Latest / Honey Badger Radio / Trump Nearly Murdered, Men to Blame? | Maintaining Frame 111

Transcript

Trump Nearly Murdered, Men to Blame? | Maintaining Frame 111 · Honey Badger Radio

1:10
Hello everybody, and welcome to Honey Badger Radio. My name is Brian Alison
1:14
and this is maintaining frame number one one one just so happens to be.
1:19
I don't know if you and you guys are into numerology, but that might
1:23
have a meaning. I have no idea, but one eleven, yeah,
1:27
one eleven Trump nearly murdered men to blame, and uh, we're gonna be
1:34
talking about recent events of which are of no consequence. I can't really think
1:41
of anything specific, but maybe something impactful that happened recently, but yeah,
1:47
maybe maybe just a little bit, probably not though probably much, just just
1:52
slightly. But it seems to be on everybody's lips, so let's talk about
1:56
it. And we're already starting to try out the usual suspects. So we
2:00
have calls to ban guns. We have calls too well, the questions about
2:08
the potential diversity in equity employment choices of Trump's security team. And we also
2:17
are starting to see the narrative of blaming insul violence starting to grope out of
2:24
the depths of the human subconscious as it does these times, and as usual,
2:29
like insul violence is simply men's violence, let's be honest. So once
2:36
again we're moving towards blaming men instead of blaming a highly fraught political landscape that's
2:40
just getting less and less civil and more violent, the rhetoric that's going around
2:46
by the day. Yeah, so I think it's worth talking about because you
2:51
know, two people are dead now and in this assassination tempt and that's often
2:57
overlooked. When you know, people make these kinds of political statements, often
3:02
there are bystanders that get caught in the crossfire. I mean, if we
3:06
want, we could also go over a very poorly timed triumphalist defense of Okay,
3:16
it's basically another House of Dragons thing, but it has this very unfortunate
3:21
theme that just just came out a couple like maybe a week before this happened,
3:25
in which one of the main female characters, who according to this author,
3:30
is channeling Hillary Clinton, basically opens fire in a crowd and hits a
3:35
whole bunch of civilians and now making a political statement about who is taking charge
3:38
of the presidency, I mean the throne of west Ross. But anyway,
3:43
I mean I thought, interesting, all that all the connections, right,
3:46
and we're all about connections here, so let's let's take a look. Let's
3:51
take a look at where the narrative is evolving, and then have all Right,
3:54
so you sent me this Twitter thing and it is a video, so
4:00
we're going to look at it. I think if I hit play, it
4:03
should automatically switch, even though it's not a YouTube video. So we're gonna
4:08
do that. Now. This is a tweet from uh Mario Nwfall, last
4:15
mate of trump alleged shooter. He was a loner, a common kind of
4:24
problem. This is common statement. Yeah, exactly, So let's let's give
4:29
this a listen. Yeah mm hmm, okay, Yeah. Well, I
5:28
mean we've spoken about this before on Honey Badger Radio about social exclusion and not
5:33
just extreme forms of social exclusion like this kind of bullying, but also just
5:40
the whole idea that men don't have a legitimate positive identity pushing them towards extremists
5:46
and extremist acts, and that the encouragement of that is going to encourage extremism.
5:51
I know you have your own opinions about that, but you know,
5:56
what what do you mean? Well, I mean, like about what's going
5:59
on here? Uh, but you know, like we have talked about this,
6:02
Like, I mean, you spoke about in the past. What I
6:05
was bringing up was you've spoken the past about how a lot of these guys
6:10
who are in extremist groups, including far right, because it's almost a meaningless
6:15
term, but like a white supremacist now real ones, not just the proud
6:19
boys who aren't. But you talked about how men who get sucked into that
6:26
will often just be part of multiple types of almost self contradicting ideologies or bounce
6:33
from ideology ideology because they don't what they're looking for is an identity, right
6:40
and any end yes, and they can't Like in our society, we don't
6:45
allow men to take a positive identity from like even any kind of productive participation
6:49
in society because it's all making patriarchy apparently, you know, and if if
6:55
men earn from it, then they are oppressing women through the paid way gap.
7:00
But so this this whole construction, like Michael McLuhan said, Michael Mitchell,
7:09
Michael, you know, when people don't have an identity, they resort
7:12
to violence. And when when society doesn't provide people or men a sense of
7:17
positive sense of participation in it, then that radicalization is is a symptom.
7:25
Like there's a lot more symptoms. Suicide is the probably the biggest symptom,
7:29
living lives of quiet, desperation, passive suicide like we see with George Floyd,
7:32
you know, stuff like that. This is all symptoms of a society
7:36
that's turned its back on its men, in my opinion. And I mean,
7:42
and I know that there's like a serious political context to this that I'm
7:45
not touching on because I just want to bring out the the the way that
7:49
we approach raising men and boys in our society lends its health to this kind
7:55
of radicalization. And it also occurs in other cultures too. Is has its
8:00
own marginalization of young men from like a family and productive work. You know,
8:07
with polygunny, somebody has to lose out right, So they have these
8:11
narratives in which you through violence you can earn extreminary extremist Islam has these narratives
8:18
that through violence you can earn a place in heaven. And you know,
8:22
that's sort of what's I think going on here. I mean, you have
8:24
these narratives that through violence you can earn a place. It's even even one
8:31
of the most stressful things about watching the Joker movie was how this guy who
8:37
was bullied and ostracized and isolated and was a complete loner and he got nothing
8:46
like no recognition from anyone until he was violent. Did you notice that?
8:50
Yeah? And then that that channeled him towards that particular identity. It's almost
8:56
like he was fighting at every step of the way. But the only way
9:00
he was recognized, even as a good person, was bite through engaging in
9:05
this kind of violence. And it was, interestingly enough, it was anarchistic
9:09
kind of pushing or so called punching up against the rich class kind of violence.
9:13
Right, And it's just and then that's sort of an example of this
9:18
kind. Yeah, I know, it's okay. I just wanted to get
9:22
in here really quick because apparently the audio wasn't playing for the people watching when
9:28
I played that video, So I got to find the correct source and make
9:33
sure the video is playing for it. So hold on a second while I
9:37
do that, and I apologize for the confusion. So let me just play
9:41
this clip again for you guys. He was almost every day there we go
9:46
in what way can you explain? I mean he would sit alone at lunch.
9:50
I mean he was just a outcast. And you know how kids are
9:52
nowadays, so they're going to see someone like that and they're gonna target him
9:56
because they think it's funny or whatever. So the best way I can describe
10:01
it, and it's honestly kind of sad, Like I don't want to say
10:05
this is what provoked it, but you never know. He said he was
10:11
alone. Yeah, I want to say he was a loner more because he
10:15
was just he was quiet, but like he was just bullied, Like he
10:18
was bullied so much, so much. Yeah, what did they still remember
10:26
at all what they said to him or called him. No, he was
10:31
just made fun of, I guess for the way he dressed or his appearance.
