Latest / Honey Badger Radio / What the D.O.G.E. Doin'? | HBR News 489

Transcript

What the D.O.G.E. Doin'? | HBR News 489 · Honey Badger Radio

• 0:04
  Speaker 1: This is HBr News number four eighty nine. What the
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: Doge doing when we discuss the news of the week
• 0:11
  Speaker 1: and give it the Badger treatment. Hello everybody, and welcome
• 0:19
  Speaker 1: to Honey Badger Radio. Because I hope you guys are
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: doing well this weekend, that you're laughing at all of
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: the absurdity so that you are not consumed by it.
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: I am your host, Brian. I am joined by, as always,
• 0:29
  Speaker 1: my lovely co hosts, Hannah Wallen and doctor Rannrakam. This
• 0:34
  Speaker 1: week's HBr News, we're going to be discussing the impact
• 0:38
  Speaker 1: of the Department of Government Efficiency also known as Doge
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: and sanity seems to be returning to our culture in
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: a couple of different ways. And more so, stick around,
• 0:49
  Speaker 1: it's going to be a good time and be sure
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: to join us afterwards for the Patron Only show. And
• 0:58
  Speaker 1: So I have this up here because I saw it
• 1:01
  Speaker 1: thought it was interesting. As you guys might know, there
• 1:04
  Speaker 1: are multiple different flavors of feminism, often used to avoid accountability,
• 1:12
  Speaker 1: which is the one thing that these ideologies are extremely
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: good at doing, or at least this is their primary skill,
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: and one of those is calling a certain brand of
• 1:21
  Speaker 1: feminism choice feminism which is this ridiculous notion that women
• 1:26
  Speaker 1: making decisions is actually feminism. So we're gonna talk a
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: little bit about this in the patreon. I don't want
• 1:33
  Speaker 1: to give anything away, but just suffice it to say
• 1:37
  Speaker 1: that it's not feminist if feminists don't like it, and
• 1:41
  Speaker 1: you're a woman making a decision. So if you want
• 1:44
  Speaker 1: to join us for that, you have to become a
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: Badger yourself by going to feed the Badger dot com
• 1:48
  Speaker 1: and setting up a monthly subscription feed Thebadger dot com
• 1:51
  Speaker 1: forceas subscribe. Five bucks a month will get you access
• 1:54
  Speaker 1: to our discord server where you'll be able to watch
• 1:58
  Speaker 1: all of the additional content, and that includes all of
• 2:01
  Speaker 1: our patron shows and videos that Alison makes before they
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: go you know, up, and there's also lots of community stuff,
• 2:11
  Speaker 1: activities and that kind of thing. So if that interests you,
• 2:15
  Speaker 1: please consider becoming a member by going to feed the
• 2:18
  Speaker 1: Badger dot com for slash subscribe. And if you don't
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: want to wake up one morning to find that we've
• 2:21
  Speaker 1: been permanently banned from the Internet, then look for our
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: archived archives content at badgerfeed dot com or honey Badger
• 2:31
  Speaker 1: Radio dot com and with all that said, let us
• 2:36
  Speaker 1: get into today's stories because this could be a long
• 2:39
  Speaker 1: show and I don't want to, I mean, just because
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: there's so much to cover. So okay, first, what the
• 2:47
  Speaker 1: DOGE doing. Here's a bullet point summary, so you guys
• 2:52
  Speaker 1: probably don't already know. The DOGE stands for the Department
• 2:55
  Speaker 1: of Government Efficiency that was put together by Donald Trump
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: and in partnership with Elon Musk, who was appointed to
• 3:05
  Speaker 1: help realize this vision. And it is essentially going through
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: all of the federal government waste and access and even
• 3:16
  Speaker 1: you know, uh, some corruption and potentially like you know,
• 3:19
  Speaker 1: potential theft and such. So, yes, it's doing the.
• 3:26
  Speaker 2: But but we're doing it with an anglicized meme. In yes,
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: I mean, doge is even better than it feels good
• 3:35
  Speaker 2: to say. But doge feels good to type, you know.
• 3:38
  Speaker 1: It does. And I know what I what I love
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: is hearing it. What I love is hearing like people
• 3:45
  Speaker 1: in like mainstream media, people in the in you know,
• 3:49
  Speaker 1: like Trump saying doge is amazing to me, Like it's amazing,
• 3:54
  Speaker 1: you know. So, but it's not just a meme. It's
• 3:58
  Speaker 1: not just areas, which you know is kind of like
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: what why this is so entertaining, but it's actually impactful,
• 4:06
  Speaker 1: it's actually doing stuff, and anybody, I mean, you would
• 4:10
  Speaker 1: think before I even read all of the lists. Okay,
• 4:14
  Speaker 1: let me just start by saying, who the hell is
• 4:17
  Speaker 1: against eliminating government waste? Like, who has an argument for
• 4:23
  Speaker 1: that other than people who stand to benefit from your
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: taxpayer dollars vanishing into a hole somewhere or just going
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: to the random pocket of some bureaucrat or going towards
• 4:35
  Speaker 1: some ridiculous cause in some foreign country.
• 4:37
  Speaker 2: Right, is there anyone in the world who trusts the
• 4:41
  Speaker 2: US government? And I mean anywhere in the world. You
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: can ask do you trust your own government? And most
• 4:48
  Speaker 2: people will be like soft no, But you asked them
• 4:53
  Speaker 2: do you trust the US government? And they say, aha, no,
• 4:56
  Speaker 2: oh yeah, yeah, no, the US government is the worst
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: government in the world. They've fucked up all our lives forever.
• 5:02
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 5:02
  Speaker 2: But once someone comes along to actually reduce the extent
• 5:09
  Speaker 2: of the power of the US government and somehow some
• 5:13
  Speaker 2: people in the world will will re unscreech all day
• 5:18
  Speaker 2: every day about what's happening.
• 5:20
  Speaker 1: Autistic screeching, yes, or narcissistic solipsistic screeching. So what the
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: doge doing Here's a bullet point summary of the actions
• 5:30
  Speaker 1: taken by the Department of Government Efficiency DOGE since its
• 5:34
  Speaker 1: installation by the President access to federal payment systems. DOGE
• 5:39
  Speaker 1: has gained access to the Treasury's Department payment systems, which
• 5:42
  Speaker 1: handle trillions of dollars in transactions annually. However, due to
• 5:47
  Speaker 1: legal challenges, there was an agreement to temporarily restrict doge's
• 5:50
  Speaker 1: access to these systems as of February fifth. Agency restructuring
• 5:57
  Speaker 1: or elimination, so all of the agencies that were restructured
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: or eliminated. US Agency for International Development USAID. DOGE, under
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk's leadership, has targeted USAID for closure, leading to
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: operational disruptions, including website downtime and the cessation of USAID's
• 6:15
  Speaker 1: X account. This has caused significant upheaval, with staff being
• 6:18
  Speaker 1: put on administrative leave and employees being recalled from overseas.
• 6:22
  Speaker 1: As you can see, the image here shows them actually
• 6:25
  Speaker 1: taking the USAID letters down like they've closed it down.
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: Department of Education, there have been explorations in a drastic cuts,
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: including the potential closure of the entire department. As of
• 6:38
  Speaker 1: when I wrote this, so like I think like we're
• 6:41
  Speaker 1: at the point now where it's either happened or it's
• 6:44
  Speaker 1: in the process of happening. The shutting down of the
• 6:47
  Speaker 1: Department of Education Consumer Financial Protection Bureau MUSK propose eliminating
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: this bureau, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation FDIC. There were
• 6:59
  Speaker 1: inc worries about abolishing this corporation. Technology and Software Modernization.
• 7:05
  Speaker 1: An executive order was signed to modernize federal technology and
• 7:08
  Speaker 1: software to enhance government efficiency and productivity. This included rebranding
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: the US Digital Service when the White House as within
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: the White House, I'm sorry as the United States DOGE
• 7:20
  Speaker 1: Service much service, very executive legal and privacy concerns. Doge's
• 7:29
  Speaker 1: access to personal and private data has raised legal concerns,
• 7:33
  Speaker 1: leading to lawsuits regarding violations of federal privacy laws, particularly
• 7:37
  Speaker 1: with respect to the Treasury's payment system. They're freaking out
• 7:40
  Speaker 1: about this. As it turns out, the USAID was brought
• 7:44
  Speaker 1: in as an executive order. This is important to point
• 7:48
  Speaker 1: out it was put in place as a product of
• 7:51
  Speaker 1: an executive order by John F. Kennedy. So anything that's
• 7:54
  Speaker 1: been put in place via executive order can also be
• 7:57
  Speaker 1: removed via executive order. So this is not like unlawful.
• 8:02
  Speaker 1: Despite I think there's like certain judges that are making
• 8:04
  Speaker 1: a stink about it. Uh, there have been legal challenges
• 8:07
  Speaker 1: regarding the authority of Jog's Like I said, public and
• 8:12
  Speaker 1: political reaction to this. The actions have sparked protests and
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: legal actions. As you might have already seen the Maxine
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: Waters clip with the guy at the front door, which
• 8:22
  Speaker 1: I could find if you guys want to see it.
• 8:24
  Speaker 1: It's pretty funny.
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: It really is like watching a five year old Yeah yeah,
• 8:31
  Speaker 2: it's hilarious.
• 8:33
  Speaker 3: Try five year old largemouth bass.
• 8:35
  Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, yeah, five year oldsmouth bass. With criticism from
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: Democrats and government watchdog groups over transparency and the legality
• 8:44
  Speaker 1: of his operations, public polls show support for the cost
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: cutting measures. It was like seventy something percent of people
• 8:51
  Speaker 1: are like yes please, so no, like it was like
• 8:54
  Speaker 1: seventy I want to say, the high seventy percentile of
• 8:58
  Speaker 1: American citizens poll agree that this is good. You can't
• 9:02
  Speaker 1: get that ratio of people to agree on anything, so
• 9:07
  Speaker 1: that is kind of amazing. Dogs employed aggressive strategies, including
• 9:12
  Speaker 1: ultimatums to federal workers to resign or face dismissal, and
• 9:16
  Speaker 1: has moved into government offices like the Federal Personnel Office
• 9:20
  Speaker 1: next to the White House. So another thing that I
• 9:23
  Speaker 1: thought was really interesting about this is that a lot
• 9:27
  Speaker 1: of the people who are working on this are young men.
• 9:29
  Speaker 1: And that's why I wanted to bring this up. A
• 9:31
  Speaker 1: lot of young men, like big balls who have been
• 9:35
  Speaker 1: a part of this solution. So in the same way
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: that in the last election, a lot of men finally said,
• 9:42
  Speaker 1: you know what, we've had enough of this bullshit. We're
• 9:44
  Speaker 1: not living under this, you know, this matriarchal system that's
• 9:49
  Speaker 1: been set up where it's all about the fields and
• 9:52
  Speaker 1: all that, because it's destroying our country. We're gonna step up.
• 9:55
  Speaker 1: We're gonna do something. And so they voted, and now
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: they're actually like participating. Remember what I said, But before,
• 10:00
  Speaker 1: when the election happened, I said, okay, this is fine,
• 10:05
  Speaker 1: but now we have to actually see people rolling up
• 10:07
  Speaker 1: their sleeves and getting to work. And it looks like
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: that's what's happening. And a lot of these are like
• 10:12
  Speaker 1: zoomer men that are just like, we're going, let's let's
• 10:15
  Speaker 1: do this. And the often very skilled with computers and
• 10:17
  Speaker 1: they know what needs to be done. So that is
• 10:22
  Speaker 1: I just did it really quick because it's a lot,
• 10:25
  Speaker 1: but that is essentially everything that Doge has done. And
• 10:28
  Speaker 1: I will also say that I have it on pretty
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: good authority because I speak to some veterans that you know,
• 10:37
  Speaker 1: they email me or they contact me, and they say
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: that there are big things changing in the government as well.
• 10:44
  Speaker 1: So you know, I just wanted to say that this
• 10:48
  Speaker 1: is exactly what was promised, This is what is being
• 10:50
  Speaker 1: delivered on and I give you guys the floor.
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: This is autism fighting back against narcissism. I have to say,
• 11:00
  Speaker 2: if we really are going to reduce these things to
• 11:03
  Speaker 2: these things like those memes that we exchanged earlier. In
• 11:08
  Speaker 2: this exchange, this is you know, narcissism has run rampant
• 11:14
  Speaker 2: through our society in the last fifty years, possibly undered,
• 11:19
  Speaker 2: and we're finally seeing the artists fight back. And if
• 11:24
  Speaker 2: there's anyone out here who's been trying to warn everyone
• 11:28
  Speaker 2: that demonizing artists is not the way to go, you
• 11:32
  Speaker 2: ought to be demonizing the narcissists and sort of praising
• 11:36
  Speaker 2: the artists. I mean, this has been a point of
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: contention among certain creators for some time now, and I'd
• 11:48
  Speaker 2: just like to say that the reason the USA is
• 11:53
  Speaker 2: being made great again, it's because of the artists. So
• 11:58
  Speaker 2: everyone out there who attributed everything bad to autism really ought.
