Latest / 360 with Katie Woolf / Jed Hansen on why he quit the CLP to run as an independent candidate for the seat of Solomon

Transcript

Jed Hansen on why he quit the CLP to run as an independent candidate for the seat of Solomon · 360 with Katie Woolf

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: Now. Yesterday, the COLPS vice president, Jed Hanson not only
• 0:04
  Speaker 1: resigned from the Country Country Liberal Party, but he also
• 0:07
  Speaker 1: expressed his plans to run for the seat of Solomon
• 0:10
  Speaker 1: as an independent. He said that he didn't have much
• 0:13
  Speaker 1: faith in the colp's pre selected candidate to run for
• 0:17
  Speaker 1: the seat, and he joins me in the studio right now.
• 0:20
  Speaker 1: Good morning to you, Jed. Morning, Thanks so much for
• 0:23
  Speaker 1: your time this morning. Now, Jed, why did you quit
• 0:25
  Speaker 1: the Country Liberal Party?
• 0:26
  Speaker 2: Well, as I was saying to you before, the reality
• 0:28
  Speaker 2: was I felt that when I joined the party, the
• 0:30
  Speaker 2: party had core intrinsic values such as small government, low taxes,
• 0:35
  Speaker 2: the rights of individual freedoms, small business, so on and
• 0:38
  Speaker 2: so forth. And I think somewhere along the line, I
• 0:41
  Speaker 2: think that those values have been lost, and what happened
• 0:44
  Speaker 2: was recently I feel like the party.
• 0:47
  Speaker 3: Itself has moved off them.
• 0:50
  Speaker 2: And for me personally, I still stick to those values individualism,
• 0:55
  Speaker 2: small business, tax low taxation, and I just couldn't. I
• 1:01
  Speaker 2: couldn't see the the tree.
• 1:04
  Speaker 3: Through the forest.
• 1:05
  Speaker 2: I just I couldn't agree with the party platform that
• 1:07
  Speaker 2: had moved off it.
• 1:09
  Speaker 1: It's a big call to quit the CLP. And then
• 1:11
  Speaker 1: decide that you're going to run against the person that's
• 1:14
  Speaker 1: been pre selected for the CLP, particularly presumably when you
• 1:19
  Speaker 1: were well you were the vice president when she was
• 1:22
  Speaker 1: pre selected.
• 1:23
  Speaker 3: No, I wasn't. Actually I joined them.
• 1:25
  Speaker 2: I joined the management team in October and she'd been
• 1:28
  Speaker 2: pre selected back in June. So I came on board
• 1:30
  Speaker 2: after she'd already been pre selected. But it's not me
• 1:32
  Speaker 2: running against Temam Farm. It's me running against the incumbent,
• 1:35
  Speaker 2: which is Love Gosling.
• 1:36
  Speaker 1: So this season't sort of a decision that you've made
• 1:39
  Speaker 1: in an effort to split the Conservative vote. No.
• 1:42
  Speaker 2: I think when I look at the ineffectiveness of the incumbent,
• 1:46
  Speaker 2: which is mister Gosling, I don't think he's done much
• 1:49
  Speaker 2: in his position of the last in the last term.
• 1:51
  Speaker 2: I don't think the other candidates, even from the CLP,
• 1:56
  Speaker 2: are going to do the job that they that is
• 1:59
  Speaker 2: respectful to the territorians.
• 2:00
  Speaker 3: I just don't see it.
• 2:02
  Speaker 1: Did you put your hand up for pre selection for
• 2:04
  Speaker 1: the seed of solvment for the Seal Peak. No, so
• 2:06
  Speaker 1: it wasn't something that you wanted to do previously.
• 2:08
  Speaker 2: No. I've always been focused on local territory issues. Local
• 2:11
  Speaker 2: territory politics. But when you're looking at a lot of
• 2:16
  Speaker 2: the malfeasance and wrongdoing that's happening at the territory level,
• 2:19
  Speaker 2: at the local level, one of the roles of a
• 2:23
  Speaker 2: federal member is to form select committees or committees in
• 2:27
  Speaker 2: general to investigate wrongdoing. One of the wrongdoings is like
• 2:31
  Speaker 2: misspending of money. If you've got issues like the turf club,
• 2:37
  Speaker 2: which was improperly handled. When you've got money like the
• 2:40
  Speaker 2: water bottling fiasco that happened many years ago, the money
• 2:44
  Speaker 2: that went from the sale of TiO into Infrastructure Development
• 2:47
  Speaker 2: fund and that just sort of disappeared. Those are wrong
• 2:51
  Speaker 2: doings by the government, mishandling of money, and the only
• 2:55
  Speaker 2: way to see accountability is by having a select committee
• 3:00
  Speaker 2: investigate those problems.
