Latest / David Icke / The 9/11 Special | David Icke & Captain Dan Hanley

Transcript

The 9/11 Special | David Icke & Captain Dan Hanley · David Icke

• 0:00
  100 years ago, Nikola Tesla discovered a healing technology that threatened the entire pharmaceutical
• 0:06
  industry. The day he died, the government seized everything. For 100 years, this technology was
• 0:14
  hidden. Until now, Plasma is back. Tesla Club, TZLA.Club.
• 0:24
  Hello and welcome to this iconic special on this anniversary of the most blatant inside job known
• 0:36
  as 9-11, in which some 3,000 people died on September 11, 2001 in an attack that was so
• 0:48
  obviously orchestrated from within the United States. And the world was changed forever,
• 0:58
  just as it was meant to be. It was the trigger that led to the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion
• 1:29
  of Iraq and death and destruction and mayhem across the Middle East. And it triggered also
• 1:39
  the Patriot Act, which was the first in that post 9-11 world we're still living in,
• 1:49
  in which basic freedoms are systematically deleted. And all of this came from a simple fact.
• 2:05
  The wrong people were blamed for 9-11. Oh, we want to invade Afghanistan, so what can we do?
• 2:16
  Well, what we'll say is, Osama bin Laden was behind the attacks, then we can invade Afghanistan
• 2:23
  because they was behind the attacks and they're protecting him.
• 2:29
  And it's a technique that I've been calling since the 1990s, problem reaction solution. You
• 2:37
  create the problem, covertly blame someone else for it. You tell the public the version of the
• 2:45
  problem that you want them to believe and you want them to react with anger, with fear, with
• 2:56
  enormous frustration and say, what are you? What are they? Authority. Going to do about it.
• 3:06
  At which point, those who've covertly created the problem
• 3:10
  got that public reaction, do something, then offer the solutions to the problems they have
• 3:18
  themselves covertly created. And September 11th in those attacks, when you look at the evidence,
• 3:32
  was a most obvious problem reaction solution. And we've seen so many since with COVID,
• 3:43
  with human cause climate change, because there's another version of problem reaction solution,
• 3:49
  which I call no problem reaction solution. When you don't even need a real problem,
• 3:55
  you need the public perception that there is a problem. And thus you can convince them,
• 4:02
  you must provide the solution, which are changes in society that push on this dystopia
• 4:10
  month after month after month. Now, I was immediately
• 4:23
  dismissing the official narrative of 9-11. It made absolutely no sense. And throughout
• 4:31
  2001 and into 2002, I researched a book, which I think from my knowledge anyway,
• 4:38
  was the first major book to be published on the subject of challenging the official narrative.
• 4:46
  And it's called Alice in Wonderland and the World Trade Center Disaster,
• 4:50
  Why the Official Story of 9-11 is a Monumental Lie. And many, many years later, around 2018,
• 5:04
  I thought, I'm going to do an update of this book and bring in all the information that's
• 5:15
  and evidence that's come to light since. Well, it took me about two weeks to realize that actually
• 5:22
  updating that book was not on. It had to be a totally new book. And so in 2019, I published
• 5:30
  The Trigger about 9-11. And I read everything that moved. I researched everything it was
• 5:36
  possible to research. And it's a massive volume, the first half of which takes apart every aspect
• 5:46
  of the official story of 9-11. And in the second part, it names many of the people and
• 5:56
  organizations that were behind those attacks. And it wasn't 19 Arab hijackers.
• 6:06
  Now, I'm going to be talking to a very experienced airline pilot in America,
• 6:13
  who very quickly realized there's no way that the official story of how the planes were flown
• 6:19
  and who by could possibly be true. But first, I just want to deal with the buildings falling.
• 6:29
  Because they were the most obvious controlled demolition you could ever see. And before I get
• 6:41
  into the buildings themselves, let's remind ourselves of what a controlled demolition looks like.
• 7:21
  So there you have it, a controlled demolition where they put the charges in the particular
• 7:26
  parts of the building to make it fall on its own footprint and cause dust is everywhere.
• 7:34
  And here's another two to make the same point. And so we come to Building 7 in the World Trade Center.
• 8:31
  And even today, lots of people say, what do you mean Building 7? It was the North Tower and the
• 8:37
  South Tower. Oh yes, it was. There the towers, the planes hit. But there was another substantial
• 8:45
  building skyscraper that came down that day, later in the afternoon, that had not been hit
• 8:53
  by a plane. And yet it fell in its own footprint exactly like a controlled demolition, which
• 9:01
  of course is what it was. And here is some footage of that. And it's sobering to think
• 9:13
  that the official story is that this massive building was brought down exactly as a controlled
• 9:21
  demolition, but by fire. This is World Trade Center 7 just before it collapsed on September
• 9:30
  the 11th, 2001. It had not been hit by an aircraft. It had been damaged by falling debris and fire.
• 9:37
  But by 5.20pm, most of the fires have been extinguished. Although the building was 47
• 9:43
  stories high, it doesn't fall sideways, nor collapse unevenly.
• 9:51
  For this to have happened, all of the building's vertical supports must have given way at almost
• 9:57
  exactly the same time. Yet the Federal Emergency Management Agency reported that the collapse
• 10:03
  was due primarily to fire. But what does it look like to you?
• 10:16
  Yes, that building was brought down by fire, apparently, which means that the fire must have
• 10:27
  been so evenly spread, and breaking the laws of physics in terms of its temperature,
• 10:35
  that all the major parts of the building failed at exactly the same time so it came down on its own
• 10:46
  footprint. I mean, it's almost incomprehensible that the authorities would seek to explain it away
• 10:56
  with such absolute, bloody nonsense. So, you've seen the control demolition buildings come down
• 11:06
  on the land that they're standing on, and we've also seen and heard the ratatat of the explosives
• 11:14
  going off before and during the collapse of the building. So let's go back to
• 11:22
  Building 7 here and watch for the very clear black explosions going off all over the building
• 11:32
  before and during its collapse. It's a controlled demolition. But of course, the authorities,
• 12:07
  the government can't admit that because if it did, the whole narrative, all of it,
• 12:15
  of 9-11 would fall apart. So what do they do? Well, what do governments do? They bloody lie.
• 12:23
  And so we've had a government agency, Producer Report, telling us that somehow
• 12:32
  a building, wasn't it by a plane? They say all debris came from the other two buildings or whatever,
• 12:38
  but that building fell in perfect controlled demolition style because of a fire.