10:35
All right, so you guys should be able to hear that now and
10:41
give us a confirmation that we have the context. No, No, I'm
10:43
watching the audio. It should be it's just a it's it's a mess because
10:48
just real quick, obs, when I'm doing the live shows through video Ninja,
10:54
I have to put all of the separate audios yours, mine, whoever
10:58
else and whatever video was fine to on their own separate audio channels. But
11:01
when we do content through where we're on Discord or something, which I do
11:05
for the Patron shows, I have to completely rearrange it. So that only
11:09
the audio is all coming out of one place because in discord you can't break
11:13
it up. So this means that when I do a show, another live
11:18
show, I have to like remember to flip everything again. It's it's pain
11:22
the ass to be honest, but that's what happens. So it should be
11:26
good now, all right. So to to reply to what you were saying,
11:33
Uh yeah, I mean, let me know if if my sound is
11:39
too loud, I see that it's it seems to be peaking in the in
11:43
one place, but it's not on in here, so maybe it's not really
11:46
that bad anyway. Not the Kates who had a series of podcasts called the
11:52
in Cell Project. She spoke to several guys at work, you know,
11:58
for various sort of like organizations attract terrorist activity, and what they revealed is
12:05
that a lot of men looking for direction, looking for meaning, they join
12:11
extremist groups, just like you said, a lot. And sometimes those extremes,
12:16
they they'll go from being white supremacist to Antifa to Islamist terrorists or you
12:22
know, part of an Islamist group, and it has nothing to do with
12:24
the ideology. They don't believe in it. Most of the time, they
12:26
just want to be belong to something, and a lot of times these groups
12:31
give them that. You know, other people like James Lindsay has written about.
12:37
James Lindsay has a series called the The New Discourses podcasts, and I
12:43
remember one episode that I thought was particularly interesting where he talked about how Maoist
12:48
communists had three different circles and it was like the outer school, the Inner
12:54
School, and the inner circle, and the outer school is kind of where
12:58
these guys are at. The outer school is just people. They don't know
13:01
a lot about what the philosophy is, they don't know much about the political
13:05
stuff. They just want to feel like they're a part of something bigger than
13:09
themselves, and so they join these groups. This is where you get your
13:11
you know. We were talking a little bit on one of the news shows,
13:16
I think it was a while back about these protests going on in Columbia
13:20
regarding Israel Palestine, right, and I was trying to get across that the
13:26
people who are engaging in those protests, most of them do not actually know
13:33
what is going on with Israel Palisin. I'm not saying that they're wrong,
13:37
I'm saying they are not operating under an educated position. They are just joining
13:45
the side that makes them feel like they're part of a larger hole. Now
13:48
they may be on the right side because some people have accused me of like,
13:52
you know, caping for Israel. I know what that government is doing.
13:58
I know that they're shady shit going on. My point is the Columbia
14:01
students don't they're doing it. It's like it's like getting a monkey to answer
14:05
a mathematic mathematical question. If it puts the right answer down, that doesn't
14:09
mean it knows what it's doing. So this is the same thing. It's
14:13
like I want to feel like I belong, So I joined Antifa, so
14:16
I joined Black Lives Matter, so I joined the pro Palestine thing, so
14:20
I go to these pride marches whatever. And that's what these kids are doing.
14:26
So if this is true, I don't know, because there's a lot
14:31
of there's a lot of fog around the assailant and conveniently or inconveniently, he
14:39
was killed immediately after he fired his shots. Yeah, this might be true,
14:46
and it wouldn't be surprising, of course. You know, if you
14:48
want to if you want like sort of if you want to have ripe access
14:56
to people who can act as agents on your behalf if you are, you
15:01
know, recruiting for your extremist groups. It's really it's not hard to find
15:07
men that don't have a purpose because of what we have left them with.
15:13
And they don't even really have to be in cells per se, you know.
15:16
I know that in cells are like one of the ways. But it
15:18
could just be guys like this, like this guy. Maybe he's just somebody
15:20
who gets bullied a lot. Maybe it's just somebody who sees the daily market
15:24
as trash. Maybe he's somebody who's having a hard time finding a job in
15:28
this economy, you know, and it's just men living in quiet desperation,
15:33
and there's someone that says, hey, you know, you want to be,
15:35
you want to have meaning, you want to leave your mark on the
15:39
world, you know, join us. And b X has talked about this
15:43
too. I've had her on the show a couple of times, and she
15:45
talks about how there are you know, groomers, and I'm just not not
15:50
just sexual groomers, but people agents that are looking for men, mostly men,
15:56
because they're going to be the most useful to them to use in their
16:00
cause, to get them to commit acts of terror. To get them to
16:04
harm others, to you know, commit ourson whatever. And a lot of
16:10
them are Satanic. And I say that not as a as a religious person,
16:14
but like rather like they put it in the like it's what they believe.
16:18
Like they are saying, we are a Satanic organization. You know,
16:21
I'm just telling you what they are based on their description. So I'm not
16:26
saying anything about this particular incident. I'm just looking at the broader pattern.
16:30
I'm saying, you know, there's lots of fertile ground to do this,
16:36
and lots of people have talked about it. Mm hmm. I mean and
16:40
while you were speaking about I was thinking about Islam as as sort of a
16:44
cultural tradition and no no offense, And I'm not actually I am sort of
16:48
singling about because of a lot of the social situation that they tend to deal
16:52
with. And it's not necessarily because they themselves, like the religion itself is
16:59
necessarily like this, but the but this is what happens when you have a
17:03
place with not a lot of agricultural resources, let's say, is that you
17:08
you end up with these kind of centralization or trying to centralization centralized resources.
17:15
Harem kind of model, and as a result of that, there's a significant
17:21
number of men who have no real likelihood of ever having a wife and family
17:26
and ever really participating productively in the social system. So you have this kind
17:33
of ocean of this, these these these men who don't have prospects, and
17:38
so it is it's just a field that's rife for radicalization. And it doesn't
17:42
even really have as much to do with ideology. It's just the circumstance.
17:47
And now we're seeing this like we're replicating it again in the West. We're
17:51
replicating this situation where we have what what they're terming soft polygyny, soft harems,
17:57
and most men are don't really have a hope of prospects, and they're
18:04
also basically but the thing is that there's no framework and there's and then in
18:11
conjunction with that, we're also having these ideological attacks on men's identities just as
18:17
they are right, we're not even acknowledging the fact that men provide all kinds
18:22
of things as a result of who they are, as a result of being
18:26
men. Being men means that they tolerate discomfort more than women. They tolerate
18:34
and they tolerate risk more than women. A lot of the jobs that men
18:37
do are incredibly risky and stressful, and that includes being a politician, Like
18:45
I see right here, this is I mean, honestly, because Trump is
18:49
a man. I'm seeing a lot of people framing this act is almost like
18:52
legitimate political discourse. Would you do that? Maybe you wouldn't. Even even
18:56
somebody going out and and and at a Hillary rally and saying kunt would be
19:03
considered worse than this. Think about it. Yeah, And that's the kind
19:08
of discourse we're in in terms of the recognition of relative harms men versus women.