• 12:07
  Speaker 4: To be hanging that cancer his head in shame right now.
• 12:16
  Speaker 4: And I can leave it there.
• 12:18
  Speaker 3: I think, yeah, you don't. You don't want to piss
• 12:25
  Speaker 3: autistic people off. We we get we're bulldogs when when
• 12:30
  Speaker 3: we get pissed off, And it's probably the most functional
• 12:35
  Speaker 3: thing that we can do is turn that into all right,
• 12:40
  Speaker 3: what don't I like about this situation and what can
• 12:44
  Speaker 3: I do to fix it? Especially the high functioning population,
• 12:49
  Speaker 3: which is a large population among people with autism. I'm
• 12:54
  Speaker 3: I'm happy about a lot of what's happening here. I'm
• 12:56
  Speaker 3: especially happy, well, I'm especially happy about everything, but especially,
• 13:05
  Speaker 3: I guess, out of out of all the things, the
• 13:08
  Speaker 3: fact that young men are actually recognizing that that they
• 13:14
  Speaker 3: have a right, a reason, and a responsibility to step
• 13:17
  Speaker 3: up and tell women no on the safety net addiction
• 13:21
  Speaker 3: that has been draining men for generations now, so they're
• 13:26
  Speaker 3: going to be okay, right that those generations coming after
• 13:31
  Speaker 3: them are going to be in much less financial duress
• 13:35
  Speaker 3: because of this. They're going to actually have the situation
• 13:39
  Speaker 3: they need to be able to get their family started
• 13:41
  Speaker 3: and live their lives and you know, have their circumstances
• 13:46
  Speaker 3: actually be good for their homes. And in addition to that,
• 13:52
  Speaker 3: the cancerous Department of Education is being eliminated. I hope
• 13:59
  Speaker 3: they actually go through. The next thing that needs to
• 14:02
  Speaker 3: happen is a high pressure pressure campaign, meaning everyone in
• 14:08
  Speaker 3: our audience, everyone in the men's rights movement at large,
• 14:12
  Speaker 3: not just our audience, but our audience is the one
• 14:16
  Speaker 3: it's going to hear. Us really needs to start writing
• 14:19
  Speaker 3: to If you live in a state in the United States,
• 14:23
  Speaker 3: and you can write to your senators and your congressmen
• 14:28
  Speaker 3: and maybe the other congressman from your state, you.
• 14:32
  Speaker 4: Know, do it.
• 14:33
  Speaker 3: If you live outside the United States, you can still
• 14:37
  Speaker 3: write letters.
• 14:39
  Speaker 1: You just have to.
• 14:39
  Speaker 3: You just have to probably mail them because it doesn't
• 14:42
  Speaker 3: give you the option to go through the system to
• 14:46
  Speaker 3: send them. But the Title nine legislation that just keeps
• 14:53
  Speaker 3: being morphed into newer and stranger and more dysfunctional policy
• 15:02
  Speaker 3: just needs to be repealed. We already have anti discrimination laws.
• 15:07
  Speaker 3: We don't need a separate, specific anti discrimination law for
• 15:13
  Speaker 3: university and the only thing that it has ever done
• 15:16
  Speaker 3: has been used to discriminate against men. So I think
• 15:23
  Speaker 3: one of the next targets needs to be that law.
• 15:25
  Speaker 3: Because even without a federal Department of Education, state departments
• 15:31
  Speaker 3: of education, which we'll have to you know, take up
• 15:35
  Speaker 3: the mantle of dealing with what's the policy in their state,
• 15:40
  Speaker 3: which is good that they're going to be doing that,
• 15:44
  Speaker 3: they would be subject to Title nine. And Title nine
• 15:48
  Speaker 3: is a train wreck. So you need to write to
• 15:52
  Speaker 3: your politicians in your area and let them know Title
• 15:57
  Speaker 3: nine needs to be gone in that it needs to
• 16:00
  Speaker 3: be replaced. That that simply says that the constitutional prohibitions
• 16:08
  Speaker 3: against discrimination on the basis of race and sex and
• 16:12
  Speaker 3: all that apply to universities, especially if they're still getting
• 16:18
  Speaker 3: federal funding. That's that's good enough. It doesn't have to
• 16:22
  Speaker 3: be anything else. It doesn't have to specify sports and
• 16:27
  Speaker 3: uh make universities into a court court system and determine
• 16:31
  Speaker 3: that they're going to be handling something that the real
• 16:33
  Speaker 3: court system should be handling and all that. So, uh,
• 16:37
  Speaker 3: this is this is good. I hope to see more
• 16:39
  Speaker 3: of this. Meanwhile, because of this happening, this this uh
• 16:47
  Speaker 3: going through the budget and everything, the site us A
• 16:51
  Speaker 3: Spending dot gov has become you know, more publicly available
• 16:56
  Speaker 3: and uh it's become more public knowledge that it's there
• 17:00
  Speaker 3: and everything, and I've been digging through it, and so
• 17:04
  Speaker 3: we are talking about the shit show of funding that
• 17:08
  Speaker 3: feminism has gotten on HBr talk. We talked about some
• 17:12
  Speaker 3: of it last week, and we're going to talk about
• 17:15
  Speaker 3: some more of it this week, because there's quite a bit.
• 17:19
  Speaker 3: There's a lot, and that's not even like the broader
• 17:23
  Speaker 3: search of just women, which you can do and find
• 17:27
  Speaker 3: anything that mentions women, but definitely you've got to check
• 17:34
  Speaker 3: us out and see some of the crazy feminist initiatives
• 17:38
  Speaker 3: that are being funded by the US federal government right now.
• 17:44
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I do have a clip for of because I
• 17:49
  Speaker 1: wanted to go into a little bit more detail on
• 17:51
  Speaker 1: some of these other institutions. So we already know about
• 17:55
  Speaker 1: USAID because it's been talked about all week, and obviously
• 18:00
  Speaker 1: USAID is essentially the CIA SYOP Global Syop Operation Manifest
• 18:07
  Speaker 1: and they have all of the listing or at least
• 18:09
  Speaker 1: like and that's probably just one of other organizations, like
• 18:13
  Speaker 1: for example, USAID was funding the BBC, and I wouldn't
• 18:17
  Speaker 1: be surprised. And I think this is an important thing
• 18:19
  Speaker 1: to point out that what we are finding out is
• 18:22
  Speaker 1: likely just a piece of the larger picture, and that
• 18:27
  Speaker 1: not only are there other areas where our government, our
• 18:30
  Speaker 1: federal government, and even our state governments are participating in
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: similar bs. But I wouldn't be surprised if other countries
• 18:38
  Speaker 1: also have this problem. But we just happen to be
• 18:41
  Speaker 1: focused on the US right now because we're the one
• 18:43
  Speaker 1: that actually wanted to do something about it. So, you know,
• 18:47
  Speaker 1: like I wouldn't be surprised if the Canadian government has
• 18:51
  Speaker 1: a lot of you know, expensive skeletons in its closet,
• 18:54
  Speaker 1: the British government, the European Union, I wouldn't be surprised.
• 18:57
  Speaker 1: And I think that we should what is happening here
• 19:02
  Speaker 1: for people who are not United States citizens, it was
• 19:05
  Speaker 1: what it should do is raise your hackles about your
• 19:08
  Speaker 1: own government to find out how deep the rabbit hole goes,
• 19:10
  Speaker 1: because I guarantee you that there is a large network
• 19:15
  Speaker 1: of deep state operations. The US might be the biggest one,
• 19:19
  Speaker 1: but it's not the only one. So I just want
• 19:22
  Speaker 1: to put that out there right off the bat, and
• 19:24
  Speaker 1: USAID is probably not the only like, let's say, apparatus
• 19:29
  Speaker 1: through which these things are done in the States. There's
• 19:32
  Speaker 1: probably a number of other ones.
• 19:34
  Speaker 3: No In fact, when we were looking into feminist stuff,
• 19:37
  Speaker 3: we found like Justice Department spending, DoD TO spending, is
• 19:43
  Speaker 3: health and Human services, Like it's not just USAID.
• 19:48
  Speaker 1: Yeah, right for sure. So but I just want to
• 19:52
  Speaker 1: put that out there so we already know what USAID
• 19:54
  Speaker 1: is then that we don't know about the Department of Education,
• 19:57
  Speaker 1: which is fucking amazing. Now remember, just in case there
• 20:01
  Speaker 1: are brain dead people in our in our audience, the
• 20:04
  Speaker 1: removing like them shutting down the Federal Department of Education,
• 20:07
  Speaker 1: is not them shutting down education itself. It's it's just
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: the top down, you know, way that they do things.
• 20:15
  Speaker 1: And the truth of the matter is our education system
• 20:19
  Speaker 1: is trash and a lot of it has to do
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: with the Federal Department of Education, but at the state
• 20:25
  Speaker 1: level there needs to be changes as well. I mean,
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: our kids are just not being served, like they're very
• 20:32
  Speaker 1: poorly educated. Their reading levels are in the toilet, their
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: mathematics abilities are in the toilet. And I watched that unfold,
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: you know, in person, in real time. I saw it
• 20:40
  Speaker 1: when I was in college and when I was substitute teaching.
• 20:44
  Speaker 1: So yeah, it's pathetical. It needs to change.
• 20:47
  Speaker 2: We have the same problem in Britain with the NHS. Yeah,
• 20:50
  Speaker 2: I think if the government wasn't in charge of almost
• 20:54
  Speaker 2: every hospital in the country, then we wouldn't be able
• 20:58
  Speaker 2: to get healthcare anyway whatsoever. It's like all the memes
• 21:05
  Speaker 2: of if if people sent their children into an educational
• 21:11
  Speaker 2: facility to teach them how to walk within the generation,
• 21:15
  Speaker 2: people would be convinced that we wouldn't be able to
• 21:18
  Speaker 2: walk without the government. Yeah, yeah, and yeah and all
• 21:24
  Speaker 2: of this ship and yeah, it's if we did if
• 21:28
  Speaker 2: we didn't have the NHS. Yeah, I mean, most British
• 21:32
  Speaker 2: people can't even conceive of the notion of not having
• 21:36
  Speaker 2: the NHS, because if if we didn't have the NHS,
• 21:40
  Speaker 2: we'd have the dreaded American.
• 21:44
  Speaker 1: Medical system where you where you have to.
• 21:49
  Speaker 2: Pay for things. Yeah, we have to pay doctors like
• 21:56
  Speaker 2: maybe ten grand to save your life rather than pay
• 21:59
  Speaker 2: the government ten grand over the course of your life.
• 22:02
  Speaker 2: And then if you if you, if you ever get
• 22:05
  Speaker 2: like a life threatening condition, you have to sit in
• 22:10
  Speaker 2: a queue in a line for two years and die
• 22:14
  Speaker 2: in that queue.
• 22:16
  Speaker 3: And that's they get told that they don't they don't
• 22:20
  Speaker 3: allow for your condition to be treated.
• 22:22
  Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean we told a lot of horror stories
• 22:27
  Speaker 2: in Britain about about the American legal system that if
• 22:30
  Speaker 2: you have a problem that you'll have to you have
• 22:33
  Speaker 2: to pay them for the rest of your life. But
• 22:36
  Speaker 2: in Britain you have to pay them for your entire life.
• 22:40
  Speaker 2: I mean as soon as you start paying taxes. Yeah, yeah,
• 22:44
  Speaker 2: you have to pay for everyone else's health care. And then,
• 22:51
  Speaker 2: per chance you ever get a healthcare problem of your own,
• 22:55
  Speaker 2: you you say, can I can I get some medical
• 23:00
  Speaker 2: assistance for free? Yes, of course, come back in five years,
• 23:07
  Speaker 2: which is I mean, it's at least better than the
• 23:09
  Speaker 2: Canadian system, in which all they say is have you
• 23:12
  Speaker 2: considered dying? Yeah, I'm doing another meme there. Yes, there's
• 23:17
  Speaker 2: the system where you pay out the ass for doctors
• 23:21
  Speaker 2: to save your life. There's the system where you wait
• 23:25
  Speaker 2: in a two year line for doctors to save your life.
• 23:29
  Speaker 2: And there's the system where doctors just fucking kill you.
• 23:32
  Speaker 2: And the UK is just now adopting the Canadian model,
• 23:39
  Speaker 2: and I'm like, yeah, none of these are ideal, but
• 23:45
  Speaker 2: maybe maybe we could find a happy medium. And it's
• 23:49
  Speaker 2: the same with the education system. It's a yeah, maybe
• 23:54
  Speaker 2: we could, Like they did exist such a thing as
• 24:02
  Speaker 2: private education it's called homeschooling. It's how every it's how
• 24:08
  Speaker 2: everything worked up until like a couple of hundred years ago,
• 24:13
  Speaker 2: and even a couple of hundred years ago, it was
• 24:15
  Speaker 2: only fucking the upper class who had it. But yeah,
• 24:20
  Speaker 2: people seem to get by for a very long time
• 24:27
  Speaker 2: with just parents teaching their children how to do things.
• 24:32
  Speaker 1: Most of the history even, yes.
