Latest / Reformed Thinking / Toward a Biblical Model of Cultural Engagement

Transcript

Toward a Biblical Model of Cultural Engagement · Reformed Thinking

0:00
So imagine you have spent 10 years living in a remote,
0:03
restricted village in Central Asia.
0:06
You speak the local dialect, Florida State.
0:08
You. Probably blend right in.
0:10
Oh absolutely. I mean, you wear the traditional
0:12
clothing so well that from a distance nobody even notices you
0:16
are a foreigner, you drink tea with the village elders every
0:19
single afternoon, and you are universally liked.
0:23
You are basically considered a friend of the community at that
0:25
point. Yeah, precisely.
0:27
And yet in all that time, over a decade of shared meals and local
0:31
integration, you have never once clearly verbally explained the
0:35
gospel of Jesus Christ, which is.
0:38
A terrifying thought. It really is.
0:39
The question you have to ask yourself is are you actually a
0:42
missionary or are you just a highly dedicated long term
0:45
tourist? That is the $1,000,000 question
0:48
right there. Welcome to Reformed Thinking.
0:50
Today we are undertaking a massive deep dive into the
0:54
absolute core of what it means to engage a culture with the
0:57
truth of Scripture. It is going to be a heavy one.
1:00
It is. We are analyzing excerpts from a
1:02
text called Biblical Missions, Principles, Priorities, and
1:05
Practices by Mark Tatlock and Chris Burnett.
1:08
And we also have some incredibly sharp inserts from contributors
1:12
like Edie Burns, Peter Olatan and Elsie Ridley.
1:15
We do, and our mission for this deep dive is to tear down our
1:20
assumptions and really reconstruct the biblical
1:23
missions model of cultural engagement.
1:26
Yeah, we are looking at the mechanics.
1:28
You know how believers can faithfully deliver the precise
1:31
meaning of Scripture in foreign context out compromising
1:35
theological truth. And, crucially, doing it without
1:38
capitulating to cultural pressures.
1:40
Right, which is where so many people stumble.
1:42
We. Do and look if you are listening
1:43
to this right now thinking, well I don't need this because my
1:46
passport has expired, you need to recalibrate.
1:49
Oh, absolutely. This is an intelligence briefing
1:51
for your daily life. This deep dive is for anyone
1:54
desiring to carry out the Great Commission in your own corporate
1:57
office, your own neighborhood HOA, or your own local church.
2:01
They're doing it while resting entirely on the doctrines of
2:03
grace. Spot on.
2:05
So let's get right into the text.
2:07
Chris Burnett diagnosis a massive malfunction in how
2:10
modern workers approach cultural engagement.
2:13
He really does. It is a brilliant diagnostic
2:16
tool because, well, it forces us to look in the mirror.
2:19
Yeah. He identifies a spectrum with
2:21
two extremely dangerous polarizing extremes.
2:25
And both of them guarantee failure.
2:27
They do. So let's unpack that.
2:28
What is the first extreme? Burnett points out.
2:31
Well, on one side of this spectrum, you have workers who
2:34
prioritize theological precision to the exclusion of almost
2:37
everything else. Including human relationships.
2:40
Yes, especially human relationships.
2:42
They maintain this rigid, almost clinical, interpersonal distance
2:46
from the local people. They've all seen this archetype.
2:48
Right. Oh, totally.
2:49
I mean, they have their systematic theology completely
2:51
dialed in. Their grasp of the original
2:53
languages is flawless. They can parse every Greek verb
2:56
in the New Testament. Exactly.
2:58
But on the ground, after years in the field, the locals just
3:02
view them as strange, aloof foreigners who happen to hold a
3:06
different religious text. Yeah, the tragedy in that
3:09
scenario is that Jesus Christ is presented in a way that feels
3:12
completely superfluous to the daily lived reality of the
3:16
people. Right.
3:17
The local culture is minimally acknowledged or sometimes even
3:22
openly disdained. Which creates a massive,
3:24
unnecessary sociological barrier to the gospel.
3:27
It really does. I mean, they have the truth, but
3:30
they have barricaded it behind a wall of interpersonal apathy.
3:34
I want to look at the psychology behind that first extreme,
3:37
especially within our own theological circles.
3:40
Yeah, let's do that. Because there is a psychological
3:42
safety in dealing with proposition on a page rather
3:46
than the messy reality of a human soul.
3:49
Oh, 100%. When you reduce the mission to
3:51
just passing an unblemished theological exam, you don't have
3:55
to engage with the agonizing, complicated lives of the local.
3:59
It is a defense mechanism. It keeps you clean, so to speak.
4:01
Yeah, but then you swing the pendulum all the way to the
4:03
other side and you find the second extreme.
4:05
Which is arguably much more prevalent today.
4:08
Right. This is where workers prioritize
4:10
cultural integration so highly that they actually lose sight of
4:14
the gospel itself. They adopt the lifestyle of the
4:17
host culture so thoroughly. You know, the dress, the slang,
4:21
the entertainment, the social causes.
4:23
And what happens? They slip into a blithe apathy
4:26
regarding the spiritual state of the locals.
4:28
Yeah, they become so obsessed with fitting in, with not
4:33
offending anyone, with being perceived as a local, that the
4:36
actual urgency of the Great Commission just evaporates.