• 12:47
  No tall building had ever collapsed primarily due to fire. But that's exactly what investigators
• 12:53
  believe happened to the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11th.
• 13:00
  According to a three-year Comprehensive Building and Fire Safety Investigation
• 13:04
  just completed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST.
• 13:09
  World Trade Center 7 collapsed because of fires. We really have a new kind of progressive collapse
• 13:16
  that we have discovered here, which is a fire-induced progressive collapse. And in fact, we have shown
• 13:21
  for the first time that fire can induce a progressive collapse. NIST used detailed
• 13:25
  data describing the building and its contents to create the most complex computer simulation
• 13:31
  of a structure collapse ever made. What absolute nonsense. And if you want to see
• 13:39
  an absolute catalog of nonsense, then read the 9-11 Commission Report, which is a
• 13:47
  packet lies from start to finish, to hide what really happened. And so we come to the
• 13:54
  main World Trade Center buildings, the North Tower and the South Tower. And here are
• 14:02
  a number of witnesses and there were so many more who are describing hearing and seeing
• 14:10
  explosions in the buildings before and during the collapse.
• 14:46
  And at that point, building two was collapsing. At that point, we heard a large boom.
• 14:52
  You know, I looked up and just saw a building coming at us. Do you know if it was an explosion
• 14:57
  or if it was a building collapse? To me, it sounded like an explosion. There was another
• 15:05
  major explosion. The building itself, literally the top of it, came down. All of a sudden,
• 15:10
  you hear explosion and you could see the building starting to collapse. Huge explosion that we
• 15:15
  all heard and felt. We understand now there has been a secondary explosion on Tower 2.
• 15:21
  According to the Associated Press, another building that has either been attacked or exploded.
• 15:27
  The tower, rather, that has collapsed, that we are told collapsed because of a third explosion.
• 15:32
  And about an hour later after that, there was a huge explosion at the base of the South Tower.
• 15:37
  That's the one World Trade Center and part of the building collapsed.
• 15:41
  We could hear a rumble, which was about five seconds long, preceding the actual collapse,
• 15:46
  and then a boom when each of those towers collapsed.
• 15:59
  And then you heard from far away, boom, boom, and you heard the boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
• 16:11
  Yeah, from the corner, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom.
• 16:19
  Just like 20 straight hits. And as the bombs were going, people just started running.
• 16:23
  And I sat there and watched a few of them explode and just started going,
• 16:27
  pop, but just started with boom, boom, boom, boom. And he goes, how fast I go like firecrackers.
• 16:34
  It staggers me how the authorities can have such contempt for the intelligence
• 16:44
  of the population that they can lie so obviously about the whole range
• 16:56
  of what happened on September the 11th. Not one facet of it stands up to scrutiny.
• 17:05
  But maybe it's not so staggering when you think how many people to this day still believe,
• 17:14
  journalists not least, God help us, still believe that 19 Arab hijackers were responsible
• 17:24
  for what happened that day. When the evidence that it was an inside job is absolutely overwhelming.
• 17:33
  And when you seek the truth about what happened, you're called a truther, which is not a
• 17:43
  term of endearment, it's a term of contempt. Oh, you're a truther, are you? Yeah,
• 17:49
  because I want to know why 3000 people died on 9 11 and how the world was changed as a result.
• 17:58
  I want to know what happened. What do you mean? You don't believe the government? Oh my God.
• 18:08
  Governments lie through reflex action. That's what they do.
• 18:15
  And there's never perhaps been a more obvious example than September the 11th, 2001.
• 18:28
  Fortunately, there are intelligent people and not only intelligent people but intelligent
• 18:34
  people with a backbone who have been prepared to not only see through the lies but to press
• 18:43
  for justice and for the public to know what really happened. And so we have a series of
• 18:52
  organizations that have emerged since that day. Architects and engineers for 9 11 Truth.
• 19:01
  There are thousands of them now worldwide who are focusing on the building collapses because
• 19:09
  as architects and engineers who design and build these bloody things,
• 19:15
  they know that the official story of how they fell is ridiculous, impossible.
• 19:22
  There's firefighters for 9 11 Truth, scientists for 9 11 Truth, justice for 9 11 Heroes, military
• 19:31
  officers for 9 11 Truth, scholars for 9 11 Truth and justice, lawyers for 9 11 Inquiry.
• 19:39
  And then there's the pilot groups of pilots who can see that the story of how the planes were
• 19:47
  flown and who flew them is utterly insane. It's just not possible for what they are
• 19:57
  alleged to have done for them to have actually done.
• 20:03
  And despite all these organizations made up of experts in their field,
• 20:13
  the mainstream media morons
• 20:19
  for the establishment just go on repeating the official lies without question. Now,
• 20:29
  two of these pilot organizations are pilots for 9 11 Truth and 9 11 pilot whistleblowers
• 20:36
  at 911 pilots.org, which brings me to the director of that latter organization,
• 20:44
  a highly experienced pilot called Captain Dan Hanley. And I'll give you some
• 20:52
  bio before we talk to Dan. He says that he commenced flying more than 50 years ago
• 21:01
  in 1968, first as a civilian pilot, then as a naval aviator, and finally as a united
• 21:10
  airlines captain. He has a career span of 35 years. He flew 15 different types of aircraft,
• 21:21
  accumulating more than 20,000 flight hours. And he says that with all my experience,
• 21:29
  I can unequivocally state that I could not possibly, he with all that experience,
• 21:37
  could not possibly have flown the 9 11 flight profiles, in particular the Pentagon profile
• 21:47
  at those speeds and altitudes and flying the spectacular aerial maneuvers performed by the
• 21:55
  alleged hijackers. In other words, the pilots that were supposed to fly the planes on 9 11
• 22:05
  could not possibly have done so. So I'm delighted now to welcome from the United States,
• 22:14
  Captain Dan Hanley. Dan, thanks for joining us. With all your experience as a pilot over
• 22:22
  such a long period of time, and you were at New Jersey when it was all kicking off.
• 22:29
  At what point did you think this doesn't make sense?
• 22:35
  Well, I slept through the whole thing that morning and when I got up and realized what had happened,
• 22:41
  I thought we were under attack like everybody else did. And even when I got back on the line,
• 22:46
  with the security precautions they were taking, which really wasn't that much,
• 22:51
  which also got me into trouble when I reported it. But I still believe the official story
• 22:57
  until I start recognizing holes in the aviation security system. And I said, wait a minute,
• 23:04
  that that can't be possible that if they're that interested in security,
• 23:08
  that all these holes exist. And that's when I started reporting it. But it really wasn't until
• 23:14
  they announced the experience level of the hijackers, because I had flown Cessna aircraft
• 23:21
  way back 55 years ago. And I also flew the 7567. And I knew, given that most of the training occurred
• 23:31
  in light Cessna aircraft, that there's no way in hell they could have controlled those aircraft.
