Latest / Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show! / The GENDER CULT Exposed- The Complicity Of Academia And The Medical Establishment

Transcript

The GENDER CULT Exposed- The Complicity Of Academia And The Medical Establishment · Radio Baloney - The Richie Baloney Show!

• 0:03
  Speaker 1: This was posted by Francis Widowson, who is a Canadian
• 0:08
  Speaker 1: professor who was fired for being sane, essentially saying on
• 0:14
  Speaker 1: the unmarked Graves hoax in Canada, recognizing for accurately describing reality.
• 0:21
  Speaker 1: A Mount Royal U course teaches students that WPATH so
• 0:26
  Speaker 1: that's World Professional Association of World Professional Association of Transgender
• 0:32
  Speaker 1: Health boasters science based medicine, and that pushing gender diverse
• 0:39
  Speaker 1: children into making sure they are confident that they are
• 0:43
  Speaker 1: not cis gender is equivalent to pushing cisgender children into
• 0:47
  Speaker 1: being trans. So this person is basically just an avatar
• 0:52
  Speaker 1: for every every parasitized academic that you'll ever see. They're
• 0:59
  Speaker 1: all exactly the same. This person is totally immune to reason,
• 1:03
  Speaker 1: does not recognize any of the incoherence or hypocrisy in
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: her in this three minute clip. Right, they're incapable of
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: recognizing just the irony of their own statement. Of course,
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: there's no benefit to them to do that. So anytime
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: that they might start to have a question or say,
• 1:25
  Speaker 1: wait a second, what I just said ten seconds ago
• 1:28
  Speaker 1: kind of contradicts what I'm saying right now, there's no benefit.
• 1:31
  Speaker 1: There's no profit in that for them, right, they just
• 1:35
  Speaker 1: have to sound far left all the time. That's where
• 1:40
  Speaker 1: the profit is for them. Anything else is just danger
• 1:43
  Speaker 1: because you don't have friends when you're woke, you don't
• 1:46
  Speaker 1: have colleagues when you're woke. You have future denouncers, you
• 1:52
  Speaker 1: have future struggle sessioners. So there's no point questioning. Just
• 1:57
  Speaker 1: go with it. As long as it sounds progressive, you'll
• 2:00
  Speaker 1: be fine. So I highly object to this language. And
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: we're gonna watch this video. Don't worry, but I highly
• 2:09
  Speaker 1: object to this language. The manipulation of language right, cisgender children,
• 2:14
  Speaker 1: cis gender children, There is something that is just inherently
• 2:20
  Speaker 1: degenerate in that they're just children. Cisgender children. They're not trans,
• 2:26
  Speaker 1: They're just children, right, They're just children. This manipulation of
• 2:32
  Speaker 1: language like cisgender right is just to add a false
• 2:37
  Speaker 1: legitimacy to nonsense, too gibberish, to an infinite to the
• 2:42
  Speaker 1: infinite series of abstractions that gender theory is, and that
• 2:46
  Speaker 1: all progressive ideas are. Ultimately so let's take a look here.
• 2:51
  Speaker 2: In twenty seventeen, doctor Richard Green published a legal strategy
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: to circumvent laws and health policies prohibiting gender conversion psychotherapies
• 2:59
  Speaker 2: by simply label such practices as gender identity or gender
• 3:04
  Speaker 2: identity exploration or development. To the opposition, the disapproval of
• 3:08
  Speaker 2: pushing gender diverse children into making sure they're confident they're
• 3:11
  Speaker 2: not cisgender is equivalent to pushing cisgender children into being trans.
• 3:17
  Speaker 1: So just think about this. So here's this is the
• 3:20
  Speaker 1: sentence here, pushing gender diverse children. So it's going off
• 3:26
  Speaker 1: the assumption here that these children are gender diverse, in
• 3:32
  Speaker 1: other words, born in the wrong body, but pushing gender
• 3:35
  Speaker 1: diverse children into making sure that they are confident that
• 3:40
  Speaker 1: they are not cisgender. So that means responsible care. Right,
• 3:44
  Speaker 1: So saying maybe you're not born in the wrong body.
