Latest / The Vault: The Epstein Files / Ghislaine Maxwell's Undisputed Statement Of Facts Pursuant To Virginia's Allegations (Part 4)

Transcript

Ghislaine Maxwell's Undisputed Statement Of Facts Pursuant To Virginia's Allegations (Part 4) · The Vault: The Epstein Files

• 0:00
  Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles.
• 0:04
  In this episode, we're going to continue taking a look
• 0:07
  at Gallaine Maxwell's response to Virginia Roberts Contested Facts and
• 0:13
  the Plaintiff's Undisputed Facts Number thirty eight. Plaintiff re enrolled
• 0:19
  in high school from June twenty first, two thousand, until
• 0:22
  March seventh, two thousand and two. After finishing the ninth
• 0:25
  grade high school year at Forest Hills High School on
• 0:29
  June ninth, nineteen ninety nine, Plaintiff re enrolled at Wellington
• 0:33
  Adult High School on June twenty first, two thousand, again
• 0:37
  on August sixteenth, two thousand, and August fourteenth, two thousand
• 0:41
  and one. On September twentieth, two thousand and one, Plaintiff
• 0:45
  then enrolled at Royal Palm Beach High School. A few
• 0:48
  weeks later, on October twelfth, two thousand and one, she
• 0:51
  matriculated at Survivor's Charter School. Survivor's Charter School was an
• 0:56
  alternative school designed to assist students who had been uns
• 0:59
  scxsful at more traditional schools. Plaintiff remained enrolled at Survivor's
• 1:06
  Charter School until March seventh, two thousand and two. She
• 1:11
  was present fifty six days and absent thirteen days during
• 1:14
  her time there. Plaintiff never received her high school diploma
• 1:17
  or ged. Plaintiff and Figueroa went back to school together
• 1:22
  at Survivor's charter school example p at twenty three through
• 1:26
  twenty seven. The school day there lasted from morning until
• 1:30
  early afternoon id at twenty three through twenty seven. Plaintiff argues,
• 1:36
  again without evidentiary support, that the codes on the school
• 1:40
  records indicate semester's start and end dates rather than dates
• 1:44
  plaintiff was in school. Her misreading of the records is
• 1:48
  a parent from their face. One column is labeled entry
• 1:51
  date and the next withdrawal date, neither say semester start
• 1:55
  date or semester end date. Moreover, the codes simply prove
• 1:59
  the point plainfi if entered school codes EO one and
• 2:03
  EA one on the designated entry date, and withdrew either
• 2:07
  prior to completion to enter another training program or who
• 2:11
  will continue in the class program the next term or
• 2:14
  school year on the dates designated with jawel. The school
• 2:18
  records display entry and withdrawal dates for Wellington High School
• 2:22
  Adult Program from June twenty first, two thousand through August fifteenth,
• 2:27
  two thousand, from August sixteenth, two thousand through August thirteenth,
• 2:31
  two thousand and one, and from August fourteenth, two thousand
• 2:34
  and one through September twentieth, two thousand and one, and
• 2:38
  then an entry that same day, September twentieth, two thousand
• 2:41
  and one, at Survivor's charter school. Plaintiff would have one
• 2:45
  belief that the records show a school on Plaintiff's official
• 2:48
  transcript that she never went to Wellington High School Adult
• 2:52
  program that indicates that she withdrew the very day she
• 2:56
  concededly entered Survivor's charter school. Her intentional misreading of the
• 3:00
  record is yet another attempt to offuscate plaintiff's lack of
• 3:04
  memory regarding where and when she went to school, just
• 3:08
  like she failed to remember eight jobs that she held
• 3:11
  in two thousand, whereas she claimed to have none. The
• 3:14
  test is admissible evidence to the country, and plaintiff offers none.
• 3:19
  The flight logs which show trips in early two thousand
• 3:21
  and one do not contradict the evidence because they are
• 3:24
  during the period of time she was enrolled in adult
• 3:27
  high school, a place where night classes were taught and
• 3:30
  where one might circumstantially infer careful attendance records were not
• 3:35
  kept Fact number thirty nine. During the year two thousand,
• 3:40
  Plaintiff worked at numerous jobs. In two thousand, while living
• 3:43
  with her fiance, Plaintiff held five different jobs at Aviculture
• 3:47
  Breeding and Research Center, Southeast Employee Management Company, the Club
• 3:52
  mar A Lago, Oasis Outsourcing, and Neiman Marcus. Her taxable
• 3:57
  earnings that year totaled nearly nine thousand dollars. Plaintiff cannot
• 4:01
  now recall either the Southeast Employment Management Company or the
• 4:05
  Oasis Outsourcing jobs. Example at Q at four seventy and
• 4:09
  four seventy one reply. Plaintiff does not dispute the facts
• 4:14
  as presented, merely argues regarding their significance. The Social Security
• 4:18
  Administration records detail the five jobs at which she worked
• 4:22
  in two thousand. The month and day of the jobs
• 4:25
  are irrelevant for purposes of this recitation of facts. Likewise,
• 4:30
  plaintiff does not dispute the taxable earnings she made that year,
• 4:34
  or that she does not remember the jobs associated without
• 4:37
  Southeast Employment Management Company or Oasis Outsourcing, whether they were
• 4:42
  payroll or not. Where she made three thousand two hundred
• 4:45
  and twelve dollars and two thousand, thirty seven dollars that year.