19:15
And you know, and women don't want to take part in something like
19:18
this because it's dangerous. Politics is dangerous, you know. And that's even
19:22
being CEO is dangerous. And it's not just dangerous physically. It's dangerous in
19:26
terms of risk taking. It's dangerous in terms of social reputation. It's dangerous
19:30
in terms of the potential downfalls if you make the incorrect decision. You know,
19:36
that's why women self select out of it, and we have men doing
19:40
these roles. This is the same reason, like the same reason why men
19:42
are drawn to politics, to being CEO is the same reason why they're drawn
19:45
to climbing up cell towers, you know, or even working in sewers because
19:52
they have a higher tolerance of risk, they have a higher tolerance of discomfort
19:56
and stress, and a higher tolerance of disgusting wor work like leadership can be
20:00
some pretty disgusting work sometimes, you know so, And we don't recognize that.
20:04
Instead of saying, hey, that's a wonderful quality of masculinity and of
20:10
men and we need that and we value it and thank god we have it,
20:15
we say that it is oppression of women. We literally take something we
20:19
rely on, and honestly, women won't do these jobs. They don't do
20:25
them. Now that when people ask them, they say, well, would
20:27
you be would you work? Would you be a plumber? Would you work
20:30
in a sewer for one hundred thousand a year? And they say no,
20:34
And they say no because it's not socially prestigious, it's risky, dangerous,
20:38
uncomfortable work, and a one hundred thousand they wouldn't even do it, Like,
20:42
there's nothing you can do to incentivize women to take the jobs that men
20:45
do because they're just not inclined towards them, right, And we don't recognize
20:52
that it's masculinity that's keeping this going, keeping this engine turning over day by
20:57
day by day by day and dead. We say that that is oppression of
21:03
women. Women are excluded from these these jobs by men, not by their
21:07
own choice, but by men, by men oppressing women. And somehow that
21:11
oppression is universal, but not necessarily a trait of masculinity. It's just men
21:15
everywhere do it, and throughout all of human time, all of time.
21:18
It's the most consistent trait that the dominant narrative in our society will recognize about
21:23
men is that they oppress women. And they specifically they oppress women by doing
21:29
the jobs that they're inclined to do. So you see what I'm saying.
21:30
They take something that is a wonderful part of masculinity, you know, and
21:36
they turn it into oppression, something horrible, something terrible, the worst thing
21:41
you can do. And then doing that, they strip men's identities. They
21:45
give men a sense that they have no inherent worth or nothing to give the
21:49
world, and then that radicalizes in conjunction with low prospects, low upward mobility.
21:57
That radicalizes certain men and not all men. Because this is minimal,
22:00
Like this, the amount of men who will ever take any kind of violence
22:06
out on anyone else is like one twentieth the men who will put it on
22:11
themselves, right, and like one of the like brought up the Joker movie.
22:18
One of the horrible parts of that is it really showed the kind of
22:23
creeping destruction of this expectation of well, you know, as a as a
22:30
vulnerable man, you are irrelevant, you are invisible. But as soon as
22:36
you pick up a bat baseball bat and start getting aggressive, then people will
22:41
either pay attention to you or value you in some way. They'll use you
22:45
as a tool of their ideology. You know, they'll they'll they'll see you,
22:51
they'll respect you, and they'll see you as valuable because you've become a
22:55
soldier or a warrior in defense or perpetuation whatever thing that they think is the
23:03
world should be see what I'm saying, And he and the Joker Movie was
23:07
like the Psyche breaking down under that pressure, and at every step of the
23:11
way, he was fighting it because that's not what he wanted to be.
23:15
You know. He wanted to be healthy, he wanted to be valued,
23:18
he wanted to have a relationship. He didn't want to be a cipher for
23:23
evil or Cipher for violence, and yet the pressure was so great, you
23:30
know, and it's like he had no hope, and god damn, I've
23:34
never I have only watched that movie once. Yeah, me too. It's
23:38
you know, some movies, even if they're good ones, you can only
23:41
watch them once. Yeah, it's like, I don't know. Yeah,
23:45
I need to get a prescription for prozac before I watched that movie again.
23:51
Yeah. But anyway, so I think there's some. I think there's some
23:55
if you step way back, there's some. Okay, not new, but
24:00
you know, like there's context to all of this. And the more you
24:06
strip men of an identity, and again, most men will just be violent
24:10
internally, like they'll they'll do suicide, they'll they'll do passive destruction. Right,
24:15
you'll have you'll have the people who can the men who commit suicide,
24:19
and then you'll have the men who commit like a passive suicide like George Bloyd,
24:22
which nobody cared about prior to him becoming an ideological talking point. But
24:29
then you'll have the few men who become violent. And as those men gain
24:36
something in terms of a positive identity, we start to normalize that kind of
24:40
ideological violence and we get more of it, and I think maybe what we're
24:45
seeing in the Middle East is sort of the end end result of that kind
24:49
of normalizing young men taking an identity from becoming the tools of ideology. Does
24:59
that make sense? You know? And that's not that we don't want to
25:02
go down that path, you know, but you know, but we should
25:07
probably. It's it is. It is a terrible thing to see because I
25:12
think that, you know, the West, we should do better because we
25:17
are better, We should do better. Yes, So is this like,
25:25
okay, this this is a video. I don't think this is the Is
25:29
this like the official narrative? Now? Like? Is this what we're what
25:33
we're dealing with? Some people are saying that on Twitter you couldn't hear Let
25:37
me see, I don't know why you couldn't hear it, because I did
25:41
have it. Hold on a second, I'm just checking. No, we
25:44
should have it should have been it should have been playing. We should like
25:48
out from Brian so we can see like his his uh air control like a
25:55
NASA like panel of buttons and things he has to keep control over. Yeah,
26:00
you should. It's it's a lot. I'm like looking, I have
26:03
three legit, I have three. I have three screens. I'm looking at
26:07
three screens, so it's like a it's like a fighter jet cockpit. Actually
26:11
probably even worse like normally airline cockpit. Have you ever been in one of
26:15
those? Uh? No, Qoran says there was no sound on the Twitter
26:21
video. I think you have to click in the video to watch it on
26:23
Twitter. It's a little bit trickier. That's not me. Yeah, that's
26:27
not me. Uh Iggy Thunders gave us two dollars and said Trump post rally.
26:32
They didn't send their best thank you, Iggy Thunders. No. Well,
26:36
anyway, going back to this, well, I I wonder is this
26:41
the official narrative? So, like a lot of people are trying to because
26:45
the thing is, when these things happen, you get like, you know,
26:49
people are trying to figure out like who is this person, who is
26:53
the shooter, what was their motive? Is there a manifesto, et cetera.
