Latest / Investor Exchange / Why Lion Asiapac's S$7 Million Loss In Q1 2025 Isn't As Bad As It Seems

Transcript

Why Lion Asiapac's S$7 Million Loss In Q1 2025 Isn't As Bad As It Seems · Investor Exchange

• 0:02
  Time for another Investor Exchange Podcast. Here are your hosts, Matt and Sally.
• 0:07
  Welcome back to the Deep Dive. Today, we're digging into a financial report
• 0:12
  that honestly looks pretty catastrophic on the surface.
• 0:16
  But underneath, there's a really fascinating story, maybe even one of strategic success.
• 0:23
  We're looking at the unaudited first quarter results from Lion Asia Pack Limited
• 0:27
  for the period ending September 30, 2025.
• 0:31
  That's right. Now, our mission today really starts with the profit guidance they issued earlier.
• 0:35
  It warned the market, didn't it? Said a massive loss was coming.
• 0:39
  It did set expectations low. And the final numbers, well, they delivered on that warning.
• 0:44
  So we need to look past that really scary headline figure, find out exactly
• 0:49
  what happened, sounds like one big accounting event, and figure out the true
• 0:54
  operational health, you know, the future trajectory of the company.
• 0:57
  Yeah, because our sources suggest this really isn't a story of failure at all. Right.
• 1:00
  And what's fascinating here, for me anyway, is that these financials,
• 1:04
  they present this absolute masterclass in why you have to look past the headline
• 1:08
  number. It's a classic paradox.
• 1:11
  The statutory net loss, the figure that makes investors maybe hit the sell button,
• 1:14
  it looks dreadful. It really does.
• 1:16
  But, and this is the key part, when we isolate the impact of this one major
• 1:22
  non-operational accounting entry, the picture that's left.
• 1:25
  It suggests significant underlying operational growth and a very deliberate strategic shift.
• 1:31
  Okay, let's definitely unpack that, but maybe let's start with that surface
• 1:34
  level first, because it is jarring.
• 1:36
  The total loss, net attacks for the quarter just exploded to $7.339 million.
• 1:44
  And just for context, the same time last year, Q1 2024, the loss was only $0.157 million.
• 1:50
  That's, what, nearly a 50-fold increase. It's a huge jump. And that translates
• 1:54
  directly, as you'd expect, into the loss per share.
• 1:57
  9.06 cents this quarter compared to just 0.18 cents previously. Wow.
• 2:01
  You see numbers like that, and your first thought is, okay, the core business
• 2:03
  must have just cratered, right? Or maybe they uncovered some massive new liability.
• 2:08
  Exactly. But here's where it gets weird, where that paradox comes in.
• 2:12
  How on earth do you reconcile that massive jump in loss per share with,
• 2:17
  well, the fact that the company's core business seemed to be absolutely roaring?
• 2:22
  It doesn't immediately make sense, does it? No.
• 2:24
  Are we missing something else or is it really all down to this one external
• 2:27
  thing? Well, look at the countermetrics. They tell a very different story.
• 2:30
  The group's actual revenue soared, I mean, up by a staggering 88% for the quarter.
• 2:36
  88%. Yeah, it jumped from S4.279 million dollars up to S8.036 million dollars.
• 2:44
  You just don't see revenue climb that high when a business is,
• 2:47
  you know, fundamentally failing.
• 2:49
  Okay, that's a powerful counterpoint. And there's more. If you look at total
• 2:52
  comprehensive income now, that figure includes certain non-cash items,
• 2:55
  other equity movements that often get missed in just the simple net profit number.
• 2:59
  That figure wasn't just positive. It jumped by 110 percent, hitting S2.572 million dollars. Right.
• 3:07
  So explosive revenue growth, strong comprehensive income, but this huge statutory net loss.
• 3:13
  Exactly. It basically confirms we're dealing with a very specific non-recurring
• 3:17
  accounting event that just completely overwhelmed the main profit and loss statement
• 3:22
  for the quarter. OK, let's get straight to that then.
• 3:24
  The preliminary guidance. Yeah. It pointed towards the completion of a strategic disposal. Yeah.