• 23:36
  So I guess that's really when that happened. And I can't because it's been so long,
• 23:40
  I can't remember the exact timeframe that that occurred. But that's when I started
• 23:45
  disbelieving the official story. I mean, what sort of alerted you to the security breaches then?
• 23:52
  Because on the face of it, if the official story is true, which of course it isn't,
• 23:59
  it should never have been possible to do that with the security in place at the time, should it?
• 24:06
  No, it shouldn't. But what they did, David, was they made all kinds of promises. They said they
• 24:10
  were going to put cameras in the back of the aircraft, secondary barrier protection for the
• 24:15
  cockpit and federal air marshals. It took two years before I have this line, mainly New York,
• 24:21
  London. And it took me two years before I saw my first federal air marshal. And there's so
• 24:26
  few of them. I knew that whole program was afar. So they were only screening about 10% of the
• 24:31
  luggage going into the belly of the aircraft. So all these things were telling me, wait a
• 24:36
  while they're talking about the system secure, get on an airplane, go to Disney World,
• 24:41
  everything's fine. When I knew if it had occurred the way they were telling us it did,
• 24:47
  it wasn't possible with the security system they had set up.
• 24:52
  So the piloting of the planes, I mean, it was just incredibly
• 25:00
  accurate to say the least. And if we could pick up, first of all, I think the most blatant
• 25:06
  one of all, which is Flight 77, which supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And there was this
• 25:13
  fantastic, so the official story tells us, low circle where the plane went round and came back
• 25:21
  into the Pentagon and hit the place where they'd been reinforcing it in case of a terrorist attack
• 25:28
  exactly that point. And it was supposed to have been piloted by Hannie Henshaw.
• 25:35
  And let me get this absolutely right. Instructors at the Freeway Airport in
• 25:43
  Bowie, Maryland banned Henshaw from renting a one engine plane just weeks before 9 11,
• 25:53
  because he was so incompetent and so bloody useless, he was known as a
• 25:58
  trainee noted for incompetence, according to the New York Times, which then still buys the
• 26:05
  official story. So tell me about Flight 77, what you think about that?
• 26:12
  Well, I think it was an impossible maneuver for someone of his experience level,
• 26:16
  not only his experience level, but that exact maneuver you described, the 330 degree
• 26:23
  descending, accelerating car's return isn't the challenge as much as getting it down a few feet
• 26:29
  off the surface at over 500 knots to precisely hit the office of Naval Intelligence on its first attempt.
• 26:37
  Now this maneuver was replicated in a simulator by another pilot group and flown by highly
• 26:44
  experienced pilots. And they crashed the airplane trying to do this and yet
• 26:48
  we've been led to believe Honeyhounder did it on its first attempt.
• 26:52
  Now you talked about going to the Freeway Airport in Maryland the month prior to 9 11.
• 26:58
  I actually talked to a gent named Marcel Bernard, who's a chief instructor. He was the chief
• 27:06
  instructor at the Freeway Airport, and he confirmed this story for me. And he told me that
• 27:11
  two of his instructors, Jerry Baxter and Ben Connor, actually went up on three flights between
• 27:17
  the two of them and both came back and said the same thing, don't rent him an airplane.
• 27:21
  But what did Hanger do? He goes down the road to Congressional Air Charter, another
• 27:29
  airplane rental facility, and goes flying on a trip with an instructor named Eddie Shalev.
• 27:37
  And Eddie Shalev came back and told investigators he's a good pilot. And what appeared in the 9
• 27:44
  11 Commission Final Report? Only Eddie Shalev's story and it was an end note in the final report.
• 27:52
  And they didn't even interview Baxter or Connor. As a matter of fact, Connor said
• 28:01
  I was expecting a call from the 9 11 Commission and it never came. Now this information
• 28:06
  and we've got it on our website I can talk about later. There's an article that talks about how the
• 28:13
  FBI and the 9 11 Commission actually suppressed this key evidence. And imagine had that been
• 28:23
  in the final report, we'd have would have had an entirely different outcome. So it was a total
• 28:28
  squash job by those two agencies of the government.
• 28:33
  Well, the 9 11 Commission Report was probably the biggest work of fiction in human history,
• 28:38
  wasn't it? I mean, right across the spectrum of the events of 9 11, there wasn't any truth
• 28:46
  told at all. It was it was all cover up. And so what about the planes that hit the the Twin
• 28:53
  Towers? How difficult was it of being to to achieve that? Well, I wasn't a fighter pilot in
• 29:01
  the Navy, I flew another aircraft. But I've talked to guys that have with lots of experience.
• 29:08
  And they said you just don't hop in an airplane and be able to target an aircraft that way.
• 29:14
  A high high speed aircraft. And when you look at the closure rate at that speed of those aircraft
• 29:20
  and the fact that the Twin Towers are only only like 208 feet wide and the wingspan
• 29:25
  are 150 feet, and they hit them dead on both of them. As a matter of fact, all three of these
• 29:32
  aircraft hit their targets dead on on their first attempt. Okay. And if you if the two planes
• 29:39
  that hit the turret was all that happened that day, if the Pentagon wasn't struck,
• 29:43
  they would have been limited to calling this a terrorist attack. Since a military facility
• 29:49
  was hit the Pentagon, they called it an act of war and justified their illegal and unwarranted
• 29:54
  invasion into Afghanistan. So we equate the strike on the Twin Towers. Imagine you just
• 30:03
  driven your family car for a little over a year, and you hop into an 18-wheeler semi-attractor
• 30:09
  trailer you've never driven before. Get it up to a very high speed and try to drive it
• 30:15
  through a garage without scraping the sides of the truck. That's how accurate you would have
• 30:19
  had to have been. And we think that's the reason so many people fell for the official story. Number
• 30:25
  one, the government said it. Number two, the media supported what the government said,
• 30:29
  but most pilots, there's only a few hundred thousand pilots in the world. Most people aren't
• 30:34
  pilots and they cannot conceive of the absurdity of this ludicrous notion that these pilots
• 30:39
  actually flew these aircraft that day. So what's your view of what actually happened then?
