Latest / Mini Scroll / MINI SCROLL: Optimisation culture pushback, Patrick Ta x Jackie Aina blush updates + court date for viral driver

Transcript

MINI SCROLL: Optimisation culture pushback, Patrick Ta x Jackie Aina blush updates + court date for viral driver · Mini Scroll

• 0:00
  Coming up today on mini scroll, Internet users are turning on
• 0:04
  optimization culture. We have some Patrick Taw
• 0:07
  transition blush updates and the creator who got a fine for
• 0:11
  holding her phone in her right hand while driving when she
• 0:14
  doesn't even have a right hand to begin with has gone to court.
• 0:18
  Hi everyone, welcome to Mini Scroll, the daily Internet
• 0:22
  culture podcast bringing you the biggest stories from social
• 0:25
  media, the creator economy and the digital space every Monday
• 0:28
  through Thursday and sometimes Fridays.
• 0:30
  I'm your host, Lauren Meissner, the founder of the youth digital
• 0:34
  media brand Centennial World. Welcome back to Mini Scroll,
• 0:38
  everyone. OK, fun little tidbit for you
• 0:41
  guys. If you guys want to hear more
• 0:42
  from me, you probably don't hearing me like 5 days a week in
• 0:45
  your ears. But if you do want to hear more,
• 0:47
  I did an interview on the Female Startup Club podcast last week
• 0:51
  and it's gone Live Today, so I will link it in the show notes
• 0:54
  if you guys want to take a listen.
• 0:55
  We talked about like the business journey and honestly, I
• 0:58
  can't really listen to myself, so I don't really know what was
• 1:00
  left in, but we talked about the business journey and like the
• 1:03
  behind the scenes of building and that kind of stuff.
• 1:05
  All right, in classic, actually, I feel like today is not that
• 1:08
  weird. I was going to say in classic,
• 1:09
  like Friday mini vibes, we have some random stories.
• 1:13
  I feel like today's isn't so bad.
• 1:17
  We'll see. OK, let's get into the stories
• 1:19
  for today. So the first story that I have
• 1:21
  for you guys today is there's this growing conversation online
• 1:24
  right now about personal optimization culture and how in
• 1:27
  the pursuit of essentially peak well and productivity, we are
• 1:32
  collectively losing the meaning of life.
• 1:35
  So this sounds really heavy, but essentially the conversation
• 1:37
  started after a clip of Stephen Bartlett, who is the host of
• 1:40
  Diarrhea of ACEO went viral this week in which he talks about a
• 1:43
  recent time when he had a few glasses of wine and it ruined
• 1:47
  the next three days of his life. He said he had poor sleep, lower
• 1:51
  energy, worse workouts and decreased focus.
• 1:54
  And he tracked this all on his Is it whoop?
• 1:57
  Is that what it's called the whoop watch or whatever Whoop.
• 2:00
  I had a couple of glasses of wine, didn't get drunk.
• 2:03
  It ruined 3 days of my life because of the the domino effect
• 2:06
  it caused. So it meant that I got worse
• 2:08
  sleep that night and then because I got worse sleep that
• 2:10
  night, I ate more poorly the the next day because my my dopamine
• 2:13
  system or whatever the cortisol system was all messed.
• 2:16
  Up. And then I, I podcasted worse.
• 2:19
  I didn't go to the gym the, the day after that, that day or the
• 2:22
  day after because of that, because I felt really bad.
• 2:24
  I then slept worse and I could track all of this on my week.
• 2:26
  Hashtag add #sponsor #investor. Whatever.
• 2:28
  So this clip has spawned infinite responses, many from
• 2:32
  other really influential business people and creators who
• 2:35
  are using it as like a jumping off point to talk about how far
• 2:38
  we've gone with optimization culture.
• 2:40
  And for what? Like what is the point in all of
• 2:43
  this? Optimization culture has gone
• 2:45
  too far and it is spiritually killing us.
• 2:48
  Stephen Bartlett posted a video that he had a few glasses of
• 2:51
  wine and it ruined the next three days of his life.
• 2:53
  His sleep score was off, he ate poorly and couldn't go to the
• 2:56
  gym. Now take it from me, a reformed
• 2:58
  optimizer. I logged my activity for three
• 3:00
  years straight when I woke, what I drank, whether I exercised.
• 3:04
  I tally this up at the end of the year.
• 3:05
  But for what? A moral superiority that I drank
• 3:08
  less or that I exercised 5 1/2 days a week?