• 3:48
  Speaker 1: Maybe there's some other source of your discomfort. What is
• 3:52
  Speaker 1: happening at? What social media are you looking at? Right?
• 3:56
  Speaker 1: These sorts of interventions, right to say that perhaps perhaps
• 4:01
  Speaker 1: you're not this ludicrous thing, right that doesn't even make sense,
• 4:07
  Speaker 1: this incoherent Perhaps you're not this incoherent idea of being
• 4:11
  Speaker 1: born somehow born in the wrong body. Okay, but that's
• 4:16
  Speaker 1: equivalent So responsible care, right, saye care saying maybe you're
• 4:22
  Speaker 1: not born in the wrong body. Let's explore some alternatives. Okay,
• 4:26
  Speaker 1: according to this person, is equivalent to pushing cisgender children,
• 4:31
  Speaker 1: cisgender children, so just children, right, just children into being trans.
• 4:37
  Speaker 1: So this is totally incoherent. So what they're doing, So
• 4:41
  Speaker 1: the affirming model, the affirming model is the actual conversion therapy,
• 4:47
  Speaker 1: right because you can't disagree with it. So in Canada,
• 4:52
  Speaker 1: for instance, it's in the Human Rights Code. Now in Canada,
• 4:54
  Speaker 1: Trudeau did this, right, so all doctors, all health professionals
• 4:59
  Speaker 1: must immediately affirm gender identity. This is now protected in
• 5:03
  Speaker 1: law in Canada. So if a parent takes their ten
• 5:07
  Speaker 1: year old into a doctor or a counselor or any
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: other health professional and says that my son or my
• 5:14
  Speaker 1: daughter is born in the wrong body, the doctor must
• 5:18
  Speaker 1: immediately affirm that. If the child says I'm born in
• 5:21
  Speaker 1: the wrong body and the parent says, I don't think
• 5:23
  Speaker 1: so I disagree with that, the doctor must affirm it.
• 5:27
  Speaker 1: So anything else would be considered conversion therapy. Ironically, it's
• 5:33
  Speaker 1: tragic irony, right, tragic irony. So the actual conversion therapy
• 5:38
  Speaker 1: is the gender affirming treatment itself. That is how perverse
• 5:43
  Speaker 1: it has become. Let's let her continue here.
• 5:47
  Speaker 2: The sight should have been firmer on their stance here.
• 5:50
  Speaker 2: Conversion therapy increases psychological distress and suicide attempts and should
• 5:54
  Speaker 2: be banned, plain and simple, which it is particularly around.
• 5:59
  Speaker 1: So again, not immediately affirming this really just this kind
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: of abstraction, this idea that a child is born in
• 6:08
  Speaker 1: the wrong body, this redefinition of gender into this series
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: of infinite abstractions. None of this actually more to reality
• 6:16
  Speaker 1: in any way, right, but just simply not immediately affirming
• 6:21
  Speaker 1: and saying yes, five year old, yes, ten year old, yes,
• 6:24
  Speaker 1: thirteen year old, you're born in the wrong body, and
• 6:27
  Speaker 1: now we need to permanently medicalize you or to this
• 6:31
  Speaker 1: crazy person's mind, that's not conversion therapy, right, that's that's
• 6:35
  Speaker 1: let's just continue.
• 6:39
  Speaker 2: Sexuality in many places in the US and Canada. That
• 6:41
  Speaker 2: is no conversion therapy for homosexually categorize people. The same
• 6:49
  Speaker 2: should be for trans people affirming interventions.
• 6:53
  Speaker 1: And she's talking about children here, children, right, you could
• 6:57
  Speaker 1: you should not be able to counsel a child that
• 7:01
  Speaker 1: perhaps they're not born in the wrong body. It's hard
• 7:04
  Speaker 1: to believe. I have to keep restating this, but you
• 7:07
  Speaker 1: are not allowed to counsel a child that they might
• 7:11
  Speaker 1: not be born in the wrong body, and maybe there's
• 7:13
  Speaker 1: something else involved. And in many cases here there has
• 7:17
  Speaker 1: been abuse. A lot of them are autistic. That would
• 7:21
  Speaker 1: be the responsible thing to do, as opposed to permanently
• 7:24
  Speaker 1: medicalizing them, sterilizing them, mutilating them, et cetera.