• 3:29
  What exactly did they sell and how did selling it create this like $7 million
• 3:35
  black hole in the results?
• 3:37
  Right. So the asset they sold was a subsidiary called Compact Energy SDNBHD or CESB. PCESB.
• 3:44
  And the disposal was finalized on September 2nd, 2025.
• 3:47
  Now, the vast majority of that big headline loss figure, it's what we call a
• 3:51
  non-cash accounting effect.
• 3:53
  It stems directly from cleaning up the balance sheet after the sale,
• 3:56
  which accounting standards require. Non-cash effect. Yeah.
• 3:58
  The specific line item that really blew out the loss before tax,
• 4:02
  which was $7.010 million, was something called the D-recognition of Foreign
• 4:06
  Currency Translation Reserve. Okay.
• 4:08
  And the number attached just to that one single item, a loss of $9.333 million.
• 4:13
  $9.3 million. dollars. OK, that's a hugely technical term, isn't it?
• 4:18
  For such a massive number for someone listening.
• 4:21
  We need to understand what that foreign currency translation reserve actually is.
• 4:26
  Why did recognizing it suddenly create such a huge negative hit?
• 4:30
  OK, yeah, good question.
• 4:31
  Think of it like this. Lion Asia PAC owned CESB, which was an overseas entity,
• 4:37
  right? Right. Malaysia, I think. Yes.
• 4:39
  So they had to consolidate CESB's results into their Singapore dollar reports.
• 4:45
  Now, every time exchange rates moved over the years they owned it,
• 4:48
  the difference in the value of that foreign subsidiary wasn't immediately counted as profit or loss.
• 4:53
  It was essentially stored up, accumulated in a separate account on the balance
• 4:57
  sheet. That account is the foreign currency translation reserve.
• 5:00
  It's like a running tally, an unrealized holding account for all those historical
• 5:04
  forex movements related specifically to owning CESB.
• 5:08
  I see. So it's like accumulated paper gains or losses from currency fluctuations over time.
• 5:13
  Precisely. And the moment you sell that subsidiary, the moment it leaves the
• 5:17
  group structure, that's when the accounting rules kick in.
• 5:19
  They say, right, you have to de-recognize that reserve now. De-recognize means.
• 5:23
  It means you have to take all those cumulative stored-up exchange rate effects,
• 5:27
  whether gains or losses, and basically dump them all at once straight into your
• 5:32
  profit and loss statement for the current quarter.
• 5:34
  And in this case, unfortunately for the headline number, the net cumulative
• 5:38
  effect over all those years was a historical loss.
• 5:41
  So recognizing it meant taking a S9.333 million dollar hit to the P&L in this
• 5:49
  one quarter. Okay, that makes the distinction absolutely crystal clear now.
• 5:52
  It's a historical calculation.
• 5:53
  It's triggered by a one-time event selling the asset. It's not a reflection
• 5:58
  of how well they sold roofing materials or traded equipment today.
• 6:01
  Exactly. It's bookkeeping related to the past triggered by the sale.
• 6:04
  So let's set aside that accounting formality then.
• 6:07
  What was the actual sort of operational and cash result of selling CESB?
• 6:12
  Was it a good deal financially?
• 6:13
  Yes, it seems it was. The disposal itself actually generated a direct operating gain for the group.
• 6:20
  They recorded a positive gain on disposal of subsidiary on their books,
• 6:24
  amounting to S1.930 million dollars.
• 6:27
  Okay, so nearly two million in gain from the sale itself. Correct.
• 6:31
  But maybe even more important, certainly from a strategic point of view,
• 6:35
  the disposal resulted in a massive net cash inflow. Cash, right. How much?
• 6:40
  10.08 million dollars. Wow, okay.
• 6:43
  $10 million in fresh cash. That's the real game changer here.
• 6:47
  They cleaned up the books, took a big paper loss required by accounting rules,
• 6:50
  but they injected S10 million dollars in real, usable cash onto the balance sheet.
• 6:55
  That S10 million dollar cash injection, that pivots us perfectly,
• 6:58
  doesn't it, to the core strength of the business that remains?