• 30:48
  Because quite early on, I remember when I was researching this in 2001 and it's 2002,
• 30:57
  controlled from the ground came up and then more and more as the years unfolded.
• 31:05
  Yes. Well, can I give a brief history of remote control? Because so many people say,
• 31:11
  come on, you can't control a large aircraft like that. But the history goes back to 1944,
• 31:18
  this towards the end of World War II, which is 79 years ago, where the U.S. Army Air Corps
• 31:25
  lost Operation Aphrodite. He actually was out of the U.K. And what they did was they got out
• 31:32
  old B-24 bombers to lighten the weight of the aircraft and load it with 30,000 pounds of
• 31:38
  torpex, which was a highly incendiary compound. And pilots were required to make the takeoff. But
• 31:44
  once they got airborne, they bail out in these aircraft were remotely guided into targets in
• 31:50
  Europe. Now this was 75, 79 years ago. And we point out on our website that I'll mention,
• 31:57
  JFK's older brother Joe was killed in one of these top secret missions when there was
• 32:02
  a malfunction and it blew up before he was able to bail out of the aircraft. Now if you jump
• 32:07
  ahead and there's several other examples in between, but if you jump ahead a full 40 years and
• 32:12
  imagine the technology advancements that occurred during that timeframe with the advent of the computer
• 32:18
  age, in 1984, NASA and the FAA conducted a joint crash test experiment in a remote location.
• 32:27
  They used a four-engine commercial jet aircraft, a Boeing 720, and they loaded it up with crash
• 32:33
  dummies and cameras because they wanted to test crew and passengers survivability in the event of a
• 32:39
  crash landing. They took this big airplane off by remote control flew around the pattern several
• 32:44
  times before they intentionally crashed land of the aircraft. Now jump ahead to the early 90s.
• 32:51
  Actually remote control aircraft research has been going on for decades. But if you jump ahead
• 33:00
  to the late 80s, early 90s, we say this system called the uninterruptible autopilot
• 33:07
  was developed and produced. And you can Google uninterruptible autopilot or Boeing Honeywell
• 33:14
  uninterruptible autopilot. And the first thing that pops up is a Wikipedia article that describes
• 33:20
  what I'm about to regarding this system. But it claims that Boeing didn't patent it until 2006.
• 33:26
  Well, this is true. We've got the patent on this thing, but we've also talked to witnesses who
• 33:31
  worked on this airplane in 1996, five years before 9-11. It was installed on a Boeing 757
• 33:39
  aircraft. So the patent is there, but we know better that it was developed before 9-11.
• 33:46
  This system enables electronic hijacking and remote control of a commercial jet
• 33:53
  aircraft and fly through employment of the system called the uninterruptible autopilot.
• 33:59
  And what it does is take complete control of the aircraft's autopilot and flight management
• 34:03
  computer and drives it to wherever it wants to take the target, whether to another airport
• 34:08
  to land it or into a building. And once the systems engage, the pilots can no longer disconnect
• 34:13
  if they're along for the ride. As a matter of fact, there's four ways of disengaging an
• 34:18
  autopilot. The switch you turn it on with, a button on the yoke or the steering wheel,
• 34:23
  you apply 70-pound greater force on one of the controls, or you pull the circuit breaker. Well,
• 34:29
  you can pull every circuit breaker on the airplane and the system's still engaged
• 34:33
  because it's got its own power source and it's back door. And so it's a pretty incredible
• 34:39
  system, but it does exist. Which begs the question, why if they could do that if the
• 34:47
  official narrative is true, why didn't they take over the planes and land them?
• 34:52
  Precisely. And of course, George Boy George Bush came out at the time and said, well,
• 34:59
  we hope that at some point we'll be able to have a system which can take over the aircraft
• 35:06
  and land it. I mean, he was, well, he passed for a pilot with the National Guard.
• 35:14
  He must have known, and people around him certainly knew, that that system already
• 35:20
  was in place. That was a diversion, wasn't it? Exactly. That's exactly what I was given.
• 35:26
  He made that statement and a speech between 2757 and O'Hare. And I used to have it on our website
• 35:32
  where he made that statement. But everybody knew about it. Like I say, I believe the whole
• 35:39
  thing was this huge black project. I've gone in with the Freedom of Information Act to the FAA
• 35:45
  and other government agencies saying, give us any information you have on the uninterruptable
• 35:51
  autopilot system. And there isn't any out there. As a matter of fact, I can go into it later about
• 35:56
  what we've tried to do to get a hold of the government on all this stuff. But they've kept
• 36:03
  it well hidden. As a matter of fact, most pilots I've talked to aren't even aware that this
• 36:07
  system exists. When I pointed out to them, they said, get out of here. And then when I go through and
• 36:12
  explain to them everything I just talked about, they're dumbfounded that it even exists on the
• 36:17
  airplane. So a few years ago, several years ago, and I can't find the article anymore,
• 36:23
  the Towns Airlines was taking delivery on new aircraft and they were doing a parts
• 36:27
  inventory to make sure they got everything they paid for. And they ran across this system and
• 36:32
  got a hold of Boeing and said, what is this? And when Boeing explained it to them, they said,
• 36:37
  get it out of the aircraft, which would cost them money to do, but they did get it out of the aircraft.
• 36:43
  So very secretive. Yeah, one of the great ways they hide the truth from the public is they hide
• 36:49
  the level of potential of technology, don't they? I mean, they'll tell you when the technology
• 36:56
  comes into the public arena, oh, we've just developed this. They don't tell you that
• 37:00
  that's been possible to happen long before. We just haven't told you. And so when people
• 37:07
  like you come out and say, this is what they did, people go, oh, that's not possible.
• 37:12
  Right, right. The 2006 patent to me was a distraction to make people look at it and say,
• 37:20
  oh, look what they've done to prevent another 9-11. They come out with a system that can
• 37:24
  take control of them because that's the public stated design purpose of the system.
• 37:29
  But to prevent would be hijackers from commandeering the commercial jet aircraft and fly it by
• 37:35
  remotely guiding it to one of 108 different airports in the world and auto landing it.
• 37:40
  So people go, oh, well, they come up with a system to prevent another 9-11. And you say,
• 37:45
  not so fast. It was developed well before 9-11 and then placed too. So what in your view, Dan,
• 37:56
  what happened to the passengers? Do you say they were on the planes that were involved or
• 38:02
  they were landed and other planes took over? Well, that's a big debate out there, David.