• 7:28
  Speaker 2: Prove mental health, promo well being, and mitigate anti trends stigma. Additionally,
• 7:32
  Speaker 2: it would have been helpful for the SoC eight to
• 7:34
  Speaker 2: include a discussion of the dangers of disaffirming therapy, including
• 7:38
  Speaker 2: gender exploratory therapy. Statement seven point five in the SEC
• 7:43
  Speaker 2: condemns any efforts to discourage a child's gender diverse expressions
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: or identity. Those in the trends health field practice gender
• 7:50
  Speaker 2: affirming informed consent care in the framework of science based medicine,
• 7:56
  Speaker 2: as as bolstered by the WPATH SC.
• 7:59
  Speaker 1: Eight bolstered by w PATH Associate. So Standards of Care eight.
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: We're going to get to WPATH. Okay, we're going to
• 8:08
  Speaker 1: get to them. Because there was a big leak I
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: made a video about this o'hilio, a big leak of
• 8:11
  Speaker 1: their internal documents which proves everything she is saying is false.
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: And what did she say there?
• 8:18
  Speaker 2: Affirming interventions improve mental health, promo well being, and mitigate
• 8:21
  Speaker 2: anti trends stigma. Additionally, it would have been helpful for
• 8:25
  Speaker 2: the SEC eight to include a discussion of the dangers
• 8:27
  Speaker 2: of disaffirming therapy, including gender exploratory therapy statement seven points.
• 8:33
  Speaker 1: So disaffirming would be just like, maybe you're not born
• 8:37
  Speaker 1: in the wrong body. Maybe ten year olds don't actually
• 8:40
  Speaker 1: know that. Maybe ten year olds don't know what it's
• 8:43
  Speaker 1: like to develop into a healthy adult body, So therefore
• 8:48
  Speaker 1: they cannot possibly give informed consent on any of this,
• 8:52
  Speaker 1: you know, maybe maybe some saying stuff. Anyway, let's continue.
• 8:55
  Speaker 2: Informed consent care in the framework of science based medicine
• 9:00
  Speaker 2: as bold as bolstered by the WPATH SoC.
• 9:03
  Speaker 1: Eight its boltsters, as we'll find out, not bolstered so much, actually,
• 9:08
  Speaker 1: but let's continue.
• 9:09
  Speaker 2: Are the WPATH SoC eight perfect? No, they are not.
• 9:13
  Speaker 2: Are they intended to be rigid, immovable and followed without question.
• 9:17
  Speaker 2: That would be unscientific. The SoC eight are best or
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: promising practices meant to evolve as science evolves and new
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: research develops and adapts to individual clinical situations. We're learning
• 9:29
  Speaker 2: more about gender all the time, so they should not
• 9:31
  Speaker 2: be frozen in time yet.
• 9:34
  Speaker 1: Any suggestion that any child is not born in the
• 9:38
  Speaker 1: wrong body is wrong. That's conversion therapy, according to her.
• 9:43
  Speaker 1: So which is it? You can't have both? You see
• 9:45
  Speaker 1: what I mean when I say it's total in coherence.
• 9:47
  Speaker 1: They don't notice it. They don't notice. The irony in
• 9:51
  Speaker 1: their own statements is that they don't notice, they don't
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: want to notice. Is it some combination of both? Okay,
• 9:57
  Speaker 1: so it's fluid, it's movable. So that's basically we don't
• 10:02
  Speaker 1: know anything. We don't actually know what we're doing. But
• 10:04
  Speaker 1: what we do know is that five year old is
• 10:06
  Speaker 1: definitely born in the wrong body, that that thirteen year
• 10:09
  Speaker 1: old definitely needs a double mistectomy. But it's fluid and evolving,
• 10:13
  Speaker 1: because that's science. Well, what it really means is you
• 10:16
  Speaker 1: don't know what the hell you're doing. As we'll see
• 10:18
  Speaker 1: in the w path files, the leaked files. That's what
• 10:21
  Speaker 1: it really means. Right, So perhaps then perhaps what would
• 10:26
  Speaker 1: be saying is to say, Okay, maybe the gender affirming
• 10:31
  Speaker 1: model is wrong, considering we don't know what we're doing.
