Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Dr Disrespect Breaks Silence, the Fall of TENET Media | HBR News 471

Transcript

Dr Disrespect Breaks Silence, the Fall of TENET Media | HBR News 471 · Honey Badger Radio

1:17
Speaker 1: This is HBr News number four seventy one, Doctor Disrespect
1:21
Speaker 1: breaks his Silence, The Fall of Tenet Media, where we
1:25
Speaker 1: discuss the news of the week and give it the
1:28
Speaker 1: badger treatment. Hello and good evening everyone. I hope you're
1:39
Speaker 1: dull doing well and you're laughing at all the absurdities
1:42
Speaker 1: so that you're not consumed by it. My name is Brian,
1:46
Speaker 1: and I'm here with Hannah, who is coming down with
1:50
Speaker 1: something or coming out of some some kind of plague.
1:53
Speaker 1: So if she sounds strange, and you know, that's the reason,
1:59
Speaker 1: so wish her, you know, a speedy recovery. In addition
2:04
Speaker 1: to that, doctor Randa mcam is not here because he
2:06
Speaker 1: is really sick and is basically bedridden in Connecticut. So
2:12
Speaker 1: I'm the only one that's not sick, which is a
2:15
Speaker 1: weird twist because I'm usually sick with something in the
2:19
Speaker 1: hospital out of the hospital. But anyway, we are committed
2:23
Speaker 1: to doing the job that we are here to do,
2:25
Speaker 1: so please stick around. It's going to be a good
2:28
Speaker 1: time despite all that. On this week's HBO news show,
2:31
Speaker 1: we're going to be talking about the recent developments regarding
2:35
Speaker 1: the allegations against popular streamer doctor Disrespect. Which is a
2:42
Speaker 1: massive thing if you're a part of or at all
2:45
Speaker 1: connected to the streaming sphere. It's just another you know,
2:49
Speaker 1: man accused of things and it destroyed his life and
2:53
Speaker 1: he has said something. So we're going to look into that.
2:57
Speaker 1: Lauren Chen, you guys might know her as well. I
3:01
Speaker 1: know her as roaming millennials. She used to make like
3:04
Speaker 1: anti feminist content a long time ago, and then she
3:08
Speaker 1: sort of started building her own thing and she created
3:10
Speaker 1: a company or started a company or founded a company
3:13
Speaker 1: called Tenet Media alongside a lot of other very well
3:17
Speaker 1: known content creators, and they are facing a lot of problems.
3:23
Speaker 1: Lauren Chan has been permanently banned from almost everything, and
3:27
Speaker 1: so we're going to look at the case against Tenant
3:30
Speaker 1: Media that is being put out there, and more so,
3:34
Speaker 1: stick around. It's going to be a good time and
3:35
Speaker 1: be sure to join us afterwards for the Patron only show.
3:38
Speaker 1: So you guys probably heard about Haitian migrants eating people's
3:42
Speaker 1: pets and various like you know, local animals in Ohio,
3:50
Speaker 1: or at least the reports are coming out of Ohio,
3:52
Speaker 1: but there's also reports of this happening in Florida. I
3:55
Speaker 1: believe there was a bunch of horses that disappeared and
3:59
Speaker 1: then they were found in various states of butchering and consumption.
4:03
Speaker 1: And the issue seems to be coming from the illegal
4:08
Speaker 1: crossings happening at our southern border and some of the
4:11
Speaker 1: kinds of characters that we are finding. But what I
4:15
Speaker 1: thought I would talk about in the after show is
4:16
Speaker 1: not the story itself, although that will probably come up,
4:19
Speaker 1: but rather these hilarious memes that people have been making
4:23
Speaker 1: because Trump has said that he's going to try and
4:27
Speaker 1: protect our animals if he is elected, so people are
4:31
Speaker 1: using me magic to sort of show what that might
4:35
Speaker 1: look like. And so we're going to be looking at
4:37
Speaker 1: this stuff in the Patron show. I hope you guys
4:40
Speaker 1: would join us. I think it'll be very entertaining. And
4:44
Speaker 1: if you don't want to wake up one morning to
4:46
Speaker 1: find that our content has been removed from the Internet,
4:49
Speaker 1: scrubbed from the mainstream inter then you should be following
4:52
Speaker 1: us at Rumble, which there's a link for in the description,
4:56
Speaker 1: because that's what we've kind of would liked. I would
4:59
Speaker 1: like to see that because our main you know outlet,
5:02
Speaker 1: I know that a lot of people have made that
5:04
Speaker 1: work for them. Dan Bongino is a good example. He's
5:07
Speaker 1: only on Rumble, and I think it's overall a better platform.
5:10
Speaker 1: It's definitely friendlier to you know, opinions like ours, and
5:15
Speaker 1: the tenet media story we're going to get into will
5:17
Speaker 1: actually kind of like help drive that home. But we
5:21
Speaker 1: are on a list, we are being throttled and in
5:23
Speaker 1: various stages of you know, demonetization and repression. So you
5:28
Speaker 1: should also check out our content archive, which is at
5:33
Speaker 1: Honeybadger Radio dot com or Badger feed dot com. Hopefully
5:39
Speaker 1: we'll see you all there, and if you to join
5:40
Speaker 1: us in the after show, please become a member. Go
5:42
Speaker 1: to feed the Badger dot com forces subscribe and you'll
5:45
Speaker 1: be able to participate in the conversation along with us
5:49
Speaker 1: regarding these memes and how much it's upset the Democrat
5:54
Speaker 1: Party because memes, they hate them. So anyway, let's go on.
6:00
Speaker 2: They're jealous, yeah me Minzi.
6:03
Speaker 1: Yeah, they don't have they don't have a choice. So
6:04
Speaker 1: let's get in today's story. So first we got to
6:06
Speaker 1: start with a unfortunate actually it's a really it's kind
6:11
Speaker 1: of sad. Yeah, So James Earl Jones, you guys might
6:14
Speaker 1: know as the voice of Darth Vader, but he's done
6:18
Speaker 1: lots of other work. He has passed on, he has
6:22
Speaker 1: gone on to the next world. Age ninety three, the
6:26
Speaker 1: American actor starred in films including The Great White Hope
6:29
Speaker 1: and won two Tony Awards in Prolific Stage career. So yeah,
6:34
Speaker 1: we know him as the voice of Darth Vader. I
6:36
Speaker 1: also know him as Fulse Doom in the original Conan
6:39
Speaker 1: movie with Arnold Schwarzenegger, in which he was a great,
6:43
Speaker 1: great villain. And you know, sometimes when you bring on,
6:46
Speaker 1: like in the case of Conan, if you bring on
6:48
Speaker 1: an actor that isn't great because you know, Arnold Swarzenegger
6:53
Speaker 1: is not a great actor, then the way you make
6:56
Speaker 1: it work is you bring on a really great actor
6:59
Speaker 1: to be like his part. You know, this is what
7:01
Speaker 1: they did with the Superman movie. The original Superman movie.
7:05
Speaker 1: Christopher Reeve had no experience. He was you know, he's
7:09
Speaker 1: the guy who played Superman in case you don't know,
7:12
Speaker 1: he had no experience. He was very new. Nobody knew
7:15
Speaker 1: who he was. He didn't have a name. So what
7:17
Speaker 1: the studio did was they said, Okay, we're gonna get
7:19
Speaker 1: Marlon Brando and Gene Hackman to be in the movie
7:23
Speaker 1: as the villain and the father of Superman, and they
7:28
Speaker 1: said they would do it, but they had to get
7:30
Speaker 1: top billing. So when you watch the original Superman film,
7:32
Speaker 1: it actually doesn't open up with Christopher Reeve. It opens
7:35
Speaker 1: up with I think it's like it opens up with
7:40
Speaker 1: the other two Gene Hackman and for some reason I'm
7:43
Speaker 1: losing the name, but the guy who played his father,
7:45
Speaker 1: you know from Godfather anyway, So yeah, I'm sad. James
7:49
Speaker 1: Earl Jones has passed on. He was ninety three, though
7:53
Speaker 1: he lived a very full life, so I don't know
7:56
Speaker 1: if you want to say anything about about that his passing.
