Latest / Clone Wars: The Spinoff / Clone Wars: Breaking Down AI Rights Clauses in Music Contracts

Transcript

Clone Wars: Breaking Down AI Rights Clauses in Music Contracts · Clone Wars: The Spinoff

• 0:00
  Welcome back to Clone Wars: The Spinoff.
• 0:03
  DJ Universe here, and the table is full today.
• 0:06
  Dangerous Zygos, Calvin Blingwell, and Greedy Boi.
• 0:10
  Last time we asked who owns your voice in the AI music era.
• 0:13
  Today we're going into the paper, the actual contract language.
• 0:18
  Because in June 2026, a coalition of artist, songwriter, and manager groups put out
• 0:24
  an open letter, and the title says it all: Artists and Songwriters Must Not Be
• 0:29
  Pressured Into AI Deals Without Meaningful Consent.
• 0:33
  And look at who signed it.
• 0:35
  The European Music Managers Alliance coordinated it.
• 0:38
  Then you've got the Music Artists Coalition, the Black Music Action Coalition,
• 0:43
  Songwriters of North America, the Ivors Academy, the Featured Artists Coalition,
• 0:48
  and NITO.
• 0:50
  Reports put it at 29 organizations, and some counts go as high as 31.
• 0:56
  That's not a few people venting online.
• 0:59
  That's the infrastructure of the business saying slow down.
• 1:02
  And what they're saying is simple.
• 1:03
  These AI clauses are being slid across the table like they're standard.
• 1:07
  Like it's the font size.
• 1:09
  I've been in this game a long time, and when somebody tells me it's standard,
• 1:13
  that's when I put the pen down.
• 1:14
  Hold on, let me bring the other side, because I'm living it.
• 1:18
  When you're an independent artist and a label or a distributor puts a deal in front
• 1:24
  of you, you don't always have the power to say, change page nine.
• 1:28
  Sometimes the clause is just sitting there, and you need the money,
• 1:33
  or the release date, or the playlist push.
• 1:35
  That's the pressure the letter is about, right?
• 1:37
  The need is real, and somebody is using it.
• 1:40
  Exactly.
• 1:41
  One of the core demands is that AI terms can't be forced as a nonnegotiable
• 1:46
  condition of signing.
• 1:48
  An artist has to be able to say no without being penalized.
• 1:52
  And they want active, specific consent, not a default opt in,
• 1:57
  and not a right buried in catch all boilerplate or granted in perpetuity.
• 2:02
  Perpetuity is the word that gets me.
• 2:04
  You can't see forever from where you're standing.
• 2:06
  Nobody signing at twenty two knows what a machine can do with their voice at forty.
• 2:10
  But Zygos, if I say no to everything, I might not get in the room at all.
• 2:15
  That's my honest tension.
• 2:17
  Then know what you're trading, Calvin.
• 2:19
  Getting in the room is not the same as owning the building.
• 2:22
  I'd rather be early and slow than signed and sorry.
• 2:26
  Here's the backdrop.
• 2:27
  As of 2026, major record companies and publishers have negotiated over 270 AI
• 2:33
  training and licensing deals across creative industries, including settlements and
• 2:38
  licensing partnerships with AI generation platforms.
• 2:42
  The complaint isn't that licensing exists.
• 2:45
  The complaint is that the artist is often the last to know,
• 2:48
  and the clause shows up inside new recording, publishing, and distribution
• 2:52
  agreements.
• 2:53
  And to be clear, this is educational commentary.
• 2:56
  We're not lawyers, and this isn't legal or financial advice.
• 3:00
  Get your own attorney reading your own paper.
• 3:02
  Let's break down what's actually on the line.
• 3:05
  Start with masters.
• 3:06
  Greedy, what does an AI rights clause look like when it touches the recording?
• 3:11
  The letter points to labels asserting catalog training rights under broad
• 3:15
  distribution or exploitation definitions.
• 3:18
  In some European and emerging U.S.
• 3:21
  contracts, clauses have appeared granting companies unlimited,
• 3:25
  exclusive rights to use recordings in generative AI models,
• 3:29
  for training, validation, pattern extraction, adaptations, and output exploitation.
• 3:36
  Read that list slowly.
• 3:38
  Every one of those words is a door.
• 3:40
  So my record isn't just a record anymore.
• 3:42
  It's raw material.
• 3:43
  It can be treated that way, depending on the language.
• 3:46
  And there's a distinction you need.
• 3:47
  Inputs are the training data, your songs going into the model.
• 3:51
  Outputs are what comes out, the generated tracks, even vocal clones.
