Latest / Yaron Brook Show / War Update; Tucker; Dugin; More | Yaron Brook Show

Transcript

War Update; Tucker; Dugin; More | Yaron Brook Show · Yaron Brook Show

0:04
Speaker 1: Fundamental principles of freedom, national self interest, and individual wats.
0:14
Speaker 1: This is the ran Brook Show. Oh right, everybody, welcome
0:22
Speaker 1: to your one book show on this Sunday launch eighth.
0:27
Speaker 2: Is what I said the night day of the war
0:29
Speaker 2: or something.
0:30
Speaker 1: Like that, and we have got you covered in terms
0:34
Speaker 1: of updates here on the yuron Brook Show. All right,
0:40
Speaker 1: so basically everything is continuing. The United States continues to
0:45
Speaker 1: bomb targets in Iran. Israel has now got split focus
0:50
Speaker 1: is in targeting bombings both in Iran and in Lebanon.
0:56
Speaker 1: It is pretty amazing. Again, it's hard to fully appreciate
1:02
Speaker 1: the logistics and just the the capabilities that Israel has
1:07
Speaker 1: to be able to wage. You know, they struck one
1:09
Speaker 1: hundred different targets today inside Lebanon, and then they strike
1:13
Speaker 1: hundreds of targets in Iran, which is thousands of kilometers
1:19
Speaker 1: away distance from Israel.
1:21
Speaker 2: Truly impressive what Israel is actually doing.
1:27
Speaker 1: The United States continues to boaster its offensive resources, as
1:33
Speaker 1: I kind of predicted. I think the USS Forward, which
1:36
Speaker 1: if you remember, had originally arrived in the Eastern Mediterranean
1:41
Speaker 1: and was primarily focused on a defensive posture visa Israel.
1:50
Speaker 1: I think it turned out it wasn't really needed, and
1:52
Speaker 1: it seems like over it seems like more than what
1:57
Speaker 1: was needed to have the largest powerful aircraft carrier in
2:01
Speaker 1: the world sitting there just doing you know, defense and
2:05
Speaker 1: shooting down ballistic missiles. Also, I think with the closing
2:10
Speaker 1: of the Homo Straits, it seems that it could be
2:13
Speaker 1: better used in the in the actual offensive theater, in
2:17
Speaker 1: the Gulf of Arabia and ultimately in the Persian Gulf
2:20
Speaker 1: and so the Over the last few days, the USS
2:24
Speaker 1: Forward has traveled through the Sewis Canal.
2:27
Speaker 2: Into the Red Sea and now into the Sea of.
2:31
Speaker 1: Arabia that is basically the sea south of Saudi Arabia Yemen,
2:36
Speaker 1: and into the combat zone. This is where Americans are
2:40
Speaker 1: launching offensive operations operations. That brings in almost two hundred
2:46
Speaker 1: additional airplanes available to sendcam in terms of attacking youon.
2:51
Speaker 1: It also brings in all the various I don't know, battleships, figures,
2:55
Speaker 1: I don't know what you call, all the ships that
2:57
Speaker 1: travel with an aircraft carrier.
2:59
Speaker 2: They're like, you know, a dozen of them or something.
3:03
Speaker 1: Uh, they travel with it and they will be in
3:05
Speaker 1: the theater to knock down missiles, drones and to launch
3:11
Speaker 1: launch US cruise and ballistic missiles. So the United States
3:17
Speaker 1: has bolt stood its offensive capability with the USS forward
3:22
Speaker 1: in now in the in the kind of combat region
3:25
Speaker 1: and uh playing offense not defense.
3:30
Speaker 3: Uh M.
3:33
Speaker 1: This still continues to be if if you follow kind
3:36
Speaker 1: of the news and and what the Sunday shows and
3:38
Speaker 1: what's on Twitter and everywhere else. An overriding pessimism about
3:44
Speaker 1: this war, the idea that it's not winnable, the regime
3:47
Speaker 1: change is impossible, that you can't hit the bunkers deep underneath,
3:51
Speaker 1: so the ballistic missiles will always be there and the
3:55
Speaker 1: Uranians could just excavate them out afterwards. Uh. There is
4:01
Speaker 1: pessimism about the ability to find the uranium they enriched
4:07
Speaker 1: uranium the Uranians have that might be buried under the
4:11
Speaker 1: rubble where the United States attacked last time, or it
4:14
Speaker 1: might not be buried under the rubble.
4:16
Speaker 2: Nobody is confirming one way or the other.
4:19
Speaker 1: I don't have any special intelligence in terms of where
4:27
Speaker 1: the uranium is, but it's somewhere an Iran and you know,
4:32
Speaker 1: Israeli intelligence probably knows where, and it's probably buried somewhere
4:38
Speaker 1: deep so they can just bomb it out of existence.
4:43
Speaker 1: And other question is what do you do with that?
4:45
Speaker 1: So there's all our cessumers about that generally, as I said,
4:48
Speaker 1: regime change pessimism. I keep reading these stories, Oh the
4:54
Speaker 1: US and is all attacks are going really well. But
4:56
Speaker 1: are they winning? Are they winning the war? Could you
4:59
Speaker 1: on actually winning this? I guess for you want to
5:02
Speaker 1: win this, the regime would have to stay intact and
5:08
Speaker 1: and continue to develop nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles and oppress
5:12
Speaker 1: its own people, uh without and and continue to support
5:16
Speaker 1: Risbella and uh and Huti is Now it could be,
5:20
Speaker 1: it might actually be that by the time this war
5:22
Speaker 1: is over, there's nobody in Risbella to support. That is possible.
5:28
Speaker 2: Is well is.
5:30
Speaker 1: Just eviscerating Husabella left and right. It's it's attacking them
5:34
Speaker 1: everywhere and and constantly in south in, in the south, in,
5:40
Speaker 1: in bewut itself over the place. Indeed, uh and and
5:44
Speaker 1: Uhri Isabella is taking significant casualties.
5:49
Speaker 2: One of the attacks as well did today, I think
5:54
Speaker 2: this is right, was uh on second.
6:03
Speaker 1: Yes, it was a bombing of a hotel room. So
6:07
Speaker 1: they threaded a missile into a hotel room. A big
6:10
Speaker 1: block of the hotels, all the windows looked the same.
6:14
Speaker 1: They threaded into a particular room and imploded there and
6:18
Speaker 1: managed to kill five senior commanders in the Islamic Revolutionary
6:22
Speaker 1: Guard Corps KUDS forces.
6:27
Speaker 2: They were in Lebanon.
6:29
Speaker 1: They're there layers on between Ywan and Risbela.
6:33
Speaker 2: They killed five of them.
6:34
Speaker 1: So they killed the guy responsible for transferring funds to
6:38
Speaker 1: regime proxies in Lebanon, to finance Risbella and other kind
6:44
Speaker 1: of regime proxies in Lebanon. They killed the head of
6:47
Speaker 1: the intelligence brands branch of the KUDZ Force Lebanon Corpse,
6:52
Speaker 1: so this would be the guy providing intelligence you know,
6:56
Speaker 1: arrived or derive from Iwan.
7:00
Speaker 2: To Grisbela directly.
7:03
Speaker 1: They killed an intelligence officer in the Kods Force of
7:07
Speaker 1: the Palestinian Corps, so he would be a laison with
7:10
Speaker 1: Hamas and providing them with intelligence.
7:14
Speaker 2: And they killed two other people.
7:15
Speaker 1: So they managed to thread it and kill five people
7:20
Speaker 1: in a hotel room in Lebanon, thus depleting the Kods. Course,
7:25
Speaker 1: this is the Islamic Revolutionary God, but the Islamic Revolutionary
7:29
Speaker 1: God's coordination with Grisbela. So it's not clear that by
7:32
Speaker 1: the end of this war there's anybody in Isbela coordinate with,
7:35
Speaker 1: and it's not clear who's doing the coordinating, given that
7:38
Speaker 1: Israel is just decimating them slowly and systematically.
7:43
Speaker 2: The the you know, destroying them.
7:48
Speaker 1: Israel has now ground troops in South Lebanon where it
7:52
Speaker 1: is occupying land, and it might it might send more
7:57
Speaker 1: troops into South Lebanon, you know as well. Should Yes,
8:02
Speaker 1: nobody asks me, but if I were in charge, is
8:05
Speaker 1: a BI should basically take South Lebanon, all of it.
8:08
Speaker 2: It should go to the Le Tiny River.
8:09
Speaker 1: I've talked about this God for years now, certainly since
8:13
Speaker 1: October seventh. Izo should go to the Lee Tiny River,
8:16
Speaker 1: should occupy the entire territory and then over time systematically
8:21
Speaker 1: destroy Risbela's infrastructure that over decades and decades, Risbela has
8:27
Speaker 1: built up in Southern Lebanon so that even if Risbela returns,
8:30
Speaker 1: they'd have to stop from scratch. SOZO should do that.
8:33
Speaker 1: Whether they do it or not, it's hard to tell.
8:36
Speaker 1: But they they have entered South Lebanon in small units,
8:41
Speaker 1: in small locations, but they haven't gone all in. There's
8:46
Speaker 1: those already taken casualties in South Lebanon. It's a very
8:49
Speaker 1: difficult war. You're fighting against, you know, terrorists to jump
8:54
Speaker 1: up behind the rock and fire at you. It's it's
8:58
Speaker 1: and rockets are rain in on you, and you know
9:02
Speaker 1: you can shoot many of them down, but some are
9:04
Speaker 1: going to get through. And one of the reasons as
9:06
Speaker 1: well is hesitant to take all of Sudthern Lebanon is
9:10
Speaker 1: a fear of taking significant casualties in the process. What
9:14
Speaker 1: else in Lebanon, I mean again, the government seems on
9:20
Speaker 1: board with the dismantling of Chrisbela, but it's it's not
9:27
Speaker 1: doing anything about it, and partially is it's a sign
9:30
Speaker 1: of the weakness of the Lebanese military. They're really waiting
9:34
Speaker 1: for Israel to do the work for them. Given that stance,
9:40
Speaker 1: I don't think they should be surprised if Israel lands
9:43
Speaker 1: up basically taking you know, taking southern Lebanon at least
9:50
Speaker 1: as a buffer zone and making it demilitarized and insisting
9:54
Speaker 1: on demilitarization and using force in order to secure deal
9:57
Speaker 1: militarization and the leban His army can be north of
10:00
Speaker 1: Lady Tani and he can try to make sure Chris
10:03
Speaker 1: Ballad doesn't make it down south. That is what I
10:07
Speaker 1: would do. Yep, I mean Risbella now is functioning as
10:15
Speaker 1: a gorilla force that shoots and runs, shoots and runs
10:20
Speaker 1: and hides behind rocks. We will see, you know how
10:27
Speaker 1: this is going to be. It's going to be a difficult,
10:28
Speaker 1: difficult operation to dismantle them on the ground. It's one
10:33
Speaker 1: thing to do from the air, It's very difficult to
10:35
Speaker 1: do it from the ground. All right, what else? What
10:40
Speaker 1: else can we say? Uh? The estimates right now that
10:46
Speaker 1: Yuan has about one hundred hundred and twenty missile launches left.
10:51
Speaker 1: That's a dramatic reduction from its pre war supply. And uh,
10:56
Speaker 1: they you know, so they can they are limited how
10:58
Speaker 1: many how many of the missiles they can launch. We
11:01
Speaker 1: talked about this yesterday. The number of launchers are low
11:05
Speaker 1: again today, although slightly higher than yesterday. So they slightly higher,
11:10
Speaker 1: but still way way lower.
11:12
Speaker 2: Than the first few days of the war. Suddenly, the
11:13
Speaker 2: first day of the war.
11:17
Speaker 1: They are you know, they just don't have the capacity
11:21
Speaker 1: to build them. And to the extent that they are
11:23
Speaker 1: factories that can't build them, Israel in the United States
11:26
Speaker 1: attacking those factories and making them inoperable. Right, So there
11:30
Speaker 1: was a slight uptake of missile fire, primarily at the
11:34
Speaker 1: UAE United Arab Emirates, and the missiles are still a threat,
11:41
Speaker 1: but they were reduced threat and it's relative to what
11:44
Speaker 1: people expected before the war and insignificant threat. I will
11:48
Speaker 1: note that there were rumors earlier today Israel actually announced
11:52
Speaker 1: that the United Arab Emirates that actually attacked the run
11:55
Speaker 1: and blown up a desalination plant. The United ever Emirates
12:00
Speaker 1: a couple of hours later came out and denied this,
12:04
Speaker 1: and it was very vigorous about the denials. I think
12:06
Speaker 1: they're probably right, and you know, said that they're not
12:11
Speaker 1: excluding the possibility of attacking, but they're not going to
12:14
Speaker 1: attact civilian infrastructure.
12:16
Speaker 2: They will attack only military infrastructure.
12:18
Speaker 1: And my guess is it is Israel and the US
12:21
Speaker 1: have all the targets already lined up. The UEE doesn't
12:24
Speaker 1: feel the need to get involved and to integrate their
12:27
Speaker 1: forces into the Israeli in America. The same with the Saudist.
12:32
Speaker 1: I mean, all of these people are threatened to use force,
12:35
Speaker 1: but have not yet used any force. As of now,
12:41
Speaker 1: the US forces have sunk or damage about forty three
12:44
Speaker 1: Iranian naval vessels. That was up from thirty one vessels
12:49
Speaker 1: two days ago. So they continue to decimate the Iranian navy.
12:55
Speaker 1: I mean by this point there really isn't any navy.
12:57
Speaker 1: It's smaller ships that the striking, including uh, you know,
13:03
Speaker 1: commercial vessels that might be used by the military and
13:07
Speaker 1: uh maybe smaller vessels that they would use in order
13:12
Speaker 1: to block the Homo straits.
13:16
Speaker 4: Uh.
13:18
Speaker 1: How to tell what is actually going on in Tehran?
13:21
Speaker 1: So in terms of the regime itself, Uh, today the
13:29
Speaker 1: a member of the Assembly of Experts, Jjaslum Dilbas, who
13:35
Speaker 1: is a hardliner hard liner.
13:39
Speaker 3: In the.
13:42
Speaker 2: You know, Assembly of Experts.
13:44
Speaker 1: Today he he was on TV I guess or some
13:47
Speaker 1: media basically saying that the name that the next Supreme
13:51
Speaker 1: Leader has already been chosen.
13:55
Speaker 2: Uh, that the person has been chosen and they know who.
13:59
Speaker 1: It is, but but they've chosen not to announce it
14:05
Speaker 1: for security reasons. They don't want him debt before he's
14:10
Speaker 1: even sworn in or whatever. But the council members reached
14:15
Speaker 1: an agreement without actually meeting in person, I guess, because
14:21
Speaker 1: Israel keeps threatening if they meet in person to blow
14:23
Speaker 1: the place up, and rumors continue about is your blowing
14:28
Speaker 1: up potential meeting places for the for the experts. But
14:33
Speaker 1: they have chosen. There is a chosen one. There is
14:37
Speaker 1: a chosen supreme leader. By all accounts, it seems to
14:40
Speaker 1: be the son of how Many. The son of how
14:44
Speaker 1: Many is even more hardline than his father. Everybody says.
14:48
Speaker 1: He's also very much aligned with the with the Islamic
14:54
Speaker 1: revolutionary God. So you know, it's it's uh, it is
15:01
Speaker 1: very very It's very challenging in terms of regime change because.
15:07
Speaker 2: There's so many options, and.
15:08
Speaker 1: They keep getting another layer, and they keep elevating people.
15:12
Speaker 1: Now it's all at the same time takes them out right.
15:15
Speaker 1: So yesterday they took out the military advisor to the
15:19
Speaker 1: Supreme Leader, who who is the replacement of the guy
15:25
Speaker 1: who was originally who got killed with hominy when he
15:29
Speaker 1: was bombed. A new one was appointed and he was
15:32
Speaker 1: killed yesterday. So keeps going after regime leaders. Some of
15:39
Speaker 1: it we know about, some of it we probably don't
15:41
Speaker 1: know about. Some of it. The Iranians of acknowledged some
15:44
Speaker 1: of the some of it the Ranians have not acknowledged.
15:46
Speaker 2: But it continues.
15:48
Speaker 1: That is, the evisceration of the Iranian leadership continues, and
15:53
Speaker 1: yet they have if you will a deep bench, a
15:58
Speaker 1: deep bench, right again everybody, you know, Okay, other news.
16:15
Speaker 2: I mean again this is coming from from Israel.
16:19
Speaker 1: Just hit that one of the problems that they that
16:25
Speaker 1: they actually haven't chosen as supreme leader yet. And part
16:29
Speaker 1: of the problem is that how many supposedly in his
16:32
Speaker 1: will wrote not to select his son again. And yet
16:44
Speaker 1: I think that's the preference of many of the people.
16:47
Speaker 1: Plus it's definitely defensive the preference of the Islamic Revolutionary God.
16:52
Speaker 1: So they haven't yet chosen anybody, and that they are real, uh,
17:01
Speaker 1: the real cracks starting to appear according to this story
17:05
Speaker 1: in the leadership in the Iranian leadership. Uh, and it
17:12
Speaker 1: appears that the General of the Stomach Evolutionary God Corp.
17:18
Speaker 1: Has basically taken on himself to run the operation right now,
17:23
Speaker 1: not listening uh to to the political leadership and and
17:27
Speaker 1: just running it as from the from the military perspective.