• 3:11
  We need a 90 sleep score, 10,000 steps a day, a bed cooled to 68
• 3:15
  degrees, 6 miles on Strava, all for us to be better at sending
• 3:18
  emails or talking on a podcast. We have gummies for sleep,
• 3:22
  supplements for stress, nicotine for focus.
• 3:24
  All done for the promise of a better, happier self.
• 3:27
  We've been optimizing for years, yet somehow we are more
• 3:30
  isolated, more anxious and less happy.
• 3:32
  Optimization culture teaches us how to live longer while
• 3:35
  completely missing the point of why we're even alive.
• 3:38
  We used to think that drinking a little bit of alcohol was better
• 3:41
  for you than drinking no alcohol at all, and we have since
• 3:43
  learned that that is not true. There is no amount of alcohol
• 3:46
  that's better for you than no alcohol.
• 3:48
  But what is good for you is hanging out with your loved ones
• 3:51
  in catching a vibe or like relaxing and enjoying a good
• 3:54
  meal. All things that often happen
• 3:56
  while you're consuming alcohol. So for a long time, we took the
• 3:59
  correlation between drinking alcohol and enjoying yourself
• 4:03
  and accredited the positive effects to the alcohol itself
• 4:06
  when it's really just about the catching a vibe part.
• 4:08
  But there's something to be learned in this, which is that
• 4:11
  it is often not in doing the thing that is most good for us
• 4:14
  at any given moment that can be better for us in the long term.
• 4:18
  I think it's really critical that we analyze what these
• 4:22
  thought leaders are saying even in passing.
• 4:25
  And my belief is that the optimization culture has gotten
• 4:29
  out of control. It is robbed an entire
• 4:31
  generation of joy because of the demonization of fun.
• 4:36
  If you don't have a perfect sleep score, if you don't get up
• 4:38
  and have a green juice and go to yoga, Oh well, you're you're the
• 4:41
  worst. Oh, my God.
• 4:42
  You know, that's the, that's the worst thing that you could
• 4:44
  possibly do for yourself. Yeah.
• 4:47
  Have you noticed happiness levels have been plummeting?
• 4:49
  Maybe that's because we're monitoring every single thing
• 4:52
  about ourselves. OK, so I wanted to talk about
• 4:54
  this discussion because I think social media is a huge culprit
• 4:58
  in the takeover of optimization culture and I also think
• 5:02
  technology as a whole. So we are constantly exposed to
• 5:06
  everyone's highlight reel, which we have been for a really long
• 5:08
  time. But with TikTok specifically, we
• 5:12
  are constantly exposed to everyone's like productive day
• 5:15
  in the life. They're hyper structured
• 5:17
  routines, their Wellness hacks, their endless self improvement.
• 5:20
  And that's not to say that this didn't exist online before, but
• 5:24
  you know, you kind of had to seek out that content before.
• 5:26
  If you think about it in terms of like YouTube or something
• 5:28
  where you find a video and then you actively choose to watch it.
• 5:32
  TikTok, on the other hand, it just exposes us to content,
• 5:36
  whether we want to see it or not.
• 5:37
  It's like passive consumption that we're exposed to when we're
• 5:40
  endlessly scrolling. And we did see this type of
• 5:42
  messaging within the hustle bro millennial girl boss era where
• 5:47
  it was like prioritize productivity over rest.
• 5:50
  However, there are some differences that I see between
• 5:53
  that era and now. One of the main differences as
• 5:56
  someone who came of age in that peak time.
• 5:57
  And as a result, I am very girl boss coded.
• 6:00
  I say that all the time. It is so hard for me to
• 6:02
  deprogram, especially because I am like a quote UN quote
• 6:06
  founder. Well, I am a founder, but you
• 6:07
  know what I mean? Like I, I have to kind of like
• 6:09
  walk that walk sometimes. It's so hard for me to deprogram
• 6:13
  that despite me knowing better. But you know, we worked hard,
• 6:16
  but we also played hard. Like that was the mentality back
• 6:21
  then. Now we just have like, work hard
• 6:24
  and rest hard so that you can be optimized for working hard.
• 6:29
  Like truly, even in the most toxic height of this, like
• 6:33
  millennial hustle culture era, the mindset of working hard and
• 6:38
  girl bossing to the top was so that you could make money and
• 6:41
  have freedom to have fun. This is from Tom Ward for Inside
• 6:45
  Hook. He writes quote why we're so
• 6:47
  obsessed with being more and being better right now.