26:57
And there's always a lot of speculation and some of the conspiracy theories I
27:02
saw I don't even like to say it that way because that term is really
27:06
overused, but some of the cope on Twitter I saw coming from you know,
27:11
the people with TDS about this is just like mind boggling. The screen
27:18
is stuck on him. Oh oh yeah, right, I gotta turn the
27:21
macros back, Yeah, turn the macerels. Maybe we should have like one
27:23
where it's just a little like icon of what we're responding to or something.
27:29
Yeah, there we go, there we go. That's good. All right,
27:32
good good good. Well yeah, so I just wanted to show it
27:36
for a second while I got you know, well, well just because I
27:41
know that we're find to this specific video. So anyway, there is some
27:48
there is some, So there's a lot floating around. There is some evidence
27:52
that this kid, Thomas Matthew Crooks. I'm not sure if this is like
27:56
one hundred official that he is the guy. It sounds like it, I
28:02
don't know, like it because it's he's dead now, so it's kind of
28:06
like dead Men Tell No Tales kind of thing, like we we may never
28:10
learn why. But apparently he was featured in an ad for black Rock in
28:14
twenty twenty three, So what does that mean? You know? So that
28:18
and some people are saying you mentioned to me that he's a registered Republican.
28:22
Again, that's kind of meaningless too, because blue I believe. Yeah,
28:26
And so it's like, it's kind of like the people are grasping at something,
28:32
and I think that it's it's obvious that there was an attempt on Trump's
28:37
life by this guy. That's That's basically all it is. Like, that's
28:40
it doesn't matter what his politics are. We know that Trump wasn't popular with
28:44
Republicans either, so that's irrelevant. We know that there the media has created
28:48
a tremendous hate campaign. It's like war time propaganda against him, inevitably,
28:56
and it was all I think with the it's like all you gotta do is
29:02
say something bad about a group of people for enough times and do it like
29:07
everywhere, to the point where somebody is like, I think I'm gonna do
29:10
something about this. So that that could be the case. It could be
29:14
any number of things. Some people are saying MK ultra. That's also I
29:18
mean, that's not that's not a lie like that existed. It exists,
29:22
so it could be that too. But that again is getting into the weeds
29:26
of this. I think that ultimately what we have to understand is that this
29:33
what happened yesterday. While I'm not surprised at all, I knew it was
29:36
gonna somebody was gonna try something at some point, and I'm really happy that
29:40
it didn't kill him, although it still took it still put two people in
29:45
the hospital and killed someone else. I think one person or two people died
29:48
and a couple were in the hospital with critical condition. Mm hmm. Yeah,
29:53
that's that. There's no I don't know where's the middle ground there like,
29:57
there's no there's there's no nuance. That was wrong, that was evil.
30:03
That's it. And the media and people who have promoted, you know
30:07
this, this rhetoric not just around Trump, but around conservatives in general,
30:12
Christians, men, all of it. It all like I said, I
30:18
said this in twenty fifteen. I said this in twenty fifteen when he was
30:21
running. I said, they're not going after him, They're going after what
30:25
he symbolizes. He is an avatar for everything they hate. He is a
30:29
man, he is rich, he is straight, he is you know,
30:33
more or less like Christian I suppose, I don't know. I don't measure
30:37
people's worth based on that. But these are all the things that he hates.
30:41
These are all he is all of the black categories in one person.
30:45
And they had to destroy it like an effigy because it symbolizes everything else.
30:51
Right, It's like, why is it when I remember back when Trump was
30:56
running, he was talking with someone I can't remember who, but there was
31:00
some journalists and they were trying to get him to like essentially pander to women
31:07
and women's needs politically, and he said, yeah, you know, he
31:11
kind of gave them a bone and was like, sure, but men also
31:15
have a lot of problems, and just him saying that because they have to
31:18
take the opposite position of everything. He says, you know, Trevor Noah
31:22
and all these people came out and they were like, men, they have
31:25
it so bad. And they were, but they were being really sarcastic because
31:27
essentially he symbolizes what they hate, which is men in part. Right.
31:33
So that's why I think that this is what you're gonna get. Like,
31:38
you know, Allison, you've talked about the wartime propaganda against men. I
31:42
mean, it's gonna hurt, it's gonna eventually someone is gonna act on that.
31:48
And that's what you get, Like, and this is what the bear
31:49
meme is about. It is also comparing men to animals or something more dangerous
31:53
than animals. It is also wartime propaganda rights Basically so that men are defined
32:00
by criminal violence. And the funny thing about all of this is if you
32:04
actually look at Trump on a policy level, he's he's maybe a little left
32:08
of Bill Clinton from a pure policy level. And this is what always baffled
32:14
me about the hatred towards him. From a pure policy level, He's not
32:17
actually that right, you know, But that's that doesn't matter though. Establishment
32:24
more than anything, right, that's probably the more important thing in fact.
32:30
And you know, and before everybody's like, oh my god, Alison,
32:31
you're you're a you've got what is it, You're a Trump star or something.
32:36
As I've said multiple times on this channel, I have criticisms of Trump.
32:40
You know, I don't. I don't uncritically believe in him. I
32:44
don't think that he's necessarily going to solve problem all the problems that we have.
32:47
I think that, honestly, if I were could be completely honest,
32:51
at best, I think he's going to slow the car down, maybe put
32:54
it into a pit stop, and then we as soon as it's over,
32:58
we're just back on the on the pathway, right, I mean, but
33:00
at the very least there is a pitstop, right, and then we're just
33:05
back doing exactly the same thing. So I mean, I don't think that
33:07
he's a solution necessarily. I think maybe he's putting the brakes on what's happening.
33:13
And also I have criticism criticisms of him. I'm not an unqualified fan
33:16
at all, but I honestly don't understand the level of hatred towards him at
33:22
all, And it's always baffled me, Like, and I think it is
33:28
because of these anti establishment he's outside of this and the level of vitriol that
33:34
was directed towards him, Like it's almost to the point where the media really
33:37
should be an accessory to this. Can I say that, absolutely, absolutely
33:44
they are. They've been really irresponsible for and look you can find clips of
33:49
them saying like really damning things like somebody should do something, he has to
33:55
be stopped. But like like these kinds of this rhetoric, like this sport's
34:00
gonna go, That's what I'm saying, Like, I don't think that there
34:04
is any excuse for what happened, full stop. I don't care. And
34:07
a lot of people like these Nancy Pelosis and Chuck Schumer's come out and they're
34:12
like, we don't condone violence. Shut the fuck up, Yes you did.
34:15
You're just now that it's become a reality, you have to cover your
34:19
ass. A lot of people, a lot of people have done that.
34:22
They have basically push push, push, push, push, and it's such
34:25
a feminine thing. They push push, push, push until somebody acts on
34:30
it and all of a sudden they're like, oh, dude, I wasn't
34:31
I wasn't doing that. I'm not Hey, that was him. It's like,
34:36
no, motherfucker, that was you. You did that nobody said.