• 10:34
  Speaker 1: Maybe we're making some terrible mistakes here. No, none of that.
• 10:38
  Speaker 1: They want the bust. They want. They want to have
• 10:40
  Speaker 1: their cake and eat it too.
• 10:42
  Speaker 2: Overall, the SC eight guidelines are a step in the
• 10:44
  Speaker 2: right direction. The endorse informed consent, gender affirming care forger.
• 10:49
  Speaker 1: As we will see.
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: No, they don't under incongruence, which is notable as not
• 10:54
  Speaker 2: every TRENS person experiences gender dysphoria.
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: Just listen to that, Not every trans person experiences gender dysphoria.
• 11:03
  Speaker 1: Just think about that, like, this is two minutes. Okay,
• 11:07
  Speaker 1: in two minutes, she is fit a lifetime's worth of
• 11:12
  Speaker 1: lunacy of a scientific gibberish. She's fit that into just
• 11:16
  Speaker 1: two minutes here, right, this is only a three minute
• 11:19
  Speaker 1: long clip. Not all trans people experience gender dysphoria. How
• 11:24
  Speaker 1: does that even make sense? Well, it doesn't obviously. Again,
• 11:27
  Speaker 1: I use the word incoherent very intentionally, and.
• 11:32
  Speaker 2: Dispense with arbitrary gatekeeping such as a's age based guidelines.
• 11:37
  Speaker 2: The Associate eight edition is at its most robust when
• 11:40
  Speaker 2: it's she.
• 11:41
  Speaker 1: Calls she calls age based guidelines arbitrary, arbitrary. Children and
• 11:48
  Speaker 1: adults are different. Children have not grown, they have not
• 11:52
  Speaker 1: grown into their fully developed human body and brain. Yet
• 11:57
  Speaker 1: it's not arbitrary. Any idiot, any sane person, anybody with
• 12:02
  Speaker 1: the slightest bit of decency, because I think that's what
• 12:05
  Speaker 1: this comes down to. Can clearly see that how many
• 12:09
  Speaker 1: times do I have to say incoherent.
• 12:11
  Speaker 2: So why it has flexible guidelines for care? What critics
• 12:15
  Speaker 2: explicitly object to in the Associate eight is that this
• 12:18
  Speaker 2: latest edition doesn't advance efforts to keep care. That is because,
• 12:22
  Speaker 2: regardless of the claims otherwise, those opposed to transcre aim
• 12:25
  Speaker 2: to vilify trans people de legitimized.
• 12:28
  Speaker 1: True. So here you go. So if you have any questions, right,
• 12:31
  Speaker 1: if you say, well, maybe the ten year olds actually
• 12:34
  Speaker 1: can't give informed consent for the medical experiments that you
• 12:37
  Speaker 1: want to do on them, that's vilifying trans people, right,
• 12:41
  Speaker 1: which this is the this is the across the board
• 12:45
  Speaker 1: tactic of the modern left. They're all connected. I can
• 12:48
  Speaker 1: guarantee you this. This woman is a Marxist, I guarantee it.
• 12:51
  Speaker 1: What are the chances ninety nine point ninety nine? Any
• 12:56
  Speaker 1: question is a vilification. We see this in every field,
• 13:00
  Speaker 1: every question, everywhere.
• 13:02
  Speaker 2: Frans medicine and put a full stop to any provision
• 13:05
  Speaker 2: of gender affirming healthcare, not to improve gender affirming care
• 13:08
  Speaker 2: based on science. Okay, we're rounding in.
• 13:12
  Speaker 1: On So these are the people like this is a professor. Okay,
• 13:16
  Speaker 1: this is a professor. This person should not be teaching anybody.