4:39
What is incredibly revealing about Burnett's analysis here is
4:42
that he notes both of these extremes, despite looking like
4:46
total opposites, are marked by the exact same underlying flaw.
4:50
Yeah, they really are. They both exhibit a severe
4:52
degree of indifference toward the people they're supposed to
4:54
be reaching. Think about it.
4:56
Whether you are aloof and precise or totally integrated
4:59
and silent, you are failing to love your neighbor enough to
5:02
communicate the truth of their condition to them in a way they
5:04
can understand. Streams are fundamentally
5:07
selfish. They are the aloof worker loves
5:10
his theological comfort zone more than the locals.
5:13
And the integrated worker loves the locals approval more than he
5:17
loves their eternal souls. Man, that is a heavy
5:20
realization, and it brings us to the biblical standard which
5:24
Burnett anchors in the Apostle Paul's methodology.
5:27
Specifically in First Corinthians Chapter 9.
5:29
Right. This is the passage where Paul
5:31
states he has become all things to all men, that he might by all
5:35
means save some, Yes. Let me push back on that though,
5:39
or at least play devil's advocate for a second.
5:41
Sure, go ahead, because I hear that specific verse weaponized
5:45
constantly to justify almost any pragmatic maneuver.
5:50
All the time. People will say, hey, I'm just
5:52
becoming all things to all men. And they use it to justify
5:56
watering down the church gathering, or participating in
5:58
questionable cultural practices or avoiding hard theological
6:02
conversations. Yeah, they treat it like a hall
6:04
pass. Right.
6:05
Isn't Paul giving us a blank check for integration here?
6:08
The authors push back hard on that loose interpretation, don't
6:11
they? They absolutely push back on it,
6:13
and they do so by applying basic exegetical discipline.
6:16
Which is so necessary? It is if we connect this single
6:20
verse to the broader context of Paul's life, his other letters
6:24
and his actions in the book of Acts, we see a very rigid
6:28
boundary line. What does that boundary look
6:30
like? Well, Paul altered aspects of
6:32
his life that were strictly morally neutral.
6:36
He adapted his dialect, he changed his clothing, he altered
6:40
his diet depending on whether he was sitting with Jews or
6:42
Gentiles. He submitted to local
6:44
authorities. Right.
6:45
He did all of this to remove unnecessary stumbling blocks and
6:48
gain a hearing. But the method of his engagement
6:51
was never, ever to alter the gospel by capitulating to common
6:55
concepts that would dilute the truth.
6:57
He never tried to synchronize Christianity with the false
7:00
beliefs of the host culture. Never.
7:02
Nothing was inviolable except his obedience to Christ.
7:05
He gladly sacrificed his own customs, his Western comforts
7:08
and his personal freedoms, but he never sacrificed the truth.
7:11
He understood the difference between cultural fluency and
7:14
theological compromise. That distinction is everything,
7:17
and I want to tie this directly into our reformed understanding
7:20
manning of human nature, specifically total depravity.
7:23
Oh that is great connection. Let's dig into that.
7:26
Because if you hold to the Westminster Confession, you have
7:28
a very specific lens through which you view human culture.
7:32
You do. There is this romanticized
7:34
notion out there that if you go far enough into the Amazon or
7:38
high enough into the Himalayas, you will find some pristine,
7:42
innocent human culture that just needs a little Jesus added to
7:46
the mix. Like they are noble savages or
7:48
something. Yeah, exactly.
7:49
But total depravity dictates that no culture is inherently
7:53
neutral or good, right? Every single human culture,
7:56
including our own Western culture, is constructed by
7:59
fallen, rebellious human beings. Which means every culture
8:02
carries the stain of sin. At least 4 The Gospel must
8:05
always confront human nature, regardless of the geographic
8:08
location. Absolutely, adapting to a
8:10
culture never means softening the sharp edges of God's law.
8:13
And that is precisely where the friction happens.
8:15
It is the Law still condemns and the Gospel still saves, and that
8:21
reality transcends every cultural boundary on earth.
8:24
You cannot affirm a culture in its entirety because large
8:28
portions of that culture are built in direct rebellion
8:30
against the Creator. Yeah, the goal is not to
8:33
validate their current state. The goal is to rescue them out
8:37
of it. We have to view this through a
8:39
theological lens, not a sociological.
8:41
One, if we fail to recognize the inherent fallenness of the
8:45
culture, we will inevitably try to merge the gospel with their
8:49
existing idols. Which neutralizes the message
8:52
entirely. Let's frame this with an analogy
8:55
to explain the mechanics of what goes wrong with those two
8:57
extremes we discussed earlier. OK, I'll see here.
8:59
Think about a computer operating system.
9:02
A culture's worldview is like the base code, the kernel of the
9:05
operating system. Right, the core programming.
9:07
Yeah, so the first extreme, the aloof, precise worker, is like a
9:11
programmer who writes a brilliant piece of software.
9:15
OK, but he writes it in an entirely different programming
9:18
language and just drops the raw code onto the user's desktop
9:22
without an installer the. System can't read it.
9:25
Right, it just sits there completely useless because the
9:28
programmer refused to translate it into a compatible format.