• 7:00
  Let's focus entirely now on the operations they kept. That 88% revenue surge
• 7:05
  is, well, it's monumental.
• 7:07
  Where did that come from? Yeah, that growth, according to the report,
• 7:10
  was driven mainly by two key areas. Firstly, they had higher trading orders.
• 7:13
  And secondly, they saw increased supply from their core roofing solutions business.
• 7:18
  And if we look specifically at the performance of the continuing operations,
• 7:22
  the bits they didn't sell.
• 7:25
  They actually show profitability that lines up with that high revenue growth.
• 7:29
  So the remaining parts are healthy? Seems so.
• 7:31
  The supply of roofing solution segment, that generated a decent operating profit
• 7:36
  of $0.3 million for the quarter. Okay.
• 7:39
  And the trading segment that involves things like supplying mining equipment
• 7:43
  and parts that recorded basically a break-even result.
• 7:46
  Right. So this overall strong core performance, that's what helped them absorb
• 7:50
  some minor holding company costs. And I noticed in the sources,
• 7:54
  the costs went up, too, quite significantly in places.
• 7:57
  They did, but crucially, it seems commensurate with the volume increase.
• 8:01
  This is important, right? Costs going up in isolation is scary,
• 8:04
  but costs going up because you're selling way more stuff, that's usually a sign of scaling of growth.
• 8:09
  They reported higher costs for goods, materials, consumables, up 79 percent.
• 8:15
  Big jump. Yeah. And other expenses were up 50 percent. And they specifically
• 8:19
  mentioned that was driven by higher transportation costs needed to fulfill all
• 8:22
  those extra orders in the trading business.
• 8:24
  OK, so those cost increases actually reinforce the story of higher activity. Exactly.
• 8:29
  They seem to be the expected costs of a successful expansion in sales volume.
• 8:33
  So we've got this picture, a strategic divestiture results in a big paper loss, but nice cash boost.
• 8:40
  And the core operations that are left are thriving, growing fast.
• 8:44
  How did all this impact the balance sheet overall, specifically thinking about
• 8:49
  liquidity, their cash position, and maybe their net worth? Well,
• 8:52
  the transformation there is actually quite dramatic.
• 8:55
  And it provides, I think, the ultimate proof that the company is financially
• 8:59
  healthier after the disposal, despite that headline loss. Okay.
• 9:02
  That S10.008 million net cash inflow from selling CESB.
• 9:06
  That was the dominant factor. It drove the group's total cash and cash equivalence balance way up.
• 9:12
  It increased by $14.5 million in the quarter. Fourteen and a half million increase.
• 9:17
  Giving them a phenomenal war chest, you could call it, of S.
• 9:21
  $52.2 million in cash at the end of September.
• 9:25
  $52 million in cash. Wow. Yeah.
• 9:28
  And this cash position, this is really the takeaway you should focus on.
• 9:31
  Because despite reporting that $7.3 million statutory loss for the quarter,
• 9:35
  get this, the net asset value, the NAV per share, it actually increased.
• 9:40
  Increased, even with the loss. Increased. It went up to 75.66 cents per share,
• 9:45
  up from 72.50 cents just three months earlier at the end of June.
• 9:49
  How does that work? A loss, but higher net asset value?
• 9:53
  It's partly due to that total comprehensive income being positive,
• 9:56
  which includes things like fair value adjustments.
• 9:58
  But mostly it reflects that the underlying value is stronger now.
• 10:01
  They swapped an asset, CESB, for a large amount of cash and booked a gain on
• 10:05
  disposal, even after accounting for the currency reserve hit within the total comprehensive income.
• 10:10
  The company is financially much stronger, way more liquid, and the market,
• 10:14
  or at least the book value, sees the remaining focus group, now cash rich,
• 10:19
  as being worth more per share.
• 10:21
  Okay, that makes sense. Stronger, leaner, cashed up. So let's move into the
• 10:24
  outlook then. Yeah. The company's clearly finished this restructuring phase. They sold CESB.
• 10:28
  They even discontinued a related arbitration claim mentioned in the notes.