17:31
Speaker 1: So again, lots of lots of lots of conflict, as
17:38
Speaker 1: you'd expect among the leadership in Iran because because they're
17:43
Speaker 1: authoritarian regime with nothing really that brings them together, and uh, conflicting,
17:51
Speaker 1: you know, power struggles, and anybody becomes Supreme Leader is
17:55
Speaker 1: is going to target immediately and try to assassinate, and
17:58
Speaker 1: is always proven that they have me intelligence about where
18:01
Speaker 1: all these people live and where they hang out and
18:04
Speaker 1: where they meet, and they're afraid. My guess is they're afraid.
18:08
Speaker 1: There are lots of these little short videos being produced
18:11
Speaker 1: by Israelis and Arabs of you know, the guy being
18:15
Speaker 1: sworn in as next Supreme leader and a bomb goes
18:18
Speaker 1: off and he's annihilated. And the next thing that comes
18:21
Speaker 1: in he's a little bit more residant. So he's sworn
18:24
Speaker 1: in and boom, he's eliminated. And the next guy, now
18:27
Speaker 1: he's really hesitant, he really doesn't want it. He's trying
18:30
Speaker 1: to run away, but they force him to swear in
18:32
Speaker 1: and he's eliminated, and and you know, and this this
18:36
Speaker 1: this progression. So that is happening. So I mean the
18:42
Speaker 1: regime is, as I think, struggling. Now, remember the Islamic
18:45
Speaker 1: Revolutionary God, the main military force in Iran, is a
18:51
Speaker 1: military force primarily focused on internal security. The Slormic Evolutionary
18:57
Speaker 1: God was not built to invade other kind. It was
19:00
Speaker 1: not built to defend against invasion, that is the army.
19:05
Speaker 1: It was built to support Risbala and ruties. It was
19:09
Speaker 1: built to support the Syrian regime and the Iraqi Chiite
19:14
Speaker 1: militants terrorist groups, and it was built to secure the
19:20
Speaker 1: Islamic Revolution. It was not built as a army. And
19:27
Speaker 1: it is going to do anything that it can, everything
19:29
Speaker 1: they can to secure the regime, nothing more. And they
19:38
Speaker 1: will be ready and armed if protesters go into the
19:41
Speaker 1: streets to shoot them.
19:46
Speaker 2: All right, what else?
19:47
Speaker 1: Yesterday during the show, somebody said, is well, just hit
19:52
Speaker 1: the refineries. No, because I'd said the refineries, that makes sense.
19:57
Speaker 1: Hit the refineries, But no, they didn't. They haven't yet.
20:01
Speaker 1: Nobody said to find ingans yet. What Israel did hit
20:05
Speaker 1: were basically the oil storage facilities around Tehran, massive storage
20:14
Speaker 1: facilities that supply oil to all of Tehran. So this
20:18
Speaker 1: is where Tehran gets the oil for the gas stations
20:23
Speaker 1: and for the trucks and everything else. And I don't
20:25
Speaker 1: know if you saw the videos of these things burning,
20:27
Speaker 1: oh my god, it really looked like armageddon. And then
20:30
Speaker 1: what happened was the oil leaked into the streets and
20:34
Speaker 1: it was burning oil.
20:36
Speaker 2: She had these fires in.
20:37
Speaker 1: The gutters along the roads, and it really did look
20:42
Speaker 1: like Tehran was burning it was very very dramatic, but
20:48
Speaker 1: Israel did destroy these facilities. Now, these facilities are run
20:53
Speaker 1: by the Islamic Revolutionary God. They generate revenue by selling
20:57
Speaker 1: oil to Iranians. So this will deplete the ability to
21:01
Speaker 1: generate revenue that way. Ultimately, to stop Uranians for producing
21:06
Speaker 1: oil and and and being able to drive and and
21:09
Speaker 1: and use oil throughout the country is all. The United
21:13
Speaker 1: States are gonna have to take out the refineries. They're
21:15
Speaker 1: like ten of them. Uh, it's not that hard to
21:18
Speaker 1: take them out, right, I mean a few bombs in
21:20
Speaker 1: each one of them and they're gone. Giving the number
21:22
Speaker 1: of bombs that are being dropped, it would be nothing. Uh.
21:26
Speaker 1: They're leaving this strategically, maybe to try to force the
21:30
Speaker 1: regime's hand by threatening it. Maybe they want to see
21:34
Speaker 1: if they can, you know, destroy all the missiles and
21:38
Speaker 1: everything else, and and and tilt the regime and and
21:42
Speaker 1: and try to try to get the regime to fall
21:45
Speaker 1: without in a sense, making the lives of the civilians
21:48
Speaker 1: really really hard and using this only at the end,
21:52
Speaker 1: I'd say the sooner the better. If you're really going
21:54
Speaker 1: for a regime change, this is what you have to do.
21:58
Speaker 1: This is what you have to do right again, conflicting
22:02
Speaker 1: information about whether they have chosen a replacement. But it's
22:06
Speaker 1: good that there's conflicting information. It really does seem like
22:12
Speaker 1: there are cracks and there's disagreement, and there are challenges,
22:16
Speaker 1: and there is a lot of fear, a lot of
22:18
Speaker 1: fear among the Uranians right now about what is happening,
22:25
Speaker 1: about their future is about what they can do.
22:27
Speaker 2: Fear is a good thing for those of us who.
22:30
Speaker 1: Want to see this regime fall uh and uh and
22:33
Speaker 1: be destroyed completely. One of I mean, one of the
22:38
Speaker 1: guys who needs to be I think killed and eliminated
22:42
Speaker 1: is this Ali Lally Johnny, who is basically right now
22:46
Speaker 1: ahead of you. He wants Supreme National Security Council. This
22:50
Speaker 1: is a council of three. There's running things supposed to
22:53
Speaker 1: him and the president and one of our tools. But
22:56
Speaker 1: the reality is that the President is meaningless. You remember,
23:00
Speaker 1: he's the guy who came out it was it yesterday
23:03
Speaker 1: and basically apologized to the Golf States for being attacked
23:06
Speaker 1: and said it wouldn't happen again, and then everybody said, no,
23:10
Speaker 1: of course we're going to attack the Golf States. Forget
23:12
Speaker 1: about it. He's irrelevant, So he is irrelevant. It's not
23:16
Speaker 1: clear how relevant Ali Love and Johnny is, but he's
23:19
Speaker 1: presenting himself as basically the leader of Iran in the
23:22
Speaker 1: absence of a supreme leader. It would be good if
23:27
Speaker 1: the Supreme National Council, the three people on there were assassinated,
23:32
Speaker 1: that would be that would be, you know, another step
23:39
Speaker 1: in eviscuating the leadership and creating that uncertainty and real
23:46
Speaker 1: fear in among the leadership ranks.
23:51
Speaker 2: Let me just see.
23:54
Speaker 1: Now these I'm just reading these facilities, these oil tanks
23:59
Speaker 1: that were blown up yesterday in one of the most
24:02
Speaker 1: you know, yeah, you really need to see the videos
24:04
Speaker 1: of this. They were actually connected directly to the Tehran refinery,
24:08
Speaker 1: but the finery itself was not attacked. Again.
24:10
Speaker 2: That would be the next step. I think that is a.
24:13
Speaker 1: More permanent denial of fuel to the Iranians, and that's
24:18
Speaker 1: why these Raelis and the Americans.
24:19
Speaker 2: Are hesitating to hit it.
24:24
Speaker 1: I mean, Tehran has thirteen to fifteen million people living
24:27
Speaker 1: in it and they all supplies just being eviscerated. Now,
24:34
Speaker 1: a lot of them left the city. But it's most
24:38
Speaker 1: symbolic but meaningful in terms of the quality of life
24:40
Speaker 1: and the stand of living that they are going to have.
24:43
Speaker 1: There also tanks, no, so you know it's also attacked
24:49
Speaker 1: a number of tanks. It was more than one facility
24:52
Speaker 1: where the oil was being hit. All right. A couple
24:55
Speaker 1: of stories that are again hard to tell if they are,
25:03
Speaker 1: if this is real or not, and how real it
25:07
Speaker 1: will become. There are stories about the United States and
25:11
Speaker 1: Israel discussing two potential boots on the ground special forces
25:17
Speaker 1: operations in Iran at some point. The first one relates
25:23
Speaker 1: to what I said earlier about the nuclear fuel. Iran
25:27
Speaker 1: has a significant amounts of uranium. I think that has
25:34
Speaker 1: been refined to what sixty percent? It could be easily
25:38
Speaker 1: if they had the centerfuges and they had the facilities
25:41
Speaker 1: become weapons grade. This was the basis for what somebody
25:45
Speaker 1: was saying before the war started that you know, they
25:47
Speaker 1: could they could have eleven bombs in two weeks, which
25:51
Speaker 1: I don't know how credible that is, but you know,
25:57
Speaker 1: the those that uranium is somewhere, it's some way in Iran.
26:05
Speaker 1: And one of the stories coming out is the possibility
26:10
Speaker 1: of a joint Israeli US special operation that would basically
26:18
Speaker 1: go in after they had viscerated the Iranian military, so
26:22
Speaker 1: there was no real threat on the ground to them.
26:26
Speaker 1: They would probably take along with them some scientists who
26:29
Speaker 1: specialize in atomic weapons, maybe people from the International Atomic
26:34
Speaker 1: Energy Agency, and they would go and find it. So
26:39
Speaker 1: maybe they have intelligence about where it is. Approximately, it
26:43
Speaker 1: might mean going underground, It might mean more than hours
26:48
Speaker 1: of operation. It might meet a significant operation. They would
26:51
Speaker 1: have to protect the perimeter. Now again they have control
26:54
Speaker 1: of the air, which makes it a lot easier. Any
26:56
Speaker 1: columns of troops coming towards them could be a vision
27:00
Speaker 1: serrated by with with aircraft. But again, this is not
27:08
Speaker 1: wouldn't be a simple operation. It would be complicated, it
27:10
Speaker 1: would be ambitious. But this this is something that I
27:15
Speaker 1: think makes a lot of sense. Ultimately has to be
27:18
Speaker 1: done one way or another. I think this operation counts
27:22
Speaker 1: as a failure if the uranium is not accounted for.
27:26
Speaker 1: Either the Uranians have surrendered and willing to hand the
27:30
Speaker 1: uranium over as part of a ceasefire piece deal, or
27:36
Speaker 1: Americans Israelis have basically found it and transported it out
27:43
Speaker 1: transported out of there. So we'll be interesting to see
27:48
Speaker 1: how that one develops. The second special ops, the special
27:54
Speaker 1: ops that people are talking about is an operation to
27:59
Speaker 1: basically the Kag Island. You remember I talked about the
28:04
Speaker 1: Cogg Island. I've talked about in the past, I've talked
28:06
Speaker 1: about now this is like that where ninety all cod
28:10
Speaker 1: Uranian crude oil is shipped out of. It is an
28:12
Speaker 1: island off the coast of Iran inside the Persian Gulf.
28:17
Speaker 1: It has storage facilities of oil pipelines binging in from
28:21
Speaker 1: the mainland, and then facilities to load up tankers that
28:26
Speaker 1: can then transverse the streets of Homos and take that
28:30
Speaker 1: oil to China, primarily to China. That's where the Uranian
28:34
Speaker 1: oil goes. All the coude that Iran shifts out goes
28:39
Speaker 1: through this island. Well, a real option, and I think
28:43
Speaker 1: this is a good option, and I think this is
28:45
Speaker 1: something that should be done. Is to put ground troops
28:50
Speaker 1: on the island and to take it, to occupy it
28:55
Speaker 1: and basically tell the Iranians you want to back, surrender,
29:02
Speaker 1: open the streets of Homo's. I mean, you could decide
29:06
Speaker 1: what demands you could make, but it is unbelievably strategic
29:12
Speaker 1: somewhere that it's unlikely the Iranians fight back by dropping
29:16
Speaker 1: ballistic missiles on the island because these all facilities that
29:20
Speaker 1: they have that they don't want to have to rebuild.
29:23
Speaker 1: I don't think it would take much of an American
29:25
Speaker 1: force to take the island, particularly given American air superiority.
29:30
Speaker 1: And you could, you know, with the American Navy so close.
29:35
Speaker 1: My assumption is you could get helicopters there, you could
29:37
Speaker 1: get you know, ground troops into the island, you gave
29:42
Speaker 1: special forces, and you could take the island. And maybe
29:46
Speaker 1: maybe you would use Israeli forces to help.
29:49
Speaker 2: I doubt it.
29:50
Speaker 1: I think this would be an America only operation. Given
29:53
Speaker 1: that it's oil. This is also Donald Trump's favorite commodity,
29:57
Speaker 1: so he would love to be able to control Iranian oil.
30:00
Speaker 1: This would give him basically control of all Iranian exports. Uh,
30:06
Speaker 1: during the war and after the war. As long as
30:08
Speaker 1: he had troops there, he would control it. So this
30:12
Speaker 1: makes a lot of sense. Uh. And uh again, this
30:17
Speaker 1: is one islands, relatively small. It exports between one point
30:23
Speaker 1: five to four million barrels of oil a day a day.
30:28
Speaker 1: That's that is a huge quantity, right. Uh, So.
30:37
Speaker 2: Let's see what happens.
30:39
Speaker 1: Uh. But uh, this is this, this is a juicy
30:42
Speaker 1: target that makes a lot of sense and can be
30:45
Speaker 1: used to I mean, it fits Trump's profile, and it
30:51
Speaker 1: can be used as a balcony chip with the Iranians.
30:55
Speaker 1: Uh and uh, you.
30:57
Speaker 2: Know, the decapitates and then uh, you decapitate.
31:01
Speaker 1: You you make the missiles, you you make it possible
31:05
Speaker 1: for the Uranians really to retaliate in any meaningful way,
31:08
Speaker 1: and then you take their oil resources. And of course
31:14
Speaker 1: this is all helped and aided by the fact that
31:17
Speaker 1: the United States has basically destroyed the Ranian navy. There
31:20
Speaker 1: is no Uranian navy, So how do they get troops
31:23
Speaker 1: onto the island. It's almost impossible for them, particularly given
31:28
Speaker 1: as we said that the United States controls the airspace,
31:35
Speaker 1: so they have it. Oh yeah, maybe a couple more things.
31:43
Speaker 1: I wanted to say something about the fact that we
31:48
Speaker 1: talked about yesterday about the coods and because maybe not
31:52
Speaker 1: doing what Trump wants them to do, because he's betrayed
31:55
Speaker 1: them in the past. Well, now Trump has come out
31:58
Speaker 1: and said I don't want the codes going into Iran,
32:01
Speaker 1: and everybody's going, hmm, wonder why he changed his mind?
32:05
Speaker 1: What happened? And I think it's pretty clear what changed
32:09
Speaker 1: his mind, probably a message from Erdigon, I mean the
32:14
Speaker 1: talks don't want the Coulds to get involved in Iran.
32:20
Speaker 1: He doesn't want an autonomous state in in Iran, a
32:23
Speaker 1: code autonomous state in Iran. He doesn't want the Kods
32:26
Speaker 1: to get combat experience. He doesn't want the Kods fighting.
32:30
Speaker 1: He wants the Colds subdued. And I'm sure he is
32:34
Speaker 1: putting a lot of pressure on Trump not.
32:36
Speaker 2: To use the kids.
32:37
Speaker 1: So the likelihood of the Couds being used to take
32:40
Speaker 1: over the regime and to undermine it, I mean, I
32:42
Speaker 1: hope I'm wrong.
32:44
Speaker 2: I hope I'm wrong on a lot of this stuff.
32:45
Speaker 1: I hope I'm wrong, but it seems to me pretty
32:48
Speaker 1: unlikely given the Kods history with Trump, a history of betrayal,
32:54
Speaker 1: and the fact that Erdigon who Trump listens to because
32:59
Speaker 1: he's an authoritarian and Trump likes authoritarians. We'll fight against this,
33:06
Speaker 1: fight against this. So yep, you know the island I
33:18
Speaker 1: think is what you want to take. And again, all
33:21
Speaker 1: of this also relates to China and the fact that.
33:26
Speaker 2: China has a.
33:27
Speaker 1: Deep interest in the states of homos opening up, and
33:32
Speaker 1: China wants the oil flow, it wants its oil back,
33:36
Speaker 1: and if America is controlling that oil. That is a
33:42
Speaker 1: problem for China. As I've said many many times, it
33:45
Speaker 1: makes a Chinese attack on you, Thailand, Thailand. God, now
33:51
Speaker 1: I'm going to attack Thailand on Taiwan A lot less
33:54
Speaker 1: likely if the United States basically controls the entire oil
34:00
Speaker 1: supply Uran Venezuela.
34:02
Speaker 2: All they have is Russian oil.
34:04
Speaker 1: Not enough.
34:05
Speaker 2: It's not enough for the Chinese. So the Chinese in
34:08
Speaker 2: deep trouble.
34:10
Speaker 1: If the United States can actually pull this off, Inyuan
34:14
Speaker 1: and win this all right, Oh, I've got numbers of
34:17
Speaker 1: our missile launchers. Day nine was up from Day eight,
34:21
Speaker 1: from fifteen missiles to twenty one. That's still the second
34:25
Speaker 1: lowest since the beginning of the war, and way down
34:27
Speaker 1: from the three hundred and fifty and day one drones.