9:31
That is a great picture. And then the second extreme, the
9:34
culturally absorbed worker tries to install the new software, but
9:39
they are terrified of deleting the old corrupt operating
9:42
system. I see where this is going.
9:44
So they tried to run 2 contradictory kernels at the
9:47
exact same time. They want the software of
9:49
Christianity to run concurrently with the malware of the local
9:53
Pagan culture. And what happens?
9:55
The system inevitably crashes. You cannot run a holy gospel on
9:59
a depraved cultural operating system.
10:02
Both approaches fail the user completely.
10:05
That analogy perfectly captures the systemic failure of bad
10:09
Messiology. It really does.
10:11
And if we pull this away from foreign borders and look at our
10:13
own local churches right now, we can see these exact extremes
10:17
sitting in the pews. Oh.
10:18
Absolutely, Absolutely. I mean, are there believers in
10:21
your local congregation who are theoretically precise, who know
10:24
the catechisms backward and forward, who can debate super
10:27
lapsarianism all day long? But who are interpersonally
10:31
frigid and completely detached from their unbelieving
10:33
neighbors. Yeah, exactly.
10:35
Conversely, are there members of the congregation who are so
10:38
engrossed in secular culture, so desperate for the approval of
10:42
their progressive Co workers that they actively hide their
10:46
faith? They never bring up the
10:47
exclusivity of Christ. Right.
10:49
Both of these extremes represent a catastrophic failure to
10:53
properly engage the culture with the objective truth of God's.
10:57
Word establishing that both of these extremes fail leads us
11:00
into a critical pivot in the text.
11:03
We have to question what the correct method actually entails.
11:06
And this brings us to a concept introduced by the authors that
11:09
is frankly going to make a lot of modern readers squirm.
11:12
Yeah, they definitely will. They introduce the necessity of
11:15
assertion. Assertion, right?
11:17
They argue that true cross cultural communication is not
11:20
just a neutral transfer of information.
11:22
It is not an academic lecture. It is a confrontational act.
11:25
It is the worker is called the Ministry of Assertion, which
11:29
they define as the declarative verbal proclamation of Biblical
11:33
positions. And the stated aim of this
11:34
assertion is to intentionally disrupt the Unbeliever's
11:37
worldview. Yes, and the text specifically
11:39
highlights how this runs contrary to the prevailing mood
11:42
of contemporary interreligious dialogue.
11:45
Oh, for sure. In academic circles today, the
11:48
goal of dialogue is mutual understanding, sharing ideas,
11:51
and finding common ground so everyone can walk away feeling
11:54
validated. But the biblical model of
11:56
assertion has a radically different goal.
11:58
It does. The goal is to provoke the
12:00
audience to abandon their prior spiritual knowledge and adopt
12:04
the new content as the objective, exclusive Word of
12:08
God. Edie Burns describes the
12:10
objective as creating cognitive dissonance, a severe tension in
12:14
the unbeliever's interpretation of reality.
12:16
You want them to doubt the source and authority of their
12:19
own belief system. You have to expose the fact that
12:21
their answers to life's ultimate questions are totally
12:25
dissatisfying and logically bankrupt.
12:27
OK, I have to stop here and push back on this because we really
12:30
need to defend this position against the obvious modern
12:33
criticism. Bring it on.
12:34
In today's highly sensitive postmodern climate, the phrase
12:38
confrontational assertion sounds aggressively arrogant.
12:42
It does sound harsh to modern ears.
12:44
People will immediately accuse this model of being theological
12:47
colonialism. They will say you are just
12:50
acting like 19th century imperialists going in to destroy
12:54
local culture and impose your Western superiority.
12:58
I have heard that exact critique.
12:59
Right. So how do we square this idea of
13:02
intentional worldview disruption with the clear biblical commands
13:06
to be gentle, to be winsome, and to live peaceably with all men?
13:10
How is this not just theological bullying?
13:13
That is the defining question of modern missiology, and the
13:16
author's make a vital, highly nuanced distinction here.
13:19
What is the distinction? We have to understand the vast
13:22
difference between being a provocateur and being a biblical
13:25
expositor. OK, unpack that.
13:27
A provocateur confronts just to get a reaction.
13:29
They smash cultural idols just to stir the pot, usually out of
13:33
a sense of pride or desire for a fight.
13:35
Just trying to be edgy. Yeah, an expositor, however,
13:38
confronts. Because the objective truth
13:40
inherently challenges falsehood, the confrontation is baked into
13:45
the gospel itself. You don't have to add the
13:46
offense, it is already there. Exactly the mechanism of this
13:50
assertion must be governed by Ephesians chapter 4, verse 15,
13:54
speaking the truth in love. And Colossians 4/6 with grace,
13:58
seasoned with salt. Right.
14:00
You are aiming to dismantle a false worldview, yes, but you do
14:05
it with a good conscience and Immaculate conduct.
14:07
You take extreme care to avoid unnecessarily offending the
14:11
audience with your personal habits or your tone.
14:14
The offense should come strictly from the exclusivity of the
14:17
gospel, not from the arrogance, the harshness, or the cultural
14:20
insensitivity of the messenger. The message is the stumbling
14:23
block, not the messenger. That clarifies the mechanism
14:27
beautifully. It really does.