• 13:19
  Speaker 1: This is just a crazy person and non none too bright,
• 13:23
  Speaker 1: I will add, okay. W PATH files, So thousands of
• 13:28
  Speaker 1: files were released from w PATH, the World Professional Association
• 13:32
  Speaker 1: of Transgender Health. Now this is the authority, the health
• 13:37
  Speaker 1: authority that all of the other authorities appeal to. So
• 13:40
  Speaker 1: the AMA, the Indocrine Society, they all just have totally
• 13:44
  Speaker 1: abdicated their responsibility and giving it over to WPATH, Right,
• 13:50
  Speaker 1: so I think they fit. It kind of erases or
• 13:53
  Speaker 1: they feel that it erases their complicity, right because they
• 13:56
  Speaker 1: can say, well, we're just going along with the WPATH guidelines.
• 14:00
  Speaker 1: I mean they're the experts on it, so we just
• 14:01
  Speaker 1: follow that. Oh you're still complicit though, indocrin Society, AMA,
• 14:06
  Speaker 1: all of you, Oh you are. W PATH files from
• 14:10
  Speaker 1: Michael Schellenberger. Advocates of gender affirming care say it's evidence based.
• 14:16
  Speaker 1: No it's not. But now newly released internal files. But now,
• 14:22
  Speaker 1: newly released internal files from the World Professional Association of
• 14:26
  Speaker 1: Transgender Health w PATH proved that the practice of transgender
• 14:30
  Speaker 1: medicine is neither scientific nor medical. American Medical Association Indocrine Society,
• 14:37
  Speaker 1: the American Academy of Pediatrics, and thousands of doctors worldwide
• 14:43
  Speaker 1: rely on WPATH. It is considered the leading global authority
• 14:48
  Speaker 1: on gender medicine, and by appealing to them, they wash
• 14:52
  Speaker 1: themselves of any guilt. And yet w paths internal files,
• 14:56
  Speaker 1: which include written discussions and video, reveal that its members
• 15:01
  Speaker 1: know that they are creating victims and not getting informed consent.
• 15:06
  Speaker 1: Victims include a ten year old girl, a thirteen year
• 15:08
  Speaker 1: old developmentally delayed adolescent, individuals suffering from schizophrenia and other
• 15:15
  Speaker 1: serious mental illnesses. So the affirming model means that all
• 15:22
  Speaker 1: of them, regardless of the circumstances, if they say they're
• 15:25
  Speaker 1: born in the wrong body, you have to affirm it,
• 15:28
  Speaker 1: and anything else is a conversion therapy, which is insane.
• 15:33
  Speaker 1: The injuries described in the w PATH files include sterilization,
• 15:37
  Speaker 1: loss of sexual function, liver tumors, and death. W PATH
• 15:44
  Speaker 1: members indicate repeatedly that they know that many children and
• 15:47
  Speaker 1: their parents don't understand the effects that puberty blockers, hormones,
• 15:51
  Speaker 1: and surgeries will have on their bodies, and yet they
• 15:54
  Speaker 1: continue to perform and advocate for gender medicine. So this
• 16:00
  Speaker 1: is the really grotesque part, but it just simply is
• 16:04
  Speaker 1: a hallmark of modern leftism, of ideological capture, is that
• 16:09
  Speaker 1: even when they know what they're doing doesn't make sense,
• 16:12
  Speaker 1: they can't stop. They can't stop because they're in this
• 16:17
  Speaker 1: bubble of their own creation. And if they were to
• 16:20
  Speaker 1: question any of it, the people around them will immediately
• 16:24
  Speaker 1: struggle session them. They'll lose their jobs, they will be harassed.
• 16:29
  Speaker 1: You can't do it. You have to continue with the lie,
• 16:33
  Speaker 1: even if it's hurting children. The Wpath files prove that
• 16:37
  Speaker 1: gender medicine is comprised of unregulated and pseudo scientific experiments
• 16:42
  Speaker 1: on children, adolescents, and vulnerable adults that will go down
• 16:46
  Speaker 1: as one of the worst medical scandals in history. Who
• 16:50
  Speaker 1: would have guessed that the cure for or treatment for
• 16:54
  Speaker 1: childhood depression and confusion wouldn't be sterilizing and mutilating them.