34:34
Speaker 1: Drones significantly uptick. Huge uptick on the drones one hundred
34:38
Speaker 1: and thirty four up from twelve. One hundred and thirty
34:41
Speaker 1: four brings it closer to the quantities in the first
34:46
Speaker 1: few days. Those were still more than double the one
34:49
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty four. So Ivan still has missiles, it
34:53
Speaker 1: just doesn't have a lot of launchers and it's harder
34:55
Speaker 1: for them to get to the missiles, but Ivan definitely
34:58
Speaker 1: still has drones, and the Israelis and Americans need to
35:02
Speaker 1: need to figure out how to destroy more and more
35:04
Speaker 1: of those drones and need to you know, again, the
35:08
Speaker 1: drones are primarily a risk for the Gulf States, less
35:12
Speaker 1: so for Israel, and less so I think for the
35:15
Speaker 1: Americans operating off the coast. Let's see, it really does
35:21
Speaker 1: sound seem like.
35:25
Speaker 5: Well, let's skip that, let's do that is fine, That
35:31
Speaker 5: is fine, That is fine, all right?
35:34
Speaker 2: What else?
35:35
Speaker 1: What did I miss? In terms of Iran today? I
35:37
Speaker 1: think we've captured everything and we will see. Right, here's
35:49
Speaker 1: another story. Again, this gives you the sense of what
35:52
Speaker 1: is probably happening behind the scenes in Iran. We're just
35:55
Speaker 1: getting a glimmer, small glimmer of it. This is a
35:57
Speaker 1: source in Iran old Iran Weyer that Iran's de facto
36:03
Speaker 1: security chief Ali Lave and Johnny I talked about him
36:06
Speaker 1: a minute ago. Is opposed to uh Harameni's son becoming
36:12
Speaker 1: the leader. Lauren. Johnny supports his brother, his brother, Laura,
36:17
Speaker 1: Johnny's brother Sudik Lover Johnny a high ranking cleric in
36:22
Speaker 1: the fight for leadership see see It's an authoritarianism, it's
36:26
Speaker 1: it's it's a dictatorship. Everybody is struggling for their own
36:31
Speaker 1: you know, relatives or why they want their own relatives
36:33
Speaker 1: to be killed by the Israelis. I'm not sure, but
36:36
Speaker 1: somebody describes it as a true game of thrones moment
36:39
Speaker 1: inside the regime. But again, we don't know exactly what's
36:43
Speaker 1: going on. These are rumors coming out. How to tell
36:46
Speaker 1: exactly what what is driving any of this?
36:50
Speaker 2: Uh and uh and we will we will see.
36:54
Speaker 1: Let's see.
37:00
Speaker 2: That's not new.
37:07
Speaker 1: I mean, this is interesting if true. We will see
37:11
Speaker 1: if this is true. Katau has reportedly told the Trump
37:15
Speaker 1: administration that they will expel the Hamas leadership from the
37:18
Speaker 1: country finally, after they refuse to condemn the Ranian attacks
37:23
Speaker 1: on Koto. There was a video of the Hamas representatives
37:29
Speaker 1: basically saying, look, we stand with anybody who poses Israel.
37:33
Speaker 1: The Iranians oppose Israel. We stand with the Iranians. And
37:36
Speaker 1: they're saying it.
37:37
Speaker 2: From kata As.
37:38
Speaker 1: Kutta is taking in incoming missiles from the Ranians, so
37:42
Speaker 1: kata are not happy with Kamas. Maybe it'll actually happened
37:46
Speaker 1: this time. We will we will see.
37:48
Speaker 2: If that's that's actually actually happening. It will actually hit
37:53
Speaker 2: actually true.
37:55
Speaker 1: Let's say, yeah, I mean more, I see more and more. Uh,
38:03
Speaker 1: this is aitula something something something something something saying regional
38:08
Speaker 1: attacks will continue. And the strains are showing even inside
38:13
Speaker 1: the type body of the judiciary that you know, the
38:16
Speaker 1: real real challenges inside inside. This is good. All right,
38:25
Speaker 1: let me remind you that tomorrow tomorrow I have a
38:30
Speaker 1: guest on the show, Andrew Fox, who is a military expert,
38:37
Speaker 1: somebody that I started following during the Gaza War. He
38:41
Speaker 1: was in Gaza, well on the Israeli side, but on
38:44
Speaker 1: Gaza reporting on the so called genocide and humanitarian crisis
38:49
Speaker 1: and all that stuff, and I thought doing an amazingly
38:52
Speaker 1: objective job. He is, uh, you know, critic of Israeli
38:57
Speaker 1: army in ways that maybe I disagree with. But he's
39:02
Speaker 1: also got some interesting views about the comment campaign about
39:05
Speaker 1: Iran and what would he would take in order to
39:08
Speaker 1: get a regime change in Iran. Again, we probably don't
39:12
Speaker 1: agree on stuff, but we agree on a lot and
39:16
Speaker 1: I respect him because you know, he's he's been a
39:19
Speaker 1: real objective. You know, he went on the ground to
39:22
Speaker 1: see what was going on and reported on it objectively.
39:24
Speaker 1: He's also affiliated with a with a think tank in
39:28
Speaker 1: London that was founded originally by.
39:34
Speaker 2: His name is I'm blanking on the name. I can
39:35
Speaker 2: see his face.
39:37
Speaker 1: You know. They're really good brit who was very supportive
39:40
Speaker 1: of Israel and also traveled to the Middle East and
39:42
Speaker 1: reported from there. And anyway, the farm Polse Institute that
39:48
Speaker 1: had me as a to speak about Israel a couple
39:51
Speaker 1: of years ago. And and he's he's he's quite interesting
39:56
Speaker 1: and and he's quite he's quite good and I would so, yeah,
40:02
Speaker 1: check him out tomorrow. At what time have I got
40:05
Speaker 1: a plan for We've got to plan for two o'clock
40:11
Speaker 1: Eastern time tomorrow, two o'clock East Eastern time. And one
40:20
Speaker 1: of the things that happened over the last twenty four
40:23
Speaker 1: hours is he got invited to ps Morgan's show. Right,
40:28
Speaker 1: They called him up and they wanted him to come
40:30
Speaker 1: and appeal in the show and he basically and he
40:33
Speaker 1: said no, He said he won't. He doesn't expect ps
40:39
Speaker 1: ps is has become incredibly biased and anti Israel and
40:48
Speaker 1: support you know, has on a show these anti Semites
40:51
Speaker 1: and these clowns like Dave Smith and things like that
40:54
Speaker 1: say basically basically rejected, rejected going on PS Morgan. So
41:01
Speaker 1: I can now say he's agreed to come on youron
41:03
Speaker 1: book show, but he rejected P. S. Morgan.
41:05
Speaker 2: So that's cool.
41:08
Speaker 1: That's cool that he has agreed to come.
41:11
Speaker 2: It looks like, oh, this is bad news.
41:14
Speaker 1: It looks like Whitcoff and Kushna planning to arrive in
41:17
Speaker 1: Israel on Tuesday for talks that can't be good. Krishna
41:24
Speaker 1: and Whitcoff, nothing good can come out of that meeting.
41:31
Speaker 1: And all right, let's see, it looks like Israel is
41:38
Speaker 1: expanding its ground operation in southern Lebanon.
41:41
Speaker 2: As I said, uh and uh.
41:48
Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean Israel continues to just dismantle destroy the
41:54
Speaker 1: Islamic Revolutionary God's headquarters. So now the air Force headquarters
41:59
Speaker 1: has been destroyed, and basically they have no air force.
42:02
Speaker 1: Uh but but the air force is are saying charge
42:05
Speaker 1: on missile the drone lodgers. So again, destroying command and
42:10
Speaker 1: control makes it difficult for them to launch, makes it
42:14
Speaker 1: up to local commanders. But basically all of this is
42:18
Speaker 1: to disrupt the ability to coordinate, to coordinate anything. All right,
42:29
Speaker 1: let's see if we have anything else that's happened in
42:32
Speaker 1: the last few minutes.
42:34
Speaker 2: I'm just scanning the news.
42:36
Speaker 1: But okay, I think I think that is your update
42:38
Speaker 1: for today on on the War. Tomorrow there will be
42:43
Speaker 1: two shows. The first one will be at two pm
42:46
Speaker 1: East Coast time with Andrew Fox. It should be interesting again.
42:52
Speaker 1: You know you're not gonna agree with everything. Yes, it's
42:54
Speaker 1: a Henry Henry Jackson society where I spoke a couple
42:57
Speaker 1: of years ago. I spoke about Israel during the Gaza
43:00
Speaker 1: War and they were very gracious to have me there
43:03
Speaker 1: and and it was a good, good audience and a
43:05
Speaker 1: good group. And then and it's a think tank that
43:08
Speaker 1: was started by Douglas Murray. Thank you all for helping
43:11
Speaker 1: me with my obvious lack of ability to recall names
43:14
Speaker 1: of anything just named just imploy it all right. There'll
43:18
Speaker 1: be two shows tomorrow again, one one with Andrew Fox
43:24
Speaker 1: at two pm and one with one will just be
43:28
Speaker 1: a news roundup at probably at eight pm East Coast time,
43:35
Speaker 1: maybe seven pm East Coast time, we'll see. I'll try
43:38
Speaker 1: to do at seven pm, but we'll see. Tomorrow is
43:40
Speaker 1: going to be a busy day. It's it's crammed with stuff.
43:45
Speaker 1: So I'll let you know tomorrow the exact timing. But
43:48
Speaker 1: two shows tomorrow, all right, and then show on Tuesday,
43:51
Speaker 1: show Wednesday, and then I'm not sure what happens Thursday, Friday, Saturday.
43:56
Speaker 1: Probably a show Thursday from Prospera Prospera which is in Honduras.
44:02
Speaker 1: It's a private city in Honduras. And then Friday, it
44:06
Speaker 1: looks like my schedule Prespera is such that probably won't
44:09
Speaker 1: be able to do a show set up, but then
44:10
Speaker 1: Saturday we should be able to do a show. And
44:12
Speaker 1: Sunday we'll be able to do a show again from Prospera.
44:15
Speaker 1: No show Monday, and then we're back home for a
44:18
Speaker 1: little while or no for a couple of weeks or
44:20
Speaker 1: two and a half weeks, and I'll be doing shows,
44:22
Speaker 1: all right.
44:23
Speaker 2: What else do we have on the agenda?
44:25
Speaker 1: Yes, we have a discussion of Tucker Calson, Tucker Calson.
44:31
Speaker 1: Let's I've got a bunch of videos of Taka one, two, three,
44:35
Speaker 1: five videos of Tucker Carson. I want, I just want
44:38
Speaker 1: to stay in touch with Carl Tucker and make sure
44:41
Speaker 1: you're all up to date on the latest raving, mad
44:44
Speaker 1: crazy stuff. And I wouldn't do this if he was
44:47
Speaker 1: indeed a marginal figure that the world that recognizes crazy
44:51
Speaker 1: and insane and it rejected him. And but you know,
44:57
Speaker 1: significant numbers of Republicans linked to vote for Tucker Colson
45:02
Speaker 1: Tuckers for president. Somebody's saying he's kaka Katallson, but he's
45:07
Speaker 1: not anymore right now, he's anti anti Qatar. Uh he
45:15
Speaker 1: is now. I don't know tucka uh Chinaton China something.
45:21
Speaker 1: I don't know how how to say it, but anyway,
45:24
Speaker 1: I don't think he's part of it. He's you know,
45:26
Speaker 1: some saying he's been kicked out of Mega. Some would
45:28
Speaker 1: say that he is holding the last bastion of Mega. Uh.
45:33
Speaker 1: You know, it depends how you define Mega. Trump kicked
45:35
Speaker 1: him out of Mega. So Trump announced that he is out,
45:38
Speaker 1: the Tucker's out, that Tucker's irrelevant, the Tucker's crazy, the
45:41
Speaker 1: Tucker's nuts. For once, I agree with Trump in terms
45:44
Speaker 1: of Trump's Tucker's craziness. Trump rejected him, yet he is
45:50
Speaker 1: still incredibly influential. I don't think his viewership has dropped.
45:53
Speaker 1: You know, millions of people still watch the stuff. So
45:56
Speaker 1: we keep an eye on what is Tucker calson doing
45:59
Speaker 1: things King and what would what would what would impact
46:04
Speaker 1: he have on the world if he became I don't
46:08
Speaker 1: know if he had influence. Let's say, all right, so
46:12
Speaker 1: I've got a few videos, uh that short and and
46:15
Speaker 1: and and and they're pretty pretty pretty straightforward, and uh,
46:19
Speaker 1: you know, we'll talk a little bit about what he says.
46:22
Speaker 1: But by the way, this video, this video.
46:31
Speaker 2: Is titled because you won't see the title.
46:34
Speaker 1: On it, N'tanielle unleashes a demonic spirit. I mean, that's
46:40
Speaker 1: the thing with you can't but laugh. The guy is
46:44
Speaker 1: such a frigging idiot. He's so lost it in terms
46:50
Speaker 1: of he's lost the plot. I mean, these are the
46:53
Speaker 1: same demons the scratch Taka. Maybe I don't know. Maybe
46:56
Speaker 1: maybe Natanille sent the demons to scratch Tucker Coulson in
47:01
Speaker 1: the middle of the night. Maybe he did.
47:03
Speaker 2: We don't know, but maybe he did.
47:05
Speaker 1: All right, here they are. He was let me know
47:09
Speaker 1: if the sound is good and everything and what it's like.
47:12
Speaker 6: They've been advocating for years at the US government on
47:15
Speaker 6: behalf of Israel kill the Iola committee. They got it. Okay,
47:19
Speaker 6: you got what you wanted.
47:20
Speaker 2: Why are you well Israel?
47:21
Speaker 1: Israel killed him. So they've been advocating Israel could kill
47:24
Speaker 1: him himself, and Israel did kill him, kill him itself,
47:28
Speaker 1: so he didn't need the United States to kill how
47:29
Speaker 1: many it's Israeli intelligence, It was Israeli plains. It was
47:33
Speaker 1: Israel that killed him. But okay, but this is probably
47:36
Speaker 1: the conspiracy theory of Israel is driving the community.
47:41
Speaker 6: They got it, Okay, you got what you wanted. Why
47:42
Speaker 6: are you mad? This is the key to their psychology.
47:46
Speaker 6: And it's a spiritual principle. Bloodlust is never sated, just
47:49
Speaker 6: like any other kind of lust.
47:51
Speaker 1: Bloodlust And Nevis stated, now, not who he's talking about.
47:55
Speaker 1: He's talking about the Jews. And I mean, it doesn't
48:01
Speaker 1: get much more anti Semitic than this. This is blood
48:05
Speaker 1: libel has always been part of anti Semitism, at least
48:08
Speaker 1: since the probably since the early Middle Ages, where you know,
48:13
Speaker 1: Jews supposed he drank the blood of Christian babies. They
48:16
Speaker 1: threw babies down down wells. There's a famous blood lust
48:22
Speaker 1: involved in Yolk and England. But there's I mean, this
48:24
Speaker 1: idea of Jews craving the blood of infidel of non
48:31
Speaker 1: Jews has a long history within the anti Semitic community.
48:37
Speaker 1: Tuck has giving it them modern spin so de Tennyao.
48:42
Speaker 1: Jews Israel have a.
48:43
Speaker 6: Blood lust that is never saved, sayd. Just like any
48:46
Speaker 6: other kind of lust, nothing is ever enough. You taste
48:49
Speaker 6: it and you're telling you want more killing.
48:50
Speaker 1: And the guy's nuts taste in Italian you want more.
48:53
Speaker 6: It's the same. But there's a specific psychology at work here,
48:56
Speaker 6: and it's a graceless anti human psychology. Second, people like
49:01
Speaker 6: this win, they want to kill the people they vanquished.
49:05
Speaker 1: Second they win, they want to kill the people they vanquished.
49:09
Speaker 1: What does that even mean? Didn't they kill them in
49:12
Speaker 1: order to get them vanquished? I mean the guy is
49:15
Speaker 1: completely nuts and evil. This is real evil. And who
49:22
Speaker 1: are these people? Who are these people?
49:25
Speaker 2: Well, it's the Jews.
49:28
Speaker 6: And so you're seeing this crazed effort to purge anyone
49:32
Speaker 6: in the conservative movement or MAGA who had any doubt
49:36
Speaker 6: about the wisdom of this war. They shouldn't just be
49:38
Speaker 6: silenced and deep platformed that they should be arrested.
49:41
Speaker 1: How long before it who's calling for the rest of
49:45
Speaker 1: people who against this wolf? I don't know anybody is
49:49
Speaker 1: Nitaanielle the Jews? Who's calling for the rest? And how
49:53
Speaker 1: did he go from bloodlust against hominy and against the
50:00
Speaker 1: enemies to be vanquished. Two influences being deplatformed, being arrested.
50:08
Speaker 1: Who's calling for the arrest? Let me know if you
50:12
Speaker 1: know of any case in which somebody has been called
50:15
Speaker 1: for Tucker Carlson or his ilk to be as, how long.
50:17
Speaker 6: Before it's they should be killed?
50:18
Speaker 1: Not long?
50:19
Speaker 6: That's how quickly these things are moving because a spirit
50:22
Speaker 6: has been unleashed. This is demonic influence. Clearly, war brings
50:28
Speaker 6: people like that to the fore and it makes them
50:30
Speaker 6: more powerful.