• 3:55
  A clause can cover one, the other, or both.
• 3:57
  If you don't know which, you don't know what you signed.
• 4:00
  That's my whole point about legacy.
• 4:03
  A master is the thing you hand to your children.
• 4:05
  If somebody gets exclusive rights to train on it, and what they build sounds like
• 4:09
  you, then your catalog is competing with itself.
• 4:12
  That's the part that scares me as an independent.
• 4:15
  The research says signing away training rights can create algorithmic competitors
• 4:19
  trained on your own sound.
• 4:21
  I'm building a brand off my tone, my cadence, my ad libs.
• 4:25
  Why would I fund the thing that undercuts my merch and my touring?
• 4:29
  And that's the sound and culture side, too.
• 4:32
  Hip hop was built on sampling, flipping, remixing, so people say,
• 4:37
  what's the big deal?
• 4:39
  But a sample got cleared, or it got a lawsuit, or it got a handshake.
• 4:43
  There was a face and a name attached.
• 4:46
  A model that absorbs ten thousand voices at once doesn't have a handshake.
• 4:51
  Right.
• 4:52
  Sampling had a conversation.
• 4:54
  This is skipping the conversation.
• 4:55
  Now publishing.
• 4:57
  Songwriter melodies, lyrics, and structures being ingested for prompt based music
• 5:02
  generation.
• 5:03
  The concern in the letter is that there's no clear accounting back to the writer,
• 5:07
  whether it's mechanical or performance money.
• 5:10
  You wrote the hook, but where's your line item?
• 5:13
  And a lot of us are both artist and writer, so it's the double hit.
• 5:17
  Then voice and likeness.
• 5:18
  This is where it gets personal.
• 5:20
  Because your voice isn't a catalog asset.
• 5:23
  The signatories emphasize that personality, voice, and moral rights remain personal
• 5:28
  to the human creator.
• 5:29
  They're not standard corporate property to be traded in a blanket licensing pact.
• 5:34
  I agree with that completely.
• 5:35
  You can sell a record.
• 5:36
  You can't sell who you are.
• 5:38
  Careful, though.
• 5:39
  I agree on the principle, but I'd say the contract fight is about what's written,
• 5:44
  not what's moral.
• 5:45
  If the paper says it, you've got a fight on your hands.
• 5:48
  So you want the paper to say your voice and likeness are excluded unless you give a
• 5:54
  separate, specific yes.
• 5:57
  Now the money question.
• 5:58
  If a platform pays to license a catalog for AI, who gets paid,
• 6:02
  and how much of it reaches the artist?
• 6:04
  That's the second demand in the letter: fair compensation with transparent revenue
• 6:09
  shares.
• 6:10
  It should clearly show what percentage goes to the creator,
• 6:13
  what goes to the label, and what goes to the AI company.
• 6:17
  The fear is that AI licensing income gets treated as general catalog income,
• 6:22
  or label overhead, and disappears into a pool.
• 6:26
  And I'll be honest, I'm not saying all licensing is bad.
• 6:29
  If there's a real check, a clear split, and I said yes on purpose,
• 6:34
  I could see it.
• 6:35
  Money from a new revenue stream could fund my next tour or my next run of merch.
• 6:40
  See, that's where I push back.
• 6:41
  A check today and a perpetual grant is not a partnership, it's a buyout with a
• 6:46
  smile.
• 6:47
  How many times have we watched somebody take the advance, and ten years later
• 6:51
  they're explaining to their kids why they don't own the music?
• 6:54
  But not everybody has your leverage, Zygos.
• 6:57
  You built Currency Development.
• 6:59
  Some of us are still building the first floor.
• 7:01
  Fair.
• 7:02
  I'll give you that.
• 7:02
  Leverage matters, and that's exactly why it's unfair when it's presented as
• 7:06
  standard.
• 7:07
  But I still say, short term, specific, revocable.
• 7:10
  If it's forever, I'm not interested.
• 7:12
  And I'm somewhere between you two.
• 7:14
  I don't think the answer is always no.
• 7:17
  I think the answer is never blind.
• 7:20
  Price it.
• 7:20
  If you license training, you want to know the duration, the purpose,
• 7:25
  the safeguards, and how you get out.
• 7:27
  The letter asks for purpose specific disclosures, detailing permitted uses,
• 7:31
  safeguards, duration, and exit or revocation mechanisms.
• 7:35
  So let me test that.
• 7:37
  Greedy, if the label says, we'll pay you something, but it's pooled with everything
• 7:40
  else, do you take it?
• 7:42
  No.