14:29
If they are offended, let them be offended by the cross, not by
14:32
your lack of manners. And the text points out that
14:35
this kind of rigorous, assertive communication is not just for
14:38
the unbeliever on the street. No, it is desperately required
14:41
inside the local church as well. The authors pivot to talk about
14:44
the necessity of moving believers from the milk of the
14:46
word to solid food, drawing on Hebrews chapter 5.
14:50
They are looking at the internal health of the church, not just
14:53
its external outreach. And this is where the daily
14:56
grinding pressure of ministry really exposed loses a pastor's
15:00
priorities. The authors note a very
15:03
concerning trend here. What do they point out?
15:05
Some workers even domestically become so consumed with pre
15:09
evangelistic activities outside the church, networking, building
15:12
community relationships, running social programs.
15:15
Essentially just trying to be seen as a good guy in the
15:17
neighborhood. Right.
15:18
They do all that and they have very little time or energy left
15:21
to actually prepare themselves for the pulpit.
15:23
Yeah, when a leader neglects grueling exegetical study and
15:27
careful pulpit preparation in favor of social activities, the
15:30
congregation suffers immensely. They remain spented.
15:34
They become sluggish in their thinking.
15:35
They lack the theological spine required to withstand worldly
15:39
opposition. You end up with a church full of
15:41
spiritual infants who completely cower when the secular culture
15:45
pushes back against them. Because this assertion, this
15:48
declarative proclamation, must be so carefully managed to avoid
15:52
unnecessary offense while still retaining its razor sharp
15:55
theological edge, the model institutes 3 specific
15:59
guardrails. The text refers to these as the
16:03
parameters of cultural engagement.
16:05
I want to spend significant time on each of these because they
16:07
form the boundaries of how we operate.
16:09
They are. Crucial, they outline the
16:11
theological parameter, the linguistic parameter, and the
16:14
spiritual renewal parameter. Let's look at the theological
16:17
guardrails first, because they dictate the actual aim of the
16:20
mission. The theological parameter is
16:22
entirely built on the recognition of mankind's
16:25
fallenness. Because human beings are dead in
16:28
their trespasses and sins, as Ephesians chapter 2 clearly lays
16:32
out. Right.
16:32
So the immediate overriding mission of the Church is
16:36
reconciling individuals to God. It is the ministry of
16:39
reconciliation described in Second Corinthians chapter 5.
16:42
The primary goal of the church is not achieving society wide
16:46
political shifts. It is not fixing every social
16:48
ailment, eradicating poverty or building a utopian society.
16:52
No, and this aligns directly with the Westminster Confessions
16:55
view of human inability. Fallen man cannot produce God
16:59
pleasing spiritual fruit individually.
17:02
Nor can he produce it corporately as a political
17:04
culture. Therefore, true cultural
17:06
engagement must maintain a laser focus on preaching the gospel to
17:10
unrepentant sinners for their individual salvation.
17:13
If you lose sight of the theological parameter, you
17:16
inevitably slide into the social gospel.
17:18
Where you are just making people more comfortable on their way to
17:21
hell. Is a harsh way to put it, but it
17:23
is true. That sets up the target.
17:25
Now let's look at the linguistic parameter, which dictates how we
17:29
hit that target. This section is brilliant.
17:31
I found it fascinating because it attacks a very popular,
17:35
prevalent academic idea. Yeah, if you spend any time in
17:38
modern linguistics departments, you will hear the theory that
17:41
certain concepts are completely untranslatable.
17:44
The postmodern argument. Right.
17:46
They argue that because languages are inextricably tied
17:49
to their specific localized cultures, you can never truly
17:53
express the exact meaning of an ancient Near Eastern text in a
17:56
modern foreign language. They argue the worldview gap is
17:59
too wide. But the source text pushes back
18:01
against this linguistic relativism with incredible
18:04
force. It pushes back by relying on the
18:07
reality of language universals. Which is a concept that even
18:10
secular linguists like Noam Chomsky have had to acknowledge.
18:13
Right. The authors argue that all human
18:16
languages, no matter how isolated the culture, operate
18:19
according to established universal grammatical rules.
18:23
Because human beings share the same image of God and the same
18:26
cognitive structures. Exactly.
18:28
Our languages are fully capable of accurately expressing the
18:31
meaning of Scripture in any specific context.
18:34
While the original biblical languages and the target
18:37
languages are indeed culture bound, those differences do not
18:40
block the discovery of the original meaning.
18:43
They do not distort the underlying theological message.
18:46
Human languages share simple foundational concepts with words
18:50
that function similarly, leading to stable meanings that are
18:53
commonly recognized across the human experience.
18:57
This gives the worker massive, unshakable confidence.
19:00
They can know that the objective propositions of Scripture can be
19:03
accurately expressed and fully understood anywhere on earth.
19:06
The Gospel is translatable by design.
19:09
Let's expand on the mechanics of translation to really illustrate
19:12
this linguistic parameter. OK, let's hear an example.
19:15
Think about Isaiah chapter one, verse 18.
19:18
Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white
19:21
as snow. A classic verse.
19:23
Now imagine you are a worker trying to communicate the
19:26
theological weight of that specific verse to an isolated
19:30
tribe living in a dense tropical jungle near the equator.
19:33
OK, they have never seen snow. They don't have a word for
19:37
frozen precipitation in their entire vocabulary.
19:40
Right, the concept is foreign to them.