50:32
Speaker 1: So a demonic influence has been unleashed. Soon Niel would
50:36
Speaker 1: be calling for the assassination of Tucker Calson and other
50:41
Speaker 1: influences that you know that that that involved. I mean,
50:49
Speaker 1: this is this is not good nuggod. I mean he is.
50:56
Speaker 1: He is completely utterly on quivocally lost it. Let's take
51:06
Speaker 1: another example, and now he blamed all the issues associated
51:13
Speaker 1: with you know, the powers to be in Israel. He
51:20
Speaker 1: is recently blamed Rabbad for this, and I don't know
51:22
Speaker 1: if you know Rabbad. They have these missionaries all over
51:26
Speaker 1: the world. You can go to the you don't an
51:29
Speaker 1: island in Thailand and you will find a Hbad Ahbad
51:33
Speaker 1: a little place with a synagogue, and their primary focus,
51:38
Speaker 1: rabbad is to try to get secular people like me,
51:42
Speaker 1: Jews who are born Jewish like me, try to bring
51:45
Speaker 1: them back into the religion. And they welcome you, and
51:49
Speaker 1: they feed you, and they encourage you to pray with
51:52
Speaker 1: them and they but they teach you very nicely, and
51:54
Speaker 1: they're very tolerant, and they're very psychologically manipulative and so on.
52:00
Speaker 1: So I'm not a fan of HBBAD, but this is
52:03
Speaker 1: what they do. They kind of missionaries to try to
52:05
Speaker 1: bring Jews back into the religion, secular Jews, bring them
52:09
Speaker 1: into the religion. That is they focus in life. Taka
52:12
Speaker 1: now has turned Habbad into a demonic another demonic institution
52:17
Speaker 1: dedicated to some vast political agenda and to taking over
52:22
Speaker 1: I guess the world ultimately another Jewish bloodlust, you know,
52:27
Speaker 1: anti Semitic nonsense. Habbad has a has a place here
52:33
Speaker 1: in Puerto Rico. They're everywhere, I mean they are everywhere.
52:36
Speaker 1: I remember Kosamoi in Thailand, they were there. And it's hard.
52:42
Speaker 1: It's hard. I mean pretty much. Anyway you travel anyway
52:45
Speaker 1: Israeli's travel, secular is Raeli travel, there's going to be
52:48
Speaker 1: a HBBAD house close by. So here's his latest on Rabbad.
52:54
Speaker 1: He's done a number of shows now where he's mentioned Rabbad.
52:58
Speaker 6: So it's a big deal to have a religious war war.
53:00
Speaker 6: In some ways this may turn out to be a
53:02
Speaker 6: religious war and others it's just inherently a religious war.
53:04
Speaker 1: So this is a religious war between the Jews Israel,
53:08
Speaker 1: the Christians, Trump, and the Muslims. Oh maybe it is
53:12
Speaker 1: World War three after all, big religious wars.
53:15
Speaker 6: So you should know. And at the center of that
53:17
Speaker 6: conflict is this thing called the Third Temple, which is
53:20
Speaker 6: not yet exist but some people would like to rebuild.
53:23
Speaker 6: So we did a whole show on this seemed important
53:26
Speaker 6: and true, and in the course of that show we
53:29
Speaker 6: described patches that some soldiers in the Israeli military, the IDF,
53:34
Speaker 6: are wearing.
53:34
Speaker 1: So let's talk about this third Temple. They are Messianic, nationalistic,
53:39
Speaker 1: radical Israelis, Jews, super religious who are who are basically
53:48
Speaker 1: advocating for building a third Temple on the where the
53:53
Speaker 1: temp first and second Temple existed, which would mean knocking
53:57
Speaker 1: down the big mosque in Jerusalem the Temple and building
54:01
Speaker 1: a Jewish temple over there. And there is like, I
54:04
Speaker 1: don't know, five ten percent of the Israeli population that
54:06
Speaker 1: probably probably believes in this, but ninety percent of these
54:09
Speaker 1: raely population rejects this. Tucka has made this into oh
54:14
Speaker 1: this is what is is all about, building the Third Temple.
54:19
Speaker 1: Demonic forces probably and this some Israeli soldiers the way,
54:24
Speaker 1: this patch representing the Third Temple. But it's a tiny
54:28
Speaker 1: minority of soldiers, very very few soldiers. They are the nationalist, radical,
54:36
Speaker 1: crazy religionists. It is not a patch that is authorized
54:41
Speaker 1: by the Israeli military. It is a patch distributed by
54:45
Speaker 1: these radical political forces who are as I said, really
54:50
Speaker 1: really you know, right wing religious nuts.
54:53
Speaker 2: But for Taka, this is Israel. This is who they are.
54:57
Speaker 6: Through the idf or wearing that an image of a temple,
55:02
Speaker 6: the Third Temple, Third Temple. And we asked where did
55:06
Speaker 6: these come from? Where did they seems like from accounts
55:08
Speaker 6: that we read from those soldiers online that they got
55:11
Speaker 6: these patches somehow from a group called Hobbad in the
55:15
Speaker 6: United States. Is a global group, but it's headquartered here
55:17
Speaker 6: in New York and Brooklyn and.
55:20
Speaker 1: Now Jabad are not nationalists. How about believe in a
55:25
Speaker 1: third Temple, but they believe the Third Temple would be
55:28
Speaker 1: really built by the Messiah. You know, Jesus was not
55:31
Speaker 1: a messiah, so when the Messiah comes, only then can
55:37
Speaker 1: and will the temple be built. But that has nothing
55:41
Speaker 1: to do with the wars currently being waged because the
55:44
Speaker 1: Messiah is not here. They don't claim Bibe's the Messiah,
55:48
Speaker 1: or Trump is the Messiah, or anybody's the Messiah. Hubbad
55:52
Speaker 1: just as a theoretical advocacy for a third Temple when
55:55
Speaker 1: the Messiah comes, and they soon. I'm not distributing patches
56:01
Speaker 1: right now. These patches are being distributed by again to
56:04
Speaker 1: fall right in Israel. So this is just he makes
56:07
Speaker 1: this stuff up. He's just lying.
56:11
Speaker 6: And we said, and you can check the tape, it
56:13
Speaker 6: was like Kabad they seem like really nice people, met
56:15
Speaker 6: a bunch of people over the years. They do a
56:18
Speaker 6: bunch of charitable.
56:18
Speaker 1: Yeah, so of my best friends of Jews. They seem
56:21
Speaker 1: like nice people. But ooh, they like to drink baby's
56:24
Speaker 1: blood in the night.
56:25
Speaker 6: Enterprises. But apparently these patches came from Habad and Hibbad.
56:30
Speaker 6: Check their website is in favor of rebuilding the Third Temple.
56:34
Speaker 1: No they not, No, they're not.
56:37
Speaker 6: I will issue a statement disavowing violence against innocence.
56:41
Speaker 1: Hi. So again, complete bs, make stuff up to make
56:46
Speaker 1: is your look as evil and as horrible as possible.
56:51
Speaker 5: Ooh, that doesn't look great on your screen. Let's fix that.
56:54
Speaker 5: All right, there you.
56:55
Speaker 1: Go, All right, next daily dose of tuck.
56:59
Speaker 2: I won't do this off.
57:00
Speaker 6: That is the decline of Europe very aggressively. Now you're
57:03
Speaker 6: seeing Iranian refugees massing in France to cross the English Channel.
57:08
Speaker 6: This this this morning to Great Britain. So it's already happening.
57:12
Speaker 6: The migrant flow is already going into Europe. Like, tell me,
57:15
Speaker 6: that wasn't the point from so.
57:18
Speaker 1: The whole point of the war. It turns out you
57:20
Speaker 1: didn't know this, But it turns out, according to Tuka,
57:23
Speaker 1: the whole point of the war was.
57:29
Speaker 2: Not to defeat the Ranians.
57:31
Speaker 1: It was to create a refugee crisis. And the Iranians
57:36
Speaker 1: are so fast they can run, I guess so fast
57:41
Speaker 1: that they have managed to escape you on and get
57:43
Speaker 1: to the shores of the British Canal and start crossing
57:46
Speaker 1: that canal just in the just eight days into the war.
57:52
Speaker 1: I mean, where does he get this bullshit from? It's
57:56
Speaker 1: a complete lie again, made up stuff. There's no Uranian
57:59
Speaker 1: refugee amassing on the French coast trying to cross over
58:02
Speaker 1: to England. Now, maybe there maybe these Iranian refugees from
58:07
Speaker 1: the Islamic regime, not from the war that being in
58:10
Speaker 1: Europe for months years, running away from the Islamic regimes.
58:14
Speaker 1: For the Mulas, the people is all in the United
58:17
Speaker 1: States is trying to replace. Maybe they're running away from that.
58:20
Speaker 1: But where does he get this? He makes it up.
58:23
Speaker 1: He completely makes it up. I mean it's and unfortunately
58:31
Speaker 1: again millions of people listen to this, millions of people
58:35
Speaker 1: are now inspired by this.
58:43
Speaker 2: Crazy stuff.
58:43
Speaker 6: Okay, two more, Unconditional surrender means foreign troops get to
58:47
Speaker 6: rape your wife and daughter if they want.
58:49
Speaker 1: In every gay This is after Trump said he's after
58:52
Speaker 1: unconditional surrender. So for Tucker under nitia surrender means the
58:59
Speaker 1: troops in the front. How do you get to rape
59:01
Speaker 1: your wife and your daughter. It's not how I.
59:04
Speaker 2: Think of unconditional surrender.
59:06
Speaker 1: Hmm.
59:07
Speaker 2: I don't know about you.
59:08
Speaker 1: That's not the first thing that comes into my mind.
59:10
Speaker 1: Interesting kind of fantasies. Tucker Costs used.
59:13
Speaker 6: To have a wife and daughter if they want, and
59:15
Speaker 6: everyone knows that, and that has been If there's one
59:18
Speaker 6: consistent lesson of history, it means unconditional surrender means foreign
59:23
Speaker 6: troops get to rape your wife and daughter. Everyone can
59:26
Speaker 6: feel that.
59:27
Speaker 1: That Really, that's what Americans did in Japan, Americans in Germany.
59:32
Speaker 1: I'm sure there was some raping going on, but that
59:34
Speaker 1: was not the dominant thing of the unconditional surrender of
59:37
Speaker 1: the Japanese of the Germans.
59:42
Speaker 6: Really, this is the essence of unconditional surrender. That's like
59:46
Speaker 6: the most atavistic instinct there is. And so to avoid that.
59:50
Speaker 1: That's the most atavistic instinct there is. I mean, tells
59:54
Speaker 1: you a lot about Taka and his view of mankind.
59:57
Speaker 6: People will do anything, and so that's why it requires
1:00:01
Speaker 6: that level of force to get a population subdued to
1:00:05
Speaker 6: the point of unconditional surrendered. That's why. And so in
1:00:08
Speaker 6: this case, of course, we don't have the ground force necessary.
1:00:12
Speaker 6: I don't think Americans would voluntarily participate in it. I
1:00:15
Speaker 6: just don't think we can do that. It would require
1:00:17
Speaker 6: weapons of mass destruction. It would require presumably nuclear weapons
1:00:21
Speaker 6: in order to do that. And let's let's not lie
1:00:23
Speaker 6: to ourselves. We're moving toward that.
1:00:25
Speaker 1: So when America doesn't use nuclear weapons, and it won't,
1:00:30
Speaker 1: will Tucka then recognized that he was wrong? Will people
1:00:34
Speaker 1: call him on the fact that he was wrong? I
1:00:37
Speaker 1: mean he's again. Will anybody hold him responsible?
1:00:43
Speaker 3: No?
1:00:43
Speaker 1: I mean he's made so many bad predictions and he's
1:00:46
Speaker 1: being held responsible.
1:00:47
Speaker 2: For none of them.
1:00:48
Speaker 1: Zero is not nothing? All right? Last one, This one's funny.
1:00:54
Speaker 1: So listen to this, you know, I think I think
1:00:58
Speaker 1: this is a combination of two different clips from two
1:01:01
Speaker 1: different opportunities. He's describing Israel, and this is from I
1:01:06
Speaker 1: think yesterday. The first clip is from yesterday. The other
1:01:08
Speaker 1: clip is from his interview with Huckabee. So it's a
1:01:13
Speaker 1: a week two weeks ago something like that.
1:01:16
Speaker 2: This is how he describes as.
1:01:17
Speaker 6: Well, Israel, which is one of the single ugliest countries
1:01:20
Speaker 6: in the world.
1:01:21
Speaker 1: Nothing, Israel is one of the single ugliest countries in
1:01:26
Speaker 1: the world. How do you what do you even do
1:01:31
Speaker 1: with that? He doesn't know what he's talking about.
1:01:34
Speaker 6: Israel, which is one of the single ugliest countries in
1:01:37
Speaker 6: the world. Nothing of beauty has been built there since
1:01:39
Speaker 6: nineteen forty eight.
1:01:40
Speaker 1: So nothing a beauty has been built there since nineteen
1:01:42
Speaker 1: forty eight. I mean, I mean, his anti Semitism is
1:01:48
Speaker 1: is oozing out of his skin. Now it has corrupted
1:01:53
Speaker 1: every cell in his brain. The guy's completely detached from
1:01:58
Speaker 1: any reality. I mean, he's been Israel, he knows that's
1:02:03
Speaker 1: not true, and he died. The second clip shows that
1:02:06
Speaker 1: he knows he's not true already.
1:02:07
Speaker 6: I've been everywhere in that country, and it's true. And
1:02:11
Speaker 6: I come to Israel and the infrastructure we're flying in,
1:02:13
Speaker 6: and I said to my buddy, I was like, man,
1:02:15
Speaker 6: that looks first of looks great. I love the agriculture
1:02:17
Speaker 6: in Israel because it's beautiful. I love green, I love
1:02:19
Speaker 6: its beautiful plants.
1:02:20
Speaker 1: I remember when it didn't look like that.
1:02:21
Speaker 6: Yeah, yeah, first time I came in fifty three years ago,
1:02:24
Speaker 6: it's great. It did not look like it's great. Looks
1:02:26
Speaker 6: a lot nicer than our country, and it has higher
1:02:28
Speaker 6: standard of living. It has nicer roads than the United States.
1:02:33
Speaker 1: I guess something beautiful was built in Israel after all.
1:02:39
Speaker 1: Surprising that Patuca would contradict himself that way. Hmmm, so weird, uh,
1:03:00
Speaker 1: But that is a calocos and ladies and gentlemen, please
1:03:04
Speaker 1: do what you can to avoid him and warn people
1:03:08
Speaker 1: against him. He is an unmitigated nutcase. Talk about nutcases, Yes,
1:03:17
Speaker 1: nutcases is the theme today Alexander Dugan. So over the
1:03:22
Speaker 1: last couple of days, I've noticed a huge spike in
1:03:26
Speaker 1: discussions of Alexander Dugan. It seems like an essay was
1:03:30
Speaker 1: written the Long Game and the Conservative Right, and not
1:03:32
Speaker 1: particularly a good essay, but an essay about the political
1:03:35
Speaker 1: Catholic integrational integralists and the evil they represent, which they do,
1:03:40
Speaker 1: so that's good. A lot of people be commenting on
1:03:43
Speaker 1: this essay and it's been going back and forth, and
1:03:46
Speaker 1: a big part of this is the idea that Bannon,
1:03:49
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon, basically brought Dugan into the American right and
1:03:56
Speaker 1: is using Duganism whatever that is, in order to corrupt
1:04:03
Speaker 1: the American right. And I think there's a lot of
1:04:06
Speaker 1: truth to that. Bannon and Matt Dugan in Rome in
1:04:08
Speaker 1: twenty eighteen and then started his war Room in twenty nineteen,
1:04:13
Speaker 1: by the way, with money and advice from Jeffrey Epstein.
1:04:17
Speaker 1: It is interesting that Bennon, who had very close relationships
1:04:21
Speaker 1: with Epstein and repeatedly emails and advice and they hung
1:04:27
Speaker 1: out together and a lots of photographs of them together
1:04:31
Speaker 1: see no backlash from MAGA over his Epstein connections.
1:04:35
Speaker 2: I think that's really, really, really bizarre.
1:04:38
Speaker 1: So much for them caring about so called pedophilia, and
1:04:41
Speaker 1: yet Bannon, one of their leaders is was one of
1:04:46
Speaker 1: the closest people to Epstein and nothing happened anyway.
1:04:50
Speaker 2: Bannon, Bennon has you know, arguably.
1:04:57
Speaker 1: Basically what would you call it, popularized Duganism by taking
1:05:03
Speaker 1: his postmodernist kind of nonsense out and repackaging it inconsistent
1:05:09
Speaker 1: with Uganism, I mean, an anti globalist civilization of clash, multipolarity,
1:05:16
Speaker 1: anti liberalism as kind of trying to pitch it to
1:05:22
Speaker 1: the conservative mainstream audience. And he's been doing this now
1:05:28
Speaker 1: for eight years. And yeah, I mean, and Bannon is smart.