34:39
And this is like I got into it with remember Wick TV. I got
34:43
into it with him online because Wig TV has TDS really bad, and he's
34:46
like, we have to stop him. He can't be allowed to be president.
34:50
And I'm like, then he gets shot and he's like, oh,
34:53
that wasn't cool. It's like what the fuck, bro, Like, where
34:57
were you when all this time when everybody was saying that he was a hit
35:00
and he was all of this other shit, and you didn't say anything.
35:01
You were just like, yeah, he kinda is. You know, he's
35:04
gonna bring fascism. But then when somebody tries to stop him because of your
35:07
rhetoric, you're like, oh no, I'm not promoting that fuck. You
35:10
dude, fuck you. You did promote this like what I would This is
35:15
what I would respect. I would respect someone who said, look, here
35:20
are the things that I think he does well. Here the things I think
35:22
he doesn't do so great, He's fine otherwise, because that's generally the opinion
35:27
of most people, Like I talk to people here in Virginia all the time
35:30
about him, and they nobody says, oh, my god, ride or
35:34
die. He is my new Jesus. Nobody says that. Everybody's like,
35:37
yeah, it was. I like paying two dollars a gallon for gas.
35:39
I like being able to aff my groceries. I do think we should build
35:43
a wall on the border. Nothing. None of this is like crazy,
35:46
No, it's not. You know what, It's harder to get into Canada
35:50
than it is the US through the like legally, like it's harder. Like
35:54
I had a friend who had to spend like ten years getting ready because he
35:58
wanted to live in Toronto, and he did the work. It cost him
36:00
a lot of money and a lot of time. So for some reason,
36:04
it's hard to get into Mexico. But for some reason, we have to
36:07
be the ones that are burdened with the well if you don't open up the
36:09
border, you're racists. I mean, that's garbage. I'm sorry, but
36:13
there's no excuse, no excuse, and every policy you can look at,
36:17
there is a reasonable way to discuss it, and they they're just not reasonable.
36:22
Like it always comes down to like it's do it our way or the
36:27
highway. And every time, by the way, every time the left gets
36:30
something, they they treat it like it's normal and then they go for the
36:32
next thing. Women are ready to vote to destroy the country because we won't
36:37
let them get abortions. That's what they're claiming. When all he did was
36:42
say do the way it's supposed to be. It's like, well, I
36:45
put it to the states, and they're like that's not good enough because why
36:47
because women want everything now free forever. But here's the thing, like Trump
36:53
put it to the states, or at least yeah, that's what you're supposed
36:57
to do. The Supreme Court that he helped elect to put it to the
37:00
states. But he also he also when the Republicans came to him and said,
37:05
let's make it, let's put a federal ban on abortion, he said,
37:07
no, it's put let's put it to the states. That's the way
37:09
it should be. Okay, So he's exactly on that issue, he's acted
37:15
out of principle. And this is what sort of aggravates me about the bulk
37:21
of women. You you get this hair up your ass and you don't understand
37:27
the importance of principles, the importance of states rights and in the face of
37:32
federal over overreach. Right, they just don't see that. They just get
37:37
a hair up their ass about abortion. Well, if you want abortion,
37:42
move to a state that has it, or get involved in your local legislature,
37:46
you know, make make it a part of your local government that you
37:51
want it there, but don't support more federal oversight over state's power. Like
37:58
we're dealing with that in Canada. It's horrible, right we Essentially what's happening
38:04
in Canada is the West, the resource producing West, are becoming subsidiary colonies
38:12
of the East. And because they have the federal power, and they have
38:16
so much federal power, it's almost impossible to stand up to them. So
38:21
they basically set the agenda, like they set the period. Like the reason
38:25
why we keep getting Trudeau is because Trudeau gets elected by the time we hit
38:30
a Quebec and then nobody else matters, Like literally, the only the only
38:37
populations in Canada that matter for voting are in the East. That's it,
38:40
and we everybody else is controlled by them, even Ottawa, Ontario, Quebec.
38:46
So we're basically just resource qualonies because we don't have that we have that
38:51
credible federal control, and we're and honestly, Canada is basically just a corporate
38:55
state anyway, Like we're not we're not a real country. We're just a
38:59
bunch of bullshit pretending to be a real country. I would just basically run
39:02
by corporations. But regardless that, the the point is that the principle of
39:10
establishing local control, because here's the thing, if you want abortion rights going
39:16
forward, it's better to put it to the state, then keep it federally
39:22
because if you get somebody who's you know, even more right of Trump,
39:25
then you lose them completely. Well let's let's let's back up on the no.
39:30
No, let's let's let's look at this abortion thing really quick. So
39:35
because I think this is interesting. So women are threatening to essentially vote to
39:40
destroy the country because they're not getting their way on abortion. But what percentage
39:45
of women are actually trying to get an abortion like, what like that is
39:52
like, because what I'm what I'm asking is what I'm thinking about, is
39:55
is that I don't think this is about a woman that's like, I want
39:58
to get an abortion in Trump's not letting me. I don't think that's what
40:00
this is. I think this is maybe I'm wrong, you let me know,
40:04
But I think this is women collectively saying that we will defy any man
40:10
that dares to put any limits on anything we might want to do, even
40:16
though we don't plan on doing it. Because like most women that are not
40:22
like you know, running around with a pregnant belly trying to figure out how
40:25
to solve their problem and they're worried about the election, most women are either
40:30
getting abortions if they're going to get them at all, or they're just not
40:34
getting pregnant because you know, as adults, you can do that. You
40:37
can choose not to get pregnant ladies. I know, it's crazy. So
40:42
they're not voting based on a need that they have. They're voting on something
40:45
else, you know what I'm saying, Like, it's not based on them
40:51
needing an abortion in the moment. It's a kind of we have to do
40:53
this for the sisterhood. Okay, I was muted, but I was going
40:58
to say, I think we've constructed this kind of Okay, this is going
41:02
to be complicated, so bear with me. Just be prepared, brace yourself.