• 24:35
  Speaker 2: Yeah, all of it. Yeah, and it worked to justify
• 24:39
  Speaker 2: without the government. The government doesn't seem to have helped.
• 24:43
  Speaker 2: It seems to be slowing down the process and bureaucratizing
• 24:48
  Speaker 2: the process. And well, well we'll yeah, if the government
• 24:56
  Speaker 2: introduced an ass wiping program within a generation, people thing,
• 25:00
  Speaker 2: people can't wipe their asses without the government. I think
• 25:05
  Speaker 2: I'm quoting someone with that, but I can't remember who.
• 25:07
  Speaker 2: It feels like Thomas Soul, but it's probably not. I
• 25:10
  Speaker 2: don't think he would be as vulgar as that, but
• 25:12
  Speaker 2: it's that sort of thing, you know.
• 25:14
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Yeah, I just want to tell you I live
• 25:15
  Speaker 3: in an urban area in Ohio, and I know people
• 25:19
  Speaker 3: that just about can't wipe their asses without the government
• 25:21
  Speaker 3: now because the government does so much as taking over
• 25:28
  Speaker 3: their lives basically, and they feel like it's being done
• 25:31
  Speaker 3: for them.
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: Yeah.
• 25:32
  Speaker 3: And by the way, there are k twelve systems that
• 25:37
  Speaker 3: don't actually cost any money that you can access if
• 25:40
  Speaker 3: you have kids and you feel that they are, you know,
• 25:45
  Speaker 3: not getting what they need in the education system right now,
• 25:49
  Speaker 3: you don't have to be actively homeschooling to get access
• 25:54
  Speaker 3: to the free stuff that homeschooling systems do, and you
• 25:58
  Speaker 3: can supplement your kids education with that in the meantime.
• 26:04
  Speaker 1: Yeah. So okay, So what I wanted to bring up
• 26:08
  Speaker 1: is we talked about the Department of Education, we talked
• 26:10
  Speaker 1: about USAID. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau sounds nice, right
• 26:16
  Speaker 1: if it protects consumers financially, that's what it's for, isn't it.
• 26:22
  Speaker 1: So here is apparently Elizabeth Warren, who is a totally
• 26:27
  Speaker 1: like not radical member of Congress, had a lot of
• 26:32
  Speaker 1: bad things to say about the Orange Man about that.
• 26:34
  Speaker 1: But this is Trump's comments in response to that, And
• 26:37
  Speaker 1: I thought you guys would listen to you, maybe you'll
• 26:38
  Speaker 1: get a better idea of what the Consumer Financial Protection
• 26:42
  Speaker 1: Bureau does.
• 26:42
  Speaker 3: Sometimes, regardless of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, of Democrats, including
• 26:46
  Speaker 3: Elizabeth Warren, have said that by freezing and it's getting
• 26:49
  Speaker 3: big banks and general corporations.
• 26:51
  Speaker 5: That green light, you know, that was set up to
• 26:59
  Speaker 5: destroy people.
• 27:00
  Speaker 6: She used that as her little personal agency to go
• 27:04
  Speaker 6: around and destroy people.
• 27:07
  Speaker 5: And she's a fake.
• 27:08
  Speaker 6: Just like she said she was an Indian and she
• 27:11
  Speaker 6: wasn't an Indian. You have more Indian blood in you
• 27:14
  Speaker 6: than she has. Went to college based on the fact
• 27:18
  Speaker 6: that she was an Indian. She got jobs based on
• 27:20
  Speaker 6: the fact that she was an Indian. She's a fake.
• 27:24
  Speaker 6: That was that was set up to destroy some very
• 27:27
  Speaker 6: good people.
• 27:28
  Speaker 5: And and it worked. I mean it work a lot
• 27:32
  Speaker 5: of great people. I'll tell you.
• 27:34
  Speaker 6: Before I ever heard the term, people would come up
• 27:37
  Speaker 6: to me in the Midwest and areas that say Sirum
• 27:40
  Speaker 6: being destroyed by them.
• 27:41
  Speaker 5: They use that to destroy people. She's a nasty woman.
• 27:45
  Speaker 6: She's a really nasty woman, despite her phony beer commercial.
• 27:51
  Speaker 5: Now we did the right thing. That was a very
• 27:54
  Speaker 5: important thing to get rid of it.
• 27:58
  Speaker 6: So waste.
• 27:58
  Speaker 5: I mean, number one, it was.
• 27:59
  Speaker 6: A bad group of people running it, but it was
• 28:02
  Speaker 6: also a waste if you looked at when she really
• 28:05
  Speaker 6: ran it, Wow, that was a vicious group of people.
• 28:08
  Speaker 5: They really destroyed a lot of people.
• 28:10
  Speaker 1: Use confermits your goals to have a totally eliminated agency.
• 28:13
  Speaker 6: Yeah, because we're trying to get rid of waste, fraud
• 28:16
  Speaker 6: and abuse.
• 28:18
  Speaker 1: And there was another comment that I think it was
• 28:20
  Speaker 1: Elon Musk. No Patrick Webb here says Elon Musk calls
• 28:25
  Speaker 1: for the Consumer Financial Production Bureau remaining account balance. So
• 28:30
  Speaker 1: this is how much money they had seven hundred and
• 28:32
  Speaker 1: eleven billion, five hundred and eighty six No way, seven
• 28:36
  Speaker 1: hundred and eleven million, five hundred eighty six thousand, six
• 28:39
  Speaker 1: hundred and seventy eight dollars that we returned to the
• 28:41
  Speaker 1: American taxpayer. So nearly a billion dollars that they basically
• 28:47
  Speaker 1: took from people. So that that was I just wanted
• 28:50
  Speaker 1: to bring that up as well. And then there's the
• 28:53
  Speaker 1: FDIC which is also shut down. You'll often see them
• 28:58
  Speaker 1: on banks, So there that's I don't know what's going
• 29:01
  Speaker 1: to happen with that, but I thought I would share
• 29:05
  Speaker 1: that information with you guys. And I don't know if
• 29:08
  Speaker 1: there's any final thoughts on this doge thing before we
• 29:10
  Speaker 1: go on, but yeah.
• 29:12
  Speaker 3: If you're if you're in a situation where you feel
• 29:16
  Speaker 3: that you've experienced like fraud or or any any kind
• 29:22
  Speaker 3: of issue that is a consumer protection issue, don't go
• 29:26
  Speaker 3: to the federal government with that, go to your state
• 29:30
  Speaker 3: government with that. And in fact, any kind of consumer
• 29:36
  Speaker 3: protection laws can be enforced through the state Attorney general office.
• 29:42
  Speaker 3: And all you have to do is look up your
• 29:45
  Speaker 3: state names Attorney general Office Consumer Protection Hotline. There will
• 29:51
  Speaker 3: be one. It will be a free phone call. You
• 29:54
  Speaker 3: call them, you tell them your situation, and they will
• 29:57
  Speaker 3: investigate and they will help you as best they can.
• 30:01
  Speaker 3: And uh, every every bit of information you're able to
• 30:05
  Speaker 3: give helps your case. So this type of this type
• 30:09
  Speaker 3: of an agency, the consumer Financial Protection Bureau, that's the
• 30:13
  Speaker 3: last place I would go for help. If I was
• 30:15
  Speaker 3: dealing with an issue with a bank, I would go
• 30:18
  Speaker 3: directly to the state Attorney General's office first.
• 30:22
  Speaker 1: Yeah, speaking of banks, they are Yeah, like I said,
• 30:26
  Speaker 1: they're going after the fd I see, apparently the FDIC
• 30:29
  Speaker 1: is kind of like a gatekeeper when it comes to banks.
• 30:32
  Speaker 1: So that's a problem.
• 30:34
  Speaker 3: So do you remember we covered a few years ago
• 30:40
  Speaker 3: there had been a policy or legislation where they had
• 30:46
  Speaker 3: given banks the order to de bank people and debank
• 30:51
  Speaker 3: businesses based on certain politicals and stuff. That was run
• 30:57
  Speaker 3: through the FDIC.
• 30:58
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and he that's right, And he remember how SVB
• 31:03
  Speaker 1: was bailed out, Remember SV's bailout.
• 31:10
  Speaker 3: The justification given for creating the FDIC is this, up
• 31:14
  Speaker 3: to a certain amount, the federal government guarantees your bank deposits.
• 31:19
  Speaker 3: So if you have a fifty thousand dollars savings account
• 31:26
  Speaker 3: or something like that, up up to a certain amount,
• 31:30
  Speaker 3: and I believe it's more than that. If something happens,
• 31:34
  Speaker 3: if your bank gets robbed or if it gets attacked
• 31:39
  Speaker 3: online and the money gets taken out that way, you
• 31:43
  Speaker 3: don't lose your money. That's that's the justification given for it.
• 31:49
  Speaker 3: But instead of just being used for that, and this
• 31:53
  Speaker 3: is a thing with federal government, it's been a thing
• 31:55
  Speaker 3: with federal government for decades for actually about a century.
• 32:00
  Speaker 3: Mission creep right, Oh well, we can't just have it
• 32:03
  Speaker 3: do that, so we're gonna have it do a bunch
• 32:06
  Speaker 3: of other things too. And that's that's how we ended
• 32:08
  Speaker 3: up with all of this. If all it did was
• 32:12
  Speaker 3: ensure that people could trust that putting their money in
• 32:16
  Speaker 3: the banks meant that their money would be protected, it
• 32:21
  Speaker 3: would have been a decent thing. But what it's ended
• 32:24
  Speaker 3: up being is it's used essentially as a social credit system. Yeah,
• 32:34
  Speaker 3: it protects fraudsters too.
• 32:35
  Speaker 1: Yes, yes, well I think that there's something bigger going
• 32:40
  Speaker 1: on too. I think that there's a reason because I
• 32:42
  Speaker 1: remember Trump used to say, like way back in the day,
• 32:45
  Speaker 1: he used to say, and the Fed. This is before
• 32:47
  Speaker 1: he ever ran for office. This is like in the
• 32:50
  Speaker 1: eighties and nineties. So I don't know, man, I think
• 32:54
  Speaker 1: that this is like this is Look, it's still early days.
• 32:58
  Speaker 3: There's a lot of things people are going to learn.
• 33:00
  Speaker 3: You have no idea how deep this rend it does.
• 33:03
  Speaker 1: Yeah for sure. All right, Uh well let us know
• 33:05
  Speaker 1: of you guys think about this in the comments. I
• 33:07
  Speaker 1: do want to play that video that Hannah just sent me,
• 33:10
  Speaker 1: the dueling feminists. Well, this is probably for the act
• 33:14
  Speaker 1: the show, but I'll just play it here.
• 33:15
  Speaker 3: It is for the show.
• 33:17
  Speaker 7: May well a miss how many misconceptions and what a
• 33:20
  Speaker 7: misunderstanding that there is of what feminism is. Okay, So
• 33:25
  Speaker 7: this is the part where I say things that may
• 33:27
  Speaker 7: ruffle some feathers. So over the past few years, I've
• 33:30
  Speaker 7: become increasingly worried about the direction mainstream Internet feminism appears
• 33:34
  Speaker 7: to be headed. At least in the West, there is
• 33:37
  Speaker 7: that a controversy about this. Unfortunately, many contemporary discourses in
• 33:42
  Speaker 7: and around feminism tend to emphasize a form of hyper individualism,
• 33:45
  Speaker 7: which is informed by that neoliberal worldview.
• 33:48
  Speaker 4: Feminism is about giving women choice.
• 33:51
  Speaker 7: Choice feminism posits that each individual woman determines what is
• 33:54
  Speaker 7: empowering for herself. It's it's it's about it's about freedom,
• 34:00
  Speaker 7: which might sound good on the surface, but this concept
• 34:02
  Speaker 7: risks of securing the bigger picture. It's about liberation and
• 34:06
  Speaker 7: larger fundamental goals of the movement.
• 34:08
  Speaker 1: It's about equality.
• 34:10
  Speaker 7: By focusing on my tits, you couldn't.
• 34:14
  Speaker 1: Help yourself, could you.
• 34:16
  Speaker 3: It just had to be done.
• 34:18
  Speaker 1: Yeah, uh okay, So anyway, yeah, so choice feminism, intersectional feminism,
• 34:28
  Speaker 1: it's all it's all cancer. So just don't let them
• 34:32
  Speaker 1: sell that bag of goods on you. So anyway, Meredith G.
• 34:35
  Speaker 1: Meredith G gave us a super chow and said for
• 34:39
  Speaker 1: five dollars, thank you, Meredith, and she says, HBr News
• 34:42
  Speaker 1: for eighty nine. Everything that the CFPB was created to
• 34:46
  Speaker 1: do was already being performed by other regulatory agencies conducted
• 34:50
  Speaker 1: at the state and federal level. The FDIC is not
• 34:53
  Speaker 1: a taxpayer funded It is funded by the charges the
• 34:56
  Speaker 1: banks that are insured by it. Paid to the FDIC.
• 35:00
  Speaker 1: The issue is that Eric Holder colluded with the FDIC
• 35:03
  Speaker 1: chair to create Operation Choke Point. So this may be
• 35:06
  Speaker 1: to strip the FDIC of certain authority. Well that makes
• 35:10
  Speaker 1: perfect sense, but yeah, it can go fuck the banks.