8:01
Speaker 2: Honestly, one of the things that I think of when
8:04
Speaker 2: I think of James Earl Jones was my dad telling
8:07
Speaker 2: me about the movie Claudine, when I started talking about
8:12
Speaker 2: the way the the grabs system. I guess the welfare
8:21
Speaker 2: system and the training people to be dependent on government
8:29
Speaker 2: has affected the black population before it affected the white
8:33
Speaker 2: population and some of the conditions that made them more
8:38
Speaker 2: vulnerable during the time that that hit them. And he
8:43
Speaker 2: was like, you should watch this movie. So I did,
8:46
Speaker 2: and I will say that I'm not going to spoil
8:49
Speaker 2: it for anybody. So I recommend it to the rest
8:53
Speaker 2: of the audience that it's a nineteen seventy four movie.
8:57
Speaker 2: It's like the second one or third movie he was in.
9:02
Speaker 2: But it's it's uh, it's one that you'll you'll get
9:08
Speaker 2: pissed off about it. You'll get pissed off seeing it
9:11
Speaker 2: and everything. But it's a great movie and a great
9:14
Speaker 2: role and and one of those things that way before
9:20
Speaker 2: Darth Vader, you know, you had a bit of social
9:23
Speaker 2: consciousness there and trying to get people to understand what
9:29
Speaker 2: that that dependence actually meant and what it what damage
9:34
Speaker 2: it did. So it was a neat thing to think about.
9:38
Speaker 2: It is sad to see him go, yeah, ninety three.
9:43
Speaker 1: Yeah he did. Like again, if you make it that far.
9:46
Speaker 1: You know, there's a guy in my church. He just
9:47
Speaker 1: turned ninety one. His birthday is like literally the day
9:51
Speaker 1: before mine. And uh, you know, I mean, like the
9:55
Speaker 1: guy has had such a full life. So I'm sure
9:58
Speaker 1: Branda Christopher Lee, who pass away not a few years back,
10:02
Speaker 1: a number of years back, he also had the guy
10:04
Speaker 1: had the craziest life I've ever heard of. But the
10:07
Speaker 1: other thing, I will say, there's a couple more things
10:08
Speaker 1: I want to say about James Earl Jones other movies.
10:12
Speaker 1: He was in coming to America. He's a great sense
10:14
Speaker 1: of humor, a great a great movie about boyhood called
10:19
Speaker 1: The sand Blot and it's about these kids that played
10:22
Speaker 1: baseball and he's in that great movie. And and also
10:26
Speaker 1: he's Mufasa in The Lion King, so you know it's
10:30
Speaker 1: been around. He was also the guy who do the
10:32
Speaker 1: CNN thing? Didn't he do the CNN thing? You know,
10:35
Speaker 1: the most trusted name in news? I think that was
10:37
Speaker 1: his voice too. I don't know, but anyway, yeah, it
10:40
Speaker 1: might have been anyway, So I just wanted to put
10:43
Speaker 1: that out there. Unfortunately, you know, sad to see you go.
10:47
Speaker 1: F's in the chat for to pay your respects to
10:51
Speaker 1: James Earl Jones. And if there's anything else that you
10:53
Speaker 1: like him for, let us know in the comments. Oh
10:56
Speaker 1: and one fun trivia fact in case you didn't know,
10:58
Speaker 1: he had a very severe stutter that he had worked
11:03
Speaker 1: really hard to try to change. And this is like,
11:09
Speaker 1: when you consider the thing he's most known for is
11:12
Speaker 1: his godlike voice. Okay, that is actually quind of amazing
11:18
Speaker 1: that he was able to essentially like you know, get
11:23
Speaker 1: over or move beyond that limitation that stutter, and he did,
11:29
Speaker 1: and so people don't know him for the stutter, but
11:31
Speaker 1: that's what he had. So anyway, so yeah, good night
11:36
Speaker 1: to a real one and we're gonna move on to
11:39
Speaker 1: the next story. Again, if you guys want to send
11:41
Speaker 1: a message at any time during the show, you can
11:43
Speaker 1: go to feed Thebagel dot com for slash just the
11:46
Speaker 1: tip to send us a message. But I'm gonna move
11:49
Speaker 1: on to the next story. So now we're getting into
11:54
Speaker 1: the big ones. Okay, So Doctor Disrespect, I'm gonna read
11:59
Speaker 1: this one out. After several weeks on vacation, YouTube streamer
12:04
Speaker 1: Guy Beam, better known as his streaming persona Doctor Disrespect,
12:10
Speaker 1: has returned to the platform. He used to be on
12:13
Speaker 1: Twitch and then he got banned and now he's on YouTube.
12:17
Speaker 1: So what started as a quiet stream turned fiery as
12:21
Speaker 1: being finally acknowledged the elephant in the room and spoke
12:24
Speaker 1: about the allegations and acknowledgments concerning those allegations that he
12:29
Speaker 1: himself made. Many remember that being briefly left streaming in
12:33
Speaker 1: disgrace after rumors surfaced or resurfaced of him engaging in
12:38
Speaker 1: inappropriate messages with a minor while part of Twitch. While
12:43
Speaker 1: Beam did admit to doing so, he did not go
12:45
Speaker 1: into much detail concerning the content of the messages. Many
12:50
Speaker 1: rumors circulated as to what those messages consisted of. Beam
12:54
Speaker 1: first took the chance to sect the record straight on
12:57
Speaker 1: that part, stating that the messages were in no way
13:01
Speaker 1: textually or graphically sexual, and that there was no sexting
13:05
Speaker 1: or any plans to meet up Irl. Further, Beam refers
13:09
Speaker 1: to the messages as quote mutual bantering with inappropriate jokes
13:14
Speaker 1: taken out of context end quote. Next, he shifted his
13:18
Speaker 1: sights on Twitch themselves and claims that he was the
13:21
Speaker 1: victim of his old Twitch partner manager, whom he fired.
13:26
Speaker 1: Beam alleges that his partner manager is the one responsible
13:30
Speaker 1: for getting him suspended and eventually fired from Twitch. Beam
13:35
Speaker 1: states the minor in question had no desire to report
13:38
Speaker 1: these messages as a concern, but was pushed by Twitch
13:41
Speaker 1: to do so. The issue was even escalated to the
13:45
Speaker 1: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, but they took
13:49
Speaker 1: no action on the issue. This resulted in his lawsuit
13:52
Speaker 1: against Twitch, which he eventually won after a judge concluded
13:56
Speaker 1: that there was no wrongdoing on his part and Twitch
13:59
Speaker 1: was order to pay him. Furthermore, Beam discusses his usage
14:04
Speaker 1: of the word minor, stating that Twitch never even bothered
14:07
Speaker 1: to check if the so called victim was past the
14:10
Speaker 1: age of consent for their state, which Beam seems to
14:14
Speaker 1: insinuate that they were. Note that an individual can simultaneously
14:18
Speaker 1: be past the age of consent and still be considered
14:20
Speaker 1: a minor in many states in the US, dude to
14:22
Speaker 1: many states having age of consent of sixteen years old.
14:27
Speaker 1: Beam ended the rant alluding that he was setting up
14:30
Speaker 1: possible defamation lawsuits to certain individuals and warning the same
14:34
Speaker 1: individuals that this wasn't the full extent of the knowledge
14:37
Speaker 1: he had about the situation, saying that there was more
14:40
Speaker 1: to come in the future. So, like just to sum
14:44
Speaker 1: up what happened was there was everything was fine, and
14:49
Speaker 1: then he got he lost his membership to Twitch. It
14:52
Speaker 1: wasn't really explained something about like essentially, there were the
14:56
Speaker 1: rumors were that was something about him, you know, communicating
14:59
Speaker 1: the so somebody that he wasn't supposed to be and
15:02
Speaker 1: saying things that were inappropriate. There were no receipts shown.