• 17:02
  Speaker 1: That would not be a productive treatment. Who could have
• 17:06
  Speaker 1: guessed that? All right, let's get into it. So what
• 17:09
  Speaker 1: is this guy saying? So talking about informed consent? Right,
• 17:13
  Speaker 1: let's take a look.
• 17:14
  Speaker 3: And I think the thing, if you remember about kids,
• 17:17
  Speaker 3: is that we're often explaining these sorts of things to
• 17:19
  Speaker 3: people who haven't even had biology in high school yet.
• 17:21
  Speaker 3: And and and I know I've heard others in this
• 17:26
  Speaker 3: kind of a in this kind of a studying and say, well,
• 17:28
  Speaker 3: we think adults are like really slick biologically even picked
• 17:31
  Speaker 3: lots of people have very little medical understanding of stuff
• 17:35
  Speaker 3: like that. We just put medical professionals and mental health
• 17:38
  Speaker 3: professionals take for granted. But I don't know still what
• 17:41
  Speaker 3: to do for the fourteen year olds. The parents have
• 17:43
  Speaker 3: it on their minds, but the fourteen year old, you
• 17:45
  Speaker 3: just it's like talking with diabetic complications with a fourteen
• 17:48
  Speaker 3: year old.
• 17:48
  Speaker 1: They don't care.
• 17:49
  Speaker 3: They're not going to die there, They're going to live forever. Right,
• 17:51
  Speaker 3: So I think, I think when we're doing in form consent,
• 17:55
  Speaker 3: I know that that's still a big lacuna. And I
• 17:57
  Speaker 3: think the thing if you remember.
• 17:58
  Speaker 1: About they just admitting it farm consent is a big lacuna.
• 18:04
  Speaker 1: These are leaked. These are leaked zoom meetings from w Path.
• 18:08
  Speaker 1: You can see here Wpath, right, nobody was supposed to
• 18:12
  Speaker 1: see this, all right, Let's go down a bit further
• 18:15
  Speaker 1: here and you can see there's tons, there's thousands of files. Right,
• 18:18
  Speaker 1: here's another one. It's out of their developmental range. Sometimes
• 18:23
  Speaker 1: to understand the extent to it some of these medical
• 18:25
  Speaker 1: interventions are impacting them, yet they do it anyway, they
• 18:29
  Speaker 1: continue doing it anyway. Think of how all of these
• 18:34
  Speaker 1: people should be sued into oblivion and frankly, if there's
• 18:37
  Speaker 1: any justice sent to prison.
• 18:39
  Speaker 4: I just wanted to piggyback on all of the importance
• 18:43
  Speaker 4: that comes up with the informed consent issues. I often
• 18:49
  Speaker 4: see people who because there's such a backlog of therapists
• 18:56
  Speaker 4: to do some of the mental health therapeutic support, I
• 19:02
  Speaker 4: often see people who have already engaged in some sort
• 19:05
  Speaker 4: of and this is again with youth who've already engaged
• 19:08
  Speaker 4: in some.
• 19:09
  Speaker 2: Sort of medical.
• 19:11
  Speaker 4: Intervention. And so one of the things I do is
• 19:14
  Speaker 4: I just kind of I'm sitting with the youth and
• 19:16
  Speaker 4: their parents, and I say, oh, well, so tell me
• 19:18
  Speaker 4: more about what you know about that medical intervention. And
• 19:22
  Speaker 4: kind of like what Dan was saying, you know, children
• 19:25
  Speaker 4: and young adolescents, we wouldn't really expect them. It's kind
• 19:29
  Speaker 4: of a developmental it's out of their developmental range. Sometimes
• 19:33
  Speaker 4: to understand the extent to which some of these medical
• 19:36
  Speaker 4: interventions are impacting them.
• 19:39
  Speaker 2: We do it.
• 19:40
  Speaker 3: We try to talk about it till most of the
• 19:41
  Speaker 3: kids are nowhere in any kind of a brain space
• 19:44
  Speaker 3: to really really really talk about it in a serious way.
• 19:48
  Speaker 3: That's always bothered me. But you know, we still want
• 19:52
  Speaker 3: the kids to be happy, happier in the moment, right.