• 4:49
  She also forgot about the job at Nieman Marcus, where
• 4:52
  she made one four hundred and forty dollars in two thousand,
• 4:56
  until she was confronted with the SSA records declaration a
• 5:01
  example five number forty undisputed fact forty. Plaintiff's employment at
• 5:07
  mar A Lago SPA began in the fall of two thousand.
• 5:10
  Plaintiff's father, Sky Roberts, was hired as a maintenance worker
• 5:14
  at the mar A Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida,
• 5:17
  beginning on April eleventh, two thousand. Miss Roberts worked there
• 5:21
  year round for approximately three years. After working there for
• 5:25
  a period of time, mister Roberts became acquainted with the
• 5:28
  head of the spy area and recommended plaintiff for a
• 5:31
  job there. Mar A Lago closes every Mother's Day and
• 5:35
  reopens on November first. Example you at mar A Lago
• 5:39
  zero two one two. Most of the employees who work
• 5:42
  at mar A Lago, including all employees of the SPA
• 5:45
  area such as SPA attendants, are seasonal and work only
• 5:48
  when the club is open. I e. November one and
• 5:51
  Mother's Day. Example t at seventy two and seventy three,
• 5:56
  plaintiff was hired as a seasonal SPA attendant to work
• 5:59
  at the mar A Lago club in the fall of
• 6:01
  two thousand, after she had turned seventeen the reply. Plaintiff's
• 6:07
  response is misleading. First, she does not dispute that Miss
• 6:10
  Roberts and her father began working at mar A Lago
• 6:13
  in April of two thousand, nor that he worked there
• 6:15
  for some time, became acquainted with the head of the
• 6:18
  spy area, and recommended his daughter for a job. Second,
• 6:21
  plaintiff contends that job postings in job descriptions from two
• 6:25
  thousand and two and later are irrelevant. There are no
• 6:28
  such job posting cited. Rather, the job posting cited was
• 6:33
  from October two thousand, the same time the plaintiff was hired.
• 6:37
  Compare example v posting for Saturday, October fourteenth and Sunday
• 6:42
  October fifteenth with calendar for year two thousand showing Saturday
• 6:46
  and Sundays in October corresponding to those dates. Finally, plaintiff
• 6:51
  points to her own recollection as contrary proof. Her recollection
• 6:54
  about when she worked at mar A Lago has shifted
• 6:57
  dramatically over time. First she claim aimed it was nineteen
• 7:00
  ninety eight see Jane do one O two complaint. Then
• 7:03
  it was nineteen ninety nine see document number one. Now
• 7:07
  in this response she has changed her answer to two thousand.
• 7:11
  Her vague recollections about what year have been off base.
• 7:15
  No credit should be given to her new found recollection
• 7:18
  of which month that she worked there. In any event,
• 7:21
  she presents no admissible, credible evidence to contradict mar A
• 7:25
  Lago's own records. Even Plaintiff's father, a longtime employee of
• 7:30
  mar A Lago, admitted that the plays closed down in
• 7:33
  the summer. Plaintiff simply is not credible in her testimony
• 7:37
  that she recalls it being a summer job, and the
• 7:39
  fact that she did not work at the spa until
• 7:42
  at least November two thousand at the age seventeen, should
• 7:45
  be deemed admitted undisputed. Fact forty one. Plaintiff represented herself
• 7:52
  as a messuse for Jeffrey Epstein while working at mar
• 7:56
  A Lago's spa and reading a library book about massage,
• 7:59
  plainf met miss Maxwell. Plaintiff thereafter told her father that
• 8:04
  she got a job working for Jeffrey Epstein as a missus.
• 8:08
  Plaintiff's father took her to Epstein's house on one occasion
• 8:12
  around that time, and Epstein came outside and introduced himself
• 8:15
  to mister Roberts. Plaintiff commenced employment as a traveling messuse
• 8:19
  for mister Epstein. Plaintiff was excited about her job as
• 8:23
  a messuse, about traveling with him, and about meeting famous people.
• 8:27
  Plaintiff represented that she was employed as a massuse beginning
• 8:31
  in January of two thousand and one. Plaintiff never mentioned
• 8:35
  Miss Maxwell to her then fiance, Ostrich. Plaintiff's father never
• 8:39
  met Miss Maxwell. Reply. Plaintiff does not actually refute any
• 8:44
  of the facts set forth above, but rather spends her
• 8:47
  time discussing different facts. Plaintiff's father testified to what she
• 8:51
  told them that she was going to learn massage therapy.