19:41
So the postmodern linguist would say see untranslatable.
19:45
The cultural context of snow is lost, therefore the verse is
19:49
meaningless to them. But does that mean the
19:50
theological weight of justification is lost?
19:53
Not at all. The universal underlying concept
19:56
is pure spotless white or something completely Florida
20:00
State washed clean. Right, that proposition can
20:03
absolutely be communicated accurately in their language.
20:06
You don't need frozen water crystals to explain the washing
20:09
away of sin. The proposition of justification
20:11
remains completely intact. You find their equivalent for
20:14
spotless purity, and the truth lands with the exact same force.
20:17
That is a brilliant way to explain how propositions survive
20:21
cultural gaps. And that brings us to the third
20:24
guardrail, the spiritual renewal parameter.
20:27
The authors refer to this as the process of indigenization, and
20:31
it is vital we understand what this actually means.
20:33
This is the long term goal of the mission, right?
20:35
Yes. The endpoint is the individual
20:38
believer comprehending the translated text, applying it in
20:42
obedience to Christ, and actively repudiating their prior
20:46
Pagan idolatry. They conform their lifestyle to
20:48
scripture within their own local context.
20:51
The goal is absolutely not to make them act like Americans or
20:54
Europeans. The goal is for them to worship
20:57
the true God with a new transcultural identity of faith.
21:01
They reject the sinful, idolatrous customs of their
21:03
heritage. Things like ancestral worship,
21:06
animism, them corrupt business practices.
21:08
Right, while comfortably retaining the morally neutral
21:11
aspects of their local culture, like their music styles, their
21:14
food, and their social structures.
21:16
They become a Christian expression of their own culture,
21:18
not a clone of the missionaries culture.
21:20
Knowing these absolute boundaries, these parameters of
21:23
engagement, moves us from the theoretical into the incredibly
21:28
practical. The text provides A rigorous
21:30
sequence dividing the work of church planting into two
21:34
distinct major phases. Preparation and proclamation.
21:38
I want to look at the preparation phase first because
21:40
it is grueling. It really is.
21:42
This phase includes learning conservative doctrine, mastering
21:45
original language exegesis, achieving fluency in the target.
21:49
Language and spending massive amounts of time observing the
21:52
cultural customs and social dynamics of the locals.
21:55
When you look at the psychological weight of this
21:57
preparation phase, why do you think so many people fail here,
22:01
or worse, get permanently stuck here?
22:04
People get stuck in the preparation phase because of the
22:06
psychological comfort of being a student.
22:08
Oh, that makes a lot of sense. When you are in the preparation
22:11
phase, you are learning, you are observing, you are asking
22:15
questions, you are building relationships and drinking tea.
22:18
Everyone loves the guy who is trying to learn their language
22:21
and understand their customs. You get a constant dopamine hit
22:24
of approval from the local community.
22:26
It is safe. There is 0 friction.
22:29
But the authors draw a hard, unyielding line here.
22:32
They do all of those pre evangelistic activities,
22:35
observing the culture, seeking to understand their worldview,
22:38
building initial relationships. They are absolutely essential,
22:42
but they are not the mission. They are not the proclamation
22:45
itself. Proclamation requires
22:47
verbalizing the Gospel. It requires asserting the truth.
22:51
You can spend 15 years building an incredible relationship with
22:54
the village chief. You can know all his
22:56
grandchildren's names. But until you verbally declare
22:59
the propositions of Scripture regarding his sin and his need
23:03
for a Savior, you have not engaged in proclamation.
23:06
You have. Just been a good neighbor the.
23:07
Fear of friction is the great paralyzer of missions.
23:11
It really is. You don't get deported or
23:12
persecuted for learning the local dialect.
23:15
You get persecuted for declaring that Christ is the exclusive way
23:18
to the Father. And looking at the proclamation
23:20
phase, there is a very strong, undeniable reformed theological
23:24
connection in how the authors structure it.
23:27
The text places a massive central focus on utilizing
23:30
expository preaching and raising up qualified local male elders.
23:35
Pointing directly to First Timothy chapter 3 and Titus
23:37
chapter 1. This heavily reflects our
23:40
historical belief in the primacy of the preached word.
23:43
We believe the expositional preaching of the Word is the
23:45
ordinary means of grace that the Holy Spirit uses to regenerate
23:50
dead sinners and sanctify His people.
23:52
We don't rely on skits or emotional manipulation or smoke
23:56
machines. No, we rely on the public
23:58
reading and explaining of the text.
24:00
And that reliance on the text is what builds A lasting
24:03
institution. The authors are incredibly clear
24:06
that discipleship is the central thrust of the Great Commission.
24:09
And that happens primarily through the local church, via
24:12
the expositional teaching of scripture.
24:14
The goal of the missionary is to make himself obsolete.
24:16
It is not about generating a massive temporary crowd to write
24:20
about in a newsletter. No, it is about taking
24:23
regenerate believers and systematically maturing them by
24:26
the action of the Holy Spirit and the Word of God.
24:29
So that local, biblically qualified men can eventually
24:32
take over the pastoral duties. The Western worker is supposed
24:35
to hand over the keys and step back.
24:37
If the church cannot survive without the Western workers
24:40
funding or presence, it is not an indigenous church.