• 6:49
  Psychotherapist Eloise Skinner thinks is partly to do with the
• 6:52
  effects of capitalism. In this system, output,
• 6:55
  productivity levels and performance are highly regarded,
• 6:58
  and with wearable trackers and helpful apps everywhere, it's
• 7:01
  easier than ever to keep score. Quote.
• 7:03
  When we see optimization aligned so closely with the prevailing
• 7:06
  cultural values, we can end up feeling like our pursuit of
• 7:09
  better is linked to our self worth, identity, and personal
• 7:12
  values, she says. The narrative suggests that if
• 7:15
  we're not diligently tracking our health metrics or
• 7:17
  meticulously refining our routines, we're somehow falling
• 7:20
  behind, adds clinical psychologist Dr. Sarah Bishop.
• 7:23
  Ironically, the more we struggle to meet these unrealistic
• 7:26
  standards, the worse we feel about ourselves, leading to a
• 7:29
  sense of worthlessness. And yes, I believe the other
• 7:32
  element of this is all the tech that Skinner mentioned in that
• 7:35
  quote plays a huge role in it, right?
• 7:37
  Like millennials and other generations.
• 7:39
  Like we could play hard without the guilt.
• 7:42
  There was no like tangible proof in the moment that what we were
• 7:45
  doing was like destroying our bodies.
• 7:47
  Like if you guys have ever partied with your Apple Watch on
• 7:49
  or anything like that, you know how horrifying it is to see that
• 7:53
  data. Or even with just stress, Like
• 7:54
  even if you haven't been drinking or anything and you see
• 7:57
  your stress levels, like all of that is adding to your stress.
• 8:00
  Like all of that is just not good for you to know, in my
• 8:03
  opinion. So I really believe the lack of
• 8:05
  information that we had on how all of that was affecting our
• 8:08
  bodies, that led to more flexibility and like what we
• 8:12
  expected from ourselves. And I also think that led to
• 8:15
  significantly less guilt. And therefore there was like no
• 8:18
  moral judgement or moral value placed on having fun.
• 8:22
  There's so much judgement that people put on themselves now,
• 8:26
  but also on others when we watch them have fun, including online.
• 8:31
  There's this, like, sense of moral superiority for those who
• 8:34
  seem to prioritize, like their quote UN quote Wellness by being
• 8:38
  like, I don't know what's the trend?
• 8:39
  Like, being like, I'm such a grandma at 20 years old.
• 8:41
  I go to bed at 9:00 PM every night.
• 8:44
  And like, obviously I'm not saying drinking and partying is
• 8:47
  good for you or that you should be going out and doing this.
• 8:49
  And like, God knows, I was a party girl in my 20s.
• 8:52
  But like, if I had several glasses of wine, that would also
• 8:55
  ruin my next three days. Like, I understand what Stephen
• 8:57
  Bartlett is saying there because I cannot hang like I used to.
• 9:01
  But the point is like there is this middle between like going
• 9:05
  so hard and then like doing nothing.
• 9:09
  You know where life happens? It life happens in that middle
• 9:12
  life, especially when you're young.
• 9:14
  Like it can't just all be about making sure you get 8 hours of
• 9:17
  sleep every single night. Like exactly like for what?
• 9:20
  For what? Yes, of course, most of the time
• 9:23
  that is great, that's healthy for you and you're going to feel
• 9:26
  your best. But like for what?
• 9:28
  And anyone who knows me in real life, if you're listening to
• 9:30
  this, you're probably like, that is so ironic because literally I
• 9:35
  prioritize being optimized so that I can work on any given day
• 9:39
  for as long as I need to. Like, that is the priority in my
• 9:41
  life. But that's because I'm like in
• 9:43
  this phase of life of like trying to build a business.
• 9:46
  Like I had 10 plus years before this of like truly living like
• 9:51
  going so hard, having so much fun, prioritizing having fun
• 9:54
  over everything. And that was also when I was the
• 9:57
  happiest 100%. So on this Friday mini scroll, I
• 10:01
  implore you to go out and enjoy the weekend.
• 10:04
  I won't because I will be writing a grant for Centennial,
• 10:07
  but I implore you to go have fun.
• 10:11
  Take off your Apple Watch, take off your whoop or whatever your
• 10:14
  aura ring and just like, have fun, OK?
• 10:16
  Who cares if you don't sleep? Who cares if you don't make it
• 10:18
  to the gym? Just have fun.