• 38:10
  Some people say, yeah, the plane didn't even take off, which is absurd. I was at Newark that
• 38:13
  morning at the airport in the United Nineties. We took off with crew and passengers. But
• 38:19
  some people say, hey, there was an airborne swap of aircraft. And I don't know if you're
• 38:24
  familiar with Rebecca Rossworth, but she claimed they were diverted up to a New England airport.
• 38:30
  Passengers were required to make the phone calls before they were snuffed in the airplane,
• 38:35
  taken someplace else. Another pilot named Phil McConnell claimed the airplanes were
• 38:40
  remotely guided out over the Atlantic and blown up there. And then there were others who claim
• 38:45
  the planes were diverted to Cleveland and Chicago. But that goes outside the scope
• 38:50
  of our 9-11 pilot whistleblowers organization. But because I don't know for sure, and there's no
• 39:00
  way of proving it, I really don't know. But it's entirely possible. I'll point this out. United
• 39:06
  175 that struck the South Tyre and the second airplane did, that's why I'm tired. There are
• 39:12
  four independent photographs taken by CNN and three other private photographers. And all four of
• 39:19
  show a pod on the bottom of the aircraft. It's a long cylindrical pod. And I believe these photos
• 39:28
  were examined by photographic experts in Spain and determined that they were real.
• 39:35
  The pod was there, it wasn't photoshopped because the photographs were too grainy to have done
• 39:40
  anything like that. So if those pods were actually on the airplane, then it wasn't United
• 39:45
  175 that hit the South Tyre because the bottom of the fuselage of the 767 is smooth. So some people
• 39:54
  claim that there was an airplane swap and that a military aircraft was replaced while others
• 40:01
  even claimed there were no airplanes. I'll be attacked when this is aired because
• 40:08
  I get attacked all the time. People saying there were no airplanes. I claim there were
• 40:12
  holograms. And then I'll say to them, well, there were no airplanes. What happened to the
• 40:17
  four airplanes with crew and passengers on them? And they don't have an answer for that.
• 40:22
  Well, we also have Operation Northwoods, don't we?
• 40:28
  Exactly. Which was a plan for people who haven't come across that at the time of President Kennedy
• 40:35
  to take over aircraft or replace aircraft where they would take off from an East Coast airport
• 40:47
  and then they would be replaced by one in the same colors, which was a drone.
• 40:55
  They would fly over Cuba. This is all in official documents. And they would explode it
• 41:00
  by radio signal over Cuba and then blame the Cubans for, and what have you, Castro, for
• 41:07
  blowing it up and justifying an invasion of Cuba. So I mean, that's in official documents that
• 41:16
  they were preparing to do that in the 1960s. Exactly. I followed Northwood. Northwood's
• 41:29
  one of many false examples of false flags the United States has been involved in. You can go
• 41:35
  back to Gulf of Tonkin. You can talk about even as recent as the Oklahoma City bombing there.
• 41:41
  There's any number of false flag events that the United States has been involved in. So
• 41:48
  none of this surprises me, this false flag that they did, but it was on such a grand scale.
• 41:54
  And I believe that something like the Oklahoma City bombing of the Murray building there was
• 42:01
  a test of the gullibility of the U.S. population as to what they believe. And I believe that the
• 42:08
  9-11 false flag was a global test of the gullibility of the world's population
• 42:15
  and to believe in it. And it works so far. There's people like you, David, that are out
• 42:21
  here doing this. That's keeping the story alive. And that's what needs to be done.
• 42:26
  So let's just take the planes took off. There was interaction between the pilots and air traffic
• 42:39
  control, which then suddenly stopped. So the pilots would have been what? They'd have been looking
• 42:47
  at each other going what's going on when the plane started doing things that had nothing to do
• 42:52
  with what they were doing. Right. It had to have been horrifying for them. That's a big question.
• 42:58
  Some people claim that it's uninterruptible autopilot systems, silences, radio communication,
• 43:07
  and the aircraft transponder. But I can't find that in writing anywhere. But somehow
• 43:11
  the radios were shut off as were the transponders. But imagine that scenario you just described where
• 43:18
  the airplane just takes off on its own. They try to disconnect the autopilot and they can't do it.
• 43:23
  They try to get a radio call out. And that doesn't happen. So it hadn't been horrifying for them.
• 43:32
  So what overall or where overall do you think we are now? I mean, this is the 22nd
• 43:39
  anniversary. There's been so much exposure of the lies. And still we're still here and people that
• 43:48
  were blatantly involved in it are still at large. I mean, it must get very frustrating for you.
• 43:55
  It does, but I still won't give up and neither will you.
• 44:00
  No way. Let me just try to, I'm not going to get into our group. I'm a director and
• 44:06
  international spokesperson for a group called 9-Eleven Pilot with some board. And what we're trying to
• 44:10
  expose is exactly what we've been talking about here. And we spent three years going to the U.S.
• 44:17
  government saying we want you to investigate this. And we did letter writing emails, phone calls,
• 44:22
  et cetera. And we're totally ignored. And just recently, I sent a letter to President Biden
• 44:27
  saying, Hey, and I had sent two live letters to him before knowing he hadn't read them.
• 44:32
  But hopefully somebody in the staff might say, Hey, we gave the U.S. government a chance to
• 44:38
  investigate this. Now we're going to take it to other countries that would be
• 44:42
  more interested. And that is the two billion Muslim community that's been so harmed by 9-Eleven
• 44:49
  with his homophobia is still running rampant 22 years later here. So what we've done is joined
• 44:56
  hands with the biggest 9-Eleven truth groups and individuals in the world. And we've created this
• 45:04
  9-Eleven truth coalition of the willing. And what we're trying to do is recruit the ministers of
• 45:11
  foreign affairs from the 57 Islamic countries that are members of the Organization of Islamic
• 45:18
  Cooperation and people that aren't familiar with that organization. That's the United Nations
• 45:23
  of the Islamic world. It represents these 57 countries. And they claim to be the collective voice
• 45:31
  of the Muslim community. So we petition them in letters and trying to get through them on phone
• 45:37
  calls. I've only been successful once there. Trying to say, Hey, the United States, you'll
• 45:44
  agree with me on this statement, David, the United States government or any Western government,
• 45:49
  for that matter, will ever open an investigation into 9-Eleven regardless of who's in office,
• 45:55
  because I believe they're complicit in the crime. However, you look at how many
• 46:01
  there's 193 countries in the world and look at how a few world leaders have spoken on.