24:44
It is a dependent franchise. There's a stark way to frame it,
24:47
but it is completely accurate the.
24:49
Hesitancy to cross that threshold from preparation into
24:52
proclamation, that deep seated fear of friction we talked
24:56
about, it creates a massive vulnerability.
24:59
It really does. When workers hesitate to
25:01
proclaim objective truth, they look for bypasses.
25:04
They look for ways to make the numbers go up without
25:06
experiencing the pain of cultural pushback.
25:09
They start adopting flawed, highly pragmatic methods to try
25:13
and speed up results or make the message more palatable to the
25:16
local mindset. And this leads us right into one
25:19
of the most sobering, frankly terrifying sections of our
25:22
sources. Edie Burns provides an insert
25:24
regarding false teachings that are currently sweeping through
25:27
Asia disguised as mythological pragmatism.
25:30
These errors creep in unnoticed because they are pitched as
25:33
highly useful strategies. They claim to make the Bible
25:36
more culturally relevant. We need to examine the four
25:39
major errors. He identifies the honor shame
25:42
gospel, rapid cycle, church planting, egalitarian
25:45
leadership, and insider movements.
25:48
Let's tackle the Honor Shame gospel first.
25:50
What is the sociological appeal of this and why is it so deadly?
25:54
The sociological appeal is massive in Eastern cultures,
25:58
which is why it is so dangerous. Burns vigorously critiques the
26:01
Honor Shame gospel. Let's understand the mechanics
26:03
of this error. Proponents of this view look at
26:06
Asian cultures and observe that their entire society is built on
26:09
maintaining honor and avoiding shame.
26:12
Rather than a Western legal concept of guilt and innocence.
26:15
Right. So the pragmatist suggests that
26:17
the traditional doctrine of justification, the idea of a
26:20
forensic legal declaration of righteousness by a cosmic judge,
26:24
is just a Western concept imposed on the Bible.
26:27
They claim it doesn't resonate with the locals.
26:29
So they change the message. They redefine faith to mean
26:32
faithfulness or loyalty to a patron.
26:34
They teach that if you maintain strict loyalty to God, you earn
26:38
His honor. He removes your societal shame
26:41
and he adopts you into his family.
26:44
So they are entirely gutting the legal mechanism of the
26:46
atonement. They are.
26:48
They are turning faith from an instrument that receives grace
26:51
into a work that earns honor. Precisely.
26:54
It is pure works righteousness cloaked in anthropological
26:58
jargon. It completely destroys the
27:00
doctrine of justification by faith alone.
27:03
As Bruns points out, this is the exact same false gospel Paul
27:06
raged against in his letter to the Galatians.
27:08
It is the same merit based system the reformers battled in
27:11
the 16th century. We are not justified by our
27:14
loyalty or our faithfulness to God.
27:16
We are justified solely by the perfect faithfulness and the
27:19
imputed righteousness of another, the Lord Jesus Christ.
27:22
If you lose the legal nature of justification, you lose the
27:26
gospel entirely, no matter how much it resonates with their
27:28
cultural understanding of shame. The second pragmatic error Burns
27:32
addresses is rapid cycle church planting.
27:35
This is driven by an intense, almost corporate obsession with
27:38
speed and metrics. You see organizations promising
27:41
methods that will generate multiple new churches every
27:43
single. With generations of disciples
27:46
reproducing in weeks. It sounds amazing in a prayer
27:48
letter, but Burns points out the prioritizing speed in this
27:52
manner directly violates clear scriptural commands regarding
27:55
church polity. Specifically Source Timothy
27:58
chapter 3, verse 6. Which explicitly forbids
28:01
appointing a new convert as an elder.
28:03
When you rush the process, the institutional damage is
28:06
catastrophic. You cannot hack spiritual
28:09
maturity. It takes years of life
28:11
experience, suffering and deep study to forge a man into a
28:14
qualified elder. When you prioritize rapid
28:17
multiplication, you end up installing novices into
28:20
leadership positions. Paul warns that a novice will
28:23
become puffed up with conceit and fall into the condemnation
28:26
of the devil. You end up with hundreds of
28:28
shallow, emotionally driven house churches led by men who
28:31
have 0 theological depth and terrible character flaws.
28:34
When the first wave of persecution hits or a clever
28:38
false teacher arrives, those rapid cycle churches
28:40
disintegrate overnight because they have no doctrinal
28:43
foundation. It is the parable of the soils
28:46
playing out on a massive scale. It really is.
28:48
The third error is egalitarian leadership, and this is where we
28:52
see pragmatism directly attacking biblical authority.
28:55
Burns notes that many cultures in Asia are traditionally
28:58
matriarchal, or at least heavily influenced by female community
29:02
leaders. In an effort to remove friction
29:04
and be culturally relevant, some Western workers encourage men
29:07
and women alike to work as elders and pastors.
29:10
They actively evade the Apostle Paul's clear, restrictive
29:13
instructions regarding male headship in the church.
29:17
And the hermeneutical gymnastics they used to justify this are
29:20
astounding. To make this work, they have to
29:22
claim that Paul's pastoral epistles were just wise,
29:25
localized recommendations for a specific 1st century matriarchal
29:30
context. Rather than universally binding
29:32
authoritative scripture. They argue that if Paul were
29:35
alive today in a matriarchal culture, he would change his
29:38
mind. This is a tragic example of
29:40
elevating cultural tradition over scriptural authority.