• 10:20
  Know your limits, but have fun. Have fun responsibly.
• 10:23
  OK, the next story that I have for you guys today is we have a
• 10:26
  Patrick Todd transition blush update.
• 10:29
  I have a few updates here so I covered this earlier this week,
• 10:32
  but Patrick Todd, he released transition blushes.
• 10:35
  His brand released transition blushes inspired by a technique
• 10:38
  that has been popularized by a smaller black makeup artist
• 10:41
  painted by Esther. So first Kevin Aquan, the brand
• 10:44
  has come out backing Esther in a TikTok caption.
• 10:47
  So Kevin is credited as popularizing the technique in
• 10:50
  Western beauty like back in the day, and Esther frequently
• 10:53
  credits him as her source of inspiration now as she's
• 10:56
  bringing it into the mainstream again.
• 10:58
  So this is what they wrote. We heard Transition Blush is
• 11:00
  having quite the moment right now.
• 11:01
  Long before the term started circulating online.
• 11:04
  This technique was first published by legendary makeup
• 11:06
  artist Kevin Aquan and later refined by incredible artists
• 11:09
  like Painted by Esther in 2018. Our Neil Blush was created with
• 11:13
  the purpose of honoring Kevin's legacy and teachings.
• 11:16
  We've been delivering customizable color, dimension,
• 11:18
  and glow for almost a decade. Just a little beauty history
• 11:22
  lesson then Internet news have discovered a post from 2025
• 11:26
  where Patrick is doing the blush technique in a makeup tutorial
• 11:29
  and he specifically calls it quote my version of painted by
• 11:34
  Esther. And then just one day ago,
• 11:36
  Patrick's team did an interview with Glossy and which they claim
• 11:40
  that Esther was given the opportunity to collaborate with
• 11:43
  Patrick Taw on the blushes. Let me read you this excerpt so
• 11:46
  it reads quote In her TikTok, Painted by Esther recalled an
• 11:49
  experience in which Rima Minnesean Co founder of Patrick
• 11:52
  Taw Beauty and reached out to hire her for a personal
• 11:55
  professional makeup application in Los Angeles.
• 11:58
  So remember Painted by Esther, she said that Patrick's team
• 12:02
  reached out and tried to book her and then when they asked if
• 12:05
  they could film the booking, she got weirded out and cancelled
• 12:09
  the booking. OK, so this says an appointment
• 12:12
  Esther alleged that she cancelled when she found out
• 12:14
  they wanted to film the session. The representative for TA's
• 12:17
  Brand, however, said the appointment was cancelled due to
• 12:19
  a same day rate change and not the tone of the correspondence
• 12:22
  never changed, remaining positive throughout.
• 12:25
  In emails reviewed by Glossy, this account was corroborated.
• 12:28
  An employee of Miniseans canceled the appointment after
• 12:31
  learning the rate differed from what had originally been quoted,
• 12:34
  adding that she hoped the two could work together in the
• 12:36
  future. The emails did not mention
• 12:38
  social content as an issue or as a reason for the pricing change,
• 12:42
  and Esther's agent had referenced the inclusion of
• 12:45
  social content in the initial e-mail outlining her rate.
• 12:48
  To quote this launch was never about claiming ownership over a
• 12:50
  makeup technique that artists have interpreted over time.
• 12:53
  I have a great deal of respect for Esther and the creativity
• 12:56
  she brings to the beauty space. Toss said the representative for
• 12:59
  Todd and Todd himself both stated that the brand had hoped
• 13:03
  to work with Esther in a paid capacity to launch the
• 13:05
  transition collection. Quote.
• 13:07
  Prior to launch, I personally reached out because I genuinely
• 13:10
  admired her work and hoped to do a paid collaboration artist to
• 13:13
  artist. My team also followed up
• 13:15
  regarding a paid partnership opportunity for this launch,
• 13:17
  however her team declined. I've always respected Esther's
• 13:20
  artistry and would absolutely remain open to collaborating
• 13:23
  with her in the future. Talk continued.
• 13:25
  The current narrative makes it appear as though the brand is
• 13:27
  trying to be deceitful or steal something, but that was never
• 13:30
  the case, the representative said.
• 13:32
  They added that the Patrick Todd Beauty team had discussed how it
• 13:35
  may collaborate with Esther to launch the collection.