15:05
Speaker 1: We don't really know, Okay, as far as I know
15:07
Speaker 1: about that, then he gets fired from Twitch or not fired,
15:11
Speaker 1: but banned on Twitch. So it looks bad because you
15:14
Speaker 1: get this band right, and he goes to YouTube, and
15:18
Speaker 1: he's on YouTube and there's rumors. The rumors follow him
15:22
Speaker 1: there because that's the nature of the beast, and he,
15:26
Speaker 1: I think for legal reasons because he's in the midst
15:29
Speaker 1: of you know, defamation suits and such. He didn't want
15:32
Speaker 1: to talk about like the allegations, so he left YouTube
15:36
Speaker 1: for a while. And just so you know, this isn't
15:39
Speaker 1: what he actually looks like. This is a character that
15:41
Speaker 1: he plays so that it's like when he does his streaming,
15:44
Speaker 1: he's doing a character that's doctor disrespect. I think it's
15:48
Speaker 1: based on the King of Donkey Kong, whose name I
15:51
Speaker 1: can't remember. But you ever see that documentary called The
15:54
Speaker 1: King of Kong Hannah and it was it was a
15:58
Speaker 1: documentary about like Donkey Kong and how it was like
16:02
Speaker 1: the hottest like arcade competition it was going on like
16:06
Speaker 1: the eighties, and there was like two guys it was.
16:09
Speaker 1: It's a crazy documentary. If you want to see something
16:12
Speaker 1: that's really weird and niche, check out The King of Kong.
16:16
Speaker 2: The documentary. You haven't seen the documentary, But you're talking
16:19
Speaker 2: about that there was a battle between two guys and
16:23
Speaker 2: one of them was particularly amazing. Yes, yeah, yeah.
16:28
Speaker 1: And the one guy was like he you know, he
16:30
Speaker 1: had the mustache and the sun races and the mullet.
16:33
Speaker 1: I think that's what he's kind of like, you know.
16:35
Speaker 3: It was inspired, but yeah, it was the style at
16:38
Speaker 3: the time, exactly.
16:40
Speaker 2: It was the fast. He didn't have an onion attached
16:42
Speaker 2: to his belt though.
16:43
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, so he so anyway, he's what he's claiming
16:49
Speaker 1: is is that he used to have a guy that
16:51
Speaker 1: he that worked for him when he was on Twitch.
16:54
Speaker 1: He fired that guy. We don't know the reasons, it
16:57
Speaker 1: doesn't really matter. That guy wording to Doctor Disrespect was
17:02
Speaker 1: angry with him for the way that their you know,
17:06
Speaker 1: partnership ended, so he used he weaponized Twitch and various
17:11
Speaker 1: allegations against Doctor Disrespect. And what's particularly interesting about this
17:16
Speaker 1: case is that Twitch was trying to get this girl,
17:23
Speaker 1: whoever it was, this girl to make allegations because they
17:28
Speaker 1: really were they were really trying to get them. And
17:30
Speaker 1: the reason why I find this interesting is because I've
17:32
Speaker 1: done a couple of interviews now with people in the military.
17:36
Speaker 1: Just yesterday, I did one with a woman named Holly
17:39
Speaker 1: whose son has faced allegations. And the pattern that I see,
17:43
Speaker 1: and I know this is not unusual because we've covered
17:47
Speaker 1: so many of these cases, and this happens in the military,
17:49
Speaker 1: and it happens in colleges, and it happens in business
17:51
Speaker 1: as well, especially when you have feminists who want to
17:55
Speaker 1: take the jobs of men that are already established. So
18:00
Speaker 1: these military courts and these like these lawyers that work
18:03
Speaker 1: for the state there, they come around these women, even
18:08
Speaker 1: if these women had a completely consensual one night stand
18:12
Speaker 1: with a guy or a fling or whatever, and they
18:15
Speaker 1: get those women to make like essentially allegations of sexual assault.
18:21
Speaker 1: And I think that that while they couldn't do that
18:23
Speaker 1: because he'd never met this girl, I think that's what
18:27
Speaker 1: probably was happening, because it was suggested in the write
18:29
Speaker 1: up that Mike j gave us and he is working
18:32
Speaker 1: now to clear up his name. But the point is
18:34
Speaker 1: this story is not over yet. It seemed like open
18:37
Speaker 1: and shut. A lot of people still think he did
18:39
Speaker 1: it because that's the nature of social media and the
18:42
Speaker 1: bias against men. And I guess we'll see how it goes,
18:46
Speaker 1: but it looks like the fight's not over, So Hannah, Yeah.
18:49
Speaker 2: I obviously there's there's a couple of things that I'm
18:53
Speaker 2: going to say that are not condemning of this guy,
18:57
Speaker 2: but are going to sound like it. And and this
19:01
Speaker 2: is the same that you say to people about walking
19:04
Speaker 2: around in public, driving a car, having expensive things in
19:08
Speaker 2: your house, and you know, walking around looking vulnerable, you know,
19:15
Speaker 2: in in public places where there are where there's a
19:18
Speaker 2: lot of crime going on. It doesn't matter if you're
19:21
Speaker 2: asking for it, right, It doesn't matter if you're not
19:25
Speaker 2: asking for it. It doesn't matter if you create a
19:30
Speaker 2: situation that that practically screams for other people to take
19:35
Speaker 2: advantage of you, to take pot chats that you to
19:38
Speaker 2: take away what you have. It doesn't matter. Right, it's
19:43
Speaker 2: wrong when they do it. Right, it's completely and totally
19:48
Speaker 2: wrong when they do it. But you're the one that
19:52
Speaker 2: that has the opportunity to protect yourself from that. Right,
19:56
Speaker 2: It doesn't matter if it if it's right or wrong. Yeah,
20:00
Speaker 2: it doesn't matter if it's good or bad. It doesn't
20:02
Speaker 2: matter whether you like it or not. If you walk
20:06
Speaker 2: out in front of a car and the driver hits
20:08
Speaker 2: you because they weren't paying attention it doesn't matter that
20:13
Speaker 2: they should have been paying attention. And it doesn't matter
20:18
Speaker 2: even though they should and they might be punished for it,
20:21
Speaker 2: You're still gonna have a broken leg or a broken
20:24
Speaker 2: neck or broken arm. It's still gonna hurt, and it's
20:27
Speaker 2: still gonna take you just as long to recover from it.
20:30
Speaker 2: If they get get punished and they have to pay
20:34
Speaker 2: your medical bills, it's not going to change anything. So
20:40
Speaker 2: with that in mind, I'm not saying that this guy
20:44
Speaker 2: is guilty of doing anything inappropriate. But when you're talking
20:48
Speaker 2: to a young person and I have to deal with this,
20:52
Speaker 2: I get people that message me on Twitter what should
20:54
Speaker 2: I do about this circumstance, And that has included guys
20:58
Speaker 2: my son's age, Yeah, messaging me what do I do
21:02
Speaker 2: about this situation with this girl? And some of them
21:05
Speaker 2: are pretty sensitive situations, And the first thing I have
21:09
Speaker 2: to do is find out if they're an adult, because
21:12
Speaker 2: if they're not, the next thing I have to do
21:14
Speaker 2: is say, I need your parents' permission to talk to you.
21:17
Speaker 2: I can't just talk to you about this as a
21:20
Speaker 2: stranger because it's not my business. Your parents need to
21:25
Speaker 2: be in on this. And you know, if I can
21:28
Speaker 2: give advice to your parents that can help you, or
21:31
Speaker 2: give advice with your parents there that can help you.
21:33
Speaker 2: I'm happy to, but I'm not going to go behind
21:36
Speaker 2: somebody else's mom and dad and talk to their son
21:40
Speaker 2: about girls, because it's not right. And this is how
21:45
Speaker 2: you have to be in your life. If you don't
21:48
Speaker 2: know that kid, sorry about my voice. If you don't
21:53
Speaker 2: know that kid and you don't know what that kid's
21:57
Speaker 2: maturity level is, you don't know what that kid does
22:00
Speaker 2: or doesn't know what they're involved in, what their parents
22:02
Speaker 2: are involved in, what people they're connected to. None of that.
22:06
Speaker 2: You don't know who you're talking to, and you don't
22:08
Speaker 2: know what information you're feeding them that they're not ready
22:13
Speaker 2: to deal with. So as soon as you find out
22:19
Speaker 2: that you're talking to somebody who is under age, even
22:23
Speaker 2: if they are over the age of consent, even if
22:25
Speaker 2: it would be perfectly legal for you to have sex
22:28
Speaker 2: with that person and there was nothing their comparents could
22:31
Speaker 2: do about it, still it's better to keep aligne between
22:36
Speaker 2: you because even though you might not be doing anything
22:42
Speaker 2: malicious and you might not be doing anything predatory, you
22:47
Speaker 2: can still get smacked with the allegation that you did,
22:52
Speaker 2: and it's better for you if it doesn't, in any way,
22:57
Speaker 2: shape or form, look like there might have been something
23:02
Speaker 2: to that allegation. It's not fair to you, it's not
23:05
Speaker 2: fair to the kids that you might be able to help.