• 35:13
  Speaker 3: Yeah, Operation choke Point was what I was talking about.
• 35:16
  Speaker 3: That's where they went through, and it was done under
• 35:20
  Speaker 3: the auspices of we're gonna stop terrorism, guys. We're gonna
• 35:25
  Speaker 3: prevent terrorists from funding their activities using bank cards and
• 35:31
  Speaker 3: electronic payments, and we're gonna make the banks do all
• 35:35
  Speaker 3: the work on that, which again sounded good because the
• 35:39
  Speaker 3: banks are the ones that provide those services, so they
• 35:41
  Speaker 3: should be the ones making sure that they're not being
• 35:45
  Speaker 3: used illicit, you know, for illicit purposes and stuff. But
• 35:50
  Speaker 3: what ended up happening was things like people's PayPal accounts
• 35:56
  Speaker 3: getting canceled because MasterCard worst PayPal to get rid of
• 36:02
  Speaker 3: politically and correct people because of the pressure MasterCard was
• 36:06
  Speaker 3: receiving through an Operation Choke Point to silence people with
• 36:12
  Speaker 3: political views that might lead to well, what's going on today?
• 36:16
  Speaker 1: Actually yeah, yeah, all right, Well, let us know what
• 36:21
  Speaker 1: you guys think about this one in the comments. We
• 36:25
  Speaker 1: will endeavor to reply to your comments or read them later.
• 36:29
  Speaker 1: I look forward to seeing that, and we're gonna move
• 36:31
  Speaker 1: on to the next story. So in a related story,
• 36:35
  Speaker 1: which of this thought was kind of funny, but it's
• 36:37
  Speaker 1: also related. There is there was an exchange between a
• 36:45
  Speaker 1: jd Vance and an individual row Conna. I think that's
• 36:50
  Speaker 1: a politician. I can't remember exactly. I don't really give
• 36:52
  Speaker 1: a shit. The controversy arose over the rehiring of one
• 36:58
  Speaker 1: Marco Els, a former dough staffer who resigned after his
• 37:02
  Speaker 1: supposedly racist social media posts were revealed. Jd Vance supported
• 37:06
  Speaker 1: Ellis's return, while roe Kanna challenged the stance jd Vance's
• 37:11
  Speaker 1: initial posts. So I got the I'm gonna read the
• 37:13
  Speaker 1: tweets or the posts, and we don't call them tweets
• 37:16
  Speaker 1: the posts back and forth. So this is jd Vance's post.
• 37:22
  Speaker 1: There was a poll that Elon Musk conducted asking if
• 37:25
  Speaker 1: we could bring this guy back, and it was overwhelmingly yes.
• 37:27
  Speaker 1: And in fact, there were people in the reply saying,
• 37:30
  Speaker 1: you know, you guys shouldn't have asked him to step
• 37:33
  Speaker 1: down in the first place. He doesn't have to apologize
• 37:35
  Speaker 1: for anything. And I think that's right because that's like
• 37:39
  Speaker 1: the cancel culture thing is old now and we're done
• 37:42
  Speaker 1: with that. So what was Vance's reply to that? He says,
• 37:47
  Speaker 1: here's my view. I obviously disagree with some of Ellas's posts,
• 37:50
  Speaker 1: but I don't think stupid social media activity should ruin
• 37:53
  Speaker 1: a kid's life. Ells is nineteen years old. I think
• 37:57
  Speaker 1: that's not a kid.
• 37:58
  Speaker 2: I mean, I technically I think he's calling him a
• 38:01
  Speaker 2: kid for rhetorical reasons, but I mean it's back in
• 38:06
  Speaker 2: the day, a fourteen year old was an adult, and
• 38:08
  Speaker 2: now we're calling a nineteen nineteen year old a kid.
• 38:12
  Speaker 2: He's not a kid, Yeah, especially if he's up in
• 38:18
  Speaker 2: the range of you.
• 38:20
  Speaker 1: I guess he's young enough to not have learned what
• 38:22
  Speaker 1: he's supposed to and not supposed to say. And I
• 38:25
  Speaker 1: say that tongue in cheek, but uh, because he hasn't put.
• 38:30
  Speaker 3: Been nineteen years old. Is in the United States, you
• 38:33
  Speaker 3: can't buy alcohol if you're nineteen.
• 38:35
  Speaker 1: Right, But I think what Mike is saying, I mean,
• 38:38
  Speaker 1: he's not a child.
• 38:40
  Speaker 3: But no, but there's a we have. We have sort
• 38:42
  Speaker 3: of a spectrum of what we call a kid and
• 38:47
  Speaker 3: what we call an adult. Here at eighteen years old,
• 38:50
  Speaker 3: you can get told that you will pick up a
• 38:53
  Speaker 3: gun and defend your country and will be, you know,
• 38:57
  Speaker 3: forced to go to boot camp, taken out of whatever
• 38:59
  Speaker 3: job you're on already doing, forced to go to boot
• 39:01
  Speaker 3: camp assibly overseas to die. But you can't buy alcohol
• 39:05
  Speaker 3: till you're twenty one.
• 39:07
  Speaker 1: Yeah, So I just want to say, for clarification too,
• 39:10
  Speaker 1: he's about nineteen now, but when he made these posts
• 39:12
  Speaker 1: was years before, so it was probably because they went
• 39:15
  Speaker 1: digging through their social media is to find something offensive.
• 39:18
  Speaker 3: It's just like what they wanted when he was thirteen.
• 39:22
  Speaker 1: As you are wont to do either way that it
• 39:25
  Speaker 1: doesn't matter because the cancelation did not stick, so it shouldn't. No,
• 39:31
  Speaker 1: it shouldn't, that's what the reply said. But he said
• 39:33
  Speaker 1: we shouldn't reward I'm sorry, he says, I obviously disagree
• 39:37
  Speaker 1: with some of Ella's's posts, but I don't think stupid
• 39:39
  Speaker 1: social media activities should ruin a kid's life. We shouldn't
• 39:42
  Speaker 1: reward journalists who try to destroy people. Ever, so I
• 39:45
  Speaker 1: say bring him back. If he's a bad dude or
• 39:47
  Speaker 1: a terrible member of the team, then fire him for that.
• 39:50
  Speaker 1: And then Rocana, Oh, I remember Ocanne. He's like some
• 39:53
  Speaker 1: guy that was on MSNBC or CNN or something. He says,
• 39:58
  Speaker 1: are you going to tell him to apologize?
• 40:00
  Speaker 6: Guy?
• 40:00
  Speaker 1: Are you going to tell him to apologize for saying
• 40:03
  Speaker 1: normalize Indian hate before his rehire? Just asking for the
• 40:07
  Speaker 1: sake of both of our kids? And Jade Vance responded
• 40:10
  Speaker 1: for the sake of both our kids grow up. Racist
• 40:13
  Speaker 1: trolls on the internet, while offensive, don't threaten my kids.
• 40:16
  Speaker 1: You know what does a culture that denies grace to
• 40:19
  Speaker 1: people who make mistakes, a culture that encourages congressmen to
• 40:22
  Speaker 1: act like whiny children. So is a congressman? So I know?
• 40:27
  Speaker 1: And then Rokana follows up and says, it's a little chubby.
• 40:34
  Speaker 1: But if you're going to rehire someone to represent you
• 40:37
  Speaker 1: in the USA, why not insist? He apologized for saying
• 40:40
  Speaker 1: normalize Indian hate? Then JD. Vance reblies again. I don't
• 40:44
  Speaker 1: worry about my kids making mistakes or developing views they
• 40:47
  Speaker 1: letter regret. I don't even worry that much about trolls
• 40:50
  Speaker 1: on the internet. You know what I do worry about
• 40:52
  Speaker 1: roe that they'll grow up to be a US congressman
• 40:55
  Speaker 1: who engages an emotional blackmail over a kid's social media posts.
• 40:59
  Speaker 1: You just disgusted me.
• 41:01
  Speaker 2: This this erection is so long that it's probably in
• 41:05
  Speaker 2: his eye.
• 41:07
  Speaker 1: And then Rocanna's final response is saying, I am whiny,
• 41:11
  Speaker 1: and you discussed me maybe your way of showing strength personally.
• 41:15
  Speaker 1: I don't think you have to hurl insults or be
• 41:18
  Speaker 1: mean spirited to have a free exchange of ideas.
• 41:20
  Speaker 2: God so much more whiney.
• 41:23
  Speaker 1: Yeah at its best was not like that, and and
• 41:27
  Speaker 1: you at your best, JD were not either, So I
• 41:31
  Speaker 1: you know, this is what we need, This is what
• 41:34
  Speaker 1: we need. I'm sorry, but but go ahead.
• 41:36
  Speaker 3: When I told you guys that Vance has already got
• 41:40
  Speaker 3: my vote if he runs for president after Trump, like
• 41:45
  Speaker 3: I been, Yeah, he's in a while. Yeah, yeah, I've
• 41:49
  Speaker 3: been watching him since oh gosh, a couple of years ago.
• 41:54
  Speaker 3: I have his book and have been It's not long.
• 41:58
  Speaker 3: It's just I get like five minutes at a time
• 42:00
  Speaker 3: to sit down and read. So I have to go
• 42:03
  Speaker 3: back and reread part of what I read the last time, uh,
• 42:07
  Speaker 3: every time, because I'm not getting much opportunity. But it's
• 42:13
  Speaker 3: it's it's a very Ohio experience that he's describing and
• 42:17
  Speaker 3: growing up and everything and the people around him and stuff.
• 42:23
  Speaker 3: I don't. I actually don't know if he's thirty five yet,
• 42:26
  Speaker 3: jin Bottle asked, but he will be eventually. Everybody becomes
• 42:30
  Speaker 3: thirty five if they live long enough to be thirty five,
• 42:33
  Speaker 3: and he will, so uh, yeah, you have to be
• 42:36
  Speaker 3: thirty five to run for president.
• 42:39
  Speaker 1: You can't.
• 42:40
  Speaker 3: You can't be president if you're younger than that. But
• 42:42
  Speaker 3: but I would absolutely vote for this man. And I
• 42:45
  Speaker 3: knew that, you know, before Trump picked him for for
• 42:52
  Speaker 3: vice president. So yeah, and I'm hoping I'm hoping that
• 42:58
  Speaker 3: after he has to be because you can't be you
• 43:01
  Speaker 3: can't be the vice president if you're under thirty five either,
• 43:05
  Speaker 3: because you can't become the president. So he should be
• 43:09
  Speaker 3: able to run at the end of Trump's term. And
• 43:12
  Speaker 3: I would love to see that because he is he is.
• 43:15
  Speaker 3: He is this based all the time. He is never
• 43:18
  Speaker 3: not this based.
• 43:22
  Speaker 2: It might, Yeah, it was. It was amusing waking up
• 43:26
  Speaker 2: the other day half a week ago and everyone's talking
• 43:30
  Speaker 2: about big Balls, and you're going, what the hell is
• 43:34
  Speaker 2: this about? And it took so much scrolling through various
• 43:39
  Speaker 2: big Balls memes before we were any the wiser, and
• 43:43
  Speaker 2: eventually you find out, Okay, it's just some guy getting
• 43:48
  Speaker 2: canceled for doing edgy racism jokes online? Is that it
• 43:53
  Speaker 2: that that shit happens all the time?
• 43:55
  Speaker 1: I think that's just, isn't I think that's just his
• 43:57
  Speaker 1: name on his birth certificate. His father's name is Brass.
• 44:03
  Speaker 2: And Yeah, the big deal is that he's on the
• 44:07
  Speaker 2: Doage team. Yeah, I'm not surprised that the legacy media
• 44:11
  Speaker 2: is scrambling and besieging the walls of the machine that's
• 44:15
  Speaker 2: going to get their funding cut. So it sends the
• 44:21
  Speaker 2: reason they're doing whatever they always do. Give us the scalp,
• 44:26
  Speaker 2: you owe us the scalp of Big Balls. But the
• 44:31
  Speaker 2: other big deal is they're calling him Big Balls, which
• 44:35
  Speaker 2: is his online handle. Would you would think they'd be
• 44:39
  Speaker 2: plastering his real name all over every headline with his
• 44:43
  Speaker 2: face right below it in four K, But for whatever reason,
• 44:48
  Speaker 2: they're calling him big Balls.
• 44:50
  Speaker 3: You know, I know the reason.
• 44:52
  Speaker 2: Maybe they think it'll have more impact.
• 44:57
  Speaker 1: For a serial killer.
• 44:59
  Speaker 3: You know, they think people are going to find it embarrassing.
