1: goes to everything. This is the number one issue that
• 13:14
  Speaker 1: that guy should run against on her because she's lying
• 13:17
  Speaker 1: about she got caught red handed, lying about the facts,
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: lying about the timeline and fully in charge of a
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: state government and a DCF that would take a kid
• 13:25
  Speaker 1: from a family because she happened to claim one day
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: that she was trans and they drummed up some phony
• 13:31
  Speaker 1: charges against this family. That's what this guy should run on.
• 13:35
  Speaker 1: That's what he should. Willie? I don't know. Probably doesn't
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: have a chance in hell of winning in that state anyway.
• 13:39
  Speaker 1: It's so rigged. But anyway, that's where we are there.
• 13:42
  Speaker 1: But it may not come to that because we go
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: to our original question and the thing I opened up
• 13:46
  Speaker 1: with and it's a question we all need to ponder.
• 13:49
  Speaker 1: Because if you haven't heard about this Kutzko case in
• 13:51
  Speaker 1: Massachusetts yet, you're about to. I think, according to what
• 13:55
  Speaker 1: was posted last night, I think this is going to
• 13:59
  Speaker 1: be a national issue now because the Department of Justice,
• 14:02
  Speaker 1: the big one, the Federal Department of Justice, think is
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: about to step in and take care of this case
• 14:08
  Speaker 1: for them this comes out an official post from the u.s
• 14:11
  Speaker 1: department of justice and you know what they're referring to
• 14:15
  Speaker 1: and you know who they're referring to not by name
• 14:19
  Speaker 1: but this is exactly why they posted this just last
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: night and in this particular way this is from the u.s
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: department of justice i don't like reading posts word for
• 14:28
  Speaker 1: word in this case i think it's important parents should
• 14:31
  Speaker 1: never be kept in the dark about transgender related medical
• 14:33
  Speaker 1: decisions involving their children You think they're looking at you,
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: Maura Healy? When the state tries to step in between
• 14:40
  Speaker 1: parents and their children, parents deserve their day in court
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: to challenge that attempt to undermine their basic parental rights.
• 14:46
  Speaker 1: This week, the Department of Justice filed a merit stage
• 14:49
  Speaker 1: amicus brief in the Supreme Court, arguing that parents have
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: standing to sue when the state tries to circumvent their
• 14:54
  Speaker 1: control over medical services a child may access. Parenting belongs
• 14:59
  Speaker 1: to parents, not the state. You know exactly what they're
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: talking about. This case, that state, and that governor. The
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: Department of Justice is about to take care of this
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: thing for them. I still think that Mike Minogue guy
• 15:11
  Speaker 1: should run on this one issue because it relates to
• 15:14
  Speaker 1: all of the lunacy in that completely state which has
• 15:17
  Speaker 1: captured those poor people in that state, honest to God.
• 15:20
  Speaker 1: You may not feel sorry for them. Well, they kept
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: voting them in. Yeah, but really, honestly, the way the
• 15:27
  Speaker 1: electoral lines are drawn in that state, you really don't
• 15:29
  Speaker 1: have a chance. Here's another reason why I think, and
• 15:32
  Speaker 1: our answer to the question is, yeah, I think the
• 15:34
  Speaker 1: state's going to step in. Let's go back to the
• 15:36
  Speaker 1: State of the Union address. Remember President Trump saying this,
• 15:40
  Speaker 1: where he talked about this very same issue, the very
• 15:42
  Speaker 1: same one? So you know he's got the support, or
• 15:45
  Speaker 1: the Department of Justice has the support of President Trump
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: in this. Remember he called on all the Democrats to
• 15:50
  Speaker 1: let parents be parents and don't ever take kids over
• 15:52
  Speaker 1: a transgender issue and steal them from their homes, and
• 15:55
  Speaker 1: they wouldn't clap for it or stand for it? Remember
• 15:57
  Speaker 1: this one?
• 15:57
  Speaker 2: We can all agree no state can be allowed to
• 16:00
  Speaker 2: rip children from their parents' arms and transition them to
• 16:04
  Speaker 2: a new gender against.
• 16:05
  Speaker 1: The parents' will.
• 16:06
  Speaker 2: Who would believe that we've been talking about this? We
• 16:09
  Speaker 2: must ban it, and we must ban it immediately. Thank you. Look,
• 16:15
  Speaker 2: nobody stands up. These people are crazy. I'm telling you.
• 16:19
  Speaker 1: They're crazy. That's where we are. These people are crazy.
• 16:26
  Speaker 1: That was one of the takeaways. Every one of those
• 16:28
  Speaker 1: State of the Union addresses has like a big takeaway.
• 16:31
  Speaker 1: I think that was the one from that one, the
• 16:32
  Speaker 1: most recent one. These people are crazy. They wouldn't stand
• 16:36
  Speaker 1: up for protecting parental rights. And that's what this issue is.
• 16:39
  Speaker 1: So here's our question. Is the federal government going to
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: step in and fight the state of Massachusetts over the
• 16:45
  Speaker 1: Sophie Kutzko case, where they state, as we now know,
• 16:49
  Speaker 1: took her from that family, and the governor is intentionally
• 16:55
  Speaker 1: misaligning the facts of the case about charges against the
• 16:58
  Speaker 1: family and the timeline, which none of that stuff adds up.
• 17:00
  Speaker 1: Here's your answer. Yeah, they are. I'm pretty sure they are.
• 17:03
  Speaker 1: So this is going to be a massive federal case.
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: That's my prediction on this. I think that guy running
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: against Maura Healey in Massachusetts should run on this issue
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: alone because it speaks to the complete insanity who's running
• 17:16
  Speaker 1: that state. Honestly.
• 17:18
  Speaker 2: Willie?
• 17:18
  Speaker 1: I have no idea. But now you've got a national
• 17:21
  Speaker 1: issue over this because it speaks to everything. And they'd
• 17:24
  Speaker 1: be smart. Honestly, the Republican team, the red team over there,
• 17:28
  Speaker 1: they should run on this too. They really should. It
• 17:30
  Speaker 1: speaks to... It's an encapsulating thing. Well, we can't afford anything.
• 17:34
  Speaker 1: Gas is $ 4. 30 a gallon. Yeah, I get it. Who's in...
• 17:37
  Speaker 1: But this speaks to the insanity you're running against. You
• 17:40
  Speaker 1: see what I'm saying? Will they? I don't know, but
• 17:43
  Speaker 1: I think we have a localized Massachusetts family custody case
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: that's now gone federal. Judging by that statement from the
• 17:52
  Speaker 1: Department of Justice, they're already involved. We'll see what happens
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: with it. I don't know. All right, hopefully it's a lighter,
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: happier weekend for you. Enjoy college football. Enjoy the NFL.
• 18:01
  Speaker 1: Enjoy your entertainment. Enjoy your family. It's important, more important
• 18:05
  Speaker 1: than ever these days. Over the weekend, be safe. Make
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: it a wicked awesome Friday and weekend, and I'll talk
• 18:10
  Speaker 1: to you on Monday. But remember, audio podcasts, wherever you
• 18:14
  Speaker 1: like to get those. Thank you so much for the
• 18:16
  Speaker 1: downloads and shares. That's available for you on your favorite
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: podcast platforms. And replay, ex-YouTube, Facebook, live streaming, Monday through
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: Friday on those same networks, 8 a.m. Eastern time, every day, almost,
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: except the weekends. I take it off, too. I'll talk
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: to you later.