23:09
Speaker 2: But it's the way of the world right now, and
23:13
Speaker 2: that's just flat out how it is. At the other
23:16
Speaker 2: end of it, I wouldn't judge this situation until you
23:21
Speaker 2: know the last bit of information comes out. The fact
23:23
Speaker 2: that a judge has already concluded that there was no
23:25
Speaker 2: wrongdoing on his part weighs in his favor, certainly because
23:30
Speaker 2: the court system doesn't do men favors when they've been
23:34
Speaker 2: accused of inappropriate behavior toward young people. So that to
23:41
Speaker 2: me suggests that the allegations are unlikely to be true.
23:49
Speaker 2: And I will stay on that note until I see
23:54
Speaker 2: any evidence to the contrary, and if I see any
23:58
Speaker 2: further evidence that the alleys are false, that it's an
24:01
Speaker 2: obviously it's a false allegation case. But it's important.
24:07
Speaker 1: Two.
24:09
Speaker 2: It's it's important for men to understand you do have
24:16
Speaker 2: to defend yourself against false allegations. You have more need
24:21
Speaker 2: to defend yourself against the risk of false allegations than by,
24:26
Speaker 2: by far, by the way than women and girls have
24:31
Speaker 2: to protect ourselves against any kind of sexual exploitation, because
24:36
Speaker 2: false allegations happen to men far more than sexual violence
24:41
Speaker 2: happens to women and girls. Hell, sexual violence happens to
24:44
Speaker 2: men and boys more than it happens to women and girls.
24:49
Speaker 2: So you got to be on the lookout, you got
24:51
Speaker 2: to live defensively, and that's this is just another piece
24:56
Speaker 2: of evidence that that is the case.
24:59
Speaker 1: Yeah, one of the patterns I see from talking to
25:01
Speaker 1: all these people with their stories of false allegations is
25:05
Speaker 1: the men they think that it would it couldn't happen
25:08
Speaker 1: to them, and they think that you know, they're they
25:13
Speaker 1: just I think they put themselves at risk. Like even
25:16
Speaker 1: if like they're total playboys, they get they attract, you know,
25:20
Speaker 1: women very easily, but it sets them up, especially if
25:24
Speaker 1: you're famous, especially if you have clout. I think that's
25:27
Speaker 1: extra dangerous if you, you know, don't want this to happen.
25:32
Speaker 1: But I think there's a couple of things that I
25:34
Speaker 1: think are going on. One is they again, they don't
25:37
Speaker 1: they don't think that this happens that often, And part
25:39
Speaker 1: of that might be due to feminist propaganda. Claiming it doesn't,
25:43
Speaker 1: So why would men think it would sin it's only
25:45
Speaker 1: two percent, you know, the two percent number. The other
25:48
Speaker 1: thing is is that they don't believe that women are
25:51
Speaker 1: capable of that kind of you know, say cruelty in
25:57
Speaker 1: the case where that's you know, or malice in the
25:59
Speaker 1: cases that could be. And I think that that's a mistake,
26:02
Speaker 1: but a lot of men make it. That's why I
26:05
Speaker 1: have sympathy for, you know, guys that are some sympathy
26:09
Speaker 1: because I think that they don't you know, it's like
26:11
Speaker 1: they learn the hard way and what I'd rather not
26:14
Speaker 1: have happened.
26:15
Speaker 2: Well, so they're being Being around a gal you can
26:19
Speaker 2: trust doesn't necessarily save your butt either, because it also
26:22
Speaker 2: depends on how savvy she is and how steadfast she is.
26:26
Speaker 2: Because personal experience, when a group of authority minded people,
26:37
Speaker 2: usually other women. In my case, it was other girls
26:41
Speaker 2: come along and try to make you, try to manipulate
26:44
Speaker 2: you into making a false allegation against a guy with
26:48
Speaker 2: with you know where they're there. You're twisting the truth
26:51
Speaker 2: to make that allegation like something did happen, but it
26:54
Speaker 2: was consensual and everybody was cool with it, except for
26:58
Speaker 2: the people that are trying to create the false allegation situation. Now,
27:04
Speaker 2: like they push and push and push. They don't take
27:08
Speaker 2: no for an answer. They are the predators that they're
27:10
Speaker 2: trying to make you accuse the guy of being and
27:16
Speaker 2: they will fight tooth and nail. They will actually penalize
27:19
Speaker 2: you for not making that allegation. And I've been through that.
27:23
Speaker 2: There's you know, there's a lot of people that are
27:25
Speaker 2: not strong enough to come out on the other end
27:27
Speaker 2: of that without making that allegation, without bending to the
27:33
Speaker 2: will of the people that want them to lie about
27:35
Speaker 2: that guy. And when you do come out of it
27:39
Speaker 2: without bending to their will and without lying for them,
27:43
Speaker 2: you do get punished for it. You do get punished
27:47
Speaker 2: for it as a woman. And then the next one
27:49
Speaker 2: sees that, in the next one, in the next one,
27:52
Speaker 2: and it makes it harder for them.
27:56
Speaker 1: Yeah.
27:56
Speaker 2: So just because you can trust a girl doesn't mean
28:00
Speaker 2: that you can trust all the girls that she knows,
28:02
Speaker 2: doesn't mean that you can rely on her strength, and
28:05
Speaker 2: it doesn't mean that you're safe.
28:07
Speaker 1: Yep. Yeah, So like yeah, that's again, you know, be careful,
28:13
Speaker 1: protect your nuts. Okay, So I got a super chow
28:18
Speaker 1: from Meredith G. Thank you, Meredith, and I'm going to
28:21
Speaker 1: read it out and then we'll move on to the
28:22
Speaker 1: next story. Five dollars HBr News number four seventy one.
28:28
Speaker 1: The one criticism I have for doctor Disrespect is that
28:31
Speaker 1: he didn't get out in front of this quickly enough.
28:34
Speaker 1: In addition to not protecting himself. There's a reason people
28:37
Speaker 1: in his situation will not talk to people below the
28:40
Speaker 1: age of eighteen, and once the NDA was breached on
28:43
Speaker 1: the settlement, he should be prepared, have to be prepared
28:47
Speaker 1: to release all the details because given how people who
28:49
Speaker 1: were not longer no longer working for Twitch or behind
28:53
Speaker 1: the original takedown, he needed to know this wasn't going
28:56
Speaker 1: to go away. Yes, a bit naive out all of this,
29:01
Speaker 1: you know so, But yeah, I would say, just like
29:07
Speaker 1: if you're especially if you're in the public eye and
29:10
Speaker 1: you're you know, well known, and your and your high status,
29:13
Speaker 1: you make good money, I would probably not get involved
29:17
Speaker 1: with anyone that you aren't. You know, I just wouldn't
29:23
Speaker 1: get involved with people. I think. I think I would
29:25
Speaker 1: live a private life like Pierce Brosnan, who basically stayed
29:29
Speaker 1: with the same woman and he's still with the same
29:32
Speaker 1: woman today, And I think it's kept him safe as
29:38
Speaker 1: the reason play James Bond.
29:40
Speaker 2: You know, there's a reason why a lot of people
29:43
Speaker 2: who have big Twitter accounts with lots of followers don't
29:46
Speaker 2: answer anybody's DMS. And it's not just because of how
29:50
Speaker 2: plentiful they are. They are plentiful, you do get a
29:53
Speaker 2: lot of dms. But one of the reasons that a
29:57
Speaker 2: lot of people don't answer is because every everything you
30:01
Speaker 2: say in DMS can be taken out of context and
30:05
Speaker 2: twisted and used against you.
30:08
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, all right, Well, anyway, let us know what
30:12
Speaker 1: you guys think about that one in the comments. What
30:14
Speaker 1: do you think about the doctor disrespect situation? Do you
30:17
Speaker 1: think that he's, you know, being poorly treated by the system.