• 46:07
  You can talk about Muhammad and Malaysia, Prog-Majinadon in Iran, a few other people spoke
• 46:13
  but nobody else will because I believe their phrase will get whacked, the leader of the country,
• 46:20
  although destroy the country financially or otherwise. So they looked at what's happened
• 46:25
  at Libya and Iraq and they don't want that to happen in their countries. But we believe that
• 46:30
  if we could join together these 57 governments, they can't attack all of them at once and get
• 46:37
  them on the same page and hold this, we call it an international Islamic commission for 9-Eleven
• 46:43
  Inquiry, a Muslim 9-Eleven commission. And we believe that if we could get that out to 2 billion
• 46:50
  Muslims, that's one quarter of the global population, that we might have some success
• 46:55
  in bringing this all to public light. I know it's a bold venture and it's a long shot,
• 47:02
  but because I've been involved so long in this and realized that the US government isn't going to do
• 47:08
  anything, I've been up in Washington kicking doors down, trying to get politicians to listen.
• 47:14
  And it's a hopeless endeavor. So I just looked at the real picture of what's going on and who
• 47:20
  might be interested. And this to me is our last hope of getting it out to the global population.
• 47:26
  Well, obviously, we all know that an enormous number of politicians are just moronic.
• 47:30
  I mean, they just go along with anything. But there must be a lot of politicians
• 47:38
  who absolutely know the official story of 9-Eleven is not true and they just do nothing.
• 47:45
  Right. Well, that gets into who we think was responsible for the planning and execution of
• 47:52
  9-Eleven and what organizations have a stranglehold on every level and branch of the US government,
• 47:59
  Congress and the White House. So we both know who that is.
• 48:04
  And there are obviously some who would like to speak out, but are terrified of the consequences
• 48:11
  and their funding to continuing politics, I'm sure. But also the pilots, I mean,
• 48:19
  you're an experienced pilot, but there's a lot of experienced pilots who must also know
• 48:24
  that the official narrative of the hijackers flying the planes when they couldn't fly Cessnas
• 48:30
  is ridiculous. But I guess it's fear that stops them.
• 48:35
  Exactly. I mean, I'm part of another organization called Whistleblowing
• 48:40
  Airline Piles Association and we're attacking that very tank. And you look at the measures
• 48:46
  an airline will go through to silence would be whistleblower. And part of what we did with
• 48:53
  our organization was go on and interview pilots that have get their assessment of the pilot skills
• 49:00
  and whether or not they could fly those profiles. And it was like pulling teeth to get pilots. We
• 49:06
  got them on film and we only have 10 of them on our website. We have more, but YouTube
• 49:11
  start taking them down saying it was hate speech. It's hate speech to say it's not possible
• 49:19
  to fly a plane if you can't fly a Cessna. So we could put them on YouTube and we can go to another
• 49:26
  video platform, but we didn't want to lose our channel. So we've got 10 of them on our website
• 49:32
  and they're all echoing the same thing I've said that it was impossible for them. That's all in
• 49:38
  the airplane. But getting back to what you said, as near as I can determine, there's roughly 300,000
• 49:45
  pilots in the world. Okay. And that doesn't sound like a big number, but there's 8 billion people
• 49:49
  on the planet. So really is a small fraction of the global population. And after 9-11, once I
• 49:56
  realized that they were using 9-11 for Afghanistan, Shakanon, Iraq, et cetera, I actually was running
• 50:05
  around the United Airlines saying to pilots, we've got to do some because at the same time United
• 50:11
  was in bankruptcy and we were getting beat to death by a bankruptcy court in Chicago.
• 50:18
  And they said, no, we can't say anything. The patriotic furbors to Ohio will get crucified.
• 50:24
  We can't go there, Dan. So they could have said something early on. There were people
• 50:29
  early on that realized that the story was a lie, but they didn't do it. And the tragedy is
• 50:35
  22 years later, they're still not doing it. I mean, you can talk about the Airline
• 50:40
  Pilots Association, the largest pilot union in the world represents 60,000 pilots on the
• 50:46
  North American continent alone. They don't condemn the official story. All they did was put up a
• 50:56
  monument for the Alpha pilots that were killed that day outside their headquarters, but they
• 51:02
  could have spoken out and they haven't. So it's sad. I want to come to your treatment
• 51:11
  before we finish, but I'm sure people have so many questions about 9-11, of course. And
• 51:21
  a couple of them, one about the Twin Towers and one about the Pentagon.
• 51:27
  What's your view of an airplane? Which, you know, they're big and they're strong in the sense of
• 51:36
  doing the job they do. But in terms of solid steel, they're not that strong at all, either with
• 51:43
  the aluminium or that that's involved, a very thin aluminium by comparison. What's your view of
• 51:51
  the claim that being hit by an aircraft could bring down those massive towers?
• 52:02
  Well, there's a big argument there. Some people say that the aircraft hadn't even achieved those
• 52:07
  speeds. Other aircraft structural engineers say yes, they could. A big argument about whether
• 52:12
  or not to fall apart. But if you look at a 100 ton aircraft traveling at 500 knots,
• 52:19
  that's a lot of kinetic energy. And people say that's why they argue, no, there were no
• 52:25
  airplanes that there were pre-planet explosives in the building, which I don't agree with. And
• 52:33
  so I believe that the aircraft traveling at the speed they did, given the weight of the
• 52:38
  aircraft, could have made the hole in the building. But I don't believe the jet fuel fires that
• 52:44
  ensued and the structural damage caused by the aircraft bought the buildings down. I believe
• 52:50
  it was a control demolition. I couldn't agree more. And what about the Pentagon? Do you think there
• 52:56
  was a plane or there was a missile? Again, people argue that point that's outside the scope
• 53:06
  of our organization's intention, because all we say is the hijackers couldn't have fallen in the
• 53:14
  un-interrupted bottom of the could. But my own personal view, I've heard both sides of the story,
• 53:19
  and it's entirely possible that there was an aircraft swap and whatever happened to American 77,
• 53:25
  I don't know. But I've also talked with David Chandler, who's a physics teacher who has his
• 53:33
  organization, and he claims based on flight data recorder and other information he had
• 53:39
  that American 77 was there. I spent an hour and a half with him and one of his associates on
• 53:46
  Skype share screen, and they showed me the oldest data that they had. And it was very
• 53:52
  convincing. The only problem I have with it is that the government provided some of the data
• 53:57
  and I don't trust anything the government puts out. You can't believe the thing that comes
• 54:02
  out of government. That's the trouble, sadly. So you started speaking out about you didn't buy
• 54:12
  the story, and you were talking about airport security and United Airlines security,
• 54:19
  and suddenly your life fell apart, didn't it? What exactly happened?