29:43
Once you can see that clear commands in the New Testament
29:45
can be ignored if they clash with local customs, you have
29:48
surrendered the entire authority of the Bible.
29:50
You no longer have a standard, you just have sociology.
29:53
Yes, the 4th error is perhaps the most extreme and the most
29:57
heartbreaking insider movements. This relates to the massive
30:01
tension of how quickly individuals from Islamic or
30:04
Hindu backgrounds should publicly withdraw from their
30:07
former customs after coming to Christ.
30:10
Burns notes a terrifying trend where workers actually advise
30:13
new believers to remain insiders.
30:16
Meaning they are told to secretly worship Issa, the
30:20
Arabic name for Jesus in their hearts.
30:22
While continuing to attend the mosque, continuing to pray
30:25
toward Mecca, and maintaining all external Islamic religious
30:29
customs. They are told to blend in
30:30
completely to avoid persecution. Burns rightfully calls this an
30:34
extreme position that completely contradicts the call to
30:37
discipleship that Jesus demanded.
30:39
Jesus said whoever denies me before men, I also will deny
30:43
before my Father who is in heaven.
30:44
The insider movement promotes a gospel of safety, secrecy and
30:48
massive compromise. What makes it so heartbreaking,
30:50
as Burns points out, is the tragic irony on the ground.
30:53
You often have local indigenous believers who read the Gospels,
30:56
count the cost, and insist on suffering for Christ.
30:59
They want to break free from their false religions and be
31:02
baptized publicly, fully knowing they might face martyrdom.
31:05
But they face immense pressure to stay hidden.
31:09
Not from the local imams, but from the Western missionaries
31:12
who are pushing them to remain secret insiders to inflate the
31:16
movement's numbers. It is missiological malpractice.
31:19
It absolutely is. Think about all four of these
31:21
pragmatic methods like a mechanic working on a vehicle.
31:26
OK, I like this. The engine warning light comes
31:28
on, flashing red on the dashboard.
31:31
That light indicates a severe, complex problem under the hood,
31:35
maybe a cracked block or a failing transmission.
31:38
Something major. Adopting these hyper
31:40
contextualized methods is like a mechanic who doesn't want to do
31:43
the hard messy work of tearing down the engine.
31:46
So does he do? Instead, he just reaches under
31:48
the dashboard, grabs a pair of wire cutters and snips the wire
31:52
to the warning light. Wow.
31:54
He turns to the customer and says, look, the light is off,
31:57
everything is fine, you are good to go.
31:59
It makes the customer feel great in the moment.
32:01
It looks like a brilliant quick fix, but the underlying rot is
32:05
still there, and by ignoring the friction he guarantees a total
32:09
catastrophic engine failure at highway speeds later down the
32:12
road. You cannot bypass the hard truth
32:15
of Scripture for the sake of speed, comfort, or cultural
32:19
appeasement. The mechanic analogy is spot on.
32:22
Pragmatism always looks like a shortcut until the engine blows
32:26
up. Because these hyper
32:27
contestualized methods completely fail the test of
32:30
biblical fidelity, we are forced to look for an approach that is
32:34
both biblically sound and highly effective.
32:37
Especially in restricted nations where traditional open
32:40
missionary methods are entirely illegal.
32:42
How do you penetrate a country that won't give you a religious?
32:45
Visa. And that question pivots us
32:47
beautifully into the final major concept from our sources.
32:51
We are looking at inserts from Peter Elletan and Elsie Ridley
32:54
regarding marketplace ministry. Historically known as tent
32:56
making, right? This involves entering a
32:58
restricted country not as an official religious worker, but
33:01
via a legitimate, demanding secular profession.
33:05
You go in as an engineer, an English teacher or a business
33:07
consultant. But Ridley makes it clear
33:10
there's a right way and a highly deceptive wrong way to execute
33:14
this. Really draws a sharp, vital
33:16
contrast between what he calls the platform model and the
33:20
authentic marketplace ministry model.
33:22
In the platform model, the worker or the sending agency
33:25
creates a fake business. Or the worker takes a low level
33:28
job they care nothing about purely as a front to secure a
33:31
visa. The business is a shell, but
33:34
here is the reality. Locals are incredibly observant.
33:39
They are not easily fooled. When they ask basic questions
33:42
about the business, or notice the worker has no real
33:45
customers, or watch the worker stumble to explain their actual
33:49
daily schedule, it breeds intense suspicion.
33:51
The locals naturally assume the worker is hiding something
33:54
nefarious. Maybe they are CIA, maybe it is
33:56
a money laundering front, or maybe they are just liars.
33:59
It is completely self defeating for evangelism because you have
34:02
destroyed your own integrity and it leads to massive
34:05
psychological burnout for the worker living a double life.
34:08
On the flip side, you have the genuine marketplace ministry
34:10
model. This is where the worker secures
34:13
a real, highly demanding job that actually fits their
34:16
professional skill set. And meets a genuine economic or
34:19
social need in the local community.