1:05:35
Speaker 1: Ban is smarter than Tucka. He's smarter than a lot
1:05:37
Speaker 1: of these things, these people, and he is He's making
1:05:42
Speaker 1: this whole thing into you know, Judo Christian civilization. Globalists
1:05:46
Speaker 1: are evil, sovereignty, economic nationalism. I've talked about Bannon in
1:05:51
Speaker 1: the past, way past, and how evil Bannon really is
1:05:55
Speaker 1: and how much he is behind much of MAGA and
1:05:59
Speaker 1: really the cre of mega they're building a mega. Remember
1:06:02
Speaker 1: he ran Trump's campaign originally in twenty sixteen. Well, because
1:06:12
Speaker 1: of that, Dugan is now back. And I've read you
1:06:14
Speaker 1: a few of Dugen's kind of tweets over the last
1:06:18
Speaker 1: few weeks. But Dugan is being discussed all over Twitter,
1:06:22
Speaker 1: and I thought i'd show you a few videos of
1:06:23
Speaker 1: Dugen so you get a sense of who this guy is.
1:06:26
Speaker 1: One of the tweets I saw, let's see a few
1:06:29
Speaker 1: days ago. And this is relevant because it relates to
1:06:34
Speaker 1: techer cosson. Dugan is writing, quote techer Cousin is on
1:06:38
Speaker 1: the rise, Trump is in the decline. Please Americans, don't
1:06:43
Speaker 1: abandon your great course. That seems so close to the
1:06:46
Speaker 1: reality recently one year ago, your conservative revolution was hijacked
1:06:51
Speaker 1: by pedophiles. Rescue it with so many brave persons you have.
1:06:58
Speaker 1: He's talking about it's been hijacked by Trump. He's pro
1:07:02
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson without any question.
1:07:07
Speaker 2: So that is Dugan.
1:07:10
Speaker 1: I thought i'd show you a little bit of stuff.
1:07:12
Speaker 1: This is actually a clip that I showed you I
1:07:17
Speaker 1: don't know, months years ago. I don't remember when. But
1:07:20
Speaker 1: this gives you a flavor of Dugan's postmodernism.
1:07:25
Speaker 2: You know that you know Dugan is not a.
1:07:29
Speaker 4: So we have our special Russian truths that you need
1:07:34
Speaker 4: to accept.
1:07:36
Speaker 1: So could you hear that?
1:07:37
Speaker 2: Was the volume low? It seemed like the volume was low.
1:07:40
Speaker 1: Is that just on my side? So notice that we
1:07:44
Speaker 1: have a special Russian truth that you need to accept,
1:07:51
Speaker 1: special Russian truth that you need to accept. He's a
1:07:55
Speaker 1: right wing postmodernist as something that maybe is not you,
1:08:01
Speaker 1: maybe it's not your truth, but it's our truth, not true.
1:08:07
Speaker 7: But if the truth is relative, that doesn't mean that
1:08:12
Speaker 7: the truth doesn't exist. That means that absolute truth, one
1:08:17
Speaker 7: for all doesn't exist.
1:08:20
Speaker 1: So he says absolute truth doesn't exist.
1:08:22
Speaker 2: Is your truth is our truth?
1:08:25
Speaker 1: Truth is relative? Relative? That's pure postmodernism, that's pure leftism,
1:08:30
Speaker 1: if you will. And yet he is the leading figure
1:08:34
Speaker 1: on the Russian right and a huge influence on elements
1:08:38
Speaker 1: within the American right. Exactly if you if you.
1:08:40
Speaker 8: Watch Russian television today, you'd think that Russia America war.
1:08:47
Speaker 3: Yes, but the same if we're if we are examining, examining,
1:08:52
Speaker 3: if we are reading American prayers, we have the same.
1:08:56
Speaker 8: Not really, I've just come back from America. You don't
1:08:58
Speaker 8: really get that impression. Do you think this is genuinely
1:09:01
Speaker 8: the case?
1:09:01
Speaker 3: No?
1:09:02
Speaker 1: I think that now the situation is in Syria, for.
1:09:07
Speaker 4: Example, United States continue to be unipolar or consider continuing
1:09:13
Speaker 4: to consider itself as uni polar power. It says, no more.
1:09:20
Speaker 9: Asset and adless exists powers of the Western Europe repeats
1:09:27
Speaker 9: after Washington, we doesn't want anymore asset, but.
1:09:32
Speaker 1: I said is gone, says.
1:09:35
Speaker 4: Stop, let have asset and after that there are there is.
1:09:42
Speaker 10: Our nuclear and military power beside behind act So and
1:09:52
Speaker 10: that is serious.
1:09:54
Speaker 2: If you are boss, you could not let the.
1:09:58
Speaker 9: Other decide, if you really is a boss, decide what
1:10:03
Speaker 9: to do in your real of responsibility.
1:10:06
Speaker 2: It is conflict.
1:10:07
Speaker 1: And Russia says, no, you.
1:10:08
Speaker 2: Are not boss, You are not anymore boss.
1:10:12
Speaker 1: That's what is serious.
1:10:14
Speaker 7: It is if if we insist on multipolarity, and if.
1:10:20
Speaker 1: So, this is a big deal. You know, this is
1:10:22
Speaker 1: the new Bush, I mean Bush, the neutron strategy multipolarity.
1:10:26
Speaker 1: That is, the United States is boss over Latin America,
1:10:31
Speaker 1: over the Americas, but Russia's boss over Europe or Asia,
1:10:37
Speaker 1: China's boss of a you know, Southeast Asia. Each one
1:10:43
Speaker 1: has a different polarity and morality. Who's good and who's bad,
1:10:48
Speaker 1: who's what's right and what's wrong. Never enters into the
1:10:51
Speaker 1: calculation never enters in the calculation.
1:10:57
Speaker 4: Behind us, there is nuclear weapon.
1:11:00
Speaker 1: And notice how many times he mentions nuclear weapons. We'll
1:11:04
Speaker 1: get to that in a minute.
1:11:05
Speaker 4: Defend its principally, not because we have so much interest there.
1:11:10
Speaker 1: And by the way, they didn't defend us sad when
1:11:13
Speaker 1: when Asad was, you know, deposed by an internal uprising
1:11:20
Speaker 1: by the Sunni Islamists, Russia did nothing. Impotent. They might be,
1:11:28
Speaker 1: they might want multipolarity, but they were an impotent power
1:11:31
Speaker 1: except for the news. The question who rules the world?
1:11:36
Speaker 1: That is the problem. That's possible war only war could
1:11:40
Speaker 1: decide to really only walk in the same.
1:11:43
Speaker 8: Do you think that's really a possibility.
1:11:45
Speaker 4: If the United States doesn't want to start the work,
1:11:50
Speaker 4: you should recognize the United States should recognize openly for
1:11:56
Speaker 4: all humanity of mankind that United States is not anymore
1:12:01
Speaker 4: unique master. So let recognize that the war.
1:12:05
Speaker 1: It seems like Trump is doing exactly that, recognizing multiplearity.
1:12:12
Speaker 1: Here's another another clip from I think this is more recent.
1:12:16
Speaker 1: This is much shorter, so this will be interesting.
1:12:21
Speaker 11: And we are going to distribute nuclear weapon to everybody
1:12:25
Speaker 11: who can use it again the West.
1:12:28
Speaker 1: I'll just repeat what he said. We are going to
1:12:31
Speaker 1: he's talking about Russia distributed nuclear weapons to everybody who
1:12:37
Speaker 1: can use it against the West.
1:12:42
Speaker 11: Let's go again, and we are going to distribute nuclear
1:12:45
Speaker 11: weapon to everybody who can use it again the West.
1:12:50
Speaker 11: I think we are going to supply all kinds of
1:12:53
Speaker 11: strategical weapon to all elements of American Germany, Western Germany
1:13:02
Speaker 11: against NATO, starting from mill East. So the farious lot
1:13:08
Speaker 11: of America, we are going to war.
1:13:11
Speaker 1: So they're going to war, and the way they're going
1:13:14
Speaker 1: to go to war is they're going to distribute weapons
1:13:16
Speaker 1: to everybody who is committed to using it against the West.
1:13:21
Speaker 2: Pretty amazing.
1:13:23
Speaker 1: Uh, you know, you know this, this is this is
1:13:29
Speaker 1: this is a leading influencer both in Russia and in
1:13:33
Speaker 1: the United States among the American right, where.
1:13:37
Speaker 3: United States is on the edge of the radical collapse.
1:13:41
Speaker 1: So that when the edge of radical collapse any day now,
1:13:45
Speaker 1: we're just going to collapse.
1:13:46
Speaker 3: Hyper power that is collapsing, That is agony of it,
1:13:51
Speaker 3: and we need to understand that. Well we should not
1:13:54
Speaker 3: be hypnotized hypnotized, but the real situation in the United
1:13:58
Speaker 3: States and very very bad situation and Hance the radical
1:14:04
Speaker 3: and extra missed actress.
1:14:07
Speaker 1: So it's pretty funny coming from a Russian given with
1:14:10
Speaker 1: Russia is right now in terms of quality of life,
1:14:13
Speaker 1: standard living, somebody says, as bad as any mula, and
1:14:16
Speaker 1: it looks like one look at that bit.
1:14:18
Speaker 3: They have the problem with at Stein, the elite, at
1:14:21
Speaker 3: Stein elite, they have the problem with the economy. They
1:14:24
Speaker 3: have a great problem with the state or of the
1:14:28
Speaker 3: moral in the United States.
1:14:29
Speaker 2: Or state of the most in the United States.
1:14:32
Speaker 1: It's competing Russia stage or decay. So we need to
1:14:37
Speaker 1: follow that.
1:14:38
Speaker 3: We need to understand that, we need to study that,
1:14:41
Speaker 3: we need to have the correct realistic understanding of what
1:14:48
Speaker 3: is going on in the United States.
1:14:50
Speaker 1: So collapses not likely anytime soon. Sorry, guys.
1:14:55
Speaker 2: The America is not collapsing anytime soon.
1:14:57
Speaker 3: For America outside of their prop maybe outside of our
1:15:02
Speaker 3: own propaganda. So we need we need to have we
1:15:05
Speaker 3: have to have a very correct, realistic unders technique of
1:15:11
Speaker 3: American society because from that depends almost everything in the world.
1:15:17
Speaker 1: So we need to to try to do This is
1:15:20
Speaker 1: Benning's heroes, real Maga or the core maga who.
1:15:26
Speaker 3: Who shared with us our general ideological Do.
1:15:31
Speaker 1: You know what he just said? You said, the core
1:15:32
Speaker 1: mega who share with us a general ideological and geopolitical views.
1:15:39
Speaker 2: He shares it with the core.
1:15:41
Speaker 3: Mega political, metaphysical.
1:15:43
Speaker 2: Vision and metaphysical visions.
1:15:45
Speaker 3: Because the MAGA accepted multipolarity. Trump has betrayed MAGA and
1:15:52
Speaker 3: the class UH has thrown away multipolarity has declared the
1:15:59
Speaker 3: war to multiplarity.
1:16:01
Speaker 1: So but not MAGA.
1:16:02
Speaker 3: So we need to follow people like Acker, Carlson, Candy Solin,
1:16:07
Speaker 3: Sallex Johnson, and Andrew new Palitana.
1:16:11
Speaker 1: Okay, so these are the people who are now on
1:16:14
Speaker 1: Dougie's side, Taca, Carson, candices on. Unfortunately he also has
1:16:19
Speaker 1: a judging a Politano on his side, and and all
1:16:23
Speaker 1: the people who object to the one war. This is
1:16:25
Speaker 1: a post war. This is a post of the war starting.
1:16:30
Speaker 1: So he's trying to boast the uh you know, these
1:16:34
Speaker 1: these the nuts on the American way.
1:16:38
Speaker 3: Larrett Johnson, uh Hinkle Jackson Hinkle uh and uh great,
1:16:44
Speaker 3: absolutely great, uh king dot com that we should advite
1:16:49
Speaker 3: next time for our conference.
1:16:51
Speaker 1: He is very great.
1:16:52
Speaker 3: So we need to reach so this non confirmised MAGA
1:16:58
Speaker 3: magot people in United States who have a very similar
1:17:04
Speaker 3: vision of what are the real priority to say America,
1:17:10
Speaker 3: to save the world, to save the world.
1:17:12
Speaker 2: He's listening the squad, but that's mega squad.
1:17:15
Speaker 3: Immense amount of our friends in the United States of America,
1:17:21
Speaker 3: mega move but has has made the right of them.
1:17:26
Speaker 3: They help to them to reappear and to become important influencers,
1:17:33
Speaker 3: important power inside of American society.
1:17:38
Speaker 1: I let's see. Well, I mean, I think that's that's enough.
1:17:46
Speaker 1: I think you get you get the picture of who
1:17:49
Speaker 1: he is and where he's coming from. But this is
1:17:53
Speaker 1: you know, Bannon Bannin is hugely influential and he is now,
1:17:58
Speaker 1: I mean, he's all over the place and social media.
1:18:01
Speaker 1: Uh dugan is pitching Tucker Calson, Candice Owen and all
1:18:05
Speaker 1: the nuts of the right. So you know, it's really
1:18:10
Speaker 1: really important that you guys understand and realize.
1:18:14
Speaker 2: How evil these bastards are.
1:18:16
Speaker 1: How un American, un American, anti American MAGA really is,
1:18:23
Speaker 1: how insane and evil Tucker Calson has become, Bannon has become,
1:18:31
Speaker 1: and and all the people he listed there, you.
1:18:35
Speaker 2: Know they are.
1:18:35
Speaker 1: They are creepy and crazy and uh.
1:18:39
Speaker 2: Just truly horrific, truly horrific.
1:18:44
Speaker 1: All right, guys, that is going to be the news
1:18:47
Speaker 1: for today, Sunday, March eighth. We will anti human, anti American,
1:18:53
Speaker 1: anti freedom, anti liberty. You know, it's sad that somebody
1:18:58
Speaker 1: like Judging Polatano is part of that. But he is
1:19:01
Speaker 1: part of that, like anti war, anti American, really part
1:19:07
Speaker 1: of the Republican Party. There's willing to embrace this crazy megastuff.
1:19:15
Speaker 1: Not a Republican Party, sorry, libertarians. He's kind of a
1:19:18
Speaker 1: he's part of those crazy libertarians who've taken over the
1:19:22
Speaker 1: Libertarian Party and hate America and hate American phon policy,
1:19:27
Speaker 1: and hate Israel and hate Israeli phon policy. Which is
1:19:31
Speaker 1: said because I know Judge and Polaitano would like him.
1:19:34
Speaker 1: It's sad that these other views that the years come to.
1:19:39
Speaker 1: All right, we will now go to your questions and
1:19:42
Speaker 1: you can ask more questions and I will answer any
1:19:44
Speaker 1: question you ask or any comment you submit. We got
1:19:47
Speaker 1: two hundred and fifty plus people watching right now. You
1:19:49
Speaker 1: can do a sticker to support the show and show
1:19:52
Speaker 1: you appreciation or value for value trade with me. You
1:19:56
Speaker 1: can ask a question and I will answer it, or
1:19:58
Speaker 1: in the super chet you can make a comment. I
1:20:00
Speaker 1: will read it, even if it's insulting or whatever it
1:20:02
Speaker 1: happens to be. That way, you get to shape the show.
1:20:04
Speaker 1: I'll talk about whatever you want me to talk about
1:20:06
Speaker 1: by asking a question, what else do I want to do?
1:20:10
Speaker 1: What else do I want to say? Yes, we have
1:20:11
Speaker 1: sponsors for the Yvon book show. The Ironman Institute is
1:20:15
Speaker 1: holding a conference in Porto, Portugo. It's going to be
1:20:18
Speaker 1: a lot of fun. It's a beautiful city, it's an
1:20:20
Speaker 1: amazing city. It'll be me and Talt's Fani and on
1:20:23
Speaker 1: Cagate will be the speakers, but they'll be I don't know,
1:20:27
Speaker 1: fifty eighty one hundred people Europeans there. We're going to
1:20:31
Speaker 1: hang out. It's going to be a lot of fun.
1:20:34
Speaker 1: I hope you can come. I hope you can make it.
1:20:36
Speaker 1: Join us in Porto in April. You can find that
1:20:39
Speaker 1: information about it on Inman dot org slash start here
1:20:43
Speaker 1: Ironman dot oag's slash start here and you can get
1:20:47
Speaker 1: a discount if you sign up. It's twenty six YBS ten.
1:20:53
Speaker 1: That is a discount code twenty six ybs ten. Michael
1:20:58
Speaker 1: Williams runs a website called Defenders of Capitalism Defenders off
1:21:01
Speaker 1: Capitalism dot com. Check it out is h it is
1:21:04
Speaker 1: a great program that I have worked with Michael uh
1:21:08
Speaker 1: I've I've helped Michael with UH to develop it. It
1:21:12
Speaker 1: is a real moral, philosophical, economic, political, cultural defense of capitalism.
1:21:21
Speaker 1: Check it out Defenders of Capitalism dot com. Alex Epstein
1:21:27
Speaker 1: is UH is the world authority of everything energy UH
1:21:31
Speaker 1: and and UH power and fossil fuels and just does
1:21:36
Speaker 1: amazing work to bring UH the ideas of liberty to
1:21:41
Speaker 1: the world of energy. Check him out at alex Epstein
1:21:44
Speaker 1: substect dot com, alex Epstein dot substect dot com.
1:21:47
Speaker 2: UH he is worth following.
1:21:49
Speaker 1: You will learn so much and you become so much
1:21:52
Speaker 1: better communicator about things like climate change and the environmental policies.