• 45:01
  Speaker 3: They think people are going to think it's cringe, and
• 45:03
  Speaker 3: they didn't expect it to get latched onto and memed
• 45:07
  Speaker 3: to the degree that like people are obviously putting a
• 45:12
  Speaker 3: CDC behind a bunch of memes and it's great. But
• 45:16
  Speaker 3: they thought that if they made fun of his name
• 45:21
  Speaker 3: and made themselves, they performed discomfort for the public in
• 45:30
  Speaker 3: saying his name and discussing like none of them ever
• 45:32
  Speaker 3: used the word balls before to describe us out of testicles, right,
• 45:37
  Speaker 3: So that's there. They've underestimated the sense of humor of
• 45:42
  Speaker 3: the public, and they've underestimated the public's ability to just
• 45:47
  Speaker 3: be comfortable with things. They're being very childish about it,
• 45:50
  Speaker 3: and they think they can make you be very childish
• 45:55
  Speaker 3: about it in the same way rather than just simple
• 46:00
  Speaker 3: enjoying the show. So that's why they're doing it.
• 46:03
  Speaker 1: I just love that they had to say big balls
• 46:06
  Speaker 1: multiple times on air, and I think you're over.
• 46:09
  Speaker 3: Over yeah, high society.
• 46:12
  Speaker 4: Right.
• 46:14
  Speaker 2: Maybe they just don't know his name. They didn't bother
• 46:16
  Speaker 2: looking at it's big balls.
• 46:18
  Speaker 1: I think he has an older brother named Harry.
• 46:22
  Speaker 2: But they're putting big balls in every headline and leaving
• 46:27
  Speaker 2: the four K image to your own imagination. They're trying
• 46:33
  Speaker 2: to put this guy through the usual humiliation ritual, but
• 46:38
  Speaker 2: it's backfiring spectacularly. While they have to go through the
• 46:43
  Speaker 2: humiliation ritual of saying big balls, big balls.
• 46:48
  Speaker 1: Girl.
• 46:49
  Speaker 2: Everyone shake your fist at big balls. Big balls is
• 46:52
  Speaker 2: a bad dude, bad like you know, yeah, you all
• 46:57
  Speaker 2: you sound like Joe Biden. You all said like Joe Biden.
• 47:01
  Speaker 2: Now deal with that. This is legendarily hilarious, hilarious. It
• 47:09
  Speaker 2: is also a huge win, not just because it's a
• 47:12
  Speaker 2: much needed pushback against quote unquote cancel culture, but it's
• 47:19
  Speaker 2: also a win for anonymity, because anonymity seems to have
• 47:26
  Speaker 2: one of the days because they're not calling him his
• 47:30
  Speaker 2: net it's Edward something. But I'm not gonna that. Even
• 47:34
  Speaker 2: the legacy media has had to.
• 47:35
  Speaker 1: Go with big Balls.
• 47:36
  Speaker 2: It turns out you can't just docs anyone you don't
• 47:39
  Speaker 2: like on network television and throw them to every vigilante
• 47:45
  Speaker 2: mob in the country, at least not in the US.
• 47:50
  Speaker 2: In my country, if you tell an edgy race joke
• 47:55
  Speaker 2: on Twitter or whatever or whatever, the police can indeed
• 47:59
  Speaker 2: arrest you and docks you and tell the whole country
• 48:03
  Speaker 2: you're racist, and then whatever happens happens where it's not
• 48:09
  Speaker 2: half all like normalize Indian hate would certainly do it
• 48:15
  Speaker 2: if you did that as a tweet in Britain.
• 48:18
  Speaker 1: Oh yeah, notice.
• 48:20
  Speaker 2: How normalized Indian hate is a scandalous offense, but normalized
• 48:28
  Speaker 2: white hate is a syllabus in every university, in multiple
• 48:36
  Speaker 2: courses in every university, even though they don't call it
• 48:39
  Speaker 2: that because it has already been normalized. White hate. Nah,
• 48:46
  Speaker 2: it doesn't exist. Doesn't exist, no matter what happens. It
• 48:50
  Speaker 2: doesn't exist even in South Africa, especially in South Africa,
• 48:56
  Speaker 2: no matter what happens. If if you canceled and arrested
• 49:01
  Speaker 2: everyone who normalizes white hate, there will be no one
• 49:06
  Speaker 2: left in the universities. You might as well dis convert
• 49:10
  Speaker 2: the universities into prisons and putting it all in that
• 49:14
  Speaker 2: there would be no more newspapers and no more TV
• 49:18
  Speaker 2: broadcasts overnight because they'll be in jail as well. It
• 49:23
  Speaker 2: would be paradise, frankly, but it is not going to happen.
• 49:29
  Speaker 2: You may ask how I could possibly be black pilling
• 49:33
  Speaker 2: after all this happened, Well, because I'm reminded that I
• 49:37
  Speaker 2: still live in Britain and I have to go back
• 49:42
  Speaker 2: there this weekend. So yeah, I'm glad. I'm glad the
• 49:45
  Speaker 2: US is beginning to pull itself out of the jaws
• 49:49
  Speaker 2: of Cthulhu, But I soon have to turn tail and
• 49:53
  Speaker 2: head directly back into the jaws of Cthulhu, the beak
• 49:57
  Speaker 2: of Cthulhu that mandibles. By the way, I don't think
• 50:03
  Speaker 2: Big Bulls even exists, That's my theory. He's just one
• 50:08
  Speaker 2: of Elon Musk's all accounts, possibly AI generated. Either way,
• 50:14
  Speaker 2: it's hilarious, but yeah, yeah, what do you folks? Reckon
• 50:20
  Speaker 2: leave a comment below and don't forget to like a
• 50:22
  Speaker 2: check Sharry's caring.
• 50:24
  Speaker 1: Uh No, Actually, Big Ball is a real person. His
• 50:27
  Speaker 1: name is Edward korstine chorstein coorstein uh not. But he
• 50:32
  Speaker 1: is not the guy that said normalize Indian hate and
• 50:36
  Speaker 1: almost got fired and then came back. That guy is
• 50:40
  Speaker 1: Marco what I said, Marco uh something. So they're they're
• 50:46
  Speaker 1: they're two different people. But yeah, so he's got himself
• 50:51
  Speaker 1: an interesting team there.
• 50:53
  Speaker 3: What I would point out about that that normalized Indian
• 50:55
  Speaker 3: hate statement is this, right, in the late eighties early nineties,
• 51:03
  Speaker 3: gen X had this shit pretty well sorted.
• 51:06
  Speaker 1: Right.
• 51:06
  Speaker 3: If somebody does something crappy and and you know, they're whatever,
• 51:10
  Speaker 3: their races, doesn't matter the crappy thing they did, they
• 51:15
  Speaker 3: are accountable for that. And if somebody doesn't do crappy
• 51:19
  Speaker 3: things and it happens to be great, their race still
• 51:23
  Speaker 3: doesn't matter. They're individually credited for being great. Right, that's it.
• 51:30
  Speaker 3: You judge people, buy the content of their character and
• 51:34
  Speaker 3: and buy their actions, and and that's it, and you
• 51:38
  Speaker 3: don't you don't worry about generalizing it too. And if
• 51:42
  Speaker 3: if you have experience that you know certain types of
• 51:47
  Speaker 3: dysfunction are common to certain groups of people, you can
• 51:51
  Speaker 3: acknowledge that without generalizing it to every single person in
• 51:54
  Speaker 3: that group. You can. And we were able to do that,
• 51:58
  Speaker 3: and along came the communist segment of the left, and
• 52:04
  Speaker 3: oh no, no, no, it's all or nothing either. You know,
• 52:07
  Speaker 3: these generalizations mean that you are not allowing for exceptions
• 52:12
  Speaker 3: and you're racist, or you can't make them at all.
• 52:18
  Speaker 3: And we ended up in a situation where we are
• 52:23
  Speaker 3: now where if somebody has that type of experience and
• 52:29
  Speaker 3: they make that type of generalization, it has to apply
• 52:32
  Speaker 3: to every single person in that race, that religion, that gender,
• 52:37
  Speaker 3: that that background that you know, whatever type, whatever demographic
• 52:44
  Speaker 3: they're talking about, and it's bullshit. You have to be
• 52:47
  Speaker 3: able to acknowledge that there are certain things that some
• 52:51
  Speaker 3: people do that don't necessarily mean that everybody that has
• 52:55
  Speaker 3: something in common with them, is going to do that.
• 52:57
  Speaker 3: You could admit there are Indian scammers and still be
• 53:00
  Speaker 3: grateful that there are Indians who become doctors that work
• 53:07
  Speaker 3: in areas that aren't necessarily there may be not very
• 53:13
  Speaker 3: many people wanting to go into that area. Like almost
• 53:16
  Speaker 3: every infectious disease specialist that I have met, and I've
• 53:22
  Speaker 3: had the unfortunate situation of having to meet several of
• 53:25
  Speaker 3: them due to healthcare needs that were in my family,
• 53:31
  Speaker 3: almost all of them are Indian, male or female, but
• 53:35
  Speaker 3: almost all Indian. I don't run into very many who
• 53:38
  Speaker 3: are not. And they're great at their jobs. They do
• 53:41
  Speaker 3: a fabulous job, and they take very great care of people.
• 53:45
  Speaker 3: And when people talk about Indian scammers, those guys know
• 53:48
  Speaker 3: they're not the ones being talked about. The doctors and
• 53:52
  Speaker 3: the high ranking tech workers, the people that actually do
• 53:57
  Speaker 3: jobs that maybe other people people just aren't doing, they
• 54:02
  Speaker 3: know they're not the ones being talked about when somebody
• 54:06
  Speaker 3: talks about an Indian scammer. Just like you know, people
• 54:09
  Speaker 3: who come here from Nigeria and actually do good work
• 54:14
  Speaker 3: know that they're not the ones being talked about when
• 54:17
  Speaker 3: someone talks about Nigerian scammer or or the people who
• 54:23
  Speaker 3: come here from other countries thinking that they're going to
• 54:25
  Speaker 3: get a free ride, you know. And so we've gotten
• 54:29
  Speaker 3: to a point now where when somebody makes a hasty
• 54:34
  Speaker 3: generalization like that and it's unpleasant and it generalizes in
• 54:40
  Speaker 3: a negative light, we don't have that recognition. It's like
• 54:45
  Speaker 3: we're not allowed to recognize. We're talking about the people
• 54:49
  Speaker 3: who act that way, not all the people in that demographic.
• 54:53
  Speaker 3: And that's the people who claim to be trying to
• 54:57
  Speaker 3: eliminate racism or to blame for that increased racism by
• 55:03
  Speaker 3: making it impossible to criticize bad behavior and bad intentions
• 55:10
  Speaker 3: basically bad actors if they happen to have race other
• 55:14
  Speaker 3: than white, if they happen to be a demographic that's protected.
• 55:19
  Speaker 3: You said, you know, if you're in that group and
• 55:22
  Speaker 3: you're mad to hear about hearing that, well, it's your
• 55:25
  Speaker 3: fault period. You made it like this. So I don't
• 55:31
  Speaker 3: have any sympathy for people to get outraged over stuff
• 55:34
  Speaker 3: like that. I just don't.
• 55:38
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I don't know. I just I'm over it,
• 55:43
  Speaker 1: Like I'm sorry, but I'm not like I'm a grown
• 55:45
  Speaker 1: ass man. I'm not gonna be like fucking you know,
• 55:48
  Speaker 1: hand ringing over some like edgy kids comments on the internet,
• 55:53
  Speaker 1: like literally the internet. Like when I go if I
• 55:55
  Speaker 1: go into a go in a chat room for a
• 55:58
  Speaker 1: fucking you know, call to server or something like go
• 56:01
  Speaker 1: to a call of duty lobby, and if you can
• 56:03
  Speaker 1: take it, then you'll realize that most of the time
• 56:06
  Speaker 1: they're literally only doing that to get a rise out
• 56:08
  Speaker 1: of you. Like when we do shows. When I do shows,
• 56:12
  Speaker 1: are Allison, and we have like the mobile you know
• 56:15
  Speaker 1: stream going out and then normal stream. The mobile stream
• 56:18
  Speaker 1: goes out. We send it out because it reaches more people,
• 56:21
  Speaker 1: but it also means it reaches more people, but I
• 56:24
  Speaker 1: mean it reaches randoms. And then people just come in
• 56:26
  Speaker 1: there and say, so I'm here for the lesbian uh,
• 56:29
  Speaker 1: you know, foot rub or whatever. Like they're just trying
• 56:33
  Speaker 1: to get a reaction. That's why I tell Alison, ignore it,
• 56:35
  Speaker 1: ignore it, ignore it. It's just trolls, because because when
• 56:40
  Speaker 1: you give it attention, you validate these kinds of reactions
• 56:44
  Speaker 1: from these people because they can say, well, look, people
• 56:46
  Speaker 1: get upset by this stuff all the time. We have
• 56:48
  Speaker 1: to we better put in some laws, we better be
• 56:51
  Speaker 1: more censorious. We better like stop hate online. What what
• 56:55
  Speaker 1: do you? What are your kids gonna think about it?
• 56:57
  Speaker 1: You know, that's how you get that. So what you
• 56:59
  Speaker 1: gotta do is you either you just don't do anything.
• 57:02
  Speaker 1: Don't feed the trolls is like one of the oldest
• 57:04
  Speaker 1: laws of the Internet. So that's it. Like when these
• 57:08
  Speaker 1: when these people like try to dig up like old
• 57:11
  Speaker 1: posts that people have made. I don't care what it says.