• 13:37
  OK, so it seems like myself and others were misguided or wrong
• 13:42
  in assuming that they hadn't offered to do anything paid with
• 13:46
  Esther for this. I understand why Esther didn't
• 13:48
  want to. She said in her original video
• 13:50
  that she's had several kind of like weird instances with
• 13:53
  Patrick Taw or his brand. So I understand why she may have
• 13:57
  chosen to decline. OK, and now Jackie Ina is
• 13:59
  involved in some of this controversy because she posted a
• 14:02
  review of the blushes a few days ago.
• 14:04
  And then she got a ton of backlash because, you know, this
• 14:07
  whole situation, people were hoping that she would have been
• 14:09
  supporting Esther and I suppose like not promote the blushes in
• 14:13
  some way or review them in some way because of the situation.
• 14:16
  So while she was getting this backlash, people were in her
• 14:18
  comments saying she should be using Juvia's Place blushes
• 14:21
  instead of Patrick's because I guess Juvia's Place has similar
• 14:25
  blushes and has for a while. And then Jackie made this
• 14:29
  response video. Let me play some clips.
• 14:31
  So here's the thing. I'm never going to support
• 14:34
  Juvia's place. There's never going to be a
• 14:37
  scenario where I will turn on my camera or my phone, recommend
• 14:40
  the products, endorse the brand ever.
• 14:43
  I don't even really like mentioning the brand because
• 14:46
  they've proven before they can not take constructive criticism
• 14:50
  from me, from me specifically. I'm also never going to tell you
• 14:55
  guys collectively as consumers and as viewers to use or to not
• 15:01
  use a brand. If you feel a way about Patrick,
• 15:04
  TA, Patrick's cool, but that's your business.
• 15:08
  It is not my job to fight his battles and it never will be.
• 15:12
  If you guys collectively don't want to support Patrick as a
• 15:15
  brand, you absolutely have that right.
• 15:18
  But what I think is extremely ironic and problematic, and you
• 15:22
  know there's an issue when I get to point in that finger, you
• 15:26
  will absolutely not call me a sellout.
• 15:30
  You will absolutely not call me a hypocrite.
• 15:33
  You will absolutely not say that I pick and choose while also
• 15:37
  name dropping Juvia's place in my comments section.
• 15:39
  You. Absolutely.
• 15:40
  OK, so the reason why she's saying she will never support
• 15:43
  Juvia's Place is this goes back to 2019.
• 15:47
  In 2019, online beauty people, people that were following the
• 15:51
  beauty space, started questioning why a few popular
• 15:54
  Black influencers, including Jackie and Alyssa and Alyssa
• 15:57
  Ashley, hadn't posted reviews of Juvia's Place first foundation
• 16:01
  launch. And at first, Alyssa tried to
• 16:03
  chalk it up to poor communication and then both
• 16:06
  ended up speaking out against the brand, saying that Juvia's
• 16:10
  Place does not build relationships with Black
• 16:13
  creators and instead prioritizes building relationships with
• 16:16
  creators like Nikki Tutorials and Jeffrey Star.
• 16:19
  And then Jeffrey Star bought the foundation and endorsed the
• 16:23
  foundation, like gave it a positive review.
• 16:25
  And Juvia's Place publicly thanked him for this, which
• 16:29
  really set people off, including Jackie, given Jeffrey's history
• 16:33
  of racist behavior towards black women and Jackie specifically.
• 16:37
  So then the founder of Dubious Place, she responded directly.
• 16:40
  She targeted Jackie Ina specifically with accusations of
• 16:44
  shady business practices in a tweet that she later deleted.
• 16:47
  And then she questioned whether Jackie was actually pro black,
• 16:51
  suggesting Jackie should focus her energy on issues like
• 16:53
  poverty in Africa rather than criticizing businesses online.
• 16:58
  She got so much heat for this that she actually ended up
• 17:02
  leaving Twitter completely after this, apparently.
• 17:05
  So, yeah, like, I don't know if it was necessary for Jackie to,
• 17:07
  like, bring Juvia's place up like this in this response, but
• 17:12
  I understand why she was frustrated seeing people be
• 17:15
  like, come on, why aren't you supporting this brand?
• 17:18
  Why are you supporting Patrick Tall when he's like, quote, UN
• 17:20
  quote stolen? Like, I know he hasn't stolen,
• 17:22
  but, you know, quote, UN quote stolen or whatever from this
• 17:25
  black makeup artist. And she's trying to say, like,
• 17:28
  you don't realize what you're recommending to me.
• 17:30
  Like, you don't know the history here, right?