1:21:58
Speaker 1: All right now will remind you to support the One
1:22:01
Speaker 1: Book Show. Check out check out Patreon, Patreon dot com,
1:22:07
Speaker 1: Patreon dot com. You can sign up there for a
1:22:09
Speaker 1: monthly subscription to your One Book Show. At ten dollars
1:22:11
Speaker 1: a month. You get a ad free version of the
1:22:13
Speaker 1: podcast audio only on your feed and Apple Podcasts whatever
1:22:18
Speaker 1: it happens to be.
1:22:19
Speaker 2: You can also.
1:22:21
Speaker 1: Twenty five dollars you get to put spaen in the
1:22:23
Speaker 1: AMAS by video and ask any question you want. For
1:22:27
Speaker 1: two fifty you get a one on one with me
1:22:29
Speaker 1: once a quota and five hundred dollars. You get a
1:22:31
Speaker 1: one on one with me once a month if you want.
1:22:38
Speaker 1: All right, let's see if you want to ask me
1:22:45
Speaker 1: a question, for example, on the Polatano, I see people
1:22:48
Speaker 1: upset by what I said about in Polatano. He is, yeah,
1:22:53
Speaker 1: he's a tad Catholic and a Paleocon. But he said
1:22:56
Speaker 1: a little bit. He calls himself a libertarian. He argues
1:22:59
Speaker 1: that he's a libitarian. Anyway, if you want to ask
1:23:03
Speaker 1: me a question about Napoletano, there is the super chat.
1:23:06
Speaker 1: That's what it's their fault to ask me questions. Don't
1:23:09
Speaker 1: use the chat. Don't use the chat. So if you're
1:23:16
Speaker 1: upset with what I said, and if you if you
1:23:23
Speaker 1: want to challenge me, write whatever you want in the
1:23:26
Speaker 1: super chat.
1:23:27
Speaker 2: I will read it and I will try.
1:23:28
Speaker 1: To answer it. Challenge me, but show some respect by
1:23:33
Speaker 1: putting a couple of dollars behind it. All it takes
1:23:35
Speaker 1: is a couple of dollars. Doesn't take much more than that.
1:23:39
Speaker 1: All right, Um, Michael, thank you, Michael. Fifty dollars question.
1:23:45
Speaker 1: Really appreciate it when people talk about a successful light being.
1:23:53
Speaker 1: How much you'll be remembered after you die is the
1:23:58
Speaker 1: second handed and mistaken. A truly selfish person doesn't care
1:24:02
Speaker 1: what happens after they die or what they'll be remembered for.
1:24:06
Speaker 1: I mean, I think that's right. I don't think a
1:24:08
Speaker 1: selfish person cares. They want, you know, the impact that
1:24:14
Speaker 1: they have to exist after they die. If they're having
1:24:20
Speaker 1: an impact on the world. I think in that sense,
1:24:23
Speaker 1: they want to have a legacy. They'd like to believe,
1:24:26
Speaker 1: for example, that the work they've done has made the
1:24:28
Speaker 1: world a better place. They'd like to believe. But this
1:24:31
Speaker 1: is all while they were alive. They don't care about
1:24:35
Speaker 1: what people think of them afters They just care that
1:24:38
Speaker 1: they're productive endeavors. If they founded a company, or if
1:24:41
Speaker 1: they're advocating for objectivism, or if they are setting up
1:24:45
Speaker 1: a big charitable entity that will work after they die,
1:24:48
Speaker 1: they would like that to be successful, because that's what
1:24:52
Speaker 1: they did during while they were alive. But it's not
1:24:56
Speaker 1: that what happens afterwards matters to them. It matters to
1:25:01
Speaker 1: them only in reflecting about the future while you're here,
1:25:05
Speaker 1: why you're alive. So yes, I think it's secondhanded if
1:25:10
Speaker 1: people obsess about how people will think about them after
1:25:13
Speaker 1: they did. Oh, I didn't think the stickers. Let me
1:25:18
Speaker 1: thank the stickers. David just did a sticker. Thank you, David.
1:25:23
Speaker 1: Let's see I think Wes was up there, so Wes, yes, Wes,
1:25:26
Speaker 1: fifty dollars, Thank you. Wes really appreciate that. David has
1:25:31
Speaker 1: coming with two twenty pounds stickers.
1:25:33
Speaker 2: Thank you, David. I really appreciate it.
1:25:36
Speaker 1: Let's see we've got Altima. Thank you, Autima and Steven,
1:25:41
Speaker 1: thank you, and Tom and Darlene thank you, and Catherine
1:25:52
Speaker 1: thank you, and Tony all right, thank you, guys, really
1:25:59
Speaker 1: appreciate this. Thanks thanks for the for the stickers. You
1:26:05
Speaker 1: too can do a sticker and you don't even have
1:26:07
Speaker 1: to ask Gorkyo's question. You can support us. You can
1:26:13
Speaker 1: support us easily that way. M Yes, and if you'd
1:26:21
Speaker 1: like to ask a question there, you can ask a
1:26:25
Speaker 1: question two dollars, it's all, it costs a dollar. I
1:26:27
Speaker 1: think you can even ask a question for ninety nine cents.
1:26:30
Speaker 1: You can also do one for five hundred dollars, so
1:26:33
Speaker 1: anywhere in between, anywhere in between. Gofert, all right, Michael
1:26:40
Speaker 1: has a few twenty dollars questions. Thank you, thank you,
1:26:42
Speaker 1: thank you. Michael is saying tomorrow is promised to no
1:26:47
Speaker 1: one and belevolent universe take should we not look at
1:26:51
Speaker 1: life as a dangerous, unpredictable game. Well, I mean, tomorrow
1:26:56
Speaker 1: isn't promised to anyone. I don't think that's necessarily malevolent,
1:27:00
Speaker 1: could be motivational. It could be you have to act,
1:27:03
Speaker 1: you have to do stuff, you have to work to
1:27:04
Speaker 1: get tomorrow. So it depends on in the spirit in
1:27:07
Speaker 1: which it is said.
1:27:10
Speaker 2: You know, I don't.
1:27:11
Speaker 1: I don't think we should look at life as dangerous,
1:27:13
Speaker 1: unpredictable game. But we should look at life as You're
1:27:18
Speaker 1: not gonna gain anything without the thought and effort that's
1:27:20
Speaker 1: required to gain it. Right, You've gotta you've got to
1:27:28
Speaker 1: You've got to, uh, you gotta work at making the
1:27:33
Speaker 1: future what you want it to be. It won't just happen.
1:27:37
Speaker 1: The future indeed is not promised to anybody, because that's
1:27:41
Speaker 1: to be promised would be passive, and to gain is active.
1:27:48
Speaker 1: Michael says, I'm glad the Ranian regime is coming to
1:27:50
Speaker 1: an end.
1:27:51
Speaker 2: I hope it is.
1:27:52
Speaker 1: But what exactly a Trump's motivation? He thinks destroying you
1:27:55
Speaker 1: on will bring regional peace and give him an over
1:27:57
Speaker 1: a piece prize.
1:27:58
Speaker 2: Maybe, but I don't know. What Drop's motivations are.
1:28:01
Speaker 1: It could be that he just likes using military power
1:28:04
Speaker 1: because he's a thug and thugs like power. They like
1:28:08
Speaker 1: they like, Oh, they got big bombs, Let's drop some
1:28:10
Speaker 1: big bombs. Isn't that cool. I think he likes that.
1:28:14
Speaker 1: I think it inspires him. He lights up when he
1:28:16
Speaker 1: thinks about the operation of Venezuela when he killed Solimani
1:28:21
Speaker 1: in his first term. And he likes the use of
1:28:24
Speaker 1: physical force because he's a thuggish mentality, a thuggish human being.
1:28:29
Speaker 1: So but I don't know, you know, I don't know
1:28:38
Speaker 1: what exactly motivates him here. You know, I do think
1:28:44
Speaker 1: he wants the oil. I do think he wants control,
1:28:48
Speaker 1: but you know, maybe there's some strategy behind us in
1:28:52
Speaker 1: terms of China. I don't think he likes the fact
1:28:56
Speaker 1: that the Iranians don't do what he tells him to do,
1:29:01
Speaker 1: like like they're independent. They were, they were not falling
1:29:04
Speaker 1: into into place when he said they should. I think
1:29:10
Speaker 1: it's it's it's it's motivations like that. I think it's
1:29:13
Speaker 1: kind of personal motivations more than it is big you know,
1:29:17
Speaker 1: geopolitical strategy. People are not influenced by the people whose
1:29:25
Speaker 1: name they know. You know, this is to Bryan's point
1:29:29
Speaker 1: about Dugan, right, He says, I would go ask fifty
1:29:32
Speaker 1: Trung voters zero will know Dugan. That's true. They don't
1:29:34
Speaker 1: need to know Dugan, but they all know Bannon. Bannon's
1:29:37
Speaker 1: influenced by Dugan, and Bannon transmits Dugan's ideas into the culture.
1:29:42
Speaker 1: That's how ideas are transmitted. So if you ask people
1:29:45
Speaker 1: on the left, do they know Iman or Kant or
1:29:50
Speaker 1: you know what, can they Can they cite cont or
1:29:52
Speaker 1: can they cite Hegel or can they cite even for
1:29:55
Speaker 1: Co or any of the intellectuals that have influenced everything
1:29:59
Speaker 1: that life stands for. They probably can't, but they've got translators.
1:30:04
Speaker 1: You know, these people are being influential on all the
1:30:07
Speaker 1: intellectuals on the left, and they transmitted, so you get
1:30:12
Speaker 1: these thinkers, and then you've got a whole transmission belts.
1:30:15
Speaker 1: And the transmission belts don't work, as Dugan says, no,
1:30:19
Speaker 1: they just translate Dugan's stuff into English relevant to the
1:30:24
Speaker 1: people hearing it. And that's how the influence works. It's
1:30:28
Speaker 1: the same as me trying to influence people about Ironmand
1:30:32
Speaker 1: But I don't mention Iran that often. So it's you know, Brian,
1:30:42
Speaker 1: it's not how it's not how ideas work. It's not
1:30:49
Speaker 1: how ideas are transmitted. It's not how influence. It's not
1:30:54
Speaker 1: how influence works. All right, And again, if you want
1:31:01
Speaker 1: to ask more questions, you're free to do so. On
1:31:04
Speaker 1: the super Chet, Michael, is Trump the only president in
1:31:08
Speaker 1: recent history not afraid to go against the intellectuals?
1:31:13
Speaker 2: I think he is.
1:31:14
Speaker 1: I think he is. He's obviously evil, but other presidents
1:31:18
Speaker 1: would never invote the status quo like this. They want
1:31:21
Speaker 1: some credibility from the ivory tel. I think that's right.
1:31:24
Speaker 1: I think Trump doesn't care what the intellectuals think of him.
1:31:28
Speaker 1: He doesn't, you know, on the whole basis of maga
1:31:31
Speaker 1: is a rejection of authority, the rejection of the intellectual class,
1:31:36
Speaker 1: the rejection of elites. And so he has one way
1:31:40
Speaker 1: from his followers. And he also has, I think, a
1:31:43
Speaker 1: belief that the intellectuals don't matter, and that allows him
1:31:49
Speaker 1: to do whatever he feels like doing and reject, you know,
1:31:55
Speaker 1: the intellectual backlash. I also think that Trump is the
1:31:58
Speaker 1: only president who's not driven by a you know, a
1:32:09
Speaker 1: you know, a view of altruism. He is a he is.
1:32:13
Speaker 1: He rejects the idea of altruism at least Selene International Affairs,
1:32:18
Speaker 1: not in favor of some kind of self interested egoism,
1:32:21
Speaker 1: but in favor of whatever Trump's feels like. But at
1:32:24
Speaker 1: least he rejects at least, but he rejects altruism, and
1:32:27
Speaker 1: then for morality has no meaning to it because to him,
1:32:30
Speaker 1: morality egos altruism, and he's rejected that. But the alternative
1:32:33
Speaker 1: is I think the way he did business line, cheating,
1:32:37
Speaker 1: whatever it takes in order to get what you want.
1:32:39
Speaker 1: He truly believes that it's okay to do whatever it
1:32:44
Speaker 1: takes light, cheat steel, shoot somebody in Fifth Avenue in
1:32:49
Speaker 1: order to get what you want as long as you
1:32:50
Speaker 1: can get away with it. And as presidents, he feels
1:32:53
Speaker 1: like you can get away with pretty much anything.
1:32:57
Speaker 2: But the explicit our is not there.
1:33:01
Speaker 1: I mean, he's shaped by altruism but through its rejection.
1:33:07
Speaker 1: And what he is is a narcissist, uh, but not
1:33:14
Speaker 1: a egoist in any kind of way, not selfish in
1:33:17
Speaker 1: any kind of way, not a selfish properly understood. Okay,
1:33:26
Speaker 1: Molten's splendid fifty dollars thank you. Molten's splendid really appreciate
1:33:29
Speaker 1: the support. Yesterday I was thrilled that you were back today.
1:33:33
Speaker 1: I'm happy you are here. Been listening to podcasts of
1:33:38
Speaker 1: speeches you made seven years ago about the Middle Eastern
1:33:41
Speaker 1: terrorism and love you on waving commitment to reason and
1:33:45
Speaker 1: understanding of freedom. Thank you. I mean, the reality is
1:33:48
Speaker 1: that if you go and look at speeches I made
1:33:51
Speaker 1: on the Middle Eastern terrorism that I made twenty years ago,
1:33:54
Speaker 1: maybe they only up on YouTube seven or eight years,
1:33:57
Speaker 1: but some of the speeches I made them twenty years ago,
1:34:00
Speaker 1: and how many of the things that I said would
1:34:01
Speaker 1: happen have happened. It's I'm even amazed at how you
1:34:07
Speaker 1: know how clearly how predictive I was, and how you
1:34:15
Speaker 1: know how right I been so many different times on
1:34:20
Speaker 1: this issue, going back to going after nine to eleven,
1:34:23
Speaker 1: I mean, pretty much everything I predicted would happen, given
1:34:27
Speaker 1: the US's pathetic response at nine to eleven, has indeed happened.
1:34:32
Speaker 1: And you know, some of my speeches back then are
1:34:36
Speaker 1: pretty good. You just check them out. Thank you. Moulten.
1:34:40
Speaker 1: Splendor really appreciate the supporting and the compliment. Liven says,
1:34:44
Speaker 1: I recently watched Rick Steve's Iranco I don't know Rick
1:34:48
Speaker 1: Steve from two thousand and nine, followed by a history
1:34:51
Speaker 1: of a Fleek on Fleek. I don't know what that is,
1:34:55
Speaker 1: documentary about the brutal execution of Homeni's early regime. What
1:35:00
Speaker 1: different presentations of what different presentations of the same place.
1:35:05
Speaker 1: I don't know either one of those. I can't really comment,
1:35:08
Speaker 1: But yeah, I mean Homiani was unbelievably brutal.
1:35:11
Speaker 2: I mean he came to power with the help of
1:35:13
Speaker 2: the left.
1:35:14
Speaker 1: He basically seduced the left to support him and under
1:35:18
Speaker 1: the assumption that he would he would implement kind of
1:35:24
Speaker 1: a socialist policy and that he was a leftist. He
1:35:27
Speaker 1: used a lot of Marxist terminology in his summons that
1:35:31
Speaker 1: were being distributed in Iran from Paris, where he was
1:35:35
Speaker 1: in exile. So he really cultivated the left and they
1:35:40
Speaker 1: helped him win the revolution, and then he killed them all.
1:35:45
Speaker 1: He executed them all because he was never a leftist.
1:35:48
Speaker 1: He was never interested in the left. And just like
1:35:52
Speaker 1: right now, the leftist helping Hamas and helping his Balan,
1:35:56
Speaker 1: helping the Iranians on a global scale in demonstrations and
1:36:01
Speaker 1: stuff like that. But if ill left but if the
1:36:04
Speaker 1: Hamasniks or the Islamist ever got to power, they would
1:36:09
Speaker 1: kill all these gaze queers for Palestine or whatever. They
1:36:13
Speaker 1: would immediately execute them, just as I told Romani did so.
1:36:17
Speaker 1: This is not theoretical. We've got an exact, actual example
1:36:21
Speaker 1: sample of what actually happens.
1:36:24
Speaker 2: Thank you Lyvian. Also, thank you.
1:36:29
Speaker 1: Let's see. Thank you Jack for the sticker. Thank you
1:36:31
Speaker 1: Kim for the sticker. I really appreciate newly Dan. Shout
1:36:35
Speaker 1: out to my old neighbor Stewart who introduced me to
1:36:38
Speaker 1: Actle Shrugged, the Foune Head and your channel. Thank you
1:36:42
Speaker 1: Stuart for introducing newly Dan to Iron Randon to me.
1:36:45
Speaker 1: I really appreciate that. Thank you newly Dan. Nature observa.
1:36:49
Speaker 1: I never thought I would see the day when Tucker
1:36:52
Speaker 1: and Dugan would actually rise so far that it seems
1:36:57
Speaker 1: Trump looks like the voice of reason. Yeah, isn't that
1:37:03
Speaker 1: pretty stunning and scary? Absolutely? No, you really showed how
1:37:11
Speaker 1: that gremlin Tucker colls and hates Israel. He is sertifiably crazy, yes,
1:37:15
Speaker 1: and he's now sort of fliably antisemitic. It's not just
1:37:20
Speaker 1: hatred of Israel, he is an anti Semite I mean
1:37:22
Speaker 1: this blood libel that is typical of anti Semites, and
1:37:28
Speaker 1: he is probably the leading Him and Candace are the
1:37:31
Speaker 1: leaders of the new right antisemitic movement. And it is ugly.