• 57:14
  Speaker 1: You are acting like a fucking retarded boomer. Stop doing that.
• 57:19
  Speaker 1: Right like where we live in this year, like this
• 57:22
  Speaker 1: the time of the internet, people can say whatever they want.
• 57:25
  Speaker 1: So just don't take the bait. That's all I'm asking.
• 57:30
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna I'm gonna lose respect for you if you
• 57:32
  Speaker 1: take the bait. Okay, don't take the bait. Okay. Anyway,
• 57:38
  Speaker 1: I got some super chats and rumble rants, and then
• 57:41
  Speaker 1: we're gonna move on to the next story. So I
• 57:43
  Speaker 1: got a rumble rant from Deadly Do Right. And he
• 57:45
  Speaker 1: says for a dollar, because we've got the biggest balls
• 57:49
  Speaker 1: of them all, thank you, Deadly Deadly do Right. And
• 57:52
  Speaker 1: then ZARANX gives us five dollars and says, just consider
• 57:55
  Speaker 1: that this event will be in history books. I can't
• 57:57
  Speaker 1: wait for the chapter on Big Ball and Doge. People
• 58:01
  Speaker 1: are gonna be like, what does this even mean? So yeah,
• 58:05
  Speaker 1: so like just like I said, you know, people are
• 58:08
  Speaker 1: gonna say I love Jade Vance's response. It is the
• 58:11
  Speaker 1: appropriate response. And what I think is actually people of
• 58:15
  Speaker 1: his generation and younger are starting to they they are
• 58:19
  Speaker 1: starting to realize, I'm not going to make a generalization,
• 58:22
  Speaker 1: but they're starting to realize that none of this ship
• 58:25
  Speaker 1: is important and that like, what what we would want
• 58:28
  Speaker 1: is to get to a point where the edgy comments
• 58:31
  Speaker 1: on the Internet that would have upset someone are actually
• 58:36
  Speaker 1: things we can say to each other in real life
• 58:38
  Speaker 1: and not be upset by actually find funny. This is
• 58:41
  Speaker 1: what like comedy is for, right, Like I saw what
• 58:45
  Speaker 1: is it, oh Tony? Something he has like a showill
• 58:50
  Speaker 1: Kill Kill Tony? Is that his name? The show? And
• 58:54
  Speaker 1: you know he's got like all these different comedians like
• 58:56
  Speaker 1: Shane Gillison and stuff, and he had this this Jewish
• 59:00
  Speaker 1: comedian name Avi Shaffir or something. He's like a good
• 59:03
  Speaker 1: friend of Joe Rogan's and stuff. And they and what
• 59:06
  Speaker 1: what they do on Kill Tony is they bring out
• 59:07
  Speaker 1: these like young new comedians and they kind of really
• 59:11
  Speaker 1: you know, they they they what do you call it?
• 59:14
  Speaker 1: They rag on them, They roast them a bit, and
• 59:17
  Speaker 1: then they test to see how well they respond if
• 59:20
  Speaker 1: they can like play along, and and it was a
• 59:22
  Speaker 1: lot of fun. And they basically one guy came out
• 59:24
  Speaker 1: and Tony was like, are you Jewish? And the guy
• 59:27
  Speaker 1: was like yeah, and he you know, he was kind
• 59:29
  Speaker 1: of playing it up like he was like the thin
• 59:31
  Speaker 1: guy with thick glasses and you know, and and then
• 59:37
  Speaker 1: they were just going after each other. It was really
• 59:39
  Speaker 1: funny because they were young enough to understand that, like
• 59:42
  Speaker 1: it's okay that you know, we used to do this
• 59:44
  Speaker 1: in the eighties. Yes, this was some This was like
• 59:47
  Speaker 1: Eddie Murphy's whole thing was like pointing out, you know,
• 59:50
  Speaker 1: how different races act and stuff. I remember when he
• 59:53
  Speaker 1: did Coming to America and he literally played a Jewish
• 59:56
  Speaker 1: guy in the barbershop. That was you know, like that
• 59:59
  Speaker 1: was any Murphy playing that at the time. That was
• 1:00:02
  Speaker 1: kind of like mind blowing makeup, right, you can't do
• 1:00:05
  Speaker 1: that now. But I think that's changing. I think that
• 1:00:08
  Speaker 1: when back then we were more relaxed about these things. Yeah,
• 1:00:13
  Speaker 1: And what I think happened is Ultimately, it was a
• 1:00:15
  Speaker 1: feminine protective mindset that came along and it just like
• 1:00:19
  Speaker 1: got into everybody. And now we're at the point where
• 1:00:22
  Speaker 1: you know, you can't say shit about women. But I
• 1:00:27
  Speaker 1: think that's changing too. But of course women are getting
• 1:00:29
  Speaker 1: really upset and they think, oh my god, the men
• 1:00:31
  Speaker 1: they're gonna enslave us, And it's like, dude, don't threaten
• 1:00:34
  Speaker 1: me with a good time anyway, So thank you.
• 1:00:37
  Speaker 3: For Yeah, there's a certain type of response that works
• 1:00:41
  Speaker 3: when you run into the namby pamby bullshit whiny ass
• 1:00:45
  Speaker 3: whimpedites that respond to this kind of stuff that way.
• 1:00:48
  Speaker 3: You know, they were the ones that were the kids
• 1:00:51
  Speaker 3: on the playground that you know, they would see you
• 1:00:54
  Speaker 3: do something that looked like it might maybe possibly be
• 1:00:58
  Speaker 3: breach of a rule and and they point their finger
• 1:01:02
  Speaker 3: at you and make noises like a crowd rocket going
• 1:01:05
  Speaker 3: down the street. Um, you know those kids when they
• 1:01:10
  Speaker 3: accuse you of something. The thing that really discombobulates them
• 1:01:15
  Speaker 3: the most is to just even if it's even if
• 1:01:18
  Speaker 3: they're exaggerating, if even if they're engaging in hyperbole, whatever
• 1:01:22
  Speaker 3: doesn't matter, own it, take it and turn it around
• 1:01:26
  Speaker 3: on them. Like my one friend they would call her fat, right,
• 1:01:31
  Speaker 3: and she'd be like, don't you piss me off? Or
• 1:01:33
  Speaker 3: I'll sit on you. Yeah, okay, fine, I'm fat. I
• 1:01:38
  Speaker 3: can kick your ass too.
• 1:01:39
  Speaker 1: That's a threat, you know, I'll siously yeah.
• 1:01:45
  Speaker 3: And it's suddenly like I can't hurt you by calling
• 1:01:49
  Speaker 3: you fat. Now I don't know what to do, you know,
• 1:01:52
  Speaker 3: And and it's it's the same thing like with with
• 1:01:55
  Speaker 3: oh you're racist, you're racist, all right, that's fine, but uh,
• 1:01:59
  Speaker 3: you know, you can call me a racist all you want.
• 1:02:02
  Speaker 3: I'm just going to start making fun of your race now.
• 1:02:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, I guess I am right. But anyway, yeah, anyway,
• 1:02:10
  Speaker 1: let us know what you guys think about this. When
• 1:02:12
  Speaker 1: I got to move on to the next story. And
• 1:02:14
  Speaker 1: speaking of three or four's okay, so this is kind
• 1:02:18
  Speaker 1: of a lighter one, but you guys probably recognize this face.
• 1:02:21
  Speaker 1: This is the thousand dickstare. Bonnie Blue, known legally as
• 1:02:28
  Speaker 1: Tia Billinger, is an only Fans creator from Derbyshire, Derbyshire, UK,
• 1:02:33
  Speaker 1: who claimed that she broke a world record by having
• 1:02:36
  Speaker 1: sex with one thousand and fifty seven men in just
• 1:02:39
  Speaker 1: twelve hours, out doing the previous record of nine hundred
• 1:02:43
  Speaker 1: nineteen set by Lisa Sparks in two thousand and four.
• 1:02:47
  Speaker 1: But here's this is the That's not the story, because
• 1:02:50
  Speaker 1: you guys probably know about the woman who took one
• 1:02:52
  Speaker 1: hundred dicks in a day, and then this is the
• 1:02:53
  Speaker 1: one who took a thousand dicks in twelve hours.
• 1:02:55
  Speaker 3: Her like drama between them, Oh yeah.
• 1:02:59
  Speaker 1: Sure, because they're being competitive about who can turn themselves
• 1:03:03
  Speaker 1: into a coxsleeve the fastest. Okay. But her husband, Oliver Davidson,
• 1:03:09
  Speaker 1: whom she married in twenty twenty two and separated from
• 1:03:12
  Speaker 1: the following year, has expressed extreme support for her career
• 1:03:17
  Speaker 1: in adult entertainment. Despite their separation, Blue has stated that
• 1:03:21
  Speaker 1: Davidson continues to support and is proud of her work,
• 1:03:24
  Speaker 1: even working behind the scenes to manage her career. The
• 1:03:27
  Speaker 1: claim by Blue has sparked significant controversy, with many questioning
• 1:03:31
  Speaker 1: the physical and logistical feasibility of such an act. I'm
• 1:03:35
  Speaker 1: sure she made it work. Critics, including many gynecologists, have
• 1:03:40
  Speaker 1: expressed skepticism about the practicality and health implications. Additionally, her
• 1:03:46
  Speaker 1: past actions in engaging with barely legal students and encouraging
• 1:03:50
  Speaker 1: infidelity have further fueled public debate. However, Blue defends her
• 1:03:55
  Speaker 1: work as educational, ensuring safety through measures like passport checks
• 1:04:00
  Speaker 1: and sent forms and breathalyzer tests. Despite the controversy, her
• 1:04:04
  Speaker 1: ex husband's continue involvement highlights a unique personal dynamic in
• 1:04:09
  Speaker 1: the backdrop of her public persona.
• 1:04:13
  Speaker 3: So this is one of the things that really cheesses
• 1:04:17
  Speaker 3: me off. Right, the noble horre. Okay, it's a job.
• 1:04:24
  Speaker 3: Men do it and women do it. Women do it more,
• 1:04:29
  Speaker 3: i think than men do it because there's a bigger market.
• 1:04:34
  Speaker 3: But in any case, it's just a job, right. There's
• 1:04:39
  Speaker 3: no such thing as the noble horre, and nobody cares
• 1:04:45
  Speaker 3: if people wouldn't really care if she wasn't trying to
• 1:04:48
  Speaker 3: turn it into something major and special. It's not an accomplishedment.
• 1:04:54
  Speaker 3: It's not an athletic feat of prowess and skill to
• 1:05:00
  Speaker 3: lay on your back and let any number of people
• 1:05:06
  Speaker 3: do all the work, or you know, most of the work,
• 1:05:09
  Speaker 3: which is probably what happened of a sex act in
• 1:05:14
  Speaker 3: order to set some record or something. There's nothing special
• 1:05:18
  Speaker 3: at all about this, and there's also nothing to get
• 1:05:21
  Speaker 3: insanely outraged out about it. It is getting way more
• 1:05:26
  Speaker 3: attention than it deserves, and that was really the whole
• 1:05:29
  Speaker 3: goal was to get attention, and so you know, we're
• 1:05:34
  Speaker 3: talking about her. People all over the world are talking
• 1:05:37
  Speaker 3: about her. She got what she wanted. But this idea
• 1:05:40
  Speaker 3: of supporting it by saying, oh, it's educational, blah blah,
• 1:05:44
  Speaker 3: No it's not. It's just prostitution. There is no difference
• 1:05:48
  Speaker 3: between this woman doing what she did and some checks
• 1:05:53
  Speaker 3: standing on a street corner picking up John's right, aside
• 1:05:58
  Speaker 3: from the fact that maybe she wasn't high right now,
• 1:06:02
  Speaker 3: Ethics can can be applied to sex work and should,
• 1:06:09
  Speaker 3: Ethics can be applied to consuming sex work and should.
• 1:06:16
  Speaker 3: But aside from that, there's nothing special, remarkable or exceptional
• 1:06:24
  Speaker 3: about applying ethics to either end of that anymore than
• 1:06:30
  Speaker 3: to retail or to any service work. If you go
• 1:06:35
  Speaker 3: into somebody's house and fix their their plumbing or or
• 1:06:41
  Speaker 3: do some work on their their heating and air conditioning system,
• 1:06:45
  Speaker 3: you know, fix the steps on the back porch, it's
• 1:06:50
  Speaker 3: not any more remarkable to apply ethics to sex work
• 1:06:54
  Speaker 3: either end of sex work, than to either end of
• 1:06:56
  Speaker 3: those transactions. And it and it's bull shit that people
• 1:07:03
  Speaker 3: have turned this into a debate about some sort of
• 1:07:08
  Speaker 3: nobility being you know, characteristic of this. It's not noble,
• 1:07:15
  Speaker 3: it's not special, it's just work.
• 1:07:20
  Speaker 1: I'm gonna push back a little bit on that. I
• 1:07:23
  Speaker 1: think that if you work in retail, or you're a
• 1:07:26
  Speaker 1: maintenance person or plumber, or even a construction worker or
• 1:07:30
  Speaker 1: a janitor, you're doing something of a service for someone.