• 3:01
  Speaker 1: And so do you feel as though the CLP hasn't
• 3:04
  Speaker 1: tried to have like a select committee to be able
• 3:07
  Speaker 1: to do those things, or I'm just trying to put
• 3:09
  Speaker 1: those two issues together.
• 3:11
  Speaker 3: I think that's I think the CLP has attempted to.
• 3:13
  Speaker 2: But when you've got the incumbent who is labor, and
• 3:16
  Speaker 2: then you've got the local government which is labor and
• 3:19
  Speaker 2: the Iyekak being rather ineffective, it's sort of like a
• 3:22
  Speaker 2: whole group of ineffective parties. And then you've got like
• 3:27
  Speaker 2: you go back a couple of years and you look
• 3:28
  Speaker 2: at the John Langolant report. He spoke about the malfeasans,
• 3:31
  Speaker 2: he spoke about the misspendings. It's just been a whole
• 3:36
  Speaker 2: series of unfortunate events and people in the wrong position
• 3:38
  Speaker 2: doing the wrong thing.
• 3:39
  Speaker 1: I guess what I'm trying to ask, so is what
• 3:41
  Speaker 1: has that got to do with you quitting the COLP.
• 3:44
  Speaker 2: I Well, for me, it was, as I said, it
• 3:46
  Speaker 2: goes back to those values. I felt that the CLP
• 3:48
  Speaker 2: had moved off their core values. And this is also
• 3:51
  Speaker 2: surrounding the demandate. It was basically, you don't get to
• 3:57
  Speaker 2: surrender values for political expediency.
• 4:00
  Speaker 1: And so is it those other issues or is it
• 4:02
  Speaker 1: the mandate they make you?
• 4:04
  Speaker 3: Really mandate was one.
• 4:05
  Speaker 2: But then at the Central Council, which happened at the
• 4:07
  Speaker 2: end of February, there was a lot of leaking to
• 4:09
  Speaker 2: the media. Now it's a confidential meeting where debate happens
• 4:13
  Speaker 2: with party members in regards to platform and policy and direction,
• 4:17
  Speaker 2: and what was happening was that inside that it was
• 4:20
  Speaker 2: like having it might as well invited the NT News
• 4:22
  Speaker 2: and the ABC to sit in the room with us
• 4:25
  Speaker 2: to see what was going on.
• 4:27
  Speaker 1: So, what do you reckon was happening? Like people obviously
• 4:29
  Speaker 1: members of that Central Council meeting were just leaking straight
• 4:33
  Speaker 1: away to the media.
• 4:34
  Speaker 3: Were there were votes that were happening on the floor.
• 4:36
  Speaker 2: And these are sort of privileged votes, confidential votes that
• 4:39
  Speaker 2: secret but essentially confidential balloting.
• 4:42
  Speaker 3: Whereby you're not supposed to know who is voting.
• 4:45
  Speaker 2: And or the actual total counts because they're confidential. And
• 4:49
  Speaker 2: then I was reading it in the NT News whilst
• 4:51
  Speaker 2: I was sitting in the room, So that sort of
• 4:54
  Speaker 2: speaks to me that there's an immeasurable amount of lack
• 4:58
  Speaker 2: or lack of trust, and there's also a lack of
• 5:01
  Speaker 2: respect because what we're seeing is that the party is
• 5:04
  Speaker 2: not standing up beside their own members and they're a
• 5:08
  Speaker 2: maligning character and it's not good.
• 5:10
  Speaker 1: So, Jed, do you think I mean, has the COLP
• 5:13
  Speaker 1: got an issue here in terms of the management side
• 5:15
  Speaker 1: of things?
• 5:16
  Speaker 2: Well, I think that's sort of indicative because Jamie and
• 5:19
  Speaker 2: Ronnie stepped aside only after being re elected as president
• 5:24
  Speaker 2: in October.
• 5:26
  Speaker 3: There were issues, there were.