• 7:42
  A pool with no breakdown is a black box.
• 7:45
  I'm hungry, but I'm not starving enough to eat something I can't see.
• 7:48
  That's a good line, but some people are starving enough.
• 7:51
  I know.
• 7:52
  That's why the collective side matters.
• 7:54
  The managers, the songwriter groups, the artist coalitions,
• 7:57
  they exist so one artist isn't negotiating alone at midnight.
• 8:02
  Alone, it's pressure.
• 8:04
  Together, it's a standard you can point to.
• 8:07
  And one more thing the research is clear about.
• 8:10
  It isn't only the majors.
• 8:11
  Independent distribution platforms and digital aggregators have also begun
• 8:16
  introducing AI training terms of service.
• 8:19
  So even if you're not signing a label deal, you may be clicking agree on something.
• 8:24
  Man, that one hits close.
• 8:26
  Everybody clicks agree.
• 8:27
  And that's how you end up giving away the house through a pop up window.
• 8:31
  Let's bring it home through culture.
• 8:33
  In the Five Percent tradition, Supreme Mathematics starts with Knowledge,
• 8:38
  Wisdom, and Understanding.
• 8:40
  Greedy, how does that map to a contract?
• 8:43
  Knowledge is knowing what's written before you sign.
• 8:46
  Every clause, every definition, including the boring ones.
• 8:51
  Wisdom is the discipline to say no to a predatory opt in, or to negotiate it,
• 8:56
  instead of taking the first thing that glitters.
• 8:59
  Understanding is protecting your likeness and your catalog for the next generation.
• 9:04
  That's generational wealth in one frame.
• 9:07
  Knowledge of self comes first.
• 9:08
  If you know your worth, you read slower.
• 9:10
  If you don't, you sign faster.
• 9:12
  The people writing the clause are counting on fast.
• 9:14
  And I'll say, I came up thinking the goal was just to get on.
• 9:17
  Now I'm thinking the goal is to still own it when I'm done.
• 9:20
  Those are different goals.
• 9:22
  Alright, let's give the people something practical.
• 9:25
  A checklist of questions to ask before signing.
• 9:28
  Again, educational commentary, not legal advice, so take this to your attorney.
• 9:34
  Zygos, start us off.
• 9:36
  One.
• 9:37
  Does this agreement mention AI, machine learning, training,
• 9:41
  or synthetic voices anywhere, including in definitions and distribution terms?
• 9:45
  Two.
• 9:46
  Is this a separate, specific consent, or is it a default opt in?
• 9:50
  Three.
• 9:51
  Can I still sign if I say no, and will I be penalized for it?
• 9:54
  Four.
• 9:55
  Does the clause cover inputs, outputs, or both?
• 9:58
  Training only, or generated tracks and vocal clones too?
• 10:02
  Five.
• 10:03
  Is it limited by purpose, duration, and territory, or is it unlimited and in
• 10:09
  perpetuity?
• 10:10
  Six.
• 10:11
  What are the safeguards, and how do I revoke or exit?
• 10:14
  Seven.
• 10:15
  Does this touch my masters, my publishing, or both?
• 10:19
  Eight.
• 10:20
  Does it say anything about my voice, likeness, name, or personality?
• 10:24
  Because those should be personal to me, not tossed in with the catalog.
• 10:29
  Nine.
• 10:30
  If money comes in, what's the split between me, the label, and the AI company,
• 10:36
  and will I get reporting I can actually read?
• 10:38
  Ten.
• 10:39
  Who else can this be passed to?
• 10:41
  Can the label or distributor sublicense it or sell it along with the catalog?
• 10:46
  And eleven.
• 10:48
  If I use a distributor or aggregator, did I check their terms of service for AI
• 10:53
  training language?
• 10:54
  Because that's the click that gets everybody.
• 10:57
  And last, have a professional read it.
• 10:59
  Your lawyer, your manager, a songwriter organization if you're a member.
• 11:03
  Don't let anyone rush you.
• 11:05
  Rushed is a tactic.
• 11:06
  My closing thought is simple.
• 11:08
  The technology will keep moving.
• 11:10
  Your name, your voice, and your work are what you leave behind.
• 11:15
  Protect that like it's your children's inheritance, because it is.
• 11:19
  Still think some artists will have to make hard choices.
• 11:23
  But I'd rather make them with my eyes open.
• 11:25
  That's the spirit.
• 11:26
  Knowledge, Wisdom, Understanding.
• 11:29
  I'm DJ Universe, and this was Clone Wars: The Spinoff.
• 11:33
  Read before you sign, and we'll see you next time.