• 8:55
  She does not contest her father's testimony that Epstein came
• 8:58
  out of the house and greeted her, fought, and that
• 9:00
  her father never met Miss Maxwell. See a reply to
• 9:03
  Undisputed Fact number forty one. Whether someone can receive a
• 9:07
  massage license under Florida law without a high school equivalency
• 9:11
  diploma is of no moment. Plaintiff does not dispute she
• 9:15
  represented herself as the masseuse to others in her own
• 9:18
  handwriting beginning in January two thousand and one. Examples M
• 9:22
  and N. These facts should be deemed admitted. Number forty
• 9:28
  two Plaintiff resumed a relationship with convicted felon Anthony Figueroa
• 9:34
  in the spring of two thousand and one. While living
• 9:36
  with Ostrich, Plaintiff lied to and cheated on him with
• 9:39
  her high school boyfriend, Anthony Figaroa. Plaintiff and Ostrich thereafter
• 9:44
  broke up, and Figaroa moved into the Bento compartment with plaintiff.
• 9:49
  When Ostrich returned to the Bento compartment to check on
• 9:52
  his pets and to retrieve his belongings, Figaroa, in Plaintiff's presence,
• 9:56
  punched Ostrich in the face. Figaroa and plaintif if fled
• 10:00
  the scene before police arrived. Figaroa was then a convicted
• 10:04
  felon and a drug abuser on probation for possession of
• 10:08
  a controlled substance. Reply. Plaintiff argues relevance regarding these facts,
• 10:13
  but contests none of them. They should be deemed admitted
• 10:18
  Plaintiff's slies, cheating, and association with a convicted felon and
• 10:22
  known drug abuser are all relevant in this defamation case
• 10:26
  concerning her reputation, purported damage to such reputation, and whether
• 10:30
  she was a known liar. As the January twenty fifteen
• 10:34
  statement contends, Number forty three, plaintiff freely and voluntarily contacted
• 10:40
  the police to come to her aid in two thousand
• 10:43
  and one and two thousand and two, but never reported
• 10:46
  to them that she was an Epstein's sex slave. In
• 10:49
  August two thousand and one, at age seventeen, while living
• 10:53
  in the same apartment, plaintiff and Figueroa hosted a party
• 10:56
  with a number of guests. During that party, according to
• 10:59
  the player paintiff, someone entered Plaintiff's room and stole five
• 11:03
  hundred dollars from her shirt pocket. Plaintiff contacted the police.
• 11:07
  She met and spoke with police officers regarding the incident,
• 11:10
  and filed a report. She did not disclose to the
• 11:13
  officer that she was a sex slave. A second time,
• 11:17
  in June two thousand and two, plaintiff contacted the police
• 11:20
  to report that her former landlord had left her belongings
• 11:24
  by the roadside and had lit her mattress on fire. Again,
• 11:28
  Plaintiff met and spoke with law enforcement, but did not
• 11:32
  complain that she was the victim of any sexual trafficking
• 11:35
  or abuse or that she was being held as a
• 11:37
  sex slave. Reply, Plaintiff again presents no admissible evidence to
• 11:43
  contradict these facts, instead arguing their relevance they should be
• 11:47
  deemed admitted. Forty four From August two thousand and one
• 11:51
  until September two thousand and two, Epstein and Maxwell were
• 11:54
  almost entirely absent from Florida on documented travel unaccompanied by
• 11:59
  plantf Flight logs maintained by Epstein's private pilot, David Rodgers
• 12:05
  evidenced the substantial number of trips away from Florida that
• 12:08
  Epstein and Maxwell took unaccompanied by plaintiff between August two
• 12:12
  thousand and one and September two thousand and two. Rogers
• 12:16
  maintained a log of all flights on which Epstein and
• 12:19
  Maxwell traveled with them. Epstein additionally traveled with another pilot
• 12:23
  who did not keep such logs, and he also occasionally
• 12:27
  traveled via commercial flights for substantially all of the thirteen
• 12:31
  months of the twenty two months from November two thousand
• 12:35
  until September two thousand and two, the plaintiff lived in
• 12:38
  Palm Beach and New Epstein. Epstein was traveling outside of
• 12:41
  Florida unaccompanied by Plaintiff. During this same time period, Plaintiff
• 12:47
  was employed at various jobs, enrolled in school, and living
• 12:50
  with her boyfriend. Reply, Plaintiff goes to great lengths to
• 12:54
  dispute facts other than those presented as undisputed Fact forty four.
• 13:00
  Competitive recitation of the flights that plaintiff was on do
• 13:04
  nothing to demonstrate the thirteen months of flights from July
• 13:07
  two thousand and one until August two thousand and two
• 13:10
  that Epstein and Maxwell were on without Plaintiff, as reflected
• 13:14
  in the logs. Her assertions regarding the other flights that
• 13:18
  she took commercial or any other plane do nothing to
• 13:21
  establish all of the many flights she was not on
• 13:25
  during thirteen of the twenty two months period during which
• 13:29
  Epstein and Maxwell were away from Palm Beach. Plaintiff does
• 13:32
  not dispute that Epstein and Maxwell were on the flights
• 13:35
  without her. The facts as presented by defendant should be
• 13:39
  deemed admitted. All right, folks, we're going to wrap up
• 13:42
  this episode right here, and in the next episode, we're
• 13:44
  going to pick up where we left off. All of
• 13:47
  the information that goes with this episode can be found
• 13:50
  in the description box.