• 17:32
  And the last story that I have for you guys today, I have an
• 17:35
  update on the creator who went viral back in February when she
• 17:40
  claimed that she got a fine for holding her phone in her right
• 17:42
  hand while driving when she actually doesn't even have a
• 17:45
  right hand. So back in February, a woman
• 17:48
  posted claiming that she'd been pulled over by a police officer
• 17:51
  and given a ticket for using her phone while driving.
• 17:54
  She said the ticket claimed that she was holding her phone in her
• 17:56
  right hand, but as she showed on camera, she actually doesn't
• 17:59
  have a right hand turns. Out you can still get a ticket.
• 18:02
  Take it for. Driving with a device in your
• 18:03
  right hand, even if you don't have a right.
• 18:05
  Hand all. Right, man.
• 18:07
  So you're going to receive a citation for wireless
• 18:09
  communication device handheld while driving?
• 18:11
  You can't. We got to put the phone down as
• 18:12
  we operate a motor vehicle. Oh, and you put on there that
• 18:14
  you saw me with my right hand holding it.
• 18:16
  Yeah, not put. That no if you want to take it.
• 18:17
  Away. But that's what you said when
• 18:18
  you pulled me over. Yes?
• 18:20
  That you saw me holding my device with my right hand.
• 18:22
  Disagree. With you, Yes, that's what I'm
• 18:23
  saying. OK, yes, if you want to take.
• 18:24
  It to court and that's what you saw.
• 18:27
  That's what I said. I said that's what you said you
• 18:28
  saw, OK. OK.
• 18:29
  Take it to court. Option 5 on the back of the
• 18:31
  ticket. That's how you take that ticket
• 18:32
  to court. Any questions for me?
• 18:34
  No, thank you have. A good.
• 18:36
  Day this went so viral understandably and Internet
• 18:38
  users, they did start calling it nub gate, which she never called
• 18:42
  it that. So I said this in the first
• 18:44
  episode when I covered this back in Feb.
• 18:46
  But like if you see anyone using that, I don't think that she
• 18:49
  necessarily wants it to be called that.
• 18:50
  So just keep that in mind. But basically everyone in the
• 18:53
  comments section was saying like you've got to take legal action
• 18:55
  like please take this to court. She ended up deleting the
• 18:58
  videos. I think they just like went too
• 19:00
  viral and it freaked her out and there were people that thought
• 19:02
  maybe her deleting the videos meant that this was like a quote
• 19:05
  UN quote live. She did show footage of the
• 19:07
  situation, like you could hear the conversation between her and
• 19:11
  the police officer in her original video, but people
• 19:13
  thought maybe it was staged because she deleted the videos.
• 19:16
  I think she just deleted the videos because she knew she was
• 19:19
  actually going to take this further possibly and also
• 19:22
  because it was just like blowing up and becoming really
• 19:24
  overwhelming. Anyway, she did make one final
• 19:26
  video saying that she's requested a court date and that
• 19:29
  she also had requested body Cam footage for this court date.
• 19:33
  And yesterday she returned with an update.
• 19:35
  Her court date was May 27th and the case has been dismissed.
• 19:39
  OK, so we had court this morning and dismissed.
• 19:44
  So apparently it was dismissed over the weekend.
• 19:46
  Yesterday night when I went and checked the time to make sure
• 19:49
  that I was going to be there on time, all that jazz, it showed
• 19:53
  dismissed. But I am not one for taking a
• 19:56
  chance. So I went ahead and went to
• 19:59
  court this morning and got a handy dandy paper that says
• 20:02
  dismissed. And you guys I cannot make up
• 20:05
  the reason behind why it was dismissed.
• 20:09
  It says lack of evidence Bro, we knew that already.
• 20:15
  We love an update and I'm so glad that she has closed the
• 20:18
  loop for us on this. Anyways, guys, that's it for
• 20:21
  Friday mini scroll. Thank you so much for listening.
• 20:24
  I love you guys. Please remember to rate review
• 20:26
  and subscribe. Please Spotify star rate US.
• 20:29
  I hope you have a good weekend. Go have some fun.
• 20:31
  Don't optimize this weekend, just have fun, OK?
• 20:34
  And I will talk to you on Monday.
• 20:36
  Bye. Centennial World podcast network
• 20:38
  operates on Gadigal land. We would like to acknowledge the
• 20:41
  Gadigal of the Aura Nation, the traditional custodians of this
• 20:44
  land, and pay our respects to elders both past and present.