30:22
Speaker 1: Do you think he deserves this? Maybe he doesn't. I
30:24
Speaker 1: don't know, let me know in the comments. So we're
30:27
Speaker 1: gonna move on to the last story. This is gonna
30:29
Speaker 1: be a bit, This could be long. I don't know,
30:31
Speaker 1: because it does a lot going on here. All right, So,
30:35
Speaker 1: a recently unsealed indictment from the US Department of Justice
30:39
Speaker 1: against two alleged Russian agents. This is alleged, by the
30:43
Speaker 1: way operating in the US has had a Domino effect
30:47
Speaker 1: that has ended up sending shock waves throughout the quote
30:51
Speaker 1: conservative end quote YouTube community. Konstantine Kalashnikov and Elena Yesieva,
31:01
Speaker 1: both employees of the Russian state news broadcaster RT. You
31:06
Speaker 1: guys remember RT. They don't. They're not on YouTube anymore
31:10
Speaker 1: because well, I think they got banned, apparently invested ten
31:14
Speaker 1: million dollars into a North American shell company that then
31:18
Speaker 1: passed that money onto the organization known as Tenet Media
31:23
Speaker 1: te n e T. Tenet Media was founded in twenty
31:27
Speaker 1: twenty two by the Canadian YouTuber Lauren Chen, better known
31:32
Speaker 1: online or at least once was known as Roaming Millennial,
31:36
Speaker 1: and her husband Liam I believe his name is. Chen
31:41
Speaker 1: used Tenet Media to recruit several other right leaning YouTubers
31:45
Speaker 1: such as Tim Poole, Dave Ruben, Benny Johnson, and Matt Christiansen,
31:49
Speaker 1: and also Lauren Southern in order to provide content for
31:52
Speaker 1: the platform. She then used the money given to pay
31:54
Speaker 1: the various talents she recruited to Tenet Media. The unsealed
31:59
Speaker 1: indictment is quick to point out that Chen, as well
32:02
Speaker 1: as the talent she pulled into Tenet Media, were most
32:05
Speaker 1: likely in the dark concerning the source of the money,
32:08
Speaker 1: and that they are considered to be victims of the plot.
32:11
Speaker 1: Kalishnikov and Afanasieva sorry operated using shell companies, aliases, and
32:20
Speaker 1: fake documents while dealing with Chen and Tenet Media. While
32:23
Speaker 1: the indictment never outlines a specific guide that the YouTubers
32:27
Speaker 1: were given to follow, it does posit the following, which
32:30
Speaker 1: reads quote. While the views expressed in the videos are
32:33
Speaker 1: not uniform, the subject matter and content of the videos
32:37
Speaker 1: are often consistent with the Government of Russia's interests in
32:41
Speaker 1: amplifying US domestic divisions in order to weaken US opposition
32:45
Speaker 1: to core Government of Russia interests, such as its ongoing
32:50
Speaker 1: war in Ukraine end quote. Nearly all involved in Tenet
32:54
Speaker 1: Media have denied any allegations of knowingly or unknowingly disseminating
32:58
Speaker 1: Russian propaganda. Then, and without explanation, YouTube has shut down
33:03
Speaker 1: all of Lauren Chen's Senate media related accounts, so everything
33:07
Speaker 1: Lauren Chen built is gone. Many have comment on how
33:11
Speaker 1: the timing of this situation and the twenty twenty four
33:15
Speaker 1: presidential election is very convenient to say the least.
33:20
Speaker 2: Okay, so just let me let me see if I
33:23
Speaker 2: understand correctly. What's written here. The allegation is that these
33:29
Speaker 2: two alleged Russian agents operating in the US funded a
33:35
Speaker 2: shitload of free speech that basically was on one side
33:42
Speaker 2: of the political fence, like one facet of the political
33:47
Speaker 2: spectrum that had maybe there was some variation, that those
33:52
Speaker 2: were all pretty much establishment conservative viewpoints, not so much
34:02
Speaker 2: like libertarian leaning but more authoritarian leaning conservative viewpoints.
34:06
Speaker 1: Right, you're talking about the ones expressed by by Tenant Media.
34:10
Speaker 2: Well, the people that they are.
34:13
Speaker 1: Rt and people who funded them.
34:15
Speaker 2: No, the people that that Tenant funded here are recruited.
34:21
Speaker 2: So just from the little bit that I've seen of
34:24
Speaker 2: these people, they're not I wouldn't call any of them
34:27
Speaker 2: necessarily libertarian, wouldn't necessarily call him full on authoritarian conservative.
34:33
Speaker 2: Maybe closer to traditionalists a little bit.
34:37
Speaker 1: The people at Tenant Media are kind of all over
34:40
Speaker 1: the place, Like I know, I watch most of them,
34:43
Speaker 1: so we all know Timpoole lives on the fence, like
34:47
Speaker 1: he's got a whole his whole home in bed is there.
34:50
Speaker 1: He never really like makes any super definitive claims unless
34:55
Speaker 1: they are so unimpeachable, Like, for example.
34:58
Speaker 2: He's basically not even in a set of it's not
35:04
Speaker 2: even a set outlook that they funded.
35:07
Speaker 1: They funded it because they are over the place. I mean,
35:11
Speaker 1: like you know, Lauren Southern is like reality pilled now,
35:15
Speaker 1: so she doesn't really pick sides.
35:17
Speaker 2: But I'm not sure exactly. It doesn't appear what law
35:24
Speaker 2: are they accused of violating exactly, because it doesn't. This
35:28
Speaker 2: is just public opinion, and they're fund They're helping channels
35:32
Speaker 2: that express their own public opinions, their own private opinions grow,
35:37
Speaker 2: and they're they're in. They may be influencers, but people
35:40
Speaker 2: don't have to listen to them. People can disagree with them,
35:43
Speaker 2: people can debunk anything they say that's not true. Uh
35:47
Speaker 2: and and so on, like so they've invested in this
35:51
Speaker 2: company that is has invested in like it's a media company,
35:56
Speaker 2: is it is? Are they also going to do this
36:00
Speaker 2: to all of the Chinese money that is invested in
36:04
Speaker 2: left wing media, because there's a lot.
36:09
Speaker 3: That's that media well there that Israel is pumping into
36:14
Speaker 3: Hollywood and and and it seems like they have a
36:17
Speaker 3: theory about this, but the theory is basically just that.
36:21
Speaker 2: The views expressed the video or not uniform. It says,
36:24
Speaker 2: but often consistent with uh. Government of Russia's interest in
36:29
Speaker 2: amplifying US domestic divisions in order to weak in the
36:32
Speaker 2: US opposition to core Government of Russia interests. So U.
36:36
Speaker 2: In other words, our government has its own war going
36:42
Speaker 2: on with Russia's government, even though we are we weren't
36:46
Speaker 2: supposed to be at war with Russia, are yes, I mean.
36:54
Speaker 1: Using Ukrainian lives and I'm not.
36:59
Speaker 2: I'm not seeing the There's no spycraft going on here,
37:05
Speaker 2: there's no.
37:07
Speaker 1: I think they're claiming that. What I think they're going
37:10
Speaker 1: with an uh, they're finding and well, you know, I'll
37:13
Speaker 1: let you finish what you want to say.
37:14
Speaker 2: Throw all the money in the world at viewpoints at
37:17
Speaker 2: people expressing their own viewpoints without telling them, you know,
37:22
Speaker 2: what to say, right, without telling them what to believe
37:27
Speaker 2: or anything like that, And they throw all the money
37:30
Speaker 2: in the world at that. And those viewpoints can get
37:34
Speaker 2: expressed as loudly and as broadly as possible. But again,
37:39
Speaker 2: nobody has to listen to them.
37:41
Speaker 1: No, they don't.