• 19:55
  Speaker 1: So they don't understand what's going to happen to them,
• 19:58
  Speaker 1: but you want That's always bothered him, by the way
• 20:00
  Speaker 1: he says, But he wants them to be happy in
• 20:02
  Speaker 1: the moment. Just think about how evil that is. Right,
• 20:06
  Speaker 1: this is what we're seeing here is evil. Right. They're
• 20:08
  Speaker 1: not putting out press releases warning people about this. Right,
• 20:12
  Speaker 1: they're just going ahead, blithly, going ahead with these medical
• 20:16
  Speaker 1: experiments on children. This is what's happening behind the scenes. Right,
• 20:21
  Speaker 1: Are they having these frank discussions with the parents. It
• 20:24
  Speaker 1: sounds like they're not really. It sounds like they're just
• 20:28
  Speaker 1: going along with it. Well, they can't really give informed consent,
• 20:31
  Speaker 1: that's a problem, but we're going to do it anyway.
• 20:34
  Speaker 1: They just keep doing it. Many parents don't understand what
• 20:38
  Speaker 1: will happen to their children. Like the first the first
• 20:43
  Speaker 1: leaked Zoom message here should have just put an end
• 20:45
  Speaker 1: to wpath right from the start, Right, there should have
• 20:48
  Speaker 1: immediately been huge expose a's on Like every channel, every
• 20:53
  Speaker 1: newspaper nothing. Why is that ideological capture? Obviously the same
• 20:58
  Speaker 1: reason that these people just keep doing what they're doing
• 21:03
  Speaker 1: even though they know that they know that there's serious problems,
• 21:07
  Speaker 1: And well, I tried, and that it's in fact an ethic,
• 21:10
  Speaker 1: completely obviously unethical.
• 21:13
  Speaker 4: I try to kind of do whatever I can to
• 21:15
  Speaker 4: help them understand the best I can. But what really
• 21:18
  Speaker 4: disturbs me is when the parents can't tell me what
• 21:24
  Speaker 4: they need to know about a medical intervention that apparently
• 21:28
  Speaker 4: they signed off for.
• 21:31
  Speaker 1: Well, maybe if it disturbs you, you shouldn't do it.
• 21:34
  Speaker 1: How about that. Here's one that's really disturbing. So here's
• 21:39
  Speaker 1: another leak document, Internal communication ethical inquiry in a developmentally
• 21:46
  Speaker 1: delayed thirteen year old adolescent. That's where it should stop
• 21:50
  Speaker 1: right there, obviously right right there. But in a developmentally
• 21:55
  Speaker 1: in a developmentally delayed thirteen year old adolescent currently on
• 22:00
  Speaker 1: pubertal suppression, they may not reach the emotional and cognitive
• 22:04
  Speaker 1: development bar set by the standards of care within the
• 22:07
  Speaker 1: typical adolescent time frame, if at all. What is the
• 22:12
  Speaker 1: ethical approach to care the adolescent? This demonstrates the emotional
• 22:16
  Speaker 1: and cognitive maturity required to provide informed consent assent for
• 22:20
  Speaker 1: the treatment. So never never, Like you've already got a
• 22:25
  Speaker 1: developmentally delayed thirteen year old on puberty blockers, right, So
• 22:30
  Speaker 1: that means that child is never going to grow into
• 22:32
  Speaker 1: a fully developed, health fully developed, healthy adult body, right
• 22:38
  Speaker 1: because you don't whatever part of your puberty has been blocked,
• 22:43
  Speaker 1: you're never getting back. I just think about how demented
• 22:47
  Speaker 1: this is. Does this sound like science? Does this sound
• 22:49
  Speaker 1: like this is based on rigorous science to you? Or
• 22:53
  Speaker 1: does it sound like they're just making it up as
• 22:55
  Speaker 1: they go along. They're clearly just making it up as
• 22:59
  Speaker 1: they go along. There is no scientific rigor here. This
• 23:02
  Speaker 1: is pseudoscience. Right. These are a bunch of lunatics. How
• 23:08
  Speaker 1: about this one? So one of one of this doctor's
• 23:11
  Speaker 1: former patients is asking you about whether or not they'll
• 23:15
  Speaker 1: be able to start a family. Well, let's hear.