41:07
We're going to go deep. I think they've constructed this political position out
41:13
of this kind of feminist rhetoric around oppression, that women are asserting themselves,
41:19
that they are only allowed to be if they if they are able to basically
41:24
at any point of boredomn's child like, and that they can overcome that kind
41:30
of physical colonialism of men. And I'm pretty sure there's rhetoric. I'm not
41:36
taking this out of nowhere. There is rhetoric on this. So they've constructed
41:39
this kind of political position around complete sovereignty, complete female sovereignty, and independence
41:45
from men. And that's not possible unless they have abortion. At least that's
41:50
what they think it is. So they don't see it in terms of responsibility
41:52
like, oh, well, if you don't want to have an abortion,
41:55
don't have sex, right. They want to have complete sovereignty. So they
42:00
want to be able to do anything they want and have complete freedom from the
42:05
consequences of that, and they have constructed this political position that that is a
42:10
moral good in and of itself. So they're defending what they think is a
42:16
moral good. And again this political position is constructed out of the feminist rhetoric,
42:21
the feminist narrative about control about oppression of women. They think that literally
42:27
they're smashing patriarchy by standing up for abortion rights. And they have been sold
42:32
this idea because they think that men oppress women, that that is the most
42:36
critical thing for our society to do. So we've essentially constructed a political talking
42:40
point that now controls politics out of this out of feminist rhetoric. And you
42:46
can sort of see that, like I was talking about the Church of Women
42:50
worsting like ten years ago, eight years ago, and it's that now the
42:55
central topic in politics for women, who are the majority voter base, is
43:01
based around their freedom. Alleged freedom is a woman, which is freedom and
43:07
consequences. So they think, and it's not just that they're doing this because
43:13
they they feel like it's it's it's it's almost like a holy calling that they
43:19
destroy men and their influence or their ability to threaten women's freedom. And it's
43:28
like it's a it's a very interesting mentality and it's one that's going to continue
43:34
to dominate politics. And but it's it's more than just oh they want freedom.
43:37
It's almost like it's become its own moral good to be free from consequence
43:44
and responsibility, and that is how you attain a truly moral society in their
43:50
mind. I know that sounds absolutely deserved, but it's because that's what feminist
43:53
rhetoric has created politically, So that's why they do it. Yeah, they'll
44:00
destroy the country to get that, because the country is this fallen state of
44:05
patriarchy. Smashing patriarchy. I mean literally they're saying what they're doing. Yep,
44:10
Okay, well, I mean that was mostly what I wanted to say.
44:17
I mean, it's you know, it's a it's a dark day.
44:22
But I mean one thing that I guess helps is the fact that they don't
44:25
value male life much to begin with. So it's not a hard it's not
44:30
like a hard leap to the next thing. Because imagine if they would have
44:32
shot at that some female politician, you know, and almost killed her.
44:37
I would have been just as upset because I don't think this is the way
44:40
that you this is the way that you should be doing things. In a
44:44
first world country. It just shouted see you next Tuesday, yeah, or
44:49
just or just called her a country, would be absolutely honest. That's the
44:54
way we think. And unfortunately that's going to have influence on politics as well,
45:00
an unfortunate influence that we well we basically coddle and infantilize female politicians more
45:07
than male Like I mean, if if if Trump had acted with fear instead
45:14
of you know, I guess boldness, he probably would have been deeply criticized.
45:20
And yet a female politician somebody just runs up out of the crowd and
45:23
says cold and if she acts, if she's just like what if tweeted,
45:34
I can't go. Oh, we need to smash. We need to smash
45:38
the country in order to stop cat turd. You know, like this is
45:43
this is allowed. Like literally Trump gets shot at and he's like, yeah,
45:49
I'm still alive, still kicking. And if and and again, if
45:52
like if somebody had yelled kunt at Hillary Clinton during a or any female politician
45:59
during a rally and she just fainted dead away, no one would be like,
46:04
wow, what an incredible coward. Why would we want that as a
46:07
leader? Right, And so this this level of expected toughness expected is it's
46:15
so different that it's insane, and nobody wants to address that. Nobody wants
46:22
to address the fact of what we will tolerate female politicians being victims of.
46:27
Like at this point, if a woman female politician complains about anything like Twitter
46:35
harassment, being called names at political rallies, sternly worded letters to the editor,
46:43
if they if they complain about anything like that, and they say,
46:45
well, this is this is misogyny, are you this is misogynist abuse?
46:51
Bullshit, that's just you being weak, because this is this is what male
46:57
politicians face. I mean, this is what all politicians, but in particular
47:00
male politicians. And the reason why male politicians uniquely face violence is because all
47:06
men uniquely face violence. Like I'm I was looking at I've been responding to
47:12
a tweet from I think it was like a woman's refuge in the UK,
47:15
and they were talking about how women are killed every I don't know, one
47:20
every five days or something, and I've been in it just having this conversation
47:24
and it's like, people don't realize that the majority of murder victims are men.
47:30
When criminals choose a target, they choose men. And there was a
47:37
study done or there was like an investigation I should say done by feminist critics.
47:44
It used to be a great blog back in the day, and they
47:45
looked at who gets targeted when the aggressor can choose their target. So in
47:55
war torn countries we go back to the Middle East. In the Middle East,
48:00
a aggressor can choose their target, the more likely it is to be
48:05
a man. So, for example, violence that is terroristic violence, like
48:10
a bomb set in a marketplace, fifty to fifty female and male victims.
48:15
Right, if there's if you can actually target the violence, it starts to
48:21
become more and more male. So it's snipers, well, ninety percent of
48:25
their targets will be male. Right when you get to kidnapping, ninety five
48:31
percent is male. And then when you get to kidnapping, torture, violence,
48:37
murder, it's almost one hundred percent male. Because at each stage,
48:40
the person the aggressor has more control over whether or not they're targeting a man
48:45
or a woman, and at each stage they prefer to target a man.
48:50
So it's not just that Trump got shot at, it's that most likely Trump
48:55
got shot at, and part of the reason why was because he's a man,
49:00
not just Trump man, that that that they feel that we feel it
49:06
is a legitimate political speech to shoot male politicians. Yeah, the way that
49:09
we they we we wouldn't even consider calling a female politician a cunt legitimate's political
49:15
speech. We would consider that a campaign of misogynistic terror that has perpetuated against
49:21
women. So I mean, think about that, and think about how that
49:23
influences politics and what women are allowed to get away with and what we standards
49:29
we don't hold them to when they become politics, you know, politicians.
49:34
And then it's like and nobody's going to talk about that. Nobody's going to
49:37
talk about the fact that Trump was likely targeted not just because he was right,
49:43
not just because he was anti establishment, you know, not because people
49:46
think he's the second coming of Hitler, but also because he's a man and
49:51
men are well. I think that I think that's the first that's like the
49:57
foot in the door, because once he once you see that, once you're
50:00
dealing with a man, all the other stuff is a lot easier because I
50:04
think it's harder to prove that a woman is Hitler, for example. But
50:07
yeah, if it's a man, that's like, you know, a bonus,
50:12
a bonus to your starting Exactly, it's easier to see a man solely
50:16
as a puppet of his ideology, a reflection, a solely comprised of his
50:23
ideological position. Right, So you're not killing a human, You're killing an
50:28
ideology. Right. We strip men of their humanity. It's why they get
50:34
drawn to these ideologies. Necessarily, extremist ideologies are just ideologies period, or
50:37
even drawn to just sacrificing themselves for credit in a in a job. But
50:44
it's also why we identify them with their ideology or with their function, and
50:50
we think killing them isn't the same as killing a real persons. Why criminals
50:54
more more likely to target them. People in war zones are more likely to
50:59
target them, you know. And this is a conversation that nobody's having.