• 1:07:34
  Speaker 1: Her having sex with a thousand guys in a day
• 1:07:36
  Speaker 1: doesn't even serve the thousand guys it is. Yeah, it
• 1:07:42
  Speaker 1: is completely out of self interest. It is not making
• 1:07:45
  Speaker 1: the world a better place. And the problem is is
• 1:07:48
  Speaker 1: that there are like Vice Magazine wrote an article about
• 1:07:51
  Speaker 1: her in a very positive light, so the fact that
• 1:07:54
  Speaker 1: we're talking about it is not necessarily an endorsement of it.
• 1:07:58
  Speaker 1: I wanted to bring it up mainly because her husband,
• 1:08:01
  Speaker 1: who she's not quite divorced from yet but they're working
• 1:08:03
  Speaker 1: on it, is supporting this. And I think that men
• 1:08:06
  Speaker 1: should have standards. The thousand guys should have standards, and
• 1:08:10
  Speaker 1: the husband who's just like, oh, you go Gray, That's
• 1:08:12
  Speaker 1: where my issue is at. There are hoes, they exist,
• 1:08:16
  Speaker 1: but I don't think that a woman who bangs a
• 1:08:19
  Speaker 1: thousand dudes in a day is even doing any of
• 1:08:22
  Speaker 1: those men a service, much less her ex husband or
• 1:08:25
  Speaker 1: her soon to be ex husband, A regular prostitute, you know,
• 1:08:30
  Speaker 1: might might be serving like a dude that night if
• 1:08:34
  Speaker 1: depending on what it is he needs. But this is
• 1:08:36
  Speaker 1: not that. She is not your average three or four.
• 1:08:39
  Speaker 1: She's something else, and she's doing it for herself.
• 1:08:42
  Speaker 3: But I said, this is not an accomplishment. There's nothing
• 1:08:44
  Speaker 3: special about this. This is no, it's not educational. There's
• 1:08:50
  Speaker 3: no value to this. None of the things that are
• 1:08:52
  Speaker 3: values that are being applied to this are applicable. There's
• 1:08:56
  Speaker 3: nothing special or remarkable about this at all. It can
• 1:08:59
  Speaker 3: be dimmed in as you know, she's basically lowering a
• 1:09:04
  Speaker 3: profession that people already treat as the bottom of the barrel.
• 1:09:09
  Speaker 3: But in terms of all the positive things that people
• 1:09:12
  Speaker 3: have tried to say about it, none of them apply.
• 1:09:16
  Speaker 2: Look, I'm glad the subject of logistics was brought into this,
• 1:09:22
  Speaker 2: because all right, logistically, it's arguably not possible. So I'm
• 1:09:28
  Speaker 2: gonna say it. I don't think it's real. I don't
• 1:09:30
  Speaker 2: think any of this is real. I don't think anyone
• 1:09:34
  Speaker 2: fucked one hundred guys in the day. I don't think
• 1:09:36
  Speaker 2: anyone fucked a thousand guys a day. I think this
• 1:09:38
  Speaker 2: is thoughts and ho bags, making shit up for publicity,
• 1:09:43
  Speaker 2: and I can show my workings if you'll indulge me. Yeah,
• 1:09:47
  Speaker 2: one hundred men in twenty four hours. It's about four
• 1:09:51
  Speaker 2: men per per hour. That means they get about fifteen
• 1:09:55
  Speaker 2: minutes each to go through the motions of entering the room,
• 1:10:01
  Speaker 2: perhaps introducing themselves, presenting their paperwork perhaps, and then mounting
• 1:10:07
  Speaker 2: the giant, glistening pile of other men's come, and then
• 1:10:14
  Speaker 2: somehow getting erect and then and then they do their
• 1:10:19
  Speaker 2: thing and then they leave. I mean, what do you
• 1:10:22
  Speaker 2: do if they can't get erect?
• 1:10:24
  Speaker 1: I don't think. Well, what I would say is I
• 1:10:26
  Speaker 1: don't think that. Well, there is there's called fluffer, But.
• 1:10:31
  Speaker 2: I mean, I forbid they can't get erect. As they
• 1:10:34
  Speaker 2: gaze into this abyss of other men's come, do you
• 1:10:38
  Speaker 2: just sort of grab the tip of his flaccid cock
• 1:10:41
  Speaker 2: and then forcibly thrust it forward into yourself like you're
• 1:10:45
  Speaker 2: wringing the neck of a chicken, and then you go,
• 1:10:48
  Speaker 2: fuck it. That counts legally, that counts, Get the fuck
• 1:10:52
  Speaker 2: out of here and send in number fifty five.
• 1:10:55
  Speaker 3: They might have actually done it that way. Yeah, engage
• 1:11:00
  Speaker 3: in a lot of stimulation and.
• 1:11:03
  Speaker 2: Imagine being number sixty nine. By the way, that's going
• 1:11:06
  Speaker 2: to be a moment nice. We gotta do it right,
• 1:11:09
  Speaker 2: I mean, it would be weird if we didn't do it. Sorry,
• 1:11:13
  Speaker 2: for some reason, I'm unable to get hard right now,
• 1:11:16
  Speaker 2: shut up, give me that grab, shove, cry, send in
• 1:11:21
  Speaker 2: number seventy and this is this is taking a day
• 1:11:28
  Speaker 2: to be twenty four hours. By the way, if that's
• 1:11:32
  Speaker 2: the case, she's going to be asleep by the end
• 1:11:35
  Speaker 2: of it. She's going to be asleep sooner than normal.
• 1:11:38
  Speaker 2: If I know anything about zex, So the last sixteen
• 1:11:43
  Speaker 2: guys are going to be basically graping her. Right if
• 1:11:47
  Speaker 2: you fuck a stranger when she's asleep, that absolutely is grape.
• 1:11:53
  Speaker 2: There's no way that's happening without the police getting involved.
• 1:11:57
  Speaker 2: So we have to adjust to no more than twenty
• 1:12:01
  Speaker 2: hours for a day. Few people can stay awake for
• 1:12:07
  Speaker 2: more than twenty hours, and so that's one man every
• 1:12:11
  Speaker 2: twelve minutes. I so a thousand men in twenty hours,
• 1:12:16
  Speaker 2: and I'm gonna do twenty hours because I don't know
• 1:12:19
  Speaker 2: how to work out twelve hours. One thousand men in
• 1:12:23
  Speaker 2: twenty hours is one man every seventy two seconds. And
• 1:12:27
  Speaker 2: that has to take place in an average of seventy
• 1:12:31
  Speaker 2: two seconds. The only way you could possibly achieve this
• 1:12:35
  Speaker 2: is if every man in that line is already erect
• 1:12:40
  Speaker 2: by the time he walks in. And the image of
• 1:12:44
  Speaker 2: a thousand men waiting in line, fluffing themselves as they've
• 1:12:50
  Speaker 2: reached the front of the queue is an image to
• 1:12:52
  Speaker 2: which I react with skepticism. I suppose it would work
• 1:12:57
  Speaker 2: if they were all given viagra, But again I'm finding
• 1:13:02
  Speaker 2: myself skeptical of the image I find myself drawing. You
• 1:13:08
  Speaker 2: might say I'm only believing what I want to believe,
• 1:13:11
  Speaker 2: and maybe that's true. We sometimes say we choose to
• 1:13:14
  Speaker 2: believe things, but we don't choose to believe things. We
• 1:13:17
  Speaker 2: can't help believing things.
• 1:13:20
  Speaker 1: But we can.
• 1:13:21
  Speaker 2: Choose to think about something else, like a better world, perhaps,
• 1:13:26
  Speaker 2: And I choose to think about a world in which
• 1:13:30
  Speaker 2: these competitive prostitutes are not in fact fucking a thousand
• 1:13:36
  Speaker 2: men in a day. They are lying. They are making
• 1:13:39
  Speaker 2: it up for publicity. And I choose to think this
• 1:13:44
  Speaker 2: because otherwise there is a reality in which a woman
• 1:13:49
  Speaker 2: is shoving a thousand flaccid dick heads into her go
• 1:13:54
  Speaker 2: be desert of a dilapidated vagina for attention, and I
• 1:14:00
  Speaker 2: just don't want to believe in that world. Maybe I do.
• 1:14:03
  Speaker 4: Believe in that world.
• 1:14:04
  Speaker 2: Maybe it really has come to that. I just don't
• 1:14:11
  Speaker 2: want to believe it, and so I won't. I want.
• 1:14:14
  Speaker 2: I want to think about the beautiful life I have
• 1:14:18
  Speaker 2: with my beautiful friends, and my beautiful family, and my
• 1:14:21
  Speaker 2: beautiful lady and my beautiful audience. Come, let's come anymore?
• 1:14:29
  Speaker 2: Betread before, friends, family, countrymen. We live a good life. Really,
• 1:14:37
  Speaker 2: it's fine. We might be getting arrested for expressing any
• 1:14:40
  Speaker 2: in group preference, but at least we're not shoving soft
• 1:14:45
  Speaker 2: cocks into ourselves every seventy two seconds for the amusements
• 1:14:50
  Speaker 2: of people who don't give a shit. And that's not
• 1:14:52
  Speaker 2: happening either. Enjoy your lives, folks. There's nothing to see here.
• 1:14:57
  Speaker 2: There's nothing to see it, and you ought not to
• 1:15:00
  Speaker 2: see it. Don't want to describe none of it.
• 1:15:05
  Speaker 3: I want the trad cons to come up with their
• 1:15:07
  Speaker 3: own uh competition and and the the women of neo
• 1:15:13
  Speaker 3: trad con status, the ones that you know are are
• 1:15:16
  Speaker 3: influencers and and make YouTube videos and the like about
• 1:15:22
  Speaker 3: how traditional and conservative they are. Same sandwich making contest.
• 1:15:27
  Speaker 3: Who who can make a thousand sandwiches?
• 1:15:30
  Speaker 1: A thousand sandwiches, Now that's something I would, you know,
• 1:15:33
  Speaker 1: would actually get a cho for.
• 1:15:36
  Speaker 3: They have to be good sandwiches too.
• 1:15:38
  Speaker 1: Of course they have tood sandwiches.
• 1:15:40
  Speaker 3: He's a ham in between two slices of bread. I mean,
• 1:15:42
  Speaker 3: we're you know.
• 1:15:43
  Speaker 1: No, it's got to have all the topics and with
• 1:15:46
  Speaker 1: the olive, just like the cartoons.
• 1:15:48
  Speaker 3: Yep, yep. Yeah, who can make the most sandwiches? You know,
• 1:15:51
  Speaker 3: who can make a thousand sandwiches and the fastest amount
• 1:15:54
  Speaker 3: of time and have them be good sandwiches? And of
• 1:15:57
  Speaker 3: course this must be judged by by the of the
• 1:16:01
  Speaker 3: neo tread con tradition.
• 1:16:05
  Speaker 1: Yeap. Just to add I agree with that. Just to
• 1:16:09
  Speaker 1: add a little bit more so I did. I saw
• 1:16:12
  Speaker 1: some interviews with her about this, and I just want to,
• 1:16:15
  Speaker 1: you know, clarify someone because people also had questions about
• 1:16:17
  Speaker 1: the logistics. So this is what she said about this. Okay.
• 1:16:21
  Speaker 1: Number one, most of those guys did not have an orgasm.
• 1:16:25
  Speaker 1: They were on a strict time limit, and it was
• 1:16:28
  Speaker 1: definitely multiple men at any given time. Pointing out that
• 1:16:33
  Speaker 1: most of these men were non white, well, yeah, they
• 1:16:36
  Speaker 1: they had like a few minutes and was at a time,
• 1:16:39
  Speaker 1: and it didn't matter if you came or not. You
• 1:16:40
  Speaker 1: had to leave and we had to move on the
• 1:16:42
  Speaker 1: next thing. Because the goal was not make a thousand
• 1:16:44
  Speaker 1: guys come, The goal was fuck a thousand guys. So
• 1:16:48
  Speaker 1: what qualifies is that could be not a lot. But
• 1:16:52
  Speaker 1: they had a few minutes and it was like a
• 1:16:55
  Speaker 1: group at a time, and they didn't all use the
• 1:16:57
  Speaker 1: same holes. It was basically like aim cast and they
• 1:17:02
  Speaker 1: didn't finish. I mean some probably did because she did
• 1:17:05
  Speaker 1: supposedly get some, but like probably the majority did not.
• 1:17:10
  Speaker 1: So this is like the I guess you could say
• 1:17:14
  Speaker 1: she may have technically did the thing that she said
• 1:17:16
  Speaker 1: she was going to do, but it didn't look a
• 1:17:18
  Speaker 1: way that you think.
• 1:17:20
  Speaker 3: In addition to them.
• 1:17:22
  Speaker 1: She didn't satisfy them, I'm saying no, Yeah.
• 1:17:25
  Speaker 3: In addition to them walking away not satisfied, they also
• 1:17:29
  Speaker 3: we were in a position because I mean, she'd have
• 1:17:32
  Speaker 3: to you know, to be crude, she'd have to Eiffel
• 1:17:35
  Speaker 3: power this, or like I said, there'd have to be double.