37:42
Speaker 2: People can if the individuals in question aren't saying things
37:47
Speaker 2: that already resonate with people or that don't sound logical,
37:51
Speaker 2: like they're saying things that don't sound logical or they're
37:53
Speaker 2: saying things that are not true, and there they can
37:57
Speaker 2: be demonstrably debunked and stuff, then the government wouldn't need
38:03
Speaker 2: to go after them. They could just debunk it. They
38:06
Speaker 2: could just prove disprove it, or they could just let
38:09
Speaker 2: them look stupid in public and people would make fun
38:12
Speaker 2: of them and they would go away. Right, So they
38:15
Speaker 2: really this can't be a form of spycraft. It's a
38:22
Speaker 2: lot like It's a lot like saying that if if
38:31
Speaker 2: somebody makes a movie in a foreign country that portrays
38:36
Speaker 2: the American government in a way that's not favorable and
38:39
Speaker 2: it becomes popular because it's a good movie and because
38:44
Speaker 2: it resonates as true with people of the country, that
38:48
Speaker 2: the government should ban that movie instead of maybe considering
38:53
Speaker 2: maybe the people aren't into this thing that we're doing
38:56
Speaker 2: that's being portrayed in this movie. Yeah, well, you know
39:02
Speaker 2: obviously that there's some concern to be had here in
39:07
Speaker 2: regard to the actions being taken by the government, not
39:11
Speaker 2: in regard to the company. So I just, yeah, this
39:16
Speaker 2: blows my mind. Well, there's not any they haven't done
39:19
Speaker 2: anything wrong, no though.
39:21
Speaker 1: No, And they even acknowledged that Laurence. Okay, let's let's
39:25
Speaker 1: back up for a second. Okay, So RT, these two
39:29
Speaker 1: people supposedly are associated with RT. RT was called Russia
39:32
Speaker 1: today and you could watch videos of it back in
39:34
Speaker 1: twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen. I think probably for a while
39:39
Speaker 1: I hadn't noticed that they were not around, and they
39:42
Speaker 1: would talk about all kinds of stuff dealing with you know,
39:47
Speaker 1: global geopolitics, right, it was like all over. But they
39:50
Speaker 1: also came and did like more sort of intimate stories,
39:54
Speaker 1: you know, about the culture war, and they would have
39:57
Speaker 1: on guests from the UK, from Europe, from America, from Canada,
40:02
Speaker 1: and they were talking about it. Now, is it possible
40:05
Speaker 1: that Russia was using our te to sort of like
40:08
Speaker 1: you know, ferment some propaganda. Sure, probably likely in fact,
40:13
Speaker 1: But then all of our countries participate in our own propaganda.
40:17
Speaker 1: I mean, Canada propagandizes its own citizens, the UK propagandizes
40:22
Speaker 1: its own citizens, Our country propagandizes its own citizens, and
40:26
Speaker 1: we also propagandize other countries. We use social media, we
40:30
Speaker 1: use YouTube, we use x we use Facebook. Whatever. I'm
40:34
Speaker 1: not saying that this is okay. I'm not saying, you know,
40:37
Speaker 1: two wrongs makes who cares? But I'm saying that it's
40:40
Speaker 1: interesting that they've selected this particular group of people to
40:43
Speaker 1: target and they're using this particular instance when there are
40:47
Speaker 1: endless examples. I mean, you just mentioned China. They have
40:50
Speaker 1: spies in they have like their own police stations full
40:53
Speaker 1: of spies all over the country. Essentially, if you live
40:57
Speaker 1: in Canada, Western Canada, Vancouver Island, it's essentially becoming China.
41:02
Speaker 1: It's becoming invaded. And that's through legal immigration, by the way.
41:05
Speaker 1: But what the reason what I think is most interesting
41:08
Speaker 1: about this story, so like the fact that they have
41:11
Speaker 1: this claim, oh you know, RT is like using Russian
41:15
Speaker 1: propaganda and Tenet media to to divide Americans, which is
41:19
Speaker 1: ridiculous because a lot of people in Tenant are not
41:22
Speaker 1: even American. Plus, I think you guys are the ones
41:26
Speaker 1: in all the dividing all the like. As far as
41:29
Speaker 1: I know, Tenet media mostly just discusses. They don't talk
41:32
Speaker 1: about geopolitics. They talk about things happening close to home,
41:38
Speaker 1: you know, like about things like Pride Month, or they
41:41
Speaker 1: will cover you know, transitioning children, or they'll cover like
41:47
Speaker 1: stuff going on with Disney, you know, like it's stuff
41:50
Speaker 1: that's close to home, not really pro Russia. Propaganda, not
41:54
Speaker 1: really anti American. In fact, it's just anti woke, which
41:58
Speaker 1: wokeness is anti mime American. And I think that it's
42:03
Speaker 1: number one. That's the tenant is not a a at
42:07
Speaker 1: that level, they're kind of new. I mean, we're talking
42:09
Speaker 1: about Matt Christiansen, who's you know, if you've never seen
42:12
Speaker 1: his work, it's mostly again talking about raise hoaxes happening
42:16
Speaker 1: in America. He's pro Second Amendment. It's very he's very constitutionalist.
42:22
Speaker 1: Then you got like Benny Johnson, who's kind of like
42:24
Speaker 1: a click baity guy that puts out shorts and again
42:27
Speaker 1: it's mostly about culture.
42:28
Speaker 2: He might there's a key detail about this though. The
42:32
Speaker 2: key detail, the thing that is the most important to
42:34
Speaker 2: pay attention to is the fact that it it says
42:39
Speaker 2: in the story that they're these are their own opinions.
42:42
Speaker 2: This isn't this isn't to say specific things. I mean,
42:51
Speaker 2: if I came up with the slogan, which I didn't,
42:55
Speaker 2: somebody else did. But if I came up with the
42:56
Speaker 2: slogan abortion stops a beating heart, and I thought that
43:02
Speaker 2: was really clever, and I told it to a bunch
43:05
Speaker 2: of people, and someone came along and said man, you
43:08
Speaker 2: really should put that on a billboard. Right, it's still
43:11
Speaker 2: my slogan, my opinion, even if they helped me come
43:16
Speaker 2: up with the money.
43:18
Speaker 1: To do that.
43:20
Speaker 2: And that's the like with this situation. It cannot be
43:25
Speaker 2: It can't be spycraft for people to invest in people
43:33
Speaker 2: who are saying their own opinions in their own country,
43:36
Speaker 2: in a nation where we have a fundamental constitutional right
43:42
Speaker 2: to free speech to express those opinions publicly. It's just
43:46
Speaker 2: not possible for that to be spying, right. They cannot
43:50
Speaker 2: be foreign.
43:51
Speaker 1: Agents, no, of course not. And it make you can't
43:53
Speaker 1: even really prove it because again, this was done you know,
43:57
Speaker 1: supposedly from these two people through various shell companies and shits.
44:01
Speaker 1: So Lauren Chen.
44:05
Speaker 2: Like, even if you could prove it, it still wouldn't
44:08
Speaker 2: be there, still wouldn't be anything wrong with it, I agree.
44:12
Speaker 2: But the reason for any the actions that are being taken,
44:16
Speaker 2: it makes it very suspicious. It makes it very much
44:18
Speaker 2: election interference. What's going on right now?
44:21
Speaker 1: Yes, that's what it is. But the problem is, no,
44:24
Speaker 1: that's exactly what it is. That's what I think it is,
44:27
Speaker 1: because again you're right, they can't really do anything, but
44:30
Speaker 1: they could get YouTube to kick Lauren Chen off of
44:32
Speaker 1: every platform because YouTube is a private company and they
44:35
Speaker 1: can do whatever they want. So they're using these big
44:38
Speaker 1: tech companies because they can't come after them legally. They're
44:43
Speaker 1: just getting their friends in the corporate world to do it.
44:46
Speaker 1: So Lauren Chen is banned off of everything. And yes,
44:49
Speaker 1: I think it has to do with the fact that
44:50
Speaker 1: we have election coming up in like two months, less
44:53
Speaker 1: than two months. Okay, it's totally because of that, because
44:56
Speaker 1: Tenet Media was having an impact. Timpool is, you know,
45:00
Speaker 1: like him or hat him. He's huge, and they'll they'll
45:03
Speaker 1: get him too if they if they can. I just
45:05
Speaker 1: think that they needed enough of an excuse to pull
45:09
Speaker 1: the plug on Lauren Chen and Russia. Russia, Russia is
45:13
Speaker 1: like all they have, so that's what they're going with.