• 54:26
  Well, initially I had a sign on a JFK in Newark, and I had flysins who had friends that were killed
• 54:33
  in the United 93 that cracked out in Pennsylvania. They were almost freaking out over the whole
• 54:39
  situation here and not being protected in the back by those promises that have been made by
• 54:44
  government. So they asked me to say something, which I did. Just at the, my chief pilot and
• 54:50
  my union leaders who were friends of mine in New York, I told them, and there's a watcher damn
• 54:55
  these guys are nasty. So I said, who and they wouldn't tell me. But because I got that feedback
• 55:02
  from them, I decided to file a federal report called the captain's report. And I got
• 55:08
  blowback from the company saying from the manager said, the company thinks you're a big
• 55:13
  mouth, lose cannon whistleblower and want you to go away. And then I decided I was going to
• 55:19
  write a letter to the CEO of United. And my union leader in New York played with me to let
• 55:24
  him run it by the lawyers in Chicago, which I did. I'll make the story short because it's
• 55:30
  less than an hour. The long story short, the union lawyers said, don't send the letter in,
• 55:36
  even though he agreed with what I was stating. And basically what I was saying was, hey, the
• 55:41
  pressure is being exerted on the union because we're in bankruptcy is precluding them from
• 55:48
  representing pilots out on the line because federal reports are being stonewalled.
• 55:54
  So the union leader and the union lawyer said to me, Dan, if you send that letter in,
• 55:59
  you'll never fly another United Airlines airplane again in your life. That's really
• 56:03
  what they're going to do to you. They'll find a way to professionally,
• 56:08
  medically or psychologically ground you for life. Trust me, we've seen it happen before. Well,
• 56:13
  I had to, David, and what I did to protect myself, I had a correspondence trail a mile long.
• 56:19
  I had witnesses, I had recorded phone conversation, and I saw mental health professionals
• 56:25
  in Atlanta where I was living at the time and said, hey, test me. They're going to try to say,
• 56:30
  mentally unstable, which I did. So naive Dan believes I can press forward with this. So
• 56:36
  what I did was file a federal report that bought the FAA in. And as soon as I did that,
• 56:42
  I was moved from schedule without worrying. They said, you've got to come up to New York
• 56:47
  and talk to us about these reports. Well, they shouldn't have even had them because
• 56:52
  when you file these reports, you guarantee anonymity and you can file them with impunity.
• 56:57
  And I said, what are you doing with them? They know you have to, I said, well,
• 57:01
  the union lawyer said they won't represent me. I got to bring my attorney and they
• 57:04
  wouldn't let me do it. So we're in an impact. So the next thing I know is they pump me on
• 57:09
  sick list. And you only have so much sick list on the book. And I was running out of sick list.
• 57:14
  I was going to go now and pay. I called my chief pilot and said, hey, Bob,
• 57:17
  now this is punitive. I haven't done anything wrong. And he says, Dan, submit to the employee
• 57:23
  assistance program. It's guaranteed protection of your pay, the company endorsed at the FAA,
• 57:30
  the union, all endorsed the program. All you have to do is come to Chicago
• 57:34
  and see a doctor. And that'll be all you have to do is agree to go along with what we say,
• 57:42
  which I did. I went up and saw the doctor. And one of the first questions he asked me was,
• 57:47
  have you been seeing a mental health professional? I said, yeah, as a matter of fact, I have. Hold
• 57:52
  on. And I pulled out my cell phone and handed it to him. I go, this is my doctor in Atlanta
• 57:57
  and he talked to him, right? So I'm stretching this out too far. But I wound up going over
• 58:03
  and seeing the doctor. And I thought I was going over to an office. It was a mental health facility.
• 58:14
  It was a mental health hospital. And I talked to a Catholic nun that was a psychologist,
• 58:20
  but she wasn't a psychiatrist. And she goes, look, it was really late in the day.
• 58:25
  And I had a long day. And she goes, look, you've got to see a psychiatrist. The company
• 58:29
  wants you to. We can make arrangements for you to spend the night here. There's a big mistake
• 58:35
  on my part, but I was tired. He said, you'll see a psychiatrist first thing in the morning.
• 58:40
  I said, okay, I'll do that rather than catch cab out in the back. And I did that. And it was a
• 58:46
  big mistake because my one night overnight there wound up three days. It was one floor
• 58:54
  over the Cuckoo's Nest. I had to have meals with people, had to attend group therapy sessions,
• 59:00
  et cetera. And I finally met a psychiatrist on my third day there. I said, I'm not going to play
• 59:06
  your game anymore. I've gone along with it as I was required to do. I said, what is your diagnosis
• 59:11
  going to be? And she goes, well, we're going to say you were bipolar. Well, I smiled and I said,
• 59:20
  look, it's the first time I met you and I haven't exhibited any symptoms of bipolar disorder. I
• 59:26
  know what it is. And she goes, well, that's what we're going to say. And I said, well,
• 59:29
  I have mental health professionals in Atlanta that beg to differ with you on this diagnosis. So
• 59:35
  I got out of there. The skids were greased. They medically grounded me on that diagnosis.
• 59:42
  And I fought for five years to get my medical. No, I didn't. I realized what I was up against
• 59:49
  with the government. And I fought for five years to expose this gross violation of recall laws
• 59:56
  of what they did to me. And they closed my case after five years. So I'm interviewing any of my
• 1:00:02
  witnesses or reviewing any of my evidence. So this group we have called the Whistler
• 1:00:08
  Airline Pilots Association. We're going to try to expose this because there's many pilots out there
• 1:00:14
  this has happened to. As a matter of fact, just recently, a Delta pilot named Karleen Pettit
• 1:00:20
  won her case after five years and spending a half million dollars on the exact same thing.
• 1:00:27
  She had a PhD in safety and reporting safety issues at Delta Airlines. They pulled her up
• 1:00:33
  the line center to the strength, determined she was bipolar and grounded her. I mean,
• 1:00:38
  it's absurd what the lengths will go. And it's collusion between the airlines and the FAA that
• 1:00:45
  caused this to occur. The airline FAA corruption is legendary, isn't it? I've read a heck of a
• 1:00:53
  lot about it. But so you start speaking out about 9-11, you start speaking out about
• 1:00:59
  ASP security and your own airline sets out to label you basically crazy or psychologically
• 1:01:09
  imbalanced. They couldn't care less about you and your family as long as they shut you up.