• 5:27
  Speaker 2: Concerns in regards to the Solomon candidate, there were votes
• 5:30
  Speaker 2: that were happening. So essentially how it works as a
• 5:34
  Speaker 2: platform as a framework, positions are put forward, motions are
• 5:38
  Speaker 2: put forward, and they're voted on, and then what we
• 5:41
  Speaker 2: were seeing was that they were getting rolled back shortly
• 5:45
  Speaker 2: thereafter they were happening because things weren't working the way
• 5:48
  Speaker 2: they wanted to.
• 5:49
  Speaker 3: And it was just it was bizarre.
• 5:52
  Speaker 2: I've never in seventeen years and the party, I've never
• 5:54
  Speaker 2: seen the party act so disorganized or I've never seen
• 6:00
  Speaker 2: it before.
• 6:00
  Speaker 1: And I guess there'll be some people listening thinking to themselves.
• 6:03
  Speaker 1: So you know, you were the vice president as well
• 6:05
  Speaker 1: at the time from October until now, If you're really
• 6:07
  Speaker 1: worried about the way in which those things were being managed,
• 6:09
  Speaker 1: wasn't that partly you know, up to you as well
• 6:12
  Speaker 1: to manage Well.
• 6:12
  Speaker 2: The thing is when you have those management meetings, those
• 6:16
  Speaker 2: at the higher up to manage the direction of the party,
• 6:19
  Speaker 2: you'd speak to all the party members. You're trying to
• 6:21
  Speaker 2: get a sort of some sort of consensus on how
• 6:23
  Speaker 2: we're going to do it. And then what was happening
• 6:25
  Speaker 2: was then it would open up to discussion.
• 6:29
  Speaker 3: And then.
• 6:31
  Speaker 2: Sometimes you'd have a person invited on, or we'd have
• 6:34
  Speaker 2: a parliamentarian come in and that hijacket and it would
• 6:37
  Speaker 2: basically go off on a tangent, and substantive changes that
• 6:41
  Speaker 2: we were trying to get done were basically being pushed aside.
• 6:46
  Speaker 2: And you sit there as one person in the management
• 6:48
  Speaker 2: team of fifteen and you sit there going, well, hold on,
• 6:52
  Speaker 2: the President was agreeing with me in a phone conversation
• 6:54
  Speaker 2: before the meeting took place, and then in the management
• 6:57
  Speaker 2: meeting he has gone against me.
• 7:00
  Speaker 1: It sounds like there is just correct me if I'm wrong,
• 7:03
  Speaker 1: But you know, a lot of internal rumblings.
• 7:05
  Speaker 2: It's I think what it comes down to is when
• 7:08
  Speaker 2: you've got to because the way that party is structured
• 7:10
  Speaker 2: is that you've got the party itself and then you've
• 7:12
  Speaker 2: got the parliamentary ring. Now the parliamentary ring doesn't necessarily
• 7:16
  Speaker 2: they're the arms and legs of the party. So the
• 7:18
  Speaker 2: party votes on policy and platform and the parliamentarians enact it. Now,
• 7:23
  Speaker 2: when the when the party is basically pushed around by
• 7:27
  Speaker 2: the parliamentarians, the party becomes less effective.
• 7:31
  Speaker 1: Look, I guess so again some people listening will be
• 7:34
  Speaker 1: thinking to themselves, well, I didn't elect the party. I
• 7:36
  Speaker 1: elected those parliamentarians and if they're not listening to the
• 7:39
  Speaker 1: views of territorians, if they're only listening to the party,
• 7:42
  Speaker 1: then are they doing their jobs well?
• 7:44
  Speaker 2: When it comes to party and parliamentarians, there is a
• 7:47
  Speaker 2: connection of communication. And what happens is if you've got
• 7:51
  Speaker 2: all it takes is a few bad people in a
• 7:54
  Speaker 2: party to disrupt the workings of the machine, and that
• 8:00
  Speaker 2: doesn't it doesn't take much to put a party off
• 8:03
  Speaker 2: the rails.
• 8:04
  Speaker 3: And that's that's what I was seeing.
• 8:05
  Speaker 1: Yeah, and so Jed was the was this situation with
• 8:09
  Speaker 1: Tina McFarlane being pre selected and then there were rumblings
• 8:13
  Speaker 1: back in December last year. I remember making phone calls
• 8:16
  Speaker 1: about this. There were rumblings that the party was trying
• 8:19
  Speaker 1: to drop her back in December. Has that been a
• 8:21
  Speaker 1: catalyst here?