1:37:35
Speaker 1: It is ugly, and it is spreading among Republicans all
1:37:39
Speaker 1: over the place. Jacob says, please invite Reza Pabla Vi,
1:37:46
Speaker 1: who would be great talking around history, situation, his views
1:37:49
Speaker 1: in capitalism, to keep you in mind, as to keep
1:37:52
Speaker 1: your mind as a fem market advisor.
1:37:55
Speaker 2: That's a good idea.
1:37:56
Speaker 1: I will, As I said, I had a friend, an
1:37:58
Speaker 1: objective's friend years ago who I think for a number
1:38:02
Speaker 1: of years advised Paul Levi and I think helped him
1:38:05
Speaker 1: write a constitution and was intimately involved in educating Paul
1:38:10
Speaker 1: A Vi on capitalism and online rand. And it'll be
1:38:12
Speaker 1: interesting to see to what extent that's stuck. Oh, let
1:38:17
Speaker 1: me just remind you like the show before you leave.
1:38:19
Speaker 1: It's really really helpful on the algorithm, So please like
1:38:22
Speaker 1: the show. Also, if you're not a subscriber, please subscribe.
1:38:27
Speaker 1: Subscribe you'll you know, it doesn't cost anything and you'll
1:38:31
Speaker 1: find out when I go live and you don't have
1:38:32
Speaker 1: to listen when you don't want to, but you find
1:38:35
Speaker 1: out at least when shows are posted and with stuff
1:38:37
Speaker 1: goes live. So please like the show before you leave. Steven,
1:38:45
Speaker 1: thanks for the show. I appreciated, Stephen. Paul. Gaza has
1:38:49
Speaker 1: been out of the news. What's happening there? Any news
1:38:51
Speaker 1: of the West Bank problems? And nothing much from Gaza?
1:38:54
Speaker 1: I mean nothing as far as I know. I mean,
1:38:57
Speaker 1: as well as still securing the beyond the yellow line.
1:39:02
Speaker 1: Once in a while, Hamas sends some people to try
1:39:05
Speaker 1: to do an attack against them at Israeli soldiers and
1:39:07
Speaker 1: they're killed. In terms of the West Bank, there's still
1:39:10
Speaker 1: problems over there, primarily settlers still attacking Palestinians. There was
1:39:15
Speaker 1: just another brutal attack where some Palestinians were killed. You know,
1:39:20
Speaker 1: this has to be resolved. The rule of law has
1:39:22
Speaker 1: to apply. Otherwise Israel loses its small status as the
1:39:26
Speaker 1: good guys. So they better shot shot shopping shape up,
1:39:31
Speaker 1: they better shape up.
1:39:32
Speaker 2: Soon it will be uh, it will be interesting.
1:39:39
Speaker 9: Uh.
1:39:40
Speaker 2: Yeah.
1:39:40
Speaker 1: So it is really horrific what's going on in the
1:39:43
Speaker 1: West Bank, both in terms of the Palestinians and in
1:39:45
Speaker 1: terms of the right wing fanatics.
1:39:48
Speaker 2: Uh, you know, in the settler's.
1:39:49
Speaker 1: Movement, Roman is issuing treasuries a proper function of government?
1:39:54
Speaker 1: If governments are not allowed to own property, how should
1:39:57
Speaker 1: the branches of government function? Yes, I mean you could
1:40:01
Speaker 1: imagine the government borrowing money at times of war or
1:40:08
Speaker 1: there's a pandemic or something that requires government action rare,
1:40:16
Speaker 1: but where you know they don't have enough tax revenue
1:40:20
Speaker 1: to cover it, and yet it is supported by people,
1:40:23
Speaker 1: so they will need to buy bonds that are ultimately
1:40:26
Speaker 1: paid back through tax revenue. They couldn't, I mean, there
1:40:29
Speaker 1: have to be something in the constitution. They can't carry
1:40:32
Speaker 1: a deficit for a long time. They can't carry debt
1:40:34
Speaker 1: for a long time. They have to pay it back
1:40:37
Speaker 1: within a reasonable amount of time. But yes, I think
1:40:41
Speaker 1: issuing treasuries is a proper function of goverment, not the
1:40:43
Speaker 1: way they do it today, which is funding a permanent
1:40:45
Speaker 1: deficit and permanent debt, but temporarily. Yes, If governments are
1:40:51
Speaker 1: not allowed to own property, househould the branches of government function?
1:40:54
Speaker 1: I mean you'd have to think about what that means.
1:40:57
Speaker 1: Not to own property. They would least buildings. They still
1:41:01
Speaker 1: could write contracts, but they couldn't own significant tranches of
1:41:06
Speaker 1: land and property around the country. Whether they least the
1:41:10
Speaker 1: buildings owned. The buildings should be a site issue. I
1:41:13
Speaker 1: think leasing is better. Government shouldn't own QA. You know,
1:41:19
Speaker 1: it's the representative of the people. It's not, it's it
1:41:23
Speaker 1: should not own. Independent of that, like number six, one,
1:41:27
Speaker 1: two nine, are you aware enough of everything behind the
1:41:30
Speaker 1: scenes to sert without question that Trump has no strategy?
1:41:34
Speaker 1: Could that be tied to your distrust of him? I
1:41:39
Speaker 1: see how he behaves, I see what he says, and
1:41:44
Speaker 1: I have some insight into what's going on behind the scenes.
1:41:49
Speaker 1: I won't give you my source for that, As I
1:41:53
Speaker 1: said yesterday, they I have for a reliable source who
1:41:59
Speaker 1: is close to than minute station that they had no
1:42:02
Speaker 1: strategy around the straits of Homos. That's all I can say. So.
1:42:09
Speaker 1: But I mean, I've watched Trump for twelve years now,
1:42:13
Speaker 1: I mean a close Trump observer since twenty fifteen. And
1:42:18
Speaker 1: he's not a He's not a strategic he's not a strategist,
1:42:25
Speaker 1: and the people around him, at the top level.
1:42:29
Speaker 2: Around him are not strategist.
1:42:31
Speaker 1: Maybe they'll lay up below the people who have a strategy,
1:42:35
Speaker 1: but he and heg Seth and people like that. Advance
1:42:39
Speaker 1: is a strategist. But I don't think he's being considered
1:42:42
Speaker 1: right now. It's hard to tell what Rubio is or
1:42:46
Speaker 1: he's not. But maybe deeper within the Defense Department that
1:42:51
Speaker 1: people who have strategies but Trump does not. Michael, the
1:42:56
Speaker 1: Constitution is not an objectives document.
1:42:58
Speaker 2: It should be site.
1:43:01
Speaker 1: It should be not be cited as the standard well
1:43:03
Speaker 1: not as the standard of truth or the standard of
1:43:06
Speaker 1: philosophical standard, but it is should be cited as the
1:43:10
Speaker 1: standard for the functioning of the American government. It is
1:43:14
Speaker 1: the governing document of the American system.
1:43:18
Speaker 2: So it should be cited.
1:43:20
Speaker 1: And you know, I'm glad anytime the Supreme Court rules
1:43:23
Speaker 1: that something the government is doing is unconstitutional. I happen
1:43:26
Speaker 1: to believe eighty percent or more or ninety percent or
1:43:29
Speaker 1: what the government's doing unconstitutional. But you know, I'll take
1:43:33
Speaker 1: what I can get from the Supreme Court loss and logic. Thanks,
1:43:37
Speaker 1: thanks for the insights you bring. You on with more support,
1:43:41
Speaker 1: how could you expand your reach?
1:43:45
Speaker 2: I mean, that's an interesting question.
1:43:47
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't run any ads right now, like
1:43:50
Speaker 1: on social media, I don't do any advertising. I could
1:43:53
Speaker 1: do that. I could hire a producer, which would allow
1:43:57
Speaker 1: me to devote less time to technical of the show
1:44:01
Speaker 1: and more time to.
1:44:04
Speaker 2: You know, content.
1:44:06
Speaker 1: I could branch out and indeed have more content. I
1:44:09
Speaker 1: could have more shows. I could do shows with other people,
1:44:13
Speaker 1: you know. I was thinking, I've been thinking about should
1:44:16
Speaker 1: I do a show with Nicos, just me and Nicos
1:44:19
Speaker 1: an hour a week, two hours a week or whatever
1:44:21
Speaker 1: doing a show. I could do shows like that with
1:44:23
Speaker 1: other people, but I need a producer to be able
1:44:25
Speaker 1: to streamline everything that I do, and that would require funds.
1:44:30
Speaker 1: What else would I do? I mean, ultimately, if I
1:44:33
Speaker 1: had real money, I mean, then we could we could
1:44:36
Speaker 1: sponsor debates, we could actually go out there and do
1:44:40
Speaker 1: stuff beyond the show itself that would attract attention. I
1:44:44
Speaker 1: could hire a p Off firm, although I haven't had
1:44:47
Speaker 1: a lot of success with Poff firms in the past,
1:44:49
Speaker 1: but we could try again hire a p Off them
1:44:52
Speaker 1: to try to, you know, get the message out there
1:44:56
Speaker 1: to more channels where a podcast team, he shows radio shows, whatever,
1:45:01
Speaker 1: things like that. So there's a bunch of stuff that
1:45:03
Speaker 1: could be done, but it requires significant, significant resources. I mean,
1:45:14
Speaker 1: it's it's yeah, thanks, I mean, I'm just looking at
1:45:17
Speaker 1: the chat. It's a little ridiculous to say I'm biased
1:45:22
Speaker 1: because I dislike Trump, assuming I did that, assumes it's
1:45:26
Speaker 1: insulting and stupid. Really, because I dislike Trump for a reason,
1:45:33
Speaker 1: Like I disliked Trump, I could give you and have
1:45:35
Speaker 1: over the years, giving you a thousand reasons to dislike Trump.
1:45:41
Speaker 1: So I dislike Trump is not some emotional response that
1:45:43
Speaker 1: comes from nowhere. It's based on his actions and his speeches,
1:45:48
Speaker 1: and his what he says and what he does. And therefore,
1:45:52
Speaker 1: you know, my anti Trump bias is based on facts
1:45:57
Speaker 1: and reality. Now you want to argue with me about
1:45:59
Speaker 1: that then, and argue about factor reality. But to say, oh, well,
1:46:03
Speaker 1: you dislike Trump, so you're biased against him is stupid.
1:46:08
Speaker 1: It's just dumb because I dislike Trump because of reasons
1:46:14
Speaker 1: I have. So I'm biased against Trump because he's a
1:46:18
Speaker 1: bad guy, because he's done bad things, because he said
1:46:21
Speaker 1: stupid stuff, because I have no respect for his mind,
1:46:25
Speaker 1: because of what he said and what he's done. But
1:46:28
Speaker 1: it's that's why I'm biased against it, all right, Adam,
1:46:41
Speaker 1: thanks for the information and distraction during myself imposed half
1:46:44
Speaker 1: marathon on a nice day. Oh nice, nice, nice run.
1:46:49
Speaker 1: Half marathon is not easy. Good for you, thanks Adam. Michael.
1:46:54
Speaker 1: Why can't people see cause and effect relationships because they're
1:46:58
Speaker 1: hard and they were are real thinking. And as we
1:47:02
Speaker 1: discussed when we discussed Ininran's the Missing Link, most people
1:47:06
Speaker 1: don't do the kind of work that is required for
1:47:10
Speaker 1: real thinking, for deep thinking, for cause and effect is challenging.
1:47:15
Speaker 1: It requires concept conceptual conceptual ability, which most people just
1:47:20
Speaker 1: don't have or don't use. Put it that way, Paul,
1:47:24
Speaker 1: if Russia and China support you, run, should they be attacked? No,
1:47:29
Speaker 1: I mean you don't attack China. Russia they have nukes.
1:47:33
Speaker 1: So you've got to be very careful in how you
1:47:36
Speaker 1: deal with Russia and China. And so it's challenging. I mean,
1:47:45
Speaker 1: somebody says, was not this successful and there's no strategy?
1:47:48
Speaker 1: Come on, give me a break. I mean again, that's
1:47:51
Speaker 1: so stupid, right. The worst strategy what to attack, which
1:47:57
Speaker 1: targets to focus on? Yeah, that that's the strategy designed
1:48:01
Speaker 1: by the Pentagon, not by Trump. It's designed by military planners.
1:48:06
Speaker 1: We have very very very competent military planners. We have
1:48:10
Speaker 1: really smart people designing what targets should be attacked and how.
1:48:15
Speaker 2: To do it and how to coordinate it all.
1:48:16
Speaker 1: And by the way, a lot of that is helped
1:48:19
Speaker 1: along by the Israelis who do have a strategy around
1:48:22
Speaker 1: this wall.
1:48:23
Speaker 2: I mean big strategy.
1:48:25
Speaker 1: When I talk about Trump not having a strategy, you're
1:48:27
Speaker 1: talking about the meta strategy and he doesn't. Is this
1:48:31
Speaker 1: war about regime change maybe? Is this war about oil? Maybe?
1:48:36
Speaker 2: Is this war about the missiles and the nukes?
1:48:40
Speaker 1: Maybe? Do we really know what is the meta strategy?
1:48:46
Speaker 1: I mean the planning of actually taking out Iran? Yeah. Sure,
1:48:51
Speaker 1: there's a lot of.
1:48:52
Speaker 2: Strategic thinking going there.
1:48:53
Speaker 1: I have a lot of respects for the generals who
1:48:55
Speaker 1: actually do that work. And I said, and the lower
1:48:59
Speaker 1: levels of Pentagon, they are really really good people who
1:49:02
Speaker 1: know what they're doing and who strategized around this wall.
1:49:05
Speaker 1: They still missed the blocking of the straits of Homos
1:49:09
Speaker 1: that is going to come back and bite them. I mean,
1:49:13
Speaker 1: the fact that they went into this war without thinking
1:49:15
Speaker 1: about how to deal with the strait of Homos suggests
1:49:18
Speaker 1: that as good of a strategists they are, something is
1:49:21
Speaker 1: really lacking, because I identified that as a problem months ago. Anyway,
1:49:31
Speaker 1: have Ason thanks to the show. Thanks Havison, appreciate it.
1:49:35
Speaker 1: Havevison says, how much would a song review cost? That's
1:49:37
Speaker 1: one hundred dollars for a song, Linda, did you finish
1:49:41
Speaker 1: Quincodere's book Genesis What an Ending? Right? Yeah?
1:49:46
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm still struggling.
1:49:48
Speaker 1: With that, but yeah, I liked it, and I talked
1:49:51
Speaker 1: about it on a show when I finished it, so
1:49:54
Speaker 1: I gave it a positive review.
1:49:56
Speaker 2: I thought it was good.
1:49:59
Speaker 1: Alex has thought when open AI Department of War contract
1:50:05
Speaker 1: show for my uses, open AI models are better than Claude,
1:50:11
Speaker 1: but not sure how to weigh against long term effects
1:50:14
Speaker 1: of supporting oi's behavior. I mean, you should use the
1:50:17
Speaker 1: OI that is most practical for you right now, because
1:50:21
Speaker 1: it's hard to tell how this evolves into the future, right.
1:50:25
Speaker 2: It's it's hard to tell.
1:50:27
Speaker 1: But but yeah, Supposedly the open AI Department of War
1:50:35
Speaker 1: contract shows that that the Department of War can basically
1:50:39
Speaker 1: override open AI in making decisions on how to use
1:50:45
Speaker 1: the the AI that is not that open AI basically
1:50:50
Speaker 1: did not constrain them in any way. Rowland says, I've
1:50:56
Speaker 1: been to Customer. I've been to Customer. Didn't run into Abad,
1:51:00
Speaker 1: though there were lots of Hebrew speaking tourists among others,
1:51:03
Speaker 1: a very international place. Yeah, but pretty much everywhere where
1:51:06
Speaker 1: you're going to have Hebrew speaking tourists. You will have
1:51:09
Speaker 1: a kabbad. It's pretty much guaranteed. And and the habbad
1:51:12
Speaker 1: was in the one town that is in KOSAMOI on
1:51:16
Speaker 1: the what is it, I think eastern side of the island.
1:51:20
Speaker 1: Bryan test Chat, I am being prevented from posting a
1:51:24
Speaker 1: movie recommendation. It has an innocious name, so I'm wondering
1:51:27
Speaker 1: if the film itself is being blocked.
1:51:29
Speaker 2: I don't know, that's weird.
1:51:31
Speaker 1: You might want to misspell the name and see if
1:51:33
Speaker 1: you can get it get it to post that way, Ryan,
1:51:37
Speaker 1: imagine portraying the entire us A based on the nuttiest
1:51:41
Speaker 1: five percent of the population how Tucka does with Israel.
1:51:45
Speaker 1: He would look like a nation of We would look
1:51:47
Speaker 1: like a nation of psychopaths, especially with people like Taka
1:51:50
Speaker 1: in that five percent. Absolutely, uh Takia Carlson, Yeah, I
1:51:57
Speaker 1: mean he is, and now he's also an islam apologist
1:52:01
Speaker 1: of Islam. Jess but Ybs withdraws a finally healing I'm glad.