• 1:17:40
  Speaker 1: It was at least four dudes at a time. If
• 1:17:43
  Speaker 1: I if I at least.
• 1:17:45
  Speaker 3: Four years, you end up in a situation where you
• 1:17:48
  Speaker 3: know you're you're actually in physical contact with the other guys.
• 1:17:52
  Speaker 1: Yeah, it wasn't. It wasn't about their pleasure, So you
• 1:17:56
  Speaker 1: know that that's what That's what I'm saying. And so
• 1:17:59
  Speaker 1: not only that, but it is obviously it's really sad
• 1:18:02
  Speaker 1: that guys were even like, yeah, we'll do that. But
• 1:18:05
  Speaker 1: but again, the true story here is the like unconditional
• 1:18:11
  Speaker 1: support of her husband. That's like he must have had
• 1:18:15
  Speaker 1: the biggest chair in the house, That's what I'm saying.
• 1:18:19
  Speaker 1: So anyway, that's really what it is. You know, I
• 1:18:23
  Speaker 1: know that this is a special case of not having standards,
• 1:18:27
  Speaker 1: but I just want you guys to know that these
• 1:18:30
  Speaker 1: men exist and that's an example. So all right, anyway,
• 1:18:34
  Speaker 1: let me know what you guys think about this one
• 1:18:37
  Speaker 1: in the comments. I do have one more thing. It's
• 1:18:39
  Speaker 1: not confirmed, but this is something that Hannah sent but
• 1:18:42
  Speaker 1: I do want to clear basically for the record say
• 1:18:45
  Speaker 1: that this is not confirmed as true because we're waiting
• 1:18:50
  Speaker 1: on more data. So but I will go through this,
• 1:18:54
  Speaker 1: so just say this is a possibility. We may have
• 1:18:59
  Speaker 1: some more information concerning the assassination attempt on the president
• 1:19:04
  Speaker 1: on July thirteenth. Okay, in Butler, Pennsylvania. This is a
• 1:19:13
  Speaker 1: let's see a whistleblower's criminal complaint, and it's blacked out
• 1:19:19
  Speaker 1: the names here, but it says I am in receipt
• 1:19:21
  Speaker 1: of your private criminal complaint which you have filed against
• 1:19:25
  Speaker 1: Governor Joshua Shapiro for the alleged involvement in the attempted
• 1:19:32
  Speaker 1: homicide of former President Donald J. Trump on July thirteenth,
• 1:19:35
  Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, in Butler County, Pennsylvania. Please be advised
• 1:19:39
  Speaker 1: there are multiple investigations currently being conducted by various government agencies.
• 1:19:45
  Speaker 1: Due to these pending investigations, I am disapproving your private
• 1:19:50
  Speaker 1: criminal complaint, Signed Richard A. Goldinger, District Attorney of Butler County.
• 1:19:57
  Speaker 1: And here is something for Pennsylvania arrest warrants. It says,
• 1:20:02
  Speaker 1: it's hard to believe that there may be a bigger
• 1:20:04
  Speaker 1: story today than the final score of the Super Bowl
• 1:20:06
  Speaker 1: that happened. Oh yeah, that was a game on Sunday.
• 1:20:09
  Speaker 1: President Donald Trump learned today a federal whistleblower and former
• 1:20:13
  Speaker 1: Pennsylvania State Police employee has come forward with information and
• 1:20:17
  Speaker 1: filed a criminal complaint this week. On February seventh, twenty
• 1:20:21
  Speaker 1: twenty five, allegedly linking the Pennsylvania Governor josh Shapiro with
• 1:20:25
  Speaker 1: the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, allegations from the private
• 1:20:30
  Speaker 1: criminal complaint quote. In the weeks leading up to the
• 1:20:33
  Speaker 1: Trump rally, President Joseph Barbiden made frequent visits to defendant
• 1:20:36
  Speaker 1: Joshua Shapiro to discuss the obstacle face by the Democratic Party.
• 1:20:40
  Speaker 1: Joshua Shapiro organized, schemed, and conspired with other officials to
• 1:20:44
  Speaker 1: carry out the attempted assassination against former President Donald J.
• 1:20:48
  Speaker 1: Trump end quote and then again quote. Governor josh Shapiro facilitated, planned,
• 1:20:54
  Speaker 1: and coordinated the attempted assassination to climb the political ladder.
• 1:20:59
  Speaker 1: On July thirteen, twenty twenty four, this fiant contacted the
• 1:21:04
  Speaker 1: Secret Service to provide a tip, which was blocked by
• 1:21:07
  Speaker 1: Biden's administration on Let's see. On July fifteen, twenty twenty four.
• 1:21:13
  Speaker 1: Through July twenty third, twenty twenty four, this offiant communicated
• 1:21:17
  Speaker 1: with Secret Service Agent John T. Donahue and provided numerous
• 1:21:22
  Speaker 1: documentations related to the crimes committed by Governor Joshua Shapiro
• 1:21:26
  Speaker 1: and the Philadelphia FBI's involvement in covering up the crimes
• 1:21:30
  Speaker 1: of defendant Joshua Shapiro. Agent John T. Donahue sent the
• 1:21:35
  Speaker 1: complaint to headquarters, but the Biden administration blocked it. A
• 1:21:38
  Speaker 1: March ninth, twenty twenty four, Supervisory Special Agent Kenneth Keller
• 1:21:42
  Speaker 1: advised this fiant through email that he contacted the FBI
• 1:21:47
  Speaker 1: Philadelphia personnel FBI Victim Services and Management at the Washington
• 1:21:52
  Speaker 1: Field office, and that they advised him to direct the
• 1:21:56
  Speaker 1: affiant to Philadelphia. FBI Agent kenn Keller informed this affient
• 1:22:02
  Speaker 1: that the crimes being reported are not occurring in his
• 1:22:06
  Speaker 1: jurisdiction and that he has no jurisdiction to assist Pennsylvania victims.
• 1:22:12
  Speaker 1: He advised the affient to contact the Department of Justice.
• 1:22:15
  Speaker 1: This affient contacted Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation.
• 1:22:20
  Speaker 1: Up until recently, ex FBI Director Christopher Ray was conspiring
• 1:22:24
  Speaker 1: with the Biden administration and concealing the reports. Now that
• 1:22:27
  Speaker 1: he has resigned, his private criminal complaint must this private
• 1:22:32
  Speaker 1: criminal complaint must be investigated. And then there's the affidavit.
• 1:22:38
  Speaker 1: I'm not going to read the whole thing, but again,
• 1:22:40
  Speaker 1: like I said, this is not confirmed, but it is
• 1:22:44
  Speaker 1: out there. We will see if there is more information.
• 1:22:47
  Speaker 1: I do want to point out that Josh Shapiro was
• 1:22:50
  Speaker 1: originally like, uh, sort of like the the let's say,
• 1:22:56
  Speaker 1: potential vice I believe it is to Joe Biden before
• 1:23:02
  Speaker 1: they switched it out for Kamala Harris. I think he
• 1:23:05
  Speaker 1: was the one that or Kamala Harris was looking for
• 1:23:07
  Speaker 1: a vice and it was going to be Josh Shapiro.
• 1:23:08
  Speaker 1: That's what it was for the Harris campaign. He was
• 1:23:11
  Speaker 1: he was like the front runner, but because of everything
• 1:23:15
  Speaker 1: that was going on with Gaza and Palestine and Israel,
• 1:23:19
  Speaker 1: they didn't think that he was a good representative because
• 1:23:22
  Speaker 1: Shapiro's Jewish, so they I'm just saying that. That's sort
• 1:23:25
  Speaker 1: of like in case you want to know who this
• 1:23:27
  Speaker 1: guy is. That's a little bit that I do know
• 1:23:30
  Speaker 1: is that he was I think he was going to
• 1:23:32
  Speaker 1: be the vice president before they went with Tim Walls.
• 1:23:37
  Speaker 1: And uh yeah, that's basically again not confirmed, but nonetheless
• 1:23:42
  Speaker 1: worth mentioning. So I don't know if you guys want
• 1:23:44
  Speaker 1: to add anything to that.
• 1:23:46
  Speaker 3: The thing that I found interesting about this is like
• 1:23:49
  Speaker 3: I could understand if you were making a complaint about
• 1:23:53
  Speaker 3: something that was maybe only a big deal to the
• 1:23:58
  Speaker 3: people involved in it, like, you know, somebody, somebody had
• 1:24:03
  Speaker 3: their their valuable jewelry stolen, and you know, you thought
• 1:24:10
  Speaker 3: you knew something about the case, and you used a
• 1:24:12
  Speaker 3: criminal complaint to get the information to the local prosecuting attorney,
• 1:24:17
  Speaker 3: and the prosecuting attorney was like, well, we have other leads,
• 1:24:20
  Speaker 3: so we're going to ignore your complaint, right, But this
• 1:24:23
  Speaker 3: was an assassination, an assassination attempt on the president of
• 1:24:30
  Speaker 3: the United States, and a lead was ignored. Oh, this lead, No,
• 1:24:38
  Speaker 3: we're not gonna look at it because we got a
• 1:24:39
  Speaker 3: bunch of others. No, you don't do that. You go
• 1:24:41
  Speaker 3: down every avenue, you look at every bit of information,
• 1:24:45
  Speaker 3: and if somebody is actually providing misleading statements that don't
• 1:24:53
  Speaker 3: really have anything to do with the case because maybe
• 1:24:58
  Speaker 3: they they want something they happen, or they want attention
• 1:25:02
  Speaker 3: or for whatever reason, then you go through and you
• 1:25:06
  Speaker 3: apply the penalties for the process crimes that are that
• 1:25:10
  Speaker 3: are committed. Because it's uh in in the United States,
• 1:25:14
  Speaker 3: we don't necessarily have wasting police time as listed as
• 1:25:19
  Speaker 3: a process crime, but lying the police during an investigation
• 1:25:23
  Speaker 3: is a process crime, and you actually can get charged
• 1:25:27
  Speaker 3: for that. And you you actually can get convicted and
• 1:25:31
  Speaker 3: penalized for that. So that's the that's the way I
• 1:25:36
  Speaker 3: handle something like this. If it's a false complaint, you prosecute.
• 1:25:40
  Speaker 3: If it's if you don't have evidence showing that it's
• 1:25:44
  Speaker 3: a false complaint, you investigate, period. And and that's not
• 1:25:50
  Speaker 3: what appears to have happened here. So that's something that
• 1:25:55
  Speaker 3: not only should the complaint be getting investigated, but if
• 1:26:01
  Speaker 3: this really happened, if this is real, and you know
• 1:26:05
  Speaker 3: this district attorney attorney was like, I'm not gonna investigate
• 1:26:09
  Speaker 3: that complaint, he should be called in and made to
• 1:26:13
  Speaker 3: explain that why did you ignore this lead? Because that's
• 1:26:19
  Speaker 3: that's a big deal.
• 1:26:22
  Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, Mike, do you want to say anything
• 1:26:27
  Speaker 1: or if not, I'm going to all right, I'm gonna
• 1:26:32
  Speaker 1: take us to the Patron Show. But let us know
• 1:26:34
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about this. Again, I'm not no, no,
• 1:26:37
  Speaker 1: you know, we don't know this for sure. Hopefully this
• 1:26:39
  Speaker 1: gets looked into, but we will see. All right, So
• 1:26:43
  Speaker 1: we're gonna go, oh, what's am I gonna say something? No,
• 1:26:46
  Speaker 1: So we're gonna go into the Patron Show now and
• 1:26:48
  Speaker 1: we're gonna talk with the patrons about whatever they want
• 1:26:51
  Speaker 1: to talk about. But I will have this up as
• 1:26:53
  Speaker 1: a as a framework under which we can have conversations.
• 1:26:57
  Speaker 1: We can talk about whatever there was, like definitely others.
• 1:26:59
  Speaker 1: I could probably go on Twitter and find out what
• 1:27:01
  Speaker 1: the latest, you know, the latest scuttle butt is about Doge,
• 1:27:07
  Speaker 1: but I think I'll wait until then. But it is
• 1:27:10
  Speaker 1: kind of it is surreal to find yourself becoming so
• 1:27:13
  Speaker 1: relevant all of a sudden. Now everyone pays attention to
• 1:27:17
  Speaker 1: the Doge. All right, So anyway, thank you guys for
• 1:27:21
  Speaker 1: coming on the show. Thank you Hannah and Mike as
• 1:27:24
  Speaker 1: usual for helping me out. If you guys liked this video,
• 1:27:26
  Speaker 1: please hit like, subscribe. If you're not already subscribed, hit
• 1:27:28
  Speaker 1: the bellf notifications, leave us a comment, let us know
• 1:27:31
  Speaker 1: what you guys think about what we discussed on the
• 1:27:32
  Speaker 1: show today. And you can look check out the links
• 1:27:37
  Speaker 1: in the description for all of the resource or the
• 1:27:39
  Speaker 1: sources to our stories. And yeah, please share this video
• 1:27:44
  Speaker 1: because sharing is caring. Thank you guys so much for
• 1:27:46
  Speaker 1: coming on today's episode of HPR News, and we will
• 1:27:49
  Speaker 1: talk to you guys in the next video