• 8:23
  Speaker 2: That was part of it because the how it was
• 8:26
  Speaker 2: was that we were talking to third party providers that
• 8:30
  Speaker 2: were supposed to be working on that campaign and they
• 8:32
  Speaker 2: were telling us, they were feeding us information saying that
• 8:35
  Speaker 2: she was not working with them. She would walk into
• 8:37
  Speaker 2: a meeting saying I know everything and then walk out,
• 8:39
  Speaker 2: which is not good because these are longstanding relationships. We
• 8:42
  Speaker 2: had with providers, and then we were talking to businesses,
• 8:45
  Speaker 2: and businesses were saying, well, she's not talking, she's not
• 8:48
  Speaker 2: coming to us and talking to us, so there's no
• 8:50
  Speaker 2: connectivity there. There was a massive disconnect, and we were
• 8:54
  Speaker 2: talking to other people and they were saying that she's
• 8:58
  Speaker 2: not there, she's not present, and we just felt that
• 9:01
  Speaker 2: six months of her campaign, we just felt that she
• 9:04
  Speaker 2: wasn't being effective and the party wanted to.
• 9:06
  Speaker 1: Move on, and so why didn't they.
• 9:08
  Speaker 2: Well, that's a good question because I'm pretty sure I
• 9:12
  Speaker 2: was at those meetings and the votes were essentially unanimous
• 9:16
  Speaker 2: to move on, and then they didn't.
• 9:18
  Speaker 3: The president backed out and they changed direction.
• 9:21
  Speaker 2: Now, it could be the fact that it sort of
• 9:25
  Speaker 2: shook shook the candidate and basically made sure that she
• 9:28
  Speaker 2: got back on track and she started sort of doing
• 9:30
  Speaker 2: what she was supposed to be doing.
• 9:32
  Speaker 3: That could have been the case, but at that point
• 9:35
  Speaker 3: I just felt so.
• 9:38
  Speaker 2: Disenchanted, disenchanted with the party at that point because I
• 9:41
  Speaker 2: felt like we were saying things and then saying we're
• 9:44
  Speaker 2: going to act on this, and then back paddling wasn't happening.
• 9:47
  Speaker 3: It wasn't happening.
• 9:48
  Speaker 1: Jed, we are going to have to get ready to
• 9:50
  Speaker 1: wrap up, but talk us through very quickly why you've
• 9:53
  Speaker 1: now decided to put your hand up for the seat
• 9:56
  Speaker 1: of Solomon.
• 9:56
  Speaker 2: Well, basically, I think I think Territorians have an apple
• 10:00
  Speaker 2: tight to see substantive change. Jackie Lambie was on Q
• 10:04
  Speaker 2: and A last night and she was saying that twenty
• 10:07
  Speaker 2: twenty two is an opportune time to see independence change
• 10:11
  Speaker 2: the political landscape of Australia for the better because essentially
• 10:15
  Speaker 2: we could be looking at a hung parliament and I
• 10:17
  Speaker 2: think if you vote an independent in what they can
• 10:20
  Speaker 2: do is they can do two things. They can make
• 10:23
  Speaker 2: sure that the government of the day is accountable for
• 10:26
  Speaker 2: their wrongdoings or misspendings, or things like putting their political
• 10:30
  Speaker 2: finger on criminal investigations. I'm talking about the Rock case here.
• 10:34
  Speaker 2: That's one thing, and the other thing is to make
• 10:36
  Speaker 2: sure that the voter is actually represented it at federal Parliament,
• 10:42
  Speaker 2: to make sure that substantive changes money being spent in
• 10:45
  Speaker 2: the territory actually has an effect. And I don't think
• 10:48
  Speaker 2: you're going to get that with a big party because
• 10:50
  Speaker 2: the big party is just going to do what big
• 10:51
  Speaker 2: parties do and it just gets all lost in.
• 10:53
  Speaker 3: The noise well, Jed, no doubt.
• 10:55
  Speaker 1: We'll have you back on before the election happens. We
• 10:57
  Speaker 1: will have all of the candidates on as that elections
• 11:00
  Speaker 1: called and find out a little bit more about everyone.
• 11:02
  Speaker 1: We really appreciate your time this morning. Thanks for coming in.
• 11:04
  Speaker 3: Thank you so much.
• 11:05
  Speaker 1: Thank you,