1:52:06
Speaker 1: I'm glad, and there will be more shows to come.
1:52:10
Speaker 1: Jon thanks for exposing me to the antithesis of rand
1:52:14
Speaker 1: and since sheous correct ideas move history, we need to
1:52:18
Speaker 1: pay attention to him. Yes, we need to pay attention
1:52:21
Speaker 1: to anybody who's spouting ideas because they are the ones
1:52:23
Speaker 1: who actually move history.
1:52:26
Speaker 2: Roman.
1:52:26
Speaker 1: What's the problem with Rothbod Mesa's Institute? Oh God, Well,
1:52:30
Speaker 1: first of all, to the Rothbod Institute, it's not that.
1:52:32
Speaker 1: I mean, I wouldn't insult von Mesa's in giving him
1:52:35
Speaker 1: the name. I mean the problem is that they are anarchists.
1:52:38
Speaker 1: Thus they are you know, irrational and indestructive. Anarchy is
1:52:46
Speaker 1: a destructive ideology that ultimately is a violent ideology and
1:52:51
Speaker 1: ideology of violence that leads to authoritarianism inevitably, so anarchy
1:52:59
Speaker 1: ultimately equalitarianism. If you want to see how I think
1:53:02
Speaker 1: about this, check out my debate with Buyan Capelan. You
1:53:06
Speaker 1: can also check out the essay that Don Watkins and
1:53:09
Speaker 1: I wrote about anarcho capitalism for buying Capelin's blog, but
1:53:14
Speaker 1: it's also on Don Watkins is substack, so you can
1:53:18
Speaker 1: find it. It's pretty easy to find, uh, you know,
1:53:21
Speaker 1: the evils of anarchy and anarcho capitalism. And that's the
1:53:25
Speaker 1: problem with rot but Musa's Institute. And then because they're anarchists,
1:53:30
Speaker 1: you know, they are in addition to being anarchists, and
1:53:35
Speaker 1: because they're anarchists, I guess they're related. They were also statists,
1:53:39
Speaker 1: which is stunning, right, So they they they want to
1:53:43
Speaker 1: block immigration even in the United States. They want to
1:53:48
Speaker 1: you know, they they they often support racist causes. They
1:53:56
Speaker 1: support the South, They have a certain part of the
1:54:00
Speaker 1: institute is sympathetic to the South and the Civil War.
1:54:05
Speaker 1: What else do I have against them? And then they're
1:54:07
Speaker 1: anti war. They think nine to eleven was America's fault. Indeed,
1:54:11
Speaker 1: every crisis in history was America's fault. I mean, Rothbad
1:54:16
Speaker 1: used to toast every time an American pilot was shut
1:54:19
Speaker 1: down in Vietnam War. He used to toast that and
1:54:22
Speaker 1: celebrate it. I mean that is pretty disgusting. And and
1:54:33
Speaker 1: you know, they they they support ice. I mean, it's
1:54:38
Speaker 1: just it's an absurd amalgamation of crazy political ideas that
1:54:46
Speaker 1: only anarchists could come up with. And in that sense, yeah,
1:54:50
Speaker 1: they're really, really, really bad. Mike. On Fridays All In Podcast,
1:54:58
Speaker 1: Under Secretary of War Michelle stated that the operation is
1:55:03
Speaker 1: aimed and disarming the regime, not achieving regime change. So
1:55:09
Speaker 1: you just armed the regime that can be you know, again,
1:55:12
Speaker 1: that's not a strategy. What happens when there war was
1:55:15
Speaker 1: over and you have the same regime there and they
1:55:18
Speaker 1: armed themselves again, do you go in and disarm them again?
1:55:22
Speaker 1: That's a silly strategy. You know that that that doesn't
1:55:25
Speaker 1: make any sense. Again, bad strategy. Do I have a
1:55:27
Speaker 1: better plan, a better strategy for you on than the Pentagon? Yeah? Absolutely,
1:55:32
Speaker 1: I had a better plan for taking Gaza than the
1:55:35
Speaker 1: Israeli military executed on. I had a better plan for
1:55:38
Speaker 1: a lot of things. The reality is and and it's
1:55:42
Speaker 1: all panned out. I mean, all the flaws I saw
1:55:44
Speaker 1: in the Israeli plan played out, and we'll see what
1:55:48
Speaker 1: happens with the with the Uranian. But but that's silly
1:55:51
Speaker 1: to disarm the regime without having more than just disarming them.
1:55:56
Speaker 1: Because any regime can re arm, particularly when you have
1:55:59
Speaker 1: oil money. So it would be okay to say, okay,
1:56:02
Speaker 1: this arm the regime and prevent them from ever selling
1:56:05
Speaker 1: any oil in the future. Okay, then they won't have
1:56:07
Speaker 1: the money to be on. But just disarming the regime,
1:56:10
Speaker 1: it's not strategy, it's stupidity. I articulated my entire plan
1:56:18
Speaker 1: for Homos yesterday in great detail, so you can check
1:56:23
Speaker 1: it out. When did you meet Napolitano paleo conism versus objectivism?
1:56:29
Speaker 1: I met the Politano several times at dinner with Napolitano
1:56:32
Speaker 1: more than once. We had dinner at a very nice
1:56:35
Speaker 1: restaurant in New York the one time I remember, but
1:56:40
Speaker 1: we might have had dinner a second time. I used
1:56:43
Speaker 1: to be in a show a lot, so you remember
1:56:45
Speaker 1: when he had the Fox on Fox Business. I think
1:56:50
Speaker 1: it was he had a daily show, a weekly show.
1:56:54
Speaker 1: I can't remember anymore, but I used to be a
1:56:55
Speaker 1: regular guest in the show. I used to go to
1:56:57
Speaker 1: New York and appear in the show I did. Did
1:57:00
Speaker 1: I ever do it vice satellite? I can't remember, but
1:57:03
Speaker 1: I certainly was in studio with him. We also met
1:57:08
Speaker 1: at a number of conferences. You know, we had a
1:57:12
Speaker 1: lot of overlapping relationships. So yeah, I mentioned Trump's insurance
1:57:32
Speaker 1: plan way before yesterday. I knew it the day he
1:57:37
Speaker 1: announced it, so don't give me that bullshit.
1:57:40
Speaker 3: And then.
1:57:42
Speaker 1: Yeah, my plan was detailed and articulate and way beyond
1:57:47
Speaker 1: anything that they have going for them right now. So
1:57:50
Speaker 1: and again, my insights sources of the Trump administration tell
1:57:55
Speaker 1: me they had no plan until they started the war
1:57:58
Speaker 1: and then they came up with this insurance thing, but
1:58:00
Speaker 1: they choose thing won't work because they don't have enough
1:58:02
Speaker 1: money and they don't really want to escort the ships
1:58:04
Speaker 1: because that exposes American ships to Ranian lands. They don't
1:58:09
Speaker 1: have a plan. They don't I do particulated and great
1:58:14
Speaker 1: to tell yesterday. You listen, you didn't get it. You
1:58:17
Speaker 1: don't agree with it because you're biased. You see, you
1:58:20
Speaker 1: love Trump so much that you can't you can't accept
1:58:24
Speaker 1: that somebody might have an idea that Trump hasn't already
1:58:27
Speaker 1: come up with, so you immediately shut off your mind
1:58:29
Speaker 1: to that idea. You can't even hear my good ideas
1:58:32
Speaker 1: because they're not Trump ideas. And you resent, you resent, uh,
1:58:40
Speaker 1: you resent you was in my ideas because I'm anti Trump.
1:58:43
Speaker 1: And you say, tell China and Japan to move their
1:58:46
Speaker 1: ships to the Straits.
1:58:48
Speaker 2: That'll take months.
1:58:49
Speaker 1: That's interesting because I did mention yesterday, and you can
1:58:52
Speaker 1: check it out. Maybe you can go to chatchipt and
1:58:54
Speaker 1: ask it. China has uh, you know, two ships in
1:58:58
Speaker 1: the Golf, not in the Golf the Persian Gulf, but
1:59:01
Speaker 1: in the Arabian Sea, and Japan has at least one
1:59:05
Speaker 1: ship China has one big reconnaissance reconnaissance ship, but it
1:59:10
Speaker 1: has two I think destroyer type ships in the Arabian Sea,
1:59:14
Speaker 1: and Japan has one and they have them there permanently
1:59:17
Speaker 1: because they have an interest in securing. Plus, China has
1:59:21
Speaker 1: a big part of their fleet or significant number of
1:59:24
Speaker 1: ships near the Malika Straits, which in Singapore, which is
1:59:27
Speaker 1: not that far. They could get them there fairly quickly.
1:59:30
Speaker 1: I actually know what I'm talking about.
1:59:31
Speaker 2: Brian, You're just an idiot.
1:59:34
Speaker 1: Sorry. I don't care if you voted for Trump or not.
1:59:37
Speaker 1: You can't hear. You can't hear because you don't want
1:59:40
Speaker 1: to accept that somebody might have ideas better than Trump's,
1:59:44
Speaker 1: or might think that Trump is a buffoon who doesn't
1:59:47
Speaker 1: have a strategy, and he doesn't anyway, I don't know
1:59:50
Speaker 1: why I'm engaged with Wyan. I need to ignore him. Okay,
1:59:53
Speaker 1: Harison one hundred dollars. Thank you have Ason. I appreciate it.
1:59:56
Speaker 1: All right, this is all the supersed I can do
1:59:59
Speaker 1: for while. Please let us know what you think of
2:00:03
Speaker 1: the sky as ours. Okay, so this is I guess
2:00:07
Speaker 1: a song review. Please doesn't know what you think of
2:00:09
Speaker 1: the sky is ours? By feed rate command lyrics s
2:00:14
Speaker 1: Themulity Style, which has been available for a while now.
2:00:17
Speaker 1: It's on the album Built not Granted, on Spotify and YouTube. Okay,
2:00:22
Speaker 1: I'll check it out on YouTube because I don't do Spotify,
2:00:25
Speaker 1: but thank you. All Right, there's a song.
2:00:28
Speaker 2: Review that I will get to.
2:00:30
Speaker 1: All Right, we got a few more questions and we'll
2:00:32
Speaker 1: call it a day. Roman, if you have Rosie paulavi on,
2:00:37
Speaker 1: introduce sim to free banking. Please, getting rid of central
2:00:40
Speaker 1: bank is so important to heal the world. Yeah, but
2:00:43
Speaker 1: it's so radical. I don't expect anybody to take it seriously.
2:00:48
Speaker 1: I mean politically, it's so radical, Harrison, What single theme
2:00:53
Speaker 1: of value would you inject directly into the veins of
2:00:55
Speaker 1: our culture if you could, for example, through music? I
2:00:59
Speaker 1: mean basically self interest and pride in oneself and the
2:01:04
Speaker 1: attainment of values, the pursuit of values and importance of that,
2:01:08
Speaker 1: and and anti self sacrifice, but with a positive anecdote,
2:01:13
Speaker 1: the positive anecdote being, you know, a rational selfishness. Brian,
2:01:19
Speaker 1: I recommend an unauthorized twenty twenty five Irenian film It
2:01:24
Speaker 1: was Just an Accident on Netflix, Imprisoned and tortured years earlier.
2:01:30
Speaker 1: The film's characters may have, by chance now located the
2:01:36
Speaker 1: tormentor interesting. All right, let me show I'm gonna copy base.
2:01:42
Speaker 2: This and check it out.
2:01:44
Speaker 1: Thank you, Brian. All Right, so the movie is called
2:01:50
Speaker 1: I was just an accident, And Steven asked, what did
2:01:57
Speaker 1: you think of my cousin Vinnie fun Fun? I saw
2:02:00
Speaker 1: it years ago. It was fun, you know, you know,
2:02:07
Speaker 1: there's some smarts to it, but mainly just mainly just
2:02:10
Speaker 1: a fun movie, funny, entertaining and positive overall. Is it
2:02:24
Speaker 1: a problem, Brian? You really should, you know, stop having
2:02:27
Speaker 1: opinions about things you don't know anything about.
2:02:29
Speaker 2: Really, is it a problem you have?
2:02:33
Speaker 1: Whoops? You have? YouTube takes thirty percent of your super
2:02:37
Speaker 1: chat money? Is it a problem for you that YouTube
2:02:39
Speaker 1: takes thirty percent of super chat money? I mean the
2:02:43
Speaker 1: benefit I get from YouTube is worth many, many, many,
2:02:48
Speaker 1: many many. I mean it's worth six figures, right, so
2:02:54
Speaker 1: I can't really complain. I mean, it would be nice
2:02:56
Speaker 1: if they didn't take thirty percent, if they took something
2:03:00
Speaker 1: less than thirty percent, But I get so much benefit
2:03:04
Speaker 1: from YouTube, and I'm certainly not going to complain about
2:03:06
Speaker 1: them taking thirty percent. That's their charge. It's it's you
2:03:12
Speaker 1: know it's documented. I use their platform. They get to.
2:03:17
Speaker 2: Decide how much to charge for the platform, So.
2:03:21
Speaker 1: I am happy to do it, even if I prefer
2:03:25
Speaker 1: doing it lower number. Jose, It just came back from Europe.
2:03:32
Speaker 1: Seeing beautiful architecture is so joyful. What are your views?
2:03:36
Speaker 1: And seeing beautiful beauty through architecture from a societal viewpoint
2:03:40
Speaker 1: also sharing joy Michaelangelo's David. Absolutely, I mean, a beautiful
2:03:46
Speaker 1: architecture enhances one's life. It it it it everything you know,
2:03:52
Speaker 1: it inspires it I think, I think makes your soul.
2:04:01
Speaker 1: It just it just makes life enjoyable, and it inspires
2:04:06
Speaker 1: and uh, and it allows you to surround yourself with beautiful,
2:04:10
Speaker 1: with beauty, not just inside your house but also outside.
2:04:14
Speaker 2: Now.
2:04:15
Speaker 1: I like European architecture, but most of it is old.
2:04:18
Speaker 1: I actually prefer modern architecture. I particularly like cities the
2:04:23
Speaker 1: blend good modern architecture with uh, the old architecture. That is.
2:04:31
Speaker 1: I like Copenhagen I think does a really good job
2:04:34
Speaker 1: of that of a really nice modern architecture, homes you'd
2:04:39
Speaker 1: want to live in, uh, you know, and a blending
2:04:41
Speaker 1: of that into the.
2:04:42
Speaker 2: Older architecture I like.
2:04:45
Speaker 1: I like skyscrapers and modern skyscrapers, particularly if you go
2:04:49
Speaker 1: to Shanghai or you go to Hong Kong or Singapore,
2:04:54
Speaker 1: and and some buildings you see in the United States,
2:04:57
Speaker 1: although the United States is lagging in terms of architecture
2:05:00
Speaker 1: or ambition when it comes to modern stuff. But yeah,
2:05:05
Speaker 1: what I don't like, sadly is is, you know, is
2:05:08
Speaker 1: the lack of imagination in particularly building American neighborhoods where
2:05:13
Speaker 1: mcmahonsons you see the same house over and over and
2:05:16
Speaker 1: over again. I think it dulls the mind. It it's
2:05:20
Speaker 1: it's uh. I think suburban America is very particularly i'd
2:05:27
Speaker 1: say in the last few years, it's very uninspiring and
2:05:31
Speaker 1: uh and and and lacks of beauty and uh is
2:05:36
Speaker 1: dull and in that.
2:05:37
Speaker 2: Sense dulls the soul. Dulls the soul. All right, guys,
2:05:45
Speaker 2: thank you.
2:05:47
Speaker 1: By the way, what I said was the Pentagon had
2:05:49
Speaker 1: no strategy for the straits of homeo Is going into
2:05:52
Speaker 1: the war. I stand by that. Whether they develop a
2:05:55
Speaker 1: strategy over the next over the next few days weeks,
2:06:00
Speaker 1: I don't know, hopefully they will, but they had no
2:06:02
Speaker 1: strategy going into the wall. I have that from a
2:06:06
Speaker 1: reliable source. All right, thank you, guys. I will see
2:06:14
Speaker 1: you tomorrow again for a couple of shows. We've got
2:06:21
Speaker 1: a hose says love Barcelona crazy buildings of many different kinds.
2:06:26
Speaker 2: Thanks for your ands.
2:06:27
Speaker 1: Love the show. Yeah, Barcelona's beautiful. You know, some of
2:06:30
Speaker 1: the buildings are crazy. I don't know that I want
2:06:32
Speaker 1: to live with them in my sight all the time.
2:06:37
Speaker 1: You know, what was the name of the architect, the
2:06:39
Speaker 1: crazy architect in Barcelona whose name I forget right now,
2:06:45
Speaker 1: but Goudy, right, His buildings are crazy, but I don't
2:06:53
Speaker 1: know that i'd want to have them in front of
2:06:55
Speaker 1: my face all day. But Barcelona is a very very pleasant,
2:06:58
Speaker 1: very very nice city.
2:07:00
Speaker 2: Uh, and and I really enjoyed it. All right, guys,
2:07:03
Speaker 2: I see you tomorrow.
2:07:04
Speaker 1: And tomorrow we've got an interview with Andrew Fox and
2:07:08
Speaker 1: uh we have a news show, both of those tomorrow.
2:07:13
Speaker 1: Have a great rest of your weekend, and have a
2:07:16
Speaker 1: great week before you and I'll see you. I'll see
2:07:21
Speaker 1: you there, bye everybody. H