34:21
They are doing work they are fully qualified for and they are
34:24
doing it with excellence. And here is where the strategy
34:27
gets incredibly compelling. Elsie Ridley introduces this
34:31
concept called the 10 X Factor. The statistic he provides in the
34:35
text is absolutely staggering. Think about a traditional
34:39
religious worker in a restricted area who is trying to operate
34:42
under the radar. Because of security concerns,
34:45
they might only spend about 6 hours a week actually
34:48
interacting with locals, usually in highly controlled settings on
34:51
the weekends. But a marketplace worker?
34:53
They spend up to 60 hours a week fully immersed with the locals.
34:57
They ride the same crowded bus. They work the same stressful
35:00
shift. They take the same lunch breaks.
35:02
They complain about the same supply chain issues.
35:04
It yields 10 times the relational footprint completely
35:07
organically if we pull. Back and look at the theological
35:10
foundation of this. It ties directly into the robust
35:13
Protestant doctrine of vocation. During the Reformation, Luther
35:17
and Calvin fought hard to reclaim the idea that all honest
35:22
secular labor is honorable before God.
35:25
Working with excellence in a corporate environment, as
35:27
commanded in Ephesians chapter 6, is not a distraction from the
35:31
Great Commission. It is not something you rush
35:33
through so you can get to the real ministry on the weekend.
35:35
The work itself actually authenticates the gospel
35:38
message. The workers daily life, their
35:41
professional integrity, their rigorous work ethic, their calm
35:45
response to corporate stress or unfair bosses.
35:47
It all becomes highly visible, undeniable proof of God's
35:51
renewing work in their life. The locals begin to see that
35:54
this person operates differently not because they are from a
35:57
Western culture, but because their core identity is anchored
36:01
in Christ. The medium becomes a massive
36:03
part of the message. Of course, the text is brutally
36:06
honest about the toll this takes.
36:07
It does not romanticize by vocational ministry.
36:10
There are immense crushing challenges. 1st, there is
36:14
significant physical risk if you are caught evangelizing in
36:17
restricted nations. But beyond that, there's the
36:20
sheer grinding exhaustion of working A50 hour week at a
36:23
secular job, commuting, and then trying to do intentional
36:28
ministry discipleship and language study on top of it.
36:31
You are burning the candle at both ends constantly.
36:34
The text heavily stresses the critical need for external
36:37
accountability groups, mentioning organizations like
36:40
C-12 to keep these marketplace workers spiritually focused.
36:44
Without intense accountability, it is incredibly easy for the
36:48
worker to just get swallowed up by the corporate grind, chase
36:51
the next promotion, and forget why they moved to the Middle
36:54
East in the first place. The physical and mental
36:56
attrition rate is high and the toll on families cannot be
36:59
overstated. It requires A singular,
37:01
unrelenting focus. But the mythological efficiency
37:05
of the marketplace ministry model is undeniable.
37:07
It legally embeds the worker directly into the deepest veins
37:11
of the mission field, providing natural high trust relationships
37:14
that a traditional funded worker might never ever access.
37:17
You are reaching the business leaders, the politicians and the
37:21
cultural influencers right where they spend most of their waking
37:24
hours. Which naturally, brings the
37:25
crosshairs right back to you, the listener.
37:28
We started this deep dive looking at foreign soil, but the
37:31
application lands right in your driveway.
37:33
Let's synthesize the core truths we have uncovered today.
37:35
True cultural engagement, whether you are trying to plant
37:39
a church in Southeast Asia or trying to witness to your
37:42
neighbor in the suburb of Chicago, requires a resolute
37:46
adherence to objective biblical truth.
37:49
It requires A willingness to vocally assert that truth, fully
37:54
knowing it will cause friction and disrupt false world views.
37:57
And it requires the strategic long term wisdom to integrate
38:01
into a community genuinely avoiding the extremes of
38:04
aloofness and cultural absorption, often through
38:07
honest, hard secular labor. This force is a very challenging
38:11
reflection, building on that concept of the 10 X Factor if.
38:14
Faith workers in restricted regions of the Middle East are
38:18
utilizing their exhausting 50 hour work weeks as their
38:21
primary, most effective means of building trust and
38:23
authenticating the gospel. Look at your own secular job.
38:26
How do you view your Monday through Friday occupation?
38:29
Are you viewing your job simply as an irritating obstacle to
38:32
your faith, a place you just endure until you can get to
38:36
church on Sunday? Or are you realizing that you
38:38
already possess the 10 X Factor in your own city?
38:42
Your cubicle, your construction site, your corporate office, the
38:46
school where you teach. That is your restricted nation.
38:49
That is your specific area of cultural engagement.
38:52
You already have the visa, you already know the language
38:55
perfectly. You already have the massive
38:57
relational footprint with people who will never walk into a
39:00
church building. The only question remaining is
39:02
whether you have the theological courage to actually use it for
39:06
the Ministry of Assertion. We started this discussion
39:09
talking about medical diagnosis and the murky waters of cultural
39:12
engagement. The diagnostic X-ray might not
39:15
always be perfectly clean. The cultural variables might be
39:18
incredibly complex, but the prescribed medicine never ever
39:22
changes. The unvarnished gospel is still
39:24
the only remedy for a depraved culture.
39:27
Thank you for joining us for this deep dive on reformed
39:29
thinking. Keep reading, keep questioning
39:31
the pragmatism around you, and we will catch you next time.