51:02
Accept us. Yep, So I got some monetized content, some some super
51:12
chat, some super chats and stuff. I want to read through them really
51:15
quick. We got super chows, we got super chowds, we got super
51:19
chats, and I got the rumble to show again. Guys, I'm sorry
51:22
for raising my voice there. I got the rumble working so I can see
51:27
your rumble rant, so you don't have to tell me at least not for
51:30
now. But let's start with the super chows, because we Gluys give the
51:32
priorities to the superchild. So Richard Bierre gives us five bucks today and says,
51:37
imagine the political fallout if someone happened to sprinkle Hillary Clinton with holy water?
51:43
Or would the effect be the same as what happened when Dorothy extinguished the
51:45
wicked witch with the water? I'm melting. Thank you for that, Richard.
51:50
I can't speak to the mythology of or on the the etymology of Hillary
51:57
Clinton. I don't know what she is, what her weaknesses are, whether
52:00
it's garlic or holy water or silver, but or if she has like a
52:05
portrait of herself slowly yeah, like aging, Yeah, like Dory and gray
52:10
that you have to show her. Yeah. So, but thank you,
52:15
thank you for that, Richard. And then we got one from anonymous.
52:17
It looks like support, but there's no comment. Do you see it?
52:22
Let me see what's going on there. I think we got fifty dollars in
52:25
terms of support. I can check. I'll double check to make sure you
52:30
got you didn't send a message there, all right? I can see his
52:31
name, but I don't think necessarily we want to and he also pledged fifteen
52:37
dollars per month as well. So subscriber, thank you for joining us.
52:42
Thank you very much for joining us. Anonymous, you know who you are.
52:45
We won't we won't say very much appreciated. And I'm looking at your
52:50
options. Yeah, I see. I don't see any actual statements, so
52:57
I don't think he did send a message. So but thank you, thank
53:00
you very much. Fifty dollars is great. And also the support ongoing support
53:04
is great as well, So thank you Anonymous. All right, and then
53:07
lastly, we got ten dollars from Great Indoors. And he says, I
53:10
wonder if Jordan Owen is disappointed. I know he wanted everything done to stop
53:15
Trump from being elected again, including destroying the entire democratic system in the US
53:19
by rigging the election. But of course no assassinations kids. That would be
53:22
a step too far. We don't want to do that. What that would
53:25
go too far? Of course. Still, I bet he is mostly troubled
53:29
by the fact that this event probably has boosted the popularity of Trump even more,
53:32
and that is what these people are most concerned of, not the complete
53:37
erosion of society. Thank you, Great Indoors, like it's just I don't
53:43
understand this level. Can somebody just explain it? Nobody know, Allison.
53:47
It's not logical, it's not They're just they think that if he gets into
53:52
power, the world's going to end, Like it won't just be like another
53:57
four years of you know, some like managed decline or whatever you want to
54:02
call it, maybe even improvements, who knows. I mean, like when
54:07
he was in office for four years, there were no new wars. He
54:10
pulled some people out of war torn countries. He wanted to get out of
54:15
various programs that we had no business in. He doesn't. He's like trying
54:19
to get out of NATO, which I think is a good idea. I
54:22
think NATO is shit. I think the United Nations is shit. I think
54:24
that the whole climate thing is shit. The WHO is shit, the World
54:29
Economic Forum is shit. We shouldn't be involved with any of it. And
54:31
why are we funding paying for everybody else's mistakes? Those are all very fair
54:36
things. You know. The United States was pretty isolationists right up until the
54:39
First World War. We got dragged into some shit so and even World War
54:44
Two we didn't want anything to do with until we got bombed or you know
54:46
the attack on Pearl Harbor. So I mean, I think Jordan Owen just
54:53
has TDS. Tachyon Blue has TDS, with TV has TDS, Destiny has
54:59
like terminal ty, and they're not rational. Like for most of my life,
55:04
for as long as I've been voting, I never thought a presidential election
55:07
was the end of the world. Never I was through. I went through
55:10
Carter Reagan Bush Senior, Clinton Bush Junior Obama. Now this right, I
55:19
mean, I think that things are worse now than they have been. But
55:22
even if Biden won, I think I'd survived the next four years. I'm
55:25
not like gonna flip out. I just hope he doesn't because I think things
55:29
are pretty bad. So yeah, I don't. I don't get it.
55:32
I think that these people are all they're probably all new to this stuff because
55:36
like we've had, like the fear mongering on Reagan and George W. Bush,
55:40
we made it. It's okay, It's gonna be fine. That's what
55:44
I say. If Trump wins, it's gonna be fine. No one's gonna
55:46
die, nothing bad is gonna happen. It's not gonna be a handmaid's tail,
55:52
like Natty keeps saying. It's not happening. I'm not buying the fear
55:54
mongering. I frankly, I'm disgusted by it. Frankly, I'm disgusted by
55:59
it. If if, if anything, the worst thing that I think Project
56:01
twenty twenty five does, I don't even think it's bad, is that essentially
56:06
they're gonna be slashing all kinds of government stuff, you know, kind of
56:08
like Javier Millie did in Argentina. If we did that here, yeah,
56:14
we'd be hurting. But we're we're in so much debt. It's the only
56:17
way. And so what is it people are complaining because women can't get free
56:21
shit anymore. Well, I guess you're just gonna have to save money.
56:23
I guess you're gonna have to change your standard of living, you know.
56:27
I mean, I don't think that's gonna happen anyway. Because even Trump said
56:30
he didn't really he didn't know what Project twenty twenty five was, and he
56:34
was like, yeah, I'm not I looked into it. I'm not really
56:36
a fan. I got my own thing and that was it. And you
56:38
know, again, it's like you said, he's he's basically like Bill Clinton,
56:42
like I don't see the big deal. But of course these people,
56:46
they they're just completely irrational, like they're just out to lunch. Man,
56:51
completely out to lunch. Yeah, somebody in the chat just said wearing sunglasses
56:57
indoors opinion disregarded again to those people who might be new. I get migraines.
57:04
In order to actually see my face, I have to have lights on
57:07
me, and that is actually very uncomfortable. So it because I don't want
57:13
to go home with a massive headache. You're gonna just have to live with
57:15
me wearing sunglasses. Sorry, guys, that's just that one person who cares.
57:20
Yeah, I know. I mean, if you can't listen to an
57:22
opinion, no matter how good it might be, no matter how informative it
57:27
might be, just because somebody's wearing sunglasses, that sounds like a you problem
57:30
in my opinion. But Zarax says for five dollars super chat, thank you.
57:35
Zerinks Brian, sounding like Chris Cuomo a bit pretty sus who says that
57:40
riots have to be peaceful, and let me see there was a rumble rant
57:45
as well. I think it disappeared. No, it's right up here.