• 23:18
  Speaker 3: And I think now that I follow a lot of
• 23:20
  Speaker 3: kids into their mid twenties, I'm always like, oh, the
• 23:22
  Speaker 3: dog isn't doing it for you? Right? Yeah, they're like, no,
• 23:25
  Speaker 3: I just found this, you know, wonderful partner, and now
• 23:28
  Speaker 3: we're kids, And so I think, you know, it doesn't
• 23:31
  Speaker 3: surprise me. And I think now that I follow a
• 23:34
  Speaker 3: lot of kids.
• 23:34
  Speaker 1: Another so the dog's not doing it for you. Obviously
• 23:39
  Speaker 1: a patient who didn't understand what was happening to them,
• 23:43
  Speaker 1: and it just it goes on and on. Right, This
• 23:47
  Speaker 1: is this is as hard to believe as it may be.
• 23:51
  Speaker 1: If you want to see more, go more in depth
• 23:54
  Speaker 1: on this, find my video. Just type in radio Beloney
• 23:57
  Speaker 1: Wpath You should be able to find it. But we
• 24:00
  Speaker 1: see how grotesque it is that American Medical Association, Endocrine Society,
• 24:08
  Speaker 1: the American Academy of Pediatrics, thousands of doctors worldwide appealing
• 24:14
  Speaker 1: to W Path as the authority above all authorities. It's
• 24:19
  Speaker 1: a clown show, right, It's it's just this chaotic U charade.
• 24:25
  Speaker 1: It's it's there is no scientific rigor involved in this.
• 24:28
  Speaker 1: Are these are ideologues making it up as they go
• 24:33
  Speaker 1: along and just deceiving the world. At some point, these
• 24:38
  Speaker 1: these associations, these medical associations, uh will just simply have
• 24:43
  Speaker 1: to I think it'll be lawsuits that makes it happen.
• 24:46
  Speaker 1: And again they've kind of washed responsibility from themselves by saying, well, no,
• 24:50
  Speaker 1: we're just doing you know, the standards of care from
• 24:53
  Speaker 1: W PATH and they are the experts on this, but
• 24:56
  Speaker 1: it'll be lawsuits that brings us all to an end.
• 24:58
  Speaker 1: It's always money, It's always money. And so you see,
• 25:03
  Speaker 1: like here's a professor, right, and this they're one of thousands,
• 25:08
  Speaker 1: one of thousands. Essentially, it's not even teaching preaching this, right.
• 25:12
  Speaker 1: We went through how many incoherencies? How many contradictions were
• 25:17
  Speaker 1: just in this three minutes? Right? Half a dozen? Like
• 25:20
  Speaker 1: none of it makes any sense? Does this person understand
• 25:23
  Speaker 1: that none of it makes any sense? Does this person
• 25:26
  Speaker 1: ever kind to catch themselves and saying, well, wait a second,
• 25:28
  Speaker 1: I just said something contradictory ten seconds ago. I don't know,
• 25:32
  Speaker 1: but this is a problem, right. This isn't just crazy
• 25:35
  Speaker 1: college kids with crazy commy ideas at Berkeley anymore. Now,
• 25:40
  Speaker 1: this is a real world. This has happened to real,
• 25:42
  Speaker 1: real children, right, And also too, there are vulnerable adults
• 25:47
  Speaker 1: that have been pushed into this that essentially, you know,
• 25:50
  Speaker 1: the the real conversion therapy, which is what this is.
• 25:56
  Speaker 1: So Francis Widowson, I would follow her if you're interested
• 26:00
  Speaker 1: in this stuff, because she's she's very good, especially if
• 26:03
  Speaker 1: you're interested in the Unmarked Graves hoax. Anyway, that's all
• 26:09
  Speaker 1: I'm going to say about that, please like, share, and subscribe.
• 26:12
  Speaker 1: Subscribing really helps me out. I thank you for that.
• 26:15
  Speaker 1: I will see you next time.