• 10:32
  What's the plan now? What's the forward-looking strategy for this newly focused
• 10:37
  cash-heavy Lion AsiaPak over the next year or so?
• 10:40
  Well, management is signaling a very clear pivot. They're moving from that period
• 10:44
  of consolidation and cleanup to what looks like aggressive yet prudent expansion.
• 10:50
  Aggressive but prudent. OK.
• 10:51
  Their immediate focus, naturally, is to keep growing the two core businesses
• 10:56
  they have left, the roofing and the trading operations.
• 10:58
  Makes sense. But the real shift, I think, is in how they plan to use that capital,
• 11:03
  that S-52 million dollars.
• 11:04
  They explicitly state in the report they will be actively exploring new investment
• 11:09
  opportunities to enhance shareholders' value. Right.
• 11:11
  And they've got the cash ready to back that up. Exactly.
• 11:14
  That S-52 million dollars is sitting there waiting to be deployed.
• 11:17
  So this sounds a bit like a hunting license, doesn't it? They've got the funds,
• 11:21
  they've got the mandate from the board, presumably, to go shopping for new investments.
• 11:26
  Potentially outside their current
• 11:27
  comfort zone of metal roofing and mining equipment. Potentially, yes.
• 11:32
  They are definitely ready, but they're framing it quite carefully.
• 11:35
  They do acknowledge that the global economic outlook is still pretty uncertain.
• 11:39
  True. So they use the phrase, they will exercise prudence in managing challenges
• 11:44
  while they seek out those new opportunities.
• 11:47
  That word prudence, I think, is key here. It suggests they're not just going
• 11:51
  to throw money around wildly.
• 11:52
  They'll be looking for deals that really add value. Sensible approach given the macro environment.
• 11:57
  And you can see this cautious approach reflected in their dividend policy for
• 12:00
  the quarter as well. Ah, dividends. What did they do? They declared no dividend.
• 12:05
  And they explicitly stated the reason.
• 12:08
  They considered it necessary to conserve cash for future operations,
• 12:12
  specifically in view of the group's business strategy.
• 12:16
  Okay, so they're clearly signaling growth first.
• 12:19
  Reinvesting that cash pile is the priority over immediate shareholder payouts.
• 12:24
  That seems to be the message, yes.
• 12:26
  Prioritizing capital growth and strategic investment right now.
• 12:29
  Right. So to wrap up our deep dive into Lion Asia Pack Limited's first quarter
• 12:33
  then, it seems the period was really defined by this huge balance sheet cleanup.
• 12:38
  A massive accounting formality that, yes, it generated a scary headline statutory
• 12:43
  loss, but it completely obscured what looks like extremely strong operational momentum underneath.
• 12:50
  The company saw an 88 percent revenue surge in its core continuing businesses.
• 12:54
  And it emerged from selling off that subsidiary with this really impressive
• 12:58
  war chest of over S-52 million dollars in cash, which they've explicitly earmarked
• 13:04
  for future strategic investments.
• 13:05
  Yeah, and the crucial takeaway here, I think, for you, the listener,
• 13:08
  is the absolute necessity of looking beyond just that bottom line net loss figure,
• 13:13
  especially when there are disposals involved.
• 13:14
  That $9.333 million currency derecognition, it was a one-time accounting cleanup.
• 13:20
  Historical baggage being cleared out. Exactly.
• 13:23
  Tied to a successful divestiture that actually brought in a major cash boost.
• 13:26
  The real story here is that operational growth in the remaining business and
• 13:30
  the very strong, very liquid financial foundation they've now laid for potentially
• 13:35
  significant future strategic action. Okay, so here is the provocative thought
• 13:39
  we want to leave you with to explore on your own.
• 13:42
  Given the group's new stated focus on enhancing shareholder value,
• 13:46
  and given its substantial cash reserves, S52 million dollars,
• 13:49
  and also considering its established expertise in commodities,
• 13:53
  trading, construction-related materials…,
• 13:55
  What kind of new investment opportunity, maybe geographically or perhaps industrially,
• 13:59
  do you think would be the most logical, the most value accretive next move for
• 14:03
  LineAsiaPAC to make? Where should they deploy that cash?