45:14
Speaker 1: And I will also point out that Lauren Chen was
45:17
Speaker 1: not the only person that's getting banned. A lot of
45:20
Speaker 1: people are being targeted and there were requests coming from
45:24
Speaker 1: the European Union and South American governments to do something
45:28
Speaker 1: about these people that are getting all uppity and telling
45:31
Speaker 1: the truth online. Candice Owens was banned from YouTube or
45:36
Speaker 1: suspended from YouTube because she had a debate with a rabbi,
45:40
Speaker 1: and you know, he was upset, and so he got
45:42
Speaker 1: her band because that's what these people do. They always
45:45
Speaker 1: go after your speech. They got they came after. There
45:51
Speaker 1: was another dude, I can't remember his name now, but
45:53
Speaker 1: he was also making content and making effects. I think
45:55
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson is being targeted, and it's because they're having
46:00
Speaker 1: an impact.
46:00
Speaker 2: And its been targeted for a couple of years now.
46:03
Speaker 2: I mean, that's how Yeah, but he's not a Fox
46:05
Speaker 2: News anymore because he was targeted exactly.
46:08
Speaker 1: But but Tucker had a historian guest on and it
46:12
Speaker 1: was a really great conversation. But the historian was saying
46:15
Speaker 1: some naughty, naughty things you're not supposed to say, and
46:17
Speaker 1: so I think that his channel is in serious danger.
46:21
Speaker 1: And I'm just saying, this is happening everywhere, and it's
46:24
Speaker 1: all happening at the same time, and it's all happening
46:26
Speaker 1: right before the election. Come on, like, this is literally
46:30
Speaker 1: election interference, right, and they know that they know it is,
46:34
Speaker 1: and they also expect that most normal people will not
46:38
Speaker 1: know what's going on. And so I think that this
46:41
Speaker 1: was a targeted thing. They were just looking for, like
46:44
Speaker 1: what can we use to get Tenet Media and and
46:49
Speaker 1: essentially just at least discredit them, tarnish their reputations and
46:54
Speaker 1: you know, put them in essentially a net or a
46:58
Speaker 1: web of red tape until after November and will just
47:02
Speaker 1: silence them in the meantime. Like I would bet that
47:04
Speaker 1: because YouTube and Facebook and some of these other social
47:09
Speaker 1: media spaces, because they don't really have a case against
47:14
Speaker 1: you know, like in because people like Tim Poole and
47:18
Speaker 1: Steven Crowder He's had multiple attempts to take his channel down,
47:24
Speaker 1: and Tenant Media and Lauren Chen and Lauren Southern and
47:28
Speaker 1: Benny Johnson and Matt Christiansen and the quartering whoever they
47:33
Speaker 1: want to come after they will just throw the throw
47:37
Speaker 1: them in essentially like online limbo, wait until November seventh
47:42
Speaker 1: or right after the election is over, and if their
47:45
Speaker 1: person gets in then they'll just be like, oh, we've
47:48
Speaker 1: looked at your papers and you guys are okay now
47:50
Speaker 1: now that it's too late for you to do anything
47:52
Speaker 1: about it. So what I suspect that's what it is.
47:55
Speaker 1: I think it's very simple spycraft, like real spycraft or
47:59
Speaker 1: manipul happens all over the world. Every government does it
48:03
Speaker 1: our government is probably actually among the worst, and I
48:07
Speaker 1: hate that about our government, but it's true. So this
48:10
Speaker 1: is not unique. And I think this is targeted, and
48:12
Speaker 1: I think it's targeting people specifically because they know that
48:16
Speaker 1: they can't get their person in if they don't engage
48:19
Speaker 1: in this, or at least they suspect it. So that's
48:22
Speaker 1: what I think is going on. I hope Lauren Chen
48:24
Speaker 1: beats this thing. I met her. She's super nice, her
48:27
Speaker 1: husband is great, and Lindsay and I hung out with them,
48:30
Speaker 1: and it was in an environment where it's really easy
48:33
Speaker 1: for people that are like really big influencers with big
48:36
Speaker 1: names so like look down on you. But Lauren Chan
48:38
Speaker 1: was super chill. I got along great with her. She
48:40
Speaker 1: reminds she's got a lot of like Carl's sort of personality.
48:44
Speaker 1: You know, I get along really well with Carl when
48:46
Speaker 1: I see him, and like count Count d Angula. But yeah,
48:50
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't think that she deserves this. I
48:52
Speaker 1: think that this is this is obviously they're engaging in,
48:56
Speaker 1: you know, corporate style, government backed interference in order to
49:03
Speaker 1: get their person and that's what I think. So see fracas,
49:09
Speaker 1: Maximus says, Brian, you've actually hit the nail on the head.
49:11
Speaker 1: It's in part because Russia wants to appear based and
49:14
Speaker 1: wants to appeal to that kind of conservative Yeah. I
49:17
Speaker 1: think that. Well, you know, Putin he reached to put
49:20
Speaker 1: out a statement saying that, like he would allow people
49:24
Speaker 1: who wanted to seek asylum in Russia from woke America.
49:27
Speaker 1: And I granted it could just be bans, but we
49:30
Speaker 1: kind of deserve it. And you know, he's got a point.
49:34
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean that we stop being American, but like,
49:37
Speaker 1: why what We're giving them ammunition to make these claims
49:40
Speaker 1: and we kind of have it coming because we did
49:42
Speaker 1: let this happen. So you know, anyway, in closing, repeal
49:46
Speaker 1: the nineteenth Okay, So Hannah, do you have any other
49:51
Speaker 1: thoughts on this before I am the No.
49:54
Speaker 2: I just I just think it's it's bizarre that people
49:57
Speaker 2: anybody would buy this story at all, that they're Russian
50:03
Speaker 2: spin or to paying people to say things they were
50:07
Speaker 2: already gonna say anyway.
50:10
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, well they're backing up financially, probably to keep
50:14
Speaker 1: that business going, because yeah, why would you even need
50:17
Speaker 1: to feed them like a script? They already know what
50:20
Speaker 1: they want to say and they're already saying it so exactly.
50:25
Speaker 1: Nova Fan twenty one gives a dollar in rumble rants.
50:28
Speaker 1: I thank you. Noba Fan says, I can't confirm if
50:30
Speaker 1: this is true, but I heard they have to disclose
50:33
Speaker 1: if they got funding from somewhere. I imagine that it
50:37
Speaker 1: would be in their taxes and stuff, and I'm pretty
50:39
Speaker 1: sure again that they would be responsible in doing that correctly.
50:44
Speaker 1: But I think it's all about finding an excuse to
50:47
Speaker 1: take them out, essentially censor them, because like the thing is,
50:51
Speaker 1: the government wants to censor us really badly. They want
50:54
Speaker 1: to censor us if we have the wrong opinions. They
50:56
Speaker 1: want to censor us if we're critical of the state.
50:59
Speaker 1: You can just look at what they have written down
51:02
Speaker 1: over at these like supposed you know, anti hate groups
51:06
Speaker 1: like the ad L and the SPLC and the the
51:10
Speaker 1: DJ and the Department of Homeland Security. They have things like,
51:14
Speaker 1: you know, radical libertarianism, like people who are against like
51:20
Speaker 1: the overflow of the state, and the word They throw
51:22
Speaker 1: the word radical in there even when it doesn't really apply,
51:26
Speaker 1: because they know it's a scary word, like, oh, radical,
51:28
Speaker 1: that's crazy, he's going to attack your bonding themself.