57:49
Nova Fan twenty one gives us a dollar and says, next time a feminist
57:52
claims women are being murdered by men, call her a racist and tell her
57:57
she needs more cultural enrichment. That's usually the kind of men they're talking about,
58:00
but they don't want to say it, you know, Like there was
58:05
a gb News in the UK. I'm sorry for the digression, but there
58:09
was a gb news thing I think it was gb News or what are these
58:14
BBC type channels, and there was an anchor woman on there, and she
58:17
was talking about how unsafe she feels on the streets, and she's trying to
58:22
blame it on just men. But she's not talking about just men. She's
58:25
talking specifically about these migrant men that have come in, you know, from
58:31
like Africa in the Middle East. But because you see, this is the
58:35
conflict that these like these women in these first world countries, they're more concerned
58:42
with being called racist than with being called misandrist. So they'll just be misinterest
58:47
and it lets them make the complaints they really want to make about men of
58:52
color without actually having to face the consequences of that, because look, I'm
58:57
just talking about men. You know. Mark Lamont Hill did the same thing.
59:01
He said, I think all men are sexist. Does that mean I
59:04
hate men, of course, no, because we don't have a rule for
59:07
that. So you can be sexistement all you want anyway, you're muted alist.
59:20
Yes, I'm just trying to figure out what's going on with the the
59:23
the fundraiser. Okay, so it is live at feedbadger dot com slash support
59:28
if you guys want to help out there. We did get a support by
59:30
someone, but I think that they canceled it for whatever reason, so I
59:36
don't have a thank you to give there. We for a bit where I'm
59:42
going to be taking like people can put fun through and get as a poster.
59:52
Yes, we're working on a poster. I'll give you more, guys,
59:54
more details, like I might send out like an actual video that explains
59:59
the whole because it's a little bit complicated. It's new. I know everybody
1:00:01
hates new things, so yeah, like that's uh, I'm just trying to
1:00:09
figure out the heck's going on here. Uh Okay, it's almost like the
1:00:15
fundraisers having a glitch of some kind and we'll see, we'll figure it out.
1:00:21
Okay. Anyway, so if you want to help us out, feedbadger
1:00:23
dot com slash support, if you want to send us a message. I
1:00:27
think, is there anything more that you wanted to say about this situation,
1:00:30
because I know that you were very fairly passionate about it. Well, mostly
1:00:35
like I just didn't want to get into I you know, I think that
1:00:37
our audience knows that because I know that there are some like people suffering from
1:00:43
TDS in our chat. Sometimes I'm just you know, I think you guys
1:00:46
know that I don't care what you think about the man. It's just like
1:00:52
what I said about Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein and other people. Okay,
1:00:55
assassination. I don't know if you know this, but it's wrong. So
1:01:00
I don't know if I had to tell you that. But it's not really
1:01:02
the way forward. So I'm just gonna say that it's shit. It should
1:01:07
never have happened. It's not surprising. We know why, and that's it.
1:01:12
So all right. Well, you know, I just wanted to get
1:01:15
these ideas out because I think that we're one of the few places that actually
1:01:20
talks about these kinds of situations from the way that we do. I don't
1:01:22
know if anybody is considering that Trump wasn't just targeted because he's right, you
1:01:29
know, he's an anti establishment because of TDS. He was targeted because he's
1:01:34
a man too. Let's face it, we think that men are disposable in
1:01:38
service of political speech. This is something that's very common. Yeah, and
1:01:43
I think we're gonna be talking about this on Tuesday as well, because there's
1:01:46
some other things I did. I just remembered something. Trump's security detail people
1:01:52
were supposed to keep him alive. Number One, they were using DEI practices.
1:01:58
That's why there were women there. And number two, he wasn't.
1:02:01
He wasn't getting Like he was asking for a certain amount of protection, he
1:02:07
wasn't getting it. He was denied this by the director, who was also
1:02:10
a woman. And not saying that that's why, but just putting it out
1:02:15
there might be it might be in detail that's worthy of some note considering the
1:02:21
rhetoric around again how much Trump hates women so that I don't think that's helpful.
1:02:27
And I think though the other thing was they were trying to take away
1:02:30
secret service protections for a while, he still managed to keep some. So
1:02:35
imagine if they if they and by they I mean the Democrat Party, if
1:02:38
they managed to take away his secret service protections, he probably would be gone
1:02:43
today. If he was still even going out and going to rallies. So
1:02:47
and also because it's crazy, that night after he got shot, he went
1:02:52
to a UFC game or game of the games, a a UFC fight.
1:02:59
He went to a fight that same night. Yeah, yeah, they're fights.
1:03:01
I don't I don't know why it is a game. I mean,
1:03:04
they're kind of like games because they are winners and losers. But yeah,
1:03:07
so there you go. That was that for for Tuesdays. Yea. And
1:03:14
yeah, we're gonna go to my channel that is gender addic at gender addic
1:03:20
on YouTube. I think I'm if we can, we might keep this up
1:03:22
on Twitter, so you might still be seeing I'll leave it up on Twitter
1:03:28
and then I'll close it off everywhere else and then we'll just start it back
1:03:30
up on and I will make the show because I forgot to do that.
1:03:36
Sorry. But what we're gonna be talking about is essentially someone is making a
1:03:42
defense of Auntie war crimes. That is, the woman who took her dragon
1:03:46
to a coronation event and started killing civilians as a political statement. And they
1:03:53
they they're basically saying that the actress who did that scene said she was channeling
1:04:00
Hillary Clinton. Hope. Yeah, that's all. I think we go through
1:04:05
that, have a little fun with that, do something a little bit lighter,
1:04:09
and you can join us at gender addic that is gender erratic so two
1:04:14
r's one t yes not two teas not attic erratic, all right, and
1:04:20
or typhon Blue. You can also find me at typhon blue and yeah,
1:04:24
so hope to see you there. Actually, I think I think that's a
1:04:27
link to your channel in the description. Oh yeah, they're probably like the
1:04:30
yeah at the bottom, there's a but there's a list of yeah, google
1:04:32
low bar. You can find it there. You can join us that there,
1:04:35
all right, So once again, feed Thebadger dot com slash just the
1:04:39
tip to send us a message at any time after the show and we will
1:04:42
respond to it the very next reasonable opportunity and feed the Badger dot com slash
1:04:48
sport to continue to support this content because it's unique and it's a voice that
1:04:53
needs to be heard because people are having trouble with some of the concepts that
1:04:57
we talk about. So once again, thank you for joining and back to
1:05:01
you, Brian. All Right, Well, if you guys liked this video,
1:05:04
please hit like subscribe if you're not already subscribe hit the bellf notifications,
1:05:09
leave us a comment, let us know what you guys think about what we'll
1:05:10
be discussed on the show to day, and please please please share this video
1:05:14
because sharing us carry. Thank you so much for coming on today's episode of
1:05:16
Maintaining Frame, and we'll talk to you all in the next one. Stay
1:05:19
safe, everybody. Are machines, dude, Okay, they are literal machines.
1:05:27
They are talking point machines. They are impossible to fucking deal with,
1:05:30
especially if you have, like especially if you have like a couple of dudes
1:05:33
who have good memory. On top of that too, holy shit, you're fucked