• 1:01:17
  Well, it basically almost destroyed me. I'm happily married now, but it destroyed a 27-year
• 1:01:23
  marriage. Alienator, my two kids who blame me for the divorce still believe the official
• 1:01:28
  story. I think I'm a whacked out conspiracy nut and they don't talk to me to this day.
• 1:01:33
  I lost four million dollars in pay pension and stock. It destroyed a 35-year career in aviation
• 1:01:39
  and ruined my reputation as a pilot. So I paid a heavy price for doing what I did. And had I
• 1:01:46
  been given the opportunity to do it over again, I would have, but I would have proceeded with
• 1:01:51
  more caution. I would have gotten an aviation attorney in advance. There's a lot of things I
• 1:01:57
  know now that I didn't know then. And you got to realize this was the 2002-2003 time frame.
• 1:02:03
  And we know a heck of a lot more about how corrupt the government is now than we did 20 years ago.
• 1:02:09
  I think anyone that comes into this, like doctors that spoke out over the COVID situation,
• 1:02:19
  scientists that speak out about human cause climate change and say it's the official
• 1:02:23
  narrative isn't true, they all find to their shock just what evil has been in their midst
• 1:02:33
  without them realizing it was all around them in terms of authority. I think the way you've
• 1:02:40
  stuck with it, Dan, against all the things that you've described, all the consequences is absolutely
• 1:02:48
  fantastic. And if there was a lot more Dan Handlers in the world, it would be a different
• 1:02:52
  place. So I wish you all the best ongoing. Anything that I can do to help get information out,
• 1:03:01
  just ask. And I think it's incredible. And I would hope, I would hope embarrassing
• 1:03:11
  for people, whether they're pilots or whether they're people who know,
• 1:03:16
  who see what sacrifices you've made against their silence. And I hope they might be shamed into
• 1:03:26
  speaking out. But of course, they're so terrified of the consequences of doing so
• 1:03:34
  that they'll probably go to their grave knowing it's alive but saying nothing.
• 1:03:39
  That's what's dangerous about this, David, because what happened, like what happened to me,
• 1:03:44
  sends a chilling signal out to any other airline pilot that ever
• 1:03:49
  contemplated speaking out to keep your head down and you're going to lose it.
• 1:03:53
  So it's not just with regard to 9-11. It's any safety issue out there.
• 1:03:58
  Pilots are afraid to speak out because they know what will happen to them. And it's unsafe.
• 1:04:05
  And it just made me chuckle just a little bit to think of people that say to me
• 1:04:11
  they could never cover it up because people would speak out if they knew.
• 1:04:17
  Well, now with your example, we see why they don't.
• 1:04:22
  Exactly. And you look at this medical grounding using a psychiatrist. This goes back to Joe
• 1:04:31
  Stalin's reign of terror. It was called psycho... I can't think of it with the term of it.
• 1:04:37
  It's mechanisms of dissent. Anyone that opposed the government, he would throw them in an insane asylum,
• 1:04:46
  but he'd leave them there. So psychopathological mechanisms of dissent, that's what it was groping
• 1:04:52
  for. That's what it was called. And it's going on today. If you own a piece of paper that's
• 1:04:58
  required for you to conduct your business, whether you're a doctor, a lawyer, an accountant,
• 1:05:04
  a pilot, a nurse, and you lose that certificate, you're not going to practice your profession anymore.
• 1:05:13
  And for pilots, you're required to have two pieces of paper. One is your license,
• 1:05:18
  and the other is your medical certificate. If you lose that medical certificate,
• 1:05:22
  it's as good as losing your license. So I paid not just financially and otherwise,
• 1:05:28
  I paid a heavy price for it. So... Well, we're very grateful to you, Dan, because without people like
• 1:05:34
  you, we wouldn't know what we do. And so thanks for talking to us and the very best with everything
• 1:05:42
  you do. Well, thank you, David. It's a pleasure and a privilege to meet you. And thank you
• 1:05:47
  for having me on the program. So there we go. Another year passes the 22nd
• 1:05:57
  since that most blatant of false flag inside jobs called 9-11. And thank goodness that people like
• 1:06:09
  Dan Hanley and others won't let it go and won't let it drop. Because
• 1:06:20
  before our eyes in plain sight, the so-called deep state of America in league with other places,
• 1:06:31
  including Israel massively, let's forget that, if you look at the evidence,
• 1:06:38
  3,000 people were killed. The world was changed. And the horrors of 9-11 are still massively in
• 1:06:50
  the memory of people that experienced it, people that lost loved ones, obviously.
• 1:06:55
  And 22 years later, those people are still at large. And in the meantime, they've been
• 1:07:05
  continuing to make decisions that have dictated the direction of the world.
• 1:07:13
  9-11 was when this global cult, as I call it, really put itself on public display.
• 1:07:22
  And we're going to let it get away with it by thinking, oh, that's past now.
• 1:07:29
  Not around here we won't. I hope you've got something out of it. And the people that are
• 1:07:36
  new to 9-11, because 22, people of 22 years of age and a little bit older,
• 1:07:42
  they would not have any memory of it. That's how long it's been. But whether you were there at
• 1:07:49
  the time or whether you're learning about it now, this is a line in the sand. We must not
• 1:07:57
  let it go.
• 1:08:07
  If you want to read more and watch more of my content, then go to the description under the video
• 1:08:20
  where you can buy my books. The latest one is The Roadmap, where you can get tickets for
• 1:08:26
  public events and how you can subscribe to a fantastic video channel called iconiciconic.com.
• 1:09:01
  And I went up to the Tesla room and thankfully there was a little break in between sessions.
• 1:09:06
  I've been super excited to try the Tesla machine for quite a year now.
• 1:09:10
  And Gabriel put the Tesla on my ankle. And as soon as the machine turned on,
• 1:09:15
  I immediately felt this actually kind of hurt in the back of my wrist.
• 1:09:19
  Within a couple hours, it felt completely normal again. I was totally back to walking normally,
• 1:09:25
  no limping, there's no swelling. And after one session, that particular pain
• 1:09:30
  went down to zero. Pain that I have that was kind of nagging is gone. It's pretty amazing.
• 1:09:36
  And within a couple hours, it felt completely normal again. Zero.
• 1:09:42
  Tingling at first hurt at first and then it dissipated and then went away.
• 1:09:46
  And I think holding the bulbs for like 20 minutes really helped my wrist a lot.
• 1:09:50
  And I was totally back to walking normally, no limping, there's no swelling.