51:31
Speaker 2: You know, just just knowing about the Twitter files and
51:34
Speaker 2: and now the the Facebook files as well, Like that's
51:39
Speaker 2: enough for people to know. You know, the US government
51:42
Speaker 2: has been censoring your speech, has been censoring our speech,
51:47
Speaker 2: been targeting UH specific people like the higher level influencers
51:55
Speaker 2: more than anybody, but US as well for silencing. They've
52:00
Speaker 2: been targeting people that they did they disagree with, or
52:05
Speaker 2: that express things that challenge the status quo, that express
52:11
Speaker 2: things that make it more likely for somebody to get
52:13
Speaker 2: into to office, that will challenge the status quo, and
52:18
Speaker 2: and that will challenge the establishment. So if you are
52:22
Speaker 2: at all anti anything the establishment is doing, even if
52:27
Speaker 2: it's just one thing the establishment is doing, it doesn't
52:29
Speaker 2: matter what it is, they're going to do this. This
52:33
Speaker 2: one happens to be the The reason that they went
52:38
Speaker 2: after people who were opposed to the US involvement in
52:43
Speaker 2: Russia's UH attack on Ukraine and and the subsequent war
52:51
Speaker 2: there is they don't want people. They don't want people
52:59
Speaker 2: affect or challenging their giant money laundering operation. Right, the
53:06
Speaker 2: United States involvement in that is strictly money laundering. There
53:11
Speaker 2: is no other thing going on there. They're not doing
53:14
Speaker 2: it to help the Ukrainian people. They're not doing it
53:17
Speaker 2: out of opposition to Russia. They're not doing it because
53:20
Speaker 2: they care about the American people. They're not doing it
53:23
Speaker 2: for democracy. They're not doing it because of NATO. It
53:27
Speaker 2: is just money laundering. That's been made very clear a
53:34
Speaker 2: number of times in a number of reports that have
53:38
Speaker 2: come out. Anybody that talks about it as anything other
53:43
Speaker 2: than a giant money laundering operation is naive. And so
53:49
Speaker 2: of course they're going to go after the people who
53:52
Speaker 2: are talking about that and who are not siding with
53:55
Speaker 2: the US government and who are not just going along
54:00
Speaker 2: with the status quo because they're swaying opinion. And if
54:06
Speaker 2: the public gets upset about the giant money laundering operation,
54:09
Speaker 2: then the public might do something about it, and they
54:12
Speaker 2: will lose their meal ticket. That's why these people are
54:15
Speaker 2: being accused. That's why they're trying to turn it into
54:20
Speaker 2: the illusion of some kind of spying operation, because they
54:26
Speaker 2: might lose their meal ticket. They might lose their money
54:29
Speaker 2: off money laundering operation. That's it.
54:34
Speaker 1: Yeah, all right, Well, and don't forget the you know,
54:40
Speaker 1: the Moloch worshiping ceremonies and the adrino chrome parties that
54:44
Speaker 1: they like to throw but anyway, that's enough of the
54:47
Speaker 1: lizard people only. The last thing I would say is
54:49
Speaker 1: that like the government at least in the States can't
54:52
Speaker 1: like overtly, you know, break the constitution because we're not
54:56
Speaker 1: that weak yet, but they just do it through corporations
54:59
Speaker 1: who are more happy to do it because corporations are
55:03
Speaker 1: you know, also engaging in a beneficial relationship with the state,
55:08
Speaker 1: which is why we live in a fascist government. So anyway,
55:12
Speaker 1: with all that said, though, we are going to go
55:14
Speaker 1: into the Patron Show because I got through it in
55:17
Speaker 1: about an hour, and I think that's a good thing.
55:19
Speaker 1: That's a good thing. So let me see if there's
55:22
Speaker 1: any more super chats and I'll read them or super
55:27
Speaker 1: Child send them through. You guys got a few minutes
55:30
Speaker 1: if you want to make a comment, but I, oh, oh,
55:33
Speaker 1: I already read that. Thank you, Meredith. All right, So
55:36
Speaker 1: with that said, we're gonna look at this article in
55:39
Speaker 1: the Patron Show, which is entitled this from the Daily Mail.
55:43
Speaker 1: I thought it'd be funny and kind of laid back.
55:46
Speaker 1: Jd Vance responds to wild claims migrants are eating pets
55:49
Speaker 1: in Ohio as Trump supporters use AI to say he
55:52
Speaker 1: will save kittens and ducks, and there are some pretty
55:56
Speaker 1: funny and cute AI photos. So we'll be looking at this.
56:00
Speaker 1: And I understand that there's a lot more on Twitter,
56:02
Speaker 1: so I might like go to Twitter and look at more.
56:05
Speaker 1: And if you guys want to send links and you
56:07
Speaker 1: want to be a part of this, well, what would
56:10
Speaker 1: you call it a meme thread that we're making like
56:12
Speaker 1: on the fly live online? Then go to feed the
56:16
Speaker 1: Badger dot com Ford SA, subscribe and join us five
56:20
Speaker 1: bucks a month. We'll get you into the Discord server. Well,
56:22
Speaker 1: you can get into the Discord server for free by
56:24
Speaker 1: going to Badger Nations online, but if you want to
56:27
Speaker 1: have access to the bonus content, you have to become
56:30
Speaker 1: a member. Go to feed the Badger dot com forward
56:33
Speaker 1: slash subscribe to join us, and also see if you
56:36
Speaker 1: can help us get to our first meet up in
56:40
Speaker 1: five years in Canada, Calgary, Alberta. Go to feed the
56:45
Speaker 1: Badger dot com forward slash events. Allison's like, we're gonna
56:50
Speaker 1: be going to her this time, but next year we
56:52
Speaker 1: expect Alison to come stateside again because she was, you know,
56:57
Speaker 1: temporarily suspended. She was grounded from coming to America for
57:02
Speaker 1: five years. But I think that should be over. Actually
57:05
Speaker 1: I think it's it's over because it's been five years
57:07
Speaker 1: to the day, like back in July. But she has Yeah,
57:12
Speaker 1: it's been over five years, a little over five years.
57:15
Speaker 1: So anyway, feed the Badge of dot com forward slash
57:19
Speaker 1: just the tip to send us some mestage, Feed the
57:21
Speaker 1: Badger dot com force to have subscribed, to join us
57:23
Speaker 1: on the discord, and feed the Badger dot com for
57:26
Speaker 1: slash events to help out with the fundraiser, and maybe
57:29
Speaker 1: consider coming out. We're gonna it's gonna be a good time.
57:32
Speaker 1: We're gonna have dinner and hang out and talk in person,
57:35
Speaker 1: so please consider doing that. We're gonna say, Hannah, uh.
57:39
Speaker 2: The is somebody who was mentioning in the chat Hannah
57:41
Speaker 2: versus Haiti. It's none happening in my neighborhood. It's happening
57:45
Speaker 2: in other places outside of my neighborhoods.
57:47
Speaker 1: There's a really small town that has like a gigantic
57:51
Speaker 1: influx of migrants.
57:54
Speaker 2: And they just it's Springfield.
57:56
Speaker 1: Springfield, Yes, Springfield. I think it's got like a population
58:00
Speaker 1: of I don't know, it's a very small population and
58:03
Speaker 1: it's like they're brought in make up a third of
58:07
Speaker 1: the total population.
58:09
Speaker 2: Yeah, so that's that is. That is something that I've
58:12
Speaker 2: been hearing about and I know about. No, it's it's
58:15
Speaker 2: very different in my neighborhood. In my neighborhood, they set
58:18
Speaker 2: up infrastructure here and then sent the immigrants. And when
58:23
Speaker 2: I say they set up infrastructure here and then sent
58:25
Speaker 2: the immigrants, I mean we have a Mexican grocery store
58:28
Speaker 2: within walking distance of my my apartment. Yeah, so we
58:32
Speaker 2: shopped there sometimes. So yeah, they there. It was there
58:36
Speaker 2: were preparations made for the people that were coming to
58:40
Speaker 2: my neighborhood. And uh it looks like families came here
58:44
Speaker 2: for the most part. So very different situation than in Springfield.
58:48
Speaker 2: What happened in Springfield is definitely not something that should
58:52
Speaker 2: have happened anywhere.
58:54
Speaker 1: No, it shouldn't. All right, well anyway, uh so we're
58:57
Speaker 1: gonna end the show there. If you guys like this video,
58:59
Speaker 1: please hit like, subscribe to you're not already subscribe to
59:01
Speaker 1: the bellf notifications, leave us a comment, let us know
59:03
Speaker 1: what you guys think about all of the stories that
59:05
Speaker 1: we talked about today, and please please please share this
59:08
Speaker 1: video because sharing is caring. Thank you so much for
59:11
Speaker 1: coming on today's episode of HBr News and we will
59:14
Speaker 1: talk to you all. Well, we will see you next Tuesday.
59:18
Speaker 1: They tried to kill them. They are machines, dude. Okay,
59:23
Speaker 1: they are literal machines. They are talking point machines. They
59:27
Speaker 1: are impossible to fucking deal with, especially if you have,
59:30
Speaker 1: like especially if you have like a couple dudes who
59:32
Speaker 1: have good memory. On top of that too, holy shit,
59:35
Speaker 1: you're fucked
1:00:00
Speaker 2: Assass