Latest / The Slippery Slope / Alex Berenson Reports: The first real evidence mRNA shots RAISE the risk of Covid hospitalization and death over time

Transcript

Alex Berenson Reports: The first real evidence mRNA shots RAISE the risk of Covid hospitalization and death over time · The Slippery Slope

• 0:05
  Hi. I'm Jay felon and thank you for
• 0:07
  listening to the slippery slope. Well how is this for a headline?
• 0:11
  It comes from Alex berenson's unreported.
• 0:13
  Truths headline is the first real evidence mRNA shots?
• 0:19
  Raise the risk of covid hospitalization and death
• 0:23
  overtime. It's a bit of a scary headline,
• 0:26
  I think so. Apparently a big Swedish study
• 0:29
  offers fragmentary, but suggestive data.
• 0:33
  So on September. 20 using data which covers nine million
• 0:38
  people, Swedish researchers. Published a paper showing mRNA
• 0:43
  Jabs may increase the risk of Omicron infection after three
• 0:48
  months that finding received attention, but an even more
• 0:52
  intriguing nuggets in the paper has so far gone unnoticed.
• 0:56
  So based on one statistical analysis, vaccinated, people had
• 1:02
  a higher risk of death or hospitalization from covid
• 1:07
  roughly a year after receiving their second dose.
• 1:10
  So charts that were published in this report show that
• 1:14
  vaccination protection against death and hospitalization begins
• 1:19
  to decline slowly after about five months and then plunges
• 1:25
  about nine months in. So the data provides real world
• 1:29
  evidence of possible, vaccine caused antibody dependent in
• 1:35
  Instruments, otherwise known as IDE.
• 1:38
  So, in ad vaccines, cause our immune system to produce
• 1:44
  antibodies that help a virus or other pathogen to attack us,
• 1:49
  which is what a lot of scientists have been telling us
• 1:54
  is a possibility. However, in saying all this, the
• 1:58
  findings should not be viewed as definitive, okay?
• 2:03
  It is based on relatively few Deaths in the later time
• 2:07
  periods. So also when researchers used a
• 2:11
  different statistical method known as standard polynomial
• 2:16
  regression to analyze the data they found the vaccines remained
• 2:21
  moderately effective against hospitalizations and death.
• 2:25
  Isn't that comforting moderately effective?
• 2:28
  We're all forced to do well. I wasn't forced but you know
• 2:31
  we've all these millions and millions of people forced to
• 2:34
  take this Take this vaccine is moderately effective.
• 2:37
  Anyway, this is in fact, protection actually appeared to
• 2:42
  increase slightly around a year. A trend that is
• 2:45
  counter-intuitive at best. So doctor, Yi shoe, which is
• 2:51
  the, who is the papers lead author did not endorse either
• 2:55
  method as superior but said that research is needed more data to
• 3:02
  know which finding might be correct.
• 3:05
  Both types of analysis, provide more accurate estimates.
• 3:10
  If there is a sufficient number of cases, she wrote there are
• 3:14
  very few cases of death and a relatively low number of
• 3:18
  hospitalization, cases around week 40 and later.
• 3:22
  So the estimation is quite uncertain for both analysis.
• 3:26
  She says, so which statistical method is more likely to be
• 3:31
  accurate and is the finding that the It's actually increase risk,
• 3:37
  real. The that's the big question will
• 3:41
  and will big Pharma actually, let that information and ask.
• 3:44
  If it comes about that, it is actually raising the risk,
• 3:48
  increasing the risk. Well, independent experts on
• 3:51
  statistics disagreed. Well, and that's why they should
• 3:55
  stop calling people experts, really, because none of them
• 3:59
  ever agree. And yet, they're all trotted out
• 4:01
  on the TV screens as if they are expert.
• 4:04
  But Physically, I don't think so.
• 4:06
  Anyway, it says goes on to say that one suggested the technique
• 4:10
  showing the - efficacy called a cubed spline actually is likely
• 4:16
  to be more correct than the other.
• 4:19
  So, with standard or single polynomial, regression Blue
• 4:26
  Line, you can fit any data. If you give it enough Freedom,
• 4:30
  the price for that, is that the better?
• 4:32
  It fits the data. You give it the Worse.
• 4:35
  It will be at explaining new data and especially.
• 4:38
  So with the edges splines, due to the way they are built, avoid
• 4:44
  this problem and produce more and some more useful predictive
• 4:48
  models. However, another so-called
• 4:51
  expert wrote, I personally happen to believe strongly that
• 4:55
  these vaccines will have negative efficacy but as a
• 4:59
  statistician, I feel you simply cannot make that claim with
• 5:03
  confidence off the back. Of a spline like this, in any
• 5:08
  case, even the standard model shows, a sharp decrease in the
• 5:13
  value of a 2-dose regimen over time.
• 5:17
  Isn't that? Just so comforting if you've had
• 5:20
  those doses. So it also shows that it falls
• 5:24
  below 45% protection from Death around nine months before making
• 5:30
  it making it odd, upturn. So, The end of it all.
• 5:36
  Yes, mRNA vaccines will save you from dying from covid.
• 5:40
  Atleast for a couple of months. Isn't that just so comforting?
• 5:46
  And then like I said, if it turns out that these vaccines in
• 5:51
  the long run, doing more harm to your system, your immune system,
• 5:56
  then they should be then they're actually doing any good.
• 5:59
  Will big Pharma actually allow this information and we'll the
• 6:04
  government It's actually allow this information to come to
• 6:08
  light. I have some serious doubts, but
• 6:12
  hey, that's just my opinion. Thank you for listening, please
• 6:17
  share the slippery slope.